Highly Variable Chloroplast Markers for Evaluating Plant Phylogeny at Low Taxonomic Levels and for DNA Barcoding

Wenpan Dong; Jing Liu; Jing Yu; Ling Wang; Shiliang Zhou

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035071

Abstract

Background

At present, plant molecular systematics and DNA barcoding techniques rely heavily on the use of chloroplast gene sequences. Because of the relatively low evolutionary rates of chloroplast genes, there are very few choices suitable for molecular studies on angiosperms at low taxonomic levels, and for DNA barcoding of species.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We scanned the entire chloroplast genomes of 12 genera to search for highly variable regions. The sequence data of 9 genera were from GenBank and 3 genera were of our own. We identified nearly 5% of the most variable loci from all variable loci in the chloroplast genomes of each genus, and then selected 23 loci that were present in at least three genera. The 23 loci included 4 coding regions, 2 introns, and 17 intergenic spacers. Of the 23 loci, the most variable (in order from highest variability to lowest) were intergenic regions ycf1-a, trnK, rpl32-trnL, and trnH-psbA, followed by trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC, petA-psbJ, rps16-trnQ, ndhC-trnV, ycf1-b, ndhF, rpoB-trnC, psbE-petL, and rbcL-accD. Three loci, trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC, trnT-psbD, and trnW-psaJ, showed very high nucleotide diversity per site (π values) across three genera. Other loci may have strong potential for resolving phylogenetic and species identification problems at the species level. The loci accD-psaI, rbcL-accD, rpl32-trnL, rps16-trnQ, and ycf1 are absent from some genera. To amplify and sequence the highly variable loci identified in this study, we designed primers from their conserved flanking regions. We tested the applicability of the primers to amplify target sequences in eight species representing basal angiosperms, monocots, eudicots, rosids, and asterids, and confirmed that the primers amplified the desired sequences of these species.

Significance/Conclusions

Chloroplast genome sequences contain regions that are highly variable. Such regions are the first consideration when screening the suitable loci to resolve closely related species or genera in phylogenetic analyses, and for DNA barcoding.

Citation: Dong W, Liu J, Yu J, Wang L, Zhou S (2012) Highly Variable Chloroplast Markers for Evaluating Plant Phylogeny at Low Taxonomic Levels and for DNA Barcoding. PLoS ONE 7(4): e35071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071

Editor: Ahmed Moustafa, American University in Cairo, Egypt

Received: June 25, 2011; Accepted: March 13, 2012; Published: April 12, 2012

Copyright: © 2012 Dong et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (30930010, 30872062) and the Research Fund for the Large-scale Scientific Facilities of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 2009-LSF-GBOWS-01). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

At present, techniques for studying the molecular phylogeny of plants rely heavily on chloroplast genome sequence data. This is because the chloroplast genome has a simple and stable genetic structure, it is haploid, there are no (or very rare) recombination, it is generally uniparentally transmitted, and universal primers can be used to amplify target sequences. Another important reason is the ease of PCR amplification and sequencing of chloroplast genes, despite some intrinsic problems similar to those encountered when using animal mitochondrial DNA [1]. Many fragments of coding regions, introns, and intergenic spacers, including atpB, atpB-rbcL, matK, ndhF, rbcL, rpl16, rps4-trnS, rps16, trnH-psbA, trnL-F, trnS-G, etc., have been used for phylogenetic reconstructions at various taxonomic levels [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Unfortunately, these regions often lack variations in closely related species, especially those that have diverged recently in evolution. Therefore, a concatenation of many individual genes must be used to improve the resolution of the phylogenetic analysis, and to obtain reasonable results. Such extra investments could be avoided if more variable locations were identified and universal primers were available.

Some regions of the chloroplast genome, for example, atpF-H, matK, psbK-I, rbcL, rpoB, rpoC1 and trnH-psbA have been relied upon heavily for development of candidate markers for plant DNA barcoding [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. The aim of DNA barcoding is to solve species identification problems, but some regions such as rbcL, rpoB, and rpoC1 are useful for identification at the family rather than species level. Recently, candidate loci and some other loci frequently used in phylogenetic analyses were critically evaluated for several flowering plant groups, including Amomum [13], Carex [14], Meteoriaceae [15], Cycadales [16], Compsonuera [17], Panax [18], peach [19] and tree peonies [20]. It seems that matK and trnH-psbA are the two most promising choices of chloroplast regions. The matK gene is one of the most versatile candidates so far, because it is useful for identification at family, genus, and even species levels. However, it is difficult to amplify and sequence this region from certain taxa, and additional universal primers and optimization of PCR reactions are necessary [21], [22]. trnH-psbA is the most variable region in the chloroplast genome across a wide range of groups. However, there are some exceptions and long mononucleotide repeats (poly-structures or single nucleotide microsatellites) can cause sequencing problems. Another problem is the presence of inversions in the middle of the sequence, which can lead to incorrect alignments [23].

Most of the regions that are commonly used for phylogenetic analyses were first identified in the 1990s, before entire genome sequences were available. Shaw et al. [24] summarized and evaluated the most frequently used chloroplast regions in seed plants, which significantly helped beginning researchers. Currently, about 191 entire chloroplast genomes are available, and some genera have two or more completely sequenced chloroplast genomes. Therefore, it is timely to reevaluate the variability of chloroplast regions at low taxonomic levels. Identification of variable loci in chloroplast genomes will be extremely useful for molecular systematics and DNA barcoding. Many plant species evolved via adaptive radiations or explosive patterns of speciation, and have evolutionary histories of only a few million years. The very short evolutionary histories result in low sequence divergence. The limited sequence variation is usually harbored in a few hotspots, and most of the loci available to researchers based on previous research provide very few informative characters.

To solve phylogenetic problems at the species level, or to identify species using DNA sequences, we need to identify regions with very high evolutionary rates. Greater availability of such regions will increase our ability to resolve such identification problems. Utilization of a larger number of regions of genes or sequences can minimize the noise of the evolutionary heterogeneity of genes or parts of a gene. Therefore, searching for more regions with high evolutionary rates is very important for plant phylogenetic analyses and for DNA barcoding. Fortunately, there are now many complete chloroplast genome sequences available, even for different species in same genera. This information allows the identification of most variable regions between or among species. In this paper, we summarize the results of comparative studies on chloroplast genomes of congeners of flowering plants. Our aim was to find the most variable regions that are common across many genera. Such regions can be used to resolve phylogenies and for DNA barcoding of closely related flowering plant species.

Results

Identification of most variable loci in chloroplast genomes

There are 14 genera of seed plants in which the chloroplast genome has been sequenced for more than one species. We excluded gymnosperms from analyses because only Pinus has several genomes available. Of the angiosperm genera, we excluded Cuscuta from our analyses because of drastic genome reorganization and large deletions in the chloroplast genome. We analyzed a total of 12 genera among which nine genera have chloroplast genomic data readily available from GenBank, and the chloroplast genomic data of the other three genera are to be released (Table 1). The maximum number of polymorphic sites (S) within 600 bp in the 12 genera varied from 3 (Acorus) to 49 (Aethionema) with an arithmetic mean of 22.8. When the regions were restricted by the number of polymorphic sites (S, >+2stdev), there were 47 highly variable loci present in at least one genus, 29 were shared by two or more genera, 23 by three or more genera, 11 by four or more genera, 10 by 5 or more genera, and only 5 by 6 or more genera. To provide reasonable choices, we further analyzed 23 loci (Table S1). Among them, ndhF, trnK (containing matK), ycf1-a, and ycf1-b are largely coding regions, clpP and ndhA are introns, and the other 17 are intergenic spacers (Fig. 1). The most variable locus was ycf1, a gene of unknown function. The ycf1 locus is several kilobase-pairs long. Two regions of ycf1 showed high variability in 9 of 11 genera, and the π values of the ycf1 locus in 6 genera were markedly higher than in the other genera. The rpl32-trnL and trnK (including matK) loci were variable in 8 genera, and rps16-trnQ and trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC loci were variable in 6 genera. Judging from the values of nucleotide diversity (π values), ycf1, trnH-psbA, rpl32-trnL, rps16-trnQ, and ndhC-trnV were the most variable loci with average π values of greater than 0.01 over 12 genera. The other loci showed average π values of greater than 0.0048. The loci ndhC-trnV, rps16-trnQ, trnS^UGA-trnG^GCC, trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC, and trnT-psbD were rich in indels. Indels are usually informative in phylogenetic reconstructions and diagnostic to plant taxa.

Download:

Figure 1. Priming sites of 23 variable regions in chloroplast genome.

Large white boxes indicate coding areas, small white boxes indicate intergenic spacers, and small black boxes indicate introns. Figures above boxes indicate length (bp).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071.g001

Download:

Table 1. Angiosperm genera in which complete chloroplast genomes have been determined in two or more species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071.t001

Universality of primers

Although there are primers available for some loci, e.g., rps16-trnQ, trnH-psbA, trnK, and trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC, to provide more choices we designed new primers for 21 loci (Fig. 1, Table 2) based on available chloroplast genome data from GenBank. The two regions of ycf1 were too long and variable to design universal primers. All new primers were tested using eight species covering basal angiosperms, monocots, eudicots, rosids, and asterids. The primer pairs for 15 loci showed complete amplification successes with the eight testing species (Table 2). For some other primer pair/species combinations we failed to amplify sequences as follows: rbcL-accD of Typha orientalis and Prunus persica, accD-psaI of Panax bipinnatifidus, ndhF of Chimonanthus praecox, rpl32-trnL of Paeonia suffruticosa, trnS^GCU-trnG^GCC of T. orientalis, and trnW-psaJ of P. suffruticosa (Fig. 2). To check the quality of amplified fragments, PCR products from Nelumbo nucifera, Prunus mira, and Panax bipinnatifidus were purified with PEG8000 and directly sequenced. We considered 600 bp to be an acceptable length of a read for the sequence of a given product. One hundred and ninety-eight reads of the 210 in total (∼94.3%) reached 600 bp in length and had quality values (ratios of bases with QV >20 to the total bases of a read) higher than 90% after trimming both ends (Table 2).

Download:

Figure 2. Gel profiles of fragments amplified from six species using 21 pairs of primers.

Numbers shown at top are sequential order of loci as in Table 2 and Fig. 1. Numbers on right are size markers (kbp). Letters on left indicate species as follows: Cp: Chimonanthus praecox (L.) Link; To: Typha orientalis Presl.; Nn: Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.; Ps: Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews; Pp: Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.; and Pb: Panax bipinnatifidus Seem.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071.g002

Download:

Table 2. Primers for amplifying and/or sequencing 23 highly variable loci.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071.t002

Variability of 21 loci across Nelumbo, Panax, and Prunus, and comparisons with other loci

To assess the variability of the 21 loci, we selected two genera, Panax and Prunus, which have been studied for DNA barcoding purposes [18], [19], and the family Nelumbonaceae, which contains only two species. The number of variable sites, the nucleotide diversity, and the number of indels plus inverses were used as indicators. Four loci that have been suggested as candidate barcodes (atpF-H, rbcL, ropB, and rpoC1) were used as controls. The 21 loci performed satisfactory although not all of them were better than the controls in all three genera (Fig. 3).

Download:

Figure 3. Nucleotide diversity per site (π) and indels and inversions (I) of 21 loci in Nelumbo, Panax, and Prunus.

A & B, Nelumbo, C & D Panax, E & F, Prunus. A, C & E, π; B, D & F I. Four proposed barcoding loci, atpF-atpH, rbcL, rpoB, and rpoC1 were used as controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071.g003

Performances of the 21 loci, a case study on peaches

Peaches are a natural group of five or six species belonging to Prunus L. sect. Persica (L.) S. L. Zhou & X. Quan [19] or Amygdalus subg. Persica [25]. Nine chloroplast loci had been evaluated for DNA barcoding purpose [19]. The bootstrap consensus trees constructed using maximum parsimony based on the 21 loci (Fig. S1) show moderate to high resolutions. A combination of psbM-trnD intergenic spacer and clpP intron can solve all six species (Fig. 4).

Download:

Figure 4. Maximum parsimony tree of Prunus sect. Persica based on a concatenation of psbM-trnD intergenic spacer and clpP intron, two representatives of the 21 loci.

The figures above the branches are the bootstrap values (NJ|MP) of the clades.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071.g004

Discussion

It is believed that there are mutationally (or substitutionally) active regions in genomes, and our genomic survey of 12 genera indicated that such regions exist in chloroplast genomes. The number of polymorphic sites (S values) varied from 3 to 49 (Table 1) with an arithmetic mean value of 22.8 in 600 bp, indicating great potential for finding variable regions carrying phylogenetic information. Some considerably higher sequence variability of introns and intergenic spacers in chloroplast genomes has been reported (e.g. [24], [26], [27]). Mutationally active regions in chloroplast genomes are frequently regarded as problematic for phylogenetic analyses at higher taxonomic levels because of recombination and sequence convergence, although there are conflicting opinions on the issue (e.g. [28]). However, at lower taxonomic levels of flowering plants, the problems are less serious because in most cases there is insufficient sequence variation in chloroplast genes, rather than the high homoplasy that results from supervariability, as is found in mitochondrial genes.

The most variable locus was ycf1, a gene of unknown function. It is more variable than the matK locus in the Orchidaceae [29]. The ycf1 locus is several kb long. The region locates in the IRb region is conservative and two regions located in SSC region are extremely variable, and thus suitable for phylogenetic studies or DNA barcoding at low taxonomic levels. Unfortunately, because of the vast sequence differences at the ycf1 locus, we could not obtain universal primers currently. It is worthy of working out universal primers after examining more sequences or taxon-specific primers such as matK [30]. The matK region alone or together with trnK introns has been extensively used in molecular systematics and suggested to be a barcode for plants [6], [31]. However, the variability of matK region is not as remarkable as some other loci in the genera we examined, except for in Chimonanthus. Therefore, the matK locus could be helpful in separating angiosperm families or genera but very rarely species. The 3′ region of ndhF locus is more variable than the 5′ region and such a kind of variations is suitable for phylogenetic reconstruction for either old or recent groups [7]. The 3′ region of ndhF exhibited relatively high variability in Chimonanthus, Eucalyptus, Populus and Prunus (Table S1, Fig. 3E). The locus rpl32-trnL showed considerable length variation across taxa and a high level of positional variability. If the sequences can be unambiguously aligned, the rpl32-trnL region will be suitable for species identification. Unfortunately, the rpl32-trnL region has rarely been examined in systematics, and more case studies would further clarify its suitability for such analyses. The trnH-psbA was suggested as a candidate DNA barcode early [8], but has not been bolstered in subsequent studies. The trnH-psbA locus is really variable in most cases but suffers short length and, therefore, may not provide enough informative characters. Moreover, inversions or mononucleotide repeats are likely to exist at the trnH-psbA locus, which may result incorrect alignments or bring sequencing difficulties. The trnS-trnG has been well analyzed by Shaw et al. [24] and primer sequences were provided. The trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC includes psbZ. So the trnS^GCU-trnG^GCC region is likely to be more variable than trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC. Unexpectedly the variability of the two regions is taxon-dependent. The major problems are polyT sequences in the trnS^GCU-trnG^GCC region and (AT)n elements in the trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC region. A large indel in the trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC region was found variable within species [19]. Although the trnS^UGA was considered to be of mitochondrial origin for majority of taxa [32], it is also present in chloroplast genomes and the intergenic spacer trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC should be unique to the chloroplast genomes. The petA-psbJ and rps16-trnQ was variable in such genera as Acorus, Paeonia and Oryza in which very few variable regions exist. Similar to trnH-psbA indels and inversions are likely to happen in petA-psbJ. The loci ndhC-trnV, ndhF, rpoB-trnC, psbE-petL and rbcL-accD have been tried occasionally with varying successes. Among them the rbcL-accD deserves more attention because the rbcL has been suggested to be a barcode together with matK [31]. The discrimination power of rbcL is not as high as matK. Inclusion of rbcL-accD would compensate the insufficient variations of rbcL. The 10 other loci shown in Table S1 were variable in 3 genera. Some showed high π values in some genera, indicating that they could be useful for resolving phylogenetic relationships in those taxa.

Most of the loci identified in this study have been used frequently for phylogenetic reconstructions, and their evolutionary features have been discussed [24], [26], [27]. Some of the loci, e.g., clpP, petB-petD [33], rbcL-accD [33], [34], and trnW-psaJ have only been used occasionally. The two introns of clpP have seldom been considered in phylogenetic studies. The first intron of clpP exhibits moderate variability in some taxa, and has some potential applications, however, it may be absent from some taxa [35], [36]. The trnW-psaJ locus includes two intergenic spacers and a coding region (trnW-trnP-psaJ). The trnW-psaJ region has never been used independently and its variability should be evaluated. The trnW-psaJ region was the most variable region in Acorus, and was also one of the most variable regions in Eucalyptus (Table S1). A complete assessment of the loci presented in this study should be conducted before making final decisions about markers used for analyses.

In rapidly evolving regions of the chloroplast genome, evolutionary events that occur include the formation of secondary structures, multiple-hit sites, and intra-molecular recombination events. These problems seem less serious in phylogenetic analyses of closely related species. However, to be frank our aim to accurately solve phylogenetic relationships by using the loci identified in this study may not always be achieved because of other problems. For example, the loci accD-psaI, rbcL-accD, rpl32-trnL, rps16-trnQ, and ycf1 are likely to be absent from some genera, which limits their applications. Minute inversions are often observed in rapidly evolving regions such as introns and intergenic spacers, e.g., trnH-psbA, petN-psbM [23], [37]. If such structures were not recognized, the resulting alignments could be problematic. In addition, incorrect use of information regarding length variation could lead to misguided conclusions, because it can be very difficult to determine homologies among sequences that vary substantially in length. Both mononucleotide and multinucleotide repeats (microsatellites, such as in psbM-trnD, trnS^GCU-trnG^GCC and trnS^UGA-trnG^UCC) are sometimes present in rapidly evolving regions, and the exact numbers of repeats are difficult to determine by direct sequencing of PCR products. Several authors have suggested ways to interpret the informative but problematic characters [38], [39].

The variability of chloroplast genes differs markedly among genera (Fig. 3). There are intrinsic difficulties and/or taxonomic problems in finding variable regions in chloroplast genomes. The sequence divergence between the two species in Acorus is so small that the maximum number of substitutions every 600 bp was only 3, compared with 49 in Aethionema. Acorus americanus and A. calamus are well diverged morphologically. The very small sequence difference between A. americanus and A. calamus is perhaps due to short time of divergence. Oryza sativa subsp. indica and O. nivara are also very closely related. The cultivated O. sativa originated from O. rufipogon and/or O. nivara a few thousand years ago as a result of human selection [40]. Therefore, the variation between O. sativa subsp. indica and O. nivara is more properly considered intraspecific variation and it is unlikely that regions with high π values will be found. For such taxa, a combination of multiple genes is necessary to uncover more informative characters. In our case of peaches, many loci resolve the species better than matK (trnK), rbcL or trnH-psbA (Fig. S1) and a combination of psbM-trnD and clpP intron can resolve all six species (Fig. 4).

Although candidate genes have been significantly narrowed by this study, the loci we suggest may not be applicable for all flowering plants; however, most of the identified loci are good initial candidates for further evaluations. The controversies regarding plant DNA barcodes will continue even after markers become mandatory. Taxon-specific markers will have to be used for some difficult-to-differentiate taxa. In addition, markers that worked well in one case study do not guarantee suitability for another. Thus, pilot studies are necessary for any untested taxa and further assessments are required to better determine which loci will be useful for any given taxonomic and/or DNA barcoding questions. Moreover, if none of the candidates listed in Table S1 proves satisfactory, we have shown that additional choices are available for potential exploration (Table S3).

Methods

Collection of congener genome data and identification of variable loci

We downloaded from GenBank all chloroplast genome sequences in genera with at least two different species (Table 1). In our analyses, we also included six newly determined chloroplast genome sequences, three from the Calycanthaceae and three from Paeoniaceae (to be published). The sequences were first aligned using ClustalX 2.0 [41], and then manually adjusted with Se-Al 2.0a11 [42]. Inversions, if present, were separated to avoid exaggerated sequence differences. The variability of the aligned genomes was evaluated using the sliding window method in DNAsp ver. 4.5 [43]. The window length was set to 600 base pairs (bp), the typical length of DNA barcodes. The step size was set to 50 for relatively accurate positioning of variable regions. We only considered regions with the number of polymorphic sites (S) >+2 stdev. The regions were identified according to the original annotations, then extracted and compared among the genera after precise alignments. Regions were excluded from further consideration if they were present in fewer than three genera.

Primer design, applicability tests, and variability assessment

The locations of highly variable regions were precisely identified, and the conserved sequences flanking the regions were used for primer design. Primers for amplifying highly variable regions were designed using Primer Premier v. 5.0 (Premier Biosoft International, CA, USA) and Oligo v. 6.71 (Molecular Biology Insights, CO, USA). The primer pairs were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China).

We used eight species representing basal angiosperms, monocots, eudicots, rosids, and asterids (Table S2) to test the applicability of the primers and the variability of the selected loci. Total DNA was extracted by the CTAB method [44] from silicon gel-dried materials (Table S2). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out in 20 µL reaction mixtures. Each PCR mixture contained 2.0 µL 10×buffer, 2.0 µL dNTPs (2 µmol/L), 1.0 µL each primer (5 µmol/L), 1.0 µL total DNA (∼25 ng), 0.2 µL Taq polymerase (5 U/µL), and 11.8 µL ddH₂O. The PCR program was as follows: 94°C for 3 min, followed by 34 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 52°C (regardless of the Tm values) for 30 s, 72°C for 2 min, with final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR amplifications were carried out using a Veriti 96 Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Six species from three genera presenting basal eudicots, rosids and asterids were used to evaluate the variability of the loci and all of the resulting fragments were sequenced on an Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. The sequences were assembled using Sequencer 4.7 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), aligned with ClustalX [45], and adjusted manually with Se-Al 2.0 [42]. The number of polymorphic sites and nucleotide diversity per site (π) were computed using DnaSP ver. 5.10 [43].

Case study

Considering very low sequence variations within species [19], sequences of all 21 loci from all six species were used to test the resolutions of the loci. The species [vouchers in parenthesis, please refer to Quan and Zhou [19] for more detailed information] are P. davidiana (QX095), P. ferganensis (QX020), P. kansuensis (QX026), P. mira (QX138), P. persica (QX048), and P. potanini (SL4805–83), and P. armeniaca (SL4802–69) was used as an outgroup. Prunus ferganensis considered to be a distinct species instead of treating it a subspecies in P. persica as Quan and Zhou [19]. The methods for obtaining and analyzing the sequences are the same as above. The resolution of each locus was judged by the maximum parsimonious trees built with PAUP* [46] with the same settings as Quan and Zhou [19].

Supporting Information

Table S1.

The twenty-three most variable regions in chloroplast genomes of 12 genera with two or more species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071.s001

(DOC)

Table S2.

Samples used to test the of 23 chloroplast loci.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071.s002

(DOC)

Table S3.

Twenty-four loci of high potentials. The values are nucleotide diversity per site (π).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071.s003

(XLS)

Figure S1.

Maximum parsimony trees of all six peach species (Prunus sect. Persica) based on 21 chloroplast loci, showing the resolutions of the loci in the group. The figures above the lines are the bootstrap values for the clades.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035071.s004

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank John W. Stiller for his revision of the manuscript and suggestions. We are also grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their comments that help significantly to improve the quality of this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SZ WD. Performed the experiments: WD JY JL. Analyzed the data: WD. Wrote the paper: SZ LW WD.

References

1. Hurst GDD, Jiggins FM (2005) Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies: the effects of inherited symbionts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272: 1525.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Gao X, Zhu YP, Wu BC, Zhao YM, Chen JQ, et al. (2008) Phylogeny of Dioscorea sect. Stenophora based on chloroplast matK, rbcL and trnL-F sequences. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 46: 315–321.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Li JH (2008) Phylogeny of Catalpa (Bignoniaceae) inferred from sequences of chloroplast ndhF and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 46: 341–348.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Wilson CA (2009) Phylogenetic relationships among the recognized series in Iris Section Limniris. Systematic Botany 34: 277–284.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Peterson PM, Romaschenko K, Johnson G (2010) A classification of the Chloridoideae (Poaceae) based on multi-gene phylogenetic trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55: 580–598.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Hilu KW, Black C, Diouf D, Burleigh JG (2008) Phylogenetic signal in matK vs. trnK: A case study in early diverging eudicots (angiosperms). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48: 1120–1130.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Kim KJ, Jansen RK (1995) NdhF sequence evolution and the major clades in the sunflower Family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 10379–10383.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 8369–8374.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, van den Berg C, Madrinan S, et al. (2007) A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56: 295–299.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Ragupathy S (2006) DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique 84: 335–341.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP (2011) Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. Plos One 6: e19254.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Seberg O, Petersen G (2009) How many loci does it take to DNA barcode a Crocus? Plos One 4: e4598.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Yang ZY, Zhang L (2010) Screening potential DNA barcode regions in Amomum (Zingiberaceae). Acta Botanica Yunnanica 32: 393–400.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Starr JR, Naczi RFC, Chouinard BN (2009) Plant DNA barcodes and species resolution in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 151–163.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Zhao LJ, Jia Y, Zhou SL, Du GS (2010) The preliminary study on DNA barcoding of mosses-A case of part of genera of Meteoriaceae. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 32: 239–249.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Sass C, Little DP, Stevenson DW, Specht CD (2007) DNA barcoding in the Cycadales: testing the potential of proposed barcoding markers for species identification of Cycads. Plos One 2: e1154.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Steeves RAD, Janovec J (2008) Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 480–490.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Zuo YJ, Chen ZJ, Kondo K, Funamoto T, Wen J, et al. (2011) DNA barcoding of Panax species. Planta Medica 77: 182–187.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Quan X, Zhou SL (2011) Molecular identification of species in Prunus sect. Persica (Rosaceae), with emphasis on evaluation of candidate barcodes for plants. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 49: 138–145.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Zhang JM, Wang JX, Xia T, Zhou SL (2009) DNA barcoding: species delimitation in tree peonies. Science in China Series C-Life Sciences 52: 568–578.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Dunning LT, Savolainen V (2010) Broad-scale amplification of matK for DNA barcoding plants, a technical note. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 164: 1–9.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Yu J, Xue JH, Zhou SL (2011) New universal matK primers for DNA barcoding angiosperms. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 49: 176–181.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Whitlock BA, Hale AM, Groff PA (2010) Intraspecific inversions pose a challenge for the trnH-psbA plant DNA barcode. Plos One 5: e11533.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Beck JT, Farmer SB, Liu WS, et al. (2005) The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany 92: 142–166.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Lu LT (1986) Amygdalus L. In: Yu TT, editor. Rosaceae (3). Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinica 38. Beijing: Science Press.
26. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Schilling EE, Small RL (2007) Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: The tortoise and the hare III. American Journal of Botany 94: 275–288.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Borsch T, Quandt D (2009) Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of noncoding chloroplast DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 282: 169–199.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Müller KF, Borsch T, Hilu KW (2006) Phylogenetic utility of rapidly evolving DNA at high taxonomical levels: Contrasting matK, trnT-F, and rbcL in basal angiosperms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 99–117.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Neubig K, Whitten W, Carlsward B, Blanco M, Endara L, et al. (2009) Phylogenetic utility of ycf1 in orchids: a plastid gene more variable than matK. Plant Systematics and Evolution 277: 75–84.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Neubig KM, Abbott JR (2010) Primer development for the plastid region ycf1 in Annonaceae and Other Magnoliids. American Journal of Botany 97: E52–E55.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Group CPW (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 12794–12797.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Alverson AJ, Rice DW, Dickinson S, Barry K, Palmer JD (2011) Origins and Recombination of the Bacterial-Sized Multichromosomal Mitochondrial Genome of Cucumber. Plant Cell 23: 2499–2513.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Korall P, Conant DS, Metzgar JS, Schneider H, Pryer KM (2007) A molecular phylogeny of scaly tree ferns (Cyatheaceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 873–886.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Matsuda1a Y, Yoshimura1a H, Kanamoto H, Ujihara T, Tomizawa K, et al. (2005) Sequence variation in the rbcL-accD region in the chloroplast genome of Moraceae. Plant Biotechnology 22: 231–233.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Lee HL, Jansen RK, Chumley TW, Kim KJ (2007) Gene relocations within chloroplast genomes of Jasminum and Menodora (Oleaceae) are due to multiple, overlapping inversions. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1161–1180.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Erixon P, Oxelman B (2008) Whole-gene positive selection, elevated synonymous substitution rates, duplication, and indel evolution of the chloroplast clpP1 gene. Plos One 3: e1386.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Kim KJ, Lee HL (2005) Widespread occurrence of small inversions in the chloroplast genomes of land plants. Molecules and Cells 19: 104–113.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Kelchner SA (2000) The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482–498.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H (2000) Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369–381.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Londo JP, Chiang YC, Hung KH, Chiang TY, Schaal BA (2006) Phylogeography of Asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon, reveals multiple independent domestications of cultivated rice, Oryza sativa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 9578–9583.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, et al. (2007) Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Rambaut A (1996) Se-Al: Sequence Alignment Editor. version 2.0. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Zoology.
43. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496–2497.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Doyle J, Doyle J (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876–4882.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Swofford D (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.

[ref1] 1. Hurst GDD, Jiggins FM (2005) Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies: the effects of inherited symbionts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272: 1525.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Gao X, Zhu YP, Wu BC, Zhao YM, Chen JQ, et al. (2008) Phylogeny of Dioscorea sect. Stenophora based on chloroplast matK, rbcL and trnL-F sequences. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 46: 315–321.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Li JH (2008) Phylogeny of Catalpa (Bignoniaceae) inferred from sequences of chloroplast ndhF and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 46: 341–348.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Wilson CA (2009) Phylogenetic relationships among the recognized series in Iris Section Limniris. Systematic Botany 34: 277–284.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Peterson PM, Romaschenko K, Johnson G (2010) A classification of the Chloridoideae (Poaceae) based on multi-gene phylogenetic trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55: 580–598.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Hilu KW, Black C, Diouf D, Burleigh JG (2008) Phylogenetic signal in matK vs. trnK: A case study in early diverging eudicots (angiosperms). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48: 1120–1130.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Kim KJ, Jansen RK (1995) NdhF sequence evolution and the major clades in the sunflower Family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 10379–10383.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 8369–8374.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, van den Berg C, Madrinan S, et al. (2007) A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56: 295–299.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Ragupathy S (2006) DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique 84: 335–341.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP (2011) Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. Plos One 6: e19254.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Seberg O, Petersen G (2009) How many loci does it take to DNA barcode a Crocus? Plos One 4: e4598.
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Yang ZY, Zhang L (2010) Screening potential DNA barcode regions in Amomum (Zingiberaceae). Acta Botanica Yunnanica 32: 393–400.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Starr JR, Naczi RFC, Chouinard BN (2009) Plant DNA barcodes and species resolution in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 151–163.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Zhao LJ, Jia Y, Zhou SL, Du GS (2010) The preliminary study on DNA barcoding of mosses-A case of part of genera of Meteoriaceae. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 32: 239–249.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Sass C, Little DP, Stevenson DW, Specht CD (2007) DNA barcoding in the Cycadales: testing the potential of proposed barcoding markers for species identification of Cycads. Plos One 2: e1154.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Steeves RAD, Janovec J (2008) Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 480–490.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Zuo YJ, Chen ZJ, Kondo K, Funamoto T, Wen J, et al. (2011) DNA barcoding of Panax species. Planta Medica 77: 182–187.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Quan X, Zhou SL (2011) Molecular identification of species in Prunus sect. Persica (Rosaceae), with emphasis on evaluation of candidate barcodes for plants. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 49: 138–145.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Zhang JM, Wang JX, Xia T, Zhou SL (2009) DNA barcoding: species delimitation in tree peonies. Science in China Series C-Life Sciences 52: 568–578.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Dunning LT, Savolainen V (2010) Broad-scale amplification of matK for DNA barcoding plants, a technical note. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 164: 1–9.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Yu J, Xue JH, Zhou SL (2011) New universal matK primers for DNA barcoding angiosperms. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 49: 176–181.
View Article
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Whitlock BA, Hale AM, Groff PA (2010) Intraspecific inversions pose a challenge for the trnH-psbA plant DNA barcode. Plos One 5: e11533.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Beck JT, Farmer SB, Liu WS, et al. (2005) The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany 92: 142–166.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Lu LT (1986) Amygdalus L. In: Yu TT, editor. Rosaceae (3). Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinica 38. Beijing: Science Press.

[ref26] 26. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Schilling EE, Small RL (2007) Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: The tortoise and the hare III. American Journal of Botany 94: 275–288.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Borsch T, Quandt D (2009) Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of noncoding chloroplast DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 282: 169–199.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Müller KF, Borsch T, Hilu KW (2006) Phylogenetic utility of rapidly evolving DNA at high taxonomical levels: Contrasting matK, trnT-F, and rbcL in basal angiosperms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 99–117.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Neubig K, Whitten W, Carlsward B, Blanco M, Endara L, et al. (2009) Phylogenetic utility of ycf1 in orchids: a plastid gene more variable than matK. Plant Systematics and Evolution 277: 75–84.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Neubig KM, Abbott JR (2010) Primer development for the plastid region ycf1 in Annonaceae and Other Magnoliids. American Journal of Botany 97: E52–E55.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Group CPW (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 12794–12797.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Alverson AJ, Rice DW, Dickinson S, Barry K, Palmer JD (2011) Origins and Recombination of the Bacterial-Sized Multichromosomal Mitochondrial Genome of Cucumber. Plant Cell 23: 2499–2513.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Korall P, Conant DS, Metzgar JS, Schneider H, Pryer KM (2007) A molecular phylogeny of scaly tree ferns (Cyatheaceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 873–886.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Matsuda1a Y, Yoshimura1a H, Kanamoto H, Ujihara T, Tomizawa K, et al. (2005) Sequence variation in the rbcL-accD region in the chloroplast genome of Moraceae. Plant Biotechnology 22: 231–233.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Lee HL, Jansen RK, Chumley TW, Kim KJ (2007) Gene relocations within chloroplast genomes of Jasminum and Menodora (Oleaceae) are due to multiple, overlapping inversions. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1161–1180.
View Article
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Erixon P, Oxelman B (2008) Whole-gene positive selection, elevated synonymous substitution rates, duplication, and indel evolution of the chloroplast clpP1 gene. Plos One 3: e1386.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Kim KJ, Lee HL (2005) Widespread occurrence of small inversions in the chloroplast genomes of land plants. Molecules and Cells 19: 104–113.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Kelchner SA (2000) The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482–498.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H (2000) Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369–381.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Londo JP, Chiang YC, Hung KH, Chiang TY, Schaal BA (2006) Phylogeography of Asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon, reveals multiple independent domestications of cultivated rice, Oryza sativa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 9578–9583.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, et al. (2007) Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948.
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Rambaut A (1996) Se-Al: Sequence Alignment Editor. version 2.0. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Zoology.

[ref43] 43. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496–2497.
View Article
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Doyle J, Doyle J (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.
View Article
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876–4882.
View Article
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Swofford D (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.