Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Genetic characteristics of Bacillus anthracis isolated from northwestern China from 1990 to 2016

  • Huijuan Zhang,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China, State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, Hangzhou, China

  • Enmin Zhang,

    Roles Software

    Affiliations National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China, State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, Hangzhou, China

  • Jinrong He,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliations National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China, State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, Hangzhou, China

  • Wei Li,

    Roles Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China, State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, Hangzhou, China

  • Jianchun Wei

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    weijianchun@icdc.cn

    Affiliations National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China, State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, Hangzhou, China

Abstract

Anthrax is a global re-emerging zoonotic disease and is an endemic disease in China, especially in rural regions. In this study, the general characteristics of human anthrax outbreaks that occurred in areas of northwestern China over the past decade have been described. Meanwhile, the genetic characteristics of Bacillus anthracis isolated from these areas from 1990 to 2016 were analyzed by means of canonical single-nucleotide polymorphism (canSNP) analysis and multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) with 15 markers. Five sublineages/subgroups, namely, A.Br.001/002, A.Br.Vollum, A.Br.Aust94, A.Br.Ames and A.Br.008/009, were detected by using 13 canSNP sites. All of the sublineages were found in Xinjiang province, while one sublineage was found in Shaanxi, two in Gansu, three in Qinghai and four in Inner Mongolia. However, the geographical distribution of the B. anthracis populations exhibited different canSNP characteristics from those of the strains isolated before 1990 in China. In contrast to previous data, the A.Br.Ames subgroup was also observed to be scattered from Inner Mongolia to other provinces. All 106 strains were assigned to 36 MLVA15 genotypes, and 21 of these types were first observed in this study. The strains collected from anthrax outbreaks in recent decade were classified as subgroups A.Br.001/002 and A.Br.Ames and identified as genotypes MLVA15-28, MLVA15-30, MLVA15-31, MLVA15-38, MLVA15-CHN3, and MLVA15-CHN18. By canSNP analysis and MLVA, we found that the diversification of MLVA genotypes and the geographical distribution of B. anthracis populations is gradually becoming balanced across northwestern China. This study also provides preliminary survey results regarding the population diversity of B. anthracis in China, which will help promote the prevention and control of this important disease.

Author summary

In this study, the general characteristics of human anthrax outbreaks that occurred in northwestern China over the past decade were described. Meanwhile, the genetic characteristics of Bacillus anthracis isolated from these areas from 1990 to 2016 were analyzed with the canSNP and MLVA15 methods. Our results showed a diversity of MLVA genotypes. We also observed gradual balancing of the geographical distribution of B. anthracis population in northwestern China according to the canSNP analysis. In particular, the A.Br.Ames subgroup now seems to be scattered from Inner Mongolia to other provinces, in contrast to the data before 1990. This study also provides preliminary survey results on the population diversity of B. anthracis in China, which will help to promote the prevention and control of this important disease.

Introduction

Anthrax, caused by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis, is primarily a disease in herbivores and sometimes sparks outbreaks in humans, with potentially serious consequences [14]. This disease is enzootic in most countries in Africa and Asia, as well as in some countries in Europe and America [4,5]. To date, anthrax remains an endemic disease, and human cases of this disease are reported every year in China, especially in northern and western provinces of China, such as Xinjiang, Shaanxi, Gansu, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia and Qinghai province [6]. Because of its wide distribution and its potential use for bioterrorism, anthrax is considered a global public health threat [7]. One of the most notorious bioterrorism events associated with B. anthracis was the “letter attacks” that occurred in the United States in 2001 [6]. In addition, the emergence of “injectional anthrax” among heroin users in Europe highlights the possibility of new routes for the spread of human anthrax [7,8].

B. anthracis is a genetically homogeneous pathogen. Currently, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis and multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) might be the most effective methods for genotyping B. anthracis [911]. An approach using 13 selected SNPs located at key phylogenetic junctions in the B. anthracis SNP tree, termed canonical single-nucleotide polymorphisms (canSNPs), are currently the most affordable first line genotyping assays [11]. The global genetic population structure of B.anthracis has also been subsequently defined by the canSNP and MLVA methods [1113]. As source tracking methods in anthrax outbreaks, these methods have also been widely used to illustrate the phylogenetic relationships of B. anthracis at national or international levels [1417]. In China, the strains mostly isolated from Xinjiang province in 1981/1982 were genotyped by these methods [18].

Since 2005, the Anthrax National Surveillance Project has been covering 12 provinces in mainland China. Additional human anthrax cases were reported and a series of B. anthracis strains were collected in the surveiled provinces. Concerns have been heightened by the persistence of human anthrax cases and outbreaks in certain areas in recent years, e.g., the outbreaks in Shaanxi in 2015, Xinjiang in 2016, Gansu in 2016 and Inner Mongolia in 2011 [1921]. The northwestern provinces, namely, Xinjiang, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia, are the important disease-endemic areas, where almost half of human cases during 2005–2016 in China were found. In this study, the strains collected from 1990 to 2016 in northwestern China were investigated, and the genetic relationships among the strains were analyzed with the canSNP and MLVA methods.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee [Institutional Review Board (IRB)] of the National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC (license number: ICDC-2014013). All adult subjects provided informed consent, and a parent or guardian of any child under age18 participant provided informed consent on their behalf. The informed consent was given orally by all participants as this is standard practice in anthrax outbreak investigations, and oral consent is also a safe manner to minimize the risk of contamination since most patients have lesions on their arms or hands. The consent was recorded in daily progress notes by the attending physician at the local hospital. The IRB approved the use of oral consent, and the information provided to obtain consent included the aim of the study and the usage of the patients’ samples. No live animals were euthanized in this study, and the samples were collected from dead animals with permission from the owners of the animals.

Epidemiologic data

The Anthrax National Surveillance Project is part of the Chinese Notifiable Disease Reporting System. Human anthrax surveillance data were from a real-time online nationwide reporting system, in which each human anthrax case was reported through a standardized form. We included in the analysis all human anthrax cases with illness onset during 2005 to 2016 in northwestern China. Descriptive statistics were used in the study.

Bacterial strains

A total of 106 B. anthracis strains, including 13 DNA samples, collected from a variety of sources from six provinces in northwestern China, were included in this study. Eighty-eight of the strains (accounting for 83.02%) were collected from 1990 to 2016, and 18 strains (accounting for 16.98%) were collected before 1990. These strains were recovered from the following provinces, with the number of strains given in parentheses: Xinjiang (46), Gansu (9), Inner Mongolia (32), Qinghai (4) and Shaanxi (15); no strain was collected from Ningxia. The strains were obtained from the following sources: human (48), fur (10), sheep (9), cattle (6), soil (14), goat (1), dog (1), mules (5), yak(1) and unknown sources (11) (S1 Table). All of the strains were initially identified by B. anthracis species-specific gene targeting of the protective antigen gene (pagA, GenBank accession no. AE017336), capsule synthesis gene (capC, GenBank accession no. AE017335) and chromosomal rpoB gene (GenBank accession no. AE017334). To further understand the genetic characteristics of the pathogen, the variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) profiles and canSNP data associated with 133 B. anthracis strains collected in China in previous research were also merged into the analysis [18].

DNA preparation

B. anthracis strains were streaked onto LB agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 16–18 h. Single colonies were then suspended in 0.5 ml of TE buffer (10.0mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1.0 mM EDTA) and incubated at 100°C for 20 min. Then, cellular debris were removed by centrifugation at 15,000×g for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and filtered using 0.22 μm filters. The filtered supernatant was diluted (1:10) with sterile nuclease-free H2O and used as the DNA template for PCR amplification. Bacterial culture growth and preparation of DNA samples were performed in a biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) laboratory.

CanSNP genotyping

CanSNP analysis with the 13 markers was performed as described by Van Ert et al [11]. All amplifications were performed on a Roche LC480 instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany), and the cycling parameters were as follows: 95°C for 30 s; 45 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 20 s; and a final step at 40°C for 30 s. Each reaction included 10 μl of 2× reaction mix, each of a pair of primers at 0.2 μM, each of a pair of probes at 0.2 μM, and ddH2O for a final volume of 20 μl. The nomenclature and terminology of the sublineages in the canSNP analysis were consistent with the original literature. The A.Br.008/009 subgroup was subtyped by A.Br.011, which was performed as described by Marston et al [22].

MLVA genotyping

Fifteen markers were used in this study for MLVA. These markers included eight markers initially described by Keim et al [6] and another seven markers described by Van Ert et al in 2007 [5]. The latter combined the 15 markers and devised the MLVA15 method. The MLVA15 was performed as described previously by capillary electrophoresis with the following modifications. The forward primers were labeled with different fluorescent dyes (vrrA, vrrB1, vrrB2, vrrC1, pXO1-aat, VNTR16, VNTR23, VNTR32 and VNTR35 labeled with Fam and the others labeled with Hex). PCR amplifications were performed on a SensoQuest Labcycler (SensoQuest, Germany) with an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, which was followed by 34 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s (52°C for vrrB1, vrrB2, VNTR12, VNTR16 and VNTR17) and extension at 72°C for 1 min. The reactions were terminated by a final incubation at 72°C for 5 min. The amplicons were diluted in water (1:100; for DNA templates from blister fluid samples from patients, the amplicons were not diluted), and after denaturation by heating, the amplicons were separated by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer with a GeneScan 1200 LIZ size standard (Applied Biosystems). The lengths of the amplicons were determined according to size using GeneMapper software V.4.0 (Applied Biosystems). Selected PCR products were sequenced to verify the tandem repeat sequences. The electrophoretic band sizes obtained in this study were corrected according to the sequencing results of the PCR products.

Cluster analysis of the data

Data were imported into the BioNumerics software package (version 5.10, Applied Maths) as character data sets. Data from the canSNP analysis and MLVA were processed by cluster analysis using the categorical coefficient and the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means. Cluster analysis of the categorical data was presented using dendrograms.

Results and discussion

Anthrax in northwestern China

According to the national epidemiological surveillance data, a total of 4030 human anthrax cases were reported in mainland China from 2005 to 2016. Approximately 47% of the cases were located in northwestern provinces (Table 1).The epidemic curve showed an overall decreasing trend from 2005 to 2013, increasing again after 2013, especially in the Gansu, Qinghai, and Inner Mongolia provinces. As a result, the cases of anthrax in the six provinces of northwest China accounted for 60.86% of the total in 2016 (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Annual distribution of human anthrax cases in northwestern China from 2005 to 2016.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006908.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. Human anthrax cases in northwestern China, 2005–2016.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006908.t001

Anthrax outbreaks in northwestern China in the last few years

In recent decade, human and livestock anthrax outbreaks have been reported in many provinces across China, such as Liaoning, Jiangsu, Yunnan and Xinjiang [2326]. Since 2011, there have been four large-scale outbreaks in northwestern China, in 2011, 2015 and 2016 (Table 2). We conducted a comprehensive, in-depth retrospective epidemiological and molecular study for genetic source tracking of the B. anthracis species. From the four events, we observed that the cases all occurred in summer, June or August, and the infections originated from the slaughtering, skinning or butchering of sick animals, such as sheep, cattle, and mules. Previous studies concluded that anthrax in China was characterized by significant seasonality and spatial clustering [27], and we observed the same seasonality and animal exposure history (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Characteristics of anthrax outbreaks in northwestern China from 2011 to 2016.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006908.t002

Two of the four outbreaks need to be highly concerned. The two outbreaks occurred in Ganquan County (Shaanxi, 2015) and Min County (Gansu, 2016), which were not historically high-risk areas of anthrax occurrence; the last anthrax case reported in Ganquan County was in 1973 and that in Min County was in 1958. A sudden rise in temperature and heavy rain were recorded in both of the afflicted regions in the year of the outbreak. A retrospective epidemiological study conducted by Chen WJ et al [27] showed that temperature, relative humidity and rainfall were positively correlated over time with human anthrax in the most likely clustering areas. Increased rainfall and temperature in the summer could unearth the anthrax spores and facilitate the breeding of the bacteria. The outbreak-related strains and samples were classified as the A.Br.001/002 subgroup, which is the most prevalent group in China. In Shaanxi, the samples collected from patients and mules were assigned to the MLVA15-38 genotype. In Gansu, one strain was assigned to MLVA 15–28 and the other three were assigned to MLVA 15–30.

On the other hand, anthrax outbreaks frequently occur in livestock and humans in the Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang provinces. The surveillance data showed that the two outbreak areas (Xing’anmeng in Inner Mongolia and Tuokexun County in Xinjiang) were high-epidemic regions, with cases reported every year, such as 23 cases in 2001, 14 in 2004 and 12 in 2010 in Tuokexun County. The outbreak-related strains were classified as subgroups A.Br.Ames and A.Br.001/002. This is the first time that the A.Br.Ames subgroup was found in Xinjiang. Using the MLVA15 scheme, we identified three new genotypes, MLVA15-CHN3, CHN7, and CHN18, in Inner Mongolia and MLVA15-31 in Xinjiang.

CanSNP analysis of strains from northwestern China

The 106 B. anthracis strains (including 13 DNA samples) from the investigated provinces were distributed into 5 of the 12 canSNP sublineages/subgroups described by Van Ert et al [5]. These canSNP subgroups were A.Br.001/002 (n = 50), A.Br.Ames (n = 18), A.Br.008/009 (n = 11), A.Br.Vollum (n = 4) and A.Br.Aust94 (n = 23). A previous study by Simonson [18] described the same characteristics for B. anthracis collected from eight provinces in China (a total of 191 strains were included), but in that study, a majority of the strains were collected from Xinjiang, and those strains were all obtained before 1990. As a result, Xinjiang harbored 4 different sublineages of B.anthracis and Inner Mongolia harbored 2 sublineages, while only one sublineage, A.Br.001/002, was found in the other six provinces. In later studies, the A.Br.008/009 has been divided into A.Br.008/011 and A.Br.011/009, so we typed the 11 strains in the group with A.Br.011, all of them showed same characteristic and didn’t provide more helpful information for the study. So we still used the original nomenclature, because the objective of the study was mainly to compare the results with the previous study by Simonson. From our study, the same 5 canSNP lineages were found and the Xinjiang province is also the most diverse. However, the geographical distribution of the B. anthracis population showed different canSNP characteristics from the strains isolated before 1990 in China. The A.Br.Ames subgroup was first found in Xinjiang, and it seems that the subgroup was scattered from Inner Mongolia to other provinces, such as Xinjiang and Gansu. The A.Br.Aust94 subgroup was observed in Qinghai (2 strains from 1996) and Inner Mongolia (1 strain from 1997). The A.Br.Vollum and A.Br.008/009 subgroups were also observed in Qinghai (1 strain from 1996) and Inner Mongolia (1 strain from 1974), respectively. The new pattern may be a result of the isolation year, strain selection, and infection outbreak.

Among the provinces, Inner Mongolia is dominated by the A.Br.Ames sublineage (15 of 18 strains). Gansu and Shaanxi are dominated by the A.Br.001/002 subgroup. The 4 strains collected in 1996 and 2005 from the Qinghai province were distributed into three subgroups, namely, A.Br.001/002, A.Br.Aust94 and A.Br.Vollum. Xinjiang was dominated by the A.Br.Aust94 sublineage and had 20 of 46 strains (43.48%). The A.Br.008/009 cluster also accounted for 10 strains in this province (21.74%). The above two subgroups(A.Br.Aust94 and A.Br.008/009) are spread across most of Europe and Asia. The A.Br.001/002 subgroup, which is mainly found in the remaining provinces of China, was also predominant in Xinjiang (23.91%, 11/46). The A.Br.Vollum sublineage accounts for only 3 strains in Xinjiang. The data from the Anthrax National Surveillance Project in mainland China showed that the Xinjiang province is a high-epidemic area, especially Kashi city, which is a major “oasis” city located at crossroads along the ancient Silk Road (dating back more than 2000 years) [28]. From 1990 to 1994, severe anthrax outbreaks occurred in this city. Two towns, Zepu and Atushi, recorded 24 villages with 202 human infections and 4 villages with 81 human infections, respectively [18]. A series of B. anthracis strains were collected, and most of the collection was included in this study. The genotypes A.Br.008/009, A.Br.Vollum and A.Br.Aust94, which are spread across most of Europe and Asia, were found only in Xinjiang according to the study described by Simonson[18]. Here, we observed that these genotypes were also found in Inner Mongolia and Qinghai, which suggested that the geographical distribution of the B. anthracis population seems to have gradually become more balanced from west to east, that is to say, different provinces tend to converge on the distribution of these subgroups (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Geographical distribution of canSNP genotypes of B. anthracis strains from northern and western China.

This distribution is based on 12 canSNP genotypes described by Van Ert et al [5] and the analysis of 106 strains from five provinces of China. The subgroups are indicated by different colors. The letter n represents the number of strains from the province. We used ArcGIS version 10.0 (ESRI, USA) and Photoshop CS 8.0.1 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, USA) to plot the maps.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006908.g002

MLVA of strains from northwestern China

B. anthracis spores can persist for long periods of time in the environment, and this distinct life cycle allows B. anthracis to be characterized by relatively few genetic variations [11]. The canSNP analysis, with low resolution, is not adequate for the investigation of an infectious source. A scheme combining canSNP analysis and MLVA15 was used to analyze anthrax outbreaks in many countries, which facilitated the employment of a genetic population structure comparison [14,16,17]. In China, recently, similar methods were used to trace the source of outbreaks in Liaoning and Shaanxi provinces [19,29]. In this study, subtyping using the MLVA15 scheme indicates that all of the 106 strains were clustered into 36 MLVA genotypes. We found 21 new MLVA genotypes, which were named MLVA15-CHN (S1 Table and Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Dendrogram of canSNP typing and MLVA15 for the strains in northwestern China, during 1990–2016.

The nomenclature of genotypes of MLVA15 according to Keim Genetics Lab ID Designation. For the new genotypes, the nomenclatures labeled “CHN” were organized in this study. MLVA genotyping showed much greater genetic diversity in A.Br.008/009 and A.Br.001/002 subgroups. For the outbreak-related strains, the red-framed strains are for Shaanxi, the green-framed are for Inner Mongolia, the blue-framed are for Gansu and the yellow-framed is for Xinjiang.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006908.g003

The results showed the gradual diversification of MLVA subtyping patterns of B. anthracis with the development of the anthrax outbreaks. There were 8 MLVA genotypes in A.Br.008/009 for 11 strains, 4 in A.Br.Aust94 for 23 strains, 16 in A.Br.001/002 for 50 strains, 8 in A.Br.Ames for 18 strains and 2 in A.Br.Vollum for 4 strains. The genetic diversity of the A.Br.008/009 and A.Br.001/002 subgroups suggests repeated infections and outbreaks for the subgroups of B. anthracis and a significantly longer history for this particular clade in the studied region. It has been known that distant transportation of livestock can cause the spread of anthrax; for example, in 2012, a human anthrax outbreak occurred in Lianyungang, Jiangsu province, where no anthrax cases had been reported for many years, and epidemiological investigation found that sick cattle transported from Liaoning province were the source of the infection [29]. Similarly, the outbreak in Min County, Gansu province in 2016 was possibly due to a livestock trade fair held in this county in 2016, when a batch of yak were brought from Qinghai and Sichuan. The genotypes of outbreak-related strains were MLVA 15–30 and MLVA15-28, and the latter genotype was the same as that of a strain isolated from Xinjiang in 2016. The outbreak-related strains in Ganquan, Shaanxi province were assigned to MLVA15-38, which was the same as the strains from Xinjiang (2 strains in 1981 and 1995) and Inner Mongolia (2 strains in 1998 and one in 2012). Based on the results of the epidemiological investigation, we speculated that the outbreak-related strains may originate from Inner Mongolia. In addition, significant differences were not observed between the year of isolation from the 1980s and 1990s. This observation indicated that the strains attributed to the anthrax outbreaks that occurred in 1990s may be similar to the strains from the 1980s.

Even though the MLVA showed a relatively high resolution, this method did not always meet the requirements for detailed source tracking of outbreaks. SNR (single-nucleotide repeat) markers could provide additional genetic resolution among B.anthracis strains of the same MLVA genotype and has been used in molecular investigation of anthrax epidemics or outbreaks[30,31].

Although the combination of the canSNP and MLVA used in the study has been a useful tool for molecular epidemiology investigation and source tracking, it couldn’t provide enough information for phylogenetic analysis. Whole genome sequence analysis is increasingly becoming a standard method in terms of phylogenetic investigations for clonal bacterial species such as Bacillus anthracis. Owing to rapid progress in this field, the approach would be a more powerful tool in future.

Supporting information

S1 Table. B. anthracis strains used in this study and the MLVA15 data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006908.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank medical staff and health practitioners who have contributed to the reporting of human anthrax in mainland China.

References

  1. 1. Fasanella A, Galante D, Garofolo G, Jones MH (2010) Anthrax undervalued zoonosis. Vet Microbiol 140: 318–331. pmid:19747785
  2. 2. Doganay M, Demiraslan H (2015) Human anthrax as a re-emerging disease. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov 10: 10–29. pmid:25851429
  3. 3. World Health Organization. The control of neglected zoonotic diseases: Community-based interventions for prevention and control. Geneva, 2010. Available: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44746/1/9789241502528_eng.pdf.
  4. 4. The Food and Agriculture Organization. Anthrax is affecting animals and humans. EMPRES Transbound Anim Dis Bull 2011; No 39. Available:http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2530e/i2530e00.pdf.
  5. 5. World Health Organization. Anthrax in humans and animals. 4th ed. Geneva, 2008. pmid:26269867
  6. 6. Hoffmaster AR, Fitzgerald CC, Ribot E, Mayer LW, Popovic T (2002) Molecular subtyping of Bacillus anthracis and the 2001 bioterrorism-associated anthrax outbreak, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 8: 1111–1116. pmid:12396925
  7. 7. Booth M, Donaldson L, Cui X, Sun J, Cole S, et al. (2014) Confirmed Bacillus anthracis infection among persons who inject drugs, Scotland, 2009–2010. Emerg Infect Dis 20: 1452–1463. pmid:25148307
  8. 8. Berger T, Kassirer M, Aran AA (2014) Injectional anthrax—new presentation of an old disease. Euro Surveill 19.
  9. 9. Keim P, Price LB, Klevytska AM, Smith KL, Schupp JM, et al. (2000) Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis reveals genetic relationships within Bacillus anthracis. J Bacteriol 182: 2928–2936. pmid:10781564
  10. 10. Pearson T, Busch JD, Ravel J, Read TD, Rhoton SD, et al. (2004) Phylogenetic discovery bias in Bacillus anthracis using single-nucleotide polymorphisms from whole-genome sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 13536–13541. pmid:15347815
  11. 11. Van Ert MN, Easterday WR, Huynh LY, Okinaka RT, Hugh-Jones ME, et al. (2007) Global genetic population structure of Bacillus anthracis. PLoS One 2: e461. pmid:17520020
  12. 12. Lista F, Faggioni G, Valjevac S, Ciammaruconi A, Vaissaire J, et al. (2006) Genotyping of Bacillus anthracis strains based on automated capillary 25-loci multiple locus variable-number tandem repeats analysis. BMC Microbiol 6: 33. pmid:16600037
  13. 13. Thierry S, Tourterel C, Le Fleche P, Derzelle S, Dekhil N, et al. (2014) Genotyping of French Bacillus anthracis strains based on 31-loci multi locus VNTR analysis: epidemiology, marker evaluation, and update of the internet genotype database. PLoS One 9: e95131. pmid:24901417
  14. 14. Fasanella A, Van Ert M, Altamura SA, Garofolo G, Buonavoglia C, et al. (2005) Molecular diversity of Bacillus anthracis in Italy. J Clin Microbiol 43: 3398–3401. pmid:16000465
  15. 15. Grunow R, Klee SR, Beyer W, George M, Grunow D, et al. (2013) Anthrax among heroin users in Europe possibly caused by same Bacillus anthracis strain since 2000. Euro Surveill 18.
  16. 16. Keim P, Smith KL, Keys C, Takahashi H, Kurata T, et al. (2001) Molecular investigation of the Aum Shinrikyo anthrax release in Kameido, Japan. J Clin Microbiol 39: 4566–4567. pmid:11724885
  17. 17. Smith KL, DeVos V, Bryden H, Price LB, Hugh-Jones ME, et al. (2000) Bacillus anthracis diversity in Kruger National Park. J Clin Microbiol 38: 3780–3784. pmid:11015402
  18. 18. Simonson TS, Okinaka RT, Wang B, Easterday WR, Huynh L, et al. (2009) Bacillus anthracis in China and its relationship to worldwide lineages. BMC Microbiol 9: 71. pmid:19368722
  19. 19. Liu DL, Wei JC, Chen QL, Guo XJ, Zhang EM, et al. (2017) Genetic source tracking of an anthrax outbreak in Shaanxi province, China. Infect Dis Poverty 6: 14. pmid:28093076
  20. 20. LYU Wei-min YD-s, ZHOU Wei-zhong, LIU Dong-peng, YANG Yong (2017) Epidemiology of anthrax in Gansu,2005–2016. Disease surveillance 32: 402–404.
  21. 21. Zhang HJ, Liang XD, Hai Y, Zhong-Yan LI, Yuan HT, et al. (2012) Evaluation of the methods applied for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in anthrax outbreak. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology & Control 23: 231–233.
  22. 22. Marston CK, Allen CA, Beaudry J, Price EP, Wolken SR, et al. (2011) Molecular epidemiology of anthrax cases associated with recreational use of animal hides and yarn in the United States. PLoS One 6: e28274. pmid:22174783
  23. 23. Chen H, Bao W, Wang Y, Zhang K, Wang F (2015) Clinical and epidemiological investigation of a fatal anthrax case in China. J Infect Dev Ctries 9: 214–217. pmid:25699498
  24. 24. Li S, An X, Huang Y, Pei G, Cao D, et al. (2015) Source tracking of an anthrax outbreak in northeastern China using complete genome analysis and MLVA genotyping. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34: 89–100. pmid:25073769
  25. 25. Tan Z, Qi X, Gu L, Bao C, Tang F, et al. (2014) Molecular characterization of Bacillus anthracis directly from patients' eschar and beef in an anthrax outbreak in Jiangsu Province, China, 2012. Am J Trop Med Hyg 91: 574–576. pmid:25002304
  26. 26. Yao GH, Nie W, Wang D, Qing MA, Sun J, et al. (2014) Epidemiologic analysis on five cases involved in an outbreak of anthrax in a village of Wengan County,Guizhou,China. Chinese Journal of Zoonoses 30: 871–874.
  27. 27. Chen WJ, Lai SJ, Yang Y, Liu K, Li XL, et al. (2016) Mapping the Distribution of Anthrax in Mainland China, 2005–2013. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10: e0004637. pmid:27097318
  28. 28. Wood F. The Silk Road: two thousand years in the heart of Asia Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 2002.
  29. 29. Mao L, Zhang E, Wang Z, Li Y, Zhou H, et al. (2016) Phylogenetic Characteristics of Anthrax Outbreaks in Liaoning Province, China, 2001–2015. PLoS One 11: e0157496. pmid:27299730
  30. 30. Beyer W, Bellan S, Eberle G, Ganz HH, Getz WM, et al. (2012) Distribution and molecular evolution of bacillus anthracis genotypes in Namibia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1534. pmid:22413024
  31. 31. Garofolo G, Ciammaruconi A, Fasanella A, Scasciamacchia S, Adone R, et al. (2010) SNR analysis: molecular investigation of an anthrax epidemic. BMC Vet Res 6: 11. pmid:20187980