Figures
Abstract
Background
Specific isoniazid (INH) resistance conferring mutations have been shown to impact the likelihood of tuberculosis (TB) transmission. However, their role in the clinical presentation and outcomes of TB has not been evaluated.
Methods
We included all cases of culture-confirmed, INH monoresistant tuberculosis reported to the San Francisco Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Section from October 1992 through October 2005. For cases with stored culture isolates, we used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and gene sequencing to identify INH resistance-conferring mutations, and compared genotypic and phenotypic characteristics.
Results
Among 101 consecutive cases of INH monoresistant TB in San Francisco 19 (19%) had isolates with a katG mutation other than S315T; 38 (38%) had isolates with the katG S315T mutation, 29 (29%) had isolates with a inhA-15;c-t promoter mutation, and 15 (15%) had isolates with other mutations. The katG S315T mutation was independently associated with high-level INH resistance (risk ratio [RR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–2.27), and the inhA-15;c-t promoter mutation was inversely associated with high-level INH resistance (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21–0.89). However, specific INH resistance-conferring mutations were not associated with the clinical severity or outcomes of INH monoresistant TB cases.
Citation: Dantes R, Metcalfe J, Kim E, Kato-Maeda M, Hopewell PC, Kawamura M, et al. (2012) Impact of Isoniazid Resistance-Conferring Mutations on the Clinical Presentation of Isoniazid Monoresistant Tuberculosis. PLoS ONE 7(5): e37956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037956
Editor: Igor Mokrousov, St. Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Russian Federation
Received: January 17, 2012; Accepted: April 30, 2012; Published: May 23, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Dantes et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (K23HL094141 [AC], K23HL092629 [PN], and R01AI034238 [PH]). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Resistance to first-line anti-tuberculosis (TB) medications is a continuing global health problem [1]. In particular, resistance to isoniazid (INH) is very common, with a prevalence of 10% among new cases and 28% among previously treated cases reported globally in 2009 [2]. Resistance to INH in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is mediated by at least two genes, katG [3] and inhA [4]. Mutations in other genes such as ahpC have been evaluated previously, and are considered compensatory mutations [5] that may be a marker for INH resistance, but do not appear to confer INH resistance [6]. Prior studies have shown that clinical outcomes are similar in patients with fully drug susceptible and INH monoresistant TB [7], and suggest that specific INH resistance-conferring mutations impact the transmissibility and pathogenicity of M. tuberculosis [8] [9]. Specifically, strains with the katG S315T mutation were associated with increased transmission and pathogenicity (measured by the proportion of cases that were considered as part of a chain of transmission) compared to INH-resistant strains with other mutations.
Because specific INH resistance-conferring mutations affect the ability of a strain to cause secondary cases, we hypothesized that they may also affect the host response and outcomes of infection. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of a well-characterized cohort of INH monoresistant TB cases in San Francisco.
Methods
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Human Research Protection Program. The requirement for informed consent was waived because this was a retrospective study and posed minimal risks to human subjects.
Study population and setting
As previously described [7], we retrospectively abstracted data on demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes for all cases of de novo INH monoresistant TB reported in San Francisco, California between October 1992 and November 2005. We excluded cases from this analysis if culture isolates were unavailable, known INH resistance-conferring genes were not successfully amplified, or the phenotypic level of INH-resistance was not known. In addition, we included only the first case from any group of clustered cases. Cases were considered to be clustered if their isolates demonstrated the same restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) genotype based on the IS6110 marker, the same drug resistance profile, the same drug resistance-conferring mutation, and belonged to the same M. tuberculosis lineage, as previously described [8]. Results presented below were not significantly different when all cases in a cluster were included in the analysis.
Lineage
The three predominant phylogenetic lineages of M. tuberculosis in San Francisco are the East-Asian lineage, the Euro-American lineage, and the Indo-Oceanic lineage [10]. Multiplex real-time PCR was used to amplify lineage-specific markers [10], [11], [12], and each lineage was defined based on previously described methods [8].
Drug resistance associated mutations
We identified INH resistance-conferring mutations from M. tuberculosis culture isolates stored at −80 degrees Celsius. Briefly, for all isolates with phenotypic resistance to INH we performed real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to identify the katG S315T mutation and the -c15t inhA promoter mutation [8]. Next, for isolates without either of these two mutations, we sequenced the inhA promoter region and the entire furA-katG locus to identify other mutations [8]. The resulting mutations were sorted into four previously described groupings [8]: Group 1: isolates with a katG mutation other than S315T, Group 2: isolates with a katG S315T mutation, Group 3: isolates with a inhA-15;c-t promoter mutation, and Group 4: isolates with other or no identified mutations. We did not include mutations in ahpC because these do not appear to confer INH resistance [6].
Definitions
Drug susceptibility was confirmed in all cases using the agar-proportion method. INH resistance was classified as either low-level or high-level when there was >1% growth of M. tuberculosis complex in the presence of 0.2 ug/mL or 1 ug/mL of INH, respectively. Clinical characteristics, including presenting symptoms, the presence or absence of cavitation on chest radiographs, and treatment outcomes were abstracted from the San Francisco Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Clinic electronic database and charts. Treatment was considered completed if all anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy had been administered and there was either microbiological confirmation of cure or an indication in the medical record that the patient had received an effective course of treatment. An adverse drug reaction was defined as any symptom or laboratory abnormality leading to interruption of ≥1 anti-tuberculosis medication. Treatment outcomes of interest included death on TB treatment, culture positivity 2 months after treatment initiation, and treatment failure or relapse. In accordance with ATS/CDC/IDSA guidelines, a patient was considered to have treatment failure if culture results remained positive after 4 months of treatment and to have had a relapse when a second episode of tuberculosis was diagnosed within one year after treatment completion.
Statistical methods
We performed bivariate analysis using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney rank-sum test for continuous variables. We performed logistic regression to measure the association between INH resistance-conferring mutation groups and lineage. We performed multivariate analysis using a Poisson regression model with robust error variance [13] to determine the association between INH resistance-conferring mutation group and high-level INH resistance. To account for potential confounding, we decided a priori to adjust for the following pre-specified variables: age, gender, foreign-born status, HIV serostatus, prior active TB treatment, and prior latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment. We evaluated trends in INH monoresistant TB cases by using Poisson regression, as previously described [14]. We performed all analyses in Stata 10.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).
Results
Study population
Of 137 TB cases with INH monoresistance identified during the study period, 36 were excluded from the analysis (25 isolates were not available, 2 isolates did not have sufficient DNA to analyze, 6 isolates had unknown INH resistance level (low vs. high), and 3 isolates were clustered). Complete demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. Of 101 cases included in the analysis, 90 (89%) were pulmonary and 48 (47%) were sputum smear-positive. The median age of the study population was 43 years, 60% were male, 88% were foreign born, and 5% were HIV co-infected. In addition, 20 (20%) had prior treatment for active TB, and 19 (19%) had prior treatment for LTBI. High-level INH resistance was present in 63 (62%) cases. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between cases with high and low-level INH resistance, and between cases that were and were not included in the analysis (p>0.05 for all comparisons).
Drug-resistance alleles
A katG mutation other than S315T was found in 19 isolates (Group 1); 38 isolates had the katG S315T mutation (Group 2), 29 isolates had a inhA-15;c-t promoter mutation (Group 3), and 15 isolates had other (8) or no identified (7) mutations (Group 4). No isolates had more than one mutation. There was no significant change in the proportion of cases caused by isolates in Groups 2 (p = 0.16), 3 (p = 0.19), and 4 (p = 0.68) during the 13-year study period (Figure 1). The proportion of isolates with Group 1 mutations decreased significantly during the first four years of the study (p = 0.005), but there was no significant change thereafter.
Each line represents the number of cases in each INH resistance mutation group over time. The proportion of cases caused by isolates with group 1 mutations decreased significantly over the first four years of the study (p = 0.005), but there was no significant trend thereafter.
Lineage
Of the 101 strains of M. tuberculosis, 17 (17%) belonged to the East-Asian lineage, 44 (44%) to the Euro-American lineage, 36 (36%) to the Indo-Oceanic lineage, and 4 (4%) to other lineages. Clinical presentation was not significantly different among these lineages (Table S1). A high proportion of cases of East-Asian lineage had katG mutation other than S315T (Group 1) (35.3%), and a high proportion of cases of Euro-American lineage had katG S315T mutations (Group 2) (40.9%). However, there were no significant associations between specific INH resistance-conferring mutations and genetic lineage (Table 2).
Bivariate and Multivariate Analyses
In bivariate analysis (Table 3), there was no significant association between INH resistance- conferring mutation group and clinical presentation of TB (including cough, hemoptysis, fever, night sweats, weight-loss, and cavitary chest radiograph; p>0.05 for all comparisons). Demographic characteristics were similar across all INH resistance-conferring mutation groups (p>0.05) (Table 3). There were only three adverse clinical outcomes – one relapse after successful treatment (Group 2 mutation), one treatment failure resulting in death (Group 3 mutation), and one death during treatment (Group 2 mutation). However, the proportion of isolates with high-level INH resistance varied among different mutation groups, with 63% of Group 1, 92% of Group 2, 24% of Group 3, and 60% of Group 4 isolates exhibiting high-level INH resistance. When compared to isolates with Group 1 mutations, isolates with Group 2 mutations were more likely to have high-level INH resistance (92% vs. 63%, p = 0.04) and isolates with Group 3 mutations were less likely to have high-level INH resistance (24% vs. 63%, p = 0.01). After adjustment for age, gender, foreign-born status, HIV, and prior active or latent TB treatment (Table 4), Group 2 mutations remained associated with high-level INH resistance (risk ratio [RR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–2.27, P = 0.02), and Group 3 mutations remained inversely associated with high-level INH resistance (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21–0.89, P = 0.02).
Discussion
This study describes a large cohort of INH monoresistant TB cases, and is the only study of which we are aware to correlate specific INH resistance-conferring mutations with the clinical presentation and outcome of TB. We found that INH resistance-conferring mutations were associated with differing levels of phenotypic INH resistance. However, specific mutations did not impact the clinical presentation of TB, and there were few adverse outcomes across all mutation groups.
Our data are consistent with previous studies demonstrating an association between the katG S315T mutation and high-level INH resistance. katG encodes a mycobacterial catalase-peroxidase that also activates INH from its prodrug state, likely to an INH-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) adduct [15]. Mutations of the native serine residue at katG position 315 can alter the enzyme's ability to bind INH. An enzymatic kinetic study demonstrated that the katG S315T mutation was among the least active mutations in producing the INH-NADH adduct among 23 katG mutants tested [16]. Thus, MTB strains with the katG S315T mutations may activate less INH than other katG mutants, and therefore survive under higher concentrations of INH. However, our data suggest specific INH resistance-conferring mutations do not impact other clinical manifestations of TB.
Other studies have described an association between INH resistance-conferring mutation and genetic lineage, particularly between the katG mutation other than S315T and the East-Asian lineage, and between the inhA-15;c-t promoter mutation and Indo-Oceanic lineage [8]. While our study suggested an association between the katG mutation other than S315T and the East-Asian lineage, these results did not reach statistical significance.
There are several potential reasons for the lack of an association between INH resistance mutation group and clinical presentation of TB. First, it is possible that strains harboring the katG S315T mutation are more resistant to INH and more easily transmissible, but are no more virulent in humans than strains harboring other INH resistance-conferring mutations. This contrasts with murine studies showing increased virulence of strains with katG S315T mutation [17]. Second, host factors may be more important than pathogen-related factors in determining clinical manifestations of disease. For example, HIV infection and other immunocompromising conditions are associated with more severe disease and worse clinical outcomes [18] [19] [20]. Lastly, although our data are from one of the largest population-based series of INH monoresistance cases, our study may have been underpowered to detect a difference in clinical outcomes. The vast majority of patients with INH monoresistant TB had satisfactory treatment outcomes in our setting. Similar studies in either larger populations or populations with higher morbidity or mortality could reveal subtle differences in outcomes between TB cases resulting from different INH resistance-conferring mutations.
In conclusion, in our population-based sample of INH monoresistant TB cases, we confirmed the previously reported association between the katG S315T mutation and high-level INH resistance, and an association between inhA promoter mutations and low-level INH resistance. No mutation was associated with differing clinical manifestations of TB, and adverse outcomes were uncommon across all mutation groups. Our data suggest that INH resistance-conferring mutations may not impact the clinical presentation of M. tuberculosis and that routine genetic testing of INH monoresistant isolates is unlikely to have diagnostic or prognostic value. However, further studies are needed to determine whether specific INH resistance-conferring mutations impact clinical presentation or outcomes in the setting of HIV-co infection or multiple drug resistance.
Supporting Information
Table S1.
Clinical Presentation of Isoniazid (INH) Monoresistant Tuberculosis Cases by Lineage.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037956.s001
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
We thank the staff of the San Francisco Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control section for assistance with data collection.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: RD JM PN AC. Performed the experiments: JM EK AC. Analyzed the data: RD AC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MKM MK PH. Wrote the paper: RD JM MKM PH AC.
References
- 1.
World Health Organization (2010) Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB)- 2010 Global Report on Surveillance and Response. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Press.
- 2.
World Health Organization (2008) Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world, report no. 4. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Press.
- 3. Zhang Y, Heym B, Allen B, Young D, Cole S (1992) The catalase-peroxidase gene and isoniazid resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature 358: 591–593.
- 4. Banerjee A, Dubnau E, Quemard A, Balasubramanian V, Um KS, et al. (1994) inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 263: 227–230.
- 5. Sherman DR, Mdluli K, Hickey MJ, Arain TM, Morris SL, et al. (1996) Compensatory ahpC gene expression in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 272: 1641–1643.
- 6. Telenti A, Honore N, Bernasconi C, March J, Ortega A, et al. (1997) Genotypic assessment of isoniazid and rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind study at reference laboratory level. Journal of clinical microbiology 35: 719–723.
- 7. Cattamanchi A, Dantes RB, Metcalfe JZ, Jarlsberg LG, Grinsdale J, et al. (2009) Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with isoniazid-monoresistant tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 48: 179–185.
- 8. Gagneux S, Burgos MV, DeRiemer K, Encisco A, Munoz S, et al. (2006) Impact of bacterial genetics on the transmission of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 2: e61.
- 9. Metcalfe JZ, Kim EY, Lin SY, Cattamanchi A, Oh P, et al. (2010) Determinants of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis clusters, California, USA, 2004–2007. Emerging infectious diseases 16: 1403–1409.
- 10. Gagneux S, DeRiemer K, Van T, Kato-Maeda M, de Jong BC, et al. (2006) Variable host-pathogen compatibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 2869–2873.
- 11. Tsolaki AG, Gagneux S, Pym AS, Goguet de la Salmoniere YO, Kreiswirth BN, et al. (2005) Genomic deletions classify the Beijing/W strains as a distinct genetic lineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of clinical microbiology 43: 3185–3191.
- 12. Tsolaki AG, Hirsh AE, DeRiemer K, Enciso JA, Wong MZ, et al. (2004) Functional and evolutionary genomics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: insights from genomic deletions in 100 strains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 4865–4870.
- 13. Zou G (2004) A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. American journal of epidemiology 159: 702–706.
- 14. Cattamanchi A, Hopewell PC, Gonzalez LC, Osmond DH, Masae Kawamura L, et al. (2006) A 13-year molecular epidemiological analysis of tuberculosis in San Francisco. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 10: 297–304.
- 15. Vilcheze C, Jacobs WR Jr (2007) The mechanism of isoniazid killing: clarity through the scope of genetics. Annual review of microbiology 61: 35–50.
- 16. Cade CE, Dlouhy AC, Medzihradszky KF, Salas-Castillo SP, Ghiladi RA (2010) Isoniazid-resistance conferring mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis KatG: catalase, peroxidase, and INH-NADH adduct formation activities. Protein science: a publication of the Protein Society 19: 458–474.
- 17. Pym AS, Saint-Joanis B, Cole ST (2002) Effect of katG mutations on the virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the implication for transmission in humans. Infect Immun 70: 4955–4960.
- 18.
World Health Organization (2009) WHO Report 2009: Global Tuberculosis Control: Epidemiology, Strategy, Financing. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
- 19. Brassard P, Kezouh A, Suissa S (2006) Antirheumatic drugs and the risk of tuberculosis. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 43: 717–722.
- 20. Wallis RS (2008) Tumour necrosis factor antagonists: structure, function, and tuberculosis risks. The Lancet infectious diseases 8: 601–611.