Figures
Abstract
Background
It has been reported that treatment of DENV-infected cultures with Lovastatin (LOV), can affect viral assembly. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of LOV on the survival rate and viremia levels of DENV-2-infected AG129 mice.
Methodology/Principal Findings
Mice were inoculated with 1×106 plaque-forming units (PFU/ml) of DENV-2 and treated with LOV (200 mg/kg/day). Pre-treatment with one or three doses of LOV increased the survival rate compared to untreated mice (7.3 and 7.1 days, respectively, compared to 4.8 days). Viremia levels also decreased by 21.8% compared to untreated mice, but only in the group administered three doses prior to inoculation. When LOV was administered after viral inoculation, the survival rate increased (7.3 days in the group treated at 24 hpi, 6.8 days in the group treated at 48 hpi and 6.5 days in the group treated with two doses) compared to the untreated group (4.8 days). Interestingly, the serum viral titer increased by 24.6% in mice treated at 48 hpi with a single dose of LOV and by 21.7% in mice treated with two doses (at 24 and 48 hpi) of LOV compared to untreated mice. Finally histopathological changes in the liver and spleen in infected and untreated mice included massive extramedullary erythropoiesis foci and inflammatory filtration, and these characteristics were decreased or absent in LOV-treated mice.
Conclusions/Significance
Our results suggest that the effect of LOV on viremia depends on the timing of treatment and on the number of doses administered. We observed a significant increase in the survival rate in both schemes due to a delay in the progression of the disease. However, the results obtained in the post-treatment scheme must be handled carefully because this treatment scheme increases viremia and we do not know how this increase could affect disease progression in humans.
Citation: Martinez-Gutierrez M, Correa-Londoño LA, Castellanos JE, Gallego-Gómez JC, Osorio JE (2014) Lovastatin Delays Infection and Increases Survival Rates in AG129 Mice Infected with Dengue Virus Serotype 2. PLoS ONE 9(2): e87412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087412
Editor: Pierre Roques, CEA, France
Received: July 10, 2013; Accepted: December 27, 2013; Published: February 21, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Martinez-Gutierrez et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by COLCIENCIAS (Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación) grant No. 111549326092. M.M.G. received a Ph.D. Fellowship (1308-489-25267) from COLCIENCIAS (http://www.colciencias.gov.co/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Dengue is an arthropod-transmitted disease that has great importance worldwide. An estimated 50 million cases of dengue occur annually, especially in tropical and subtropical areas. In 2011, there were more than one million cases of dengue in the Americas alone, almost 20,000 with hemorrhagic complications, and an overall mortality rate of 0.07% [1]. In the last 50 years, the incidence of the disease has increased 30-fold, and it has even expanded into new geographic zones. This increase is due in part to global climate change. For example, through 2010, the El Niño phenomenon has been associated with an increase in the number of cases of dengue reported in Central and South America, including Colombia [2].
Dengue is caused by the dengue virus (DENV, official acronym), which is a member of the Flaviviridae family, genus Flavivirus. The disease is transmitted by mosquitoes of the genus Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae, Subgenus Stegomyia), with Aedes aegypti being the main vector in urban areas [3]. Four serotypes of DENV (1–4) can cause the disease, which can develop with a wide range of symptoms. Some patients develop a mild, self-limiting illness, while others progress into a severe illness characterized mainly by plasma extravasation that can be hemorrhagic or non-hemorrhagic [4]. Several classifications of the disease have been proposed; however, the most recent classification proposed by the World Health Organization is based on severity levels (severe and non-severe dengue). In addition, the non-severe dengue group includes both patients with warning signs of developing severe dengue and those who do not show these signs [5].
Currently, there is no licensed vaccine to prevent the development of the disease, nor is there any specific therapy against DENV infection. For this reason, the search for antiviral drugs derived from natural products or already licensed drugs that could have prophylactic and/or therapeutic use is a research priority [6]. Although in recent years a large number of studies have evaluated drugs with antiviral activity [7], only some drugs, such as chloroquine [8], balapiravir [9] and celgosivir [10], have been tested in clinical trials, and none of these have been licensed for use in humans.
The antiviral potential of Lovastatin (LOV) on DENV infection in cell culture has recently been reported [11]. This effect was reportedly due in part to faulty viral assembly [12]. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of LOV on adult patients infected with DENV has been proposed [13]. LOV is a drug that inhibits the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase [14]; this inhibition results primarily in decreased cholesterol synthesis but also affects other cellular processes such as isoprenoid synthesis and glycosylation due to the inhibition of dolichol synthesis. However, statins can also have “pleiotropic” effects on other cellular activities that are not directly dependent on cholesterol inhibition [15].
In vitro evaluations of compounds with antiviral potential are very useful; however, pre-clinical assays using animal models are essential for identifying the most promising drugs that can be evaluated and used in the medium-term in infected patients. Several DENV-infected mouse models have been used to model pathogenesis and the immune response and also for medication development and vaccine studies [16]. Among these is the AG129 mouse model, which is deficient in receptors for interferon (IFN) types I and II (IFN-α/β and IFN–γ, respectively).
The AG129 mouse model was established in 1995 to evaluate the antiviral response against lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus and vaccinia virus [17]. Several years later, this model was used to evaluate the immune response that developed after the inoculation of vaccine candidates against DENV [18]. In the last decade, AG129 mice have turned out to be a useful tool to study dengue in diverse fields, facilitating research in viral pathogenesis and immunity against infection [19]. In addition, these mice have been helpful in the evaluation of vaccine candidates [20] and drugs with potential antiviral activity [21], [22], [23], [24], [25].
Considering the previously reported in vitro antiviral activity of LOV and the utility of the AG129 mouse model for studying the antiviral potential of certain compounds, our objective was to evaluate the effect of LOV on viremia and survival in AG129 mice infected with DENV-2.
Materials and Methods
DENV Production
The New Guinea strain DENV-2 (ATCC VR-1255) was kindly donated by Dr. Richard Kenney (Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ft. Collins, CO). For its production, C6/36 cells from Aedes albopictus (ATCC CRL-1660) were grown in 5% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) at 28°C. The virus was passaged 10 to 15 times in tissue culture and then titered. To obtain viral titers greater than 1×107 PFU/ml, the supernatants were collected and centrifuged for 1 hr at 30,000 g. The pellet was then resuspended in RPMI medium and stored at −70°C until use. For inoculations, the virus was resuspended in 50 µl of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to a viral concentration of 5×105 PFU/ml or 1×106 PFU/ml.
Ethics Statement
All of our experiments that involved the use of animals were approved by the Animal Experiment Committee of the University of Wisconsin and were carried out by properly trained researchers. All procedures were carried out in accordance with institutional guidelines and the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Inoculation of AG129 Mice
AG129 mice were obtained from B&K Universal. Adult mice (six to eight weeks) were kept under ad libitum feeding conditions with 12 hr cycles of light and darkness. A 50-µl viral suspension containing either 5×105 or 1×106 PFU/ml was inoculated intraperitoneally. Animals were monitored for 30 min after inoculation to check for possible secondary effects on behavior.
LOV Treatment
Recently, it has been reported that the antiviral effect produced by LOV in cell culture varies depending on the experimental strategy used. In cultures treated with LOV before inoculation (pre-treatment), the amount of viral protein decreased significantly, whereas in cultures receiving LOV after inoculation (post-treatment), the amount of both protein and viral genome increased significantly [11]. These results led us to postulate that, depending on the timing of LOV administration, the drug could produce antiviral effects through different mechanisms. For this reason, in the AG129 mouse model, we decided to evaluate two treatment schemes: pre- and post-inoculation treatment. Moreover, taking into account previous reports of antiviral activity in the AG129 mouse model [21], [22], the antiviral efficacy of LOV was defined in terms of a decrease in viremia or an increase in survival.
Groups of six AG129 mice (six to eight weeks old) were subjected to seven different treatment schemes: Pre-treatment with single or three doses and post-treatment with early, late and two doses or five and six doses) (Figure 1). Moreover, in each assay we used three different types of controls groups: The “PBS” group consisted of mice that were not treated with LOV and were not infected but administered with PBS alone, the “CONTROL” group consisted of mice that were treated with LOV but were not infected and the “CONTROL-WITHOUT-LOV” group consisted of mice that were not treated with LOV but were inoculated with DENV-2. In both experimental strategies (pre and post-treatment), the viremia levels, loss of body weight and the survival rate of the CONTROL WITHOUT LOV group was compared with the treated groups. Finally, the CONTROL group was used to guaranty that the dose of LOV was not toxic.
Groups of six AG129 mice were subjected to seven treatment schemes. The effect of LOV on viremia and survival rate before viral inoculation (pre-treatment) was evaluated in two experimental groups: single dose (only one dose 24 hours before viral inoculation) and three doses (72, 48 and 24 hours before viral inoculation). The effect of LOV on viremia and survival rate after viral inoculation (post-treatment) was evaluated in three experimental groups: Early dose (only one dose 24 after viral inoculation), late dose (only one dose 48 after viral inoculation) and two doses (24 and 48 hours after viral inoculation). Finally, two other groups were used to evaluate the effect of multiple LOV doses, administered only post-inoculation, on the survival rate (groups five and six doses). In the first five groups, at three days post-inoculation, blood samples were collected and viremia was quantified by a plaque formation assay in VERO cells. The black triangles indicate the day of viral inoculation, the red arrows indicate the days when the clinical signs were monitored, and the red lines indicate the experimental groups in which viremia or survival was measured. In all groups, animals were monitored twice a day and clinical signs (body weight, hackle hair, diarrhea, lethargy and paralysis) and survival rates were evaluated until day eight days, when the animals were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation.
In the treated groups, 200 mg/kg/day of LOV (Merck) was prepared in 50 µl PBS and administered orally. This dose was established by considering previous reports on the antiviral effect of LOV in mice infected with respiratory syncytial virus [26]. In that study, the authors tested three different doses of LOV: 0.5, 1 and 5 mg/day. Taking into account the average weight of a mouse (approximately 25 g), those doses correspond to human doses of 20, 40 and 200 mg/kg/day, respectively. We chose to use the 200 mg/kg/day dose (equivalent to 5 mg/day). The animals were monitored daily, and clinical signs (body weight, hackle hair, diarrhea, lethargy and paralysis) and the survival rate were evaluated until the completion of the study (eight days). Animals that showed clinical signs of severe illness prior to ending the study were sacrificed immediately by CO2 asphyxiation.
Viremia Quantification from Blood Samples
At three and five days post-inoculation, blood samples were collected (approximately 100 µl) from immobilized animals by saphenous vein puncture. Serum samples were obtained by centrifugation after the blood coagulated. Viremia was quantified by a plaque formation assay in VERO cells. For this assay, 5×104 cells were seeded per well in a 24-well plate, and triplicate serial dilutions of each sample (10−1–10−5) were prepared in DMEM and added to the cells. The serum was removed 1 hr after inoculation, and semisolid media was added (DMEM with 1.5% carboxymethylcellulose and 2% FBS). After seven days of incubation, the plates were stained with crystal violet and counted to obtain the titer in PFU/ml.
Tissue Collection for Histopathological Analysis
Several animals were sacrificed at eight days post-inoculation by CO2 asphyxiation. The skin of each animal was then cleaned with 70% antiseptic alcohol, and tissues (spleen and liver) were dissected using surgical instruments. After dissection, the tissues were fixed in 10% formaldehyde for 48 hrs, processed in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Clinical Follow-up
The mice were monitored twice a day, and clinical signs (body weight, hackle hair, diarrhea, lethargy and paralysis) were recorded. The duration of the study was eight days (endpoint), but animals that showed clinical signs of severe illness prior to the end of the study were sacrificed immediately by CO2 asphyxiation, in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Experimentation Committee. The survival rate of each group was recorded daily until the end of the study.
Statistical Analysis
The viral titers in PFU/ml were tested for normality of distribution using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. When the titers had a normal distribution, an ANOVA-LSD test was used to compare levels of viremia between the treated and untreated groups. When the viral titers in PFU/ml did not have a normal distribution, we used a Kruskal-Wallis test to compare levels of viremia between treated and untreated groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were drawn and a Wilcoxon test was used to compare the survival between treated and untreated groups. Finally, to compare the average survival rates between treated and untreated groups, the ANOVA-LSD test was used. In all cases, p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Comparison of Viremia Levels and Survival Rates of Mice Infected with Different Doses of the Virus
To determine the optimal dose for infection and the time of the highest levels of viremia, groups of six mice were infected intraperitoneally with either 5×105 or 1×106 PFU/ml of the New Guinea strain of DENV.
At three and five days post-inoculation (dpi), serum samples were collected to quantify viremia by plaque assay in VERO cells. At 3 dpi, 4.1×104 PFU/ml were detected when a high dose of the virus was inoculated, while half the dosage only produced a quarter of the viremia (1.2×104 PFU/ml). Independently of the inoculated dose, there was a 70% decrease in viremia at 5 dpi (9.7×103 with a high dosage of the virus and 2.5×103 with half the dosage) (Figure 2A). Clinical signs and weight were recorded over twelve days. In the two infected groups, a considerable loss of weight was recorded compared to the control group inoculated with PBS. Weight loss began at 4 dpi and was maintained until days 8 (24.6%) and 12 (24.6%) in mice inoculated with the higher (1×106 PFU/ml) and lower (5×105 PFU/ml) doses of virus, respectively (Figure 2B). This weight loss was associated with the development of paralysis that prevented the mice from moving and getting food. In contrast, we found that the average survival (9.4±1.6 days) was significantly greater in the group inoculated with 5×105 PFU/ml compared to mice inoculated with 1×106 PFU/ml (4.8±1.6 days) (p<0.001) (Figure 2C–D). When animals showed clinical signs of severe paralysis with or without weight loss greater than 20%, they were sacrificed immediately by CO2 asphyxiation. The average survival rate was calculated based on the sum of days that each mouse survived (until death or sacrifice) over the number of mice in each experimental group. Because mice inoculated with 1×106 PFU/ml developed higher levels of viremia, this dose was used for subsequent assays.
Groups of six mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with a high viral dose of 1×106 PFU/ml (dark bars) or a low viral dose of 1×105 PFU/ml (grey bars) to determine the optimal dose of infection and time of occurrence of the highest levels of viremia. A. Plaque assay of infected VERO cells to quantify serum viremia at 3 and 5 dpi. Bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). B. Average body weight percentage, recorded every two days until the animals died or were sacrificed. C. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the survival rates of both groups from day 0 to day 12. D. Comparison of the survival rates of the two groups. Mice inoculated with 1×106 PFU/ml developed higher levels of viremia at day 3.
Effect of Pre-treatment with LOV on Viremia and Survival Rate of DENV-2-infected Mice
Because recent reports have shown that the antiviral effect of LOV in vitro is dependent on the treatment scheme used (before or after inoculation), these same strategies were used in the in vivo AG129 mouse infection model. To determine the effect of LOV administered prior to viral inoculation (pre-treatment), groups of six mice were treated with a single dose (24 hrs) or three doses (72, 48 and 24 hrs) before inoculation with DENV-2 (Figure 1). Moreover, three different types of control groups were used (See Materials and Methods section). In the group pre-treated with three LOV doses, there was a significant 21.8% reduction in viremia compared to the control group without LOV (p<0.001) (Table 1). Viremia was not significantly reduced in mice treated with a single LOV dose (reduction of 3.0%) (Figure 3A). In the groups treated with one or three LOV doses, weight loss was reduced compared to the control group without LOV (18.6% and 15.1%, respectively, compared to 24.0%) (Figure 3B). Based on Kaplan-Meier analyses, we found a significant increase of survival in the groups treated with one or three doses compared to the control group without LOV (p<0.05). This result is consistent with the average survival rates, which significantly increased (p<0.001) in the groups treated with one or three doses compared to the control group without LOV (7.33±1.0 and 7.17±0.9 days, respectively, versus 4.8±1.6 days) (Figure 3C–D). The LOV treatment alone did not affect the weight or survival time of treated mice in the control group. However, despite the reductions in viremia and weight loss and the increased survival rate observed following LOV treatment, some animals in this experimental group (pre-treatment) developed severe paralysis and were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation the moment these signs started to develop.
Groups of six mice were treated with LOV (200 mg/kg/day) orally prior to intraperitoneal inoculation with 1×106 PFU/ml of virus. One group was treated with a single dose (24 hrs before viral inoculation), and the other group was treated with three doses (72, 48 and 24 hrs before viral inoculation). Three types of controls groups were used. The “PBS” group consisted of mice that were not treated with LOV and were not infected, the “CONTROL” group consisted of mice that were treated with LOV but were not infected and the “CONTROL WITHOUT LOV” group consisted of mice that were not treated with LOV but were inoculated with DENV-2. The viremia and survival rates were compared between the control without LOV group and the treated groups (single- and three-dose groups). A. Plaque assay of infected VERO cells to quantify serum viremia at 3 dpi. Bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). B. Average body weight percentage, recorded every two days until the animals died or were sacrificed. C. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the survival rates of the untreated group and groups treated with one or three doses of LOV. D. Comparison of survival rates between the untreated group and groups treated with one or three doses. Asterisks in A and D indicate statistically significant differences between the treated LOV groups and the control without LOV group. In the group pre-treated with three LOV doses, there was a significant reduction in viremia. Moreover, the survival rates were increased in both groups (pre-treated with one or three doses).
Effect of LOV Post-treatment on Viremia and Survival Rates of DENV-2-infected Mice
We next evaluated the effect of LOV administered after viral inoculation (post-treatment). Groups of six mice were treated in three schemes: a single dose administered at 24 hours post-inoculation (hpi), a single dose administered at 48 hpi or two doses administered at 24 and 48 hpi. Moreover, three different types of controls groups were used (see the Materials and Methods section). The viral titer from mice treated at 24 hpi (4.3×104 PFU/ml) was not different from the titer of mice without LOV (4.2×104 PFU/ml). Surprisingly, in groups treated with a single dose at 48 hpi or with two doses (24 and 48 hpi), we found higher serum viral titers (5.2×104 and 5.1×104 PFU/ml, respectively) compared to the control group without LOV (4.2×104 PFU/ml) (24.6% and 21.7% increases, respectively; p<0.001) (Figure 4A and Table 1). Weight loss in infected animals was 24%, while LOV treatment at 24, 48 and 24+48 hpi reduced weight loss to only 8.0%, 13.0% and 5.3%, respectively (Figure 4B). Using Kaplan-Meier analyses, we found a significant increase of survival in all three groups compared to the control group without LOV (p<0.05). The average survival rate of the untreated animals was 4.8±1.5 days. LOV treatment in the three post-treatment schemes significantly increased the survival rate to 7.3±0.5 days in the group administered a single dose at 24 hpi and 6.8±1.3 days in the group administered a single dose at 48 hpi. The survival rate in the group administered two doses was 6.5±1.4 days (Figure 4C–D). LOV treatment alone did not affect weight or survival time in the treated mice, as is indicated by the results observed in the CONTROL group. In these animal groups, some individuals developed severe paralysis and had to be sacrificed.
Groups of six mice were treated with LOV (200 mg/kg/day) orally with three treatment schemes: a single dose 24 hrs after inoculation (early dose), a single dose 48 hrs after inoculation (late dose) or two doses after inoculation (24 and 48 hrs). Inoculations were administered intraperitoneally with a viral dose of 1×106 PFU/ml. Three types of control groups were used. The “PBS” group consisted of mice that were not treated with LOV and were not infected, the “CONTROL” group consisted of mice that were treated with LOV but were not infected and the “CONTROL WITHOUT LOV” group consisted of mice that were not treated with LOV but were inoculated with DENV-2. The viremia and survival rates were compared between the control without LOV group and the treated groups (early, late and two doses groups). A. Plaque assay of infected VERO cells to quantify serum viremia at 3 dpi. Bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). B. Average body weight percentage, recorded every two days until the animals died or were sacrificed. C. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the survival rates of the untreated group and the three treated groups. D. Comparison of survival rates between the untreated group and the three treated groups. Asterisks in A and D indicate statistically significant differences between the treated LOV groups and the control without LOV group. In the groups treated with a single dose at 48 h after viral inoculation or with two doses (24 and 48 hpi), there was a significant increase in viremia. Moreover, the survival rates were increased in the three groups.
Effect of Multiple LOV Doses Administered Post-inoculation on the Survival Rate of DENV-2-infected Mice
To evaluate whether using multiple doses of LOV could increase the survival rate, groups of six mice were inoculated with DENV-2 (1×106 PFU/ml) and treated with 200 mg/kg/day of LOV every 24 hrs for five or six days. Based on Kaplan-Meier analyses, we found a significant increase in survival in the groups treated with both treatment schemes compared to the control group without LOV (p<0.05). Specifically, the average survival rate was increased to 6.7±1.5 days in the five-dose group and 7.1±1.4 days in the six-dose group compared with the untreated control group (4.8±1.6) (Figure 5A–B).
Groups of six mice were subjected to prolonged treatment with LOV (200 mg/kg/day) orally after viral inoculation (post-treatment). The first group received a daily dose for five days (24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hrs) and the second group received a daily dose for six days (24, 48, 72, 96, 122 and 144 hrs). Inoculations were administered intraperitoneally with a viral dose of 1×106 PFU/ml. Three types of controls groups were used. The “PBS” group consisted of mice that were not treated with LOV and were not infected, the “CONTROL” group consisted of mice that were treated with LOV but were not infected and the “CONTROL WITHOUT LOV” group consisted of mice that were not treated with LOV but were inoculated with DENV-2. The survival rates were compared between the control without LOV group and treated groups (five and six doses groups). A. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the survival rates of the untreated group and the two treated groups. B. Comparison of the survival rates of untreated and treated groups. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between treated LOV groups and the control without LOV group. Both treatment schemes, using multiple doses of LOV, significantly increased the survival rates.
Histopathological Analysis
Spleens and livers of mice from each of the evaluated groups were dissected on day eight. Tissues were fixed and embedded in paraffin before being stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Tissue samples were examined at high resolution using an optical microscope. Below, we describe the observations for each experimental group.
Uninfected and untreated control mice.
In the spleen, there was a conserved architecture in the white and red pulp (Figure 6A), and moderate levels of erythropoiesis were present without megaloblastic changes (Figure 6D). The liver portal space lacked congestion or inflammatory infiltration (Figure 7A). The sinusoids did not present congestion (Figure 7D), and there was no hyperplasia in the Kupffer cells (Figure 7G), nor was there extramedullary erythropoiesis (Figure 7J).
A, D. Untreated and uninfected control mice. B, E. Untreated infected mice. C, F. LOV-treated infected mice. A–C. Comparison between red and white pulp in spleen sections. In normal mice there was a conserved architecture of both pulps (A). In untreated infected mice, expansion of the red pulp was observed with depletion of the white pulp (B). In LOV-treated infected mice, a slight expansion of the red pulp was observed, but loss of the white pulp was not as severe as in untreated animals (C). D–F. Erythropoiesis comparison. In untreated infected mice, massive erythropoiesis was observed with megaloblastic changes (E). In normal mice (C) and treated mice (F), erythropoiesis was minor and no megaloblastic changes were observed.
A, D, G, J. Untreated and uninfected control mice. B, E, H, K. Untreated infected mice. C, F, I, L. LOV-treated infected mice. A–C. Comparison between venular portal sections. In infected mice (B) there was congestion with chronic inflammatory lymphocytes compared with normal mice (A), and in mice treated with LOV, the infiltration was lower (C). D–F. Sinusoids comparison. Sinusoidal congestion was observed in untreated infected mice (E), and this was reduced in LOV-treated mice (F). In normal mice, there was no congestion (D). G–I. In LOV-treated (I) or untreated (J) mice there was hyperplasia of Kupffer cells compared with normal mice (G). J–L. In infected mice, massive extramedullar erythropoiesis was observed (K). In LOV-treated mice, erythropoiesis was minor and the number of outbreaks was lower (L). In untreated and uninfected control mice, erythropoiesis was not observed (J).
Untreated infected mice.
In the spleen, we observed red pulp expansion with white pulp reduction (Figure 6B) and extramedullary erythropoiesis with megaloblastic changes (Figure 6E). The liver showed congestion of the portal venule with the presence of a lymphocytic infiltrate (Figure 7B), sinusoidal congestion (Figure 7E), hyperplasia of Kupffer cells (Figure 7H) and abundant extramedullary erythropoiesis foci (Figure 7K).
Infected mice treated with LOV.
In the spleen, a slight depletion of the white pulp (Figure 6C) and mild extramedullary erythropoiesis without megaloblastic changes (Figure 6F) were observed. The liver exhibited congestion of the portal venule with little lymphocytic infiltrate (Figure 7C), little sinusoid congestion (Figure 7F), hyperplasia of the Kupffer cells (Figure 7I) and scarce extramedullary erythropoiesis foci (Figure 7L).
Discussion
Despite the large number of drugs that have been shown to have antiviral activity against DENV in in vitro models, few have been evaluated in animal models and only three drugs (chloroquine, balapiravir and celgosivir [8], [9], [10] have been tested in clinical assays in humans. One of the greatest difficulties in using antiviral drugs in humans is the licensing of new molecules, a process that can take many years. For this reason, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of licensed drugs that have been used and tested previously and have a low health risk (second-use drugs) is an interesting alternative in the search for new antivirals. Taking into account the advantages of evaluating second-use drugs, the present study demonstrates the effect of LOV on DENV infection in the AG129 mouse model.
To determine the optimal dose of infection and time of occurrence of the highest levels of viremia, preliminary experiments were performed in our lab to evaluate viremia from day 1 to day 9. We found that the viremia had a maximal peak at day 3, and at day 7 was almost absent (data not shown) as had been reported previously [18], [21]. We found that with a high viral dose, (1×106 PFU/ml) viremia can reach titers on the order of 4.1×104 PFU/ml, while titers reached with a low viral dose (5×105 PFU/ml) were four times lower (1.2×104) (Figure 2A). This dose-dependent effect has been reported previously in AG129 mice inoculated with the DENV-2 strain TSV01 [21] or with the DENV-2 strain D2Y98P [27]. With both viral doses (5×105 or 1×106 PFU/ml), the highest viremia level was measured at 3 dpi, but the viral load in the blood was significantly lower (greater than 70% reduction) at 5 dpi. These studies agree with previous results, in which inoculations with the DENV-2 strain TSV01 led to a peak in viremia levels at 3 dpi, followed by an 85% reduction in viremia at 5 dpi [21]. With the DENV-2 strain D2Y98P, the viremia peaked at 3 dpi with a reduction >90% at 5 dpi [27]. This reduction could be related to the activation of an immune response characterized by the appearance of IgM antibodies (beginning at 3 dpi) and neutralizing IgG antibodies (beginning at 4 dpi) [21]. Because mice inoculated with a high viral dose (1×106 PFU/ml) developed higher levels of viremia and the viremia had its maximal peak at 3 dpi, that dose was used for subsequent assays and the viremia was evaluated only at 3 dpi. When comparing the survival of the two groups, we found that, in the group inoculated with the higher dose of virus, more than 70% of the mice had died by 5 dpi, and 100% of the mice were dead by 8 dpi (Figure 2C–D). A previous study using the same strain (New Guinea) reported 75% mortality at 8 dpi and 100% mortality at 14 dpi [22]. In addition, the infected animals lost increasing amounts of weight before death (Figure 2B). A possible explanation for this weight loss is the development of paralysis, which prevents the mice from moving around to obtain food. The development of paralysis has been described in AG129 mice infected with neuroadapted [18] and non-neuroadapted [28] strains of DENV inoculated intraperitoneally or intravenously and could be related to encephalitis development. Although encephalitis has also been reported in SCID mice inoculated intracerebrally with neuroadapted strains of DENV [29], neuronal infection by DENV is a controversial issue. Some authors have detected viral antigens and have isolated virus from nervous tissue [18] of mice inoculated by methods other than intracerebral inoculation, while others report a complete absence of viral antigens in the brain [30]. The neurotropism of DENV and the development of paralysis in DENV-infected mice are important observations. However, they make it difficult to use this strain for antiviral evaluations because when animals develop paralysis and lose more than 20% of their body weight, according to the regulations of the animal experimentation committee, they must be sacrificed immediately to avoid suffering.
In humans, it has been proposed that viral load is directly related to the severity of the disease and therefore, the survival of infected patients. Patients who develop severe dengue (with hemorrhage or hypovolemic shock) have higher titers than patients with milder forms of the disease [31], [32]. However, this relationship is controversial because no differences in viremia levels were found between adult patients with severe and non-severe forms of the disease in some studies [33]. Our results indicate that the progression of the disease depends on the initial viremia peak, being slower in mice with lower viremia at 3 dpi. These results agree with those of other studies, which reported that inoculation with a high viral dose led to animals dying a few days after the peak of viremia, whereas infection with a low viral dose led to asymptomatic dissemination with animals dying after the virus had been cleared [34]. However, regardless of the initial viremia levels, the mice end up developing paralysis, which is one of the disadvantages of the AG129 model. As we mentioned above, when animals develop paralysis they cannot move around to obtain food, therefore they lose weight (in some cases more that 20%) and according to the regulations of the animal experimentation committee, they must be sacrificed immediately to avoid suffering. This made it difficult, for example, to make antiviral evaluations in the long term.
Taking into account that the infection of AG129 mice with the New Guinea strain DENV-2 results in paralysis, it would be desirable to use a different strain that results in a viscerotropic infection type, such as the D2S10 strain DENV-2. This strain causes thrombocytopenia and vascular leakage in infected mice, characteristics more commonly associated with the infection in humans [35]. Recently, a mouse model has been developed that does not require immunocompromised AG129 mice. In this model, C57BL/6 mice are used, which are deficient in only the IFN-α/β receptor. The mice are infected with a different DENV-2 strain (D220) derived from the D2S10 strain. This D220 strain DENV-2 virus causes morbidity and mortality at a ten-fold lower dose than its parental strain, D2S10 [36]. For this reason, it would be a model more relevant for dengue studies (including antiviral evaluations). However, until now, this model has not been used for this type of study, and the AG129 model continues to be the most important model for evaluating possible antiviral candidates [16], [37].
In this study, we found only a single significant decrease of viremia (21.8%) (Figure 3A) among the groups that were treated with three doses of LOV prior to viral inoculation. LOV treatment is known to decrease the amount of cholesterol in the cell membrane [14], where it is an important component of lipid rafts [38]. These structures are important for DENV entry into its main cell targets, including monocytes/macrophages [39]. Taking into account the mechanisms of action described for statins, the antiviral effect of LOV could be related to its blocking of DENV cell entry, because the virus requires cholesterol-rich microdomains during its replication cycle [39] or because cholesterol is necessary for viral trafficking in late endosomes [40]. The antiviral effect could also be due to damage to isoprenylated proteins, which are required to complete the viral replication cycle once the virus enters the cell [41], [42]. Therefore, in mice treated with three consecutive doses of LOV, the drug might decrease the levels of cholesterol in the membrane, thus affecting the entry of the virus into the cell and leading to a decrease in viremia. It is possible that this effect might be related to the number of doses used, with one dose not sufficient to decrease cholesterol in the membrane. This scenario is consistent with the results of a previous study of rat hepatocytes, in which cholesterol inhibition was dependent not only on the LOV dose used but also on the duration of treatment [43].
Surprisingly, when animals were treated with two doses of LOV after viral inoculation (post-treatment experimental strategy), an increase in viremia was observed. It is known that LOV not only decreases cholesterol synthesis but also triggers pleiotropic effects that are independent of cholesterol inhibition [44]. For example, LOV inhibits the migration of inflammatory cells [45] by blocking the expression of leukocyte function antigen 1 (LFA-1), which binds to the cellular adhesion molecule ICAM-1 [46]. The formation of this LFA-1-ICAM-1 complex is responsible for the recruitment of leukocytes to sites of infection [47], [48]. As mentioned above, the correlation between viremia and disease progression/severity is not completely clear [31], [32], [33]. However, it has been demonstrated that the rapid removal of infected cells facilitates viral dissemination and thus increases the severity of the disease [49]. In contrast, mutant viruses that do not disseminate as easily to other tissues cause a transitory viremia increase that delays the progression of the disease [50]. It is likely that LOV could delay the migration of infected cells (monocytes and macrophages) to other tissues, thus inducing higher serum viral titers and delaying the progression to severe illness. However, when LOV treatment is removed, the infected cells can then migrate normally, leading to disease development. This hypothesis is in agreement with the histopathological analysis demonstrating that, in the livers of infected mice treated with LOV, there was a reduction in the infiltration of inflammatory cells, which were present in untreated infected mice (Figure 6A–C).
Despite our finding of increased survival rates in both treatment schemes (pre- or post-inoculation) as shown in the survival curves (Figure 3C–D, 4C–D and 5A–B), neither treatment was effective in preventing the death of the mice.
The post-treatment scheme is more similar to therapy in humans, because therapy would only be administered after infection. Thus, the results obtained here must be applied carefully because the post-inoculation treatment scheme increases viremia, and we do not know how this increase might affect disease progression in humans. As mentioned above, the relationship between viremia and disease severity is controversial. Therefore, additional studies are required to elucidate the mechanisms involved in the delay of dengue progression induced by LOV in spite of an increase in viremia.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MM JCG JEO JEC. Performed the experiments: MM LAC. Analyzed the data: MM LAC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MM JEO. Wrote the paper: MM.
References
- 1.
Organization PAH (2011) Number of reported cases of dengue and figures for 2011.
- 2. Tapia-Conyer R, Betancourt-Cravioto M, Mendez-Galvan J (2012) Dengue: an escalating public health problem in Latin America. Paediatr Int Child Health 32 Suppl 114–17.
- 3. Black WCt, Bennett KE, Gorrochotegui-Escalante N, Barillas-Mury CV, Fernandez-Salas I, et al. (2002) Flavivirus susceptibility in Aedes aegypti. Arch Med Res 33: 379–388.
- 4. Oishi K, Saito M, Mapua CA, Natividad FF (2007) Dengue illness: clinical features and pathogenesis. J Infect Chemother 13: 125–133.
- 5. Lin CY, Huang CH, Chen YH (2013) Classification of dengue: the clinical use of World Health Organization 2009 guideline. J Formos Med Assoc 112: 61–63.
- 6. Farrar J, Focks D, Gubler D, Barrera R, Guzman MG, et al. (2007) Towards a global dengue research agenda. Trop Med Int Health 12: 695–699.
- 7. Sampath A, Padmanabhan R (2009) Molecular targets for flavivirus drug discovery. Antiviral Res 81: 6–15.
- 8. Tricou V, Minh NN, Van TP, Lee SJ, Farrar J, et al. (2010) A randomized controlled trial of chloroquine for the treatment of dengue in Vietnamese adults. PLoS neglected tropical diseases 4: e785.
- 9. Nguyen NM, Tran CNB, Phung LK, Duong KTH, le Anh Huynh H, et al. (2013) A randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial of balapiravir, a polymerase inhibitor, in adult dengue patients. Journal of Infectious Diseases 207: 1442–1450.
- 10. Watanabe S, Rathore AP, Sung C, Lu F, Khoo YM, et al. (2012) Dose- and schedule-dependent protective efficacy of celgosivir in a lethal mouse model for dengue virus infection informs dosing regimen for a proof of concept clinical trial. Antiviral Res 96: 32–35.
- 11. Rothwell C, Lebreton A, Young Ng C, Lim JY, Liu W, et al. (2009) Cholesterol biosynthesis modulation regulates dengue viral replication. Virology 389: 8–19.
- 12. Martinez-Gutierrez M, Castellanos JE, Gallego-Gomez JC (2011) Statins reduce dengue virus production via decreased virion assembly. Intervirology 54: 202–216.
- 13. Whitehorn J, Van Vinh Chau N, Truong NT, Tai LT, Van Hao N, et al. (2012) Lovastatin for adult patients with dengue: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 13: 203.
- 14. Endo A, Kuroda M, Tanzawa K (1976) Competitive inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase by ML-236A and ML-236B fungal metabolites, having hypocholesterolemic activity. FEBS Lett 72: 323–326.
- 15. Jasinska M, Owczarek J, Orszulak-Michalak D (2007) Statins: a new insight into their mechanisms of action and consequent pleiotropic effects. Pharmacol Rep 59: 483–499.
- 16. Zompi S, Harris E (2012) Animal models of dengue virus infection. Viruses 4: 62–82.
- 17. van den Broek MF, Muller U, Huang S, Aguet M, Zinkernagel RM (1995) Antiviral defense in mice lacking both alpha/beta and gamma interferon receptors. J Virol 69: 4792–4796.
- 18. Johnson AJ, Roehrig JT (1999) New mouse model for dengue virus vaccine testing. J Virol 73: 783–786.
- 19. Julander JG, Perry ST, Shresta S (2011) Important advances in the field of anti-dengue virus research. Antivir Chem Chemother 21: 105–116.
- 20. Brewoo JN, Kinney RM, Powell TD, Arguello JJ, Silengo SJ, et al. (2012) Immunogenicity and efficacy of chimeric dengue vaccine (DENVax) formulations in interferon-deficient AG129 mice. Vaccine 30: 1513–1520.
- 21. Schul W, Liu W, Xu HY, Flamand M, Vasudevan SG (2007) A dengue fever viremia model in mice shows reduction in viral replication and suppression of the inflammatory response after treatment with antiviral drugs. J Infect Dis 195: 665–674.
- 22. Stein DA, Huang CY, Silengo S, Amantana A, Crumley S, et al. (2008) Treatment of AG129 mice with antisense morpholino oligomers increases survival time following challenge with dengue 2 virus. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: 555–565.
- 23. Chang J, Schul W, Yip A, Xu X, Guo JT, et al. (2011) Competitive inhibitor of cellular alpha-glucosidases protects mice from lethal dengue virus infection. Antiviral Res 92: 369–371.
- 24. Byrd CM, Dai D, Grosenbach DW, Berhanu A, Jones KF, et al. (2013) A novel inhibitor of dengue virus replication that targets the capsid protein. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57: 15–25.
- 25. Miller JL, Lachica R, Sayce AC, Williams JP, Bapat M, et al. (2012) Liposome-Mediated Delivery of Iminosugars Enhances Efficacy against Dengue Virus In Vivo. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 56: 6379–6386.
- 26. Gower TL, Graham BS (2001) Antiviral activity of lovastatin against respiratory syncytial virus in vivo and in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45: 1231–1237.
- 27. Watanabe S, Tan KH, Rathore AP, Rozen-Gagnon K, Shuai W, et al. (2012) The magnitude of dengue virus NS1 protein secretion is strain dependent and does not correlate with severe pathologies in the mouse infection model. J Virol 86: 5508–5514.
- 28. Shresta S, Sharar KL, Prigozhin DM, Beatty PR, Harris E (2006) Murine model for dengue virus-induced lethal disease with increased vascular permeability. J Virol 80: 10208–10217.
- 29. Lin YL, Liao CL, Chen LK, Yeh CT, Liu CI, et al. (1998) Study of Dengue virus infection in SCID mice engrafted with human K562 cells. J Virol 72: 9729–9737.
- 30. Balsitis SJ, Coloma J, Castro G, Alava A, Flores D, et al. (2009) Tropism of dengue virus in mice and humans defined by viral nonstructural protein 3-specific immunostaining. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80: 416–424.
- 31. Libraty DH, Young PR, Pickering D, Endy TP, Kalayanarooj S, et al. (2002) High circulating levels of the dengue virus nonstructural protein NS1 early in dengue illness correlate with the development of dengue hemorrhagic fever. J Infect Dis 186: 1165–1168.
- 32. Vaughn DW, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, Innis BL, Nimmannitya S, et al. (2000) Dengue viremia titer, antibody response pattern, and virus serotype correlate with disease severity. J Infect Dis 181: 2–9.
- 33. Guilarde AO, Turchi MD, Siqueira JB Jr, Feres VC, Rocha B, et al. (2008) Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever among adults: clinical outcomes related to viremia, serotypes, and antibody response. J Infect Dis 197: 817–824.
- 34. Tan GK, Ng JK, Trasti SL, Schul W, Yip G, et al. (2010) A non mouse-adapted dengue virus strain as a new model of severe dengue infection in AG129 mice. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e672.
- 35. Shresta S, Sharar KL, Prigozhin DM, Beatty PR, Harris E (2006) Murine model for dengue virus-induced lethal disease with increased vascular permeability. Journal of virology 80: 10208–10217.
- 36. Orozco S, Schmid MA, Parameswaran P, Lachica R, Henn MR, et al. (2012) Characterization of a model of lethal dengue virus 2 infection in C57BL/6 mice deficient in the alpha/beta interferon receptor. J Gen Virol 93: 2152–2157.
- 37. Cassetti MC, Durbin A, Harris E, Rico-Hesse R, Roehrig J, et al. (2010) Report of an NIAID workshop on dengue animal models. Vaccine 28: 4229–4234.
- 38. Lingwood D, Kaiser HJ, Levental I, Simons K (2009) Lipid rafts as functional heterogeneity in cell membranes. Biochem Soc Trans 37: 955–960.
- 39. Reyes-Del Valle J, Chavez-Salinas S, Medina F, Del Angel RM (2005) Heat shock protein 90 and heat shock protein 70 are components of dengue virus receptor complex in human cells. J Virol 79: 4557–4567.
- 40. Poh MK, Shui G, Xie X, Shi PY, Wenk MR, et al. (2012) U18666A, an intra-cellular cholesterol transport inhibitor, inhibits dengue virus entry and replication. Antiviral Res 93: 191–198.
- 41. Krishnan MN, Sukumaran B, Pal U, Agaisse H, Murray JL, et al. (2007) Rab 5 is required for the cellular entry of dengue and West Nile viruses. J Virol 81: 4881–4885.
- 42. Xu XF, Chen ZT, Zhang JL, Chen W, Wang JL, et al. (2008) Rab8, a vesicular traffic regulator, is involved in dengue virus infection in HepG2 cells. Intervirology 51: 182–188.
- 43. Isusi E, Aspichueta P, Liza M, Hernandez ML, Diaz C, et al. (2000) Short- and long-term effects of atorvastatin, lovastatin and simvastatin on the cellular metabolism of cholesteryl esters and VLDL secretion in rat hepatocytes. Atherosclerosis 153: 283–294.
- 44. Palaniswamy C, Selvaraj DR, Selvaraj T, Sukhija R (2010) Mechanisms underlying pleiotropic effects of statins. Am J Ther 17: 75–78.
- 45. Mueck AO, Seeger H, Wallwiener D (2001) Further evidence for direct vascular actions of statins: effect on endothelial nitric oxide synthase and adhesion molecules. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 109: 181–183.
- 46. Stanislaus R, Singh AK, Singh I (2001) Lovastatin treatment decreases mononuclear cell infiltration into the CNS of Lewis rats with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. J Neurosci Res 66: 155–162.
- 47. Dustin ML, Springer TA (1988) Lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) interaction with intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) is one of at least three mechanisms for lymphocyte adhesion to cultured endothelial cells. J Cell Biol 107: 321–331.
- 48. Shaw SK, Ma S, Kim MB, Rao RM, Hartman CU, et al. (2004) Coordinated redistribution of leukocyte LFA-1 and endothelial cell ICAM-1 accompany neutrophil transmigration. J Exp Med 200: 1571–1580.
- 49. Lee E, Wright PJ, Davidson A, Lobigs M (2006) Virulence attenuation of Dengue virus due to augmented glycosaminoglycan-binding affinity and restriction in extraneural dissemination. J Gen Virol 87: 2791–2801.
- 50. Prestwood TR, Prigozhin DM, Sharar KL, Zellweger RM, Shresta S (2008) A mouse-passaged dengue virus strain with reduced affinity for heparan sulfate causes severe disease in mice by establishing increased systemic viral loads. J Virol 82: 8411–8421.