Metalloproteinase-Dependent TLR2 Ectodomain Shedding is Involved in Soluble Toll-Like Receptor 2 (sTLR2) Production

Patricia Langjahr; David Díaz-Jiménez; Marjorie De la Fuente; Estefhany Rubio; Douglas Golenbock; Francisca C. Bronfman; Rodrigo Quera; María-Julieta González; Marcela A. Hermoso

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104624

Abstract

Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2, a type I membrane receptor that plays a key role in innate immunity, recognizes conserved molecules in pathogens, and triggering an inflammatory response. It has been associated with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Soluble TLR2 (sTLR2) variants have been identified in human body fluids, and the TLR2 ectodomain can negatively regulate TLR2 activation by behaving as a decoy receptor. sTLR2 generation does not involve alternative splicing mechanisms, indicating that this process might involve a post-translational modification of the full-length receptor; however, the specific mechanism has not been studied. Using CD14⁺ peripheral human monocytes and the THP-1 monocytic leukemia-derived cell line, we confirm that sTLR2 generation increases upon treatment with pro-inflammatory agents and requires a post-translational mechanism. We also find that the constitutive and ligand-induced release of sTLR2 is sensitive to pharmacological metalloproteinase activator and inhibitors leading us to conclude that metalloproteinase TLR2 shedding contributes to soluble receptor production. By expressing human TLR2 in ADAM10- or ADAM17-deficient MEF cells, we find both enzymes to be implicated in TLR2 ectodomain shedding. Moreover, using a deletion mutant of the TLR2 juxtamembrane region, we demonstrate that this domain is required for sTLR2 generation. Functional analysis suggests that sTLR2 generated by metalloproteinase activation inhibitsTLR2-induced cytokine production by this monocytic leukemia-derived cell line. The identification of the mechanisms involved in regulating the availability of soluble TLR2 ectodomain and cell surface receptors may contribute further research on TLR2-mediated processes in innate immunity and inflammatory disorders.

Citation: Langjahr P, Díaz-Jiménez D, De la Fuente M, Rubio E, Golenbock D, Bronfman FC, et al. (2014) Metalloproteinase-Dependent TLR2 Ectodomain Shedding is Involved in Soluble Toll-Like Receptor 2 (sTLR2) Production. PLoS ONE 9(12): e104624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104624

Editor: Claudia Farias Benjamim, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Received: October 25, 2013; Accepted: July 15, 2014; Published: December 22, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Langjahr et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: The sources of funding that have supported the work are Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (National Fund for Science and Technology; FONDECYT) grants 1080290 and 1120577 (MAH) (www.fondecyt.cl). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The innate immune system is essential for inducing an inflammatory response and for the activation of acquired immunity [1]. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a class of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that play a key role in innate immunity and trigger a specific immune response. TLRs are expressed predominantly in immune cells and recognize conserved structures from pathogenic (PAMPs -pathogen-associated molecular patterns-) and non-pathogenic microorganisms or endogenous ligands associated with cellular damage (DAMPs-damage associated molecular patterns-). TLRs lead to activation of transcription factors, such as NF-κB, AP-1 and IRF3, which induce the expression of cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules, among others. In humans, 10 TLRs have been described that recognize PAMPs/DAMPs of various chemical natures [2], [3]. TLR2 is a type I integral membrane protein that, upon recognition of PAMPs from bacteria, fungi and viruses as well as DAMPs, forms a homodimer or heterodimer with either TLR1 or TLR6 [3].

In addition to the role of TLRs in activating the immune response against pathogens, members of this receptor family have also been associated with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases [4], suggesting that TLR-signaling pathways must be tightly regulated to avoid harmful inflammatory responses [5], [6]. TLR-activation can be regulated by cytoplasmatic molecules, such as MyD88s, IRAK-M, TOLLIP and by activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway [7], [8], [9], [10]. Additionally, there is a negative regulatory function for the ectodomain of TLRs, as has been demonstrated for the soluble form of murineTLR4, a splicing variant of tlr4 gene [11], the soluble TLR5 identified in fish [12] and soluble forms of human TLR2 (sTLR2) [13] and TLR9 [14].

Furthermore, sTLR2 has been detected in human fluids, such as plasma, breast milk, saliva and amniotic fluid as well as in supernatant of cultured monocytes [13], [15], [16]. sTLR2 functions as a regulator of TLR2 responses, playing a role as a decoy receptor and interfering with TLR2 mobilization to lipid rafts and association with co-receptor CD14 [13], [17]. In pathological conditions, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, HIV infection and acute myocardial infarction, sTLR2 levels are altered when compared to healthy subjects [18], [19], [20].

It has been suggested that sTLR2 generation involves a post-translational mechanism of the full-length receptor [13] as only one encoding TLR2 mRNA has been detected, excluding the contribution of alternative splicing [13], [21]. However, the specific post-translation mechanism for sTLR2 production has not been studied.

Proteolytic cleavage of transmembrane proteins is a common post-translational mechanism. When this process occurs at the ectodomain level, releasing a soluble fragment, it is referred as ectodomain shedding. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and disintegrinmetalloproteinases (ADAMs) are broadly studied enzymes that participate in ectodomain shedding [22], [23]. In the immune system, this mechanism is essential for generating soluble biologically active molecules, such as cytokines and their receptors, chemokines and growth factors. This process also produces a membrane-bound protein fragment which typically undergoes regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP), involving the γ-secretase complex [22]. In this study, we explore in monocytic cells that TLR2 proteolytic processing and sTLR2 generation triggered by Pam₃CSK₄, aTLR2-specific ligand. We now report that sTLR2 production, involving ADAM10- and ADAM17-dependent TLR2-ectodomain shedding contributes to soluble receptor generation in MEF cells and that the juxtamembrane domain of TLR2 is required for efficient cleavage. These results suggest that sTLR2, induced by metalloproteinase activation, functions as a negative regulator of the TLR2-induced cytokine production.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All clinical investigation must have been conducted according to Declaration of Helsinki principles. Participants were identified by number, not by name, and provided informed consent. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Clínica Las Condes.

Isolation of human peripheral blood CD14+ cells

Human peripheral blood CD14⁺ cells were obtained from healthy donors by negative selection using a commercially kit (RosetteSep, StemCell), following manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, EDTA was added to whole blood to a final concentration of 1 mM and 50 µL of RosetteSep Human Monocyte Enrichment Cocktail per mL; the sample was gently mixed, incubated for 20 min and then diluted with an equal volume of PBS containing 2% FBS/1 mM EDTA, followed by Ficoll-Hypaque (GE Healthcare) density-gradient centrifugation. Cells at the interface were collected, washed and plated in RPMI medium. Cell viability and CD14 content were analyzed by flow cytometry (BD FACSCalibur). Purified cells were 76–85% CD14⁺ and 91–97% viable.

Cell culture

Isolated human peripheral blood CD14⁺ cells and the human acute monocytic leukemia-derived cell line, THP-1 (American Type Culture Collection, ATCC) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Invitrogen). HEK293 cells were also from ATCC and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Gibco, Invitrogen). HEK293cells stably expressing human TLR2-yellow fluorescent protein (TLR2-YFP), kindly provided by D. Golenbock [24], were cultured in DMEM medium with 0.5 mg/mL G418 (Sigma-Aldrich). Mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) ADAM17^-/- cells were provided by Amgen, USA; ADAM10^-/- [25] and wild type MEF by VIB Institute, Belgium and cultured in DMEM/F12 medium. All culture media were supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Invitrogen), 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Gibco, Invitrogen). Cells were maintained at 37°C, 5% CO₂.

Chemicals reagents

The pharmacological activator and inhibitor of metalloproteinase APMA, and TAPI-1, respectively, were purchased from Biomol International. GM6001 was purchased from Chemicon International Inc., USA. PMA, cycloheximide, EDTA, DAPT and E. coli LPS were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich; TLR2-ligand Pam₃CSK₄ was purchased from Enzo Life Science. rhTLR2 was obtained from R&D Systems, USA. GI254023X was kindly provided by A. Ludwig (Universitätklinikum Aachem, Germany).

Cell culture supernatants for sTLR2 detection

For sTLR2 analysis in conditioned media, THP-1 cells were washed with serum-free medium and 1×10⁶ cells/mL cultured in serum-free RPMI1640 medium supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin in 6-well plates. After incubation, cell supernatants were processed as described in [13]. Briefly, the supernatants were centrifuged for 5 min at 1200 rpmandfiltered (0.22 µm pore); 0.1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40 and protease inhibitors were added and concentrated 10–15 times (Centricon YM-10 concentrators; Millipore) before Western blotting or ELISA. Serial dilutions of the cell homogenates were performed and the detection of antigen was linear in the range of concentration studied.

Isolated peripheral CD14⁺ cells were incubated, for the stimulation time periods, in serum-free RPMI1640 medium; cell supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 10 min before ELISA assay.

TransientlyTLR2-YFP-transfected HEK293Tor MEF cells were incubated in serum-free medium supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin; cell supernatants were processed and concentrated 10 times as described above.

Cell viability analysis

Cell counts and viability were determined using a hemocytometer and trypan blue dye exclusion as well as with propidium iodide exclusion method using a flow cytometry (BD FACSCalibur analyzer).

Quantification of TLR2, IL-8, TNF-α level in cell supernatant

To eliminate contamination with cellular debris, supernatants were carefully processed by centrifugation at 14000 rpm and filtered through 0.22 µm pore filters. TLR2 levels were determined using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (DuoSet, R&D Systems). The final sTLR2 content in conditioned media was calculated, adjusting for the concentration factor.

Levels of IL-8 and TNF-α were also determined by ELISA (R&D Systems, eBioscience, respectively). All samples were analyzed in duplicate according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Flow cytometric analysis

Specific antibodies against human TLR2, CD14 and isotype-matched control antibodies were purchased from eBioscience. For analysis of cell surface TLR2 or CD14, 3×10⁵ freshly isolated cells were suspended in PBS containing 10% human AB plasma, washed and incubated with anti-human FITC- or PE-conjugated TLR2 antibodies, anti-humanPerCP-Cy5.5 conjugated CD14 antibodies or isotype-matched antibodies for 30 min on ice. After washing, cells were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. Cell-surface fluorescence intensity was assessed using a FACSCalibur analyzer and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).

Cell transfection

TLR2-YFP (kindly provided by D. Golenbock, UMass Medical School, USA) and mutant constructs were transfected in HEK293T cells with FuGENE reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, FuGENE reagent (3 µL per µg of transfected plasmid) was added to OPTIMEM (Gibco, Life Technologies) with the purified plasmid DNA and allowed to incubate for 40 min at room temperature before adding to cells plated in OPTIMEM. After 24 h, the transfection medium was replaced.

MEFs were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Life Technologies). The medium was replaced 6 h post-transfection. To normalize transfection efficiency in MEF cells soluble variant release levels were expressed as the ratio of sTLR2 levels in the cell culture supernatants and TLR2 in cell homogenates in ELISA assays and adjusted to the total protein content in cell homogenates by Bradford method.

Immunoblotting

Cells were lysed with ice-cold Low Detergent Buffer (LDB) supplemented with Complete Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail tablets (Roche Applied Science)and disrupted by sonication three times for 10 seconds at 14 Watts on ice. The samples were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 5 min to ensure against any cellular contamination in the supernatant. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay (BioRad). Equivalent amounts of total protein were separated using 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (BioRad). Non-specific binding was blocked with a solution containing 5% non-fat milk in TBS (2 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 13.7 mM NaCl) by agitation for 1 h at room temperature.

Detection of TLR2 was determined with a polyclonal anti-TLR2 (N-terminal) antibody (R&D System). Recombinant human TLR2 extracellular region (rhTLR2) was included in a lane in the gel to indicate the identity of the receptor. The specificity of the detection was confirmed by performing peptide competition assay by co-incubation of the TLR2 antibody with the rhTLR2.

Detection of TLR2-YFP was determined using an anti-GFP antibody (Abcam) followed by a goat antibody raised against rabbit IgG and conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Actin content was also detected with a specific antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). Immunoreactive bands were visualized with the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western Blotting System (Amersham).

Negative regulation assay

THP-1 cells (5×10⁵ /well) were cultured in 500 µL of serum free RPMI medium and pre-incubated for 30 min with 100 µL of 10x concentrated medium of APMA treated or untreated-HEK293-TLR2-YFP, or mock-transfected HEK293. Cells were stimulated with Pam₃CSK₄ (10 ng/mL) or not (control) for 6 h, and supernatants were collected, centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 10 min and assayed for IL-8 detection by ELISA.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test using GraphPad Prism 5 software. The lacks of probability are indicated.

Results

Production of sTLR2 by THP-1 cells occurs post-translationally

Generation of sTLR2 can result from the post-translation modification of membrane-associated TLR2 [13]. As monocytes express high levels of membrane TLR2 and also produce sTLR2 [13], we initially examined the release of sTLR2 into culture supernatant of the acute monocytic leukemia-derived cell line, THP-1, by ELISA. Here, we show that constitutive sTLR2 levels did not decrease, but ligand-stimulated sTLR2 indeed increased in the presence of the translation inhibitor cycloheximide (Fig. 1A). More than 90% of the cells excluded trypan blue, eliminating the possibility that the treatment induced cell death. Concordant with Dulay, A. et al. [16], sTLR2 levels in culture supernatant increased with cycloheximide treatment. This result reveals that sTLR2 production involves a post-translation mechanism that may not require alternative splicing.

Download:

Figure 1. Production of sTLR2 involves a post-translation mechanism.

(A) THP-1 cells were pretreated or not with cycloheximide (100 µg/mL) for 30 min and stimulated with Pam₃CSK₄ (1 µg/mL) for 5 h and the amount of sTLR2 was quantified in the cell culture supernatants by ELISA. Student t test, * p<0.05. (B) Detection of sTLR2 in 18 h culture supernatant (SN) of THP-1 cells by Western blotting using a N-terminal anti-TLR2 antibody. One representative of three experiments is shown. SN: cell culture supernatant; rhTLR2: recombinant human TLR2 protein. (C) Cell surface TLR2 levels evaluated by flow cytometry after stimulation with Pam₃CSK₄ (1, 10 or 20 µg/mL) for 2 h. ***, p<0.0001. (D) Cell surface TLR2 levels evaluated by flow cytometry after treatment with cycloheximide and then stimulation for 2 h with Pam₃CSK₄. MFI = mean fluorescence intensity. *, p<0.05; **, p = 0.009.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104624.g001

The presence of sTLR2 in THP-1 culture supernatant was determined by Westernblot analysis, using an anti-TLR2 ectodomain antibody, which revealed two major specific bands of ∼73–75 kDa, with a migration pattern similar to that of recombinant TLR2 (rhTLR2) in reducing conditions (75–80 kDa) (Fig. 1B), suggesting that these bands correspond to the TLR2 ectodomain. Although additional experiments are required to reach a final conclusion, the two immunoreactive bands can correspond to glycosylated sTLR2 polypeptides with slightly different electrophoretic mobility, as was previously described [26]. The ∼102 kDa TLR2 band corresponds to the full-length receptor, consistent with the molecular weight previously reported for the full-size TLR2 glycoprotein [27]. Similar results for the full-length TLR2 were also previously obtained by using freshly isolated monocytes lysates [13].

Addition of Pam₃CSK₄ alone augmented the levels of membrane-associated TLR2 (Fig. 1C), as was previously reported [28]. To understand the post-translational mechanism involved in sTLR2 production, the levels of membrane-associated TLR2 were determined in Pam₃CSK₄–stimulated cells that have been pre-treated with cycloheximide. A significant decrease in membrane-associated TLR2 was observed after 2 h (Fig. 1D).

These results demonstrate that in the absence of de novo protein synthesis, receptor level decreases in plasma membrane. This effect may be due to TLR2 shedding, although these data do not rule out other mechanisms that could reduce surface receptor levels, such as endocytosis. However, our observations suggest the occurrence of membrane TLR2 decrease and TLR2 de novo synthesis, simultaneously.

Then, the effect of pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules on sTLR2 production was studied. Cell treatment with phorbol ester (PMA) or Pam₃CSK₄, known activators of metalloproteinases [29], [30], induced and increased in sTLR2 production in a time-dependent manner (S1A Fig.), which is consistent with previous reports [13]. sTLR2 was constitutively produced by THP-1. Pam₃CSK₄ also increased sTLR2 production from isolated human peripheral CD14⁺ cells (S1B Fig.). Moreover, when THP-1cells were stimulated with LPS, a TLR4 ligand, production of sTLR2 also increased (S1C Fig.), suggesting that broad pro-inflammatory stimuli promote production of the soluble receptor.

When levels of membrane-associated TLR2 were determined in PMA-treated THP-1 cells, a significant decrease was seen, even after a short stimulation period of 30 min, and this decrease was maintained up to 120 min (S1D Fig.). Reduced membrane TLR2 levels in cells exposed to PMA treatment may be produced by a TLR2 metalloproteinase shedding mechanism. In contrast, Pam₃CSK₄ treatment increases TLR2 levels on the cell surface, confirming the previously described observations by Li, CH et al. [28]. These results suggest that different mechanisms occur simultaneously: TLR2 ectodomain shedding, and de novo expression of TLR2. PMA, compared to TLR2 agonists, is widely known for its strong effect on activation of several intracellular signaling pathways that converge in the induction of metalloproteinases.

Based on previous results indicating that the anti-inflammatory agent dexamethasone did not counteract Pam₃CSK₄-induced TNF-α expression [10], sTLR2 production was analyzed in cells exposed to both stimuli. We found that dexamethasone did not decrease ligand-inducedsTLR2 generation (S1E Fig.).

Constitutive and ligand-induced sTLR2 production involves metalloproteinase-dependent TLR2shedding in human monocytes

Ectodomain shedding of immune-related molecules, such as TNF-α and its receptors, occurs from the surface of leukocytes by the effect of metalloproteinases [31]. As shown above, PMA and Pam₃CSK₄ increase sTLR2 levels. Both agents are known to induce metalloproteinase activation [32], [33]. To test whether or not metalloproteinases are involved in constitutive and ligand-induced sTLR2 production in THP-1 cells, we stimulated with p-aminophenylmercury acetate (APMA), a broad metalloproteinase activator. We found that APMA promoted an increase in sTLR2 concentration (Fig. 2A) and, as expected, a decrease in membrane-associated TLR2 levels (Fig. 2B and right histogram), with no changes in viable cell count (data not shown). Similarly, shedding of TNF-α was also observed in cells stimulated with APMA, reflected by its increased level in cell culture supernatants, as well as by its decreased content in the cell surface (data not shown). These results suggest that a proteolytic cleavage of membrane-associated TLR2 could be implicated in the mechanism of sTLR2 generation.

Download:

Figure 2. Metalloproteinase activity regulates sTLR2 release and TLR2 surface content from THP-1 cells.

(A) Cells were treated with APMA (10 µM), vehicle (DMSO) or left untreated (-) for 5 h and the concentration of sTLR2 in the supernatants was determined by ELISA. Student t-test, **, p = 0.003. (B) Cell surface TLR2 was examined on these cells after 2 h addition of APMA (10 µM), vehicle (DMSO) or left untreated (-) using anti-TLR2-FITC conjugated antibody and analysis by flow cytometry. ***, p<0.0001. MFI = mean fluorescence intensity. A representative histogram is shown using cells stained with isotype control antibody (filled histogram), untreated cells (dot line) and APMA-treated cells (black line). (C) Cells were treated for 18 h with EDTA (2 mM), TAPI-1 (25 µM or 75 µM), GI254023X (5 µM) (GI) or left untreated (-) and the sTLR2 concentration in the cell supernatants was determined by ELISA. *, p<0.05; **, p = 0.003. Westernblot (10% SDS-PAGE reducing gel) shows sTLR2 release in cell supernatant of TAPI-1 or left untreated (-) treated THP-1 cells using N-terminal anti-TLR2 antibody. One representative of three experiments is shown. (D) Cells treated with TAPI-1 (25 µM or 75 µM), GI254023X (GI) (5 µM) or left untreated (-) were added 30 min prior to cell stimulation with Pam₃CSK₄ (1 µg/mL) for 18 h and the concentration of sTLR2 in cell supernatants was assayed by ELISA. Data represent the mean ± SE of three independent determinations. Student t test **, p = 0.001; ***, p = 0.0001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104624.g002

To confirm the participation of a metalloproteinase, pharmacological inhibition of constitutive sTLR2 production was assessed initially using EDTA (2 mM), a chelator of divalent ions, necessary for metalloproteinase cleavage. A significant decrease in sTLR2 concentration in the supernatant was observed (Fig. 2C), suggestive that MMPs may be participating in TLR2 shedding, thus supporting the use of other pharmacological strategies. Accordingly, similar results were obtained with the broad-spectrum metalloproteinase inhibitor, TAPI-1, showing a decrease in sTLR2 content (Fig. 2C). An inhibition curve of basal sTLR2 release was made with TAPI-1, and we use the concentration where the cells were metabolically active and not undergoing cell death (less than 5% tripan-blue positive cells in the culture) (data not shown). These results indicate that metalloproteinase activity can contribute to constitutive sTLR2 generation, however they cannot rule out that other mechanisms may be participating in the soluble receptor production.

Treatment with TAPI-1 shown a diminution in sTLR2 production (Fig. 2C) as detected by western blotting using an N-terminal anti-TLR2 antibody. The two bands of ∼73 and 75 kDa have similar molecular size to the recombinant TLR2 ectodomain (see also Fig. 1B). A less intense TLR2 immunoreactive band of ∼100 kDa was also observed that might correspond to the full-length TLR2 [27] associated to membrane vesicles.

To define whether sTLR2 release by metalloproteinase activity is a ligand-dependent mechanism, we determined the effect of TAPI-1 on cells challenged with Pam₃CSK₄ and a significantly reduction of sTLR2 production was observed (Fig. 2D), with no changes in viable cell count (data not shown). Similarly, TAPI-1 inhibits constitutive and TLR2-mediated production of TNF-α, reflected by decreased levels in cell culture supernatants (data not shown). These results confirm the involvement of members of the metalloproteinase subfamily in the TLR2-driven sTLR2 generation. Despite the fact that metalloproteinase shedding participates in sTLR2 production, we cannot rule out other complementary mechanism for its generation in particular considering that TAPI-1 inhibited sTLR2 production in resting cells by ∼30%.

In order to determine whether a specific metalloproteinase could be implicated in TLR2 shedding, we used a pharmacological inhibitor with selectivity for ADAM10, GI254023X [34]. No effect of GI254023X was observed on constitutive sTLR2 production (Fig. 2C); in contrast, decreased Pam₃CSK₄-induced sTLR2 content was observed (Fig. 2D), no change in viable cell count was observed (data not shown). This result demonstrates that TLR2 cleavage induced by the receptor ligand was dependent on the activity of ADAM10 in THP-1 cells; although this observation cannot exclude the involvement of other metalloproteinases.

To confirm that constitutive and ligand-induced sTLR2 production involves metalloproteinase-dependent TLR2 shedding in monocytes, isolated human peripheral CD14⁺ cells were stimulated with APMA or pharmacological metalloproteinase inhibitors. TNF-α levels in supernatant were also quantified by ELISA. TAPI-1 and GM6001 inhibit constitutive and TLR2-mediated production of TNF-α (data not shown). Accordingly to assays with THP-1 cell line, metalloproteinase activator increase sTLR2 production (Fig. 3A). Metalloproteinase inhibitors, TAPI-1 and GM6001, decreased constitutive (Fig. 3B) and Pam₃CSK₄-induced (Fig. 3C) sTLR2 generation, confirming that TLR2 shedding is involved in soluble receptor generation in human monocytes.

Download:

Figure 3. TLR2 shedding is involved in sTLR2 generation in human peripheral monocytes.

(A) Isolated human peripheral CD14⁺ cells were treated with APMA (10 µM), vehicle (DMSO) or left untreated (-) for 5 h. *, p<0.05. (B) Cells were incubated for 18 h with TAPI-1 (25 µM or 75 µM), GM6001 (10 µM) or left untreated (-).*, p<0.05.(C) Cells treated with TAPI-1 (25 µM or 75 µM), GI254023X (GI) (5 µM) or left untreated (-) were added 30 min prior to cell stimulation with Pam₃CSK₄ (1 µg/mL) for 18 h. Supernatants were harvested and soluble receptor was measured by ELISA. *, p<0.05; ** p<0.01. Data are express as percentage of maximal release ± SE of two independent determinations using four different healthy donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104624.g003

ADAM10- and ADAM17-mediated TLR2 shedding

The participation of ADAM10 and ADAM17 in TLR2 ectodomain shedding was further investigated using MEFs generated from ADAM10- and ADAM17-deficient mice. Release of sTLR2 was significantly reduced in ADAM10- and ADAM17-deficient MEF cells transiently expressing human TLR2 (Fig. 4), demonstrating that these two enzymes can contribute to TLR2 shedding. If this is the case, i.e. that both ADAM 10 and ADAM17 are involved in TLR2 shedding, our results suggest that, in the absence of one of them, the other compensate and induce TLR2 shedding. Several studies have shown that in the absence of one enzyme in deficient-cell or animal models, a different, non-canonical enzyme can substitute for its function and act on the substrate [35]. Therefore, our studies cannot exclude other enzymes and/or other mechanisms participating in sTLR2 generation in MEF cells.

Download:

Figure 4. ADAM10 and ADAM17 are involved in TLR2 shedding.

MEF cells were transfected with an expression plasmid encoding human TLR2 or with an empty vector; sTLR2 content in cell supernatants was analyzed by ELISA. sTLR2 content (pg/mL) was normalized to total TLR2 cell levels (ng/mg total protein). Data represent the mean ± SE of three independent determinations. *, p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104624.g004

The content of sTLR2 in conditioned media of TLR2-transfected MEF cells stimulated with Pam₃CSK₄ was not detected. Indeed, over 60% of cell did not survive this treatment as detected by trypan-blue exclusion (data not shown). This result could be due to a greater susceptibility of TLR2-expressing ADAM10^-/- or ADAM17^-/- MEFs cells to undergo apoptosis when exposed to Pam₃CSK₄. As reported previously, Pam₃CSK₄ activates a cellular death pathway via TLR2, and probably the lack of function of a shedding mechanism might impact on sTLR2 generation controlling TLR2-induced apoptosis [36].

Deletion in TLR2 juxtamembrane region impairs sTLR2 production

Although there is no consensus amino acid sequence for proteolytic cleavage by metalloproteinases; most transmembrane proteins that are susceptible to metalloproteinase shedding are cleaved at the juxtamembrane region [23]. To evaluate the potential cleavage site of metalloproteinase(s) in TLR2, we generated two juxtamembrane-region deletion-mutants, of 10 (TLR2-YFP-Δ10) and 16 (TLR2-YFP-Δ16) amino acids, respectively, corresponding to the sequence between the last TLR2 leucine-rich-repeat (LRR) motif and the transmembrane region (Fig. 5A). Control (TLR2-YFP) and mutant constructs were transiently transfected into HEK293T cells that do not endogenously express TLR2. The TLR2 surface content, evaluated by flow cytometry, was similar inTLR2-YFP and TLR2-YFP-Δ10, but was significantly decreased in TLR2-YFP-Δ16 (Fig. 5B), even though theTLR2 content in whole cell lysates of the mutants was similar (Fig. 5C). The ∼110 kDa band in the Westernblot corresponds to TLR2-YFP, which is absent in the lysate of TLR2-YFP (-) cells. The ∼80 kDa band could correspond to a fusion protein (TLR2-YFP), albeit with a different degree of glycosylation. Whereas YFP is fused to the TLR2 C-terminus, the ∼80 kDa band does not correspond to the TLR2 ectodomain of closest electrophoretic mobility (see Fig. 1B), because upon MMPs shedding it lacks the YFP-tag.

Download:

Figure 5. Deletion of TLR2 juxtamembrane region impairs sTLR2 generation.

(A)Amino acid sequence of wild type (TLR2-YFP) surrounding the potential TLR2 transmembrane domain and deletion mutants, lacking 10 (TLR2-YFP-Δ10) or 16 (TLR2-YFP-Δ16) amino acids. Student t test, ** p<0.01. (B) HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with TLR2-YFP, TLR2-YFP-Δ10 or TLR2-YFP-Δ16, and TLR2 surface expression was evaluated by flow cytometry with anti-TLR2-PE antibody. MFI = mean fluorescence intensity. Student t test, ** p<0.01. (C) Westernblot analysis, using anti-GFP antibody, of transfected cell lysates described in (B) Mock transfected HEK-cells (-); bands correspond to two GFP immunoreactive TLR2-YFP polypeptides. (D) Pam₃CSK₄-induced IL-8 production by wild type and deletion mutant expressing cells was evaluated by ELISA. (E) sTLR2 content in cell supernatants, relative to Pam₃CSK₄-induced wild type cells, of wild type or Δ10 or Δ16 deletion mutant transfected cells was evaluated by ELISA. * p<0.05; ** p<0.01. All graphs show mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104624.g005

These findings suggests that removal of 16 amino acids from the TLR2 juxtamembrane region affects TLR2 cell membrane expression, as has been shown for juxtamembrane region deletion mutants ofMHC Class I-related chain A (MICA) [37]. To confirm that the mutation affects membrane-anchored receptor function, we found no increased production of IL-8 in TLR2-YFP-Δ16-expressing cells stimulated with Pam₃CSK₄, when compared to TLR2-YFP- or TLR2-YFP-Δ10-expressing cells (Fig. 5D). This protein deletion might be affecting ligand binding to the extracellular domain that has an impact on IL-8 release (Fig. 5D). This effect can be a consequence of a conformational change in TLR2 ectodomain, leading to a decrease affinity for the ligand. However, additional studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Finally, decreased sTLR2 content in cell supernatants was determined in TLR2-YFP-Δ10- and -Δ16-expressing cells in comparison to the wild type TLR2-YFP (Fig. 4E), indicating that TLR2 juxtamembrane deletion affects sTLR2 generation and that the sheddase cleavage site is located in a receptor domain close to the transmembrane region. Another possibility is that the deletion affects the structure of TLR2 ectodomain therefore is not recognized by the enzyme. The effect of Pam₃CSK₄ on the release of sTLR2 by Δ10 or Δ16 cells was also affected and undetectable differences with untreated cells were seen (data not shown), since the enzyme-recognition or-cleavage site in full-length TLR2 is altered in these mutants.

sTLR2 induced by metalloproteinase-activation inhibits Pam₃CSK₄-mediated IL-8 production

To demonstrate the negative regulatory function of sTLR2, induced by metalloproteinase activation, we analyzed the effect of conditioned media from HEK293-TLR2-YFP cells exposed to APMA on TLR2-induced IL-8 production by THP-1 cells. Activation of metalloproteinases in HEK293-TLR2-YFPcells induced sTLR2 release (Fig. 6A), similar to the effects previously described (see Fig. 2A). IL-8 production was significantly reduced when Pam₃CSK₄-activated THP-1 cells were incubated with conditioned media from APMA-treated or untreatedHEK293-TLR2-YFP cells (Fig. 6B). However, inhibition of IL-8 production was higher in cells exposed to conditioned media of APMA-treated HEK293-TLR2-YFP cells compared with untreated HEK293-TLR2-YFP cells conditioned media. THP-1 cells were also incubated with conditioned media from APMA-treated or untreated HEK293, cells that do not endogenously express TLR2 and no effect on IL-8 was observed (Fig. 6B). These data suggest that sTLR2 induced by metalloproteinase activation inhibits IL-8 production, thus acting as a negative regulator. Similar results were obtained when the recombinant human TLR2 ectodomain protein was used as a control to antagonize TLR2-driven IL-8 production (Fig. 6C). Although natural sTLR2 released by cells was shown to be biologically active in negatively regulating TLR2-triggered inflammatory responses [13], the inhibition of IL-8 production by soluble variant induced by metalloproteinase activation has not been previously demonstrated. These results confirm those previously reported from natural sTLR2 and extend our knowledge about the mechanisms leading to the production of this negative regulator of innate immune and inflammatory responses.

Download:

Figure 6. sTLR2 induced by metalloproteinase activator APMA inhibit TLR2 ligand-mediated IL-8 production.

(A) Stably transfected HEK-TLR2-YFP cells were incubated for 24 h with fresh medium; 5 h prior to cell supernatant collections they were treated with APMA (10 µM) or DMSO; and sTLR2 content in conditioned media was determined by ELISA. Student t test ***, p<0.0001. (B) THP-1 cells were pre-treated with conditioned media of HEK293 (HEK-WT), APMA-treated HEK293 (HEK-WT+APMA), HEK-TLR2-YFP (HEK-TLR2) or APMA-treated HEK-TLR2-YFP cells (HEK-TLR2+APMA), and then Pam₃CSK₄-induced IL-8 production was determined. Student t test *, p = 0.0481; **, p = 0.0017; ^##, p = 0.008. (C) Pam₃CSK₄-induced IL-8 production by THP-1 cells, pre-treated or not with recombinant human TLR2 ectodomain. Student t test *, p<0.05. All graphs show mean values ± SE of three independent experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104624.g006

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that metalloproteinase is involved in the mechanisms that generate constitutive and ligand-induced sTLR2 and we revealed the functional role of this shed receptor on TLR2-induced cytokine production. Over-activation of TLR2 signaling is involved in multiple pathological conditions, such as autoimmune and inflammatory diseases [38]. Therefore, regulation of TLR2 activity and the signaling cascade represents an important mechanism for maintaining cell homeostasis. sTLR2 has proven to be a negative regulator of the receptor-dependent activity both in vitro and in vivo, using recombinant TLR2 ectodomain in monocyte cultures or in a mouse model of peritoneal inflammation, respectively [13], [17]. Furthermore, levels of sTLR2 are altered in pathological conditions, such as ulcerative colitis and acute myocardial infarction [18], [20]. Collectively, these data suggest that soluble variants of TLR2 play an important role in regulating the receptor activation and in mechanisms leading to inflammatory diseases. Thus, how these pro-inflammatory conditions impact on the mechanisms by which sTLR2 are generated is of vast interest.

The study confirms sTLR2 production is increased by activation of peripheral monocytes and a monocytic-leukemia derived cell line with Pam₃CSK₄ suggesting that TLR2 activation increases its own shedding. PMA and LPS, other potent inflammatory stimuli, also increased production of the soluble receptor, presumably because they converge at some level in the signaling pathway. Moreover, the broadly used anti-inflammatory agent dexamethasone did not decrease the ligand-induced sTLR2 generation, suggesting that the intracellular events, perhaps including the PI3K pathway, triggered by TLR2 activation in the presence of glucocorticoid [10], are also involved in this process.

The mechanism contributing to sTLR2 generation has not yet been completely clarified. Inhibition of protein translation did not decrease sTLR2, demonstrating that the mechanism involved in sTLR2 generation is a post-translation process and does not require alternative splicing, as was previously shown [13]. Strikingly, cycloheximide treatment lead to an increased in sTLR2 production in cells stimulated with Pam₃CSK₄. Cells exposed to cycloheximide are subjected to translation inhibition that may decrease the amount of many regulatory proteins involved in sTLR2 production and/or processing (such as a TIMP-tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-), resulting in an increased processing of the membrane-anchored TLR2. In this regard, the translation inhibitor cycloheximide inhibited stimulated TIMP-1 production in human astrocytes or mouse osteoblastic cells [39], [40] and basal and stimulated TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 activity [41], [42]. It is noteworthy that ADAMs activity is regulated by multiple mechanisms [35], not only by TIMPs, cannot be ruled out that these regulatory mechanisms are also affected by the translation inhibitor.

Additionally, cycloheximide treatment in TLR-activated THP-1 cells leads to a super-induction of IL-1 gene transcription. This is due to inhibition of re-synthesis of NF-κB repressor IκB-α. IκB-α binds to the activated NF-κB in the nucleus resulting in the inhibition of NF-κB activity [43] and this transcription factor participates in metalloproteinase activity regulation.

Well-known activators of metalloproteinase, such as PMA and APMA [32], decreased the content of TLR2 in the plasma membrane and increased sTLR2. These data led us to evaluate whether TLR2 is subjected to protein ectodomain shedding. This post-translation mechanism is highly conserved for membrane-associated proteins of the immune system, which regulates the availability of many molecules, such as cytokines and chemokines, among others [44].

Since production of sTLR2 is sensitive to metalloproteinase inhibitors, in particular TAPI-1 and GI254023X and induced a decrease in soluble receptor by activated cells, we suggest that sTLR2 production by metalloproteinase shedding is higher in activated cells. Similar results were observed with the production of the soluble variant of the TREM-1 receptor, where the metalloproteinase inhibitor GM6001affects its release in LPS-stimulated monocytes [45].

As TLR2 shedding was inhibited by TAPI-1 [46], a metzincin metalloproteinase inhibitor, the TLR2 sheddase(s) might be a member of this enzyme subfamily. Shedding was also diminished by GI254023X, a preferential inhibitor of ADAM10, indicating an involvement of this metalloproteinase in ligand-induced sTLR2 generation in human monocytes. ADAM10 participates in the constitutive shedding of many substrates; such as transmembrane chemokines and adhesion molecules [47], Notch [48] and low-affinity immunoglobulin E receptor CD23 [49]. Our results show that ADAM10 cleaves TLR2 in Pam₃CSK₄-activated monocytes, establishing ADAM10 as an inducible sheddase for TLR2, as has been also reported for IL-6R [50].

Indeed, we find sTLR2 production is decreased in both ADAM10^-/- or ADAM17^-/- MEFs expressing human TLR2, suggesting that both enzymes contribute to human TLR2 shedding in murine cells. However, in the THP-1 cell line preferential inhibition of ADAM10 does not affect sTLR2 constitutive production, which could be ascribed to a difference in the enzymes involved in TLR2 proteolytic processing in different species, such us IL-6R shedding [50]. ADAM10 and ADAM17 are important regulators of the immune system as they are responsible for ectodomain shedding of several proteins, such as TNF-α [51] and CX3CL1 [47]. Many substrates are processed by both enzymes; however, other proteins are processed by either ADAM10 or ADAM17 [52]. Our results let us to conclude that TLR2 fits in the class of substrates processed by both proteases.

In the context of the innate immune response, shedding of TLR2 represents a strategy by which a cell can down regulate the immune response triggered by a microorganism or alarmins sensed by an antigen-presenting cell, a monocyte or dendritic cell. By increasing TLR2 levels and a simultaneously decrease in membrane TLR2 availability, an excessive inflammatory response might be avoided. Other members of the IL1-R/TLR superfamily undergo ectodomain shedding, such as IL-1R2 [53] and TLR9 [14]. Additionally, TLR9 is also subjected to N-terminal domain cleavage to promote receptor activation [54]. Collectively, our data and the other reported information suggest that proteolytic processing of TLR contribute to regulate receptor signaling.

Due to an up-regulation of metalloproteinases in many inflammatory disorders, high levels of sTLR2 might be produced to avoid detrimental responses. We found that sTLR2 generated by metalloproteinase activation inhibited Pam₃CSK₄-mediated IL-8 production by monocytes, suggesting that the TLR2-shedding product is a functional negative regulator of the receptor pathway and proteolytic processing of the receptor downregulates inflammatory signaling.

In summary, the identification of TLR2 metalloproteinase shedding as a significant component involved in soluble receptor generation is an important contribution to the understanding of TLR2 signaling regulation and sTLR2 pathophysiological function.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig.

sTLR2 production by cells stimulated with different pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules. (A)THP-1 cells were treated or not with Pam₃CSK₄ (1 µg/mL), PMA (50 ng/mL) for 5 or 18 h and then the amount of sTLR2 quantified in the cell culture supernatant by ELISA. Student t test *, p<0.05; ***, p = 0.0007. (B) Isolated peripheral CD14⁺ cells were stimulated with Pam₃CSK₄ (1 µg/mL) for 18 h. Student t test *, p<0.05. (C) THP-1 cells were treated or not with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 18 h and sTLR2 content in the cell culture supernatant quantified by ELISA. Student t test *, p<0.05. (D) Surface TLR2 levels after treatment of THP-1 PMA (50 ng/mL) for the indicated times. Student t test **, p<0.01. (E) THP-1 cells were pre-treated with dexamethasone (10 nM) and stimulated with Pam₃CSK₄ (1 µg/mL) for 18 hand sTLR2 content in the cell culture supernatant quantified by ELISA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104624.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. A. Ludwig (UniversitätklinikumAachem, Germany) for providing metalloproteinase inhibitor GI254023X, Dr. Bart DeStrooper for providing MEF ADAM10^-/- and WT cells, to Dr. B. Knowles (Siriraj Center of Excellence for stem cell Research, Mahidol University, Thailand), for her comments and suggestion, to C. Hernández for flow cytometric assistance, and to Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (National Fund for Science and Technology; FONDECYT) grant 1080290 and 1120577 (MAH).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PL DDJ MDlF FCB MJG MAH. Performed the experiments: PL DDJ MDlF ER. Analyzed the data: PL DDJ MDlF ER RQ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DG FCB MAH. Wrote the paper: PL MAH.

References

1. Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R (2002) Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol 20:197–216.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Kawai T, Akira S (2010) The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol 11:373–384.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Lee CC, Avalos AM, Ploegh HL (2012) Accessory molecules for Toll-like receptors and their function. Nat Rev Immunol 12:168–179.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Takeuchi O, Akira S (2010) Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 140:805–820.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Coll RC, O'Neill LA (2010) New insights into the regulation of signalling by toll-like receptors and nod-like receptors. J Innate Immun 2:406–421.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Liew FY, Xu D, Brint EK, O'Neill LA (2005) Negative regulation of toll-like receptor-mediated immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 5:446–458.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Burns K, Janssens S, Brissoni B, Olivos N, Beyaert R, et al. (2003) Inhibition of interleukin 1 receptor/Toll-like receptor signaling through the alternatively spliced, short form of MyD88 is due to its failure to recruit IRAK-4. J Exp Med 197:263–268.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Kobayashi K, Hernandez LD, Galan JE, Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R, et al. (2002) IRAK-M is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling. Cell 110:191–202.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Zhang G, Ghosh S (2002) Negative regulation of toll-like receptor-mediated signaling by Tollip. J Biol Chem 277:7059–7065.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Arancibia S, Benitez D, Nunez LE, Jewell CM, Langjahr P, et al. (2011) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase interacts with the glucocorticoid receptor upon TLR2 activation. J Cell Mol Med 15:339–349.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Iwami KI, Matsuguchi T, Masuda A, Kikuchi T, Musikacharoen T, et al. (2000) Cutting edge: naturally occurring soluble form of mouse Toll-like receptor 4 inhibits lipopolysaccharide signaling. J Immunol 165:6682–6686.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Tsukada H, Fukui A, Tsujita T, Matsumoto M, Iida T, et al. (2005) Fish soluble Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5S) is an acute-phase protein with integral flagellin-recognition activity. Int J Mol Med 15:519–525.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. LeBouder E, Rey-Nores JE, Rushmere NK, Grigorov M, Lawn SD, et al. (2003) Soluble forms of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 capable of modulating TLR2 signaling are present in human plasma and breast milk. J Immunol 171:6680–6689.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Chockalingam A, Cameron JL, Brooks JC, Leifer CA (2011) Negative regulation of signaling by a soluble form of toll-like receptor 9. Eur J Immunol 41:2176–2184.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Kuroishi T, Tanaka Y, Sakai A, Sugawara Y, Komine K, et al. (2007) Human parotid saliva contains soluble toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and modulates TLR2-mediated interleukin-8 production by monocytic cells. Mol Immunol 44:1969–1976.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Dulay AT, Buhimschi CS, Zhao G, Oliver EA, Mbele A, et al. (2009) Soluble TLR2 is present in human amniotic fluid and modulates the intraamniotic inflammatory response to infection. J Immunol 182:7244–7253.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Raby AC, Le Bouder E, Colmont C, Davies J, Richards P, et al. (2009) Soluble TLR2 reduces inflammation without compromising bacterial clearance by disrupting TLR2 triggering. J Immunol 183:506–517.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Candia E, Diaz-Jimenez D, Langjahr P, Nunez LE, de la Fuente M, et al. (2012) Increased production of soluble TLR2 by lamina propria mononuclear cells from ulcerative colitis patients. Immunobiology.
19. Heggelund L, Flo T, Berg K, Lien E, Mollnes TE, et al. (2004) Soluble toll-like receptor 2 in HIV infection: association with disease progression. Aids 18:2437–2439.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Ueland T, Espevik T, Kjekshus J, Gullestad L, Omland T, et al. (2006) Mannose binding lectin and soluble Toll-like receptor 2 in heart failure following acute myocardial infarction. J Card Fail 12:659–663.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Haehnel V, Schwarzfischer L, Fenton MJ, Rehli M (2002) Transcriptional regulation of the human toll-like receptor 2 gene in monocytes and macrophages. J Immunol 168:5629–5637.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Murphy G, Murthy A, Khokha R (2008) Clipping, shedding and RIPping keep immunity on cue. Trends Immunol 29:75–82.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Blobel CP (2005) ADAMs: key components in EGFR signalling and development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:32–43.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Latz E, Visintin A, Lien E, Fitzgerald KA, Monks BG, et al. (2002) Lipopolysaccharide rapidly traffics to and from the Golgi apparatus with the toll-like receptor 4-MD-2-CD14 complex in a process that is distinct from the initiation of signal transduction. J Biol Chem 277:47834–47843.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Hartmann D, de Strooper B, Serneels L, Craessaerts K, Herreman A, et al. (2002) The disintegrin/metalloprotease ADAM 10 is essential for Notch signalling but not for alpha-secretase activity in fibroblasts. Hum Mol Genet 11:2615–2624.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Weber AN, Morse MA, Gay NJ (2004) Four N-linked glycosylation sites in human toll-like receptor 2 cooperate to direct efficient biosynthesis and secretion. J Biol Chem 279:34589–34594.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Yang RB, Mark MR, Gurney AL, Godowski PJ (1999) Signaling events induced by lipopolysaccharide-activated toll-like receptor 2. J Immunol 163:639–643.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Li CH, Wang JH, Redmond HP (2006) Bacterial lipoprotein-induced self-tolerance and cross-tolerance to LPS are associated with reduced IRAK-1 expression and MyD88-IRAK complex formation. J Leukoc Biol 79:867–875.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Roomi MW, Kalinovsky T, Rath M, Niedzwiecki A (2014) In vitro modulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in pediatric human sarcoma cell lines by cytokines, inducers and inhibitors. Int J Oncol 44:27–34.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Yun MR, Seo JM, Park HY (2014) Visfatin contributes to the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages through the differential regulation of inflammatory cytokines in THP-1 cells. Cell Signal 26:705–715.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Bell JH, Herrera AH, Li Y, Walcheck B (2007) Role of ADAM17 in the ectodomain shedding of TNF-alpha and its receptors by neutrophils and macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 82:173–176.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Cauwe B, Van den Steen PE, Opdenakker G (2007) The biochemical, biological, and pathological kaleidoscope of cell surface substrates processed by matrix metalloproteinases. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 42:113–185.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Gebbia JA, Coleman JL, Benach JL (2004) Selective induction of matrix metalloproteinases by Borrelia burgdorferi via toll-like receptor 2 in monocytes. J Infect Dis 189:113–119.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Ludwig A, Hundhausen C, Lambert MH, Broadway N, Andrews RC, et al. (2005) Metalloproteinase inhibitors for the disintegrin-like metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17 that differentially block constitutive and phorbol ester-inducible shedding of cell surface molecules. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 8:161–171.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Huovila AP, Turner AJ, Pelto-Huikko M, Karkkainen I, Ortiz RM (2005) Shedding light on ADAM metalloproteinases. Trends Biochem Sci 30:413–422.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Aliprantis AO, Yang RB, Weiss DS, Godowski P, Zychlinsky A (2000) The apoptotic signaling pathway activated by Toll-like receptor-2. EMBO J 19:3325–3336.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Waldhauer I, Goehlsdorf D, Gieseke F, Weinschenk T, Wittenbrink M, et al. (2008) Tumor-associated MICA is shed by ADAM proteases. Cancer Res 68:6368–6376.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Palsson-McDermott EM, O'Neill LA (2007) The potential of targeting Toll-like receptor 2 in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Ir J Med Sci 176:253–260.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Fields J, Gardner-Mercer J, Borgmann K, Clark I, Ghorpade A (2011) CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta expression is increased in the brain during HIV-1-infection and contributes to regulation of astrocyte tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1. J Neurochem 118:93–104.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Li Y, Tang L, Duan Y, Ding Y (2010) Upregulation of MMP-13 and TIMP-1 expression in response to mechanical strain in MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells. BMC Res Notes 3:309.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Mann JS, Kindy MS, Hyde JF, Clark MR, Curry TE Jr (1993) Role of protein synthesis, prostaglandins, and estrogen in rat ovarian metalloproteinase inhibitor production. Biol Reprod 48:1006–1013.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Ulisse S, Farina AR, Piersanti D, Tiberio A, Cappabianca L, et al. (1994) Follicle-stimulating hormone increases the expression of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 and induces TIMP-1 AP-1 site binding complex(es) in prepubertal rat Sertoli cells. Endocrinology 135:2479–2487.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Lim EK, Mitchell PJ, Brown N, Drummond RA, Brown GD, et al. (2013) Regiospecific methylation of a dietary flavonoid scaffold selectively enhances IL-1beta production following Toll-like receptor 2 stimulation in THP-1 monocytes. J Biol Chem 288:21126–21135.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Levine SJ (2004) Mechanisms of soluble cytokine receptor generation. J Immunol 173:5343–5348.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Gomez-Pina V, Soares-Schanoski A, Rodriguez-Rojas A, Del Fresno C, Garcia F, et al. (2007) Metalloproteinases shed TREM-1 ectodomain from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocytes. J Immunol 179:4065–4073.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Mohler KM, Sleath PR, Fitzner JN, Cerretti DP, Alderson M, et al. (1994) Protection against a lethal dose of endotoxin by an inhibitor of tumour necrosis factor processing. Nature 370:218–220.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Hundhausen C, Schulte A, Schulz B, Andrzejewski MG, Schwarz N, et al. (2007) Regulated shedding of transmembrane chemokines by the disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 facilitates detachment of adherent leukocytes. J Immunol 178:8064–8072.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Gibb DR, Saleem SJ, Chaimowitz NS, Mathews J, Conrad DH (2011) The emergence of ADAM10 as a regulator of lymphocyte development and autoimmunity. Mol Immunol 48:1319–1327.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Weskamp G, Ford JW, Sturgill J, Martin S, Docherty AJ, et al. (2006) ADAM10 is a principal 'sheddase' of the low-affinity immunoglobulin E receptor CD23. Nat Immunol 7:1293–1298.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Garbers C, Janner N, Chalaris A, Moss ML, Floss DM, et al. (2011) Species specificity of ADAM10 and ADAM17 proteins in interleukin-6 (IL-6) trans-signaling and novel role of ADAM10 in inducible IL-6 receptor shedding. J Biol Chem 286:14804–14811.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Crowe PD, Walter BN, Mohler KM, Otten-Evans C, Black RA, et al. (1995) A metalloprotease inhibitor blocks shedding of the 80-kD TNF receptor and TNF processing in T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 181:1205–1210.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Deuss M, Reiss K, Hartmann D (2008) Part-time alpha-secretases: the functional biology of ADAM 9, 10 and 17. Curr Alzheimer Res 5:187–201.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Colotta F, Dower SK, Sims JE, Mantovani A (1994) The type II 'decoy' receptor: a novel regulatory pathway for interleukin 1. Immunol Today 15:562–566.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Ewald SE, Lee BL, Lau L, Wickliffe KE, Shi GP, et al. (2008) The ectodomain of Toll-like receptor 9 is cleaved to generate a functional receptor. Nature 456:658–662.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R (2002) Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol 20:197–216.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Kawai T, Akira S (2010) The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol 11:373–384.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Lee CC, Avalos AM, Ploegh HL (2012) Accessory molecules for Toll-like receptors and their function. Nat Rev Immunol 12:168–179.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Takeuchi O, Akira S (2010) Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 140:805–820.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Coll RC, O'Neill LA (2010) New insights into the regulation of signalling by toll-like receptors and nod-like receptors. J Innate Immun 2:406–421.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Liew FY, Xu D, Brint EK, O'Neill LA (2005) Negative regulation of toll-like receptor-mediated immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 5:446–458.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Burns K, Janssens S, Brissoni B, Olivos N, Beyaert R, et al. (2003) Inhibition of interleukin 1 receptor/Toll-like receptor signaling through the alternatively spliced, short form of MyD88 is due to its failure to recruit IRAK-4. J Exp Med 197:263–268.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Kobayashi K, Hernandez LD, Galan JE, Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R, et al. (2002) IRAK-M is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling. Cell 110:191–202.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Zhang G, Ghosh S (2002) Negative regulation of toll-like receptor-mediated signaling by Tollip. J Biol Chem 277:7059–7065.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Arancibia S, Benitez D, Nunez LE, Jewell CM, Langjahr P, et al. (2011) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase interacts with the glucocorticoid receptor upon TLR2 activation. J Cell Mol Med 15:339–349.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Iwami KI, Matsuguchi T, Masuda A, Kikuchi T, Musikacharoen T, et al. (2000) Cutting edge: naturally occurring soluble form of mouse Toll-like receptor 4 inhibits lipopolysaccharide signaling. J Immunol 165:6682–6686.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Tsukada H, Fukui A, Tsujita T, Matsumoto M, Iida T, et al. (2005) Fish soluble Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5S) is an acute-phase protein with integral flagellin-recognition activity. Int J Mol Med 15:519–525.
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. LeBouder E, Rey-Nores JE, Rushmere NK, Grigorov M, Lawn SD, et al. (2003) Soluble forms of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 capable of modulating TLR2 signaling are present in human plasma and breast milk. J Immunol 171:6680–6689.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Chockalingam A, Cameron JL, Brooks JC, Leifer CA (2011) Negative regulation of signaling by a soluble form of toll-like receptor 9. Eur J Immunol 41:2176–2184.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Kuroishi T, Tanaka Y, Sakai A, Sugawara Y, Komine K, et al. (2007) Human parotid saliva contains soluble toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and modulates TLR2-mediated interleukin-8 production by monocytic cells. Mol Immunol 44:1969–1976.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Dulay AT, Buhimschi CS, Zhao G, Oliver EA, Mbele A, et al. (2009) Soluble TLR2 is present in human amniotic fluid and modulates the intraamniotic inflammatory response to infection. J Immunol 182:7244–7253.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Raby AC, Le Bouder E, Colmont C, Davies J, Richards P, et al. (2009) Soluble TLR2 reduces inflammation without compromising bacterial clearance by disrupting TLR2 triggering. J Immunol 183:506–517.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Candia E, Diaz-Jimenez D, Langjahr P, Nunez LE, de la Fuente M, et al. (2012) Increased production of soluble TLR2 by lamina propria mononuclear cells from ulcerative colitis patients. Immunobiology.

[ref19] 19. Heggelund L, Flo T, Berg K, Lien E, Mollnes TE, et al. (2004) Soluble toll-like receptor 2 in HIV infection: association with disease progression. Aids 18:2437–2439.
View Article
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Ueland T, Espevik T, Kjekshus J, Gullestad L, Omland T, et al. (2006) Mannose binding lectin and soluble Toll-like receptor 2 in heart failure following acute myocardial infarction. J Card Fail 12:659–663.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Haehnel V, Schwarzfischer L, Fenton MJ, Rehli M (2002) Transcriptional regulation of the human toll-like receptor 2 gene in monocytes and macrophages. J Immunol 168:5629–5637.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Murphy G, Murthy A, Khokha R (2008) Clipping, shedding and RIPping keep immunity on cue. Trends Immunol 29:75–82.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Blobel CP (2005) ADAMs: key components in EGFR signalling and development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:32–43.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Latz E, Visintin A, Lien E, Fitzgerald KA, Monks BG, et al. (2002) Lipopolysaccharide rapidly traffics to and from the Golgi apparatus with the toll-like receptor 4-MD-2-CD14 complex in a process that is distinct from the initiation of signal transduction. J Biol Chem 277:47834–47843.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Hartmann D, de Strooper B, Serneels L, Craessaerts K, Herreman A, et al. (2002) The disintegrin/metalloprotease ADAM 10 is essential for Notch signalling but not for alpha-secretase activity in fibroblasts. Hum Mol Genet 11:2615–2624.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Weber AN, Morse MA, Gay NJ (2004) Four N-linked glycosylation sites in human toll-like receptor 2 cooperate to direct efficient biosynthesis and secretion. J Biol Chem 279:34589–34594.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Yang RB, Mark MR, Gurney AL, Godowski PJ (1999) Signaling events induced by lipopolysaccharide-activated toll-like receptor 2. J Immunol 163:639–643.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Li CH, Wang JH, Redmond HP (2006) Bacterial lipoprotein-induced self-tolerance and cross-tolerance to LPS are associated with reduced IRAK-1 expression and MyD88-IRAK complex formation. J Leukoc Biol 79:867–875.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Roomi MW, Kalinovsky T, Rath M, Niedzwiecki A (2014) In vitro modulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in pediatric human sarcoma cell lines by cytokines, inducers and inhibitors. Int J Oncol 44:27–34.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Yun MR, Seo JM, Park HY (2014) Visfatin contributes to the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages through the differential regulation of inflammatory cytokines in THP-1 cells. Cell Signal 26:705–715.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Bell JH, Herrera AH, Li Y, Walcheck B (2007) Role of ADAM17 in the ectodomain shedding of TNF-alpha and its receptors by neutrophils and macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 82:173–176.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Cauwe B, Van den Steen PE, Opdenakker G (2007) The biochemical, biological, and pathological kaleidoscope of cell surface substrates processed by matrix metalloproteinases. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 42:113–185.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Gebbia JA, Coleman JL, Benach JL (2004) Selective induction of matrix metalloproteinases by Borrelia burgdorferi via toll-like receptor 2 in monocytes. J Infect Dis 189:113–119.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Ludwig A, Hundhausen C, Lambert MH, Broadway N, Andrews RC, et al. (2005) Metalloproteinase inhibitors for the disintegrin-like metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17 that differentially block constitutive and phorbol ester-inducible shedding of cell surface molecules. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 8:161–171.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Huovila AP, Turner AJ, Pelto-Huikko M, Karkkainen I, Ortiz RM (2005) Shedding light on ADAM metalloproteinases. Trends Biochem Sci 30:413–422.
View Article
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Aliprantis AO, Yang RB, Weiss DS, Godowski P, Zychlinsky A (2000) The apoptotic signaling pathway activated by Toll-like receptor-2. EMBO J 19:3325–3336.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Waldhauer I, Goehlsdorf D, Gieseke F, Weinschenk T, Wittenbrink M, et al. (2008) Tumor-associated MICA is shed by ADAM proteases. Cancer Res 68:6368–6376.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Palsson-McDermott EM, O'Neill LA (2007) The potential of targeting Toll-like receptor 2 in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Ir J Med Sci 176:253–260.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Fields J, Gardner-Mercer J, Borgmann K, Clark I, Ghorpade A (2011) CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta expression is increased in the brain during HIV-1-infection and contributes to regulation of astrocyte tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1. J Neurochem 118:93–104.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Li Y, Tang L, Duan Y, Ding Y (2010) Upregulation of MMP-13 and TIMP-1 expression in response to mechanical strain in MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells. BMC Res Notes 3:309.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Mann JS, Kindy MS, Hyde JF, Clark MR, Curry TE Jr (1993) Role of protein synthesis, prostaglandins, and estrogen in rat ovarian metalloproteinase inhibitor production. Biol Reprod 48:1006–1013.
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Ulisse S, Farina AR, Piersanti D, Tiberio A, Cappabianca L, et al. (1994) Follicle-stimulating hormone increases the expression of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 and induces TIMP-1 AP-1 site binding complex(es) in prepubertal rat Sertoli cells. Endocrinology 135:2479–2487.
View Article
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Lim EK, Mitchell PJ, Brown N, Drummond RA, Brown GD, et al. (2013) Regiospecific methylation of a dietary flavonoid scaffold selectively enhances IL-1beta production following Toll-like receptor 2 stimulation in THP-1 monocytes. J Biol Chem 288:21126–21135.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Levine SJ (2004) Mechanisms of soluble cytokine receptor generation. J Immunol 173:5343–5348.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Gomez-Pina V, Soares-Schanoski A, Rodriguez-Rojas A, Del Fresno C, Garcia F, et al. (2007) Metalloproteinases shed TREM-1 ectodomain from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocytes. J Immunol 179:4065–4073.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Mohler KM, Sleath PR, Fitzner JN, Cerretti DP, Alderson M, et al. (1994) Protection against a lethal dose of endotoxin by an inhibitor of tumour necrosis factor processing. Nature 370:218–220.
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Hundhausen C, Schulte A, Schulz B, Andrzejewski MG, Schwarz N, et al. (2007) Regulated shedding of transmembrane chemokines by the disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 facilitates detachment of adherent leukocytes. J Immunol 178:8064–8072.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Gibb DR, Saleem SJ, Chaimowitz NS, Mathews J, Conrad DH (2011) The emergence of ADAM10 as a regulator of lymphocyte development and autoimmunity. Mol Immunol 48:1319–1327.
View Article
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Weskamp G, Ford JW, Sturgill J, Martin S, Docherty AJ, et al. (2006) ADAM10 is a principal 'sheddase' of the low-affinity immunoglobulin E receptor CD23. Nat Immunol 7:1293–1298.
View Article
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Garbers C, Janner N, Chalaris A, Moss ML, Floss DM, et al. (2011) Species specificity of ADAM10 and ADAM17 proteins in interleukin-6 (IL-6) trans-signaling and novel role of ADAM10 in inducible IL-6 receptor shedding. J Biol Chem 286:14804–14811.
View Article
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Crowe PD, Walter BN, Mohler KM, Otten-Evans C, Black RA, et al. (1995) A metalloprotease inhibitor blocks shedding of the 80-kD TNF receptor and TNF processing in T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 181:1205–1210.
View Article
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Deuss M, Reiss K, Hartmann D (2008) Part-time alpha-secretases: the functional biology of ADAM 9, 10 and 17. Curr Alzheimer Res 5:187–201.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Colotta F, Dower SK, Sims JE, Mantovani A (1994) The type II 'decoy' receptor: a novel regulatory pathway for interleukin 1. Immunol Today 15:562–566.
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Ewald SE, Lee BL, Lau L, Wickliffe KE, Shi GP, et al. (2008) The ectodomain of Toll-like receptor 9 is cleaved to generate a functional receptor. Nature 456:658–662.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Isolation of human peripheral blood CD14+ cells

Cell culture

Chemicals reagents

Cell culture supernatants for sTLR2 detection

Cell viability analysis

Quantification of TLR2, IL-8, TNF-α level in cell supernatant

Flow cytometric analysis

Cell transfection

Immunoblotting

Negative regulation assay

Statistical analysis

Results

Production of sTLR2 by THP-1 cells occurs post-translationally

Constitutive and ligand-induced sTLR2 production involves metalloproteinase-dependent TLR2shedding in human monocytes

ADAM10- and ADAM17-mediated TLR2 shedding

Deletion in TLR2 juxtamembrane region impairs sTLR2 production

sTLR2 induced by metalloproteinase-activation inhibits Pam3CSK4-mediated IL-8 production

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 Fig.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

sTLR2 induced by metalloproteinase-activation inhibits Pam₃CSK₄-mediated IL-8 production