Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Evidence for Distinct Functions of MRE11 in Arabidopsis Meiosis

  • Ivica Šamanić,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Split, Split, Croatia

  • Juraj Simunić,

    Affiliation Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Split, Split, Croatia

  • Karel Riha,

    Affiliations Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology, Vienna, Austria, Central European Institite of Technology (CEITEC), Brno, Czech Republic

  • Jasna Puizina

    puizina@pmfst.hr

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Split, Split, Croatia

Abstract

The evolutionary conserved Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex functions as one of the guardians of genome integrity in eukaryotes; it is required for the double-strand break repair, meiosis, DNA checkpoint, and telomere maintenance. To better understand the role of the MRE11 gene in Arabidopsis, we performed comparative analysis of several mre11 alleles with respect to genome stability and meiosis. The mre11-4 and mre11-2 alleles presumably produce truncated MRE11 proteins composed of the first 499 and 529 amino acids, respectively. Although the putative MRE11 truncated proteins differ only by 30 amino acids, the mutants exhibited strikingly different phenotypes in regards to growth morphology, genome stability and meiosis. While the mre11-2 mutants are fully fertile and undergo normal meiosis, the mre11-4 plants are sterile due to aberrant repair of meiotic DNA breaks. Structural homology analysis suggests that the T-DNA insertion in the mre11-4 allele probably disrupted the putative RAD50 interaction and/or homodimerization domain, which is assumed to be preserved in mre11-2 allele. Intriguingly, introgression of the atm-2 mutant plant into the mre11-2 background renders the double mutant infertile, a phenotype not observed in either parent line. This data indicate that MRE11 partially compensates for ATM deficiency in meiosis of Arabidopsis.

Introduction

The evolutionary conserved MRN complex (MRX in yeast) is composed of Mre11, Rad50 and Nbs1 (Xrs2) proteins. The complex functions as one of the essential guardians of genome integrity by directing the processing of DNA double strand break (DSB) and is required for meiotic recombination, DSB repair via homologous recombination and end-joining reactions, DNA damage signaling, telomere maintenance and responding to stalled replication forks and resolution of DNA hairpins [1-8]. The molecular mechanism underlying these biological functions of MRX complex involves tethering DNA molecules by means of the interaction between DNA-bound MRN oligomers [9-11]. In addition, in vitro analyses with human and yeast proteins indicate that complex specifies 3’ to 5’ double stranded exonuclease and both double-stranded and single-stranded endonuclease activities as well as limited helicase activities [11-14]. In accordance with these biochemical activities, MRE11 plays an evolutionary conserved role in DSB resection [15]. In mice and humans the Mre11 complex is involved in DNA damage signaling and through interactions with ATM activates the DNA damage checkpoint [2,16-18]. There is no experimental evidence that MRE11 activates or interacts with ATM in plants.

The MRE11 gene has been identified in the genomes of all of the eukaryotes sequenced to date, including the Arabidopsis MRE11 ortholog [19]. The homology between different Mre11 orthologs is the strongest in the N terminus which contains four conserved phosphoesterase domains, but is less pronounced in the C terminus of the protein which contains two DNA binding domains [3,13,20,21]. The N-terminal region harbors a Nbs1 interacting domain [9], while at the C-terminal region interacts with Rad50 [22]. Dynamic molecular architecture of human Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) consists of a globular DNA binding domain (Mre11) from which two 50-nm-long coiled coils (Rad50) protrude [9-11]. Rad50 contains Walker A and B nucleotide (NTP)-binding motifs at the N- and C- termini separated by two coiled-coil structures that can fold back on itself via zink-hook (´hinge´region) in the center of the proteins (8-10). The ´hinge´ region allows two distinct Rad50 molecules to dimerize while the ATP-binding domain on the opposite end interacts with Mre11 protein (11).The coiled coils are flexible and their apices can adopt forms of either self-association (intracomplex interaction) or intercomplex association [23]. Recent studies showed that DNA binding of human MRN complex leads to parallel orientation of the coiled coils, which prevents their intracomplex interactions and favours intercomplex associations needed for DNA tethering and biological function of MRN complex [24].

Originally, Mre11 was identified in yeast, S. cerevisiae as a gene required for early steps of meiotic recombination, namely for induction as well as for repair of meiotic DSBs. Mutational analysis of the yeast MRE11 gene showed that its function in DSB initiation is located in the C-terminal part of the protein and is distinct from its end processing function which is associated with the N-terminal part of the protein [20,25,26]. Elucidating Mre11 function in vertebrates is hampered by the fact that null mutations in any component of the MRX complex cause embryonic lethality [27-29]. On the contrary, Arabidopsis mre11 mutants and rad50 mutants are viable and were shown to be sensitive to genotoxic treatment [21,30,31]. In addition, rad50 mutation stimulates homologous intrachromatid recombination between tandem repeats in somatic cells [32]. MRE11 protein has also been implicated to play a role in an alternative DNA end-joining pathway that mediates fusion of deprotected chromosome termini [33].

Plants deficient for the MRE11 or RAD50 proteins are fully sterile and cytological analyses of meiosis revealed massive chromosome fragmentation during prophase I [34,35]. The fragmentation was abolished by a mutation in the SPO11-1 topoisomerase, which is consistent with the idea that MRE11 is required for repair of the meiotic breaks [35]. In Arabidopsis, three T-DNA insertion mutant lines of MRE11 gene were previously described mre11-1, mre11-2 [21] and mre11-3 [35]. While mre11-1 and mre11-3 mutants were both dwarfed and sterile with many developmental defects, the mre11-2 plants displayed normal vegetative growth and fertility [21]. This indicates that C-terminal region of MRE11 is in Arabidopsis dispensable for fertility and meiotic recombination. However, effect of the mre11-2 allele on meiosis has not been analyzed.

In this study, we performed comparative characterization of Arabidopsis mutants harboring mre11-2 and mre11-4 alleles. While these alleles carry T-DNA insertions in a very similar region of the MRE11 gene and their position differs only by 30 amino acids, they exhibited strikingly different phenotypes in regards to genome stability and meiosis. While mre11-2 mutants are fully fertile and their meiosis is compromised only in the ATM deficient plants, the mre11-4 mutants exhibit defective repair of meiosis DSBs and genome instability in somatic cells. This in vivo data indicate that the region between aa 499-529 is critical for meiotic function of the Arabidopsis MRE11 protein.

Results

Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis mre11-4 allele

To examine the MRE11 gene function in Arabidopsis thaliana we obtained a new T-DNA insertional mutant line, SALK_028450, from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (Nottingham, UK). The insertion was annotated within the 19th intron with the left border oriented toward the 3’end of the MRE11 gene (Figure 1a). To precisely map the border between the T-DNA and the 5' of the gene we performed PCR reactions with primer M6 in combination with primers specific for the left or right border of the T-DNA. A specific PCR product was obtained with primers M6 and NPT-1 (data not shown). Sequence analysis of the PCR product showed that the right border of the T-DNA is located in the 18th intron, which results in a deletion of the entire 19th exon of the MRE11 gene (Figure 1d). We refer to this mutation, which disrupts the gene in its 3' end as the mre11-4 allele. Plants homozygous and heterozygous for the T-DNA insertion were identified by multiplex PCR with the two gene specific primers (M5 and M6) in combination with a T-DNA-specific primer (LBc-1). MRE11 +/- plants were indistinguishable from wild-type, and their self-fertilization produced homozygous mutants in the expected 3:1 ratio (26 wild-type: 8 mutants), suggesting that the mre11-4 mutation was recessive. Details on the phenotype of mre11-4 mutants are given below.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Molecular analysis and the effect of the T-DNA insertion in mre11 mutant lines.

a) Schematic representation of the mre11-4 allele with the T-DNA disruption located in the 18th intron (right border, NPT-1) and the left border (LBc-1) oriented toward 3´ end of the MRE11 gene. Vertical arrows indicate the T-DNA insertion sites for mre11-2 and mre11-3 alleles, previously characterized [21,35]. Green boxes represent exons. MRE11 gene specific primers are shown by short horizontal arrows. (b) Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR of MRE11 transcripts in wild-type and three mre11 mutants. The full-length transcripts were not produced in the three mre11 mutants. Primers spanning different regions of MRE11 transcripts used in the second round of RT-PCR are indicated at the top of each column. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase A (GAPA) was used as control for cDNA amount and quality. c) Schematic representation of the predicted full-length MRE11 protein (wt) and putative truncated MRE11 proteins: mre11-3 mutant lacks 461 amino acids, mre11-4 lacks 221 amino acids and mre11-2 lacks 191 amino acids. Arrows indicate the T-DNA disruption sites of the MRE11 gene with respect to the full-length protein. The various putative protein domains are marked according to [8,36]; the phosphoesterase motifs (I to IV) with red boxes and two DNA binding domains (blue boxes) as well as the regions important for NBS1 and RAD50 interaction. Ideograms are drawn roughly in scale. Scale bars indicate 100 amino acids. d) Sequence analysis of the junction between the T-DNA and MRE11 gene obtained via sequencing in the mre11-4 mutants. The top line shows the genomic sequence, exon sequence is shown in uppercase letters, intron sequence is shown in lowercase italic letters, the filler DNA nucleotides are shown in small red uppercase letters and the nucleotides derived from the T-DNA insertion are shown in uppercase boldface letters. The bottom lines show the predicted amino acid sequence as a result of the T-DNA insertion. If the truncated intron 18 is not spliced out, hypothetically, 35 amino acids (ARRYRFS CLITFFNSGLLFQTGTTLNPFSGYSFDL) could be derived from the intron, filler DNA and T-DNA and form the C terminus of the predicted protein in the mre11-4 line. The predicted STOP codon is indicated by *.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078760.g001

We next examined the effect of the T-DNA insertion on gene expression by RT-PCR and compare it with the mre11-2 and mre11-3 mutants. Transcription of the region upstream of the T-DNA insertion was detected in all three mutant lines (Figure 1b, primers M4+M7), while there were no transcripts from downstream region of the T-DNA insertion. This confirmed that the T-DNA insertions disrupted the synthesis of full-length MRE11 transcripts and result in production of truncated transcripts. RT-PCR showed that mre11-4 mutant plants similarly to mre11-2 plants had normal levels of transcription of 5' end and middle part of the mRNA, and no expression of its 3’ end. Based on the nucleotide sequence analysis around the T-DNA insertion sites, we predicted that mre11-4 mutants may produce hypothetical C-truncated Mre11 protein consisting of 499 amino acids (Figure 1d). Based on similar calculations that take into account only the amino acids encoded by the MRE11 gene, it was previously shown that mre11-3 and mre11-2 mutants may produce hypothetical C-truncated MRE11 proteins consisting of 259 and 529 amino acids, respectively [21,35]. We were not able to confirm presence of these proteins by Western-blot analysis due to pour quality of available antibody (data not shown).

Comparative phenotypic and cytogenetic analysis

To further analyze the effect of T-DNA insertion on mre11-4 mutant growth and development, a comparative phenotypic analysis with previously characterized mre11-2 and mre11-3 lines was performed. In contrast to mre11-2 plants that exhibit wilt-type appearance, plants homozygous for the mre11-4 mutant allele are sterile and semi-dwarf with obvious morphological abnormalities (Figure 2a) and resemble mre11-3 mutants. Rosette leaves were asymmetric and slightly upward twisted with yellow leaf margins. Microscopic analysis of mre11-4 and mre11-3 internal leaf structures revealed misarranged mesophyll cells with increased intercellular spaces (not shown). Vascular patterns of cotyledons were also defective showing interrupted and freely ending veins (not shown). mre11-4 and mre11-3 seedlings grown on vertical MS plate had reduced primary root length and secondary roots were much less developed compared with wild-type and mre11-2 seedlings (Figure 2b). mre11-4 as well mre11-3 mutants produced very small seedless siliques, which contrasts with fully fertile siliques of mre11-2 plants (Figure 2c).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Arabidopsis mre11-4 and mre11-3 mutant alleles confer vegetative growth defects and sterility.

a) Morphology of five weeks old mre11 mutant plants and their comparison to wild-type plant. The arrows point at regions that are shown at higher magnification in the inserts. Coin for scale = 18 mm. b) Phenotypic appearance of ten-day-old wild-type (wt) and mre11 mutant seedlings. wt and mre11-2 mutant plants develop true leaves. In contrast, mre11-4 and mre11-3 (inserts) mutant plants only expand their cotyledons but do not develop true leaves and show reduced root growth. Wild-type and mre11 mutant seeds were germinated on MS agar plates. c) Comparison of siliques harvested from mature wild-type and mre11 mutants. The siliques from the mr11-4 and mre11-3 lines produced no seeds. mre11-2 siliques were full (normal seed set) and were indistinguishable from wild-type. atm-2 mutant plants are partially sterile.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078760.g002

We have previously reported that the growth defects detected in mre11-3 mutants correlate with increased genome instability in somatic cells [35]. To investigate whether the developmental aberrations observed in mre11-4 mutant are also associated with irregularities at cellular or chromosomal level, we performed cytogenetic analysis by comparing mitotic figures from pistil’s cells of wild-type and mre11 mutant plants (Figure 3a). In wild-type and mre11-2 chromosome preparations regular mitotic phases were clearly discernible. On contrary, bridged chromosomes and acentric fragments were a hallmark of mre11-4 and mre11-3 mitotic figures. In addition, we assessed the spectrum and frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in mitotic cells as a gauge of spontaneous genomic instability (Figure 3b). In mre11-2 nuclei, only one acentric fragment was observed out of 77 mitotic cells, whereas mre11-3 and mre11-4 mutants had unstable genomes with chromosome fragmentations and fusions discovered in 13 - 14 % of the analyzed mitotic cells.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Genome instability in mitotic cells from mre11 mutants.

Anaphase spreads were prepared from pistils stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and visualized by epifluorescence microscopy. a) Wild-type figure (upper left) show the phragmoplast, the cytoplasmic structure that forms at the equator of the spindle after the chromosomes have divided during the anaphase of plant mitosis. Genome instability manifested by chromosome fusions and chromosomal breaks is evident in mre11-4 and mre11-3 cells. Examples of mre11-4 anaphase with two bridges and acentric fragment lagging between separating daughter nuclei are shown. Thick fragmented bridge was detected in mre11-3 cell. Scale bar indicates 2 μm and serves all micrographs. b) Graphic representation recapitulating the spectrum of cytological abnormalities in mitotic cells from wild-type and mre11 flower buds. Chromosomal aberrations in cells are classified in three categories; anaphase bridges, acentric fragments and fragmented bridges. The total number of scored mitotic cells for each genotype is indicated in parentheses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078760.g003

To determine whether the necrotic areas on mre11-4 and mre11-3 mutant leaves contained dead cells, trypan blue staining was performed. As shown in Figure 4, jigsaw-puzzle shaped leaf epidermis of wild type and mre11-2 mutant plants were colorless, while there was extensive cell death in the leaves of the mre11-4 and mre11-3 mutant lines (Figure 4e-h1). The selected leaf surfaces of these mutants showed dark blue regions composed of irregularly shaped epidermal cells.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Developmental abnormalities of mre11-4 and mre11-3 mutants were connected with extensive spontaneous cell death.

Necrotic lesions on leaves in wild-type (a,b) and three allelic series of Arabidopsis mre11 mutants (c-h) were visualized by staining with trypan blue. There was extensive cell death in the leaves of the mre11-4 (e,f) and mre11-3 (g,h) mutant plants. In contrast, cell death was not observed in the wild-type (a,b) and mre11-2 mutant (c,d). Leaf areas marked by red squares are shown at higher magnification below each figure (a1-h1). Scale bar for macroscopic leaf figures indicate 3 mm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078760.g004

Comparative analysis of meiosis

To investigate the origin of the sterility of mre11-4 mutants we analyzed meiosis in pollen mother cells (PMCs). In wild-type male meiocytes chromosomes gradually condense during leptotene (Figure 5a), pair up in zygotene (Figure 5b) and synapse in pachytene (Figure 5c). Five bivalents become visible through diplotene (Figure 5d), fully condensed in diakinesis (Figure 5i) and line up in metaphase plate (Figure 5j). Homologous chromosomes move to opposing cellular poles during anaphase I (Figure 5k) and in telophase I two polar groups of chromosomes are observed (Figure 5l). During second meiotic division sister chromatids separate to finally give the four haploid microspores (Figure 5m-p).

thumbnail
Figure 5. Arabidopsis mre11-4 mutants exhibit dramatic chromosomal fragmentation and fusion following zygotene/ pachytene.

DAPI stained chromosome spreads from pollen mother cell (PMC) meiocytes are given in (a-d) and (i-p) for wild-type, (e-h) and (q-t) for the mre11-4 mutant. The major stages of wild-type meiosis are as follows: leptotene (a), zygotene (b), pachytene (c), diplotene (d), diakinesis (i), metaphase I (j), anaphase I (k), telophase I (l), prophase II (m), metaphase II (n), anaphase II (o), tetrads containing four microspores (p). In mre11-4 mutant, after normal leptotene (e) and zygotene (f), all the subsequent stages were severely impaired, hence it was difficult to identify and define meiotic progression precisely. The approximate stages of mre11-4 meiosis are as follows: late prophase I (g), post zygo-pachytene fusion/fragmentation (h,q), approximately prophase II (r), approximately anaphase II (s), polyads with variable number of microspores of different sizes (t). All micrographs have the same scale bar = 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078760.g005

In mre11-4 mutants regular prophase was absent and all the subsequent stages of meiosis were severely impaired. After normal leptotene (Figure 5e), fragmented chromosome threads appeared at the mid-prophase stage that corresponds to the wild-type zygotene-pachytene (Figure 5f). A typical looped ribbon-like structure, normally present in wild-type pachytene, was never observed in mre11-4 mutants, suggesting a failure to synapse homologous chromosomes in the absence of MRE11 function. Chromosome fragmentation became more visible as chromatin continued to condense in the subsequent stages of post zygo-pachytene and varying sizes and numbers of chromosome fragments, but no regular bivalents were observed in all PMCs (Figures 5g-h). Second meiotic division was identified based on the appearance of the typical organellar band in the middle of the PMCs. In spite of severe chromosomal fragmentation, meiosis progressed into meiosis II (Figures 5 r-s) and finished with polyads, containing microspores with unequal amounts of DNA (Figure 5t). This phenotype is comparable with meiotic defects observed in mre11-3 mutants [35].

Unlike mre11-4 mutant plants which are completely sterile, homozygous mre11-2 mutants are fully fertile [21] and we did not detect any cytological abnormalities in meiosis (Figures 6 a-l). Although mre11-2 mutants have phenotypically normal appearance, they are still sensitive to DNA damage [21] indicating that function of this protein is compromised. MRE11 acts in DNA damage signaling in conjunction with ATM. It has been reported that function of ATM is in meiosis partially redundant with ATR and NBS1. To investigate whether MRE11 acts redundantly with ATM, we generated mre11-2 atm-2 double mutant. The atm-2 single mutants exhibit drastically reduced fertility, but still produce reduced seed number [16]. In contrast, mre11-2 atm-2 double mutants are completely sterile (Figure 7) indicating severely impaired meiosis (Figure 6).

thumbnail
Figure 6. Meiotic phenotypes of mre11-2, atm-2 and mre11-2 atm-2 double mutants.

atm-2 prophase proceeds to pachytene (a2), when fully synapsed chromosomes are visible. First abnormalities were bridges between bivalents in diplotene (b2) and multiple lumping of bivalents together in diakinesis (c2). Metaphase I (d2) shows univalent far from aligned bivalents at equatorial plane. Chromosome bridges formed between the separating groups of anaphase I chromosomes (e2) are accompanied by lagging acentric fragments and chromatid bridges between the two nuclei (f2). Subsequent stages of atm-2 meiosis II also display chromosome fragmentation and chromatin bridging across the organelle band (g2-i2). In telophase II several discrete DAPI-stained fragments are visible outside of the four groups of chromosomes (j2). Meiosis in mre11-2 atm-2 mutant is seriously impaired at all post-leptotene stages (a3) when long tracts of unpaired chromosomes were observed. The most common cytological phenomenon is the chromosome stickiness (b3-d3). At anaphase I (e3) sticky chromosomes lagged behind stretched chromosomes which began to separate to opposing poles. At telophase I (f3) multiple chromosome bridges were stretched between two groups of chromosomes at poles. The irregularities of meiosis II include intensively stained chromatin mass between partially decondensed dyad nuclei (g3); uneven distribution of chromosomes at metaphase II (h3); chromatin bridges across the organelle band in anaphase II (i3) and chromosomal fragments excluded from four distinct groups of chromosomes at telophase II (j3). All micrographs have the same scale bar = 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078760.g006

thumbnail
Figure 7. Arabidopsis mre11-2 atm-2 double mutant plants form empty siliques and are completely sterile.

a) Morphology of five weeks old mre11-2 atm-2 double mutant plant. b) The siliques from the mre11-2 atm-2 double mutant line produced no seeds, mre11-2 siliques had normal seed set and atm-2 mutant plants were partially sterile. c) Empty siliques of mre11-2 atm-2 double mutants - larger magnification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078760.g007

Cytogenetic analysis in atm-2 mutants showed that early stages of prophase I occurred normally up to pachytene, when homologous chromosomes were completely aligned along their length (Figure 6 a2). The first abnormalities in atm-2 meiosis become visible during the diplotene and diakinesis when chiasmata between bivalents (Figure 6 b2) and entangled multivalents (Figure 6 c2) were observed, suggesting that nonhomologous pairing and synapsis could occur during atm-2 meiosis. At metaphase I the unpaired chromosomes are displaced from bivalents that are aligned at equatorial plane (Figure 6 d2). However, the most obvious and frequent anomalies are chromosome fragmentation and abnormal stretches of chromosomes observed during anaphase-telophase I transition (Figure 6, e2 and f2). Bridges between univalents or chromatids accompanied by fragments were also present in meiosis II (Figure 6, g2- i2). At the end of atm-2 meiosis in telophase II several discrete fragments are seen outside of the four groups of chromosomes (Figure 6 j2). A similar meiotic phenotype was previously described for the Arabidopsis atm-1 mutant line [16].

Chromosome integrity in male meiocytes of mre11-2 atm2 double mutant was strongly affected; starting from late zygotene/early pachytene-like stages when homologous chromosomes fail to synapse and become extensively fragmented (Figure 6a3). During prophase I chromosomes were clumped together into groups of various sizes. Chromosome stickiness ranged from small aggregations that they might represent fragments of chromosomes (Figure 6b3) to multiple interconnected chromosomes (Figure 6 c3) and compact chromatin mass on the metaphase plate involving the entire chromosome complement (Figure 6 d3). The stickiness of chromatin caused impaired chromosome segregation in the first meiotic division (Figure 6, e3 and f3). Dyad stage meiocytes show several DAPI bright chromatin bodies lagged in the region of organelle band between the reforming nuclei (Figure 6 g3). At metaphase II unbalanced chromosome groups with distinctly sized units are evident (Figure 6 h3). Additional chromosome fragments appeared during separation in anaphase II (Figure 6 j3). The meiotic products of the second division were distributed into four groups of varying sizes (Figure 6 j3). Eventually, unequal nuclei reformed to produce equivalent of the tetrads with excluded laggard chromosomal bodies that did not contribute to microspores formation. This indicates that MRE11 partially compensates for ATM deficiency in meiosis and that mre11-2 plants are impaired in this function.

In silico analysis of the predicted truncated MRE11 proteins

To better understand the functional differences between the mre11-2 and mre11-4 alleles, we searched for structural homology in the region that is supposed to be truncated in the mre11-4 allele, but was presumably retained in the mre11-2 line (Figure 8a). Interestingly, this region is positioned immediately downstream of the recently identified Mre11-Rad50 binding domains (RBDs) in Pyrococcus furiosus [36]. Multiple sequence alignment of MRE11 fragment from seven plant species shows that the mre11-4 deletion partially overlaps with a region that is highly conserved in plants (Figure 8a).

thumbnail
Figure 8. The putative Rad50 binding domain of AtMRE11protein in several plant species and its predicted three dimensional structure.

a) Alignment between partial MRE11 sequences of Pyrococcus furiosus (Pf), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Solanum lycopersicum (Sl), Vitis vinifera (Vv), Ricinus communis (Rc), Glicinia max (Gm), Capsella rubella (Cr) and Zea mays (Zm). RBD-αI and RBD-αJ helices that make the RAD50 binding domain are indicated. b) Predicted three dimensional structure of the partial AtMRE11 protein. RBD-αI and RBD-αJ helices are marked in blue. 30 amino acids, which differ the putative MRE11 proteins coded by mre11-4 allele from mre11-2 allele, L499 to S530 are marked in green.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078760.g008

In order to obtain a more detailed information of the protein region affected by the mre11-4 deletion, we used the homology based prediction algorithm to get the three dimensional structure of affected region of MRE11. Alignment between the partial RBD sequences of P. furiosus and seven different plant species shows the positions of the helices RBD-αI and RBD-αJ. Sequence similarity between P. furiosus and A. thaliana for RBD-αI and RBD-αJ was 37.5% and 50% respectively. The second RBD helix is placed adjacent to the mre11-4 deletion, which may affect the function of this domain and the MRE11 protein (Figure 8 b).

Discussion

In this study, we compared two mre11 alleles, mre11-4 and mre11-2, that presumably produce putative truncated MRE11 proteins composed of the first 499 and 529 amino acid residues, respectively. However, despite this relatively small length difference in the C-terminus, the phenotypic differences between mre11-2 and mre11-4 mutant lines are striking: mre11-2 mutants display normal phenotype and fertility while mre11-4 plants were sterile with many developmental defects.

The chromosomal instability observed in mre11-3 and mre11-4 mutants lead to accumulation of DNA damage and consequently to increased cell death, which has been confirmed by trypan blue staining and reduction in the number of leaf cells. These results are in agreement with immunolocalization of γ-H2AX foci in in rad50 and mre11 root tips and reduced cell division in those cells [37]. This suggests that MRE11 function is severely compromised in these mutants. In contrast, mre11-2 plants look phenotypically normal arguing that this allele produces a truncated peptide that retains at least partial functionality, which may depend on aa residues 499-529. This region is very close to the Mre11 Rad50 binding domains (RBD) recently identified in Pyrococcus furiosus [36]. We suggest that T-DNA insertion in the mre11-4 allele has probably disrupted the putative Rad50 interaction and/or homodimerization domain, which is assumed to remain preserved in mre11-2 allele. The sequence conservation around the insertion site of the mre11-4 allele supports the hypothesis of the functional importance of the deleted region.

Using conditional mouse cell lines that either abrogate nuclease activities or inactivate the entire MRN complex, the essential function of MRN has been associated with the nuclease activity [15]. Lack of the nuclease activity causes phenotypes indistinguishable from the null allele, including early embryonic lethality and dramatic genomic instability. Although the mre11-4 allele could have preserved all the predicted nuclease domains, nevertheless phenotypically it is indistinguishable from mre11-3 mutant, which harbors disruption in the putative nuclease domain. According to our in silico model, deletion of RBD could have equally deleterious consequences for function of MRN complex as mutations in the nuclease domains. However, one must take into consideration the possibility that the mre11-4 could represent a 'null' allele, thus expressing no protein at all. Sterility and morphological resemblance between the mre11-3 mutants, which are assumed to be ‘null’ [35], and mre11-4 mutants could, possibly, suggest such an alternative interpretation of the data.

We demonstrated that mre11-4 mutants had an aberrant meiotic phenotype, very similar to the meiotic phenotype of mre11-3 mutants, which was characterized by severely fragmented chromosomes – consequence of unrepaired and misrepaired SPO11 induced DSBs [35]. The experimental evidence gathered in a number of organisms demonstrates that the Mre11 complex is required for processing of Spo11 induced meiotic DSBs, and permits homolog pairing, recombination and bivalent formation [38,39]. Recent studies suggest that Mre11 endo/exonuclease activities and Exonuclease 1 (Exo1) are required for removing Spo11- oligonucleotides from DSB ends [40] and for subsequent bidirectional resection of DSBs [41]. Thus the mre11-3 and mre11-4 alleles are deficient in repair of meiotic breaks.

In contrast, the mre11-2 allele that lacks 191 terminal amino acids is fully proficient in meiotic repair demonstrating that the C-terminus not be required for DSB repair in Arabidopsis. Similarly, in mammals, MRE11ALTD1/ATLD1 mutation caused by C-terminal 75-amino acid deletion is not associated with meiotic abnormalities in mice [42]. Although in budding yeast is the C-terminal part of the Mre11 protein required for DSB induction in meiosis, studies with separation of function mutants revealed that N-terminus is crucial for the DSB processing and repair [20,26]. We have previously demonstrated that MRE11 is not required for DSB induction in Arabidopsis [35], which is corroborated by the lack of any apparent meiotic defects in mre11-2 mutants. Nevertheless, we found that that mre11-2 causes in ATM deficient plants infertility and meiotic phenotype characterized by lack of chromosome pairing and defects in meiotic double strand break repair, suggesting that MRE11 protein and ATM kinase have a redundant meiotic function that is distinct from DSB repair. A similar genetic interaction has also been observed in nbs1-1 atm-3 double mutants, which are sterile, although nbs1-1 mutants are fertile and atm-3 mutants semi-fertile, thus suggesting that Arabidopsis ATM kinase plays synergistical role with NBS1 in the control of meiotic events [43].

Hypersensitivity of mre11-2 line to genotoxic treatments [21] suggests that C-terminus of the MRE11 protein is involved in DNA damage signaling/and or checkpoint activation, most-likely through interaction with NBS-1 and subsequent ATM/ATR activation. This assumption comes from the Mre11 structure defined by the X-ray crystallography, which shows that C-terminal domain close to the hydrophobic region is important for protein-protein interactions [8,11,44]. It was assumed that C-terminal truncation of Mre11 reduces protein interactions within the MRN complex as well as its interactions with other damage-response proteins, including ATM kinase.

New research suggests that the Mre11 C-terminus is playing a previously unknown role in human somatic dividing cells. It has been shown that Mre11 C-terminus interacts with CDK2 and governs the overall levels and the phosphorylation status of the CtIP protein and its interaction with BRCA1. This oligomeric protein complex controls the capacity of cells to initiate resection at DSBs and restricts the use of homologous recombination to cell cycle phases when sister chromatids are present and its function does not require ATM activation [45]. Although the significance of the mammalian protein CtIP in meiosis has not yet been elucidated, based on the phenotype of com1-1 mutant line, an Arabidopis homologue of the yeast Com1/Sae2 and closely related to the mammalian CtIP, it has been predicted that CtIP in Arabidopsis is required for meiotic DSB repair [46]. The confirmation of such genetic interaction would probably explain the complete sterility of double mre11-2 atm-2 mutant line.

Conclusion

The results of comparative molecular, cytogenetic and morphological characterization were showed that two Arabidopsis mutants harboring mre11-2 and mre11-4 alleles be strikingly different with regard to genome stability and meiosis. The structural analysis of the region surrounding the T-DNA insertion suggests that the region between aa 499-529, which probably represents the part of RAD50 interaction and/or homodimerization domain, is critical for the meiotic double strand break repair function of the Arabidopsis MRE11 protein. The fact that meiosis of mre11-2 mutants is compromised only in the ATM deficient plants, suggest that C-terminus of the MRE11 protein, which was previously assumed to be dispensable for Arabidopsis meiosis, is associated with another, currently unknown, meiotic function of MRE11 in Arabidopsis, probably related to DNA damage signaling.

Material and Methods

Arabidopsis lines and growth conditions

Seeds of the mre11-4 Arabidopsis thaliana SALK_028450 line, ecotype Columbia (Col-0), were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (Nottingham, UK). Because mre11-4 mutants are sterile, the mre11-4 allele was maintained via self-fertilization of heterozygous plants. Double mutants were produced by crossing the atmre11-2 mutants into the atatm-2 background and screening subsequent generations. All plants were cultivated in a growth chamber under long-day condition (16-h light/8-h dark) at 23 °C, on a mixture of peat (Type 3 special, Gebr. Brill Substrate, Germany) and a silicaceous material of volcanic origin (Agrilit 3, Perlite Italiana, Italy). In order to break seed dormancy and allow coordinated germination, seeds were placed on moist filter paper for 48-h at 4 °C in Petri dishes wrapped with parafilm.

For comparative phenotypic analysis of wild-type and mre11 seedlings, seeds were sown on medium (pH 5.8) containing Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal salt mixture (4.39 g/L, Sigma) plus Gamborg`s B-5 Basal Salt Mixture (3.1g/L, Sigma), MES monohydrate (0.5 g / L, 4-Morpholineethanesulfonic acid monohydrate, Fluka), sucrose (10 g/L) and agar (6 g/L, Plant agar, Duchefa, Biochemie). Before planting, Arabidopsis seeds were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol for 1 min, then with bleach solution (6.15% sodium hypochlorite solution plus 0.1% Triton X-100) for 7 min, and subsequently rinsed by sterile distilled water 5 times, and then kept in the dark for 48-h at 4° for stratification. The plates were then transferred to a 23 °C chamber for ten days.

DNA analyses

Plant genomic DNA was extracted from 0.05-0.2 g A. thaliana fresh leaf tissue using the hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) extraction buffer [47]. Plants were genotyped by PCR with two gene specific primers flanking insertion site and with a primer specific for left border of the T-DNA. Primers M5 (5'-CGTCATCGTCTTTG-CTACTGAGTA-3') and M6 (5'-ATGGAGATCCTTCCAGTTAACGAT-3') and LBc-1 (5'-TGGACCGCTTGCTGCAACTCT-3') were used for the MRE11 locus, resulting in 1329-bp and ~1- kb products for the wild-type and mre11-4 alleles. As the atmre11-2 atatm-2 double mutant is completely sterile, we PCR- screened F2 offspring for homozygous insertion mre11-2-/- [gene-specific primers M5 and M6 plus the T-DNA specific primer JL-202 (5'-CATTTT ATAATAACGCTGCGGACATCTAC-3'] and homozygous insertion atm-2-/- [gene-specific primers AtmF19 (5'-CTTGCCTCCCAGAAAAATGTTATT-3') and AtmR19 (5'-ACACTTCCTCT-AAACTCAACTATCAGACG-3') plus T-DNA specific primer LBc-1. Two 650-bp and 850-bp products were generated from the mre11-2 allele and 650-bp product from the atm-2 allele. Purified DNA sample (10 ng/μL) was added to PCR mixture (final volume of 20 μL) that contained 10x PCR buffer minus Mg (1x), MgCl2 (1.5 mM), dNTP mixture (0.2 mM), 0.5 μM concentrations of each of the primers and 0.05 U/ μL of recombinant Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). PCR condition for the ATM locus were as follows: 94°C for 2 min, followed by 10 cycles with a decrease in annealing temperature (94°C for 15 s, 65 to 0.5°C per cycle for 15 s, and 68°C for 2 min), followed by 35 cycles (94°C for 15 s, 60°C for 15 s, and 68°C for 2 min) and final extension step at 68°C for 7 min. The conditions of MRE11-PCR were as follows: 94°C for 4 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s; and 72°C for 7 min.

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from young inflorescences using the TriReagent solution (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). RNA samples were DNase-treated (DNase Set; Qiagen) and quantified. First strand MRE11 and GAPA cDNAs were synthesized as follows: 5 pmol of primers M7 (5'-ACACCAGAACCACCAAGAACCAT-3'), M2 (5'-CCAATGGGAGTTTGATCTCTGA-3'), M5, LBc-1 and GAPA-2 (5'- CAACTCTCTGTGAGTAACCCCAT-3') were incubated with 2 μg of total RNA at 70°C for 5 min. Reverse transcription was performed with M-MLV (H-) reverse transcriptase (8 U/ μL, RevertAid TM H Minus Reverse Transcriptase, Fermentas) in a 25 μL reaction volume at 37 °C for 50 min. MRE11 fragments were amplified from cDNA pools by PCR with following gene-specific primer combinations: M4 plus M7; M1 (5'-CCAATGGATGAGGCC-TGAAGTT-3') plus M2; M5 plus M6. Positions of the primers relative to the MRE11 gene are shown schematically in Figure 1a. PCR thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 4 minutes at 94°C, 25 cycles of 15 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 60°C and 1 minute at 72°C, followed by 7 minutes at 72°C. Control RT-PCR with GAPA2 and GAPA3 (5´-TCTTCTCCCTTGGAAGGAGCT-3´) primers specific for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase A (GAPA) were performed for 20 cycles.

Analysis of meiotic and mitotic chromosomes

Inflorescences of both the wild type and mutants were harvested and fixed in Carnoy`s solution (ethanol:glacial acetic acid, 3:1) and stored at 4°C. Mitotic figures were obtained from pistils of unopened floral buds. Meiotic figures were prepared from anthers of young floral buds (~ 0.5 mm in diameter). After washing the inflorescences in water and 0.01M citrate buffer (pH 4.7), pistils or anthers were dissected under the stereo microscope and transferred to an enzyme mixture containing 0.5% (w/v) cellulase Onozuka R-10 (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) and 0.5% (w/v) pectolyase (Sigma) in 0.01 M citrate buffer. The enzyme mixture was replaced by citrate buffer after ~45 min of incubation at 37°C in a moist chamber. Citrate buffer was removed and pistils or anthers were squeezed by a pinhead on the glass slide in a drop of 45% acetic acid. After freezing slides at −80°C, coverslip was removed and slides were air-dried. Slides were stained with 2mg/mL of DAPI and mounted in Vectashield antifade solution (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Identification of meiotic stages was performed according to [48,49]. Images were captured under a Zeiss Axio-imager M1 Epifluorescence and Brightfield Microscope with a high-resolution microscopy camera (Carl Zeiss AxioCam MR Rev3) using Axio Vision Rel. 4.7 softer (Karl Zeiss, Vienna, Austria).

Cell death assay

Necrotic lesions on leaves were detected by lactophenol-trypan blue staining [50]. Stain solution was prepared by mixing 8g of phenol, 8 mL of glycerol, 8 mL of lactic acid, 8 mL of distilled water and 8g of trypan blue (Sigma).Whole leaves were boiled for approximately 1 min in the stain solution, incubated overnight at room temperature and then decolorized in chloral hydrate (2,5g/ mL). Trypan blue-stained areas were examined under a microscope.

In silico analysis of the predicted truncated MRE11 proteins

Gene structure schematic diagram is drawn by Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) available at the Center for Bioinformatics (CBI) on Peking University (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) [51]. The prediction of three-dimensional structure of A. thaliana MRE11 fragment was done using I-TASSER server (http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/). As an additional restraint for homology based modeling, A. thaliana MRE11 protein was aligned with RAD50 binding domain of the Mre11 protein of Pyrococcus furiosus [36], which structure was retrieved from PDB database (PDB ID: 3QKU, 3QKS). All sequence alignments were done by Muscle algorithm within MEGA5 software package [52].

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions, which improved the final version of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JP KR. Performed the experiments: IS JP JS. Analyzed the data: IS JS JP KR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JP KR. Wrote the manuscript: IS JP KR.

References

  1. 1. Haber JE (1998) The many interfaces of Mre11. Cell 95: 583-586. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81626-8. PubMed: 9845359.
  2. 2. D'Amours D, Jackson SP (2002) The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 317-327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm805. PubMed: 11988766.
  3. 3. Stracker TH, Theunissen JW, Morales M, Petrini JH (2004) The Mre11 complex and the metabolism of chromosome breaks: the importance of communicating and holding things together. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 845-854. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.014. PubMed: 15279769.
  4. 4. Assenmacher N, Hopfner KP (2004) MRE11/RAD50/NBS1: complex activities. Chromosoma 113: 157-166. PubMed: 15309560.
  5. 5. Borde V (2007) The multiple roles of the Mre11 complex for meiotic recombination. Chromosome Res 15: 551-563. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-007-1147-9. PubMed: 17674145.
  6. 6. Slijepcevic P (2006) The role of DNA damage response proteins at telomeres--an "integrative" model. DNA Repair (Amst) 5: 1299-1306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.05.038. PubMed: 16798109.
  7. 7. Williams RS, Williams JS, Tainer JA (2007) Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 is a keystone complex connecting DNA repair machinery, double-strand break signaling, and the chromatin template. Biochem Cell Biol 85: 509-520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/O07-069. PubMed: 17713585.
  8. 8. Rupnik A, Lowndes NF, Grenon M (2010) MRN and the race to the break. Chromosoma 119: 115-135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-009-0242-4. PubMed: 19862546.
  9. 9. de Jager M, van Noort J, van Gent DC, Dekker C, Kanaar R et al. (2001) Human Rad50/Mre11 is a flexible complex that can tether DNA ends. Mol Cell 8: 1129-1135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00381-1. PubMed: 11741547.
  10. 10. van Noort J, van der Heijden T, de Jager M, Wyman C, Kanaar R et al. (2003) The coiled-coil of the human Rad50 DNA repair protein contains specific segments of increased flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 7581-7586. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1330706100. PubMed: 12805565.
  11. 11. Hopfner KP, Craig L, Moncalian G, Zinkel RA, Usui T et al. (2002) The Rad50 zinc-hook is a structure joining Mre11 complexes in DNA recombination and repair. Nature 418: 562-566. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00922. PubMed: 12152085.
  12. 12. Trujillo KM, Yuan SS, Lee EY, Sung P (1998) Nuclease activities in a complex of human recombination and DNA repair factors Rad50, Mre11, and p95. J Biol Chem 273: 21447-21450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.34.21447. PubMed: 9705271.
  13. 13. Paull TT, Gellert M (1998) The 3' to 5' exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell 1: 969-979. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80097-0. PubMed: 9651580.
  14. 14. Moreau S, Ferguson JR, Symington LS (1999) The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol Cell Biol 19: 556-566. PubMed: 9858579.
  15. 15. Buis J, Wu Y, Deng Y, Leddon J, Westfield G et al. (2008) Mre11 nuclease activity has essential roles in DNA repair and genomic stability distinct from ATM activation. Cell 135: 85-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.015. PubMed: 18854157.
  16. 16. Garcia V, Bruchet H, Camescasse D, Granier F, Bouchez D et al. (2003) AtATM is essential for meiosis and the somatic response to DNA damage in plants. Plant Cell 15: 119-132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.006577. PubMed: 12509526.
  17. 17. Paull TT, Lee JH (2005) The Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex and its role as a DNA double-strand break sensor for ATM. Cell Cycle 4: 737-740. doi:https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.4.6.1715. PubMed: 15908798.
  18. 18. Borde V, Cobb J (2009) Double functions for the Mre11 complex during DNA double-strand break repair and replication. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 41: 1249-1253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2008.12.013. PubMed: 19150506.
  19. 19. Hartung F, Puchta H (1999) Isolation of the complete cDNA of the Mre11 homologue of Arabidopsis (accession No. AJ243822) indicates conservation of DNA recombination mechanisms between plants and other eukaryotes. Plant Physiol 121: 312.
  20. 20. Usui T, Ohta T, Oshiumi H, Tomizawa J, Ogawa H et al. (1998) Complex formation and functional versatility of Mre11 of budding yeast in recombination. Cell 95: 705-716. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81640-2. PubMed: 9845372.
  21. 21. Bundock P, Hooykaas P (2002) Severe developmental defects, hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, and lengthened telomeres in Arabidopsis MRE11 mutants. Plant Cell 14: 2451-2462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.005959. PubMed: 12368497.
  22. 22. Trujillo KM, Roh DH, Chen L, Van Komen S, Tomkinson A et al. (2003) Yeast xrs2 binds DNA and helps target rad50 and mre11 to DNA ends. J Biol Chem 278: 48957-48964. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M309877200. PubMed: 14522986.
  23. 23. Williams RS, Tainer JA (2005) A nanomachine for making ends meet: MRN is a flexing scaffold for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell 19: 724-726. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.006. PubMed: 16168369.
  24. 24. Moreno-Herrero F, de Jager M, Dekker NH, Kanaar R, Wyman C et al. (2005) Mesoscale conformational changes in the DNA-repair complex Rad50/Mre11/Nbs1 upon binding DNA. Nature 437: 440-443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03927. PubMed: 16163361.
  25. 25. Ajimura M, Leem SH, Ogawa H (1993) Identification of new genes required for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 133: 51-66. PubMed: 8417989.
  26. 26. Nairz K, Klein F (1997) mre11S--a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev 11: 2272-2290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.17.2272. PubMed: 9303542.
  27. 27. Xiao Y, Weaver DT (1997) Conditional gene targeted deletion by Cre recombinase demonstrates the requirement for the double-strand break repair Mre11 protein in murine embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 2985-2991. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.15.2985. PubMed: 9224597.
  28. 28. Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, Morrison C, Haraguchi T et al. (1999) Mre11 is essential for the maintenance of chromosomal DNA in vertebrate cells. EMBO J 18: 6619-6629. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.23.6619. PubMed: 10581236.
  29. 29. Zhu J, Petersen S, Tessarollo L, Nussenzweig A (2001) Targeted disruption of the Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene NBS1 leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr Biol 11: 105-109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00019-7. PubMed: 11231126.
  30. 30. Gallego ME, Jeanneau M, Granier F, Bouchez D, Bechtold N et al. (2001) Disruption of the Arabidopsis RAD50 gene leads to plant sterility and MMS sensitivity. Plant J 25: 31-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00928.x. PubMed: 11169180.
  31. 31. Gallego ME, White CI (2001) RAD50 function is essential for telomere maintenance in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 1711-1716. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.4.1711. PubMed: 11172016.
  32. 32. Gherbi H, Gallego ME, Jalut N, Lucht JM, Hohn B et al. (2001) Homologous recombination in planta is stimulated in the absence of Rad50. EMBO Rep 2: 287-291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/embo-reports/kve069. PubMed: 11306548.
  33. 33. Heacock M, Spangler E, Riha K, Puizina J, Shippen DE (2004) Molecular analysis of telomere fusions in Arabidopsis: multiple pathways for chromosome end-joining. EMBO J 23: 2304-2313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600236. PubMed: 15141167.
  34. 34. Bleuyard JY, Gallego ME, White CI (2004) Meiotic defects in the Arabidopsis rad50 mutant point to conservation of the MRX complex function in early stages of meiotic recombination. Chromosoma 113: 197-203. PubMed: 15309561.
  35. 35. Puizina J, Siroky J, Mokros P, Schweizer D, Riha K (2004) Mre11 deficiency in Arabidopsis is associated with chromosomal instability in somatic cells and Spo11-dependent genome fragmentation during meiosis. Plant Cell 16: 1968-1978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.104.022749. PubMed: 15258261.
  36. 36. Williams GJ, Williams RS, Williams JS, Moncalian G, Arvai AS et al. (2011) ABC ATPase signature helices in Rad50 link nucleotide state to Mre11 interface for DNA repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 423-431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2038. PubMed: 21441914.
  37. 37. Amiard S, Charbonnel C, Allain E, Depeiges A, White CI et al. (2010) Distinct roles of the ATR kinase and the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex in the maintenance of chromosomal stability in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22: 3020-3033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.078527. PubMed: 20876831.
  38. 38. Keeney S (2001) Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr Top Dev Biol 52: 1-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(01)52008-6. PubMed: 11529427.
  39. 39. Grelon M, Vezon D, Gendrot G, Pelletier G (2001) AtSPO11-1 is necessary for efficient meiotic recombination in plants. EMBO J 20: 589-600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.3.589. PubMed: 11157765.
  40. 40. Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S (2005) Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436: 1053-1057. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03872. PubMed: 16107854.
  41. 41. Garcia V, Phelps SE, Gray S, Neale MJ (2011) Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1. Nature 479: 241-244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10515. PubMed: 22002605.
  42. 42. Theunissen JW, Kaplan MI, Hunt PA, Williams BR, Ferguson DO et al. (2003) Checkpoint failure and chromosomal instability without lymphomagenesis in Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) mice. Mol Cell 12: 1511-1523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00455-6. PubMed: 14690604.
  43. 43. Waterworth WM, Altun C, Armstrong SJ, Roberts N, Dean PJ et al. (2007) NBS1 is involved in DNA repair and plays a synergistic role with ATM in mediating meiotic homologous recombination in plants. Plant J 52: 41-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03220.x. PubMed: 17672843.
  44. 44. Williams RS, Moncalian G, Williams JS, Yamada Y, Limbo O et al. (2008) Mre11 dimers coordinate DNA end bridging and nuclease processing in double-strand-break repair. Cell 135: 97-109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.017. PubMed: 18854158.
  45. 45. Buis J, Stoneham T, Spehalski E, Ferguson DO (2012) Mre11 regulates CtIP-dependent double-strand break repair by interaction with CDK2. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 246-252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2212. PubMed: 22231403.
  46. 46. Uanschou C, Siwiec T, Pedrosa-Harand A, Kerzendorfer C, Sanchez-Moran E et al. (2007) A novel plant gene essential for meiosis is related to the human CtIP and the yeast COM1/SAE2 gene. EMBO J 26: 5061-5070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601913. PubMed: 18007598.
  47. 47. Doyle J, Doyle J (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh green tissue. Phytochem Bulletins 19: 11-15.
  48. 48. Ross KJ, Fransz P, Jones GH (1996) A light microscopic atlas of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Chromosome Res 4: 507-516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02261778. PubMed: 8939362.
  49. 49. Armstrong SJ, Jones GH (2003) Meiotic cytology and chromosome behaviour in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot 54: 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg034. PubMed: 12456750.
  50. 50. Koch E, Slusarenko A (1990) Arabidopsis is susceptible to infection by a downy mildew fungus. Plant Cell 2: 437-445. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3869093. PubMed: 2152169.
  51. 51. Guo AY, Zhu QH, Chen X, Luo JC (2007) [GSDS: a gene structure display server]. Yi Chuan 29: 1023-1026. doi:https://doi.org/10.1360/yc-007-1023. PubMed: 17681935.
  52. 52. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731-2739. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121. PubMed: 21546353.