Correction
13 Apr 2015: The PLOS ONE Staff (2015) Correction: Smoking Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Dementia: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies with Investigation of Potential Effect Modifiers. PLOS ONE 10(4): e0126169. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126169 View correction
Figures
Abstract
Background
Previous studies showed inconsistent results on the association of smoking with all-cause dementia and vascular dementia (VaD), and are limited by inclusion of a small number of studies and unexplained heterogeneity. Our review aimed to assess the risk of all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and VaD associated with smoking, and to identify potential effect modifiers.
Methods and Findings
The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Psychinfo databases were searched to identify studies that provided risk estimates on smoking and incidence of dementia. A random-effects model was used to yield pooled results. Thirty-seven studies were included. Compared with never smokers, current smokers showed an increased risk of all-cause dementia (risk ratio (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18–1.45), AD (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13–1.73) and VaD (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15–1.66). For all-cause dementia, the risk increased by 34% for every 20 cigarettes per day (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25–1.43). Former smokers did not show an increased risk of all-cause dementia (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96–1.06), AD (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96–1.13) and VaD (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.83–1.13). Subgroup analyses indicated that (1) the significantly increased risk of AD from current smoking was seen only in apolipoprotein E ε4 noncarriers; (2) current smokers aged 65 to 75 years at baseline showed increased risk of all-cause dementia and AD compared to those aged over 75 or under 65 years; and (3) sex, race, study location and diagnostic criteria difference in risk of dementia was not found.
Conclusions
Smokers show an increased risk of dementia, and smoking cessation decreases the risk to that of never smokers. The increased risk of AD from smoking is more pronounced in apolipoprotein E ε4 noncarriers. Survival bias and competing risk reduce the risk of dementia from smoking at extreme age.
Citation: Zhong G, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Guo JJ, Zhao Y (2015) Smoking Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Dementia: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies with Investigation of Potential Effect Modifiers. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0118333. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118333
Academic Editor: Keith Laws, University of Hertfordshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: September 11, 2014; Accepted: January 12, 2015; Published: March 12, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Zhong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Dementia is a clinical state characterized by progressive deterioration in cognitive, functional and behavioral abilities [1]. It was estimated that the number of cases of dementia would reach around 81.1 million by 2040 [2]. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) could account for approximately 70% and 20% of dementia cases, respectively [1].
The global prevalence of smoking in the population aged more than 15 years is 31.1% and 6.2% for men and women in 2012, respectively [3]. The smoking-dementia relationship has been investigated by many studies [4–10]. A pooled analysis [11] found that mortality associated dementia was higher in smokers than that in never smokers. Nevertheless, researchers seem to be more interested in the association of smoking with risk of developing dementia. Up to date, two meta-analyses [12, 13] on smoking and risk of all-cause dementia, AD and VaD and two meta-analyses [14, 15] focusing on smoking and risk of AD have been published. These previous reviews reported that cigarette smoking might be a risk factor for developing dementia. However, several limitations as described below indicate that a more comprehensive meta-analysis is needed.
First, inclusion of a small number of studies was a limitation in previous reviews [12–15]. A 2014 meta-analysis [15] on smoking and risk of AD and a 2008 meta-analysis [12] on smoking and risk of all-cause dementia, AD and VaD involved 9 and 13 studies, respectively. Yet, more than 20 additional studies were published in the past several years. Second, previous meta-analyses [12–15] detected significant heterogeneity across studies, but they all did not identify the potential sources of heterogeneity. The unexplained heterogeneity raised questions regarding the reliability of pooled results. Third, a 2007 meta-analysis of 11 studies [13] and a 2008 meta-analysis of 13 studies [12] presented inconsistent results on the association of smoking with all-cause dementia and VaD. Thus, the association of smoking with all-cause dementia and VaD needs to be further investigated. Fourth, the potential dose–response pattern on smoking-dementia association and the modification effect of apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele on this association remain unclear. Finally, the results of a recent meta-analysis [14] by Cataldo et al on smoking and risk of AD may be biased by not classifying smokers to current and former smokers and the possibility of misclassification caused by inclusion of two large cohort studies [16, 17] using death certificates for AD diagnosis.
With those considerations above, our objectives for this study were: (1) to calculate the risk of all-cause dementia, AD and VaD for current versus never smokers, former versus never smokers and ever versus never smokers; (2) to identify potential effect modifiers of association between smoking and all-cause dementia, AD and VaD; (3) to explore the dose–response pattern of the association of smoking and dementia.
Materials and Methods
1. Search strategy
This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA statement [18]. We conducted an electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Psychinfo from their inception to March 25, 2014, with limitation to human subjects imposed. We used the following search terms: “Alzheimer's disease”, “dementia”, “vascular dementia”, “cognitive impairment”, “cognitive decline”, “cognition”, “smoking”, “cigarette”, “cigarettes”, “nicotine” “tobacco” and “smoke”. We also reviewed the reference lists of identified studies and pertinent reviews for additional citations. We did not contact original authors through e-mails for extra data parameters.
2. Study selection
Studies were included if they (1) had a prospective cohort study design and were published in English or Chinese; (2) examined smoking status and identified that participants were free of dementia at baseline; and (3) reported minimum information necessary to obtain risk ratio (RR) on smoking and incident dementia (all-cause dementia, AD or VaD).
The process of study screening was independently conducted by two reviewers (GCZ and YW). An initial screening by scanning titles and abstracts was conducted to exclude irrelevant studies. We conducted a second screening by reading the full text to exclude unrelated articles. Any disagreement about eligibility of studies was resolved by consensus.
3. Data extraction
Two reviewers (GCZ and YW) independently extracted information. Discrepancies between two reviewers were settled by discussion. Collected information was presented as follows: last name of the first author, publication date, study location, mean age of participants at baseline, sex, race, number of cases and participants, number of current smokers, source of cohort, female proportion in study population, maximum length of follow-up, loss to follow-up rates, smoking category, outcome of interest, diagnostic criteria, the most fully adjusted risk estimates with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), and adjustment factors.
4. Statistical analysis and quality assessment
A random-effects model was used to yield summary effect size. We used I2 statistic to quantitatively describe heterogeneity across studies [19]. High heterogeneity existed when I2 is more than 75%, moderate heterogeneity when I2 ranged from 50% to 75% and low heterogeneity when I2 was less than 50%. To reflect the stability of our results and to identify potential sources of between-study variability, we conducted sensitivity analyses through three methods, namely ignoring a single study in turn, repeating our analyses through a fixed-effects model, and using various exclusion criteria. Where possible, subgroup analyses were also performed to explore underlying sources of heterogeneity. A p-value for heterogeneity between subgroups was calculated through meta-regression.
Given that all types of dementia are relatively uncommon events, the hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) were roughly equal to RR [20, 21]. The HR and OR were therefore directly regarded as RR when RR was unavailable. We derived unadjusted RR from the corresponding exposure distribution when HR, OR and RR were unavailable. We used data from the report with the longest follow-up duration when multiple reports originated from the same population. If stratified results by smoking status (i.e., current and former) were separately reported, we summarized these stratum data through a random-effects model to produce an average estimate for ever smoking. Similarly, for two studies [4, 22] presenting measures by exposure level, we combined these risk estimates through a random-effects model to obtain the overall value for our meta-analysis. One study [5], whose authors only provided measures for men and women separately, was treated as two separate reports.
We conducted a dose-response analysis based on the method previously described by Orsini et al [23]. Given that the original researchers did not report person-year by exposure level, we approximately derived such data from mean duration of follow up and number of participants at each exposure level. We designated the midpoint of lower and upper boundaries as the assigned dose because all available data parameters of tobacco consumption were reported as range. Furthermore, if the highest range was open-ended, we considered that it shared the same width as the adjacent range. We fitted log-linear dose-response model to regress the log RR on the exposure level.
To reflect the impact of current smoking on the incidence of dementia at a population level, population attributable fraction (PAF) was calculated by the following formula: PAF = {P×(RR-1)/[P×(RR-1)+1]}. Here, P and RR denote the prevalence of current smoking and the summary RR, respectively. On the basis of included studies that reported prevalence of current smoking at baseline, we chose the median prevalence because the prevalence distribution was skewed.
We judged the methodological quality of included studies through the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale [24]. This tool could award a maximum of nine stars for each cohort study: four stars for the selection of study cohorts, two stars for the comparability of study groups and three stars for the ascertainment of outcome. If a study obtained six or more stars, it was considered to be of high quality.
Publication bias was tested with Begg’s test [25] and Egger’s test [26]. Data synthesis and analysis were performed via STATA software (version12.0, StataCorp, College Station, TX). Statistical significance level was set at p<0.05 under two-sided test unless otherwise specified.
Results
1. Literature search
We identified 4,417 relevant citations after removing duplicates. A total of 4,351 citations were further excluded after reviewing their title and abstract. The remaining 66 citations were assessed in more detail for eligibility by reading the full text. Of these, 31 were excluded. We added 2 studies [27, 28] through the process of scanning the reference lists of pertinent reviews. Finally, 37 studies were used for the final data synthesis (Fig. 1).
2. Study characteristics
The main characteristics of included studies are shown in Table 1. Our meta-analysis involved 960,280 individuals, and documented 14,935 all-cause dementia cases, 5,816 AD cases, and 1,406 VaD cases during follow-up varying from 2 years [9] to 40 years [29]. The sample size of included studies ranged from 163 [30] to 848,505 [5]. The average score for methodological quality of included studies was 6.22, with 24 studies showing high quality (S1 Table). 29 studies reported information on loss to follow-up. Of these, 14 had low loss to follow-up rate (≦20%). All cohorts were derived from general populations except the two cohorts from hospitals [22, 31]. The mean age of participants at baseline ranged from 42.5 years [31] to 84.0 years [32]. Note that three studies [31, 33, 34] and one study [29] recruited volunteers and twins as their participants, respectively. 34 studies reported information about sex ratios. Of these, the proportion of women ranged from 0% [10, 22, 33–37] to 81.34% [32]. The overall proportion of women in these 34 studies was 42.12%.
Adjusted RRs were available for 22 studies and most adjusted for age (21 studies) and sex (15 studies). The diagnostic criteria for dementia varied across studies, but Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) [38] and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition Revised (DSM-III-R) [39] were the most commonly used for dementia diagnosis; National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke-Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) [40] was the most used for AD diagnosis, and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) [41] was the most used for VaD diagnosis.
3. Current smoking and risk of all-cause dementia, AD and VaD
Our meta-analyses involved 937,392 subjects for all-cause dementia, 907,077 subjects for AD, and 882,548 subjects for VaD. Current smokers had significantly increased risk of all-cause dementia (n = 17 studies; RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.18–1.45), AD (n = 12 studies; RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13–1.73) and VaD (n = 5 studies; RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15–1.66) compared to never smokers (Fig. 2). There was evidence of low heterogeneity of pooled RR of VaD (I2 = 27.2%; p = 0.23), and moderate heterogeneity of pooled RR of all-cause dementia (I2 = 50.6%; p<0.01) and AD (I2 = 66.8%; p<0.01).
4. Former smoking and risk of all-cause dementia, AD and VaD
Our meta-analyses included 937,691 subjects for all-cause dementia, 907,376 subjects for AD, and 882,548 subjects for VaD. Former smokers did not show increased risk of all-cause dementia (n = 18 studies; RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96–1.06), AD (n = 13 studies; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96–1.13) and VaD (n = 5 studies; RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.83–1.13) compared to never smokers (Fig. 3). Low heterogeneity was observed for all-cause dementia (I2 = 6.3%; p = 0.38), AD (I2 = 2.8%; p = 0.42), and VaD (I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.91).
5. Ever smoking and risk of all-cause dementia, AD and VaD
Our meta-analyses included 955,050 subjects for all-cause dementia, 919,549 subjects for AD, and 886,794 subjects for VaD. Ever smoking showed significantly increased risk of all-cause dementia (n = 27 studies; RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05–1.22) and VaD (n = 8 studies; RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05–1.47) compared to never smokers, with low heterogeneity (all-cause dementia, I2 = 45.7%, p<0.01; VaD, I2 = 38.3%, p = 0.11) (Fig. 4). However, the increased risk of AD was of marginal significance (n = 22 studies; RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00–1.26), with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 55.9%; p<0.01).
6. Sensitivity analyses
Sensitivity analyses by exclusion of any single study in turn did not materially change the pooled risk estimates of all-cause dementia, AD and VaD for current and former smokers (Table 2). Furthermore, when we examined the effect of various exclusion criteria (see Table 2 for details of various exclusion criteria) on the summary results and repeated our analysis through the fixed-effects model, the aforementioned initial associations still remained. Similar results were observed for the association between ever smoking and all-cause dementia. However, the associations of ever smoking with AD and VaD were not stable. Specifically, the pooled RR of AD for ever smoking ranged from 1.10 (95% CI 0.97–1.26) to 1.14 (95% CI 1.02–1.29) in the analysis of omitting a single study in turn. Moreover, the analysis through the fixed-effects model produced a statistically significant RR of 1.17 (95% CI 1.09–1.24). For ever smoking and VaD, the result by exclusion of the study by Juan et al [9] was marginal (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99–1.29).
7. Subgroup analyses
The results of subgroup analyses on association of smoking with all-cause dementia and AD are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Current smokers aged 65 to 75 years at baseline showed increased risk of all-cause dementia and AD compared to those aged over 75 or under 65 years (Fig. 5), despite the fact that the difference between these subgroups was not significant (all p for heterogeneity>0.05). Current smokers without APOE ε4 allele showed a significantly increased risk of AD (RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.34–3.03), whereas the association between current smoking and AD in APOE ε4 carriers was not significant (RR 1.51; 95% CI 0.69–3.28).
Each circle represents an individual study. The area of circle is proportional to the inverse variance of logrr. RR, risk ratio.
The association between former smoking and all-cause dementia and AD persisted in all subgroups, with no evidence of heterogeneity between subgroups from meta-regression, apart from the subgroup for all-cause dementia stratified by the mean age of participants (p = 0.03). In the analysis stratified by adjusted risk estimates, we found evidence of significant heterogeneity between subgroups for the association between current smoking and all-cause dementia (p = 0.03) and AD (p = 0.01). Sex, study location, race and several key study characteristics, including sample size, mean duration of follow-up and loss to follow-up rate, were not the source of heterogeneity for pooled RR of all-cause dementia and AD for current, former and ever smoking.
Additionally, we found no significant difference between the subgroup using DSM-IV criteria and the subgroup using DSM-III-R criteria. The small number of studies of ever smoking and VaD precluded our interpretation to the results of subgroup analyses (S2 Table). We did not perform subgroup analysis with respect to current smoking, former smoking and VaD since limited studies [4, 5, 7, 9, 10] were available.
8. Dose–response analysis
Only two studies [4, 22] were included in the dose–response analysis of current smoking and all-cause dementia. Under the fixed-effect dose–response meta-regression model, the risk of dementia significantly increased by 34% for every 20 cigarettes per day (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25–1.43; p for nonlinearity = 0.36, goodness-of-fit chi2 = 5.91, p = 0.43; Fig. 6). For current smoking and incident AD and VaD, only one study was available, which showed a dose–response relationship [4].
The solid line represents the linear trend and lines with short dashes represent its’ 95% confidence interval.
9. PAF calculation
Fifteen studies reported the prevalence of current smoking in their study population. The prevalence of current smoking ranged from 8.8% (95% CI 6.8%–10.7%) [42] to 34.5% (95% CI 34.4%–34.6%) [5], with the median value of 20.7% (95% CI 20.2%–21.3%) [4]. The PAF of all-cause dementia, AD, and VaD for current smoking was 5.8% (95% CI 3.5%–8.7%), 7.6% (95% CI 2.6%–13.5%) and 7.3% (95% CI 2.9%–12.3%), respectively.
Discussion
The present meta-analysis identified that current smokers consistently showed increased risks of all-cause dementia, AD, and VaD compared with never smokers, while former smokers did not show increased risks. We also found that ever smokers showed increased risks of all-cause dementia and VaD, but the associations were weaker than that for current smokers. The increased risk of AD in ever smokers was marginal.
A diagnosis of dementia can never be valid and definitive without subsequent histopathological confirmation and this is challenging for researchers who rely on clinical diagnoses [43]. Accordingly, participants generally received a clinical diagnosis of dementia on the basis of various diagnostic classification systems. Several diagnostic criteria of dementia including DSM-IV criteria, DSM-III-R criteria, and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria are widely used. However, some studies observed that the prevalence of dementia varied remarkably when researchers relied on different diagnostic criteria [44, 45]. A large number of studies included in the present study allowed us to examine the effects of different diagnostic classification systems on the risk of dementia through subgroup and sensitivity analysis. We found that the diagnostic criteria of dementia did not modify the smoking-dementia association.
Previous studies indicated that the incidence of dementia rises with increasing age [46–49]. However, in subgroup analyses stratified by age at baseline, we observed an unanticipated decline in the risk of all-cause dementia and AD among current and ever smokers aged from 65–75 to over 75 years, most notably for current smokers. A possible interpretation for above phenomenon is that the risk of all-cause dementia and AD should rise with increasing age, but survival bias [50] and competing risk [51] apparently reduce the risk of dementia from smoking at extreme age. In fact, several previous studies [52, 53] have observed similar phenomena. Hernan and colleagues [53] observed that the weighted average RR of incident AD gradually decreased with increasing age. Similarly, Taylor and colleagues [52] found a positive association among individuals aged less than 50 years but an inverse association among those aged more than 50 years when investigating the relationship between smoking increasing allele and smoking initiation. Generally, survival bias will be introduced when researchers recruit older smokers into their study cohorts at baseline, and competing risk will occur if a smoker dies of smoking-associated events (e.g., lung cancer) before receiving a diagnosis of dementia during follow-up [51]. Given these facts, future epidemiologic studies on “bad” exposures and age-related outcomes should take into account the influence of survival bias and competing risk when making interpretations to their results.
The modification effect of APOE ε4 allele on the association between smoking and dementia remains controversial. As suggested by our subgroup analyses, the association of current smoking and increased risk of AD remained significant only in APOE ε4 noncarriers. Our findings are consistent with results of previous prospective studies [7, 8, 54]. The underlying mechanisms for the aforementioned results are unclear. APOE ε4 carriers are at an elevated risk of AD [55–57]. A potential explanation for our results is that the increased risk of AD due to APOE ε4 allele makes the increased risk due to other risk factors insubstantial. We could not assess the combined effects of smoking and APOE ε4 allele on all-cause dementia and VaD because of few individual studies exploring it. Further research is warranted to clarify the modification effect of APOE ε4 allele on association of smoking with dementia.
In the present study, smokers were grouped into current, former and ever smokers. Our meta-analyses observed increased risk of dementia in ever but not former smokers. Considering ever smokers consist of current and former smokers, this phenomenon may be attributable to the influence of current smokers. Indeed, as shown by our forest plots, risks of dementia in ever smokers were lower than those in current smokers but higher than those in former smokers.
The potential biological mechanisms regarding smoking and increased risk of dementia have been proposed [58, 59]. In brief, smoking could disturb the balance between generation and reduction of oxidants and free radical species. The consequent overload of oxidants and free radical species triggers oxidative stress (OS). Increased OS contributes to formation of senile plaque and neurofibrillary tangles, signifying the occurrence of dementia. In addition, increased risk of dementia resulting from smoking may be realized through cardiovascular disease (CVD) because smoking-related OS has been hypothesized as an underlying mechanism for CVD [60], and CVD contribute to an increased risk of dementia [61, 62].
The heterogeneity of the studies regarding adjustment of the risk estimates for underlying confounders is a possible limitation of our review. Smoking is associated with other dietary, lifestyle and social factors, such as higher intake of alcohol, lower body weight, higher blood pressure and lower education level. The subgroup analyses stratified by adjustment for body mass index, hypertension, alcohol and education showed consistent results on current smoking and all-cause dementia, as well as former smoking and all-cause dementia and AD, but the results for current smoking and AD only remained significant in subgroups with adjustment for alcohol and education. In addition, the limited number of studies adjusting for body mass index and hypertension could be subject to over-adjustment because both could be mediators in the causal pathway between smoking and dementia. Considering these facts, we could not completely rule out the possibility that the inadequate control for various underlying confounders may bias our findings. A promising and useful approach to reduce confounding bias is Mendelian randomization [63, 64], and it can assess the potential causal associations between exposures and end points. Fortunately, genome-wide association studies have identified that the CHRNA3 rs1051730 genotype is a common genetic marker strongly associated with smoking behavior [65, 66]. Thus, it raises a possibility of using Mendelian randomization to explore the nature of smoking-dementia association.
Our study also has several strengths. Inclusion of only prospective cohort studies can avoid recall bias and chicken–egg question occurring in case-control studies. We included a large number of studies, so we had enough statistical power to identify smoking-dementia association. Subgroup analyses promote a better understanding of smoking-dementia association. The stability of pooled results as evidenced by sensitivity analyses indicates the robustness of our findings. No statistical evidence of publication bias and inclusion of studies that treated smoking as a covariate further support the robustness of our findings. In addition, we explored the dose–response pattern between smoking and risk of all-cause dementia for the first time, despite the fact that only two studies were available.
Conclusions
Our meta-analysis indicates that smokers show an increased risk of dementia, and quitting smoking decreases the risk to that of never smokers. The increased risk of AD from smoking is more pronounced in APOE ε4 noncarriers. Both survival bias and competing risk reduce the risk of dementia from smoking at extreme age. The smoking-dementia relationship could not be modified by sex, race, study location and the diagnostic criteria of dementia. Future study is warranted to clarify the modification effect of APOE ε4 allele on association of smoking with dementia.
Supporting Information
S1 Dataset. Original data associated with the present study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118333.s002
(XLS)
S2 Table. Subgroup analyses of smoking and vascular dementia.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118333.s004
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
We thank Ling-Ou Li and Yang Peng for assistance in statistical analysis. We also thank professor Lam for modifying our initial manuscript.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: GCZ. Performed the experiments: GCZ YW. Analyzed the data: GCZ YW Y. Zhang Y. Zhao. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GCZ YW Y. Zhang Y. Zhao. Wrote the paper: GCZ. Modification of initial manuscript: Y. Zhang Y. Zhao. Modification of initial manuscript: JJG.
References
- 1. Reitz C, Brayne C, Mayeux R. Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease. Nature reviews Neurology. 2011;7: 137–152. pmid:21304480
- 2.
Organization World Health. Dementia: a public health priority: World Health Organization;2012.
- 3. Ng M, Freeman MK, Fleming TD, Robinson M, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Thomson B, et al. Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980–2012. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;311: 183–192. pmid:24399557
- 4. Rusanen M, Kivipelto M, Quesenberry CP Jr, Zhou J, Whitmer RA. Heavy smoking in midlife and long-term risk of Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. Archives of internal medicine. 2011;171: 333–339. pmid:20975015
- 5. Kimm H, Lee PH, Shin YJ, Park KS, Jo J, Lee Y, et al. Mid-life and late-life vascular risk factors and dementia in Korean men and women. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2011;52: e117–122. pmid:20932588
- 6. Rusanen M, Rovio S, Ngandu T, Nissinen A, Tuomilehto J, Soininen H, et al. Midlife smoking, apolipoprotein E and risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a population-based cardiovascular risk factors, aging and dementia study. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders. 2010;30: 277–284. pmid:20847559
- 7. Reitz C, den Heijer T, van Duijn C, Hofman A, Breteler MM. Relation between smoking and risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 2007;69: 998–1005. pmid:17785668
- 8. Aggarwal NT, Bienias JL, Bennett DA, Wilson RS, Morris MC, Schneider JA, et al. The relation of cigarette smoking to incident Alzheimer's disease in a biracial urban community population. Neuroepidemiology. 2006;26: 140–146. pmid:16493200
- 9. Juan D, Zhou DH, Li J, Wang JY, Gao C, Chen M. A 2-year follow-up study of cigarette smoking and risk of dementia. European journal of neurology: the official journal of the European Federation of Neurological Societies. 2004;11: 277–282. pmid:15061830
- 10. Tyas SL, White LR, Petrovitch H, Webster Ross G, Foley DJ, Heimovitz HK, et al. Mid-life smoking and late-life dementia: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Neurobiology of aging. 2003;24: 589–596. pmid:12714116
- 11. Batty GD, Russ TC, Starr JM, Stamatakis E, Kivimaki M. Modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors as predictors of dementia death: pooling of ten general population-based cohort studies. Journal of negative results in biomedicine. 2014;13: 8. pmid:24886432
- 12. Peters R, Poulter R, Warner J, Beckett N, Burch L, Bulpitt C. Smoking, dementia and cognitive decline in the elderly, a systematic review. BMC geriatrics. 2008;8: 36. pmid:19105840
- 13. Anstey KJ, Von Sanden C, Salim A, O'Kearney R. Smoking as a risk factor for dementia and cognitive decline: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. American journal of epidemiology. 2007;166: 367–378. pmid:17573335
- 14. Cataldo JK, Prochaska JJ, Glantz SA. Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease: An analysis controlling for tobacco industry affiliation. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 2010;19: 465–480. pmid:20110594
- 15. Beydoun MA, Beydoun HA, Gamaldo AA, Teel A, Zonderman AB, Wang Y. Epidemiologic studies of modifiable factors associated with cognition and dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC public health. 2014;14: 643. pmid:24962204
- 16. Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I. Smoking and dementia in male British doctors: prospective study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2000;320: 1097–1102. pmid:10775216
- 17. Hirayama T. Large cohort study on the relation between cigarette smoking and senile dementia without cerebrovascular lesions. Tobacco Control. 1992;1: 176.
- 18. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2009;339: b2535. pmid:19622551
- 19. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2003;327: 557–560. pmid:12958120
- 20. Greenland S. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiologic reviews. 1987; 9: 1–30. pmid:3678409
- 21. Siristatidis C, Sergentanis TN, Kanavidis P, Trivella M, Sotiraki M, Mavromatis I, et al. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF: impact on ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction update. 2013; 19: 105–123. pmid:23255514
- 22. Rosengren A, Skoog I, Gustafson D, Wilhelmsen L. Body mass index, other cardiovascular risk factors, and hospitalization for dementia. Archives of internal medicine. 2005;165: 321–326. pmid:15710796
- 23. Orsini N, Bellocco R, Greenland S. Generalized least squares for trend estimation of summarized dose–response data. The Stata Journal. 2006; 6(1):40–57.
- 24.
Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2000.
- 25. Begg CB and Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50: 1088–1101. pmid:7786990
- 26. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1997;315: 629–634. pmid:9310563
- 27. Broe GA, Creasey H, Jorm AF, Bennett HP, Casey B, Waite LM, et al. Health habits and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in old age: a prospective study on the effects of exercise, smoking and alcohol consumption. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health. 1998; 22: 621–623. pmid:9744220
- 28. Launer LJ, Andersen K, Dewey ME, Letenneur L, Ott A, Amaducci LA, et al. Rates and risk factors for dementia and Alzheimer's disease: results from EURODEM pooled analyses. EURODEM Incidence Research Group and Work Groups. European Studies of Dementia. Neurology. 1999;52: 78–84. pmid:9921852
- 29. Hassing LB, Dahl AK, Thorvaldsson V, Berg S, Gatz M, Pedersen NL, et al. Overweight in midlife and risk of dementia: a 40-year follow-up study. International journal of obesity (2005). 2009;33: 893–898. pmid:19506566
- 30. Laurin D, Verreault R, Lindsay J, Dewailly E, Holub BJ. Omega-3 fatty acids and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD. 2003;5: 315–322. pmid:14624027
- 31. Whitmer RA, Gunderson EP, Barrett-Connor E, Quesenberry CP Jr, Yaffe K. Obesity in middle age and future risk of dementia: a 27 year longitudinal population based study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2005;330: 1360. pmid:15863436
- 32. Wang HX, Fratiglioni L, Frisoni GB, Viitanen M, Winblad B. Smoking and the occurrence of Alzheimer's disease: cross-sectional and longitudinal data in a population-based study. American journal of epidemiology. 1999;149: 640–644. pmid:10192311
- 33. Lin FR, Metter EJ, O'Brien RJ, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss and incident dementia. Archives of neurology. 2011;68: 214–220. pmid:21320988
- 34. Moffat SD, Zonderman AB, Metter EJ, Kawas C, Blackman MR, Harman SM, et al. Free testosterone and risk for Alzheimer disease in older men. Neurology. 2004;62: 188–193. pmid:14745052
- 35. Power BD, Alfonso H, Flicker L, Hankey GJ, Yeap BB, Almeida O. Body adiposity in later life and the incidence of dementia: the health in men study. PloS one. 2011;6: e17902. pmid:21464984
- 36. Laurin D, Masaki KH, White LR, Launer LJ. Ankle-to-brachial index and dementia: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Circulation. 2007;116: 2269–2274. pmid:17967779
- 37. Laurin D, Masaki KH, Foley DJ, White LR, Launer LJ. Midlife dietary intake of antioxidants and risk of late-life incident dementia: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. American journal of epidemiology. 2004;159: 959–967. pmid:15128608
- 38.
Association AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. 1994.
- 39.
Association AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. 1987.
- 40. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Almeida O. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984;34: 939–944. pmid:6610841
- 41. Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, Cummings JL, Masdeu JC, Garcia JH, et al. Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. Neurology. 1993;43: 250–260. pmid:8094895
- 42. Bowen ME. A prospective examination of the relationship between physical activity and dementia risk in later life. American journal of health promotion: AJHP. 2012;26: 333–340. pmid:22747314
- 43. Karantzoulis S, Galvin JE. Distinguishing Alzheimer's disease from other major forms of dementia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11: 1579–1591. pmid:22014137
- 44. Erkinjuntti T, Ostbye T, Steenhuis R, Hachinski V. The effect of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dementia. The New England journal of medicine. 1997;337: 1667–1674. pmid:9385127
- 45. Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Vataja R, Kaste M. Dementia three months after stroke. Baseline frequency and effect of different definitions of dementia in the Helsinki Stroke Aging Memory Study (SAM) cohort. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 1997;28: 785–792. pmid:9099197
- 46. Vardarajan BN, Faber KM, Bird TD, Bennett DA, Rosenberg R, Boeve BF, et al. Age-specific incidence rates for dementia and Alzheimer disease in NIA-LOAD/NCRAD and EFIGA families: National Institute on Aging Genetics Initiative for Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease/National Cell Repository for Alzheimer Disease (NIA-LOAD/NCRAD) and Estudio Familiar de Influencia Genetica en Alzheimer (EFIGA). JAMA neurology. 2014;71: 315–323. pmid:24425039
- 47. Jorm AF, Jolley D. The incidence of dementia: a meta-analysis. Neurology. 1998;51: 728–733. pmid:9748017
- 48. Gao S, Hendrie HC, Hall KS, Hui S. The relationships between age, sex, and the incidence of dementia and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. Archives of general psychiatry. 1998;55: 809–815. pmid:9736007
- 49. Katz MJ, Lipton RB, Hall CB, Zimmerman ME, Sanders AE, Verghese J, et al. Age-specific and sex-specific prevalence and incidence of mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and Alzheimer dementia in blacks and whites: a report from the Einstein Aging Study. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. 2012; 26: 335–343. pmid:22156756
- 50. Hernan MA, Alonso A, Logroscino G. Cigarette smoking and dementia: potential selection bias in the elderly. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2008;19: 448–450. pmid:18414087
- 51. Chang CC, Zhao Y, Lee CW, Ganguli M. Smoking, death, and Alzheimer disease: a case of competing risks. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. 2012; 26: 300–306. pmid:22185783
- 52. Taylor AE, Munafo MR. Commentary: Does mortality from smoking have implications for future Mendelian randomization studies? International journal of epidemiology. 2014;43: 1483–1486. pmid:25125581
- 53. Hernan MA, Alonso A, Logroscino G. Cigarette smoking and dementia: Potential selection bias in the elderly. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2008;19: 448–450. pmid:18414087
- 54. Merchant C, Tang MX, Albert S, Manly J, Stern Y, Mayeux R. The influence of smoking on the risk of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1999;52: 1408–1412. pmid:10227626
- 55. Chuang YF, Hayden KM, Norton MC, Tschanz J, Breitner JC, Welsh-Bohmer KA, et al. Association between APOE epsilon4 allele and vascular dementia: The Cache County study. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders. 2010;29: 248–253. pmid:20375505
- 56. Koponen S, Taiminen T, Kairisto V, Portin R, Isoniemi H, Hinkka S, et al. APOE-epsilon4 predicts dementia but not other psychiatric disorders after traumatic brain injury. Neurology. 2004;63: 749–750. pmid:15326261
- 57. Huriletemuer , Wang B, Wang J, Wang G, Zhang C, Zhao S, et al. APOE epsilon4 is a high-risk factor for Alzheimer's disease in the Mongolian population. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2010;288: 167–169. pmid:19819468
- 58. Durazzo TC, Mattsson N, Weiner MW. Smoking and increased Alzheimer's disease risk: A review of potential mechanisms. Alzheimer's & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2014;10: S122–145.
- 59. Burke A, Fitzgerald GA. Oxidative stress and smoking-induced vascular injury. Progress in cardiovascular diseases. 2003;46: 79–90. pmid:12920701
- 60. Ambrose JA, Barua RS. The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: an update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004;43: 1731–1737. pmid:15145091
- 61. Paciaroni M, Bogousslavsky J. Connecting cardiovascular disease and dementia: further evidence. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2013; 2: e000656. pmid:24351703
- 62. Newman AB, Fitzpatrick AL, Lopez O, Jackson S, Lyketsos C, Jagust W, et al. Dementia and Alzheimer's disease incidence in relationship to cardiovascular disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study cohort. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2005; 53: 1101–1107. pmid:16108925
- 63. Zoccali C, Testa A, Spoto B, Tripepi G, Mallamaci F. Mendelian randomization: a new approach to studying epidemiology in ESRD. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2006; 47: 332–341. pmid:16431263
- 64. Didelez V, Sheehan N. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Statistical methods in medical research. 2007;16: 309–330. pmid:17715159
- 65. Kaur-Knudsen D, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE. CHRNA3 genotype, nicotine dependence, lung function and disease in the general population. The European respiratory journal. 2012;40: 1538–1544. pmid:22441734
- 66. Tobacco and Genetics Consortium. Genome-wide meta-analyses identify multiple loci associated with smoking behavior. Nature genetics. 2010;42: 441–447. pmid:20418890
- 67. Zhou R, Deng J, Zhang M, Zhou HD, Wang YJ. Association between bone mineral density and the risk of Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD. 2011;24: 101–108. pmid:21187587
- 68. Ronnemaa E, Zethelius B, Lannfelt L, Kilander L. Vascular risk factors and dementia: 40-year follow-up of a population-based cohort. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders. 2011;31: 460–466. pmid:21791923
- 69. Ogunniyi A, Lane KA, Baiyewu O, Gao S, Gureje O, Unverzagt FW, et al. Hypertension and incident dementia in community-dwelling elderly Yoruba Nigerians. Acta neurologica Scandinavica. 2011;124: 396–402. pmid:21303353
- 70. Gao S, Nguyen JT, Hendrie HC, Unverzagt FW, Hake A, Smith-Gamble V, et al. Accelerated weight loss and incident dementia in an elderly African-American cohort. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2011; 59: 18–25. pmid:21054328
- 71. Chen R, Hu Z, Wei L, Ma Y, Liu Z, Copeland JR. Incident dementia in a defined older Chinese population. PloS one. 2011; 6: e24817.US. pmid:21966372
- 72. Scarmeas N, Luchsinger JA, Schupf N, Brickman AM, Cosentino S, Tang MX, et al. Physical activity, diet, and risk of Alzheimer disease. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2009;302: 627–637. pmid:19671904
- 73. Alonso A, Mosley TH Jr, Gottesman RF, Catellier D, Sharrett AR, Coresh J. Risk of dementia hospitalisation associated with cardiovascular risk factors in midlife and older age: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2009; 80: 1194–1201. pmid:19692426
- 74. Kivipelto M, Rovio S, Ngandu T, Kareholt I, Eskelinen M, Winblad B, et al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 magnifies lifestyle risks for dementia: a population-based study. Journal of cellular and molecular medicine. 2008; 12: 2762–2771. pmid:18318693
- 75. Dahl AK, Lopponen M, Isoaho R, Berg S, Kivela SL. Overweight and obesity in old age are not associated with greater dementia risk. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008; 56: 2261–2266. pmid:19093925
- 76. Beydoun MA, Lhotsky A, Wang Y, Dal Forno G, An Y, Metter EJ, et al. Association of adiposity status and changes in early to mid-adulthood with incidence of Alzheimer's disease. American journal of epidemiology. 2008;168: 1179–1189. pmid:18835864
- 77. Cherubini A, Martin A, Andres-Lacueva C, Di Iorio A, Lamponi M, Mecocci P, et al. Vitamin E levels, cognitive impairment and dementia in older persons: the InCHIANTI study. Neurobiology of aging. 2005;26: 987–994. pmid:15748776
- 78. Lindsay J, Laurin D, Verreault R, Hebert R, Helliwell B, Hill GB, et al. Risk factors for Alzheimer's disease: a prospective analysis from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. American journal of epidemiology. 2002;156: 445–453. pmid:12196314
- 79. Tyas SL, Manfreda J, Strain LA, Montgomery PR. Risk factors for Alzheimer's disease: a population-based, longitudinal study in Manitoba, Canada. International journal of epidemiology. 2001;30: 590–597. pmid:11416089
- 80. Yoshitake T, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, Ohmura T, Iwamoto H, Nakayama K, et al. Incidence and risk factors of vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease in a defined elderly Japanese population: the Hisayama Study. Neurology. 1995;45: 1161–1168. pmid:7783883
- 81. Letenneur L, Dartigues JF, Commenges D, Barberger-Gateau P, Tessier JF, Orgogozo JM. Tobacco consumption and cognitive impairment in elderly people. A population-based study. Annals of epidemiology. 1994; 4: 449–454. pmid:7804499
- 82. Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Beckett LA, Funkenstein HH, Albert MS, Chown MJ, et al. Relation of smoking and alcohol consumption to incident Alzheimer's disease. American journal of epidemiology. 1992;135: 347–355. pmid:1550089