Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Association of Genetic Variants in the Adiponectin Gene with Metabolic Syndrome: A Case-Control Study and a Systematic Meta-Analysis in the Chinese Population

  • Meng Gao,

    Affiliation Hubei Key Lab of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, College of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China

  • Daxia Ding,

    Affiliation Hubei Key Lab of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, College of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China

  • Jinghua Huang,

    Affiliation Hubei Key Lab of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, College of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China

  • Yali Qu,

    Affiliation Wuhan Center of Medical Therapeutics, Wuhan, China

  • Yu Wang,

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

  • Qingyang Huang

    huangqy@mail.ccnu.edu.cn

    Affiliation Hubei Key Lab of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, College of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of metabolic syndrome has been rising worldwide, including in China, but knowledge on specific genetic determinants of metabolic syndrome is very limited. A number of studies have reported that polymorphisms in the ADIPOQ gene are associated with metabolic syndrome in Chinese Han populations. However, data is still conflicting. The objective of this study was to examine the associations of the adiponectin genetic variants with metabolic syndrome by a case-control study and meta-analyses in Chinese.

Methods

We first investigated the association of ADIPOQ rs2241766 (+45T>G in exon 2), rs266729 (−11377C>G in promoter) and rs1501299 (+276G>T in intron 2) polymorphisms with metabolic syndrome in a Hubei Han Chinese population with 322 metabolic syndrome patients and 161 normal controls recruited from the Yichang, Hubei. Then we comprehensively reviewed the association between ADIPOQ rs2241766/rs266729/rs1501299 and metabolic syndrome in the Chinese populations via a meta-analysis. The strength of association was assessed by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

The G allele frequency of rs2241766 in metabolic syndrome patients was significantly higher than those of controls group (29.8% vs 23.3%, OR = 1.40, P = 0.033). The logistic regression analysis adjusted by gender and age showed a nominally significant association for rs2241766 GG+GT genotype (P = 0.065, OR = 1.55) and rs1501299 GG genotype in recessive model (OR = 1.54, P = 0.066). However, no association was observed for rs266729 in our sample. We identified thirteen studies for rs2241766 (2,684 metabolic syndrome patients and 2,864 controls), three studies for rs266729, and eleven studies for rs1501299 (2,889 metabolic syndrome patients and 3,304 controls) in Chinese. Meta-analysis indicated significant associations for the rs2241766 G allele (OR = 1.14, 95%CI = 1.05–1.24, P = 0.003), rs266729 GG+GT genotypes (OR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.68–0.92, P = 0.003) and rs1501299 GG+TG genotypes (OR = 1.42, 95%CI 1.16–1.75, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated ADIPOQ as a pleiotropic locus for metabolic syndrome and its components in the Han Chinese population.

Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) refers to a cluster of multiple metabolic abnormalities,including abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia (low blood levels of HDL – C, high blood levels of LDL – C and triglycerides (TG)), hypertension, insulin resistant (IR), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and elevated fasting glucose [1]. MetS had 4–5 fold increased risk of diabetes and 2–3 fold increased risk of heart disease and death [2][3]. Although there are a few versions of disputed MetS definition including the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) [4], the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) [5] and the World Health Organization (WHO) [6], and Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS) [7], they all agree on four major disorders, including obesity especially central obesity, IGT such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), dyslipidemia and hypertension [1]. The prevalence of the MetS in the old population of China has reported to be 23% in men and 41% in women [8], about 21% in Chinese adults [9], 23.8% in US Whites, 21.6% in African Americans, and 31.9% in Mexican Americans [10][11]. The increasing prevalence of MetS poses a serious public health problem worldwide.

The familial nature of MetS, the marked difference in the prevalence among various racial groups, and differences in concordance rates between monozygotic twins clearly suggested that MetS is under genetic control. Heritability estimates for MetS range from 10% to 42% [12][16]. For instance, the heritability of MetS was found to be 24% among 803 individuals from 89 Caribbean-Hispanic families in the Northern Manhattan Family Study [15], 42% in 1,617 adult female twin pairs recruited from rural China with low MetS prevalence (4.4%) [16].

The evidence of genetic determinants fueled the study to identify susceptibility genes for MetS using linkage or association studies. Genome-wide linkage studies in multiple populations found evidence for linkage of MetS on chromosome 1, 2, 3q37, 7q, 16 [17][21]. Principal component factor analysis was also used to define quantitative phenotypes to identify the underlying genetic basis of MetS [22][30]. Although a number of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were successfully identified, no specific gene or mutation has been found as a result of these linkage studies. Three genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been carried out for MetS. Four SNPs in genes CETP and LPL are associated with MetS in Indian Asian male population [31]. GWAS of seven studies of the STAMPEED consortium, comprising 22,161 participants of European ancestry, suggested that eleven variants were nominally associated with MetS [32]. APOA1/C3/A4/A5 gene cluster region (SNP rs964184) was associated with MetS in recent GWAS of 4 Finnish cohorts consisting of 2637 MetS cases and 7927 controls (both free of diabetes) (P = 7.23×10−9 in meta-analysis) [33].

Adiponectin (ADIPOQ) gene is located on human 3q27, a susceptibility locus for MetS and its components. ADIPOQ expresses adipocyte-specific secretory protein. The data from human studies suggested that plasma ADIPOQ level is related to each component of MetS. It is well documented that lower plasma ADIPOQ levels were associated with obesity [34][38], T2DM [39][43], dyslipidemia [44] and higher blood pressure [45][48]. Weight reduction has been shown to significantly increase plasma ADIPOQ levels [49]. Higher levels of ADIPOQ in plasma minimize the risk of developing T2DM [50][51]. Treatment with PPARγ2 agonist for hyperglycemia in T2DM patients [52][53] and treatment of hypertension with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonist [54][55] drastically increased the plasma ADIPOQ concentration.

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) pattern of ADIPOQ SNPs in the Chinese population was shown in Figure 1. The SNPs rs266729 (−11377C>G in promoter), rs2241766 (+45T>G in exon 2) and rs1501299 (+276G>T in intron 2) in the ADIPOQ gene have been reported to be associated with MetS in Chinese populations [56][69]. However, these results have often been inconsistent due to a small sample size, which may affect their reliability.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Linkage disequilibrium pattern of ADIPOQ SNPs in the Chinese population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058412.g001

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the association between ADIPOQ rs2241766, rs1501299, rs266729 polymorphisms and MetS in a Hubei Han Chinese population, and to systematically review the association of ADIPOQ rs2241766/rs266729/rs1501299 with MetS in Chinese via a meta-analysis.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

All participants gave written informed consent. The protocol was in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, and was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Yiling Hospital in Yichang, Hubei Province. The present study included a total of 483 individuals of Hubei Han Chinese, comprising 322 MetS patients (93 males, 299 females, age 52.2±10.41 years) and 161 controls (84 males, 77 females, age 65.48±10.80 years). The IDF definition of MetS [5], which incorporates ethnicity by providing different criteria for the MetS in different ethnic groups, was used. IDF criteria for Asian identifies MetS for subjects with central obesity (waist circumference ≥90 cm for men, ≥80 cm for women), plus any two of: 1) elevated plasma TG≥1.69 mmol/L ; 2) low plasma HDL cholesterol <1.04 mmol/L for men, <1.29 mmol/L for women; 3) Systolic blood pressure (SBP)≥130 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP)≥85 mmHg or current medication; 4) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥5.6 mmol/L or diagnosed with T2DM. Control subjects did not meet any IDF criteria of MetS.

Clinical characteristics

The weight, height, waist and hip circumference were measured in all individuals. BMI and waist to hip ratio (WHR) were separately calculated as weight (kg)/height2 (m2) and waist (cm)/hip (cm). Clinical parameters measured included FPG, 2 hours' postprandial blood glucose (PBG), SBP and DBP, total cholesterol, TG, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and fasting insulin.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was obtained from whole blood leukocytes using standard phenol/chloroform method. Three SNPs (rs2241766, rs1501299, rs266729) in the ADIPOQ gene were selected to genotype using polymerase chain reaction – restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. The primer sequences and the annealing temperature of the PCR were shown in Table 1. PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 μl, containing 100 ng DNA template, 0.5 μl forward primer (20 μM), 0.5 μl reverse primer (20 μM), 0.5 μl Taq polymerase (2 U/μl), 2.5 μl 10×PCR buffer (Mg2+ Plus), 0.5 μl dNTP mixture. The PCR amplification conditions were as follows: an initial denaturing cycle at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 amplification cycles (denaturing at 94°C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 30 s), and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

thumbnail
Table 1. Primer sequences and reaction conditions for genotyping assay.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058412.t001

Association analysis

The genotype distribution in the cases and controls were separately tested for Hardy – Weinberg equilibrium using the χ 2 test before association analysis. The genotypic and allelic frequencies between MetS patients and controls were compared using χ 2 test. The genotype – disease association analyses were performed by logistic regression analysis. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software (version 11.5). Statistical power was estimated by the ‘Case – control for discrete traits’ module of the web-based Genetic Power Calculator (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/gpc/qcc.html), which takes the control-case ratio of the study sample into account.

Literature search strategy in meta-analysis

PubMed and HuGeNet and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and VIP Information were searched up to August 2012, using “adiponectin” or “ADIPOQ” or “adiponectin gene polymorphism”, “AMP1”, and “metabolic syndrome” or “MetS” or “metabolic syndrome X” or “ syndrome X” as key words. The references of all computer-identified publications were searched for additional studies. The PubMed option “Related Articles” was used to search for potentially relevant papers. Reference lists in retrieved articles were also screened. Without any language restriction, we only selected published manuscripts (including their online supporting materials). Studies included in the meta-analysis must meet all the following criteria: (1) assessed the associations of polymorphisms in the ADIPOQ gene with MetS; (2) used case – control or cohort design; (3) provided odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI), or genotype frequency among case and control group; (4) for duplicate publications from the same patient population, only the paper that had the largest population, contained more useful information or the latest one was selected. The following information was extracted: first author name, year of publication, ethnicity, sample size, genotype distribution and minor allele frequency in cases and controls, p value for allele frequency (Figure 2).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Flow diagram of studies included our meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058412.g002

Meta-analysis

We found forty-six published potentially relevant papers but only fourteen meet selection criteria. Among the forty-six papers, twenty-six were excluded due to irrelevance. In addition, four articles were excluded because they studied other polymorphisms or duplicate publications. Two studies from Korea and Croatia were also excluded. Moreover, one paper included two studies. From the above, 13 Chinese studies with a total of 2,684 cases and 2,864 controls were included in rs2241766 analysis, 11 Chinese studies with a total of 2,889 cases and 3,304 controls were included in rs1501299 analysis, 3 Chinese studies including our independent study with a total of 1,486 cases and 1,379 controls were included in rs266729 analysis. Table 2 summarized the characteristics of fifteen Chinese association studies of ADIPOQ polymorphisms with MetS.

thumbnail
Table 2. Characteristics of case-control studies included in a meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058412.t002

The associations of polymorphisms in the ADIPOQ gene with MetS were estimated by calculating pooled OR and 95% CI under additive, dominant and recessive genetic models by using stata 10.0 software. ORs were calculated using 2×2 contingency tables for each study. The χ 2-based Q-test and the inconsistency index (I2) were applied to assess heterogeneity among studies. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing one study at a time and calculating the pooled ORs for the remaining studies. The Z-test was used to calculate the P value of the overall effect for the meta-analysis. Pooled ORs were computed by the fixed-effects method of Mantel-Haenszel (peto method) for data combined under no heterogeneity between studies (P>0.1). If significant heterogeneity exists between studies (P≤0.1), then a random effects model of Der-Simonian-Laird (D-L method) is appropriate for data combined. The conservative Egger's regression analysis was used to evaluate publication bias.

Results

Clinical characteristics of subjects

Clinical characteristics of the study subjects are shown in Table 3. Independent t-test analysis showed that the gender, age, height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, SBP, DBP, FPG, BMI, triacylglycerol, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol, in MetS were significantly higher than those of the controls group. Since height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, SBP, DBP, FPG, BMI, triacylglycerol, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol were components of MetS, only gender and age were used as covariates to be adjusted in association analyses.

SNP rs2241766 and MetS

The genotypic distributions of the rs2241766 polymorphism was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in both MetS patients and controls group (P>0.05). The G allele and GG+TG genotype frequencies of rs2241766 in MetS patients were significantly higher than those of controls group (G allele: 29.8% vs 23.3%, OR = 1.40, 95%CI = 1.03–1.91, P = 0.033; GG+TG genotype: P = 0.012, OR = 1.63, 95%CI = 1.11–2.39). The logistic regression analysis adjusted by gender and age showed a nominally significant association for rs2241766 GG+GT genotype (P = 0.065, OR = 1.55, 95%CI = 0.97–2.48).

We identified thirteen Chinese studies for the ADIPOQ rs2241766 including our study. Figure 3(A) presents the forest plot of risk G allele OR of individual study and meta-analysis for association between ADIPOQ rs2241766 and MetS in a total of 2,684 case patients and 2,864 control subjects. Of these, eleven studies showed a trend of elevated OR for the risk allele G. Two studies have an opposite trend. There was no significant between study heterogeneity. A fixed effect model was thus used and generated a combined allelic OR of 1.14 (95%CI 1.04–1.24, P = 0.003) for the rs2241766 G allele, 1.19 (95%CI 1.07–1.33, P = 0.002) for the GG+GT genotypes in dominant model (Table 4). We further combined genotype data of all thirteen studies. The SNP rs2241766 showed consistent associations with MetS: OR = 1.12 (95%CI = 1.04–1.22, P = 0.005) for the G allele, OR = 1.17 for GG+GT genotypes (95%CI = 1.06–1.30, P = 0.003) in dominate model.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Forest plots of meta-analysis of the association of ADIPOQ rs2241766 (A) and rs1501299 (B) polymorphisms with metabolic syndrome in the Chinese population.

Estimation of odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in each study are displayed as closed square and horizontal line, respectively. The size of the black squares reflects the weight of the study in the meta-analysis. The diamond represents the combined OR, calculated using a random or fixed effect model, with its 95%CI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058412.g003

thumbnail
Table 4. Meta-analysis of associations between polymorphisms in the ADIPOQ gene and MetS risk.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058412.t004

SNP rs266729 and MetS

No association was observed for either rs266729 G allele, GG genotype in recessive model or GG+CG genotypes in dominant model with or without adjustment for gender and age in our sample. Because only three association studies of the rs266729 polymorphism with MetS were found in Chinese, we pooled genotype data of all three studies. The allele frequencies for G were 0.249 in the MetS group, and 0.278 in the control group. The pooled OR was 0.862 (95%CI = 0.76–0.97, P = 0.015) for the G allele, 0.80 (95%CI = 0.68–0.92, P = 0.003) for GG+GT genotypes in dominant model.

SNP rs1501299 and MetS

An association trend was observed for rs1501299 G allele (OR = 1.30, 95%CI 0.98–1.74, P = 0.068) and the GG genotype in recessive model without (OR = 1.48, 95%CI 1.01–2.18, P = 0.045) or with adjustment of gender and age (OR = 1.54, 95%CI 0.97–2.45, P = 0.066) in our sample.

Figure 3 (B) presents the forest plot of risk G allele OR of individual study and meta-analysis for association between ADIPOQ rs1501299 and MetS in a total of 2,889 cases and 3,304 controls1 from eleven Chinese studies. Nine studies showed a trend of elevated OR for the risk allele G. One study from the Taiwan [57] and one study from Ningxia [67] showed a trend in the opposite direction. Significant associations were found for the G allele (OR = 1.27, 95%CI 1.02–1.59, P = 0.033), the GG+TG genotypes in dominant model (OR = 1.42, 95%CI 1.16–1.75, P = 0.001) and for GG vs TT in additive model (OR = 1.48, 95%CI 1.20–1.82, P<0.001) (Table 4).

Sensitivity analysis

A sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing one study at a time and calculating the pooled ORs for the remaining studies. The results indicated that none of the individual studies influenced the pooled ORs (1.12–1.20, 95%CI 1.02–1.32), P (0.014–0.001) value and heterogeneity (I2 = 2.3∼26.9%) for rs2241766. However, the result of meta-analysis for rs1501299 was not stable. The meta-analysis result of the allele model becomes significant after removing Yang's [57] (P = 0.009, OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.08–1.66) or Chen's [67] (P = 0.014, OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.06–1.67) studies that showed an association trend in the opposite direction.

Heterogeneity analysis

A significant heterogeneity was observed for rs1501299 in allele analysis (P<0.001, I2 = 84.8%). Meta-regression analysis including covariates the age in case groups and control groups, publication date, sample size, diagnostic criteria, region and gender, showed that only the age in case groups and control groups significantly contributed to the heterogeneity (P = 0.008, 0.031, respectively). The inconsistency index I2 decreases from 84.8% to 60.3% after removing Huang's study [58] that had the highest age in case groups and control groups.

Discussion

In the present study we examined the association of rs2241766, rs1501299 and rs266729 polymorphisms in the ADIPOQ gene with MetS risk in Chinese. The rs2241766 was associated with susceptibility to MetS in the Hubei Han Chinese population (allele G: 29.8% vs 23.3%, P = 0.033). The association was further confirmed by our meta-analysis, which involved 2,684 case patients and 2,864 control in Chinese populations. A weak association was found for the rs1501299 GG genotype in recessive model in our sample, and significant associations were found for the G allele (OR = 1.27, 95%CI 1.02–1.59, P = 0.033), the GG+TG genotypes in dominant model (OR = 1.42, 95%CI 1.16–1.75, P = 0.001) and for GG vs TT in additive model (OR = 1.48, 95%CI 1.20–1.82, P<0.001) in meta-analysis. The result from pooled three genotype data suggested that rs266729 was significantly associated with MetS in additive (G allele: OR = 0.862, 95%CI = 0.76–0.97, P = 0.015) and dominant models (GG+GT genotypes: OR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.68–0.92, P = 0.003). Therefore, both our study in Hubei Han Chinese and meta-analyses in the Chinese population suggested that polymorphisms in the ADIPOQ gene were associated with MetS risk.

To our knowledge, this study represents the first meta-analysis between polymorphisms in the ADIPOQ gene and MetS in the Chinese populations. Thirteen small studies previously conducted in Chinese populations examined the rs2241766 polymorphism in relation to MetS with inconsistent results. Only two studies [61], [64] found significant associations, which are similar to our results. Our meta-analysis consistently supports the association between the SNP rs2241766 and MetS under additive, dominant models, and in the pooled data. For rs1501299, a weak association was found in our sample, and significant associations were detected in meta-analysis. For rs266729, although no association was observed in our Hubei Han Chinese and two previous studies [63], [66], a significant association was detected for pooled genotype data. The G allele may decrease the risk of MetS (OR = 0.862, 95%CI = 0.76–0.97, P = 0.015). These results highlight the pivotal role of systematic review to draw firm conclusions.

The low serum ADIPOQ level is a strong risk factor for MetS [36], [38], [70][71]. It is well documented that ADIPOQ levels are highly heritable (30–70%) [72][74]. Candidate gene study, GWAS and meta-analysis have shown pronounced associations between common polymorphisms in the ADIPOQ gene and plasma ADIPOQ levels [74][78]. Vasseur et al. [73] demonstrated that higher ADIPOQ levels were associated with variant alleles of SNPs rs2241766 T>G (P = 0.01) and rs1501299 G>T (P = 0.01), whereas variant alleles at SNP rs266729 C>G (P = 0.0003) were associated with a lower ADIPOQ level. Patients with rs266729CG, CG+GG genotypes (P = 0.034, 0.035 respectively) had higher levels of serum ADIPOQ than those with the CC genotypes in a Chinese Han population [66]. Another study found that the GG genotype for rs1501299 was associated with lower serum ADIPOQ levels as compared with the GT and TT genotypes [79]. Moreover, a meta-analysis by Menzaghi et al. [74] indicated that variants in ADIPOQ played a role in modulating ADIPOQ secretion. Therefore, polymorphisms in the ADIPOQ gene may regulate the serum ADIPOQ levels, thereby influence the risk of MetS.

Six meta-analysis of the association between the genetic variants in the ADIPOQ gene and T2DM have been published [74], [80][84]. Menzaghi et al. [74] found no association between any of the SNPs (rs2241766/rs1501299/rs266729) and T2DM among populations from all over the world. Li et al. [83] and Chen et al. [84] demonstrated that the rs2241766 G allele increased the risk of T2DM (OR = 1.34, 1.28, respectively) in Chinese populations. However, no association was detected in the meta-analysis of 6370 T2DM patients and 15443 normal individuals from all over the world [81]. In contrast, Gong et al. [81] and Han et al. [82] consistently demonstrated that the G allele of rs266729 contributed to the development of T2DM in global meta-analysis of populations from all over the world and European White, but not Asian. For the rs1501299 polymorphism in intron 2, although associations were found in meta-analysis of Li et al's [80] nine and Chen et al's [84] eight case – control studies in the Chinese Han population, there was no association in meta-analysis of Li et al's [83] eleven Chinese Han case – control studies and Han et al's [82] global meta-analysis of populations from all over the world. Recently, two meta-analyses explored the relationship between SNPs rs2241766 and rs1501299 in the ADIPOQ gene and blood pressure and essential hypertension in Chinese populations [85][86]. No significant association was found. ADIPOQ rs1501299 T (OR = 1.59; 95% CI 1.39–1.81) was associated with an increased risk of obesity in a recent meta-analysis [87]. These results implicated ADIPOQ as a pleiotropic locus for MetS and its components, presumably serving as an important physiological and pharmacological target in the prevention and treatment of MetS.

Although we limit our meta-analysis to the Chinese population, meta-analysis still revealed significant between-study heterogeneity for SNP rs1501299 (Table 3). The source of between-study heterogeneity may be due to: 1) Regional variations. All of the subjects in the current meta-analysis were Han Chinese but from different regions and the Han Chinese population is not a genetically homogenous group. 2) Different diagnostic criteria for MetS. IDF [56][57], [59][60], [63], [66], CDS [58], [61], [64], [67], [69], WHO [62], [68] and ATPIII [65] diagnostic criteria are used respectively. 3) Selection bias. The age of the control subjects ranges from 33.4 [59] to 77.9 [58], and sample size ranges from 88 [60] to 2141 [66]. Our meta-regression analysis showed that the age in case groups and control groups significantly contributed to the heterogeneity.

We acknowledged that there were some limitations in our study. First, sample size in our study was comparatively small and had insufficient statistical power to detect the association. Assuming the prevalence of 30%, and the minor allele frequencies of the marker and QTL are both 0.2, a marker is in complete LD (D' = 1) with a QTL, and using a dominant genetic model, this study had about 68% power at a significance level of α = 0.05 to detect an effect size of 1.4. Second, the present meta-analysis was based primarily on unadjusted effect estimates and the confounding factors were not controlled for. Third, due to lack of original data, the effects of gene – gene and gene-environment interactions were not considered in our current study. In addition, a weak publication bias was detected for the rs2241766 dominant model.

In conclusion, our results and meta-analysis demonstrates that ADIPOQ is a pleiotropic locus for MetS and its components in Chinese Han population. In the future, well-designed studies with large sample sizes in diverse ethnic populations are warranted.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: QYH MG. Performed the experiments: MG DD JH. Analyzed the data: MG DD JH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MG DD JH YQ. Wrote the paper: QYH MG YW.

References

  1. 1. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ (2005) The metabolic syndrome. Lancet 365: 1415–28.
  2. 2. Cheung BM, Wat NM, Man YB, Tam S, Thomas GN, et al. (2007) Development of diabetes in Chinese with the metabolic syndrome, a 6-year prospective study. Diabetes care 30(6): 1430–1436.
  3. 3. Thomas GN (2007) Schooling CM, McGhee SM, Ho SY, Cheung BM, et al (2007) Metabolic syndrome increases all-cause and vascular mortality, The Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Study. Clin Endocrinol (oxf) 66(5): 666–671.
  4. 4. Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (2001) Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). JAMA 285: 2486–2497.
  5. 5. Alberti KG, Zimmet P (2005) IDF Epidemiology Task Force Consensus Group (2005) The metabolic syndrome-a new worldwide definition. Lancet 366 (9491): 1059–1062.
  6. 6. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ (1998) Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Diabet Med 15: 539–553.
  7. 7. Expert Panel on Metabolic Syndrome of Chinese Diabetes Society (2004) Recommendations on metabolic syndrome of Chinese diabetes society (Chinese). Chin J Diab12: 156–161.
  8. 8. Zhuo Q, Wang ZQ, Fu P, Piao JH, Tian Y, et al. (2010) Association between adiponectin and metabolic syndrome in older adults from major cities of China. Biomed Environ Sci 23(1): 53–61.
  9. 9. Xu WH, Ruan XN, Fu XJ, Zhu QL, Zhang H, et al. (2010) Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Pudong new area of Shanghai using three proposed definitions among Chinese adults. BMC Public Health 10: 246.
  10. 10. Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH (2002) Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third national health and nutrition examination survey. JAMA 287: 356–359.
  11. 11. Lorenzo C, Williams K, Hunt KJ, Haffner SM (2007) The national cholesterol dducation program – adult treatment panel III, international diabetes federation, and world health organization definitions of the metabolic syndrome as predictors of incident cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Diabetes Care 30: 8–13.
  12. 12. Bosy-Westphal A, Onur S, Geisler C, Wolf A, Korth O (2007) Common familial influences on clustering of metabolic syndrome traits with central obesity and insulin resistance: the Kiel obesity prevention study. Int J Obes (Lond) 31(5): 784–90.
  13. 13. Henneman P, Aulchenko YS, Frants RR, van Dijk KW, Oostra BA, et al. (2008) Prevalence and heritability of the metabolic obesity reviews genetics of metabolic syndrome and its individual components in a Dutch isolate: the Erasmus Rucphen Family study. J Med Genet 45(9): 572–77.
  14. 14. Bellia A, Giardina E, Lauro D, Tesauro M, Di Fede G, et al. (2009) “The Linosa Study”: epidemiological and heritability data of the metabolic syndrome in a Caucasian genetic isolate. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 19(7): 455–61.
  15. 15. Lin HF, Boden-Albala B, Juo SH, Park N, Rundek T, et al. (2005) Heritabilities of the metabolic syndrome and its components in the northern manhattan family study. Diabetologia 48(10): 2006–2012.
  16. 16. Zhang S, Liu X, Yu Y, Hong X, Christoffel KK, et al. (2009) Genetic and environmental contributions to phenotypic components of metabolic syndrome: a population-based twin study. Obesity (SilverSpring) 17(8): 1581–7.
  17. 17. Kissebah AH, Sonnenberg GE, Myklebust J, Goldstein M, Broman K, et al. (2000) Quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 3 and influence phynotype of the metabolic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(26): 14478–83.
  18. 18. Ng MC, So WY, Lam VK, Cockram CS, Bell GI, et al. (2004) Genome-wide scan for metabolic syndrome and related quantitative traits in Hong Kong Chinese and confirmation of a susceptibility locus on chromosome 1q21–q25. Diabetes 53(10): 2676–83.
  19. 19. Langefeld CD, Wagenknecht LE, Rotter JI, Williams AH, Hokanson JE, et al. (2004) Linkage of the metabolic syndrome to 1q23–q31 in Hispanic families: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study Family Study. Diabetes 53(4): 1170–4.
  20. 20. Edwards KL, Wan JY, Hutter CM, Fong PY, Santorico SA (2011) Multivariate linkage scan for metabolic syndrome traits in families with type 2 diabetes. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19(6): 1235–43.
  21. 21. Farook VS, Puppala S, Schneider J, Fowler SP, Chittoor G, et al. (2012) Metabolic syndrome is linked to chromosome 7q21 and associated with genetic variants in CD36 and GNAT3 in Mexican Americans. Obesity (Silver Spring) 20(10): 2083–92.
  22. 22. Arya R, Duggirala R, Almasy L, Rainwater DL, Mahaney MC, et al. (2002) Linkage of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations to a locus on chromosome 9p in Mexican Americans. Nat Genet 30(1): 102–5.
  23. 23. Loos RJ, Katzmarzyk PT, Rao DC, Rice T, Leon AS, et al. (2003) Genome-wide linkage scan for the metabolic Syndrome in the HERITAGE Family Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(12): 5935–43.
  24. 24. Tang W, Miller MB, Rich SS, North KE, Pankow JS, et al. (2003) Linkage analysis of a composite factor for the multiple metabolic syndrome: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study. Diabetes 52(11): 2840–2847.
  25. 25. Stein CM, Song Y, Elston RC, Jun G, Tiwari HK, et al. (2003) Structural equation model-based genome scan for the metabolic syndrome. BMC Genet 4 Suppl 1S99.
  26. 26. Kraja AT, Hunt SC, Pankow JS, Myers RH, Heiss G, et al. (2005) Quantitative trait loci for metabolic syndrome in the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network study. Obes Res 13(11): 1885–90.
  27. 27. Bosse Y, Despres JP, Chagnon YC, Rice T, Rao DC, et al. (2007) Quantitative trait locus on 15q for a metabolic syndrome variable derived from factor analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15(3): 544–50.
  28. 28. Edwards KL, Hutter CM, Wan JY, Kim H, Monks SA (2008) Genome-wide linkage scan for the metabolic syndrome: The GENNID Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16(7): 1596–1601.
  29. 29. Cheng CY, Lee KE, Duggal P, Moore EL, Wilson AF, et al. (2010) Genome-wide linkage analysis of multiple metabolic factors: evidence of genetic heterogeneity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18(1): 146–52.
  30. 30. Tam CH, Lam VK, So WY, Ma RC, Chan JC, et al. (2010) Genome-wide linkage scan for factors of metabolic syndome in a Chinese population. BMC Genetics 11: 14.
  31. 31. Zabaneh D, Balding DJ (2010) A genome-wide association study of the metabolic syndrome in Indian Asian men. Plos One 5(8): e11961.
  32. 32. Kraja AT, Vaidya D, Pankow JS, Goodarzi MO, Assimes TL, et al. (2011) A bivariate genome-wide approach to metabolic syndrome: STAMPEED consortium. Diabetes 60(4): 1329–39.
  33. 33. Kristiansson K, Perola M, Tikkanen E, Kettunen J, Surakka I, et al. (2012) Genome-wide screen for metabolic syndrome susceptibility loci reveals strong lipid gene contribution but no evidence for common genetic basis for clustering of metabolic syndrome traits. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 5(2): 242–9.
  34. 34. Yang WS, Lee WJ, Funahashi T, Tanaka S, Matsuzawa Y, et al. (2002) Plasma adiponectin levels in overweight and obese Asians. Obes Res. 10(11): 1104–10.
  35. 35. Wang J, Li H, Franco OH, Yu Z, Liu Y, Lin X (2008) Adiponectin and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and elderly Chinese. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16(1): 172–8.
  36. 36. Ryu HK, Yu SY, Park JS, Choi YJ, Huh KB, et al. (2010) Hypoadiponectinemia is strongly associated with metabolic syndrome in Korean type 2 diabetes patients. J Am Coll Nutr 29(3): 171–8.
  37. 37. Hirose H, Yamamoto Y, Seino-Yoshihara Y, Kawabe H, Saito I (2010) Serum high-molecular-weight adiponectin as a marker for the evaluation and care of subjects with metabolic syndrome and related disorders. J Atheroscler Thromb 17(12): 1201–11.
  38. 38. Koh SB, Yoon J, Kim JY, Yoo BS, Lee SH, et al. (2011) Relationships between serum adiponectin with metabolic syndrome and components of metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic Koreans: ARIRANG study. Yonsei Med J52 (2): 234–41.
  39. 39. Hotta K, Funahashi T, Arita Y, Takahashi M, Matsuda M, et al. (2000) Plasma concentrations of a novel, adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in type 2 diabetic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20(6): 1595–99.
  40. 40. Kovac IP, Havlik RJ, Foley D, Peila R, Hernandez D, et al. (2007) Linkage and association analyses of type 2 diabetes/impaired glucose metabolism and adiponectin serum levels in Japanese Americans from Hawaii. Diabetes 56(2): 537–40.
  41. 41. Lee CY, Lee CH, Tsai S, Huang CT, Wu MT, et al. (2009) Association between serum leptin and adiponectin levels with risk of insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance in non-diabetic women. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 25(3): 116–25.
  42. 42. Li S, Shin HJ, Ding EL, van Dam RM (2009) Adiponectin levels and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 302(2): 179–88.
  43. 43. Li Y, Yatsuya H, Iso H, Toyoshima H, Tamakoshi K (2012) Inverse relationship of serum adiponectin concentration with type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence in middle-aged Japanese workers: six-year follow-up. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 28(4): 349–56.
  44. 44. Matsubara M, Maruoka S, Katayose S (2002) Decreased plasma adiponectin concentrations in women with dyslipidemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(6): 2764–2769.
  45. 45. Kazumi T, Kawaguchi A, Sakai K, Hirano T, Yoshino G (2002) Young men with high-normal blood pressure have lower serum adiponectin, smaller LDL size, and higher elevated heart rate than those with optimal blood pressure. Diabetes Care 25(6): 971–976.
  46. 46. Huang KC, Chen CL, Chuang LM, Ho SR, Tai TY, et al. (2003) Plasma adiponectin levels and blood pressures in nondiabetic adolescent females. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(9): 4130–34.
  47. 47. Adamczak M, Wiecek A, Funahashi T, Chudek J, Kokot F, et al. (2003) Decreased plasma adiponectin concentration in patients with essential hypertension. Hypertension 16(1): 72–75.
  48. 48. Shankar A, Marshall S, Li J (2008) The association between plasma adiponectin level and hypertension. Acta Cardiol 63(2): 160–5.
  49. 49. Yang WS, Lee WJ, Funahashi T, Tanaka S, Matsuzawa Y, et al. (2001) Weight reduction increases plasma levels of an adipose-derived anti-inflammatory protein, adiponectin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86(8): 3815–19.
  50. 50. Lindsay RS, Funahashi T, Hanson RL, Matsuzawa Y, Tanaka S, et al. (2002) Adiponectin and development of type 2 diabetes in the Pima Indian population. Lancet 360(9326): 57–58.
  51. 51. Haluzik M, Parizkova J, Haluzik MM (2004) Adiponectin and its role in the obesity-induced insulin resistance and related complications. Physiol Res 53(2): 123–9.
  52. 52. Maeda N, Takahashi M, Funahashi T, Kihara S, Nishizawa H, et al. (2001) PPARgamma ligands increase expression and plasma concentrations of adiponectin, an adipose-derived protein. Diabetes 50(9): 2094–99.
  53. 53. Yang WS, Jeng CY, Wu TJ, Tanaka S, Funahashi T, et al. (2002) Synthetic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist, rosiglitazone, increases plasma levels of adiponectin in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 25(2): 376–80.
  54. 54. Koh KK, Quon MJ, Han SH, Chung WJ, Ahn JY, et al. (2004) Additive beneficial effects of losartan combined with simvastatin in the treatment of hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients. Circulation 110(24): 3687–92.
  55. 55. Furuhashi M, Ura N, Higashiura K, Murakami H, Tanaka M, et al. (2003) Blockade of the renin – angiotensin system increases adiponectin concentrations in patients with essential hypertension. Hypertension 42(1): 76–81.
  56. 56. Liu DX, Hua Qi, Guo JC, Liu RK, Yang Z, et al. (2006) Difference of adiponectin gene exon 2 Glyl5Gly genotype and allele frequency between patients with metabolic syndrome and normal persons. Chin J Clin Rehabilitation 10(6): 4–6.
  57. 57. Yang WS, Yang YC, Chen CL, Wu IL, Lu JY, et al. (2007) Adiponectin SNP276 is associated with obesity, the metabolic syndrome, and diabetes in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr 86(2): 509–13.
  58. 58. Huang FZ (2008) The association of adiponectin gene SNP+45, SNP+276 with metabolic syndrome and plasma adiponectin concentration. Chinese Master's Dissertations Full-Text Database.
  59. 59. Li YP, Zhang Y, Li XL, Deng DY, Yang M, et al. (2009) The association of adiponectin gene SNP+45, SNP+276 and SNP-11377 with metabolic syndrome. Clin Focus 24(9): 786–788.
  60. 60. Cai Q, Liu HJ, Chen T, Zhu MC (2010) Mononucleotide polymorphism at +45 and +276 site of adiponectin gene in aircrew with metabolic syndrome. Clin J Med Officers 38(5): 813–815.
  61. 61. Zhu XW, Wu WJ, Bu RF, Deng ZX, Hua JL, et al. (2010) Studies on adiponectin gene polymorphisms in patients with metabolic syndrome. Shandong Med J 50(29): 10–12.
  62. 62. Yao M (2004) The relationship between adiponectin gene and metabolic syndrome. Chinese Doctor's Dissertations Full-Text Database.
  63. 63. Li YP, Yang M, Xiong YX, Li XL, Xu B, et al. (2010) Adiponectin gene SNP-11377 and SNP-4522 haplotypes are related to metabolic syndrome. Basic Clin Med 30(12): 1288–92.
  64. 64. Bu RF, Wu WJ, Hua JL, Shen H, Xu L, et al. (2011) The association of adiponectin gene polymorphism and serum adiponectin level with metabolic syndrome in older. Chin J Gerontology 31: 4112–14.
  65. 65. Leu HB, Chung CM, Lin SJ, Jong YS, Pan WH, et al. (2011) Adiponectin gene polymorphism is selectively associated with the concomitant presence of metabolic syndrome and essential hypertension. Plos One 6(5): e19999.
  66. 66. Du J, Ye Xh, Li Q, Yu X, Cheng J, et al. (2012) Genetic variants in the ADIPOQ gene and the risk of metabolic syndrome: a case-control study of a Chinese Han population. Ann Hum Genet 76(2): 101–9.
  67. 67. Chen F, Wu HL, Yang QL, Liu YJ, Wang J, et al. (2012) Study on the correlation of adiponectin gene polymorphism and coronary heart disease in the patients with metabolic syndrome in Han nationlity population in Ningxia. Clin J Crit Care Med 32(1): 24–29.
  68. 68. Wang SJ, Jia WP, Bao YQ, Lu JQ (2012) Association of adiponectin gene polymorphism with metabolic syndrome. J Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy 26(7): 659–61.
  69. 69. Li XT, Wei DY, He H, Zhang J, Wang C, et al. (2012) Association of the adiponectin gene (ADIPOQ) +45 T > G polymorphism with the metabolic syndrome among Han Chinese in Sichuan province of China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 21 (2): 296–301.
  70. 70. Hung J, Mc Quillan BM, Thompson PL, Beilby JP (2008) Circulating adiponectin levels associate with inammatory markers, insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome independent of obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 32(5): 772–779.
  71. 71. King GA, Deemer SE, Thompson DL (2012) Adiponectin is associated with risk of the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in women. Acta Diabetol (Suppl 1): 41–9.
  72. 72. Comuzzie AG, Funahashi T, Sonnenberg G, Martin LJ, Jacob HJ, et al. (2001) The genetic basis of plasma variation in adiponectin, a global endophenotype for obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86(9): 4321–25.
  73. 73. Vasseur F, Helbecque N, Dina C, Lobbens S, Delannoy V, et al. (2002) Single-nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes in the both proximal promoter and exon 3 of the APM1 gene modulate adipocyte-secreted diponectin hormone levels and contribute to the genetic risk for type 2 diabetes in French Caucasians. Hum Mol Genet 11(21): 2607–14.
  74. 74. Menzaghi C, Trischitta V, Doria A (2007) Genetic influences of adiponectin on insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes 56(5): 1198–1209.
  75. 75. Hivert MF, Manning AK, McAteer JB, Florez JC, Dupuis J, et al. (2008) Common variants in the adiponectin gene (ADIPOQ) associated with plasma adiponectin levels, type 2 diabetes, and diabetes-related quantitative traits: the Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes 57(12): 3353–59.
  76. 76. Ling H, Waterworth DM, Stirnadel HA, Pollin TI, Barter PJ, et al. (2008) Genome-wide linkage and association analyses to identify genes influencing adiponectin levels: the GEMS Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 17(4): 737–44.
  77. 77. Heid IM, Henneman P, Hicks A, Coassin S, Winkler T, et al. (2010) Clear detection of ADIPOQ locus as the major gene for plasma adiponectin: results of genome-wide association analyses including 4659 European 32 individuals. Atherosclerosis 208(2): 412–20.
  78. 78. Dastani Z, Hivert MF, Timpson N, Perry JR, Yuan X, et al. (2012) Novel loci for adiponectin levels and their influence on type 2 diabetes and metabolic traits: a multi-ethnic meta-analysis of 45,891 individuals. PLoS Genet 8(3): e1002607.
  79. 79. González-Sánchez JL, Zabena CA, Martínez-Larrad MT, Fernández-Pérez C, Pérez-Barba M, et al. (2005) An SNP in the adiponectin gene is associated with decreased serum adiponectin levels and risk for impaired glucose tolerance. Obes Res 13(5): 807–12.
  80. 80. Li S, Li L, Li K, Qi X, Hoekema D, et al. (2008) Association of adipose most abundant transcript 1 gene (apM1) with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 68(6): 885–9.
  81. 81. Gong M, Long J, Liu Q, Deng HC (2010) Association of the ADIPOQ rs17360539 and rs266729 polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 325(1–2): 78–83.
  82. 82. Han LY, Wu QH, Jiao ML, Hao YH, Liang LB, et al. (2011) Associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (+45T>G, +276G>T, −11377C>G, −11391G>A) of adiponectin gene and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 54(9): 2303–14.
  83. 83. Li Y, Li X, Shi L, Yang M, Yang Y, et al. (2011) Association of adiponectin SNP+45 and SNP+276 with type 2 diabetes in Han Chinese populations: a meta-analysis of 26 case-control studies. PLoS One 6(5): e19686.
  84. 84. Chen J, Han XY, Ji LN (2012) Meta-analysis of association studies between five candidate genes and type 2 diabetes in Chinese Han population. Endocrine 42(2): 307–20.
  85. 85. Zhao T, Zhao J (2011) Genetic effects of adiponectin on blood lipids and blood pressure. Clin Endocrinol(Oxf) 74(2): 214–222.
  86. 86. Xi B, He D, Wang Q, Xue J, Liu M, et al. (2012) Common polymorphisms (rs2241766 and rs1501299) in the ADIPOQ gene are not associated with hypertension susceptibility among the Chinese. Mol Biol Rep 39(9): 8771–5.
  87. 87. Yu Z, Han S, Cao X, Zhu C, Wang X, et al. (2012) Genetic polymorphisms in adipokine genes and the risk of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 20(2): 396–406.
  88. 88. Liu DM, Jin LZ, Yu DM, Li G, Zhang J, et al. (2004) Research of T2DM and adiponectin gene polymorphism. Chin J Diabetes 12(6): 397–8.
  89. 89. Liu F, He ZY, Deng S, Zhang H, Li N, et al. (2011) Association of adiponectin gene polymorphisms with the risk of ischemic stroke in a Chinese Han population. Mol Biol Rep 38(3): 1983–88.