Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Analysis of Triclosan-Selected Salmonella enterica Mutants of Eight Serovars Revealed Increased Aminoglycoside Susceptibility and Reduced Growth Rates

Abstract

The biocide triclosan (TRC) is used in a wide range of household, personal care, veterinary, industrial and medical products to control microbial growth. This extended use raises concerns about a possible association between the application of triclosan and the development of antibiotic resistance. In the present study we determined triclosan mutant prevention concentrations (MPC) for Salmonella enterica isolates of eight serovars and investigated selected mutants for their mechanisms mediating decreased susceptibility to triclosan. MPCTRC values were 8 - 64-fold higher than MIC values and ranged between 1 - 16 µg/ml. The frequencies at which mutants were selected varied between 1.3 x 10-10 - 9.9 x 10-11. Even if MIC values of mutants decreased by 3-7 dilution steps in the presence of the efflux pump inhibitor Phe-Arg-β-naphtylamide, only minor changes were observed in the expression of genes encoding efflux components or regulators, indicating that neither the major multidrug efflux pump AcrAB-TolC nor AcrEF are up-regulated in triclosan-selected mutants. Nucleotide sequence comparisons confirmed the absence of alterations in the regulatory regions acrRA, soxRS, marORAB, acrSE and ramRA of selected mutants. Single bp and deduced Gly93→Val amino acid exchanges were present in fabI, the target gene of triclosan, starting from a concentration of 1 µg/ml TRC used for MPC determinations. The fabI genes were up to 12.4-fold up-regulated. Complementation experiments confirmed the contribution of Gly93→Val exchanges and fabI overexpression to decreased triclosan susceptibility. MIC values of mutants compared to parent strains were even equal or resulted in a more susceptible phenotype (1-2 dilution steps) for the aminoglycoside antibiotics kanamycin and gentamicin as well as for the biocide chlorhexidine. Growth rates of selected mutants were significantly lower and hence, might partly explain the rare occurrence of Salmonella field isolates exhibiting decreased susceptibility to triclosan.

Citation: Rensch U, Klein G, Kehrenberg C (2013) Analysis of Triclosan-Selected Salmonella enterica Mutants of Eight Serovars Revealed Increased Aminoglycoside Susceptibility and Reduced Growth Rates. PLoS ONE 8(10): e78310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078310

Editor: Axel Cloeckaert, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, France

Received: July 11, 2013; Accepted: September 19, 2013; Published: October 18, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Rensch et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: The study was in parts financially supported by the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (grant FK3 1329-450). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Biocides are broadly used to control microbial growth and, thus play an essential role in preventing the spread of infectious agents and disease [1]. In food animal production, the consumption of biocides has been increased during recent years. This has been in response not only to consumer demands for healthy, minimally processed food without preservatives or antimicrobial agents but also to ensure food safety and outbreak containment [2,3]. In this food animal environment, biocides are used for cleaning and disinfecting farm buildings or abattoirs to improve hygiene and to reduce microbial loads. In addition, they act as preservatives in animal feed or in animal-derived products (e.g. semen, eggs) or can be used for animal skin spot-on applications such as teat dips [1]. In contrast to most antimicrobial agents, biocides affect multiple target sites of the bacterial cells and therefore, decreased susceptibility to biocides is thought to occur more rarely [4]. Despite this, tolerance of bacteria to biocides is documented for most classes, and increasing percentages of tolerant strains might contribute to the survival of zoonotic pathogens in the food chain and might facilitate the emergence of bacterial persisters [3,5]. In addition, concerns have been raised about a possible association between the overuse of biocides and the development of antimicrobial resistance. Nevertheless, it is not clear if these results achieved under laboratory conditions are transferable to a comparable situation in a natural environment [6,7].

Triclosan (TRC), a halogenated biphenyl ether, is used in Europe, North America and Asia in a wide variety of products and has become the most commonly used antibacterial agent in the United States [6,8]. It is used as an antibacterial adjunct in medical devices such as surgical suture material or hand soaps [9] and is also found in a variety of personal care and household products including soaps, deodorants, toothpastes, antiseptic-creams, plastics and functional clothing [10]. It has been used for more than 40 years as a single active ingredient or as a component in biocide formulations and, as a consequence, triclosan is commonly detected in the aquatic environment [1,8]. At low concentrations, triclosan inhibits the enoyl-acyl carrier protein FabI, an enzyme required for the fatty acid synthesis of bacteria, by mimicking the natural substrate [11,12]. At higher concentrations, a nonspecific effect on cell membranes and the interference with proteins or with the bacterial lipid synthesis have been described [6,12]. Increased tolerance of bacteria to triclosan can develop through multiple mechanisms such as modifications in the target site or over-production of FabI, changes in the membrane permeability of cells, or enhanced multidrug efflux pump activity [8,13]. In Stenotrophomonas and Pseudomonas, triclosan binds to efflux pump repressor proteins and, subsequently, leads to a release of the repressor from regulatory regions and to an up-regulation of downstream targets [7,14]. The de-repression of multidrug efflux systems, which are able to export a wide range of compounds, including triclosan, out of the cell contributes to a less susceptible antibiotic phenotype as shown for several bacterial species, e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica [7,15–17]. Nevertheless, inconsistent findings have been reported and other studies failed to demonstrate cross-resistance between biocide tolerance and antibiotic resistance [6,18,19].

Salmonella enterica is a major cause of enteric illness worldwide. Human disease is often associated with the consumption of contaminated food, with poultry products often acting as vehicles [20]. Due to increasing percentages of Salmonella isolates resistant to commonly used antibiotics, the treatment of severe infections is becoming more difficult [2]. In a previous comparative analysis, testing of 375 avian Salmonella isolates revealed no increase in triclosan MIC values of isolates collected during different time periods [21]. Nonetheless, enhanced expression of multidrug efflux pumps in response to biocide usage is a matter of concern although the mediated levels of antimicrobial resistance are relatively low [22]. The major efflux pump in Salmonella, AcrAB-TolC, is involved not only in antimicrobial resistance, but also in virulence [23]. Its substrate spectrum includes antibiotics, quaternary ammonium compounds, acridines as well as triclosan and the functional activity of AcrAB can be complemented by another efflux system, AcrEF [2]. In Enterobacteriaceae, expression of AcrAB-TolC is known to be regulated at various levels including global regulators such as MarA, SoxS and RamA and a local repressor, AcrR [24,25]. In quinolone-resistant salmonellae, structural changes in regulatory genes such as ramA and soxS have been identified which modulate efflux pump expression [24,25]. Furthermore, it has recently been shown that several toxic compounds such as dequalinium induce ramA expression as well [26]. Nevertheless, very little is known about alterations in the relevant regions of multidrug efflux regulators following biocide exposure.

It was the aim of the present study (i) to determine the level of concentrations of triclosan required to inhibit the emergence of mutants, (ii) to investigate mechanisms mediating decreased triclosan susceptibility in selected mutants of various serovars and (iii) to determine changes in the antimicrobial susceptibility and in the growth rates of generated mutants.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and determination of mutant prevention concentrations

Eight Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolates of avian origin comprising the serovars Enteritidis, Hadar, Infantis, Livingstone, Paratyphi B, Saintpaul, Typhimurium and Virchow were used as parent strains in this study. The isolates were collected between 2002 and 2008 during a surveillance study of non-typhoidal salmonellae in Germany. Isolates were cultivated overnight at 37°C on Luria Bertani (LB) agar plates or in LB broth (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany). Following Randall et al. 2004, the lowest concentration inhibiting the emergence of mutants from ≥1010 cells was defined as the mutant prevention concentration (MPC) [27,28]. For MPC determination, an overnight culture was centrifuged and cells were concentrated in 5 ml 0.9 % NaCl. Ten 100 µl aliquots of the cell suspension were plated on agar plates supplemented with triclosan in a concentration of 1 - 256 x the MIC value. Plates were incubated at 37°C. After 24h and 48h, the MPC24h and MPC48h were determined as the lowest concentration that inhibited the growth of any mutant. In addition, the mutant frequency was calculated by dividing the number of mutants grown at a specific concentration of triclosan by the number of CFU/ml inoculum. The molecular mechanisms of decreased susceptibility to triclosan were investigated for selected mutants.

Susceptibility testing and efflux pump inhibition

To assess MIC values of the biocides triclosan, acriflavine, benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine (purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany and AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) susceptibility testing was performed by the broth macrodilution method and as previously described, S. Enteritidis 7112 was used as the wild-type control [21]. Procedures regarding inoculum density, growth medium and incubation times and conditions were in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [29]. The susceptibility of isolates to the antimicrobial agents tetracycline, chlorampheniol, florfenicol, gentamicin, kanamycin and ciprofloxacin was investigated by broth macrodilution. Performance and interpretations followed the recommendations given in the CLSI document VET01-A4 [29]. For quality control purposes, E.coli ATCC 25922 was used as a reference strain. For all selected mutant strains, MICs were determined in the presence and absence of the efflux pump inhibitor phenylalanyl-arginyl-β-naphthylamide (PaβN), (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) that inhibits RND efflux pumps such as AcrAB-TolC. PaβN was used in a concentration corresponding to 0.25 x the MIC of the inhibitor [30].

Stability of the triclosan tolerant phenotype and growth kinetics of mutant strains

The phenotypic stability of decreased susceptibility to triclosan was investigated by MIC determination after a daily subculture of generated mutants (five CFU per serovar) for 10 successive days on agar plates without any supplement. Susceptibility testing to biocides and antibiotics was repeated after the serial passage. Changes in the growth kinetic between S. Enteritidis, S. Paratyphi B and S. Saintpaul parent strains and their corresponding triclosan tolerant mutants were assessed. For this, an overnight culture was diluted in a 10-fold dilution series (up to 10-4) and 1 ml of the diluted culture were inoculated into 99 ml fresh LB broth to obtain approximately 5 x 102 CFU. Cells were incubated at 37°C with shaking (140 rpm) for 19 h and optical density readings at 600 nm and numbers of CFU/ml were recorded every hour. Every growth kinetic experiment was performed three times independently.

DNA preparation, PCR amplification and sequence analysis

Total genomic DNA was extracted by using the Dneasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The gene fabI and, for a choice of isolates, the regions acrRA, soxRS, marORAB, acrSE and ramRA, encoding gene products known to be involved in the regulation of AcrAB-TolC, were amplified by PCR as previously described [20,24,31,32]. Amplification products were sequenced on both strands (Eurofins MWG, Ebersberg, Germany) and the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences were compared for parent strains and their triclosan mutants by using the DNAMAN software (Lynnon BioSoft, Quebec, Canada). In addition, macrorestriction analysis was conducted as previously described to confirm the origin of the mutants [33].

Expression analysis of efflux pump genes and fabI

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis (qRT-PCR) was used to assess the expression of efflux pump genes acrA, tolC and acrF, regulatory genes marA, ramA and soxS and the gene encoding FabI. Overnight cultures of parent strains and mutants were grown to the mid-logarithmic phase and the total RNA was extracted by using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer´s instructions. DNase digestion (RNase-Free DNase Set, Qiagen) was done to eliminate contaminating DNA. Extracted RNA was quantified for yield using a Biophotometer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Amounts of 0.5 µg RNA were reverse-transcribed into cDNA by using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen). Reverse-transcription minus controls were included to confirm the absence of genomic DNA. qRT-PCR was performed in a LightCycler 480 II instrument (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) with each specific primer pair as previously described [25,34,35] by using the LightCycler 480 SYBR Green 1 Master Kit (Roche). Amplifications were performed with an initial step of 5 min at 95°C, followed by 45 cycles of 10 s at 95°C, 10 s at 60°C and 10 s at 72°C. The gene gyrB was included as a reference gene [25]. All qRT-PCRs were performed in three independent experiments. The relative expression software tool (REST) was used for calculating and analyzing qRT-PCR results [36].

Cloning and transformation experiments

The entire gene fabI plus 157 and 141 bp in the up- and downstream regions were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of S. Paratyphi B parent (fabI original) and the respective mutant strain (fabI Gly93→Val). For this, previously described primers and the Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) were used [20]. Amplicons from both strains were cloned into vector TOPO pCR2.1 (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) and transformed into recipient strains E. coli TOP10, S. Typhimurium LT2 and the S. Livingstone field isolate 4. The fabI nucleotide sequences of all recombinant plasmids were checked for mutations and confirmed by sequence analysis and sequence alignments. E. coli TOP10 and Salmonella recipients harbouring the confirmed recombinant vector plasmids were tested for their susceptibility to triclosan, chloramphenicol and tetracycline and for control purposes for their susceptibility to the biocides chlorhexidine, benzalkonium chloride and acriflavine. Susceptibility testing was performed in the presence and absence of the efflux pump inhibitor PaβN. qRT-PCR experiments assessed the gene expression of fabI.

Statistical analysis

Data were calculated and interpreted using the software GraphPad Prism6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, USA). For comparison of growth curves, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney-U-Test was used and differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Results and Discussion

Bacterial susceptibility of parent strains and MPCs of triclosan

Among the Salmonella field isolates, MIC values of triclosan (MICTRC) varied between 0.125 - 0.5 µg/ml, these results being within the range recently reported for avian salmonellae in Germany [21]. For the biocides acriflavine, benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine, the MICs were 32 to 128 µg/ml, 32 µg/ml and 1 to 8 µg/ml, respectively. Susceptibility testing to antimicrobial agents revealed that two isolates of serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium were susceptible to all antimicrobials tested, whereas the isolates of serovars Paratyphi B, Livingstone, Infantis and Hadar were resistant to tetracycline. Isolates of serovars Saintpaul and Virchow showed combined resistance to gentamicin and kanamycin (S. Saintpaul) or chloramphenicol and tetracycline (S. Virchow). MICs of florfenicol varied between 2 to 8 µg/ml. For all Salmonella serovars, mutants showing decreased susceptibility to triclosan were selected easily overnight and concentrations between 1 to 16 µg/ml triclosan were necessary to inhibit the emergence of any mutant (MPC value) after 24 or 48 h of incubation. The MIC/MPC ratios were calculated and ranged between 8 and 64. The frequency of mutation to decreased triclosan susceptibility was in the range of 1.3 x 10-10 to 9.9 x 10-11 for all serovars and thus, seems to be slightly lower than the frequency to mutation calculated after ciprofloxacin selection [17,37]. For each serovar, one mutant was selected from an agar plate supplemented with triclosan in a concentration of one dilution step below the MPC for further analysis.

Efflux activity of selected mutants

After four serial passages on LB agar plates supplemented with triclosan, selected mutants exhibited 64- to >512-fold higher MIC values of triclosan than the parent strains (Table 1). Growth in the presence of 0.25-fold MIC of the inhibitor PaβN decreased the MICTRC values by 3 to 7 dilution steps, a finding that may result from an inhibition of the multidrug efflux pumps AcrAB-TolC or AcrEF, previously identified to be involved in triclosan and/or biocide tolerance of Salmonella [2,38]. As efflux inhibition pointed towards enhanced efflux activity, the level of expression of genes acrA, tolC, acrF, ramA, soxS and marA, encoding efflux components or regulators, was assessed by comparative qRT-PCR. In contrast to previous investigations of Salmonella mutants obtained after ciprofloxacin exposure or exposure to biocide formulations [2,25], only minor increases in acrA, tolC and acrF gene expression levels were observed, indicating that neither AcrAB-TolC nor AcrEF are up-regulated in the triclosan mutants. The changes ranged from 0.9- to 1.9-fold (for acrA), 0.8- to 1.1-fold (for tolC) and from 0.8- to 1.2-fold (for acrF). Divergent findings were reported by Karatzas et al. 2007, who detected an association of triclosan exposure with overexpression of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump gene acrB, suggesting that Salmonella strains or exposure conditions may affect the results [4]. Slightly higher increases in gene expression were observed for marA (up to 2.5-fold) or ramA (up to 3.4-fold), whereas similar to the response to tertiary amine compounds or mixtures of aldehydes and quaternary ammonium compounds [2], a minor down-regulation of soxS (up to 0.3-fold) was determined (Table 2). Sequencing of S. Paratyphi B and S. Saintpaul acrRA, soxRS, marORAB, acrSE and ramRA regions and comparisons between parent strains and their respective mutants did not detect any sequence alteration that might cause ramA or marA up-regulation.

Analysis of Salmonella field isolatesaCharacteristics of selected mutants
Salmonella isolatesYears of isolation   MICTRC (µg/ml)   MPCTRCb (µg/ml)   MPC/MIC    Frequency of mutant selection     MIC (µg/ml)
24 h48 h24 h   48 h   TRC  TRC in the presence of 0.25 x MIC PAβN
S. Enteritidis 9220060.254416165.4 x 10-11321
S. Hadar 520020.125128164.4 x 10-11162
S. Infantis 120020.1258864642.4 x 10-11641
S. Livingstone 320020.254416169.9 x 10-11>641
S. Paratyphi B 520040.1252216161.7 x 10-11321
S. Saintpaul 8096920080.5161632321.3 x 10-10>640.5
S. Typhimurium var. Cop.20080.2522881.4 x 10-10641
S. Virchow 220020.2512486.3 x 10-11161

Table 1. Mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) and MICs of triclosan for Salmonella parent strains and generated mutants.

a TRC = triclosan
b for determining MPC values, agar plates supplemented with 1 - 128 x the MIC of TRC were used
CSV
Download CSV
StrainsMutation in fabIMIC (µg/ml)ax-fold change in gene expression (based on group means)
TRCGEN  KAN  CHX  CIPTETFLO  CHL  acrAtolCacrFmarAramAsoxSfabI
S. Enteritidis 920.251420.032144
S. Enteritidis 92 mutant 2Gly93 – Val320.5210.0321441.2 ± 0.040.8 ± 0.11.1 ± 0.032.1 ± 0.51.8 ± 0.40.5 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.3
S. Hadar 50.1252820.253244
S. Hadar 5 mutant 1Gly93 – Val161420.2532441.1 ± 0.041.1 ± 0.20.9 ± 0.31.7 ± 0.22.8 ± 0.90.4 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.4
S. Infantis 10.1251420.2512844
S. Infantis 1 mutant 4Gly93 – Val640.5210.25128441.2 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.81.1 ± 0.20.9 ± 0.040.5 ± 0.11.9 ± 0.3
S. Livingstone 30.252810.03212844
S. Livingstone 3 mutant 2Gly93 – Val>64140.50.032128441.5 ± 0.70.9 ± 0.020.9 ± 0.21.4 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.1
S. Paratyphi B0.1251440.1256444
S. Paratyphi B mutant 1Gly93 – Val320.5220.12564440.9 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.20.9 ± 0.12.5 ± 1.11.2 ± 0.40.6 ± 0.212.4 ± 2.1
S. Saintpaul 809690.53212881288
S. Saintpaul 80969 mutant 8Gly93 – Val>641664412881.5 ± 0.71.01 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.32.4 ± 0.71.1 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.11.5 ± 0.2
S. Typhimurium var. Cop.0.252820.125122
S. Typhimurium var. Cop. mutant 1Gly93 – Val640.5420.1251220.9 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.41.1 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.1
S. Virchow 20.254840.25644256
S. Virchow 2 mutant 1Gly93 – Val161240.256442561.9 ± 0.41.1 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.22.1 ± 1.13.4 ± 0.40.4 ± 0.21.5 ± 0.2

Table 2. Comparison of MIC values and gene expression between Salmonella field isolates and their triclosan-selected mutants.

a Antimicrobial agents and biocides are abbreviated as follows: CHL = chloramphenicol; CIP = ciprofloxacin; CHX = chlorhexidine; GEN = gentamicin; KAN = kanamycin; TET = tetracycline; TRC = triclosan
CSV
Download CSV

Contribution of fabI mutations and fabI-overexpression to triclosan tolerance

Comparisons of nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of fabI genes amplified from parent strains and mutants revealed a single bp exchange at codon 93 (GGT → GTT) that resulted in a Gly93 →Val amino acid exchange. This exchange was present in mutants of all eight serovars and previously described to occur in S. Typhimurium [20]. In serovar Typhimurium, no correlation of the Gly93 →Val amino acid exchange with triclosan MICs could be detected [20]. Therefore, we investigated mutants of various serovars selected on lower concentrations of triclosan (picked from agar plates supplemented with triclosan in a concentration of 1 to 4 dilution steps below the MPC). The amino acid exchange at position Gly93 →Val was present in all mutants starting from a concentration of 1 µg/ml triclosan used for selection, suggesting that the emergence of this mutation is an early step in the development of triclosan tolerance. None of the strains possessed a second alteration in fabI at positions 115, 159 or 203, taking into account that these positions are less effective in Salmonella or E. coli in mediating high levels of triclosan tolerance [22,39]. Gene expression analysis of all mutants showed 1.2- to 1.9 -fold increases in fabI expression, with the exception of serovar Paratyphi B, demonstrating a 12.4-fold up-regulation of the gene. As previous studies have shown that overexpression of wild-type fabI in medium- or high-level triclosan tolerant mutants had either no effect or decreased MIC values of triclosan [20], complementation experiments were performed. As compared with S. Typhimurium LT2 and S. Livingstone 4 recipient strains, recipients harbouring wild-type fabI on a recombinant vector plasmid exhibited 16-fold increases in MIC values of triclosan, respectively (Table 3). MICs of clones carrying recombinant Gly93 →Val fabI plasmids were even 512- and 256-fold higher than those of the recipient strains. MIC values of other biocides remained unchanged. Gene expression analysis confirmed 3.7- to 123.3-fold higher levels of fabI expression due to the plasmid location of the gene (data not shown). Therefore, it can be assumed that Gly93 →Val exchanges and enhanced expression of the fabI gene play an important role in the development of triclosan tolerance. Nevertheless, PAβN decreased the MICTRC values of the clones up to 64-fold, indicating that functional active multiple drug efflux systems are required for higher levels of triclosan tolerance.

BacteriafabI carriage on plasmids   MIC (µg/ml)a
TRCTRC in the presence of 0.25 x MIC PAβNCHL   CHL in the presence of 0.25 x MIC PAβNTET   TET in the presence of 0.25 x MIC PAβN
E. coli TOP100.125< 0.0084120.5
E. coli TOP10::pCR2.10.125< 0.0084120.5
E. coli TOP10::pCR2.1 fabI original20.1254120.5
E. coli TOP10::pCR2.1 fabI Gly93→Val6414120.5
S. Livingstone 40.125< 0.0088220.5
S. Livingstone 4::pCR2.1 fabI original20.58220.5
S. Livingstone 4::pCR2.1 fabI Gly93→Val6418220.5
S. Typhimurium LT20.25< 0.0088110.5
S. Typhimurium LT 2::pCR2.1 fabI original40.258110.5
S. Typhimurium LT 2::pCR2.1 fabI Gly93→Val6448110.5

Table 3. MIC values of triclosan for E. coli and Salmonella strains harboring fabI with and without mutation on a plasmid.

a CHL = chloramphenicol; TET = tetracycline; TRC = triclosan; PAβN = Phe-Arg-β-naphthylamide
CSV
Download CSV

Increase in aminoglycoside susceptibility and reduced growth rates of triclosan tolerant mutants

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of triclosan-selected mutants and comparisons to parent strains displayed a decrease in MIC values of the aminoglycoside antibiotics gentamicin and kanamycin, whereas MICs of additionally tested antimicrobials remained the same (Table 2). For the biocides, a 2-fold decrease in MICs occurred in some mutants only for chlorhexidine. These decreases were independent of the classification of the parent strains as susceptible or resistant to gentamicin or kanamycin and comprised 1- or 2- dilution steps in all mutants. Particularly noteworthy is that changes in the susceptibility took place only in mutants cultivated on agar plates supplemented with triclosan, whereas MIC values decreased in line with the parent strains after a few serial passages without triclosan. Albeit minor, the changes could be repeated in three independent test series and macrorestriction analysis confirmed the clonal relationship of the triclosan-adapted strains. A similar observation was made by Cottell et al., who detected a statistically significant increase in the susceptibility of triclosan-selected E. coli mutants to gentamicin, amikacin, framycetin, streptomycin and kanamycin compared with parent strains [40]. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a reduction in tobramycin, amikacin and gentamicin resistance was detected after benzalkonium chloride exposure, but results were strain-dependent [41,42]. In S. Typhimurium, changes in outer membrane LPS O-antigen chain molecules have been detected after adaptation to biocide formulations [43]. Whether changes in outer membrane LPS contribute to the MIC reduction of aminoglycosides in triclosan-selected mutants, as suggested in Pseudomonas [42], remains to be clarified.

Testing of the phenotypic stability of mutants revealed that elevated MICs of triclosan were not lost in the absence of selective pressure after a daily subculture of generated mutants for 10 successive days. However, the growth rates of mutants were statistically significant lower than for their parent strains, as shown for S. Enteritidis, S. Paratyphi B and S. Saintpaul mutants (Figure 1). These findings indicate that mutants of various serovars adapted to high concentrations of triclosan are less fit, even if the ability to colonize and persist in the avian gut might be retained, as previously shown for S. Typhimurium [20]. Nevertheless, these findings might explain the rare occurrence of decreased susceptibility to triclosan in Salmonella field isolates or clinical isolates and the lack of a resistance development, as shown during a comparison of current isolates with isolates collected 1 - 3 decades ago, despite the long-term use of triclosan [21,22].

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Growth curves of Salmonella parent strains and their triclosan-selected mutants.

The culture-based enumeration was performed every hour. Each point in the graph represents the average CFU/ml of three independent experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078310.g001

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Vera Nöding and Sina Hoffmann for their excellent technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: UR GK CK. Performed the experiments: UR. Analyzed the data: UR CK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GK. Wrote the manuscript: UR GK CK.

References

  1. 1. Condell O, Sheridan Á, Power KA, Bonilla-Santiago R, Sergeant K et al. (2012) Comparative proteomic analysis of Salmonella tolerance to the biocide active agent triclosan. J Proteomics 75: 4505-4519. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.044. PubMed: 22579747.
  2. 2. Whitehead RN, Overton TW, Kemp CL, Webber MA (2011) Exposure of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to high level biocide challenge can select multidrug resistant mutants in a single step. PLOS ONE 6: e22833. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022833. PubMed: 21829527.
  3. 3. Condell O, Iversen C, Cooney S, Power KA, Walsh C et al. (2012) Efficacy of biocides used in the modern food industry to control Salmonella enterica, and links between biocide tolerance and resistance to clinically relevant antimicrobial compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 3087-3097. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07534-11. PubMed: 22367085.
  4. 4. Karatzas KA, Webber MA, Jorgensen F, Woodward MJ, Piddock LJ et al. (2007) Prolonged treatment of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium with commercial disinfectants selects for multiple antibiotic resistance, increased efflux and reduced invasiveness. J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 947-955. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm314. PubMed: 17855722.
  5. 5. Cerf O, Carpentier B, Sanders P (2010) Tests for determining in-use concentrations of antibiotics and disinfectants are based on entirely different concepts: "resistance" has different meanings. Int J Food Microbiol 136: 247-254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.10.002. PubMed: 19853944.
  6. 6. Middleton JH, Salierno JD (2013) Antibiotic resistance in triclosan tolerant fecal coliforms isolated from surface waters near wastewater treatment plant outflows (Morris County, NJ, USA). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 88: 79-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.10.025. PubMed: 23195806.
  7. 7. Hernández A, Ruiz FM, Romero A, Martínez JL (2011) The binding of triclosan to SmeT, the repressor of the multidrug efflux pump SmeDEF, induces antibiotic resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. PLOS Pathog 7: e1002103. PubMed: 21738470.
  8. 8. Dann AB, Hontela A (2011) Triclosan: environmental exposure, toxicity and mechanisms of action. J Appl Toxicol 31: 285-311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.1660. PubMed: 21462230.
  9. 9. Jones RD, Jampani HB, Newman JL, Lee AS (2000) Triclosan: A review of effectiveness and safety in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 28: 184-196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1067/mic.2000.102378. PubMed: 10760227.
  10. 10. Schweizer HP (2001) Triclosan: a widely used biocide and its link to antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol Lett 202: 1-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10772.x. PubMed: 11506900.
  11. 11. Heath RJ, Rubin JR, Holland DR, Zhang E, Snow ME et al. (1999) Mechanism of triclosan inhibition of bacterial fatty acid synthesis. J Biol Chem 274: 11110-11114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.16.11110. PubMed: 10196195.
  12. 12. Lubarsky HV, Gerbersdorf SU, Hubas C, Behrens S, Ricciardi F et al. (2012) Impairment of the bacterial biofilm stability by triclosan. PLOS ONE 7: e31183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031183. PubMed: 22523534.
  13. 13. Russell AD (2004) Whither triclosan? J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 693-695. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh171. PubMed: 15073159.
  14. 14. Ghosh S, Cremers CM, Jakob U, Love NG (2011) Chlorinated phenols control the expression of the multidrug resistance efflux pump MexAB-OprM in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by interacting with NalC. Mol Microbiol 79: 1547-1556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07544.x. PubMed: 21231970.
  15. 15. McMurry LM, Oethinger M, Levy SB (1998) Overexpression of marA, soxS, or acrAB produces resistance to triclosan in laboratory and clinical strains of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 166: 305-309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13905.x. PubMed: 9770288.
  16. 16. Braoudaki M, Hilton AC (2004) Adaptive resistance to biocides in Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157 and cross-resistance to antimicrobial agents. J Clin Microbiol 42: 73-78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.1.73-78.2004. PubMed: 14715734.
  17. 17. Randall LP, Cooles SW, Piddock LJV, Woodward MJ (2004) Effect of triclosan or a phenolic farm disinfectant on the selection of antibiotic-resistent Salmonella enterica. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 621-627. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh376. PubMed: 15269199.
  18. 18. Lambert RJ (2004) Comparative analysis of antibiotic and antimicrobial biocide susceptibility data in clinical isolates of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa between 1989 and 2000. J Appl Microbiol 97: 699-711. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02345.x. PubMed: 15357719.
  19. 19. Stickler DJ, Jones GL (2008) Reduced susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to triclosan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 991-994. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01094-07. PubMed: 18180352.
  20. 20. Webber MA, Randall LP, Cooles SW, Woodward MJ, Piddock LJV (2008) Triclosan resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: 83-91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn137. PubMed: 18388112.
  21. 21. Rensch U, Klein G, Schwarz S, Kaspar H, de Jong A et al. (2013) Comparative analysis of the susceptibility to triclosan and three other biocides of avian Salmonella enterica isolates collected 1979 through 1994 and 2004 through 2010. J Food Protect 76: 653-656. doi:https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-420. PubMed: 23575128.
  22. 22. Copitch JL, Whitehead RN, Webber MA (2010) Prevalence of decreased susceptibility to triclosan in Salmonella enterica isolates from animals and humans and association with multiple drug resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents 36: 247-251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.04.012. PubMed: 20541914.
  23. 23. Nishino K, Nikaido E, Yamaguchi A (2009) Regulation and physiological function of multidrug efflux pumps in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Biochim Biophys Acta 1794: 834-843. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.02.002. PubMed: 19230852.
  24. 24. Abouzeed YM, Baucheron S, Cloeckaert A (2008) ramR mutations involved in efflux-mediated multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 2428-2434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00084-08. PubMed: 18443112.
  25. 25. Kehrenberg C, Cloeckaert A, Klein G, Schwarz S (2009) Decreased fluoroquinolone susceptibility in mutants of Salmonella serovars other than Typhimurium: detection of novel mutations involved in modulated expression of ramA and soxS. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 1175-1180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkp347. PubMed: 19778917.
  26. 26. Yamasaki S, Nikaido E, Nakashima R, Sakurai K, Fujiwara D et al. (2013) The crystal structure of multidrug-resistance regulator RamR with multiple drugs. Nat Commun 4: 2078. PubMed: 23800819.
  27. 27. Randall LP, Cooles SW, Piddock LJV, Woodward MJ (2004) Mutant prevention concentrations of ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin for Salmonella enterica. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 688-691. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh360. PubMed: 15243029.
  28. 28. Drlica K (2003) The mutant selection window and antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 11-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg269. PubMed: 12805267.
  29. 29. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2013) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard - fourth edition. CLSI Document VET01-A4. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI.
    • 30. Preisler A, Mraheil MA, Heisig P (2006) Role of novel gyrA mutations in the suppression of the fluoroquinolone resistance genotype of vaccine strain Salmonella Typhimurium vacT (gyrA D87G). J Antimicrob Chemother 57: 430-436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki475. PubMed: 16431864.
    • 31. Olliver A, Vallé M, Chaslus-Dancla E, Cloeckaert A (2004) Role of an acrR mutation in multidrug resistance of in vitro-selected fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 238: 267-272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2004.07.046. PubMed: 15336432.
    • 32. Olliver A, Vallé M, Chaslus-Dancla E, Cloeckaert A (2005) Overexpression of the multidrug efflux operon acrEF by insertional activation with IS1 or IS10 elements in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT204 acrB mutants selected with fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 289-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.1.289-301.2005. PubMed: 15616308.
    • 33. Michael GB, Cardoso M, Schwarz S (2008) Molecular analysis of multiresistant porcine Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Bredeney isolates from Southern Brazil: identification of resistance genes, integrons and a group II intron. Int J Antimicrob Agents 32: 120-129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.02.024. PubMed: 18571903.
    • 34. Tabak M, Scher K, Hartog E, Romling U, Matthews KR et al. (2007) Effect of triclosan on Salmonella Typhimurium at different growth stages and in biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 267: 200-206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00547.x. PubMed: 17156099.
    • 35. Zheng J, Cui S, Meng J (2009) Effect of transcriptional activators RamA and SoxS on expression of multidrug efflux pumps AcrAB and AcrEF in fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 95-102. PubMed: 18984645.
    • 36. Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L (2002) Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 30: e36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.9.e36. PubMed: 11972351.
    • 37. Kehrenberg C, de Jong A, Friederichs S, Cloeckaert A, Schwarz S (2007) Molecular mechanisms of decreased susceptibility to fluoroquinolones in avian Salmonella serovars and their mutants selected during the determination of mutant prevention concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother 59: 886-892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm072. PubMed: 17369276.
    • 38. Baucheron S, Imberechts H, Chaslus-Dancla E, Cloeckaert A (2002) The AcrB multidrug transporter plays a major role in high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium phage type DT204. Microb Drug Resist 8: 281-289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/10766290260469543. PubMed: 12523625.
    • 39. McMurry LM, Oethinger M, Levy SB (1998) Triclosan targets lipid synthesis. Nature 394: 531-532. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/28970. PubMed: 9707111.
    • 40. Cottell A, Denyer SP, Hanlon GW, Ochs D, Maillard JY (2009) Triclosan-tolerant bacteria: changes in susceptibility to antibiotics. J Hosp Infect 72: 71-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.01.014. PubMed: 19246121.
    • 41. Loughlin MF, Jones MV, Lambert PA (2002) Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells adapted to benzalkonium chloride show resistance to other membrane-active agents but not to clinically relevant antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 49: 631-639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/49.4.631. PubMed: 11909837.
    • 42. Joynson JA, Forbes B, Lambert RJ (2002) Adaptive resistance to benzalkonium chloride, amikacin and tobramycin: the effect on susceptibility to other antimicrobials. J Appl Microbiol 93: 96-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01667.x. PubMed: 12067378.
    • 43. Karatzas KA, Randall LP, Webber M, Piddock LJ, Humphrey TJ et al. (2008) Phenotypic and proteomic characterization of multiply antibiotic-resistant variants of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium selected following exposure to disinfectants. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 1508-1516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01931-07. PubMed: 18083849.