Non-invasive monitoring of drug action: A new live in vitro assay design for Chagas’ disease drug discovery

Anna F. Fesser; Olivier Braissant; Francisco Olmo; John M. Kelly; Pascal Mäser; Marcel Kaiser

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487

Abstract

New assay designs are needed to improve the predictive value of the Trypanosoma cruzi in vitro tests used as part of the Chagas' disease drug development pipeline. Here, we employed a green fluorescent protein (eGFP)-expressing parasite line and live high-content imaging to monitor the growth of T. cruzi amastigotes in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. A novel assay design allowed us to follow parasite numbers over 6 days, in four-hour intervals, while occupying the microscope for only 24 hours per biological replicate. Dose-response curves were calculated for each time point after addition of test compounds, revealing how EC50 values first decreased over the time of drug exposure, and then leveled off. However, we observed that parasite numbers could vary, even in the untreated controls, and at different sites in the same well, which caused variability in the EC50 values. To overcome this, we established that fold change in parasite number per hour is a more robust and informative measure of drug activity. This was calculated based on an exponential growth model for every biological sample. The net fold change per hour is the result of parasite replication, differentiation, and death. The calculation of this fold change enabled us to determine the tipping point of drug action, i.e. the time point when the death rate of the parasites exceeded the growth rate and the fold change dropped below 1, depending on the drug concentration and exposure time. This revealed specific pharmacodynamic profiles of the benchmark drugs benznidazole and posaconazole.

Author summary

Chagas' disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, is a chronic debilitating infection occurring mostly in Latin America. There is an urgent need for new, well tolerated drugs. However, the latest therapeutic candidates have yielded disappointing outcomes in clinical trials, despite promising preclinical results. This demands new and more predictive in vitro assays. To address this, we have developed an assay design that enables the growth of T. cruzi intracellular forms to be monitored in real time, under drug pressure, for 6 days post-infection. This allowed us to establish the tipping point of drug action, when the death rate of the parasites exceeded the growth rate. The resulting pharmacodynamics profiles can provide robust and informative details on anti-chagasic candidates, as demonstrated for the benchmark drugs benznidazole and posaconazole.

Citation: Fesser AF, Braissant O, Olmo F, Kelly JM, Mäser P, Kaiser M (2020) Non-invasive monitoring of drug action: A new live in vitro assay design for Chagas’ disease drug discovery. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14(7): e0008487. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487

Editor: Barbara A. Burleigh, Harvard School of Public Health, UNITED STATES

Received: January 15, 2020; Accepted: June 15, 2020; Published: July 27, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Fesser et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: R scripts and the results of high-content image analysis are available on Github (https://github.com/fesser-af/NiMDA). All other results are in the manuscript. Original high-content microscopy images are available on request.

Funding: This work was financially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (IZRJZ3_164172 to PM), the Nikolaus und Bertha Burckhardt-Bürgin-Stiftung (37X1381 to AF), the Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft (AF), and the Merian Iselin Stiftung (OB). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

About 8 million people globally are infected with Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas' disease [1]. The progression of Chagas’ disease is divided into three phases: an acute, a chronic indeterminate and, in about 30% of the infected people, a symptomatic chronic phase. This last phase can begin decades after infection and is marked by severe cardiac or digestive symptoms. There are only two drugs registered for Chagas' disease, benznidazole and nifurtimox, and these suffer from severe side effects and variable efficacy [2]. Therefore, new treatment options are needed urgently.

Azoles like posaconzale and E1224, a prodrug of ravuconazole, were the most advanced drug candidates. However, in clinical trial, 80% of the posaconazole-treated patients relapsed within the 20 month follow-up after treatment, in contrast to 6% of the benznidazole-treated patients [2]. As a result, the research community was forced to rethink the pre-clinical drug discovery pipeline for Chagas’ disease [3, 4]. In particular, the design of T. cruzi in vitro assays had to be revisited to render them more predictive for the situation in vivo. A number of parameters were proposed for optimization: the choice of strains [5, 6], the life-cycle stages [7], the treatment regimens [8], and assay designs that assessed drug cidality. Tremendous progress has been made, especially in the area of high-content imaging technology for phenotypic assays [6, 8–14]. New wash-out designs were also introduced to assess reversibility and cidality of drug action [15, 16]. In combination with the development of more sensitive animal models [17–19], this permitted a focus on pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. PK-PD modeling allows treatment regimens to be modified for optimal exposure of the target organism to the drug candidate [20–22]. It also helps to define benchmark PK-PD parameters of the target product profile for drug candidates.

While there has been progress in modeling drug candidate PK profiles [23], the PD profile of a drug remains more difficult to determine. Two major aspects of PD need to be considered: time-to-kill and the question of whether drug action is concentration-driven or time-driven. Isothermal microcalorimetry has been used to determine time-to-kill for various pathogens, including African trypanosomes and Plasmodium falciparum [24, 25]. However, isothermal microcalorimetry cannot be used for intracellular amastigotes, the disease-relevant stage of T. cruzi, as it is impossible to differentiate the heatflow of the parasite from that of the host cell. Time-to-kill can also be determined by setting more than one temporal endpoint in an assay, which can mean that one plate per time point has to be assessed [9, 16]. An efficient method to determine pharmacodynamic parameters still needs to be found.

Here, we describe a new in vitro live-imaging assay design and novel analysis methodology, which enables time-to-kill to be determined and identifies whether drug action is time- or concentration-driven.

Methods

Parasite and cell cultivation

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) were cultivated in RPMI supplemented with 10% FCS at 37°C, 5% CO₂ and >95% humidity. MEF were sub-cultured once per week at a ratio of 1:10 after 5 min treatment with trypsin. T. cruzi STIB980 clone 1 (DTU TcI) was obtained from A. Osuna in 1983. Epimastigotes were maintained at 27°C in liver infusion tryptose (LIT) medium [26] supplemented with 20 μg/ml hemin and 10% FCS. Cultures were diluted weekly to maintain exponential growth. To stimulate metacyclogenesis, epimastiogte cultures were kept in the same medium for 3–4 weeks. About 10⁷ parasites from a predominantly metacyclic culture were taken to infect MEF for 48 h, and the cycle of amastigotes and trypomastigotes was maintained by infecting MEF weekly with an MOI of 1:1. eGFP-expressing parasites were kept for maximum of 4 weeks in the mammalian cycle.

Transfection

Exponentially growing T. cruzi epimastigotes were synchronized for 24 h with 20 mM of hydroxyurea (Sigma) [27]. Following hydroxyurea removal by washing twice with PBS, 10⁷ epimastigotes were electroporated with 2.5 μg of pTRIX2-eGFP plasmid (Fig 1A) linearized with AscI and SacI (New England Biolabs). The plasmid had been derived from pTRIX-REh9 [28]. We used the Amaxa Nucleofector (programme X-014) with buffer Tb-BSF (Pacheco-Lugo et al., 2017), conditions we had found to be optimal for T. cruzi. 24 h after transfection, the parasites were diluted 1:10 in medium containing 100 μg/ml G418 (Invivogen). Epimastigotes were cloned by limiting dilution. Clones were selected according to their eGFP expression level, infectivity and growth profile. Transgenic epimastigote cultures were maintained in the presence of 500 μg/ml G418.

Download:

Fig 1. Transgenic parasites transfected with pTRIX2-eGFP.

(A) The plasmid pTRIX2-eGFP was constructed by inserting the enhanced green fluorescent protein gene into the T. cruzi rDNA targeting plasmid pTRIX2-RE9h [28]. (B) Fluorescence levels of transfectant (G12) and wildtype (wt) epimastigotes were measured with flow cytometry. Epifluorescent images of transfectants in epimastigotes (C), metacyclic trypomastigotes (D), amastigotes in MEF (E), and trypomastigotes (F). Epimastigotes and metacyclic trypomastigotes were imaged with 630x magnification for 200 ms on DIC, 100 ms with the A4 filter cube (Hoechst 33342), and 300 ms with the L5 filter cube (GFP). Amastigote-infected MEF and trypomastigotes were imaged with 400x magnification for 50 ms with phase-contrast, 50 ms with the A4 filter cube (Hoechst 33342), and 815 ms with the L5 filter cube (GFP). Scale bars represent 10 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.g001

Flow cytometry

10⁵ epimastigotes in a small volume (approx. 100 μl) were fixed by the addition of the same volume of 10% formalin for 15 min at room temperature. After fixation, the volume was adjusted to 1.5 ml with PBS. Then, the parasites were analyzed for the levels of green fluorescence (FL1; excitation 488/10 nm and emission 530/30 nm) on a BD FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson and Company) gating approximately from 100 to 2000 on the FSC and the SSC channel.

Fluorescence microscopy

Epimastigote or trypomastigote parasites were deposited on a glass slide (Menzel Superfrost Plus), allowed to settle for 15 min, then washed with PBS and fixed with 10% formalin. For amastigotes, 10⁴ MEF per well were seeded on 16-well LabTek chamber glass slides (LabTek). After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the MEF were infected with 10⁵ trypomastigotes per well. The slides were fixed with 10% formalin for 15 min. All samples were embedded in Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories) and covered with a 1.5 AutomatStar coverslip (DURA group). Samples were imaged using the Leica DM 5000B microscope with a Sola FISH 365 LED light source. Images were taken with a 10x ocular, plus a 20x or 63x objective, with phase contrast and DIC, respectively. Fluorescence images were taken by using the filter cubes A4 (excitation 377/50 nm, emission 447/60 nm) or L5 (excitation 470/40 nm, emission 525/50 nm).

Macrophage isolation

Peritoneal mouse macrophages were obtained from female CD1 mice (30–35 g body weight) as follows: 2 ml of a 2% (wt/vol) starch solution in distilled water were injected i.p., and macrophages were harvested 24 h later by peritoneal lavage with RPMI medium containing 1% anticontamination cocktail (100 μl in 10 ml, [29]). After centrifugation at 460 g at 4°C for 15 min, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended in RPMI medium containing 1% anticontamination cocktail, 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (iFCS) and 15% RPMI containing LADMAC (ATCC CRL2420) growth factors. The expanded peritoneal mouse macrophages (ePMM) were kept in this medium at 37°C for 3–4 days and then detached with 5 min trypsin treatment and cell scrapers. The cells were counted with a Neubauer hemocytometer.

High content microscopy

All assays were performed on an ImageXpress Micro XLS (Molecular Devices) high-content microscope. Fluorescent imaging was done using the following filter cubes: GFP (300 ms exposure), DAPI (50 ms exposure), and Cy5 (300 ms exposure). Phase-contrast images were taken on the transmitted light channel (TL10, 10% illumination). All images were taken using a 20x Zeiss objective and a cooled CCD camera with (6.45 μm x 6.45 μm pixel size, 1392 x 1040 pixel resolution).

Live high content assay

For the live high content assay, 10⁴ ePMM were seeded into the central wells of a black 96-well plate in 100 μl of RPMI medium supplemented with 1% anticontamination cocktail [29], 10% iFCS and 15% RPMI containing LADMAC growth factors. The border wells were filled with 100 μl water. Every 24 h a new set of wells was infected with 3×10⁴/well culture-derived trypomastigotes leading to an MOI of 3 parasites to 1 host cell. This had previously been tested to lead to an optimized detection of parasites per host cells with a geometric mean of 1.1 parasites per host cells [95% confidence interval from 0.82 to 1.4]. 24 h post-infection (hpi), the remaining extracellular trypomastigotes were washed off twice with 200 μl supplemented RPMI and the infected host cells were further cultivated in 100 μl RPMI, with serial dilution of drugs. On the sixth day of infection, the plate was covered with translucent PCR film (Eppendorf AG) and placed into the ImageXpress Micro XLS microscope into an environmental chamber with 37°C, humidity, and no additional CO₂. After 1 h acclimatization, the focus plane was determined. On 9 sites per well, images were taken every 4 h using the GFP filter set (300 ms exposure) and transmitted light with 10% illumination (300 ms exposure).

After live imaging, all supernatant was removed and the cells were fixed with 10% formalin for 15 min at room temperature and stained with 100 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Merck) for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. The plate was stored at 4°C until it was imaged with the ImageXpress using transmitted light with 10% illumination (300 ms exposure), the GFP (300 ms exposure) and the DAPI (50 ms exposure) filter set on 9 sites per well.

Image analysis

Image analyses were performed on the MetaXpress 6 software. For live imaging, green fluorescent parasites were quantified from the GFP channel. The TopHat filter was applied with 10 pixel diameter. Round objects of size 1–10 μm and a fluorescence difference of over 1000 were designated as parasites (from the filtered image). For imaging of fixed cells, host nuclei and parasite kinetoplasts were counted. Parasites' mitochondrial DNA (kinetoplast DNA, kDNA) is AT-rich and was therefore stained more strongly using minor-groove binding stains such as Hoechst 33342 [30]. Round objects of size 5–30 μm with a fluorescence difference of over 1000 were designated as host cell nuclei.

Parasite kDNA was detected by applying a TopHat filter with 10 pixels diameter as round objects of 1–10 μm and a fluorescence difference of over 1000, which did not coincide with host cell nuclei. Parasite kDNA in an area where the green fluorescence difference was lower than 1000 were defined as GFP-negative parasites. The remaining parasites were denoted GFP-positive parasites.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed in R version 3.5.1 [31] using the packages “tidyverse” [32], “readxl” [33], and “viridis” [34]. Scripts for different analysis steps are available under GitHub (https://github.com/fesser-af/NiMDA). The dose-response relationship for each time point of drug exposure was quantified by a four-parameter log-logistic model (Equation 1) using the package “drc” [35] in R. When a dose-response model with an upper plateau (d) of 100% and lower plateau of 0% could be determined, it was chosen preferentially.

Equation 1 Dose-response model.

The four-parameters of this model to determine the relative growth at a given concentration (x) were the upper plateau (d), the lower plateau (c), the hill slope (b), and the inflection point (f). The inflection point (f) corresponds to the half maximal effective concentration (EC50). The base of the exponential is e (Euler’s number).

Exponential models of change in parasite numbers (Equation 2) were determined for each site in R. Exponential multiplication was assumed to dominate the replication period.

Equation 2 Exponential model for change in parasite numbers.

P(t) is the number of detected parasites at a certain time after infection (in h), P(0) is the hypothetical number of parasites at this site assuming an exponential growth over the whole range of the time after infection, e^c describes the fold change in parasite numbers per h, t is the time of infection of interest (in h)

Results

Transfected T. cruzi expressing eGFP in the replicating life-cycle stages

To enable fluorescence-based live imaging, T. cruzi STIB980 epimastigotes were transfected with a linearized plasmid containing the eGFP gene (enhanced green fluorescent protein) under control of the rRNA promoter (Fig 1A), which was designed to integrate into the spacer region within the genomic rRNA locus. Fluorescent metacyclic, amastigote, and trypomastigote forms were derived from the transfected and cloned epimastigote transformants as described (Methods). eGFP expression was detected in the replicating stages of the transfected parasite line by flow cytometry and epifluorescence microscopy (Fig 1B–1F). As quantified by flow cytometry, the green fluorescence levels (excitation 488 nm, emission 522 nm) in epimastigote forms were about 100 times higher than the autofluorescence levels of non-transfected cells (Fig 1B). Epifluorescence imaging showed an even distribution of eGFP throughout the cytosol in epimastigotes and amastigotes, the two replicating stages (Fig 1C and 1E, respectively). Green fluorescence could also be detected in the flagellum of epimastigotes and the short flagellum of amastigotes. In contrast, in the non-replicating stages, the metacyclic trypomastigotes and trypomastigotes (Fig 1D and 1F, respectively), green fluorescence was barely distinguishable from the autofluorescence of the non-transfected parent. While the epimastigote replication rate of the transgenic T. cruzi line was nearly unaltered (S1A Fig), the infectivity of the transgenic trypomastigotes was slightly lower than that of the wildtype trypomastigotes (S1B Fig).

When cultivated for approx. 4 months in the absence of antibiotic selection, the ratio of the transgenic T. cruzi amastigotes still expressed eGFP at a detectable level was reduced to approx. half of a recently introduced population (S1D Fig). When epimastigote forms of the transgenic T. cruzi line were cultivated without antibiotics for six months, about 96% still expressed eGFP (S1C Fig, S1 Table). For this reason, amastigote cultures were only maintained for 4 weeks after they had been derived from epimastigotes.

A new assay design for live monitoring of drug action

We have devised a new plate design combined with a special imaging scheme that enables observation of parasite development over 6 days, with only 24 h of user time on the high-content microscope (Fig 2). The mammalian cells were cultured in 96-well plates, but were not all infected with T. cruzi at the same time (Fig 2B). Instead, every 24 h, a new row of 10 wells was infected with an MOI of 3:1 (Fig 2). 24 h post infection (hpi), the wells were washed thoroughly to remove extracellular parasites. Then, 7 wells were treated with a 3-fold serial dilution of test compound, while the remaining wells were left untreated. Thus in every row on the plate, the parasites had the same period of infection and the same period of drug exposure. In every column, the parasites were exposed to the same drug concentration. By day 6, when all the rows were used up, the infection period covered 1 to 6 days and drug treatment from 0 to 5 days. The plate was then placed into the microscope for automated live imaging over 24 h. Every 4 h, images were taken from 9 sites per well on the GFP channel for parasite quantification as well as with transmitted light for quality control. After 24 h, the plate was fixed with 10% formalin and stained with Hoechst 33342. All 9 sites per well were imaged once again on the DAPI channel, GFP channel, and with transmitted light. The DNA stain enabled the number of host cells to be determined by nuclei count (5–30 μm round objects), with the number of parasites inferred from counting their kinetoplasts (1–10 μm round objects). The parasite kinetoplast is brighter than the parasite nucleus, because the AT-rich kinetoplast DNA binds Hoechst preferentially [30].

Download:

Fig 2. Assay design.

The timeline of the experimental set-up (A) and plate design (B). On a 96 well plate, a new set of wells containing expanded peritoneal mouse macrophages (ePMM) was infected every 24 h. Extracellular parasites were removed 24 h hpi and drugs were added in 3-fold serial dilution. On day 6, after addition of parasites and drugs (either benznidazole or posaconazole), the plate was imaged on 9 sites per well over 24 h every 4 h (live imaging). After 24 h live imaging, the plate was fixed and stained with Hoechst 33342 and imaged again (fixed imaging). Green fluorescent parasites per image were detected for all images (from live and fixed imaging) of the green fluorescent channel. Kinetoplasts per image were detected on images of the DAPI channel (fixed imaging).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.g002

High content imaging reveals the high degree of variability in untreated cultures

All assays were performed as biological triplicates, which resulted in a total of 27,540 fluorescent microscopy images per drug tested. On every image of the GFP channel, the number of green fluorescent parasites was determined; on the DAPI channel images of fixed cells, the numbers of host nuclei and parasites (on basis of kDNA) were also determined.

Parasite numbers per image were driven by the time post infection, drug concentration, and the drug exposure time (Fig 3). There was a high degree of variability: between the days of infection (rows on the plate), between replicate wells in the same row, and even between different sites in the same well. Nevertheless, there were common trends in the dynamics of infection (Fig 3A and 3B). In the untreated control cultures, the increase in parasite numbers over the period of infection (6 days) could be separated into three phases. During the first 24 h, the increase was usually the most pronounced, but also displayed the highest variance, consistent with settling of parasites into the focal plane and the differentiation of trypomastigotes, that barely expressed eGFP, to amastigotes that express eGFP. During days 2 to 4, parasite numbers, as determined by green fluorescence, continued to increase, consistent with amastigote replication, but began to level off towards day 4 (Fig 3A). On days 5 and 6, parasite numbers inferred from the green fluorescent channel increased only slightly, if at all (Fig 3A). Around day 4, differentiation to trypomastigotes dominated the development in parasite numbers over amastigote replication. Fixation of cells allowed a direct comparison between the parasite numbers determined by green fluorescence and those determined from DNA-staining of the kinetoplast (Fig 3A and 3B and S2 Fig). The latter method returned higher numbers. Parasites detected as kDNA on the DAPI channel, but not on the GFP channel, could be either trypomastigotes that did not express eGFP, dead parasites whose kinetoplast was still intact, or revertants that no longer expressed the eGFP gene. During the middle phase (day 3 post infection), the proportion of parasites detected on the green fluorescent channel to parasites detected on the DAPI channel was 0.95. This suggests that the plateauing of GFP-positive parasites at later time points was due to the transformation of intracellular amastigotes to trypomastigotes and not to a loss of the eGFP gene.

Download:

Fig 3. Parasite numbers over time after infection and drug exposure.

The assay design was used to monitor the development of parasite numbers for posaconazole and benznidazole treated parasites. Number of untreated parasites per image over time after infection are depicted from live (A) and fixed (B) imaging with detection as green fluorescent parasites or as kinetoplasts, respectively. Mean number of treated parasites per image per well is depicted for benznidazole (C) and posaconazole (C) in live imaging detected as green fluorescent parasites. Untreated controls are depicted in black (C, D).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.g003

In our experience, ePMM are the best suited for long-term, high-content experiment in respect to their longevity and parasite detection rates on the DAPI channel [15]. But even with ePMM, the host cell numbers (per image) were decreasing slightly, yet significantly, over the course of the imaging period of a biological replicate batch (from the first plate of a batch (benznidazole) to the last plate of a batch (posaconazole), a total of 5 days, S3A Fig). This led to a slight increase of the parasite to host cell ratio in older host cells (S3B Fig). The host cells were unevenly distributed over a well, which additionally could have influenced the variability in parasite numbers. The host cells were relatively tolerant to benznidazole and posaconazole, with EC50 values of >345 μM and >143 nM, respectively (S4 Fig).

The decrease in EC50 values over time of drug exposure is a characteristic feature of a drug

For each time point of drug exposure, the growth relative to the untreated control at the same stage of infection depends on the drug concentration. A four-parameter log-logistic model was used to determine this relationship and the half maximal effective concentration (EC50, Fig 4A and 4B). The predictions of the dose-response models in comparison to the counted parasite numbers over time are shown in S5 Fig.

Download:

Fig 4. Development of the concentration of half-maximal effect (EC50) over time of drug exposure.

Dose-response curves were estimated for each time point after drug exposure by modelling growth relative to the same-aged untreated control using the “drc” package in R for benznidazole-(A) and posaconazole-treated (B) parasites. The resulting estimates of the EC50 are plotted over time of drug exposure (C, D). For several time points the 95% confidence interval of the EC50 value did not meet the inclusion criteria, i.e. upper and lower limits less than tenfold higher or lower than the EC50 value.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.g004

Over the time of drug exposure, the EC50 values decreased until they reached a stable minimum (Fig 4C and 4D). How soon the final EC50 value was reached, was as characteristic for a drug as the final EC50 value itself. For benznidazole, the EC50 value decreased from a median value of 15 μM (with 95% confidence intervals ranging from 6.7 μM to 29 μM) after 24 h of drug exposure to 1.7 μM (with 95% confidence intervals ranging from 0.66 μM to 2.7 μM) after 52 h of drug exposure. Afterwards, the majority of the EC50 values remained in this range. In contrast, for posaconazole, during the first 48 h, only 12 EC50 values could reliably be determined with a median of 9.4 nM (95% confidence intervals ranging from 0.88 nM to 22 nM). 52 h after drug exposure, an EC50 value could be determined in all replicates for the first time with a median value of 4.8 nM (95% confidence intervals ranging from 0.12 nM to 8.0 nM). Afterwards, the majority of the EC50 values remained in this range.

The EC50 values in these experiments were highly variable, even between biological replicates. At some time points, the EC50 values could not be determined with a reasonable 95% confidence interval. This is consistent with the fact that the parasite numbers have a high variability even in the untreated culture. Thus, classical end-point read-outs such as EC50 may not be the most suitable method for quantifying drug action with live imaging. We therefore aimed for a more robust read-out.

The change in parasite numbers at each site can be quantified in an exponential model

At every imaged site, the same set of host cells was observed over the 24 h period of imaging. Therefore, for each site, the change in parasite numbers between time points in this 24 h interval (as exemplified in Fig 5A) only depended on the age of infection, the drug concentration, and the time of drug exposure. We determined an exponential model for parasite numbers over time at every imaged site (Methods, Equation 2).

Download:

Fig 5. Exponential model of the development of parasite numbers over time.

Numbers of green fluorescent parasites from one plate are plotted over time after infection (A). The parasite numbers obtained at the seven time points from the 9 sites in one well from this plate are highlighted in green as an example. The exponential models (Methods) determined for every site of this well are plotted for illustration. The variable “fold change per h” of those exponential models for every site of all plates changes between days after infection (B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.g005

This exponential model of change in parasite numbers has two parameters: the offset P(0) and the slope c (Equation 2). In the logarithmized version of the equation, the slope c can be negative, zero or positive, corresponding to declining, stagnating and growing parasite numbers, respectively. The slope c is a net result of replication rate, differentiation rate, and parasite reduction rate. The offset (basal parasite number, P(0)) is an extrapolation of the number of parasites in the monitored region at the time of infection.

Most of the observed variability in parasite numbers was captured by the variability in P(0), which already differed between different sites of one well. This was to be expected since the numbers of infected host cells are not evenly distributed over the whole well, and some infected host cells would have been infected by more than one parasite.

While the extrapolated basal parasite number P(0) was very variable, the fold change in parasite numbers (i.e. the exponential of the slope, e^c) was more robust, especially between days 2–4. In addition, the fold change is more informative as it directly reflects the difference between replicating and dying amastigotes (at least in the early phase, when the amastigotes do not differentiate to trypomastigotes; Fig 5B). For these reasons, we used the fold change of parasite numbers over time of drug exposure to characterize drug action. In particular, we focused on the tipping point of drug action, i.e. the time point when the death rate of the parasites exceeded the growth rate, and the fold change dropped below 1.

The tipping point of drug action is a sensitive and robust readout

The fold change in parasite numbers in drug-treated cultures was calculated based on the exponential model of parasite replication. Initially, the parasites continue to replicate, although often more slowly than in the untreated control. After some time of drug exposure, at certain concentrations, parasite numbers start to decrease, i.e. parasites are dying. Once most parasites are killed, the parasite numbers will not decrease further and the fold change will approximate to 1. If the fold change exceeds 1 again, this might indicate that surviving parasites are replicating, or reflect an issue with drug stability. Certain drugs might be cytostatic at some concentrations. In this case, the net fold change would be stable at approx. 1 over the whole period of drug exposure.

The tipping point was defined as the time point immediately after the net fold change dropped below 1. The tipping point of drug action is both time- and concentration-dependent. Fig 6 shows the fold change in parasite numbers for each concentration and for every day post drug exposure. For each replicate and each drug concentration, the tipping point, i.e. the day when the fold change in parasite number has significantly dropped below 1 (95% confidence interval excluding 1), is marked.

Download:

Fig 6. The fold change in parasite numbers of drug-treated parasites depends on drug concentration and time of drug exposure.

The fold change in parasite numbers was obtained by exponential models of change in parasite numbers for every site (Methods). The fold change in parasite numbers depended on the concentration and time of exposure with benznidazole (A) and posaconazole (B). The first day of drug exposure, at which the fold change was significantly below 1, is indicated for every replicate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.g006

In the benznidazole-treated wells, parasite numbers started to decrease within the first 24 h of drug treatment at the highest concentrations. After 48 h, parasite numbers reached 0 for the highest concentration. In the posaconazole-treated wells, parasite numbers continued to increase for at least 2 days. For benznidazole, there was a correlation between drug concentration and the tipping point of drug action (Fig 6A). In contrast, in most cases, the posaconazole-treated parasites only started dying during the third day of drug exposure, even at the highest concentration (Fig 6B). In summary, calculating the tipping points allowed the measurement of time- and concentration-dependence of drug action against intracellular T. cruzi amastigotes, and illustrated potential shortcomings of posaconazole as compared to benznidazole.

Discussion

The target candidate profile for Chagas disease is very demanding. A successful preclinical candidate needs to demonstrate high activity against a broad range of T. cruzi strains from all DTUs [5]. The activity needs to be selective (i.e. a high selectivity index) and trypanocidal, i.e. leading to irreversible clearance of parasites. Preferably, this activity is achieved quickly. Due to the diversity of aspects in activity, there is no single one assay design to test for all requirements. A hit from a predictive primary assay will have to pass through a panel of secondary assays. The LacZ assay [12, 36] with its high throughput capacity is an attractive primary assay. Several secondary assays have been established in the last few years, in particular wash-out assay designs [15, 16, 37] and formats like the clonal outgrowth assay [38] to measure irreversible cidality. High-content microscopy has led to great innovation in kinetoplastid drug discovery [6, 9–14, 39]. It combines the high throughput capacity of systems such as the LacZ assay [12, 36] with detailed information on the numbers of parasites and host cells. Nuclear staining as a read-out allows high-throughput in vitro assays to be undertaken with a broad panel of strains [6]. Furthermore, high-content assays with nuclear staining allow for a direct determination of selectivity indexes. However, the use of nuclear staining generally requires fixation of the cells, precluding live imaging over several days to observe the time-course of drug action. Live imaging can be more easily done with fluorescent T. cruzi reporter lines.

We established an eGFP expressing parasite line for use in live imaging assays. This parasite line expresses eGPF in high levels from the ribosomal locus, but only in the replicating life-cycle stages. This is in line with the observation that the reduction of transcription in the non-replicating (metacyclic) trypomastigote stage is particularly pronounced for ribosomal loci [40].

The new assay design presented here enables the monitoring of T. cruzi amastigote replication for 6 days post-infection, and drug action over 5 days of exposure, in four-hourly intervals. Nine sites per well can be monitored separately. This not only creates a wealth of data–it also reveals a high degree of variability in T. cruzi numbers, not only between different wells and different days of infection, but also between different sites in the same well, infected on the same day. This complicated the EC50 determination at each time point.

In contrast, the fold change per h in the number of parasites over the period of 24 h after drug incubation is a sensitive and robust measure of pharmacodynamics. The fold change on a specific day of infection was very reproducible within wells, between wells, and between days of infection. The fold change is influenced by the drug concentration and the time of drug exposure. For each drug concentration, we can determine the day of drug exposure at which the net fold change per h drops significantly below one. At this tipping point, the death rate of the parasites exceeds the growth rate. The graphical representation of the fold change per h of parasite numbers in relation to drug concentration and exposure time clearly depicts the different pharmacodynamics of benznidazole and posaconazole. For benznidazole, the time-to-kill decreased roughly exponentially with increasing drug concentration. In contrast, even at the highest concentrations of posaconazole tested, the net killing only started after 3 days of drug exposure.

The concept of monitoring growth of intracellular T. cruzi via rates (i.e. fold change) and determining the tipping point of drug action provides a novel pharmacodynamic parameter to determine time-to-kill that can be applied to any assay design employing repetitive imaging of the same site. The fold change in parasite numbers can readily be incorporated to PK-PD modelling, as mathematical modelling requires rates. We propose to introduce the concentration-dependency of the tipping point of drug action as a novel measure to benchmark drug candidates for Chagas' disease in vitro.

Supporting information

S1 Fig.

Epimastigote replication (A), trypomastigote infectivity (B), transgene expression stability in epimastigotes (C) and amastigotes (D) of the transgenic parasite line. Epimastigote density (A) was quantified daily after inoculum of 10⁴ epimastigotes/ml using the Neubauer chamber. Wt denotes the STIB980 wildtype, G12+ the eGFP-expressing STIB980 line cultivated constantly in 500 μg/ml G418, and G12- the eGFP-expressing STIB980 line cultivated for 5 months without any antibiotic selection pressure. (B) Infectivity was measured using high-content microscopy of Hoechst-stained ePMM infected with the MOI 5:1 for 48 h. (C) Phenotypic transgene stability was measured in epimastigotes by flow cytometry in two replicates. The geometric mean of the fluorescence level of the parasite population and the proportion of green fluorescent parasites were determined (S1 Table). (D) In amastigotes, phenotypic transgene stability was measured by simultaneous comparison of ePMM infected for 5 days with a MOI 5:1 using trypomastigotes, which have either been passaged weekly 2 or 18 times in a Mef culture.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Development of parasite numbers over time for all replicates separately.

Parasite numbers per image from untreated wells of all biological replicates from live imaging (green, detected as GFP positive parasites) and fixed imaging (black, detected as kinetoplasts).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Development of host cell numbers over time for all replicates.

Host cell numbers per image (A) and parasites per host cell numbers per image (B) from untreated wells of all biological replicates from fixed imaging (black, parasites detected as kinetoplasts) in relation to time passed between plating the host cells and fixing the plate. Linear models of the correlation and their 95% interval are plotted in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Development of host cell numbers over time and drug exposure.

Host cell numbers per image at the given drug concentrations (of benznidazole (A), and posaconazole (B)) and the respective dose-response curves estimated using Equation 1 with the R package “drc” for all time points, at which a dose-response curve could be estimated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Development of parasite numbers over time and drug exposure.

Parasite numbers per image (detected as green fluorescent parasites in the live imaging) at the given drug concentrations (of benznidazole (A), and posaconazole (B)) and the respective dose-response curves estimated using Equation 1 with the R package “drc” for all imaged time points. The y-axis in logarithmic scale to illustrate the parasite development over time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.s005

(TIF)

S1 Table. Stability of transgene expression in T. cruzi epimastigotes.

Phenotypic transgene stability was measured in epimastigotes by flow cytometry in two replicates. The geometric mean of the fluorescence level of the parasite population and the proportion of green fluorescent parasites were determined. Wt denotes the T. cruzi STIB980 wildtype, G12+ the eGFP-expressing STIB980 line cultivated constantly in 500 μg/ml G418, and G12- the eGFP-expressing STIB980 line cultivated for 5 months without any antibiotic selection pressure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008487.s006

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Isolation and expansion of peritoneal macrophages was performed by Romina Rocchetti. Monica Cal provided cell and parasite culture support and support with high-content microscopy. Dr. Remo Schmidt supported the molecular biology and basic statistical analyses. We kindly thank Prof. Dr. Till Voss and his group for letting us use the high-content microscope. Special thanks to him and Dr. Nicolas Brancucci for fruitful discussions on high-content use. We thank Prof. Dr. Antonio Osuna for the kind provision of the T. cruzi strain. We thank Prof. Dr. Joachim Clos for the kind provision with the LADMAC cells.

References

1. Stanaway J.D. and Roth G., The burden of Chagas disease: estimates and challenges. Glob Heart, 2015. 10(3): p. 139–44. pmid:26407508
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Molina I., et al., Randomized trial of posaconazole and benznidazole for chronic Chagas' disease. N Engl J Med, 2014. 370(20): p. 1899–908. pmid:24827034
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Chatelain E., Chagas disease drug discovery: toward a new era. J Biomol Screen, 2015. 20(1): p. 22–35. pmid:25245987
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Keenan M. and Chaplin J.H., A new era for chagas disease drug discovery? Prog Med Chem, 2015. 54: p. 185–230. pmid:25727705
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Zingales B., et al., Drug discovery for Chagas disease should consider Trypanosoma cruzi strain diversity. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 2014. 109(6): p. 828–33. pmid:25317712
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Moraes C.B., et al., Nitroheterocyclic compounds are more efficacious than CYP51 inhibitors against Trypanosoma cruzi: implications for Chagas disease drug discovery and development. Sci Rep, 2014. 4: p. 4703. pmid:24736467
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Francisco A.F., et al., Biological factors that impinge on Chagas disease drug development. Parasitology, 2017. 144(14): p. 1871–1880. pmid:28831944
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Yang G., et al., Evaluation of Parameters Impacting Drug Susceptibility in Intracellular Trypanosoma cruzi Assay Protocols. SLAS Discov, 2017. 22(2): p. 125–134. pmid:27729503
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. De Rycker M., et al., Identification of Trypanocidal Activity for Known Clinical Compounds Using a New Trypanosoma cruzi Hit-Discovery Screening Cascade. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2016. 10(4): p. e0004584. pmid:27082760
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Neitz R.J., et al., Lead identification to clinical candidate selection: drugs for Chagas disease. J Biomol Screen, 2015. 20(1): p. 101–11. pmid:25281737
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Alonso-Padilla J., et al., Automated high-content assay for compounds selectively toxic to Trypanosoma cruzi in a myoblastic cell line. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2015. 9(1): p. e0003493. pmid:25615687
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Alonso-Padilla J. and Rodriguez A., High throughput screening for anti-Trypanosoma cruzi drug discovery. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2014. 8(12): p. e3259. pmid:25474364
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Nohara L.L., et al., High-content imaging for automated determination of host-cell infection rate by the intracellular parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasitol Int, 2010. 59(4): p. 565–70. pmid:20688189
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Engel J.C., et al., Image-based high-throughput drug screening targeting the intracellular stage of Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas' disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2010. 54(8): p. 3326–34. pmid:20547819
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Cal M., et al., Assessing anti-T. cruzi candidates in vitro for sterile cidality. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist, 2016. 6(3): p. 165–170. pmid:27639944
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. MacLean L.M., et al., Development of Trypanosoma cruzi in vitro assays to identify compounds suitable for progression in Chagas' disease drug discovery. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2018. 12(7): p. e0006612. pmid:30001347
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Lewis M.D., et al., A new experimental model for assessing drug efficacy against Trypanosoma cruzi infection based on highly sensitive in vivo imaging. J Biomol Screen, 2015. 20(1): p. 36–43. pmid:25296657
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Henriques C., et al., In vivo imaging of mice infected with bioluminescent Trypanosoma cruzi unveils novel sites of infection. Parasit Vectors, 2014. 7: p. 89. pmid:24589192
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Canavaci A.M., et al., In vitro and in vivo high-throughput assays for the testing of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi compounds. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2010. 4(7): p. e740. pmid:20644616
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Meyer K.J., Meyers D.J., and Shapiro T.A., Optimal kinetic exposures for classic and candidate antitrypanosomals. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2019.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. ter Kuile F., et al., Plasmodium falciparum: in vitro studies of the pharmacodynamic properties of drugs used for the treatment of severe malaria. Exp Parasitol, 1993. 76(1): p. 85–95. pmid:8467901
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Hodel E.M., Kay K., and Hastings I.M., Incorporating Stage-Specific Drug Action into Pharmacological Modeling of Antimalarial Drug Treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2016. 60(5): p. 2747–56. pmid:26902760
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Perin L., et al., Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution of Benznidazole after Oral Administration in Mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2017. 61(4).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Gysin M., et al., Isothermal microcalorimetry—A quantitative method to monitor Trypanosoma congolense growth and growth inhibition by trypanocidal drugs in real time. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist, 2018. 8(2): p. 159–164. pmid:29587237
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Wenzler T., et al., Isothermal microcalorimetry, a new tool to monitor drug action against Trypanosoma brucei and Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2012. 6(6): p. e1668. pmid:22679520
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Fernandes J.F. and Castellani O., Growth characteristics and chemical composition of Trypanosoma cruzi. Experimental Parasitology, 1966. 18(2): p. 195–202.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Olmo F., et al., Optimising genetic transformation of Trypanosoma cruzi using hydroxyurea-induced cell-cycle synchronisation. Mol Biochem Parasitol, 2018. 226: p. 34–36. pmid:29990513
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Lewis M.D., et al., Bioluminescence imaging of chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infections reveals tissue-specific parasite dynamics and heart disease in the absence of locally persistent infection. Cell Microbiol, 2014. 16(9): p. 1285–300. pmid:24712539
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Maser P., et al., An anti-contamination cocktail for the in vitro isolation and cultivation of parasitic protozoa. Parasitol Res, 2002. 88(2): p. 172–4. pmid:11936508
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Wheeler R.J., Gull K., and Gluenz E., Detailed interrogation of trypanosome cell biology via differential organelle staining and automated image analysis. BMC Biol, 2012. 10: p. 1. pmid:22214525
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2018, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
32. Wickham H., tidyverse: Easily Install and Load the 'Tidyverse'. 2017.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Wickham H. and Bryan J., readxl: Read Excel Files. 2018.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Garnier S., viridis: Default Color Maps from 'matplotlib'. 2018.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Ritz C., et al., Dose-Response Analysis Using R. PLoS One, 2015. 10(12): p. e0146021. pmid:26717316
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Buckner F.S., et al., Efficient technique for screening drugs for activity against Trypanosoma cruzi using parasites expressing beta-galactosidase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1996. 40(11): p. 2592–7. pmid:8913471
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Sykes M.L. and Avery V.M., Development and application of a sensitive, phenotypic, high-throughput image-based assay to identify compound activity against Trypanosoma cruzi amastigotes. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist, 2015. 5(3): p. 215–28. pmid:27120069
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Shah-Simpson S., et al., Bioenergetic profiling of Trypanosoma cruzi life stages using Seahorse extracellular flux technology. Mol Biochem Parasitol, 2016. 208(2): p. 91–5. pmid:27392747
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Yazdanparast E., et al., INsPECT, an open-source and versatile software for automated quantification of (Leishmania) intracellular parasites. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2014. 8(5): p. e2850. pmid:24831235
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Elias M.C., et al., Transcription rate modulation through the Trypanosoma cruzi life cycle occurs in parallel with changes in nuclear organisation. Mol Biochem Parasitol, 2001. 112(1): p. 79–90. pmid:11166389
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Stanaway J.D. and Roth G., The burden of Chagas disease: estimates and challenges. Glob Heart, 2015. 10(3): p. 139–44. pmid:26407508
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Molina I., et al., Randomized trial of posaconazole and benznidazole for chronic Chagas' disease. N Engl J Med, 2014. 370(20): p. 1899–908. pmid:24827034
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Chatelain E., Chagas disease drug discovery: toward a new era. J Biomol Screen, 2015. 20(1): p. 22–35. pmid:25245987
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Keenan M. and Chaplin J.H., A new era for chagas disease drug discovery? Prog Med Chem, 2015. 54: p. 185–230. pmid:25727705
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Zingales B., et al., Drug discovery for Chagas disease should consider Trypanosoma cruzi strain diversity. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 2014. 109(6): p. 828–33. pmid:25317712
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Moraes C.B., et al., Nitroheterocyclic compounds are more efficacious than CYP51 inhibitors against Trypanosoma cruzi: implications for Chagas disease drug discovery and development. Sci Rep, 2014. 4: p. 4703. pmid:24736467
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Francisco A.F., et al., Biological factors that impinge on Chagas disease drug development. Parasitology, 2017. 144(14): p. 1871–1880. pmid:28831944
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Yang G., et al., Evaluation of Parameters Impacting Drug Susceptibility in Intracellular Trypanosoma cruzi Assay Protocols. SLAS Discov, 2017. 22(2): p. 125–134. pmid:27729503
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. De Rycker M., et al., Identification of Trypanocidal Activity for Known Clinical Compounds Using a New Trypanosoma cruzi Hit-Discovery Screening Cascade. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2016. 10(4): p. e0004584. pmid:27082760
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Neitz R.J., et al., Lead identification to clinical candidate selection: drugs for Chagas disease. J Biomol Screen, 2015. 20(1): p. 101–11. pmid:25281737
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Alonso-Padilla J., et al., Automated high-content assay for compounds selectively toxic to Trypanosoma cruzi in a myoblastic cell line. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2015. 9(1): p. e0003493. pmid:25615687
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Alonso-Padilla J. and Rodriguez A., High throughput screening for anti-Trypanosoma cruzi drug discovery. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2014. 8(12): p. e3259. pmid:25474364
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Nohara L.L., et al., High-content imaging for automated determination of host-cell infection rate by the intracellular parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasitol Int, 2010. 59(4): p. 565–70. pmid:20688189
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Engel J.C., et al., Image-based high-throughput drug screening targeting the intracellular stage of Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas' disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2010. 54(8): p. 3326–34. pmid:20547819
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Cal M., et al., Assessing anti-T. cruzi candidates in vitro for sterile cidality. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist, 2016. 6(3): p. 165–170. pmid:27639944
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. MacLean L.M., et al., Development of Trypanosoma cruzi in vitro assays to identify compounds suitable for progression in Chagas' disease drug discovery. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2018. 12(7): p. e0006612. pmid:30001347
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Lewis M.D., et al., A new experimental model for assessing drug efficacy against Trypanosoma cruzi infection based on highly sensitive in vivo imaging. J Biomol Screen, 2015. 20(1): p. 36–43. pmid:25296657
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Henriques C., et al., In vivo imaging of mice infected with bioluminescent Trypanosoma cruzi unveils novel sites of infection. Parasit Vectors, 2014. 7: p. 89. pmid:24589192
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Canavaci A.M., et al., In vitro and in vivo high-throughput assays for the testing of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi compounds. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2010. 4(7): p. e740. pmid:20644616
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Meyer K.J., Meyers D.J., and Shapiro T.A., Optimal kinetic exposures for classic and candidate antitrypanosomals. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2019.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. ter Kuile F., et al., Plasmodium falciparum: in vitro studies of the pharmacodynamic properties of drugs used for the treatment of severe malaria. Exp Parasitol, 1993. 76(1): p. 85–95. pmid:8467901
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Hodel E.M., Kay K., and Hastings I.M., Incorporating Stage-Specific Drug Action into Pharmacological Modeling of Antimalarial Drug Treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2016. 60(5): p. 2747–56. pmid:26902760
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Perin L., et al., Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution of Benznidazole after Oral Administration in Mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2017. 61(4).
View Article
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Gysin M., et al., Isothermal microcalorimetry—A quantitative method to monitor Trypanosoma congolense growth and growth inhibition by trypanocidal drugs in real time. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist, 2018. 8(2): p. 159–164. pmid:29587237
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Wenzler T., et al., Isothermal microcalorimetry, a new tool to monitor drug action against Trypanosoma brucei and Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2012. 6(6): p. e1668. pmid:22679520
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Fernandes J.F. and Castellani O., Growth characteristics and chemical composition of Trypanosoma cruzi. Experimental Parasitology, 1966. 18(2): p. 195–202.
View Article
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Olmo F., et al., Optimising genetic transformation of Trypanosoma cruzi using hydroxyurea-induced cell-cycle synchronisation. Mol Biochem Parasitol, 2018. 226: p. 34–36. pmid:29990513
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Lewis M.D., et al., Bioluminescence imaging of chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infections reveals tissue-specific parasite dynamics and heart disease in the absence of locally persistent infection. Cell Microbiol, 2014. 16(9): p. 1285–300. pmid:24712539
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Maser P., et al., An anti-contamination cocktail for the in vitro isolation and cultivation of parasitic protozoa. Parasitol Res, 2002. 88(2): p. 172–4. pmid:11936508
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Wheeler R.J., Gull K., and Gluenz E., Detailed interrogation of trypanosome cell biology via differential organelle staining and automated image analysis. BMC Biol, 2012. 10: p. 1. pmid:22214525
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2018, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

[ref32] 32. Wickham H., tidyverse: Easily Install and Load the 'Tidyverse'. 2017.
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Wickham H. and Bryan J., readxl: Read Excel Files. 2018.
View Article
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Garnier S., viridis: Default Color Maps from 'matplotlib'. 2018.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Ritz C., et al., Dose-Response Analysis Using R. PLoS One, 2015. 10(12): p. e0146021. pmid:26717316
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Buckner F.S., et al., Efficient technique for screening drugs for activity against Trypanosoma cruzi using parasites expressing beta-galactosidase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1996. 40(11): p. 2592–7. pmid:8913471
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Sykes M.L. and Avery V.M., Development and application of a sensitive, phenotypic, high-throughput image-based assay to identify compound activity against Trypanosoma cruzi amastigotes. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist, 2015. 5(3): p. 215–28. pmid:27120069
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Shah-Simpson S., et al., Bioenergetic profiling of Trypanosoma cruzi life stages using Seahorse extracellular flux technology. Mol Biochem Parasitol, 2016. 208(2): p. 91–5. pmid:27392747
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Yazdanparast E., et al., INsPECT, an open-source and versatile software for automated quantification of (Leishmania) intracellular parasites. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2014. 8(5): p. e2850. pmid:24831235
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Elias M.C., et al., Transcription rate modulation through the Trypanosoma cruzi life cycle occurs in parallel with changes in nuclear organisation. Mol Biochem Parasitol, 2001. 112(1): p. 79–90. pmid:11166389
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Author summary

Introduction

Methods

Parasite and cell cultivation

Transfection

Flow cytometry

Fluorescence microscopy

Macrophage isolation

High content microscopy

Live high content assay

Image analysis

Statistical analyses

Equation 1 Dose-response model.

Equation 2 Exponential model for change in parasite numbers.

Results

Transfected T. cruzi expressing eGFP in the replicating life-cycle stages

A new assay design for live monitoring of drug action

High content imaging reveals the high degree of variability in untreated cultures

The decrease in EC50 values over time of drug exposure is a characteristic feature of a drug

The change in parasite numbers at each site can be quantified in an exponential model

The tipping point of drug action is a sensitive and robust readout

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig.

S2 Fig. Development of parasite numbers over time for all replicates separately.

S3 Fig. Development of host cell numbers over time for all replicates.

S4 Fig. Development of host cell numbers over time and drug exposure.

S5 Fig. Development of parasite numbers over time and drug exposure.

S1 Table. Stability of transgene expression in T. cruzi epimastigotes.

Acknowledgments

References