Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Minutes to midnight: Turning back the Doomsday Clock through neglected disease vaccine diplomacy

  • Peter J. Hotez

    hotez@bcm.edu

    Affiliations Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, Departments of Pediatrics, National School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, National School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Department of Biology, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, United States of America, James A Baker III Institute of Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Scowcroft Institute of International Affairs, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America

New information reveals that the 10 nations currently producing nuclear weapons also suffer with approximately one-half of the world’s disease burden from several neglected diseases, including intestinal helminth infections, dengue, and measles.

In the aftermath of World War II and the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists established the Doomsday Clock, meant to symbolize the time we have left until global nuclear annihilation strikes at midnight [1]. As of 2018, we have reached two minutes until midnight, the closest we have ever gotten since 1953 when the United States detonated its first hydrogen bomb [1].

Today, the Arms Control Association identifies nine nations—United States, United Kingdom, France, Israel, Pakistan, India, Russia, China, and North Korea—hosting nuclear warhead inventories [2] (Fig 1). Together, these countries account for almost 15,000 nuclear warheads. In addition, while Iran cannot be considered yet to be a nuclear weapons nation, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), it has an advanced nuclear program, including substantial uranium enrichment capabilities [3].

thumbnail
Fig 1. 2018 Estimated global nuclear warhead inventories (updated June 20, 2018).

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat. Reprinted with permission from The Arms Control Association.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006676.g001

The 10 current nuclear nations also stand out because they are simultaneously affected by neglected diseases. Shown in Table 1 is an assessment of five neglected diseases, including four neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), among the 10 countries, as determined by the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2016 [4]. It finds that the nuclear weapons states account for more than one-half of the world’s incident measles and dengue cases as well as more than 40% of the global prevalence of intestinal helminth infections (i.e., ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm infection) [4]. GBD 2016 further finds that the 10 nations together also account for a significant percentage of the global incidence of cutaneous leishmaniasis and cystic echinococcosis and likely other NTDs [4].

thumbnail
Table 1. Neglected diseases among the 10 nuclear weapons nations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006676.t001

So why should we care? In a previous assessment conducted in 2010, I estimated that the research and development (R&D) dollars spent on neglected diseases among the nuclear weapons countries amounted to less than 1/10,000th of the R&D funding spent to develop and maintain nuclear weapons technologies [5]. Since then, there has been only modest public health gains in terms of the reduction in the prevalence or incidence of these diseases, although measles incidence has been declining globally since the Millennium Development Goals.

As we move closer to midnight on the Doomsday Clock, the leaders of the 10 nuclear nations, which include at least six group of 20 (G20) nations where NTDs are surprisingly widespread [6], must recognize that funding and scientific activities currently focused on nuclear weapons could be redirected towards health expenditures. In so doing, the 10 nations would help to advance Sustainable Development Goals. As in 2010, I once again argue that neglected diseases are wise investments, both in the areas of implementation science and R&D.

There is little doubt that if the scientific leadership of the 10 nuclear nations were allowed to redirect their energies toward vaccine diplomacy [7], either by expanding coverage of existing vaccines and other interventions or by binational or multinational development of new vaccines and other technologies, we might see the elimination of the five diseases highlighted here. Recently, I emphasized the importance of binational cooperation between the two largest nuclear weapons nations, the US and Russia [8]. This approach led to the global elimination of smallpox, and soon polio, but it could be extended to neglected diseases [8]. Moreover, the US and Russia (as well as other nuclear nations) have troops deployed to NTD-endemic areas of the Middle East and elsewhere.

We’ve come a long way towards reducing the global prevalence and incidence of several NTDs [9]. Through vaccine diplomacy, we now have the opportunity of accelerating neglected disease elimination. In parallel, we might successfully set back the Doomsday Clock for at least a few minutes!

References

  1. 1. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Timeline. Available from: https://thebulletin.org/timeline, accessed June 3, 2018
  2. 2. Arms Control Association. Fact Sheets & Briefs. Available from: https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat, accessed July 2, 2018.
  3. 3. NTI. Iran. Available from: http://www.nti.org/learn/countries/iran/, accessed July 2, 2018.
  4. 4. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Results. Available from: http://www.healthdata.org/results, accessed June 2, 2018
  5. 5. Hotez PJ (2010) Nuclear Weapons and Neglected Diseases: The “Ten-Thousand-to-One Gap”. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4(4): e680. Available from: pmid:20436916
  6. 6. Hotez PJ, Damania A, Naghavi M (2016) Blue Marble Health and the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 10(10):e0004744. pmid:27788134
  7. 7. Hotez PJ (2014) "Vaccine diplomacy": historical perspectives and future directions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Jun 26;8(6):e2808. pmid:24968231
  8. 8. Hotez PJ (2017) Russian-United States vaccine science diplomacy: Preserving the legacy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017.
  9. 9. Hotez PJ, Fenwick A, Ray SE, Hay SI, Molyneux DH (2018) “Rapid impact” 10 years after: The first “decade” (2006–2016) of integrated neglected tropical disease control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 12(5): e0006137. pmid:29795551