Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Unique Signatures of Natural Background Radiation on Human Y Chromosomes from Kerala, India

  • Sanjay Premi,

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India

  • Jyoti Srivastava,

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India

  • Sebastian Padinjarel Chandy,

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India

  • Sher Ali

    alisher@nii.res.in

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Background

The most frequently observed major consequences of ionizing radiation are chromosomal lesions and cancers, although the entire genome may be affected. Owing to its haploid status and absence of recombination, the human Y chromosome is an ideal candidate to be assessed for possible genetic alterations induced by ionizing radiation. We studied the human Y chromosome in 390 males from the South Indian state of Kerala, where the level of natural background radiation (NBR) is ten-fold higher than the worldwide average, and that from 790 unexposed males as control.

Results

We observed random microdeletions in the Azoospermia factor (AZF) a, b and c regions in >90%, and tandem duplication and copy number polymorphism (CNP) of 11 different Y-linked genes in about 80% of males exposed to NBR. The autosomal homologues of Y-linked CDY genes largely remained unaffected. Multiple polymorphic copies of the Y-linked genes showing single Y-specific signals suggested their tandem duplication. Some exposed males showed unilocus duplication of DAZ genes resulting in six copies. Notably, in the AZFa region, approximately 25% of exposed males showed deletion of the DBY gene, whereas flanking genes USP9Y and UTY remained unaffected. All these alterations were detected in blood samples but not in the germline (sperm) samples.

Conclusions

Exposure to high levels of NBR correlated with several interstitial polymorphisms of the human Y chromosome. CNPs and enhanced transcription of the SRY gene after duplication are envisaged to compensate for the loss of Y chromosome in some cells. The aforesaid changes, confined to peripheral blood lymphocytes, suggest a possible innate mechanism protecting the germline DNA from the NBR. Genome analysis of a larger population focusing on greater numbers of genes may provide new insights into the mechanisms and risks of the resultant genetic damages. The present work demonstrates unique signatures of NBR on human Y chromosomes from Kerala, India.

Introduction

Natural background radiation (NBR) has been affecting all forms of life since the time of its inception, although its geographical scope has been varied. Semi-permanent exposure to ionizing radiation leaves a lasting imprint on the genome [1][3]. Such change(s) may be used as biomarkers to monitor progression of tumors, chromosomal lesions, minisatellite length polymorphisms, and other alterations involving DNA [4]. Attempts have been made to establish a correlation between background radiation and phenotypic changes in rats [5], cases of Down's syndrome [6], chromosomal aberrations [7], and congenital malformations [8]. However, experimental evidence for radiation-induced mutations/alterations in humans still remains controversial in the absence of sufficient data.

The human Y chromosome, with fewer than 50 genes or gene families coding for proteins, is not essential for life but harbors several testis-specific genes [9] necessary for sperm production, and hence continuation of the species. It is well known that at least three non-overlapping regions of the human Y chromosome – AZFa, AZFb, and AZFc (Azoospermia factors a, b, and c) – are essential for spermatogenesis [10]. Microdeletions in these regions affecting one or more of the candidate genes (DAZ, RBMY, DBY, and USP9Y) cause male infertility [11]. Deletions of the DAZ genes in the distal Yq11 (AZFc) region are always associated with azoospermia [12][14]. The human Y chromosome abnormalities have also been attributed to the single copy SRY gene located on the p11.3 region, which plays a predominant role in male sex determination [15]. Mutations in the conserved HMG box domain and its up/down stream sequences have been correlated with sex reversal or poor binding of the SRY protein to the target DNA [15].

Assessment of the effects of long-term experimental irradiation on humans and its impact across the generations is not possible owing to logistic and ethical constraints. Only a few studies have been carried out following the Chernobyl disaster focusing on the effect of radiation on minisatellite mutation rate [16] or the radiation effect from nuclear weapon tests on the human germline mutation rate [3]. In this context, coastal areas in Kerala (South India), which contain 10% thorium phosphate monazite, offer a natural setting to assess the radiogenomic effects of background radiation. This radioactivity strip measuring an area of about 10 km by 1 km supports a sizable population of fishermen [17]. Earlier, we reported on the status of DAZ genes in 100 males exposed to NBR [18]. Triggered by the initial results, we undertook analysis of the Y chromosome in 390 exposed males and 790 unexposed ones as controls for possible structural variations. The results showed exclusive somatic microdeletions and CNP of the Y chromosome–linked genes.

Results

Random Y Chromosome Microdeletions in NBR-Exposed Males

STS mapping showed randomly scattered microdeletions in the AZFa, AZFb and AZFc regions of the Y chromosome in the exposed males. Frequency of microdeletions was higher in the AZFc region than in AZFa and AZFb. The AZFc microdeletions were distributed mainly in the proximal and distal portions throughout the sample pool. These microdeletions included sY1197, sY1258, sY1206 and sY1201 STSs in about 90% of exposed males (Figures 1 and 2). None of the samples showed the characteristic STS profile of gr/gr (sY1291 negative; and sY1161, sY1206, sY1191 and sY1201 all positive) or b1/b3 (sY1161, sY1197, sY1191 and sY1291 all negative; and sY142, sY1258, sY1206 and sY1201 all positive) deletions/duplications, except for a single sample (34B) depicting gr/gr deletion. In the absence of a blood sample from this male, FISH analysis could not be conducted. The AZFa microdeletions were confined to the proximal region encompassing sY79 and sY81 STSs (deletion interval 5A), sY88 (deletion interval 5D), and sY86 in about 85% of exposed males. Absence of sY117 in some exposed males hints at the AZFb phenotype, but the presence of sY149, sY127, and other interstitial STSs proved the intactness of the AZFb region. STS mapping of AZFa, b and c regions in representative exposed males is given in Figure 2.

thumbnail
Figure 1. PCR-based assays of STSs with DNA of a few representative males exposed to natural background radiation (NBR).

On the left of the panels, “RE” denotes radiation exposed, F and B denote father and son, respectively, and numbers refer to family IDs. The STSs are given on the right of the panels. Note de novo microdeletions in father but not in son, and vice-versa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g001

thumbnail
Figure 2. STS map for AZFa, b & c regions in representative exposed males.

(a) Conventional organization of the human Y chromosome. (b) STSs employed in mapping three different AZF regions are shown in corresponding colors. (c) Results of STS mapping using genomic DNA from the peripheral blood lymphocytes of the exposed males. “NM” denotes unexposed males. Sample IDs for the exposed males are given on left. “F” and “B” denote father and son, respectively. Note deletion of sY79, sY89 and sY639 in all the males and frequent deletions of sY83 and sY84 in AZFa, sY117 and sY129 in AZFb and several STSs in distal and proximal AZFc regions (see text for details).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g002

Besides random microdeletions, primers specific to DBY1 and DBY2 genes did not show any amplification in 95 exposed males (Figure 3). This was confirmed by Southern blot hybridization using 32P-labeled PCR product of DBY gene(s) from the normal male (not shown). Successful PCR amplification with sY83, sY86, sY84, DF1.5, sY87, UTY1, UTY3 and sY88 STSs showed breakpoints located downstream of sY87 and upstream of UTY3. The DBY microdeletions were inconsistent between fathers and sons where father lacked them but son did not or vice versa. Studies on Human Endogenous Retroviral (HERV) elements also showed randomly scattered microdeletions without a conclusive provirus A/B mediated recombination (Figure 4). The STSs sY1066, sY1182 and sY1185 that were absent in approximately 50–60% of exposed males represented hotspots for microdeletions. Approximately 10% of AZFc and 4–5% of AZFa/b STSs showed additional amplicons along with the expected ones (Figure S1) involving sY1201, sY1206, sY83 and sY84 STSs in more than 98% of exposed males. Such amplicons were absent in the normal males and, as expected, in the females, suggesting creation of new primer binding sites in the exposed males.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Exclusive somatic deletion of DBY gene in ∼25% of exposed males.

(A) Representative males with their IDs shown on top. DNA from blood and semen samples are denoted as “b” and “s”, respectively. Note deletion of DBY amplicons exclusively in the blood DNA of exposed males compared to that of semen DNA. The SRY (sY14) and β-actin PCRs were used as positive controls. (B) Schematic representation of the AZFa region. Candidate AZFa genes are given in “b1”, STSs used in “b2”, and the results of screening in “b3”. Note the absence of amplicons with primers corresponding to DBY1 and DBY2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. Analysis of the AZFa HERV elements in the exposed males.

(A) Schematic representation of provirus elements with various STS markers used to study recombination mediated duplication or deletion. (B) Status of HERV elements in exposed males. Note presence of all the STSs in normal/unexposed males and randomly scattered microdeletions without any conclusive major deletion/duplication in the exposed ones. Female DNA was used as negative controls. Number of males showing deletion of a particular STS is given in percentage.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g004

The intactness of 95% of STSs in germline (sperm) DNA in the exposed males substantiated the somatic nature of microdeletions, corroborating our earlier study [18]. To rule out possibilities of PCR reaction failure, single and multiplex PCRs were conducted thrice followed by Southern blot hybridization using [32Pα-dCTP] labeled PCR products of the corresponding STSs of the unexposed males (not shown). Except for 2% of cases of the normal males that showed random microdeletions, all the unexposed control males (390 from Kerala and 400 from other parts of India) were free from microdeletions.

Copy Number Polymorphism (CNP) of the Y-Linked Genes in Exposed Males

Real time PCR using TaqMan/SYBR green chemistries uncovered duplications/multiplications of the Y-linked genes resulting in CNPs. Similar CNPs of the SRY and DAZ genes were reported earlier [18], [19]. In the present study, TaqMan assays were standardized for 11 genes listed in Table 1. A ten-fold dilution series of genomic DNA showed a difference of 3.32–3.6 Ct (cycle threshold) per dilution and a standard curve with a slope of −3.24, both of which reflected maximum efficiency of the assay system (Figure S2). Representative real time PCR amplification plots for few assays are shown here (Figures S3, S4, and S5). As expected, no amplification was detected with female genomic DNA, confirming Y chromosome specificity of the primers and probes. All the samples were used in triplicate and each showed matching Ct values with a ±0.05 difference. Owing to the haploid status of the Y chromosome, Ct value for the RNaseP gene was found to be −1 as compared to that of the SRY gene (ΔCt = Ct SRY-Ct RNaseP = 1) and +1 for DAZ genes (ΔCt = −1) in blood DNA of the normal male [18], [19].

thumbnail
Table 1. Details of the primers and probes used in this study#.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.t001

TaqMan probes uncovered CNPs in most of the Y-linked genes (SRY, DAZ, VCY, CDY1, UTY, HSFY, PRY, XKRY, BPY2) and DYZ1-repeat showing a maximum of 2–3 rounds of duplication in ∼85% of exposed males (Table 2). Most frequently duplicated genes included DAZ, CDY1 and PRY. However, copies of autosomal (CDYL1, CDYL2) genes largely remained unaffected. The autosomal genes CDYL1 and CDYL2 showed normal copies in about 95% of cases, whereas those of retro-transposed homolog CDY1 was found to be frequently altered. Often, there was no correlation between father and son (denoted as f = father, b = son) with respect to the number of copies of this gene. The germline DNA of exposed males showed normal copies of these genes in >90% of males. In all the cases, copy number never decreased; it either increased or remained unaltered.

thumbnail
Table 2. Copy number polymorphism of the Y-linked and autosomal genes in human males exposed to natural background radiation (NBR)#.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.t002

Multiple Polymorphic Copies of the SRY Gene and Exposure to NBR

Copy number of the SRY gene varied among the exposed males. Fathers and sons in several families showed 2 or more copies of this gene (Table 2). Of all the samples analyzed, ∼85% showed SRY copies ranging from 2–8. Irrespective of number of copies in blood DNA, germline DNA showed a normal single copy in 90% of exposed males.

Sequence analyses of PCR-amplified 20 SRY fragments (table 1) from each of the selected 100 exposed males showed insertions, deletions and silent point mutations scattered upstream, downstream and within the HMG box. Frequent transversions were noticed from pyrimidine (C/T) to purine (A/G) throughout the SRY exon. Approximately 90% of the insertions were of adenine or guanine only (table 3). Surprisingly, amongst multiple copies of SRY genes ranging from 4–8 detected in an individual, at least one copy remained normal with respect to its nucleotide sequence. This was in accordance with our previous study showing multiple copies of the SRY gene in one male 33F [19]. Multiple copies of the SRY gene have been reported in rodents [20], [21] but not in humans. Thus, in the present study, multiple polymorphic copies of the SRY gene correlated with the effects of NBR. The amino acid changes in some representative males are shown in Figure S6.

thumbnail
Table 3. Details of nucleotide and amino acid alterations in the SRY gene in some representative males exposed to NBR#.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.t003

Expression Level of SRY Gene in the Exposed and Unexposed Males

It is not possible to assess expression of Y-linked genes in human tissues or gonads owing to logistic constraints. Therefore, we studied expression of the SRY gene in the blood. Normal fertile males showed varying levels of SRY transcripts even among members of the same family within and across the populations. Similar variations were detected among exposed males, but in general, the expression level was several folds higher than in the unexposed ones (Figure 5). The difference in the expression level was conspicuous in males with the same number of copies. For instance, males 3B and 10B, with 2 copies of the SRY gene, showed 1.5–2 times the level of expression, whereas 9F, 10F, 31F, 32F, 33F and 33B, also with two copies, showed higher levels (around 4–9 times) of expression. Males 29F and 29B, with four copies of the SRY gene, showed similar levels of expression as those having 2 copies. For calculations, a male (8F) with the lowest level of SRY transcripts was used as a calibrator in real time PCR. Startlingly, males with 8 copies of the SRY gene (e.g., 7F) showed 25 times higher expression as compared to that of the calibrator.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Expression of SRY gene in exposed and unexposed males based on real time PCR.

(A) Unexposed males with single copy of SRY showing variable expression in lymphocytes. Transcript levels were normalized using β-actin and RNaseP genes as internal controls, and a normal male (N05) as calibrator. (B) Exposed males showing fluctuating but conspicuously higher levels of SRY expression compared to that in normal ones, even with eight copies of the gene. The male RE61F was used as calibrator. Copy number of the SRY gene in corresponding males is given on top of each bar.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g005

Multiple Polymorphic Copies of the CDY1 Gene and Background Radiation Exposure

Sequencing of full length CDY1 genes (primers in Table 1) showed polymorphism similar to that detected in SRY genes. The CDY1 gene from a single male (6F) was amplified, cloned into pGEMT easy vector, and sequenced (Figure S7). Nucleotide analysis of 5–10 full-length CDY1 fragments, each from 50 exposed males, uncovered random point mutations throughout the single exon. All the exposed males showed two types of CDY1 sequences, one full length with inserted intron, and the other one with point nucleotide changes leading to correspondingly truncated CDY1 protein as uncovered in-silico (Figure 6). Once again, this highlighted polymorphism of the multiple copies of CDY1 gene, similar to that of SRY. Sequence comparison of the CDY1 gene from representative exposed males is given in Figure S8. Based on our data, we inferred that NBR exposure leads to the formation of multiple polymorphic copies of the Y-linked genes. This was substantiated by full length sequencing of the XKRY gene showing nucleotide changes spread all across its length, though frequently in the middle portions (not shown). Although there is no report on the implications of this gene for male fertility, its small size makes it an attractive candidate for the assessment of point nucleotide changes.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Two different copies (6F_4, 6F_11) of CDY1 gene in NBR-exposed male (6F) are shown along with its normal sequence (top).

Note the conspicuous difference between the two copies. Amino acid changes corresponding to nucleotides are highlighted in red with yellow background.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g006

DAZ Genes (DAZ1–DAZ4) in Males Exposed to NBR

Analysis of SFV/SNV/STS in 390 exposed males showed all the six intact SNVs, confirming the presence of four DAZ genes in >85% of males. Similar SNV/SFV analysis of the remaining 15% showed either the absence of an allele, or absence of a single band corresponding to a specific SNV (Table 4). Another intriguing observation was the loss of the restriction enzyme site for SNVII since the PCR product remained undigested in >55% of exposed males. However, the majority of the NBR-exposed males showed intact DAZ genes.

thumbnail
Table 4. AZFc region SNV/SFV typing in males exposed to NBR#.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.t004

Status of the Other AZFc Candidates

SNV/SFV analysis of the other AZFc candidates revealed complete absence of STS Y-DAZ3 in blood DNA in approximately 60% of the exposed males (Table 4). The TTY4/1 allele A was absent in 167 of the 390 males. Similarly, allele B of the SNV BPY2/1 was absent in 15% of males, Likewise, allele A and a 398 bp fragment of allele B of the SNV GOLY/1 were absent in >30% of exposed males (Figure 7). The other AZFc SNVs AZFc-P1/1 and RRM3 were normal in all the cases.

thumbnail
Figure 7. AZFc SNV/SFV typing in the exposed males.

“NBRE” refers to natural background radiation–exposed males, and numbers represent the family IDs. (A) Loss of SNV TTY4/1 allele “A” (541 bp) in exposed males (arrows in panel “A”). Sizes of digested DNA with HaeIII enzyme are given on the right. Note the absence of 541 bp band in several males. Some showed complete absence of the SNV TTY4/1. (B) SNV for BPY2 gene showing its absence in some males (arrow) and loss of allele B (289+181 bp) in others (upper panel). (C) SNV typing of GOLGA2LY gene. Note the absence of allele “A” and 289 bp of allele “B” in some males (arrows in “C”).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g007

Tandem Duplication of the Y-Linked Loci in Males Exposed to NBR

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) conducted on metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei of the normal males showed a single signal in each of the SRY and DXZ1 probes [19] (Figure 8a). As expected, a single signal was detected in the centromeric region of each X chromosome in the normal female used as negative control (data not shown). Exposed males also showed a single signal with multiple copies of the SRY gene. A male (7F) carrying eight copies of SRY showed a relatively stronger signal on the Y chromosome compared to that of a normal male. However, in several cases with 2–4 copies of SRY, differences in the signal intensity were not discernible. Depending upon the condensation status of the sister chromatids in some cases, two signals of the SRY were seen. Interestingly, ∼5–12% of males lacked signals for the SRY gene, whereas a signal for DXZ1 was consistently detected. The absence of signal was attributed to the loss of Y chromosome shown in the later section.

thumbnail
Figure 8. Structural organization of the human Y chromosome in exposed males.

Probe combinations are described in table S4. The abbreviations “fl” and “tr” refer to fluorescein and Texas red labels, respectively. Probe combination AtrBfl corresponds to dual color FISH with 18E8 in red and 63C9 in green. (a) SRY-FISH showing a single signal with varying intensities, with its multiple copies representing tandem duplication. (b) FISH with AtrBfl showing localization of probe “A” onto the proximal Yp region in all the NBR-exposed and normal males. This was substantiated using AtrCfl and AtrDfl probe combinations shown in (c) and (d), respectively. FISH with probe “D” showed exclusive localization of one of the three green amplicons onto the short arm, overlapping with the signal for probe “A”, which was substantiated using probe combinations AtrDfl, DtrCfl, and Dfl shown in (d), (e), and (f), respectively. Such localization was detected in 85–90% of exposed males. Percentage of cells showing probe D signal on the short arm was higher in the exposed males compared to unexposed ones. The ratios show percent of males to percent of cells (e.g., in probe D, panel f, 100/40% means only 40% cells of all the males showed alteration with respect to probe “D”). (g–h) Variation in length and position of Yq heterochromatin detected using 3.4 kb repeat unit of DYZ1 as FISH probe. This fluctuation was more prominent in the exposed males compared with an almost uniform signal in normal males (NM).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g008

FISH probes (Cosmids 18E8, 46A6 and 63C9) used for the DAZ genes have been explained in the literature [22]. Cosmid probe 18E8 encompassing the 5′ end of two neighboring DAZ genes showed two signals in the normal males, or one, if the same were merged. In 20% of exposed males with 6 copies of DAZ genes, three signals were discernible (Figure 9i). In these exposed males, only one locus of DAZ underwent duplication (unilocus duplication), resulting in six copies. Males with 8 or 16 copies showing correspondingly stronger signals compared to that of normal males seem to have undergone single and double rounds of tandem duplications, respectively (Figure 9). Except for males with unilocus duplication, approximately 30% showed three signals in about 9–12% of cells (not shown) and complete absence of signals in 10–15% of interphase nuclei (explained later). The absence of DAZ signals was construed to be due to the loss of Y chromosome. This inference was based on a number of Y-specific probe combinations and painting described in later sections. As expected, the mosaicisms affected Ct values of DAZ and SRY genes during real time PCR assay.

thumbnail
Figure 9.

(i), Tandem duplication of DAZ genes in NBR-exposed males uncovered by FISH. Numbers in parentheses represent copies of DAZ genes ranging from 4–16 in the exposed males with corresponding variation in signal intensity. Sample IDs are given in square brackets. Note three signals in samples 3F, 24F and 13F, with two on one side and a single one on the other, highlighting the unilocus duplication of DAZ genes (see text for details). (ii), Organization of DAZ genes in exposed males. Only six representative exposed males and a normal one (Nm) are shown, with their sample IDs on top, copies of DAZ in parentheses, and probes on the right of the panels. The normal male (Nm) showed the expected number of discernible signals for each probe (A–E) with combinations of AtrBfl and AtrCfl separating two signals. Exposed males showed higher DAZ copies corresponding to unilocus (RE53F & RE53B) or bilocus duplications (RE52F, RE54F, RE54B, & RE56F) evident from the number and intensity of the corresponding signals shown in (A), (B) and (D), respectively. Similarly, probe “D” specific for green amplicons showed three expected signals overlapping “B” with “C” in normal males. In exposed males, 80–90% of cells showed unexpected overlap of probe “D” signal with that of “A” (RE53F, 54F & 56F), as shown in (C). Presence of three signals with probe D was confirmed by different probe combinations as shown in (D) and (E). (F) Schematic map of the AZFc amplicons given as a reference.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g009

Structural (Re)organization of the DAZ Genes

Previously, two DAZ loci in the AZFc region, each with an inverted pair of DAZ genes (amplicons r1, r2, r3, r4) and an inter-DAZ sequence were detected. We observed a similar arrangement in the interphase nuclei of the exposed males. But subsequent hybridization of DAZ probes with metaphase Y chromosomes revealed a different organization. The cosmid 18E8 (probe A) representing 5′ DAZ exons 1 through 7 on one side and the inter-DAZ region on the other [22] was localized onto the proximal Yp instead of on the anticipated Yq region in all 390 exposed males (Figure 8). The other two DAZ cosmids 46A6 and 63C9 (probes “B” and “C”) representing DAZ exons 2 through 11 and 3′ DAZ, respectively, were localized on their anticipated positions in the Yq region, overlapping with each other on the metaphase Y chromosome (Figure 8). Similar results were obtained with FISH conducted on interphase nuclei (Figure 9ii). Signals for probes “A” and “C” or “A” and “B” never overlapped. Another probe (D) corresponding to neighboring g1/g2/g3 amplicons of the DAZ genes detected the expected 3 signals on the interphase nuclei. On the metaphase Y chromosome, probe “D” detected the expected overlap with probes “B” and “C”. In addition, in each of 80–90% of exposed males, 70–80% of cells showed an unexpected overlap of probe D signals with that of probe A on the proximal short arm of Y chromosome (Yp). Overall structural reorganization of the AZFc region and DAZ genes in the exposed males is summarized in Figure 10. Similar (re)organization was detected in normal males and thus this was not attributed to the effect of NBR.

thumbnail
Figure 10. (i), Schematic representation of the AZFc region.

(A) Arrangement of the AZFc amplicons as reported in the literature. Probes used in this study are given below the corresponding amplicons. Cosmids common to all the DAZ genes are highlighted in pink. (B) Arrangement of the AZFc amplicons in the NBR-exposed and control males showing decreased intervening length between the two DAZ genes at each locus. This decrease is hypothesized to be due to translocation of 18E8 sequences onto the Yp. (ii), (A) Diagrammatic illustration showing positions of DAZ genes and neighboring AZFc amplicons reported thus far. Red horizontal bars represent two DAZ loci. The amplicons g1, g2, and g3, detected with BAC 336F2 (probe D) are represented by green horizontal bars. (B) Translocation of probe “A” signal to the Yp shown as red dotted horizontal bar. (C) Duplication of either one or all the g1, g2, and g3 amplicons followed by translocation to the short arm with higher frequency in NBR-exposed males compared to that in normal ones. (D) and (E) represent Y chromosomes of Sumatran orangutan and pygmy chimpanzee, respectively, where DAZ genes are present on the short arm of the Y chromosome. The Yp localization of DAZ genes was not linked with the exposure to NBR, since a similar arrangement was detected in the normal males.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g010

Long Arm Heterochromatin of the Y Chromosome (Yqh)

Prominent length variation of the Yq heterochromatin was detected in the exposed males using a 3.4 kb FISH probe (Figure 8g–h) compared with an almost uniform signal in the normal males. This variation was construed to be due to copy number variation (CNV) of the 3.4 kb repeat units. In normal males, the average number of copies of the DYZ1 repeat varies from 4000–4500. In the exposed males, this number was detected in the range of 4500–6500 (table 2). The increase in DYZ1 copy number among 390 males correlated with varying FISH signals. Interestingly, ∼5–12% of cells per exposed male were devoid of signal, suggesting loss of Y chromosome.

Loss of the Y Chromosome and NBR Exposure

Conclusions on FISH were drawn based upon the analysis of 400 interphase/metaphases each from 390 exposed males. As mentioned earlier, FISH conducted with SRY/DXZ1 showed DXZ1 signals on the X-centromere in all the cells, but SRY signal was missing in 5–12% of cells (Figure 11). Similar observations were made using different AZFc and DAZ probes individually and in combination with one another. Whole chromosome painting confirmed the loss of Y chromosome as mentioned earlier (Figure 11). In normal males, ∼96–98% of cells were positive for all the probes whereas in the remaining ones, signals were not detected owing to technical constraints.

thumbnail
Figure 11. Loss of Y chromosome in 10–15% of cells in NBR-exposed males.

Details of probes and probe combinations labeled with red (Texas red, tr) or green (fluorescein, fl) are given in parentheses. Probe symbols (A–D) are the same as given in Figures 1 and 2. SRY probe combination hybridizes simultaneously to SRY gene on the Y (Yp11.3) and centromeric region of the X chromosome (DXZ1). WCP refers to whole chromosome painting showing loss of the Y chromosome (arrows).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.g011

Discussion

Owing to its haploid status, repetitive nature and intrachromosomal homologous recombination, the human Y chromosome is highly prone to genetic variations [23], [24], which are passed on to the next generation un-repaired. However, this chromosome has been implicated with male sex determination and spermatogenesis. Thus, lethal mutations are usually not transmitted to the next generation. The present study is an attempt to explore genetic variations of the human Y chromosome in males exposed to NBR.

The AZF Microdeletions and Radiation Exposure

Ionizing radiation induces several types of DNA lesions through single-strand (SSB) and double-strand (DSB) breaks, AP sites (either apyrimidinic or apurinic), and DNA–DNA and DNA–protein cross-linking, in addition to base modifications [25], [26]. Several alterations in the DNA induced by ionizing radiation are chemically identical to those caused by reactive oxygen species [27]. Ionizing radiation induces isolated as well as clustered damages involving two or more lesions within one or two helical turns of DNA. Base lesions within the clustered DNA enhance biological severity of the damage. Highly localized DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation leads to intrachromosomal breaks [28], [29]. Several attempts have been made to establish a correlation between background radiation, chromosomal aberrations and phenotypic changes [5][8]. However, due to insufficient data, experimental evidence of radiation induced mutations in humans still remains highly controversial.

Our study demonstrated a correlation between radiation exposure and microdeletions in the AZF regions. These microdeletions did not follow a normal pattern of inheritance since deletions detected in fathers were absent in their sons and vice versa. This discrepancy, observed in most of the exposed males, was true for gene copy number variations as well. This can be explained on the basis of unaffected germline DNA in the exposed males. We postulate that radiation exposure caused localized DNA damages but by some unknown protection mechanism, the germline DNA remained intact. Scrutiny of microdeletions showed higher frequency in proximal and distal AZFc, and to some extent in the AZFa region, but absence of any major deletion phenotypes such as gr/gr, b1/b3, b2/b4 (AZFc) and HERV mediated recombination (AZFa). Absence of microdeletions in the germline explains the normal fertility status of the exposed males.

Somatic (blood DNA) deletion of the DBY gene observed in 25% of exposed males was intriguing since such deletion has been correlated with male infertility [30]. However, normal fertility in the exposed males is maintained because of the intact DBY gene in the germline. The negligible frequency of microdeletions detected in normal males may be taken as internal polymorphisms of the Y chromosome. In view of the microdeletions absence of major deletion phenotypes and normal fertility of the exposed males, diagnosis of the infertile males on the basis of microdeletions may prove to be inadequate. Instead, the patients may be subjected to selection criteria, ethnic variations and detailed experimental design to pin-point involvement of Y-microdeletions during spermatogenesis. In addition, levels of the hormones, quality of the semen samples and sperm counts may also be taken into consideration. This is important because in certain ethnic groups, absence of a pair of DAZ gene does not seem to affect fertility status of the males [13].

Gene Duplications and the Human Y Chromosomes

CNPs in humans have been reported using genome wide array-CGH techniques [31][34]. But these approaches have limitations due to the limited number of samples taken up for analysis and low resolution. This problem can be circumvented by using TaqMan probes, which differentiate between a single copy SRY and RNaseP genes in blood and semen DNA samples. The human genome contains blocks of duplicated sequences which are prone to rearrangements resulting in genomic variation [32], [35]. CNPs of gene(s) related to disease resistance or susceptibility, responsiveness to a particular drug, and aging ailments have been reported [34]. Despite its wide-spread occurrence in the human genome, no report is available on the Y-linked genes. Thus, the present report on CNP of the Y-linked genes seems to be a singular observation which is well within the realm of genetic variation and genome evolution. Gene duplication increases the complexity of a genome, particularly when it is not clear if the resultant copies follow normal levels of expression [36]. Incidentally, this question cannot be resolved by Southern blot hybridization [37]. The presence of 4–16 copies of the SRY gene detected in the NBR-exposed males demonstrated that non-disjunction of the Y chromosome and duplication of Y-linked genes are independent events.

Tandem Duplication of the Y-Linked Genes

The localized FISH signals of the candidate SRY and DAZ genes on the interphase nuclei and metaphase Y chromosomes in all the males exposed to NBR confirmed their tandem duplication. Earlier studies demonstrated two DAZ clusters, each harboring an inverted pair of DAZ genes separated by a 40–43 kb intervening sequence [22]. We detected translocation of this intervening region from Yq onto the proximal Yp in more than 95% of cells from all the exposed and unexposed males using cosmid 18E8 [22]. This suggested that the structure of the Indian Y chromosome is much different compared to the one reported in the literature. This issue has been discussed in detail in a separate manuscript.

Copy Number Variation (CNV) and Sequence Polymorphisms

Identification of several new players in the sex determination pathway [38] indicates that there is lot more to explore in terms of the actual role of the SRY gene. This view was substantiated by the analyses of this gene in exposed males (present study) and SCRA patients [19]. Most interesting was the duplication of this gene not reported earlier. A classical model suggests that after gene duplication, one copy preserves the ancestral function while the other one may conform to a new function [39]. Alternatively, another model, duplication, divergence and complementation (DDC), suggests that duplicated genes are preserved because each copy loses some, but not all of its functions through degenerating mutations [39]. Gene duplication and alternate splicing are inversely correlated evolutionary mechanisms fuelling the process of new biological functions [40]. NBR might have initiated the process of gene duplication leading to CNV. Sequence polymorphism, CNV, and the presence of only one normal copy of the SRY gene suggest that the hidden functionality of such a phenomenon only becomes apparent when the genome is challenged by environmental factors/stresses. Thus, tandem duplication of genes detected in the present study possibly occurred in order to absorb the mutation load caused due to NBR. We observed males with higher copies of SRY genes showing correspondingly enhanced levels of SRY transcripts. However, it was not clear if all the transcripts were translated. In the presence of abundant mRNA transcripts, it is logical to construe that transcriptional machinery failed to discriminate between normal and altered versions of a duplicated gene. Tandem duplication of SRY followed by its augmented transcription may well be a possible mechanism of up-regulation of a gene.

Polymorphism of multiplicated Y-linked genes became more evident by sequence analysis of the SRY in other exposed males showing several known and novel mutations. Besides SRY, sequence polymorphism was observed in CDY1 and XKRY genes, supporting the hypothesis that in the exposed males, other Y-linked genes are also affected. This was corroborated by SNV/SFV typing of DAZ genes in males exposed to NBR. These males showed either complete absence of a particular SNV allele or presence of additional amplicons. Similar to DAZ SNVs/SFVs, the AZFc region also showed polymorphisms. All these somatic sequence variations in the males correlated with the NBR exposure.

Possible Mechanisms of Gene Duplication

A single copy gene gives rise to a number of mRNA transcripts, some of which may be reverse transcribed and transposed back into the DNA, resulting in multiple copies [41]. Thus, besides putative tandem duplication, reverse transcriptase activity on the mRNA may also contribute to CNV. However, this seemed to be a less likely event because SRY copies detected were in multiples of two to a maximum of 16. Owing to the availability of a large number of mRNA transcripts, reverse transcriptase–like activity would have generated far greater numbers of SRY copies.

Somatic Nature of Alterations in NBR-Exposed Males

Natural background radiation may be responsible for varying alterations. However, intact germline DNA of the exposed males suggested a strong protective mechanism to counter the effects of NBR. Alternatively, it is likely that owing to high turnover of meiotic activities, defective cells undergo rapid apoptosis leaving behind no trace of an alteration in the germline. We are aware of the fact that, based on the analysis of some Y-linked genes, no major conclusion on the effect of NBR can be drawn. Thus, more genes involved in control and regulation of signal transduction, apoptosis, genome imprinting, tumor suppression and progression may be included to monitor the overall impact of NBR on the genome. This would go a long way towards undertaking corrective measures to save the population at high risk, if any.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates the effects of NBR on gene duplications and sequence polymorphisms, a possible genome strategy to absorb the mutational loads. This is evident from the multiple polymorphic copies of the SRY and CDY1 genes. Moreover, from the enhanced SRY expression in blood, it is logical to construe that transcriptional machinery failed to discriminate between normal and altered versions of a duplicated gene. Absence of microdeletions and CNV of genes in germline DNA of exposed males suggested that the germline DNA is protected by some innate, still unexplored repair mechanism(s). Analysis of the additional Y-linked loci, and even the autosomal genes, may uncover the overall impact of NBR on the structural and functional attributes of the human genome.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection

Peripheral blood and semen samples were collected with informed consent from 390 males of two generations at Chavara (lat. 8°57.8′N, long. 76°31.8′E) and Thevara (lat. 9°58′N, long. 76°16′E) in Kerala, India [17]. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institute's Ethical and Biosafety Committee. Since the population at the site of the NBR sample collection is illiterate, oral consent was obtained from the participants, facilitated by a recognized local clinician. In the case of control samples from other parts of India, written consent was obtained wherever possible. After due scrutiny, the clearance by the Institute's Ethical Committee was accorded. Following this, no additional approval regarding a particular gene sequence/gene variant was required for publication of the data.

The semen analysis of the exposed males was conducted by a commercial technician and the results are given in Tables S1 and S2. For control, blood and semen samples from 390 healthy unexposed males of matched age groups from Kochi city (South India) and 400 normal males from different parts of India were included. DNA from blood and semen was isolated following standard protocols. RNA was isolated from lymphocytes separated from blood with Accuspin™ System-Histopaque®-1077 (SIGMA, cat no: A7054) using TRI-X reagent (MRC, cat no: TB-126-200) and cDNA synthesized using high cDNA Archive Kit (cat no: 4322171, ABI, USA).

STS Mapping of the AZF Regions

The AZF regions were screened in blood and semen DNA from normal and exposed males for the presence or absence of STS markers, and details of the primers used are given in Figures 2 and 3. The AZFc region was assessed for the intactness of the sites P1.1/P1.2, GOLGA2LY, BPY2 and TTTY4 genes by the STSs and SNVs [12], [13] (Table S3). PCR was carried out in 100 µl, precipitated with Na+-acetate/ethanol and used for restriction digestion with the recommended enzymes. The digested DNA was resolved on 2–3% agarose gel. For human endogenous retrovirus (HERV) repeats, sY82, sY746, sY1064, sY86 sY85, sY84, sY1065, sY1066, and sY88 STSs were used [23].

PCR Amplification and Sequencing of the SRY and CDY1 Fragments

The SRY and CDY1 genes were amplified from semen and blood DNA with primers given in Table 1. Approximately 20 fragments amplified with each primer set from each male were sequenced. Sequences were analyzed by NCBI Blast and ClustalW alignments. Some PCR amplicons were cloned into p-GEMT easy vector (Promega, USA) for subsequent use.

Silver Staining of the DNA in Polyacrylamide Gel

For small sizes of AZFc haplotype specific bands in the SNV/SFV typing, a 12% polyacrylamide gel was run in 1XTBE and silver stained for band visualization. Gel was treated with fixative-1 (40% methanol, 10% acetic acid) for 30 min followed by 2 washes with fixative-2 (10% ethanol, 5% acetic acid) for 15 min each. Gel was then rinsed in the oxidizer (1% potassium dichromate, 0.2% HNO3) for 5 min followed by 3 washes of de-ionized water until all the yellow color disappeared from the gel. Following this, gel was treated with 2% AgNO3 for 20 min and then washed with de-ionized water again until the brown precipitate was removed. Finally, gel was rinsed in developer (3% Na2CO3, 0.05% formaldehyde) for about 5 min or until the bands appeared. The action of developer was stopped by treating the gel in a stop solution (5% acetic acid) for 5 min.

Primers, TaqMan Probes, and Conditions for Real Time PCR

For real time PCR, “Assay on Demand” specific for SRY gene (ID: Hs00243216_s1, nucleotide location 453) and an endogenous control, RNaseP gene (single copy per haploid genome; Catalog number: 4316831), having FAM/TAMRA and FAM/MGB probes, respectively (Applied Biosystems, USA), were used. The TaqMan assay for DAZ genes was based on a 100 bp fragment of the sY587 sequence. Similarly, TaqMan assays were designed for other candidate genes by selecting a unique fragment for each one of them. Primers and FAM/NFQ probes were designed by “Primer Express Software (v 2.0)” and procured commercially from the “Assay on Demand” service of Applied Biosystems (ABI, USA). TaqMan universal PCR Master Mix (P/N: 4304437), standard male genomic DNA (P/N: 4312660), and a kit (P/N: 4316831) having FAM/MGB probe for RNaseP gene and CEPH family female genomic DNA were purchased from ABI, USA. Using male genomic DNA and primer for RNaseP gene, TaqMan assays were conducted. All the reactions were run in triplicate on the real time PCR (Sequence Detection System, 7000, ABI, USA). The efficiency and specificity of each TaqMan Assay were established using 10-fold dilution series of the standard male genomic DNA. Female genomic DNA was used as a negative control. Temperature profile for PCR reaction included 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of 95°C for 0:15 min and 60°C for 1 min (referred to as universal PCR conditions by ABI, USA). Approximately 10–15 ng of genomic DNA per reaction, per individual from blood and semen samples were used. Copies of the genes were calculated by comparative Ct method in an absolute quantitation assay following standard protocol [19]. All the samples were used in triplicate and reactions were repeated at least three times to ensure error free consistent ΔCt values. The haploid status of Y-linked genes in comparison to autosomal RNaseP in case of DNA from blood was taken into consideration for copy number calculation. The details of the genes, respective TaqMan assays, and target sites of the TaqMan probes are given in Table 1.

Copy Number Estimation of the Y-Linked Genes and Expression of the SRY gene

Copies of the genes were calculated using the formula: Copy Number = (1+E)−ΔCt, where E is the efficiency of the PCR and ΔCt = difference in threshold cycle value between the test sample and endogenous control. If the efficiency is maximum (one), the copy number of test gene is  = 2−ΔCt. The relative level of SRY transcripts in blood was calculated by the ΔΔCt method following standard protocol (ABI). In this case, Ct values were normalized twice, first with the RNaseP gene as an endogenous control and second with the sample showing highest Ct value (lowest expression) using SRY gene as calibrator sample. All the reactions were conducted on Sequence Detection System-7000 as mentioned above (ABI, USA).

Copy Number Calculation of DYZ1 Repeat

Copy number of DYZ1 was calculated based on absolute quantitation assay using SYBR green dye and Sequence Detection System-7000 (ABI, USA). A set of primers specific to DYZ1 (DYZ1F- 5′ TGGAATGGAATCGAATGGAATGGAA 3′ and DYZ1R- 5′ TGCCAAATCATTGCATTCCTTTCC 3′) was designed using Primer Express Software V2.0 (ABI). The efficiency of the primers was assessed using a 10-fold dilution series of the recombinant plasmid and standard male genomic DNA. All the PCRs were repeated thrice in triplicate. Copies of the DYZ1 arrays were calculated by extrapolation of the standard curve obtained with known copies of the recombinant plasmid.

Southern Hybridization

Microdeletions present in AZF regions were confirmed by Southern hybridization using 200 ng of genomic DNA and [32Pα-dCTP] labeled PCR product as probe. Deletion of DBY gene was confirmed following similar protocol of Southern hybridization using 50 µg genomic DNA.

Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH)

Approximately 400 µl of whole blood was cultured for chromosome preparation following standard protocols [19]. LSI SRY (Cat 32-191007) and WCP Y Spectrum green (Cat 32-122024) DNA FISH probes for SRY/CEP X and Y chromosome, respectively, were purchased from VYSIS (Illinois, USA). Cosmid probes 18E8, 63C9 and 46A6 were purchased from the Gene service, UK (www.geneservice.co.uk/home). BAC clones were purchased from the Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute (CHORI), and FISH was conducted following standard protocol [19], [22]. Biotynilated anti-fluorescein and anti-Texas red antibodies coupled with fluorescein and Texas red avidin DCS (Vector Labs) were used in dual probe FISH experiments. Details of all the FISH probes are given in Table S4.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

STSs amplifying additional bands. The ‘M’ is the molecular marker, ‘RE’ is radiation exposed, ‘N’ is normal unexposed males and, ‘F’ and ‘B’ denote father and son, respectively whereas the numbers state the respective families. Note the additional bands in case of sY1201, and sY1206 where the normal unexposed males showed only a single expected band. Similarly, in case of sY84 and sY86, multiple bands were observed in the exposed males whereas the unexposed ones (not shown here) showed only a single expected band. The additional bands were detected in several other STSs mentioned in the text.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s001

(0.40 MB PDF)

Figure S2.

Validation of Real Time PCR primers and TaqMan Probes for the DAZ genes. The assay was designed on the 100 bp fragment of sY587. (A) Real Time PCR plot for primers checked with SYBR green dye and 10 fold dilution series of human genomic DNA and recombinant plasmid for sY587. Note the Ct difference of ∼3.3 among different dilutions suggesting maximum efficiency of the reaction. (B) Standard curve obtained on the basis of the 10 fold dilution series. Note the slope and R2 values, both of which highlight the maximum efficiency of the primers. (C) Copy number calculation of the DAZ gene in normal males (ΔCt = −1) corresponding to 4 copies. (D) Copy number calculation of the DAZ gene in sperm (haploid DNA) of normal males. Note the ΔCt = −2 corresponding to four copies (see text for details). The X-Axis is cycle number and the Y, measure of Fluorescence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s002

(0.42 MB PDF)

Figure S3.

Real time plots for the copy number calculation of the SRY gene in the males exposed to NBR. (A) Representative plot for duplication of the SRY leading to 2 copies instead of 1 (ΔCt = 0). (B) Representative plot for two rounds of duplication of the SRY leading to 4 copies (ΔCt = −1). (C) Representative plot for three rounds of duplication of the SRY leading to 8 copies (ΔCt = −2). (D) Representative plot for 4 rounds of duplication of the SRY leading to 16 copies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s003

(0.49 MB PDF)

Figure S4.

Real time plots for the copy number calculation of the autosomal CDYL and Y linked HSFY genes in males exposed to NBR. The color coding for the lines in the plots are given above where red is for internal control RNaseP, brown, CDYL and blue for HSFY. (A) Representative plot for single copy HSFY and two copies of the CDYL genes. (B) Representative plot for duplication of the HSFY leading to 2 copies (ΔCt = 0) whereas the CDYL remains 2 copies. (C) Representative plot for the duplication of CDYL whereas the HSFY remains unaffected.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s004

(0.40 MB PDF)

Figure S5.

Real time plots for the copy number calculation of the autosomal CDYL and Y linked CDY1 genes in males exposed to NBR. Note the Ct difference among RNAseP, CDYL and CDY in different plots. The copy number of each gene corresponding to Ct values is given on the plot. The color coding for the lines in the plots are given on top.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s005

(0.52 MB PDF)

Figure S6.

SRY amino acid sequence polymorphisms. Amino acids constituting the HMG box are in green. The changes are highlighted in red with yellow background. For the consequent phenotypes of these amino acid changes, see Harley et al., 2005 [15].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s006

(1.07 MB PDF)

Figure S7.

The CDY1 gene in NBR exposed males. (A) PCR amplification of full length CDY1 (2800 bp) gene from the NBR exposed males. (B) Restriction analysis of the CDY1 recombinant, pGEMT-easy plasmid with Ecor1 showing the insert fall of 2800 bp. (C) ClustalW alignment of two CDY1 nucleotide sequences from a male 6F. The two types of sequences were concluded on the basis of ∼20 recombinant plasmids sequenced. Note the nucleotide differences between two sequences from 6F.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s007

(0.04 MB PDF)

Figure S8.

Amino Acid changes in the CDY protein in few NBR exposed males. Note that some of the amino acid changes are consistent in all the NBR exposed males. Since most of the nucleotide changes were dual, all the amino acid changes detected by the ORF finder of NCBI were observed as “X”. All the amino acid changes are highlighted in red with a yellow background.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s008

(0.02 MB PDF)

Table S1.

Semen Analysis in the males exposed to NBR. LF: Liquefaction, CL: Color, VL: Volume, VY: Viscosity, DT: Dropping Test, TC: Total Count, AM: Actively Motile, SM: Sluggish Motile, NM: Non Motile. SAA: Same as Above. In all the representative cases, the liquefaction took place before 30 seconds. The motility has been assessed with in 30 min and 60 min of the sample collection. Note the highly variable sperm count in NBR males.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s009

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S2.

Semen Analysis in the males exposed to NBR. The numbers given under each heading represents the percent sperm with that particular phenotype. Per HPF (/HPF) is per “high power field”

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s010

(0.02 MB PDF)

Table S3.

SNV/SFV typing in males exposed to NBR. List of all the SNVs and STSs used to assess the intactness of the DAZ genes and AZFc region in males exposed to natural background radiations in addition to the routine STSs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s011

(0.03 MB PDF)

Table S4.

Details of the BAC and Cosmid clones used as probes for FISH and PCR primers used for the authentication of the clones.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004541.s012

(0.02 MB PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Sangeeta Thatai and Shri Khem Singh Negi for technical assistance. The equipment donation from the Alexander Von Humboldt Foundation, Bonn, Germany is gratefully acknowledged.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SP SA. Performed the experiments: SP JS. Analyzed the data: SP JS SA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SPC. Wrote the paper: SP JS SA.

References

  1. 1. Sankaranarayanan K (1999) Ionizing radiations and genetic risks X. The potential “disease phenotypes” of radiation-induced genetic damage in humans: perspectives from human molecular biology and radiation genetics. Mutation Research 429: 45–83.
  2. 2. (1993) UNSCEAR United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiations, The 1993 Report to the General Assembly WITH Scientific Annexes, United Nations, New York 1993.
  3. 3. Dubrova YE, Bersimbaev RI, Djansugurova LB, Tankimanova MK, Mamyrbaeva ZZ, et al. (2002) Nuclear weapons tests and human germline mutation rate. Science 295: 1037.
  4. 4. Hande MP, Azizova TV, Geard CR, Burak LE, Mitchell CR, et al. (2003) Past exposure to densely ionizing radiation leaves a unique permanent signature in the genome. Am J Hum Genet 72: 1162–1170.
  5. 5. Kuzin AM, Slozhenikina LV, Fialkovaskaia LA, Primak-Miroliubov VN (1983) possible effect of natural background radiation on the development of mammals. Radiobiologiia 23: 192–195.
  6. 6. Sundaram K (1977) Down's syndrome in Kerala. Nature 267: 728–729.
  7. 7. Cheriyan VD, Kurien CJ, Das B, Ramachandran EN, Karuppasamy CV, et al. (1999) Genetic monitoring of the human population from high-level natural radiation areas of Kerala on the southwest coast of India. II. Incidence of numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations in the lymphocytes of newborns. Radiat Res 152: 154–158.
  8. 8. Jaikrishan G, Andrews VJ, Thampi MV, Koya PK, Rajan VK, et al. (1999) Genetic monitoring of the human population from high-level natural radiation areas of Kerala on the southwest coast of India. I. Prevalence of congenital malformations in newborns. Radiat Res 152: 149–153.
  9. 9. Skaletsky H, Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Hillier L, et al. (2003) The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome: a mosaic of discrete sequence classes. Nature 423: 825–837.
  10. 10. Tiepolo L, Zuffardi O (1976) Localization of factors controlling spermatogenesis in the non-fluorescent portion of the human Y chromosome long arm. Hum Genet 34: 119–124.
  11. 11. Foresta C, Moro E, Ferlin A (2001) Y chromosome microdeletions and alterations of spermatogenesis. Endocrine Reviews 22: 226–239.
  12. 12. Fernandes S, Huellen K, Goncalves J, Dukal H, Zeisler J, et al. (2002) High frequency of DAZ1/DAZ2 gene deletions in patients with severe oligospermia. Mol Hum Reprod 8: 286–298.
  13. 13. Fernandes S, Parachchini S, Meyer LH, Florida G, Tyler-Smith C, et al. (2004) A large AZFc deletion removes DAZ3/DAZ4 and nearby genes from men in Y haplogroup N. Am J Hum Genet 74: 180–187.
  14. 14. Repping S, van Daalen SKM, Lange J, Silber S, van der Veen F, et al. (2002) Recombination between palindromes P5 and P1 on the human Y chromosome cause massive deletions and spermatogenic failure. Am J Hum Genet 71: 906–922.
  15. 15. Harley VR, Clarkson MJ, Argentaro A (2005) The molecular action and regulation of the testis determining factors SRY (Sex determining region on the Y chromosome) and SOX9 [SRY-related high-mobility group (HMG) box 9. Endocrin Rev 24: 466–487.
  16. 16. Dubrova E, Grant G, Chumak A, Stezhka VA, Karakasian AN (2002) Elevated minisatellite mutation rate in the post Chernobyl families from Ukraine. Am J Hum Genet 71: 801–809.
  17. 17. Forster L, Forster P, Lutz-Bonengel S, Willkomm H, Brinkmann B (2002) Natural radioactivity and human mitochondrial DNA mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 13950–13954.
  18. 18. Premi S, Srivastava J, Sebastian PC, Ali S (2007) AZFc Somatic microdeletions and copy number polymorphism of the DAZ genes in human males exposed to natural background radiations. Hum Genet 121(3): 337–346.
  19. 19. Premi S, Srivastava J, Sebastian PC, Ahmad J, Ali S (2006) Tandem Duplication and Copy Number Polymorphism of the SRY Gene in Patients with Sex Chromosome Anomalies and Males Exposed to Natural Background Radiation. Mol Hum Reprod 12(2): 113–121.
  20. 20. Lundrigen BL, Tucker PK (1997) Evidence for multiple functional copies of the male sex-determining locus, SRY, in African murine rodents. J Mol Evol 45(1): 60–65.
  21. 21. Bullejos M, Sanchez A, Burgos M, Jimenez R, Guardia RD (1999) Multiple mono- and polymorphic Y-linked copies of the SRY HMG-box in microtidae. Cytogenet Cell Genet 86: 46–50.
  22. 22. Saxena R, De Vries JWA, Repping S, Algappan R, Skaletsky H (2000) Four DAZ genes in two clusters found in AZFc region of the human Y chromosome. Genomics 67: 256–267.
  23. 23. Sun C, Skaletsky H, Rozen S, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E, et al. (2000) Oates R and Page DC: Deletion of the azoospermia factor a (AZFa) region of human Y chromosome caused by recombination between HERV15 proviruses. Hum Mol Genet 9: 2291–2296.
  24. 24. Jobling MA, Chi CI, Turner DJ, Bowden GR, Lee AC, et al. (2007) Structural variation on the short arm of the human Y chromosome: recurrent multigene deletions encompassing Amelogenin Y. Hum Mol Genet 16: 307–16.
  25. 25. O'Neill P, Fielden EM (2007) Primary free radical processes in DNA. Adv Radiat Biol 17: 53–120.
  26. 26. Nakajima M, Takenchi T, Takeshita T, Morimoto K (1996) 8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine in human leukocyte DNA and daily health practice factors: effects of individual alcohol sensitivity. Environ Health Perspect 104: 1336–1338.
  27. 27. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W (1995) DNA Rep. Mutagen. Washington DC: ASM Press.
  28. 28. Prise KM, Pinto M, Newman HC, Michael BD (2001) A review of studies of ionizing radiation-induced double stranded break clustering. Radiat Res 156: 572–576.
  29. 29. Loucas BD, Eberle RL, Durante M, Cornforth MN (2004) Complex chromatid-isochromatid exchanges following irradiation with heavy ions? Cytogenet Genome Res 104: 206–210.
  30. 30. Foresta C, Ferlin A, Moro E (2000) Deletion and expression analysis of AZFa genes on the human Y chromosome revealed a major role for DBY in male infertility. Hum Mol Genet 9(8): 1161–1169.
  31. 31. Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN, Listewnik ML, Donahoe PK, et al. (2004) Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet 36: 949–951.
  32. 32. Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Troge J, Alexander J, Young J, et al. (2004) Large-Scale Copy Number Polymorphism in the Human Genome. Science 305(5683): 525–528.
  33. 33. Buckley PG, Mantripragada KK, Piotrowski A, Stahl TD, Dumanski JP (2005) Copy-number polymorphisms: mining the tip of an iceberg. Trends Genet 21(6): 315–317.
  34. 34. Nadeau JH, Lee C (2006) Genetics: Copies count. Nature 439: 798–799.
  35. 35. Sharp AJ, Locke DP, McGrath SD, Cheng Z, Bailey AJ, et al. (2005) Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 77: 78–88.
  36. 36. Xionglei H, Zhang J (2005) Gene complexity and gene duplicability. Curr Biol 15(11): 1016–1021.
  37. 37. Murthy KS, Magliocco MA, Dmetrick JD (2005) Copy number analysis of c-erb-B2 (HER-2/neu) and topoisomerase II alpha genes in breast carcinoma by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction using hybridization probes and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129(1): 39–46.
  38. 38. Ottolenghi C, Veitia R, Quintana-Murci L, Torchard D, Scapoli L, et al. (2000) The region on 9p associated with 46, XY sex reversal contains several transcripts expressed in the urogenital system and a novel doublesex-related domain. Genomics 64: 170–178.
  39. 39. Hoof VA (2005) Conserved functions of yeast genes support the duplication, degeneration and complementation model for gene duplication. Genetics 171: 1455–1461.
  40. 40. Kopleman MN, Lancet D, Yanai I (2005) Alternative splicing and gene duplication are inversely correlated evolutionary mechanisms. Nat Genet 37(6): 588–589.
  41. 41. Moran JV, Holmes SE, Naas TP, de Berardinis RJ, Boeke JD, et al. (1996) High frequency retrotransposition in cultured mammalian cells. Cell 29: 917–927.