Figures
Abstract
Events in plant lipid metabolism are important during seedling establishment. As it has not been experimentally verified whether lipid metabolism in 2- and 5-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings is diurnally-controlled, quantitative real-time PCR analysis was used to investigate the expression of target genes in acyl-lipid transfer, β-oxidation and triacylglycerol (TAG) synthesis and hydrolysis in wild-type Arabidopsis WS and Col-0. In both WS and Col-0, ACYL-COA-BINDING PROTEIN3 (ACBP3), DIACYLGLYCEROL ACYLTRANSFERASE1 (DGAT1) and DGAT3 showed diurnal control in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings. Also, COMATOSE (CTS) was diurnally regulated in 2-day-old seedlings and LONG-CHAIN ACYL-COA SYNTHETASE6 (LACS6) in 5-day-old seedlings in both WS and Col-0. Subsequently, the effect of CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) from the core clock system was examined using the cca1lhy mutant and CCA1-overexpressing (CCA1-OX) lines versus wild-type WS and Col-0, respectively. Results revealed differential gene expression in lipid metabolism between 2- and 5-day-old mutant and wild-type WS seedlings, as well as between CCA1-OX and wild-type Col-0. Of the ACBPs, ACBP3 displayed the most significant changes between cca1lhy and WS and between CCA1-OX and Col-0, consistent with previous reports that ACBP3 is greatly affected by light/dark cycling. Evidence of oil body retention in 4- and 5-day-old seedlings of the cca1lhy mutant in comparison to WS indicated the effect of cca1lhy on storage lipid reserve mobilization. Lipid profiling revealed differences in primary lipid metabolism, namely in TAG, fatty acid methyl ester and acyl-CoA contents amongst cca1lhy, CCA1-OX, and wild-type seedlings. Taken together, this study demonstrates that lipid metabolism is subject to diurnal regulation in the early stages of seedling development in Arabidopsis.
Citation: Hsiao A-S, Haslam RP, Michaelson LV, Liao P, Napier JA, Chye M-L (2014) Gene Expression in Plant Lipid Metabolism in Arabidopsis Seedlings. PLoS ONE 9(9): e107372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107372
Editor: Christopher Beh, Simon Fraser University, Canada
Received: May 26, 2014; Accepted: August 9, 2014; Published: September 29, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Hsiao et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by the Wilson and Amelia Wong Endowment Fund and the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (HKU765813M). ASH and PL were supported by a HKU Postgraduate Studentship and a University Postgraduate Fellowship, respectively. Work done by JAN, LVM and RPH investigating the dynamics of seed oil synthesis was funded by an Institute Strategic Program Grant (Designing Seeds) from the BBSRC (United Kingdom). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
In plant seeds, triacylglycerol (TAG) is the major storage lipid in oil bodies and functions as a critical energy reserve during germination and seedling establishment [1]–[3]. The biosynthesis of TAG occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via the Kennedy pathway, and incorporates a series of membrane-bound enzymes [4]–[7]. Diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) and phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (PDAT) catalyze the transacylation of diacylglycerol (DAG) to produce TAG [8], [9]. In germinating Arabidopsis seeds and young seedlings, DGAT3 is more highly expressed than DGAT1, DGAT2, and PDAT1 [3]. During germination and early post-germinative growth, the fatty acids (FAs) released from stored TAGs are converted to sucrose (Suc), providing carbon and metabolic energy for seedling development [3], [6].
Biochemical pathways in various subcellular locations participate in storage reserve mobilization [3], [10], [11]. Oil breakdown is initiated during lipolysis when TAG in oil bodies is hydrolyzed to free FA and glycerol [12]. It has been established in Arabidopsis that two TAG lipases, encoded by SUGAR DEPENDENT1 (SDP1) and SDP1-LIKE (SDP1L), are responsible for the majority of oil breakdown [13], [14]. The released free FAs and/or acyl-CoA esters enter the β-oxidation pathway and are transported across the peroxisomal membrane by PEROXISOMAL ABC TRANSPORTER1 (PXA1)/PEROXISOME DEFICIENT3 (PED3)/COMATOSE (CTS) [15]–[17]. The conversion of FAs to fatty acyl-CoAs is activated by two peroxisomal long-chain acyl-CoA synthetases (LACS6 and LACS7) [18]. The three core enzymes in the β-oxidation pathway consist of acyl-CoA oxidase (ACX), multifunctional protein (MFP), and 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase (KAT) [3]. ACX, which catalyzes the first step of acyl-CoA oxidation in Arabidopsis, is encoded by six genes [10], [19]. The acx1acx2 mutant lacking medium-/long-chain ACXs shows a Suc-dependent seedling establishment phenotype [20]. Of the other β-oxidation enzymes, MFP2, which catalyzes both hydration and dehydrogenation [10], is substantially induced during postgerminative seedling development [21], whilst KAT2, which catalyzes thiolytic cleavage in the last step of β-oxidation [10], is expressed during germination [22]. The Arabidopsis kat2 mutant is defective in storage oil breakdown and is dependent on exogenous Suc during seedling establishment [22]. After β-oxidation, acetyl-CoA is converted to either citrate for respiration, or soluble sugars through the glyoxylate cycle and gluconeogenesis to support metabolism and growth [10].
During plant lipid metabolism, lipids and their acyl-CoA derivatives are transported between different subcellular compartments [10], [23]. Acyl-CoA-binding proteins (ACBPs) are candidates for such transfer because recombinant ACBPs have been demonstrated to bind acyl-CoA esters and phospholipids in vitro [24]–[32]. Arabidopsis ACBPs have been shown to mediate heavy metal stress tolerance [28], [33], plant defense [34], drought tolerance [35], and freezing tolerance [26], [32], [36]. Both ACBP1 and ACBP2 are expressed during seedling establishment [35], [37] while ACBP3 is highly expressed in germinating seedlings [38]. Some ACBPs have been reported to display diurnal expression [30], [31], [38], [39]. In 4-week-old Arabidopsis Col-0 rosettes, the expression of ACBP4 and ACBP5 was higher in the light period [30], while ACBP4 and ACBP5 accumulation lagged behind, with peak expression at the end of the subjective day [39]. In contrast, ACBP3 was induced in the dark in 4-week-old Col-0 rosettes [30], [31] and 2- to 3-week-old ACBP3pro::GUS transformants [38].
In Arabidopsis, the clock regulatory circuit comprises a series of interlinked transcriptional feedback loops [40], [41]. The core clock loop consists of an evening-phased pseudoresponse regulator TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 (TOC1) and two morning-expressed MYB transcription factors CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY), which are reciprocally regulated [42]. CCA1 and LHY are DNA-binding proteins suppressing TOC1 expression by binding to its 5′-flanking region [42]–[44]. As CCA1 and LHY act synergistically [45], the cca1lhy double mutant [44], [46]–[49] was included in this study to address the diurnal regulation of ACBPs and other genes in lipid metabolism in early developing Arabidopsis seedlings. As our previous studies on diurnal control of ACBPs were conducted using 2- to 4-week-old rosettes [30], [31], [38], we were interested to investigate if any ACBPs are diurnally regulated earlier in development.
Many ACBPs are stress responsive [26], [28], [29], [32]–[36] and harmony between external environmental signals and the internal clock can improve plant fitness and survival [50], [51]. For example, CCA1 regulation of defense genes allows plants to anticipate infection at dawn and better time responses to balance growth and defense [52]. This would be pertinent to ACBP3 which has been reported to play a role in plant defense [34], [38]. Furthermore, the clock is also known to control events in primary metabolism [53]–[56], for example CCA1 affects chlorophyll synthesis and biomass production, leading to starch metabolism and growth vigour [57]. Other examples include the regulation of CCA1 by glutamate (Glu) (and Glu-derived metabolites) and CCA1 control of nitrogen (N)-assimilatory genes [58]. Indeed, defective clock regulation reduced starch turnover and caused irregular leaf growth during the day [59]. High throughput analysis of several circadian microarray experiments revealed that about one-third of the genes expressed in 9-day-old seedlings are influenced by the biological clock [60]. As it has not been experimentally verified whether lipid metabolism in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings is diurnally-controlled, we initiated investigations on the expression of ACBPs and lipid metabolism genes in wild-type WS and Col-0 versus their cca1lhy and CCA1-OX derivatives, and subsequently demonstrated that lipid metabolism is diurnally affected even at the early stages in seedling development.
Materials and Methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
Wild-type Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) consisted of ecotypes WS (Cs28823) and Col-0. Arabidopsis wild-type and mutant cca1-11 lhy-21 (Cs9380) [61] seeds were purchased from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC). CCA1-OX (35S::CCA1) was provided by Professor E.M. Tobin [62]. Seeds of each genotype were harvested at the same time from plants grown under the same conditions in the growth chamber (16 h light, 270 µmol m−2 s−1 and 8 h dark) at 22°C. Seeds were stored in a desiccator in the dark at room temperature. For germination assays, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and lipid analysis, seeds were surface-sterilized and germinated in half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 1% (w/v) agar with 20 mM sucrose [20], to encourage more rapid seedling growth [63]. Following 4 days of 4°C treatment in the dark, plates were incubated in the tissue culture room (12 h light, 250 µmol m−2 s−1 and 12 h dark) at 22°C. For germination assays, freshly-harvested and after-ripening (harvested 3–6 months prior to use) seeds were tested and seeds were scored as germinated when radicle protrusion occurred. For Nile Red staining, seeds were grown on 1% (w/v) water-based agar.
qRT-PCR analysis
Seedlings germinated from after-ripening seeds (harvested 3–6 months prior to use) were used for qRT-PCR analysis. Two sets of 2- and 5-day-old seedlings from each genotype were prepared in opposing 12-h-light/12-h-dark regimes according to Baudry et al. (2010) [64]. Samples were collected from both sets. Eight time points per day were selected [65]. For each time point, 500–600 2-day-old seedlings or 30–40 5-day-old seedlings were pooled for RNA isolation.
RNA, prepared using a RNeasy Isolation Kit (Qiagen), was treated with DNase and reverse-transcribed to cDNA according to the procedure supplied by the cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). The expression of IPP2 (isopentenyl pyrophosphate:dimethylallyl pyrophosphate isomerase 2), which is not affected by diurnal or circadian regulation in Arabidopsis seedlings, was used as an internal control [64], [66]. The expression of genes in lipid metabolism was detected in qRT-PCR using gene-specific primers as listed in Table S1. StepOne Plus (Applied Biosystems) and FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche) were utilized in qRT-PCR. Conditions for qRT-PCR were: 95°C, 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C, 15 s and 60°C, 1 min. The relative ratio of threshold cycle (Ct) values between the IPP2 gene and the specific gene was calculated. For quantification to calculate 2△Ct, three technical replicates at each time point were used. Data in Figures 1–6 and S1 represents a mean value of six repeats from two independent biological samples. Genes which displayed a 2-fold or greater value at peak expression over its lowest expression level in wild-type WS or Col-0, in both two biological repeats, were deemed to be diurnally regulated.
Expression of ACBPs in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings of wild-type WS (open circle) and the cca1lhy mutant (closed rhombus) germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles. Relative gene expression level on the Y axis was normalized against IPP2. Each time point represents a mean value of six repeats from two independent biological samples ± SE. White boxes, subjective day; black boxes, subjective night.
Expression of ACBPs in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings of wild-type Col-0 (open circle) and CCA1-OX (closed rhombus) germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles. Relative gene expression level on the Y axis was normalized against IPP2. Each time point represents a mean value of six repeats from two independent biological samples ± SE. White boxes, subjective day; black boxes, subjective night.
Expression of SDP1, CTS, LACS6, LACS7, ACX1, ACX2, MFP2 and KAT2 in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings of wild-type WS (open circle) and the cca1lhy mutant (closed rhombus) germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles. Relative gene expression on the Y axis was normalized against IPP2. Each time point represents a mean value of six repeats from two independent biological samples ± SE. White boxes, subjective day; black boxes, subjective night.
Expression of CTS, SDP1, LACS6, LACS7, ACX1, ACX2, MFP2 and KAT2 in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings of wild-type Col-0 (open circle) and CCA1-OX (closed rhombus) germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles. Relative gene expression level on the Y axis was normalized against IPP2. Each time point represents a mean value of six repeats from two independent biological samples ± SE. White boxes, subjective day; black boxes, subjective night.
Expression of DGAT1, DGAT2, DGAT3 and PDAT1 in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings of the wild type (open circle) and the cca1lhy mutant (closed rhombus) germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles. Relative gene expression on the Y axis was normalized against IPP2. Each time point represents a mean value of six repeats from two independent biological samples ± SE. White boxes, subjective day; black boxes, subjective night.
Expression of DGAT1, DGAT2, DGAT3 and PDAT1 in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings of wild-type Col-0 (open circle) and CCA1-OX (closed rhombus) germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles. Relative gene expression level on the Y axis was normalized against IPP2. Each time point represents a mean value of six repeats from two independent biological samples ± SE. White boxes, subjective day; black boxes, subjective night.
Confocal microscopy
One-day-old imbibed seeds and seedlings (aged 2 to 5 days) grown under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles were infiltrated with an aqueous solution of Nile Red (Sigma) to visually detect neutral lipids [23], [67]–[70]. Images were obtained with a 63 X oil objective by confocal laser scanning microscopy using a Zeiss LSM 710 system equipped with argon and HeNe lasers as excitation sources. Fluorescence was excited at 514 nm and collected with a 539–653 nm filter.
TAG extraction and mass spectrometry (MS) profiling
Dry seeds and seedlings germinated from after-ripening seeds (harvested 3–6 months prior to use) were used for lipid analysis. Dry seeds and 1- to 5-day-old seedlings germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles were collected for lipid analysis. Seed TAGs were extracted following Bligh and Dyer (1959) [71]; seeds were heated for 10 min at 95°C in 1 ml of isopropanol and homogenized using a mortar and pestle. The homogenate was centrifuged, supernatant collected, and the pellet re-extracted. The molecular species of TAGs were analysed by electrospray ionisation triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (API 4000 QTRAP; Applied Biosystems). The profiling samples were prepared by combining 50 µl of the total lipid extract with 950 µl of isopropanol/methanol/50 mM ammonium acetate/dichloromethane (4∶3∶2∶1). TAGs [M+NH4]+ were measured following Li et al. (2014) [72] and were defined by the presence of one acyl fragment and the mass/charge of the ion formed from the intact lipid (neutral loss profiling). This allows identification of TAG acyl species and the total acyl carbons and total number of acyl double bonds in the other two chains. TAGs were quantified after background subtraction, smoothing, integration, isotope deconvolution and comparison of sample peaks with those of the internal standard (using LipidView, Applied Biosystems). The mass spectral responses of various TAG species are variable, owing to differential ionization of individual molecular TAG species. The data were normalized to the internal standard tri-17∶0 (Nu-Check Prep, USA). Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were obtained by transmethylation [73] and analyzed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) [74].
Acyl-CoA profiling
Five-day-old seedlings germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles were used [3]. Samples were extracted for acyl-CoA profiling according to Larson and Graham (2001) [75]. Analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem MS with multiple reaction monitoring, operated in a positive mode, was carried out [76]. Liquid chromatography separation was conducted using an Agilent 1200 LC system as previously described [77].
Accession numbers
Sequence data included herein can be found in the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative or GenBank databases under the following accession numbers: TOC1 (AT5G61380; NM_125531), GI (AT1G22770; NM_102124), ACBP1 (AT5G53470; NM_124726), ACBP2 (AT4G27780; NM_118916), ACBP3 (AT4G24230; NM_118556), ACBP4 (AT3G05420; NM_111415), ACBP5 (AT5G27630; NM_122645), ACBP6 (AT1G31812; NM_102916), SDP1 (AT5G04040; NM_120486), CTS (AT4G39850; NM_120148), LACS6 (AT3G05970; NM_111471), LACS7 (AT5G27600; NM_122642), ACX1 (AT4G16760; NM_117778), ACX2 (AT5G65110; NM_125910), MFP2 (AT3G06860; NM_111566), KAT2 (AT2G33150; NM_128874), DGAT1 (AT2G19450; NM_127503), DGAT2 (AT3G51520; NM_115011), DGAT3 (AT1G48300; NM_103727), PDAT1 (AT5G13640; NM_121367), IPP2 (AT2G39800; NM_111146).
Results
Analysis of the expression of ACBPs and other genes in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings
Two- and 5-day-old seedlings of the cca1lhy mutant, CCA1-OX and their respective wild types (WS and Col-0) grown in 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles were subjected to qRT-PCR to compare the expression of ACBPs (Figures 1–2) and other genes in lipid metabolism, particularly target genes associated with lipolysis (SDP1 in Figures 3–4), β-oxidation (CTS, LACS6, LACS7, ACX1, ACX2, MFP2 and KAT2 in Figures 3–4) and TAG synthesis (DGAT1, DGAT2, DGAT3 and PDAT1 in Figures 5–6). The relative expression of ACBPs, SDP1, CTS, LACS6, LACS7, ACX1, ACX2, MFP2, KAT2, DGAT1, DGAT2, DGAT3 and PDAT1 between the cca1lhy mutant and wild-type WS (Figures 1, 3, and 5) and between CCA1-OX and wild-type Col-0 (Figures 2, 4, and 6) were compared. The expression of IPP2 (isopentenyl pyrophosphate:dimethylallyl pyrophosphate isomerase 2, At3g02780), which is known not to be influenced by diurnal or circadian control in Arabidopsis seedlings, was used as an internal control [64], [66]. As a positive control, the expression of core clock genes TOC1 and GIGANTEA (GI) between the cca1lhy mutant and wild-type WS (Figure S1A) and between CCA1-OX and wild-type Col-0 (Figure S1B) were compared. TOC1 showed peak expression at Zeitgeber time 9 (ZT9) in 2-day-old Col-0 seedlings (P<0.05; Student's t test), ZT12 in 2-day-old WS and 5-day-old Col-0 seedlings (P<0.05; Student's t test), and ZT18 in 5-day-old WS seedlings (P<0.05; Student's t test) (Figure S1). Peak GI expression occurred during the subjective day, at ZT6 in 2- and 5-day-old WS (P<0.01; Student's t test) and 2-day-old Col-0 seedlings and at ZT9 in 5-day-old Col-0 seedlings (P<0.01; Student's t test) (Figure S1). Fluctuations in expression of TOC1 and GI in the wild types were generally not apparent in the cca1lhy mutant and CCA1-OX (Figure S1), suggesting that both the cca1lhy mutant and CCA1-OX are arrhythmic lines as previous reported [44], [62].
In 2-day-old WS seedlings, obvious fluctuation in expression was not observed in both ACBP1 and ACBP2 except at ZT3, when ACBP1 peaked in cca1lhy (P<0.05; Student's t test) (Figure 1). In 5-day-old seedlings, both ACBP1 and ACBP2 mRNAs peaked in WS at ZT15 while this pattern was not evident in cca1lhy (P<0.05; Student's t test) (Figure 1). ACBP3 expression peaked at ZT12 in 2- and 5-day-old WS and at ZT24 in 2- and 5-day-old cca1lhy (P<0.05; Student's t test) (Figure 1). In 2-day-old but not 5-day-old cca1lhy, ACBP4 mRNA generally showed higher expression than WS (P<0.05; Student's t test) (Figure 1). In 2-day-old seedlings, ACBP5 expression was higher at ZT6 in cca1lhy than in WS (P<0.05; Student's t test) (Figure 1). In 5-day-old WS seedlings, ACBP5 showed higher expression than the cca1lhy mutant from ZT18 to ZT24 (P<0.05; Student's t test) but differences between them were not significant for ACBP6 (Figure 1). In 2-day-old seedlings, ACBP6 expression peaked at ZT6 and showed lowest expression at ZT12 in WS (P<0.001; Student's t test); such fluctuation was absent in cca1lhy (Figure 1).
Similar to WS, wild-type Col-0 showed more obvious fluctuation in ACBP1 and ACBP2 expression in 5-day-old rather than 2-day-old seedlings (Figure 2), again peaking at ZT15 at day 5 (Figure 1), while the expression pattern of ACBP1 and ACBP2 in CCA1-OX was rather similar to the wild type (Figure 2). In comparison to Col-0, peak ACBP3 expression at ZT12 and ZT24 was greater in 2-day-old CCA1-OX (P<0.05; Student's t test) (Figure 2). In 5-day-old CCA1-OX, ACBP3 showed lower expression than Col-0 from ZT3 to ZT9 but expression significantly increased between ZT15 to ZT24 (P<0.05; Student's t test) (Figure 2). In 2- and 5-day-old Col-0, ACBP4 did not show obvious diurnal regulation, while in CCA1-OX its expression deviated from Col-0 with greatest differences between them at ZT9 on day 2 (P<0.05; Student's t test; Figure 2). In 2-day-old Col-0, both ACBP5 and ACBP6 mRNAs did not show obvious diurnal expression, while ACBP5 expression was enhanced in 5-day-old CCA1-OX at ZT15 and ACBP6 generally showed higher expression in 2- and 5-day-old CCA1-OX (P<0.05; Student's t test) in comparison to Col-0 (Figure 2).
Comparative gene expression in lipid metabolism between cca1lhy and wild-type seedlings
When the expression of genes in lipolysis and β-oxidation in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings were analyzed by qRT-PCR, SDP1 was down-regulated at ZT3 and ZT6, and up-regulated at ZT21 and ZT24 in cca1lhy versus WS (Figure 3). In cca1lhy, CTS showed lower expression than WS at ZT15 (P<0.001; Student's t test) especially in 2-day-old seedlings (Figure 3), but LACS6 did not demonstrate obvious changes. However, in 2-day-old cca1lhy, LACS7 showed higher expression than WS at ZT6 and ZT9 (P<0.05; Student's t test), but lower expression (at ZT18-24) in 5-day-old seedlings (Figure 3). ACX1 mRNA expression was somewhat reduced in cca1lhy in comparison to WS especially at ZT3 (P<0.01; Student's t test) at days 2 and 5 (Figure 3). In 2-day-old WS, ACX2, MFP2 and KAT2 mRNAs all showed the lowest expression at ZT12 (Figure 3). However, the expression of ACX2 was higher in 2-day-old cca1lhy at most time points in comparison to WS (Figure 3). MFP2 and KAT2 expression was generally lower (P<0.05; Student's t test) in 5-day-old cca1lhy at most time points in comparison to WS, although most MFP2 and KAT2 values were higher at day 2 (P<0.05; Student's t test; Figure 3). Hence, the genes involved in storage reserve mobilization, such as ACX2, MFP2, and KAT2 seemed more highly-expressed in cca1lhy than WS at day 2 (Figure 3). At day 5, ACX2, MFP2, and KAT2 were generally down-regulated during the subjective night in cca1lhy in comparison to WS (Figure 3).
Given that TAG synthesis plays a role during seedling establishment [3], DGAT1, DGAT2, DGAT3 and PDAT1 expression was analyzed in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings (Figure 5). Differences in DGAT1, DGAT3 and PDAT1 expression were observed between the 2- and/or 5-day-old cca1lhy and WS (Figure 5). Variation of DGAT1 expression was higher in 2-day-old WS than in cca1lhy, with the lowest expression at ZT24 (P<0.01; Student's t test; Figure 5). DGAT1 showed pronounced fluctuation in 5-day-old WS but not cca1lhy (Figure 5). In contrast, DGAT1 and DGAT3 expression in 5-day-old cca1lhy seemed less affected than WS by light/dark cycling whilst there was no significant difference between the genotypes in DGAT2 expression in both 2- and 5-day-old seedlings (Figure 5). Five-day-old WS showed peak DGAT1 expression at ZT9 with a second peak at ZT18 (Figure 5). Peak DGAT3 expression occurred at ZT18 (Figure 5). Absence of these peaks in the mutant suggests that diurnal control of DGAT1 and DGAT3 was quashed. Interestingly, PDAT1 expression showed greater fluctuation in 5-day-old cca1lhy than WS but such differences were less obvious in 2-day-old seedlings (Figure 5). These findings provide evidence for diurnal control of TAG synthesis in DGAT1, DGAT3, and PDAT1 expression in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings.
Comparative gene expression in lipid metabolism between CCA1-OX and wild-type seedlings
To further investigate the role of CCA1 in lipid metabolism, the expression of CTS, SDP1, LACS6, LACS7, ACX1, ACX2, MFP2 and KAT2 in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles of wild-type Col-0 and CCA1-OX was analyzed by qRT-PCR (Figure 4). In 2-day-old Col-0, CTS and LACS7 expression peaked at ZT9 and ZT21, respectively, while LACS6 peaked at ZT15 and the lowest expression of SDP1, CTS, LACS6, LACS7, ACX1, ACX2, MFP2 and KAT2 appeared at ZT12 or ZT24 (Figure 4). Genes involved in storage reserve mobilization in CCA1-OX were generally down-regulated in 2-day-old seedlings and up-regulated in 5-day-old seedlings in comparison to Col-0 (Figure 4). In particular, in 2-day-old CCA1-OX, SDP1 expression was generally lower than Col-0 from ZT6 to ZT15, LACS6 from ZT15 to ZT21, ACX1 from ZT15 to ZT24, MFP2 from ZT3 to ZT21 and KAT2 from ZT3 to ZT21 (Figure 4). Also, loss in diurnal regulation was evident in 2-day-old CCA1-OX for CTS, in contrast to Col-0 which peaked at ZT9 and showed lowest expression at ZT12 (P<0.05; Student's t test) (Figure 4). Other deviations from wild-type diurnal control in 2-day-old CCA1-OX were observed for LACS7 and ACX2 (Figure 4).
In 5-day-old seedlings, SDP1 mRNA in CCA1-OX was significantly up-regulated from ZT15 to ZT24 (P<0.05; Student's t test; Figure 4). Similar to SDP1, ACX2 (P<0.05; Student's t test) and KAT2 (P<0.01; Student's t test) were more highly expressed in 5-day-old CCA1-OX during the subjective night while ACX1 showed higher expression at most time points (P<0.05; Student's t test; Figure 4). These results suggest that some genes in lipid metabolism are diurnally-regulated during germination and seedling establishment as captured on 2- and 5-day-old seedlings.
In wild-type Col-0, DGAT1 showed lowest expression at ZT3 and ZT24 at both days 2 and 5; DGAT3 showed lowest expression at ZT12 at day 2 but was generally induced in the subjective night at day 5; and PDAT1 showed highest expression at ZT3 on day 5 (Figure 6). When the expression of DGAT1, DGAT2, DGAT3, and PDAT1 in 2- and 5-day-old CCA1-OX was compared to Col-0, there were no clear changes in DGAT2 expression. The expression of DGAT1 in CCA1-OX appeared induced in the subjective night, peaking at ZT15 (P<0.05; Student's t test) in 2-day-old seedlings (Figure 6). In contrast, the expression of DGAT3 was generally higher than Col-0 in the subjective day at 2 days (P<0.05; Student's t test; Figure 6). PDAT1 expression in 2-day-old CCA1-OX was generally higher (P<0.05; Student's t test) than Col-0 but this pattern was not retained in 5-day-old seedlings (Figure 6). In summary, when CCA1 was overexpressed in Col-0, DGAT1 and DGAT3 were more affected than DGAT2 and PDAT1 in both 2- and 5-day-old seedlings (Figure 6).
Data mining of microarray analysis specific to 9-day-old seedlings
Covington et al. (2008) [60] have integrated information from multiple circadian microarray experiments using 9-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings to evaluate the circadian transcriptome. Genes that were expressed (Exp) and those under circadian control (Cir) are summarized (Table S2) in a total of nine datasets, including four original datasets: namely Covington [78], Edwards [79], Michael 1 and Michael 2 [55]; three of which the original Covington (C) and Edwards (E) datasets were combined in three different ways: CECE, CCEE, and EECC; and finally two combined datasets: C+E intersection and C+E union [60]. Mining their summarized data (Additional Data File 2 in [60]), we identified ACBPs and the genes associated with lipolysis, β-oxidation and TAG synthesis that were expressed, as well as those that showed clock regulation (Table S2), and the expression pattern of the selected genes in the normalized CCEE dataset is presented in Figure S2. ACBPs did not show any obvious clock regulation in 9-day-old seedlings (Table S2) while ACBP2 and ACBP5 showed some fluctuations (Figure S2). The lipolysis gene SDP1 demonstrated clock regulation in all nine datasets (Table S2), peaking at the subjective day (Figure S2). Of the β-oxidation genes, CTS indicated clock regulation only in the Covington dataset (Table S2); while LACS6 displayed clock regulation in seven datasets except for the original Covington and Edwards datasets (Table S2), peaking at the late subjective day (Figure S2). LACS7 and MFP2 did not exhibit any evidence of clock regulation in all nine datasets (Table S2). ACX1, peaking at the subjective night or from the late subjective night to the early subjective day (Figure S2) and KAT2, peaking from the late subjective day to the early subjective night (Figure S2), showed clock regulation in most datasets except in the original Edwards and Covington datasets, respectively (Table S2); whilst ACX2 demonstrated such regulation only in Michael 1 and Michael 2 (Table S2). Of the TAG synthesis genes, DGAT1 (but not DGAT2) showed clock regulation in all nine datasets (Table S2), peaking at the late subjective day (Figure S2). PDAT1 was clock-regulated in six datasets except the original Covington, Michael 1, and Michael 2 (Table S2), peaking at the subjective day (Figure S2). In general, genes under clock control showed high expression in the subjective day or at day-night transition.
The cca1lhy mutant retains oil bodies
It has been reported that oil body accumulation is a phenotype observed in Arabidopsis mutants abrogated in the mobilization of storage reserves [13], [16], [18], [20]–[22]. Freshly-harvested and after-ripening seeds of cca1lhy and WS, germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles on water-based agar, were stained with Nile Red during seedling growth from days 1 to 5 after imbibition (Figure 7). Confocal laser microscopy revealed the presence of red-stained spherical inclusions representing oil body accumulation in cca1lhy from days 1 to 5 in comparison to WS (Figure 7). In cca1lhy, the oil bodies were evident at day 5 in samples derived from freshly-harvested and after-ripening seeds (Figure 7) although seedling establishment would have been completed by then [20]. In WS, the number of oil bodies had substantially declined by day 3 and very few were evident by days 4 and 5 (Figure 7). When the germination frequency was investigated using freshly-harvested seeds of the cca1lhy mutant and wild-type WS cultured under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles on half-strength MS medium containing 20 mM sucrose, there were no significant differences between them except at day 1 when the wild type germinated better (Figure S3A). However, after-ripening (Figure S3B) seeds of the cca1lhy mutant were slightly impaired in germination in comparison to the wild type over a 7-day observation period.
Confocal laser microscopy of Nile Red stained oil bodies of the radicle from 1-day-old imbibed seeds (Day 1) and hypocotyl epidermis from 2- to 5-day-old seedlings (Day 2 to Day 5) of the cca1lhy mutant and wild-type WS germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles on water-based agar. Samples from freshly-harvested and after-ripening seeds of the cca1lhy mutant and wild-type WS are shown. Scale bar = 10 µm.
TAG accumulates in 5-day-old cca1lhy seedlings
When 4- and 5-day-old cca1lhy seedlings showed oil body accumulation in contrast to the wild type (Figure 7), we were prompted to investigate whether this coincided with changes in TAG content. Dry seed and seedling samples collected at regular intervals, 1 to 5 days after imbibition under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles, were analyzed for TAG content by electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) (Figure 8). CCA1-OX dry seeds showed significantly higher TAG content than wild-type Col-0 (Figure 8A), while cca1lhy seemed to contain slightly lower TAG than WS (Figure 8A), but this difference was not statistically significant (Figure 8A). At day 1 after imbibition, there were no apparent differences in TAG content amongst cca1lhy, CCA1-OX, and their respective wild types (Figure 8B). At days 2 and 3 after imbibition, only CCA1-OX indicated an elevated TAG content in comparison to Col-0 (Figure 8C–D), and this was maintained to day 4 (Figure 8E). The increase of TAG in cca1lhy over WS appeared at days 4 and 5 after imbibition (Figure 8E–F). The cca1lhy mutant showed highest TAG content amongst all the genotypes on days 4 to 5 (Figure 8E–F). In contrast, by day 5 there were no apparent differences between CCA1-OX and Col-0 (Figure 8F).
(A) Total TAG content of wild-type, cca1lhy, and CCA1-OX dry seeds. (B)–(F) Total TAG content of wild-type, cca1lhy, and CCA1-OX seedlings at Day 1 (B), Day 2 (C), Day 3 (D), Day 4 (E), and Day 5 (F) cultured under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles on half-strength MS medium supplemented with 20 mM sucrose. White bar, wild-type WS; light gray bar, the cca1lhy mutant; dark gray bar, wild-type Col-0; black bar, CCA1-OX. Data in (A) represents a mean value of three repeats ± SD per seed, each measurement contains 20 dry seeds. Data in (B)–(F) represents a mean value of three repeats ± SD per mg fresh weight (FW) of seedlings, per measurement contains 96–122 mg seedlings. Student's t test for *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01.
Total FAs accumulate in 5-day-old cca1lhy seedlings
Changes in FA composition were identified between cca1lhy and WS (Figure 9), as well as CCA1-OX and Col-0 (Figure 10), using GC-FID analysis of FAMEs on dry seeds and seedlings grown under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles. In dry seeds and 1- to 3-day-old seedlings, there were no significant changes in fatty acid content between cca1lhy and WS (Figure 9A–D). However, cca1lhy showed an increase in fatty acids at days 4 to 5 after imbibition in comparison to WS (Figure 9E–F).
(A) Major fatty acid (FA) content of WS and cca1lhy dry seeds. (B)–(F) Major FA content of WS and cca1lhy seedlings at Day 1 (B), Day 2 (C), Day 3 (D), Day 4 (E), and Day 5 (F) cultured under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles on half-strength MS medium supplemented with 20 mM sucrose. White bar, wild-type WS; light gray bar, the cca1lhy mutant. Data in (A) represents a mean value of three repeats ± SD per seed, each measurement contains 20 dry seeds. Data in (B)–(F) represents a mean value of three repeats ± SD per mg fresh weight (FW) of seedlings, per measurement contains 96–122 mg seedlings. Student's t test for *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01.
(A) Major fatty acid (FA) content of Col-0 and CCA1-OX dry seeds. (B)-(F) Major FA content of Col-0 and CCA1-OX seedlings in Day 1 (B), Day 2 (C), Day 3 (D), Day 4 (E), and Day 5 (F) cultured under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles on half-strength MS medium supplemented with 20 mM sucrose. Dark gray bar, wild-type Col-0; black bar, CCA1-OX. Data in (A) represents a mean value of three repeats ± SD per seed, each measurement contains 20 dry seeds. Data in (B)–(F) represents a mean value of three repeats ± SD per mg fresh weight (FW) of seedlings, per measurement contains 96–117 mg seedlings. Student's t test for *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01.
Interestingly, in comparison to Col-0, CCA1-OX showed some compositional changes i.e. higher 18∶2 and 18∶3 fatty acid content in dry seeds (Figure 10A), similar fatty acid content in 1-day-old seedlings (Figure 10B), higher 18∶2, 18∶3, and 20∶1 fatty acid content in 2-day-old seedlings (Figure 10C), increased 16∶0, 18∶0, 18∶1, 18∶2, 18∶3, 20∶0, 20∶1, and 22∶1 fatty acid content in 3-day-old seedlings (Figure 10D), higher 18∶1, 18∶2, 18∶3, and 20∶1 fatty acid content in 4-day-old seedlings (Figure 10E), but similar fatty acid content in 5-day-old seedlings (Figure 10F).
Acyl-CoA profiling highlighted differences in acyl-CoA composition between cca1lhy, CCA1-OX, and wild-type seedlings
During storage reserve mobilization in post-germination development, fatty acids from oil bodies are activated to acyl-CoAs before they enter peroxisomal FA β-oxidation [19]. To determine the acyl-CoA compositional changes amongst cca1lhy, CCA1-OX, and wild-type Arabidopsis, the acyl-CoA pool was profiled in 5-day-old seedlings germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles. Some acyl-CoA esters (16∶0, 16∶3, 24∶0, and 26∶0) accumulated in cca1lhy in comparison to wild-type WS (Figure S4); whilst others, e.g. 18∶2, 22∶1, and 28∶1-CoA, decreased in cca1lhy in comparison to WS (Figure S4). When compared to wild-type Col-0, 16∶3, 18∶3, 20∶0, 20∶1, 22∶1, 24∶1 and 26∶1-CoA were reduced in CCA1-OX (Figure S4). Only 24∶0 and 30∶0-CoA accumulated in CCA1-OX in comparison to Col-0 (Figure S4).
Discussion
Comparative expression of ACBPs and lipid metabolism genes in Arabidopsis seedlings
In plants, it has been reported that the mRNAs of many metabolic enzymes are clock-regulated [53]–[56]. For example, the expression of genes involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis peaked at late dark; those of the electron transport photosystems peaked in the light; starch synthesis genes were highly expressed at early light or during the day in contrast to starch degradation genes which peaked at late light; and most genes related to nitrogen and sulfate assimilation peaked at the subjective night or at early light [53], [56], [80]–[83]. Various enzymes involved in plant lipid biosynthesis including β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase 16 (KCS16; At4g34250), acyl-CoA desaturase-like 2 (ADS2; At2g31360), sphingolipid Δ8-desaturase 2 (SLD2; At2g46210), UDP-Glc:sterol glucosyltransferase (UGT80A2; At3g07020), CDP-DAG synthase 1 (CDS1; At1g62430), and lecithine cholesterol acyltransferase-like protein (At1g27480) are known to be transcriptionally regulated by the biological clock [53].
In this study, the comparative expression of ACBPs and lipid metabolism genes was investigated in 2- and 5-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings. Consistent with previous reports that TOC1 peaks at ZT12 [43] and GI peaks during the subjective day in 7-day-old WS seedlings [84], our investigation on WS and Col-0 seedlings revealed that TOC1 expression also peaked at ZT12 in 2-day-old WS and 5-day-old Col-0, while GI peaked during the subjective day in both 2- and 5-day-old WS and Col-0 (Figure S1). The expression of ACBPs and lipid metabolism genes was observed herein to align with the expression of TOC1 and GI and they too showed variation in expression between the cca1lhy mutant and wild-type WS (Figure S1A) and between CCA1-OX and wild-type Col-0 (Figure S1B). At days 2 and 5, ACBP3 showed more obvious diurnal regulation in wild-type WS (Figure 1) than Col-0 (Figure 2). In 5-day-old wild-type WS and Col-0 seedlings, a similar diurnal expression pattern was observed for ACBP1 and ACBP2 (Figures 1, 2 and S5). Fluctuation of ACBP6 expression was more obvious in 2-day-old wild-type WS (Figures 1 and S5). As candidates for acyl-lipid transfer, fluctuation in expression of ACBPs suggests that it may diurnally affect acyl-lipid metabolism in seedlings. When we compared the expression pattern between WS and cca1lhy, our results revealed that the expression pattern of all ACBP mRNAs in cca1lhy slightly deviated from the wild type (Figure 1). Moreover, the diurnal expression pattern of ACBPs in wild-type Col-0 seedlings germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles showed some differences from results conducted on 4-week-old rosettes under 16-h-light/8-h-dark [30]: both ACBP1 and ACBP2 showed peak expression at ZT15 in 5-day-old seedlings but not in rosettes; both ACBP4 and ACBP5 showed peak expression at ZT9 in rosettes but not in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings. Nevertheless, similarity was noted in ACBP3 peaks at ZT24 in 2-day-old seedlings and 4-week-old rosettes. Indeed, ACBP3 expression displayed the most contrast between the cca1lhy mutant and WS (Figure 1) and between CCA1-OX and Col-0 (Figure 2), consistent with our previous reports that ACBP3 mRNA is most affected by light/dark cycling [30], [31] and that the 5′-flanking region of ACBP3 is responsive to dark/light [38]. This finding relating ACBP3 to CCA1 supports a previous report that CCA1 regulates plant defense [52]; ACBP3 has been shown to play a role in the plant defense response [34], [38]. Furthermore, variations in the gene expression patterns of ACBPs in seedlings and rosettes indicate that diurnal regulation may alter at various stages in plant development.
Besides ACBPs, genes related to storage reserve mobilization showed diurnal fluctuation in expression in wild-type seedlings (Figures 3, 4 and S5). In some cases peak expression differed between WS and Col-0. For example in 2-day-old WS, peak expression of CTS was observed at ZT15 (Figure 3) in contrast to ZT9 in Col-0 (Figure 4). Nevertheless, in both 2-day-old wild-type WS and Col-0 seedlings, a similar expression pattern was observed for SDP1 with lowest expression at ZT24 (Figures 3–4). In 2-day-old WS seedlings, lowest expression at ZT12 was noted for ACX2, MFP2 and KAT2 (Figure 3) while in 2-day-old Col-0 seedlings two troughs at ZT12 and ZT24 were observed for LACS6, ACX2 and KAT2 (Figure 4). Genes involved in storage reserve mobilization somewhat showed reduced expression at day-night transition (ZT12 and ZT24) in 2-day-old wild-type seedlings but this pattern became less obvious in older (5-day-old) seedlings (Figures 3–4). Such fluctuations suggest that β-oxidation may be subject to diurnal regulation in these young Arabidopsis seedlings (Figure S5).
Loss of diurnal regulation of CTS was observed in both 2-day-old cca1lhy and CCA1-OX seedlings (Figures 3–4). ACX2, MFP2 and KAT2 were generally up-regulated in 2-day-old cca1lhy and MFP2 and KAT2 mildly down-regulated during the subjective night at day 5 in comparison to WS (Figure 3). In contrast, ACX1, MFP2 and KAT2 were generally down-regulated in 2-day-old CCA1-OX seedlings and up-regulated at day 5 in comparison to Col-0 (Figure 4). Taken together, these results suggest that the expression of genes in storage reserve mobilization is altered in both cca1lhy and CCA1-OX seedlings. ACX1, MFP2 and KAT2 have corresponding mutants previously reported to show an oil body retention phenotype [20]–[22]. Such down-regulation may explain for the oil body accumulation phenotype we observed in the 4- and 5-day-old cca1lhy mutants (Figure 7) arising from a reduction in lipid catabolism.
Genes of TAG synthesis as well as ACBPs and genes involved in storage reserve mobilization showed fluctuation in expression in wild-type seedlings (Figures 5, 6 and S5). When comparing the expression pattern in the wild types versus the cca1lhy mutant or CCA1-OX, both DGAT1 and DGAT3 showed different patterns between 5-day-old cca1lhy and WS (Figure 5) as well as CCA1-OX and Col-0 (Figure 6), suggesting that both genes play important roles in seedling establishment and TAG recycling during storage reserve mobilization, in good agreement with the results of Hernández et al. (2012) [3]. The lack of diurnal fluctuation in the expression of DGAT1 and DGAT3 in 5-day-old cca1lhy in comparison to WS (Figure 5) and the increased fluctuation of PDAT1 expression in cca1lhy (Figure 5) may also account for the significant lipid changes in TAG (Figure 8) and FAs (Figure 9) at day 5 (and day 4). In summary, the qRT-PCR results have indicated that both TAG synthesis and its hydrolysis is affected in the cca1lhy mutant.
Our data mined from microarray analysis [60] suggested that SDP1, LACS6, ACX1, KAT2, DGAT1, and PDAT1 are circadian regulated in at least six datasets (Table S2). Our qRT-PCR is consistent with Covington et al. (2008) [60] in that the expression of some genes in lipid metabolism is diurnally-regulated. We had observed a diurnal expression pattern of target genes in WS and Col-0 and differences between 2- and 5-day-old cca1lhy and WS seedlings, as well as between CCA1-OX and Col-0 (Figures 3, 4, 5, 6 and S5).
However, day 2 is important and significant changes in transcription patterns of genes involved in storage reserve mobilization have been reported [63]. Therefore, variation in gene expression within day 2 might partially be ascribed to developmental rather than diurnal regulation. Moreover, for many metabolic genes, cycling of transcripts need not correlate to changes in maximal catalytic activity or protein level. For example, the mRNAs of many genes in starch degradation oscillate, but their protein levels are kept constant in Arabidopsis [80], [82], [83], [85]. Hence, we caution that our transcriptomic analysis merely provides evidence of diurnal regulation of lipid metabolism at the level of transcription.
Comparison between the cca1lhy mutant and WS at germination
Except for day 1, the germination rate of freshly-harvested seeds after stratification did not significantly differ between the cca1lhy mutant and wild-type WS (Figure S3A), consistent with a previous report [86] which concluded that circadian clock genes coordinate environmental signalling affecting dormancy release in plants. Herein, we used 4-day stratification at 4°C to eliminate the effect of dormancy and subsequently investigated the relationship between the biological clock and lipid metabolism from germination to seedling establishment. Our data showed only minor changes from days 1 to 7 between the cca1lhy mutant and wild-type WS in germination rate for after-ripening seeds (Figure S3B). An oil body retention phenotype was evident in seedlings germinated from either freshly-harvested seeds or after-ripening seeds of the cca1lhy mutant (Figure 7), suggesting that seed germination and storage reserve mobilization are regulated independently as previously shown [87]. In after-ripening seeds, the germination frequencies between the cca1lhy mutant and the wild type further diversified (Figure S3B), in contrast to the hypersensitive dominant phenotype that freshly-harvested seeds of the cca1lhy mutant showed a higher frequency of germination than the wild type and exhibited germination hypersensitivity on cold treatments of 1, 2, and 3 days [86]. Our results indicate that dormant seed and non-dormant seed germination, though differentially regulated, are subject to diurnal control and establish a link between clock regulation and lipid metabolism in Arabidopsis seedlings.
Lipid profiling indicates lipid metabolism is altered in cca1lhy and CCA1-OX seedlings
In plants, storage reserve mobilization that occurs during seed germination and early seedling establishment is known to be a dynamic process [10], [11]. A process which we demonstrate is intimately linked to internal plant biological clock. Herein, we showed an oil body accumulation phenotype in the cca1lhy mutant, indicating that lipid metabolism in Arabidopsis seedlings is affected by clock components (CCA1 and LHY). Direct evidence for the influence of the clock in metabolism can be obtained from measurements of metabolites in clock mutants [83]. The Arabidopsis arrhythmic mutant prr5prr7prr9 had elevated levels of citric acid cycle intermediates and other metabolites, including amino acids [88]. With regard to lipids, the amounts of linoleic and linolenic acids showed temperature-related fluctuations in cotton seedlings [89]. It has also been shown that only 18∶1 FA, but not other fatty acids, oscillates under diurnal cycles in Arabidopsis, with higher levels accumulated in the light rather than the dark [90]. Besides FA, phosphatidylcholine was recently reported to oscillate diurnally and affects florigen-mediated flowering [91].
Previous reports have revealed that the accumulation of 20∶1-CoA is characteristic of the storage reserve mobilization related mutants, cts/pxa1, lacs6lacs7, acx1acx2, mfp2 and kat2 [3], [16], [18], [20]–[22]. In this study, although a slight down-regulation of various β-oxidation key enzymes including ACX1, MFP2, and KAT2, was observed in 5-day-old cca1lhy (Figure 3), 20∶1-CoA did not accumulate (Figure S4), suggesting that TAG hydrolysis may be more affected by diurnal regulation than β-oxidation. However, some acyl-CoAs (16∶0, 16∶3, 24∶0, and 26∶0) accumulated significantly in 5-day-old cca1lhy in comparison to WS (Figure S4), while an 18∶1-CoA increase was reported in the 5-day-old acx1acx2, mfp2 and kat2 mutants [3], [20], [22] and 18∶2-CoA accumulation in the 5-day-old acx1acx2 mutant [3], [20]. Elevation in different kinds of acyl-CoA species might indicate variation in transport mechanisms during storage reserve mobilization. Other than β-oxidation, it has been reported that the N-end rule pathway can regulate seed oil mobilization as was proven using mutants in PROTEOLYSIS6 and ARGINYL-TRNA:PROTEIN ARGINYLTRANSFERASE [70]. The data represented herein was expressed as % fresh weight and minor changes in lipid content may be attributed to differences in the water content between cca1lhy and WS. For example, lower amounts of 30∶0-CoA in the cca1lhy mutant may suggest lower epidermal waxes and higher water loss in the mutant.
Variation in TAG content between CCA1-OX and Col-0 exists in dry seeds (Figure 8A) and was observed in 2- to 4-day-old seedlings (Figure 8C–E), but no significant differences were detected in 1- and 5-day-old seedlings (Figure 8B, F). It appears that differences in 18∶2 and 18∶3 FAs between dry seeds of CCA1-OX and Col-0 (Figure 10A) attributed to the TAG content increases in 2- to 4-day-old seedlings (Figure 8C–E) with 18∶2 being the major FA present (Figure 10). Meanwhile, a general elevation in the expression of β-oxidation key enzymes (ACX1, ACX2, and KAT2) in 5-day-old CCA1-OX (Figure 4), suggests that most acyl-CoA utilization correspondingly increased, concomitant with a decrease in many acyl-CoA species in CCA1-OX. Only 24∶0 and 30∶0-CoAs accumulated in CCA1-OX, perhaps indicative that other proteins are involved in lipid transport during storage reserve mobilization (Figure S4). Given the predominance of 24∶0 and 30∶0 acyl chains in the formation of sphingolipids and waxes as observed for 24∶0 and 30∶0 derivatives in the wax-deficient eceriferum mutants [92]–[96], the major changes noted in 24∶0 and 30∶0-CoAs in CCA1-OX may have contributed to the high levels of C24-OH in the formation of sphingolipids and waxes. Interestingly, it has been reported that KCS16 and SLD2 are transcriptionally regulated by the biological clock [53], and the extent of diurnal regulation in wax and sphingolipid biosynthesis remains to be further determined.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Expression of TOC1 and GI in 2- and 5-day-old seedlings germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles. (A) Comparison in expression between TOC1 and GI in the cca1lhy mutant (closed rhombus) and wild-type WS (open circle) as investigated by qRT-PCR. (B) Comparison in expression between TOC1 and GI in CCA1-OX (closed rhombus) and wild-type Col-0 (open circle) as investigated by qRT-PCR. Relative gene expression level on the Y axis was normalized against IPP2. Each time point represents a mean value of six repeats from two independent biological samples ± SE. White boxes, subjective day; black boxes, subjective night.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107372.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
The expression pattern of ACBPs and lipid metabolism genes in 9-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings. The expression pattern was sieved out from the normalized CCEE dataset from the Additional Data File 1 of Covington et al. (2008). White boxes, subjective day; black boxes, subjective night.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107372.s002
(TIF)
Figure S3.
Germination frequencies of WS and the cca1lhy mutant under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles on half-strength MS medium supplemented with 20 mM sucrose. (A) Freshly-harvested seeds of the cca1lhy mutant (closed rhombus) and wild-type WS (open circle). (B) After-ripening seeds of the cca1lhy mutant (closed rhombus) and wild-type WS (open circle) were harvested 3–6 months prior to the assay. Values are mean ± SD of measurements made on four separate batches of 50–100 seeds. Student's t test for ☆, P<0.01; ★, P<0.001.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107372.s003
(TIF)
Figure S4.
Acyl-CoA profiling of the cca1lhy mutant and CCA1-OX in comparison to wild-type Arabidopsis. Acyl-CoA content of 5-day-old seedlings from the cca1lhy mutant, CCA1-OX, WS and Col-0 germinated under 12-h-light/12-h-dark cycles. White bar, wild-type WS; light gray bar, the cca1lhy mutant; dark gray bar, wild-type Col-0; black bar, CCA1-OX. n = 24; average ± SE. Student's t test for **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107372.s004
(TIF)
Figure S5.
Diurnal regulation of the major lipid metabolic pathways in germinating Arabidopsis seedlings. Target genes in acyl-lipid transfer (ACBP1, ACBP2, ACBP3, ACBP4, ACBP5 and ACBP6), lipolysis (SDP1), β-oxidation (CTS, LACS6, LACS7, ACX1, ACX2, MFP2 and KAT2) and TAG synthesis (DGAT1, DGAT2, DGAT3 and PDAT1) at Day 2 (A) and Day 5 (B) are represented in italics. Genes which displayed a 2-fold or greater value at peak expression over its lowest expression level in wild-type WS or Col-0, in both biological repeats, were deemed to be diurnally regulated. Genes which showed diurnal regulation in wild-type WS in qRT-PCR are coloured in orange; those diurnally-regulated in wild-type Col-0 are in blue; and those diurnally-regulated in both WS and Col-0 are in green.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107372.s005
(TIF)
Table S1.
Gene-specific primers for qRT-PCR used in this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107372.s006
(DOC)
Table S2.
The expressed and circadian pattern of lipid metabolism genes in 9-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings mined from circadian microarray data sets. Expressed and circadian pattern of lipid metabolism genes sieved out from Additional Data File 2 in Covington et al. (2008). Exp represents expressed; Cir represents circadian.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107372.s007
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor E. M. Tobin for providing the CCA1-OX seeds and the ABRC for providing the cca1lhy mutant.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: ASH RPH MLC. Performed the experiments: ASH RPH LVM PL. Analyzed the data: ASH RPH LVM MLC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JAN MLC. Wrote the paper: ASH RPH MLC. Coordinated the project: JAN MLC.
References
- 1. Murphy DJ (1994) Biogenesis, function and biotechnology of plant storage lipids. Prog Lipid Res 33: 71–85.
- 2. Chapman KD, Dyer JM, Mullen RT (2012) Biogenesis and functions of lipid droplets in plants. Thematic review series. Lipid droplet synthesis and metabolism: from yeast to man. J Lipid Res 53: 215–226.
- 3. Hernández ML, Whitehead L, He Z, Gazda V, Gilday A, et al. (2012) A cytosolic acyltransferase contributes to triacylglycerol synthesis in sucrose-rescued Arabidopsis seed oil catabolism mutants. Plant Physiol 160: 215–225.
- 4.
Stymne S, Stobart AK (1987) Triacylglycerol biosynthesis. In: Stumpf PK, edtor. The Biochemistry of Plants: A Comprehensive Treatise. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. pp. 175–214.
- 5. Ohlrogge J, Browse J (1995) Lipid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7: 957–970.
- 6. Chapman KD, Ohlrogge JB (2012) Compartmentation of triacylglycerol accumulation in plants. J Biol Chem 287: 2288–2294.
- 7. Bates PD, Stymne S, Ohlrogge J (2013) Biochemical pathways in seed oil synthesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16: 358–364.
- 8. Ichihara K, Takahashi T, Fujii S (1988) Diacylglycerol acyltransferase in maturing safflower seeds: its influences on the fatty acid composition of triacylglycerol and on the rate of triacylglycerol synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 958: 125–129.
- 9. Dahlqvist A, Stahl U, Lenman M, Banas A, Lee M, et al. (2000) Phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase: an enzyme that catalyzes the acyl-CoA-independent formation of triacylglycerol in yeast and plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 6487–6492.
- 10. Graham IA (2008) Seed storage oil mobilization. Annu Rev Plant Bio 59: 115–142.
- 11. Theodoulou FL, Eastmond PJ (2012) Seed storage oil catabolism: a story of give and take. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15: 322–328.
- 12. Huang AHC (1992) Oil bodies and oleosins in seeds. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 43: 177–200.
- 13. Eastmond PJ (2006) SUGAR-DEPENDENT1 encodes a patatin domain triacylglycerol lipase that initiates storage oil breakdown in germinating Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell 18: 665–675.
- 14. Kelly AA, Quettier AL, Shaw E, Eastmond PJ (2011) Seed storage oil mobilization is important but not essential for germination or seedling establishment in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 157: 866–875.
- 15. Zolman BK, Silva ID, Bartel B (2001) The Arabidopsis pxa1 mutant is defective in an ATP-binding cassette transporter-like protein required for peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation. Plant Physiol 127: 1266–1278.
- 16. Footitt S, Slocombe SP, Larner V, Kurup S, Wu Y, et al. (2002) Control of germination and lipid mobilization by COMATOSE, the Arabidopsis homologue of human ALDP. EMBO J 21: 2912–2922.
- 17. Hayashi M, Nito K, Takei-Hoshi R, Yagi M, Kondo M, et al. (2002) Ped3p is a peroxisomal ATP-binding cassette transporter that might supply substrates for fatty acid β-oxidation. Plant Cell Physiol 43: 1–11.
- 18. Fulda M, Schnurr J, Abbadi A, Heinz E, Browse J (2004) Peroxisomal Acyl-CoA synthetase activity is essential for seedling development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 16: 394–405.
- 19. Graham IA, Eastmond PJ (2002) Pathways of straight and branched chain fatty acid catabolism in higher plants. Prog Lipid Res 41: 156–181.
- 20. Pinfield-Wells H, Rylott EL, Gilday AD, Graham S, Job K, et al. (2005) Sucrose rescues seedling establishment but not germination of Arabidopsis mutants disrupted in peroxisomal fatty acid catabolism. Plant J 43: 861–872.
- 21. Rylott EL, Eastmond PJ, Gilday AD, Slocombe SP, Larson TR, et al. (2006) The Arabidopsis thaliana multifunctional protein gene (MFP2) of peroxisomal β-oxidation is essential for seedling establishment. Plant J 45: 930–941.
- 22. Germain V, Rylott EL, Larson TR, Sherson SM, Bechtold N, et al. (2001) Requirement for 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase-2 in peroxisome development, fatty acid β-oxidation and breakdown of triacylglycerol in lipid bodies of Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J 28: 1–12.
- 23. Li-Beisson YH, Shorrosh B, Beisson F, Andersson MX, Arondel V, et al. (2010) Acyl-lipid metabolism. The Arabidopsis Book 8: e0133
- 24. Leung KC, Li HY, Mishra G, Chye ML (2004) ACBP4 and ACBP5, novel Arabidopsis acyl-CoA-binding proteins with kelch motifs that bind oleoyl-CoA. Plant Mol Biol 55: 297–309.
- 25. Leung KC, Li HY, Xiao S, Tse MH, Chye ML (2006) Arabidopsis ACBP3 is an extracellularly targeted acyl-CoA-binding protein. Planta 223: 871–881.
- 26. Chen QF, Xiao S, Chye ML (2008) Overexpression of the Arabidopsis 10-kilodalton acyl-coenzyme A-binding protein ACBP6 enhances freezing tolerance. Plant Physiol 148: 304–315.
- 27. Chen QF, Xiao S, Qi W, Mishra G, Ma J, et al. (2010) The Arabidopsis acbp1acbp2 double mutant lacking the acyl-CoA-binding proteins ACBP1 and ACBP2 is embryo lethal. New Phytol 186: 843–855.
- 28. Gao W, Xiao S, Li HY, Tsao SW, Chye ML (2009) Arabidopsis thaliana acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP2 interacts with a heavy-metal-binding protein ATFP6. New Phytol 181: 89–102.
- 29. Gao W, Li HY, Xiao S, Chye ML (2010) Acyl-CoA-binding protein 2 binds lysophospholipase 2 and lysoPC to promote tolerance to cadmium-induced oxidative stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant J 62: 989–1003.
- 30. Xiao S, Chen QF, Chye ML (2009) Light-regulated Arabidopsis ACBP4 and ACBP5 encode cytosolic acyl-CoA-binding proteins that bind phosphatidylcholine and oleoyl-CoA ester. Plant Physiol Biochem 47: 926–933.
- 31. Xiao S, Gao W, Chen QF, Chan SW, Zheng SX, et al. (2010) Overexpression of Arabidopsis acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP3 promotes starvation-induced and age-dependent leaf senescence. Plant Cell 22: 1463–1482.
- 32. Du ZY, Xiao S, Chen QF, Chye ML (2010) Depletion of the membrane-associated acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP1 enhances the ability of cold acclimation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 152: 1585–1597.
- 33. Xiao S, Gao W, Chen QF, Ramalingam S, Chye ML (2008) Overexpression of membrane-associated acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP1 enhances lead tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J 54: 141–151.
- 34. Xiao S, Chye ML (2011) Overexpression of Arabidopsis ACBP3 enhances NPR1-dependent plant resistance to Pseudomonas syringe pv tomato DC3000. Plant Physiol 156: 2069–2081.
- 35. Du ZY, Chen MX, Chen QF, Xiao S, Chye ML (2013) Overexpression of Arabidopsis acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP2 enhances drought tolerance. Plant Cell Environ 36: 300–314.
- 36. Liao P, Chen QF, Chye ML (2014) Transgenic Arabidopsis flowers overexpressing acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP6 are freezing tolerant. Plant Cell Physiol 55: 1055–1071.
- 37. Du ZY, Chen MX, Chen QF, Xiao S, Chye ML (2013) Arabidopsis acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP1 participates in the regulation of seed germination and seedling development. Plant J 74: 294–309.
- 38. Zheng SX, Xiao S, Chye ML (2012) The gene encoding Arabidopsis acyl-CoA-binding protein 3 is pathogen inducible and subject to circadian regulation. J Exp Bot 63: 2985–3000.
- 39. Xiao S, Chen QF, Chye ML (2009) Expression of ACBP4 and ACBP5 proteins is modulated by light in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav 4: 1063–1065.
- 40. Gardner MJ, Hubbard KE, Hotta CT, Dodd AN, Webb AA (2006) How plant tell the time. Biochem J 397: 15–24.
- 41. McClung CR (2006) Plant circadian rhythms. Plant Cell 18: 792–803.
- 42. Alabadí D, Oyama T, Yanovsky MJ, Harmon FG, Más P, et al. (2001) Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 293: 880–883.
- 43. Perales M, Más P (2007) A functional link between rhythmic changes in chromatin structure and the Arabidopsis biological clock. Plant Cell 19: 2111–2123.
- 44. Pruneda-Paz JL, Breton G, Para A, Kay SA (2009) A functional genomics approach reveals CHE as a component of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 323: 1481–1485.
- 45. Lu SX, Knowles SM, Andronis C, Ong MS, Tobin EM (2009) CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL function synergistically in the circadian clock of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 150: 834–843.
- 46. Fujiwara S, Oda A, Yoshida R, Niinuma K, Miyata K, et al. (2008) Circadian clock proteins LHY and CCA1 regulate SVP protein accumulation to control flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20: 2960–2971.
- 47. Graf A, Schlereth A, Stitt M, Smith AM (2010) Circadian control of carbohydrate availability for growth in Arabidopsis plants at night. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 9458–9463.
- 48. Farinas B, Mas P (2011) Functional implication of the MYB transcription factor RVE8/LCL5 in the circadian control of histone acetylation. Plant J 66: 318–329.
- 49. Li G, Siddiqui H, Teng Y, Lin R, Wan XY, et al. (2011) Coordinated transcriptional regulation underlying the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Nat Cell Biol 13: 616–622.
- 50. Dodd AN, Salathia N, Hall A, Kévei E, Tóth R, et al. (2005) Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309: 630–633.
- 51. Green RM, Tingay S, Wang ZY, Tobin EM (2008) Circadian rhythms confer a higher level of fitness to Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol 129: 576–584.
- 52. Wang W, Barnaby JY, Tada Y, Li H, Tör M, et al. (2011) Timing of plant immune responses by a central circadian regulator. Nature 470: 110–114.
- 53. Harmer SL, Hogenesch JB, Straume M, Chang HS, Han B, et al. (2000) Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Science 290: 2110–2113.
- 54. Schaffer R, Landgraf J, Accerbi M, Simon V, Larson M, et al. (2001) Microarray analysis of diurnal and circadian-regulated genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13: 113–123.
- 55. Michael TP, Mockler TC, Breton G, McEntee C, Byer A, et al. (2008) Network discovery pipeline elucidates conserved time-of-day-specific cis-regulatory modules. PLoS Genet 4: e14.
- 56. Khan S, Rowe SC, Harmon FG (2010) Coordination of the maize transcriptome by a conserved circadian clock. BMC Plant Biol 10: 126.
- 57. Ni Z, Kim ED, Ha M, Lackey E, Liu J, et al. (2009) Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature 457: 327–331.
- 58. Gutiérrez RA, Stokes TL, Thum K, Xu X, Obertello M, et al. (2008) Systems approach identifies an organic nitrogen-responsive gene network that is regulated by the master clock control gene CCA1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 4939–4944.
- 59. Ruts T, Matsubara S, Wiese-Klinkenberg A, Walter A (2012) Aberrant temporal growth pattern and morphology of root and shoot caused by a defective circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana.. Plant J 72: 154–161.
- 60. Covington MF, Maloof JN, Straume M, Kay SA, Harmer SL (2008) Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol 9: R130.
- 61. Hall A, Bastow RM, Davis SJ, Hanano S, McWatters HG, et al. (2003) The TIME FOR COFFEE gene maintains the amplitude and timing of Arabidopsis circadian clocks. Plant Cell 15: 2719–2729.
- 62. Wang ZY, Tobin EM (1998) Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression. Cell 93: 1207–1217.
- 63. Rylott EL, Hooks MA, Graham IA (2001) Co-ordinate regulation of genes involved in storage lipid mobilization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem Soc Trans 29: 283–287.
- 64. Baudry A, Ito S, Song YH, Strait AA, Kiba T, et al. (2010) F-box proteins FKF1 and LKP2 act in concert with ZEITLUPE to control Arabidopsis clock progression. Plant Cell 22: 606–622.
- 65. Soy J, Leivar P, González-Schain N, Sentandreu M, Prat S, et al. (2012) Phytochrome-imposed oscillations in PIF3 protein abundance regulate hypocotyl growth under diurnal light/dark conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant J 71: 390–401.
- 66. Hazen SP, Schultz TF, Pruneda-Paz JL, Borevitz JO, Ecker JR, et al. (2005) LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a Myb domain protein essential for circadian rhythms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 10387–10392.
- 67. Greenspan P, Mayer EP, Fowler SD (1985) Nile red: a selective fluorescent stain for intracellular lipid droplets. J Cell Biol 100: 965–973.
- 68. Siloto RM, Findlay K, Lopez-Villalobos A, Yeung EC, Nykiforuk CL, et al. (2006) The accumulation of oleosins determines the size of seed oilbodies in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18: 1961–1974.
- 69. Linka N, Theodoulou FL, Haslam RP, Linka M, Napier JA, et al. (2008) Peroxisomal ATP import is essential for seedling development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 20: 3241–3257.
- 70. Holman TJ, Jones PD, Russell L, Medhurst A, Úbeda Tomás S, et al. (2009) The N-end rule pathway promotes seed germination and establishment through removal of ABA sensitivity in Arabidopsis.. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 4549–4554.
- 71. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37: 911–917.
- 72. Li M, Baughman E, Roth MR, Han X, Welti R, et al. (2014) Quantitative profiling and pattern analysis of triacylglycerol species in Arabidopsis seeds by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Plant J 77: 160–172.
- 73. Bernard A, Domergue F, Pascal S, Jetter R, Renne C, et al. (2012) Reconstitution of plant alkane biosynthesis in yeast demonstrates that Arabidopsis ECERIFERUM1 and ECERIFERUM3 are core components of a very-long-chain alkane synthesis complex. Plant Cell 24: 3106–3118.
- 74. Domergue F, Vishwanath SJ, Joubès J, Ono J, Lee JA, et al. (2010) Three Arabidopsis fatty acyl-coenzyme A reductases, FAR1, FAR4, and FAR5, generate primary fatty alcohols associated with suberin deposition. Plant Physiol 153: 1539–1554.
- 75. Larson TR, Graham IA (2001) Technical advance: a novel technique for the sensitive quantification of acyl CoA esters from plant tissues. Plant J 25: 115–125.
- 76. Haynes CA, Allegood JC, Sims K, Wang EW, Sullards MC, et al. (2008) Quantitation of fatty acyl-coenzyme As in mammalian cells by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Lipid Res 49: 1113–1125.
- 77. Smith MA, Dauk M, Ramadan H, Yang H, Seamons LE, et al. (2013) Involvement of Arabidopsis ACYL-COENZYME A DESATURASE-LIKE2 (At2g31360) in the biosynthesis of the very-long-chain monounsaturated fatty acid components of membrane lipids. Plant Physiol 161: 81–96.
- 78. Covington MF, Harmer SL (2007) The circadian clock regulates auxin signaling and responses in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol 5: e222.
- 79. Edwards KD, Anderson PE, Hall A, Salathia NS, Locke JC, et al. (2006) FLOWERING LOCUS C mediates natural variation in the high-temperature response of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 18: 639–650.
- 80. Smith SM, Fulton DC, Chia T, Thorneycroft D, Chapple A, et al. (2004) Diurnal changes in the transcriptome encoding enzymes of starch metabolism provide evidence for both transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of starch metabolism in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol 136: 2687–2699.
- 81. Bläsing OE, Gibon Y, Günther M, Höhne M, Morcuende R, et al. (2005) Sugars and circadian regulation make major contributions to the global regulation of diurnal gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17: 3257–3281.
- 82. Lu Y, Gehan JP, Sharkey TD (2005) Daylength and circadian effects on starch degradation and maltose metabolism. Plant Physiol 138: 2280–2291.
- 83. Farré EM, Weise SE (2012) The interactions between the circadian clock and primary metabolism. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15: 293–300.
- 84. Dixon LE, Knox K, Kozma-Bognar L, Southern MM, Pokhilko A, et al. (2011) Temporal repression of core circadian genes is mediated through EARLY FLOWERING 3 in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 21: 120–125.
- 85. Gibon Y, Bläsing OE, Palacios-Rojas N, Pankovic D, Hendriks JH, et al. (2004) Adjustment of diurnal starch turnover to short days: depletion of sugar during the night leads to a temporary inhibition of carbohydrate utilization, accumulation of sugars and post-translational activation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in the following light period. Plant J 39: 847–862.
- 86. Penfield S, Hall A (2009) A role for multiple circadian clock genes in the response to signals that break seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21: 1722–1732.
- 87. Pritchard SL, Charlton WL, Baker A, Graham IA (2002) Germination and storage reserve mobilization are regulated independently in Arabidopsis. Plant J 31: 639–647.
- 88. Fukushima A, Kusano M, Nakamichi N, Kobayashi M, Hayashi N, et al. (2009) Impact of clock-associated Arabidopsis pseudo-response regulators in metabolic coordination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 7251–7256.
- 89. Rikin A, Dillwith JW, Bergman DK (1993) Correlation between the circadian rhythm of resistance to extreme temperatures and changes in fatty acid composition in cotton seedlings. Plant Physiol 101: 31–36.
- 90. Martiniere A, Shvedunova M, Thomson AJ, Evans NH, Penfield S, et al. (2011) Homeostasis of plasma membrane viscosity in fluctuating temperatures. New Phytol 192: 328–337.
- 91. Nakamura Y, Andrés F, Kanehara K, Liu YC, Dörmann P, et al. (2014) Arabidopsis florigen FT binds to diurnally oscillating phospholipids that accelerate flowering. Nat Commun 5: 3553.
- 92. Rashotte AM, Jenks MA, Feldmann KA (2001) Cuticular waxes on eceriferum mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 57: 115–123.
- 93. Jenks MA, Tuttle HA, Eigenbrode SD, Feldmann KA (1995) Leaf epicuticular waxes of the eceriferum mutants in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 108: 369–377.
- 94. Chen X, Goodwin SM, Boroff VL, Liu X, Jenks MA (2003) Cloning and characterization of the WAX2 gene of Arabidopsis involved in cuticle membrane and wax production. Plant Cell 15: 1170–1185.
- 95. Rowland O, Zheng H, Hepworth SR, Lam P, Jetter R, et al. (2006) CER4 encodes an alcohol-forming fatty acyl-coenzyme A reductase involved in cuticular wax production in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 142: 866–877.
- 96. Fiebig A, Mayfield JA, Miley NL, Chau S, Fischer RL, et al. (2000) Alterations in CER6, a gene identical to CUT1, differentially affect long-chain lipid content on the surface of pollen and stems. Plant Cell 12: 2001–2008.