Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Modulation of Brain β-Endorphin Concentration by the Specific Part of the Y Chromosome in Mice

  • Michel Botbol ,

    s.tordjman@yahoo.fr

    Affiliation INSERM U 669, Troubles des Conduites Alimentaires à l'Adolescence, Paris, France

    ⨯
  • Pierre L. Roubertoux,

    Affiliation Aix Marseille Université, INSERM U 910, Génétique Médicale Génomique Fonctionnelle, Marseille, France

    ⨯
  • Michèle Carlier,

    Affiliation Aix Marseille Université and Institut Universitaire de France, Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS UMR 6146, Marseille, France

    ⨯
  • Séverine Trabado,

    Affiliation INSERM U 693, Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud, Kremlin-Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, CHU Bicêtre, Service de Génétique Moléculaire, Pharmacogénétique et Hormonologie, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

    ⨯
  • Sylvie Brailly-Tabard,

    Affiliation INSERM U 693, Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud, Kremlin-Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, CHU Bicêtre, Service de Génétique Moléculaire, Pharmacogénétique et Hormonologie, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

    ⨯
  • Fernando Perez-Diaz,

    Affiliation Centre Emotion, UFR 3 Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent 246 CNRS, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France

    ⨯
  • Olivier Bonnot,

    Affiliation Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France

    ⨯
  • Guillaume Bronsard,

    Affiliation Laboratoire de Santé Publique (EA3279), Ecole de Médecine de LaTimone, Marseille, France

    ⨯
  • Sylvie Tordjman

    Affiliations Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent de Rennes, CHGR et Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France, Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France, CNRS UMR 8158, Paris, France

    ⨯

Abstract

Background

Several studies in animal models suggest a possible effect of the specific part of the Y-chromosome (YNPAR) on brain opioid, and more specifically on brain β-endorphin (BE). In humans, male prevalence is found in autistic disorder in which observation of abnormal peripheral or central BE levels are also reported. This suggests gender differences in BE associated with genetic factors and more precisely with YNPAR.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Brain BE levels and plasma testosterone concentrations were measured in two highly inbred strains of mice, NZB/BlNJ (N) and CBA/HGnc (H), and their consomic strains for the YNPAR. An indirect effect of the YNPAR on brain BE level via plasma testosterone was also tested by studying the correlation between brain BE concentration and plasma testosterone concentration in eleven highly inbred strains. There was a significant and major effect (P<0.0001) of the YNPAR in interaction with the genetic background on brain BE levels. Effect size calculated using Cohen's procedure was large (56% of the total variance). The variations of BE levels were not correlated with plasma testosterone which was also dependent of the YNPAR.

Conclusions/Significance

The contribution of YNPAR on brain BE concentration in interaction with the genetic background is the first demonstration of Y-chromosome mediated control of brain opioid. Given that none of the genes encompassed by the YNPAR encodes for BE or its precursor, our results suggest a contribution of the sex-determining region (Sry, carried by YNPAR) to brain BE concentration. Indeed, the transcription of the Melanocortin 2 receptor gene (Mc2R gene, identified as the proopiomelanocortin receptor gene) depends on the presence of Sry and BE is derived directly from proopiomelanocortin. The results shed light on the sex dependent differences in brain functioning and the role of Sry in the BE system might be related to the higher frequency of autistic disorder in males.

Citation: Botbol M, Roubertoux PL, Carlier M, Trabado S, Brailly-Tabard S, Perez-Diaz F, et al. (2011) Modulation of Brain β-Endorphin Concentration by the Specific Part of the Y Chromosome in Mice. PLoS ONE 6(3): e16704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016704

Editor: Georges Chapouthier, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France

Received: December 13, 2010; Accepted: January 11, 2011; Published: March 8, 2011

Copyright: © 2011 Botbol et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work is funded by INSERM U910. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The Y chromosome includes the YNPAR and the YPAR. The YNPAR is called non-pairing or specific region and is transmitted from father to sons exclusively. The YPAR recombines with the X chromosome at the male meiosis and is called pairing or pseudoautosomal region for this reason. Few functional genes are mapped on YNPAR (histocompatibility Y antigen, RNA binding motif protein, and several other genes contributing to male reproduction such as Sry and genes necessary for the spermatozoon development and maintenance). Several lines of evidence suggest a possible effect of YNPAR on brain opioid, and more specifically on brain β-endorphin (BE). Neonatal injection of testosterone decreases brain BE concentration and the number of μ receptors in the hypothalamus (μ receptors are receptors of BE) [1], [2]. In addition, neonatal injection or exposure to testosterone contributes to the “male pattern” of the ontogenesis of μ receptors in the hypothalamus and to the development of BE innervations in the brain [2]–[6]. Inversely, intracerebro-ventriculaire injection of BE decreases plasma Luteinizing Hormone concentration and consequently plasma testosterone concentration; this effect involves the μ receptors and is blocked by the preliminary administration of Naloxone (an antagonist of the μ receptors) [7]–[10]. Given these previous observations and because YNPAR is involved in plasma testosterone concentration and testicular reactivity to testosterone [11], [12], the YNPAR is expected to be associated with brain BE.

This hypothesis of an effect of the YNPAR on brain BE is also supported by studies in mice models and in humans showing an inhibitory influence of central opioids acting through the μ receptors (such as BE) on aggressive behavior [13]–[20], and an effect of the murine YNPAR on aggression [21]–[25]. In addition, Laarakker et al.'s study [26] reporting a contribution of the YNPAR to anxiety-related behavior in mice, strengthens the hypothesis of an effect of the YNPAR or brain BE, given that BE is considered as a stress hormone [27]–[29].

Finally, in humans, and more precisely in autistic disorder, two other arguments support our hypothesis: on one hand, the fourfold higher prevalence of autism in male compared to female [30] (autism is a pervasive developmental disorder for which family and twin studies suggest a genetic contribution [31]–[33]) could indicate a contribution of the YNPAR; on the other hand, several studies have reported abnormal central as well as peripheral BE levels in individuals with autism [34].

The present study was designed first to test directly the effect of YNPAR on brain BE levels in two highly inbred strains of mice, NZB/BlNJ (N) and CBA/HGnc (H), and their consomic strains for the YNPAR. Second, an indirect effect of the YNPAR on brain BE level via plasma testosterone was tested by studying the genetic correlation between brain BE concentration and plasma testosterone concentration in eleven highly inbred strains of mice.

Methods

Mice and rearing conditions

Brain β-endorphin and plasma testosterone were measured in a set of inbred strains of mice and in a quartet of parental and their consomic strains for the YNPAR. The set of inbred strains consisted in 11 inbred mouse strains A/J, XLII, BA, BALB/cBy, C57BL/10Bg, C57BL/6Jby, CPB-K, DBA/1Bg, DBA/2j, CBA/HGnc and NZB/BlNJ. The strains were maintained in the laboratory for six or more generations of brother-sister mating regimen. The quartet of parental and their consomic strains for the YNPAR was developed as follows: we selected two strains of laboratory mice NZB/BlNJ (N) and CBA/HGnc (H) that were known for the different origin of their respective Y chromosomes. Furthermore, N and H were selected because the N males, who present the highest scores for aggression and the highest plasma testosterone concentration compared to the H males [1], [3], [7]–[10], [13]–[20], were expected to have also lower brain BE levels as suggested by previous reports described in the introduction [13], [35]. The production of the consomics for the YNPAR has been previously described [12], [36]. The HNF1 males carried the N-YNPAR of the N donor strain because the YNPAR is paternally transmitted. The males were sired with an H female. The progeny carried the N-YNPAR but 50% of the N genes were lost and replaced by H genes at each generation. The N-YNPAR was substituted to the H-YNPAR after several generations of repeated backcrosses. The H strain and its consomic H.N-YNPAR differed only by the origin of N-Y NPAR that is H-YNPAR in the parental and N-YNPAR in the consomics. A similar strategy was developed to develop the consomic N.H- YNPAR, with the N strain as recipient and H as donor strain for the YNPAR. The males came from the 25 and 26th backcross generations when they were used for the present experiments. The probability to have one allele from the autosomes, X chromosome and YPAR from the donor strain in the consomic is below 5×10−8 under these conditions. In addition, with homozygous autosomal alleles no genomic imprinting could contribute to the difference between a parental and its congenic strain. The isogenicity between each parental and its consomic strain was confirmed by the acceptance of reciprocal skin grafts and identity of mandible shape measurements [37], [38] because both are controlled by a large number of loci spread on the genome [39]. This isogenicity between each parental and the respective consomic strain was also tested by comparing 123 Mit polymorphisms (unpublished). Moreover, each parental strain and its consomic had identical genetic information for the Sts locus mapped on the YPAR [36].

Four to six littermates were housed with their mother in a 42×11×18 cm plastic cage and a bedding of dust-free sawdust with food and water ad libitum, temperature 24.0±0.5°C and lights on at 08:00 AM. Weaning took place at 28±2 days of age. Males were then placed with the same age female (usually a littermate) and were killed at 66±4 days by cervical dislocation. Cervical dislocation was selected as being the more rapid technique for euthanasia. The whole brains (after removing olfactory bulbs and cerebellum) were saved for biochemical analyses and stored at −80°C. The blood was collected by intra-cardiac puncture in 10 µl of heparin and the plasma was kept at −25°C. The experimental protocol with the mice was conducted according to the European guidelines and was approved by the National Committee of the Scientific Research (CNRS).

Biochemical analyses

Brain tissues were homogenized in 5 volumes of 0.1 M HCl and heated for 15 min at 95°C. After centrifugation (38,000×g, 10 min, 4°C), the supernatant was adjusted to pH 7.0 with 1 M Tris base, and the resulting precipitate was spun down at 6,000×g for 10 min at 4°C. Protein concentrations were determined in the pellets by the method of Lowry et al. [40] with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Brain BE levels are expressed in picomoles per gram of fresh tissue.

The plasma testosterone was assayed according to RIA in coated tubes using a specific testosterone antibody exhibiting a reduced cross-reaction (7.5%) with other androgen steroids (125 I-TESTOSTERONE COATRIA, kit Biomérieux). The competitive inhibition reaction was measured between a fixed amount of 125 I-labelled testosterone and the testosterone to be determined (standards or samples) for a fixed number of binding sites on the anti-testosterone antibody. Coated tubes, containing plasma and 125 I-testosterone tracer, were incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The 125 I-testosterone bound was separated from that remaining in solution. The bound radioactivity counted for 1 min was then inversely proportional to the testosterone quantity in standards or samples. Each individual sample was assayed in duplicate and the sample again assayed when the difference between the two results was over 20%.

Statistical analyses

The effect of the YNPAR on brain BE level and plasma testosterone concentration was studied using a two-way ANOVA, with genetic background -H versus N- and origin of the YNPAR -H versus N- as main factors. Effect size was calculated using the θ2 statistic and expressed as a percentage of variance [41]. Comparisons between the 11 inbred mouse strains for BE or testosterone variables were performed using ANOVA. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test indicated that BE and testosterone levels were not normally distributed; thus all ANOVAs were performed using log-transformed BE and testosterone values. Correlations between brain BE levels and plasma testosterone concentrations in the 11 inbred mouse strains (each strain is represented by the mean of five animals for biological variables) were determined by Spearman rank-order correlation analyses. According to Hegmann and Possidente [42], these correlations between biological measures can be considered as an estimation of genetic correlations. The significance level was set at 0.05; however, the usual level of 0.05 is very conservative when the correlations are computed on mean scores and not on individual scores.

Results

Effect of the YNPAR on brain β-endorphin levels

Brain BE levels were significantly modified by the non-YNPAR genotype and the YNPAR in interaction with non- YNPAR genotype (F(1,17) = 4.80, P<0.04, θ2 = 0.10 and F(1,17) = 27.18, P<0.0001, θ2 = 0.56, respectively). The YNPAR alone did not contribute significantly to BE concentration (F(1,17)<1). Partial comparisons indicated that BE levels were significantly higher in the H strain than in the N strain (t (1.47) = 2.43, P<0.05). The substitution of the YNPAR from H by the YNPAR from N, in the H strain, reduced significantly the brain BE concentration, and the substitution of the YNPAR from N by the YNPAR from H, in the N strain, reduced the brain BE level to the lowest concentration.(see Figure 1).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Brain BE concentration (mean ±SEM) in NZB and CBA/H and their consomic strains for YNPAR.

The N.H-YNPAR differs only from the NZB by the YNPAR from CBA/H, and the H.N- YNPAR differs only from the CBA/H by the YNPAR from NZB. Partial comparisons with Student's t test showed that the parental NZB and CBA/H strains differed significantly (P<0.05), and each parental strain differed significantly from its consomic strain (CBA/H vs.H.N-YNPAR: P<0.001; NZB vs. N.H-YNPAR: P<0.01); n = 5 animals for each strain, except for NZB (n = 6); SEM = standard error of the mean.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016704.g001

Effect of the YNPAR on plasma testosterone concentration

The non-YNPAR genotype, the YNPAR region and their interactions modulated significantly plasma testosterone concentration (F (1,17) = 48.42, P<0.0001, θ2 = 18.20; F(1,17) = 109.15, P<0.0001, θ2 = 0.41 and F(1,17) = 72.63, P<.0001, θ2 = 27.28, respectively). Partial comparisons indicated that testosterone concentration were significantly higher in the N strain than in the H strain (t (5.99) = 11.97, P<0.0001). The substitution of the YNPAR from N by the YNPAR from H, in the N strain, reduce significantly the testosterone concentration (t (5.99) = 13.37, P<0.001), whereas the opposite replacement of the YNPAR from H by the YNPAR from N, in the H strain, did not modify the testosterone concentration (see Figure 2).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Plasma testosterone concentration (mean ±SEM) in NZB and CBA/H and their consomic strains for YNPAR.

The N.H-YNPAR differs only from the NZB by the YNPAR from CBA/H, and the H.N-YNPAR differs only from the CBA/H by the YNPAR from NZB. Partial comparisons with Student's t test showed that the parental NZB and CBA/H strains differed significantly (P<0.0001), and the parental NZB strain differed significantly from its consomic strain (NZB vs. N.H-YNPAR: P<0.001); n = 10 animals for each strain; SEM = standard error of the mean.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016704.g002

Correlation between β-endorphin and testosterone

The data of brain BE levels and plasma testosterone concentrations (mean ± SEM) in the 11 inbred strains are presented in Table 1. The 11 inbred mouse strains did not differ significantly for BE or testosterone concentrations. In addition, there was no correlation between brain BE levels and plasma testosterone concentration when the analysis was conducted on the eleven different inbred strains including the same N and H males contributing to the present study (ρ spearman = 0.09, P>0.1).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Brain β-Endorphin and plasma Testosterone concentrations (Mean ± SEM) in 11 inbred mouse strains (n = 5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016704.t001

Discussion

Our main data indicated a significant and major effect of the YNPAR in interaction with the genetic background on brain BE levels. The controls to ensure the isogenicity of the background in each parental strain and its consomic strain rule out a possible contribution of residual autosomal alleles from the donor strain to this effect of the YNPAR in interaction with the genetic background. None of the annotations of the genes carried by the YNPAR allows us to consider that one of them contributes directly in the BE production [43].

An indirect effect of the YNPAR in interaction with the genetic background on brain BE levels via plasma testosterone is not supported by our findings. Indeed, there was no correlation in this study between brain BE levels and plasma testosterone concentrations, although this research is limited by the absence of variability of BE or testosterone concentration between the 11 inbred strains. In addition, our results on plasma testosterone measured in the parental N and H and their consomic strains confirm our previous study [12] and indicate that the strain distribution pattern differs for brain BE levels and plasma testosterone concentrations; the YNPAR from N, which depleted BE on the H background, had no effect on testosterone. Thus, the strong decremental effect on brain BE levels resulting from the transfer of the YNPAR from N on H, cannot be explained by variations of plasma testosterone concentrations. Furthermore, the statistical effects of the YNPAR substitution are not the same in BE and testosterone: first, the YNPAR modulates BE concentration via an interactive effect with the genetic background and with no significant effect of YNPAR alone, whereas testosterone concentration is modulated by the YNPAR substitution alone and by an interaction between the YNPAR and the genetic background. Finally, effect size of the non-YNPAR genotype, the Y NPAR and their interactions differ for BE and testosterone.

The indirect effect of the YNPAR in interaction with the genetic background on brain BE levels might be explained by a contribution of the sex-determining region of the Y chromosome (Sry) carried by YNPAR [44]–[47]. Thus, the transcription of the Melanocortin receptor (Mc2R) gene depends on the presence of Sry [45], [48]. Mc2R gene, located on chromosome 18, has been identified as the gene of the receptor of proopiomelanocortin. Proopiomelanocortin plays an important role in the BE system given that BE is directly derived from proopiomelanocortin. The YNPAR has different origins in inbred strains of mice. The N and H strains are from Asian and European origins, respectively. An analysis of the YNPAR patterns of restriction reveals that the N and H strains belong to different groups [49] suggesting Sry polymorphisms. We hypothesized that Sry polymorphisms between YNPAR from N and YNPAR from H, modify the transcription of several genes including Mc2R, resulting in the modification of BE brain concentration.

The effect of the YNPAR on brain BE concentration in interaction with the genetic background reported in the present study is the first demonstration of Y-chromosome mediated control of brain opioid. The results open new perspectives to better understand sex differences observed in some disorders such as autistic disorder, where abnormal central BE levels have been reported. Finally, the findings could have important implications for research on the genetic control of BE metabolic pathways.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: S. Tordjman PR MC. Performed the experiments: S. Tordjman PR MC S. Trabado SB-T OB GB. Analyzed the data: FP-D MC MB. Wrote the paper: MB S. Tordjman PR.

References

  1. 1. Diez-Guerra FJ, Bicknell RJ, Mansfield S, Emson PC, Dyer RG (1987) Effect of neonatal testosterone upon opioid receptors and the content of beta-endorphin, neuropeptide Y and neurotensin in the medial preoptic and the mediobasal hypothalamic areas of the rat brain. Brain Res 424: 225–230.
  2. 2. Martini L, Dondi D, Limonta P, Maggi R, Piva F (1989) Modulation by sex steroids of brain opioid receptors: implications for the control of gonadotropins and prolactin secretion. J Steroid Biochem 33: 673–681.
  3. 3. Barraclough CA (1966) Modifications in the CNS regulation of reproduction after exposure of prepubertal rats to steroid hormones. Recent Prog Horm Res 22: 503–539.
  4. 4. MacLusky NJ, Naftolin F (1981) Sexual differentiation of the central nervous system. Science 211: 1294–1302.
  5. 5. Hammer RP Jr (1984) The sexually dimorphic region of the preoptic area in rats contains denser opiate receptor binding sites in females. Brain Res 308: 172–176.
  6. 6. Hammer RP Jr (1985) The sex hormone-dependent development of opiate receptors in the rat medial preoptic area. Brain Res 360: 65–74.
  7. 7. Taya K, Sasamoto S (1989) Inhibitory effects of corticotrophin-releasing factor and beta-endorphin on LH and FSH secretion in the lactating rat. J Endocrinol 120: 509–515.
  8. 8. Horton RJ, Francis H, Clarke IJ (1989) : Seasonal and steroid dependent effects on the modulation of LH secretion in the ewe by intracerebroventriculary administered beta-endorphin or naloxone. J Endocrinol 122: 503–517.
  9. 9. Meites J, Bruni JF, Van Vugt DA, Smith AF (1979) Relation of endogenous opioid peptides and morphine to neuroendocrine functions. Life Sci 24: 1325–1336.
  10. 10. Pfeiffer DG, Pfeiffer A, Shimohigashi Y, Merriam GR, Loriaux DL (1983) Predominant involvement of mu-rather than delta- or kappa-opiate receptors in LH secretion. Peptides 4: 647–679.
  11. 11. Le Roy I, Tordjman S, Migliore-Samour D, Degrelle H, Roubertoux PL (2001) Genetic Architecture of testis and seminal vesicle weights in mice. Genetics 158: 1–5.
  12. 12. Tordjman S, Roubertoux PL, Carlier M, Moutier R, Anderson G, et al. (1995) Linkage between brain serotonin concentration and the sex-specific part of the Y-chromosome in mice. Neurosci Lett 183: 190–192.
  13. 13. Tordjman S, Carlier M, Cohen D, Cesselin F, Bourgouin S, et al. (2003) The role of Endorphins, Enkephalins and Dynorphins in aggression. Behav Genet 33: 529–536.
  14. 14. Ibarra P, Bruehl SP, McCubbin JA, Carlson CR, Wilson JF, et al. (1994) : An unusual reaction to opioid blockade with naltrexone in a case of post-traumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress 7: 303–309.
  15. 15. Haney M, Miczek KA (1989) Morphine effects on maternal aggression, pup care and analgesia in mice. Psychopharmacology 98: 68–74.
  16. 16. Shaikh MB, Dalsass M, Siegel A (1990) Opioidergic mechanisms mediating aggressive behavior in the cat. Aggress Behav 16: 191–206.
  17. 17. Espert R, Navarro JF, Salvador A, Simon VM (1993) Effects of morphine hydrochloride on social encounters between male mice. Aggress Behav 19: 377–383.
  18. 18. Miner LL, Elmer GI, Pieper JO, Marley RJ (1993) Aggression modulates genetic influences on morphine analgesia as assessed using a classical mendelian cross analysis. Psychopharmacology 111: 17–22.
  19. 19. Shaikh MB, Lu CL, Siegel A (1991) An enkephalinergic mechanism involved in amygdaloid suppression of affective defence behavior elicited from the midbrain periaqueductal gray in the cat. Brain Res 559: 109–117.
  20. 20. Weiner S, Shaikh MB, Shaikh AB, Siegel A (1991) Enkephalinergic involvement in periaqueductal gray control of hypothalamically elicited predatory attack in the cat. Physiol Behav 49: 1099–1105.
  21. 21. Maxson SC, Didier-Erickson A, Ogawa S (1989) The Y chromosome, social signals, and offense in mice. Behav Neural Biol 52: 251–259.
  22. 22. Guillot PV, Carlier M, Maxson S, Roubertoux P (1995) Intermale aggression tested in two procedures, using four inbred strains of mice and their reciprocal congenics: Y chromosomal implications. Behav Genet 25: 357–360.
  23. 23. Canastar A, Maxson SC, Bishop CE (2008) Aggressive and mating behaviors in two types of sex reversed mice: XY females and XX males. Arch Sex Behav 37(1): 2–8.
  24. 24. Miczek KA, Maxson SC, Fish EW, Faccidomo S (2001) Aggressive behavioural phenotype in mice. Behav Brain Res 125: 167–181.
  25. 25. Sluyter F, Van Oortmerssen GA, De Ruiter AJ, Koolhaas JM (1996) Aggression in wild house mice: current state of affairs. Behav Genet 26(5): 489–496.
  26. 26. Laarakker MC, Ohl F, Van Lith HA (2008) Chromosomal assignment of quantitative trait loci influencing modified hole board behavior in laboratory mice using consomic strains, with special reference to anxiety-related behavior and mouse chromosome 19. Behav Genet 38(2): 159–184.
  27. 27. Angelogianni P, Gianoulakis C (1989) Ontogeny of the beta-endorphin response to stress in the rat: role of the pituitary and the hypothalamus. Neuroendocrinology 50: 372–381.
  28. 28. Gerra G, Volpi R, Delsignore R, Caccavari R, Gaggiotti MT, et al. (1992) ACTH and β-endorphin responses to physical exercise in adolescent women tested for anxiety and frustration. Psychiatry Res 41: 179–186.
  29. 29. Kjaer A, Knigg U, Bach FW, Warberg J (1992) Histamine-and stress-induced secretion of ACTH and β-endorphin: involvement of corticotropin-releasing hormone and vasopressin. Neuroendocrinology 56: 419–428.
  30. 30. Tordjman S, Gutknecht L, Carlier M, Spitz E, Antoine C, et al. (2001) Role of the serotonin transporter gene in the behavioral expression of autism. Mol Psychiatry 5: 831–836.
  31. 31. Bailey A, Le Couteur A, Gottesman I, Bolton P, Simonoff E, et al. (1995) Autism as a strongly genetic disorder. Evidence of a British twin study. Psychol Med 25: 63–77.
  32. 32. Smalley SL, Asarnow RF, Spence MA (1988) Autism and genetics. A decade of research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45: 953–961.
  33. 33. Steffenburg S, Gillberg C, Hellgren L, Andersson L, Gillberg IC, et al. (1989) A twin study of autism in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 30: 405–416.
  34. 34. Tordjman S, Anderson GM, Botbol M, Brailly-Tabard S, Perez-Diaz F, et al. (2009) Pain reactivity and plasma β-Endorphin in children and adolescents with autistic disorder. Plos One 4(8): eS289, 1–10.
  35. 35. Roubertoux P, Le Roy I, Mortaud S, Perez-Diaz F, Tordjman S (1999) Measuring aggression in the mouse. In: Crusio WE, Gerlai RT, editors. Handbook of molecular-genetic techniques for brain and behavior research (Vol. 13: Techniques in the Behavioral and Neural Science; pp. 696–709). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    • 36. Roubertoux PL, Degrelle H, Maxson SC, Phillips J, Tordjman S, et al. (1994) Alleles of the microsomal steroid sulfatase gene (Sts) in the pseudoautosomal region of the heterosomes of the mouse. CR Acad Sci 317: 523–527.
    • 37. Moutier R, Carlier M (1991) Mandible shape analysis in Y-congenic strains of mice. Lab Anim 25: 303–307.
    • 38. Bayley DW (1985) Genes that affect the shape of the murine mandible. Congenic strain analysis. J Hered 76: 107–114.
    • 39. Yonekawa H, Moriwaki K, Gotoh O, Miyashita N, Migita S, et al. (1982) Origins of laboratory mice deduced from restriction patterns of mitochondrial DNA. Differentiation 22: 222–226.
    • 40. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275.
    • 41. Cohen J (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn). New York: Academic Press.
      • 42. Hegmann JP, Possidente B (1981) Estimating genetic correlations from inbred strains. Behav Genet 11: 103–113.
      • 43. Mouse Genome Database (MGD) at the Mouse Genome Informatics website, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine. World Wide Web (URL: http://www.informatics.jax.org) (September 10, 2009).
        • 44. Bouma GJ, Hart GT, Washbum LL, Recknagel AK, Eicher EM (2004) Using real time RT-PCR analysis to determine multiple gene expression patterns during XX and XY mouse fetal gonad development. Gene Expr Patterns 5: 141–149.
        • 45. Bouma GJ, Affourtit JP, Bult CJ, Eicher EM (2007) Transcriptional profile of mouse pre-granulosa and Sertoli cells isolated from early-differentiated fetal gonads. Gene Expr Patterns 7: 113–123.
        • 46. Wertz K, Herrmann BG (2000) Large-scale screen for genes involved in gonad development. Mech Dev 98: 51–70.
        • 47. Neidhardt L, Gasca S, Wertz K, Obermayr F, Worpenberg S, et al. (2000) Large-scale screen for genes controlling mammalian embryogenesis, using high-throughput gene expression analysis in mouse embryos. Mech Dev 98: 77–94.
        • 48. Menke DB, Page DC (2002) Sexually dimorphic gene expression in the developing mouse gonad. Gene Expr Patterns 2: 359–367.
        • 49. Tucker PK, Lee BK, Lundrigan BL, Eicher EM (1992) Geographic origin of the Y Chromosomes in “old” inbred strains of mice. Mamm Genome 3: 254–261.