Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Seroprevalence of Hepatitis E Virus Infection among Swine Farmers and the General Population in Rural Taiwan

  • Jian-Te Lee,

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan

  • Pei-Lan Shao,

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Luan-Yin Chang,

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Ning-Shao Xia,

    Affiliation National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

  • Pei-Jer Chen,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Chun-Yi Lu,

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Li-Min Huang

    lmhuang@ntu.edu.tw

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

Objectives

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging pathogen. We evaluated the seroprevalence of HEV infection among swine farmers and the general population in Taiwan, a nonendemic country.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional seroepidemiologic study in rural Taiwan in 2012 and 2013. The study included swine farmers, health examination attendees, pregnant women, and students. A commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM against HEV. Pertinent information was collected using a questionnaire.

Results

In total, 660 participants were enrolled in the study, including 156 swine farmers, 314 health examination attendees, 100 pregnant women, and 90 students. IgG anti-HEV was detected in 29.5% of swine farmers, 11.5% of health examination attendees, 2% of pregnant women, and 1.1% of students. Two subjects were positive for IgM anti-HEV. Logistic regression analysis revealed that swine farmers had an approximately 3.5-fold increased risk (odds ratio [OR], 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91–6.27; p<0.0001) for being seropositive for IgG anti-HEV as compared to the general population. Age was positively associated with seropositive rate (OR, 1.07 per year; 95% CI, 1.05–1.09; p<0.0001).

Conclusion

HEV infection is prevalent in Taiwan. The seroprevalence of HEV infection is high in swine farmers and in the elderly population.

Introduction

Hepatitis E virus (HEV), a small non-enveloped RNA virus, is the only member of the genus Hepevirus in the family Hepeviridae [1]. It is thought to be the most common cause of acute hepatitis worldwide [2]. HEV causes more than 3 million symptomatic infections each year [3]. The major route of transmission is fecal-oral, waterborne, and foodborne [2]. HEV infections are largely asymptomatic, but can cause acute hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure with an approximately 20% mortality rate in pregnant women living in highly endemic countries [4]. There are 4 HEV genotypes but only 1 serotype [5]. HEV genotypes 1 and 2 infect only humans and typically cause either sporadic cases or outbreaks in developing countries [6]. HEV genotypes 3 and 4 infect pigs and other mammalian animals in both developing and developed countries (autochthonous infection); humans are accidental hosts [7]. Although HEV infections in developed countries are less common, seroprevalence varies widely from 1% to >20%, depending on the diagnostic kit used for detection [8], [9]. Over the past decade, there has been an emergence of HEV infections and zoonotic transmission in developed countries, particularly in Japan [10] and Europe [11]. Chronic HEV infections have received increasing attention in recent years because they pose a threat to immunocompromised hosts, including solid-organ-transplant recipients [12], patients with hematological disorders receiving chemotherapy [13], and those with human immunodeficiency virus infections [14].

In Taiwan, endemics have occurred for hepatitis A, B, and C, but not for hepatitis E. However, sporadic and locally acquired HEV infections have been documented in Taiwan [15]; the most commonly observed HEV genotype is genotype 4. According to the Centers for Disease Control in Taiwan, the crude incidence rate of acute hepatitis E was 0.03–0.06/100,000 person-years in 2008–2012 [16]. However, an increasing number of HEV infections has been detected in nearby countries, including China [17], Hong Kong [18], and Japan [10]. Whether these infections are due to changing epidemiology or increased surveillance remains unclear, but it is important to understand the local epidemiology. The most recent seroepidemiologic study in Taiwan was published in 1994 [19]. We evaluated the current seroprevalence of HEV infection using a new assay kit.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Study Area

We conducted a cross-sectional seroepidemiologic study in rural Taiwan in 2012 and 2013. Yunlin County is located in west-central Taiwan. Yunlin County has a population of 710,000 inhabitants and an area of 1291 km2 and is famous for its swine farming. According to the statistics compiled by the Council of Agriculture in Taiwan in 2012 [20], there were nearly 1.5 million pigs in a total of 1380 herds in Yunlin County. The pig density of Yunlin County (1153 pigs/km2) ranks among the highest in Taiwan (average, 173 pigs/km2). The pig density of the townships in Yunlin County is 154–3897 pigs/km2 (Fig. 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Pig density (pigs/km2) in the study area is depicted on the map (Yunlin County, Taiwan).

Pig density in each township was calculated as the number of pigs divided by the size of the area.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067180.g001

Ethics Statement

This study was conducted in Yunlin County, Taiwan. Written informed consent was obtained for all subjects, and parental consent was further obtained for those aged less than 20 years. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Taiwan University Hospital (reference number 201111038RIB).

Recruitment of the Study Population

Swine farmers, health examination attendees, pregnant women, and students were recruited for participation in the study. We visited local swine herds to recruit swine farmers, their family members, and associated personnel working with the herds. Health examination attendees were enrolled at the National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch. We enrolled pregnant women at 2 local obstetric clinics. Blood samples were taken during the first trimester and at delivery. High school students were randomly selected in the study area during routine health examination. Those who had received blood transfusion within 1 year were excluded from participation. A questionnaire was also administered to collect relevant information.

Serological Tests for Hepatitis E Virus (HEV)

Recruited subjects underwent blood sampling, and sera were aliquoted and stored at −80°C until analysis. A commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from Wantai Biopharmaceutical, Inc. (Beijing, China) was used to detect immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) against HEV (anti-HEV) [21], [22]. Laboratory analysis was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical Analysis

Data collected by the questionnaire were verified and digitalized. Univariate analysis, the chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test were used to analyze categorical variables when appropriate. To identify independent variables associated with anti-HEV seropositivity, we performed logistic regression analysis. The magnitude of the association between variables and seropositivity is expressed as an odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. The pig density of each township was calculated as the number of pigs divided by size of the area. We performed statistical analysis using SPSS (PASW Statistics 18.0, Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

Study Population and Demographics

A total of 660 participants, including 156 swine farmers, 314 health examination attendees, 100 pregnant women, and 90 students were enrolled in the study. Age (years) and sex ratio (male/female) were 43.9±13.1 (2.7), 43.4±15.1 (1.4), 27.8±5.0 (0), and 12.9±1.4 (1.0) for each group, respectively. Demographic details are shown in Table 1. Swine farmers were recruited from 21 local swine herds. Most of the pregnant women entered the study at 2 months of gestation, and 9 (9%) did not complete the pregnancy for various reasons.

Seroprevalence Rate of HEV Infection

Seropositivity of IgG anti-HEV was detected in 46 swine farmers (29.5%), 36 health examination attendees (11.5%), 2 pregnant women (2%), and 1 student (1.1%). The seropositive rate was significantly different between groups (p<0.0001). Seroprevalence rates stratified by age are shown in Table 2. The overall seropositive rate was 12.9% (85/660). Among the 85 individuals who were seropositive, 56 were male (66%), with a mean age of 52.4±12.4 (median, 54; range, 12–79) years. There was a trend toward seropositivity with increased age. Two subjects were positive for IgM anti-HEV, including one swine farmer and one health examination attendee.

thumbnail
Table 2. Seroprevalence of immunoglobulin G against hepatitis E virus (IgG anti-HEV).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067180.t002

Univariate Analysis

We compared HEV seroprevalence rates between swine farmers and health examination attendees, which represented the general population. The seropositivity of IgG anti-HEV was significantly higher in subjects who were swine farmers (p<0.0001), had traveled to China (p<0.0001) and who were aged >40 years (p<0.0001). The gender (p = 0.312), ground water in the household (p = 0.202), consumption of undercooked pork or offal (p = 0.608) or a history of hepatitis (p = 0.564) had no association with HEV seropositivity.

Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis

We included variables with significant association with HEV seropositivity for further analysis. Pig density was also included for the theoretical importance. Based on multiple logistic regression analysis (Table 3), swine farmers had an approximately 3.5-fold (odds ratio [OR], 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91–6.27; p<0.0001) higher risk than the general population to be seropositive for IgG anti-HEV. Age was independently associated with seropositive rate (OR, 1.07 per year; 95% CI, 1.05–1.09; p<0.0001). A travel history to China was not significantly associated with seropositive rate (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.93–3.28; p = 0.084), as well as the pig density of the townships in which the subjects lived (OR, 1.08 per 1000 pigs/km2; 95% CI, 0.85–1.37; p = 0.533).

thumbnail
Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for risk factors associated with the seropositive rate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067180.t003

Discussion

Our study revealed that HEV infection is prevalent in Taiwan. The seropositive rate among the general population (12%) in rural Taiwan was comparable to that in the United Kingdom (16.2%) and Korea (23.1%), but less than that in the highly endemic southwest France (52.5%) when the same diagnostic assay was used [22][24]. A previous study in northern Taiwan showed a similar seroprevalence (10.7%) in 1994 [19]. However, direct comparisons between the 2 studies were limited by the use of different diagnostic assays [22]. The assay kit used in the current study is more sensitive than the HEV diagnostic serology kits previously available. In developed countries, the dynamics of HEV seroprevalence is intriguing. HEV seroprevalence in Japan remained constant between 1974 and 1994 [25], suggesting low-level exposure. Denmark experienced a decrease in seroprevalence of both HEV and hepatitis A virus (HAV) between 1983 and 2003 [26], suggesting the effectiveness of improved sanitation and the role of cohort effect. Only 1–2% of sporadic HEV infections by zoonotic genotypes 3 and 4 are symptomatic [27]. Given the low incidence of HEV infections but relatively high HEV seroprevalence in Taiwan, low exposure to HEV and subclinical HEV infections may have existed previously in Taiwan. In our study, the seroprevalence of HEV infection was higher in the elderly population. A marked decrease in HAV seroprevalence has been observed in the Taiwanese population born after 1982 [28]. Whether the high seroprevalence in the elderly population in Taiwan indicates constant exposure to HEV or if this observation was a result of the cohort effect requires additional analysis.

Compared with the general population, swine farmers had a 3.5-fold greater risk of being seropositive for HEV in our study. The association between occupational exposure to pigs and significantly higher seroprevalence of HEV had been reported previously for swine farmers in Eastern Europe [29] and for pig handlers in Taiwan [30], but not in Denmark [26] or northern Thailand [31]. These findings may be due to different epidemiology from different regions. In developed countries, pigs have been recognized as important factors in HEV transmission [2]. However, environmental exposure is also considered a potential source of HEV transmission, as revealed by the presence of HEV RNA in surface water samples in the Netherlands [32]. This may be responsible in part for the high seroprevalence in the general population.

A travel history to China was positively associated with HEV seropositivity in the univariate analysis but the factor was not significant in the multiple logistic regression analysis. Long been considered an endemic country, China continued to have occasional foodborne outbreaks in recent years, mainly caused by HEV genotype 4 [2]. According to Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, 35% of the cases (18/51) with acute hepatitis E were imported in 2008–2012 [16]. Locally acquired HEV infections remained important clinically and a lack of travel history should not preclude the possibility of hepatitis E in Taiwan. Pig density was not significantly associated with the seroprevalence rate in our study. Pigs were concentrated and reared on swine farms in the study area. Other than swine farming, people have little direct contact with pigs. Although confounding factors may exist because we did not take migration of the subjects into consideration, our results suggest that occupational exposure is more important than casual contact.

Autochthonous infections of HEV genotypes 3 and 4 were much more common in elderly men and in those with pre-existing liver diseases such as chronic hepatitis B infection [2], [8]. Despite the administration of universal hepatitis B vaccination since 1984, a considerable disease burden in the elderly population of Taiwan continues to exist. The seroprevalence rates of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus were approximately 15% and 5% in persons born before 1970 in the study area [33], [34]. Although most locally acquired HEV infections are self-limited, they can cause “acute-on-chronic” liver failure and even mortality [8]. Increased surveillance of HEV infections should be considered during the follow-up of these patients. In our study, only 2% of pregnant women were seropositive for anti-HEV during the first trimester. Anecdotal reports have examined HEV genotype 3 infections during pregnancy [35]. Although the role of HEV genotype 4 infections during pregnancy was not clear, most pregnant women were found to be susceptible to HEV infections in the study area. A recombinant HEV vaccine recently became available in China [27] but further evaluation is needed to develop methods for HEV prevention in specific risk groups in different regions.

There were some limitations to this study. The sample size was relatively small and may not be fully representative of the study area. Our results may not correlate to seroprevalence in urban areas.

In conclusion, HEV infection is prevalent in Taiwan. The seroprevalence of HEV infection is higher in swine farmers and in the elderly population. The disease burden of HEV infection in patients with pre-existing liver diseases and pregnant women should be examined. Increased surveillance of specific risk groups should be conducted to understand the local epidemiology and guide vaccine strategies.

Acknowledgments

We were indebted to Dr. Jou-Wei Lin for help with statistical analysis, Mr. Chien-Liang Chen for preparing the figures, the First Common Laboratory of National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch for technical support, and Ms. Erh-Hsuan Hsieh for help with laboratory analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JTL LMH. Performed the experiments: JTL LMH. Analyzed the data: JTL LYC LMH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NSX PJC. Wrote the paper: JTL. Critical review of the manuscript: PLS LYC CYL LMH.

References

  1. 1. Meng XJ, Anderson DA, Arankalle VA (2011) Hepeviridae. In: King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ, editors. Virus taxonomy: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, 1st edition. San Diego, CA: Elsevier. 1024–1028.
  2. 2. Kamar N, Bendall R, Legrand-Abravanel F, Xia NS, Ijaz S, et al. (2012) Hepatitis E. Lancet. 379: 2477–2488.
  3. 3. Rein DB, Stevens GA, Theaker J, Wittenborn JS, Wiersma ST (2012) The global burden of hepatitis E virus genotypes 1 and 2 in 2005. Hepatology 55: 988–997.
  4. 4. Guthmann JP, Klovstad H, Boccia D, Hamid N, Pinoges L, et al. (2006) A large outbreak of hepatitis E among a displaced population in Darfur, Sudan, 2004: the role of water treatment methods. Clin Infect Dis 42: 1685–1691.
  5. 5. Engle RE, Yu C, Emerson SU, Meng XJ, Purcell RH (2002) Hepatitis E virus (HEV) capsid antigens derived from viruses of human and swine origin are equally efficient for detecting anti-HEV by enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 40: 4576–4580.
  6. 6. Purcell RH, Emerson SU (2008) Hepatitis E: an emerging awareness of an old disease. J Hepatol 48: 494–503.
  7. 7. Dalton HR, Bendall R, Ijaz S, Banks M (2008) Hepatitis E: an emerging infection in developed countries. Lancet Infect Dis 8: 698–709.
  8. 8. Dalton HR, Stableforth W, Thurairajah P, Hazeldine S, Remnarace R, et al. (2008) Autochthonous hepatitis E in Southwest England: natural history, complications and seasonal variation, and hepatitis E virus IgG seroprevalence in blood donors, the elderly and patients with chronic liver disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20: 784–790.
  9. 9. Kuniholm MH, Purcell RH, McQuillan GM, Engle RE, Wasley A, et al. (2009) Epidemiology of hepatitis E virus in the United States: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Infect Dis 200: 48–56.
  10. 10. Miyamura T (2011) Hepatitis E virus infection in developed countries. Virus Res 161: 40–46.
  11. 11. Bouquet J, Tessé S, Lunazzi A, Eloit M, Rose N, et al. (2011) Close similarity between sequences of hepatitis E virus recovered from humans and swine, France, 2008–2009. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 2018–2025.
  12. 12. Kamar N, Selves J, Mansuy JM, Ouezzani L, Péron JM, et al. (2008) Hepatitis E virus and chronic hepatitis in organ-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med 358: 811–817.
  13. 13. Tamura A, Shimizu YK, Tanaka T, Kuroda K, Arakawa Y, et al. (2007) Persistent infection of hepatitis E virus transmitted by blood transfusion in a patient with T-cell lymphoma. Hepatol Res 37: 113–120.
  14. 14. Dalton HR, Bendall RP, Keane FE, Tedder RS, Ijaz S (2009) Persistent carriage of hepatitis E virus in patients with HIV infection. N Engl J Med 361: 1025–1027.
  15. 15. Okamoto H (2007) Genetic variability and evolution of hepatitis E virus. Virus Res 127: 216–228.
  16. 16. Taiwan Centers for Disease Control (2013 Feb 1) Notifiable Infectious Diseases Statistics System.
  17. 17. Zhao Q, Zhang J, Wu T, Li SW, Ng MH, et al. (2013) Antigenic determinants of hepatitis E virus and vaccine-induced immunogenicity and efficacy. J Gastroenterol 48: 159–168.
  18. 18. Chiu DM, Chan MC, Yeung AC, Ngai KL, Chan PK (2013) Seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus in Hong Kong, 2008–2009. J Med Virol 85: 459–461.
  19. 19. Lee SD, Wang YJ, Lu RH, Chan CY, Lo KJ, et al. (1994) Seroprevalence of antibody to hepatitis E virus among Chinese subjects in Taiwan. Hepatology 19: 866–870.
  20. 20. Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan) (2012 Nov 16) Pig Herds Update Report–22012.
  21. 21. Tang X, Yang C, Gu Y, Song C, Zhang X, et al. (2011) Structural basis for the neutralization and genotype specificity of hepatitis E virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108: 10266–10271.
  22. 22. Bendall R, Ellis V, Ijaz S, Ali R, Dalton H (2010) A comparison of two commercially available anti-HEV IgG kits and a re-evaluation of anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence data in developed countries. J Med Virol 82: 799–805.
  23. 23. Park HK, Jeong SH, Kim JW, Woo BH, Lee DH, et al. (2012) Seroprevalence of anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) in a Korean population: comparison of two commercial anti-HEV assays. BMC Infect Dis 12: 142.
  24. 24. Mansuy JM, Bendall R, Legrand-Abravanel F, Sauné K, Miédouge M, et al. (2011) Hepatitis E virus antibodies in blood donors, France. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 2309–2312.
  25. 25. Tanaka E, Matsumoto A, Takeda N, Li TC, Umemura T, et al. (2005) Age-specific antibody to hepatitis E virus has remained constant during the past 20 years in Japan. J Viral Hepat 12: 439–442.
  26. 26. Christensen PB, Engle RE, Hjort C, Homburg KM, Vach W, et al. (2008) Time trend of the prevalence of hepatitis E antibodies among farmers and blood donors: a potential zoonosis in Denmark. Clin Infect Dis 47: 1026–1031.
  27. 27. Zhu FC, Zhang J, Zhang XF, Zhou C, Wang ZZ, et al. (2010) Efficacy and safety of a recombinant hepatitis E vaccine in healthy adults: a large-scale, randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 376: 895–902.
  28. 28. Su SB, Lin CY, Sheu MJ, Kan WC, Wang HY, et al. (2010) Decrease in seroprevalence of hepatitis A after the implementation of nationwide disposable tableware use in Taiwan. BMC Public Health 10: 719.
  29. 29. Drobeniuc J, Favorov MO, Shapiro CN, Bell BP, Mast EE, et al. (2001) Hepatitis E virus antibody prevalence among persons who work with swine. J Infect Dis 184: 1594–1597.
  30. 30. Hsieh SY, Meng XJ, Wu YH, Liu ST, Tam AW, et al. (1999) Identity of a novel swine hepatitis E virus in Taiwan forming a monophyletic group with Taiwan isolates of human hepatitis E virus. J Clin Microbiol 37: 3828–3834.
  31. 31. Hinjoy S, Nelson KE, Gibbons RV, Jarman RG, Mongkolsirichaikul D, et al.. (2012) A cross-sectional study of hepatitis E virus infection in healthy people directly exposed and unexposed to pigs in a rural community in Northern Thailand. Zoonoses Public Health (in press).
  32. 32. Rutjes SA, Lodder WJ, Lodder-Verschoor F, van den Berg HH, Vennema H, et al. (2009) Sources of hepatitis E virus genotype 3 in The Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 15: 381–387.
  33. 33. Chen CH, Yang PM, Huang GT, Lee HS, Sung JL, et al. (2007) Estimation of seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus in Taiwan from a large-scale survey of free hepatitis screening participants. J Formos Med Assoc 106: 148–155.
  34. 34. Tseng YT, Sun HY, Chang SY, Wu CH, Liu WC, et al. (2011) Seroprevalence of hepatitis virus infection in men who have sex with men aged 18–40 years in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 110: 431–438.
  35. 35. Anty R, Ollier L, Péron JM, Nicand E, Cannavo I, et al. (2012) First case report of an acute genotype 3 hepatitis E infected pregnant woman living in South-Eastern France. J Clin Virol 54: 76–78.