Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Serum Chemerin Concentrations Associate with Beta-Cell Function, but Not with Insulin Resistance in Individuals with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

  • Erifili Hatziagelaki ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Erifili Hatziagelaki, Christian Herder

    Affiliation 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Athens University, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece

  • Christian Herder ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Erifili Hatziagelaki, Christian Herder

    Affiliations Institute of Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, German Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

  • Anastasia Tsiavou,

    Affiliation 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Athens University, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece

  • Tom Teichert,

    Affiliations Institute of Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, German Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

  • Athina Chounta,

    Affiliation 4th Department of Internal Medicine, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece

  • Peter Nowotny,

    Affiliations Institute of Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, German Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

  • Giovanni Pacini,

    Affiliation Metabolic Unit, CNR Neuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Padova, Italy

  • George Dimitriadis,

    Affiliation 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Athens University, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece

  • Michael Roden

    michael.roden@ddz.uni-duesseldorf.de

    Affiliations Institute of Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, German Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

Abstract

The novel adipokine chemerin has been related to insulin-resistant states such as obesity and non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, its association with insulin resistance and beta cell function remains controversial. The main objective was to examine whether serum chemerin levels associate with insulin sensitivity and beta cell function independently of body mass index (BMI), by studying consecutive outpatients of the hepatology clinics of a European university hospital. Individuals (n=196) with NAFLD were stratified into persons with normal glucose tolerance (NGT; n=110), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; n=51) and type 2 diabetes (T2D; n=35) and the association between serum chemerin and measures of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function as assessed during fasting and during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was measured. Our results showed that serum chemerin positively associated with BMI (P=0.0007) and C peptide during OGTT (P<0.004), but not with circulating glucose, insulin, lipids or liver enzymes (all P>0.18). No BMI independent relationships of chemerin with fasting and OGTT derived measures of insulin sensitivity were found (P>0.5). Chemerin associated positively with fasting beta cell function as well as the OGTT derived insulinogenic index IGI_cp and the adaptation index after adjustment for age, sex and BMI (P=0.002-0.007), and inversely with the insulin/C peptide ratio (P=0.007). Serum chemerin neither related to the insulinogenic index IGI_ins nor the disposition index. In conclusion, circulating chemerin is likely linked to enhanced beta cell function but not to insulin sensitivity in patients with NAFLD.

Introduction

Chemerin is highly expressed in white adipose tissue, liver and lungs, secreted as inactive prochemerin and binds after activation to the chemokine—like receptor 1 (CMKLR1) [1,2]. Binding of chemerin to CMKLR1 in immune cells and adipose tissue stimulates chemotaxis at sites of inflammation [3,4].

Previous studies in humans suggested that chemerin is increased and/or associates with age [3,5], degree of adiposity based on body mass index (BMI) or fat mass and obesity-related markers such as leptin and resistin [3,610]. Circulating chemerin has been also related to degree of glycemia and insulin resistance based on fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and fasting insulin [3,5,6,7,8]. Furthermore, chemerin has been positively associated with blood pressure [3,7,8] and biomarkers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) [3,5,8,9]. In line, body weight reduction by lifestyle intervention [11] and bariatric surgery [12,13] also reduced serum chemerin levels. Employing different measures of insulin sensitivity yielded contradictory results regarding its association with chemerin levels [1427]. In addition, data on a relationship between chemerin and beta-cell function are scarce in humans. In chemerin-deficient mice, chemerin positively regulates glucose-dependent insulin secretion [28]. Likewise, circulating chemerin tended to be positively associated with HOMA-β as a surrogate marker of fasting insulin secretion in Japanese patients with metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes [20].

Circulating levels of chemerin have been also associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [13,29,30], which comprises a broad spectrum of disorders ranging from simple fatty liver to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis [31]. NAFLD is closely linked to obesity and insulin resistance, which frequently co-exists with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or type 2 diabetes [32,33].

As chemerin may modulate insulin resistance and inflammatory responses [34], we examined its role in patients with NAFLD. More specifically, we tested (i) whether chemerin levels differently associate with insulin sensitivity and/or beta-cell function using both fasting levels and dynamic changes of glucose and insulin after oral glucose loading and (ii) if so, whether these associations occur independently of BMI in patients with NAFLD and different degrees of glucose tolerance.

Materials and Methods

Study participants

We studied consecutive patients who presented with elevated serum aminotransferases at the outpatient Hepatology Clinics of Attikon University General Hospital in Athens, Greece, between June 2009 and May 2012, and who were diagnosed with NAFLD. The diagnosis of NAFLD was based on the presence of increased liver transaminases, i.e. alanine transaminase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) 1.5-2times above the upper limit of the normal range, along with typical hepatic fat infiltration, i.e. “bright liver” or hyperechogenic appearance employing abdominal ultrasound and the exclusion of other possible causes of liver disease, including alcoholic liver disease (alcohol consumption exceeding 20 g/day), adverse drug reactions, viral hepatitis, autoimmune disorders and hereditary diseases affecting the liver [35].

Upon inclusion in the study, height and weight from each patient were measured. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were recorded. After overnight fasting, the patients with NAFLD underwent fasting blood sampling and a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), during which blood samples were obtained through an indwelling peripheral vein cannula at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min to measure plasma glucose, serum insulin and serum C-peptide concentrations. Patients with known history of diabetes or a fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dl did not undergo an OGTT and were therefore excluded from the study. A total of 197 patients were enrolled in the study and classified according to the criteria by the American Diabetes Association [36] into 110 individuals with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), 52 with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 35 with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Ethics statement

The institutional review board of “Attikon” University General Hospital approved this study and the patients gave their informed consent in writing.

Laboratory analyses

Serum cholesterol (total, LDL, HDL), triglycerides, aspartate transaminase (AST), ALT and γ-GT were assessed using a Cobas 8000 analyzer (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Plasma glucose was measured using the glucose oxidase method (YSI, Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, CO). Serum C-peptide and insulin levels were quantified using the respective radioimmunoassays from Millipore (St. Charles, MO). Serum chemerin was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Chemerin Human ELISA; Biovendor, Brno, Czech Republic) with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of 3.4% and 6.4%, respectively.

Calculation of insulin sensitivity and secretion

In the fasted state, insulin sensitivity was assessed from QUICKI = 1/[log (insulin) + log (glucose)] [38], while beta-cell function was estimated with the ratio of insulin to glucose concentration. During the OGTT, total and incremental areas under the time curves (AUC) of plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations were calculated using the trapezoidal rule. The oral glucose insulin sensitivity (OGIS) represents a measure of dynamic insulin sensitivity as previously described and validated against the hyperinsulinemic-normoglycemic clamp [37,38]. Beta-cell function was assessed from insulinogenic indices (IGI) [39]. The IGI_cp, given as the ratio of the difference between C-peptide at 30 min and at fasting versus the analogous difference for glucose at 30 min and at fasting, provides an empirical index mirroring beta-cell function at portal level. Using insulin instead of C-peptide yields the classic IGI_ins [39]. The beta-cell adaptation index reflects the mechanism, by which the beta-cell modulates insulin release in response to changes of insulin resistance, and is given as OGIS times IGI_cp, while the disposition index is given as OGIS times IGI_ins [38].

Statistical analysis

The characteristics of the study sample are given as percentages for categorical variables, mean and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables with normal distribution and median (25th and 75th percentiles) for continuous variables without normal distribution. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test for normal distribution of data. Group comparisons for these variables were performed using Fisher’s exact test, t-test or ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (for two or more groups) and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test for more than two groups, respectively. Correlations were assessed as partial Spearman correlation coefficients adjusting for the variables indicated. P values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.02 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) and SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Anthropometric and metabolic characteristics

Table 1 presents the basic characteristics of the study population stratified by glucose tolerance status. Except from younger age in NGT compared with IGT and T2D, the groups did not differ with respect to sex, BMI as well as serum lipids and transaminases.

Individuals with IGT and T2D had higher fasting, 2-h and AUC glucose than individuals with NGT (Table 1). Fasting insulin was higher in T2D than in NGT, while other insulin and C-peptide-related parameters were not different between groups. QUICKI was lower in T2D than in IGT and NGT, while OGIS was lower in both T2D and IGT than in NGT (Table 1). Fasting beta-cell function did not differ between the groups (Table 1). From OGTT estimates of beta cell function, IGT and T2D had lower IGI_cp, IGI_ins and disposition index than NGT, whereas the adaptation index was decreased only in T2D (Table 1).

Serum chemerin concentrations

The three groups differed with regard to serum chemerin levels (PANOVA = 0.014; Fig 1A). Serum chemerin was 169±37 ng/ml in NGT, 189±43 ng/ml in IGT (P<0.05 vs. NGT) and 187±63 ng/ml in T2D (P>0.05 vs. NGT). Chemerin were 11% higher in the combined IGT+T2D group than in NGT (188±52 ng/ml, P = 0.004). Of note, serum chemerin was higher in women than in men (190±42 ng/ml and 165±44 ng/ml, P<0.001) (Fig 1B). In addition, serum chemerin levels differed with respect to BMI (PANOVA = 0.002; Fig 1C). Individuals with normal weight, overweight or obesity had serum chemerin levels of 165±33 ng/ml, 169±42 ng/ml (P>0.05 vs. normal weight) and 190±48 ng/ml (P<0.01 vs. normal weight, respectively).

thumbnail
Fig 1.

Chemerin serum levels in NAFLD patients (means±SD) stratified by (A) glucose tolerance status (normal (NGT; n = 110) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; n = 51) or type 2 diabetes; no sex differences between the 3 groups, P = 0.58), (B) sex and (C) body mass index (normal weight, n = 34; overweight n = 77; obese n = 85).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124935.g001

Associations of chemerin with age, sex and metabolic characteristics

In a joint model containing chemerin, age, sex and BMI, both age and BMI positively associated with serum levels of chemerin, and the sex difference remained significant for chemerin (Table 2). In contrast, no significant associations were found in age-, sex- and BMI-adjusted analyses between chemerin levels and lipids (triglycerides, total, LDL, HDL cholesterol) or transaminases (ALT, AST, γ-GT) (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Associations between Serum Chemerin Levels and Anthropometric and Metabolic Variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124935.t002

In age- and sex-adjusted analyses, serum chemerin levels positively associated with 2-h glucose and fasting insulin, but not with other glucose- and insulin-related variables. After further adjustment for BMI, the significant associations disappeared (Table 2), while serum chemerin associated with C-peptide levels independently of BMI.

Serum chemerin levels neither related to QUICKI nor to OGIS after adjustment for age, sex and BMI. In contrast, serum chemerin associated positively with fasting beta-cell function, IGI_cp as well as adaptation index based on C-peptide, independent of BMI, but not with IGI_ins and disposition index. Serum chemerin also inversely associated with the ratio of insulin to C-peptide (Table 2).

Stratifying the study population into the subgroups with NGT and IGT/T2D did not affect the associations between serum chemerin and metabolic parameters in both subgroups (S1 Table).

Discussion

This study shows that circulating chemerin concentrations not only positively associate with BMI in patients with NAFLD, but are also higher in individuals with IGT or type 2 diabetes compared to NGT in this study population. Serum chemerin further exhibited BMI-independent associations with beta-cell function, but not with insulin sensitivity.

Chemerin has been proposed as a novel biomarker of insulin resistance related to obesity and T2D, but it was unknown whether the observed associations between chemerin levels and metabolic features are mainly mediated by obesity or occur independently of obesity. In particular, putative associations with T2D are poorly understood because it is not clear whether chemerin primarily relates to insulin resistance or beta-cell dysfunction.

Our study extends previous studies by assessing insulin resistance based on dynamic measurements from an OGTT rather than relying on surrogate markers of insulin resistance derived from fasting parameters only. Although we found that chemerin and QUICKI were correlated, there was no association when OGIS was used as more precise measure of insulin resistance. Moreover, the association with QUICKI was mainly explained by BMI. These data are in line with several studies that also failed to observe a BMI-independent association between chemerin and insulin resistance assessed by HOMA-IR [6,11,14,19,26]. Two previous studies analyzed the association between chemerin and the OGTT-based Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (ISI) [11,26] with contradictory results: the first study in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes found a significant inverse association after adjustment for age, sex and BMI [11], whereas the inverse association between chemerin and Matsuda ISI in children from Germany was mainly explained by age and BMI [26]. Evidence for a direct BMI-independent association between chemerin and insulin resistance comes from two studies using hyperinsulinemic-normoglycemic clamps in non-obese normoglycemic men [17] and in a very heterogeneous cohort with respect to age, BMI and insulin resistance [27].

The reason for the discrepancy between the aforementioned findings is currently unclear. It is important to note that also mechanistic studies revealed opposing effects of chemerin on insulin action. Kralich et al. showed an increase in insulin—stimulated glucose uptake and insulin receptor substrate-1 tyrosine phosphorylation after chemerin treatment [40], whereas Takahashi et al. reported a decrease in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake [41]. While exogenous administration of chemerin exacerbates glucose intolerance and decreases tissue glucose uptake in obese diabetic mice [42], chemerin-deficient mice are also glucose intolerant [28].

The absence of any correlation between serum chemerin and insulin resistance in the present study could be due to our study population consisting of patients with NAFLD. Several studies indicated that liver disease may affect circulating chemerin levels [42]. Previous studies reported higher chemerin levels in patients with clinical or biopsy-proven NAFLD [13,29,30]. In the present study, patients with IGT and T2D had higher chemerin levels than glucose tolerant patients with NAFLD suggesting a specific role for insulin action or secretion. Nevertheless, a recent study found elevated mRNA levels of both chemerin and its receptor, CMKLR1, in the human liver, with greater expression in patients with NASH [43]. The increase in chemerin in overweight patients with NAFLD may be more pronounced than effects of insulin resistance per se and thereby obscure or blunt any association with insulin resistance. On basis of the previous data and our study, a future study comprising persons without and with NAFLD and careful matching for glucose tolerance status will be necessary to address the question whether the presence of NAFLD modifies the association between chemerin and insulin resistance.

In contrast to insulin resistance, our study clearly showed that chemerin levels associate positively with beta-cell function during fasting and under dynamic conditions as assessed with the insulinogenic index IGI_cp and the adaptation index. These data are novel as two previous studies used only HOMA-B as surrogate marker of fasting beta-cell function. In these studies, chemerin did not relate to HOMA-B in cohorts from Japan [20] and Mauritius [3] after adjustment for age, sex and BMI. Data from studies using dynamic measurements of beta-cell functions have not been published so far. In addition to the fact that dynamic measures are more sensitive to detect changes in insulin secretion, the difference between the present and the previous studies could result form the study population, i.e. Caucasian patients with NAFLD. The generally higher degree of insulin resistance in NAFLD may explain a compensatory excessive increase in insulin secretion during OGTT, which is typical for IGT and early or newly diagnosed patients with T2D [44]. On the other hand, it is conceivable that chemerin per se supports insulin secretion under these conditions. Recent studies on chemerin in mouse models serve to support our human data [28]. Islets from chemerin-deficient mice exhibit impaired glucose-dependent insulin secretion (GSIS), whereas transgenic mice overexpressing chemerin have increased GSIS. Although these data support a beneficial effect of chemerin on beta-cell function, additional preclinical and clinical studies are required to elucidate the interplay between chemerin and insulin secretion in more detail.

The use of dynamic measurements from an OGTT to simultaneously assess insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function represents the main strength of our study. Nevertheless, some limitations should be taken into account. We included patients diagnosed with NAFLD using transaminases and liver ultrasound rather than employing liver biopsy. Although the liver biopsy is the gold standard procedure to diagnose NAFLD [45,46], it is not generally used in mild forms as present in our cohort. Furthermore, we recruited patients form a specialized clinic and did not include persons without NAFLD. Thus, we cannot generalize our findings to the general population or other ethnic groups, but we were able to detect alterations within a well-defined closely matched groups with different degrees of glucose tolerance.

In conclusion, this study did not observe a BMI-independent correlation between increased circulating chemerin concentrations and insulin resistance in patients with NAFLD. On the other hand, we found a robust association between elevated chemerin and increased beta-cell function which points towards a novel beneficial role of chemerin for dynamic insulin secretion in the context of NAFLD and type 2 diabetes.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Associations between Serum Chemerin Levels and Anthropometric and Metabolic Variables In the Subgroups with NGT and IGT/T2D.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124935.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Karin Röhrig and Irena Latta, both from the German Diabetes Center, for their excellent technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EH CH AT GD MR. Performed the experiments: EH CH AT AC PN. Analyzed the data: CH TT GP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AC PN. Wrote the paper: EH CH MR.

References

  1. 1. Zabel BA, Allen SJ, Kulig P. Chemerin activation by serine proteases of the coagulation fib-rinolytic, and inflammatory cascades. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:34661–34666. pmid:16096270
  2. 2. Meder W, Wendland M, Busmann A, Kutzleb C, Spodsberg N, John H, et al. Characterization of human circulating TIG2 a ligand for the orphan receptor ChemR23. FEBS Lett. 2003;555:495–499. pmid:14675762
  3. 3. Bozaoglu K, Bolton K, McMillan J, Zimmet P, Jowett J, Collier G, et al. Chemerin is a novel adipokine associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Endocrinology. 2007;148:4687–4694. pmid:17640997
  4. 4. Ernst MC, Sinal CJ. Chemerin: at the crossroads of inflammation and obesity. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21:660–667. pmid:20817486
  5. 5. Lehrke M, Becker A, Greif M, Stark R, Laubender RP, von Ziegler F, et al. Chemerin is associated with markers of inflammation and components of the metabolic syndrome but does not predict coronary atherosclerosis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161:339–344. pmid:19497986
  6. 6. Bozaoglu K, Segal D, Shields KA, Cummings N, Curran JE, Comuzzie AG, et al. Chemerin is associated with metabolic syndrome phenotypes in a Mexican-American population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3085–3088. pmid:19470637
  7. 7. Shin HY, Lee DC, Chu SH, Jeon JY, Lee MK, Im JA, et al. Chemerin levels are positively correlated with abdominal visceral fat accumulation. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;77:47–50. pmid:21895733
  8. 8. Dong B, Ji W, Zhang Y. Elevated serum chemerin levels are associated with the presence of coronary artery disease in patients with metabolic syndrome. Intern Med. 2011;50:1093–1097. pmid:21576834
  9. 9. Catalán V, Gómez-Ambrosi J, Rodríguez A, Ramírez B, Rotellar F, Valenti V, et al. Increased levels of chemerin and its receptor, chemokine-like receptor-1, in obesity are related to inflammation: tumor necrosis factor-α stimulates mRNA levels of chemerin in visceral adipocytes from obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013; 9:306–314. pmid:22154272
  10. 10. Chu SH, Lee MK, Ahn KY, Im JA, Park MS, Lee DC, et al. Chemerin and adiponectin contribute reciprocally to metabolic syndrome. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34710. pmid:22509348
  11. 11. Kim SH, Lee SH, Ahn KY, Lee DH, Suh YJ, Cho SG, et al. Effect of lifestyle modification on serum chemerin concentration and its association with insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014;80:825–833. pmid:23682797
  12. 12. Ress C, Tschoner A, Engl J, Klaus A, Tilg H, Ebenbichler CF, et al. Effect of bariatric surgery on circulating chemerin levels. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010;40:277–280. pmid:20105226
  13. 13. Sell H, Divoux A, Poitou C, Basdevant A, Bouillot JL, Bedossa P, et al. Chemerin correlates with markers for fatty liver in morbidly obese patients and strongly decreases after weight loss induced by bariatric surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:2892–2896. pmid:20375212
  14. 14. Fatima SS, Bozaoglu K, Rehman R, Alam F, Memon AS. Elevated chemerin levels in Pakistani men: an interrelation with metabolic syndrome phenotypes. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57113. pmid:23468920
  15. 15. Jialal I, Devaraj S, Kaur H, Adams-Huet B, Bremer AA. Increased chemerin and ecreased omentin-1 in both adipose tissue and plasma in nascent metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:E514–E517. pmid:23303213
  16. 16. Lin X, Tang X, Jiang Q, Liu Q, Lin Z, Lin J, et al. Elevated serum chemerin levels are associated with the presence of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Lab. 2012;58:539–544. pmid:22783586
  17. 17. Ouwens DM, Bekaert M, Lapauw B, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Lehr S, Hartwig S, et al. Chemerin as biomarker for insulin sensitivity in males without typical characteristics of metabolic syndrome. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2012;118:135–138. pmid:22335466
  18. 18. Pfau D, Bachmann A, Lössner U, Kratzsch J, Blüher M, Stumvoll M, et al. Serum levels of the adipokine chemerin in relation to renal function. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:171–173. pmid:19837789
  19. 19. Stefanov T, Blüher M, Vekova A, Bonova I, Tzvetkov S, Kurktschiev D, et al. Circulating chemerin decreases in response to a combined strength and endurance training. Endocrine. 2014;45:382–391. pmid:23783366
  20. 20. Takahashi M, Inomata S, Okimura Y, Iguchi G, Fukuoka H, Miyake K, et al. Decreased serum chemerin levels in male Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: sex dimorphism. Endocr J. 2013;60:37–44. pmid:22986456
  21. 21. Yan Q, Zhang Y, Hong J, Gu W, Dai M, Shi J, et al. The association of serum chemerin level with risk of coronary artery disease in Chinese adults. Endocrine. 2012;41:281–288. pmid:22042485
  22. 22. Klöting N, Fasshauer M, Dietrich A, Kovacs P, Schön MR, Kern M, et al. Insulin-sensitive obesity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010;299:E506–E515. pmid:20570822
  23. 23. Alfadda AA, Sallam RM, Chishti MA, Moustafa AS, Fatma S, Alomaim WS, et al. Differential patterns of serum concentration and adipose tissue expression of chemerin in obesity: adipose depot specificity and gender dimorphism. Mol Cells. 2012;33:591–596. pmid:22544171
  24. 24. El-Mesallamy HO, El-Derany MO, Hamdy NM. Serum omentin-1 and chemerin levels are interrelated in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without ischaemic heart disease. Diabet Med. 2011;28:1194–1200. pmid:21668495
  25. 25. Stepan H, Philipp A, Roth I, Kralisch S, Jank A, Schaarschmidt W, et al. Serum levels of the adipokine chemerin are increased in preeclampsia during and 6 months after pregnancy. Regul Pept. 2011;16:69–72.
  26. 26. Landgraf K, Friebe D, Ullrich T, Kratzsch J, Dittrich K, Herberth G, et al. Chemerin as a mediator between obesity and vascular inflammation in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E556–E564. pmid:22438234
  27. 27. Chakaroun R, Raschpichler M, Klöting N, Oberbach A, Flehmig G, Kern M, et al. Effects of weight loss and exercise on chemerin serum concentrations and adipose tissue expression in human obesity. Metabolism. 2012;61:706–714. pmid:22136911
  28. 28. Takahashi M, Okimura Y, Iguchi G, Nishizawa H, Yamamoto M, Suda K, et al. Chemerin regulates β-cell function in mice. Sci Rep. 2011;1:123. pmid:22355640
  29. 29. Kukla M, Zwirska-Korczala K, Hartleb M, Waluga M, Chwist A, Kajor M, et al. Serum chemerin and vaspin in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Scand J Gasteroenterol. 2010;45:235–242. pmid:20095887
  30. 30. Yilmaz Y, Yonal O, Kurt R, Alahdab YO, Eren F, Ozdogan O, et al. Serum levels of omentin, chemerin and adipsin in patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Scand J Gasteroenterol. 2011;46:91–97. pmid:20809771
  31. 31. Adams LA, Lymp JF, St Sauver J, Sanderson SO, Lindor KD, Feldstein A, et al. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:113–121. pmid:16012941
  32. 32. Pinto HC, Baptista A, Camilo ME, Valente A, Saragoça A, de Moura MC. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clinicopathological comparison with alcoholic hepatitis in ambulatory and hospitalized patients. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41:172–179. pmid:8565753
  33. 33. Powell EE, Cooksley WG, Hanson R, Searle J, Halliday JW, Powell LW. The natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a follow-up study of forty-two patients for up to 21 years. Hepatology. 1990;11:74–80. pmid:2295475
  34. 34. Yoshimura T, Oppenheim JJ. Chemerin reveals its chimeric nature. J Exp Med. 2008;205:2187–2190. pmid:18809717
  35. 35. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology. 2012;55:2005–2023. pmid:22488764
  36. 36. Genuth S, Alberti KG, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R, Kahn R, et al. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3160–3167. pmid:14578255
  37. 37. Mari A, Pacini G, Murphy E, Ludvik B, Nolan JJ. A model-based method for assessing insulin sensitivity from the oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:539–548. pmid:11289482
  38. 38. Pacini G, Mari A. Methods for clinical assessment of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;17:305–322. pmid:12962688
  39. 39. Tura A, Kautzky-Willer A, Pacini G. Insulinogenic indices from insulin and C-peptide: comparison of beta-cell function from OGTT and IVGTT. Diab Res Clin Pract. 2006;72:298–301. pmid:16325298
  40. 40. Kralisch S, Weise S, Sommer G, Lipfert J, Lossner U, Blüher M, et al. Interleukin-1beta induces the novel adipokine chemerin in adipocytes in vitro. Regul Pept. 2009;154:102–106. pmid:19233230
  41. 41. Takahashi M, Takahashi Y, Takahashi K, Zolotaryov FN, Hong KS, Kitazawa R, et al. Chemerin enhances insulin signaling and potentiates insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:573–578. pmid:18242188
  42. 42. Ernst MC, Issa M, Goralski KB, Sinal CJ. Chemerin exacerbates glucose intolerance in mouse models of obesity and diabetes. Endocrinology. 2010;151:1998–2007. pmid:20228173
  43. 43. Döcke S, Lock JF, Birkenfeld AL, Hoppe S, Lieske S, Rieger A, et al. Elevated hepatic chemerin mRNA expression in human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169:547–557. pmid:23935128
  44. 44. Tabák AG, Jokela M, Akbaraly TN, Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M, Witte DR. Trajectories of glycaemia, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion before diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: an analysis from the Whitehall II study. Lancet. 2009;373:2215–2221. pmid:19515410
  45. 45. Emanuele E. Is biopsy always necessary? Toward a clinicolaboratory approach for diagnosing nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in obesity. Hepatology. 2008;48:2086–2087. pmid:19030167
  46. 46. Yilmaz Y, Dolar E. Biomarkers for noninvasive biochemical diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: tools or decorations? World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:4346–4347. pmid:19750583