Figures
Abstract
Background
Sorafenib induces frequent dose limiting toxicities (DLT) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sarcopenia has been associated with poor performance status and shortened survival in cancer patients.
Patients and Methods
The characteristics of Child Pugh A cirrhotic patients with HCC receiving sorafenib in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Sorafenib plasma concentrations were determined at each visit. Toxicities were recorded during the first month of treatment, and sarcopenia was determined from baseline CT-scans.
Results
Forty patients (30 males) were included. Eleven (27.5%) were sarcopenic. Eighteen patients (45%) experienced a DLT during the first month of treatment. Sarcopenic patients experienced significantly more DLTs than non-sarcopenic patients did (82% versus 31%, p = 0.005). Grade 3 diarrhea was significantly more frequent in sarcopenic patients than in non-sarcopenic patients (45.5% versus 6.9%, p = 0.01), but not grade 3 hand foot syndrome reaction (9% versus 17.2%, p = 1). On day 28, median sorafenib AUC (n = 17) was significantly higher in sarcopenic patients (102.4 mg/l.h versus 53.7 mg/l.h, p = 0.013).
Citation: Mir O, Coriat R, Blanchet B, Durand J-P, Boudou-Rouquette P, Michels J, et al. (2012) Sarcopenia Predicts Early Dose-Limiting Toxicities and Pharmacokinetics of Sorafenib in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 7(5): e37563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037563
Editor: Taro Yamashita, Kanazawa University, Japan
Received: November 14, 2011; Accepted: April 25, 2012; Published: May 30, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Mir et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: Prof. Goldwasser and Dr. Ropert have acted as paid consultants for Bayer Healthcare. Dr. Mir and Dr. Coriat have acted as paid consultants for Roche. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for more than 24,000 new cases per year in the United States, and causes approximately 19,000 deaths yearly [1]. The incidence of HCC is increasing in Western countries, and HCC is diagnosed at advanced stages in up to 60% of all patients [2].
Sorafenib (Nexavar; Bayer Healthcare, Wayne, NJ) is an orally active multi–kinase inhibitor that targets BRAF, RET, PDGFR-β, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 [3]. At a dose of 400 mg bid, sorafenib displays clinical activity in patients with advanced HCC [4]. Sorafenib-induced toxicities (diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, rash, fatigue and hypertension) may limit patient's ability to receive full-dose treatment, and resulted in dose reductions in 26% and treatment termination in 44% of patients included in the pivotal phase III trial [4].
Little is known on factors predicting sorafenib toxicity. Recently, the condition of low muscle mass named sarcopenia [5], [6] was identified as a significant predictor of toxicity in patients with metastatic renal cancer treated with sorafenib 400 mg bid [7]. Sarcopenia has been studied mainly in geriatric populations [5], but also more recently in cancer patients, in whom sex-specific cut-offs were determined, based on mortality risks [8]. Sarcopenia and overall lean body mass may represent an occult condition in cancer patients with normal or even high body mass index (BMI). Sarcopenia has been associated with poor PS, capecitabine and epirubicin toxicity, and shortened survival in cancer patients [8], [9], [10].
The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether sarcopenia could predict the occurrence of early dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in HCC patients treated with sorafenib. We hypothesized that an increased toxicity, as well as a higher drug exposure, would be observed in sarcopenic HCC patients.
Materials and Methods
Participants
We performed a retrospective electronical medical record review of consecutive patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib in our institution from June 2007 to December 2010. From October 2008, a population pharmacokinetics study including patients receiving sorafenib for various malignancies was initiated [11]. The pharmacokinetic data of patients with HCC were extracted for the present study.
Ethics
All patients provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the local ethics board according to good clinical practice and applicable laws, and the declaration of Helsinki.
Treatment, toxicity and activity assessment
Adult patients with HCC received sorafenib at a starting dose of 200 mg bid or 400 mg bid according to their ECOG PS and co-morbidities, at the discretion of the treating physician, as described by other authors [12]. Patients were treated in an outpatient setting, and toxicity was assessed at visits on days 14 and 28 after the initiation of sorafenib (or before if clinically indicated), then monthly.
Sorafenib dose was reduced to 200 mg bid in the case of severe toxicity (grade 3 or 4 toxicity according to the NCI-CTC v3.0), except for patients with grade 3 hypertension in whom anti-hypertensive drugs were introduced according to current guidelines [13]. If toxicity was not thereby resolved, treatment was terminated, and if so, patients were returned to the initially scheduled dose.
A DLT was defined as any toxicity leading to dose reduction, temporary or permanent or discontinuation of treatment. Following the design of a previous study [9], only DLTs occurring during the first month of treatment were examined for the present analysis (Figure 1).
Treatment activity was assessed every three months by CT-scan, or before if clinically indicated, according to RECIST v1.0.
Patients' characteristics are described in Table 1. Patients presented with a broad range of LBM. Therefore, the administered dose of sorafenib was markedly variable when expressed per kg of LBM, ranging from 3.8 to 16.8 mg/kg LBM bid. Eleven (27.5%) of 40 patients had sarcopenia (10 men and 1 woman).
Anthropometric measurements
Weight was measured with a medical balance beam scale and height was measured with a stadiometer. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated [weight (kg)/height (m2)] and the World Health Organization (WHO) categories were used: underweight, BMI<18.5; normal, 18.5<BMI<24.9; overweight, 25<BMI<29.9; obesity, BMI>30. Body surface area (BSA) was calculated using the Mosteller formula: body-surface area (m2) = ([height (cm)×weight (kg)]/3600)1/2.
Image analysis
Body composition was evaluated using CT-scan, as previously described [14], [15]. Regional adipose tissues (visceral and subcutaneous) and muscle tissues were assessed on CT images, which had been performed for diagnostic and follow-up purposes. Images taken within 30 days before initiation of sorafenib were included (Figure 1). Images were analyzed using ImageJ software v1.42q (National Institutes of Health, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij).
The third lumbar vertebra (L3) was chosen as a standard landmark, as previously described [7]. Muscles were identified based on their anatomic features, and the structure of those specific muscles were quantified based on pre-established thresholds of Hounsfield units (−29 to +150) of skeletal muscle tissue [15]. Cross-sectional areas (cm2) of the sum of all of these muscles were computed for each image, and the mean value for two consecutive images was computed for each patient.
Total lumbar skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (cm2) and total lumbar adipose tissue area (cm2), are linearly related to whole-body muscle and adipose tissue mass [16], [17]. These values were normalized for stature as is conventional for BMI and body composition components [8], [16] and expressed in units of cm2/m2. The sex-specific cut-offs for sarcopenia [8] determined in patients with digestive malignancies (55.4 cm2/m2 for males and 38.9 cm2/m2 for females) were used.
Total lean body mass (LBM) was estimated from muscle cross-sectional areas as described by Mourtzakis et al. [16]: LBM (kg) = 0.30×[skeletal muscle at L3 using CT (cm2)]+6.06.
Pharmacokinetic measurements
On each visit, blood samples were drawn to determine sorafenib plasma concentrations. Sorafenib concentration determination was conducted using a previously described high-performance liquid chromatography method [18]. The accuracy, within-assay and between assay precision of this method were 96.9–104.0%, 3.4–6.2% and 7.6–9.9%, respectively. A specific bayesian estimator developed in our institution [11] allowed estimating individual sorafenib area under the plasma concentration–time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC). A 1-compartment model with saturated absorption, first-order intestinal loss and linear elimination was implemented in the ADAPT II software package, then used to estimate sorafenib exposure (AUC).
Statistical analysis
Prevalence of toxicity was compared by Fisher's exact test. The Wilcoxon test was used for comparison of continuous variables, and the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for comparisons between AUCs. AUCs were normalized to a dose of 400 mg sorafenib twice daily to investigate their relation with BMI, LBM or adipose index. Dose-standardized AUCs were also used to compare the drug exposition between non- and sarcopenic patients. The impact of baseline parameters, including sarcopenia, on the occurrence of DLT during the first month of treatment was evaluated by multiple regression with 3000 bootstrap iterations. All p values were two-sided, and the level of significance was p<0.05.
Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were measured from the date of first treatment administration to the date of disease progression or death for the former, and the date of death for the latter. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the distribution of times from baseline to outcome were computed, and the groups were compared using the log-rank test. Calculations were performed with NCSS™ 2007 software (NCSS, Kaysville, UT).
Results
Patients
Among 45 patients received sorafenib for advanced HCC from June 2007 to December 2010, 42 had computerized tomography (CT) images that met criteria for analysis. Three patients were excluded from the investigation because they had either no CT scans on record (n = 2), or a CT scan >30 days from treatment initiation (n = 1). Finally, two additional patients with Child B cirrhosis were also excluded. Overall, 40 patients with advanced HCC and Child A cirrhosis were selected for the present analysis (Figure 2), and AUCs on day 28 were available for 17 (43%) patients.
Sorafenib toxicity
Eighteen patients (45%) experienced a DLT during the first month of treatment (Table 2). The dose was reduced to 200 mg bid for the 12 patients who had been started on sorafenib at a dose of 400 mg bid. In the remaining 6 patients, who had been started on sorafenib 200 mg bid, the treatment was discontinued.
DLTs included grade 3 diarrhea in 7 cases, grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 6 cases, and grade 4 upper GI bleeding in 1 case. The remaining four patients had multiple, simultaneous grade 2 toxicities, with grade 3 fatigue. Grade 3 hypertension occurred in 3 patients (all non-sarcopenic), but was not considered as dose-limiting since it was controlled by the introduction of oral anti-hypertensive agents, without modification of sorafenib dosing.
The comparison between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients is summarized in Table 2. Six of 11 sarcopenic patients had been started on sorafenib 200 mg bid, a higher proportion than that observed in non-sarcopenic patients (54.5% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.04). However, no difference was observed regarding sorafenib dose/kg of LBM, age, height, weight, BMI and BSA. As expected, significant differences in serum albumin, lumbar skeletal muscle index and LBM were seen between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients.
Overall, patients with sarcopenia presented with a higher prevalence of DLT (81.8% or 9/11) compared with non-sarcopenic patients (31.0% or 9/29, p = 0.005; Table 2, Figure 3a). When considering each toxicity separately, only grade 3 diarrhea was significantly more prevalent in sarcopenic patients (5/11 patients or 45.5% vs. 2/29 patients or 6.9%, p = 0.01, Figure 3b). No significant difference was found for other toxicities, especially hand-foot skin reaction (Figure 3c). By multivariate analysis, only sarcopenia was an independently correlated with the occurrence of DLT (p = 0.03).
Sorafenib pharmacokinetics
The median calculated dose-adjusted AUC on day 28 was higher in sarcopenic patients than in non-sarcopenic patients (median: 102.4 mg/l.h, range: 48.0–137.8 vs. 53.7 mg/l.h, range: 24.5–74.5, respectively, p = 0.013, Figure 3d). No correlation was found between AUC and BMI, LBM or adipose index (p = 0.34, 0.11 and 0.23, respectively). Patients who experienced a DLT during the first 28 days of treatment had higher AUCs on day 28 (median: 106.4 mg/l.h, range 48–177.8 vs 56.7 mg/l.h, range 24.5–136.7), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). As well, no statistical difference was found between AUC on day 28 in patients with or without grade 3 diarrhea (median: 102.4 mg/l.h, range 48–137.8 vs. 56.9 mg/l.h, range 24.5–136.7, respectively, p = 0.10).
Survival analysis
The median PFS and OS for the study population (n = 40) were 4.6 (95%CI: 2.5–7.7) and 8.9 months (95%CI: 7.4–16.5), respectively. No significant differences were observed between non-sarcopenic and sarcopenic patients regarding median PFS [4.6 (95%CI: 2.5–7.7) vs. 2.5 months (95%CI: 1.3–16.1), respectively, p = 0.94] and median OS [11.0 (95%CI: 7.7–16.5) vs. 7.4 months (95%CI: 1.9–19.3), respectively, p = 0.28] (Figure 4).
Discussion
The present retrospective analysis is the first study evaluating relationships between body composition and chemotherapy toxicity and pharmacokinetics in patients with HCC. In a daily practice population of 40 patients with HCC and Child A cirrhosis, we found a proportion of 27.5% of patients with sarcopenia, a proportion similar to that observed in other series [19].
Sarcopenic patients received more frequently an initial dose of sorafenib of 200 mg bid based on the clinical judgement of the treating physician, a finding consistent with the knowledge that sarcopenia has been associated with poor PS in cancer patients [8]. Interestingly, despite the apparent heterogeneity in sorafenib dosing between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients, the doses of sorafenib/kg of LBM were identical in both groups.
During the first month of treatment, sarcopenic patients experienced significantly more DLTs, mainly grade 3 diarrhea. DLTs were frequent in our patients, probably because they represents a daily practice population, more frail and more prone to develop severe toxicity than patients treated in clinical trials.
Sarcopenic patients had higher sorafenib AUC on day 28 than non-sarcopenic patients, but we found no significant correlation between AUC and the occurrence of DLT or grade 3 diarrhea, although a trend was observed (p = 0.09 and p = 0.10, respectively). This negative result may be due to the small number of patients with pharmacokinetic data, since routine monitoring of sorafenib plasma concentrations has recently started in our institution. We therefore hypothesize that the ongoing collection of pharmacokinetic data in our institution could allow the demonstration of a relationship between increased exposure and the occurrence of severe diarrhea. Of note, phase I trials have failed to demonstrate a clear correlation between sorafenib exposure and other toxicities [20].
Several hypotheses accounting for increased exposure and increased toxicity in sarcopenic patients with HCC can be raised.
Firstly, sarcopenia might result in alterations in the distribution, metabolism and clearance of anticancer drugs. Prado et al. [10] have recently evidenced a critical role for LBM in the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin. In line with Prado's hypothesis regarding epirubicin, it is of interest to underscore that sorafenib is highly protein-bound (>99%, mainly to albumin). Binding might also occur in lean body tissues, and not exclusively to serum albumin. Hence, patients with sarcopenia would have high intra-tissular exposure to unbound sorafenib. A potential confounding factor could be hypoalbuminemia, which was more prevalent in sarcopenic patients in our study. The pharmacokinetics of sorafenib in patients with low albuminemia remains unknown. Miller et al. [21] investigated total and free sorafenib exposure in cancer patients with varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction receiving a single-dose of sorafenib 400 mg. In contradiction to a priori hypothesis, sorafenib unbound fraction in a cohort including patients with severe hypoalbuminemia (<25 g/L) were not significantly different from those measured in the cohort with normal hepatic function. However, the clinical relevance of this study using a single-dose of sorafenib 400 mg is limited, because it does not provide information on sorafenib pharmacokinetics and toxicity when the steady-state has been reached. Hence, the consequences of hypoalbuminemia in patients receiving sorafenib remain to determine.
Secondly, Antoun et al. [7] found that sarcopenia and low BMI could predict DLT (at any time during the treatment) in patients with advanced renal cancer. The authors hypothesized that in patients with low BMI and sarcopenia, sorafenib flat-dosing (400 mg bid) could result in increased exposure, and thereby in excessive toxicity. Our results confirm this hypothesis, although we found no relationship between BMI and the occurrence of sorafenib-induced DLT in patients with HCC. This may be due to the fact that patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis might develop lower limb oedema and mild ascites, leading to erroneously normal calculated BMI. Antoun et al. [7] underscored that sarcopenic patients have an increased propensity for nosocomial infections and other complications in hospital [22], a possible reflect of a global frailty that might include vulnerability to sorafenib toxicity.
Thirdly, systemic inflammation underlies sarcopenia [6], and might play a role in the occurrence of DLT. Indeed, inflammation has a negative impact on the activity of CYP3A4 [23], one of the enzymes involved in the metabolism of sorafenib. Hence, sarcopenic patients with high baseline CRP levels could experience high exposure to sorafenib due to low CYP3A4 activity, and subsequently excessive toxicity. In the present study, we found no difference in baseline CRP levels between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. However, the impact of sarcopenia on CYP3A4 activity deserves further investigations, including phenotypic and genotypic testing.
The limitations of the present study include its retrospective nature and the small number of patients. Further prospective studies including a PK/PD approach are needed to validate these results in larger populations of patients. Our results also pinpoint that the evaluation of LBM based on CT-scan analysis is worth being investigated in patients treated with sorafenib, rather than other clinical parameters such as body weight, BSA or BMI.
In conclusion, our results highlight the emerging role of sarcopenia assessment to improve the anticipation of sorafenib-related toxicities, opening gates to drug dosing individualization in patients with advanced HCC. This concept warrants validation in further prospective studies evaluating toxicity after drug dosing based on pre-treatment evaluation of sarcopenia.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the nurses, residents and clinical research staff of the Cochin Teaching Hospital.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: OM RC BB JPD PBR JM SR MV SP SC FG. Performed the experiments: OM RC BB. Analyzed the data: OM RC BB JPD PBR JM SR MV SP SC FG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: OM RC BB JPD PBR JM SR MV SP SC FG. Wrote the paper: OM RC BB JPD PBR JM SR MV SP SC FG.
References
- 1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90.
- 2. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J (2003) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 362: 1907–1917.
- 3. Wilhelm S, Carter C, Lynch M, Lowinger T, Dumas J, et al. (2006) Discovery and development of sorafenib: a multikinase inhibitor for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5: 835–844.
- 4. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, et al. (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359: 378–390.
- 5. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, et al. (2010) Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 39: 412–423.
- 6. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, et al. (2011) Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 12: 489–495.
- 7. Antoun S, Baracos VE, Birdsell L, Escudier B, Sawyer MB (2010) Low body mass index and sarcopenia associated with dose-limiting toxicity of sorafenib in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 21: 1594–1598.
- 8. Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Sawyer MB, et al. (2008) Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 9: 629–635.
- 9. Prado CM, Baracos VE, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Mourtzakis M, et al. (2009) Sarcopenia as a determinant of chemotherapy toxicity and time to tumor progression in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine treatment. Clin Cancer Res 15: 2920–2926.
- 10. Prado CM, Lima IS, Baracos VE, Bies RR, McCargar LJ, et al. (2010) An exploratory study of body composition as a determinant of epirubicin pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 67: 93–101.
- 11.
Hornecker M, Blanchet B, Billemont B, Sassi H, Ropert S, et al. (2011) Saturable absorption of sorafenib in patients with solid tumors: a population model. Invest New Drugs. DOI 10.1007/s10637-10011-19760-z.
- 12. Kim JE, Ryoo BY, Ryu MH, Chang HM, Suh DJ, et al. (2012) Sorafenib Dose Escalation in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncology 82: 119–125.
- 13. Izzedine H, Ederhy S, Goldwasser F, Soria JC, Milano G, et al. (2009) Management of hypertension in angiogenesis inhibitor-treated patients. Ann Oncol 20: 807–815.
- 14. Heymsfield SB, Wang Z, Baumgartner RN, Ross R (1997) Human body composition: advances in models and methods. Annu Rev Nutr 17: 527–558.
- 15. Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB, Lyons W, Gallagher D, et al. (1998) Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol 85: 115–122.
- 16. Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, et al. (2008) A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33: 997–1006.
- 17. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, Gallagher D, St-Onge MP, et al. (2004) Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J Appl Physiol 97: 2333–2338.
- 18. Blanchet B, Billemont B, Cramard J, Benichou AS, Chhun S, et al. (2009) Validation of an HPLC-UV method for sorafenib determination in human plasma and application to cancer patients in routine clinical practice. J Pharm Biomed Anal 49: 1109–1114.
- 19. Meza-Junco J, Montano-Loza A, Prado CMM, Lieffers JR, Baracos VE, et al. (2011) Sarcopenia in patients (pts) with hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC). J Clin Oncol 29: e14570.
- 20. Strumberg D, Clark JW, Awada A, Moore MJ, Richly H, et al. (2007) Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of sorafenib: a review of four phase I trials in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. Oncologist 12: 426–437.
- 21. Miller AA, Murry DJ, Owzar K, Hollis DR, Kennedy EB, et al. (2009) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction: CALGB 60301. J Clin Oncol 27: 1800–1805.
- 22. Cosqueric G, Sebag A, Ducolombier C, Thomas C, Piette F, et al. (2006) Sarcopenia is predictive of nosocomial infection in care of the elderly. Br J Nutr 96: 895–901.
- 23. Kacevska M, Robertson GR, Clarke SJ, Liddle C (2008) Inflammation and CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism in advanced cancer: impact and implications for chemotherapeutic drug dosing. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 4: 137–149.