In Vitro Matured Oocytes Are More Susceptible than In Vivo Matured Oocytes to Mock ICSI Induced Functional and Genetic Changes

Shubhashree Uppangala; Shilly Dhiman; Sujit Raj Salian; Vikram Jeet Singh; Guruprasad Kalthur; Satish Kumar Adiga

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119735

Abstract

Background

Concerns regarding the safety of ICSI have been intensified recently due to increased risk of birth defects in ICSI born children. Although fertilization rate is significantly higher in ICSI cycles, studies have failed to demonstrate the benefits of ICSI in improving the pregnancy rate. Poor technical skill, and suboptimal in vitro conditions may account for the ICSI results however, there is no report on the effects of oocyte manipulations on the ICSI outcome.

Objective

The present study elucidates the influence of mock ICSI on the functional and genetic integrity of the mouse oocytes.

Methods

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) level, mitochondrial status, and phosphorylation of H2AX were assessed in the in vivo matured and IVM oocytes subjected to mock ICSI.

Results

A significant increase in ROS level was observed in both in vivo matured and IVM oocytes subjected to mock ICSI (P<0.05-0.001) whereas unique mitochondrial distribution pattern was found only in IVM oocytes (P<0.01-0.001). Importantly, differential H2AX phosphorylation was observed in both in vivo matured and IVM oocytes subjected to mock ICSI (P <0.001).

Conclusion

The data from this study suggests that mock ICSI can alter genetic and functional integrity in oocytes and IVM oocytes are more vulnerable to mock ICSI induced changes.

Citation: Uppangala S, Dhiman S, Salian SR, Singh VJ, Kalthur G, Adiga SK (2015) In Vitro Matured Oocytes Are More Susceptible than In Vivo Matured Oocytes to Mock ICSI Induced Functional and Genetic Changes. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0119735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119735

Academic Editor: Dragana Nikitovic-Tzanakaki, University of Crete, GREECE

Received: October 8, 2014; Accepted: January 13, 2015; Published: March 18, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Uppangala et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: Data are available from the Manipal University Institutional Data Access/Ethics Committee for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding: This work was supported by the intramural grant from Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal- 576104 and Dr. TMA Pai Endowment Chair Fund of Manipal University sanctioned to SKA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has become the treatment of choice for several infertility disorders; however, concerns regarding the safety of this technique have been intensified recently due to increased risk of birth defects in ICSI born children [1–4]. Although fertilization rate is significantly higher in ICSI cycles, several studies have failed to demonstrate the benefits of ICSI in improving the pregnancy rate [5–6]; possibly due to poor developmental competence of the embryos [7], compromised implantation [8] and post-implantation developmental potential [9]. These observations prompt more basic research to assess the safety of ICSI [10–11].

Several sperm mediated factors can affect the ICSI outcome [12–15]. Incorporation of the acrosome into the oocyte during ICSI has shown to be potentially hazardous to embryo development [16]. Similarly, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) which is being used successfully in human ICSI for sperm immobilization has shown adverse effects on gametes and embryos [17–20]. On the other hand, the poor technical skill, and suboptimal in vitro conditions may also be detrimental to the embryonic development and impair ICSI outcome [21–22]. However, there is no report on the effect of oocyte manipulations on the ICSI outcome.

Although ICSI has been successful in many other species, the ability of oocytes to tolerate microinjection process is related to the species [23] possibly due to differences in oocyte ultrastructure. Mouse is considered as a model organism to study mammalian fertilization. However, the ability to fertilize mouse oocytes by conventional ICSI is difficult [24]. Due to increased sensitivity of mouse oocytes to micromanipulation and also ethical restrictions in using human oocytes, we have used mouse model to elucidate the effects of in situ manipulations such as ooplasma aspiration and microinjection on the functional and genetic integrity of the oocytes. In order to rule out the sperm mediated effects, only mock injection was performed without sperm involvement. In addition to in vivo matured oocytes, in vitro matured (IVM) oocytes were also used since IVM process makes the oocyte more vulnerable to embryological interventions [25]. Injected oocytes were activated parthenogenetically to elucidate the influence of mock ICSI on the functional and genetic integrity of the oocytes.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Eight weeks old healthy Swiss albino female mice (N = 62) were used in this study. The animals were maintained under the controlled conditions of temperature (23±2°C) and light (12h light/dark cycles) with standard diet and water ad libitum. Institutional Ethical Committee of Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University (IAEC/KMC/03/2011–2012) approval was taken prior to the commencement of the study.

Superovulation and MII oocytes retrieval

Female mice were superovulated by intraperitoneal injection (5IU) of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG, Cat No. G4877 Sigma Aldrich, USA) followed by the administration of 10IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, Eutrig-HP) after 48h. Animals were euthanized 12h post hCG by cervical dislocation and oocyte cumulus complexes (OCC) were released from the oviduct into the pre-warmed M2 medium. OCCs were exposed to 0.1% hyaluronidase (Cat. No. 4272 Sigma Aldrich, USA) for 30 seconds and oocytes were washed in M16 medium and then incubated in M2 medium at 37°C under 5% CO₂.

GV oocyte collection and In Vitro maturation

Animals were euthanized and the ovaries were collected in pre-warmed M2 medium. The cortical region of the ovaries was gently teased using fine needles and the Germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes were released from the secondary/tertiary follicles. The GV oocytes were further subjected to IVM by culturing in 20μL of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Cat. No. D5648, Sigma Aldrich, USA) supplemented with 1% Non-essential α-amino acids (Cat. No. M7145, Sigma Aldrich, USA), 1% Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium (ITS, Cat. No. 51500–056 Gibco, USA), 0.05% pyruvate and 0.3% BSA overlaid with oil. Oocytes were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO₂ for 24h and then assessed for nuclear maturity. Oocytes with polar body were considered as mature (metaphase II).

Mock ICSI

Both in vivo matured and IVM oocytes were randomly divided into three groups. Two sets of controls (Standard control: oocytes incubated at 37°C and 5% CO₂; ICSI control: oocytes kept in the ICSI dish without mock injection) and ICSI group (oocytes kept in the ICSI dish subjected to mock injection) were included in this study. ICSI dish had about ten micro droplets of 3.5μL M16 medium where single mature oocytes were placed in each droplet. Approximately 10μL of PVP based immobilization medium (PVP Clinical Grade, Cat # 10900000A, Origio, Medicult) was placed adjacent to oocyte droplets and the dish was overlaid with mineral oil. Mock injection was carried out using an inverted microscope (Olympus IX71, Tokyo, Japan) at a magnification of 350X, on a heated stage (MATS-USMZSS, Thokai Hit, Japan) maintained at 37°C. Two micromanipulators (Narishige, Tokyo, Japan) were mounted on the microscope that allowed the micro-movements of two needles on a three-dimensional plane. Briefly, oocytes were positioned by keeping the polar body at 6 o’ clock position and held with gentle suction using holding pipette. Injection needle was first equilibrated in PVP followed by zona penetration, then ooplasm was aspirated and released without the deposition of sperm into the oocyte. A time period of 30 min was maintained for the entire procedure and after 30 min, oocytes were further processed for different parameters as described in the subsequent sections. Mock ICSI in both the groups was performed by a single person. Care was taken while aspirating the cytoplasm to the fixed level.

Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species

The intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in oocytes was measured by 2′',7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCHFDA, Cat No. D6883, Sigma Aldrich, USA) fluorescence assay as described earlier [26]. Thirty minutes after mock injection, oocytes in three study groups were incubated separately in 10μM DCHFDA prepared in M16 medium for 30min at 37°C and 5% CO₂. Oocytes were then washed to remove surface-bound dye before being mounted between a slide and coverslip. Fluorescence emissions of oocytes were recorded using a fluorescent microscope (Imager-A1, Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany) under UV light with filter at 405–435nm. Appropriate positive and negative controls were used in each experiment. Images were acquired and the intracellular ROS levels were quantified using Q Capture software (Media Cybernetics Inc., USA).

Assessment of mitochondrial distribution

The mitochondrial distribution pattern was assessed in both in vivo matured IVM oocytes as previously described [27] with minor modification. Briefly, oocytes were incubated in M16 medium containing 10μg/mL of Rhodamine 123 (Cat No. R8004, Sigma Aldrich, USA) for 20min at 37°C and 5% CO₂. After wash, the oocytes were transferred onto a glass slide containing about 20μL of fluorescent mounting medium (Cat. No. S3023, Dako, USA), carefully observed under UV light (405–435nm) using a fluorescent microscope (Imager-A1, Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany) and the images were acquired using Q Capture imaging software (Media Cybernetics Inc. USA). The patterns of mitochondrial distribution were classified according to Liu et al. [28] as follows: i) uniform distribution: mitochondria spread uniformly all over the cytoplasm ii) aggregated distribution: mitochondria distributed in irregular clumps and iii) peripheral distribution: mitochondria localized in the periphery of the oocytes.

Measurement of mitochondrial activity

The mitochondrial activity in mock injected IVM oocytes was determined as described earlier [29] with minor modifications. Briefly, the oocytes were exposed to 1μg/mL 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide JC-1 (Cat. No. T3168, Molecular probes, Life technologies, USA), for 30 min at 37°C followed by wash in DMEM medium supplemented with 1mg/mL of bovine serum albumin. JC-1 monomers and JC-1 aggregates were detected in a using a fluorescence microscope (Imager-A1, Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany). The ratio of orange and green fluorescence was calculated using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA).

Parthenogenetic activation

The oocytes were subjected to parthenogenetic activation as described by Ma et al. [30] with minor modifications. Briefly oocytes were incubated in 20μL droplet of M16 medium (Ca⁺⁺ Mg⁺⁺ free) containing 10mM SrCl₂ at 37°C in 5% CO₂ for 3h and then washed three-times in M16 medium. Pronuclear formation was scored to determine the rate of activation and only activated oocytes were used for immunofluorescence.

γ-H2AX detection

Immunofluorescence detection of γ-H2AX was performed according to the previously described method [31] with minor modifications. Oocytes were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min and then permeabilized for 30 min at room temperature with PBS containing 0.1% (V/V) Triton X-100 and 0.5% bovine serum albumin. They were then stained with anti-phospho-Histone H2AX antibody (1:20, Cat. No. 05–636; Upstate Biotechnology, Billerica, MA, USA) incubated overnight at 4°C followed by treatment with secondary antibody conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Goat anti-mouse IgG, Cat. No. sc-2010, 1:50 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) for 1h at 37°C. The immunostained oocytes were washed with PBS containing 0.1% triton-X, counterstained with 4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and observed under fluorescent microscope. Immunofluorescent signals were recorded using a fluorescent microscope (Imager-A1, Zeiss, Gottingen Germany) equipped with Q-imaging Micropublisher 5.0 RTV digital camera (Qimaging Surrey, BC, Canada). The number of foci bearing oocytes and the average number of foci per cell were calculated from a minimum of 30 oocytes per data point. In addition, the foci were categorized as small (< 1μm diameter), and large (> 1μm diameter) in each group.

Statistical analysis

The data represents either mean and standard error (Mean ± SEM) or percentage of the values. The statistical significance level was calculated using Chi square test, Fischer’s exact test, Mann- Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn post-test for multiple comparisons using GraphPAD Instat software (Graphpad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The graphs were plotted using Origin 6.0 (Origin Lab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

Results

Mock ICSI increased ROS level in both In Vivo matured and IVM oocytes

A total of 61 in vivo matured and 79 IVM oocytes were included in order to assess the effect of mock ICSI on intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species. The ROS level in oocytes was quantified in all three groups as described in the materials and methods. The data on baseline ROS level was recorded in the oocytes from standard control group whereas ICSI control group served as an internal control. The in vivo matured oocytes in both ICSI control and ICSI group had significantly higher levels of ROS in comparison to the standard control (P < 0.05, P < 0.001 respectively, Fig. 1A). Further, the ICSI group had significantly higher level of ROS compared to ICSI control (P < 0.01, Fig. 1A). In contrast to in vivo matured oocytes, IVM oocytes did not show any significant difference between standard control and ICSI control. However, ICSI group had significantly higher level of ROS in comparison to standard control and ICSI control (P <0.001) (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, in vivo matured oocytes in ICSI group had almost 1.5 fold increase in ROS level in comparison to corresponding group in IVM (P < 0.0001).

Download:

Fig 1. Effect of mock injection on Reactive oxygen species level in in vivo and in vitro matured murine oocytes assessed using 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCHFDA) staining.

A. Oocytes retrieved from superovulated mice, subjected to mock ICSI were assessed for ROS production. The relative ROS intensity in standard control (N = 19), ICSI control (N = 22) and ICSI group (N = 20), was determined. The error bars represent the corresponding SEM (Mean ± SEM). ^aP <0.05: Standard control Vs ICSI control, ^bP <0.01: Standard control Vs ICSI group, ^cP < 0.001: ICSI control Vs ICSI group. B. In vitro matured metaphase II oocytes, subjected to mock ICSI were assessed for ROS production. The relative ROS intensity in standard control (N = 28), ICSI control (N = 25) and ICSI group (N = 26), was determined (Mean ± SEM). ^dP < 0.001: Standard control Vs ICSI group and ICSI control Vs ICSI group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119735.g001

IVM oocytes were more susceptible to mock ICSI induced changes in mitochondria

Mitochondrial distribution pattern was measured in 113 in vivo matured and 98 IVM oocytes. Importantly, mitochondrial distribution pattern did not vary significantly between three groups of in vivo matured oocytes and majority of the oocytes had uniform distribution pattern (Fig. 2A). In contrast, a significant decline in uniform mitochondrial distribution pattern was observed in IVM derived standard control oocytes in comparison to that of in vivo matured one (P <0.05). On the other hand, both ICSI control and ICSI groups had significantly lower number of oocytes displaying uniform pattern in comparison to standard control (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01 respectively) (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, ICSI group had approximately 44% of oocytes with peripheral mitochondrial pattern which was not observed in any other groups of in vivo matured and IVM oocytes (P < 0.0001).

Download:

Fig 2. Mitochondrial distribution and activity as measured by Rhodamine 123 and JC1 staining of oocytes.

A. Oocytes retrieved from superovulated mice, subjected to mock ICSI were assessed for mitochondrial distribution. The percentage of oocytes displaying uniform (closed bar); and aggregated (grey bar) distribution in standard control (N = 28), ICSI control (N = 49) and ICSI group (N = 36), was determined. B. In vitro matured metaphase II oocytes, subjected to mock ICSI were evaluated for mitochondrial distribution. The percentage of oocytes displaying uniform (closed bar); aggregated (grey bar) and peripheral (open bar) distribution in standard control (N = 33), ICSI control (N = 33) and ICSI group (N = 32), was determined. ^aP <0.05: Uniform distribution pattern in standard control of figure A Vs Standard control in figure B. ^bP < 0.001: Standard control Vs ICSI control. ^cP < 0.01: Standard control Vs ICSI group. ^dP < 0.0001: percentage of oocytes displaying peripheral distribution in ICSI group with other two groups. C. Mitochondrial activity as measured by the JC1 ratio in IVM oocytes in standard control (N = 81); ICSI control (N = 69) and ICSI group (N = 68). Please note that difference were not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119735.g002

Since IVM oocytes subjected to mock ICSI displayed a unique peripheral distribution, oocytes were subjected to JC-1 staining to understand the mitochondrial activity. JC-1 aggregates forming multimers that fluoresce orange in active mitochondria and green from JC-1 monomers in inactive mitochondria. Though, we observed a moderate increase in the ratio, the difference was not statistically significant. These observations suggest that altered distribution pattern observed in mock injected oocytes may not affect mitochondrial activity significantly (Fig. 2C).

Parthenogenetic activation rate was unaffected by mock ICSI

To assess whether mock injection affects the developmental competence of oocytes, oocytes from all the three groups were parthenogenetically activated using SrCl_2. The activation rate in the in vivo matured oocytes was not statistically significant between standard control (67%), ICSI control (81%) and ICSI (83%). Similarly, IVM oocytes did not show statistically significant difference between three groups (standard control: 38%; ICSI control: 44% and ICSI: 37%) (Table 1). However, overall activation rate in IVM oocytes was significantly lower than in vivo matured oocytes in the corresponding subgroups (P < 0.01).

Download:

Table 1. Parthenogenetic activation rate across study groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119735.t001

Phosphorylated H2AX in oocytes subjected to mock injection

A significant increase in the ROS level and altered mitochondrial distribution pattern in mock injected oocytes prompted us to look into the prevalence of DNA double strand breaks (DSB’s) and the repair process in in vivo matured and IVM oocytes subjected to mock injection. To address this, parthenogenetically activated oocytes were immunostained to detect H2AX phosphorylation. Since γ-H2AX foci size reflects specific biological response, the number of small (< 1μm diameter) and large foci (> 1μm diameter) were analyzed in each group. The number of small foci was significantly lower than large foci in all three groups of in vivo matured oocytes (P <0.0001). The number of large foci in in vivo matured ICSI control and ICSI groups was almost 2.5 fold higher than standard control and the differences were statistically significant (P <0.001). The oocytes in ICSI control and ICSI groups had comparable number of large foci hence the difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 3A). On the other hand, IVM derived oocytes in standard control had almost 18 fold higher number of small foci in comparison to corresponding group in in vivo matured oocytes (P <0.0001). Conversely, the number of large foci in IVM groups was comparable to in vivo matured groups. On the other hand, the number of small foci was significantly lower in both ICSI control and ICSI groups in comparison to standard control of IVM oocytes (P < 0.001). In contrast to small foci, the number of large foci in ICSI control and ICSI groups were significantly higher than standard control in IVM oocytes (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3B,C).

Download:

Fig 3. γ-H2AX immunolocalization in GV oocytes.

(A) Oocytes retrieved from superovulated mice, subjected to mock ICSI were assessed for γ-H2AX foci. The average number of foci bearing oocytes from standard control (N = 33), ICSI control (N = 40) and ICSI group (N = 41) from a total of 19 animals were evaluated. ^aP < 0.0001 between small foci (open bar) and large foci (closed bar) in corresponding groups. ^bP < 0.001: standard control Vs ICSI control and ICSI group. B. In vitro matured metaphase II oocytes, subjected to mock ICSI were activated parthenogenetically to assess γ-H2AX foci. The average number of foci bearing oocytes from standard control (N = 31), ICSI control (N = 36) and ICSI group (N = 30) from a total of 14 animals were evaluated. ^cP < 0.0001: Small foci in in vitro matured Vs in vivo matured oocytes. ^dP < 0.001: Small foci in ICSI control and ICSI groups Vs standard control. ^eP <0.001: Large foci in ICSI control and ICSI groups Vs standard control. (C) Representative images of γ-H2AX foci in three groups (enlarged foci are shown in the insert, red arrow shows small focus and yellow arrow shows large focus). The scale bar applies to all nine micrographs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119735.g003

Discussion

We present here a study using a mouse model to test the impact of oocyte manipulation by mock ICSI on the functional and genetic integrity of the oocytes. To our knowledge, this is the first time significant alterations in ROS production and mitochondrial distribution pattern have been observed in the oocytes subjected to ICSI conditions. Though mitochondrial pattern was unaffected in in vivo matured oocytes, it is interesting to note that, mock ICSI resulted in a unique peripheral mitochondrial distribution in in vitro matured oocytes. Importantly, highly significant, distinct H2AX phosphorylation triggered by mock ICSI was observed in IVM oocytes.

To mimic clinical ICSI, a modified technique close to clinical situation was employed in mouse oocytes without sperm deposition in the ooplasm. The overall success in terms of degeneration rate following manipulation, oocyte granulation and fragmentation was not significantly different from control groups (data not shown) indicating that there was no immediate negative effect of manipulations on overall efficiency.

ROS that are produced in measurable quantities by every aerobic system were considered toxic to living cells [32]. In the present study, apart from in vivo matured mouse oocytes, GV oocytes were cultured in vitro to attain maturity and after 24h of maturation, ROS level was assessed in oocytes post mock injection. It has been shown that IVM derived oocytes were highly susceptible to oxidative stress [33]; hence we speculated increased ROS level in IVM oocytes. To our surprise, the baseline ROS level in IVM oocytes was significantly lower than in vivo matured oocytes. Since ovarian production of ROS is transiently triggered by LH [34], lack of LH stimuli in IVM system possibly resulted in a lower level of ROS in these oocytes. It has been suggested that certain amount of ROS is essential for the successful fertilization process [35]. In case of sperm-activated oocytes, ROS peaks are associated with fertilization events such as sperm penetration and sperm head decondensation [36]. However, our data suggest that increase in ROS level is independent of sperm deposition but may be related to mechanical stress induced during mock injection process since both in vivo matured and IVM oocytes subjected to mock injection had significantly higher level of ROS compared to standard and ICSI controls.

Since mitochondria are the sources and targets of ROS, we next examined the mitochondrial distribution pattern in mock injected oocytes. The patterns of mitochondrial distribution in mock injected IVM oocytes were distinct from those oocytes matured in vivo, suggesting that mitochondrial organization is impaired following mock injection. The localization of mitochondria in the oocyte during maturation is strictly regulated [37] and it has been suggested that changes in mitochondrial organization is a reliable indicator of oocyte capacity to sustain embryonic development [38]. In addition, the migration of mitochondria towards center and its uniform distribution is believed to be an indication of cytoplasmic maturation [28]. Interestingly, IVM oocytes, which have lower developmental capacity than those matured in vivo, display reduced mitochondrial transport to the central region which is suggested to be associated with a reduced cytoplasmic microtubule network [39–40]. Though, approximately 80% of IVM oocytes in the standard control displayed uniform distribution pattern, it is important to note that a significant number of oocytes displayed aggregated distribution when exposed to in vitro conditions for a period of 30 minutes. Importantly, mock injection has resulted in peripheral localization of mitochondria in about 44% oocytes possibly due to cytoskeletal disruption induced by ooplasm aspiration which could impact the distribution of mitochondria [41–42]. To understand the impact of peripheral distribution pattern observed in mock ICSI group on the mitochondrial integrity, JC1 staining strategy which was previously been used to measure the mitochondrial activity in mouse oocytes [43] was employed. However, alteration in the JC1 ratio did not correlate the change in distribution pattern suggesting that mitochondrial distribution but not activity is affected in mock injected IVM oocytes.

Since normal mitochondrial function is required for the formation of oocyte spindles, we next examined the functional ability of the oocytes subjected to mock ICSI. To avoid the sperm mediated effects in evaluating ICSI induced changes in the oocytes, our study used parthenogenetic activation for assessing the activation potential. The analysis of parthenogenetic activation potential in both in vivo matured and IVM derived metaphase II oocytes did not reveal significant differences between mock injected and control groups though overall activation rate was significantly lower in IVM oocytes.

Increased ROS level and altered mitochondrial distribution in mock injected oocytes may render oocyte DNA to ROS-induced DNA damage. Earlier study has shown that ICSI derived mouse embryos had abnormal chromosomal conformation during segregation at first mitotic division and consequently formed micronuclei like structures at the two cell stage [44]. Micronuclei in embryos are usually originated in response to genetic insult and increased micronuclei frequency is suggestive of embryonic genetic instability [45–46]. Extensive chromatin remodeling occurs during the process of pronuclear formation and this appears to be the determining factor for the normal onset of gene expression [47]. Hence, we assessed the phosphorylation of H2AX in the pronuclei of activated oocytes derived from mock injection. H2AX histone characteristically undergoes phosphorylation at serine 139 in response to DNA damage and DNA DSB’s in somatic cells [48–50]. Immunolocalization of γ-H2AX in activated pronucleus showed distinct patterns of foci (Fig. 3C). The size of the foci is known to reflect specific biological response hence we categorized the foci into small and large types based on the diameter of the foci. Small γ-H2AX foci are associated with cell cycle regulation and mitosis whereas larger foci are suggestive of recruitment of DNA repair proteins or accumulation of DNA DSB aggregates [51–52]. In vivo matured oocytes had relatively few small foci in all three groups. On the other hand, both ICSI control and ICSI group had similar number of large foci though the incidence was significantly higher than the in vivo matured standard control. These observations suggest that DSBs in in vivo matured oocytes were induced even without mock injection but possibly by exposing the oocytes to in vitro conditions for 30 min. Several factors may account for these changes. It has been shown that HEPES buffering system present in the culture medium can be detrimental to the embryos if used during ICSI [22]. In addition, pH changes in ICSI medium [53], temperature variations [54], light used in the microscope [55] may influence the functional and genetic integrity of the oocytes. Interestingly, the number of small foci in IVM oocytes was significantly higher from in vivo matured oocytes especially baseline level of small foci in IVM oocytes was almost 18 fold higher than corresponding group in in vivo matured oocytes. This observation suggests that cell cycle regulation is perturbed in IVM derived oocytes as small foci are involved in the cell cycle regulatory process [52–53]. In contrast to in vivo matured oocytes, mock injected IVM oocytes had a higher number of large γ-H2AX foci which was significantly higher than ICSI control.

Since the plasma membrane of the in vitro matured oocytes are less elastic than those matured in vivo [56], it is possible that the process of needle insertion and ooplasmic aspiration might have influenced the results in the study. On the other hand, these mechanical aspects in ICSI had no effect on blastocyst formation in bovine oocytes [57]. Though, ICSI was performed by a single individual and the differences in the process of needle penetration, ooplasm leakage and subsequent degeneration was not significantly different between in vivo and in vitro matured group, it is still possible that the ultra-structural changes in IVM oocytes are responsible for immediate stress response and genetic instability observed in this study.

Although the results of the study are of interest, and have been understudied in the last decade by the ART field, the experimental design contains certain limitations. The use of the mouse as a model for human ICSI cannot be compared since it is difficult to perform ICSI successfully in this species using the clinically applied methods. Numerous studies show good success rates with ICSI in the mouse when used piezo injectors [23, 44] which were not used in the present set up. Secondly, there is no data on the developmental competence of the mock injected oocytes beyond PN stage which is very important to address the impact of H2AX phosphorylation on the genetic instability at later stages of preimplantation development. However, it has been shown that haploid parthenotes exhibit poor development and increased apoptosis due to genomic instability [58] which made us exclude this parameter in the present experimental setup. Another limitation is the influence of PVP on the oocytes which was not elucidated in the present manuscript. There is possibility that some amount of PVP is entering the oocyte during the process of mock injection, and importantly earlier study has shown that in situ DNA fragmentation can occur when poor quality spermatozoa are exposed to PVP in ICSI dish [20]. Hence further studies are required to rule out these confounding factors on our results.

In conclusion, there is scarce information about the genetic and functional changes that occurs in oocytes subjected to ICSI. Hence the results presented in this study may have some exciting clinical implications. Though, the experimental model and technique used in the present study did not mimic clinical ICSI completely, our results could be integrated in understanding of ICSI practice to optimize the conditions especially when more vulnerable oocytes are used.

Supporting Information

S1 Dataset. Raw data of ROS intensity in superovulated oocytes, IVM oocytes, mitochondrial distribution pattern in in vivo matured and IVM oocytes, H2AX foci in in vivo matured and IVM oocytes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119735.s001

(XLSX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SKA. Performed the experiments: SU SD SS VS. Analyzed the data: SU GK. Wrote the paper: SKA SU GK.

References

1. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 725–730. pmid:11882727
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Cox GF, Bürger J, Lip V, Mau UA, Sperling K, Wu BL, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet 2002;71: 162–164. pmid:12016591
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Lim D, Bowdin SC, Tee L, Kirby GA, Blair E, Fryer A, et al. Clinical and molecular genetic features of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod. 2009;24: 741–747. pmid:19073614
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P, Scott H, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366: 1803–1813. pmid:22559061
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Albano C, Camus M, Van Landuyt L, Devroey P, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2002;78: 1030–1037. pmid:12413989
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Mansour R, Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Dyer S, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2006. Hum Reprod. 2014;29: 1536–1551 pmid:24795090
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, Sakkas D. Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a paternal influence? Hum Reprod. 1998;13: 1632–1637. pmid:9688404
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Simón C, Landeras J, Zuzuarregui JL, Martín JC, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Early pregnancy losses in in vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 1999 72: 1061–1065. pmid:10593382
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Martínez MC, Méndez C, Ferro J, Nicolás M, Serra V, Landeras J. Cytogenetic analysis of early nonviable pregnancies after assisted reproduction treatment. Fertil Steril. 2010;93: 289–92. pmid:19748088
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Edwards RG. Widening perspectives of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Nat Med. 1999;5: 377–8. pmid:10202920
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Winston RM, Hardy K. Are we ignoring potential dangers of in vitro fertilization and related treatments? Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4: 14–8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Morris ID, Ilott S, Dixon L, Brison DR. The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod. 2002;17: 990–998. pmid:11925396
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Silber S, Escudero T, Lenahan K, Abdelhadi I, Kilani Z, Munné S. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2003;79: 30–38. pmid:12524060
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Bakos HW, Thompson JG, Feil D, Lane M. Sperm DNA damage is associated with assisted reproductive technology pregnancy. Int J Androl. 2008;31: 518–526. pmid:17822420
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Zini A, Bielecki R, Bomani JM, Ciamp A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23: 2663–2668. pmid:18757447
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Morozumi K, Yanagimachi R. Incorporation of the acrosome into the oocyte during intracytoplasmic sperm injection could be potentially hazardous to embryo development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 14209–14214. pmid:16183738
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Jean M, Mirallie S, Boudineau M, Tatin C, Barriere P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with polyvinylpyrrolidone: a potential risk. Fertil Steril 2001;76: 419–420. pmid:11476804
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Mizuno K, Hoshi K, Huang T. Fertilization and embryo development in a mouse ICSI model using human and mouse sperm after immobilization in polyvinylpyrrolidone. Hum Reprod. 2002;17: 2350–2355. pmid:12202424
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Kato Y, Nagao Y. Effect of PVP on sperm capacitation status and embryonic development in cattle. Theriogenology. 2009;72: 624–635. pmid:19604569
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Salian SR, Kalthur G, Uppangala S, Kumar P, Adiga SK. Frozen-thawed spermatozoa from oligozoospermic ejaculates are susceptible to in situ DNA fragmentation in polyvinylpyrrolidone-based sperm-immobilization medium. Fertil Steril. 2012;98: 321–325. pmid:22608317
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Dumoulin JM, Coonen E, Bras M, Bergers-Janssen JM, Ignoul-Vanvuchelen RC, van Wissen LC, et al. Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: effect of the injection procedure. Hum Reprod. 2001;16: 306–312 pmid:11157825
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Morgia F, Torti M, Montigiani M, Piscitelli C, Giallonardo A, Schimberni M, et al. Use of a medium buffered with N-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-ethanesulfonate (HEPES) in intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures is detrimental to the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2006;85: 1415–1419. pmid:16600227
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Yanagimachi R. Intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa and spermatogenic cells: its biology and applications in humans and animals. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10: 247–288. pmid:15823233
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Stein P, Schultz RM. ICSI in the mouse. Methods Enzymol. 2010;476: 251–262. pmid:20691870
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Lei T, Guo N, Liu JQ, Tan MH, Li YF. Vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes: effects on meiotic spindle configuration and mitochondrial function. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7: 1159–1165. pmid:24696732
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Mathias FJ, D’Souza F, Uppangala S, Salian SR, Kalthur G, Adiga SK. Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing in protecting oocyte and granulosa cell DNA integrity. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2014;4: 1–6
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Johnson LV, Walsh ML, Chen LB. Localization of mitochondria in living cells with rhodamine 123. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1980;77: 990–994. pmid:6965798
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Liu S, Li Y, Gao X, Yan JH, Chen ZJ. Changes in the distribution of mitochondria before and after in vitro maturation of human oocytes and the effect of in vitro maturation on mitochondria distribution. Fertil Steril. 2010;93: 1550–1555. pmid:19423101
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Harris SE, Maruthini D, Tang T, Balen AH, Picton HM. Metabolism and karyotype analysis of oocytes from patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2010;25: 2305–2315. pmid:20659909
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Ma JY, Ou Yang YC, Wang ZW, Wang ZB, Jiang ZZ, Luo SM, et al. The effects of DNA double-strand breaks on mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. Cell cycle. 2013; 12: 1233–1241. pmid:23518501
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Sudhakaran S, Uppangala S, Salian SR, Honguntikar SD, Nair R, Kalthur G, et al. Oocytes recovered after ovarian tissue slow freezing have impaired H2AX phosphorylation and functional competence. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2014;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Nagy IZ. On the true role of oxygen free radicals in the living state, aging, and degenerative disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;928: 187–199. pmid:11795510
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Curnow EC, Ryan JP, Saunders DM, Hayes ES. In vitro developmental potential of macaque oocytes, derived from unstimulated ovaries, following maturation in the presence of glutathione ethyl ester. Hum Reprod. 2010;25: 2465–74. pmid:20729236
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Shkolnik K, Tadmor A, Ben-Dor S, Nevo N, Galiani D, Dekel N. Reactive oxygen species are indispensable in ovulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108: 1462–1467. pmid:21220312
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Blondin P, Coenen K, Sirard MA. The impact of reactive oxygen species on bovine sperm fertilizing ability and oocyte maturation. J Androl. 1997;18: 454–460. pmid:9283960
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Morado S, Cetica P, Beconi M, Thompson JG, Dalvit G. Reactive oxygen species production and redox state in parthenogenetic and sperm-mediated bovine oocyte activation. Reproduction. 2013;145: 471–478. pmid:23630331
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Dumollard R, Duchen M, Carroll J. The role of mitochondrial function in the oocyte and embryo. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2007;77: 21–49. pmid:17222699
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Bavister BD, Squirrell JM. Mitochondrial distribution and function in oocytes and early embryos. Hum Reprod. 2000;15: 189–198. pmid:11041524
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Brevini TA, Vassena R, Francisci C, Gandolfi F. Role of adenosine triphosphate, active mitochondria, and microtubules in the acquisition of developmental competence of parthenogenetically activated pig oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2005;72: 1218–12123. pmid:15659704
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Sun QY, Wu GM, Lai L, Park KW, Cabot R, Cheong HT et al. Translocation of active mitochondria during pig oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development in vitro. Reproduction. 2001;122: 155–163. pmid:11425340
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Schramm RD, Paprocki AM, Bavister BD. Features associated with reproductive ageing in female rhesus monkeys. Hum Reprod. 2002;17: 1597–1603. pmid:12042284
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Sanfins A, Lee GY, Plancha CE, Overstrom EW, Albertini DF. Distinctions in meiotic spindle structure and assembly during in vitro and in vivo maturation of mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2003;69: 2059–2067. pmid:12930715
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Van Blerkom J, Davis P, Alexander S. Inner mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsim), cytoplasmic ATP content and free Ca2+ levels in metaphase II mouse oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2003;18: 2429–2440. pmid:14585897
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Yamagata K, Suetsugu R, Wakayama T. Assessment of chromosomal integrity using a novel live-cell imaging technique in mouse embryos produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2009;24: 2490–2499. pmid:19574276
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Adiga SK, Toyoshima M, Shiraishi K, Shimura T, Takeda J, Taga M, et al. p21 provides stage specific DNA damage control to preimplantation embryos. Oncogene. 2007;26: 6141–6149. pmid:17420724
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Adiga SK, Upadhya D, Kalthur G, Bola Sadashiva SR, Kumar P. Transgenerational changes in somatic and germ line genetic integrity of first-generation offspring derived from the DNA damaged sperm. Fertil Steril. 2010; 93: 2486–2490. pmid:19591998
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Renard JP. Chromatin remodelling and nuclear reprogramming at the onset of embryonic development in mammals. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1998;10: 573–580. pmid:10612463
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem. 1998;273: 5858–5868. pmid:9488723
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Tanaka T, Kurose A, Huang X, Traganos F, Dai W, Darzynkiewicz Z. Extent of constitutive histone H2AX phosphorylation on Ser-139 varies in cells with different TP53 status. Cell Prolif. 2006;39: 313–323. pmid:16872365
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Mah LJ, El-Osta A, Karagiannis TC. GammaH2AX as a molecular marker of aging and disease. Epigenetics. 2010;16: 129–136.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. McManus KJ, Hendzel MJ. ATM-dependent DNA damage-independent mitotic phosphorylation of H2AX in normally growing mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16: 5013–5025. pmid:16030261
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, Bonner WM. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol. 2000;10: 886–895. pmid:10959836
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Squirrell JM, Lane M, Bavister BD. Altering intracellular pH disrupts development and cellular organization in preimplantation hamster embryos. Biol Reprod. 2001;64: 1845–1854. pmid:11369617
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Ye J, Coleman J, Hunter MG, Craigon J. Campbell KH, Luck MR. Physiological temperature variants and culture media modify meiotic progression and developmental potential of pig oocytes in vitro. Reproduction. 2007;133: 877–886. pmid:17616718
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Takenaka M, Horiuchi T, Yanagimachi R. Effects of light on development of mammalian zygotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104: 14289–14293. pmid:17709739
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Griffiths TA, Murdoch AP, Herbert M. Embryonic development in vitro is compromised by the ICSI procedure. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1592–1596. pmid:10875872
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Motoishi M, Goto K, Tomita K, Ookutsu S, Nakanishi Y. Examination of the safety of intracytoplasmic injection procedures by using bovine zygotes. Hum Reprod. 1996;11: 618–620. pmid:8671279
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Liu L, Trimarchi JR, Keefe DL. Haploidy but not parthenogenetic activation leads to increased incidence of apoptosis in mouse embryos. Biol Reprod. 2002;66: 204–210. pmid:11751284
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 725–730. pmid:11882727
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Cox GF, Bürger J, Lip V, Mau UA, Sperling K, Wu BL, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet 2002;71: 162–164. pmid:12016591
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Lim D, Bowdin SC, Tee L, Kirby GA, Blair E, Fryer A, et al. Clinical and molecular genetic features of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod. 2009;24: 741–747. pmid:19073614
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P, Scott H, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366: 1803–1813. pmid:22559061
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Albano C, Camus M, Van Landuyt L, Devroey P, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2002;78: 1030–1037. pmid:12413989
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Mansour R, Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Dyer S, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2006. Hum Reprod. 2014;29: 1536–1551 pmid:24795090
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, Sakkas D. Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a paternal influence? Hum Reprod. 1998;13: 1632–1637. pmid:9688404
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Simón C, Landeras J, Zuzuarregui JL, Martín JC, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Early pregnancy losses in in vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 1999 72: 1061–1065. pmid:10593382
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Martínez MC, Méndez C, Ferro J, Nicolás M, Serra V, Landeras J. Cytogenetic analysis of early nonviable pregnancies after assisted reproduction treatment. Fertil Steril. 2010;93: 289–92. pmid:19748088
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Edwards RG. Widening perspectives of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Nat Med. 1999;5: 377–8. pmid:10202920
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Winston RM, Hardy K. Are we ignoring potential dangers of in vitro fertilization and related treatments? Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4: 14–8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Morris ID, Ilott S, Dixon L, Brison DR. The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod. 2002;17: 990–998. pmid:11925396
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Silber S, Escudero T, Lenahan K, Abdelhadi I, Kilani Z, Munné S. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2003;79: 30–38. pmid:12524060
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Bakos HW, Thompson JG, Feil D, Lane M. Sperm DNA damage is associated with assisted reproductive technology pregnancy. Int J Androl. 2008;31: 518–526. pmid:17822420
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Zini A, Bielecki R, Bomani JM, Ciamp A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23: 2663–2668. pmid:18757447
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Morozumi K, Yanagimachi R. Incorporation of the acrosome into the oocyte during intracytoplasmic sperm injection could be potentially hazardous to embryo development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 14209–14214. pmid:16183738
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Jean M, Mirallie S, Boudineau M, Tatin C, Barriere P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with polyvinylpyrrolidone: a potential risk. Fertil Steril 2001;76: 419–420. pmid:11476804
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Mizuno K, Hoshi K, Huang T. Fertilization and embryo development in a mouse ICSI model using human and mouse sperm after immobilization in polyvinylpyrrolidone. Hum Reprod. 2002;17: 2350–2355. pmid:12202424
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Kato Y, Nagao Y. Effect of PVP on sperm capacitation status and embryonic development in cattle. Theriogenology. 2009;72: 624–635. pmid:19604569
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Salian SR, Kalthur G, Uppangala S, Kumar P, Adiga SK. Frozen-thawed spermatozoa from oligozoospermic ejaculates are susceptible to in situ DNA fragmentation in polyvinylpyrrolidone-based sperm-immobilization medium. Fertil Steril. 2012;98: 321–325. pmid:22608317
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Dumoulin JM, Coonen E, Bras M, Bergers-Janssen JM, Ignoul-Vanvuchelen RC, van Wissen LC, et al. Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: effect of the injection procedure. Hum Reprod. 2001;16: 306–312 pmid:11157825
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Morgia F, Torti M, Montigiani M, Piscitelli C, Giallonardo A, Schimberni M, et al. Use of a medium buffered with N-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-ethanesulfonate (HEPES) in intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures is detrimental to the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2006;85: 1415–1419. pmid:16600227
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Yanagimachi R. Intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa and spermatogenic cells: its biology and applications in humans and animals. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10: 247–288. pmid:15823233
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Stein P, Schultz RM. ICSI in the mouse. Methods Enzymol. 2010;476: 251–262. pmid:20691870
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Lei T, Guo N, Liu JQ, Tan MH, Li YF. Vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes: effects on meiotic spindle configuration and mitochondrial function. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7: 1159–1165. pmid:24696732
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Mathias FJ, D’Souza F, Uppangala S, Salian SR, Kalthur G, Adiga SK. Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing in protecting oocyte and granulosa cell DNA integrity. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2014;4: 1–6
View Article
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Johnson LV, Walsh ML, Chen LB. Localization of mitochondria in living cells with rhodamine 123. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1980;77: 990–994. pmid:6965798
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Liu S, Li Y, Gao X, Yan JH, Chen ZJ. Changes in the distribution of mitochondria before and after in vitro maturation of human oocytes and the effect of in vitro maturation on mitochondria distribution. Fertil Steril. 2010;93: 1550–1555. pmid:19423101
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Harris SE, Maruthini D, Tang T, Balen AH, Picton HM. Metabolism and karyotype analysis of oocytes from patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2010;25: 2305–2315. pmid:20659909
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Ma JY, Ou Yang YC, Wang ZW, Wang ZB, Jiang ZZ, Luo SM, et al. The effects of DNA double-strand breaks on mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. Cell cycle. 2013; 12: 1233–1241. pmid:23518501
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Sudhakaran S, Uppangala S, Salian SR, Honguntikar SD, Nair R, Kalthur G, et al. Oocytes recovered after ovarian tissue slow freezing have impaired H2AX phosphorylation and functional competence. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2014;
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Nagy IZ. On the true role of oxygen free radicals in the living state, aging, and degenerative disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;928: 187–199. pmid:11795510
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Curnow EC, Ryan JP, Saunders DM, Hayes ES. In vitro developmental potential of macaque oocytes, derived from unstimulated ovaries, following maturation in the presence of glutathione ethyl ester. Hum Reprod. 2010;25: 2465–74. pmid:20729236
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Shkolnik K, Tadmor A, Ben-Dor S, Nevo N, Galiani D, Dekel N. Reactive oxygen species are indispensable in ovulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108: 1462–1467. pmid:21220312
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Blondin P, Coenen K, Sirard MA. The impact of reactive oxygen species on bovine sperm fertilizing ability and oocyte maturation. J Androl. 1997;18: 454–460. pmid:9283960
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Morado S, Cetica P, Beconi M, Thompson JG, Dalvit G. Reactive oxygen species production and redox state in parthenogenetic and sperm-mediated bovine oocyte activation. Reproduction. 2013;145: 471–478. pmid:23630331
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Dumollard R, Duchen M, Carroll J. The role of mitochondrial function in the oocyte and embryo. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2007;77: 21–49. pmid:17222699
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Bavister BD, Squirrell JM. Mitochondrial distribution and function in oocytes and early embryos. Hum Reprod. 2000;15: 189–198. pmid:11041524
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Brevini TA, Vassena R, Francisci C, Gandolfi F. Role of adenosine triphosphate, active mitochondria, and microtubules in the acquisition of developmental competence of parthenogenetically activated pig oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2005;72: 1218–12123. pmid:15659704
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Sun QY, Wu GM, Lai L, Park KW, Cabot R, Cheong HT et al. Translocation of active mitochondria during pig oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development in vitro. Reproduction. 2001;122: 155–163. pmid:11425340
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Schramm RD, Paprocki AM, Bavister BD. Features associated with reproductive ageing in female rhesus monkeys. Hum Reprod. 2002;17: 1597–1603. pmid:12042284
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Sanfins A, Lee GY, Plancha CE, Overstrom EW, Albertini DF. Distinctions in meiotic spindle structure and assembly during in vitro and in vivo maturation of mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2003;69: 2059–2067. pmid:12930715
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Van Blerkom J, Davis P, Alexander S. Inner mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsim), cytoplasmic ATP content and free Ca2+ levels in metaphase II mouse oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2003;18: 2429–2440. pmid:14585897
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] PubMed/NCBI

[169] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Yamagata K, Suetsugu R, Wakayama T. Assessment of chromosomal integrity using a novel live-cell imaging technique in mouse embryos produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2009;24: 2490–2499. pmid:19574276
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] PubMed/NCBI

[173] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Adiga SK, Toyoshima M, Shiraishi K, Shimura T, Takeda J, Taga M, et al. p21 provides stage specific DNA damage control to preimplantation embryos. Oncogene. 2007;26: 6141–6149. pmid:17420724
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] PubMed/NCBI

[177] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Adiga SK, Upadhya D, Kalthur G, Bola Sadashiva SR, Kumar P. Transgenerational changes in somatic and germ line genetic integrity of first-generation offspring derived from the DNA damaged sperm. Fertil Steril. 2010; 93: 2486–2490. pmid:19591998
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[179] View Article

[180] PubMed/NCBI

[181] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Renard JP. Chromatin remodelling and nuclear reprogramming at the onset of embryonic development in mammals. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1998;10: 573–580. pmid:10612463
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[183] View Article

[184] PubMed/NCBI

[185] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem. 1998;273: 5858–5868. pmid:9488723
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[187] View Article

[188] PubMed/NCBI

[189] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Tanaka T, Kurose A, Huang X, Traganos F, Dai W, Darzynkiewicz Z. Extent of constitutive histone H2AX phosphorylation on Ser-139 varies in cells with different TP53 status. Cell Prolif. 2006;39: 313–323. pmid:16872365
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[191] View Article

[192] PubMed/NCBI

[193] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Mah LJ, El-Osta A, Karagiannis TC. GammaH2AX as a molecular marker of aging and disease. Epigenetics. 2010;16: 129–136.
View Article
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. McManus KJ, Hendzel MJ. ATM-dependent DNA damage-independent mitotic phosphorylation of H2AX in normally growing mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16: 5013–5025. pmid:16030261
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[198] View Article

[199] PubMed/NCBI

[200] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, Bonner WM. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol. 2000;10: 886–895. pmid:10959836
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[202] View Article

[203] PubMed/NCBI

[204] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Squirrell JM, Lane M, Bavister BD. Altering intracellular pH disrupts development and cellular organization in preimplantation hamster embryos. Biol Reprod. 2001;64: 1845–1854. pmid:11369617
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[206] View Article

[207] PubMed/NCBI

[208] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Ye J, Coleman J, Hunter MG, Craigon J. Campbell KH, Luck MR. Physiological temperature variants and culture media modify meiotic progression and developmental potential of pig oocytes in vitro. Reproduction. 2007;133: 877–886. pmid:17616718
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[210] View Article

[211] PubMed/NCBI

[212] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Takenaka M, Horiuchi T, Yanagimachi R. Effects of light on development of mammalian zygotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104: 14289–14293. pmid:17709739
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[214] View Article

[215] PubMed/NCBI

[216] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Griffiths TA, Murdoch AP, Herbert M. Embryonic development in vitro is compromised by the ICSI procedure. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1592–1596. pmid:10875872
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[218] View Article

[219] PubMed/NCBI

[220] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Motoishi M, Goto K, Tomita K, Ookutsu S, Nakanishi Y. Examination of the safety of intracytoplasmic injection procedures by using bovine zygotes. Hum Reprod. 1996;11: 618–620. pmid:8671279
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[222] View Article

[223] PubMed/NCBI

[224] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Liu L, Trimarchi JR, Keefe DL. Haploidy but not parthenogenetic activation leads to increased incidence of apoptosis in mouse embryos. Biol Reprod. 2002;66: 204–210. pmid:11751284
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[226] View Article

[227] PubMed/NCBI

[228] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Animals

Superovulation and MII oocytes retrieval

GV oocyte collection and In Vitro maturation

Mock ICSI

Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species

Assessment of mitochondrial distribution

Measurement of mitochondrial activity

Parthenogenetic activation

γ-H2AX detection

Statistical analysis

Results

Mock ICSI increased ROS level in both In Vivo matured and IVM oocytes

IVM oocytes were more susceptible to mock ICSI induced changes in mitochondria

Parthenogenetic activation rate was unaffected by mock ICSI

Phosphorylated H2AX in oocytes subjected to mock injection

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 Dataset. Raw data of ROS intensity in superovulated oocytes, IVM oocytes, mitochondrial distribution pattern in in vivo matured and IVM oocytes, H2AX foci in in vivo matured and IVM oocytes.

Author Contributions

References