Allergen-Specific Cytokine Polarization Protects Shetland Ponies against Culicoides obsoletus-Induced Insect Bite Hypersensitivity

Chantal Meulenbroeks; Jaco J. van der Lugt; Nathalie M. A. van der Meide; Ton Willemse; Victor P. M. G. Rutten; Dietmar M. W. Zaiss

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122090

Abstract

The immunological mechanisms explaining development of an allergy in some individuals and not in others remain incompletely understood. Insect bite hypersensitivity (IBH) is a common, seasonal, IgE-mediated, pruritic skin disorder that affects considerable proportions of horses of different breeds, which is caused by bites of the insect Culicoides obsoletus (C. obsoletus). We investigated the allergen-specific immune status of individual horses that had either been diagnosed to be healthy or to suffer of IBH. Following intradermal allergen injection, skin biopsies were taken of IBH-affected and healthy ponies and cytokine expression was determined by RT-PCR. In addition, allergen-specific antibody titers were measured and cytokine expression of in vitro stimulated, allergen-specific CD4 T-cells was determined. 24 hrs after allergen injection, a significant increase in mRNA expression of the type-2 cytokine IL-4 was observed in the skin of IBH-affected Shetland ponies. In the skin of healthy ponies, however, an increase in IFNγ mRNA expression was found. Analysis of allergen-specific antibody titers revealed that all animals produced allergen-specific antibodies, and allergen-specific stimulation of CD4 T-cells revealed a significant higher percentage of IFNγ-expressing CD4 T-cells in healthy ponies compared to IBH-affected ponies. These data indicate that horses not affected by IBH, in contrast to the so far established dogma, are not immunologically ignorant but have a Th1-skewed allergen-specific immune response that appears to protect against IBH-associated symptoms. To our knowledge this is the first demonstration of a natural situation, in which an allergen-specific immune skewing is protective in an allergic disorder.

Citation: Meulenbroeks C, van der Lugt JJ, van der Meide NMA, Willemse T, Rutten VPMG, Zaiss DMW (2015) Allergen-Specific Cytokine Polarization Protects Shetland Ponies against Culicoides obsoletus-Induced Insect Bite Hypersensitivity. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0122090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122090

Academic Editor: Heinz Fehrenbach, Research Center Borstel, GERMANY

Received: October 16, 2014; Accepted: February 17, 2015; Published: April 22, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Meulenbroeks et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was financially supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation (STW-NOW), the Dutch Federation of horse breeding and ALK-Abelló/Artu Biologicals. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Co-author Jaco J. van der Lugt is employed by IDEXX Laboratories. IDEXX Laboratories provided support in the form of salary for author JJvdL, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific role of this author is articulated in the author contributions section.

Competing interests: The authors have the following interests: Co-author Jaco J. van der Lugt is employed by IDEXX Laboratories. This study was funded in part by ALK-Abelló and Artu Biologicals. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction

Following the seminal discovery by Mosmann and Coffman that CD4 T-cells can differentiate into different subtypes [1], hypersensitivity reactions became associated with different CD4 T-helper (Th) subtypes. Th1 cells, as characterized by the expression of the cytokine IFNγ, have been associated with type IV hypersensitivity reactions, which are T-cell mediated, delayed type hypersensitivity responses. Th2 cells, as characterized by the expression of the cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, have been associated with classical, allergic type-I hypersensitivity reactions; reactions that are associated with an IgE-mediated degranulation of mast cells. Nevertheless, it rapidly was recognized that a more mixed reactions of both types of immune responses persists in most allergic individuals. In mouse models, it was shown that the treatment of allergic animals with type-1 inducing CpG-ODN can ameliorate disease symptoms [2]. However, mainly due to a lack of a truly natural, experimental model systems, knowledge of how these two types of immune responses develop in conjunction with each other during the immune response to an allergen, and how these dynamic interactions contribute to, or prevent the development of allergic disorders, is still largely lacking [3]. Most interestingly, even in a clinical trial in which immune-stimulatory CpG-ODN sequences coupled to allergens were administered, the treatment-induced amelioration of symptoms was not correlated with intracellular levels of IL-4 or IFNγ in activated CD4T cells [4].

To determine how an underlying, allergen-specific immune skewing may contribute to the development of allergies, we chose a natural, experimental model system in horses. Considerable proportions of horses of different breeds suffer from an IgE-mediated allergic reaction to Culicoides spp., a disorder commonly called insect bite hypersensitivity (IBH) [5–7]. Diagnosis of IBH is predominantly based on the assessment of clinical symptoms in the IBH season and a positive skin test with Culicoides spp. extract. Culicoides-specific IgE titers are reported to be higher in IBH-affected ponies compared to healthy ponies [8–11], and histology of IBH lesional skin showed pronounced eosinophilia [12] and IgE- positive mast cells in acute lesional IBH skin [13]. Therefore, IBH has generally been considered a type-I allergic hypersensitivity reaction. Nevertheless, also an enhanced infiltration of CD4⁺ T cells and a pronounced type-IV delayed type hypersensitivity component has been described in skin test responses [14].

To our knowledge, no systematic, longitudinal studies have been performed so far that would have given insight into the local immune response during an allergen-induced IBH challenge. To address this aspect of immune responsiveness, we challenged healthy and IBH sensitive ponies by injection of C. obsoletus whole body extract into the skin and collected biopsies at different time points thereafter. Our results revealed that IBH-affected ponies show a clear IL-4 characterized type-2 skewing of the immune response upon intra-cutaneous allergen injection. Moreover, contrary to general assumption, healthy ponies, were not immunologically ignorant to Culicoides-specific antigens, but showed a type-1 skewed immune response characterized by IFNγ expression, which correlated with protection against IBH-associated symptoms.

Material and Methods

Study population

Sixteen Shetland ponies were included in the study during the IBH off-season and 19 during the IBH-season, which reflected winter and summer respectively. IBH-affected ponies (n = 10 and n = 8 respectively, age range 2–10 years) had each been diagnosed by a certified veterinarian and had a history of recurrent, seasonal, pruritic clinical signs of the skin at the mane and tail with remission in the off-season. Control ponies (n = 6 and n = 11, respectively, age range 4–15 years) were randomly selected from the same stables and had been diagnosed to have no clinical signs or history of IBH. None of the ponies was treated with immunosuppressive drugs prior to or during the experiments.

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Utrecht.

C. obsoletus whole body extract preparation

Whole body extract (WBE) was prepared as previously described before [15]. In brief, whole body extract (WBE) was prepared from about three hundred life female C. obsoletus insects, which were frozen at -80°C. After crushing insects with a micro-pestle in 1ml of PBS containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), samples were centrifuged at 14 000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. Supernatant was filtered, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C, until use as WBE.

Diagnostic skin test

In horses, it is a common and accepted practice to diagnostically relate allergen-induced swelling to histamine-induced swelling and therefore all ponies were injected intra-dermally with 0.1 ml PBS (T = 0), 0.1 ml 1:1000 histamine solution (positive control) and 0.1 ml 1 mg/ml C. obsoletus WBE. The developing swelling was then measured 30 min post injection. The relative wheal diameter (RWD) was calculated by subtracting the average value of the histamine and PBS wheal diameter from the corresponding C. obsoletus wheal diameter. RWD = C. obsoletus WD—((histamine WD + PBS WD)/2).

Collection and processing of blood and skin samples

Prior to injection, blood was collected form each pony. For the determination of C. obsoletus-specific antibody isotypes titers, serum was separated and stored at -20°C. Skin biopsies (4 mm) of WBE injection sites and controls were taken 5 min, 20 min and 24 hrs after allergen injection, under local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine (B. Braun, AG Melsungen, Germany). Three biopsies were taken per time point, whereby each site was separated far enough from the next to prevent any influence from the one injection to the other. Of the three biopsies taken per time point, two were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until used for RNA isolation. The third skin biopsy was fixed in 4% neutral buffered formaldehyde and paraffin-embedded for histopathology.

C. obsoletus-specific antibody titers

ELISA was performed and analyzed as described previously [15]. In brief, microtiter plates were coated with 10 μg/ml C. obsoletus and incubated overnight at 4°C. After washing the plates and blocking, diluted serum samples (1:5, 1:50 and 1:500) were added in duplicate. After 1.5 hrs, plates were washed and incubated for 1 hr with HRP-labeled, goat anti-horse isotype specific antibodies: IgGa (AAI35P), IgGb (AAI36P), IgGc (AAI37P) or IgG(T) (AAI38P) (AbD Serotec, Düsseldorf, Germany) diluted 1:1000 in casein buffer. The microtiter plates were washed with PBS-Tween and developed with tetramethylbenzidine at RT. The reaction was stopped with a 1% HCL solution. Absorbance was measured with a SpectraMax M5 multi-mode microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Berkshire, UK) at a wavelength of 450 nm corrected for the OD measured at 650 nm. The values used for further analysis were calculated by subtracting the OD₄₅₀ of the serum-free control from the OD₄₅₀ of serum samples.

Histological examination of skin samples

Paraffin-embedded biopsies were cut in 4 μm sections and stained with either haematoxylin-eosin (HE) for routine histopathology or toluidine blue (TB) for mast cell analysis. Sections were graded according to a semi-quantitative grading system (0 = absent, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) as previously described [12]. All HE slides were analyzed microscopically in a blinded fashion towards the experimental grouping of biopsies. Total number of mast cells was determined by counting these cells in three representative fields per slide at 400 x magnification.

mRNA expression in skin biopsies

Snap-frozen skin samples were cut and homogenized with beads for 30 min at a frequency 25/s in 0.5 ml TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Breda, NL) using a Mixer Mill 301 (Retsch Verder NV, Vleuten, NL). Next 0.1 ml 100% chloroform was added to each sample and incubated at RT for 3 minutes. A water-phase was obtained by centrifuging 15 min at 14000 rpm at 4°C. The mRNA was extracted from the water-phase using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Venlo, NL) according to the manufacturer’s specification. The mRNA concentrations were measured with a Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo Scientific, Etten-Leur, NL). A concentration of 1 μg total mRNA was used to produce cDNA with an iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad laboratories, Veenendaal, NL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

QPCR was performed as described previously [12]. All probes were designed with Primer3 (version 0.4.0); for details see S1 Table. Relative expression for each gene was calculated by the Pfaffl method [16] using the housekeeping gene 18s ribosomal RNA (18s rRNA) as a reference.

In vitro differentiation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells

Monocytes were isolated from PBMC using mouse anti-human CD14 (biG 10, Biometec) and anti-mouse IgG microbeads using an LS column (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturers’ specifications. Cells were then differentiated for two days in the presence of purified, E.coli expressed recombinant horse IL-4 (50 ng/ml) and horse GM-CSF (50 ng/ml). After 2 days, medium was refreshed with new IL-4 and GM-CSF. The culture was maintained for an additional 3 days prior to antigen exposure. Differentiation and maturation was examined by FACS analysis using mouse anti-human CD206 (3.29B1.10, Beckman Coulter) and mouse anti-human CD86 (IT2.2, Biolegend), and their respective isotype controls.

Antigen-specific T-cell stimulation

PBMC were stimulated with 10 μg/ml WBE or left untreated (mock). After 2 days, medium was refreshed with medium containing 2 ng/ml recombinant equine IL-2 (Kingfisher Biotech). Three days later, cells were harvested and mixed with matured autologous monocyte derived DC that had been activated for 24 hrs with 1 μg/ml LPS either in the presence or absence of 10 μg/ml WBE. Cells were then incubated for 6 hrs in the presence of 5 μM monensin (Sigma). Cells were then stained for CD3 and CD4 using the mouse anti-equine CD4 (clone CVS4) and intracellularly with mouse anti-bovine IFNγ (CC302, MCA1783F, AbD Serotec), and mouse anti-equine IL-4 Alexa 647 (12H8). Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and data analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 4.00 (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA). To compare unpaired samples form IBH-affected ponies with those from healthy ponies, Mann–Whitney U test (+) was used. To compare paired data, non-parametric, paired Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was used. Results were considered significant when p ≤0.05.

Results

Increased influx of leucocytes in animals suffering from IBH

To investigate the allergen-specific immune balance in the skin of ponies that either suffered from IBH or had been diagnosed to be healthy (Fig 1A), biopsies were taken at different time points following C. obsoletus allergen injection in the skin. In previous studies, we had found an overall, basal activation of the immune system in the skin of horses in summer [12]. To ascertain maximal detection of allergen-specific immune responses in comparison to basal immune activation in the skin, all samples were collected during winter, when Culicoides spp. are absent. Histological analysis of the skin following allergen injection was performed using H&E-stained slides from 10 IBH-affected and 6 healthy ponies. Slides were graded by a certified expert, who was blinded for the experimental set-up. In none of the samples, signs of acanthosis or hyperkeratosis could be detected, indicating that the biopsy sites all represent acute lesions (S2 Table). As shown in Fig 1B, both healthy and IBH-affected ponies showed an increased lymphocyte influx into the skin upon allergen-injection over time. Influx into the skin of IBH-affected animals was significantly stronger than that into the skin of unaffected animals (Fig 1B). Eosinophilic granulocytes were found predominantly in the middle dermis of the skin, and consistently more eosinophils were found in the skin of IBH-affected than in the skin of healthy ponies (S2 Table).

Download:

Fig 1. Delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in ponies following allergen injection in the skin.

Immune reactions of 6 healthy (light bars) and 10 IBH-sensitive animals (dark bars) to allergen injection in winter was determined at the site of injection at different time points after injection. A) relative skin swelling in animals, 30 min following C. obsoletus WBE compared to histamine injection; B) total histological score of the skin; C) number of mast cells; D) total CD3 mRNA expression; E) total MIP1α mRNA expression. Bars represent average +SEM; dots represent individual animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122090.g001

Mast cells have been shown before to play an important role in the immune-pathogenesis of IBH [13,17]. As shown in Fig 1C, also the number of mast cells in the skin of IBH-affected animals was significantly higher than that in the skin of unaffected animals. Frequency of mast cells in the skin following injection stayed consistent over time, in both groups, suggesting that there is no substantial allergen injection-induced efflux of mast cells into the draining lymph nodes [18].

In contrast to mast cells, however, T-cells appeared to be emigrating from the skin. mRNA expression of CD3_ζ, a T cell marker, in snap-frozen skin biopsies declined in the skin of all treated animals, but was most pronounced in the skin of IBH-affected animals (P = 0.0391) (Fig 1D). MIP1α, a chemokine and activation marker, however, showed the direct opposite development. In all animals MIP1α mRNA expression was up-regulated 24 hrs after allergen injection, most pronounced in the skin of IBH-affected animals (P = 0.0039) (Fig 1E). MIP1α is expressed by a wide range of different activated leukocytes, such as macrophages and activated T-cells. Expression of MIP1α was most pronounced 24 hrs after allergen injection. It can be assumed that most of the injected allergen will have been taken up and been processed at that time point. Therefore these data suggest that the main source of MIP1α at the site of injection must have been cells belonging to the adaptive immune response that were reacting to processed epitopes presented by local antigen presenting cells. Such data further suggest that un-specifically activated by-stander T-cells may at that time point have emigrated the site of inflammation, while allergen-specific T-cells have immigrated and have become activated.

IBH-affected animals have a type 2-biased immune response, while unaffected animals have a type-1 biased immune response

To analyze the immune response following allergen injection in the skin in more detail, we assessed cytokine expression in the biospies taken at different time points after injection. We found the Th2 cytokine marker, IL-4, significantly (P = 0.0039) upregulated 24 hrs after allergen injection. The expression was significantly (P<0.0001) higher in the skin of IBH-sensitive than in the skin of unaffected animals (Fig 2B). Also IL-5, another Th2 cytokine marker, showed a significant (P = 0.0137) upregulation in IBH skin 24 hrs after allergen injection (data not shown). In contrast to IBH-sensitive animals, in the skin of healthy animals the Th1 cytokine IFNγ was significantly (P = 0.0313) upregulated 24 hrs post injection (Fig 2A). In effect, the balance of these two cytokines was substantially shifted towards an IFNγ -dominated response in healthy animals, while IL-4 was more prominent in animals with IBH (Fig 2C). Other cytokines, such as IL-10, did not show any up- or down-regulation between the different time points (data not shown). The expression of FoxP3, a transcription factor specific for regulatory T-cells, did not differ between time points; nor was it different between the skin of healthy and IBH-sensitive animals (data not shown).

Download:

Fig 2. Type-1 immune response skewing in the skin of healthy ponies following allergen injection.

Cytokine expression at the site of injection, 24 hrs after allergen injection, was determined by qRT-PCR. A) IFNγ and B) IL4 mRNA expression as ratio to 18S; C) ratio IFNγ / IL4 expression. Bars represent average +SEM; n = 6 and n = 10, for healthy and IBH-sensitive animals, respectively; dots represent individual animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122090.g002

Taken together, these data show that ponies sensitive to IBH have a strong type-2 biased immune response, while animals protected against IBH-associated pathology show a bias towards a type-1 immune response 24 hrs after allergen injection.

Healthy ponies have Culicoides-specific antibody titers similar to IBH-affected animals

To determine whether both IBH-sensitive as well as healthy ponies may have developed antigen-specific immune responses against C. obsoletus antigens, we measured C. obsoletus-specific IgE, IgGa, IgGb, IgGc and IgG(T) antibody levels in the blood of the animals in the off-season. As shown in Fig 3, all animals, whether sensitive to IBH or not, had clearly detectable levels of C. obsoletus-specific antibodies. As described before [10], the average C. obsoletus-specific IgE serum level was elevated for IBH-sensitive compared to healthy animals (Fig 3), and significant differences between IBH-sensitive and healthy animals were measured for C. obsoletus-specific IgGa antibodies (P = 0.042), an isotype that correlates with the human IgG1 and is associated with type-2 immune responses in horses [19]. No substantial differences, however, were found for C. obsoletus-specific IgGb, IgGc and IgG(T) antibodies in serum between IBH and healthy ponies (Fig 3).

Download:

Fig 3. Healthy horses have allergen-specific serum antibodies.

Allergen-specific antibody titers, for different isotypes, were determined in the serum of healthy (dark bars) and IBH-sensitive animals (dark bars) by ELISA. Bars represent average +SEM; n = 6 and n = 10, for healthy and IBH-sensitive animals, respectively; dots represent individual animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122090.g003

These data show that all ponies have been exposed to allergens and that all animals have developed C. obsoletus-specific antibody responses.

Allergic animals have a Th2-biased allergen-specific immune response, while protected animals have a Th1-biased response

To determine, whether the above-described bias in immune responses is reflected in the underlying allergen-specific CD4 T-helper cell differentiation, we determined the allergen-specific T-cell response in ponies. To this end, CD4 T-cells were isolated from the blood of ponies in summer during the allergy season. Isolated CD4 T-cells were then in vitro expanded by PBMC exposed to allergen. Expanded allergen-specific CD4 T-cells were then re-stimulated with allergen-exposed monocyte derived dendritic cells (DC) and cytokine expression was determined by intracellular cytokine staining. Background activation was determined by activation of expanded T-cells by DC that had not been exposed to allergen. As shown in Fig 4, CD4 T-cells expanded from healthy horses was significantly (P = 0,0058) higher in frequency than IFNγ-producing allergen-specific CD4 T-cells from animals that suffered from IBH. Despite the fact that healthy horses had also elevated IL4 responses, the ratio of IFNγ- versus IL4-producing T-cells was in comparison to IBH affected animals substantially skewed towards IFNγ-producing cells in healthy animals (Fig 4D).

Download:

Fig 4. Increased frequencies of allergen-specific Th1 cells in healthy compared to IBH-affected ponies.

Allergen-specific CD4 T-cells were in vitro expanded in summer from PBMC of 11 healthy and 8 IBH-affected animals, by stimulation with WBE. Cytokine expression of expanded CD4 T-cells was then determined by exposure to monocyte-derived DCs in the presence or absence of allergen. A) representative FACS blot; B) IFNγ- and C) IL4 CD4 T-cells; D) ratio IFNγ/ IL4 CD4 T-cells. Bars represent average +SEM; dots represent individual animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122090.g004

Taken together, these data indicate that an underlying Th1 bias of the allergen-specific immune response correlates with a protection of animals from the allergen-induced IBH-associated pathology.

Discussion

Allergies are wide spread immunological disorders affecting a considerable proportion of the populations. A complex interaction of genetic as well as environmental factors determines whether an allergen-exposed individual becomes allergic or not. Generally, it is assumed that individuals either react with an IgE-associated immune response or remain immunological ignorant or tolerant upon exposure to the allergen. Moreover, is it assumed that in healthy individuals mainly cells that generally are involved in the induction of peripheral tolerance, such as regulatory T-cells, induce tolerance also against allergens. Nevertheless, it remains still largely unknown why such an immunological tolerance is induced in non-allergic individuals but not in allergic individuals.

IBH is an IgE-mediated, naturally occurring allergic skin disease in horses caused by bites of the insect, Culicoides spp.. IBH is affecting horse breeds differently and within affected breeds variable fractions of local horse populations suffer from it [20]. IBH therefore appeared a highly attractive model system to determine, why some animals that were exposed to the allergen developed IBH, while others remained unaffected. To address the underlying mechanism that determines why some animals are affected by IBH and others are not, we injected into animals known to be affected by IBH, as well as in animals known to be not affected by IBH, whole body extracts of Culicoides spp.—a method known to reliably reflect naturally evoked hypersensitivity reactions in the skin [15]. Our data show that an underlying allergen-specific Th1 immune response correlated with protection, while an underlying allergen-specific Th2 immune response led to the development of IBH. Thus, in contrast to general consensus, healthy animals were not tolerant to the allergen, but responded in a non-pathogenic way to exposure.

In recent years, clinical studies in patients suffering from a number of different types of allergies, such as allergies to cow’s milk [21], bee venom [22] or birch pollen [23], have shown that an amelioration of symptoms and the induction of tolerance in allergic individuals is associated with an increase of allergen-specific IgG4 antibodies. These antibodies compete with the existing allergen-specific IgE antibodies for the allergen and thereby prevent the degranulation of mast cells [24]. This shift away from IgE to IgG4 antibodies is supposed to be mediated by IL-10 producing T-cells with regulatory function [24]. In this context, it is interesting to mention that the group of Marti described an increased frequency of CD25^high allergen-specific FoxP3-expressing regulatory T-cells in healthy horses. The expression of FoxP3 was significantly higher in regulatory T-cells derived from healthy than in cells derived from IBH-affected horses, when in vitro stimulated by allergen [25].

The suppressive capacity of FoxP3-expressing regulatory T-cells in vivo is influenced by mast cells [26, 27]. While the activation of mast cells enhances the suppressive capacity of local regulatory T-cell populations [26, 27], diminishes IgE-crosslinking induced degranulation of mast cells the suppressive capacity of regulatory T-cells [28]. This effect is most likely mediated via the local secretion of histamine [29]. In line with these finding, it was recently demonstrate in a peanut-allergy model that mast cell-derived IL-4 contributes to the priming of allergen-specific Th2 cell responses, while IgE activated mast cells impaired regulatory T-cell induction [30]. Under allergic situations either IgE blockade or inhibition of mast cell signaling promoted regulatory T-cell induction and restored regulatory T-cell versus Th2 cell balance. This balance ultimately led to immune tolerance [30]. Similarly, a recent study using CpG treatment in a chronic mouse lung inflammation model [31], demonstrated that the treatment-induced amelioration of disease was less dependent on the induction of IFNγ expression but was more associated with an enhanced regulatory T-cell response.

In line with these findings, we would—based on the data presented here—suggest a scenario in which individuals that do not suffer from an allergic reaction may in first instance not be ignorant to an allergen, but develop a type-1 skewed allergen-specific immune response. In those individuals that react with a type-1 biased allergen-specific immune response, regulatory T-cell populations can suppress local allergic immune responses and induce allergen-specific immune tolerance. Those individuals, however, who react with a type-2 biased immune response, allergen-specific IgE crosslinking may induce degranulation of basophils and mast cells, which renders the local regulatory T-cell population non-functional. This may allow the local inflammation to perpetuate itself, finally leading to the observed allergen-specific epitope spreading and allergen-induced immunopathology. To test such a hypothesis, further research should establish whether these two independent observations in horses, i.e. of differential immune bias of IBH-sensitive and unaffected animals as described here, and the enhanced regulatory function of FoxP3 expressing regulatory T-cells in unaffected animals [25], are connected with each other via an IgE and mast cell degranulation mediated mechanism.

Thus, taken together, our data cannot fully explain why some individuals react with a type-2 immune response to allergens in the first place. Nevertheless, our data suggest a novel way of how to prevent the development of allergic diseases, for instance in individuals in danger of developing occupational allergic diseases. Such persons could, for instance, be immunized prior to exposure to the allergen in a way that skews the allergen-specific immune response towards a type-1 immune response. Further, should a therapeutic inhibition of mast cell degranulation as well as of type-2 immune responses, accompanied by the induction of allergen-specific type-1 biased allergen-specific immune responses, ameliorate symptoms of allergic individuals and protect treated individuals from developing allergies. Our data further suggest that the natural occurring allergic immune response of horses to Culicoides obsoletus-derived allergens could be a valuable model system to test such novel therapeutic approaches; in particular so, since it is well established that the immune response to Culicoides allergens in horses at the T cell level closely resembles those in human allergies [32].

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Primers and probes as well as the PCR conditions used for qRT-PCR

.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122090.s001

(PDF)

S2 Table. Histological scores from healthy and IBH-affected ponies at different time points after allergen injection.

Paraffin-embedded biopsies were cut into sections and stained with either haematoxylin-eosin (HE). Sections were graded according to a semi-quantitative grading system (0 = absent, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) as previously described ¹²; average and range between brackets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122090.s002

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Piet and Peter Lijffijt for identifying and transporting all Shetland ponies included in this study and P.W.T. Stolk for all the clinical procedures performed in this study. We are very grateful for the mouse anti-equine CD4 CVS4 hybridoma which was generously provided by David P. Lunn and the mouse anti-equine IL-4 Alexa 647 antibody provided by Bettina Wagner. We would also like to thank Anouk Schurink for help catching C. obsoletus for the production of WBE.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CM TW VPMGR DZ. Performed the experiments: CM JJvdL NMAvdM. Analyzed the data: CM JJvdL NMAvdM TW VPMGR DZ. Wrote the paper: CM JJvdL NMAvdM TW VPMGR DZ.

References

1. Mosmann TR, Cherwinski H, Bond MW, Giedlin MA, Coffman RL. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J Immunol 1986; 136:2348–57. pmid:2419430
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Kline JN, Kitagaki K, Businga TR, Jain VV. Treatment of established asthma in a murine model using CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002; 283:L170–9. pmid:12060574
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Romagnani S. Immunologic influences on allergy and the TH1/TH2 balance. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113:395–400. pmid:14758340
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Creticos PS, Schroeder JT, Hamilton RG, Balcer-Whaley SL, Khattignavong AP, Lindblad R, et al. Immunotherapy with a ragweed-toll-like receptor 9 agonist vaccine for allergic rhinitis. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1445–55. pmid:17021320
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Anderson GS, Belton P, Kleider N. The hypersensitivity of horses to culicoides bites in british columbia. Can Vet J 1988; 29:718–23. pmid:17423117
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. van der Rijt R, van den Boom R, Jongema Y, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM. Culicoides species attracted to horses with and without insect hypersensitivity. Vet J 2008; 178:91–7. pmid:17728164
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. van Grevenhof EM, Ducro B, Heuven HC, Bijma P. Identification of environmental factors affecting the prevalence of insect bite hypersensitivity in Shetland ponies and Friesian horses in The Netherlands. Equine Vet J 2007; 39:69–73. pmid:17228599
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Wilson AD, Harwood LJ, Bjornsdottir S, Marti E, Day MJ. Detection of IgG and IgE serum antibodies to Culicoides salivary gland antigens in horses with insect dermal hypersensitivity (sweet itch). Equine Vet J 2001; 33:707–13. pmid:11770994
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Wagner B, Miller WH, Morgan EE, Hillegas JM, Erb HN, Leibold W, et al. IgE and IgG antibodies in skin allergy of the horse. Vet Res 2006; 37:813–25. pmid:16973120
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Heimann M, Janda J, Sigurdardottir OG, Svansson V, Klukowska J, von Tscharner C, et al. Skin-infiltrating T cells and cytokine expression in Icelandic horses affected with insect bite hypersensitivity: a possible role for regulatory T cells. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011; 140:63–74. pmid:21168921
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Hellberg W, Wilson AD, Mellor P, Doherr MG, Torsteinsdottir S, Zurbriggen A, et al. Equine insect bite hypersensitivity: immunoblot analysis of IgE and IgG subclass responses to Culicoides nubeculosus salivary gland extract. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2006; 113:99–112. pmid:16797724
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Meulenbroeks C, van der Meide NM, Zaiss DM, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, van der Lugt JJ, Smak J, et al. Seasonal differences in cytokine expression in the skin of Shetland ponies suffering from insect bite hypersensitivity. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2013; 151:147–56. pmid:23219157
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. van der Haegen A, Griot-Wenk M, Welle M, Busato A, von Tscharner C, Zurbriggen A, et al. Immunoglobulin-E-bearing cells in skin biopsies of horses with insect bite hypersensitivity. Equine Vet J 2001; 33:699–706. pmid:11770993
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Anderson GS, Belton P, Kleider N. Culicoides obsoletus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as a causal agent of Culicoides hypersensitivity (sweet itch) in British Columbia. J Med Entomol 1991; 28:685–93. pmid:1941937
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. van der Meide NM, Meulenbroeks C, van Altena C, Schurink A, Ducro BJ, Wagner B, et al. Culicoides obsoletus extract relevant for diagnostics of insect bite hypersensitivity in horses. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2012; 149:245–54. pmid:22906994
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:e45. pmid:11328886
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Rufenacht S, Marti E, von Tscharner C, Doherr MG, Forster U, Welle M, et al. Immunoglobulin E-bearing cells and mast cells in skin biopsies of horses with urticaria. Vet Dermatol 2005; 16:94–101. pmid:15842539
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Byrne SN, Limon-Flores AY, Ullrich SE. Mast cell migration from the skin to the draining lymph nodes upon ultraviolet irradiation represents a key step in the induction of immune suppression. J Immunol 2008; 180:4648–55. pmid:18354188
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Wagner B. Immunoglobulins and immunoglobulin genes of the horse. Dev Comp Immunol 2006; 30:155–64. pmid:16046236
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Schurink A, Podesta SC, Ducro BJ, van Arendonk JA, Frankena K. Risk factors for insect bite hypersensitivity in Friesian horses and Shetland ponies in The Netherlands. Vet J 2013; 195:382–4. pmid:22841449
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Savilahti EM, Rantanen V, Lin JS, Karinen S, Saarinen KM, Goldis M, et al. Early recovery from cow's milk allergy is associated with decreasing IgE and increasing IgG4 binding to cow's milk epitopes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:1315–21 e9. pmid:20462631
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Varga EM, Kausar F, Aberer W, Zach M, Eber E, Durham SR, et al. Tolerant beekeepers display venom-specific functional IgG4 antibodies in the absence of specific IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 131:1419–21. pmid:23063581
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Geroldinger-Simic M, Zelniker T, Aberer W, Ebner C, Egger C, Greiderer A, et al. Birch pollen-related food allergy: clinical aspects and the role of allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127:616–22 e1. pmid:21251701
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Matsuoka T, Shamji MH, Durham SR. Allergen immunotherapy and tolerance. Allergol Int 2013; 62:403–13. pmid:24280670
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Hamza E, Steinbach F, Marti E. CD4+CD25+ T cells expressing FoxP3 in Icelandic horses affected with insect bite hypersensitivity. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2012; 148:139–44. pmid:21700344
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Lu LF, Lind EF, Gondek DC, Bennett KA, Gleeson MW, Pino-Lagos K, et al. Mast cells are essential intermediaries in regulatory T-cell tolerance. Nature 2006; 442:997–1002. pmid:16921386
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Zaiss DM, van Loosdregt J, Gorlani A, Bekker CP, Grone A, Sibilia M, et al. Amphiregulin enhances regulatory T cell-suppressive function via the epidermal growth factor receptor. Immunity 2013; 38:275–84. pmid:23333074
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. de Vries VC, Wasiuk A, Bennett KA, Benson MJ, Elgueta R, Waldschmidt TJ, et al. Mast cell degranulation breaks peripheral tolerance. Am J Transplant 2009; 9:2270–80. pmid:19681828
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Forward NA, Furlong SJ, Yang Y, Lin TJ, Hoskin DW. Mast cells down-regulate CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cell suppressor function via histamine H1 receptor interaction. J Immunol 2009; 183:3014–22. pmid:19667094
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Burton OT, Noval Rivas M, Zhou JS, Logsdon SL, Darling AR, Koleoglou KJ, et al. Immunoglobulin E Signal Inhibition during Allergen Ingestion Leads to Reversal of Established Food Allergy and Induction of Regulatory T Cells. Immunity 2014; 41:141–51. pmid:25017467
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Campbell JD, Kell SA, Kozy HM, Lum JA, Sweetwood R, Chu M, et al. A limited CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotide therapy regimen induces sustained suppression of allergic airway inflammation in mice. Thorax 2014; 69:565–73. pmid:24464743
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Schaffartzik A, Hamza E, Janda J, Crameri R, Marti E, Rhyner C. Equine insect bite hypersensitivity: what do we know? Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2012; 147:113–26. pmid:22575371
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Mosmann TR, Cherwinski H, Bond MW, Giedlin MA, Coffman RL. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J Immunol 1986; 136:2348–57. pmid:2419430
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Kline JN, Kitagaki K, Businga TR, Jain VV. Treatment of established asthma in a murine model using CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002; 283:L170–9. pmid:12060574
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Romagnani S. Immunologic influences on allergy and the TH1/TH2 balance. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113:395–400. pmid:14758340
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Creticos PS, Schroeder JT, Hamilton RG, Balcer-Whaley SL, Khattignavong AP, Lindblad R, et al. Immunotherapy with a ragweed-toll-like receptor 9 agonist vaccine for allergic rhinitis. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1445–55. pmid:17021320
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Anderson GS, Belton P, Kleider N. The hypersensitivity of horses to culicoides bites in british columbia. Can Vet J 1988; 29:718–23. pmid:17423117
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. van der Rijt R, van den Boom R, Jongema Y, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM. Culicoides species attracted to horses with and without insect hypersensitivity. Vet J 2008; 178:91–7. pmid:17728164
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. van Grevenhof EM, Ducro B, Heuven HC, Bijma P. Identification of environmental factors affecting the prevalence of insect bite hypersensitivity in Shetland ponies and Friesian horses in The Netherlands. Equine Vet J 2007; 39:69–73. pmid:17228599
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Wilson AD, Harwood LJ, Bjornsdottir S, Marti E, Day MJ. Detection of IgG and IgE serum antibodies to Culicoides salivary gland antigens in horses with insect dermal hypersensitivity (sweet itch). Equine Vet J 2001; 33:707–13. pmid:11770994
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Wagner B, Miller WH, Morgan EE, Hillegas JM, Erb HN, Leibold W, et al. IgE and IgG antibodies in skin allergy of the horse. Vet Res 2006; 37:813–25. pmid:16973120
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Heimann M, Janda J, Sigurdardottir OG, Svansson V, Klukowska J, von Tscharner C, et al. Skin-infiltrating T cells and cytokine expression in Icelandic horses affected with insect bite hypersensitivity: a possible role for regulatory T cells. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011; 140:63–74. pmid:21168921
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Hellberg W, Wilson AD, Mellor P, Doherr MG, Torsteinsdottir S, Zurbriggen A, et al. Equine insect bite hypersensitivity: immunoblot analysis of IgE and IgG subclass responses to Culicoides nubeculosus salivary gland extract. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2006; 113:99–112. pmid:16797724
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Meulenbroeks C, van der Meide NM, Zaiss DM, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, van der Lugt JJ, Smak J, et al. Seasonal differences in cytokine expression in the skin of Shetland ponies suffering from insect bite hypersensitivity. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2013; 151:147–56. pmid:23219157
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. van der Haegen A, Griot-Wenk M, Welle M, Busato A, von Tscharner C, Zurbriggen A, et al. Immunoglobulin-E-bearing cells in skin biopsies of horses with insect bite hypersensitivity. Equine Vet J 2001; 33:699–706. pmid:11770993
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Anderson GS, Belton P, Kleider N. Culicoides obsoletus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as a causal agent of Culicoides hypersensitivity (sweet itch) in British Columbia. J Med Entomol 1991; 28:685–93. pmid:1941937
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. van der Meide NM, Meulenbroeks C, van Altena C, Schurink A, Ducro BJ, Wagner B, et al. Culicoides obsoletus extract relevant for diagnostics of insect bite hypersensitivity in horses. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2012; 149:245–54. pmid:22906994
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:e45. pmid:11328886
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Rufenacht S, Marti E, von Tscharner C, Doherr MG, Forster U, Welle M, et al. Immunoglobulin E-bearing cells and mast cells in skin biopsies of horses with urticaria. Vet Dermatol 2005; 16:94–101. pmid:15842539
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Byrne SN, Limon-Flores AY, Ullrich SE. Mast cell migration from the skin to the draining lymph nodes upon ultraviolet irradiation represents a key step in the induction of immune suppression. J Immunol 2008; 180:4648–55. pmid:18354188
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Wagner B. Immunoglobulins and immunoglobulin genes of the horse. Dev Comp Immunol 2006; 30:155–64. pmid:16046236
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Schurink A, Podesta SC, Ducro BJ, van Arendonk JA, Frankena K. Risk factors for insect bite hypersensitivity in Friesian horses and Shetland ponies in The Netherlands. Vet J 2013; 195:382–4. pmid:22841449
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Savilahti EM, Rantanen V, Lin JS, Karinen S, Saarinen KM, Goldis M, et al. Early recovery from cow's milk allergy is associated with decreasing IgE and increasing IgG4 binding to cow's milk epitopes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:1315–21 e9. pmid:20462631
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Varga EM, Kausar F, Aberer W, Zach M, Eber E, Durham SR, et al. Tolerant beekeepers display venom-specific functional IgG4 antibodies in the absence of specific IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 131:1419–21. pmid:23063581
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Geroldinger-Simic M, Zelniker T, Aberer W, Ebner C, Egger C, Greiderer A, et al. Birch pollen-related food allergy: clinical aspects and the role of allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127:616–22 e1. pmid:21251701
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Matsuoka T, Shamji MH, Durham SR. Allergen immunotherapy and tolerance. Allergol Int 2013; 62:403–13. pmid:24280670
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Hamza E, Steinbach F, Marti E. CD4+CD25+ T cells expressing FoxP3 in Icelandic horses affected with insect bite hypersensitivity. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2012; 148:139–44. pmid:21700344
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Lu LF, Lind EF, Gondek DC, Bennett KA, Gleeson MW, Pino-Lagos K, et al. Mast cells are essential intermediaries in regulatory T-cell tolerance. Nature 2006; 442:997–1002. pmid:16921386
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Zaiss DM, van Loosdregt J, Gorlani A, Bekker CP, Grone A, Sibilia M, et al. Amphiregulin enhances regulatory T cell-suppressive function via the epidermal growth factor receptor. Immunity 2013; 38:275–84. pmid:23333074
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. de Vries VC, Wasiuk A, Bennett KA, Benson MJ, Elgueta R, Waldschmidt TJ, et al. Mast cell degranulation breaks peripheral tolerance. Am J Transplant 2009; 9:2270–80. pmid:19681828
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Forward NA, Furlong SJ, Yang Y, Lin TJ, Hoskin DW. Mast cells down-regulate CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cell suppressor function via histamine H1 receptor interaction. J Immunol 2009; 183:3014–22. pmid:19667094
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Burton OT, Noval Rivas M, Zhou JS, Logsdon SL, Darling AR, Koleoglou KJ, et al. Immunoglobulin E Signal Inhibition during Allergen Ingestion Leads to Reversal of Established Food Allergy and Induction of Regulatory T Cells. Immunity 2014; 41:141–51. pmid:25017467
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Campbell JD, Kell SA, Kozy HM, Lum JA, Sweetwood R, Chu M, et al. A limited CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotide therapy regimen induces sustained suppression of allergic airway inflammation in mice. Thorax 2014; 69:565–73. pmid:24464743
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Schaffartzik A, Hamza E, Janda J, Crameri R, Marti E, Rhyner C. Equine insect bite hypersensitivity: what do we know? Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2012; 147:113–26. pmid:22575371
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Material and Methods

Study population

C. obsoletus whole body extract preparation

Diagnostic skin test

Collection and processing of blood and skin samples

C. obsoletus-specific antibody titers

Histological examination of skin samples

mRNA expression in skin biopsies

In vitro differentiation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells

Antigen-specific T-cell stimulation

Statistical analysis

Results

Increased influx of leucocytes in animals suffering from IBH

IBH-affected animals have a type 2-biased immune response, while unaffected animals have a type-1 biased immune response

Healthy ponies have Culicoides-specific antibody titers similar to IBH-affected animals

Allergic animals have a Th2-biased allergen-specific immune response, while protected animals have a Th1-biased response

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Primers and probes as well as the PCR conditions used for qRT-PCR

S2 Table. Histological scores from healthy and IBH-affected ponies at different time points after allergen injection.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References