Figures
Abstract
Neuromedin U, encoded by the NMU gene, is a hypothalamic neuropeptide that regulates both energy metabolism and bone mass. The beta-2 adrenergic receptor, encoded by the ADRB2 gene, mediates several effects of catecholamine hormones and neurotransmitters in bone. We investigated whether NMU single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes, as well as functional ADRB2 SNPs, are associated with bone stiffness in children from the IDEFICS cohort, also evaluating whether NMU and ADRB2 interact to affect this trait. A sample of 2,274 subjects (52.5% boys, age 6.2±1.8 years) from eight European countries, having data on calcaneus bone stiffness index (SI, mean of both feet) and genotyping (NMU gene: rs6827359, rs12500837, rs9999653; ADRB2 gene: rs1042713, rs1042714), was studied. After false discovery rate adjustment, SI was significantly associated with all NMU SNPs. rs6827359 CC homozygotes showed the strongest association (recessive model, Δ = −1.8, p = 0.006). Among the five retrieved haplotypes with frequencies higher than 1% (range 2.0–43.9%), the CCT haplotype (frequency = 39.7%) was associated with lower SI values (dominant model, Δ = −1.0, p = 0.04) as compared to the most prevalent haplotype. A non-significant decrease in SI was observed in in ADRB2 rs1042713 GG homozygotes, while subjects carrying SI-lowering genotypes at both SNPs (frequency = 8.4%) showed much lower SI than non-carriers (Δ = −3.9, p<0.0001; p for interaction = 0.025). The association was more evident in preschool girls, in whom SI showed a curvilinear trend across ages. In subgroup analyses, rs9999653 CC NMU or both GG ADRB2 genotypes were associated with either lower serum calcium or β-CrossLaps levels (p = 0.01). This study in European children shows, for the first time in humans, a role for NMU gene through interaction with ADRB2 gene in bone strength regulation, more evident in preschool girls.
Citation: Gianfagna F, Cugino D, Ahrens W, Bailey MES, Bammann K, Herrmann D, et al. (2013) Understanding the Links among neuromedin U Gene, beta2-adrenoceptor Gene and Bone Health: An Observational Study in European Children. PLoS ONE 8(8): e70632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070632
Editor: Hubert Vaudry, University of Rouen, France
Received: April 9, 2013; Accepted: June 20, 2013; Published: August 1, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Gianfagna et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study is supported by the European Community within the Sixth RTD Framework Programme Contract no. 016181 (FOOD) and by the grant from EU for the IDEFICS study (http://www.idefics.eu). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Bone development is a key processes characterizing growth during childhood and adolescence [1]. Understanding this process is of crucial importance for planning strategies to prevent or treat pediatric bone disorders, as well as osteoporosis later in life [2]. While it is well known that bone homeostasis is determined by the cross-talk between osteoblasts and osteoclasts, the complexity of the regulatory influences on these cells is continuously expanding [3].
Neuromedin U (NMU) is a hypothalamic neuropeptide that regulates various metabolic functions including energy homeostasis and glycemic control [4]. Recently, Sato et al. [5] showed that NMU double-null mice have increased bone mass, demonstrating also an interactive effect between single allele deletions of NMU and beta-2-adrenergic receptor (ADRB2). Thus, NMU is involved also in bone formation, acting as a central mediator of the effect of leptin, lead by sympathetic nervous system (SNS), on osteoblast ADRB2, which regulates cell proliferation [6], [7]. No candidate gene studies have been published on humans focusing on NMU and bone health. Moreover, the polymorphisms most significantly associated with bone health reported by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are located in DNA regions being far from NMU [8]. However, GWAS mainly focus on SNPs with large effect and did not investigate all polymorphisms in all genetic models, as well as did not consider interactions among SNPs [9].
To provide more in depth knowledge on bone health in young children, this study investigated a large sample of European children of the IDEFICS study [10]. The project aimed at identifying and preventing dietary- and lifestyle-related disorders in children and infants, mainly focusing on overweight and obesity as well as on bone health disorders, also in conjunction with overweight [11], as it shares part of its risk factor profile. In the present study we investigated the association between bone stiffness and two candidate genes, NMU and ADRB2, focusing on gene-gene interactions. Moreover, we investigated whether, in subjects carrying risk alleles, a bone loss is more evident at specific ages during childhood and whether the loss interests bone mass or microarchitecture.
Methods
Ethics Statement
The study was conducted according to the standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. All applicable institutional and governmental regulations pertaining to the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during this research. Approval by the appropriate ethical committees was obtained by each of the eight centers engaged in the fieldwork (Belgium: Ethics Committee, University Hospital, Gent; Cyprus: Cyprus National Bioethics Committee; Estonia: Tallinn Medical Research Ethics Committee; Germany: Ethics Committee, University of Bremen; Hungary: Egészségügyi Tudományos Tanács, Pécs; Italy: Comitato Etico, ASL Avellino; Spain: Comité Ético de Investigación, Clínica de Aragón - CEICA; Sweden: Regional Ethics Review Board, University of Gothenburg). Both the children and their parents gave their oral (children) and written (parents) informed consent for examinations, collection of samples, subsequent analysis and storage of personal data and collected samples.
Study Population
IDEFICS is a large European multi-center study on childhood obesity [10], [12]. A cohort of 16,224 children aged 2–9 years has been recruited in a population-based survey between September 2007 and May 2008 (T0), in eight European countries (Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain and Sweden) using standardized procedures. A community-oriented intervention program for primary prevention of obesity was implemented [13]. Children were allocated to either control or intervention group and were followed up for two years (T1, 2009–2010).
DNA was extracted from a subgroup of 4,678 samples randomly selected from the total study population, stratified by country [14], [15]. All children with complete data on age, sex, parental questionnaire, height, weight, hip and waist circumferences, birthplace and language spoken at home as well as with provided saliva samples were included in the present analysis. Although no formal enquiry about ethnicity was made, two questions in the parental questionnaire provided information about ethnicity. “Place of birth of both parents” and “language habitually spoken at home” were used to select only children of European descent. DNA was successfully extracted in all cases, however, after the exclusion of samples with improbable DNA yields or not correctly genotyped, 4,641 children had at least one SNP successfully genotyped in the NMU (n = 4529) or ADRB2 (n = 4566) gene. During the IDEFICS baseline survey, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound sonometry (QUS) measurements were performed in 7,447 children. The present analysis refers to the 2,267 children with genotypes and QUS data available at T0. QUS measurements were performed also two years later, during the follow-up, in 1,792 genotyped children.
Calcaneal Bone Stiffness
Calcaneal QUS measurements were performed using Lunar Achilles Insight (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) [16]. In previous studies conducted on children, coefficient of variation was 1.9–3.5% [17]–[19]. Good values of short- and long-term interunit precision were reported in a prospective multicenter study [20], [21]. Calibration of the QUS devices has been performed daily during the entire study period. Measurements were made according to the standard procedure provided by the manufacturer. The real time image of the calcaneus and the ROI parameter ensures that the measurement is accurate and alerts the examiner to perform the measure again when a child moved too much. An adapter was used for children’s feet in order to get the proper position of the calcaneus.
The device estimates calcaneal bone stiffness index (SI), calculated from broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS): SI = (0.67×BUA)+(0.28×SOS) - 420. Precision ranged from 1.0 to 3.8% (CV) for BUA and from 0.19 to 0.30% (CV) for SOS [22]. The intermediate values BUA and SOS to calculate SI were retained and registered in the database only in few centers and are available only for 878 children (T1). Both feet were measured once (100% of measures) and the mean SI of both feet was calculated and used in the statistical analyses, as well as for BUA and SOS when available.
Anthropometric Measures
The measurement of weight was carried out using an electronic scale (Tanita BC 420 SMA, Tanita Europe GmbH, Sindelfingen, Germany) to the nearest 0.1 kg with children wearing indoor clothes, without shoes. Height was measured using a telescopic height-measuring instrument (Seca 225 stadiometer, Birmingham, UK) to the nearest 0.1 cm. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (in kg) divided by height squared (in m).
Genotyping
Tagging SNPs of NMU gene were selected from the release 2.0 Phase II data of the HapMap Project (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) using the Tagger program of Haploview software (v4.1) [23]. Selection criteria included r2≤0.8 and a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥0.05 in Caucasians. NMU gene spans 56,156,162-56,197,222 bp (NCBI.36) on chromosome region 4q12. We selected a region that includes the third block (56,187,256-56,193,006) containing eight SNPs. Of these, three tag SNPs (rs6827359, rs12500837, rs9999653) located in intronic regions were genotyped. Two missense coding SNPs in ADRB2 gene, rs1042713 (Arg16Gly) and rs1042714 (Gln27Glu), were selected according to previous literature on obesity risk [24], [25].
Saliva samples collected (Oragene DNA Self-Collection Kit, OG-300/OG-250; DNA Genotek Inc., Kanata, Ontario, Canada) from participating children were shipped to the central laboratory at the University of Glasgow for DNA extraction [14].
Variants of NMU gene were genotyped at Fondazione “Giovanni Paolo II” by a multiplexed end-point assay that detects variants of a single nucleic acid sequence. The allelic discrimination was performed by 7500 Fast Real-Time System (Applied Biosystems) using 96-well reaction plate with standard reagents and standard protocols. Result analysis was made by SDS v1.4 software (Applied Biosystems). Variants of ADRB2 gene were genotyped at the University of Glasgow using Taqman assays (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK). Genotype calls were made by the analysis software (StepOne v2.1; Applied Biosystems). The genotyping success rate of the five variants examined was on average 97.6%. A random 5% repeated selection of samples for each SNP was genotyped again with 100% concordance.
Blood Measures
Children participating in the IDEFICS survey were asked to participate, on voluntary basis, in blood drawing. Serum/plasma samples were stored at −80°C [26]. Serum calcium was determined by a standard photometric test (o-Cresolphtalein) with a Roche Cobas Integra 800 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Serum cross-linked collagen N-telopeptides (β-CrossLaps) and vitamin D (25(OH)D) were measured with an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay using a Roche Modular E170 analyzer (Roche). Serum leptin was determined by radioimmunoassay (Mediagnost GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany) [27].
Statistical Analysis
The distribution of each polymorphism was assessed for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium with chi-square test. General linear model analysis was applied to test the associations between SI and gene variants with SAS software (v9.2 for Windows, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 2002–2008) adjusting for age, sex, country and, only for T1 measurements, intervention (control vs intervention region). For each SNP, codominant, dominant and recessive models were tested. To select the best genetic model, we choose the genotype showing the most significant results after correction for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate (FDR) assessment. The resulting nine p values were imported in SAS and tested using PROC MULTTEST (INPVALUES option), which converts them in FDR adjusted values, to allow the use of standard significance cut off (p<0.05). The Haplo.stats package (v1.4.4; http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/haplo.stats/index.html) was used to estimate the NMU haplotype frequencies (haplo.em function) and to verify the associations between haplotype and phenotype (haplo.glm function). The most prevalent haplotype was chosen as reference. Only the haplotypes with frequencies greater than 1% were taken into consideration for association analyses. Age, sex, country (T0) and intervention (T1 analysis) were considered as covariates. Codominant model was tested as main model, then dominant and recessive models were also tested. To investigate if an association between genotypes and SI is driven by bone mineral density rather than by trabecular structure, supplementary analyses on BUA and SOS parameters were performed in the subgroup of children with available data on these parameters.
To verify the gene-gene interaction, an interaction analysis was performed, testing the model with the two SNPs and their interaction term in the general linear model analysis. Differences in SI values were then verified between carriers and non-carriers of the most associated genotypes of both NMU and ADRB2 genes.
To investigate the effect of age, sex and bone related biomarkers, further analyses were performed. The association between genotypes and SI were verified at different ages (preschool and primary school children, less than or higher than/equal to 6 years) [11] in both genders. Sex-specific SI trend during the growth was analyzed for each genotype. A locally weighted regression (LOESS) was used to test the assumption of a linear vs. nonlinear relationship between SI and age. SI of each child at T0 were plotted in a graph (PROC SGPLOT with LOESS statement in SAS) using a scatterplot smoothing method which automatically determines the optimal smoothing parameter [28], [29]. Adjustment for BMI or weight was performed using SI residuals obtained after regression with BMI or weight as covariates.
To give more insights in biological mechanisms, gene-environmental interactions were tested using some bone related variables as calcium (n = 605), 25-hydroxy vitamin D (n = 590), leptin (n = 252) and beta-crosslaps (n = 592) levels in serum.
Results
Population Characteristics
Characteristics of the study population (N = 2,267, boys 52.4%) are listed in table 1. All genotype groups were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and minor allele frequencies (MAF) resulted similar to values reported in HapMap database for Caucasians (Table 2). Five haplotypes were inferred with frequencies higher than 1% (range 2.2%–43.3%; Table 3).
Associations between NMU and SI
Using FDR correction, four models resulted significantly associated with SI among nine tested (p = 0.05; Table 4) at T0. SI values were 1.5–2.5 points lower in homozygotes for the variant allele C of both rs6827359 (raw p = 0.006) and rs12500837 (raw p = 0.023), as well as in homozygotes for major allele C of rs9999653 (both dominant and codominant model, raw p = 0.014 and 0.020, respectively), compared to carriers of the opposite allele. The use of further covariates such as BMI or weight, plausibly related to both genotypes and SI, did not change the results. The phenotype variance explained by rs6827359 CC was 0.30%, while age plus sex explained 0.12% of variance.
The most prevalent haplotype was TTC (Table 3), then it was used as referent haplotype. Subjects carrying the CCT haplotype (containing the unfavorable allele C of both rs6827359 and rs12500837) had lower SI than those carrying the most prevalent one. This result obtained using standard additive model analysis was statistically significant (p = 0.04, decreased value of 1 point for each haplotype copy). Dominant and recessive models were also tested, without significant results. Homozygotes for the haplotype containing only one unfavorable allele in rs6827359 (CTT/CTT) also showed lower SI values (−2.2, p = 0.055, homozygosis prevalence 6.2%; Table 4).
Data on QUS measurements at T1 did not reach the statistical power needed to confirm the data, although SI values were concordantly decreased in all three unfavorable genotypes (data not shown).
NMU-ADRB2 Interaction
Significant association between ADRB2 genotypes and SI were not found. However, gene-gene interaction analysis considering both genotypes and their mathematical product revealed a statistically significant effect also for their interaction term (p = 0.025; table 4). Carriers of both the unfavorable genotypes (rs6827359 CC of NMU and rs1042713 GG of ADRB2, n = 186) were then compared with non-carriers, showing a larger difference in SI than single rs6827359 (−3.9, n = 1928, p<0.0001). The presence of both variants explained 0.64% of the phenotype variance. No significant effect was observed for SI values at T1.
Sex-specific SI Trends during Growth
The interaction effect of categorical age (<6 or ≥6 years) and sex on SI was nominally significant (p = 0.05). Therefore, the SI differences between double opposite homozygotes in rs6827359 and rs1042713 polymorphisms were also tested in subgroups of children stratified for age and/or sex. The differences remained significant in both age classes and in both sexes. However, a further stratified analysis combining sex per age subgroups showed a large effect for younger girls (−7.4 points for double risk homozygotes, p = 0.005, p for interaction = 0.11), which was statistically significant yet after FDR adjustment (p = 0.021, using p values from the 4 subgroups of age class per sex), despite the decreased sample size (Table 5). The use of BMI or weight as covariates did not change the results.
SI trends during age among carriers and non-carriers of double homozygosis conditions in the subgroups of girls and boys is depicted in Figure 1. Despite the similar sample size, trends in subgroups of boys (panel A) appear to be parallel, while girls (panel B) carrying both risk genotypes showed a curvilinear trend, mainly at preschool age. The trend did not become linear after adjustment for BMI or weight.
SI values and their 95% confidence intervals at different ages for homozygotes of both NMU rs6827359 and ADRB2 rs1042713 risk alleles (CC+GG, dark grey) and homozygotes for non-risk alleles (TT+AA, light gray) in subgroups of boys (panel A, n = 620, carriers of CC+GG = 101) and girls (panel B, n = 572, carriers of CC+GG = 85). Graph was obtained using SAS software (PROC SGPLOT with LOESS statement, see text). Local regression method implies that statistical power decreases at extreme x values (larger confidence intervals).
Bone Related Parameters
BUA and SOS were available in a limited subgroup of subjects collected at T1 (n = 865). As SI, SOS values were decreased in carriers of all three unfavorable NMU genotypes, although non-significantly. Moreover, a synergistic effect of NMU and ADRB2 genotypes was observed (p for interaction = 0.01), with carriers of double unfavorable variants having a large decrease in SOS values (−10.7, p = 0.021) in comparison with non-carriers. The difference resulted larger in children younger than 6 years (−26.3, p = 0.008; p for interaction = 0.017, n = 202). No significant effect was observed for BUA values.
In a subsample ranging from 252 to 605 subjects where biomarkers were measured, homozygosity for the C allele of NMU rs9999653 was inversely associated with serum calcium levels, while GG genotypes of both ADRB2 polymorphisms were associated with lower levels of β-Crosslaps (p = 0.01 for all). However, none of these parameters was associated with SI in this subsample (data not shown).
Discussion
This is the first population study investigating the association between NMU gene and bone health and its interaction with a gene in the linked sympathetic nervous pathway involved in bone health regulation. Genetic variants of NMU gene are associated with SI in European children of IDEFICS population, with allele C of SNP rs6827359 showing the most significant decrease in SI. Haplotype analysis confirmed the involvement of NMU gene and, in particular, of SNP rs6827359, in bone health. Furthermore, there was a significant interaction between NMU and ADRB2 gene, with double risk homozygous children showing a decrease of 3.9 point in SI with respect to double opposite homozygotes. The effect appeared to be more evident in younger girls, in whom a curvilinear SI trend during growth was observed. Subgroup analyses showed that the effect on SI was mainly driven by the effect on its component SOS and that the genotype-SI association was not mediated by bone related biomarkers.
NMU is a hypothalamic neuropeptide, involved in the regulation of various metabolic functions [4]. Recently, NMU was suggested to be involved also in bone health determination [5]. One of the main systems regulating bone formation involves leptin that inhibits bone formation by binding to its receptors located in hypothalamus and thereby activating the SNS. This process requires the expression of ADRB2 in osteoblasts, which mediates several effects of catecholamine hormones and neurotransmitters in bone [30]. The inhibition of bone formation through a hypothalamic relay suggested that molecules affecting energy metabolism in the hypothalamus, such as NMU, could also modulate bone mass. Using transgenic mice, Sato et al. showed that NMU acts as a modulator of leptin-SNS-ADRB2 regulation of bone formation, through a central relay and via an unidentified pathway. NMU-deficient mice had high bone mass due to an increase in bone formation that was reversed by a natural agonist for the NMU receptor. Furthermore, transgenic mice null for one allele of both NMU and ADRB2 genes showed a more pronounced increase in bone mass, suggesting an interaction between NMU and ADRB2 [5]–[7]. We here demonstrated this phenomenon in children, showing that different SI values are associated with different NMU genotypes and with double homozygotes of both NMU and ADRB2 risk genotypes. Thus, observations from in vitro data and transgenic mouse models were confirmed in humans, that NMU is involved in bone health and interacts with ADRB2 signal.
QUS is a radiation free, portable, cost-effective tool, measuring properties of bone that contribute to mechanical bone strength by sending sound waves; the more complex the bone structure, the more sound waves will be absorbed [31]. Measuring SI with QUS has value in assessing associations in children. In fact, over the last decades, many studies used QUS to study bone strength in healthy children at the calcaneus [17]–[19], [32], [33] even in preschool children [12], [34] and it was suggested to predict the risk of osteopenia or fragility fracture [33], [35]. Calcaneus is the most popular site for QUS measurement since it consists for 90% of trabecular bone and has a high turnover rate and therefore will show bone metabolic changes first [1]. Moreover, using transaxial transmission, the QUS parameters are related to bone density and structure and not to cortical thickness, which is an advantage when examining children and adolescents, since cortical thickness varies a lot during growth [36]. Finally, the safe and portable nature of the method will allow designing feasible screening programs from school to school, then calcaneus SI could became a useful marker for public health interventions.
The SI is derived from the measured values BUA, which largely reflects bone mineral density, and SOS, which reflects elasticity and density due to trabecular connectivity [37]. Unfortunately, BUA and SOS were available only at T1 and only for a subgroup of children. Although the limited sample size, SOS showed a strong association with double homozygosity of risk alleles. This result suggests that NMU and ADRB2 are involved more in microarchitecture formation than in mineral content accrual, confirming the data from Sato et al. [5], showing a prevalent role for NMU in osteoblast proliferation rather than in their function. In fact, in NMU-null mice they observed higher osteoblast numbers in the presence of a normal mineral apposition rate.
Despite the decreased sample size of subgroup analyses of age and sex, in girls less than 6 years significant associations were found between genotypes and SI, concordantly with the overall sample. Analyzing trends across ages, in girls a curvilinear trend was observed for carriers of both risk genotypes, while in boys SI trends appeared to be linear and parallel. Since sample sizes of boys and girls are similar, the reason of non-linearity should be mainly attributed to the major dispersion of SI values observed in pre-school girls, which suggest the involvement of other factors at this age. Anyway, the stronger association observed in younger girls could be determined by the NMU-SNS pathway and this suggests to deeply investigating the sex-specific factors potentially involved at earlier ages. These observations could be of relevance, since bone peak at early ages has been associated with future osteoporosis [2], [38]. A link between the hypothalamic neuropeptide NMU and gonadotropin secretion is known [39], which however takes places at later ages. Gender differences were also reported in NMU-deficient mice [5], where the increase in bone formation was however more prominent in male than in female mice.
Finally, we investigated possible mechanisms underlying the association between NMU/ADRB2 gene and bone stiffness, by measuring biological markers related to bone metabolism in serum samples of a children subgroup. Some associations were found with calcium or β-CrossLaps levels, bone turnover markers, however they were present for SNPs less associated with SI. Furthermore, an association between SI and these biomarkers was not found, due to limited statistical power in the subgroup of genotyped subjects with biomarkers measured.
The study has some limitations.
Indeed, being the first study in humans suggesting an effect on NMU on bone health, it needs confirmation. The GWAS performed on bone health measured with different techniques did not reveal any effect for SNPs near NMU region. However, GWAS are focused on a relatively limited selection of polymorphisms which cannot be in linkage with all other known polymorphism and report only highly significant associations, as well as do not study neither all genetic model nor the interactive effects among genotypes [9]. Furthermore, heritability of QUS traits ranged from 0.42 to 0.57 [40], allowing further researches on polymorphisms with minor effects or on plausible gene-gene interactions.
The main strength of our study is a strong biological plausibility, since our results reproduce those observed in mice [5]. Moreover, it is performed on a large sample recruited in eight countries and it is focused on children, in which environmental exposure time is short and genetics should have more impact than expected.
In conclusion, our study in European children suggests an involvement of NMU-SNS pathway in bone stiffness, mainly in bone microarchitecture, more evident in preschool girls. The identification of genetic markers in the NMU pathway could be helpful in planning therapies for bone-loss disorders or metabolic diseases using novel NMU receptors inhibitors or NMU analogs [41], as well as in finding novel specific targets for preventive or therapeutic interventions.
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted as part of the IDEFICS study (http://www.idefics.eu). We are grateful for the support provided by school boards, headmasters and communities. We thank the IDEFICS children and their parents for participating in this extensive examination.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: WA LI. Performed the experiments: DC MESB ACK. Analyzed the data: FG KB. Wrote the paper: FG LI. Acquisition of data: DH YK SM DM LAM YPP PR AS SS IS TV. Revising and approving final version of manuscript: FG DC WA MESB KB DH ACK YK SM DM LAM YPP PR AS SS IS TV LI.
References
- 1. Schoenau E, Saggese G, Peter F, Baroncelli GI, Shaw NJ, et al. (2004) From bone biology to bone analysis. Horm Res 61: 257–269.
- 2. Rizzoli R, Bianchi ML, Garabédian M, McKay HA, Moreno LA (2010) Maximizing bone mineral mass gain during growth for the prevention of fractures in the adolescents and the elderly. Bone 46: 294–305.
- 3. Teti A (2011) Bone development: overview of bone cells and signaling. Curr Osteoporos Rep 9: 264–273.
- 4. Peier AM, Desai K, Hubert J, Du X, Yang L, et al. (2011) Effects of peripherally administered neuromedin U on energy and glucose homeostasis. Endocrinology 152: 2644–2654.
- 5. Sato S, Hanada R, Kimura A, Abe T, Matsumoto T, et al. (2007) Central control of bone remodeling by neuromedin U. Nat Med. 13: 1234–1240.
- 6. Rosen CJ (2008) Bone remodeling, energy metabolism, and the molecular clock. Cell Metab 7: 7–10.
- 7. Driessler F, Baldock PA (2010) Hypothalamic regulation of bone. J Mol Endocrinol 45: 175–181.
- 8. Richards JB, Zheng HF, Spector TD (2012) Genetics of osteoporosis from genome-wide association studies: advances and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 13: 576–588.
- 9. Gianfagna F, Cugino D, Santimone I, Iacoviello L (2012) From candidate gene to genome-wide association studies in cardiovascular disease. Thromb Res 129: 320–324.
- 10. Ahrens W, Bammann K, de Henauw S, Halford J, Palou A, et al. (2006) Understanding and preventing childhood obesity and related disorders–IDEFICS: a European multilevel epidemiological approach. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 16: 302–308.
- 11. Sioen I, Mouratidou T, Herrmann D, De Henauw S, Kaufman JM, et al. (2012) Relationship between markers of body fat and calcaneal bone stiffness differs between preschool and primary school children: results from the IDEFICS baseline survey. Calcif Tissue Int 91: 276–285.
- 12. Ahrens W, Bammann K, Siani A, Buchecker K, De Henauw S, et al. (2011) The IDEFICS cohort: design, characteristics and participation in the baseline survey. Int J Obes (Lond) 35: S3–S15.
- 13. De Henauw S, Verbestel V, Mårild S, Barba G, Bammann K, et al. (2011) The IDEFICS community-oriented intervention programme: a new model for childhood obesity prevention in Europe? Int J Obes. (Lond) 35 Suppl 1S16–S23.
- 14. Koni AC, Scott RA, Wang G, Bailey ME, Peplies J, et al. (2011) DNA yield and quality of saliva samples and suitability for large-scale epidemiological studies in children. Int J Obes (Lond) 35 Suppl 1S113–S118.
- 15.
Cugino D, Gianfagna F, Ahrens W, De Henauw S, Koni A, et al.. (2013) Polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinase gene and adiposity indices in European children: results of the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes (Lond), in press.
- 16. Wunsche K, Wunsche B, Fahnrich H, Mentzel HJ, Vogt S, et al. (2000) Ultrasound bone densitometry of the os calcis in children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int 67: 349–355.
- 17. Zebaze RM, Brooks E, High M, Duty E, Bronson W (2003) Reproducibility of heel ultrasound measurement in prepubescent children: lack of influence of ethnicity, sex, or body size. J Ultrasound Med 22: 1337–1340.
- 18. Sawyer A, Moore S, Fielding KT, Nix DA, Kiratli J, et al. (2001) Calcaneus ultrasound measurements in a convenience sample of healthy youth. J Clin Densitom 4: 111–120.
- 19. Jaworski M, Lebiedowski M, Lorenc RS, Trempe J (1995) Ultrasound bone-measurement in pediatric subjects. Calcif Tissue Int 56: 368–371.
- 20. Economos CD, Sacheck JM, Wacker W, Shea K, Naumova EN (2007) Precision of Lunar Achilles+ bone quality measurements: time dependency and multiple machine use in field studies. Br J Radiol 80(959): 919–925.
- 21. Hans D, Schott AM, Chapuy MC, Benamar M, Kotzki PD, et al. (1994) Ultrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study. Calcif Tissue Int 55: 94–99.
- 22. Prins SH, Jørgensen HL, Jørgensen LV, Hassager C (1998) The role of quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone: a review. Clin Physiol 18: 3–17.
- 23. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21: 263–265.
- 24. Jalba MS, Rhoads GG, Demissie K (2008) Association of codon 16 and codon 27 beta 2-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms with obesity: a meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16: 2096–2106.
- 25. Meirhaeghe A, Helbecque N, Cottel D, Amouyel P (2000) Impact of polymorphisms of the human beta2-adrenoceptor gene on obesity in a French population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24: 382–387.
- 26. Peplies J, Günther K, Bammann K, Fraterman A, Russo P, et al. (2011) Influence of sample collection and preanalytical sample processing on the analyses of biological markers in the European multicentre study IDEFICS. Int J Obes (Lond) 35 Suppl 1S104–S112.
- 27. Tubić B, Magnusson P, Swolin-Eide D, Mårild S; IDEFICS Consortium (2011) Relation between bone mineral density, biological markers and anthropometric measures in 4-year-old children: a pilot study within the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes (Lond) 35 Suppl 1S119–S124.
- 28.
Delwiche LD, Slaughter SJ (2008) Using PROC SGPLOT for quick high quality graphs. Proceedings of Western Users of SAS Software Conference, Universal City, California - US. Available: http://www.wuss.org/proceedings08/08WUSS%20Proceedings/papers/how/how05.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2013.
- 29. Cleveland W, SJ Devlin (1988) Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc 83: 596–610.
- 30. Takeda S, Elefteriou F, Levasseur R, Liu X, Zhao L, et al. (2002) Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system. Cell 111: 305–317.
- 31. Baroncelli GI (2008) Quantitative ultrasound methods to assess bone mineral status in children: technical characteristics, performance, and clinical application. Pediatr Res 63: 220–228.
- 32. Alwis G, Rosengren B, Nilsson JA, Stenevi-Lundgren S, Sundberg M, et al. (2010) Normative calcaneal quantitative ultrasound data as an estimation of skeletal development in Swedish children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int 87: 493–506.
- 33. Fielding KT, Nix DA, Bachrach LK (2003) Comparison of calcaneus ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in children at risk of osteopenia. J Clin Densitom 6: 7–15.
- 34. Nohara T, Ueda M, Ohta A, Sugimoto T (2009) Correlation of body growth and bone mineral density measured by ultrasound densitometry of the calcaneus in children and adolescents. Tohoku J Exp Med 219: 63–69.
- 35. Marín F, González-Macías J, Díez-Pérez A, Palma S, Delgado-Rodríguez M (2006) Relationship between bone quantitative ultrasound and fractures: a meta-analysis. J Bone Miner Res 21: 1126–1135.
- 36. Glüer CC, Wu CY, Jergas M, Goldstein SA, Genant HK (1994) Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 55: 46–52.
- 37. Portero NR, Arlot ME, Roux JP, Duboeuf F, Chavassieux PM, et al. (2005) Evaluation and development of automatic two-dimensional measurements of histomorphometric parameters reflecting trabecular bone connectivity: correlations with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound in human calcaneum. Calcif Tissue Int 77: 195–204.
- 38. Heaney RP, Abrams S, Dawson-Hughes B, Looker A, Marcus R, et al. (2000) Peak bone mass. Osteoporos Int 11: 985–1009.
- 39. Fukue Y, Sato T, Teranishi H, Hanada R, Takahashi T, et al. (2006) Regulation of gonadotropin secretion and puberty onset by neuromedin U. FEBS Lett. 580: 3485–3488.
- 40. Lee M, Choh AC, Williams KD, Schroeder V, Dyer TD, et al. (2012) Genome-wide linkage scan for quantitative trait loci underlying normal variation in heel bone ultrasound measures. J Nutr Health Aging 16: 8–13.
- 41. Ingallinella P, Peier AM, Pocai A, Marco AD, Desai K, et al. (2012) PEGylation of Neuromedin U yields a promising candidate for the treatment of obesity and diabetes. Bioorg Med Chem 20: 4751–4759.