Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Molecular Typing and Phenotype Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Blood in Taiwan

  • Wei-Yao Wang,

    Affiliations Graduate Institute of Medical Science, National Defense Medical Center and Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, Division of Infectious Disease, Fong-Yuan Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China

  • Tzong-Shi Chiueh,

    Affiliations Graduate Institute of Medical Science, National Defense Medical Center and Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, National Defense Medical Center and Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

  • Jun-Ren Sun,

    Affiliations Graduate Institute of Medical Science, National Defense Medical Center and Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, National Defense Medical Center and Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

  • Shin-Ming Tsao,

    Affiliation Division of Clinical Microbiology and Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China

  • Jang-Jih Lu

    janglu45@gmail.com

    Affiliations Graduate Institute of Medical Science, National Defense Medical Center and Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China

Abstract

Background

Staphylococcus aureus causes a variety of severe infections such as bacteremia and sepsis. At present, 60–80% of S. aureus isolates from Taiwan are methicillin resistant (MRSA). It has been shown that certain MRSA clones circulate worldwide. The goals of this study were to identify MRSA clones in Taiwan and to correlate the molecular types of isolates with their phenotypes.

Methods

A total of 157 MRSA isolates from bacteremic patients were collected from nine medical centers. They were typed based on polymorphisms in agr, SCCmec, MLST, spa, and dru. Phenotypes characterized included Panton-Valentine leucocidin (pvl), inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance (MLSBi), vancomycin (VA) and daptomycin (DAP) minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC), and superantigenic toxin gene profiles. Difference between two consecutive samples was determined by Mann-Whitney-U test, and difference between two categorical variables was determined by Fisher's exact test.

Results

Four major MRSA clone complexes CC1, CC5, CC8, and CC59 were found, including 4 CC1, 9 CC5, 111 CC8, and 28 CC59 isolates. These clones had the following molecular types: CC1: SCCmecIV and ST573; CC5: SCCmecII and ST5; CC8: SCCmecIII, ST239, and ST241, and CC59: SCCmecIV, SCCmecVT, ST59, and ST338. The toxin gene profiles of these clones were CC1: sec-seg-(sei)-sell-selm-(seln)-selo; CC5: sec-seg-sei-sell-selm-(seln)-selp-tst1; CC8: sea-selk-selq, and CC59: seb-selk-selq. Most isolates with SCCmecVT, ST59, spat437, and dru11 types were pvl+ (13 isolates), while multidrug resistance (≥4 antimicrobials) were associated with SCCmecIII, ST239, spa t037, agrI, and dru14 (119 isolates) (p<0.001). One hundred and twenty four isolates with the following molecular types had higher VA MIC: SCCmecII and SCCmecIII; ST5, ST239, and ST241; spa t002, t037, and t421; dru4, dru10, dru12, dru13, and dru14 (p<0.05). No particular molecular types were found to be associated with MLSBi phenotype.

Conclusions

Four major MRSA clone complexes were found in Taiwan. Further studies are needed to delineate the evolution of MRSA isolates.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common pathogens in both community- and hospital-associated infections [1], [2], [3]. It is also the leading cause of skin, [4], [5], cardiovascular tissue [6] and osteoarticular tissue [7] infections, pneumonia [5], [8], and bacteremia [9]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has emerged in the 1960s and reached a prevalence of 60–80% in the 1980s [1], [10], [11]. Patients with invasive MRSA infections have a higher mortality rate than those with noninvasive MRSA infections [9], [11], [12]. MRSA is also the leading cause of death due to microbial infections [4], [11].

Several molecular methods have been developed to type MRSA isolates, including pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) [13], multilocus sequence typing (MLST) [14], and typing based on polymorphisms of the following genetic loci: the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mecA (SCCmec) [15], the X region encoding protein A (spa) [16], the mec-associated hypervariable region (dru) [17], and the accessory gene regulator (agr) [18]. With these typing methods, some MRSA isolates including the New York/Japan (SCCmecII-ST5-agrII), Hungarian (SCCmecIII-ST239-agrI), and USA 300 (SCCmecIV-ST8-agrI) clones have been identified worldwide [19], [20]. MRSA isolates also harbor a number of virulence factors including antibiotic resistance [21], [22], Panton-Valentine leukocidin [23], and exotoxins [19], [24].

Although MRSA typing is commonly done, few studies have been conducted to correlate genotypes with phenotypes. Furthermore, most MRSA typing performed in Taiwan are limited to isolates from one hospital [25], [26], [27]. In this study, we expanded our scope to include MRSA isolates from various locations in Taiwan. We also correlated molecular types of the MRSA isolates with their phenotypes based on the virulence factors present in each isolate.

Materials and Methods

Identification and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of MRSA isolates

A total of 1,000 isolates suspected to be MRSA from various specimens were collected from March to August, 2003 as part of the Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) program. Ten hospitals of various medical centers participated in this program including three each in northern (hospitals N1, N2, N3), central (hospitals C1, C2, C3), and southern (hospitals S1, S2, S3) and one in eastern (hospital E1) part of Taiwan. S. aureus was identified as Gram-positive cocci with β-hemolysis on 5% sheep blood agar and giving positive results for catalase, coagulase, DNase, and mannitol fermentation tests. MRSA isolates were screened with 30-ug cefoxitin disc [28], [29] and confirmed to harbor the mecA gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [15] and by oxacillin resistance [29]. Among the 1,000 isolates, 157 non-duplicated MRSA isolates from blood samples from 9 medical centers in Taiwan were used in this study, including 70 from N1, 4 from N2, 17 from N3, 3 from C1, 1 from C2, and 18 from C3, 24 from S1, 1 from S3, and 19 from E1 hospitals. Isolates that were resistant to four or more of the following antibiotics by the disc diffusion test were considered as multidrug resistance: gentamicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SXT), ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, ampicillin/sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, oxacillin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin. Inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance (MLSBi) was determined by the D-test, in which the erythromycin and clindamycin discs were placed 15 mm apart on blood agar plates [28]. The vancomycin (VA) MICs of the isolates were determined by both the agar dilution test [28] and the E-test with strips containing gradients of VA and daptomycin (DAP) according to manufacturer's instructions (AB BIODISK, AB bioMerieux, Sweden).

Bacterial DNA extraction and SCCmec classification

Genomic DNA was extracted from each MRSA isolate using the Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Geneaid, Taiwan). The genes encoding the cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) complex and the mec complex were typed by multiplex PCR (M-PCR) with 14 primers as described by Kondo et al. [15]. SCCmec types I to V were identified by comparing the M-PCR banding patterns of the isolates to those of the following reference strains: ATCC 10442 (SCCmec type I), N315 (SCCmec type II), 85/2082 (SCCmec type III), MW2 (SCCmec type IVa), WIS (SCCmec type V), and TSGH-17 (SCCmec type VT). Isolates initially determined to be SCCmecV were further analyzed with specific primers (ccrC-FR) for SCCmecVT [30], which was recently renamed as SCCmecVII (the Taiwan clone) [31].

Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)

The following seven housekeeping genes of each MRSA isolate were amplified and sequenced as described previously [14]: the carbamate kinase (arcC), shikimate dehydrogenase (aroE), glycerol kinase (glp), guanylate kinase (gmk), phosphate acetyltransferase (pta), triosephosphate isomerase (tpi), and acetyl coenzyme A acetyltransferase (yqiL) genes. The allelic number and profile (sequence type or ST) of each gene were determined by comparing the sequences to those of the known alleles deposited in the S. aureus MLST database (http://saureus.mlst.net/).

Polymorphism of the X region encoding protein A (spa typing)

The X region of the spa gene contains variable numbers of 21- to 27-bp repeats, with the 24-bp repeat being most common [16]. The X region of each MRSA isolate was amplified by PCR as described by Shopsin et al. [32]. The amplified products were sequenced and analyzed by the Ridom StaphType software program (version 1.4; Ridom, GmbH, Wurzburg, Germany [http://spa.ridom.de/index.shtml]), which automatically determined the repeat profile and the spa type of each isolate [33].

Polymorphism of the mec-associated hypervariable region

Amplification of the hypervariable region, which contains variable numbers of 40-bp direct repeat units (dru), was performed by PCR with primers orf145 and IS431mec as described by Senna et al. [17]. The copy number of dru in each MRSA isolate was determined by the size of the amplified fragment according to the following equation: dru copy no. = (size of PCR product−171)÷40 [17].

Accessory gene regulator (agr) typing

The agr gene of each MRSA isolate was amplified with primers Pan, agr1, agr2, agr3, and agr4 as described by Gilot et al [18]. These primers allowed amplification of a 441-bp DNA fragment from agr group I, a 575-bp fragment from agr group II, a 323-bp fragment from agr group III, and a 659-bp fragment from agr group IV strains.

Gene encoding Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl)

Amplification of the pvl gene was done with primers luk-PV-1 and luk-PV-2 as described by Lina et al. [23]. The reference strain TSGH-17 was used as the positive control, and the strain 85/2082 was used as the negative control.

Superantigenic toxin gene profile

Each MRSA isolate was examined for the existence of a total of 18 genes encoding classical (sea, seb, sec, sed, see, seg, seh, sei, selj, selk, sell, selm, seln, selo, selp, selq, and selr) and newly described superantigenic (tsst-1) toxins by four multiplex PCRs, with femA and femB as positive control genes in the M-PCR [34].

Discriminatory power of molecular typing systems and statistic methods

The discriminatory power of each typing method was determined by the Simpson's index of diversity as described by Hunter [35]. The difference between two consecutive samples within the same population was determined by the Mann-Whitney-U test if the population was not normally distributed (nonparametric), and the difference between two categorical variables was determined by the Fisher's exact test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. The Pearson's test was used to determine whether two consecutive samples had a close (r≥0.7) or moderate (0.7>r≥0.4) correlation.

Results

MRSA identification and antimicrobial susceptibility determination

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the disc diffusion method revealed that 119 (75.8%) of the 157 MRSA isolates were resistant to multiple drugs including erythromycin (149 isolates, 94.9%), clindamycin (136 isolates, 86.5%), TMP-SXT (113 isolates, 71.8%), and gentamicin (123 isolates, 78.2%) (Table 1). The mean vancomycin MIC was determined to be 1.56 mg/L (range:1–3 mg/L) by the agar dilution method (Table 1); this value was very close to that determined by the E-test (mean: 1.66 mg/L; range: 1–3 mg/L). The mean daptomycin MIC determined by the E-test was 0.25 mg/L (range: 0.064–0.75 mg/L). The Pearson's coefficient for correlation between vancomycin and daptomycin resistance showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.47) (Fig. 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Correlation between vancomycin and daptomycin MICs of 157 MRSA blood isolates determined by E-test; r (Pearson's correlation coefficient) = 0.474.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030394.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. Correlations between molecular types and phenotypes of MRSA blood isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030394.t001

Molecular typing

There were 5 SCCmec types including types II (9, 5.7%), III (115, 73.2%), IV (21, 13.4%), V (1, 0.6%), and VT (11, 7.0%) (Table 2). Only two agr groups were found, and most (147, 93.6%) isolates belonged to agr group I. A total of 7 MLST types were identified, including ST5 (9, 5.7%), ST239 (99, 63.0%), ST241 (12, 7.6%), ST59 (27, 17.2%), and others [ST338 (1, 0.6%), ST573 (4, 2.5%), and ST900 (2, 1.3%)]. Two new single locus variants of ST241 were identified in 3 isolates (Table 2). For spa typing, a total of 14 spa types were found; the following 4 types were more prevalent: t037 (107, 68.2%), t437 (20, 12.7%), t002 (8, 5.1%), and t421 (7, 4.5%). There were 11 dru types determined with dru14 (76, 48.4%), dru9 (23, 14.6%), dru11 (11, 7.0%), dru12 (11, 7.0%), dru4 (10, 6.4%), dru6 (8, 5.1%), and dru10 (7, 4.5%) being more common. The discrimination indices, defined as Simpson's diversity index (D value), for SCCmec, agr, MLST, spa, and dru typing were 0.713, 0.232, 0.842, 0.785, and 0.945, respectively.

thumbnail
Table 2. Clonal complexes and relationship between various molecular types of 157 MRSA blood isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030394.t002

The distribution of various molecular types of 157 MRSA blood isolates among 9 medical centers in Taiwan was shown in Table S2. Although it seemed that most identified molecular types were found equally in four areas of Taiwan, the majority of isolates with ST59, SCCmecIV and VT, and spa t421 were recovered in N1 hospital. All four ST573 and two ST900 isolates were recovered from the same hospital (N1) in northern Taiwan (Table S2).

Significant association was noted between various molecular types (Table S1). For example, SCCmecII isolates were distributed among agr group II, ST5, spa t002 and dru4 types (p<0.001). Similarly, SCCmecIII isolates were mostly found in agr group I, ST239, ST241, spa t037, and dru14 types (p<0.05 for ST241 and p<0.001 for other corresponding types). SCCmecIV isolates were mainly seen in agr group II, ST59, ST573, spa t437, and dru9 types (p<0.05 for agr group II and p<0.001 for other corresponding types), and SCCmecVT isolates were mostly found in ST59, spa t437, and dru11 types (p<0.001).

With SCCmec and MLST combination typing, the MRSA isolates were classified into four clone complexes (CC), including CC1, CC5, CC8, and CC59 (Table 2). CC1 included SCCmecIV-ST573 (4 isolates, 2.5%). CC5 contained SCCmecII- ST5 (9 isolates, 5.7%). CC8 (111 isolates, 70.7%) comprised SCCmecIII-ST239 (99 isolates, 63.1%) or ST241 (12 isolates, 7.6%). CC59 (28 isolates, 17.8%) consisted of SCCmecIV (17 isolates, 10.8%) or VT (10 isolates, 6.4%)-ST59 (27 isolates, 17.2%) or ST338 (1 isolate, 0.6%) (Table 2). Five isolates did not belong to any of these 4 clone complexes.

Correlation between molecular types and phenotypes

Thirteen (8.3%) of the 157 MRSA isolates were found to harbor the pvl gene (Table 1). These isolates were mostly distributed in SCCmecVT, ST59, spa t437, and dru11 types (p<0.001). The MLSBi phenotype was also present in 13 isolates (8.3%), but no significant association between MLSBi and any specific molecular type was found. The mutidrug resistance (≧4 classes of antimicrobials, including oxacillin) phenotype was significantly correlated with SCCmecIII, agr group I, ST239, spa t037, and dru14 types (p<0.001). Isolates with higher vancomycin MIC were noted in SCCmecII and SCCmecIII; ST5, ST239, and ST241; spa t002, t037, t421; dru4, dru10, dru12, dru13, and dru14 types (p value from <0.001 to <0.05 respectively), and those with elevated daptomycin MIC were found in SCCmecII and SCCmecIII; ST5 and ST239; spa t002, t037 and t421; dru4, dru10, dru12, dru13, and dru14 types(p value from <0.001 to <0.05 respectively) (Table 1).

The most prevalent toxin genes detected by M-PCR were selk (134, 85%), selq (133, 85%), sea (105, 67%), and seb (26, 17%). Some toxin genes were associated with specific molecular types (Table S3). For example, selk and selq are associated with SCCmecIII, SCCmecIV, and SCCmecVT; agr group I; ST239; spa t037 and t3592; and dru 14. The seb gene was mainly found in isolates with SCCmecIV and SCCmecVT, ST59, spa t437, dru9 and dru11 types. The tst-1 gene was found to be associated with SCCmecII; agr group II; ST5; spa t002; and dru4 types (p value from <0.001 to <0.05 respectively) (Table S3). A total of 15 superantigenic toxin gene profiles were seen. The most prevalent ones were sea-selk-selq (95, 60.5%), seb-selk-selq (17, 10.8%), and selk-selq (12, 7.6%). One isolate had no detectable toxin gene (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Association of superantigenic toxin gene profiles with different SCCmec types and agr groups of MRSA blood isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030394.t003

Discussion

MRSA strains were originally found in hospital settings (HA-MRSA) in the 1960s [3], [8], but community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) strains have emerged in recent 20 years [36], [37]. The prevalence of MRSA in United States is shown to be increased from 22.8% to 56.2% during a 11-year surveillance study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention [1]. The reports of the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance I and II (TSAR I and II) in 2000 indicate that 60% of the 400 S. aureus isolates from 65 hospitals in Taiwan were MRSA [10]. The mortality rate of patients with MRSA bacteremia has been shown to be as high as 33% [9], [27]. Because of the great impact of MRSA on patients' outcome, we investigated the association between genotypes and phenotypes of MRSA isolates from patients with bacteremia. Among the 157 independent blood MRSA isolates from 9 medical centers in Taiwan, 124 (79%) were HA-MRSA (SCCmecII and SCCmecIII) and 33 isolates (21%) were CA-MRSA (SCCmecIV, SCCmecV, and SCCmecVT). Most isolates (152, 96.8%) were found to belong to the following four clonal complexes: CC1, CC5, CC8, and CC59 (Table 2). The SCCmecIII-ST239 isolates were found to have a higher rate of multidrug resistance than other isolates, a finding similar to those of previous reports [5], [38]. Interestingly, we found strains with particular molecular types such as ST573 and ST900 were exclusively recovered from one university-affiliated teaching hospital in northern Taiwan (N1), and the ratios of molecularly CA-MRSA stains (ST59, SCCmecIV and VT, and spa t421) were higher than those recovered from other hospitals (Table S2). These findings showed that the molecular types of MRSA blood isolates were not equally distributed in the island and the prevalence CA-MRSA might increase in some hospitals, which was compatible with the previous reports [39], [40].

A pandemic MRSA lineage, ST239, has been found to descend from ST8 and ST30 parents (both belonging to CC8) through simple chromosome replacement instead of movement of mobile genetic elements [41]. There is only one allelic difference (arcC) in 7 housekeeping genes used for MLST between ST8 and ST239, but they are distinguished at least 6 surface protein-encoding genes including spa. Recently, Harris et al had delineated the intercontinental spread and microevolution of the MRSA ST239 isolates by mapping genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to reference sequence [42]. They found MRSA ST239-spa t037, responsible for the South American clade and scattering isolates from Europe and Asia, represented the ancestral ST239 spa type. MRSA ST239-spa t421 was identified as another clone circulating mainly in Portugal [42]. There were 99 MRSA isolates in our study classified as ST239, within which 92 isolates were ST239-spa t037 and 4 were ST239-spa t421. These findings indicated that those MRSA ST239 strains in Taiwan might be spread from Europe and America and disseminated islandwide.

Another clone, ST5 accounted for a minority of our MRSA collection (9 in 157 isolates, 5.7%), and eight of them were assigned as SCCmecII-spa t002. Nűbel et al investigated the evolution history of MRSA ST5 clone with SNPs mutation method and found that limited clades were identified but were not concordant with results of spa typing [43]. They also found that geographic spread of MRSA ST5 over a long distance was a rare event and the progeny of the ST5 resided locally rather than globally. The haplotype G, consisting of strains from East Asia including Taiwan, was mainly assigned as SCCmecII-spa t002. Our study displayed similar molecular typing results of MRSA ST5 strains with the haplotype G reported by Nűbel et al [43].

Based on polymorphisms of the agr gene, we classified our MRSA isolates into two groups (I and II), and most isolates (147, 93.6%) belonged to agr group I. This finding is consistent with that of Ho et al. [44] and Lu et al. [45]. Only 10 (6.4%) of our MRSA isolates belonged to agr group II. Previous studies have shown that some agr group II isolates are glycopeptide-intermediately resistant S. aureus (GISA) and hetero-GISA [46], [47]. In the study of Moise-Broder et al., agr group II isolates from 31 of 36 patients with treatment failure were found to be resistant to vancomycin [21]. In this study, no significant association was found between agr group II and vancomycin resistance.

Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) is a cell wall anchored virulence factor [48]. The polymorphic X region in the spa gene has been shown to be sufficiently stable for typing with a discriminatory power comparable to other typing methods including PFGE [16]. A total of 14 spa types were found in this study with types t037, t437, t002, and t421 being the majority. We also found that most spa t437 isolates belonged to SCCmecIV, SCCmecVT, and ST59, similar to the results of a previous studies on CA-MRSA [7], [49], [50]. In addition, most spa t037 isolates were found to belong to SCCmecIII and ST239, and those of spa t002 were mostly SCCmecII and ST5. These results agree with those of HA-MRSA typing in other studies [7], [27], [51]. It has been reported that bacteremic patients in ICU and those with prolonged hospitalization were more likely to be infected with MRSA strains with elevated vancomycin MIC (2 mg/L), in which more than 80% of strains belonged to SCCmecIII-spa t037 [27]. Our study also showed that SCCmecIII-spa t037 (105 isolates, 66.9%) constituted most of the MRSA blood isolates with higher vancomycin MICs than those of CA-MRSA. This may provide a guide in empirical antibiotic therapy for MRSA bacteremia.

The increased vancomycin MIC of MRSA is a great concern. Two studies reveal that the success rates of glycopeptide treatment are decreased in MRSA bacteremic patients if vancomycin MIC of the MRSA isolate exceeds 1 mg/L [21], [22]. Wang et al. demonstrated that bacteremic patients in ICU and those with prolonged hospitalization were more likely to be infected with MRSA strains with elevated vancomycin MIC (2 mg/L), and those with elevated vancomycin MIC were associated with increased mortality rate [27]. In this study, vancomycin MICs of all MRSA blood isolates were found to be equal to or greater than 1 mg/L (range: 1–3 mg/L).

Daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections, bacteremia, and endocarditis caused by S. aureus, including MRSA [52], [53]. Cui et al. had reported that reduced susceptibility of GISA to vancomycin and daptomycin might result from increased thickness of bacterial wall [54]. We found that elevated daptomycin MIC was associated with particular types such as SCCmecII and SCCmecIII; ST5 and ST239; spa t002, t037 and t421; dru4, dru10, dru12, dru13, and dru14. These isolates also had elevated vancomycin MICs (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.47) (Fig. 1). These findings may aid in the selection of appropriate antibiotic for MRSA and GISA infections.

Clindamycin has been recommended for non-critical infections caused by S. aureus, including MRSA [37], [55]. Resistance to clindamycin may be constitutive (MLSBc) or inducible (MLSBi) by erythromycin, and the latter may be misinterpreted as clindamycin susceptible by the traditional disc diffusion method. We found 13 isolates (8.3%) with the MLSBi phenotype, but they were not associated with any specific molecular types. The high resistance rate to erythromycin (94.9%) and clindamycin (86.5%) with low rate of MLSBi phenotype may represent a high percentage of our MRSA isolates with the MLSBc phenotype.

Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl) is associated with necrotizing pneumonia [23], scald skin syndrome [56], atopic dermatitis [57], wounds [56], bacteremia [56], and osteoarticular infections [58]. In this study, 13 MRSA isolates were found to harbor the pvl gene. Unlike the previous reports by Vandenesch et al. [59] and Udo et al. [60] in which most pvl+ MRSA isolates belonged to SCCmecIV, most of our pvl+ MRSA isolates were associated with SCCmecVT (11 isolates, 84.6%), ST59 (12 isolates, 92.3%), spa t437 (11 isolates, 84.6%), and dru11 (8 isolates, 61.5%). These results resembled those of the previous report that the Taiwan clone (SCCmecVT-ST59-spa t437 or t441-pvl+) with resistance to erythromycin and tetracycline constituted most of the pvl+ CC59 CA-MRSA strains found in Western Australia [49].

S. aureus produces a number of toxins including staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1), which may cause food poisoning, enterocolitis, toxic shock syndrome, and autoimmune disease in human and livestock [24], [61]. More than 20 different SEs have been found. We found that HA-MRSA isolates (77% of SCCmecIII and SCCmecII) harbored more SEs than CA-MRSA (15% of SCCmecIV and 7% of SCCmecVT). This result is similar to that of Tristan et al. [19]. It has been shown that each SCCmec type of MRSA contains a certain type of SE gene. For example, 77% of SCCmecII and 87% SCCmecIII isolates are sec+, whereas 68% of SCCmecIV and 80% of SCCmecV isolates are seb+ [26]. We also found that some SE genes were significantly associated with certain molecular types (for example, sea, selk, and selq with SCCmecIII-ST59-spa t037; seb with SCCmecIV or VT-ST59-spa t437; and tst-1 with SCCmecII-ST5-agrII-spa t002). Some isolates harbored multiple toxins, and a total of 15 superantigenic toxin gene profiles were found in our study. Interestingly, we found that some particular combination of toxin genes were associated with specific SCCmec types and agr groups (e.g., sea-selk-selq and selk-selq in SCCmecIII-agrI, seb-selk-selq in SCCmecIV or VT-agrI, and sec-seg-sei-sell-selm-selp-tst1 in SCCmecII-agrII). This finding was different from that reported by Becker et al, in which 429 S. aureus isolates (219 blood isolates and 210 isolates from anterior nasal nares) from Germany were found to harbor specific toxic gene combinations such as seg-sei (55% of all isolates and 53% of blood isolates) as well as sed-sej (7% of all isolates and 10.5% of blood isolates) [62]. These findings indicated that MRSA blood isolates from Taiwan had unique toxin gene profiles, suggesting different geographical distribution of MRSA clones.

In conclusion, we have identified four major MRSA clone complexes CC1, CC5, CC8, and CC59 in Taiwan with the following molecular types: CC1: SCCmecIV-ST573; CC5: SCCmecII- ST5; CC8: SCCmecIII-ST239 or ST241; and CC59: SCCmecIV or SCCmecVT-ST59 or ST338. The toxin gene profiles of these MRSA clone complexes are CC1: sec-seg-(sei)-sell-selm-(seln)-selo; CC5: sec-seg-sei-sell-selm-(seln)-selp-tst1; CC8: sea-selk-selq, and CC59: seb-selk-selq. In addition, CC1 and CC5 clones had higher levels of vancomycin MIC than CC59. Continued surveillance of genotypes and phenotypes of MRSA isolates is needed to delineate the epidemiologic changes and to provide a positive impact on clinical practice.

Ethics Statement

There was no human participant, patient data, or animal study included in this experimentation.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Relationship between various molecular types of 157 MRSA blood isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030394.s001

(DOC)

Table S2.

Distribution of various molecular types of 157 blood isolates among 9 medical centers in Taiwan.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030394.s002

(DOC)

Table S3.

Distributions of superantigenic toxin genes in different molecular types of MRSA blood isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030394.s003

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Chao-Hung Lee for assistance with the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: W-YW J-JL. Performed the experiments: W-YW J-RS. Analyzed the data: W-YW J-JL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: W-YW T-SC S-MT J-JL. Wrote the paper: W-YW J-JL. Verifying data: J-JL.

References

  1. 1. Lowy FD (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 339: 520–532.
  2. 2. Daum RS (2007) Clinical practice. Skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 357: 380–390.
  3. 3. Jevons MP, Coe AW, Parker MT (1963) Methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Lancet 1: 904–907.
  4. 4. DeLeo FR, Chambers HF (2009) Reemergence of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the genomics era. J Clin Invest 119: 2464–2474.
  5. 5. Chen CJ, Su LH, Chiu CH, Lin TY, Wong KS, et al. (2007) Clinical features and molecular characteristics of invasive community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Taiwanese children. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 59: 287–293.
  6. 6. Chi CY, Wang SM, Lin CC, Liu CC (2010) Microbiological characteristics of community-associated Staphylococcus aureus causing uncomplicated bacteremia and infective endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 48: 292–294.
  7. 7. Wang WY, Lee SY, Chiueh TS, Lu JJ (2009) Molecular and phenotypic characteristics of methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients with septic arthritis. J Clin Microbiol 47: 3617–3623.
  8. 8. Haque NZ, Zuniga LC, Peyrani P, Reyes K, Lamerato L, et al. (2010) Relationship of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration to mortality in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, or health-care-associated pneumonia. Chest 138: 1356–1362.
  9. 9. Liao CH, Chen SY, Chang SC, Hsueh PR, Hung CC, et al. (2005) Characteristics of community-acquired and health care-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients treated at the emergency department of a teaching hospital. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 53: 85–92.
  10. 10. McDonald LC, Lauderdale TL, Shiau YR, Chen PC, Lai JF, et al. (2004) The status of antimicrobial resistance in Taiwan among Gram-positive pathogens: the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) programme, 2000. Int J Antimicrob Agents 23: 362–370.
  11. 11. Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, et al. (2007) Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. Jama 298: 1763–1771.
  12. 12. Liao CH, Lai CC, Chen SY, Huang YT, Hsueh PR (2010) Strain relatedness of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from patients with repeated bacteraemia. Clin Microbiol Infect 16: 463–469.
  13. 13. Tenover FC, McDougal LK, Goering RV, Killgore G, Projan SJ, et al. (2006) Characterization of a strain of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus widely disseminated in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 44: 108–118.
  14. 14. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG (2000) Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 38: 1008–1015.
  15. 15. Kondo Y, Ito T, Ma XX, Watanabe S, Kreiswirth BN, et al. (2007) Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51: 264–274.
  16. 16. Frenay HM, Bunschoten AE, Schouls LM, van Leeuwen WJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, et al. (1996) Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on the basis of protein A gene polymorphism. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 15: 60–64.
  17. 17. Senna JP, Pinto CA, Carvalho LP, Santos DS (2002) Comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and PCR analysis of polymorphisms on the mec hypervariable region for typing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 40: 2254–2256.
  18. 18. Gilot P, Lina G, Cochard T, Poutrel B (2002) Analysis of the genetic variability of genes encoding the RNA III-activating components Agr and TRAP in a population of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis. J Clin Microbiol 40: 4060–4067.
  19. 19. Tristan A, Ferry T, Durand G, Dauwalder O, Bes M, et al. (2007) Virulence determinants in community and hospital meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 65: Suppl 2105–109.
  20. 20. Deleo FR, Otto M, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF (2010) Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 375: 1557–1568.
  21. 21. Moise-Broder PA, Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Schentag JJ, Forrest A, et al. (2004) Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy. Clin Infect Dis 38: 1700–1705.
  22. 22. Sakoulas G, Moise-Broder PA, Schentag J, Forrest A, Moellering RC Jr, et al. (2004) Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 42: 2398–2402.
  23. 23. Lina G, Piemont Y, Godail-Gamot F, Bes M, Peter MO, et al. (1999) Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 29: 1128–1132.
  24. 24. Larkin EA, Carman RJ, Krakauer T, Stiles BG (2009) Staphylococcus aureus: the toxic presence of a pathogen extraordinaire. Curr Med Chem 16: 4003–4019.
  25. 25. Lin SH, Liao WH, Lai CC, Liao CH, Tan CK, et al. (2010) Risk factors for mortality in patients with persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in a tertiary care hospital in Taiwan. J Antimicrob Chemother 65: 1792–1798.
  26. 26. Wang JL, Wang JT, Chen SY, Chen YC, Chang SC (2010) Distribution of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec Types and correlation with comorbidity and infection type in patients with MRSA bacteremia. PLoS One 5: e9489.
  27. 27. Wang JL, Wang JT, Sheng WH, Chen YC, Chang SC (2010) Nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia in Taiwan: mortality analyses and the impact of vancomycin, MIC = 2 mg/L, by the broth microdilution method. BMC Infect Dis 10: 159.
  28. 28. CLSI (2009) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 19th informational supplement (M100-S19). CLSI, Wayne, PA.
  29. 29. CLSI (2009) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard (M02-A10). CLSI, Wayne, PA.
  30. 30. Boyle-Vavra S, Ereshefsky B, Wang CC, Daum RS (2005) Successful multiresistant community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage from Taipei, Taiwan, that carries either the novel Staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) type VT or SCCmec type IV. J Clin Microbiol 43: 4719–4730.
  31. 31. Higuchi W, Takano T, Teng LJ, Yamamoto T (2008) Structure and specific detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type VII. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 377: 752–756.
  32. 32. Shopsin B, Gomez M, Montgomery SO, Smith DH, Waddington M, et al. (1999) Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol 37: 3556–3563.
  33. 33. Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W, Rothganger J, Claus H, et al. (2003) Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J Clin Microbiol 41: 5442–5448.
  34. 34. Omoe K, Hu DL, Takahashi-Omoe H, Nakane A, Shinagawa K (2005) Comprehensive analysis of classical and newly described staphylococcal superantigenic toxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. FEMS Microbiol Lett 246: 191–198.
  35. 35. Hunter PR, Gaston MA (1988) Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol 26: 2465–2466.
  36. 36. Fridkin SK, Hageman JC, Morrison M, Sanza LT, Como-Sabetti K, et al. (2005) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N Engl J Med 352: 1436–1444.
  37. 37. Herold BC, Immergluck LC, Maranan MC, Lauderdale DS, Gaskin RE, et al. (1998) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk. JAMA 279: 593–598.
  38. 38. Donnio PY, Preney L, Gautier-Lerestif AL, Avril JL, Lafforgue N (2004) Changes in staphylococcal cassette chromosome type and antibiotic resistance profile in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a French hospital over an 11 year period. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 808–813.
  39. 39. Seybold U, Kourbatova EV, Johnson JG, Halvosa SJ, Wang YF, et al. (2006) Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 genotype as a major cause of health care-associated blood stream infections. Clin Infect Dis 42: 647–656.
  40. 40. Maree CL, Daum RS, Boyle-Vavra S, Matayoshi K, Miller LG (2007) Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates causing healthcare-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 236–242.
  41. 41. Robinson DA, Enright MC (2004) Evolution of Staphylococcus aureus by large chromosomal replacements. J Bacteriol 186: 1060–1064.
  42. 42. Harris SR, Feil EJ, Holden MT, Quail MA, Nickerson EK, et al. (2010) Evolution of MRSA during hospital transmission and intercontinental spread. Science 327: 469–474.
  43. 43. Nubel U, Roumagnac P, Feldkamp M, Song JH, Ko KS, et al. (2008) Frequent emergence and limited geographic dispersal of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 14130–14135.
  44. 44. Ho CM, Hsueh PR, Liu CY, Lee SY, Chiueh TS, et al. (2010) Prevalence and accessory gene regulator (agr) analysis of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus among methicillin-resistant isolates in Taiwan–SMART program, 2003. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29: 383–389.
  45. 45. Lu PL, Tsai JC, Chiu YW, Chang FY, Chen YW, et al. (2008) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage, infection and transmission in dialysis patients, healthcare workers and their family members. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23: 1659–1665.
  46. 46. Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC Jr, Wennersten C, Venkataraman L, et al. (2002) Accessory gene regulator (agr) locus in geographically diverse Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46: 1492–1502.
  47. 47. Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, et al. (2002) Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun 70: 631–641.
  48. 48. Palmqvist N, Foster T, Tarkowski A, Josefsson E (2002) Protein A is a virulence factor in Staphylococcus aureus arthritis and septic death. Microb Pathog 33: 239–249.
  49. 49. Coombs GW, Monecke S, Ehricht R, Slickers P, Pearson JC, et al. (2010) Differentiation of clonal complex 59 community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Western Australia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54: 1914–1921.
  50. 50. Ho CM, Ho MW, Lee CY, Tien N, Lu JJ (2011) Clonal spreading of methicillin-resistant SCCmec Staphylococcus aureus with specific spa and dru types in central Taiwan. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-10011-11338-10093.
  51. 51. Aires de Sousa M, Crisostomo MI, Sanches IS, Wu JS, Fuzhong J, et al. (2003) Frequent recovery of a single clonal type of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patients in two hospitals in Taiwan and China. J Clin Microbiol 41: 159–163.
  52. 52. Carpenter CF, Chambers HF (2004) Daptomycin: another novel agent for treating infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 38: 994–1000.
  53. 53. Fowler VG Jr, Boucher HW, Corey GR, Abrutyn E, Karchmer AW, et al. (2006) Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 355: 653–665.
  54. 54. Cui L, Tominaga E, Neoh HM, Hiramatsu K (2006) Correlation between Reduced Daptomycin Susceptibility and Vancomycin Resistance in Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50: 1079–1082.
  55. 55. Hussain FM, Boyle-Vavra S, Bethel CD, Daum RS (2000) Current trends in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a tertiary care pediatric facility. Pediatr Infect Dis J 19: 1163–1166.
  56. 56. Holmes A, Ganner M, McGuane S, Pitt TL, Cookson BD, et al. (2005) Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying Panton-Valentine leucocidin genes in England and Wales: frequency, characterization, and association with clinical disease. J Clin Microbiol 43: 2384–2390.
  57. 57. Lo WT, Wang SR, Tseng MH, Huang CF, Chen SJ, et al. (2010) Comparative molecular analysis of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from children with atopic dermatitis and healthy subjects in Taiwan. Br J Dermatol 162: 1110–1116.
  58. 58. Dohin B, Gillet Y, Kohler R, Lina G, Vandenesch F, et al. (2007) Pediatric bone and joint infections caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive Staphylococcus aureus. Pediatr Infect Dis J 26: 1042–1048.
  59. 59. Vandenesch F, Naimi T, Enright MC, Lina G, Nimmo GR, et al. (2003) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes: worldwide emergence. Emerg Infect Dis 9: 978–984.
  60. 60. Udo EE, Pearman JW, Grubb WB (1993) Genetic analysis of community isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Western Australia. J Hosp Infect 25: 97–108.
  61. 61. Holtfreter S, Broker BM (2005) Staphylococcal superantigens: do they play a role in sepsis? Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 53: 13–27.
  62. 62. Becker K, Friedrich AW, Lubritz G, Weilert M, Peters G, et al. (2003) Prevalence of genes encoding pyrogenic toxin superantigens and exfoliative toxins among strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from blood and nasal specimens. J Clin Microbiol 41: 1434–1439.