Figures
Abstract
Background
Candidia esophagitis (CE) is an AIDS-defining condition, usually occurring in individuals with low CD4 counts of <200 cells/µL. Endoscopy is a valuable definitive diagnostic method for CE but may not be indicated for asymptomatic patients or for those with high CD4 counts or without oral candidiasis. This study assessed such patients to clarify the factors associated with CE and its severity on endoscopy in the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era.
Methodology/ Principal Findings
A total of 733 HIV-infected patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy were analyzed. Sexual behavior, CD4+ count, HIV-RNA viral load (VL), history of HAART, GI symptoms, GI diseases, and oral candidiasis were assessed. Endoscopic severity of CE was classified as mild (Kodsi's grade I/II) or severe (grade III/IV). Of the 733 subjects, 62 (8.46%) were diagnosed with CE (mild, n = 33; severe, n = 29). Of them, 56.5% (35/62) had no GI symptoms, 30.6% (19/62) had CD4 + ≥200 cells/μL, and 55.3% (21/38) had no oral candidiasis. Univariate analysis found lower CD4+ counts, higher HIV VL, and no history of HAART to be significantly associated with CE. With lower CD4+ counts and higher HIV VL, CE occurrence increased significantly (P<0.01 for trend in odds). Multivariate analysis showed low CD4+ counts and high HIV VL to be independently associated with CE. Of the severe CE patients, 55.2% (16/29) had no GI symptoms and 44.4% (8/18) had no oral candidiasis. Median CD4+ counts in severe cases were significantly lower than in mild cases (27 vs. 80; P = 0.04).
Conclusions
Low CD4+ counts and high HIV VL were found to be factors associated with CE, and advanced immunosuppression was associated with the development of severity. Endoscopy is useful as it can detect CE, even severe CE, in patients without GI symptoms, those with high CD4 counts, and those without oral candidiasis.
Citation: Nishimura S, Nagata N, Shimbo T, Asayama N, Akiyama J, Ohmagari N, et al. (2013) Factors Associated with Esophageal Candidiasis and Its Endoscopic Severity in the Era of Antiretroviral Therapy. PLoS ONE 8(3): e58217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058217
Editor: Geneviève Chêne, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Received: September 4, 2012; Accepted: February 1, 2013; Published: March 26, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Nishimura et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was partly supported by Medicine for Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants, Research on Clinical Trials' Infrastructure Development and grants for research and development in National Center for Global Health and Medicine. No additional external funding was received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Candida esophagitis (CE) is the most common infectious disease of the esophagus [1]–[3] and the most common gastrointestinal (GI) opportunistic disorder among individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [4], [5]. The prevalence of CE among HIV patients with esophageal symptoms who have undergone endoscopy was approximately 42% prior to the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) [6]. Although the rate of AIDS-related opportunistic infections has decreased dramatically since, CE remains one of the most common AIDS defining illnesses [4]–[6].
Only a limited number of studies have investigated the associated factors of CE, and no study has yet been conducted with a large population of patients. In the pre-HAART era, a low CD4+ cell count (<200 cells/μL) was identified as one such associated factor [1], [3], [5], [7], [8]. In the HAART era, esophageal symptoms such as odynophagia and dysphagia are associated factors, while a CD4+ cell count >200, an HIV viral load <400, and the presence of gastric ulcers are considered protective factors for CE [6]. The prevailing view is that a presumptive diagnosis of CE can usually be made following the recent onset of typical symptoms [7] or the presence of oral candidiasis, and empiric antifungal therapy can then be started as a diagnostic trial [7], [9]–[11].
Endoscopy is a highly valuable definitive method for CE as it enables tissue biopsy and pathological and cultural examinations of specimens in addition to the evaluation of gross appearance [7], [8], [10], [12]. However, under these conditions, endoscopy may not be indicated for asymptomatic patients, or for those with high CD4 cell counts or without oral candidiasis. The gross appearance and severity of CE on endoscopy can vary from small white plaques or confluent, linear, and nodular elevated plaques to thick white plaque cover on esophageal mucosa which may cause circumferential narrowing of the esophageal lumen [7], [8], [10], [12]. However, the clinical factors associated with CE severity remain to be identified. In Japan, screening endoscopy is frequently performed for the early detection of malignant or premalignant lesions, even for asymptomatic patients. In this study, we performed endoscopy for a large number of HIV-infected patients including those with no GI symptoms, high CD4 counts, or no oral candidiasis.
Materials and Methods
Objectives
We conducted a cross-sectional study to identify clinical factors associated with the diagnosis of CE. We also assessed the association between the severity of CE and clinical factors.
Participants
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed in a cohort of 752 HIV-infected patients between 2003 and 2009 at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM), a 900-bed hospital located in the Tokyo metropolitan area and the largest referral center for HIV/AIDS in Japan.
Indications for endoscopy were: 1) gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic patients; and 2) fecal occult blood test results, abnormal findings on CT or annual health checkups, or laboratory abnormal findings of tumor markers or infections suspicious of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic patients. In Japan, screening endoscopy is frequently performed for the early detection of malignant or premalignant lesions, even as part of the examination for patients who are asymptomatic.
We excluded patients who had received endoscopy for follow-up evaluation shortly after treatment for GI diseases. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to endoscopy and biopsy. Study protocols were approved by the NCGM ethics committee.
Diagnosis of Candida Esophagitis
CE was suspected on endoscopic findings on the basis that candidal white plaques in the esophagus cannot be washed away [13]. Biopsy was performed when endoscopy revealed white plaques in the esophagus. For pathological diagnosis, hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining were used to identify candida. In the case of negative CE biopsy results, visible CE lesions on endoscopy were confirmed to be resolved following antifungal therapy.
Endoscopic Assessment
Endoscopy was performed by gastroenterologists at NCGM with a high resolution gastroscope (GIF-H260 or Q260, Olympus Corp., Japan). Gross appearance on endoscopy was graded according to Kodsi's classification as grade I–IV, with grade I/II defined as mild and grade III/IV defined as severe (Figure 1A–D) [14]. In addition, an endoscopic finding of candidal white plaques covering the entire circumference of the esophageal lumen was referred to as “white carpet” (Figure 1E). The presence/absence of oral candidiasis was determined by oral endoscopic imaging (Figure 1F) and medical record descriptions. Endoscopic Kodsi classification grades were assessed by two physicians (S.N. and N.A.), and interobserver agreement for the endoscopic findings was evaluated. Two physicians made their judgments from endoscopic images only and were blinded to the subjects' clinical details (HIV results, HIV-RNA, CD4 counts, symptoms, and histological results). Only endoscopic findings obtained by one observer (N.A.) were used for evaluation.
A: Grade I, a few raised white plaques up to 2 mm in size without edema or ulceration. B: Grade II, multiple raised white plaques greater than 2 mm in size without ulceration. C: Grade III, confluent, linear, and nodular elevated plaques. D: Grade IV, finding of grade III with increased friability of the mucous membranes and occasional narrowing of the lumen. E: “White carpet” appearance, thick white plaque cover on esophageal mucosa circumferential narrowing the lumen. F: Oral Candidiasis, in which endoscopy can detect laryngopharyngeal candidiasis.
Clinical Factors
GI symptoms were collected from medical records written by an attending doctor who interviewed each patient before endoscopy. Those without GI symptoms or descriptions of symptoms in their medical charts and those with a reason for receiving “screening” endoscopy were treated as asymptomatic cases.
GI symptoms comprised epigastralgia, nausea, heart burn, dysphagia, throat pain, appetite loss, hematemesis, and tarry stools. CD4+ cell count values obtained within 2 weeks before or after endoscopy were collected from patient medical records and categorized into the following three groups: ≥200 cells/μL; 100–199 cells/μL; <100 cells/μL. HIV-RNA viral load (VL) as determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was also reviewed within 1 month of endoscopy. The minimum detection level was 40 copies/mL of plasma, and a positive result was defined as ≥40 copies/mL. We categorized HIV-RNA VL into four groups: VL ≤40 copies/ml (normal range); 40<VL≤10,000 copies/ml; 10,000<VL≤100,000 copies/ml; and 100,000< VL copies/ml.
Routes of infection were determined using face-to-face questionnaires conducted by the medical staff. HIV infection routes were classified into the following five categories: men who have sex with men (MSM); heterosexual; drug user; use of untreated blood products; and unknown. Sexual behavior was divided into two categories: MSM and heterosexual. Patients who were neither homosexual nor bisexual were regarded as heterosexual.
The presence of HIV-related GI diseases such as cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS), Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), malignant lymphoma (ML), and idiopathic ulcer, as well as other GI diseases such as esophageal varix, gastric adenoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, and reflux esophagitis were verified by examination of medical records and the endoscopic database. Information regarding history of HAART was collected from pre-endoscopy medical records.
Statistical analysis
The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to determine factors associated with CE, and the relationships between CE and CD4+ cell count and HIV-RNA viral load were evaluated using the Chi-square test for linear trends. A multiple logistic regression model was used in multivariate analysis with factors showing values of P<0.2 on univariate analysis. A final model was then developed by backward selection of factors showing values of P<0.1. To identify the best performing combination of clinical factors, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) was calculated.
The interobserver agreement of endoscopic severity (mild or severe) was measured with kappa statistics. Kappa values >0.80 were denoted excellent, 0.60–0.80 good, 0.40–0.60 moderate, 0.20–0.40 fair, and <0.20 poor.
Association between the severity of CE and clinical factors were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for age, CD4+ cell count, and HIV-RNA viral load. Fisher's exact test was used for sex, sexual behavior, history of HAART, and the presence of GI symptoms and oral candidiasis. Values of P<0.05 were considered significant, and all statistical analysis was performed using Stata version 10 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).
Results
Participants
Of the 752 potential study subjects we recruited who underwent endoscopy, 19 patients who underwent endoscopy for follow-up evaluation shortly after treatment for GI diseases were excluded. The remaining 733 patients were selected for data analysis.
Baseline Characteristics
Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 44 years (interquartile range [IQR], 36–56 years), and patients were predominantly male (92.8%). Routes of HIV infection included MSM (62.9%), heterosexual (18.1%), hemophilia (16.8%), drug use (0.3%), and unknown (1.9%). The median CD4+ cell count was 234 cells/μL (IQR, 97–399 cells/μL), and the median HIV-RNA viral load was <40 copies/mL (IQR, <40–23,000 copies/mL). HAART had been administered to 545 patients (74.35%). The median CD4+ cell count was significantly higher in patients with HAART than in those without (265 vs 121 cells/μL, P<0.01). The median HIV-RNA viral load was significantly lower in patients with HAART than in those without (<40 vs 45,000 copies/mL, P<0.01).
GI symptoms were noted in 263 patients (35.9%) and included epigastalgia (n = 84), nausea (n = 36), tarry stool (n = 29), hematemesis (n = 25), heart burn (n = 22), dysphagia (n = 12), throat pain (n = 8), and appetite loss (n = 5). The endoscopic diagnosis of upper GI diseases is shown in Table 2. Of the 733 patients, 62 (8.46% [95% CI, 6.54–10.71]) were diagnosed with CE. The presence or absence of oral candidiasis was determined in 38 patents from endoscopic images, of which 17 were found to be positive.
Clinical Factors Associated with CE
Of all CE patients, 56.5% (35/62) had no GI symptoms, 30.6% (19/62) had CD4 +≥200 cells/μL, and 55.3% (21/38) had no oral candidiasis (Table 3). Univariate analysis revealed that a low CD4+ cell count, higher HIV-RNA viral load, and no history of HAART were significantly associated with CE (Table 3).
With a lower CD4+ count (≥200; 100–199; and <100 cells/μL), the occurrence of CE increased significantly (P<0.01 for trend in odds, Table 3). Similarly, with a higher HIV-RNA VL (VL≤40; 40<VL≤10,000; 10,000<VL≤100,000; and 100,000<VL copies/ml), the occurrence of CE increased significantly (P<0.01 for trend in odds, Table 3).
Multivariate analysis revealed that lower CD4+ cell counts and a higher HIV-RNA VL were independent associated factors for CE (Table 3). Performance of the combination of these two factors was calculated as 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72–0.83) in ROC-AUC analysis.
Endoscopic Severity and Clinical Factors
Endoscopy placed 33 patients in the mild group (grade I/II: 7/26) and 29 in the severe group (grade III/IV: 24/5). A “white carpet” was observed in three grade-IV patients. The interobserver agreement for endoscopic severity was shown to be 0.77 (rated as “good”) by Kappa statistics.
Table 4 summarizes the distribution of clinical factors of CE patients by severity. Among the severe CE patients, 55.2% (16/29) had no GI symptoms and 44.4% (8/18) had no oral candidiasis. No significant associations were found between groups with respect to age, sex, percentage of MSM, HIV-RNA viral load, history of HAART, GI symptoms, and oral candidiasis. The median CD4+ cell count in severe cases was significantly lower than in mild cases (27 vs. 80; P = 0.0374).
Discussion
CE is the most common esophageal disorder observed in HIV patients [15], with a prevalence of 43–53% in the pre-HAART era that has decreased to 17–24% since the introduction of HAART [6], [8], [16]. In the present study, CE was found in 8.46% of HIV patients who underwent upper GI endoscopy. This is lower than reported previously, probably because the present study included many asymptomatic patients.
The presence of CE is an indication for systemic treatment with antifungals [11], and endoscopy is essential for diagnosing CE. Endoscopy is usually performed as a diagnosis for patients with GI symptoms, but a previous study reported HIV patients with CE who were totally asymptomatic [5]. Surprisingly, the present patient population included 35 (56.1%) CE patients with no GI symptoms. These observations suggest the need for identifying clinical factors other than GI symptoms predictive of CE.
In the present study, univariate analysis identified the absence of prior HAART, low CD4+ cell count, and higher HIV-RNA viral load as factors associated with CE. Multivariate analysis identified a low CD4+ cell count and a higher HIV-RNA VL as independent associated factors. A low CD4+ cell count and high HIV-RNA viral load as associated factors are consistent with previous reports. López-Dupla and colleagues [5] compared several factors between patients with oral candidiasis and those with CE in the pre-HAART era and found that the CD4:CD8 ratio was significantly lower in CE patients and that lymphocyte and CD4+ cell counts were lower, albeit non-significantly, in CE patients. Their study included a large number of patients (n = 114) but, as a case series, did not compare the data with those obtained from control patients [5]. Nkuize and colleagues [6] studied 706 patients infected with HIV (239 from the pre HAART era, 238 from the early HAART era, and 229 from the recent HAART era). Of the 238 patients from the early HAART era, they identified odynophagia/dysphagia as an associated factor and an HIV-RNA viral load <400 copies/mL, a CD4+ cell count >200 cells/μl, and gastric ulcers as protective factors. However, their study did not consider the history of HAART or the presence of asymptomatic patients. Manfredi and colleagues [17] speculate that high HIV-RNA VL is an important factor associated with the recurrence of CE, regardless of immune status.
CE is classified into mild and severe cases according to endoscopic findings, and severe cases are associated with complications such as hemorrhage, stenosis, and esophagotracheal fistula [18], [19]. It is therefore important to identify clinical factors associated with severe CE cases, and we identified a low CD4+ cell count as one such factor. Some patients with severe CE had characteristic endoscopic findings such as “white carpet” (Figure 1E), which has not been reported previously, and suggests the involvement of compromised immune function in its formation. The presence of GI symptoms was not associated with severe CE. More surprisingly, 55.2% of patients with severe CE were asymptomatic, indicating that the determination of endoscopic indications on the basis of symptoms alone may lead to a missed diagnosis of severe CE.
Werneck-Silva and colleagues [15] demonstrated that Kodsi's grade-I (mild) cases are associated with significantly higher CD4+ cell counts than other grades while there is no significant difference in CD4+ cell count between grade II–IV cases. Wilcox and colleagues [10] also reported that many CE patients endoscopically graded as severe had a CD4+ cell count <200, although their data are inadequate as their study included only a small number of HIV patients with CE. We also evaluated oral candidiasis, in addition to clinical factors, but found no association with the severity of CE.
There are several limitations in the present study. Although oral candidiasis is considered an important associated factor for the diagnosis of CE [7], [9], [13], this finding was not observed in all patients in the present study, and some patients were missing relevant oral candidiasis data. Second, we did not evaluate the clinical factors of diabetes and malignancy, or the use of oral antibiotics and antacids as associated factors for CE in non-HIV patients [15], [20]–[22]. Third, selection bias was present, for although subjects were patients who underwent endoscopy, those who had severe clinical conditions such as unstable circulatory or respiratory dynamics or bleeding tendency may have been more likely to be excluded. Therefore, the present results are applicable to patients with relatively good general condition.
Conclusions
Clinical factors should be considered when determining the endoscopic indication to diagnose CE. Low CD4+ cell counts and higher HIV-RNA VL were identified as clinical factors associated with CE, while higher endoscopic severity was shown to be associated with lower CD4+ cell counts. Endoscopy is useful as it can detect CE, even severe CE, in patients without GI symptoms, those with high CD4 counts, and those without oral candidiasis.
Acknowledgments
We wish to express our gratitude to Ms. Hisae Kawashiro, Clinical Research Coordinator, for help with data collection. We also thank all the clinical staff at the AIDS Clinical Center and all the staff of the endoscopy unit.
Author Contributions
Advised to the writing of the manuscript: JA NO SO NU. Conceived and designed the experiments: NN SN NO. Performed the experiments: NN SN NA. Analyzed the data: TS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HY NA. Wrote the paper: SN NN.
References
- 1. Eras P, Goldstein MJ, Sherlock P (1972) Candida infection of the gastrointestinal tract. Medicine (Baltimore) 51: 367–379.
- 2. Young JA, Elias E (1985) Gastro-oesophageal candidiasis: Diagnosis by brush cytology. J Clin Pathol 38: 293–296.
- 3. Wheeler RR, Peacock JE Jr, Cruz JM, Richter JE (1987) Esophagitis in the immunocompromised host: Role of esophagoscopy in diagnosis. Rev Infect Dis 9: 88–96.
- 4. Monkemuller KE, Lazenby AJ, Lee DH, Loudon R, Wilcox CM (2005) Occurrence of gastrointestinal opportunistic disorders in AIDS despite the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Dig Dis Sci 50: 230–234.
- 5. Lopez-Dupla M, Mora Sanz P, Pintado Garcia V, Valencia Ortega E, Uriol PL, et al. (1992) Clinical, endoscopic, immunologic, and therapeutic aspects of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients: A survey of 114 cases. Am J Gastroenterol 87: 1771–1776.
- 6. Nkuize M, De Wit S, Muls V, Arvanitakis M, Buset M (2010) Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. HIV Med 11: 412–417.
- 7. Bianchi Porro G, Parente F, Cernuschi M (1989) The diagnosis of esophageal candidiasis in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome: Is endoscopy always necessary? Am J Gastroenterol 84: 143–146.
- 8. Bonacini M, Young T, Laine L (1991) The causes of esophageal symptoms in human immunodeficiency virus infection. A prospective study of 110 patients. Arch Intern Med 151: 1567–1572.
- 9. Wilcox CM, Alexander LN, Clark WS, Thompson SE 3rd (1996) Fluconazole compared with endoscopy for human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with esophageal symptoms. Gastroenterology 110: 1803–1809.
- 10. Wilcox CM, Schwartz DA (1996) Endoscopic-pathologic correlates of candida esophagitis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 41: 1337–1345.
- 11. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK Jr, Calandra TF, et al. (2009) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 48: 503–535.
- 12. Antinori A, Antinori A, Ammassari A, Masetti R, De Luca A, et al. (1995) Presumptive clinical criteria versus endoscopy in the diagnosis of candida esophagitis at various HIV-1 disease stages. Endoscopy 27: 371–376.
- 13. Baehr PH, McDonald GB (1994) Esophageal infections: Risk factors, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Gastroenterology 106: 509–532.
- 14. Kodsi BE, Wickremesinghe C, Kozinn PJ, Iswara K, Goldberg PK (1976) Candida esophagitis: A prospective study of 27 cases. Gastroenterology 71: 715–719.
- 15. Werneck-Silva AL, Prado IB (2009) Role of upper endoscopy in diagnosing opportunistic infections in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. World J Gastroenterol 15: 1050–1056.
- 16. Rolston KV, Rodriguez S (1992) Upper gastrointestinal disease in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals. Arch Intern Med 152: 881–882.
- 17. Manfredi R, Sabbatani S, Calza L (2007) Recurring candida albicans esophagitis in a HIV-infected patient undergoing long-term antiretroviral therapy, and with absent-negligible immunodeficiency. Braz J Infect Dis 11: 605–609.
- 18. Gaissert HA, Breuer CK, Weissburg A, Mermel L (1999) Surgical management of necrotizing candida esophagitis. Ann Thorac Surg 67: 231–233.
- 19. Kanzaki R, Yano M, Takachi K, Ishiguro S, Motoori M, et al. (2009) Candida esophagitis complicated by an esophago-airway fistula: Report of a case. Surg Today 39: 972–978.
- 20. Yakoob J, Jafri W, Abid S, Jafri N, Islam M, et al. (2003) Candida esophagitis: Risk factors in non-HIV population in Pakistan. World J Gastroenterol 9: 2328–2331.
- 21. Chocarro Martinez A, Galindo Tobal F, Ruiz-Irastorza G, Gonzalez Lopez A, Alvarez Navia F, et al. (2000) Risk factors for esophageal candidiasis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 19: 96–100.
- 22. Mimidis K, Papadopoulos V, Margaritis V, Thomopoulos K, Gatopoulou A, et al. (2005) Predisposing factors and clinical symptoms in HIV-negative patients with candida oesophagitis: Are they always present? Int J Clin Pract 59: 210–213.