Abstract
Background
Multiplex detection of low-level mutant alleles in the presence of wild-type DNA would be useful for several fields of medicine including cancer, pre-natal diagnosis and infectious diseases. COLD-PCR is a recently developed method that enriches low-level mutations during PCR cycling, thus enhancing downstream detection without the need for special reagents or equipment. The approach relies on the differential denaturation of DNA strands which contain Tm-lowering mutations or mismatches, versus ‘homo-duplex’ wild-type DNA. Enabling multiplex-COLD-PCR that can enrich mutations in several amplicons simultaneously is desirable but technically difficult to accomplish. Here we describe the proof of principle of an emulsion-PCR based approach that demonstrates the feasibility of multiplexed-COLD-PCR within a single tube, using commercially available mutated cell lines. This method works best with short amplicons; therefore, it could potentially be used on highly fragmented samples obtained from biological material or FFPE specimens.
Methods
Following a multiplex pre-amplification of TP53 exons from genomic DNA, emulsions which incorporate the multiplex product, PCR reagents and primers specific for a given TP53 exon are prepared. Emulsions with different TP53 targets are then combined in a single tube and a fast-COLD-PCR program that gradually ramps up the denaturation temperature over several PCR cycles is applied (temperature-tolerant, TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR). The range of denaturation temperatures applied encompasses the critical denaturation temperature (Tc) corresponding to all the amplicons included in the reaction, resulting to a gradual enrichment of mutations within all amplicons encompassed by emulsion.
Figures
Citation: Castellanos-Rizaldos E, Milbury CA, Makrigiorgos GM (2012) Enrichment of Mutations in Multiple DNA Sequences Using COLD-PCR in Emulsion. PLoS ONE 7(12): e51362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051362
Editor: Sergey Korolev, Saint Louis University, United States of America
Received: September 5, 2012; Accepted: November 1, 2012; Published: December 6, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Castellanos-Rizaldos et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the Innovative Molecular Analysis Technologies Program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), grants CA-111994 and CA-151164 (GMM). The contents of this manuscript do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: COLD-PCR technology has been commercially licensed from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. This manuscript has not been published previously and is not being considered concurrently by another journal. All authors and acknowledged contributors have read and approved the manuscript. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
Detection of low-level mutant alleles in the presence of wild-type DNA is important in several fields of medicine, including cancer, pre-natal diagnosis and infectious diseases [1]. A number of approaches have been described that enrich the abundance of low-level mutant allelic burden present in biological specimens, so that mutations can subsequently be detected [1]. These include electrophoretic or enzymatic approaches, which require multiple reagents or specialized equipment. Co-amplification of major and minor DNA alleles at Lower Denaturation temperature (COLD-PCR) represents a PCR-based technique that enriches mutation-containing sequences by adjusting the denaturation temperature to within ∼0.3°C of a critical temperature (Tc). This enables preferential amplification of mutated sequences during the PCR cycling program irrespective where the mutation lies on the amplicon [2]. A main advantage of this procedure is its simplicity, since it does not require new instrumentation, special reagents or additional processing. This makes COLD-PCR accessible to different laboratory settings [3] that employ a variety of downstream mutation detection assays including high resolution melting, HRM [4]–[8], Sanger sequencing [9]–[12], mass-spectrometry [2], real time PCR [13], [14] and RFLP analysis [15].
Multiplex pre-amplification from genomic DNA; emulsification with gene-specific primers; mixing into a single tube; and temperature-tolerant emulsion-based fast-COLD-PCR.
A COLD-PCR drawback is that it is not easily scalable for enriching mutations in diverse amplicons simultaneously, since generally, a different Tc applies to each amplicon. The requirement for determining Tc with a precision of ∼0.3°C means that Tc is subject to variations due to different brand thermo-cyclers, well-to-well temperature fluctuations or reagent conditions [16]. For this reason, we recently developed temperature-tolerant-COLD-PCR (TT-COLD-PCR), a modified form of COLD-PCR that applies to all COLD-PCR formats described, [2], [17]. TT-COLD-PCR relaxes the stringency on Tc and allows sequences of different Tc to be amplified using a single thermo-cycling program [16]. In TT-COLD-PCR, amplification starts at a lower Tc and increases gradually over several PCR cycles, spanning an overall 2–3°C temperature window. This enables enrichment of mutations in all amplicons whose Tc lies within the temperature window [16]. Yet individual DNA targets still need to be amplified in separate tubes using TT-COLD-PCR and adaptation to multiplex formats is difficult in view of primer-primer interactions. Multiple primer interactions can be even more problematic for COLD-PCR compared to conventional PCR, in view of the low denaturation temperatures applied that may enhance primer-dimer formation and non-specific amplification products.
In this work we demonstrate that the problem of multiplexing COLD-PCR can be overcome by employing temperature-tolerant amplification in emulsion. We describe a COLD-PCR protocol that allows simultaneous enrichment of mutations in multiple DNA targets of different Tm in a single tube by applying a temperature-tolerant cycling protocol in emulsion. PCR amplification inside water-in-oil emulsion enables compartmentalization that eliminates multiple primer interactions when co-amplifying complex DNA templates [18]–[20]. We demonstrate the application of temperature-tolerant fast-COLD-PCR in emulsion (TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR, Figure 1) by enriching mutations in four exons of the TP53 gene, in a single tube.
Materials and Methods
Reference human genomic DNA obtained from Promega, Inc. (catalog number G1471, Madison, WI, USA) was used as wild type control and for preparing dilutions with mutant cell lines. Genomic DNA from cell lines with TP53 mutations in exons 6–9 was purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA), Table 1. A genomic DNA mixture containing 5% mutant DNA abundance, resulting from a combination of DNA from mutated cell lines into human male genomic DNA, was tested. To obtain a simplified genomic template for subsequent TT-fast-COLD-ePCR reactions, exons 2–11 of TP53 gene were pre-amplified in a single multiplex-PCR reaction from genomic DNA as reported by Fredriksson [21] with minor modifications [22]. Briefly, multiplex reactions were performed in 15 μl final reaction volumes containing 1× Phusion™ high-fidelity (HF) buffer, 0.2 mmol/L (each) dNTPs, 0.1 μmol/L (each) primers, and 0.6 U Phusion™ high fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs Inc., Ipswich, MA), reported to have an error rate of 4.2×10−7. Primers were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT Inc., Coralville, IA, USA) and are summarized in Table 2.
For emulsion-PCR/COLD-PCR, the aqueous phase of the reaction (50 µl volume) was prepared individually for each target amplicon with 0.2 µmol/L amplicon-specific primers (F and R), 1× Phusion™ Buffer, 0.2 mmol/L (each) dNTPs, 2 U of Phusion™ DNA polymerase, 1× LCGreen (Idaho Technology Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) and 2 µl of DNA template up to 50 µl with water. The oil phase of the reaction was prepared as described [23]–[25]; 4.5% Span 80 (product no. S6760, Sigma Aldrich, USA), 0.4% Tween 80 (product no. P1754, Sigma Aldrich, USA), 0.05% Triton X-100 (part no. T1001, Affymetrix, USA) were mixed with 100% mineral oil (product no. M5904, Sigma Aldrich) to 50 ml. Then, 300 µl of the oil phase was mixed with 50 µl of the aqueous phase in separate tubes for each of the target amplicons and vortexed for 5 min at high speed. 100 µl aliquots were used during the amplification reaction to ensure proper heat distribution.
A 5% mutation abundance was evaluated for TP53 gene exons 6–9 by conventional PCR (left panels) and TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR (right panels). Duplicate experiments are depicted in each case. The enrichment of the mutations in all four exons is estimated from the chromatograms.
In preliminary experiments, the optimal amount of target DNA molecules per micelle was determined for each target amplicon and appropriate dilutions from the pre-amplification product were used as template for TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR. TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR was performed using the guidelines described, and with minor modifications, per Table 3. To retrieve amplified DNA following TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR, corresponding samples were transferred to 1.5 ml tubes and centrifuged for 5 min at 13,000 g [23], [24] to remove the upper oil phase. Then, samples were mixed with 1 ml of butanol (catalog. no. B7906, Sigma Aldrich, USA) by vortexing and further purified using the Qiagen purification kit according to manufacturer’s instructions [25]. To analyze the amplified DNA, following emulsion removal, recovered DNA was further amplified by conventional PCR using nested primers specific for each amplicon in the presence of 1X LCGreen intercalating dye. The products were analyzed using high resolution melting (HRM) with a Light Scanner HR96 system (Idaho Technologies, Inc.) and Sanger-sequenced at Eton Bioscience, Inc. (Cambridge, MA, USA). Sanger chromatograms were analyzed with BioEdit v7.1.3 (Ibis Biosciences, Abbott Laboratories, USA) to determine the approximate mutational load from the peak height as previously described [17]. All experiments were repeated multiple independent times.
To test the amplification efficiency during the emulsion PCR step, a control experiment was performed by performing a subsequent, nested real time PCR using LC-Green dye from the emulsion-PCR and comparing the real-time PCR threshold difference with and without the emulsion-PCR step. Furthermore, to ensure that amplification takes place solely within the emulsion and not in the aqueous phase, exonuclease I (ExoI, New England Biolabs, MA) was added to the reactions to eliminate the extracellular portion of the PCR primers. Experiments to validate the efficient degradation of PCR primers in the aqueous phase of the sample by ExoI were performed, with and without forming the emulsion (5 min vigorous vortexing versus gently mixing the oil and aqueous phase, respectively).
Results
Emulsion-PCR Validation
The present procedures yield formation of emulsions with diameters of 3–10 µm (Figure S1). We verified efficient amplification in emulsion (ePCR) by monitoring the product yield (Ct value) in a subsequent, nested real-time PCR reaction that utilizes diluted ePCR product as a template. In Figure S2, panel A shows 10 cycles PCR threshold difference in the nested PCR between emulsified-amplified DNA and versus an identically treated sample where the ePCR step was omitted. In panel B, we observe that, when ExoI is added, in the absence of emulsion there is no PCR product formed, presumably due to the anticipated ssDNA (primer) hydrolysis by ExoI. In contrast, when the emulsion is formed in the same samples by 5 min vigorous vortexing, subsequent addition of ExoI does not inhibit PCR, consistent with the expectation that the hydrophilic ExoI does not penetrate the emulsion. These data are consistent with amplification taking place within the emulsion efficiently and not in the extracellular space when ExoI is present. ExoI was added to the reactions described below to exclude amplification taking place outside emulsions.
TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR for Individual Amplicons
Figure S3 demonstrates that mutation enrichments of ∼7–15 fold are obtained for exons 6–9 when these are amplified as separate, single-amplicon reactions. This figure depicts TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR applied in emulsion, using as starting material genomic DNA containing 5% mutant DNA, and followed by Sanger sequencing of the final product. In contrast, when conventional PCR, instead of COLD-PCR, is applied to the same emulsions, the 5% mutant peaks are not visible in any of the chromatograms, indicating the efficient enrichment of mutations using the TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR cycling program.
TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR for TP53 Exons 6–9 in a Single Tube
To perform TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR in a single tube for all targets (Figure 1), TP53 exons 6–9 were emulsified individually then combined into a single tube and cycled on an Eppendorf Mastercycler (Eppendorf Inc., Haupage, NY). The TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR program (Table 3) was designed to simultaneously amplify exons 6–9 of TP53 gene as described earlier [16], and by spanning a range of Tc from 85.2°C–88.5°C, with 0.3°C temperature increments every eight cycles (initial Tc = lowest melting temperature of the amplicons tested minus 2°C). Fluorescent difference curve plots relative to wild type DNA become clearly detectable via HRM analysis in those amplicons generated by TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR, Figure 2. In contrast, HRM analysis of the same amplicons amplified by conventional PCR in emulsion does not show a signal distinct from the wild type profile. HRM results were further validated via Sanger sequencing, Figure 2. The data indicate that the mutant abundance displayed a ∼5–10 fold enrichment in all exons simultaneously when amplified by TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR. These results are comparable with the mutation enrichment obtained following one-round fast –COLD-PCR of single amplicons in solution [2]. Therefore, the use of the emulsion with the multiplex format of TT-fast-COLD-PCR does not significantly affect the mutation enrichment obtained.
It is noteworthy that when the same TT-fast-COLD-PCR cycling of the 4 exons is performed in solution, (i.e. in the absence of emulsion reagents or ExoI), Sanger sequencing depicts mutation enrichment in 3 out of 4 amplicons (exon 6, 8 and 9), while for exon 7 no amplification is obtained (Figure S4). The data indicate that multiple primers in solution lead to primer-primer interactions that inhibit efficient generation of the amplicon from exon 7. The compartmentalization provided by the emulsion reduces multiple primer interactions and overcomes this problem.
Discussion
Since its original description, the development of PCR in emulsion has been exploited for several applications, such as quantification of DNA methylation [26], studying in vitro directed evolution [18], [19], [27], [28] or detection of rare variants at specific mutation ‘hotspot’ positions [29]. The data presented here provide proof of principle for one yet application of emulsion-PCR. By compartmentalizing COLD-PCR reactions and ramping-up the temperature gradually, multiple targets with different melting temperature (Tm) and Tc are amplified and enriched simultaneously while preventing excessive primer and template interactions.
In principle, a high number of amplicons with Tc within the range covered by the amplification protocol can be co-amplified using COLD-PCR in emulsion. In practice the rate-limiting step is the initial pre-amplification stage plus the preparation of emulsions containing multiplex-PCR targets and discrete primers for each target. It is envisioned that micro-fluidics can overcome these limitations. Thus, the number of sequences can be scaled-up by employing recent developments that merge complex DNA templates with sequence-specific primers over millions of emulsions per experiment [19], [30]. These new engineering tools can facilitate the high-throughput adaptation of the TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR principle presented in this work. The mutation-enriched DNA can optionally be combined with high-throughput sequencing platforms to improve the reliability and lowest limit of mutation calling [31]. Alternatively, high throughput genotyping methods (MALDI) can be used as the endpoint detection system [32].
In the present manuscript we have shown the adaptation of fast-COLD-PCR format in emulsion. This form of COLD-PCR is only applicable to mutations that decrease the melting temperature of the amplicon (G:C>A:T, G:C>T:A, or Tm-reducing indels). Tm-reducing base substitutions account for the majority of mutations in cancer [33]. The adaptation of other forms of COLD-PCR (full- or ice-COLD-PCR) in emulsion, analyzing clinical samples fresh or in formalin (FFPE), is also desirable and will be addressed in future work.In summary, we demonstrated that emulsion-PCR overcomes the limitations of unwanted multiple-primer interactions during temperature-tolerant COLD-PCR and enables single-tube amplification and mutation enrichment for multiple target DNA sequences. This development facilitates multiplexed enrichment and detection of panels of clinically-relevant mutations to aid prognosis, diagnosis and management in heterogeneous cancer samples.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Water in oil emulsion at 100× magnification with a Zeiss Axioimager Z1 fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, GmbH, Germany) after five minutes of vortexing.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051362.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
Validation of emulsion-PCR. Panel A: DNA amplified by emulsion PCR (ePCR) or where ePCR amplification was omitted, was evaluated by an additional nested, real-time qPCR using LCGreen (duplicate reactions). Panel B: Effect of adding exonuclease I (ExoI) in the sample prior to ePCR, with and without emulsion formation, as evaluated by nested, qPCR. Left: aqueous and oil phase without emulsion formation (gently mixed) with and without ExoI. Right: emulsion (formed by vortexing for 5 min) with and without adding ExoI.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051362.s002
(TIF)
Figure S3.
Single-exon amplification in emulsions, in separate reactions for each TP53 exon, using a 5% dilution of mutation-containing DNA into wild-type DNA. A. conventional PCR in emulsion. B. temperature-tolerant fast COLD-PCR in emulsion.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051362.s003
(TIF)
Figure S4.
TT-fast-eCOLD-PCR multiplex (TP53 exons 6–9) amplification in solution (without emulsion formation), using a 5% dilution of mutation-containing DNA into wild-type DNA. A. conventional multiplex PCR. B. temperature-tolerant fast COLD-PCR multiplex in solution.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051362.s004
(TIF)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: ECR GMM. Performed the experiments: ECR. Analyzed the data: ECR GMM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ECR CAM. Wrote the paper: ECR GMM.
References
- 1. Milbury CA, Li J, Makrigiorgos GM (2009) PCR-based methods for the enrichment of minority alleles and mutations. Clin Chem 55: 632–640.
- 2. Li J, Wang L, Mamon H, Kulke MH, Berbeco R, et al. (2008) Replacing PCR with COLD-PCR enriches variant DNA sequences and redefines the sensitivity of genetic testing. Nat Med 14: 579–584.
- 3. Luthra R, Zuo Z (2009) COLD-PCR finds hot application in mutation analysis. Clin Chem 55: 2077–2078.
- 4. Milbury CA, Li J, Makrigiorgos GM (2009) COLD-PCR-enhanced high-resolution melting enables rapid and selective identification of low-level unknown mutations. Clin Chem 55: 2130–2143.
- 5. Kristensen LS, Daugaard IL, Christensen M, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Hager H, et al. (2010) Increased sensitivity of KRAS mutation detection by high-resolution melting analysis of COLD-PCR products. Hum Mutat 31: 1366–1373.
- 6. Mancini I, Santucci C, Sestini R, Simi L, Pratesi N, et al. (2010) The use of COLD-PCR and high-resolution melting analysis improves the limit of detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer. J Mol Diagn 12: 705–711.
- 7. Pinzani P, Santucci C, Mancini I, Simi L, Salvianti F, et al. (2011) BRAFV600E detection in melanoma is highly improved by COLD-PCR. Clin Chim Acta 412: 901–905.
- 8. Pritchard CC, Akagi L, Reddy PL, Joseph L, Tait JF (2010) COLD-PCR enhanced melting curve analysis improves diagnostic accuracy for KRAS mutations in colorectal carcinoma. BMC Clin Pathol 10: 6.
- 9. Li J, Milbury CA, Li C, Makrigiorgos GM (2009) Two-round coamplification at lower denaturation temperature-PCR (COLD-PCR)-based sanger sequencing identifies a novel spectrum of low-level mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. Hum Mutat 30: 1583–1590.
- 10. Santis G, Angell R, Nickless G, Quinn A, Herbert A, et al. (2011) Screening for EGFR and KRAS mutations in endobronchial ultrasound derived transbronchial needle aspirates in non-small cell lung cancer using COLD-PCR. PLoS One 6: e25191.
- 11. Carotenuto P, Roma C, Cozzolino S, Fenizia F, Rachiglio AM, et al. (2012) Detection of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer with Fast COLD-PCR. Int J Oncol 40: 378–384.
- 12. Galbiati S, Brisci A, Lalatta F, Seia M, Makrigiorgos GM, et al. (2011) Full COLD-PCR protocol for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases. Clin Chem 57: 136–138.
- 13. Li J, Wang L, Janne PA, Makrigiorgos GM (2009) Coamplification at lower denaturation temperature-PCR increases mutation-detection selectivity of TaqMan-based real-time PCR. Clin Chem 55: 748–756.
- 14. Liu PJ, Liang HY, Xue L, Yang C, Liu Y, et al. (2012) Potential clinical significance of plasma-based KRAS mutation analysis using the COLD-PCR/TaqMan (R)-MGB probe genotyping method. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 4: 109–112.
- 15.
Delaney D, Diss TC, Presneau N, Hing S, Berisha F, et al.. (2009) GNAS1 mutations occur more commonly than previously thought in intramuscular myxoma. Mod Pathol.
- 16. Castellanos-Rizaldos E, Liu P, Milbury CA, Guha M, Brisci A, et al. (2012) Temperature-Tolerant COLD-PCR Reduces Temperature Stringency and Enables Robust Mutation Enrichment. Clin Chem 58: 1130–1138.
- 17. Milbury CA, Li J, Makrigiorgos GM (2011) Ice-COLD-PCR enables rapid amplification and robust enrichment for low-abundance unknown DNA mutations. Nucleic Acids Res 39: e2.
- 18. Tawfik DS, Griffiths AD (1998) Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution. Nature Biotechnology 16: 652–656.
- 19. Schaerli Y, Hollfelder F (2009) The potential of microfluidic water-in-oil droplets in experimental biology. Mol Biosyst 5: 1392–1404.
- 20. Tewhey R, Warner JB, Nakano M, Libby B, Medkova M, et al. (2009) Microdroplet-based PCR enrichment for large-scale targeted sequencing. Nature Biotechnology 27: 1025–1031.
- 21. Fredriksson S, Baner J, Dahl F, Chu A, Ji H, et al. (2007) Multiplex amplification of all coding sequences within 10 cancer genes by Gene-Collector. Nucleic Acids Res 35: e47.
- 22. Milbury CA, Chen CC, Mamon H, Liu P, Santagata S, et al. (2011) Multiplex amplification coupled with COLD-PCR and high resolution melting enables identification of low-abundance mutations in cancer samples with low DNA content. J Mol Diagn 13: 220–232.
- 23. Schutze T, Rubelt F, Repkow J, Greiner N, Erdmann VA, et al. (2011) A streamlined protocol for emulsion polymerase chain reaction and subsequent purification. Analytical Biochemistry 410: 155–157.
- 24. Williams R, Peisajovich SG, Miller OJ, Magdassi S, Tawfik DS, et al. (2006) Amplification of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR. Nat Methods 3: 545–550.
- 25. Wetmur JG, Kumar M, Zhang L, Palomeque C, Wallenstein S, et al. (2005) Molecular haplotyping by linking emulsion PCR: analysis of paraoxonase 1 haplotypes and phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 2615–2619.
- 26. Li M, Chen WD, Papadopoulos N, Goodman SN, Bjerregaard NC, et al. (2009) Sensitive digital quantification of DNA methylation in clinical samples. Nature Biotechnology 27: 858–863.
- 27. Kojima T, Takei Y, Ohtsuka M, Kawarasaki Y, Yamane T, et al. (2005) PCR amplification from single DNA molecules on magnetic beads in emulsion: application for high-throughput screening of transcription factor targets. Nucleic Acids Res 33: e150.
- 28. Gan R, Yamanaka Y, Kojima T, Nakano H (2008) Microbeads display of proteins using emulsion PCR and cell-free protein synthesis. Biotechnol Prog 24: 1107–1114.
- 29. Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, et al. (2008) Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nature Medicine 14: 985–990.
- 30. Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, Belgrader P, Heredia NJ, et al. (2011) High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Anal Chem 83: 8604–8610.
- 31. Milbury CA, Correll M, Quackenbush J, Rubio R, Makrigiorgos GM (2012) COLD-PCR enrichment of rare cancer mutations prior to targeted amplicon resequencing. Clin Chem 58: 580–589.
- 32. Thomas RK, Baker AC, Debiasi RM, Winckler W, Laframboise T, et al. (2007) High-throughput oncogene mutation profiling in human cancer. Nat Genet 39: 347–351.
- 33. Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith R, Dalgliesh GL, Hunter C, et al. (2007) Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature 446: 153–158.
