Ancient Origins of RGK Protein Function: Modulation of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels Preceded the Protostome and Deuterostome Split

Henry L. Puhl III; Van B. Lu; Yu-Jin Won; Yehezkel Sasson; Joel A. Hirsch; Fumihito Ono; Stephen R. Ikeda

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100694

Abstract

RGK proteins, Gem, Rad, Rem1, and Rem2, are members of the Ras superfamily of small GTP-binding proteins that interact with Ca²⁺ channel β subunits to modify voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel function. In addition, RGK proteins affect several cellular processes such as cytoskeletal rearrangement, neuronal dendritic complexity, and synapse formation. To probe the phylogenetic origins of RGK protein–Ca²⁺ channel interactions, we identified potential RGK-like protein homologs in genomes for genetically diverse organisms from both the deuterostome and protostome animal superphyla. RGK-like protein homologs cloned from Danio rerio (zebrafish) and Drosophila melanogaster (fruit flies) expressed in mammalian sympathetic neurons decreased Ca²⁺ current density as reported for expression of mammalian RGK proteins. Sequence alignments from evolutionarily diverse organisms spanning the protostome/deuterostome divide revealed conservation of residues within the RGK G-domain involved in RGK protein – Ca_vβ subunit interaction. In addition, the C-terminal eleven residues were highly conserved and constituted a signature sequence unique to RGK proteins but of unknown function. Taken together, these data suggest that RGK proteins, and the ability to modify Ca²⁺ channel function, arose from an ancestor predating the protostomes split from deuterostomes approximately 550 million years ago.

Citation: Puhl HL III, Lu VB, Won Y-J, Sasson Y, Hirsch JA, Ono F, et al. (2014) Ancient Origins of RGK Protein Function: Modulation of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels Preceded the Protostome and Deuterostome Split. PLoS ONE 9(7): e100694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100694

Editor: Kevin Currie, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States of America

Received: April 9, 2014; Accepted: May 23, 2014; Published: July 3, 2014

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are freely available without restriction. The genetic analysis is based on public databases and the search paradigm and accession numbers of items analyzed are in the manuscript. Data are available at Genbank under the accessions: KJ826437, KJ826438, KJ826439, KJ826440, KJ826441, KJ826442, KJ826443, KJ826444. The Electrophysiological data including the program, plugins, and custom software, are available upon request. Requests for this data may be sent to the corresponding author.

Funding: This work was supported by the intramural program at the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. YS and JAH were supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant 1519/12). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The RGK protein family, comprised of Gem, Rad, Rem1, and Rem2, is an atypical subset of the Ras superfamily [1] of small GTP-binding proteins. Although the founding RGK members, Rad and Gem, were discovered over 20 years ago [2]–[4], the physiological functions of RGK proteins remain unclear. Rad was initially cloned based on differential mRNA expression in type II diabetic muscle [2]. Likewise, Gem (also known as kir) was cloned based on differential expression from mitogen-induced T-lymphocytes [3] and abl tyrosine kinase oncogene transformed hematopoietic cells [2]. Rem1 [5] and Rem2 [6] were later discovered based on sequence homology to the existing RGK proteins.

The connection between RGK proteins and voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel (VGCC) function arose from a yeast-two hybrid screen for protein partners that interact with VGCC β-subunits (Ca_vβ). Béguin et al. [7] demonstrated that Gem bound directly to Ca_vβ and inhibited VGCC function by interfering with trafficking of high-voltage activated Ca²⁺ channels (i.e., those containing Ca_vβ) to the plasma membrane. Subsequent studies confirmed and extended these observations demonstrating that all four RGK family members interacted with all four Ca_vβ subunits (CACNB1-4) to attenuate VGCC function [8]-[11]. Additional mechanisms underlying attenuation of VGCC have been proposed including production of a non-conducting species [12]–[14], disruption of channel gating [15], and binding to the α₁-subunit of some VGCCs [16]. Genetic ablation of Rem [17] or Rad [18] in mice results in increased L-type Ca²⁺ current in cardiac myocytes suggesting that endogenous RGK proteins tonically inhibit VGCC function in this tissue.

Additional functions for RGK proteins have emerged from large-scale genomic screens. For example, Rem2 emerged from an RNAi screen designed to identify proteins involved in CNS synaptogenesis [19]. Subsequent work confirmed that Rem2 impacts synapse development and dendritic morphology [20], [21]. Likewise, Gem may impact dendritic arborization and participate in certain forms of autism [22]. In non-mammalian vertebrates, RGK proteins also influence neuronal development. Inhibition of Rem2 expression in embryonic Danio rerio (zebrafish) interfered with midbrain development at 36 hours post fertilization [23]. Finally, a differential display screen in the urodele amphibian Cynops pyrrhogaster (Japanese fire belly newt) to identify proteins involved in limb regeneration revealed that Rad was highly up-regulated in skeletal muscle at the site of amputation [24]. Together, these indicate that: 1) RGK proteins serve important functions during development or regeneration of excitable cells, and 2) orthologs of RGK proteins are found throughout the vertebrate lineage.

Given the multitude of pathways in which RGK proteins participate, the question of whether RGK protein–VGCCs interactions are integral to function has arisen [21], [25]. To address this, we sought to determine whether modulation of VGCC function and residues involved with Ca_vβ interaction were conserved in evolutionarily diverse organisms. Here, we identify and clone RGK and RGK-like proteins from Danio rerio and Drosophila melanogaster and show that expression in mammalian neurons attenuates VGCC current density. Identification of RGK protein homologs in non-vertebrate deuterostomes and multiple protostome phyla followed by sequence comparison revealed that residues important for Ca_vβ binding were highly conserved. In addition, highly conserved residues specific to RGK proteins were identified. These data suggest that RGK protein interactions with VGCC functions arose in a common ancestor predating the protostome-deuterostome split occurring around 550 million years ago.

Materials and Methods

Electrophysiology

Superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neuron dissociation and intranuclear microinjection of cDNA.

All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health's Guidelines for Animal Care and Use and approved by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Animal Care and Use Committee. SCG neurons from adult (6–12 week old) Wistar rats were dissected and dissociated as described previously [26], [27]. Briefly, animals were anesthetized by CO₂ inhalation and decapitated before dissection. Two SCG per rat were removed, de-sheathed, cut into small pieces, and incubated in modified Earles' balanced salt solution (EBSS) containing 2 mg/mL collagenase (CLS4; Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ), 0.6 mg/mL trypsin (Worthington Biochemical) and 0.1 mg/mL DNase I at 36°C for 1 hour in a water bath shaker rotating at 110 rpm. The EBSS was supplemented with 3.6 g/L d-glucose and 10 mM HEPES. After incubation, neurons were mechanically dissociated by vigorously shaking the flask for 10 s. Neurons were centrifuged at 50×g for 6 min and resuspended in Minimal Essential Media (MEM) with 10% fetal calf serum twice before being plated on poly-l-lysine coated tissue culture dishes. Cells were maintained in a humidified 95% air/5% CO₂ incubator at 37°C.

Three to six hours after dissociation, plasmid constructs were injected directly into the nucleus of SCG neurons as described previously [26]–[28]. Briefly, cDNA was injected with a FemtoJet microinjector and 5171 micromanipulator (both from Eppendorf, Hauppauge, NY) using an injection pressure and duration of 140–160 hPa and 0.3 s, respectively. Injected plasmids were diluted in EB buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5) and centrifuged in capillary tubes at 10,000 rpm for at least 30 min to separate particulate contaminants in the cDNA preparation. Cloned Danio rerio RGK protein ortholog and Drosophila melanogaster RGK-like protein homolog cDNA constructs were injected at 50–100 ng/µl together with pEGFP cDNA (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) at 5 ng/µl to identify successfully injected neurons. Following injections, neurons were incubated overnight at 37°C and electrophysiological experiments were performed the following day.

Electrophysiology

Ca²⁺-channel currents (I_Ca) were recorded using a patch-clamp amplifier (Axopatch 200B, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) and conventional whole-cell patch-clamp techniques [29]. Patch electrodes were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries (1.65 mm outer diameter, 1.20 mm inner diameter, King Precision Glass, Claremont, CA) using a Model P-97 micropipette puller (Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA). The patch electrodes were coated with silicone elastomer (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, Midland, MI) and fire-polished. A Ag/AgCl pellet connected to the bath solution via a 0.15 M NaCl/agar bridge was used as a ground. Voltage protocol generation and data acquisition were performed using custom-designed software (S5) on a Macintosh G4 computer (Apple, Cupertino, CA). Current traces were filtered at 2 kHz (−3 dB; 4-pole Bessel), digitized at 10 kHz with a 16-bit analog-to-digital converter board (ITC-18, HEKA, Bellmore, NY) and stored on the computer for later analyses. Uncompensated cell capacitive currents were elicited by a 5 ms, +10 mV step from a holding potential of −80 mV immediately after establishment of the whole-cell configuration. I_Ca traces were recorded following cancellation of cell membrane capacitance and series resistance compensation (>85% prediction and correction; lag set to 5 µs).

Pipette solution contained (in mM) 120 N-methyl-d-glucamine, 20 tetraethylammonium hydroxide (TEA-OH), 11 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 10 sucrose, 1 CaCl₂, 14 Tris-creatine phosphate, 4 MgATP and 0.3 Na₂GTP, pH 7.2 with methanesulfonic acid. External I_Ca recording solution consisted of (in mM) 140 methanesulfonic acid, 145 TEA-OH, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, 10 CaCl₂ and 0.0003 tetrodotoxin (TTX; Alomone Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel), pH 7.4 with TEA-OH.

Data analysis and statistical testing

Igor Pro version 6 (WaveMetrics, Portland, OR) was used to analyze current traces. Cell membrane capacitance was calculated from uncompensated capacitive current recordings using the equation C_m = Q/V where C_m is the cell membrane capacitance (in pF), Q is the charge stored in the capacitor/cell membrane (in coulombs, derived from integrating the area under the capacitive transient current) and V is the amplitude of the voltage step (in volts). I_Ca amplitude was measured isochronally 10 ms after the initiation of the voltage step. I_Ca density (pA/pF) was calculated by dividing I_Ca amplitude by C_m.

Statistical tests were performed with Prism 6 for Mac OS X (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). All data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance between two groups was determined using an unpaired Student's t tests. Comparisons of multiple groups against a pooled control was done using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Dunnett's post-test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Molecular Biology

Zebrafish RGK protein orthologs were cloned from cDNA prepared from an adult male fish using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). Briefly, after anesthesia with MS-222 (tricaine methanesulfonate), a section (approximately 50 mg) was dissected from the trunk immediately caudal to the gills. The section was ground with a small ground glass pestle in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube containing 600 µl of RTL buffer. The lysate was applied to a QiaShredder column to shear genomic DNA. The resulting lysate (approximately 450 µl) was used to isolate total RNA as per the RNeasy kit instructions. Total RNA concentration was determined from absorbance at 260 nm. First strand cDNA was generated from 1 µg of total RNA using the RT for PCR kit (PT1107-1) from Clontech and oligo dT primer.

Primers for the amplification of zebrafish RGK protein orthologs were designed based on the following reference sequences: Gem (NM_001045849), Rad (NM_199798), Rem1 (NM_201174), and Rem2 (NM_001123046). All four sets were designed to incorporate MluI or NotI sites (bolded and underlined) on the 5′ or 3' ends of the open reading frames, respectively. The PCR amplification was performed using PfuUltra Hotstart polymerase from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA). The products were cloned into the pCI vector (Promega, Madison, WI) and sequence verified. Primer sequences were as follows:

dr_Gem for: GATCACGCGTACCATGACCCTGCTGGCGAGCGTGC

dr_Gem rev: GATCGATCGCGGCCGCTTACAGACTCATCAGGTCATGAC

dr_Rad for: GATCACGCGTACCATGACTTTGAACAAAGGAGACAAG

dr_Rad rev: GATCGATCGCGGCCGCTTATAGCACTGAAAGGTCGTGGC

dr_Rem1 for: GATCACGCGTACCATGACACTCAACACACAGAAGG

dr_Rem1 rev: GATCGATCGCGGCCGCTCACAGCACAGCGAGGTCATGG

dr_Rem2 for: GATCACGCGTACCATGTCGGACCAGGGTTATGGC

dr_Rem2 rev: GATCGATCGCGGCCGCTCACATTAAAGCGCTGAGGTCG

Drosophila melanogaster RGK-like protein homologs were cloned from adult polyA+ RNA (Clontech). One microgram of PolyA+ RNA was used with the RT for PCR kit to generate first strand cDNA as above. Primers for the amplification of Drosophila melanogaster RGK proteins were designed based on the following sequences: RGK1 (AAF57577), RGK2 (AAF57577) and RGK3 (ABV53867). All three sets were designed to incorporate MluI or NotI sites (underlined) on the 5′ or 3′ ends of the open reading frames, respectively. The PCR amplification was performed using PfuUltra Hotstart polymerase. The products were cloned into the pCI vector and sequence verified. Primer sequences were as follows:

dm_RGK1 for: GATCACGCGTACCATGGCGCCCTTCTACAAGCGC

dm_RGK1 rev: GATCGATCGCGGCCGCTTAGAGTACATGCAGATTCTCGC

dm_RGK2 for: GATCACGCGTACCATGGCCCAGCAACAGCGCAGC

dm_RGK2 rev: GATCGATCGCGGCCGCTTATAGCACATGCAGATTCTCG

dm_RGK3 for: GATCACGCGTACCATGGTGGACGACATCTCACCG

dm_RGK3 rev: GATCGATCGCGGCCGCTTAGAGCACCTGCAGATTCTCGC

A second RGK2 forward primer was designed to amplify from the second methionine residue after several attempts to generate a full length predicted product failed. This sequence is designated dm_RGK2t in the text.

dm_RGK2t for: GATCACGCGTACCATGGCCCAGCAACAGCGCAGC

The mouse DiRas2 open reading frame (NM_001024474) was amplified from mouse whole brain cDNA and cloned into the MluI and NotI sites of pCI (Promega). The open reading frame for the fluorescent protein variant Venus was amplified with MluI sites on both ends and cloned into the MluI site of the DiRas2 pCI clone. The insertion orientation was confirmed by sequencing. Open reading frames for human Rit1 (AF084462) and Rit2 (NM_002930) were amplified from human whole brain cDNA (Clontech) and cloned into pcDNA3.1 at the KpnI/XhoI sites for Rit1, or the BamHI/XhoI sites for Rit2. All clones were sequence verified.

RGK protein ortholog search strategies

Initial identification of RGK protein orthologs/homologs utilized standard tools such as pre-computed NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) BlastP searches (BLink), annotated databases such as Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org/) gene trees and NCBI UniGene, and individual BlastP [30] searches using EnsemblMetazoa (http://metazoa.ensembl.org/) for non-vertebrate species using human RGK protein sequences as the query. After examining the sequence of several protostome RGK-like protein homologs, we generated a search protocol using the last eleven amino acids as PHI-BLAST pattern and human Gem or Rad as the query sequence: [KR][SAF][KR][SH][C][HNED][DNEV][LM]x[VSA][L]. The PHI-BLAST[31] search set was the non-redundant protein sequences database (nr). The algorithm parameters were the defaults with the exception of the maximum target sequences which was increased to 1000. This was followed by a 2^nd iteration PSI-BLAST. Protostome RGK orthologs were found together with vertebrate Ras superfamily members such as Rit1 and Rit2 in the hit list as sequence identity decreased.

Results

Cloning and expression of zebrafish RGK protein orthologs

Orthologs of RGK proteins within the vertebrate lineage were easily identified using the NCBI Basic Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) using human RGK proteins as the search query. At present, an Ensembl analysis of human Gem identifies 56 orthologs in vertebrates and expansion of the pre-computed genetic tree reveals 217 genes that represent the four known family members from mammals to ray-finned fish. We decided to clone and express RGK proteins identified in Danio rerio for several reasons. First, genes encoding putative orthologs of Gem, Rad, Rem1, and Rem2 were readily identified in the Danio rerio genome. Second, transcripts for some RGK proteins have been verified and their function inferred from knockdown or screening studies [23], [32], [33]. Third, functional expression of zebrafish cDNAs in mammalian cell lines has been demonstrated [34]. Finally, the popularity of zebrafish as a vertebrate model organism results in a more refined (high coverage and better annotation) genomic database and easily obtainable mRNA/cDNA for cloning.

PCR amplification of predicted open-reading frames from Danio rerio cDNA produced full length clones denoted dr_Gem, dr_Rad, dr_Rem1, and dr_Rem2 (NP_001039314, NP_956092, NP_957468, and NP_001116518, respectively). Within the conserved Ras-homology or G-domain, amino acid similarity with human orthologs was 80–90% except for dr_Rem2 which was 54%. To explore the functional consequences of Danio rerio RGK proteins, mammalian expression vectors containing the cloned open-reading frames were injected into adult rat sympathetic ganglion neurons and the impact of the resulting expression on I_Ca properties assayed as previously reported [12], [35]. The predominant I_Ca component in rat SCG neurons arises from Ca_V2.2 or ω-conotoxin GVIA-sensitive N-type channels [36]. Unlike co-expression experiments (i.e., RGK protein and VGCC subunits expressed simultaneously) in mammalian clonal cells or Xenopus oocytes, the native VGCC in adult sympathetic neurons are present prior to RGK protein overexpression and thus less influenced by forward trafficking perturbation [12].

Ca²⁺ currents were evoked with a 70 ms test pulse to various potentials from a holding potential of −80 mV in solutions (see Methods) designed to eliminate current components arising from other voltage-gated ion channels (e.g., primarily Na⁺ and K⁺). Under control conditions (neurons heterologously expressing EGFP only), inward currents became apparent around −30 mV, reached a maximum around +10 mV, and thereafter declined reaching a zero current asymptote near +80 mV (Fig. 1A; open circles). Current density (pA/pF) was determined from the I_Ca amplitude measured isochronally at 10 ms after initiation of the test pulse divided by the membrane capacitance (C_m) as determined from integration and fitting the decay of a capacitive transient (see Methods). In neurons previously injected with Danio rerio cDNA (100 ng/µl) encoding RGK protein orthologs, the mean I_Ca density was markedly reduced across a broad range of voltages (Figure 1A, filled symbols). Mean I_Ca density at +10 mV (maximal current) was reduced by 83–97% by expressing RGK proteins (Fig 1B). The mean C_m for RGK protein expressing neurons ranged from 42–53 pF. None of the values were significantly different from the C_m of the control group (mean 45 pF; not shown) indicating current density reductions arose from effects on channels rather than plasma membrane surface area.

Download:

Figure 1. Heterologous expression of zebrafish RGK protein orthologs reduces I_Ca density in rat sympathetic neurons.

A. Current-voltage (I-V) plots in which mean ± SEM I_Ca density (pA/pF) is plotted versus test potential (mV). I_Ca was evoked from a holding potential of −80 mV to the test potentials indicated. I_Ca amplitude, determined 10 ms after initiation of the test pulse, was normalized to membrane capacitance (C_m). Control neurons (open circles) were injected with EGFP cDNA (n = 6). Neurons previously injected with Danio rerio RGK protein cDNA clones (100 ng/µl approximately 18–24 hours prior to recording) are depicted with filled symbols: dr_Gem (triangle, n = 11); dr_Rad (diamond, n = 7), dr_Rem1 (inverted triangle, n = 7), and dr_Rem2 (square, n = 9). B. Category plot of data shown in panel A for I_Ca density at +10 mV. Mean I_Ca density for neurons expressing RGK protein clones differed significantly (P<0.05) from control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test). C. Normalized I-V plots for control (open circle) and dr_Rem2 expressing (red filled square) neurons. Data, from panel A, was normalized to the maximal I_Ca density and plotted to illustrate similarity of voltage-dependence. D. Exemplar I_Ca traces acquired at +10 mV from control (black) and dr_Rem2 (red) expressing neurons. Traces are depicted without (left) and with normalization (right) to maximal current. Dotted line represents zero current level.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100694.g001

Normalization of the I-V curve (Fig 1A) to the maximal I_Ca density (+10 mV) revealed that expression of RGK proteins appeared to reduce current density by a constant proportion at each voltage. An exemplar of dr_Rem2 vs. control normalized I-V curves is illustrated in Fig. 1C. Despite a reduction in mean current density of 93% by dr_Rem2, the normalized I-V curves come close to superimposing over the entire voltage range. Individual current traces for dr_Rem2 expressing neurons appeared similar when scaled to control currents (Fig. 1D) as previously shown for mammalian Rem2 expression [12] indicating no overt changes in activation or inactivation kinetics. However, this was not studied in detail as the large suppression of current amplitude in most cases made such comparisons difficult to interpret.

Cloning and expression of Drosophila melanogaster RGK orthologs

The presence of RGK protein homologs in the protostome phyla (e.g., arthropods, nematodes, mollusks, etc.) has not been reported to our knowledge. BLAST searches of the Drosophila melanogaster genomic database using human RGK proteins as the source revealed three potential isoforms annotated as RGK1 (AAF57577), RGK2 (AAF57577), and RGK3 (ABV53867). Given the evolutionary distances involved, it was difficult to ascertain whether the sequences represent true orthologs with a 1∶1 relationship with vertebrate RGK protein subtypes. Hence, for non-vertebrate protein sequences, we will use the term RGK-like protein homolog. RGK-like protein homolog open reading frames were cloned from Drosophila melanogaster polyA RNA following reverse transcription and PCR amplification. The clone, denoted dm_RGK1, has an open reading frame predicting a 498 amino acid protein identical to AAF57577 except for a single Q116E substitution. We were unsuccessful at generating a full length RGK2 PCR product based on the nucleotide sequence for AAF57577. However, amplification from the second methionine (M165) was successful and the predicted product matched residues 165–740 of AAF57577 which we denote as dm_RGK2t. The (predicted) truncated product contains the entire Ras-like G-domain and carboxyl-terminus elements previously shown necessary for Ca²⁺ channel modulation [12]. Cloning of RGK3 resulted in 2 clones: 1) dm_RGK3 (identical to ABV53867) and 2) dm_RGK3L which contains a 29 residue insertion starting after residue 401Q and is apparently a variant resulting from alternative splicing. Comparison of Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens RGK G-domains revealed a 47–56% identity and conservation in the last seven amino acids previously identified as the C-7 motif [37]. The later is significant in that the C-7 motif appears specific to RGK proteins. In contrast, the N-termini of Drosophila melanogaster RGK proteins are longer (ca. 250–500 residues) than vertebrate N-termini (ca. 80–150 residues) and share little apparent sequence similarity.

To assess function, the Drosophila melanogaster RGK clones were expressed in rat SCG neurons and whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of I_Ca performed (Fig. 2) as described above for the Danio rerio clones. Similar to vertebrate RGK protein clones, expression of all Drosophila melanogaster RGK-like protein homolog clones produced a decrease in sympathetic neuron I_Ca density while producing little overt alteration in the shape of the I-V curve or individual current traces. Attenuation of peak current density (pA/pF) ranged from 63–86% (Fig. 2B) while mean C_m was not significantly altered (mean C_m ranged from 50–59 pF compared with a control of 56 pF). As an exemplar, the dm_RGK2t I-V curve was normalized to the control I-V curve (in this case, uninjected SCG neurons) as illustrated in Fig. 2C. The near superimposition of the curves demonstrates that mean current density was similarly attenuated over a wide range of test potentials. Likewise, normalization of individual currents traces (Fig. 2D) showed little change in current kinetics suggesting activation and inactivation were not greatly altered by dm_RGK2t expression.

Download:

Figure 2. Fruit fly RGK-like protein homologs reduce I_Ca density in rat sympathetic neurons.

A. I-V plots in which mean ± SEM I_Ca density is plotted versus test potential. I_Ca was evoked and acquired as described for Fig. 1. Control neurons (open circles) were not injected with cDNA (n = 17). Neurons previously injected with Drosophila melanogaster RGK protein cDNA clones (50 ng/µl approximately 18–24 hours prior to recording) are depicted with filled symbols: dm_RGK1 (triangle, n = 13); dm_ RGK2t (diamond, n = 8), dm_RGK3 (inverted triangle, n = 8), and dm_RGK3L (square, n = 9). B. Category plot of data shown in panel A for I_Ca density at +10 mV. Mean I_Ca density for neurons expressing RGK protein clones differed significantly (P<0.05) from control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test). C. Normalized I-V plots for control (open circle) and dm_RKG2t expressing (red filled diamond) neurons. Data, from panel A, was normalized to the maximal I_Ca density and plotted to illustrate similarity of voltage-dependence. D. Exemplar I_Ca traces acquired at +10 mV from control (black) and dm_RGK2t (red) expressing neurons. Traces are depicted without (left) and with normalization (right) to maximal current. Dotted line represents zero current level.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100694.g002

To examine whether expression of other Ras subfamily members affected SCG neuron I_Ca density, experiments were performed using human Rit1, Rit2, and diRas2. Mammalian Rit1 and Rit2 often showed up in BLAST search hit lists with scores similar to protostome RGK-like protein homologs. DiRas2 was examined because of similarities in the region distal to the G5 motif (α5-helix, see below). Following cDNA injection into rat SCG neurons, none of these constructs significantly reduced mean I_Ca density when compared with uninjected control neurons (Figure S2). Hence, the ability of RGK-like proteins to attenuate I_Ca density following expression appears specific, at least within this experimental context.

Taken together, the expression of RGK protein orthologs from Danio rerio and homologs from Drosophila melanogaster in rat sympathetic neurons recapitulates, at least superficially, the I_Ca phenotype resulting from rat Rem2 heterologous expression [12]. Although the precise mechanism of Ca²⁺ channel inhibition by these RGK orthologs is unclear, the conservation of phenotype from diverse and evolutionarily distant species strengthens interpretations based on sequence comparisons.

Identification of RGK orthologs from diverse organisms

Protein BLAST searches [30] using human RGK proteins as the search query accurately identified vertebrate orthologs. The search for more diverse sequences related to RGK proteins became increasingly complex as more evolutionarily distant genomes were examined. As search stringency decreased, other members of the Ras superfamily appeared in the hit lists (Rit1 and Rit2 being the most common contaminants) due to the homology of the Ras G-domain [38], [39]. In addition to vertebrate orthologs, our earlier searches revealed potential deuterostome RGK-like protein homologs in the sea lancet, Branchiostoma floridae (XP_002594243), and the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (XP_785320). In addition to the Drosophila melanogaster RGK-like protein homologs, numerous protostome sequences were apparent in a large number of insect species (e.g., fruit flies, ants, bees, etc.) with sequenced genomes. We also found partial arthropod sequences from the wood tick, Ixodes scapularis (XP_002402890) and the water flea, Daphnia pulex (EFX75065). From these sequences it became apparent that, in addition to the G-domain, the last eleven residues, encompassing the C-7 domain [37] were highly conserved. Using alignment of the last eleven residues, we developed a search pattern (see Methods) to use with Pattern Hit Initiated BLAST [31], PHI-BLAST, and a human RGK protein sequence as search query (Gem or Rad). When followed by a second iteration of Position-Specific Iterated BLAST (PSI-BLAST), the hit list contained a large number of potential protostome RGK-like protein homologs that did not appear in previous searches. Multiple putative homologs for the sea hare, Aplysia californica, the pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, and the polychaete worm, Capitella teleta, were identified. It should be noted that many of the sequences are predicted (denoted XP, predicted protein model) from the genomic sequencing data and require further validation. Together with representative vertebrate sequences, the G- and C-terminus domains were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm.

Alignment of the RGK protein G-domain

A phylogenetic tree [40] with annotated representative species from which RGK protein orthologs and homologs were aligned is shown in Figure 3. Alignment of the RGK G-domain, color-coded for sequence identity, is shown in Figure 4. Unlike most Ras superfamily proteins, RGK proteins have extended N-termini preceding the G-domain. Although generally about 60–80 residues in vertebrates, the N-termini length in protostome homologs varied greatly from being potentially absent (ELU18455, Capitella teleta) to over 500 residues (e.g., AAF57675, Drosophila melanogaster). It should be noted, however, that many of the predicted transcripts have not been verified nor have protein products been detected. To identify the putative RGK G-domains, searches were performed on the highly conserved G-motifs, G1 (GXXGXGKS) and G5 (EXSA). G-motifs (G1–5) are canonical sequences involved in binding of GDP/GTP and Mg²⁺ found in both small-GTPase and heterotrimeric G-proteins. The start of the G-domain was defined as -6 residues from the start of G1 which encompasses the first β-sheet (β1) defined in structural studies of Ras superfamily proteins [41]. The end of the G-domain was defined as +30 residues from the beginning of the G5 motif, which includes the last α-helix (α5) in the structures, plus about 10 additional residues. The G1 and G5 motifs were less conserved in protostome and non-vertebrate deuterostomes with variations as noted in the supplement (Table S1). G-domains, determined in this manner, were between 170–180 residues with the exception of non-vertebrate deuterostomes Branchiostoma floridae (XP_002594243) and Ciona intestinalis (XP_002128442) which had insertions in the predicted G-domain. The alignment is composed of representative species with vertebrates comprising about half the sequences and non-vertebrate deuterostomes and protostomes comprising the remainder.

Download:

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree for RGK protein orthologs.

Phylogenetic tree layout was adapted from Yau and Hardie [40]. The deuterostome branch is labeled in green with dark green representing the phylum chordata. Tunicates and cephalochordates are subdivisions within this phylum with vertebrates representing the major group. Echinoderms (e.g., starfish, sea urchins, sea cucumbers) represent the second largest grouping of deuterostomes and are labeled in light green. The protostome branch is depicted below the dotted line in blue. Major phyla for which RGK protein orthologs/homologs were identified are presented in blue and the others in gray. Organisms with two letter abbreviation and common name (in parentheses) are depicted on the right.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100694.g003

Download:

Figure 4. Alignment of RGK protein G-domains.

G-domain sequences were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm in MacVector (version 12.7.5). Sequence labels (left) are color coded with vertebrates in green, non-vertebrate deuterostomes in pink, and protostomes in blue. The black horizontal line divides the deuterostomes/protostome sequences. Organism genus and species abbreviations (e.g., hs for Homo sapiens) are depicted in Figure 3. The method for parsing the RGK protein G-domain sequence is documented in the text and supplement (table S1) along with GenBank accession numbers for each sequence. The G-motifs (G1–5) along with canonical RGK protein sequences for G1, G3, G4, and G5 are depicted above the alignments. The residue numbers are for human Gem (top row) and are right justified. The inverted black triangles represent key residues participating in RGK protein–Ca_vβ interaction[43]. Secondary structural domains (α-helices and β-sheets) are depicted schematically below the sequences. Sequence identity color scale is depicted in the lower right corner.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100694.g004

Examination of the alignment shows strong conservation in the G1, G4, and G5-motifs as well as sequences corresponding to the β4, α3, and β5 structural elements (Fig. S1B). As previously noted [9], the G2-motif in RGK proteins is poorly conserved compared with nearly all Ras superfamily members [38], [39] and this becomes more evident when evolutionarily diverse RGK-like protein family members are considered. As this region in RAS re-orients during GDP/GTP exchange (switch I region) and provides a major effector binding surface, the lack of conservation in RGK orthologs is consistent with structural studies indicating lack of order in this region and the current notion that RGK proteins deviate from the canonical GDP/GTP switch mechanism. The G3 motif in RGK proteins, DXWE, has been noted to differ from the highly conserved DXXG motif found in most Ras superfamily members [39], and has been proposed as an RGK protein signature sequence based on vertebrate sequences [41]. However, the G3 motif sequence conservation diminishes in non-vertebrate deuterostome and all protostome sequences. A similar pattern is noted for the W141 (residue numbering for hs Gem) and cysteine residue (C146) in the α2 helix that are highly conserved in vertebrate RGK proteins but missing from other sequences. Conversely, the G4 and G5 motifs, regions involved in binding with the guanine base, show a high degree of conservation that extends into non-vertebrate species (see also Fig. S1A). Several of the key residues in G4 (N191, K192) and G5 (E219, S221) show absolute conservation across all the species examined. Finally, the region distal to the G5 motif comprising the β6–α5 linker and α5 helix is not particularly well conserved among Ras subfamily members [38] yet shows a high degree of conservation in RGK-related proteins (Fig. S1B). Interestingly, a previous study [42] implicates this region of Gem for both binding to Ca_Vβ subunits and producing Ca²⁺ channel inhibition.

Interaction of RGK proteins with the Ca_Vβ subunits [7] is proposed to be integral to channel inhibitory function although alternative mechanisms have been put forth [16]. A comprehensive alanine-scanning mutagenesis study [43] based on Gem and Ca_vβ3 interaction assayed with immunoprecipitation revealed three residues in the mouse Gem G4–G5 domain region (R196, V223, and H225) that influenced this interaction without interfering with GDP/GTP binding. Interestingly, these residues are not conserved within the Ras superfamily and are thus potentially specific to RGK function. Sequence comparison across diverse species (residues indicated by inverted black triangles in Fig. 4) strongly supports the mutagenesis results. Residues cognate to mouse Gem R196 and H225 are nearly 100% conserved for all species examined. The V223 residue is less conserved with valine or leucine accounting for most of the deuterostome residues. In some protostome RGK-like protein homologs, including Drosophila melanogaster, the cognate residue is an isoleucine and, as shown earlier, expression of these RGK-like proteins are capable of inhibiting Ca²⁺ channel function. Isoleucine was one of several hydrophobic residues that maintained Gem-Ca_Vβ interaction when substituted at this site [43]. In a complementary fashion, the Ca_Vβ residues with which R196, V223, and H225 putatively interact are very highly conserved (rat Ca_Vβ3 D194, D270, D272). The Ca_Vβ conservation may point to conservation of the RGK-Ca_Vβ interface, although the Ca_Vβ GuK domain, in general, is very highly conserved. Nonetheless, the conservation of the RGK unique residues in both protostomes and deuterostomes argues strongly for the RGK protein-Ca_Vβ interaction comprising a major function of this class of proteins.

Alignment of the RGK protein carboxyl terminus

The last 40 residues of RGK and RGK-like proteins were aligned using ClustalW (Fig. 5A). Among vertebrate RGK proteins, several motifs have been documented in this region. A Ca²⁺/calmodulin binding site [44] and polybasic region are located between residues -35 and -15 (relative to the stop codon). The latter is involved in plasma membrane targeting presumably via binding to anionic phospholipids such as PIP₂ [45]. A serine residue at -8, when phosphorylated, is believed to be a 14-3-3 protein binding site. The most intriguing element is the C-7 motif [37] which starts with a highly conserved cysteine residue and continues to the end of the protein (Fig. 5B). The function of this motif is unclear but it appears to be unique to RGK proteins. Although cysteine residues in the C-termini of many Ras superfamily proteins are often prenylated (e.g., the canonical CAAX box), evidence for post-translational modification of C-7 is lacking. Finally, the last four residues of most vertebrate RGK proteins comprise a potential class I PDZ ligand [46], X-S/T-X-V/L. At present, PDZ domain containing proteins have not been identified that interact with RGK proteins.

Download:

Figure 5. Alignment of RGK protein C-termini.

A. The last 40 residues of RGK and RGK-like protein sequences were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm in MacVector (version 12.7.5). Sequence labels and identity color-coding are as shown in Figure 4. Previously defined functional domains identified in vertebrate RGK proteins are depicted schematically above the sequences. Residue labeling is for hs Gem (lower numbering) or in residues from the stop codon (upper numbering). B. Sequence logo depiction of the terminal 20 amino acids including the RGK protein signature C-7 domain. Web logo was created with WebLogo 3 (http://weblogo.threeplusone.com) [51].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100694.g005

Examination of the carboxyl-terminus alignment reveals that overall conservation noted previously for vertebrate orthologs decreases in more diverse organisms. Even among vertebrate RGK proteins, Danio rerio Rem2 shows an apparent deviation in the polybasic and calmodulin binding regions. As expression of Danio rerio Rem2 as well as Drosophila melanogaster RGK-like protein homologs decreased I_Ca density in SCG neurons, these residues are not essential to this phenotype. Conversely, the C-7 motif plus 3–4 additional residues are highly conserved in all sequences. In particular, the cysteine residue is invariant in all orthologs/homologs examined suggesting a highly conserved but unknown function. The S/T and basic residues immediately preceding the cysteine are also well conserved suggesting that 14-3-3 protein binding may be of ancient origin. The residue at -6 is well conserved in both deuterostomes and protostomes but is a histidine in the former and an acidic residue (D/E) in the latter. The leucine at -1 and -4 is moderately well conserved in RGK orthologs. However, the S/T at -3, a residue critical to the Type PDZ ligand motif, is not conserved in protostomes where it tends to be an aromatic residue. Taken together, these data show that the last ten residues of RGK and related proteins are highly conserved and comprise a signature unique to RGK proteins that is not found in other Ras superfamily members (Fig. S1C).

Discussion

Here we provide evidence for RGK-like protein homologs in the genomes of non-vertebrate deuterostomes and protostomes suggesting that a common RGK protein ancestor arose prior to the split between deuterostomes and protostomes approximately 550 million years ago. Moreover, expression of cloned RGK protein ortholog/homolog open reading frames from Danio rerio and Drosophila melanogaster mRNA in mammalian neurons decreased I_Ca density establishing conservation of this phenotype. Sequence comparisons across evolutionarily diverse organisms revealed conserved residues unique to RGK-like proteins previously implicated in Ca²⁺ channel function. Taken together, the data suggest that interaction between RGK protein orthologs/homologs and voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels arose during the earliest stages of differentiation from the Ras superfamily of proteins.

Two interesting observations arose during cloning of RGK protein related sequences. First, prior to searching the Danio rerio genome, we anticipated identifying duplicates of RGK protein orthologs. Teleost fish, such as Danio rerio, have undergone an additional cycle of whole-genome duplication compared with other vertebrates and hence often possess gene duplicates, termed ohnologues, that resulted from this expansion [47], [48]. For example, several Ca_Vβ subunits (Ca_Vβ2, Ca_Vβ3, and Ca_Vβ4) are both duplicated and expressed in zebrafish [49]. The absence of apparent RGK protein ohnologues in Danio rerio led us to speculate that high RGK protein gene dosages were not tolerated and thus duplicates heavily selected against. However, ohnologues of Rem2 were identified in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, [50] weakening this notion. Second, cloning of Drosophila melanogaster RGK3 revealed a novel splice variant that was active in reducing Ca²⁺ channel density. To our knowledge, this is the first RGK-like protein splice variant cloned from cDNA shown to have effects on Ca²⁺ channels. The extent and significance of sequence diversification resulting from alternative splicing of RGK proteins is unclear.

The reduction of I_Ca density in sympathetic neurons following expression of Danio rerio and Drosophila melanogaster RGK orthologs/homologs closely resembled the phenotype observed when mammalian Rem2 was overexpressed [12]. Thus, these RGK protein relatives might act similarly to reduce current without affecting channel surface density. It is also possible that channel endocytosis, in this case, could be enhanced as suggested previously [15] as we did not directly measure Ca²⁺ channel surface density. Interruption of Ca²⁺ channel trafficking to the plasma membrane by RGK proteins is less likely in the adult sympathetic neuron assay given the slow turnover of Ca²⁺ channels [12]. However, disruption of forward Ca²⁺ channel trafficking by vertebrate RGK proteins has been postulated and thus protostome homologs may share this ability as well.

The role that RGK protein orthologs/homologs play in Danio rerio and Drosophila melanogaster Ca²⁺ channel physiology is unclear although both organisms contain voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel genes similar to those found in mammals. Of note, Ca_Vβ sequences are conserved in both organisms. The genetic malleability of Danio rerio and Drosophila melanogaster should provide opportunities to further explore this question. Currently, the function of RGK-like proteins in protostomes is unknown.

Using sequential PHI/PSI BLAST searches we identified numerous potential non-vertebrate RGK-like protein homologs not previously reported. In deuterostomes, single RGK-like protein homologs were identified in echinoderms, tunicates, and sea lancelets that differed significantly from vertebrate RGK proteins (Fig. 4). Whether these organisms contain additional RGK-like protein isoforms or contain only a single RGK-like protein is unclear. We also identified, for the first time, numerous potential RGK-like protein homolog sequences in protostomes. The available genomes are heavily represented by insects (flies, ants, bees, and wasps) and thus the majority of protostome homologs were found within these genomes. However we did identify potential RGK-like protein homologs in two mollusks, Aplysia californica and Crassostrea gigas, and a polychaete worm (Capitella teleta). Inclusion of representative protostomes to sequence alignments helped refine several concepts deduced from earlier RGK protein sequence comparisons. In terms of RGK proteins and Ca²⁺ channel function, three observations stand out. First, three residues identified in an alanine mutagenesis screen found to be important for Ca_vβ interaction with mouse Gem [43] are conserved in non-vertebrate RGK-like protein sequences. Significantly, these residues are not conserved within the greater Ras subfamily suggesting that RGK protein–Ca_vβ interaction is an ancient property that arose prior to the deuterostome/protostome split. Second, the sequence corresponding to the structural α5-helix shows a similar conservation pattern which is relatively specific to RGK proteins when compared to the greater Ras subfamily. Interestingly, this region has also been implicated in Ca²⁺ channel function [42]. These conserved G-domain residues, when mapped onto the Gem structure (Fig. 6) define a potential interaction surface important to the Ca²⁺ channel phenotype seen following RGK protein expression. Finally, the last eleven residues are highly conserved with a cysteine at position -7 being absolutely conserved in all sequences examined. The C-7 motif as a unique RGK protein signature sequence [37] and the addition of more diverse sequences strengthens this argument. We have used this sequence motif in PHI-BLAST searches to uncover additional potential RGK-like protein homologs in diverse organisms. At present, the function of this unique sequence is unclear.

Download:

Figure 6. Location of RGK protein structural determinants.

Shown are two perspectives, related by a 90° rotation along the drawn axis, of the RGK G-domain in surface representation. Secondary structure is depicted along with labeled residues underneath the surface. Nucleotide (GDP) is shown in a bond representation and Mg²⁺ is seen as a magenta sphere. The red residues are the amino acids essential for RGK-Ca_V β association as denoted by inverted black triangles in Figure 4. Alpha helix 5 is shown in pink and the absolutely conserved Ala from alpha helix 4 is shown in orange. Residue numbering is based on Homo sapiens Gem (PDB code: 2HT6).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100694.g006

Taken together, the data reveal the ancient origins of RGK proteins within the Ras superfamily. Sequence conservation and electrophysiological experiments suggest that RGK protein interaction with voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels originated prior to the deuterostome/protostome split and that this function has been strictly conserved to present times.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Sequence conservation of RGK protein orthologs/homologs. Analysis of RGK and RGK-like protein sequences was performed using ConSurf [52]. Negative scores denote conserved amino acids. The multiple sequence alignments shown in Figures 4 and 5 were used as input. A. Conservation scores are drawn in histogram form for the RGK G-domain. Scores were smoothed with a moving average of five residues. Residue numbering is based on human Gem. The G-domain is depicted as a black strip with the labeled G loops in grey. B. Differential conservation scores between the Ras subfamily (67 different orthologs of H-Ras, K-Ras and M-Ras) and the RGK family (panel A), using the Gem G-domain residue numbering. No smoothing was employed. In this instance, positive values indicate greater differences in conservation between the two subfamilies. Notably, beginning with the G4 loop, RGK proteins are more conserved than the Ras counterpart. C. Conservation scores for the RGK orthologs in the C-terminal region.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100694.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Heterologous expression of mammalian Ras family proteins with sequence homology to RGK proteins does not change I_Ca density in rat sympathetic neurons. A. Category plot for I_Ca measured at +10 mV. Uninjected neurons (black circles, n = 14) were not injected with cDNA and recorded in parallel with injected neurons. Neurons previously injected with human Rit1 (AF084462, cloned into pcDNA3.1), human Rit2 (NM_002930, cloned into pcDNA3.1), mouse DiRas2 (NM_001024474, cloned into pCI-Kan) or Venus-tagged DiRas2 cDNA clones (50 ng/µl approximately 18–24 hours prior to recording) are depicted with filled circles: Rit1 (orange, n = 9); Rit2 (purple, n = 7); DiRas2 (red, n = 9), Venus-DiRas2 (green, n = 10). The mean I_Ca for all injected groups was not significantly different (P>0.05) from uninjected controls (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett's multiple comparison test). B. Category plot for I_Ca density measured at +10 mV from the same cells shown in A. The mean I_Ca density for all injected groups ws\as not significantly different (P>0.05) from uninjected controls (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett's multiple comparison test). C. I-V plots in which mean ± SEM I_Ca density (pA/pF) is plotted versus command potential (mV). I_Ca was evoked and acquired as described for Fig. 1. D. Representative image of HeLa cells transfected with Venus-tagged DiRas2. HeLa cells (ATCC) were plated (2.0×10⁴ cells per ml) on poly-l-lysine coated glass bottom dishes (MatTek) in MEM +/+. Cells were transfected with 250 ng Venus-DiRas2 cDNA and 7 µl fully deacylated polyethylenimine (PEI) at 7.5 mM in 100 µl MEM-/- overnight. Cells were imaged the following day with a Retiga EXi 12-bit CCD camera (QImaging) mounted on a Zeiss Axiovert 200 inverted microscope using appropriate filters for Venus fluorescence and MicroManager software (v1.4.15). Scale bar is 100 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100694.s002

(TIF)

Table S1.

RGK protein ortholog/homolog sequences used for alignments. Protein sequence accession numbers are shown along with annotation. The sequence of the G1 motif is shown with deviations from the canonical sequence as illustrated. Residue numbers refer to the start and end of the G1 motif. The start of the G-domain is calculated at -6 from the start of the G1 motif. Similar information is depicted for the G5 motif with the G-domain end being calculated at +30 residues from the end of the G5 motif. The calculated length of the G-domain is shown (AA). The residue number for the conserved cysteine (C-7) is shown as well as the start and end of the C-terminus (last 40 residues were aligned).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100694.s003

(TIFF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SRI HLP. Performed the experiments: SRI HLP VBL YJW. Analyzed the data: SRI HLP VBL YJW YS JAH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JAH FO. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: SRI HLP VBL JH.

References

1. Wennerberg K, Rossman KL, Der CJ (2005) The Ras superfamily at a glance. J Cell Sci 118: 843–846.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Reynet C, Kahn CR (1993) Rad: a member of the Ras family overexpressed in muscle of type II diabetic humans. Science 262: 1441–1444.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Maguire J, Santoro T, Jensen P, Siebenlist U, Yewdell J, et al. (1994) Gem: an induced, immediate early protein belonging to the Ras family. Science 265: 241–244.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Dorin D, Cohen L, Del Villar K, Poullet P, Mohr R, et al. (1995) Kir, a novel Ras-family G-protein, induces invasive pseudohyphal growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Oncogene 11: 2267–2271.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Finlin BS, Andres DA (1997) Rem is a new member of the Rad- and Gem/Kir Ras-related GTP-binding protein family repressed by lipopolysaccharide stimulation. J Biol Chem 272: 21982–21988.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Finlin BS, Shao H, Kadono-Okuda K, Guo N, Andres DA (2000) Rem2, a new member of the Rem/Rad/Gem/Kir family of Ras-related GTPases. Biochem J 347 Pt 1: 223–231.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Béguin P, Nagashima K, Gonoi T, Shibasaki T, Takahashi K, et al. (2001) Regulation of Ca²⁺ channel expression at the cell surface by the small G-protein kir/Gem. Nature 411: 701–706.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Kelly K (2005) The RGK family: a regulatory tail of small GTP-binding proteins. Trends Cell Biol 15: 640–643.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Correll RN, Pang C, Niedowicz DM, Finlin BS, Andres DA (2008) The RGK family of GTP-binding proteins: regulators of voltage-dependent calcium channels and cytoskeleton remodeling. Cell Signal 20: 292–300.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Flynn R, Zamponi GW (2010) Regulation of calcium channels by RGK proteins. Channels (Austin) 4: 434–439.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Yang T, Colecraft HM (2013) Regulation of voltage-dependent calcium channels by RGK proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1828: 1644–1654.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Chen H, Puhl HL, Niu S-L, Mitchell DC, Ikeda SR (2005) Expression of Rem2, an RGK family small GTPase, reduces N-type calcium current without affecting channel surface density. J Neurosci 25: 9762–9772.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Finlin BS, Correll RN, Pang C, Crump SM, Satin J, et al. (2006) Analysis of the complex between Ca²⁺ channel β-subunit and the Rem GTPase. J Biol Chem 281: 23557–23566.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Yang T, Suhail Y, Dalton S, Kernan T, Colecraft HM (2007) Genetically encoded molecules for inducibly inactivating Ca_V channels. Nat Chem Biol 3: 795–804.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Yang T, Xu X, Kernan T, Wu V, Colecraft HM (2010) Rem, a member of the RGK GTPases, inhibits recombinant Ca_V1.2 channels using multiple mechanisms that require distinct conformations of the GTPase. J Physiol (Lond) 588: 1665–1681.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Fan M, Buraei Z, Luo H-R, Levenson-Palmer R, Yang J (2010) Direct inhibition of P/Q-type voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels by Gem does not require a direct Gem/Ca_vβ interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 14887–14892.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Zhang J, Chang L, Chen C, Zhang M, Luo Y, et al. (2011) Rad GTPase inhibits cardiac fibrosis through connective tissue growth factor. Cardiovasc Res 91: 90–98.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Manning JR, Yin G, Kaminski CN, Magyar J, Feng H-Z, et al. (2013) Rad GTPase deletion increases L-type calcium channel current leading to increased cardiac contraction. J Am Heart Assoc 2: e000459.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Paradis S, Harrar DB, Lin Y, Koon AC, Hauser JL, et al. (2007) An RNAi-based approach identifies molecules required for glutamatergic and GABAergic synapse development. Neuron 53: 217–232.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Ghiretti AE, Paradis S (2011) The GTPase Rem2 regulates synapse development and dendritic morphology. Dev Neurobiol 71: 374–389.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Moore AR, Ghiretti AE, Paradis S (2013) A loss-of-function analysis reveals that endogenous Rem2 promotes functional glutamatergic synapse formation and restricts dendritic complexity. PLoS ONE 8: e74751.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Krey JF, Paşca SP, Shcheglovitov A, Yazawa M, Schwemberger R, et al. (2013) Timothy syndrome is associated with activity-dependent dendritic retraction in rodent and human neurons. Nature Neuroscience 16: 201–209.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Edel MJ, Boué S, Menchon C, Sánchez-Danés A, Izpisua Belmonte JC (2010) Rem2 GTPase controls proliferation and apoptosis of neurons during embryo development. Cell Cycle 9: 3414–3422.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Shimizu-Nishikawa K, Tsuji S, Yoshizato K (2001) Identification and characterization of newt rad (ras associated with diabetes), a gene specifically expressed in regenerating limb muscle. Dev Dyn 220: 74–86.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Wang H-G, Wang C, Pitt GS (2011) Rem2-targeted shRNAs reduce frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents without altering voltage-gated Ca²⁺ currents. PLoS ONE 6: e25741.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Ikeda SR (2004) Expression of G-protein signaling components in adult mammalian neurons by microinjection. Methods Mol Biol 259: 167–181.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Ikeda SR, Jeong S-W (2004) Use of RGS-insensitive Gα subunits to study endogenous RGS protein action on G-protein modulation of N-type calcium channels in sympathetic neurons. Meth Enzymol 389: 170–189.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Lu VB, Williams DJ, Won Y-J, Ikeda SR (2009) Intranuclear microinjection of DNA into dissociated adult Mammalian neurons. JoVE. doi:10.3791/1614
29. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch 391: 85–100.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Leung YF, Dowling JE (2005) Gene expression profiling of zebrafish embryonic retina. Zebrafish 2: 269–283.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Veldman MB, Bemben MA, Thompson RC, Goldman D (2007) Gene expression analysis of zebrafish retinal ganglion cells during optic nerve regeneration identifies KLF6a and KLF7a as important regulators of axon regeneration. Dev Biol 312: 596–612.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. de Velasco EMF, Law PY, Rodríguez RE (2009) Mu opioid receptor from the zebrafish exhibits functional characteristics as those of mammalian mu opioid receptor. Zebrafish 6: 259–268.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Ward Y, Spinelli B, Quon MJ, Chen H, Ikeda SR, et al. (2004) Phosphorylation of critical serine residues in Gem separates cytoskeletal reorganization from down-regulation of calcium channel activity. Mol Cell Biol 24: 651–661.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Zhu Y, Ikeda SR (1993) Adenosine modulates voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels in adult rat sympathetic neurons. J Neurophysiol 70: 610–620.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Del Villar K, Dorin D, Sattler I, Urano J, Poullet P, et al. (1996) C-terminal motifs found in Ras-superfamily G-proteins: CAAX and C-seven motifs. Biochem Soc Trans 24: 709–713.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Colicelli J (2004) Human RAS superfamily proteins and related GTPases. Sci STKE 2004: RE13
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Rojas AM, Fuentes G, Rausell A, Valencia A (2012) Evolution: The Ras protein superfamily: Evolutionary tree and role of conserved amino acids. J Cell Biol 196: 189–201.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Yau K-W, Hardie RC (2009) Phototransduction motifs and variations. Cell 139: 246–264.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Sasson Y, Navon-Perry L, Huppert D, Hirsch JA (2011) RGK family G-domain:GTP analog complex structures and nucleotide-binding properties. J Mol Biol 413: 372–389.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Leyris J-P, Gondeau C, Charnet A, Delattre C, Rousset M, et al. (2009) RGK GTPase-dependent Ca_V2.1 Ca²⁺ channel inhibition is independent of Ca_Vβ-subunit-induced current potentiation. FASEB J 23: 2627–2638.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Béguin P, Ng YJA, Krause C, Mahalakshmi RN, Ng MY, et al. (2007) RGK small GTP-binding proteins interact with the nucleotide kinase domain of Ca²⁺-channel β-subunits via an uncommon effector binding domain. J Biol Chem 282: 11509–11520.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Fischer R, Wei Y, Anagli J, Berchtold MW (1996) Calmodulin binds to and inhibits GTP binding of the ras-like GTPase Kir/Gem. J Biol Chem 271: 25067–25070.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Correll RN, Botzet GJ, Satin J, Andres DA, Finlin BS (2008) Analysis of the Rem2 - voltage dependant calcium channel beta subunit interaction and Rem2 interaction with phosphorylated phosphatidylinositide lipids. Cell Signal 20: 400–408.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Nourry C, Grant SGN, Borg J-P (2003) PDZ domain proteins: plug and play! Sci STKE. 2003: RE7
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Meyer A, Schartl M (1999) Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. Curr Opin Chem Biol 11: 699–704.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Howe K, Clark MD, Torroja CF, Torrance J, Berthelot C, et al. (2013) The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 496: 498–503.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Zhou W, Horstick EJ, Hirata H, Kuwada JY (2008) Identification and expression of voltage-gated calcium channel β subunits in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 237: 3842–3852.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Hollis DM, Sawa Y, Wagoner A, Rawlings JS, Goetz FW (2012) Isolation and molecular characterization of Rem2 isoforms in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Tissue and central nervous system expression. Comp Biochem Physiol B, Biochem Mol Biol 161: 93–101.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia J-M, Brenner SE (2004) WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14: 1188–1190.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Glaser F, Pupko T, Paz I, Bell RE, Bechor-Shental D, et al. (2003) ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 19: 163–164.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Wennerberg K, Rossman KL, Der CJ (2005) The Ras superfamily at a glance. J Cell Sci 118: 843–846.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Reynet C, Kahn CR (1993) Rad: a member of the Ras family overexpressed in muscle of type II diabetic humans. Science 262: 1441–1444.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Maguire J, Santoro T, Jensen P, Siebenlist U, Yewdell J, et al. (1994) Gem: an induced, immediate early protein belonging to the Ras family. Science 265: 241–244.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Dorin D, Cohen L, Del Villar K, Poullet P, Mohr R, et al. (1995) Kir, a novel Ras-family G-protein, induces invasive pseudohyphal growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Oncogene 11: 2267–2271.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Finlin BS, Andres DA (1997) Rem is a new member of the Rad- and Gem/Kir Ras-related GTP-binding protein family repressed by lipopolysaccharide stimulation. J Biol Chem 272: 21982–21988.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Finlin BS, Shao H, Kadono-Okuda K, Guo N, Andres DA (2000) Rem2, a new member of the Rem/Rad/Gem/Kir family of Ras-related GTPases. Biochem J 347 Pt 1: 223–231.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Béguin P, Nagashima K, Gonoi T, Shibasaki T, Takahashi K, et al. (2001) Regulation of Ca²⁺ channel expression at the cell surface by the small G-protein kir/Gem. Nature 411: 701–706.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Kelly K (2005) The RGK family: a regulatory tail of small GTP-binding proteins. Trends Cell Biol 15: 640–643.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Correll RN, Pang C, Niedowicz DM, Finlin BS, Andres DA (2008) The RGK family of GTP-binding proteins: regulators of voltage-dependent calcium channels and cytoskeleton remodeling. Cell Signal 20: 292–300.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Flynn R, Zamponi GW (2010) Regulation of calcium channels by RGK proteins. Channels (Austin) 4: 434–439.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Yang T, Colecraft HM (2013) Regulation of voltage-dependent calcium channels by RGK proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1828: 1644–1654.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Chen H, Puhl HL, Niu S-L, Mitchell DC, Ikeda SR (2005) Expression of Rem2, an RGK family small GTPase, reduces N-type calcium current without affecting channel surface density. J Neurosci 25: 9762–9772.
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Finlin BS, Correll RN, Pang C, Crump SM, Satin J, et al. (2006) Analysis of the complex between Ca²⁺ channel β-subunit and the Rem GTPase. J Biol Chem 281: 23557–23566.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Yang T, Suhail Y, Dalton S, Kernan T, Colecraft HM (2007) Genetically encoded molecules for inducibly inactivating Ca_V channels. Nat Chem Biol 3: 795–804.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Yang T, Xu X, Kernan T, Wu V, Colecraft HM (2010) Rem, a member of the RGK GTPases, inhibits recombinant Ca_V1.2 channels using multiple mechanisms that require distinct conformations of the GTPase. J Physiol (Lond) 588: 1665–1681.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Fan M, Buraei Z, Luo H-R, Levenson-Palmer R, Yang J (2010) Direct inhibition of P/Q-type voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels by Gem does not require a direct Gem/Ca_vβ interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 14887–14892.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Zhang J, Chang L, Chen C, Zhang M, Luo Y, et al. (2011) Rad GTPase inhibits cardiac fibrosis through connective tissue growth factor. Cardiovasc Res 91: 90–98.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Manning JR, Yin G, Kaminski CN, Magyar J, Feng H-Z, et al. (2013) Rad GTPase deletion increases L-type calcium channel current leading to increased cardiac contraction. J Am Heart Assoc 2: e000459.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Paradis S, Harrar DB, Lin Y, Koon AC, Hauser JL, et al. (2007) An RNAi-based approach identifies molecules required for glutamatergic and GABAergic synapse development. Neuron 53: 217–232.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Ghiretti AE, Paradis S (2011) The GTPase Rem2 regulates synapse development and dendritic morphology. Dev Neurobiol 71: 374–389.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Moore AR, Ghiretti AE, Paradis S (2013) A loss-of-function analysis reveals that endogenous Rem2 promotes functional glutamatergic synapse formation and restricts dendritic complexity. PLoS ONE 8: e74751.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Krey JF, Paşca SP, Shcheglovitov A, Yazawa M, Schwemberger R, et al. (2013) Timothy syndrome is associated with activity-dependent dendritic retraction in rodent and human neurons. Nature Neuroscience 16: 201–209.
View Article
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Edel MJ, Boué S, Menchon C, Sánchez-Danés A, Izpisua Belmonte JC (2010) Rem2 GTPase controls proliferation and apoptosis of neurons during embryo development. Cell Cycle 9: 3414–3422.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Shimizu-Nishikawa K, Tsuji S, Yoshizato K (2001) Identification and characterization of newt rad (ras associated with diabetes), a gene specifically expressed in regenerating limb muscle. Dev Dyn 220: 74–86.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Wang H-G, Wang C, Pitt GS (2011) Rem2-targeted shRNAs reduce frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents without altering voltage-gated Ca²⁺ currents. PLoS ONE 6: e25741.
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Ikeda SR (2004) Expression of G-protein signaling components in adult mammalian neurons by microinjection. Methods Mol Biol 259: 167–181.
View Article
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Ikeda SR, Jeong S-W (2004) Use of RGS-insensitive Gα subunits to study endogenous RGS protein action on G-protein modulation of N-type calcium channels in sympathetic neurons. Meth Enzymol 389: 170–189.
View Article
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Lu VB, Williams DJ, Won Y-J, Ikeda SR (2009) Intranuclear microinjection of DNA into dissociated adult Mammalian neurons. JoVE. doi:10.3791/1614

[ref29] 29. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch 391: 85–100.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Leung YF, Dowling JE (2005) Gene expression profiling of zebrafish embryonic retina. Zebrafish 2: 269–283.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Veldman MB, Bemben MA, Thompson RC, Goldman D (2007) Gene expression analysis of zebrafish retinal ganglion cells during optic nerve regeneration identifies KLF6a and KLF7a as important regulators of axon regeneration. Dev Biol 312: 596–612.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. de Velasco EMF, Law PY, Rodríguez RE (2009) Mu opioid receptor from the zebrafish exhibits functional characteristics as those of mammalian mu opioid receptor. Zebrafish 6: 259–268.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Ward Y, Spinelli B, Quon MJ, Chen H, Ikeda SR, et al. (2004) Phosphorylation of critical serine residues in Gem separates cytoskeletal reorganization from down-regulation of calcium channel activity. Mol Cell Biol 24: 651–661.
View Article
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Zhu Y, Ikeda SR (1993) Adenosine modulates voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels in adult rat sympathetic neurons. J Neurophysiol 70: 610–620.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Del Villar K, Dorin D, Sattler I, Urano J, Poullet P, et al. (1996) C-terminal motifs found in Ras-superfamily G-proteins: CAAX and C-seven motifs. Biochem Soc Trans 24: 709–713.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Colicelli J (2004) Human RAS superfamily proteins and related GTPases. Sci STKE 2004: RE13
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Rojas AM, Fuentes G, Rausell A, Valencia A (2012) Evolution: The Ras protein superfamily: Evolutionary tree and role of conserved amino acids. J Cell Biol 196: 189–201.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Yau K-W, Hardie RC (2009) Phototransduction motifs and variations. Cell 139: 246–264.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Sasson Y, Navon-Perry L, Huppert D, Hirsch JA (2011) RGK family G-domain:GTP analog complex structures and nucleotide-binding properties. J Mol Biol 413: 372–389.
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Leyris J-P, Gondeau C, Charnet A, Delattre C, Rousset M, et al. (2009) RGK GTPase-dependent Ca_V2.1 Ca²⁺ channel inhibition is independent of Ca_Vβ-subunit-induced current potentiation. FASEB J 23: 2627–2638.
View Article
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Béguin P, Ng YJA, Krause C, Mahalakshmi RN, Ng MY, et al. (2007) RGK small GTP-binding proteins interact with the nucleotide kinase domain of Ca²⁺-channel β-subunits via an uncommon effector binding domain. J Biol Chem 282: 11509–11520.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Fischer R, Wei Y, Anagli J, Berchtold MW (1996) Calmodulin binds to and inhibits GTP binding of the ras-like GTPase Kir/Gem. J Biol Chem 271: 25067–25070.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Correll RN, Botzet GJ, Satin J, Andres DA, Finlin BS (2008) Analysis of the Rem2 - voltage dependant calcium channel beta subunit interaction and Rem2 interaction with phosphorylated phosphatidylinositide lipids. Cell Signal 20: 400–408.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Nourry C, Grant SGN, Borg J-P (2003) PDZ domain proteins: plug and play! Sci STKE. 2003: RE7
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Meyer A, Schartl M (1999) Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. Curr Opin Chem Biol 11: 699–704.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Howe K, Clark MD, Torroja CF, Torrance J, Berthelot C, et al. (2013) The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 496: 498–503.
View Article
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Zhou W, Horstick EJ, Hirata H, Kuwada JY (2008) Identification and expression of voltage-gated calcium channel β subunits in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 237: 3842–3852.
View Article
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Hollis DM, Sawa Y, Wagoner A, Rawlings JS, Goetz FW (2012) Isolation and molecular characterization of Rem2 isoforms in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Tissue and central nervous system expression. Comp Biochem Physiol B, Biochem Mol Biol 161: 93–101.
View Article
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia J-M, Brenner SE (2004) WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14: 1188–1190.
View Article
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Glaser F, Pupko T, Paz I, Bell RE, Bechor-Shental D, et al. (2003) ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 19: 163–164.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar