Figures
Abstract
The high throughput and cost-effectiveness afforded by short-read sequencing technologies, in principle, enable researchers to perform 16S rRNA profiling of complex microbial communities at unprecedented depth and resolution. Existing Illumina sequencing protocols are, however, limited by the fraction of the 16S rRNA gene that is interrogated and therefore limit the resolution and quality of the profiling. To address this, we present the design of a novel protocol for shotgun Illumina sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, optimized to amplify more than 90% of sequences in the Greengenes database and with the ability to distinguish nearly twice as many species-level OTUs compared to existing protocols. Using several in silico and experimental datasets, we demonstrate that despite the presence of multiple variable and conserved regions, the resulting shotgun sequences can be used to accurately quantify the constituents of complex microbial communities. The reconstruction of a significant fraction of the 16S rRNA gene also enabled high precision (>90%) in species-level identification thereby opening up potential application of this approach for clinical microbial characterization.
Citation: Ong SH, Kukkillaya VU, Wilm A, Lay C, Ho EXP, Low L, et al. (2013) Species Identification and Profiling of Complex Microbial Communities Using Shotgun Illumina Sequencing of 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequences. PLoS ONE 8(4): e60811. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060811
Editor: John Parkinson, Hospital for Sick Children, Canada
Received: June 1, 2012; Accepted: March 5, 2013; Published: April 8, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Ong et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work is supported by grants from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The use of high-throughput short-read sequencing of the 16S rRNA amplicon for the profiling of microbial communities has become an increasingly attractive option for researchers due to its cost-effectiveness, and this has been further aided by the capability to do multiplexed sequencing [1], [2]. However, this approach is limited by its perceived lack of precision in characterizing a microbial community and the presence of amplification biases for various variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene [3], [4], [5], [6]. In particular, all published Illumina protocols have been restricted by an approach based on end-sequencing of specific short variable regions [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], due in part to the fragment-size limitations for paired-end Illumina sequencing, but also due to the bioinformatics challenge in a combined analysis of short-reads from different variable regions.
Correspondingly, despite being substantially more costly, 454 pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA amplicon sequences is still a popular approach in the scientific community [14] as the longer reads can provide more reliable and specific matches and enable easier analysis (though recent studies suggest that longer read lengths occasionally may not provide more information [15], [16]). This advantage is in part offset by the presence of homopolymer errors and the lower read counts that impact the identification of rare and novel taxa. Furthermore, 454 pyrosequencing is currently prohibitively expensive for clinical microbiome studies that often involve hundreds of samples and multiple time points. Therefore, improved application of relatively inexpensive short-read sequencing platforms is a critical need.
In this study, we report a shotgun short-read sequencing approach (developed on, but not specific to the Illumina platform) for reconstructing 16S rRNA amplicon sequences that we demonstrate is a) less biased and tuned to capture a greater fraction of 16S rRNA gene sequences and b) provides accurate assignment (precision >90%) at deeper taxonomic levels using the sequences. While the advantage of shotgun sequencing of a significant fraction of the 16S rRNA gene is almost self-evident, it is not clear if the resulting short read data can be assembled reliably and used effectively. In this work, we demonstrate using several in silico and experimental datasets that the resulting shotgun short reads can be precisely re-assembled into amplicon sequences for characterizing the constituents of complex microbial communities. Significantly, the ability to accurately reconstruct sequences enables, to our knowledge, the first reported approach for accurate species-level identification based on the 16S rRNA gene using Illumina sequencing. This makes our approach valuable for clinical applications and represents a step in the direction of routine microbial diagnostics based on high-throughput sequencing.
Materials and Methods
Sample Collection
Stool samples were collected from a healthy 34-year-old adult and a healthy 2-year-old infant. Throat swab sample SW18 is from an adult with macular degeneration whereas 50658 is from a healthy control. A 33-species artificial bacterial community of known composition, referred to here as ABC33 (for Artificial Bacterial Community; see Table S1 in File S1), was created by pooling equimolar concentrations of bacterial genomic DNA acquired from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ), and the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM).
Nucleic Acid Extraction from Swab Samples
Swabs were broken off and placed in Lysing Matrix E tubes (MP Biomedicals). 360 µl of Buffer ATL (QIAGEN) was added and samples were homogenised at 6 m/s for 40 seconds on FastPrep Automated Homogenizer (MP Biomedicals). The suspension was centrifuged at full speed for 1 minute. 20 µl of Proteinase K (QIAGEN) was mixed thoroughly with homogenized supernatant and incubated for 30 mins at 56°C. Next, 200 µl of Buffer AL (QIAGEN) was added and vortexed, followed by 200 µl of 96–100% ethanol.
The mixture was transferred into a DNAeasy Mini Spin column and centrifuged at ≥6000× g for one minute, and the eluate discarded. This step was done for the first time with the addition of 500 µl of Buffer AW1 (QIAGEN) and repeated for a second time with 500 µl of Buffer AW2 (QIAGEN). DNA elution was done using 50 µl of Buffer EB (QIAGEN) and stored at −20°C.
Nucleic Acid Extraction from Stool Samples
100–200 mg of stool sample was weighed in a microcentrifuge tube and transferred into Lysing Matrix E tube (MP Biomedicals) before adding 1.4 ml of Buffer ASL (QIAGEN). Samples were homogenised twice at 4 m/s for 30 secs using a FastPrep Automated Homogenizer (MP Biomedicals). The suspension was next heated at 95°C for 5 mins and centrifuged at full speed for 1 min. One InhibitEX tablet was added to each sample and vortexed for 1 min. The suspension was incubated for 1 min at room temperature before centrifuging at full speed for 3 mins. 15 µl of Proteinase K (QIAGEN) and 200 µl Buffer AL (QIAGEN) were added to the supernatant and incubated for 10 mins at 70°C.
Next, 200 µl of 96–100% ethanol was added and samples were transferred into QIAamp Spin columns (QIAGEN). The columns were centrifuged at full speed for 1 min, and the eluate discarded. This step was done for the first time with the addition of 500 µl of Buffer AW1 (QIAGEN) and repeated for a second time with 500 µl of Buffer AW2 (QIAGEN). DNA elution was done using 200 µl of Buffer AE (QIAGEN) and stored at −20°C.
Evaluation of PCR Primer Universality
PCR primer sequences were compared against the sequences in three popular 16S rRNA databases namely Greengenes (dated May 9, 2011) [17], RDP (Release 10 Update 27) [18] and SILVA (Release 108) [19]. A perfect match (after fully accounting for ambiguous letters) between the primer sequence and a subsequence in the database entries was considered a hit.
16S rRNA Gene Amplification and Sequencing
Bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified using the primer pair 338F* (5′-ACTYCTACGGRAGGCWGC-3′) and 1061R (5′-CRRCACGAGCTGACGAC-3′); see Figure 1 and related text for details. Briefly, each 50 µL of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction contains 100 ng of fecal genomic DNA or 3 µL of throat swab genomic DNA respectively as template, 10 µL 5× HotStar HiFidelity PCR buffer, 0.5 µM of each primer, 1 µL of HotStar HiFidelity DNA polymerase (2.5U) and 1 µL of 25 mM MgSO4 (all part of the HotStar HiFidelity Polymerase Kit from QIAGEN).
A) Percentage of sequences matching individual primers, with the top two primers highlighted in boxes. B) Percentage of sequences amplifiable by various primer pairs (338F*/1061R is the best pair). Percentage of matched sequences is measured against the Greengenes 16S rRNA sequence database. See Table S4 in File S1 for primer sequences and results measured against the RDP and SILVA databases. Primer numbering is based on the E. coli system of nomenclature as in Brosius et al. [37] and for simplicity the same name (say 784F) is used for both forward and reverse primers at a given position.
PCR reactions were carried out using the respective protocols: (1) for the stool samples, an initial denaturation step performed at 95°C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 30 s), annealing (59°C, 30 s) and extension (72°C, 1 min), and a final elongation of 6 min at 72°C; (2) for ABC33 and throat swabs, the parameters were the same as above but we used 35 PCR cycles.
PCR products between 700 and 1,000 bases in size were then purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN) and quantified using NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Purified amplicons were then sheared in a controlled manner to fragments with an average length of 180 bases using Adaptive Focused Acoustics™ (Covaris). DNA sequencing libraries were constructed from the fragments using NEBNExt® DNA Sample Preparation Reagents (New England Biolabs) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
DNA sequencing libraries were labeled with different multiplex indexing barcodes using the Multiplexing Sample Preparation Oligonucleotide Kit from Illumina. Finally, multiplexed paired-end sequencing (2×75 bp reads) of the sheared fragments was done using an Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx.
Pre-processing of Sequencing Datasets
Image analysis and base calling were done on the Genome Analyzer IIx using CASAVA 1.7. After de-multiplexing of data and removal of reads that failed Illumina’s purity/chastity filter (PF = 0), reads were converted to FASTQ format. Reads were then filtered and trimmed by removing trailing bases with quality scores lower or equal to 2, followed by removal of read pairs containing reads shorter than 60 bases [20].
Resolution of Sequencing Approaches
In order to provide a theoretical measure for the resolution of various primer combinations and sequencing approaches, corresponding regions were extracted (the whole amplicon for shotgun sequencing) from 16S rRNA sequences in the Greengenes database (dated May 9, 2011; current_prokMSA_unaligned.fasta; Table 1) and clustered using UCLUST [21] (version 2.0.591; parameters: –optimal) at the species (97% identity) and genus level (95% identity). Clusters were also assessed for purity i.e. the percentage of clusters that do not have discordant species or genus level taxonomy assignments, based on the taxonomy assignments provided in Greengenes (current_GREENGENES_gg16S_unaligned.fasta: OTU ids were used at the species level).
Generation of Simulated Datasets
Three simulated datasets were generated based on three community composition profiles (“Oral”, “Gut” and “Complex”) using the metagenomic simulator MetaSim [22]. The composition of the “Gut” community was determined based on 2,062 16S rRNA gene sequences (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession numbers DQ325545 to DQ327606) reported by Gill et al. [23]. Sequences were searched using BLAST against a pruned version of the Greengenes database which only contains sequences for which taxonomic information is specified down to the species-level, and the top BLAST hit returned (E-value <1e-4; all sequences had hits) was collected to generate a composition profile. The composition of the “Oral” microbiome was based on 14,115 16S rRNA gene sequences found in human saliva samples reported by Nasidze et al. [24] and determined in a similar fashion (Mihai Pop, personal communication). The composition of a “Complex” community was obtained from Turnbaugh et al. [25] (Table S3 in File S1, “Uneven 1”) and contains 67 taxa of vastly varying abundances ranging from 0.000103% to 10.3%.
The simulation options for MetaSim were set to mimic features of the sequencing dataset for ABC33. For each community a total of 3.3 million paired-end reads of length 75 bases with an insert size of 160 and a standard deviation of 40 were simulated. The sequencing error profile for MetaSim was derived from the base-pair quality scores averaged per position of the ABC33 dataset. Quality values used for generating the error profile were then uniformly applied to all simulated sequences to obtain valid FASTQ files.
Reconstruction of 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequences
The expectation-maximization based assembly program EMIRGE [20], originally designed for whole genome datasets, was adapted to help reconstruct the amplicon sequences from the short-read datasets. Specifically, to reduce resource usage and runtime, the analysis was limited to the top (in terms of average quality) 100,000 reads, where the results were confirmed to be robust to sampling (Table S2 in File S1). EMIRGE (GIT version 98787b5) was run with parameters set to match known read and insert lengths and sequences with relative abundance below 0.1% were filtered out (except when stated otherwise).
Classification of Amplicon Sequences
Sequences reconstructed by EMIRGE were trimmed to the primer amplified regions and searched using BLAST against the complete Greengenes database (dated May 9, 2011; current_GREENGENES_gg16S_unaligned.fasta). BLAST hits were sorted in consecutive order by lowest E-value, highest bit-score, highest percent identity and longest alignment length, and only the top hit according to these sorting criteria was used for classification. Hits below predefined percent identity (97% at the species level, 95% at the genus level and 80% at the phylum level) were not considered for classification purposes and dropped. Note that the dropped hits are either sequences incorrectly reconstructed by EMIRGE or novel sequences that do not have similar enough sequences in the Greengenes database.
Classification results from EMIRGE (and modQIIME and RTAX, see below) were evaluated in terms of precision ( = TP/(TP+FP)) and recall ( = TP/(TP+FN)). A hit was considered a true positive (TP) if it matched the classification (at the appropriate level, species or genus) of a member of the simulated community, and was otherwise marked a false positive (FP). Members of the simulated community with relative abundance above the appropriate threshold (typically 0.1%, except when stated otherwise) that did not have a true positive hit were marked as false negatives (FN).
Characterization of Community Composition
Sequences reconstructed by EMIRGE are also assigned abundance estimates by the program and this enabled us to use EMIRGE results to directly characterize community composition at various taxonomic levels. As an alternative to EMIRGE, we evaluated the generic 16S rRNA analysis pipeline QIIME version 1.3.0 [26] for its ability to provide higher recall rates and thus be more sensitive in detecting constituents of a community. Specifically, we assigned operational taxonomic units (OTUs) to the reads by using QIIME’s “OTU reference” option (pick_otus:otu_picking_method = uclust_ref, pick_otus:similarity = 0.97) with a pre-clustered Greengenes database (gg_97_otus_4feb2011.fasta), with the reverse strand matches option enabled (pick_otus:enable_rev_strand_match = True) and sequences with relative abundance below 0.1% filtered out (the false positive rate was found to increase quickly at lower thresholds). To extend QIIME to handle paired-read data, the pipeline was run separately for each of the two read files and the results were merged with a filtering step that accepts a read classification only if both ends of a read were mapped to the same OTU. Note that this approach (modQIIME) has greater precision when compared to the single read version (Table S3 in File S1) and a more sophisticated alternative called RTAX [16] is now available as part of the QIIME package.
Results
Tuned Selection of 16S rRNA Amplicons
As a result of fragment size limitations, existing Illumina end-sequencing protocols (with reads from the ends of an amplified region) for the 16S rRNA gene have been limited in the choice of primer combinations that could be explored. Our extension to a shotgun sequencing approach enabled us a wider choice of primer combinations and the opportunity to tune it better for a desired optimization criterion. In particular, we used an in silico assessment to identify primers likely to minimize the number of species whose 16S rRNA genes are not amplified.
Our results clearly highlight that the three top-performing primers at the 5′ end are 338F*, 533R* and 341F, whereas at the 3′ end, 1061R is the standout best-performing primer (Figure 1A and Table S4 in File S1). Assessment of all primer combinations further emphasized the advantage of these three combinations –338F*/1061R, 533R*/1061R, 341F/1061R – with each primer pair capable of amplifying more than 90% of the sequences in the Greengenes database (Figure 1B; note that a similar analysis can also be done using the package PrimerProspector [27]). This is when only perfect matches are considered as hits and therefore an even higher percentage is likely to be amplified in practice. As a longer amplicon implicitly contains more information about the corresponding 16S rRNA gene segment (see below), we selected the combination 338F*/1061R (covering 92% of sequences in the Greengenes database), which amplifies the region covering V3 to V6 of the 16S rRNA gene, for the rest of our analysis. The primer pair 338F*/1061R was also evaluated using NCBI BLAST and the UCSC In-Silico PCR software against several human genome assemblies (hg16, hg17, hg18 and hg19) to confirm that no amplification artifacts are expected – a consideration which is of relevance in the clinical context.
As shown in Table 1, shotgun sequencing approaches have a substantial advantage over end-sequencing protocols, having on average twice as many species-level OTUs that can be identified, in principle. Among end-sequencing protocols, sequencing the 3′-end of the V3 regions provides the greatest resolution, though the 5′-end is substantially less informative. In contrast, both ends of the V6 region can resolve more than 24,000 OTUs, possibly explaining the popularity of this choice in published studies (Table S5 in File S1). As expected, clusters produced from whole-amplicon sequences also had significantly higher purity (Table 1). A similar pattern was observed at the genus level, although the best end-sequencing protocol (sequencing the 3′-end of the V3 region) is comparable in resolution to shotgun sequencing approaches. Cluster purity was in general higher at the genus level and whole-amplicon sequences were uniformly better than end-sequencing approaches. Among shotgun protocols, the choice of 338F*/1061R is marginally better in resolution than 533R*/1061R and 341F/1061R at the species level but is a clearer winner at the genus level. Overall, 338F*/1061R performed the best under all metrics (Figure 1 and Table 1) and was the primer pair of choice in this study.
Precise Reconstruction of the 16S rRNA Gene from Shotgun Sequences
While shotgun sequencing of the V3 to V6 region of the 16S rRNA gene has the potential to more completely capture microbial OTUs and with greater resolution (Table 1), accurate reconstruction of the region from short reads is a potential challenge. In our analysis, we used several in silico datasets (“Oral”, “Gut” and “Complex”) as well as real sequencing data from an artificial bacterial community (ABC33) to assess the capability of the 16S rRNA gene sequence assembler EMIRGE.
Similar to the results in the original paper [20] based on whole-genome shotgun sequencing data, EMIRGE was able to reconstruct sequences with precision consistently higher than 90% at the genus as well as at the species level, and even achieved perfect precision at the species level for the in silico “Gut” community (Table 2). The few false positives reported were found to match species closely related to the true positives and may have arisen due to the limitations of the “best BLAST hit” criterion we adopted for classification. To our knowledge, this is the first report of precise species-level identification using Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene.
Precision/Recall Tradeoffs Using modQIIME
Our evaluation of amplicon sequences from EMIRGE suggests that while the “reconstruction followed by classification” approach can result in high precision, recall rates, especially at the species level, may be low for some communities. This observation could be a function of the conservative reconstruction approach employed by EMIRGE. However, our naive BLAST-based classification could also be the culprit and more sophisticated algorithms could potentially lead to higher recall rates.
Trading off precision in order to achieve a higher recall, we explored a modified clustering-based approach that directly classifies reads without an intermediate reconstruction step (modQIIME). Our results (Table 2) suggest that at the genus level, we can indeed do this tradeoff and obtain recall rates higher than 90%, with a variable loss in precision. An alternative tradeoff, typically intermediate between EMIRGE and modQIIME, is also possible using RTAX [16] which has recently become available as part of the QIIME package (Table 2). Species-level classifications however continued to have modest recall rates using clustering-based approaches, suggesting that EMIRGE would be more appropriate for this task. Note that species-level recall rates for all approaches and, in particular for EMIRGE, was significantly lower for the “Complex” and ABC33 datasets, highlighting the challenge of species-level identification when many closely-related species are present in a community (Table 2). In terms of diversity metrics, all three approaches mostly over-estimated the diversity of the samples (Table S6 in File S1), with RTAX and EMIRGE typically being the closest to the true answer. Both EMIRGE and modQIIME were moderately compute and memory intensive (typically taking a few hours and <11 hours with 4 CPUs and <25 Gb of RAM) while RTAX required several days to analyze a dataset in the worst case.
Concordance of Microbial Community Structure
A strong advantage of deep sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene on the Illumina platform is the potential to accurately quantify abundances for even rare members of a microbial community. Our analysis of the in silico datasets suggests that the abundances estimated from the reconstructed sequences were indeed quite accurate even at the species level (Figure 2A) and with correlation coefficients greater than 0.95 for EMIRGE on all datasets. The clustering approaches (modQIIME and RTAX), generally have poor correlation coefficients at the species level (−0.2 to 0.7), but have modest results at the genus level (correlation coefficient >0.7).
A) Correlation between known and estimated relative abundances of predicted species on three in silico datasets. A log-scaled version of this plot can be seen in Figure S1 in File S1. B) Composition at the phylum level for the throat swab and stool sequencing datasets.
Analysis of sequencing datasets from the throat swab and stool samples using EMIRGE and modQIIME showed a broad agreement in their results and with what is known about these microbial communities through Sanger and 454 sequencing (Figure 2B). For example, the stool microbiota was dominated by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, followed by Actinobacteria and Tenericutes, in agreement with previous Sanger [28], [29] and 454 [30] sequencing surveys. The most notable compositional difference between the infant and adult stool samples is the difference in their Bacteroidetes:Firmicutes ratio [31], [32], [33], with a lower percentage of Firmicutes observed in the 2-year-old infant compared to the 34-year-old adult.
For the throat swab samples, the five most abundant phyla detected were Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria, which is in agreement with 454 sequencing results reported by Jakobson et al. [34] and with 16S rRNA gene microarray by Lemon et al. [35]. The high variability in composition between samples has also been noted before from saliva [24], and in particular in this study, throat swab sample SW18 has a much higher abundance of Actinobacteria and lower abundance of Fusobacteria compared to sample 50658. Interestingly, our analysis revealed a significant proportion of sequences that could not be annotated at the species-level (>15% in terms of relative abundance for SW18; though they can be classified at the phylum-level - Figure 2B), highlighting the strength of our approach for studying novel constituents of a microbial community.
Analysis at the species level identified 38 members in the two stool samples and 44 members in the two throat swabs we sequenced, with several members detected at as low as 0.01% abundance (Tables S7 and S8 in File S1). Interestingly, at the species level the infant and adult stool samples have few species in common whereas the throat samples share most of their abundant members. As a sanity check, we also confirmed that a majority of the reported species are common constituents of the gut and oral microbiota (Table S7 in File S1).
Discussion
The novel shotgun 16S rRNA Illumina sequencing protocol presented here has clear theoretical advantages, with a primer pair optimized to amplify a longer stretch of the 16S rRNA gene as well as more sequences (92% of the Greengenes database) and selected to have high resolution at both the genus and species level. Our empirical results further highlight its utility for precise (>90% at the species level) and high-resolution microbiome profiling, though additional benchmarking using long-read sequencing datasets would be ideal. Taken together, we believe this makes for a good case for wide usage of this protocol (especially when species-level classification is desired) on the Illumina platform. While the read lengths analyzed here were around 75 bp, longer reads (up to 150 bp) can currently be generated on an Illumina HiSeq at a greater cost and with higher sequencing error rates (even longer reads of up to 250 bp can be generated for a significantly higher cost on the MiSeq). These longer reads should allow for more precise reconstruction and analysis and as read lengths approach the typical amplicon length (this is already possible on a PacBio RS sequencer but at a much greater cost), computational analysis of the resulting sequences will get simplified.
With recent improvements in sequencing throughput, using deep DNA sequencing as a pathogen screening tool is an attractive idea but its utility is limited by contamination from non-microbial and host DNA. The use of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing can address this drawback but it comes with the cost of amplification biases. Our results for the sequencing and analysis protocol presented here suggests that with a careful choice of primers, the biases can be minimized, and that microbial constituents of a sample can be precisely quantified at the species level using as few as 100,000 reads. With improved automation of library-preparation and multiplexing steps, this approach will be cost and time effective for future clinical microbiome studies with hundreds of samples and multiple time points. A recent example of such a study is one that looked at the association of gut microbiota with type 2 diabetes and uncovered potential biomarkers [36]. A 16S rRNA-based approach such as the one described here would be more cost effective when similar studies are conducted for microbiota of body sites where host DNA contamination can be significant (e.g. oral and skin).
The principal approaches used for short-read sequence analysis in this study (EMIRGE and modQIIME) were moderately compute and memory intensive (requiring large clusters if hundreds of samples need to be analyzed) and had modest recall rates. Improved algorithms for data analysis could potentially enable better tradeoffs between compute resources, sequencing depth and sensitivity for reliable detection of rare species in a microbial community.
Availability
Simulated datasets and community profiles can be found at http://collaborations.gis.a-star.edu.sg/~shotgun_16S_sequencing/. The post-processor script for modQIIME can be found at https://github.com/CSB5/16s-arxiv-1210.3464 (version 1). The five human sample datasets (adult gut, infant gut, throat SW18, throat 50658 and ABC33) can be accessed from NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) via accession numbers SRX148649–148652.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Genome Technology & Biology group at GIS for sequencing and the Scientific & Research Computing group for sequence analysis support. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: NN MLH. Performed the experiments: CL EXPH LL. Analyzed the data: SHO VUK AW. Wrote the paper: SHO AW CL NN.
References
- 1.
Illumina Inc. (2008) Multiplexed Sequencing with the Illumina Genome Analyzer System. http://www.illumina.com/documents/products/datasheets/datasheet_sequencing_multiplex.pdf.
- 2. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, et al. (2011) Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108 Suppl 14516–4522.
- 3. Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA (2003) Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J. Microbiol. Methods 55: 541–555.
- 4. Chakravorty S, Helb D, Burday M, Connell N, Alland D (2007) A detailed analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 69: 330–339.
- 5. Wang Y, Qian PY (2009) Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PLoS ONE 4(10): e7401.
- 6. Pei AY, Oberdorf WE, Nossa CW, Agarwal A, Chokshi P, et al. (2010) Diversity of 16S rRNA genes within individual prokaryotic genomes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 76(12): 3886–3897.
- 7. Lazarevic V, Whiteson K, Huse S, Hernandez D, Farinelli L, et al. (2009) Metagenomic study of the oral microbiota by Illumina high-throughput sequencing. J Microbiol Methods 79(3): 266–271.
- 8. Hummelen R, Fernandes AD, Macklaim JM, Dickson RJ, Changalucha J, et al. (2010) Deep sequencing of the vaginal microbiota of women with HIV. PLoS ONE 5(8): e12078.
- 9. Claesson MJ, Wang Q, O’Sullivan O, Greene-Diniz R, Cole JR, et al. (2010) Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions. Nucleic Acids Res 38(22): e200.
- 10. Zhou HW, Li DF, Tam NF, Jiang XT, Zhang H, et al. (2010) BIPES, a cost-effective high-throughput method for assessing microbial diversity. ISME J 5(4): 741–749.
- 11. Gloor GB, Hummelen R, Macklaim JM, Dickson RJ, Fernandes AD, et al. (2010) Microbiome profiling by Illumina sequencing of combinatorial sequence-tagged PCR products. PLoS ONE 5(10): e15406.
- 12. Bartram AK, Lynch MD, Stearns JC, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Neufeld JD (2011) Generation of multimillion-sequence 16S rRNA gene libraries from complex microbial communities by assembling paired-end Illumina reads. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 3846–3852.
- 13. Degnan PH, Ochman H (2012) Illumina-based analysis of microbial community diversity. ISME J 6(1): 183–194.
- 14. Tringe SG, Hugenholtz P (2008) A renaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene. Curr Opin Microbiol 11(5): 442–446.
- 15. Rodrigue S, Materna AC, Timberlake SC, Blackburn MC, Malmstrom RR, et al. (2010) Unlocking short read sequencing for metagenomics. PLoS ONE 5(7): e11840.
- 16. Soergel DA, Dey N, Knight R, Brenner SE (2012) Selection of primers for optimal taxonomic classification of environmental 16S rRNA gene sequences. ISME J 6(7): 1440–1444.
- 17. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, et al. (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 5069–5072.
- 18.
Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, et al.. (2009) The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37 (Database issue): D141–145.
- 19. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs B, Ludwig W, et al. (2007) SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 35(21): 7188–7196.
- 20. Miller CS, Baker BJ, Thomas BC, Singer SW, Banfield JF (2011) EMIRGE: reconstruction of full-length ribosomal genes from microbial community short read sequencing data. Genome Biol 12(5): R44.
- 21. Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26(19): 2460–2461.
- 22. Richter DC, Ott F, Auch AF, Schmid R, Huson DH (2008) MetaSim–A sequencing simulator for genomics and metagenomics. PLoS ONE 3(10): e3373.
- 23. Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. (2006) Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 312(5778): 1355–1359.
- 24. Nasidze I, Li J, Quinque D, Tang K, Stoneking M (2009) Global diversity in the human salivary microbiome. Genome Res. 19(4): 636–643.
- 25. Turnbaugh PJ, Quince C, Faith JJ, McHardy AC, Yatsunenko T, Niazi F, et al. (2010) Organismal, genetic, and transcriptional variation in the deeply sequenced gut microbiomes of identical twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107: 7503–7508.
- 26. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, et al. (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7(5): 335–336.
- 27. Walters WA, Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Berg-Lyons D, Fierer N, et al. (2011) PrimerProspector: de novo design and taxonomic analysis of barcoded polymerase chain reaction primers. Bioinformatics 27(8): 1159–1161.
- 28. Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, et al. (2005) Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 308(5728): 1635–1638.
- 29. Ley RE, Bäckhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, et al. (2005) Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102(31): 11070–11075.
- 30. Andersson AF, Lindberg M, Jakobsson H, Bäckhed F, Nyrén P, et al. (2008) Comparative analysis of human gut microbiota by barcoded pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 3(7): e2836.
- 31. Woodmansey EJ (2007) Intestinal bacteria and ageing. J Appl Microbiol 102: 1178–1186.
- 32. Mariat D, Firmesse O, Levenez F, Guimarăes V, Sokol H, et al. (2009) The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio of the human microbiota changes with age. BMC Microbiol. 9: 123.
- 33. Claesson MJ, Cusack S, O’Sullivan O, Greene-Diniz R, de Weerd H, et al. (2011) Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108 Suppl 14586–4591.
- 34. Jakobsson HE, Jernberg C, Andersson AF, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Jansson JK, et al. (2010) Short-term antibiotic treatment has differing long-term impacts on the human throat and gut microbiome. PLoS ONE 5(3): e9836.
- 35.
Lemon KP, Klepac-Ceraj V, Schiffer HK, Brodie EL, Lynch SV, et al.. (2010) Comparative analyses of the bacterial microbiota of the human nostril and oropharynx. MBio 1(3). pii: e00129–10.
- 36. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, et al. (2012) A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabeters. Nature 490(7418): 55–60.
- 37. Brosius J, Palmer ML, Kennedy PJ, Noller HF (1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 75(10): 4801–4805.