Figures
Abstract
Background
A number of studies have investigated associations of genetic variation in RAD23B Ala249Val (rs1805329 C>T) with cancer susceptibility; however, the findings are inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to acquire a more precise estimation of the relationship.
Method
We searched literatures from PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the association between Ala249Val polymorphism and cancer risk.
Results
A total of 23 studies consisting of 10837 cases and 13971 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between RAD23B Ala249Val polymorphism and cancer risk (Val/Val vs. Ala/Ala: OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.75–1.25; Ala/Val vs. Ala/Ala: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.96–1.22; recessive model: OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.76–1.14 and dominant model: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.94–1.20). We did not find any significant associations in the further stratification analyses by cancer type, ethnicity and source of control.
Conclusions
Despite some limitations, this meta-analysis indicates that it is unlikely that the RAD23B 249Val/Val polymorphism may contribute to the individual susceptibility to cancer risk. However, further advanced designed studies with larger sample size and different ethnicities should be conducted to confirm our results.
Citation: Li Z, Zhang Y, Ying X, Song J, Zhang R, Li Z, et al. (2014) The Association between RAD23B Ala249Val Polymorphism and Cancer Susceptibility: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 9(3): e91922. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091922
Editor: Arthur J. Lustig, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, United States of America
Received: September 1, 2013; Accepted: February 18, 2014; Published: March 18, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Li et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in economically developed countries as well as developing countries. The global burden of cancer continues to increase [1]. DNA damage is highly relevant to all aspects of oncology. Most mutations and large genomic alterations (deletions, translocations, loss of heterozygosity, and amplifications) that are relevant to cancer originate from DNA injury [2]. Four major DNA repair pathways exist in mammalian cells, in which nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is the most diverse and well-studied DNA repair system [3], [4]. The NER pathway plays important roles in the repair of bulky lesions, such as pyrimidine dimers, photo-products, larger chemical adducts and cross-links, as well as in the maintenance of genomic stability [4]. There are at least four steps of reaction (DNA damage recognition, incision of damaged DNA, repair of the gapped DNA, DNA ligation) and several key enzymes (XPC-RAD23B, CSB, XPA and XPF-ERCC1, etc.) involved in the NER pathway [4]–[6]. Polymorphisms in genes related to NER pathway may alter the DNA repair capacity and also play a role in carcinogenesis [7]. For example, the Lys939Gln and Ala499Val as well as the ploy (AT) deletion/insertion polymorphisms of the XPC gene were significantly associated with an increased overall cancer risk [8], [9]. The XPC binds to RAD23B, and forms the XPC-RAD23B complex, which plays important roles in the damaged DNA recognition and DNA repair initiation in the NER pathway [10].
RAD23B gene, also called HR23B or HHR23B, is located at chromosome 9q31.2. There are at least 1102 reported single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the RAD23B gene region (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP). RAD23B Ala249Val (rs1805329 C>T) is one of the important polymorphisms and it encoding protein involved in DNA damage recognition, which influence cancer susceptibility in individuals [11]. A number of studies have focused on the association between RAD23B Ala249Val polymorphism and caner risk [12]–[31], but the conclusions are still inconsistent. The possible reasons may be the small effect of the polymorphism on cancer risk and the relatively small sample size in each published study. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis combining the relevant published studies to draw a more precise estimation of the association.
Materials and Methods
Search strategy
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science using the search terms: “RAD23B or HR23B or HHR23B”, “polymorphism or variant or variation” and “cancer or carcinoma or tumor” (the last search was updated on November 2, 2013). All searched studies were retrieved, and their references were also checked for other relevant publications. Review articles and bibliographies of other relevant studies identified were searched manually to obtain additional eligible studies. Only the publications in English with full text available were included. If the same patient population was used in several publications, only the most recent study was included in this meta-analysis.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) evaluation of the association between RAD23B Ala249Val polymorphism and cancer risk, (b) case-control designed studies, (c) sufficient data provided for estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) study design, case-only or non-cancer subjects only studies; (2) duplicate of a previously published study; (3) deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in controls without further evidence of other polymorphisms of RAD23B gene or other genes.
Data extraction
Two of the authors (Zhenjun Li and Yan Zhang) independently extracted the information from all the eligible publications according to the inclusion criteria. When the two authors had a disagreement on any elements such as the source of controls, ethnicity and etc., it was resolved by discussion between them. If consensus could not be reached, another author would be consulted to resolve the dispute and the majority of the votes made a final decision. The following data were collected from each study: first author's surname, publication year, country of origin, ethnicity, cancer type, source of controls, genotyping method, total number of cases and controls, and numbers of cases and controls with Ala/Ala, Ala/Val and Val/Val genotypes for the RAD23B Ala249Val polymorphism, respectively. Different ethnicities were categorized as Caucasian, Asian, Latino, African and more than one ethnicity. Source of controls were stratified to population-based and hospital-based. Cancer type was further categorized as respiratory tract, digestive tract, urinary system, breast, brain and other cancer. We did not define any minimum number of patients to include in our meta-analysis.
Statistical methods
We used the goodness-of-fit chi-square test to evaluate HWE for each study, and P<0.05 was considered as deviation from HWE. Crude ORs with their corresponding 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the RAD23B Ala249Val polymorphism and cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed in homozygous model (Val/Val vs. Ala/Ala), heterozygous model (Ala/Val vs. Ala/Ala), recessive model (Val/Val vs. Ala/Ala + Ala/Val), and dominant model (Ala/Val + Val/Val vs. Ala/Ala), respectively. Chi-square-based Q-test was used to check heterogeneity assumption. P values greater than 0.1 for the Q-test suggest a lack of heterogeneity among studies, hence we used the fixed-effects model (the Mantel-Haenszel method) to calculate the pooled OR estimate of the each study [32]. Otherwise, the random-effects model (the DerSimonian and Laird method) was used [33]. We performed subgroup analyses by variables of cancer type, ethnicity and source of controls. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the accuracy and stability of the results. Potential publication bias was estimated by the funnel plot, in which the standard error of log (OR) of each study was plotted against its log (OR). An asymmetric plot suggests a possible publication bias. Funnel plot asymmetry was assessed by the method of Egger's linear regression test, a linear regression approach to measure funnel plot asymmetry on the natural logarithm scale of the OR. The significance of the intercept was determined by the t-test suggested by Egger (P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant) [34]. All the statistical tests were performed with STATA version 11.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). All P values were two-sided, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Study characteristics
We identified 43 potentially relevant publications after a comprehensive literature screening from the previous mentioned databases. After assessing the publications according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 20 of the 43 publications met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis (Figure 1) [12]–[31]. One publication was excluded for it focused on oral premalignant lesions, which cannot be classified as cancer [35]. Another one [36] was excluded for overlapping data with a previous study [19]. The remaining 21 publications were not association studies. As a result, a total of 20 publications including 10837 cases and 13971 controls were used in the meta-analysis. For publications reporting results for more than one ethnic group [15] or cancer type [27], the results were analyzed and reported separately. Therefore, 20 publications were reported as 23 studies. Table 1 summarizes the studies identified and their main characteristics. The sample sizes ranged from 61 to 1267 for cases, and from 111 to 2405 for controls, in which four studies focused on the type of respiratory tract cancer, digestive tract cancer, urinary tract cancer, brain tumor as well as other cancers, and three on breast cancer. There were 17 studies on Caucasians, three studies of Asians, two studies of Latinos, one study of Africans, and one with more than one ethnicity, respectively. Cases were confirmed by histologically for 12 studies, and controls were matched for sex and age for 13 studies. Of the 23 studies included in our final analysis, 11 were population-based, 12 were hospital-based. The distribution of genotypes in the controls did not deviate from HWE, except for three studies [17], [23], [24]. In light of the distribution of genotypes for other DNA repair genes in the controls was consistent with HWE, so we included these three studies in our final analysis to enlarge our sample size and minimize the selection bias.
Meta-analysis result
The main results of this meta-analysis are shown in Table 2 and Figure 2. Overall, no significant associations were found between RAD23B Ala249Val polymorphism and cancer risk when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (Val/Val vs. Ala/Ala: OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.75–1.25; Ala/Val vs. Ala/Ala: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.96–1.22; recessive model: OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.76–1.14 and dominant model: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.94–1.20). No significant associations were observed when stratified by cancer type, ethnicity and source of controls.
For each study, the estimates of ORs and their corresponding 95% CIs were plotted with a box and a horizontal line. The symbol filled diamond indicates pooled OR and its corresponding 95% CI.
Sensitivity analysis
We deleted one single study involved in the meta-analysis at a time to reflect the impact of the individual data-set to the pooled ORs, and the corresponding pooled ORs were not materially altered (data not shown), indicating that our results were statistically robust.
Publication bias
We used Begg's funnel plot and Egger's test to assess the publication bias of the literatures. The shape of the funnel plot revealed some evidence of obvious asymmetry and we found one study may lead to publication bias [30]. Therefore the Egger's test was used to provide further statistical evidence of funnel plot symmetry. We did not find any evidence of publication bias from the results after this study was excluded (P = 0.426 for Val/Val vs. Ala/Ala; P = 0.071 for Ala/Val vs. Ala/Ala; P = 0.458 for recessive model; and P = 0.087 for dominant model, respectively).
Discussion
We performed this meta-analysis including 10837 cases and 13971 controls to estimate the association between RAD23B Ala249Val polymorphism and cancer risk. We did not find any significant association between this polymorphism and the overall cancer risk. Although the exact mechanisms of how RAD23B Ala249Val polymorphism affects cancer risk at the molecular level remain unknown, the established knowledge on the structural and biological functions of the RAD23B gene may imply the potential effect of this polymorphism.
RAD23B gene is located at chromosome 9q31.2. The protein encoded by RAD23B is one of the two human homologs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad23. RAD23B and XPC proteins bind to form an XPC-RAD23B heterodimeric subcomplex [6], [37], which plays a key role in DNA damage recognition in the NER global genome repair pathway. It has been demonstrated that polymorphisms of DNA repair genes may lead to DNA repair capacity alteration, sequentially contribute to cancer susceptibility [38]. Hence, variants in both genes may interact to hinder NER and increase the risk of cancer [7].
In the subgroup analysis based on ethnicities and source of controls, we did not find any statistical significance. The potential reason for the association discovered in study may not be reproduced across all ethnic groups may be ascribed to the ethnicity difference which may expose to different environment as well as dietary difference. Some of the findings may be due to chance because studies with small sample size may have insufficient statistical power to detect a slight effect [39]. Considering the limited studies and population numbers of each ethnicity included in the meta-analysis, our results should be interpreted with caution.
We also found two recent meta-analyses focused on the overall cancer risk and XPC gene polymorphisms [8], [9]. The XPC can bind with RAD23B to form the XPC-RAD23B complex which plays an important role in damaged DNA recognition [10]. He et al. [8] found that the XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism was significantly associated with overall cancer risk from 62 studies with a total of 25708 cancer cases and 30432 controls, they also found the Ala499Val polymorphism was associated with overall cancer risk with evidence from 34 studies including 14877 cases and 17888 controls. Likewise, Dai et al. [9] also found the XPC PAT +/+ carriers may have an increased overall cancer risk from 32 publications with 10214 cases and 11302 controls. However, in this study, we did not find any evidence for the association between RAD23B Ala249Val polymorphism and overall cancer risk, which may be due to this polymorphism exposing a weak or nearly no effect on cancer risk. Carcinogenesis is a complex process, and different cancer types may have different mechanisms. In addition, it is possible that the sample size for any given cancer is not sufficient to detect any association.
Cigarette smoking is one of the risk factors for lung cancer as well as other cancers such as bladder cancer [40], [41]. Tobacco smoke contains at least 55 carcinogens that can generate reactive oxygen species and sequentially lead to mutations [42]. The carcinogens can interact with human DNA and cause DNA damages, and if left unrepaired, such DNA damages can induce mutations and initiate tumorigenesis [43]. Yin et al. [44] found that heavy cigarettes smokers may have an increased lung cancer risk. Exposure to certain environmental factors might be required for detecting the association of DNA repair polymorphisms and cancer risk.
Several limitations of this meta-analysis should be addressed. First, the numbers for each type of cancer and sample sizes were relatively small, with possible insufficient statistical power to investigate the real association; second, our results were based on unadjusted estimates, whereas a more precise analysis should be conducted if raw data from each individual study were available. This would allow for the adjustment by other co-variants including age, gender, smoking status, drinking status, BMI, virus infection, environmental factors, and other lifestyle. Moreover, we only included the articles written in English, which may potential miss some articles.
In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicated that RAD23B Ala249 Val polymorphism was not associated with cancer susceptibility. However, interactions of gene variants and environmental risk factors, such as smoking, drinking, infection, and sun exposure should also be considered in the analysis. Such studies including more samples with different ethnicities, environmental factors, and sufficient biological evidence for the SNP functions may lead to a better, comprehensive understanding of the association between the RAD23B Ala249Val polymorphism and cancer risk.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: XY JS. Performed the experiments: Zhenjun Li YZ. Analyzed the data: YZ Zhen Li HC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PY YS WP ZC. Wrote the paper: Zhenjun Li YZ XY RZ.
References
- 1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90.
- 2. Hoeijmakers JH (2009) DNA damage, aging, and cancer. N Engl J Med 361: 1475–1485.
- 3. EC F (2001) How nucleotide excision repair protects against cancer. Nature Rev Cancer 1: 22–33.
- 4. Leibeling D, Laspe P, Emmert S (2006) Nucleotide excision repair and cancer. J Mol Histol 37: 225–238.
- 5. Fousteri M, Mullenders LH (2008) Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells: molecular mechanisms and biological effects. Cell Res 18: 73–84.
- 6. Friedberg EC (2001) How nucleotide excision repair protects against cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 1: 22–33.
- 7. Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD (2002) Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11: 1513–1530.
- 8. He J, Shi TY, Zhu ML, Wang MY, Li QX, et al. (2013) Associations of Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms of the XPC gene with cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 133: 1765–1775.
- 9. Dai QS, Hua RX, Zhang R, Huang YS, Hua ZM, et al. (2013) Poly (AT) deletion/insertion polymorphism of the XPC gene contributes to urinary system cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Gene 528: 335–342.
- 10. Sugasawa K, Ng JM, Masutani C, Iwai S, van der Spek PJ, et al. (1998) Xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein complex is the initiator of global genome nucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell 2: 223–232.
- 11. Hsieh HC, Hsieh YH, Huang YH, Shen FC, Tsai HN, et al. (2005) HHR23A, a human homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad23, regulates xeroderma pigmentosum C protein and is required for nucleotide excision repair. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 335: 181–187.
- 12. Shen M, Berndt SI, Rothman N, Demarini DM, Mumford JL, et al. (2005) Polymorphisms in the DNA nucleotide excision repair genes and lung cancer risk in Xuan Wei, China. Int J Cancer 116: 768–773.
- 13. Huang WY, Berndt SI, Kang D, Chatterjee N, Chanock SJ, et al. (2006) Nucleotide excision repair gene polymorphisms and risk of advanced colorectal adenoma: XPC polymorphisms modify smoking-related risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15: 306–311.
- 14. Landi S, Gemignani F, Canzian F, Gaborieau V, Barale R, et al. (2006) DNA repair and cell cycle control genes and the risk of young-onset lung cancer. Cancer Res 66: 11062–11069.
- 15. Mechanic LE, Millikan RC, Player J, de Cotret AR, Winkel S, et al. (2006) Polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes, smoking and breast cancer in African Americans and whites: a population-based case-control study. Carcinogenesis 27: 1377–1385.
- 16. Shen M, Zheng T, Lan Q, Zhang Y, Zahm SH, et al. (2006) Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma among women in Connecticut. Hum Genet 119: 659–668.
- 17. Millikan RC, Hummer A, Begg C, Player J, de Cotret AR, et al. (2006) Polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes and risk of multiple primary melanoma: the Genes Environment and Melanoma Study. Carcinogenesis 27: 610–618.
- 18. Garcia-Closas M, Malats N, Real FX, Welch R, Kogevinas M, et al. (2006) Genetic variation in the nucleotide excision repair pathway and bladder cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15: 536–542.
- 19. Wu X, Gu J, Grossman HB, Amos CI, Etzel C, et al. (2006) Bladder cancer predisposition: a multigenic approach to DNA-repair and cell-cycle-control genes. Am J Hum Genet 78: 464–479.
- 20. Chang JS, Wrensch MR, Hansen HM, Sison JD, Aldrich MC, et al. (2008) Nucleotide excision repair genes and risk of lung cancer among San Francisco Bay Area Latinos and African Americans. Int J Cancer 123: 2095–2104.
- 21. Lin J, Pu X, Wang W, Matin S, Tannir NM, et al. (2008) Case-control analysis of nucleotide excision repair pathway and the risk of renal cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 29: 2112–2119.
- 22. Zhang M, Huang WY, Andreotti G, Gao YT, Rashid A, et al. (2008) Variants of DNA repair genes and the risk of biliary tract cancers and stones: a population-based study in China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17: 2123–2127.
- 23. Abbasi R, Ramroth H, Becher H, Dietz A, Schmezer P, et al. (2009) Laryngeal cancer risk associated with smoking and alcohol consumption is modified by genetic polymorphisms in ERCC5, ERCC6 and RAD23B but not by polymorphisms in five other nucleotide excision repair genes. Int J Cancer 125: 1431–1439.
- 24. McKean-Cowdin R, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Inskip PD, Ruder AM, Butler M, et al. (2009) Associations between polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and glioblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18: 1118–1126.
- 25. Pan J, Lin J, Izzo JG, Liu Y, Xing J, et al. (2009) Genetic susceptibility to esophageal cancer: the role of the nucleotide excision repair pathway. Carcinogenesis 30: 785–792.
- 26. Michiels S, Laplanche A, Boulet T, Dessen P, Guillonneau B, et al. (2009) Genetic polymorphisms in 85 DNA repair genes and bladder cancer risk. Carcinogenesis 30: 763–768.
- 27. Rajaraman P, Hutchinson A, Wichner S, Black PM, Fine HA, et al. (2010) DNA repair gene polymorphisms and risk of adult meningioma, glioma, and acoustic neuroma. Neuro Oncol 12: 37–48.
- 28. Ibarrola-Villava M, Pena-Chilet M, Fernandez LP, Aviles JA, Mayor M, et al. (2011) Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair and oxidative stress pathways associated with malignant melanoma susceptibility. Eur J Cancer 47: 2618–2625.
- 29. Tomoda T, Nouso K, Sakai A, Ouchida M, Kobayashi S, et al. (2012) Genetic risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus: a case control study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27: 797–804.
- 30. Perez-Mayoral J, Pacheco-Torres AL, Morales L, Acosta-Rodriguez H, Matta JL, et al. (2013) Genetic polymorphisms in RAD23B and XPC modulate DNA repair capacity and breast cancer risk in Puerto Rican women. Mol Carcinog 52(Suppl 1): 127–138.
- 31. Santos LS, Gomes BC, Gouveia R, Silva SN, Azevedo AP, et al. (2013) The role of CCNH Val270Ala (rs2230641) and other nucleotide excision repair polymorphisms in individual susceptibility to well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Oncol Rep 30: 2458–2466.
- 32. Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22: 719–748.
- 33. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7: 177–188.
- 34. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315: 629–634.
- 35. Wang Y, Spitz MR, Lee JJ, Huang M, Lippman SM, et al. (2007) Nucleotide excision repair pathway genes and oral premalignant lesions. Clin Cancer Res 13: 3753–3758.
- 36. Chen M, Kamat AM, Huang M, Grossman HB, Dinney CP, et al. (2007) High-order interactions among genetic polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair pathway genes and smoking in modulating bladder cancer risk. Carcinogenesis 28: 2160–2165.
- 37. Thoma BS, Wakasugi M, Christensen J, Reddy MC, Vasquez KM (2005) Human XPC-hHR23B interacts with XPA-RPA in the recognition of triplex-directed psoralen DNA interstrand crosslinks. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 2993–3001.
- 38. Shen MR, Jones IM, Mohrenweiser H (1998) Nonconservative amino acid substitution variants exist at polymorphic frequency in DNA repair genes in healthy humans. Cancer Res 58: 604–608.
- 39. Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El Ghormli L, Rothman N (2004) Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 434–442.
- 40. Ezzati M, Henley SJ, Lopez AD, Thun MJ (2005) Role of smoking in global and regional cancer epidemiology: current patterns and data needs. Int J Cancer 116: 963–971.
- 41. Ezzati M, Lopez AD (2003) Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000. Lancet 362: 847–852.
- 42. Hoffmann D, Hoffmann I (1997) The changing cigarette, 1950–1995. J Toxicol Environ Health 50: 307–364.
- 43. Geacintov NE, Broyde S, Buterin T, Naegeli H, Wu M, et al. (2002) Thermodynamic and structural factors in the removal of bulky DNA adducts by the nucleotide excision repair machinery. Biopolymers 65: 202–210.
- 44. Yin ZB, Hua RX, Li JH, Sun C, Zhu JH, et al. (2013) Smoking and hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism contribute to lung cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol DOI:https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13277-013-1222-0.