ATR Suppresses Endogenous DNA Damage and Allows Completion of Homologous Recombination Repair

Adam D. Brown; Brian W. Sager; Aparna Gorthi; Sonal S. Tonapi; Eric J. Brown; Alexander J. R. Bishop

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091222

Abstract

DNA replication fork stalling or collapse that arises from endogenous damage poses a serious threat to genome stability, but cells invoke an intricate signaling cascade referred to as the DNA damage response (DDR) to prevent such damage. The gene product ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) responds primarily to replication stress by regulating cell cycle checkpoint control, yet it’s role in DNA repair, particularly homologous recombination (HR), remains unclear. This is of particular interest since HR is one way in which replication restart can occur in the presence of a stalled or collapsed fork. Hypomorphic mutations in human ATR cause the rare autosomal-recessive disease Seckel syndrome, and complete loss of Atr in mice leads to embryonic lethality. We recently adapted the in vivo murine pink-eyed unstable (p^un) assay for measuring HR frequency to be able to investigate the role of essential genes on HR using a conditional Cre/loxP system. Our system allows for the unique opportunity to test the effect of ATR loss on HR in somatic cells under physiological conditions. Using this system, we provide evidence that retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells lacking ATR have decreased density with abnormal morphology, a decreased frequency of HR and an increased level of chromosomal damage.

Citation: Brown AD, Sager BW, Gorthi A, Tonapi SS, Brown EJ, Bishop AJR (2014) ATR Suppresses Endogenous DNA Damage and Allows Completion of Homologous Recombination Repair. PLoS ONE 9(3): e91222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091222

Editor: Alvaro Galli, CNR, Italy

Received: December 9, 2013; Accepted: February 10, 2014; Published: March 27, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Brown et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [grant K22ES012264 to A.J.R.B.]; American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant [ACS-IRG-00-173-04 to A.J.R.B.]; GCCRI Ambassador’s Circle Research Support Award [ to A.J.R.B.]; the National Institute of Aging [grant T32AG021890 to A.D.B.], the Medical Student Summer Research Program, School of Medicine, UTHSCSA [to B.W.S.], the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [grant RP101491 to A.G.], a Translational Science Training Across Disciplines Scholarship from the UT System Graduate Programs Initiative [to A.G.], a National Cancer Institute [grant T32CA148724-2 to SST] and Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute endowment funds to defray the costs of publication. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: Co-author Alexander J. R. Bishop is a PLOS ONE Editorial Board member. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE Editorial policies and criteria.

Introduction

DNA damage is an unavoidable consequence of life resulting from both endogenous and exogenous sources. Dividing cells are particularly susceptible to DNA damage as many lesions can cause replication forks to stall and/or collapse. Without an appropriate response, such interruptions to DNA replication can lead to genome instability. To ensure that chromosomes are accurately and faithfully duplicated, cells have evolved an elaborate set of DDR mechanisms in which DNA replication slows allowing for the recruitment of DNA repair factors while also preventing potentially deleterious progression through cell cycle [1]. One such response to replication stress involves the protein kinase ATR. The ATR protein kinase is a member of the phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PIKK) family, and is the orthologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1. Activation of ATR by replication-blocking DNA damage elicits a pleiotropic signal transduction pathway that includes numerous transducer and effector proteins [2].

Similar to many other DDR proteins, ATR is an essential gene and its absence leads to early embryonic lethality in mice prior to embryonic day 7.5 (E7.5) [3]. Furthermore, loss of ATR function via the disruption of the kinase domain also results in early embryonic lethality before E8.5 [4]. It is interesting to note that bona fide ATR heterozygous mice exhibited an increase incidence of tumors [3] and that ATR heterozygosity results in a decreased S-phase arrest [5]. Conclusions drawn from these earlier studies were that the lethality is likely due to a defect in checkpoint control in the presence of replication stress during a time of rapid cellular proliferation. Supporting this conclusion, subsequent studies have demonstrated that replication inhibition and DNA damage induce the formation of ATR foci [6], and ATR prevents the formation of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in response to stalled replication forks [7]–[9].

One of the mechanisms used by cells to resolve replication stress or a stalled replication fork, such that they can continue dividing, is HR repair [10]. This type of repair is considered a high fidelity process since it utilizes homologous sequences as an accurate template. This template is typically provided by the sister chromatid during S- or G2-phase before mitosis. Due to the correlation between replication stress-induced ATR activation and initiation of HR, a number of studies have investigated the role of ATR in regulating HR. Indirect evidence suggesting that ATR promotes HR include the findings that ATR phosphorylates a number of substrates known to directly affect HR (e.g. CHK1, BRCA1 and BLM) [6], [11]–[14]. Additionally, the PIKK inhibitor caffeine, which inhibits ATR kinase activity as well as other PIKKs such as ATM and DNA-PK, decreased site directed DSB-induced HR [15]. Further, reduced levels of ATR rendered cells sensitive to PARP1 inhibition [16], a phenomenon often associated with a HR defect. More direct studies addressing the role of ATR in HR have also been conducted. Following expression of a kinase dead ATR mutant protein, Wang et al., found that HR frequency decreased following a restriction enzyme-mediated site-directed DSB, presumably in a dominant-negative fashion [17]. This would suggest that ATR promotes HR following DNA damage. In contrast, Chanoux et al. found that the conditional deletion of ATR in mouse embryonic fibroblasts resulted in an approximate two-fold increase in spontaneous-induced RAD51 foci (a surrogate marker of an early and essential step in HR), and that this result was further increased in the presence of the replication stress inducing agent aphidicolin [18]. However, it should be noted that though RAD51 protein is necessary in an early step of HR, its accumulation in nuclear foci does not necessarily indicate completion of the HR repair event.

In light of these discrepancies, we set out to investigate whether ATR deficiency affects the frequency of HR that is observed through normal development. For this study, we utilized the p^un in vivo mouse system for measuring HR. The basis of the p^un system is a 70 kilobase tandem repeat of genomic material within the pink-eyed dilution (p; also known as Oca2) gene, rendering it functionless [19]–[21]. The p gene is involved in pigmentation, so the p^un mouse is identified phenotypically by the appearance of a light grey coat and pink eyes (due to a colorless RPE cell layer). Within the eye, the RPE is normally a pigmented cell type, and restoration of this pigmentation in otherwise transparent cells is the basis of our assay. To produce a functional p gene in RPE cells carrying homozygous p^un mutation, a deletion-mediated recombination event must occur between the duplicated region, deleting one copy of the 70 kb region and establishing the correct intron/exon format of the wild-type gene. Based upon studies using an analogous system in yeast [22], as well as genetic and exposure studies with the p^un assay [23]–[25] conducted by others and our laboratory, it seems that these recombination events could occur via single strand annealing (SSA), unequal crossing over or gene conversion either between sister chromatids or homologues or via a template switch event during DNA replication. To assess the role of essential genes like Atr on HR, we recently modified the p^un assay, to include the tissue-specific Cre/loxP system [24] and now extend this system to investigate the in vivo conditional loss of ATR on HR. Our findings suggest a role for ATR in promoting HR and that its absence results in chromosomal instability and cellular abnormalities.

Materials and Methods

Mouse lines

C57BL/6J pink-eyed unstable (p^un/un) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory. The p^un mutation is a recessive mutation, so genotyping homozygosity of this allele is through the appearance of a dilute (i.e. grey) fur coat and pink eyes. Atr^+/neo [3] and Atr^flox/flox [9] were obtained from E.J. Brown on a C57BL6 background and backcrossed two times to p^un/un mice. Cre expressing (Trp1-Cre^tg/tg p^un/un) mice and Cre activity reporter based on expression of nuclear localized beta-galactosidase (β-gal) (RC::PFwe^ki/ki p^un/un) [26] were used to establish two cohorts of mice in a manner similar to the study by Brown et al. [24]; 1) Atr constitutive (Atr^+/− Trp1-Cre^tg/tg p^un/un) and 2) Atr floxed (Atr^flox/flox RC::PFwe^ki/ki p^un/un). Animals from each cohort were crossed to generate Atr conditional heterozygous (Atr^cond/+ Trp1-Cre^tg/o RC::PFwe^ki/+ p^un/un) and Atr conditional null (Atr^cond/− Trp1-Cre^tg/o RC::PFwe^ki/+ p^un/un). The study was approved by the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) policy as outlined in our protocol number 07005-34-02-A,B1,C. The facility is operated in compliance with the Public Law 89–544 (Animal Welfare Act) and its amendments, Public Health Services Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (PHS Policy) using the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Guide) as the basis of operation. Periodic inspections are conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The University is accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, International (AAALAC). Mice were euthanized using procedures recommended by the Panel of Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Medical Association, namely CO2 asphyxiation with CO2 delivered from a compressed gas cylinder by inhalation to effect in a chamber that has not been recharged.

Retinal pigment epithelium dissection and whole mount staining

Eyes were removed, rinsed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), rinsed again in PBS and stained for β-galactosidase activity as previously described [24]. Stained eyes were dissected and RPE whole mounts were mounted according to Claybon and Bishop [27]. For those RPE whole mounts that were stained with phalloidin, Alexa Fluor 546 Phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies) was used according to manufacture instructions. In brief, PFA fixed RPE whole mounts were rinsed in PBS and then blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin for twenty minutes at room temperature. Phalloidin stock reagent was diluted 1:40 in blocking solution and incubated in the dark for an additional twenty minutes. Samples were washed three times in PBS, mounted onto glass microscope slides and imaged.

Visualization and analysis of whole mounts

All RPE whole mounts were visualized using a Zeiss Lumar V.12 stereomicroscope and Zeiss Axiovision 4.6 software. Measurements of RPE length were performed using Adobe Photoshop, and the reported RPE petal length was defined as the distance from the optic nerve to the distal edge of the RPE. Relative RPE petal length was calculated by dividing the petal length for each sample per genotype by the average petal length of the p^un/un samples. To determine cell density, a 200 μm² area was drawn using Adobe Photoshop at the position that is approximately 0.6 of the petal length from the optic nerve head to the edge of the RPE and the total number of cells located completely inside this area were counted. If any portion of a cell was found to be outside of this area, then it was excluded from counting. The same 200 μm² area used for cell density was also used for quantifying micronuclei (see results for description) with the exception that any cell (i.e. touching or entirely inside the area) was used. Therefore, we have used this region as a representation of the entire RPE and reported the data as the percentage of cells with micronuclei. The observation of cellular morphology and quantifications of cell density and micronuclei were done using the phalloidin-stained images in order to accurately identify cell boundaries. Using these fluorescent-based images meant that β-galactosidase positive staining nuclear material (i.e. blue nuclei and blue micronuclei) appears black and not blue.

RPE HR reversion events (i.e. eye spots) were scored by the phenotypic appearance of a cell with their cytoplasm packed with brown melanosomes. Unless otherwise noted, the number of pigmented cells or groups of pigmented cells are counted for the entire RPE whole mount by using a stereomicroscope with criteria for what constitutes a single eye spot (single HR event) set forth by Bishop et al. [28]. To define Cre activity in our system we used a nuclear localized β-galactosidase Cre reporter system [24], [26]. The nuclear localization of this enzymatic reporter is paramount to our system because it allows for the detection of both Cre activity (nuclear blue stain) and HR (cytoplasmic brown pigmentation) in the same cell. For each eye spot counted, the presence of a β-galactosidase positive stained nucleus was also recorded. Therefore, the frequency of eye spots per RPE with or without β-galactosidase staining was used to calculate the frequency of HR (i.e. number of eye spots per RPE). Additionally, the overall percentage of β-galactosidase staining for each RPE whole mount was visually assessed and assigned a percentage.

I-SceI DR-GFP HR assay

The U2OS cell line containing a stably integrated copy of the direct repeat-green fluorescent protein (DR-GFP) construct was kindly provided by Dr. Maria Jasin, and the frequency of HR was measured according to previous publications [29], [30]. Briefly, Liopfectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) was used to transfect 75 picomoles of either scramble control siRNA (Santa Cruz sc-37007) or ATR siRNA (Santa Cruz sc-29763) into 1×10⁵ DR-GFP U2OS cells using the reverse transfection method according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were then washed 24 hours later and transfected with I-SceI expression vector, empty vector or a GFP expression vector using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) as an internal control for transfection efficiency. After 72 hours, cells were trypsinized and HR frequency was quantified as percentage GFP⁺ cells via flow cytometry. The experiment was run in triplicate for each condition. Knockdown efficiency was measured by western blot using standard methods (1∶1000 dilution of ATR antibody, Abcam ab2905). All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Results

Size reduction in ATR conditional null eyes

It has been demonstrated that ATR is essential for embryonic development [3], [4], as well as being necessary for maintenance and homeostasis of tissues in adult mice using a ubiquitously expressing inducible Cre system [31]. We recently developed a conditional system to assess the role of essential genes on HR frequency by excising the gene of interest only in the RPE [24]. Expression of the Cre transgene is driven by the tyrosinase related protein 1 (Trp1) promoter, whose expression is restricted to the RPE during mouse embryonic development [32]. Therefore, we wanted to assess the effect of ATR loss on RPE development and HR frequency. We initially observed that the well-stained Atr conditional null eyes were markedly reduced in size (Fig. 1a) and further observation of RPE whole mounts confirmed this finding (Fig. 1b). We quantified this reduction in size by determining the change of petal length relative to p^un/un samples (Fig. 1c). In doing so, we observed an approximate 45% reduction in RPE petal length of Atr conditional nulls compared to p^un/un samples (P<0.0001, ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test). The Trp1-Cre^tg/o and Atr conditional heterozygous eyes were also smaller than p^un/un samples (P<0.0001, ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test), yet both were larger than the Atr conditional nulls. Therefore, the reduction in RPE petal length that can be attributed solely to loss of ATR is approximately 30%. In addition to the small ATR null eyes, we also observed a number of eyes of this same genotype that are apparently normal in size (Fig. 1b). Interestingly though, the proportion of β-galactosidase positive cells (i.e. denoting Cre activity) is substantially decreased in these RPE (Fig. 1b). Petal length of these RPE is similar to the Trp1-Cre^tg/o and Atr conditional heterozygous eyes and larger than the small Atr conditional null samples (P<0.0001, ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test) (Fig. 1c).

Download:

Figure 1. Conditional deletion of Atr leads to a reduction in the size of mouse eyes.

Extracted eyes (A) and dissected RPE whole mounts (B) from 30 day old mice following nuclear localized β-gal activity staining. Conditional deletion of Atr often resulted in the significant reduction of eye size (A and B). The conditional loss of ATR significantly reduced RPE petal length as defined by the distance from the optic nerve to the distal edge of the RPE (C). i p^un/un (n = 7); ii Trp1-Cre^tg/o (n = 6); iii Atr^cond/+ (n = 6); iv (s) Atr^cond/− small (n = 10); iv (n) Atr^cond/− normal (n = 6) (A, B and C). Solid red lines indicate the distal edge of the RPE, small dashed red lines indicate the proximal edge of the RPE, large red dashed lines denote the region that is 0.6 of the petal length (petal length equals the distance between the optic nerve and the proximal edge of the RPE) and solid red circles indicate the optic nerve. Scale bar: 1 mM (B). For (C) α: comparison to p^un/un (P<0.0001); β: comparison to Trp1-Cre^tg/o (P<0.0001); γ: comparison to Atr^cond/+ (P<0.0001) and δ: comparison to Atr^cond/− normal (P<0.0001); error bars indicate S.E.M.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091222.g001

Loss of ATR results in abnormal RPE cellular morphology and increase in chromosomal instability

The cells of p^un/un RPE exhibited a uniform cobble stone morphology, yet we observed varying degrees of differences from this norm in cells of Trp1-Cre^tg/o, Atr conditional heterozygous and Atr conditional null RPEs, and these differences were most apparent in the Atr conditional null in which the cells were markedly increased in size with abnormal morphology (Fig. 2a). We therefore quantified cell density for each genotype and found that the loss of ATR was associated with a decrease in cell density and increase in cell size (Fig. 2b).

Download:

Figure 2. Morphological abnormalities of the RPE monolayer and increased chromosomal damage following the conditional deletion of Atr.

Loss of either a single copy of Atr or both copies of Atr lead to morphological abnormalities of the RPE (A), a significant decrease in cell density (B) and a significant increase in micronuclei formation (C). i p^un/un (n = 5); ii Trp1-Cre^tg/o (n = 7); iii Atr^cond/+ (n = 9); and iv (s) Atr^cond/− small (n = 23); (A, B and C). RPE whole mounts were stained for nuclear localized β-gal activity (black spots) and phalloidin (yellow) to identify nuclear material and cell boundaries, respectively. Red boxes indicate the 200 μm² region used for cell counting, solid red circles and white arrowheads mark individual cells and micronuclei, respectively (A). Error bars indicate S.E.M. (B and C). Scale bar: 25 μm (A). For (B) α: comparison to p^un/un (P<0.001); β: comparison to Trp1-Cre^tg/o (P<0.001) and γ: comparison to Atr^cond/+ (P<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091222.g002

In order to compare across the genotypes, we used a 200 μm² area at a position that is approximately 0.6 of the petal length from the optic nerve head to the edge of the RPE (Fig. 1b). This region was chosen because it is approximately the point in which the cells of the Atr conditional heterozygous RPEs regained a more wild-type (e.g. cobblestone-like) morphology. It is interesting to note that previous work using the p^un system found that this region corresponded to the onset of the last third of embryonic RPE development [33], and this stage of embryonic development is when Trp-1 Cre expression within the RPE was previously noted to begin decreasing [32]. Furthermore, the distance that is 0.6 of the length of the Atr conditional heterozygous or Trp1-Cre^tg/o RPE is approximately the same as the total petal length of the small Atr conditional null RPE (optic nerve head to the proximal edge) and where the cells of the more normal-sized Atr conditional null RPE no longer stained positive for Cre activity (i.e. lack of blue β-galactosidase stain) (Fig. 1b), suggesting that Cre is most likely not active from this point onward. The greatest loss in cell density was in RPE of the small Atr conditional null samples when compared to either p^un/un (P<0.001, ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test), Trp1-Cre^tg/o ( P<0.001, ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test) or Atr conditional heterozygous (P<0.01, ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test) (Fig. 2b). Cell density appears to be ATR dose dependent as Atr conditional heterozygous RPE were significantly decreased from Trp1-Cre^tg/o (P<0.001, ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test). Normal sized Atr conditional null RPE were excluded from this analysis due to the lack of Cre activity in this region, as this indicates that these cells are actually Atr heterozygous (i.e. Atr^flox/−).

The reporter employed in our system is a Cre-mediated nuclear localized β-galactosidase [26]. Unlike our previous study and unpublished data in which blue stain was restricted to the nuclei of these now fully differentiated post-mitotic RPE cells, we observed small cytoplasmic bodies of blue stain in addition to the more usual large blue nuclei (Fig. 2a, white arrow heads) in the ATR conditionally deleted RPE cells. A previous report using an ATR hypomorphic Seckel syndrome cell line described an approximate two-fold increase of spontaneous micronuclei compared to wild-type and this difference was further augmented following treatment with the replication stress-inducing drug hydroxyurea [34]. Based on the location and size of the small blue staining bodies, as well as the study by Alderton et al., we believe that it is reasonable to assume that these small blue stained bodies are micronuclei. We next quantified these blue bodies in the RPE of our conditional samples and found an inverse correlation between the amount of ATR and levels of micronuclei (P<0.0001, Chi-square test) (Fig. 2c). Interestingly, much like the observed change in cell density, Atr conditional heterozygosity resulted in a micronuclei haploinsufficiency phenotype and may reflect the decreased S-phase checkpoint previously observed with ATR heterozygous cells [5].

ATR promotes homologous recombination in mouse RPE cells

We next assessed the frequency of p^un reversion events (Fig. 3a) in our samples by quantifying the presence of pigmented eye spots per RPE. We previously quantified HR frequency using three different criteria: 1) all eye spots regardless of nuclei color; 2) eye spots with blue nuclei (i.e. β-galactosidase positive stained nuclei to denote Cre activity occurred) and 3) eye spots with blue nuclei from RPE with an overall blue stain of ≥80% [24]. Using the most stringent criteria, we found that the frequency of HR is significantly decreased in the Atr conditional null RPEs compared to Trp1-Cre^tg/o and Atr conditional heterozygous (P<0.001, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test) (Fig. 3bi and 3c). Whereas Atr haploinsufficiency impacted cell density and occurrence of micronuclei, the frequency of HR in Atr conditional heterozygotes was not different from Trp1-Cre^tg/o (Fig. 3b). To account for the different sized conditional null samples we separated out small and normal sized RPE and reanalyzed them. In order to do this, we had to reduce the stringency criteria to include all eye spots regardless of nuclei color. Though this reduced stringency likely results in the inclusion of events that occurred without deletion of Atr (thus inflating the HR frequency), it was necessary to allow inclusion of additional samples because the majority of the normal sized null samples had limited blue staining. The frequency of HR for both the small (P<0.001, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test) and normal (P<0.05, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test) sized Atr conditional null samples were significantly decreased compared to Trp1-Cre^tg/o and Atr conditional heterozygous (P<0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test) (Fig. 3bii), but not different from each other. In order for this analysis to be valid, we assume that all HR eye spots lacking blue nuclei were actually conditionally null rather than remaining heterozygous. Our previous work though, found that the amount of blue stain strongly correlated with excision of our gene of interest [24]. Therefore, we next asked if in the approximate outer one third of the normal sized null eyes whether the HR frequency is similar to that of Trp1-Cre^tg/o and Atr conditional heterozygous samples (Fig. 1b). This region was found to be devoid of blue stain suggesting that the floxed allele of Atr in these cells was not excised (i.e. the cells in this region are heterozygous for Atr). As expected from our previous analysis, the HR frequency in this region was similar to that of the Trp1-Cre^tg/o and Atr conditional heterozygous groups (Fig. 3biii).

Download:

Figure 3. Spontaneous homologous recombination repair is decreased in the absence of ATR in vivo.

Schematic representation of the p^un mutation (tandem duplication of exons 6–18) in which a HR-mediated event facilitates the deletion of one copy of the repeat resulting in the reversion of the mutant allele to a functional p gene. Reversion (HR) events are scored phenotypically by counting the numbers of single or groups of cells in the RPE with brown pigmentation in their cytoplasm. (A). Loss of one copy of Atr does not affect HR frequency (i.e. the number of p^un reversion events per RPE) (Bi and ii), whereas complete loss of ATR resulted in the significant decrease of HR frequency (Bi and ii). Within the outer clear region of Atr^cond/− normal eyes (i.e. no β-gal activity suggesting the presence of a single copy of Atr), the HR frequency was not different from Trp1-Cre^tg/o and Atr^cond/+ in similar regions (Biii). Representative eye spot images from different genotypes in B. Pigmentation can be observed in the cytoplasm following a p^un reversion event in the RPE. Blue nuclei indicate nuclear-localized Cre activity (C). For (B and C) (s) Atr^cond/− small and (n) Atr^cond/− normal eyes; *P<0.05 and ***P<0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091222.g003

ATR promotes homologous recombination in a human tissue culture assay

Finally, to corroborate our in vivo data, we used the well-established DR-GFP in vitro HR reporter assay [29], [30] to examine HR in cells lacking ATR. ATR expression was decreased using siRNA targeted to human ATR in the U2OS cell line that stably expresses the DR-GFP construct [35]. The frequency of I-SceI-induced HR was two-fold lower in cells with decreased ATR expression compared to scramble control siRNA cells (P = 0.0009, unpaired t-test) (Figs. 4a and 4b), matching what was previously reported with either caffeine exposure [15] or expression of a presumably dominant negative ATR kinase dead mutant [17]. This result also suggests that ATR may have a more general role in controlling homologous recombination in response to a double strand break, having already been shown to be involved in some of the latter parts of break processing [36].

Download:

Figure 4. ATR promotes homologous recombination in vitro.

I-SceI-induced HR-mediated repair was significantly decreased in the DR-GFP U2OS cell line with reduced ATR expression (A). For (A) ***P<0.001 and n = 3. (B) A representative image of ATR expression knockdown using siRNA in the DR-GFP U2OS cells (siCtr is scramble).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091222.g004

Discussion

Genomic instability is known to be a major factor in cancer development, thus understanding the systems that influence genomic stability in the normal somatic tissue is key to understanding cancer predisposition. Homologous recombination is a key DNA repair pathway that is usually considered to have high fidelity. However, either too much or too little HR can be deleterious, resulting in genomic alterations that can promote cancer development. To examine HR through normal somatic development we use the p^un assay system, often observing changes that are too infrequent to be observed by tissue culture systems and without confounding issues of multiple altered genetic backgrounds as are often present in established tissue culture systems. We have used this strategy successfully for a number of genetic models with differing results; ATM, p53, GADD45a, BLM, and PARP1 suppress p^un events, while BRCA1 and BRCA2 are necessary for a subset of p^un events [24], [25], [33], [37], [38]. Although the initiating lesion in the p^un assay is unknown, data from our laboratory and others predict that spontaneous HR events can be initiated in response to DNA replication stress [22], [24], [33]. Additionally, Saleh-Gohari et al. demonstrated that endogenous damage (e.g. DNA single strand breaks) is most similar to damage-induced collapsed replication forks, and that these lesions are most likely substrates for spontaneous HR events [39].

The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of ATR loss on spontaneous HR frequency. In order to bypass the embryonic lethality associated with complete loss of ATR [3] or Atr kinase dead [4] mouse models, we utilized the recently developed in vivo conditional mouse p^un assay [24]. In the current study, we found that conditional loss of ATR led to a 2.5-fold reduction in the frequency of spontaneous HR, suggesting that ATR promotes this type of repair (Fig. 3bi). In response to site-directed DSBs, Wang et al. also showed a 2-fold reduction in ATR kinase dead cells [17], and we also observed a similar reduction of HR following ATR knockdown using a similar in vitro assay (Fig. 4). ATR is believed to be the primary signaling kinase responding to replication stress in order to prevent deleterious lesions (e.g. replication fork collapse or DSBs) that might be caused by replication fork stalling. Previous studies have found that ATR deficient cells have increased levels of the DSB marker H2AX following exposure to agents that induce replication stress [9], [18]. Therefore, we suggest that ATR reduces the incidence of DSBs that can occur as a result of replication fork collapse by promoting HR at a stalled replication fork (Fig. 5). In apparent contrast to this model, an increase in both spontaneous and replication damage-induced RAD51 foci in the absence of ATR has been reported [9], [18]. A potential explanation for this discrepancy is that accumulation of RAD51 foci measures HR initiation [40], which may not be inhibited by the absence of ATR, while the study by Wang et al. and the work presented here measured the completion of an HR event. Therefore, it is plausible to hypothesize that ATR function is not required for the initiation of HR, but rather a later step that results in the removal of RAD51, thus allowing for the completion of HR. Alternatively, but not necessarily mutually exclusively, the absence of ATR and a lack of S-phase arrest may not allow sufficient time for the completion of HR before a merging replication fork will stall at the same lesion. Such an event would result in replication fork collapse, DNA breakage and thus micronuclei formation. Such a “replication catastrophe” with ATR deficiency was recently described [41] and shown to result from depletion of RPA. RPA normally binds single stranded DNA during DNA replication and is known to interact with homologous recombination proteins to facilitate this DNA repair reaction [42].

Download:

Figure 5. Model for the relationship between ATR, homologous recombination and chromosomal stability.

In the presence of replication stress from endogenous lesions, ATR is activated initiating an S-phase arrest to block aberrant merger of another replication fork at the same lesion. Some stalled replication forks will be substrates for HR (depicted here is the formation of a chicken foot structure that acts as a RAD51 substrate). If HR proceeds as normal, then the replication fork will be restored. However, we propose that this progression is dependent upon sufficient time to complete the HR reaction and possibly a more direct licensing of a later step in HR by ATR kinase activity (CHK1, BRCA1 and BLM, for example – not shown). If HR does not restore the stalled fork, then it may collapse, potentially leading to chromosomal breaks and the production of micronuclei. Thick lines are parental strand DNA, thin lines are daughter strand DNA, half arrowheads represent 3′ ends, the solid black triangle represents a DNA lesion and solid black circles represent RAD51 protein.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091222.g005

Of note with the current study, in comparison to prior studies using the p^un assay, the conditional loss of ATR is the only genetic alteration that has resulted in a size reduction of the eye and RPE. Furthermore, fragmented nuclei as identified by nuclear localized β-galactosidase staining in the conditional p^un system, have only been observed in the partial and complete loss of ATR. Both of these unique observations attest to the hypothesis that ATR is essential for mitigating endogenous-derived genomic instability, most likely resulting from replication stress.

Homologous recombination is an essential process as evident by the number of genes involved in HR that are essential for mouse embryonic development [43]. This is in part due to increased levels of DNA damage and subsequent genomic instability. As mentioned above, cells lacking ATR have increased levels of DNA damage, and we also observed the product of an increased level of DNA damage in ATR deficient RPE, the accumulation of micronuclei (Fig. 2a and c). Our data therefore further supports a model in which a reduction in HR from loss of ATR leads to an increase in DNA damage and chromosomal instability (Fig. 5). This is also evident from the loss of RPE cellular morphology. It is noteworthy to mention that a recent study investigated the affect of TrpCre-1 on RPE biology. In this paper, the authors showed that Cre alone caused a decrease in cell density with an increase in abnormal cell morphology [44]. We also saw this phenomenon in our Trp1-Cre^tg/o RPEs, but loss of ATR greatly augmented these effects. Perhaps this is due to the cell’s inability to properly respond to DNA damage induced from illegitimate Cre activity [45]. However, the ability of RPE cells to persist through to adulthood with this type of DNA damage having occurred during embryonic development, and the ensuing chromosomal instability, micronuclei and multiple nuclei, suggests something more. RPE cells frequently undergo azygotic mitosis towards the end of the development of the tissue, resulting in many RPE cells with two nuclei (but not more). This suggests that these cells may be able to retain viability when mitotic division is unsuccessful or smaller micronuclei are formed, despite being a primary tissue. This may explain the presence of multi nucleated and enlarged RPE cells when ATR is deficient. In a recent publication, Eykelenboom et al described a similar phenomenon following loss of ATR in the DT40 tissue culture system, however their cells died following the inappropriate progression through G2-M without completion of replication [46]. However, their results substantiate the requirement of ATR in preventing cell division in the absence of complete DNA replication and that without this checkpoint the production of micronuclei will ensue. Of note, the p^un assay relies on the specific deletion of chromosomal DNA, generally considered a deleterious event due to the potential loss of genetic material. Our results would suggest that such genetic loss is preferential to the more catastrophic consequence of continuing through cell cycle without completing DNA replication.

Although Atr conditional heterozygous RPE did not display a HR haploinsufficiency phenotype, we did observe that Atr heterozygosity impacted both accumulation of micronuclei and cell density (Fig. 2). It is interesting to compare this observation with Seckel syndrome, the human disease associated with ATR mutation. Seckel syndrome results from the hypomorphic effect of inheriting a single ATR mutation, which consequently reduces ATR function and is characterized by severe microcephaly and proportional primordial dwarfism and skeletal abnormalities [47]. One cellular phenotype of Seckel syndrome is increased spontaneous and replication stress-induced micronuclei [34]. This is in agreement with the present study where we observe that both Atr conditional null, as well as Atr heterozygous cells has increased micronuclei frequency (Fig. 2c). Of interest, we have not observed these micronuclei when we used the same system to conditionally delete BRCA1 or BRCA2, similarly impairing HR (data not shown). If the absence of ATR results in increased replication fork collapse, DSBs and an inability to utilize HR to repair these lesions, then one would expect chromosomal fragmentation and thus micronuclei. However, we also noted a significant increase in micronuclei when only one copy of ATR was present, suggesting increased spontaneous damage and ensuing chromosomal instability. This observation fits with the known decreased S-phase arrest associated with ATR heterozygosity [5].

A recent report by Ruzankina et al. also conditionally deleted ATR in adult mouse tissues. The authors concluded that loss of ATR caused the premature appearance of age-related phenotypes and increased the deterioration of tissue homeostasis [31]. Similar to that study, we also observed a mosaicism of Atr deletion in our RPE, particularly in the normal sized Atr conditional null RPE (Fig. 1b). This is most pronounced in the more distal region of RPE where proliferation is greatest (many tightly packed cells produced in a short period at the end of RPE development), and suggests that a number of cells escaped Cre activity thereby remaining heterozygous and were capable of proper organ development. Supporting this interpretation of our observation is that the petal length (Fig. 1c) and HR frequency of the outer region without staining (therefore lacking Cre activity) (Fig. 3biii) of the normal sized Atr conditional null eyes are not different from Atr conditional heterozygous and Trp1-Cre^tg/o RPE. These observations also belie the inherent issues of trying to measure HR in the context of modulating an essential gene such as Atr. In any such study it is necessary to control for the competition between the cells impaired in progression through cell division and proliferation because of the loss of an essential gene with cells that have a growth advantage due to retaining a functional copy of the essential gene. As such, our result that demonstrates the requirement of ATR in HR is probably a conservative measurement.

This study is another example of the ability of the conditional p^un assay in measuring the effect of essential genes on HR frequency. More importantly, we have provided direct evidence that ATR is necessary for completion of HR events during somatic development in response to the normal levels of endogenous replication stress that occurs. The reduction of HR in the absence of ATR correlates with increased DNA damage and abnormal cell morphology.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to members of the Bishop Lab for their comments on the manuscript and the UTHSCSA Department of Lab Animal Services for the care of animals.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AJRB. Performed the experiments: ADB BWS AG SST. Analyzed the data:AJRB ADB BWS AG EJB SST. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EJB. Wrote the paper: ADB BWS AJRB.

References

1. Myung K, Datta A, Kolodner RD (2001) Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104: 397–408.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Budzowska M, Kanaar R (2009) Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems. Cell Biochem Biophys 53: 17–31.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Brown EJ, Baltimore D (2000) ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev 14: 397–402.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. de Klein A, Muijtjens M, van Os R, Verhoeven Y, Smit B, et al. (2000) Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr Biol 10: 479–482.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Garg R, Callens S, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB, et al. (2004) Chromatin association of rad17 is required for an ataxia telangiectasia and rad-related kinase-mediated S-phase checkpoint in response to low-dose ultraviolet radiation. Mol Cancer Res 2: 362–369.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Tibbetts RS, Cortez D, Brumbaugh KM, Scully R, Livingston D, et al. (2000) Functional interactions between BRCA1 and the checkpoint kinase ATR during genotoxic stress. Genes Dev 14: 2989–3002.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Plevani P, et al. (2001) The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412: 557–561.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Cha RS, Kleckner N (2002) ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297: 602–606.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Brown EJ, Baltimore D (2003) Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance. Genes Dev 17: 615–628.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Helleday T, Lo J, van Gent DC, Engelward BP (2007) DNA double-strand break repair: from mechanistic understanding to cancer treatment. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 923–935.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Pichierri P, Rosselli F, Franchitto A (2003) Werner's syndrome protein is phosphorylated in an ATR/ATM-dependent manner following replication arrest and DNA damage induced during the S phase of the cell cycle. Oncogene 22: 1491–1500.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Davies SL, North PS, Dart A, Lakin ND, Hickson ID (2004) Phosphorylation of the Bloom's syndrome helicase and its role in recovery from S-phase arrest. Mol Cell Biol 24: 1279–1291.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Li W, Kim SM, Lee J, Dunphy WG (2004) Absence of BLM leads to accumulation of chromosomal DNA breaks during both unperturbed and disrupted S phases. J Cell Biol 165: 801–812.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Hu B, Wang H, Wang X, Lu HR, Huang C, et al. (2005) Fhit and CHK1 have opposing effects on homologous recombination repair. Cancer Res 65: 8613–8616.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Sorensen CS, Hansen LT, Dziegielewski J, Syljuasen RG, Lundin C, et al. (2005) The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat Cell Biol 7: 195–201.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. McCabe N, Turner NC, Lord CJ, Kluzek K, Bialkowska A, et al. (2006) Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Res 66: 8109–8115.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Wang H, Wang H, Powell SN, Iliakis G, Wang Y (2004) ATR affecting cell radiosensitivity is dependent on homologous recombination repair but independent of nonhomologous end joining. Cancer Res 64: 7139–7143.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Chanoux RA, Yin B, Urtishak KA, Asare A, Bassing CH, et al. (2009) ATR and H2AX cooperate in maintaining genome stability under replication stress. J Biol Chem 284: 5994–6003.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Brilliant MH (2001) The mouse p (pink-eyed dilution) and human P genes, oculocutaneous albinism type 2 (OCA2), and melanosomal pH. Pigment Cell Res 14: 86–93.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Brilliant MH, Gondo Y, Eicher EM (1991) Direct molecular identification of the mouse pink-eyed unstable mutation by genome scanning. Science 252: 566–569.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Oetting WS, King RA (1999) Molecular basis of albinism: mutations and polymorphisms of pigmentation genes associated with albinism. Hum Mutat 13: 99–115.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Galli A, Schiestl RH (1995) On the mechanism of UV and gamma-ray-induced intrachromosomal recombination in yeast cells synchronized in different stages of the cell cycle. Mol Gen Genet 248: 301–310.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Karia B, Martinez JA, Bishop AJ (2013) Induction of homologous recombination following in utero exposure to DNA-damaging agents. DNA Repair (Amst).
24. Brown AD, Claybon AB, Bishop AJ (2011) A conditional mouse model for measuring the frequency of homologous recombination events in vivo in the absence of essential genes. Mol Cell Biol 31: 3593–3602.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Claybon A, Karia B, Bruce C, Bishop AJ (2010) PARP1 suppresses homologous recombination events in mice in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 7538–7545.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Farago AF, Awatramani RB, Dymecki SM (2006) Assembly of the brainstem cochlear nuclear complex is revealed by intersectional and subtractive genetic fate maps. Neuron 50: 205–218.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Claybon A, Bishop AJ (2011) Dissection of a mouse eye for a whole mount of the retinal pigment epithelium. J Vis Exp.
28. Bishop AJ, Kosaras B, Carls N, Sidman RL, Schiestl RH (2001) Susceptibility of proliferating cells to benzo[a]pyrene-induced homologous recombination in mice. Carcinogenesis 22: 641–649.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Gunn A, Bennardo N, Cheng A, Stark JM (2011) Correct end use during end joining of multiple chromosomal double strand breaks is influenced by repair protein RAD50, DNA-dependent protein kinase DNA-PKcs, and transcription context. J Biol Chem 286: 42470–42482.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Pierce AJ, Johnson RD, Thompson LH, Jasin M (1999) XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 13: 2633–2638.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Ruzankina Y, Pinzon-Guzman C, Asare A, Ong T, Pontano L, et al. (2007) Deletion of the developmentally essential gene ATR in adult mice leads to age-related phenotypes and stem cell loss. Cell Stem Cell 1: 113–126.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Mori M, Metzger D, Garnier JM, Chambon P, Mark M (2002) Site-specific somatic mutagenesis in the retinal pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 1384–1388.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Bishop AJ, Hollander MC, Kosaras B, Sidman RL, Fornace AJ Jr, et al. (2003) Atm-, p53-, and Gadd45a-deficient mice show an increased frequency of homologous recombination at different stages during development. Cancer Res 63: 5335–5343.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Alderton GK, Joenje H, Varon R, Borglum AD, Jeggo PA, et al. (2004) Seckel syndrome exhibits cellular features demonstrating defects in the ATR-signalling pathway. Hum Mol Genet 13: 3127–3138.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Xia B, Sheng Q, Nakanishi K, Ohashi A, Wu J, et al. (2006) Control of BRCA2 cellular and clinical functions by a nuclear partner, PALB2. Mol Cell 22: 719–729.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Polo SE, Blackford AN, Chapman JR, Baskcomb L, Gravel S, et al. (2012) Regulation of DNA-end resection by hnRNPU-like proteins promotes DNA double-strand break signaling and repair. Mol Cell 45: 505–516.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Bishop AJ, Barlow C, Wynshaw-Boris AJ, Schiestl RH (2000) Atm deficiency causes an increased frequency of intrachromosomal homologous recombination in mice. Cancer Res 60: 395–399.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Reliene R, Bishop AJ, Li G, Schiestl RH (2004) Ku86 deficiency leads to reduced intrachromosomal homologous recombination in vivo in mice. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 103–111.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Saleh-Gohari N, Bryant HE, Schultz N, Parker KM, Cassel TN, et al. (2005) Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 25: 7158–7169.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Yeung PL, Denissova NG, Nasello C, Hakhverdyan Z, Chen JD, et al. (2012) Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies support a late step in DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. J Cell Biochem 113: 1787–1799.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Toledo LI, Altmeyer M, Rask MB, Lukas C, Larsen DH, et al. (2013) ATR Prohibits Replication Catastrophe by Preventing Global Exhaustion of RPA. Cell 155: 1088–1103.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Park MS, Ludwig DL, Stigger E, Lee SH (1996) Physical interaction between human RAD52 and RPA is required for homologous recombination in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 271: 18996–19000.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Friedberg EC, Meira LB (2006) Database of mouse strains carrying targeted mutations in genes affecting biological responses to DNA damage Version 7. DNA Repair (Amst) 5: 189–209.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Thanos A, Morizane Y, Murakami Y, Giani A, Mantopoulos D, et al. (2012) Evidence for baseline retinal pigment epithelium pathology in the Trp1-Cre mouse. Am J Pathol 180: 1917–1927.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Loonstra A, Vooijs M, Beverloo HB, Allak BA, van Drunen E, et al. (2001) Growth inhibition and DNA damage induced by Cre recombinase in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 9209–9214.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Eykelenboom JK, Harte EC, Canavan L, Pastor-Peidro A, Calvo-Asensio I, et al. (2013) ATR activates the S-M checkpoint during unperturbed growth to ensure sufficient replication prior to mitotic onset. Cell Rep 5: 1095–1107.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. O'Driscoll M, Ruiz-Perez VL, Woods CG, Jeggo PA, Goodship JA (2003) A splicing mutation affecting expression of ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) results in Seckel syndrome. Nat Genet 33: 497–501.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Myung K, Datta A, Kolodner RD (2001) Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104: 397–408.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Budzowska M, Kanaar R (2009) Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems. Cell Biochem Biophys 53: 17–31.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Brown EJ, Baltimore D (2000) ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev 14: 397–402.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. de Klein A, Muijtjens M, van Os R, Verhoeven Y, Smit B, et al. (2000) Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr Biol 10: 479–482.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Garg R, Callens S, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB, et al. (2004) Chromatin association of rad17 is required for an ataxia telangiectasia and rad-related kinase-mediated S-phase checkpoint in response to low-dose ultraviolet radiation. Mol Cancer Res 2: 362–369.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Tibbetts RS, Cortez D, Brumbaugh KM, Scully R, Livingston D, et al. (2000) Functional interactions between BRCA1 and the checkpoint kinase ATR during genotoxic stress. Genes Dev 14: 2989–3002.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Plevani P, et al. (2001) The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412: 557–561.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Cha RS, Kleckner N (2002) ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297: 602–606.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Brown EJ, Baltimore D (2003) Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance. Genes Dev 17: 615–628.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Helleday T, Lo J, van Gent DC, Engelward BP (2007) DNA double-strand break repair: from mechanistic understanding to cancer treatment. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 923–935.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Pichierri P, Rosselli F, Franchitto A (2003) Werner's syndrome protein is phosphorylated in an ATR/ATM-dependent manner following replication arrest and DNA damage induced during the S phase of the cell cycle. Oncogene 22: 1491–1500.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Davies SL, North PS, Dart A, Lakin ND, Hickson ID (2004) Phosphorylation of the Bloom's syndrome helicase and its role in recovery from S-phase arrest. Mol Cell Biol 24: 1279–1291.
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Li W, Kim SM, Lee J, Dunphy WG (2004) Absence of BLM leads to accumulation of chromosomal DNA breaks during both unperturbed and disrupted S phases. J Cell Biol 165: 801–812.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Hu B, Wang H, Wang X, Lu HR, Huang C, et al. (2005) Fhit and CHK1 have opposing effects on homologous recombination repair. Cancer Res 65: 8613–8616.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Sorensen CS, Hansen LT, Dziegielewski J, Syljuasen RG, Lundin C, et al. (2005) The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat Cell Biol 7: 195–201.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. McCabe N, Turner NC, Lord CJ, Kluzek K, Bialkowska A, et al. (2006) Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Res 66: 8109–8115.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Wang H, Wang H, Powell SN, Iliakis G, Wang Y (2004) ATR affecting cell radiosensitivity is dependent on homologous recombination repair but independent of nonhomologous end joining. Cancer Res 64: 7139–7143.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Chanoux RA, Yin B, Urtishak KA, Asare A, Bassing CH, et al. (2009) ATR and H2AX cooperate in maintaining genome stability under replication stress. J Biol Chem 284: 5994–6003.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Brilliant MH (2001) The mouse p (pink-eyed dilution) and human P genes, oculocutaneous albinism type 2 (OCA2), and melanosomal pH. Pigment Cell Res 14: 86–93.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Brilliant MH, Gondo Y, Eicher EM (1991) Direct molecular identification of the mouse pink-eyed unstable mutation by genome scanning. Science 252: 566–569.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Oetting WS, King RA (1999) Molecular basis of albinism: mutations and polymorphisms of pigmentation genes associated with albinism. Hum Mutat 13: 99–115.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Galli A, Schiestl RH (1995) On the mechanism of UV and gamma-ray-induced intrachromosomal recombination in yeast cells synchronized in different stages of the cell cycle. Mol Gen Genet 248: 301–310.
View Article
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Karia B, Martinez JA, Bishop AJ (2013) Induction of homologous recombination following in utero exposure to DNA-damaging agents. DNA Repair (Amst).

[ref24] 24. Brown AD, Claybon AB, Bishop AJ (2011) A conditional mouse model for measuring the frequency of homologous recombination events in vivo in the absence of essential genes. Mol Cell Biol 31: 3593–3602.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Claybon A, Karia B, Bruce C, Bishop AJ (2010) PARP1 suppresses homologous recombination events in mice in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 7538–7545.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Farago AF, Awatramani RB, Dymecki SM (2006) Assembly of the brainstem cochlear nuclear complex is revealed by intersectional and subtractive genetic fate maps. Neuron 50: 205–218.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Claybon A, Bishop AJ (2011) Dissection of a mouse eye for a whole mount of the retinal pigment epithelium. J Vis Exp.

[ref28] 28. Bishop AJ, Kosaras B, Carls N, Sidman RL, Schiestl RH (2001) Susceptibility of proliferating cells to benzo[a]pyrene-induced homologous recombination in mice. Carcinogenesis 22: 641–649.
View Article
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Gunn A, Bennardo N, Cheng A, Stark JM (2011) Correct end use during end joining of multiple chromosomal double strand breaks is influenced by repair protein RAD50, DNA-dependent protein kinase DNA-PKcs, and transcription context. J Biol Chem 286: 42470–42482.
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Pierce AJ, Johnson RD, Thompson LH, Jasin M (1999) XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 13: 2633–2638.
View Article
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Ruzankina Y, Pinzon-Guzman C, Asare A, Ong T, Pontano L, et al. (2007) Deletion of the developmentally essential gene ATR in adult mice leads to age-related phenotypes and stem cell loss. Cell Stem Cell 1: 113–126.
View Article
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Mori M, Metzger D, Garnier JM, Chambon P, Mark M (2002) Site-specific somatic mutagenesis in the retinal pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 1384–1388.
View Article
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Bishop AJ, Hollander MC, Kosaras B, Sidman RL, Fornace AJ Jr, et al. (2003) Atm-, p53-, and Gadd45a-deficient mice show an increased frequency of homologous recombination at different stages during development. Cancer Res 63: 5335–5343.
View Article
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Alderton GK, Joenje H, Varon R, Borglum AD, Jeggo PA, et al. (2004) Seckel syndrome exhibits cellular features demonstrating defects in the ATR-signalling pathway. Hum Mol Genet 13: 3127–3138.
View Article
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Xia B, Sheng Q, Nakanishi K, Ohashi A, Wu J, et al. (2006) Control of BRCA2 cellular and clinical functions by a nuclear partner, PALB2. Mol Cell 22: 719–729.
View Article
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Polo SE, Blackford AN, Chapman JR, Baskcomb L, Gravel S, et al. (2012) Regulation of DNA-end resection by hnRNPU-like proteins promotes DNA double-strand break signaling and repair. Mol Cell 45: 505–516.
View Article
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Bishop AJ, Barlow C, Wynshaw-Boris AJ, Schiestl RH (2000) Atm deficiency causes an increased frequency of intrachromosomal homologous recombination in mice. Cancer Res 60: 395–399.
View Article
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Reliene R, Bishop AJ, Li G, Schiestl RH (2004) Ku86 deficiency leads to reduced intrachromosomal homologous recombination in vivo in mice. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 103–111.
View Article
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Saleh-Gohari N, Bryant HE, Schultz N, Parker KM, Cassel TN, et al. (2005) Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 25: 7158–7169.
View Article
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Yeung PL, Denissova NG, Nasello C, Hakhverdyan Z, Chen JD, et al. (2012) Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies support a late step in DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. J Cell Biochem 113: 1787–1799.
View Article
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Toledo LI, Altmeyer M, Rask MB, Lukas C, Larsen DH, et al. (2013) ATR Prohibits Replication Catastrophe by Preventing Global Exhaustion of RPA. Cell 155: 1088–1103.
View Article
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Park MS, Ludwig DL, Stigger E, Lee SH (1996) Physical interaction between human RAD52 and RPA is required for homologous recombination in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 271: 18996–19000.
View Article
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Friedberg EC, Meira LB (2006) Database of mouse strains carrying targeted mutations in genes affecting biological responses to DNA damage Version 7. DNA Repair (Amst) 5: 189–209.
View Article
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Thanos A, Morizane Y, Murakami Y, Giani A, Mantopoulos D, et al. (2012) Evidence for baseline retinal pigment epithelium pathology in the Trp1-Cre mouse. Am J Pathol 180: 1917–1927.
View Article
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Loonstra A, Vooijs M, Beverloo HB, Allak BA, van Drunen E, et al. (2001) Growth inhibition and DNA damage induced by Cre recombinase in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 9209–9214.
View Article
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Eykelenboom JK, Harte EC, Canavan L, Pastor-Peidro A, Calvo-Asensio I, et al. (2013) ATR activates the S-M checkpoint during unperturbed growth to ensure sufficient replication prior to mitotic onset. Cell Rep 5: 1095–1107.
View Article
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. O'Driscoll M, Ruiz-Perez VL, Woods CG, Jeggo PA, Goodship JA (2003) A splicing mutation affecting expression of ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) results in Seckel syndrome. Nat Genet 33: 497–501.
View Article
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Mouse lines

Retinal pigment epithelium dissection and whole mount staining

Visualization and analysis of whole mounts

I-SceI DR-GFP HR assay

Results

Size reduction in ATR conditional null eyes

Loss of ATR results in abnormal RPE cellular morphology and increase in chromosomal instability

ATR promotes homologous recombination in mouse RPE cells

ATR promotes homologous recombination in a human tissue culture assay

Discussion

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References