T-Bet and Eomes Regulate the Balance between the Effector/Central Memory T Cells versus Memory Stem Like T Cells

Gang Li; Qianting Yang; Yibei Zhu; Hong-Rui Wang; Xinchun Chen; Xueguang Zhang; Binfeng Lu

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067401

Abstract

Memory T cells are composed of effector, central, and memory stem cells. Previous studies have implicated that both T-bet and Eomes are involved in the generation of effector and central memory CD8 T cells. The exact role of these transcription factors in shaping the memory T cell pool is not well understood, particularly with memory stem T cells. Here, we demonstrate that both T-bet or Eomes are required for elimination of established tumors by adoptively transferred CD8 T cells. We also examined the role of T-bet and Eomes in the generation of tumor-specific memory T cell subsets upon adoptive transfer. We showed that combined T-bet and Eomes deficiency resulted in a severe reduction in the number of effector/central memory T cells but an increase in the percentage of CD62L^highCD44^low Sca-1⁺ T cells which were similar to the phenotype of memory stem T cells. Despite preserving large numbers of phenotypic memory stem T cells, the lack of both of T-bet and Eomes resulted in a profound defect in antitumor memory responses, suggesting T-bet and Eomes are crucial for the antitumor function of these memory T cells. Our study establishes that T-bet and Eomes cooperate to promote the phenotype of effector/central memory CD8 T cell versus that of memory stem like T cells.

Citation: Li G, Yang Q, Zhu Y, Wang H-R, Chen X, Zhang X, et al. (2013) T-Bet and Eomes Regulate the Balance between the Effector/Central Memory T Cells versus Memory Stem Like T Cells. PLoS ONE 8(6): e67401. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067401

Editor: Mehrdad Matloubian, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America

Received: March 7, 2013; Accepted: May 18, 2013; Published: June 27, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Li et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This work is supported by 1R21CA167229-01A1 to BL. GL is partly supported by a scholarship from NSFC (#2010692006). This work is partly supported by NSFC key grant 30930085, the 973 project (No. 2013CB530501) and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution (PAPD) (to XG. Zhang). Y Zhu is supported by NSFC grant 31170866, 81273208 and Jiangsu natural science fund BK2011289. QY and XC are supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China Grant No.81171535.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist

Introduction

Tumor growth can elicit type 1 cellular immune responses that limit cancer progression. Ample clinical evidence shows that longer survival of cancer patients is associated with increased expression of genes characteristic of type 1 effector T cells, in particular master transcription regulators T-bet and Eomes. [1]–[5] In T cells, T-bet and Eomes are regulated by cytokines with divergent functions and therefore have overlapping as well as distinct functions [6]–[11]. IL-12 and IFN-γ drive T-bet expression, [12], [13] and IL-2 promotes Eomes expression. [7], [14], [15] T-bet and Eomes play an additive role in driving IFN-γ production and cytotoxic activities of effector CD8 T cells in vitro. [8], 16 T-bet and Eomes also coordinately promote T cell migration to inflamed tissues by inducing chemokine receptors. [16], [17] In addition, T-bet and Eomes control the expression of CD122 and are required for maintenance of IL-15-dependent memory CD8 T cells. [10], [11] High T-bet expression promotes short-lived effector CD8 T cells, whereas low T-bet expression promotes long-lived memory cells. [18], [6], [11], [19] Thus, T-bet and Eomes are important for both function and homeostasis of effector and memory T cells. However, the role of T-bet and Eomes in the setting of memory T cell responses to tumor antigens is unknown.

The memory T cells have been typically divided into two main subsets based on the expression of the lymph node homing molecules CD62L and CCR7. [20] Central memory T cells (T_CM) express high levels of CD62L and CCR7, whereas effector memory T cells (T_EM) express low levels of CD62L and CCR7. Recent studies demonstrated the existence of a new population of memory T cells designated T memory stem cells (T_SCM) [21] [22]. T_SCM are CD44^low CD62L^high, a phenotype similar to those of naïve T cells [21]. Nevertheless, they differ from naïve cells by expressing stem cell antigen–1 (Sca-1) and proliferate vigorously upon restimulation with its antigenic peptide [21] [23] [22]. Although T-bet and Eomes are known to be involved in both function and homeostasis of effector and memory T cells, their role in T_SCM is not studied.

Adoptive T cell therapy has become increasingly appreciated as a feasible therapeutic approach for human cancer. The infused tumor antigen-specific T cells are believed to adopt multiple effector and memory T cell fates in the host. Since T-bet and Eomes are master transcriptional factors for CD8 T cells, we studied their individual and collective roles in determining the phenotype and function of adoptively transferred T cells. We demonstrated that T-bet and Eomes play a synergistic role during the effector phase of an antitumor immunity. In addition, both T-bet and Eomes are required for the maintenance of effector and central memory CD8⁺ T cells. Interestingly, we found that the absence of both T-bet and Eomes resulted in a T cell population dominated by phenotypically-defined T_SCM. Our study establishes that the T-bet and Eomes transcriptional unit regulates the balance between effector/central memory T cells and T_SCM.

Methods

Mice

Generation of CD4-cre Eomes fl/fl (EKO) and T-bet−/− CD4-cre Eomes fl/fl (DKO) mice has been described [16]. Pmel-1 TCR transgenic mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and bred with TKO (the Jackson Laboratory), EKO, and DKO mice. B6-LY5.2/Cr mice were purchased from Frederick National Lab. All animal experiments have been approved by IACUC of University of Pittsburgh and IACUC of Soochow University.

Adoptive T cell Therapy

B6-LY5.2/Cr mice were challenged with 3×10⁵ B16F0 cells i.d. 6 days later, mice were irradiated at 500 rad. On day 7, the mice were adoptively transferred with 5×10⁵ WT, T-bet−/−, Eomes−/−, or T-bet/Eomes DKO pmel-1 T cells which have been cultured in Th1 condition for 3 days. Tumor growth was monitored every two days.

To examine the prophylactic function of adoptive transfer T cells, B6-LY5.2/Cr mice were irradiated at 500 rad. 24 h post irradiation, the mice were adoptively transferred with 4×10⁶ WT, T-bet−/−, Eomes−/−, or T-bet/Eomes DKO pmel-1 T cells which have been cultured in Th1 conditions for 4 days. 1 month later, the recipient mice were challenged with 2×10⁵ B16F0 cells i.d.

T Cell Culture

For generation of effector pmel-1 T cells, spleen and lymph node were collected from C57BL/6 WT, TKO, EKO, and T/E DKO pmel-1 TCR transgenic mice. CD8⁺ T cells were purified using anti-CD8 magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotech). Cells were stimulated with irradiated T cell free APC, 1 µM mgp100_25–33 (EGSRNQDWL), IL-2 (20 units/ml) and IL-12 (3.4 ng/ml) plus anti–IL-4 (10 µg/ml, clone 11B11) for Tc1 for 72 h. APCs were prepared from splenocytes that are depleted of T cells and irradiated by 3000 rad.

Flow Cytometric Analysis

CD4 (clone GK1.5), CD8 (clone 53-6.7), CD44 (clone IM7), CD122 (clone 5H4), CD62L (clone MEL-14), CD127 (clone A7R34), CD45.1 (clone A20) and CD45.2. (clone 104) were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA). Flow cytometric analysis was performed using a FACS flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

For intracellular cytokine staining, harvested cells were stimulated with PMA (10 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 µg/ml) for 4 h and incubated for the last 1 h with brefeldin A (10 µg/ml). Cells were subjected to intracellular cytokine analysis with anti–IL-17 (eBio17B7; eBioscience) and anti–IFN-γ Ab (clone XMG1.2; eBioscience).

Harvest of Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes

Tumor masses were removed, minced, and digested with collagenase and hyaluronidase digestion solution (2.5 mg/ml collagenase I, 1 mg/ml collagenase IV, 0.25 mg/ml hyaluronidase IV-S, 300 µg/ml DNase I, and 0.01% HEPES in RPMI 1640 medium) at 37°C for 2 h. The pieces were then gently pressed between the frosted edges of two sterile glass slides, and the cell suspension was filtered through a 40-µm cell strainer (BD Biosciences). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were further purified by using the gradient as per manufacturer protocol, washed, and re-suspended in HBSS for analysis.

Results

T-bet and Eomes are Required for Adoptive Tumor Immunotherapy in Mice

Adoptive T cell therapy is a promising strategy for the treatment of cancer. [24], [25] To begin to dissect the genetic program regulating the function of adoptively transferred T cells in tumor-bearing hosts, we first focused on T-bet and Eomes.[1]–[5] To generate tumor-reactive CD8⁺ T cells, we used T cells from WT, T-bet−/− (TKO), Eomes−/− (EKO), and T-bet−/− Eomes−/− (DKO) pmel-1 T cell receptor transgenic mice. [26] The number of naïve pmel-1 T cells was comparable among all strains. We stimulated pmel-1 naïve T cells in vitro in Th1 conditions for three days to generate effector T cells specific for melanoma antigen (Ag) gp100. At this time point, most of the T cells had proliferated as determined by carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CSFE) staining and there was no difference in proliferation between the strains (data not shown), consistent with our previous results and suggesting that T-bet and Eomes were not required for clonal expansion of CD8 T cells [27]. In addition, the number of live cells was similar among WT, TKO, EKO, and DKO pmel-1 T cells after 72 h in culture (data not shown). We then infused the effector T cells to B16 melanoma-bearing mice that had been non-lethally irradiated 24 h before. Tumor growth was inhibited in recipient mice adoptively transferred with WT pmel-1 T cells (Figure 1). Similarly, tumor growth was inhibited in mice infused with either TKO or EKO pmel-1 T cells, suggesting T-bet and Eomes were individually non-essential (Figure 1). In contrast, adoptively transferring DKO pmel-1 T cells failed to inhibit the tumor growth (Figure 1). These data demonstrated that both T-bet and Eomes were required for adoptive therapy of cancer.

Download:

Figure 1. Adoptive immune therapy in mice requires both T-bet and Eomes.

B6-LY5.2/Cr mice were challenged with 3×10⁵ B16F0 cells i.d. 6 days later, mice were irradiated at 500 rad. On day 7, the mice were adoptively transferred with 5×10⁵ WT, T-bet−/−, Eomes−/−, or T-bet/Eomes DKO pmel-1 T cells which have been cultured in Th1 condition for 3 days. Tumor growth was monitored every two days. 5 mice were in each group. The no-transfer group did not receive any T cells. *P<0.05, determined by Mann-Whitney Test comparing recipients infused with DKO and WT T cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067401.g001

T-bet and Eomes Control the Number, Trafficking and Effector Function of Adoptively Transferred T cells

Since T-bet and Eomes are induced by different signals, [27] it is conceivable that they might regulate different functions of the adoptively transferred T cells in vivo. We first examined the frequency of adoptively transferred pmel-1 T cells in secondary lymphoid organs and tumor sites on approximately 20 days post infusion. The purity of infused pmel-1 T cells were about 95% CD8⁺ Vβ13⁺ (data not shown), and CD44 was highly upregulated in pmel-1 T cells regardless of their genotype (Figure S1 in file S1). The donor T cells can be distinguished from endogenous T cells by their distinctive CD45 alleles. We confirmed that majority of CD45.2⁺ cells were CD8⁺Vβ13⁺ upon infusion (Figure S2 file S1). Thirty days after infusion, about 7% of the lymphocytes in the spleen were donor CD45.2⁺ WT T cells (Figure 2 A and B). Similar percentages of infused T cells were found in mice receiving TKO or EKO T cells (Figure 2 A and B). In contrast, only 1% of donor DKO pmel-1 T cells could be detected at this time point (Figure 2A), and this was statistically significant (Figure 2B). In lymph nodes of the recipient mice, about 5% of the lymphocytes were adoptively transferred WT T cells. Similar percentages of EKO adoptively transferred T cells were observed in the lymph node (Figure 2 A and C). In contrast, the percentage of adoptively transferred TKO T cells was increased significantly to about 20% in lymph nodes (Figure 2 A and C). Surprisingly, the percentage of DKO T cells was similar to that of WT T cells in the lymph nodes (Figure 2 A and C). These data suggest that T-bet and Eomes might play different roles in the survival and trafficking of adoptively transferred effector T cells in secondary lymphoid organs.

Download:

Figure 2. T-bet and Eomes regulate tissue distribution and survival of the adoptive transferred T cells in tumor-bearing recipient mice.

B6-LY5.2/Cr mice were challenged with 3×10⁵ B16F0 cells i.d. 6 days later, mice were irradiated at 500 rad. On day 7, the mice were adoptively transferred with 5×10⁵ WT, T-bet−/−, Eomes−/−, or T-bet/Eomes DKO pmel-1 T cells which have been cultured in Th1 condition for 3 days. (A) Splenocytes (SPL), lymph node (LN) and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were harvested from tumor-bearing mice 20 days after T cell infusion. The percentage of donor cells (CD45.2⁺) cells was determined by flow cytometry and the representative dot plots were shown. (B) The average percentage of donor cells (CD45.2⁺) in spleen was shown (N = 4 for each genotype). (C) The average percentage of donor cells (CD45.2⁺) in lymph nodes was shown (N = 4 for each genotype). (D) The average percentage of donor cells (CD45.2⁺) in tumor was shown (N = 4 for each genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM of four mice for each genotype. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 by Student’s t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067401.g002

The antitumor effect of adoptively transferred T cells is ultimately determined by their ability to migrate to and carry out effector functions within the tumor. We therefore examined the frequency of the adoptively transferred pmel-1 T cells within the B16 tumor. Approximately 30% of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were WT pmel-1 T cells (Figure 2 A and D). Either T-bet or Eomes deficiency resulted in a modest but statistically significant reduction in the percentage of the donor T cells among the TILs (Figure 2 A and D). Strikingly, T-bet and Eomes double deficiency greatly reduced the number of donor T cells in the tumor tissues (Figure 2 A and B). These data demonstrated that T-bet and Eomes synergistically control T cell persistence within the tumor. This is likely due to the combined effect of lack of expression of chemokine receptors such as CXCR3 as we have reported in CD8 T cells previously [16], reduced survival due to reduced CD122 [10], and diminished effector function such as IFN-γ production and cytolytic activities.

To further characterize adoptively transferred effector T cells, we examined the surface markers such as CD44 and CD62L that are characteristic of naïve and memory T cell subsets. The expression of CD44 and CD62L on the endogenous CD8 T cells in spleens was not changed in all recipient mice regardless of the genotype of the infused T cells (Figure 3A). Close to 100% of the WT and EKO donor T cells were CD44^high. About two thirds of the WT and EKO CD44⁺ T cells were CD62L^low, characteristic of effector cells, and one third were CD62L^high, typical of central memory T cells. Therefore, the persistent WT and EKO T cells consisted mainly of phenotypic central and effector memory T cells. In contrast, the level of CD44 on the adoptively transferred TKO T cells was modestly reduced (Figure 3 A and B). And a population of CD62L^high CD44^low T cells was evident (Figure 3A). This phenotype is consistent with that of T_SCM. [21] Similarly but more dramatically, levels of CD44 on DKO T cells was more significantly reduced (Figure 3 A and B). CD62L^high CD44^low T cells were prominently present in DKO pmel-1 T cells (Figure 3A). In addition, the adoptive transferred T cells, regardless of their genotypes, were all Sca-1^high (Figure 3C). All activated T cells, such as memory stem cells, memory and effector T cells, express very high levels of Sca-1, whereas naïve T cells express low levels of Scal-1. The fact that DKO T cells bore naïve characteristics (CD62L^high CD44^low) but also expressed high levels of Sca-1 was consistent with them being T_SCM. These data suggest that T-bet plays an important role in maintaining the effector/central memory phenotype. The increase of CD62L^high CD44^low population was also consistent with our finding that more TKO T cells were found in the lymph nodes (Figure 2C) because CD62L is important for T cell trafficking to the lymph node. Eomes plays an additional role in promoting effector T cell fate, as DKO T cells had a greater decrease in CD44 levels (Figure 3B). Similar decreases in the CD44^high population within DKO T cells were observed in lymph node cells (data not shown).

Download:

Figure 3. T-bet and Eomes regulate the surface marker and function and adoptive transferred T cells in tumor-bearing mice.

Pmel-1 T cells were adoptively transferred to tumor-bearing B6-LY5.2/Cr mice as in figure 1. 20 days post T cell infusion, spleen cells were harvested and analyzed. (A) Dot plots show percentage of CD44^hiCD62L^hi, CD44^hiCD62L^lo and CD44^loCD62L^hi T cells in within donor (CD45.2⁺) and recipient (CD45.2⁻) CD8⁺ T cells. (B) The average percentage of donor cells (CD45.2⁺) CD44⁺ CD8⁺ T cells in the spleen was shown (N = 4 for each genotype). (C) Sca-1 levels in the adoptive transferred CD8 T cells were shown. (D). Splenocytes were harvested from different recipient tumor-bearing mice, were subsequently stimulated with PMA and ionomycin for 4 hours and incubated for the last 1 hour with brefeldin A. The percentage of donor pmel-1 CD8⁺ T cells producing IFN-γ and IL-17 were examined. (E) The average percentage of IFN-γ⁺ donor cells CD8⁺ T cells in the spleen as shown in (D) are shown (N = 4 for each genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM of four mice for each genotype. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 by Student’s t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067401.g003

IFN-γ production of adoptively transferred T cells was also examined. About 85% of the donor WT T cells produced IFN-γ (Figure 3 D and E). The frequency of IFN-γ⁺ cells modestly reduced in EKO T cells (Figure 3 D and E). T-bet deletion resulted in lower frequency of IFN-γ producers (Figure 3 D and E). The combined deficiency of T-bet and Eomes led to the greatest reduction of the frequency of IFN-γ producers. T-bet and Eomes were shown to inhibit IL-17 production in CD8 T cells, and lack of both T-bet and Eomes resulted in exacerbated inflammation in a mouse infectious model. [28] However, although we observed a great reduction of IFN-γ producers, we did not find a significant increase of IL-17-producing CD8 T cells within DKO T cells (Figure 3 D). Thus, the increased tumor growth in mice infused with DKO T cells was not due to alteration of IL-17 production.

T-bet and Eomes are Required for Maintaining Memory T cells in the Blood and Secondary Lymphoid Organs

In order to examine the roles of T-bet and Eomes in memory T cells, we infused in vitro-activated WT, TKO, EKO and DKO effector T cells into non-lethally irradiated naïve C57BL/6 mice. We used pmel-1 TCR transgenic T cells, which provide TCR with a strong affinity. This approach allowed tracking of defined populations of antigen-specific memory CD8 cells and avoided the interference of spontaneously generated memory phenotype cells of unknown history. We have included IL-12 in the culture that provided strong inflammatory signals. In addition, the recipient mice had been non-lethally irradiated and conditioned for favorable homeostatic proliferation of the adoptively transferred T cells. All measures ensured a productive generation of memory T cells. [25], [29] Regardless of genotypes, all of the in vitro activated T cells expanded equivalently and were CD44^high effector T cells in vitro. These primed T cells were expected to become long-lived memory T cells in vivo upon adoptive transfer. The recipient mice were bled at different time points and the frequency of adoptively transferred T cells was determined by flow cytometry. Three days post adoptive transfer, the frequencies of transferred CD45.2⁺ T cells in the blood were similar among mice receiving WT, TKO or EKO donor T cells (Figure 4A). More than 90% of the CD45.2⁺ cells were CD8⁺Vb13⁺, confirming they were pmel-1 T cells (data not shown). In contrast, the frequency of DKO T cells was significantly lower (Figure 4A). The frequency of infused WT T cells was reduced 15 and 29 days post transfer (Figure 4A). The frequencies of TKO and EKO T cells were similarly reduced and were not different from that of WT T cells. In contrast, the frequency of DKO T cells was drastically reduced in the blood at these time points in comparison to WT T cells (Figure 4A). From day 29 to day 3 post infusion, there were about 4, 7, 6 and 1.5 folds reduction in the percentage of adoptive transferred T cells in the blood for WT, TKO, EKO and DKO T cells respectively. These data suggested that T-bet and Eomes were complementary in determining the number of memory T cells in blood.

Download:

Figure 4. T-bet and Eomes regulate T cell numbers in blood upon adoptive transfer into non-lethally irradiated mice.

B6-LY5.2/Cr mice were irradiated at 500 rad. 24 h post irradiation, the mice were adoptively transferred with 5×10⁵ WT, T-bet−/−, Eomes−/−, or T-bet/Eomes DKO pmel-1 T cells which have been cultured in the Th1 condition for 4 days. (A) The recipient mice were bled at different time points and the frequency of the adoptively transferred T cells (CD45.2) among total CD45⁺ cells (CD45.2 plus CD45.1) was determined by flow cytometry. (B) The frequency of the adoptively transferred T cells in spleen and LN were analyzed 30 days post transfer. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of five mice for each genotype. ***P<0.001 by Student’s t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067401.g004

Thirty days post transfer, we analyzed the frequency of the adoptively transferred T cells in secondary lymphoid organs. Similar to what we observed in blood, there was no difference in the frequency of memory T cells among the adoptively transferred WT, TKO and EKO T cells in either spleens or lymph nodes. There was about a two-fold and statistically significant reduction of DKO memory T cells compared to WT memory T cells in both spleens and lymph nodes (Figure 4B). The difference between DKO and WT T cells in the blood was far greater than that in the spleen or the in lymph node (Figure 4 A and B). Collectively these data showed that T-bet and Eomes were important in maintaining the memory pool and required for blood circulation of memory T cells.

T-bet and Eomes were Required for Effector/central Memory T cells but Dispensable for Phenotypic Memory Stem T cells

Memory T cells have been divided into central and effector memory T cells both of which are CD44^high. Recently, another subset of T cells called stem memory T cells have been discovered which are CD44^lowCD62L^high. [21], [30] We showed that the level of CD44 on fully activated effector DKO T cells was largely equivalent to that of WT effector T cells after four-day culture (Figure 5A). We examined the surface markers on these cells 30 days after infusion. Because recipient mice had been non-lethally irradiated before T cell infusion, the donor T cells were expanded in the lymphopenic hosts. IL-15 is shown to regulate memory T cell proliferation and previous studies also demonstrated that CD122, the receptor shared by IL-2 and IL-15, is regulated by T-bet and Eomes in naïve mice. [10] Consistent with published results, CD122 expression was partially reduced in both TKO and EKO T cells compared to WT T cells (Figure 5B). In contrast, expression of CD122 was fully ablated in DKO T cells. More strikingly, whereas 60% of the adoptively transferred WT, T-bet−/− and Eomes−/− T cells were CD44^high, less than 20% of the DKO T cells were CD44^high (Figure 5 B, C and D). In sharp contrast, the percentage of CD44^low memory cells was greatly increased in DKO pmel-1 T cells compared with T cells of other genotypes (Figure 5 B, C and D). Therefore T-bet and Eomes are important for the survival of CD44^high memory T cells, likely mediated by CD122 signaling by IL-15. In contrast, they are not required for CD44^low phenotypic T_SCM. The majority of the CD44^low cells were CD62L^high (Figure 5C), consistent with a phenotype of T_SCM. Sca-1 is considered as an important marker for T_SCM in mice [21], [22]. We found that all infused T cells were Sca-1^high regardless of their genetic backgrounds (Figure 5E). These data suggest that DKO memory T cells had features of T_SCM. In addition, DKO T cells expressed high similar levels of bcl-2 compared to WT, EKO and TKO T cells. We then examined the ability of the memory T cells to produce IFN-γ. The frequencies of IFN-γ-producers were similar between WT and EKO memory T cells. In contrast, the frequency of IFN-γ+ cells was significantly reduced in TKO T cells (Figure 5 F). The frequency of IFN-γ+ cells was further reduced in DKO T cells (Figure 5 F). These data suggest that T-bet and Eomes all contribute to the immediate effector function of memory T cells, as measured by IFN-γ production. In contrast, similar percentages of adoptively transferred T cells, regardless of their genotypes, made IL-2 (figure 5G). Although CXCR3 was shown expressed in human T_SCM, [30] it was not expressed on adoptively transferred DKO T cells (data not shown), consistent with our previously published data. [16].

Download:

Figure 5. T-bet and Eomes regulate memory subsets of the adoptive transferred T cells.

(A) WT, T-bet−/− (TKO), Eomes−/− (EKO), or T-bet/Eomes DKO pmel-1 T cells were cultured in Th1 conditions for 4 days. Expression of CD44 and CD62L on pmel-1 T cells was examined by flow cytometry. (B) B6-LY5.2/Cr mice (CD45.1) were adoptively transferred with WT, T-bet−/−, Eomes−/−, or T-bet/Eomes DKO pmel-1 T cells (CD45.2). Blood was collected from different recipient mice and stained for CD45.2, CD8, CD44, CD122 30 days after transfer. (C) Thirty days post transfer, spleens and lymph nodes (LN) were harvested. Surface markers CD44 and CD62L were examined by flow cytometry. Host cells were CD8⁺CD45.1⁺. WT, TKO, EKO, and DKO indicate representative plots of CD44 versus CD62L of CD8⁺CD4.5.2⁺ donor CD8 T cells. (D) Thirty days post transfer, spleens were harvested. The average percentage of donor cells (CD45.2⁺) CD44⁺ CD8⁺ T cells among all the donor CD8⁺ T cells in the spleen was shown (N = 5 for each genotype). (E) Thirty days post transfer, spleens were harvested. Sca-1 expression on donor CD45.2⁺ CD8⁺ T cells was shown (representative of five independent experiments). (F) and (G) Splenocytes were then stimulated with PMA and ionomycin for 4 hours and incubated for the last 1 hour with Brefeldin A. CD45.2⁺ Cells producing IFN-γ (F) and IL-2 (G) were examined with intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. The average percentages of IFN-γ⁺ and IL-2⁺ cells among the donor CD45.2⁺ CD8⁺ T cells in the spleen were shown (N = 5 for each genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM of five samples for each genotype. ***P<0.001 by Student’s t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067401.g005

T-bet and Eomes were Required for the Antitumor Recall Responses Mediated by Adoptively Transferred T cells

Our data suggest that, despite the drastic reduction of memory T cells in the blood, the total number of memory DKO T cells in the lymph node and spleen was about two-fold reduced compared to WT T cells. The numbers of memory TKO and EKO T cells were similar to that of WT T cells. However, it was not clear whether TKO, EKO or DKO memory T cells were functionally competent. To address this question, we re-challenged recipients with B16 tumor cells and monitored tumor growth (Figure 6 A). The mice infused with WT pmel-1 T cells were fully protected from a second inoculation of tumor cells. Similarly, all mice receiving TKO or EKO pmel-1 T cells were protected from tumor growth (Figure 6 B). In contrast, mice receiving DKO T cells succumbed to the challenge with B16 cells and grew tumor (Figure 6 B). These results suggest that T-bet and Eomes are complementary or redundant in carrying out recall immune responses against tumor.

Download:

Figure 6. T-bet and Eomes are required for the memory recall responses against tumor cell rechallenge.

(A) B6-LY5.2/Cr mice were non-lethally irradiated at 500 rad, within 24 hours of irradiation, mice were adoptively transferred with 4×10⁶ WT, T-bet−/−, Eomes−/−, or T-bet/Eomes DKO pmel-1 T cells which have been cultured in Th1 condition for 4 days. One month later, mice were challenged with 2×10⁵ B16F0 cells i.d. (B) Tumor growth was monitored every other day. 5 mice were in each group. ***P<0.001, determined by Mann-Whitney Test comparing recipients with DKO and WT T cells. (C) Thirty days post T cell infusion, spleens were harvested. Splenocytes were stained with CFSE and then stimulated with 0.01 µM gp100_25–33 peptide for 72 h hours. Then the donor cells (CD45.2⁺CD8⁺) were analyzed by flow cytometry for CFSE dilution. Host CD8 T cells were the CD45.1⁺ CD8⁺ population. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067401.g006

We then examined whether WT, TKO, EKO, and DKO memory T cells exhibited different proliferative potentials. We re-stimulated the memory T cells from spleens of the recipient mice with 0.01 µM gp100_25–33 peptide for 72 h in vitro. As expected, host CD8 T cells did not enlarge in size or proliferated (Figure 6C). Without addition of the gp100_25–33 peptide, the donor T cells also did not proliferate (data not shown). In contrast, the donor WT pmel-1 T cells blasted and proliferated vigorously upon stimulation with the gp100_25–33 peptide (Figure 6C). This assay also showed no difference in the proliferation potential in recall responses among WT, TKO, EKO, and DKO pmel-1 memory T cells (Figure 6 C). Similar results were obtained with splenocytes stimulated with higher concentrations of gp100_25–33 peptide (0.1 µM and 1 µM) or with lymph node cells (data not shown). Collectively, these data suggest the effector functions rather than the proliferative potential are controlled by T-bet and Eomes in memory T cells. These results also demonstrated that DKO peml-1 memory T cells were capable of hyper-proliferation upon recall stimulation, even with very low amounts of antigen, consistent with a phenotype of T_SCM. In addition to proliferation, CD44 could be up-regulated in DKO T cells (figure S3 in file S1), suggesting DKO T cells were capable of some levels of differentiate.

Discussion

In this study, we examined the role of T-bet and Eomes in both effector and memory responses against tumor. In the setting of adoptive immune therapy of an existing tumor, we showed that the lack of either T-bet or Eomes did not significantly compromise the antitumor effect. However, “knockout” of both of these transcription factors rendered the therapy ineffective. In order to study how T-bet and Eomes regulate the memory T cell pool, we infused T cells of single or double T-bet and Eomes deletion into non-lethally irradiated mice and characterized these T cells and the antitumor recall response. We found that deletion of both T-bet and Eomes in CD8 T cells profoundly inhibited the persistence of effector and central memory T cells. To our surprise, despite the depletion of bulk central and effector memory T cells, the total number of memory DKO T cells was about half of WT T cells in secondary lymphoid organs. Further analysis revealed that deletion of T-bet and Eomes led to a significant increase in the proportion of tumor antigen-specific phenotypic memory stem T cells. These data suggest that T-bet and Eomes are important for differentiation and maintenance of central and effector memory cells, but non-essential or suppressive for generation and persistence of stem cell like memory CD8 T cells (Figure 7).

Download:

Figure 7. T-bet and Eomes determine memory T cell subsets.

Upon activation, naïve T cells are destined to different cellular fates. Current data show that T-bet and Eomes are crucial for the generation of various effector, memory and exhausted T cell subsets. Higher levels of T-bet drive terminally differentiated effector T cells which eventually either become exhausted by further up-regulating Eomes or undergo apoptosis. T cell expressing lower levels of T-bet become memory T cells which also express Eomes. Activated naïve T cells can also take a fate of becoming T_SCM, which maintain their “naivety” and developmental potential. Our data suggest that T-bet and Eomes regulate the balance between T_EM, T_CM, and T_SCM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067401.g007

One interesting outcome of this study is that the DKO memory cells bore characteristics consistent with the phenotype of T_SCM. [21], [22] The predominant feature of T_SCM is CD44^low CD62L^hi Sca-1⁺. We found majority of DKO memory T cells were indeed CD44^low CD62L^hi Sca-1⁺. We have also found that before adoptive transfer, all the cells have proliferated and therefore were post-mitotic, fitting another important feature of T_SCM. [21] In addition, recall response assays showed that DKO memory T cells proliferated similarly upon recall stimulation even with very low antigen. So the recall clonal expansion was normal for DKO memory T cells. Collectively, these data showed that the majority of DKO memory T cells were likely T_SCM.

Recent studies have firmly established that T_SCM have potent antitumor activities upon infusion into host mice [22]. In contrast, DKO T cells, which were phenotypically similar to T_SCM, were severely compromised in their antitumor function. However these results are not conflicting. We believe the antitumor effect of memory stem cells is dependent on further differentiation of memory stem cells into effector cells in vivo and such differentiation program is dependent on T-bet and Eomes. Although memory stem cells share many properties with central memory T cells, they are thought to be distinctive in terms of developmental stage. Central memory T cells are more differentiated because they express T cell lineage transcription factors such as T-bet and Eomes. In contrast, T_SCM are pluripotent and can further differentiate into effector and memory cells. Therefore, the T cell activation program not only results in the generation of effector and central memory T cells with a determined function, but also result in clonal expansion of pluripotent memory stem T cells. Asymmetric cell division is a mechanism that allows both self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells, resulting the production of one stem cell and one differentiating cell. A recent study showing asymmetric segregation of T-bet into two daughter cells after T cell division supports a role of T-bet in dichotomy between differentiated and stem T cells [31]. The benefit of memory stem cells is likely to select and expand T cells with specific activities while preserving their differentiation potential to become effector cells and central memory T cells by taking further inflammatory cues. Our data suggest that T-bet and Eomes regulate the balance between the “stemness” and differentiation of memory T cells (Figure 7).

Supporting Information

File S1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067401.s001

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Lisa Borghesi, Penny Morel, Sarah Gaffen and Zhaoyang You for critical reading of this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XC XZ BL. Performed the experiments: GL QY YZ HW. Analyzed the data: QY BL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HW BL XZ XC. Wrote the paper: GL QY BL.

References

1. Pages F, Berger A, Camus M, Sanchez-Cabo F, Costes A, et al. (2005) Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 353: 2654–2666.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Chen LJ, Zheng X, Shen YP, Zhu YB, Li Q, et al.. (2012) Higher numbers of T-bet(+) intratumoral lymphoid cells correlate with better survival in gastric cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother.
3. Chen LJ, Sun J, Wu HY, Zhou SM, Tan Y, et al. (2011) B7-H4 expression associates with cancer progression and predicts patient's survival in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 60: 1047–1055.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Lu B, Chen L, Liu L, Zhu Y, Wu C, et al. (2011) T-cell-mediated tumor immune surveillance and expression of B7 co-inhibitory molecules in cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Immunol Res 50: 269–275.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Atreya I, Schimanski CC, Becker C, Wirtz S, Dornhoff H, et al. (2007) The T-box transcription factor eomesodermin controls CD8 T cell activity and lymph node metastasis in human colorectal cancer. Gut 56: 1572–1578.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Takemoto N, Intlekofer AM, Northrup JT, Wherry EJ, Reiner SL (2006) Cutting Edge: IL-12 inversely regulates T-bet and eomesodermin expression during pathogen-induced CD8+ T cell differentiation. J Immunol 177: 7515–7519.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Qui HZ, Hagymasi AT, Bandyopadhyay S, St Rose MC, Ramanarasimhaiah R, et al. (2011) CD134 plus CD137 dual costimulation induces Eomesodermin in CD4 T cells to program cytotoxic Th1 differentiation. J Immunol 187: 3555–3564.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Pearce EL, Mullen AC, Martins GA, Krawczyk CM, Hutchins AS, et al. (2003) Control of effector CD8+ T cell function by the transcription factor Eomesodermin. Science 302: 1041–1043.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Paley MA, Kroy DC, Odorizzi PM, Johnnidis JB, Dolfi DV, et al. (2012) Progenitor and terminal subsets of CD8+ T cells cooperate to contain chronic viral infection. Science 338: 1220–1225
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Intlekofer AM, Takemoto N, Wherry EJ, Longworth SA, Northrup JT, et al. (2005) Effector and memory CD8+ T cell fate coupled by T-bet and eomesodermin. Nat Immunol 6: 1236–1244.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Banerjee A, Gordon SM, Intlekofer AM, Paley MA, Mooney EC, et al. (2010) Cutting edge: The transcription factor eomesodermin enables CD8+ T cells to compete for the memory cell niche. J Immunol 185: 4988–4992.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Szabo SJ, Kim ST, Costa GL, Zhang X, Fathman CG, et al. (2000) A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell 100: 655–669.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Mullen AC, High FA, Hutchins AS, Lee HW, Villarino AV, et al. (2001) Role of T-bet in commitment of TH1 cells before IL-12-dependent selection. Science 292: 1907–1910.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Pipkin ME, Sacks JA, Cruz-Guilloty F, Lichtenheld MG, Bevan MJ, et al. (2010) Interleukin-2 and inflammation induce distinct transcriptional programs that promote the differentiation of effector cytolytic T cells. Immunity 32: 79–90.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Hinrichs CS, Spolski R, Paulos CM, Gattinoni L, Kerstann KW, et al. (2008) IL-2 and IL-21 confer opposing differentiation programs to CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Blood 111: 5326–5333.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Zhu Y, Ju S, Chen E, Dai S, Li C, et al. (2010) T-bet and eomesodermin are required for T cell-mediated antitumor immune responses. J Immunol 185: 3174–3183.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Lord GM, Rao RM, Choe H, Sullivan BM, Lichtman AH, et al. (2005) T-bet is required for optimal proinflammatory CD4+ T-cell trafficking. Blood 106: 3432–3439.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Joshi NS, Cui W, Chandele A, Lee HK, Urso DR, et al. (2007) Inflammation directs memory precursor and short-lived effector CD8(+) T cell fates via the graded expression of T-bet transcription factor. Immunity 27: 281–295.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Intlekofer AM, Takemoto N, Kao C, Banerjee A, Schambach F, et al. (2007) Requirement for T-bet in the aberrant differentiation of unhelped memory CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med 204: 2015–2021.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A (1999) Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 401: 708–712.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Zhang Y, Joe G, Hexner E, Zhu J, Emerson SG (2005) Host-reactive CD8+ memory stem cells in graft-versus-host disease. Nat Med 11: 1299–1305.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Gattinoni L, Zhong XS, Palmer DC, Ji Y, Hinrichs CS, et al. (2009) Wnt signaling arrests effector T cell differentiation and generates CD8+ memory stem cells. Nat Med 15: 808–813.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Kato K, Cui S, Kuick R, Mineishi S, Hexner E, et al. (2010) Identification of stem cell transcriptional programs normally expressed in embryonic and neural stem cells in alloreactive CD8+ T cells mediating graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16: 751–771.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Lizee G, Overwijk WW, Radvanyi L, Gao J, Sharma P, et al.. (2012) Harnessing the Power of the Immune System to Target Cancer. Annu Rev Med.
25. Restifo NP, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA (2012) Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response. Nat Rev Immunol 12: 269–281.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Overwijk WW, Theoret MR, Finkelstein SE, Surman DR, de Jong LA, et al. (2003) Tumor regression and autoimmunity after reversal of a functionally tolerant state of self-reactive CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med 198: 569–580.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Zhou X, Yu S, Zhao DM, Harty JT, Badovinac VP, et al. (2010) Differentiation and persistence of memory CD8(+) T cells depend on T cell factor 1. Immunity 33: 229–240.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Intlekofer AM, Banerjee A, Takemoto N, Gordon SM, Dejong CS, et al. (2008) Anomalous type 17 response to viral infection by CD8+ T cells lacking T-bet and eomesodermin. Science 321: 408–411.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Wiesel M, Oxenius A (2012) From crucial to negligible: functional CD8(+) T-cell responses and their dependence on CD4(+) T-cell help. Eur J Immunol 42: 1080–1088.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Gattinoni L, Lugli E, Ji Y, Pos Z, Paulos CM, et al. (2011) A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nat Med 17: 1290–1297.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Chang JT, Ciocca ML, Kinjyo I, Palanivel VR, McClurkin CE, et al. (2011) Asymmetric proteasome segregation as a mechanism for unequal partitioning of the transcription factor T-bet during T lymphocyte division. Immunity 34: 492–504.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Pages F, Berger A, Camus M, Sanchez-Cabo F, Costes A, et al. (2005) Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 353: 2654–2666.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Chen LJ, Zheng X, Shen YP, Zhu YB, Li Q, et al.. (2012) Higher numbers of T-bet(+) intratumoral lymphoid cells correlate with better survival in gastric cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother.

[ref3] 3. Chen LJ, Sun J, Wu HY, Zhou SM, Tan Y, et al. (2011) B7-H4 expression associates with cancer progression and predicts patient's survival in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 60: 1047–1055.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Lu B, Chen L, Liu L, Zhu Y, Wu C, et al. (2011) T-cell-mediated tumor immune surveillance and expression of B7 co-inhibitory molecules in cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Immunol Res 50: 269–275.
View Article
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Atreya I, Schimanski CC, Becker C, Wirtz S, Dornhoff H, et al. (2007) The T-box transcription factor eomesodermin controls CD8 T cell activity and lymph node metastasis in human colorectal cancer. Gut 56: 1572–1578.
View Article
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Takemoto N, Intlekofer AM, Northrup JT, Wherry EJ, Reiner SL (2006) Cutting Edge: IL-12 inversely regulates T-bet and eomesodermin expression during pathogen-induced CD8+ T cell differentiation. J Immunol 177: 7515–7519.
View Article
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Qui HZ, Hagymasi AT, Bandyopadhyay S, St Rose MC, Ramanarasimhaiah R, et al. (2011) CD134 plus CD137 dual costimulation induces Eomesodermin in CD4 T cells to program cytotoxic Th1 differentiation. J Immunol 187: 3555–3564.
View Article
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Pearce EL, Mullen AC, Martins GA, Krawczyk CM, Hutchins AS, et al. (2003) Control of effector CD8+ T cell function by the transcription factor Eomesodermin. Science 302: 1041–1043.
View Article
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Paley MA, Kroy DC, Odorizzi PM, Johnnidis JB, Dolfi DV, et al. (2012) Progenitor and terminal subsets of CD8+ T cells cooperate to contain chronic viral infection. Science 338: 1220–1225
View Article
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Intlekofer AM, Takemoto N, Wherry EJ, Longworth SA, Northrup JT, et al. (2005) Effector and memory CD8+ T cell fate coupled by T-bet and eomesodermin. Nat Immunol 6: 1236–1244.
View Article
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Banerjee A, Gordon SM, Intlekofer AM, Paley MA, Mooney EC, et al. (2010) Cutting edge: The transcription factor eomesodermin enables CD8+ T cells to compete for the memory cell niche. J Immunol 185: 4988–4992.
View Article
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Szabo SJ, Kim ST, Costa GL, Zhang X, Fathman CG, et al. (2000) A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell 100: 655–669.
View Article
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Mullen AC, High FA, Hutchins AS, Lee HW, Villarino AV, et al. (2001) Role of T-bet in commitment of TH1 cells before IL-12-dependent selection. Science 292: 1907–1910.
View Article
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Pipkin ME, Sacks JA, Cruz-Guilloty F, Lichtenheld MG, Bevan MJ, et al. (2010) Interleukin-2 and inflammation induce distinct transcriptional programs that promote the differentiation of effector cytolytic T cells. Immunity 32: 79–90.
View Article
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Hinrichs CS, Spolski R, Paulos CM, Gattinoni L, Kerstann KW, et al. (2008) IL-2 and IL-21 confer opposing differentiation programs to CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Blood 111: 5326–5333.
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Zhu Y, Ju S, Chen E, Dai S, Li C, et al. (2010) T-bet and eomesodermin are required for T cell-mediated antitumor immune responses. J Immunol 185: 3174–3183.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Lord GM, Rao RM, Choe H, Sullivan BM, Lichtman AH, et al. (2005) T-bet is required for optimal proinflammatory CD4+ T-cell trafficking. Blood 106: 3432–3439.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Joshi NS, Cui W, Chandele A, Lee HK, Urso DR, et al. (2007) Inflammation directs memory precursor and short-lived effector CD8(+) T cell fates via the graded expression of T-bet transcription factor. Immunity 27: 281–295.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Intlekofer AM, Takemoto N, Kao C, Banerjee A, Schambach F, et al. (2007) Requirement for T-bet in the aberrant differentiation of unhelped memory CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med 204: 2015–2021.
View Article
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A (1999) Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 401: 708–712.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Zhang Y, Joe G, Hexner E, Zhu J, Emerson SG (2005) Host-reactive CD8+ memory stem cells in graft-versus-host disease. Nat Med 11: 1299–1305.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Gattinoni L, Zhong XS, Palmer DC, Ji Y, Hinrichs CS, et al. (2009) Wnt signaling arrests effector T cell differentiation and generates CD8+ memory stem cells. Nat Med 15: 808–813.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Kato K, Cui S, Kuick R, Mineishi S, Hexner E, et al. (2010) Identification of stem cell transcriptional programs normally expressed in embryonic and neural stem cells in alloreactive CD8+ T cells mediating graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16: 751–771.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Lizee G, Overwijk WW, Radvanyi L, Gao J, Sharma P, et al.. (2012) Harnessing the Power of the Immune System to Target Cancer. Annu Rev Med.

[ref25] 25. Restifo NP, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA (2012) Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response. Nat Rev Immunol 12: 269–281.
View Article
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Overwijk WW, Theoret MR, Finkelstein SE, Surman DR, de Jong LA, et al. (2003) Tumor regression and autoimmunity after reversal of a functionally tolerant state of self-reactive CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med 198: 569–580.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Zhou X, Yu S, Zhao DM, Harty JT, Badovinac VP, et al. (2010) Differentiation and persistence of memory CD8(+) T cells depend on T cell factor 1. Immunity 33: 229–240.
View Article
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Intlekofer AM, Banerjee A, Takemoto N, Gordon SM, Dejong CS, et al. (2008) Anomalous type 17 response to viral infection by CD8+ T cells lacking T-bet and eomesodermin. Science 321: 408–411.
View Article
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Wiesel M, Oxenius A (2012) From crucial to negligible: functional CD8(+) T-cell responses and their dependence on CD4(+) T-cell help. Eur J Immunol 42: 1080–1088.
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Gattinoni L, Lugli E, Ji Y, Pos Z, Paulos CM, et al. (2011) A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nat Med 17: 1290–1297.
View Article
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Chang JT, Ciocca ML, Kinjyo I, Palanivel VR, McClurkin CE, et al. (2011) Asymmetric proteasome segregation as a mechanism for unequal partitioning of the transcription factor T-bet during T lymphocyte division. Immunity 34: 492–504.
View Article
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Mice

Adoptive T cell Therapy

T Cell Culture

Flow Cytometric Analysis

Harvest of Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes

Results

T-bet and Eomes are Required for Adoptive Tumor Immunotherapy in Mice

T-bet and Eomes Control the Number, Trafficking and Effector Function of Adoptively Transferred T cells

T-bet and Eomes are Required for Maintaining Memory T cells in the Blood and Secondary Lymphoid Organs

T-bet and Eomes were Required for Effector/central Memory T cells but Dispensable for Phenotypic Memory Stem T cells

T-bet and Eomes were Required for the Antitumor Recall Responses Mediated by Adoptively Transferred T cells

Discussion

Supporting Information

File S1.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References