The Host-Protective Effect of Arabinosylated Lipoarabinomannan against Leishmania donovani Infection Is Associated with Restoration of IFN-γ Responsiveness

Bidisha Paul Chowdhury; Syamdas Bandyopadhyay; Shibali Das; Saikat Majumder; Mukesh Kumar Jha; Suchandra Bhattacharyya Majumdar; Bhaskar Saha; Subrata Majumdar

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117247

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), which is endemic as a major infectious disease in the tropical and subtropical countries, is caused by a protozoan parasite Leishmania donovani. At present, restricted treatment options and lack of vaccines intensify the problem of controlling VL. Therefore, finding a novel immunoprophylactic or therapeutic principle is a pressing need. Here, we report that arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan (Ara-LAM), a TLR2-ligand isolated from Mycobacterium smegmatis, exhibits a strong immunomodulatory property that conferred protection against L. donovani infection. Although, Ara-LAM modulates TLR2 and MAPK signaling, it is not known whether Ara-LAM involves IFN-γ signaling for effective parasite clearance. Because, it is reported that IFN-γ signaling, a principle mediator of NO generation and macrophage and Tcell activation, is hampered during leishmanial pathogenesis. Ara-LAM increases IFN-γ receptor expression and potentiates IFN-γ receptor signaling through JAK-STAT pathway. Moreover, Ara-LAM reciprocally modulates IRF4 and IRF8 expression and reinstates anti-leishmanial Th1 response that eventuates in significantly reduced parasite load in spleen and liver of L. donovani-infected BALB/c mice. IFN-γRα silencing resulted in the suppression of these host-protective mechanisms affected by Ara-LAM. Thus, Ara-LAM-mediated restoration of IFN-γ responsiveness is a novel immuno-modulatory principle for protection against L. donovani susceptible host.

Citation: Chowdhury BP, Bandyopadhyay S, Das S, Majumder S, Jha MK, Majumdar SB, et al. (2015) The Host-Protective Effect of Arabinosylated Lipoarabinomannan against Leishmania donovani Infection Is Associated with Restoration of IFN-γ Responsiveness. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0117247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247

Academic Editor: Ira J. Blader, University at Buffalo, UNITED STATES

Received: September 11, 2014; Accepted: December 22, 2014; Published: February 6, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Chowdhury et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was financially supported by Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India [Grant number BT/PR14435/MED/29/201/2010]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by a protozoan parasite Leishmania donovani, is one of the most widespread infectious diseases affecting many countries [1]. It is re-emerging as a major disease due to lack of effective chemotherapy and vaccine [2] and due to co-infection with HIV [3]. The HIV-Leishmania co-infection is virtually untreatable [4]. In addition, emergence of drug-resistant parasites [5] compels development of an immunotherapeutic principle. As Leishmania expressed lipophosphoglycan (LPG) interacts with the macrophage expressed TLR2 [6, 7], which subsequently regulates the expression and function of the leishmanial DNA recognizing TLR9 [8, 9], TLR2 is targeted for developing an anti-leishmanial immunotherapy.

We characterized a novel TLR2 ligand, arabinosylated-lipoarabinomannan (Ara-LAM)—a Mycobacterium smegmatis cell-wall glycolipid [10], for effective anti-tubercular immuno-prophylaxis [11]. Ara-LAM induces TLR2 expression and MyD88-dependent TLR2 signaling in L. donovani-infected macrophages [12]. Ara-LAM reciprocally regulates mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in a TLR2-dependent manner [13]. Among the pro-inflammatory cytokines, IFN-γ activates macrophages through JAK1/JAK2-STAT1 mediated signaling and induces nitric oxide synthase-dependent killing of amastigotes, the intracellular form of the parasite [14–16]. IFN-γ regulates several signaling molecules including Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs) [17]. IRFs comprise a very important group of transcription factors that modulate host defence through different interferon signaling [17–19]. Among all IRFs, IRF4 and IRF8 have been reported to play counteracting roles in the immune system, despite structural semblances and direct involvement in IFN-γ signaling. For example, IRF8 alone or in co-ordination with IRF1 regulates different IFN-γ-induced genes, such as IL-12, iNOS, MHC-II, TNF-α and NADPH phagocyte oxidase [20–23], which are implicated in anti-leishmanial defence [24]. In contrast, IRF4 was reportedly associated with Th2 response in L. major infection [25, 26]. During active infection, L. donovani-infected macrophages do not respond to IFN-γ suggesting that IFN-γ responsiveness is impaired [27]. As Ara-LAM induces proinflammatory response in infected macrophages and IRF8 acts as a link between TLR and IFN-γ signaling [28], it is quite possible that TLR2 ligand Ara-LAM modulates the IFN-γ induced signaling which in turn facilitates the anti-leishmanial effect of Ara-LAM. Thus, we investigated whether Ara-LAM, a TLR2 ligand, would restore IFN-γ responsiveness in L. donovani-infected macrophages and eliminate the parasite more efficiently.

Herein, we demonstrate that Ara-LAM pre-treatment transcriptionally activated the IFN-γ receptor α-chain (IFN-γRα) expression in L. donovani-infected macrophages resulting in increased expression of IFN-γRα on the cell surface and higher phosphorylation of JAK1, JAK2 and STAT1. This effect of Ara-LAM was found to be more pronounced than a known TLR2 ligand Peptidoglycan (PGN). The restored IFN-γ signaling, in turn, influenced IL-12 and IL-10 productions by reciprocally regulating the expressions of IRF8 and IRF4, followed by improved MHC-II expression on parasitized macrophages and robust T-cell proliferation. These effects of Ara-LAM conferred significant protection against L. donovani infection in susceptible BALB/c mice.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

In this study, female and male BALB/c mice (18–20 gm) were used. The Animals were acclimatized for 15 days in polypropylene cages in the Animal House facility, with standard food and water ad libitum. The animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the OECD guidelines, accepted by the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision on Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai, India, and as per the approval of the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (Bose Institute, Kolkata, Registration Number: 95/99/CPCSEA). When required, the surgical procedures performed under Ketamine hydrochloride (100 mg/kg i.m.) anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize the suffering of the animals.

Animals, macrophages and parasites

6–8 weeks old BALB/c mice (both sex) were purchased from the National Centre for Laboratory Animal Sciences, India. L. donovani (strain MHOM/IN/1983/AG83) were maintained in Medium 199 (Sigma) with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) and passage through BALB/c mice to maintain the virulence. Stationary-phase promastigotes obtained by suitable transformation were used for infecting BALB/c mice and macrophages. Peritoneal macrophages from thioglycolated BALB/c mice were cultured for 48 h, as described elsewhere [29]. Adherent macrophages were infected with Leishmania promastigotes (stationary phase) at a ratio of 1:10. Experiments were performed according to the animal use protocols approved by the institutional animal ethics committee.

Isolation and purification of Ara-LAM

Ara-LAM was isolated as described elsewhere [29]. The noncytotoxic dose of Ara-LAM was 3μg/ml [10].

Preparation of TLR2-shRNA and IFN-γRα-shRNA

For in vivo gene silencing, TLR2-specific and IFN-γRα specific short hairpin oligos (shRNA~50 bases) were synthesized with a nine base loop sequences in the middle and a terminator sequence (five to six Ts) at the 3’-end and inserted in the multiple cloning site of pSilencer 1.0 U6 (mouse) plasmid vector having mouse U6 promoter (Ambion Inc., Grand Island, NY). Scrambled shRNA was used as Control shRNA.

Preparation of cell lysate and immunoblot analysis

Cell lysates were prepared as described elsewhere [30]. Equal amounts of protein (50 μg) were subjected to 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate poly acrylamide gel electrophoresis, and immunoblotting was performed as described elsewhere [30].

Flow cytometry

Macrophages were stained with phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled anti-IFN-γRα antibody and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–labeled anti-MHC-II antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotech). For intracellular cytokine staining, purified CD4⁺ T cells from soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA) stimulated and Brefeldin A (10 mg/ml) treated splenocytes and hepatocytes were permeabilized (0.1% saponin) and stained with anti-mouse IFN-γ-FITC and anti-mouse IL-10-PE antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA). Cells were analyzed using a FACS Verse flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Diego, CA).

Isolation of RNA and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA extracted from macrophages (TRI reagent; Sigma) was reverse transcribed using Revert Aid M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (Fermentas) and semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using Perkin Elmer Gen Amp PCR system 2400. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) or β-actin were used as reference. Sequences of the PCR primers are listed in Table 1. The reaction conditions consisted of an initial activation step (5 min at 95°C) and cycling step (denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing for 30 s at 58°C, and extension for 1 min at 72°C for 35 cycles). PCR amplified product was subsequently size fractioned on 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV-light.

Download:

Table 1. Sequences of the PCR primers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247.t001

Preparation of cytosolic and nuclear extracts

Cells were collected after incubation for indicated periods. The cytosolic and nuclear fractions were seperated as described elsewhere [12].

Chromatin Immuno-precipitation (ChIP) assay

CHIP assays were conducted using the CHIP Assay kit following the manufacturers Protocol (Millipore, Billerica, MA) as described elsewhere [13]. With the extracted DNA, PCR was conducted using promoter specific primers: IFN-γRα promoter (NF-κB binding site), IL-10 promoter (IRF4 binding site) and IL-12p40 promoter (IRF8 binding site) (Table 1). PCR amplified product was resolved on 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV-light.

In vitro parasite burden count

For studying the activity of Ara-LAM against the uptake and intracellular multiplication of L. donovani parasite, peritoneal macrophages cultured on glass cover slips were treated and infected as per protocol; macrophages were then fixed and stained with Giemsa as described elsewhere [13] for calculation of the number of intracellular amastigotes.

In vivo experiments

BALB/c mice were divided in seven groups according to treatment regime: (1) control mice (administered phosphate-buffered saline); (2) L. donovani–infected mice; (3) Ara-LAM–treated mice (injected with 30 μg of Ara-LAM intraperitonially); (4)Ara-LAM–treated infected mice (injected with 1x10⁷ parasites/mice, through tail vein after 2 days of Ara-LAM treatment); (5) TLR2-shRNA administered Ara-LAM–treated infected mice; (6) IFN-γRα-shRNA administered Ara-LAM–treated infected mice; and (7) Control shRNA administered Ara-LAM–treated infected mice. TLR2-shRNA, IFN-γRα-shRNA or control shRNA (100μg/mice) were administered through tail vein. After 2 days, mice were subjected to Ara-LAM (30μg/mice, i.p.) treatment for another 2 days followed by L. donovani infection (1x10⁷ parasites/mice, i.v). Mice were sacrificed 28 days after infection; the splenic and hepatic parasite loads (expressed in Leishman-Donovan units) were enumerated under a microscope [12]. Isolated splenocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium plus 10% (FCS) for cytokine profiling, gene expression study and T-cell proliferation assay.

Cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Culture supernatants were analyzed using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (BD Biosciences), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

Nitrite generation

Nitrite level in culture was measured using the Nitric Oxide Colorimetric Assay kit (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals), as described elsewhere [12].

Proliferation assay

The T cell proliferation assay was performed as described elsewhere [12]. ³H-Thymidine uptake, as an index of proliferation, was measured using a liquid scintillation counter (Tri-Carb 2800TR; Perkin Elmer).

CD4⁺ T cell purification

Splenic and hepatic CD4⁺ T-cells (purity ~95% as ascertained by FACS) from the indicated mice were isolated by positive selection using CD4⁺ IMag beads, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences).

Statistical analysis

In vitro assays were done in triplicate and a minimum of 4 mice were used per group for in vivo experiments. Data, including densitometry analysis, shown as means ± SD, are from 1 experiment performed at least 3 times. Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA was used to assess the significance of differences between the mean values for control and experimental groups. A difference with P <0.05 was considered significant, and a difference with P < 0.001 was considered highly significant.

Results

1. Ara-LAM enhanced IFN-γ Rα expression in L. donovani-infected macrophages

In chronic leishmanial infections, host macrophages lose IFN-γ responsiveness due to impaired IFN-γ receptor expression and signalling [31–34]. We examined whether Ara-LAM pre-treatment would enhance IFN-γRα expression in BALB/c-derived thioglycolate-elicited L. donovani-infected macrophages. We observed that the IFN-γRα expression started decreasing 3 hours after the infection (Fig. 1A) and Ara-LAM prevented the reduction in IFN-γRα expression in L. donovani-infected macrophages (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C; p< 0.05) possibly by enhancing NF-κB binding to IFN-γRα promoter (Fig. 1D). The Ara-LAM enhanced IFN-γRα expression was further potentiated by rIFN-γ stimulation (Fig. 1B, 1C, 1D), suggesting that Ara-LAM primes the macrophages to respond to IFN-γ and enhance IFN-γ responsiveness of the infected macrophages. These findings suggest that the Ara-LAM enhanced IFN-γRα expression may restore IFN-γ responsiveness of the parasitized macrophages.

Download:

Fig 1. Ara-LAM enhanced IFN-γ Receptor alpha chain expression in parasitized macrophages.

(A) BALB/c derived peritoneal macrophages (2x10⁶cells) were infected with Leishmania donovani (cell: parasite 1:10) for 30mins, 1hr, 3hrs, 12hrs, 18hrs and 24hrs. Other sets of macrophages were pre-treated with Ara-LAM for 3 hrs and followed by infection for the same time periods. Cell lysates were prepared followed by Western blot for IFN-γRα. Data are from 1 of 3 experiments conducted in the same way with similar results. IFN-γRα expression in Ara-LAM treated infected macrophages were significantly higher than the infected cells (p<0.05). (B) In a separate set of experiment, BALB/c derived peritoneal macrophages (2x10⁶cells) were pre-treated with Ara-LAM for 3 hr and followed by Leishmania donovani infection for 24 hr. Macrophages were then treated with rIFN-γ (20ng/ml) for 45min, followed by cell lysate preparation and Western blotting for IFN-γRα. The blots shown are representative of three experiments. (C) Ara-LAM pre-treated peritoneal macrophages (2x10⁶cells) were infected with L. donovani for 24 hrs followed by rIFN-γ (20ng/ml) stimulation for another 24 hrs, and staining with IFN-γRα-PE Ab and analyzed on a flow cytometer. Data are from one representative experiment that was repeated thrice. (D) Treated and untreated infected macrophages (2x10⁶cells) were subjected to immuno-precipitation using NF-κB (IP:NF-κB) specific Ab. Semi quantitative RT-PCR was performed for amplifying the putative NF-κB binding sites at the IFN-γRα promoter. Data are from one representative experiment, which was performed at least thrice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247.g001

2. Ara-LAM increased IFN-γ responsiveness in L. donovani-infected macrophages

IFN-γ responsiveness depends not only on IFN-γR expression but also on the effective IFN-γ signaling through JAK1/JAK2-STAT1 pathway [32, 33]. Therefore, we assessed IFN-γ-induced JAK/STAT phosphorylation in Ara-LAM-treated parasitized macrophages. We observed that Ara-LAM restored the rIFN-γ-induced JAK1, JAK2 and STAT1 phosphorylation, which had been suppressed by L. donovani infection (Fig. 2A). As a result, active STAT1 was increased in the nuclear fraction of the Ara-LAM pre-treated infected macrophages compared to the untreated, L. donovani-infected macrophages (Fig. 2B) indicating that Ara-LAM enhanced IFN-γ responsiveness in L. donovani-infected macrophages by restoring IFN-γ signaling through JAK-STAT pathway. Moreover, we observed that Ara-LAM showed more potent induction of IFN-γRα expression and its downstream signaling through JAK1/JAK2 and STAT1 activation in L. donovani infected macrophages, in comparision with the known TLR2 ligand Peptidoglycan (PGN) (S1 Fig.).

Download:

Fig 2. Moderation of IFN-γ induced JAK-STAT signaling by Ara-LAM in Leishmania infected macrophages.

(A) BALB/c derived peritoneal macrophages were pre-treated with Ara-LAM for 3 hrs, followed by L. donovani infection for 24hrs. Macrophages were treated with rIFN-γ (20ng/ml) for 45min, followed by cell lysate preparation and Western blot for JAK1, p-JAK1, JAK2, p-JAK2, STAT-1 and p-STAT-1. The blots shown are representative of triplicate experiments. (B) Both the nuclear extracts and the cytosolic extracts of differently treated peritoneal macrophages were prepared followed by Western blot to analyze the nuclear translocation of p-STAT-1 in L. donovani infected macrophages. Blots shown here are from one of three representative experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247.g002

3. Ara-LAM differentially regulated Interferon Regulatory Factors in infected macrophages

As IFN-γ responsiveness also depends on Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs) [24, 35, 36], we examined the effects of Ara-LAM on the expression of these IRFs in L. donovani-infected macrophages. We observed that L. donovani differentially modulated the expression of eight IRFs in macrophages (Fig. 3A). Of these, IRF4 expression increased but IRF8 expression decreased during infection (Fig. 3A). Ara-LAM reversed the expression of IRF8, which is implicated in Th1 response [20–23], and IRF4, which facilitates Th2 response [37], in L. donovani-infected macrophages (Fig. 3B).

Download:

Fig 3. Ara-LAM reciprocally regulated IRF4 and IRF8 expression and corresponding immune response during L. donovani infection both in vitro and in vivo.

(A) L. donovani infected and uninfected control peritoneal macrophages were collected in Trizol for RNA extraction and semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed. Data represent means ± SD for three experiments. Inset 1: Comparison between IRF4 and IRF8 expression in L. donovani infected and uninfected control macrophages. (B) Peritoneal macrophages (2x10⁶cells) from BALB/c mice were cultured and subjected to Ara-LAM pre-treatment (3μg/ml) for 3hrs, followed by L. donovani challenge for 6hrs. Both rIFN-γ stimulated (20ng/ml, 45mins) and unstimulated cells were collected in Trizol for RNA extraction and semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed. Data are from one representative experiment, which was performed at least thrice. Inset 2: Reciprocal expression of IRF4 and IRF8 by Ara-LAM in L. donovani infected macrophages. (C-D) BALB/c derived peritoneal macrophages (2x10⁶cells) were treated with Ara-LAM (3μg/ml) for 3hrs, followed by L. donovani challenge for 6hrs. After 45 min of rIFN-γ stimulation immuno-precipitations were conducted using IRF8 (IP:IRF8) and IRF4 (IP: IRF4) specific Abs. Semi quantitative RT-PCR was performed for amplifying the putative IRF8 binding sites of the IL-12p40 promoter and IRF4 binding sites of the IL-10 promoter. Data represent means ± SD for three sets of experiments. Inset 3: Ara-LAM mediated up-regulation of IRF8 binding to the IL-12 promoter and down-regulation of IRF4 binding to the IL-10 promoter in infected macrophages. (E-F) BALB/c mice were injected with respective shRNAs (for 2 days) followed by treatment with either phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (control) or Ara-LAM (30 μg intraperitoneally) for 2 days, after which mice were infected. 28 days later, mice were sacrificed and splenocytes (2x10⁶) were collected in Trizol for mRNA extraction and semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis (see Methods). Data are from one of three representative experiments. Inset 4: Correlations (R-values) between IRF4 and IL-10 or IL-12 expression in Ara-LAM treated and untreated infected splenocytes. Inset 5: Correlations (R-values) between IRF8 and IL-10 or IL-12 expression in same set of mice. (G-H) A separate set of splenocytes (2x10⁶) were stimulated with soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA) at 5 μg/ml for 48 h. Release of Interleukin 12 (IL-12) p70 and Interleukin 10 (IL-10) culture supernatants were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Data represent means ± SD for 4 animals per group. ***P <.001 and **P < .01 for the comparison with infected mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247.g003

To further confirm the involvement of Ara-LAM in the regulation of IRF function (IRF4 and IRF8), we performed ChIP assay at IL-12p40 and IL-10 loci. We observed that Ara-LAM augmented the rIFN-γ induced IRF8 binding to the IL-12p40 promoter in parasitized macrophages (Fig. 3C). By contrast, Ara-LAM pre-treatment significantly reduced the binding of IRF4 to the IL-10 promoter in the L. donovani-infected macrophages (Fig. 3D).

Corroborating with these data, Ara-LAM induced IRF8 expression but suppressed IRF4 expression (Fig. 3E), accompanied by increased IL-12 but diminished IL-10 production, in Leishmania-infected BALB/c mice (Fig. 3F, 3G, 3H; R = 0.98 for correlation between IRF8 and IL-12, and R = 0.99 for correlation between IRF4 and IL-10). TLR2 shRNA abrogated IRF8 and IL-12 expression but elevated IRF4 and IL-10 expression in Ara-LAM treated BALB/c mice; these effects of Ara-LAM were significantly suppressed in IFNR silenced condition (Fig. 3E–3H). Thus, Ara-LAM reciprocally modulated IRF4 and IRF8 transcription factors that might mediate the anti-leishmanial effect of Ara-LAM.

4. Host-protective effects of Ara-LAM was abrogated by IFN-γRα or TLR2 silencing

As Ara-LAM, a TLR2 ligand, restored IFN-γ responsiveness in L. donovani-infected macrophages in vitro, we examined whether Ara-LAM protected L. donovani-infected BALB/c mice and if protected, whether the protection was dependent on TLR2 or IFN-γR. So, here we used two specific shRNAs for TLR2 and IFN-γRα respectively and their silencing efficacy was checked at both mRNA and protein level (S2 Fig.). We observed that silencing of TLR2 and IFN-γRα with TLR2-shRNA and IFN-γRα-shRNA, respectively, significantly reduced the Ara-LAM induced IFN-γ and nitric oxide production in L. donovani-infected BALB/c mice (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C). The suppressed NO generation was correlated with the decreased iNOS expression in the spleen cells of these shRNA administered infected mice (Fig. 4A). The diminished IFN-γ and NO generation corroborated with the failure of Ara-LAM to reduce hepatic or splenic parasite burden in those IFN-γR, or TLR2, silenced BALB/c mice (Fig. 4D, 4E). For further confirmation, this anti-parasitic effect of Ara-LAM was compared with that of PGN and found Ara-LAM to be more potent in reducing parasite burden in L. donovani infected BALB/c mice (S3 Fig.).

Download:

Fig 4. Effect of Ara-LAM and IFN-γ signaling against leishmanial pathogenesis in BALB/c mice.

(A) Mice were injected with respective shRNAs (for 2 days) followed by treatment with either phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (control) or Ara-LAM (30 μg intraperitoneally) for 2 days, after which mice were infected. After 28 days mice were sacrificed, splenocytes (2x10⁶) was collected in Trizol for mRNA extraction and semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis (see Methods). Data are from one of three representative experiment. (B-C) A separate set of splenocytes (2x10⁵cells/well) was stimulated with soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA) at 5 μg/ml for 48 h. Release of Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and nitric oxide in culture supernatants were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the Nitric Oxide Colorimetric Assay kit, respectively. Data represent means ± SD for four animals per group. ***P <.001 and **P <. 01 for the comparison with infected mice. (D-E) Differently treated infected mice were sacrificed 28 days after infection. Levels of parasite burden in liver and spleen are expressed in Leishman-Donovan units (LDUs). Data represent means ± SD for 4 animals per group. ***P <.001 and **P < .01 for the comparison with infected mice. (F) Proliferative responses to soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA) (5 μg/ml) of splenocytes from above mentioned group of mice were examined by measuring [³H]thymidine incorporation. At 5 μg/ml SLA, optimal proliferation was obtained. Data represent means ± SD for 4 animals per group. ***P <.001 and **P < .01 for the comparison with infected mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247.g004

Because the elevated production of Th1 cytokines is essential for the activation and proliferation of T cells for anti-leishmanial protection whereas impaired or deviated T cell response is required for Leishmania survival [38, 39], we investigated whether Ara-LAM treatment could restore the Leishmania impaired T-cell proliferation. We observed that Ara-LAM rectified the deficient T-cell proliferation in L. donovani-infected control shRNA treated but not in TLR2 silenced or IFN-γRα silenced mice (Fig. 4F). These results indicated that Ara-LAM restored T cell proliferation in L. donovani-infected mice in TLR2 and IFN-γRα dependent manner.

5. Ara-LAM reversed the T-helper subset expansion in L. donovani-infected mice

Because L. donovani impairs MHC-II molecules expression [40], which is regulated by IFN-γ [21, 41] and because Ara-LAM induced T cell expansion was dependent on IFN-γRα, we examined whether Ara-LAM would restore MHC-II expression in infected macrophages. Compared to the untreated infected macrophages, Ara-LAM treated infected macrophages had substantially higher MHC-II molecules expression that was further enhanced by rIFN-γ (Fig. 5), corroborating with the Ara-LAM enhanced IFN-γRα-dependent T-cell proliferation in L. donovani-infected BALB/c mice (Fig. 4F). The Ara-LAM mediated enhanced IFN-γ responsiveness and subsequent improved antigen presentation in parasitized macrophages resulted in abrogated parasitemia (Fig. 5B). Here also Ara-LAM showed greater effectivity in clearing intracellular amastigotes compared to PGN, a known TLR2 ligand, both in vitro and in vivo (S1 and S3 Figs.).

Download:

Fig 5. Ara-LAM induced the MHC-II expression in the membrane of L. donovani infected cells and helped in parasite killing.

(A) Peritoneal macrophages (2x10⁶cells) isolated from BALB/c mice were pre-treated with Ara-LAM (3μg/ml) for 3hrs, followed by Leishmania donovani challenge for 24hrs. Both rIFN-γ (20ng/ml) stimulated (for 24hrs) and non-stimulated cells were then stained with anti-MHCII-FITC antibody and analyzed by Flow cytometry for MHC-II. Data are from one of three representative experiments. (B) In a similar set of experiment, the macrophages were cultured in cover slips, treated with Ara-LAM for 3 hrs followed by Leishmania infection and rIFN-γ stimulation (20ng/ml). After 24hrs of incubation intracellular parasite number were assessed as described in methods. Data represent means ± SD for three sets of experiments. ***P <.001 for the comparison with infected macrophages.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247.g005

In addition, silencing of TLR2 or IFN-γRα in L. donovani-infected BALB/c mice reduced the Ara-LAM up-regulated IFN-γ secreting CD4⁺ T cells (Fig. 6A) but increased the Ara-LAM suppressed IL-10 producing CD4⁺ T-cells in both spleen and liver (Fig. 6B).

Download:

Fig 6. Induction of IFN-γ and IL-10 secreting CD4⁺ T cells by Ara-LAM in Leishmania-infected mice.

Twenty eight days after infection, different groups of mice were sacrificed, splenocytes and hepatocytes were isolated and stimulated with soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA) for 48hrs. Before harvesting, cells were incubated with brefeldin A (10 mg/mL) for 4 hrs. CD4⁺ T cells were purified by Magnetic Associated Cell Sorter (see Materials and Methods), permeabilized (0.1% saponin) and stained with anti-mouse IFN-γ-FITC (A) and anti-mouse IL-10-PE (B) antibodies and were analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are from one of three experiments conducted in the same way with similar results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247.g006

The data generated from these experiments collectively indicate that Ara-LAM works through TLR2 to restore IFN-γ responsiveness in L. donovani-infected macrophages and re-establishes host-protective IFN-γ secreting CD4⁺ T cells in a mouse model of visceral leishmaniasis, a fatal disease in absence of an effective therapy.

Discussion

Visceral leishmaniasis, characterized by severe immunosuppression due to increased parasite-driven Th2 cytokine production [38, 42], is treated with sodium antimony gluconate or miltefosine that have serious side-effects [2, 4]. As these drugs require host immune system for anti-leishmanial activity [32], severe immunosuppression in VL patients reduces their efficacy. As the other anti-leishmanial drugs amphotericin B and paromomycin are not orally bioavailable [43], the treatment becomes more difficult. These problems aggravate with the emergence of drug-resistant L. donovani [5]. Therefore, finding a suitable immunomodulator is a pressing need for anti-leishmanial therapy.

A class of immunomodulators target TLRs. Several recent findings have suggested the pro-inflammatory role of TLR2 in different infection models [44, 45]. Likewise, Ara-LAM, a potent immunomodulator, uses TLR2 to induce pro-inflammatory functions [10] and to reverse the impaired anti-tubercular cell-mediated immune responses in mouse model [11]. Ara-LAM has been demonstrated as a major component responsible for the pro-inflammatory activity of the whole bacteria (M. smegmatis and M. fortuitum) [46]. In an experimental L. donovani infection, Ara-LAM elicits a strong host-protective pro-inflammatory immune response via TLR2 activated MAPK-mediated signaling, but it fails to do so in TLR2 silenced condition [12, 13]. Although, Ara-LAM is effective in both pre-treatment and post-treatment strategies, the anti-leishmanial effect is more pronounced in pre-treatment model, suggesting Ara-LAM as a immunoprophylactic agent rather than a immunotherapeutic tool against L. donovani infection [12, 29].

Leishmania deactivates the macrophage functions facilitating the parasite infection and propagation within the cell [7, 47]. A key immunomodulatory activity required for eliminating Leishmania is IL-12-dependent production of IFN-γ by Th1 cells [14, 15], IFN-γ activates macrophages by iNOS-dependent elimination of the parasite Leishmania [16]. Befitting the principle of parasitism, Leishmania deactivates macrophages ensuring its intracellular survival [47]. For example, L. donovani lowers IFN-γ responsiveness in macrophages [7, 48] by lowering IFN-γ receptor expression and by enhancing phosphatase-mediated STAT-1 inactivation [31, 32, 34]. Corroborating to these observations, IFN-γ-deficient mice were more susceptible to Leishmania infection than the wild-type controls [49]. These findings implied that targeting TLR for restoring IFN-γ responsiveness could be an immunotherapeutic principle. Therefore, in the present study, we tested whether Ara-LAM, a TLR2 ligand, could restore the IFN-γ responsiveness of the L. donovani-infected macrophages. We also examined the importance of IFN-γ in Ara-LAM mediated protection against leishmanial pathogenesis. The data presented here indicate that Ara-LAM enhanced transcription of the IFN-γRα gene, perhaps through the recruitment of NF-κB to its promoter (Fig. 1D), and cell surface expression of the receptor in both control and infected macrophages (Fig. 1A-C). Ara-LAM treatment of the L. donovani-infected cells restored IFN-γ responsiveness, as evident from the Ara-LAM-induced JAK-1, JAK2 and STAT1 phosphorylation in these cells (Fig. 2). As SHP-1 regulates IFN-γRα signaling in infected macrophages [50], the Ara-LAM enhanced IFN-γ responsiveness in Leishmania-infected macrophages could also result from reduced SHP-1 phosphorylation. The Ara-LAM induced STAT1 phosphorylation could possibly result from autocrine IFN-γ [12, 32]. Eventually, these Ara-LAM induced events lead to enhanced IFN-γ responsiveness in L. donovani infected macrophages.

IFN-γ responsiveness also depends on the Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs). Here, we have studied two IRF family members, IRF4 and IRF8, due to their structural semblances, direct involvement in IFN-γ signaling and counteracting roles in the immune system. Here, we observed that their expression was reciprocally regulated by L. donovani but reversed by Ara-LAM in macrophages (Fig. 3). In L. donovani-infected macrophages, IRF4 expression and its binding to the IL-10 promoter was induced, whereas IRF8 expression and binding to the IL-12p40 promoter was inhibited. We observed that Ara-LAM increased IL-12 production by effective binding of IRF8 to the IL-12p40 promoter (Fig. 3C-D). The observation is consistent with the reported counteracting roles of IRF4 and IRF8 in the immune system. IRF4 mediates the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [25]. By contrast, IRF8 mediates the IFN-γ triggered TNF-α, IL-12 and NO production [20] and contributes to the cross-talk between TLR and IFN-γ signaling pathways [28]. Moreover, Ara-LAM enhanced MHC-II expression on the surface of the parasitized macrophages was reinforced by rIFN-γ, possibly through IRF8 (Fig. 5A) [21], for better parasite clearance from the infected macrophages (Fig. 5B). These effects of the IFN-γ activated IRF8 may collectively skew the T cell response to Th1-type, as observed here with Ara-LAM treatment (Figs. 3, 4, 6).

Although complete abrogation of the Ara-LAM mediated host protective immune response and parasite killing in TLR2 silenced mice clearly suggest that Ara-LAM is a TLR2 ligand and it works through TLR2 signaling pathway, for better understanding we compared the effect of Ara-LAM with a known TLR2 ligand, Peptidoglycan (PGN). Here, we observed that both Ara-LAM and PGN induced the IFN-γRα associated JAK1/2-STAT1 signaling cascade in parasitized macrophages resulted in diminished parasitemia, both in vitro and in vivo, but Ara-LAM was found more potent (S1 and S3 Figs.).

Thus, Ara-LAM enhanced IFN-γRα expression, NO generation and Th1 cytokine production along with higher CD4⁺ T-cell activation and proliferation in Leishmania infected BALB/c mice. All these host-protective mechanisms were significantly suppressed by IFN-γRα silencing due to absence of effective IFN-γ signaling (Figs. 3, 4, 6). Collectively our findings, both in vitro and in vivo, imply active involvement of IFN-γ signaling in Ara-LAM mediated anti-leishmanial activity.

Thus, we characterize for the first time that Ara-LAM improves the IFN-γ responsiveness of the parasitized macrophages and this IFN-γ signaling, in turn, plays an important role in generating Ara-LAM mediated host protective anti-leishmanial immune response.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. (A) BALB/c derived peritoneal macrophages (2x10⁶cells) were pre-treated with Ara-LAM (3μg/ml) and PGN (5μg/ml) for 3 hrs and infected with L. donovani (cell: parasite 1:10) for 24hrs, followed by cell lysate preparation and Western blot for IFN-γRα, JAK1, p-JAK1, JAK2, p-JAK2, STAT-1, p-STAT-1 and GAPDH.

The blots shown are representative of triplicate experiments. (B) Both the nuclear extracts and the cytosolic extracts of differently treated peritoneal macrophages were prepared followed by Western blot to analyze the nuclear translocation of p-STAT-1 in L. donovani infected macrophages. Blots shown here are from one of three representative experiments. (C) In a separate experiment, the macrophages were cultured in cover slips, treated with Ara-LAM and PGN for 3 hrs followed by Leishmania infection. After 24hrs of incubation intracellular parasite number were assessed as described in methods. Data represent means ± SD for three sets of experiments. ***P <.001 for the comparison with infected macrophages.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Mice were injected with TLR2 or IFN-γRα shRNAs (for 2 days) followed by treatment with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (control).

After 30 days mice were sacrificed, splenocytes (2x10⁶) was collected in Trizol and cell lysis buffer for mRNA and protein extraction respectively. TLR2 and IFN-γRα expressions were studied by semi-quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot methods (see Methods). Each data are from one of three representative experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Mice were treated with either Ara-LAM (30 μg intraperitoneally) or PGN (50 μg intraperitoneally) for 2 days, followed by L. donovani infection.

After 28 days mice were sacrificed. Levels of parasite burden in liver and spleen are expressed in Leishman-Donovan units (LDUs). Data represent means ± SD for 4 animals per group. ***P <.001 for the comparison with infected mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117247.s003

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to The Director, Bose Institute (Kolkata) for providing space and other infrastructural facilities. We cordially thank Mr. Prabal Gupta and Central instrument facility, Bose Institute, for their technical assistance (FACS, Gel Doc, Scintillation counter).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: BPC S. Majumdar. Performed the experiments: BPC SD S. Majumder SB MKJ SBM. Analyzed the data: BPC BS S. Majumdar. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MKJ SBM. Wrote the paper: BPC BS S. Majumdar.

References

1. Chappuis F, Sundar S, Hailu A, Ghalib H, Rijal S, et al. (2007) Visceral leishmaniasis: what are the needs for diagnosis, treatment and control. Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 873–882. pmid:17938629
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Sundar S, Chakravarty J (2013) Leishmaniasis: an update of current pharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 14: 53–63. pmid:23256501
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Okwor I, Uzonna JE (2013) The immunology of Leishmania/HIV co-infection. Immunol Res 56: 163–171. pmid:23504228
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Den Boer ML, Alvar J, Davidson RN, Ritmeijer K, Balasegaram M (2009) Developments in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 14: 395–410. pmid:19708817
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Vanaerschot M, Dumetz F, Roy S, Ponte-Sucre A, Arevalo J, et al. (2014) Treatment failure in leishmaniasis: drug-resistance or another (epi-) phenotype? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 24802998.
6. Faria MS, Reis FC, Lima AP (2012) Toll-like receptors in Leishmania infections: guardians or promoters? J Parasitol Res doi: 10.1155/2012/930257.
7. Bhardwaj S, Srivastava N, Sudan R, Saha B (2010) Leishmania interferes with host cell signaling to devise a survival strategy. J Biomed Biotechnol doi: 10.1155/2010/109189. pmid:23258958
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Srivastava S, Pandey SP, Jha MK, Chandel HS, Saha B (2013) Leishmania expressed lipophosphoglycan interacts with Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 to decrease TLR-9 expression and reduce anti-leishmanial responses. Clin Exp Immunol 172: 403–409. pmid:23600828
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Abou Fakher FH, Rachinel N, Klimczak M, Louis J, Doyen N (2009) TLR9-dependent activation of dendritic cells by DNA from Leishmania major favors Th1 cell development and the resolution of lesions. J Immunol 182: 1386–1396. pmid:19155485
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Majumder N, Dey R, Mathur RK, Datta S, Maitra M, et al. (2006) An unusual pro-inflammatory role of interleukin-10 induced by arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan in murine peritoneal macrophages. Glycoconj J 23: 675–686. pmid:17115274
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Majumder N, Bhattacharjee S, Dey R, Majumdar SB, Pal NK, et al. (2008) Arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan modulates the impaired cell mediated immune response in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv infected C57BL/6 mice. Microbes Infect 10: 349–357. pmid:18417403
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Bhattacharya P, Bhattacharjee S, Gupta G, Majumder S, Adhikari A, et al. (2010) Arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan–mediated protection in Visceral leishmaniasis through up regulation of toll-like receptor-2 signaling: an immunoprophylactic approach. J Inf Dis 202: 145–155. pmid:20500089
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Bhattacharya P, Gupta G, Majumder S, Adhikari A, Banerjee S, et al. (2011) Arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan skews Th2 phenotype towards Th1 during Leishmania infection by chromatin modification: involvement of MAPK signaling. PloS One DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024141.
14. Constantinescu CS, Hondowicz BD, Elloso MM, Wysocka M, Trinchieri G, et al. (1998) The role of IL-12 in the maintenance of an established Th1 immune response in experimental leishmaniasis. Eur J Immunol 28: 2227–2233. pmid:9692892
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Rosas LE, Snider HM, Barbi J, Satoskar AA, Lugo-Villarino G, et al. (2006) STAT1 and T-bet play distinct roles in determining outcome of visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania donovani. J Immunol 177: 22–25. pmid:16785492
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Bogdan C, Rollinghoff M, Diefenbach A (2000) The role of nitric oxide in innate immunity. Immunol Rev 173: 17–26. pmid:10719664
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Honda K, Taniguchi T (2006) IRFs: master regulators of signaling by Toll-like receptors and cytosolic pattern-recognition receptors. Nat Rev Immunol 6: 644–658. pmid:16932750
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Taniguchi T, Ogasawara K, Takaoka A, Tanaka N (2001) IRF family of transcription factors as regulators of host defense. Annu Rev Immunol 19: 623–655. pmid:11244049
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Ozato K, Tailor P, Kubota T (2007) The interferon regulatory factor family in host defense: mechanism of action. J Biol Chem 282: 20065–20069. pmid:17502370
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Vila-del Sol V, Punzón C, Fresno M (2008) IFN-γ-Induced TNF-α Expression Is Regulated by Interferon Regulatory Factors 1 and 8 in Mouse Macrophages. J Immunol 181: 4461–4470. pmid:18802049
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Marquis JF, Kapoustina O, Langlais D, Ruddy R, Dufour CR, et al. (2011) Interferon Regulatory Factor 8 Regulates Pathways for Antigen Presentation in Myeloid Cells and during Tuberculosis. PloS Genet DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002097.
22. Giese NA, Gabriele L, Doherty TM, Klinman DM, Tadesse-Heath L, et al. (1997) Interferon (IFN) consensus sequence-binding protein, a transcription factor of the IFN regulatory factor family, regulates immune responses in vivo through control of interleukin 12 expression. J Exp Med 9: 1535–1546. pmid:9348311
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Alter-Koltunoff M, Goren S, Nousbeck J, Feng CG, Sher A, et al. (2008) Innate immunity to intraphagosomal pathogens is mediated by interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF-8) that stimulates the expression of macrophage-specific Nramp1 through antagonizing repression by c-Myc. J Biol Chem 283: 2724–2733. pmid:18045875
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Jayakumar A, Donovan MJ, Tripath V, Ramalho-Ortigao M, McDowel M (2008) Leishmania major infection activates NF-kappaB and interferon regulatory factors 1 and 8 in human dendritic cells. Infect Immun; 76: 2138–2148. pmid:18316378
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Tominaga N, Ohkusu-Tsukada K, Udono H, Abe R, Matsuyama T, et al. (2003) Development of Th1 and not Th2 immune responses in mice lacking IFN-regulatory factor-4. Int Immunol 15: 1–10. pmid:12502720
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Akbari M, Honma K, Kimura D (2014) IRF4 in dendritic cells inhibits IL-12 production and controls Th1 immune responses against Leishmania major. J Immunol 192: 2271–2279. pmid:24489086
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Bhardwaj N, Rosas LE, Lafuse WP, Satoskar AR (2005) Leishmania inhibit STAT1-mediated IFN-γ signaling in macrophages: increased tyrosine phosphorylation of dominant negative STAT1β by Leishmania mexicana. Int J Parasitol 35: 75–82. pmid:15619518
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Zhao J, Kong HJ, Li H, Huang B, Yang M, et al. (2006) IRF-8/Interferon (IFN) Consensus Sequence-binding Protein Is Involved in Toll-like Receptor (TLR) Signaling and Contributes to the Cross-talk between TLR and IFN-γ Signaling Pathways. J Biol Chem 281: 10073–10080. pmid:16484229
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Bhattacharjee S, Majumder N, Bhattacharyya P, Bhattacharyya S, Majumdar S (2007) Immunomodulatory role of arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan on Leishmania donovani infected murine macrophages. Indian J Biochem Biophys 44: 366–372. pmid:18341212
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Ghosh S, Bhattacharyya S, Sirkar M, Sa GS, Das T, et al. (2002) Leishmania donovani suppresses activator protein-1 and NF-kB in host macrophages via ceramide generation: involvement of extracellular signal regulated kinase. Infect Immun 70: 6828–6838. pmid:12438359
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Ray M, Gam AA, Boykins R and Kenney R (2000) Inhibition of Interferon-g Signaling by Leishmania donovani. J Inf Dis 181: 1121–1128. pmid:10720539
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Wadhone P, Maiti M, Agarwal R, Kamat V, Martin S, et al. (2009) Miltefosine Promotes IFN-γ-Dominated Anti-Leishmanial Immune Response. J Immunol 182: 7146–7154. pmid:19454711
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Forget G, Gregory DJ, Olivier M (2005) Proteasome-mediated degradation of STAT1alpha following infection of macrophages with Leishmania donovani. J Biol Chem 280: 30542–30549. pmid:15983048
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Sen S, Roy K, Mukherjee S, Mukhopadhyay R, Roy S (2011) Restoration of IFNγR Subunit Assembly, IFNγ Signaling and Parasite Clearance in Leishmania donovani Infected Macrophages: Role of Membrane Cholesterol. PLoS Pathog DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002229.
35. Kamijo R, Harada H, Matsuyama T, Bosland M, Gerecitano J, et al. (1994) Requirement for transcription factor IRF-1 in NO synthase induction in macrophages. Science 263: 1612–1615. pmid:7510419
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Contursi C, Wang IM, Gabriele L, Gadina M, O'Shea J, et al. (2000) IFN consensus sequence binding protein potentiates STAT1-dependent activation of IFN-g responsive promoters in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 91–96. pmid:10618376
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Ahyi AN, Chang HC, Dent AL, Nutt SL, Kaplan MH (2009) Interferon Regulatory Factor (IRF)-4 regulates the expression of a subset of Th2 cytokines. J Immunol 183: 1598–1606. pmid:19592658
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Alexander J, Bryson K (2005) T helper (h) 1\Th2 and leishmania: paradox rather than paradigm. Immunol Lett 99: 17–23. pmid:15894106
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Esch KJ, Juelsgaard R, Martinez PA, Jones DE, Petersen CA (2013) Programmed death 1-mediated T cell exhaustion during visceral leishmaniasis impairs phagocyte function. J Immunol 191: 5542–5550. pmid:24154626
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Matte C, Descoteaux A (2010) Leishmania donovani amastigotes impair gamma interferon-induced STAT1alpha nuclear translocation by blocking the interaction between STAT1alpha and importin-alpha5. Infect Immun 78: 3736–3743. pmid:20566692
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Delvig AA, Lee JJ, Chrzanowska-Lightowlers ZM, Robinson JH (2002) TGF-beta1 and IFN-gamma cross-regulate antigen presentation to CD4 T cells by macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 72:163–166. pmid:12101276
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Nylén S, Maurya R, Eidsmo L, Manandhar KD, Sundar S, et al. (2007) Splenic accumulation of IL-10 mRNA in T cells distinct from CD4+CD25+ (Foxp3) regulatory T cells in human visceral leishmaniasis. J Exp Med 204: 805–817. pmid:17389235
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Croft SL, Seifert K, Yardley V (2006) Current scenario of drug development for leishmaniasis. Indian J Med Res 123: 399–410. pmid:16778319
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Reyes JL, González MI, Ledesma-Soto Y, Satoskar AR, Terrazas LI (2001) TLR2 mediates immunity to experimental cysticercosis. Int. J Biol Sci 7: 1323–1333.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Marinho FA, de Paula RR, Mendes AC, de Almeida LA, Gomes MT, et al. (2013) Toll-like receptor 6 senses Mycobacterium avium and is required for efficient control of mycobacterial infection. Eur J Immunol 43: 2373–2385. pmid:23716075
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Bohsali A, Abdalla H, Velmurugan K, Briken V (2010) The non-pathogenic mycobacteria M. smegmatis and M. fortuitum induce rapid host cell apoptosis via a caspase-3 and TNF dependent pathway. BMC Microbiol 10: 237–248. pmid:20831789
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Olivier M, Gregory DJ, Forget G (2005) Subversion mechanisms by which Leishmania parasites can escape the host immune response: a signaling point of view. Clin Microbiol Rev 18: 293–305. pmid:15831826
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Reiner NE, Ng W, Ma T, McMaster WR (1988) Kinetics of gamma interferon binding and induction of major histocompatibility complex class II mRNA in Leishmania-infected macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci 85: 4330–4334. pmid:2967971
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Wang ZE, Reiner SL, Zheng S, Dalton DK, Locksley RM (1994) CD4⁺ effector cells default to the Th2 pathway in interferon γ-deficient mice infected with Leishmania major. J Exp Med 179: 1367–1371. pmid:7908325
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Blanchette J, Racette N, Faure R, Siminovitch KA, Olivier M (1999) Leishmania-induced increases in activation of macrophage SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatise are associated with impaired IFN-γ-triggered JAK2 activation. Eur J Immunol 29: 3737–3744. pmid:10556830
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Chappuis F, Sundar S, Hailu A, Ghalib H, Rijal S, et al. (2007) Visceral leishmaniasis: what are the needs for diagnosis, treatment and control. Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 873–882. pmid:17938629
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Sundar S, Chakravarty J (2013) Leishmaniasis: an update of current pharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 14: 53–63. pmid:23256501
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Okwor I, Uzonna JE (2013) The immunology of Leishmania/HIV co-infection. Immunol Res 56: 163–171. pmid:23504228
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Den Boer ML, Alvar J, Davidson RN, Ritmeijer K, Balasegaram M (2009) Developments in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 14: 395–410. pmid:19708817
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Vanaerschot M, Dumetz F, Roy S, Ponte-Sucre A, Arevalo J, et al. (2014) Treatment failure in leishmaniasis: drug-resistance or another (epi-) phenotype? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 24802998.

[ref6] 6. Faria MS, Reis FC, Lima AP (2012) Toll-like receptors in Leishmania infections: guardians or promoters? J Parasitol Res doi: 10.1155/2012/930257.

[ref7] 7. Bhardwaj S, Srivastava N, Sudan R, Saha B (2010) Leishmania interferes with host cell signaling to devise a survival strategy. J Biomed Biotechnol doi: 10.1155/2010/109189. pmid:23258958
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] PubMed/NCBI

[22] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Srivastava S, Pandey SP, Jha MK, Chandel HS, Saha B (2013) Leishmania expressed lipophosphoglycan interacts with Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 to decrease TLR-9 expression and reduce anti-leishmanial responses. Clin Exp Immunol 172: 403–409. pmid:23600828
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] PubMed/NCBI

[26] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Abou Fakher FH, Rachinel N, Klimczak M, Louis J, Doyen N (2009) TLR9-dependent activation of dendritic cells by DNA from Leishmania major favors Th1 cell development and the resolution of lesions. J Immunol 182: 1386–1396. pmid:19155485
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[28] View Article

[29] PubMed/NCBI

[30] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Majumder N, Dey R, Mathur RK, Datta S, Maitra M, et al. (2006) An unusual pro-inflammatory role of interleukin-10 induced by arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan in murine peritoneal macrophages. Glycoconj J 23: 675–686. pmid:17115274
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] PubMed/NCBI

[34] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Majumder N, Bhattacharjee S, Dey R, Majumdar SB, Pal NK, et al. (2008) Arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan modulates the impaired cell mediated immune response in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv infected C57BL/6 mice. Microbes Infect 10: 349–357. pmid:18417403
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] PubMed/NCBI

[38] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Bhattacharya P, Bhattacharjee S, Gupta G, Majumder S, Adhikari A, et al. (2010) Arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan–mediated protection in Visceral leishmaniasis through up regulation of toll-like receptor-2 signaling: an immunoprophylactic approach. J Inf Dis 202: 145–155. pmid:20500089
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Bhattacharya P, Gupta G, Majumder S, Adhikari A, Banerjee S, et al. (2011) Arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan skews Th2 phenotype towards Th1 during Leishmania infection by chromatin modification: involvement of MAPK signaling. PloS One DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024141.

[ref14] 14. Constantinescu CS, Hondowicz BD, Elloso MM, Wysocka M, Trinchieri G, et al. (1998) The role of IL-12 in the maintenance of an established Th1 immune response in experimental leishmaniasis. Eur J Immunol 28: 2227–2233. pmid:9692892
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Rosas LE, Snider HM, Barbi J, Satoskar AA, Lugo-Villarino G, et al. (2006) STAT1 and T-bet play distinct roles in determining outcome of visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania donovani. J Immunol 177: 22–25. pmid:16785492
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Bogdan C, Rollinghoff M, Diefenbach A (2000) The role of nitric oxide in innate immunity. Immunol Rev 173: 17–26. pmid:10719664
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Honda K, Taniguchi T (2006) IRFs: master regulators of signaling by Toll-like receptors and cytosolic pattern-recognition receptors. Nat Rev Immunol 6: 644–658. pmid:16932750
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Taniguchi T, Ogasawara K, Takaoka A, Tanaka N (2001) IRF family of transcription factors as regulators of host defense. Annu Rev Immunol 19: 623–655. pmid:11244049
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Ozato K, Tailor P, Kubota T (2007) The interferon regulatory factor family in host defense: mechanism of action. J Biol Chem 282: 20065–20069. pmid:17502370
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Vila-del Sol V, Punzón C, Fresno M (2008) IFN-γ-Induced TNF-α Expression Is Regulated by Interferon Regulatory Factors 1 and 8 in Mouse Macrophages. J Immunol 181: 4461–4470. pmid:18802049
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Marquis JF, Kapoustina O, Langlais D, Ruddy R, Dufour CR, et al. (2011) Interferon Regulatory Factor 8 Regulates Pathways for Antigen Presentation in Myeloid Cells and during Tuberculosis. PloS Genet DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002097.

[ref22] 22. Giese NA, Gabriele L, Doherty TM, Klinman DM, Tadesse-Heath L, et al. (1997) Interferon (IFN) consensus sequence-binding protein, a transcription factor of the IFN regulatory factor family, regulates immune responses in vivo through control of interleukin 12 expression. J Exp Med 9: 1535–1546. pmid:9348311
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Alter-Koltunoff M, Goren S, Nousbeck J, Feng CG, Sher A, et al. (2008) Innate immunity to intraphagosomal pathogens is mediated by interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF-8) that stimulates the expression of macrophage-specific Nramp1 through antagonizing repression by c-Myc. J Biol Chem 283: 2724–2733. pmid:18045875
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Jayakumar A, Donovan MJ, Tripath V, Ramalho-Ortigao M, McDowel M (2008) Leishmania major infection activates NF-kappaB and interferon regulatory factors 1 and 8 in human dendritic cells. Infect Immun; 76: 2138–2148. pmid:18316378
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Tominaga N, Ohkusu-Tsukada K, Udono H, Abe R, Matsuyama T, et al. (2003) Development of Th1 and not Th2 immune responses in mice lacking IFN-regulatory factor-4. Int Immunol 15: 1–10. pmid:12502720
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Akbari M, Honma K, Kimura D (2014) IRF4 in dendritic cells inhibits IL-12 production and controls Th1 immune responses against Leishmania major. J Immunol 192: 2271–2279. pmid:24489086
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Bhardwaj N, Rosas LE, Lafuse WP, Satoskar AR (2005) Leishmania inhibit STAT1-mediated IFN-γ signaling in macrophages: increased tyrosine phosphorylation of dominant negative STAT1β by Leishmania mexicana. Int J Parasitol 35: 75–82. pmid:15619518
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Zhao J, Kong HJ, Li H, Huang B, Yang M, et al. (2006) IRF-8/Interferon (IFN) Consensus Sequence-binding Protein Is Involved in Toll-like Receptor (TLR) Signaling and Contributes to the Cross-talk between TLR and IFN-γ Signaling Pathways. J Biol Chem 281: 10073–10080. pmid:16484229
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Bhattacharjee S, Majumder N, Bhattacharyya P, Bhattacharyya S, Majumdar S (2007) Immunomodulatory role of arabinosylated lipoarabinomannan on Leishmania donovani infected murine macrophages. Indian J Biochem Biophys 44: 366–372. pmid:18341212
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Ghosh S, Bhattacharyya S, Sirkar M, Sa GS, Das T, et al. (2002) Leishmania donovani suppresses activator protein-1 and NF-kB in host macrophages via ceramide generation: involvement of extracellular signal regulated kinase. Infect Immun 70: 6828–6838. pmid:12438359
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Ray M, Gam AA, Boykins R and Kenney R (2000) Inhibition of Interferon-g Signaling by Leishmania donovani. J Inf Dis 181: 1121–1128. pmid:10720539
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Wadhone P, Maiti M, Agarwal R, Kamat V, Martin S, et al. (2009) Miltefosine Promotes IFN-γ-Dominated Anti-Leishmanial Immune Response. J Immunol 182: 7146–7154. pmid:19454711
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Forget G, Gregory DJ, Olivier M (2005) Proteasome-mediated degradation of STAT1alpha following infection of macrophages with Leishmania donovani. J Biol Chem 280: 30542–30549. pmid:15983048
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Sen S, Roy K, Mukherjee S, Mukhopadhyay R, Roy S (2011) Restoration of IFNγR Subunit Assembly, IFNγ Signaling and Parasite Clearance in Leishmania donovani Infected Macrophages: Role of Membrane Cholesterol. PLoS Pathog DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002229.

[ref35] 35. Kamijo R, Harada H, Matsuyama T, Bosland M, Gerecitano J, et al. (1994) Requirement for transcription factor IRF-1 in NO synthase induction in macrophages. Science 263: 1612–1615. pmid:7510419
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Contursi C, Wang IM, Gabriele L, Gadina M, O'Shea J, et al. (2000) IFN consensus sequence binding protein potentiates STAT1-dependent activation of IFN-g responsive promoters in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 91–96. pmid:10618376
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Ahyi AN, Chang HC, Dent AL, Nutt SL, Kaplan MH (2009) Interferon Regulatory Factor (IRF)-4 regulates the expression of a subset of Th2 cytokines. J Immunol 183: 1598–1606. pmid:19592658
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Alexander J, Bryson K (2005) T helper (h) 1\Th2 and leishmania: paradox rather than paradigm. Immunol Lett 99: 17–23. pmid:15894106
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Esch KJ, Juelsgaard R, Martinez PA, Jones DE, Petersen CA (2013) Programmed death 1-mediated T cell exhaustion during visceral leishmaniasis impairs phagocyte function. J Immunol 191: 5542–5550. pmid:24154626
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Matte C, Descoteaux A (2010) Leishmania donovani amastigotes impair gamma interferon-induced STAT1alpha nuclear translocation by blocking the interaction between STAT1alpha and importin-alpha5. Infect Immun 78: 3736–3743. pmid:20566692
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Delvig AA, Lee JJ, Chrzanowska-Lightowlers ZM, Robinson JH (2002) TGF-beta1 and IFN-gamma cross-regulate antigen presentation to CD4 T cells by macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 72:163–166. pmid:12101276
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Nylén S, Maurya R, Eidsmo L, Manandhar KD, Sundar S, et al. (2007) Splenic accumulation of IL-10 mRNA in T cells distinct from CD4+CD25+ (Foxp3) regulatory T cells in human visceral leishmaniasis. J Exp Med 204: 805–817. pmid:17389235
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Croft SL, Seifert K, Yardley V (2006) Current scenario of drug development for leishmaniasis. Indian J Med Res 123: 399–410. pmid:16778319
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Reyes JL, González MI, Ledesma-Soto Y, Satoskar AR, Terrazas LI (2001) TLR2 mediates immunity to experimental cysticercosis. Int. J Biol Sci 7: 1323–1333.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Marinho FA, de Paula RR, Mendes AC, de Almeida LA, Gomes MT, et al. (2013) Toll-like receptor 6 senses Mycobacterium avium and is required for efficient control of mycobacterial infection. Eur J Immunol 43: 2373–2385. pmid:23716075
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Bohsali A, Abdalla H, Velmurugan K, Briken V (2010) The non-pathogenic mycobacteria M. smegmatis and M. fortuitum induce rapid host cell apoptosis via a caspase-3 and TNF dependent pathway. BMC Microbiol 10: 237–248. pmid:20831789
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Olivier M, Gregory DJ, Forget G (2005) Subversion mechanisms by which Leishmania parasites can escape the host immune response: a signaling point of view. Clin Microbiol Rev 18: 293–305. pmid:15831826
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Reiner NE, Ng W, Ma T, McMaster WR (1988) Kinetics of gamma interferon binding and induction of major histocompatibility complex class II mRNA in Leishmania-infected macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci 85: 4330–4334. pmid:2967971
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Wang ZE, Reiner SL, Zheng S, Dalton DK, Locksley RM (1994) CD4⁺ effector cells default to the Th2 pathway in interferon γ-deficient mice infected with Leishmania major. J Exp Med 179: 1367–1371. pmid:7908325
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Blanchette J, Racette N, Faure R, Siminovitch KA, Olivier M (1999) Leishmania-induced increases in activation of macrophage SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatise are associated with impaired IFN-γ-triggered JAK2 activation. Eur J Immunol 29: 3737–3744. pmid:10556830
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Animals, macrophages and parasites

Isolation and purification of Ara-LAM

Preparation of TLR2-shRNA and IFN-γRα-shRNA

Preparation of cell lysate and immunoblot analysis

Flow cytometry

Isolation of RNA and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

Preparation of cytosolic and nuclear extracts

Chromatin Immuno-precipitation (ChIP) assay

In vitro parasite burden count

In vivo experiments

Cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Nitrite generation

Proliferation assay

CD4+ T cell purification

Statistical analysis

Results

1. Ara-LAM enhanced IFN-γ Rα expression in L. donovani-infected macrophages

2. Ara-LAM increased IFN-γ responsiveness in L. donovani-infected macrophages

3. Ara-LAM differentially regulated Interferon Regulatory Factors in infected macrophages

4. Host-protective effects of Ara-LAM was abrogated by IFN-γRα or TLR2 silencing

5. Ara-LAM reversed the T-helper subset expansion in L. donovani-infected mice

Discussion

Supporting Information

S2 Fig. Mice were injected with TLR2 or IFN-γRα shRNAs (for 2 days) followed by treatment with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (control).

S3 Fig. Mice were treated with either Ara-LAM (30 μg intraperitoneally) or PGN (50 μg intraperitoneally) for 2 days, followed by L. donovani infection.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

CD4⁺ T cell purification