Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Expression, Purification and Characterization of Arginase from Helicobacter pylori in Its Apo Form

  • Jinyong Zhang,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medical Laboratory, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China

  • Xiaoli Zhang,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medical Laboratory, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China

  • Chao Wu,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medical Laboratory, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China

  • Dongshui Lu,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medical Laboratory, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China

  • Gang Guo,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medical Laboratory, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China

  • Xuhu Mao,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medical Laboratory, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China

  • Ying Zhang,

    Affiliation National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Da-Cheng Wang,

    Affiliation National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Defeng Li ,

    lidefeng@moon.ibp.ac.cn (DL); qmzou2007@163.com (QZ)

    Affiliation National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Quanming Zou

    lidefeng@moon.ibp.ac.cn (DL); qmzou2007@163.com (QZ)

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medical Laboratory, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China

Abstract

Arginase, a manganese-dependent enzyme that widely distributed in almost all creatures, is a urea cycle enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of L-arginine to generate L-ornithine and urea. Compared with the well-studied arginases from animals and yeast, only a few eubacterial arginases have been characterized, such as those from H. pylori and B. anthracis. However, these enzymes used for arginase activity assay were all expressed with LB medium, as low concentration of Mn2+ was detectable in the medium, protein obtained were partially Mn2+ bonded, which may affect the results of arginase activity assay. In the present study, H. pylori arginase (RocF) was expressed in a Mn2+ and Co2+ free minimal medium, the resulting protein was purified through affinity and gel filtration chromatography and the apo-form of RocF was confirmed by flame photometry analysis. Gel filtration indicates that the enzyme exists as monomer in solution, which was unique as compared with homologous enzymes. Arginase activity assay revealed that apo-RocF had an acidic pH optimum of 6.4 and exhibited metal preference of Co2+>Ni2+>Mn2+. We also confirmed that heat-activation and reducing regents have significant impact on arginase activity of RocF, and inhibits S-(2-boronoethyl)-L-Cysteine (BEC) and Nω-hydroxy-nor-Arginine (nor-NOHA) inhibit the activity of RocF in a dose-dependent manner.

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a gastric pathogen that infects more than 50% of the world population, is the cause of gastritis and peptic ulcers and a risk factor for gastric cancer [1], [2]. It usually causes chronic infection and persists for the life of the host and is not eradicated despite a vigorous immune response was raised by host immune system [3], suggesting that the bacterial reserve some mechanisms for escaping from host immune response, such mechanisms have been under extensive study and reported elsewhere [4], [5], [6].

Arginase is a urea-cycle enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of L-arginine to yield L-ornithine and urea, and it is present in almost all known life forms and plays a crucial role in nitrogen metabolism [7], [8]. In the gastric pathogen H. pylori, arginase is encoded by rocF gene and the resulting protein RocF exhibits extensive genotypic and phenotypic variation [9], [10]. Recently, RocF was identified to show some immunosuppressant properties and is probably involved in the bacterium’s evasion of the host’s immune system [11]. Firstly, RocF competes with host inducible nitric oxide synthase for the common substrate L-arginine, thus reduces the synthesis of NO, an important component of innate immunity and an effective antimicrobial agent that is able to kill the invading pathogens directly. Research indicates that arginase-deficient bacteria are more sensitive to NO-dependent killing by host macrophages, whereas the wild-type bacteria exhibited no loss of survival [12], [13]. Secondly, RocF is involved in inhibiting human T cell proliferation and T cell CD3ζ expression, and thus efficiently reduces host cellular immune response by contributing to the inability of T cells. [14]. Finally, the product urea is utilized by urease to generate ammonia and carbon dioxide, which helps to neutralize the acidic environment of the stomach and thus facilitate colonization by the bacterium [15]. These clue that RocF could inhibit host innate defense and adaptive immune response simultaneously to facilitate the pathogenesis of H. pylori, thus RocF is considered to be a new virulence of H. pylori [11].

The arginase activity of RocF has been characterized by McGee et al previously by using the enzyme expressed in LB medium and purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography, the enzyme exhibit an metal preference of Co2+>Mn2+>Ni2+ and show optimal activity at pH 6.1 [16]. They also noticed that the specific activity of purified arginase varied in different elutions, owing to the partial inhibition of enzyme activity at high concentration of imidazole. Besides, in order to determine the crystal structure of RocF, we have also expressed the protein in LB medium and purified it by Ni-NTA affinity and gel filtration chromatography [17], the resulting protein was partially Mn2+ bounded as determined by flame photometry analysis, the extra divalent ions would also affect the determination of arginase activity of RocF. In order to minimize the influence of imidazole and the extra Mn2+ on arginase activity assay, apo-RocF is required.

In this paper, we have developed a Mn2+ and Co2+ free minimum medium to express apo-form of RocF, the resulting protein was first purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography and then by gel filtration chromatography to exclude imidazole from the enzyme, Co2+, Mn2+ and Ni2+ were not detected in the protein as determined by flame photometry analysis, indicating apo-RocF was obtained, the protein was used to determine the optimum of divalent ions and pH value; the impact of heat-activation, reducing agents and potent inhibitors on arginase activity of apo-RocF were also studied.

Results and Discussion

Protein expression and purification

A minimum medium was chosen for the expression of apo-RocF, the formation of the medium was listed in Table 1, Mn2+ and Co2+ were excluded of the medium as they were critical for arginase activity [16], [18], [19], [20], other metal ions such as Fe2+ and Mg2+ that essential for bacterial normal growth were retained in the medium. RocF was expressed at 37°C under the induction of 1 mM IPTG, SDS-PAGE of cell lysates showed a major protein band of the expected 37 kDa size. RocF was expressed in the soluble fraction and the level was about 10% of the total cellular proteins, which was less than 20% of RocF expressed in LB medium (data unreported). By virtue of the His6 tag at the C-terminal of the protein, the sonicated supernatant was loaded onto Ni-NTA column directly for affinity chromatography, SDS-PAGE indicate that the eluate had a purity of about 90%, the eluate was then concentrated and applied to gel filtration chromatography, fractions corresponding to RocF monomer was pooled and analyzed by SDS-PAGE, the purity was up to about 95%. The protein was found to be highly unstable and will lost considerable of its activity quickly, which was in consistence with the previous report by McGee et al [16], the purified protein was stored at 4°C and used for activity assay within 3 days to minimize lose of its activity in the present study.

thumbnail
Table 1. The formation of the minimum medium used for expression of apo-RocF.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026205.t001

Oligomerization of apo-RocF

Gel filtration indicates that apo-RocF exists as monomer in solution (Figure S1), which is in consistent with the former report that RocF exists as a mixture of monomer and dimer with monomer being the major form, and dimmer was undetectable with salt concentrations higher than 100 mM [21]. This is strange because only two different oligomeric states of arginase have been reported so far. In general, the eukaryotic arginases tend to be trimeric whereas the bacterial ones tend to be hexameric [22], [23]. To explain the reason for the difference, the amino acid sequences of several arginases including those from rat [24], homo-sapiens [22], [23], T. thermophilus, B. caldovelox [22], [23]and H. pylori were aligned with the online program ClusterW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/), the structures of these arginases except RocF were available at PDB. As shown in Figure 1, RocF retains the three conserved characteristic domains including GGDHS, SXDXDXDP and DAHXD that are critical for ions binding and the catalytic process as other arginases [22], [23]. However, an insertion of 13 residues (ESEEKAWQKLCSL) was observed in the middle of the sequence of RocF, the function of this domain was not clear for the moment. Besides, RocF exhibits considerable differences in N and C-terminal sites and the C-terminal sequence were thought to be essential for the oligomerization of arginase. In brief, the C-terminal 14 residues in eukaryotic arginases (Figure 1, green box) termed an ‘oligomerization motif’ was essential for trimer formation [22], [23]. Sequences alignment indicates that this motif was absent in prokaryotes arginases, on the other hand, prokaryotes arginases form hexamer by interactions of residues from the C-terminal through salt bridges and hydrogen bonds [22], [23]. However, RocF was unique among all of these enzymes, it adopts a "KHSFARSY" motif in the C-terminal which was not found in other prokaryotes arginases and shows no similarity with the ‘oligomerization motif’, we propose that this motif may responsible for the oligomeric organization of RocF as monomer.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Alignment of amino acid sequences of RocF with homologous enzymes.

Colored outlines indicate identical and similar amino acid residues, respectively. Residues in the three blue boxes represent the three conserved domain that consider being important for ions binding and the catalytic process. Residues in the red box were an insertion that only observed in RocF but not other arginases. Residues in the black box revealed the difference in the N-terminal of aligned enzymes. Residues in the green box represent the domain termed ‘oligomerization motif’ that exist in eukaryotic arginases, which was absent in T. thermophilus and B. caldovelox arginases but was substituted by a non-conserved motif in RocF.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026205.g001

Protein determinations

Researches revealed that arginase is a binuclear manganese metalloenzyme, each monomer was able to bind two manganeses [22], [23], however, some arginases can be activated by other divalent metal ions such as cobalt and nickel, particularly, it was reported that arginase from H. pylori and B. anthracis exhibit optimal catalytic activity at the presence of Co2+ and Ni2+, respectively [16], [20], so we assume that the three dimensional structure of RocF in complex with Co2+ may undergo conformation switch as compared with RocF in complex with Mn2+. In order to gain Co2+ bounded RocF for structure studies, we have tried to purify RocF expressed in LB medium by Co-NTA affinity chromatography, however, the resulting protein was both Co2+ and Mn2+ bounded as determined by flame photometry analysis (Table 2) , while Ni2+ was undetectable. The ratio was 8∶1 for RocF and Co2+ and 3.6∶1 for RocF and Mn2+, indicating that the affinity between RocF and Mn2+ was relatively higher than Co2+ and Ni2+. Based on these results, we propose that RocF was Mn2+ bounded in vivo as other arginases. When the protein was purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography, only Mn2+ was detected in the protein with a ratio of 1∶1.8 (Table 2), these results revealed that protein expressed in LB medium was already Mn2+ bounded and this will affect the results for arginase activity assay. The ratio between Mn2+ and RocF was nearly 1∶2, obviously lower than the saturation value of 2∶1. These results indicate that these metal ions bind RocF with low affinity, which was supported by the finding that arginases will lose divalent metal ions during the process of dialysis [25].

thumbnail
Table 2. Flame photometry analysis of divalent metal ions in RocF obtained in different medium and purified by different methods.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026205.t002

In order to obtain apo-RocF for arginase activity assay, we developed a Mn2+ and Co2+ free minimum medium to express RocF and the resulting protein was purified by Ni-NTA affinity and gel filtration chromatography, these three kinds of metal ions in the protein were also determined, as shown in table 2, the concentration of these metal ions were not detectable as compared with RocF, indicating that apo-RocF was obtained and this form of the enzyme was used for arginase activity assay. Besides, imidazole also has considerable impact on the colorimetric development by L-ornithine. In this study, the protein eluated from Ni-NTA was also used for arginase activity assay, however, after the addition of 250 µl of ninhydrin (4 mg/ml) at 95°C, the characteristic yellow color developed within a few minutes but diminished after 1h, indicating that imidazole should be excluded from the protein for accurate activity assay. In this study, gel filtration chromatography was applied for further purification of apo-RocF as well as desalting.

The concentration of the purified protein was determined by BCA assay (Thermo Scientific PIERCE®) [26] according to the protocol and adjusted to 0.05 mg ml−1 for arginase activity assay. A standard curve was generated and used to determine the concentration of L-ornithine in the reaction mixture, the R2 value was 0.9989 (Figure S2).

Optimal metal ions and pH of apo-RocF

The activity of the purified apo-RocF was measured at the presence of different divalent metal ions at pH 3.0, 6.0 and 9.0, as shown in Figure 2, unlike the well characterized mammalian arginases, apo-RocF show optimal catalytic activity when heat-activated with Co2+, significantly higher than incubated with Ni2+ and Mn2+, the specific activity was slightly higher when heat-activated with Ni2+ as compared with Mn2+. No arginase activity was detected at the presence of other divalent ions. Obviously, the highest activity appears at pH 6.0, which was in consistence with the report that RocF had an acidic pH optimum [16]. Our data suggest that apo-RocF show its metal preference of Co2+>Ni2+>Mn2+, which was different form the report of Co2+>Mn2+>Ni2+ for Mn2+ partially bounded RocF [16]. Apo-RocF also exhibit considerable arginase activity at pH 9.0, which was half as that at pH 6.0, no activity was detected at pH 3.0, probably due to denature of the enzyme under acidic conditions. The fresh apo-RocF yield a high arginase activity of nearly 900U, which was nearly the same as the activity of B. anthracis arginase [20] but was 100 times higher than RocF reported previously [16], indicating the extra imidazole and Mn2+ have significantly impact on arginase activity of RocF.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Apo-RocF exhibits optimal catalytic activity at the existence of cobalt in an acidic pH.

Apo-RocF was first heat-activated at the existence of different divalent metal ions for 30 min at 55°C and the arginase activity was measured at pH 3.0, 6.0 and 9.0 as described in methods. Arginase activity was detectable when assayed with CoCl2, MnCl2 and NiCl2 at pH 6.0 and 9.0, the highest activity was observed at the present of Co2+ at pH 6.0.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026205.g002

RocF was considered to be important for survival of H. pylori in the acidic gastric environment [27]. In the present study, by determination of arginase activity of apo-RocF at various pH value revealed that it exhibit a pH optimum of 6.4 (Figure 3), which was nearly the same as the report of 6.1 [16], this is unique because all other arginases characterized have a alkaline pH optimum of 9 to 11 [20], [28], so we consider that the acid pH optimum of RocF may be an adaptation to the acidic colonization environment of H. pylori.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Apo-RocF shows optimal catalytic activity at pH 6.4.

Apo-RocF was heat-activated with CoCl2 at 55°C and then assayed for arginase activity at 37°C for 60 min in arginase buffer at various pH values. Data are presented as mean arginase activity ± standard deviation. A) Screen of arginase activity of apo-RocF between pH3.0 to 9.0. B) Further Screen of arginase activity of apo-RocF between pH 5.1 to 7.9.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026205.g003

Heat-activation was essential for arginase activity of apo-RocF

Previous studies indicated that arginase activity significantly increased after head-activation with metal ions at 55°C before reaction [16], [20]. In this study, apo-RocF was incubated with CoCl2, MnCl2 and NiCl2 at 4°C, 37°C, 55°C and 70°C for 30 min and then used for activity assay. Remarkably, heat treatment dramatically increased arginase activity in the presence of these ions. When heat-activated at the existence of Co2+, the activity at 55°C was 2.5, 1.5 and 3 times higher than heat-activated at 4°C, 37°C and 70°C, respectively. Similar results were observed when heat-activated with Mn2+ and Ni2+ but the difference was not so obviously (Figure 4). These results indicate heat-activation is essential for arginase activity, probably by promoting the binding of RocF with these ions. Lower activity was observed at 70°C, maybe the enzyme is not stable as before or even denatured at such a high temperature, thus resulting in a lower activity.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Effect of heat-activation on arginase activity of apo-RocF.

Apo-RocF was heat- activated at 37°C, 55°C and 70°C or maintained on ice for 30 minutes at the presence of 5 mM CoCl2, MnCl2 or NiCl2, and then assayed with arginase buffer at pH 6.4 (buffered by MES). Data are presented as mean arginase activity ± standard deviation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026205.g004

Reducing agents significantly reduce arginase activity of apo-RocF

Previous studies revealed that RocF is extremely sensitive to reducing agents such as dithiothreitol (DTT) and 2-mercaptoethanol (β-ME) and its activity could be inhibited by small dose of these agents [16], [29]. In this study, the impact of DTT and β-ME on the activity of apo-RocF were also evaluated, various concentration of these agents were added into the reaction mixture before or after heat-activation at 55°C at the existence of Co2+, as shown in Figure 5, both DTT and β-ME have significant influence on its activity. Obviously, RocF is more sensitive to DTT than β-ME, and reducing agents will resulting in lost more of arginase activity when added into the reaction mixture before heat-activation. When reducing agents were added before heat-activation, the arginase activity of apo-RocF reduced dramatically even the concentration of reducing agents was 5 µM, and arginase activity reduced quickly as the concentration of reducing agents increase, 30 µM of DTT and 300 µM of β-ME will resulted in completely loss of arginase activity, with 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 10 µM and 30 µM, respectively. However, when added after heat-activation, the activity of apo-RocF was not affected even the concentration of DTT reached 20 µM, and 1 mM DTT is required for completely lost of arginase activity, which was 30 times higher than added before incubation. For β-ME, the activity began to reduce when the concentration reached 100 µM, and the activity was still detectable even the concentration reached 10 mM. Similar results were observed at the present of Mn2+ and Ni2+ (data unreported). Compared with the results reported previously, our results indicate that apo-RocF was more sensitive to reducing agents. These difference further confirmed that heat-activation at 55°C will significantly promote the binding of metal ions with RocF.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Apo-RocF is extremely sensitive to reducing agents.

Various concentrations of reducing agents DTT or β-ME were added into the reaction mixture before (A) or after (B) heat-activation with CoCl2. Reducing agents were replaced with sterile water in control tubes. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined from the graph.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026205.g005

As there are six cysteines in the amino acid sequence of RocF, it was believed that disulphide bonds are critical for the catalysis process and essential for the activity of the enzyme, and the existence of a disulphide bond between Cys66 and Cys73 was confirmed by mass spectrometric studies [30], so it was suggested that reducing agents reducing the activity of RocF probably by disturbing the formation of disulphide bonds. However, mutational analysis shows that disulphide bonds are not important for catalytic activity [29]. Further more, we have determined the three dimensional structure of RocF and no disulphide bonds were observed between these cysteines (to be published). Besides, we have noticed that precipitation appeared as soon as these reducing agents were added into apo-RocF. These results indicate that no disulphide bonds was exist in RocF, and reducing agents significantly reducing the activity probably by competes with the enzyme for metal ions, as the later were important for the stability and enzymatic catalytic process of RocF, this assumption was supported by a former report [29].

BEC and nor-NOHA inhibit arginase activity of apo-RocF in a dose-dependent manner

BEC and nor-NOHA are two L-arginine analogues that have successfully co-crystallized with arginases from various species [31], [32], [33], indicating that these chemicals may server as potent inhibitors and are important candidates for novel anti-bacterial drug development. In this study, the inhibitory effect of the two chemicals on arginase activity of apo-RocF was assayed, as shown in Figure 6, both BEC and nor-NOHA are able to inhibit RocF activity in a dose-dependent manner. Notably, the highest inhibitory effect was observed when heat- activated with Co2+, with 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 1 mM and 0.5 mM for BEC and nor-NOHA, respectively, indicating that nor-NOHA exhibit a higher affinity with RocF. However, the inhibitory effect of these inhibitors was not significant as compared with reducing agents, when the concentration of these chemicals reached 10 mM, the specific activity was still detectable. Similar results were observed when heat-activated with Mn2+ and Ni2+. Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of the two chemicals on apo-RocF activity can be divided into two parts, when the concentration of BEC were lower than 5 mM, the activity of RocF decreased quickly as the concentration of BEC increase; however, when the concentration of BEC were higher than 5 mM, the activity of RocF decreased in a lower speed. For nor-NOHA, the corresponding concentration was 0.5 mM, obviously lower than BEC. These results indicate that nor-NOHA and its analogues are more effective to serve as potent inhibitors for RocF than BEC.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Inhibitors BEC (A) and nor-NOHA (B) inhibit argianse activity of apo-RocF in a dose-dependent manner.

Apo-RocF was first heat-activated at 55°C at the existence of CoCl2, MnCl2, or NiCl2, arginase activity was then assay with arginase buffer at pH 6.4 contain different concentrations of inhibitors. Inhibitors were replaced with sterile water in control tubes. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined from the graph.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026205.g006

Materials and Methods

Cloning and expression of apo-RocF

The rocF gene (NCBI-Gene ID: 899897) encoding H. pylori arginase RocF was amplified by PCR from H. pylori strain 26695 genomic DNA and cloned via introduced NdeI/XhoI restriction sites into the pET22b vector (Novagen) resulting in the recombinant plasmid pET22b-rocF as described previously [17]. Apo-RocF was obtained by expression of RocF in a Mn2+ and Co2+ free minimal medium. In brief, E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) (Novagen) competent cells transformed with the recombinant plasmid pET22b-rocF were first grown in LB medium containing 100 mg ml−1 ampicillin at 37°C until the OD600 of the culture reached 0.8. The cells were harvested by low-speed centrifugation, resuspended and washed twice in minimal medium, cells was then transferred to minimal medium containing 100 mg ml−1 ampicillin and incubated for 2 h at 37°C, isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was then added to the culture at a final concentration of 1 mM to induce the expression of the recombinant protein at 37°C for 3 h. Cells was harvested by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C.

Purification and determination of apo-RocF

Cell pellets were resuspended in 15 ml lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl and 10 mM imidazole) and sonicated on ice. The lysate was centrifuged at 16,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then loaded onto a Ni-NTA column (Novagen) equilibrated with the lysis buffer. After washing with the washing buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl and 25 mM imidazole) to remove unbound fractions, the elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl and 250 mM imidazole) was applied. The eluate containing the recombinant protein RocF was concentrated to about 1.0 ml and then applied to a Hiload16/60 Superdex200 prep-grade gel filtration column (Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl. The peak fractions corresponding to the recombinant protein were pooled and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

The existence and concentration of divalent metal ions (Co2+, Ni2+ and Mn2+) in the protein were determined by flame photometry in Tsinghua University. The concentration of the protein was determined by BCA method by using BSA as a standard [26]. The oligomeric state of the enzyme was determined by gel filtration chromatography using Superdex™ 200 10/300GL.

Arginase activity assay

The arginase assay was carried out spectrophotometrically by measuring the formation of L-ornithine at 515 nm with ninhydrin. Protein sample of apo-RocF after purification was diluted to 0.05 mg ml−1 with 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl. The sample (25 µl) was added to 25 µL of 10 mM of various divalent metal ions (final concentration of 5 mM) or 25 µl of sterile water as no metal ion negative control. The mixture were heat-activated at 55°C or were maintained on ice for 30 min. 200 µl of buffered 10 mM L-arginine (arginine buffer) was then added, and the mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 750 µl of acetic acid, and the color was then developed by the addition of 250 µl of ninhydrin (4 mg ml−1) at 95°C for 1 h. The concentration of L-ornithine was measured spectrophotometrically at 515 nm in 1.5 ml cuvettes. Representative data were normalized for protein and are presented as specific activity in nmol L-ornithine/min/mg protein ± standard deviation with a minimum of two experiments conducted in triplicate. A standard curve was generated and the slope was used to measure the concentration of L-ornithine in the reaction mixture, the method was the same as argianse activity assay, and the concentration of L-ornithine in the 1.25 ml reaction mixture was 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 µM, respectively.

Metal ions, pH and temperature optimum

To determinate the metal ions preference of apo-RocF, the activity of the purified RocF was measured at the existence of different divalent metal ions (CoCl2, MnCl2, NiCl2, CuSO4, CaCl2, ZnCl2, MgCl2, FeSO4) at pH 3.0, 6.0 and 9.0, respectively. To determine pH optimum, buffers of different pH including citric acid (pH 3.0), sodium acetate (pH 4.0), sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate (pH 5.0), MES (pH 6.0), HEPES (pH 7.0), Tris (pH 8.0) and Capso (pH 9.0) were obtained by addition of concentrated HCl or 10 M NaOH after the addition of arginine (10 mM). To confirm the effect of heat-activation on arginase activity of apo-RocF, the purified protein was incubated with equal volume of CoCl2, MnCl2 and NiCl2 (25 µL) at 4°C, 37°C, 55°C and 70°C for 30 min and then used for arginase activity assay.

Effect of reducing agents on arginase activity of apo-RocF

To determine the impact of reducing agents on arginase activity of apo-RocF, different concentrations of DTT or β-ME were added to the reaction mixture before or after incubation at 55°C at the presence of Co2+, while sterile water was served as positive control. The concentration of RocF, arginine, Co2+ and the total reaction volume were the same as previously.

Effect of inhibitors nor-NOHA and BEC on arginase activity of apo-RocF

Apo-RocF were first heat-activated at the presence of Co2+, Ni2+ and Mn2+ at 55°C, arginase buffer containing different concentrations (0.1 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM and 10 mM) of two inhibitors, nor-NOHA and BEC, were then added into the reaction mixture and the inhibitory effect on arginase activity of apo-RocF was evaluated. The concentration of RocF, arginine, divalent ions and the total reaction volume were not changed, and the inhibitor free aiginine buffer was used as positive control.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

RocF exists as monomer in solution. Gel-filtration chromatography (Superdex™ 200 10/300GL) for apo-RocF in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl, apo-RocF exists as monomer according to the position of the peak.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026205.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

The standard curve generated for determination the concentration of L- ornithine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026205.s002

(TIF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JZ YH DL DW QZ. Performed the experiments: JZ XZ YH DL. Analyzed the data: JZ YH DL CW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DL GG XM YZ. Wrote the paper: JZ XZ QZ.

References

  1. 1. Kusters JG, van Vliet AHM, Kuipers EJ (2006) Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clinical microbiology reviews 19: 449–490.
  2. 2. Ye W, Held M, Lagergren J, Engstrand L, Blot WJ, et al. (2004) Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric atrophy: risk of adenocarcinoma and squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus and adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 96: 388–396.
  3. 3. Suerbaum S, Michetti P (2002) Helicobacter pylori infection. The New England journal of medicine 347: 1175–1186.
  4. 4. Kao JY, Zhang M, Miller MJ, Mills JC, Wang B, et al. (2010) Helicobacter pylori immune escape is mediated by dendritic cell-induced Treg skewing and Th17 suppression in mice. Gastroenterology 138: 1046–1054.
  5. 5. Yuan J, Li P, Tao J, Shi X, Hu B, et al. (2009) H. pylori escape host immunoreaction through inhibiting ILK expression by VacA. Cellular & molecular immunology 6: 191–197.
  6. 6. Chaput C, Ecobichon C, Cayet N, Girardin SE, Werts C, et al. (2006) Role of AmiA in the morphological transition of Helicobacter pylori and in immune escape. PLoS pathogens 2: e97.
  7. 7. Ikemoto M, Tabata M, Miyake T, Kono T, Mori M, et al. (1990) Expression of human liver arginase in Escherichia coli. Purification and properties of the product. The Biochemical journal 270: 697–703.
  8. 8. Muszynska G, Severina LO, Lobyreva LW (1972) Characteristics of arginases from plant, ureotelic and uricotelic organisms. Acta biochimica Polonica 19: 109–116.
  9. 9. Hovey JG, Watson EL, Langford ML, Hildebrandt E, Bathala S, et al. (2007) Genetic microheterogeneity and phenotypic variation of Helicobacter pylori arginase in clinical isolates. BMC microbiology 7: 26.
  10. 10. Mendz GL, Holmes EM, Ferrero RL (1998) In situ characterization of Helicobacter pylori arginase. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1388: 465–477.
  11. 11. Baldari CT, Lanzavecchia A, Telford JL (2005) Immune subversion by Helicobacter pylori. Trends in immunology 26: 199–207.
  12. 12. Cheng Y, Chaturvedi R, Asim M, Bussiere FI, Scholz A, et al. (2005) Helicobacter pylori-induced macrophage apoptosis requires activation of ornithine decarboxylase by c-Myc. The Journal of biological chemistry 280: 22492–22496.
  13. 13. Gobert AP, McGee DJ, Akhtar M, Mendz GL, Newton JC, et al. (2001) Helicobacter pylori arginase inhibits nitric oxide production by eukaryotic cells: a strategy for bacterial survival. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 13844–13849.
  14. 14. Zabaleta J, McGee DJ, Zea AH, Hernandez CP, Rodriguez PC, et al. (2004) Helicobacter pylori arginase inhibits T cell proliferation and reduces the expression of the TCR zeta-chain (CD3zeta). Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950) 173: 586–593.
  15. 15. McGee DJ, Radcliff FJ, Mendz GL, Ferrero RL, Mobley HL (1999) Helicobacter pylori rocF is required for arginase activity and acid protection in vitro but is not essential for colonization of mice or for urease activity. Journal of bacteriology 181: 7314–7322.
  16. 16. McGee DJ, Zabaleta J, Viator RJ, Testerman TL, Ochoa AC, et al. (2004) Purification and characterization of Helicobacter pylori arginase, RocF: unique features among the arginase superfamily. European journal of biochemistry/FEBS 271: 1952–1962.
  17. 17. Zhang J, Zhang X, Mao X, Zou Q, Li D (2011) Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic studies of Helicobacter pylori arginase. Acta crystallographica Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications 67: 707–709.
  18. 18. Carvajal N, Torres C, Uribe E, Salas M (1995) Interaction of arginase with metal ions: studies of the enzyme from human liver and comparison with other arginases. Comparative biochemistry and physiology Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology 112: 153–159.
  19. 19. Tormanen CD (2001) Allosteric inhibition of rat liver and kidney arginase by copper and mercury ions. Journal of enzyme inhibition 16: 443–449.
  20. 20. Viator RJ, Rest RF, Hildebrandt E, McGee DJ (2008) Characterization of Bacillus anthracis arginase: effects of pH, temperature, and cell viability on metal preference. BMC biochemistry 9: 15.
  21. 21. Srivastava A, Sau AK (2010) Biochemical studies on Helicobacter pylori arginase: insight into the difference in activity compared to other arginases. IUBMB life 62: 906–915.
  22. 22. Bewley MC, Jeffrey PD, Patchett ML, Kanyo ZF, Baker EN (1999) Crystal structures of Bacillus caldovelox arginase in complex with substrate and inhibitors reveal new insights into activation, inhibition and catalysis in the arginase superfamily. Structure 7: 435–448.
  23. 23. Di Costanzo L, Sabio G, Mora A, Rodriguez PC, Ochoa AC, et al. (2005) Crystal structure of human arginase I at 1.29-A resolution and exploration of inhibition in the immune response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 13058–13063.
  24. 24. Kanyo ZF, Scolnick LR, Ash DE, Christianson DW (1996) Structure of a unique binuclear manganese cluster in arginase. Nature 383: 554–557.
  25. 25. Kuhn NJ, Ward S, Piponski M, Young TW (1995) Purification of human hepatic arginase and its manganese (II)-dependent and pH-dependent interconversion between active and inactive forms: a possible pH-sensing function of the enzyme on the ornithine cycle. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 320: 24–34.
  26. 26. Walker JM (1994) The bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay for protein quantitation. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N J) 32: 5–8.
  27. 27. Molnar B, Galamb O, Sipos F, Leiszter K, Tulassay Z (2010) Molecular pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection: the role of bacterial virulence factors. Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) 28: 604–608.
  28. 28. Hirsch-Kolb H, Heine JP, Kolb HJ, Greenberg DM (1970) Comparative physical-chemical studies of mammalian arginases. Comp Biochem Physiol 37: 345–359.
  29. 29. Srivastava A, Dwivedi N, Sau AK (2010) Role of a disulphide bond in Helicobacter pylori arginase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 395: 348–351.
  30. 30. McGee DJ, Kumar S, Viator RJ, Bolland JR, Ruiz J, et al. (2006) Helicobacter pylori thioredoxin is an arginase chaperone and guardian against oxidative and nitrosative stresses. The Journal of biological chemistry 281: 3290–3296.
  31. 31. Di Costanzo L, Ilies M, Thorn KJ, Christianson DW (2010) Inhibition of human arginase I by substrate and product analogues. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 496: 101–108.
  32. 32. Shishova EY, Di Costanzo L, Emig FA, Ash DE, Christianson DW (2009) Probing the specificity determinants of amino acid recognition by arginase. Biochemistry 48: 121–131.
  33. 33. Cama E, Pethe S, Boucher J-L, Han S, Emig FA, et al. (2004) Inhibitor coordination interactions in the binuclear manganese cluster of arginase. Biochemistry 43: 8987–8999.