Immunostimulatory Effects Triggered by Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 Probiotic Strain Involve Activation of Dendritic Cells and Interferon-Gamma Production

Matías Alejandro Molina; Ailén Magalí Díaz; Christina Hesse; Wiebke Ginter; María Virginia Gentilini; Guillermo Gabriel Nuñez; Andrea Mercedes Canellada; Tim Sparwasser; Luciana Berod; Marisa Silvia Castro; Marcela Alejandra Manghi

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127262

Abstract

Probiotics can modulate the immune system, conferring beneficial effects on the host. Understanding how these microorganisms contribute to improve the health status is still a challenge. Previously, we have demonstrated that Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 implants itself and persists in the murine gastrointestinal tract, and enhances and skews the profile of cytokines towards the Th1 phenotype in several biological models. Given the importance of dendritic cells (DCs) in the orchestration of immunity, the aim of this work was to elucidate the influence of E. faecalis CECT7121 on DCs and the outcome of the immune responses. In this work we show that E. faecalis CECT7121 induces a strong dose-dependent activation of DCs and secretion of high levels of IL-12, IL-6, TNFα, and IL-10. This stimulation is dependent on TLR signaling, and skews the activation of T cells towards the production of IFNγ. The influence of this activation in the establishment of Th responses in vivo shows the accumulation of specific IFNγ-producing cells. Our findings indicate that the activation exerted by E. faecalis CECT7121 on DCs and its consequence on the cellular adaptive immune response may have broad therapeutic implications in immunomodulation.

Citation: Molina MA, Díaz AM, Hesse C, Ginter W, Gentilini MV, Nuñez GG, et al. (2015) Immunostimulatory Effects Triggered by Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 Probiotic Strain Involve Activation of Dendritic Cells and Interferon-Gamma Production. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0127262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262

Academic Editor: Jagadeesh Bayry, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FRANCE

Received: December 6, 2014; Accepted: April 14, 2015; Published: May 15, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Molina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: Our work was partly supported by University of Buenos Aires, Argentina (grant number 20020100101002) to MarAM and institutional funding from the Institute of Infection Immunology (Twincore, Hannover, Germany). This work was done in the frame of a scientific collaborative program (PROALAR DA/10/05) between the Institute of Infection Immunology (Twincore, Hannover, Germany) and the Laboratorio de Modulación de la Respuesta Inmune, (IDEHU,CONICET-UBA, Argentina) granted to TDS and MarAM by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation (MINCyT, Argentina) and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, Germany). The funds granted by this program were exclusively aimed to cover the costs of travel and accommodations for travel between Germany and Argentina for the researchers involved to specific project tasks. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The gastrointestinal microbiota varies in a continuum range between mutualism and pathogenicity, as a consequence of both residential and ingested microorganisms [1]. This microbiota is essential to human health and imprints unique characteristics in each human being; it contributes to food digestion and the development and optimal functioning of the immune system. Moreover, a disproportion of these microorganisms has not only local but also systemic consequences, as observed in cases of intestinal inflammation and infection [1]. Therefore, maintenance of the correct equilibrium and even an enhancement of the beneficial effects of the microbiota offer an opportunity for treatments both in health and disease conditions.

In the last years, the increased interest in the beneficial functions of the human microflora has resulted in the selection of specific species with putative health-promoting capacities. These selected microorganisms, recognized as probiotics, are defined as “live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host” [2]. Clinical applications of probiotics include the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal infections, inflammatory bowel diseases, allergies, and also their use as vaccine adjuvants [1]. The mechanisms by which probiotics exert these beneficial effects are diverse and can be classified into three main categories: (1) those involving the influence on other microorganisms (especially pathogens); (2) those by which the barrier function played by the intestinal epithelium is enhanced; and (3) those involving the modulation of the immune system. While the first one is the best-studied effect, the immunomodulatory mechanisms are less understood and seem to be genus/strain specific [1]. Understanding how these microorganisms contribute to improve the health status is still a challenge, and a better knowledge of how probiotic bacteria interact with host cells is needed for their optimized application.

Dendritic cells (DCs) include a heterogeneous population of cells whose central function is to present antigens. In contrast to other antigen-presenting cells, DCs have the unique capacity of stimulating primary immune responses. Besides, they can induce either immunogenic or tolerogenic immune responses depending upon the type of DC and the nature of the antigen encountered [3–7]. DCs recognize and respond to microbial structures via pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) including Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and lectins, among others [8–9]. Recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by these receptors results in functional changes on DCs including up-regulation of their migratory capacity, expression of co-stimulatory molecules, and cytokine production [10–11]. Different stimuli induce the production of specific cytokines scenarios that are responsible for the fine-tuning of an adequate immune response in each case. Interleukin-(IL-)12-producing DCs are responsible for the shift of the adaptive immune response towards a T helper (Th) 1-profile. IL-6 and TNFα are pro-inflammatory cytokines that have important effects in systemic inflammation. In contrast, IL-10 results in anti-inflammatory actions and is important for the generation of regulatory T cells. Despite all the available information about the understanding of the general functions of DCs, the mechanisms by which DCs respond to probiotics in the intestine and select appropriate immune responses have been poorly studied [1].

Most microorganisms that are considered probiotics are generally selected from the Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium genera [1]. Other probiotics that belong to the Gram-positive Lactic Acid Bacteria include Enterococcus faecalis strains, and even Gram-negative microorganisms such as Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 or yeasts identified as Saccharomyces boulardii have also been demonstrated to confer beneficial effects to the host [1].

Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 is a promising candidate for being considered as a probiotic strain [12–15]. This microorganism has been recovered from a corn silage at an establishment located in the city of Tandil (Argentina). Employing several murine models, we have previously demonstrated that E. faecalis CECT7121 implants itself and persists in the gastrointestinal tract [12], and enhances and skews the profile of cytokines to the Th1 phenotype in situations such as vaccination, anti-tumoral immunity, and allergic reactions [13–15]. In these models, we have shown that the intragastric administration of E. faecalis CECT7121 can induce a stronger cellular anti-tetanic and anti-diphtheric response in BALB/c mice immunized with Diphtheria-Tetanus-Bordetella pertussis vaccine [13]. This probiotic is also able to reduce the mortality of animals challenged with a lethal dose of the murine LBC lymphoma cells, triggering mechanisms that include the generation of a Th1 response characterized by a high production of IL-12 and interferon-gamma (IFNγ) [14]. Finally, this bacterium prevents the establishment of an allergic response against ovalbumin, diminishing Immunoglobulin-E (IgE) specific titers as well as Th2 cytokines levels (i.e. IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13), and impairing the generation of active cutaneous anaphylactic reactions [15].

In the present work, we intended to elucidate the main mechanisms that are triggered by E. faecalis CECT7121 and that lead to the beneficial effects observed in mice. In this context, we analyzed the effects caused by the stimulation of DCs and the influence of this activation in the establishment of Th responses. In addition, we studied the role of regulatory cells in the beneficial effects conferred by E. faecalis CECT7121. Our results allowed us to conclude that the activation of DCs might be the most relevant consequence after inoculation of this probiotic, skewing the adaptive immune response towards the production of IFNγ. This work postulates E. faecalis CECT7121 as a novel adjuvant candidate for mucosal immunostimulation, in both oral and systemic vaccination strategies.

Materials and Methods

Ethical statement

All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the Argentinean and German (TierSchG BGBl. I S. 1105; 25-05-1998) animal protection laws. Mice were housed and handled in accordance with good animal practices as defined by the National Research Council of the National Academies (USA), the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA, European Union), and the national animal welfare body GV-SOLAS (Germany). All animal experiments were approved by the Instituto de Estudios de la Inmunidad Humoral “Prof. Dr. Ricardo A. Margni” (IDEHU, CONICET-UBA) and the Lower Saxony Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments, as well as the responsible state office (Lower Saxony State Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety) under the permit numbers 33.9-42502-04-11/0453 considering the German Animal Welfare Act and UBACyT B028 (2008–2011) considering Argentinean institutions. All procedures were performed after mice were euthanized by CO₂ or cervical dislocation, and every effort was made to minimize animal suffering.

Animals

Six- to eight-week-old BALB/c and C57BL/6 wild-type mice were obtained from the Animal Facility at the Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias (Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina) or at the Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (HZI, Germany), and were kept at the Animal Facility of the Instituto de Estudios de la Inmunidad Humoral (CONICET-UBA, Argentina) or at the Twincore-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (MHH-HZI, Germany), respectively.

Human DC-SIGN (dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin, CD209) transgenic mice, termed “hSIGN”, were generated using the murine CD11c promoter driving expression of a human DC-SIGN cDNA sequence as previously described [16]. Myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 knock-out (MyD88^-/-) [17], mannose receptor knock-out (MR^-/-) [18], and OT-II mice [19] were also employed. hSIGN × MyD88^-/- and hSIGN × MR^-/- mice were crossed at HZI (Germany). All genetically modified mice belonged to the C57BL/6 genetic background, and were kept at Twincore (MHH-HZI, Germany).

All animals were housed (n = 5 mice/cage) under specific conditions according to the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (National Research Council of the National Academies, USA), with controlled air temperature (20–22°C), humidity, and 12 h light/dark cycles; food and water were provided ad libitum.

Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 suspensions and sub-cellular fractions

E. faecalis CECT7121 was grown in Triptone Soy Broth (Biokar Diagnostics, France) at 37°C for 18 h. After incubation, the culture was harvested by centrifugation at 5,800 g for 15 min (4°C) and washed with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS). E. faecalis CECT7121 suspensions were prepared as previously described (approximately 3.0×10⁸ CFU/mL in sterile PBS) [12]. For in vitro studies, heat-killed microorganisms (Ef∅; 80°C, 1 h) were used to stimulate cell cultures [12–15]. Identification and contamination/inactivation were routinely controlled.

Cell walls and soluble lysate fractions from E. faecalis CECT7121 were obtained by bacterial disruption according to a modified protocol from Araki et al [20]. Briefly, E. faecalis CECT7121 was grown in 1–2 L of TSB, during 18 h at 37°C and continuous shaking (150 rpm). Bacterial suspensions were then washed with sterile PBS between steps (6,000 g, 20 min, 4°C), and subjected to different treatments: (1) sonication (3 cycles × 5 min, power output 12 W (Ultrasonic Processor GE 50; Sonics & Materials, Inc., USA), in cold, sterile, distilled water); (2) osmotic lysis (cold 1 M NaCl (Biopack, Argentina), 10 min); (3) boiling (20 min, sterile, distilled water); (4) trypsin digestion (2 mg (Gibco, USA) in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.50, 2 h, 37°C); (5) SDS treatment (0.4% (w/v) SDS (Gibco, USA), 1 h at room temperature). Between each step, bacterial suspension was centrifuged (20,000 g, 30 min-1 h, 4°C). The “soluble lysates” were collected after every cycle of sonication, clarified by centrifugation (20,000 g, 1 h), filtered (0.22 μm), lyophilized, and kept at -20°C. “Bacterial cell walls” were collected by differential centrifugation (2,700 g, 15 min; and 20,000 g, 30 min) after the last centrifugation step; the pellet was resuspended in sterile distilled water, lyophilized, and kept at -20°C.

Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) was purified following the improved procedure described by Morath and colleagues [21]. A defrosted aliquot of bacteria was treated with an equal volume of n-butanol (Biopack, Argentina) under stirring for 30 min at room temperature. After centrifugation (13,000 g for 20 min), the aqueous phase was lyophilized, resuspended with chromatography start buffer (15% n-propanol in 0.1 M ammonium acetate, pH 4.70; both from Biopack, Argentina), and centrifuged at 45,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was subjected to hydrophobic interaction chromatography on Octyl Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA) and the elution was performed by increasing the percentage of n-propanol in the acetate buffer up to 60% (linear gradient). Purified LTA was detected by Western Blot employing specific rabbit antiserum against E. faecalis CECT7121 cell wall fraction (obtained in our laboratory).

Generation and in vitro stimulation of mouse Bone Marrow-derived Dendritic Cells (BM-DCs)

In vitro generation of Granulocyte-Monocyte Colony Stimulatory Factor (GM-CSF)- driven DCs from Bone Marrow (BM) precursors has been described previously [22]. Briefly, BM cells were isolated from femurs and tibiae, and red blood cells (RBC) were lysed at room temperature by standard procedures employing hypotonic RBC lysis buffer (150 mM NH₄Cl, 10 mM NaHCO₃, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.40; all from Biopack, Argentina) [23]. Then, 2.0–4.0×10⁶ BM cells were seeded onto bacterial sterile Petri dishes with 10–20 mL of complete RPMI 1640 culture medium (cRPMI) containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 300 μg/mL L-glutamine, 10 mM HEPES, and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (all from Gibco, USA, with the exception of FCS: Natocor, Argentina or Hyclone, USA), plus 10% GM-CSF conditioned medium (prepared in our laboratory with GM-CSF present in culture supernatants of J588L cells). Cells were cultured for 6 to 8 d in cRPMI at 37°C and 5% CO₂ before stimulation experiments were performed.

Immature BM-DCs (4.0×10⁵ DCs/mL) were stimulated for 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h (37°C, 5% CO₂) with Ef∅ (MOI 1:1, 10:1, and 100:1) or with Escherichia coli O111:B4 lipopolysaccharide (LPS 1 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, USA). A period of stimulation of 24 h was selected as the most suitable. The same amount of BM-DCs was stimulated for 24 h (37°C, 5% CO₂) with bacterial cell walls (1, 10, 100, and 1,000 μg/mL), soluble lysates (1, 10, 100, and 1,000 μg of total proteins/mL), or purified LTA (1, 10, 100, and 1,000 μg/mL).

After stimulation, culture supernatants were collected and stored at -80°C, until different cytokines were evaluated by ELISA (IL-6, TNFα, IL-12p40, and IL-10). Stimulated cells were washed and resuspended employing cold sterile PBS plus 5 mM EDTA (5–10 min on ice), and stained for flow cytometry analysis: CD11c-APC (HL3), Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class II (I-E[k])-PE (14-4-4S), CD80-FITC (16-10A1), CD40-PE (3/23), and CD83-PE (Michel-19); all from BD Biosciences (USA).

BM precursors from genetically modified animals (hSIGN, MyD88^-/-, MR^-/-, hSING × MyD88^-/-, and hSIGN × MR^-/-) were also employed for the generation of BM-DCs. Differentiation, stimulation, and analysis were performed as described above.

DC-T cell co-culture under stimulation with E. faecalis CECT7121

GM-CSF derived BM-DCs were generated as previously described. On day 7, 2.5×10⁴ BM-DCs were incubated with 30 μg/mL ovalbumin (OVA, grade VI; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 2–3 h, washed and further incubated with different MOIs of Ef∅ overnight. Then, stimulated BM-DCs were washed and co-cultured for 4 days at 37°C and 5% CO₂ with 5.0–10.0×10⁴ OT-II CD4⁺ T lymphocytes. OT-II CD4⁺ T cells were enriched by negative magnetic sorting using the Dynabeads Untouched Mouse CD4 Cells kit (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. On day 4, cell suspensions (5.0–10.0×10⁶ cells) were stimulated during 6 h with 0.1 μg/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and 1 μg/mL Ionomycin (both from Sigma-Aldrich, USA); 3 μg/mL Brefeldin A (eBioscience, USA) were added for the last 2 h of incubation, before staining and data acquisition.

Spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes cell cultures

For ex vivo cultures, aseptically removed spleens and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) were cut into pieces and cell suspensions were passed through a 200 μm mesh nylon sieve. Cells were centrifuged (10 min, 200 g, 4°C) and pellets were washed with sterile PBS. After the RBC lysis, cells were counted in a Neubauer’s haemocytometer by Trypan dye blue exclusion. One hundred microlitres of spleen or MLNs cell suspensions (4.0×10⁶ cells/mL) were cultured with the same volume of cRPMI alone or Ef∅ (MOI 10:1) in quadruplicates at 37°C and 5% CO₂ in air. Concanavalin A (ConA, 10 μg/mL, 100 μL; Vector Labs, USA) was used as mitogen. In each experiment, two cell cultures were performed: one to assess cell proliferation and the other to determine the cytokine levels in supernatants. After 72 h, supernatants were collected and stored at -80°C until assayed for cytokine levels. Proliferative responses were assessed by [³H]-thymidine (PerkinElmer Inc., USA) uptake employing a Liquid Scintillation Analyzer 1600TR (Packard, USA). Proliferation results were expressed as mean counts per minute (cpm) ± SEM of quadruplicate cultures.

Identification of immune cellular populations by flow cytometry

Cellular suspensions from spleen or MLNs were specifically stained with labeled antibodies for flow cytometry assays. Antibodies (and clones) employed were: CD3ε -APC (145-2C11), CD19-Pacific Blue (eBio1D3), CD11b-APC.Cy7 (M1/70), CD45/B220-PE (RA3-6B2), CD4-eFluor 450 (RM4-5), Forkhead box P3 (Foxp3)-PE (FJK-16s), CD11b-eFluor 450 (M1/70), and Gr-1-Alexa647 (RB6-8C5), all from eBioscience (USA); CD11c-Texas Red (N418) from Life Technologies (USA); and Ly6C-PE.Cy7 (HK1.4) from BioLegend (USA). For IFNγ intracellular staining, cells were stained employing CD4-APC (GK1.5), CD8α-eFluor 450 (53–6.7), and IFNγ-PE (XMG1.2), all from eBioscience (USA).

For the standard staining protocol, approximately 1.0×10⁶ cells were washed in PBS and stained with the LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen, USA) to exclude dead cells. Cells were then washed with PBS and incubated in staining buffer (0.25% (w/v) bovine seroalbumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 2 mM EDTA in PBS) containing Fc-block (αCD16/32, 2.4G2) for 10 min on ice. Cells were stained with labeled antibodies. In most cases, staining was performed for 20 to 30 min on ice and cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min on ice. Intracellular staining for Foxp3 was performed after fixing and permeabilizing the cells with the Foxp3 Fixation/Permeabilization Kit (eBioscience, USA). For intracellular staining of IFNγ, cell suspensions (5.0–10.0×10⁶ cells) were restimulated with PMA + Ionomycin as previously described. Suspensions were stained for exclusion of dead cells, then washed with PBA-S permeabilization buffer (PBA plus 0.5% saponin; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and specifically stained for 20 min on ice.

Samples were stored at 4°C and acquired either on a BD FACSAria II (BD Biosciences, USA) or a CyAn ADP (Beckman Coulter, Inc., USA) flow cytometers. Data were analyzed using the FlowJo software version 9.3.2 (Tree Star, Inc., USA). Single stains and “fluorescence minus one” controls were used for accurate gating and compensation. Non-specific binding was estimated by isotype controls and cellular aggregates were excluded by SSC-W. Quantitative results were expressed as mean percentage ± SEM.

Determination of cytokine levels by ELISA

BD OptEIA ELISA kits (BD Biosciences, USA) were employed to evaluate all cytokines with the exception of IL-13, which was detected by Mouse IL-13 Cytoset (Invitrogen, USA). Assays were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were expressed as mean concentration ± SEM of animals from the same experimental group.

In vivo stimulation with probiotic-pulsed DCs

Approximately 4.0×10⁶ immature BM-DCs (C57BL/6 wild-type) were in vitro stimulated with cRPMI (DC) or Ef∅ (MOI 10:1; Ef-DC). After 18 h of incubation, stimulated BM-DCs were washed with sterile PBS and 5.0x10⁵ BM-DCs/mouse were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected into naïve C57BL/6 mice [24].

Seven days after inoculation, animals were sacrificed, spleens were removed, and 1.0×10⁶ cells were cultured in the presence of cRPMI or Ef∅ (MOI 10:1) for 72 h. Cytokines (IFNγ, IL-13, and IL-10) were measured by ELISA in culture supernatants, as previously described [25–27].

Intragastric treatment of mice with Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121

Sex-matched BALB/c mice (n = 5–10/group) were intragastrically (i.g.) inoculated with either sterile PBS (0.2 mL/mouse) or live E. faecalis CECT7121 (3.0×10⁸ CFU/mL, 0.2 mL/mouse) employing a non-flexible stainless steel animal feeding needles (20G x 1.5" with a 2.25 mm spherical tip, Thomas Scientific, USA). Inoculations were performed during 3 consecutive days, as previously described [12]. Animals were sacrificed and analyzed on days 4 and 11 post-last inoculation. The i.g. administration of E. faecalis CECT7121 did not cause any physical harm to the animals. In this work, none of the animals died as a result of treatment, nor showed signs of discomfort or illness such as weight loss, apathy, trembling, or restricted motility. The technical staff was responsible for monitoring the physical condition of the animals twice a day.

Statistical analysis

In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed between 2 to 5 times. All values were presented as means with their standard errors. Statistical significance was evaluated using unpaired t tests or ANOVA, according to the experimental design. When variables had a normal distribution (D’Agostinos & Pearson’s omnibus normality test) and showed homoscedasticity (F test or Bartlett’s test to compare variances), parametric tests were employed: unpaired Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA plus Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison post hoc tests. Welch’s correction (unpaired t tests), or Log(Y) and sqrt(Y) transformations (ANOVA) were occasionally used when variables showed heteroscedasticity. When samples did not have a normal distribution or did not show homoscedasticity, non-parametric tests were assayed: Mann-Whitney U-test or Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA plus Dunn’s post hoc tests. Graphical and statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 5.0d for Mac OS X (GraphPad Software, USA). Values were considered significantly different at *p<0.05, **p<0.01, or ***p<0.001.

Results

E. faecalis CECT7121 activates BM-DCs in vitro and stimulates the production of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines

Given the importance of dendritic cells (DCs) in the initiation and organization of the immune response, BM-DCs were in vitro stimulated with Ef∅ at different time-points and the levels of IL-6, TNFα, IL-12, and IL-10 were determined by ELISA. E. faecalis CECT7121 induced the activation of BM-DCs and the production of all analyzed cytokines in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 1). When stimulated BM-DCs were analyzed by flow cytometry, an up-regulation of MHC-II, CD80, and CD40 was observed (Fig 1); additionally, an increase in CD83 expression was detected compared to non-stimulated cells (data not shown). These results clearly demonstrated that this probiotic bacterium is able to activate BM-DCs, not only by inducing the expression of MHC-II and co-stimulatory molecules and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, but also of IL-10 as a regulatory interleukin.

Download:

Fig 1. In vitro activation and cytokine production of BM-DCs by stimulation with E. faecalis CECT7121.

(A) BALB/c BM-DCs were in vitro stimulated with heat-killed E. faecalis CECT7121 (Ef∅ at different MOIs), and IL-6, TNFα, IL-12, and IL-10 were measured in culture supernatants after 24 h. LPS (E. coli O26:B6) was employed as a positive control. Cytokine levels were expressed as mean pg/mL ± SEM. Comparisons were performed between Basal and stimulated cells. ns: non-significant, *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison test). (B) The surface expression of MHC-II, CD80, and CD40 was assessed by flow cytometry after 24 h of BM-DCs stimulation with heat-killed E. faecalis CECT7121 (Ef∅). Results are representative from 5 different in vitro experiments. Heat-killed E. faecalis CECT7121 probiotic strain induce a strong dose-dependent secretion of cytokines and expression of activation markers on BM-DCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.g001

In order to identify the subcellular fractions involved in such activation, E. faecalis CECT7121 was dissected into bacterial cell walls and soluble lysates. Both stimuli activated BM-DCs in vitro in a dose-dependent manner, as determined by flow cytometry (data not shown) and cytokine production (Fig 2). Notably, while both stimuli at high concentrations induced IL-12 and IL-6, the soluble lysates induced low TNFα and failed to induce IL-10 production at the tested concentrations (Fig 2). Since the activation status of the DCs evidenced by the expression of cell surface markers was comparable at high doses of all the antigenic preparations tested (data not shown), these findings indicate that the presence of different PAMPs plays distinct roles in the process of induction of cytokine release [28–29].

Download:

Fig 2. BM-DCs stimulation with E. faecalis CECT7121 cell walls and soluble lysate.

BM-DCs were in vitro stimulated with E. faecalis CECT7121 cell walls (μg) and soluble lysate (μg of total protein), and IL-6, TNFα, IL-12, and IL-10 were measured in culture supernatants after 24 h (A, B, C, and D, respectively). Heat-killed E. faecalis CECT7121 (MOIs 1:1 and 100:1) was employed as a positive control. Cytokine levels were expressed as mean pg/mL ± SEM. ns: non-significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison tests after ‘sqrt(IL-12)’ or ‘Log(TNFα)’ transformations). E. faecalis CECT7121 cell walls and soluble lysate show different behavior. Both stimuli are able to induce IL-12 and IL-6, but the soluble lysates induce low TNFα and fail to induce IL-10 production.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.g002

Considering that lipoteichoic acids (LTA) are postulated as a main PAMP in the cell wall fraction of Gram positive bacteria, LTA from E. faecalis CECT7121 was purified and employed to stimulate in vitro BM-DCs. LTA induced a dose-dependent up-regulation of classical DC maturation markers such as MHC-II, CD80, CD40, and CD83 (Fig 3A). Moreover, upon stimulation with different concentrations of LTA, BM-DCs secreted different cytokines including IL-6, TNFα, and IL-12 but no IL-10 (Fig 3B). Our results demonstrate that LTA may have major relevance in the stimulatory activity of this probiotic strain.

Download:

Fig 3. LTA purified from probiotic strain E. faecalis CECT7121 induce in vitro activation of BM-DCs.

Lipoteichoic acids (LTA) were purified from E. faecalis CECT7121, and BM-DCs were stimulated in vitro with different concentrations (24 h). Cell surface marker expressions were measured by flow cytometry (A), and cytokines were evaluated in culture supernatants by ELISA (B). Flow cytometry results are representative from 2 independent experiments. Cytokine levels are expressed as mean pg/mL ± SEM. ns: non-significant, ***p<0.001 (One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison tests). LTA from E. faecalis CECT7121 induce a dose-dependent up-regulation of activation molecules and the secretion of different cytokines by BM-DCs with the exception of IL-10.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.g003

BM-DC activation by E. faecalis CECT7121 is dependent on the presence of MyD88

In order to study the role of specific PRRs involved in DC activation by E. faecalis CECT7121, genetically modified BM precursors were employed. As observed by flow cytometry analysis and cytokine expression, only TLR signaling seemed to be crucial for DC activation by E. faecalis CECT7121, since absence of MyD88 abrogated BM-DC maturation induced by this probiotic bacterium (Fig 4). Only a high MOI (100:1) induced an up-regulation of MHC-II, CD80, and CD40 expression in MyD88^-/- DCs, as well as a low production of IL-12 and TNFα, demonstrating that the major effect of E. faecalis CECT7121 is mediated via MyD88-dependent pathways [28].

Download:

Fig 4. In vitro stimulation of genetically modified BM-DCs by E. faecalis CECT7121.

BM-DCs generated from MyD88^-/-, hSIGN, MR^-/-, hSIGN × MyD88^-/-, and hSIGN × MR^-/- mice were in vitro stimulated with heat-killed E. faecalis CECT7121 (Ef∅) for 24 h. MHC-II, CD80, and CD40 expression levels were analyzed by flow cytometry (A), and IL-6, TNFα, IL-12, and IL-10 were determined by ELISA (B). Flow cytometry results are representative from 2 independent experiments. Cytokine levels are expressed as mean pg/mL ± SEM. ns: non-significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison tests). Absence of MyD88 abrogates BM-DC maturation induced by E. faecalis CECT7121. Modifications in the expression of lectins such as human DC-SIGN or mannose receptor do not seem to influence DC activation by E. faecalis CECT7121.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.g004

On the other hand, modifications in the expression of different lectins such as human DC-SIGN in transgenic murine hSIGN DCs or mannose receptor knock-out cells do not seem to influence DC activation by E. faecalis CECT7121 (Fig 4A), indicating that these receptors are not relevant for DC activation as observed by other authors [16, 30–34].

In vitro probiotic-activated BM-DCs drive the polarization of T cells towards a Th1 profile

As E. faecalis CECT7121 was able to fully activate in vitro BM-DCs and to induce the release of high levels of IL-12, DC-T cell in vitro co-cultures were employed in order to determine the polarizing effects of probiotic-primed DCs. Wild-type and MyD88^-/- BM-DCs were stimulated with E. faecalis CECT7121, pulsed with ovalbumin (OVA), and co-cultured with CD4⁺ T cells purified from naïve OT-II mice. As expected, E. faecalis CECT7121-primed BM-DCs induced the production of IFNγ by CD4⁺ T cells (Fig 5A) and this effect was TLR-dependent, since the absence of MyD88 abrogated the induction of Th1 phenotype (Fig 5B). These results reinforce the hypothesis that E. faecalis CECT7121 stimulation induces an immune response skewed towards the production of IFNγ (the hallmark of Th1 responses).

Download:

Fig 5. DC-T cell co-culture under stimulation with E. faecalis CECT7121.

BM-DCs pulsed with ovalbumin and further stimulated with heat-killed E. faecalis CECT7121, were co-cultured with CD4⁺ enriched OT-II T lymphocytes (96 h). After PMA + Ionomycin re-stimulation, CD4⁺IFNγ⁺ cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Comparisons were performed between OVA and probiotic-stimulated cultures. ns: non-significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 (One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison tests). E. faecalis CECT7121-primed BM-DCs induce the production of IFNγ by CD4+ T cells. This effect is TLR-dependent, since the absence of MyD88 abrogates this induction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.g005

E. faecalis CECT7121-primed BM-DCs also induce the production of IFNγ in vivo after adoptive cell transference

DC-T cell co-cultures demonstrated that E. faecalis CECT7121 activates BM-DCs and promotes the production of IFNγ. To determine whether this effect was relevant in vivo and whether DCs were important in this phenomenon, E. faecalis CECT7121-primed BM-DCs were injected i.p. into naïve C57BL/6 mice. After 7 days, spleen cells from injected animals were stimulated ex vivo with Ef∅ and different cytokines were measured in culture supernatants by ELISA. Our results demonstrate that E. faecalis CECT7121-primed BM-DCs induce the accumulation of specific IFNγ -producing cells in vivo, without production of neither IL-13 nor IL-10 (Fig 6A–6C). This observation indicates that DCs are relevant for E. faecalis CECT7121 immunostimulation in vivo, activating the adaptive immune response and inducing the production of IFNγ in vivo.

Download:

Fig 6. In vivo influence of E. faecalis CECT7121-pulsed DCs, and IFNγ production by spleen cells.

C57BL/6 BM-DCs were pulsed with heat-killed E. faecalis CECT7121 (Ef∅) for 18 h, and then adoptively transferred to naïve C57BL/6 mice. After 7 days, spleen cells were ex vivo stimulated with Ef∅ (72 h) and cytokines were analyzed in culture supernatants by ELISA (A, IFNγ; B, IL-13; C, IL-10). Cytokine levels are expressed as mean pg/mL ± SEM. Comparisons were performed between DC and Ef-DC groups. ns: non-significant, * p<0.05 (Unpaired Student’s t test). E. faecalis CECT7121-primed BM-DCs adoptively transferred to naïve mice induce the specific-secretion of IFNγ by spleen cells without production of IL-13 or IL-10.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.g006

Intragastric immunization with live Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 does not modify the total cellularity at local or systemic levels

In order to analyze the in vivo effects of E. faecalis CECT7121, BALB/c mice were i.g. inoculated with this probiotic strain during 3 consecutive days as previously described [12]; this immunization schedule ensures E. faecalis CECT7121 implantation at least for 18 days, without modifying the commensal microflora. In the present work, we studied several immunological parameters on days 4 and 11 after the last inoculation, a period during which the bacterium still remains implanted in the murine intestine.

After immunization, no significant changes in the total cellularity were observed neither in the spleen nor in the MLNs of E. faecalis CECT7121-treated mice compared with non-treated control group (Table 1). Then, we characterized different cell populations by flow citometry using antibodies that specifically recognized CD3ε, CD4, CD8α, CD19, CD45R/B220, CD11c, CD11b, and Gr-1, markers of T cells, B cells, and myeloid cells. No significant changes were detected in any of these cell populations tested on day 4 or 11 post-administration, with the exception of a marginal, non-significant increment of total T lymphocytes (CD3ε⁺ cells) (Table 2). This increase in T cells was mostly due to a rise in CD4⁺ but not CD8α⁺ cells in the spleen and especially in the local MLNs (Table 3).

Download:

Table 1. Total number of spleen and MLN cells after i.g. treatment with E. faecalis CECT7121.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.t001

Download:

Table 2. Spleen immune cell populations after in vivo treatment with E. faecalis CECT7121.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.t002

Download:

Table 3. CD4⁺ and CD8α⁺ cells in spleen and MLNs after probiotic immunization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.t003

Treatment with the probiotic strain primes T cell proliferation and production of IFNγ

For a further evaluation the influence of E. faecalis CECT7121 on the immune system at the local and systemic levels, T cell responses were analyzed ex vivo after polyclonal (ConA) or specific (Ef∅) stimulation. In both spleen and MLNs cell cultures, cells obtained from treated mice showed similar basal proliferation compared to cells obtained from control animals (Fig 7). Nevertheless, in vivo immunization with E. faecalis CECT7121 exerted a 1.8 fold increase in ConA-induced ex vivo spleen cell proliferation on day 11 post-treatment (Fig 7A and 7B), demonstrating a systemic stimulatory effect of this probiotic on the immune system. Additionally, Ef∅ was employed as stimulus to evaluate specific spleen cell proliferation, but no differences were observed between experimental and control groups. Furthermore, no differences were detected in MLN cells proliferation (Fig 7C and 7D). Correlating with the T-cell proliferation observed for both groups of animals, only cells stimulated with ConA secreted high levels of IL-2, a key cytokine for lymphocyte proliferation (data not shown).

Download:

Fig 7. Spleen and MLN cells proliferation of probiotic-treated animals.

Spleen (A and B) and MLNs (C and D) cells were ex vivo stimulated with ConA and heat-killed E. faecalis CECT7121 (Ef∅), and proliferation was assessed by ³H-thymidine uptake. Results were expressed as mean cpm ± SEM from 2 independent experiments, and comparisons were performed between PBS and EF groups. *p<0.05 (Mann-Whitney U-test). In both spleen and MLNs cell cultures, cells obtained from treated mice compared to control animals show an increase in ConA-induced proliferation on day 11 post-treatment without specific proliferation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.g007

We next analyzed the production of different cytokines after i.g. inoculation with E. faecalis CECT7121 and observed a rapid IFNγ production by spleen cells stimulated with Ef∅ as observed on day 4 post-treatment (5.4 fold increase; Fig 8A). The production of IFNγ was no longer statistically relevant on day 11, although the same tendency was still observed (Fig 8B). Overall, these results are in concordance with those obtained in our previous studies where E. faecalis CECT7121 induced a Th1-skewed systemic response [12–15].

Download:

Fig 8. IFNγ production after in vivo immunization with E. faecalis CECT7121.

Supernatants from spleen (A and B) and MLNs (C and D) cell cultures were analyzed by direct ELISA to determine the levels of IFNγ. Results were expressed as mean pg/mL ± SEM from 2 independent experiments, and comparisons were performed between PBS and EF groups. ns: non-significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 (Mann-Whitney U-test). The inoculation of E. faecalis CECT7121 induces a rapid IFNγ production at local (MLNs) and systemic (spleen) levels.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.g008

In MLNs, cells from immunized mice also produced higher amounts of IFNγ after polyclonal stimulation with ConA on days 4 and 11 post-treatment (4.0 fold increase in both cases), although on day 11 the levels were lower (Fig 8C and 8D). Contrarily, no IFNγ secretion was detected upon specific stimulation with Ef∅. Altogether, these results show that the i.g. treatment with this probiotic exerts an immunostimulatory effect, by transiently increasing the production of IFNγ both at local and systemic levels.

Apart from IFNγ, spleen cells from immunized mice showed a slight but significant increase in the production of IL-6 after ConA stimulation (1.8 fold increase on day 4; Control 39.04 pg/mL ± 14.69 vs EF 70.07 pg/mL ± 13.84, *p<0.05). Other cytokines tested (IL-12, IL-2, and IL-13) did not show any significant change associated with the immunization with E. faecalis CECT7121 (data not shown), at least on the tested time-points.

The probiotic strain E. faecalis CECT7121 does not modify the recruitment of regulatory cell populations

Different myeloid and lymphoid cell populations actively regulate the immune response in order to avoid exacerbated reactions that may harm our body. It has been shown that certain probiotic strains can exert their functions by activating regulatory cells [35]. We therefore analyze changes in two main regulatory cell populations, including Tregs (CD4⁺FoxP3⁺) and monocytic and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (mMDSCs: CD11b⁺Ly6C^highGr-1^int; gMDSCs: CD11b⁺Ly6C^intGr-1^high) after E. faecalis CECT7121 treatment. While no Tregs accumulation was observed neither in spleens nor in MLNs, a non-significant tendency in the accumulation of gMDSCs was observed in the spleen of immunized mice (day 11 post-immunization) (Fig 9A and 9B).

Download:

Fig 9. Evaluation of regulatory cells in the spleen of probiotic-immunized animals.

Spleen and MLNs cells were stained employing specific antibodies to determine CD4⁺FoxP3⁺ Tregs by flow cytometry (A). CD11b⁺Ly6C^intGr-1^high gMDSCs and CD11b⁺Ly6C^highGr-1^int mMDSCs were also determined by flow cytometry in the spleen of PBS and immunized mice (B). Results were expressed as mean cpm ± SEM from 2 independent experiments, and comparisons were performed between PBS and probiotic-treated mice. ns: non-significant (One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison tests). The inoculation of E. faecalis CECT7121 does not induce Tregs accumulation neither in spleens nor in MLNs, but causes a non-significant accumulation of gMDSCs in the spleen of immunized mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127262.g009

Altogether, these results allow us to conclude that the effects of E. faecalis CECT7121 are not mediated by regulatory cell populations.

Discussion

The gastrointestinal microbiota is essential to human health, as it contributes to food digestion and to the development and optimal functioning of the intestinal immune system [1]. These properties could be exploited in the modulation of both local and systemic immune responses.

Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 is a probiotic strain that has been demonstrated to implant itself, persist, and induce protective immune responses in several biological models [12–15]. This work was aimed at elucidating the immunological mechanisms exerted by E. faecalis CECT7121 in immunocompetent mice.

DCs are important in the instruction of both innate and adaptive responses and their activation by probiotics generally modulate the immune response towards a Th1-phenotype or a T regulatory profile [36–38]. Herein, we evaluated DCs as a possible target for probiotic stimulation. Heat-killed E. faecalis CECT7121 probiotic strain induced a strong dose-dependent secretion of IL-12, IL-6, TNFα, and IL-10 on BM-DCs, as well as an increased expression of activation markers such as MHC-II, CD80, and CD40. It is well known that IL-12 and IFNγ induce Th1-responses, while IL-4 predominantly generates Th2-profiles, and IL-6 and TGFβ drive the generation of Th17 cells [39–40]. Moreover, the production of IL-10 by some probiotic strains may induce the generation of Treg cells [39–41]. In this context, the stimulation of DCs by E. faecalis CECT7121 results in a variety of cytokines that drive phenotypical and functional changes during T-cell activation, which will in turn define the fate of T-cell responses. Our results suggest that E. faecalis CECT7121 may drive the activation of T cell responses and the production of Th1-responses, probably due to the high levels of IL-12 secreted by stimulated DCs. On the other hand, we also detected high IL-10 secretion when BM-DCs were stimulated with our probiotic strain. Although it is known that stimulation of DC via TLRs may trigger IL-10 production when accompanied by activation of other PRRs such as lectins [29], the high levels of this anti-inflammatory cytokine produced in vitro suggest that this mechanism may have an important role in vivo. In summary, DCs seem to be an important cellular target of E. faecalis CECT7121 as it does not only trigger inflammatory IL-12/IFNγ-responses, but also induces the simultaneous production of anti-inflammatory molecules.

MyD88-KO DCs showed the relevance of TLR signaling during E. faecalis CECT7121 stimulation: the abrogation of this adapter protein impaired DC maturation and cytokine production. In addition, the general importance of lectin-signaling pathways in the shaping of DCs functions has been extensively analyzed in the past [4,8,29]; in this sense, we also studied the influence of two different lectin receptors: DC-SIGN and MR. Neither the expression of human DC-SIGN nor the absence of MR on BM-derived murine DCs seemed to modify the stimulatory effect of this probiotic. Nevertheless, the importance of lectin-signaling pathways should not be ruled out, since there is a bulk of evidence indicating the influence of these signals in the shaping of DC functions [29]. In addition to the study of receptors involved in the recognition of E. faecalis CECT7121, different antigenic preparations isolated from this probiotic induced different cytokine responses, with LTA being an interesting immunostimulatory molecule since it successfully activated DCs in vitro and induced the production of all pro-inflammatory cytokines tested. Gram-positive LTAs have gained interest as important immune modulators based on several studies, both in vitro and in vivo [1,42].

To confirm the importance of DC stimulation by this probiotic on T cell responses, different experiments both in vitro (pulsed DC-T cells co-cultures) [3,43] and in vivo (IFNγ-producing responses by probiotic stimulated-DCs adoptive transfer) [24–27] proved that the activation of DCs by E. faecalis CECT7121 leads to the generation of Th1-adaptive cellular responses, most likely because of the high levels of IL-12 produced after the probiotic stimulation.

During in vivo studies after the inoculation of E. faecalis CECT7121, although no changes in the total number of spleen or MLN cells were observed, this probiotic caused an enhancement of local and systemic immunity, inducing higher proliferative responses and skewing the immune response towards the production of IFNγ. This IFNγ production was higher on day 4 and diminished by day 11 after treatment, showing signs of a kinetic response taking place both at local and systemic levels. This dynamic response indicates the usefulness of this probiotic bacterium to direct specific responses towards Th1-profiles, making it an interesting candidate to be used as oral adjuvant [13]. Other authors have demonstrated that the ingestion of certain probiotic strains may induce high proliferative responses of both T and B cells [44–45]. While this immune activation influences polyclonal, E. faecalis CECT7121 non-specific responses, the lack of specific proliferation in both lymphoid organs could be in line with the capacity of probiotic bacteria to behave as a commensal microorganism without inducing uncontrolled inflammatory responses. Regulatory mechanisms in the gut are triggered in order to avoid inflammatory responses against commensal microflora. In fact, it has been demonstrated that gut-associated lymphoid tissues DCs induce local protective IgA adaptive responses against commensal bacteria as an important regulatory mechanism [46]. Indeed we have initially observed an increase in total IgA+ cells in the lamina propria after the administration of E. faecalis CECT7121 at time-points as early as 1 day after the last inoculation (unpublished data). Probably, this rapid expansion of IgA+ clones could be the consequence of a T-cell independent IgA class switch as it has been demonstrated that DCs that have sampled endogenous flora induce IgA production through T-dependent and independent mechanisms [47]. Further studies are required to understand the mechanisms triggered by this probiotic strain at the intestinal level. Indeed, it would be interesting to study whether E. faecalis CECT7121 is able to increase luminal ATP levels as some commensal bacteria and thus promote T cell differentiation as shown previously Atarashi et al [48]. Another explanation for the lack of specific proliferation responses could be related to a direct inhibition of T and/or B cell proliferation. Plitnick et al have demonstrated that LTA from Gram-positive bacteria can specifically bind to IL-2 and impair the mononuclear cells proliferation induced by tetanus toxoid stimulation [49]. Moreover, these authors have also described a dose-dependent production of IFNγ after LTA stimulation, not only demonstrating that the inhibitory effect on IL-2 seems to be selective, but also that this PAMP per se is able to induce the secretion of IFNγ and could also be responsible for our observations regarding the production of this cytokine.

Taking into account immune regulatory mechanisms, a non-significant tendency in the splenic accumulation of granulocytic MDSCs could constitute a mechanism to prevent exacerbated inflammatory responses, at least during the time span studied. Although MDSCs have been primarily associated with cancer, many studies have demonstrated their role in bacterial, viral, and even parasitic infections [50–53]. Regarding Tregs accumulation, some probiotics usually associated to Lactobacillus strains are able to increase the number of CD4⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺ cells both at local and systemic lymphoid organs [54]. To our knowledge, there are no reports that link Tregs accumulation and E. faecalis strains, and our results prompt us to conclude that this probiotic does not affect the generation and recruitment of Tregs, at least at the time-points tested after intragastric immunization.

Considering the rapid in vivo production of IFNγ after E. faecalis CECT7121 inoculation, Hua and colleagues obtained similar results when they studied the secretion of different cytokines by mononuclear cells and DC cultures from healthy donors that consumed a commercial mix of probiotics [55]. These authors found that the IFNγ levels were higher in the treated group, and that this increase was notably dependent on the ratio of bacteria used as stimulus. These results are in line with our observations, especially taking into account that the commercial mix employed by Hua et at includes an Enterococcus faecalis probiotic strain. Additionally, Kosaka and colleagues have described that the ingestion of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris FC induces the production of IFNγ and IL-10 by spleen cells; these effects also seem to be due to the activation of DCs in a MyD88-dependent manner, and the subsequent production of IL-12 and IL-18 [56].

To sum up, our results demonstrate that the immune stimulation triggered by E. faecalis CECT7121 involves the activation of the innate response (being DCs a key target) and the consequent development of Th1-related, cellular adaptive responses. Probably, the humoral immune response will be also modulated by the ingestion of E. faecalis CECT7121, but this aspect was not studied in this work. This work globally analyzes for the first time different aspects of an Enterococcus faecalis probiotic strain and allows concluding that this bacterium is suitable for enhancing immune responses and skewing the cytokine profile to the production of IFNγ. Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 may be employed as a novel adjuvant strategy, both for oral or systemic vaccination.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MAM TS LB MSC MarAM. Performed the experiments: MAM AMD CH WG MVG GGN AMC MSC. Analyzed the data: MAM LB MSC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TS MSC MarAM. Wrote the paper: MAM CH WG GGN TS LB MSC MarAM.

References

1. Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. (2010) Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 8(3):171–184. pmid:20157338
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States—World Health Organization. (2001) Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. 5 p.
3. Chirdo FG, Millington OR, Beacock-Sharp H, Mowat AM. (2005) Immunomodulatory dendritic cells in intestinal lamina propria. Eur J Immunol 35(6):1831–1840. pmid:16010704
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Neutra MR, Kozlowski PA. (2006) Mucosal vaccines: the promise and the challenge. Nat Rev Immunol 6(2):148–158. pmid:16491139
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Iwasaki A. (2007) Mucosal dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol 25:381–418. pmid:17378762
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Coombes JL, Powrie F. (2008) Dendritic cells in intestinal immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol 8(6):435–446. pmid:18500229
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Mayer CT, Berod L, Sparwasser T. (2012) Layers of dendritic cell-mediated T cell tolerance, their regulation and the prevention. Front Immunol 3(183):1–16.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. van Vliet SJ, den Dunnen J, Gringhuis SI, Geijtenbeek TBH, van Kooyk Y. (2007) Innate signaling and regulation of dendritic cell immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 19:435–440. pmid:17629469
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. van Vliet SJ, García-Vallejo JJ, van Kooyk Y. (2008) Dendritic cells and C-type lectin receptors: coupling innate to adaptive immune responses. Immunol Cell Biol 86:580–587. pmid:18679407
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Heeg K, Sparwasser T, Lipford GB, Häcker H, Zimmermann S, Wagner H. (1998) Bacterial DNA as an evolutionary conserved ligand signaling danger of infection to immune cells. EMBO J 17(7):464–469. pmid:9764548
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Mann ER, Landy JD, Bernardo D, Peake ST, Hart AL, Al-Hassi HO, et al. (2013) Intestinal dendritic cells: their role in intestinal inflammation, manipulation by the gut microbiota and differences between mice and men. Immunol Lett 150(1–2):30–40. pmid:23376547
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Castro MS, Sparo MD, Molina MA, Andino PJ, Manghi MA. (2007) Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 induces systemic immunomodulatory effects and protects from Salmonella infection. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 2(4):215–224.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Castro MS, Molina MA, Sparo MD, Manghi MA. (2008) Effects of Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 on the specific immune response after DTPw vaccionation. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 3(1):25–30.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Castro MS, Molina MA, Di Sciullo P, Azpiroz MB, Leocata Nieto F, Sterín-Speziale NB, et al. (2010) Beneficial activity of Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 in the anti-lymphoma protective response. J Appl Microbiol 109(4):1234–1243. pmid:20477887
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Castro MS, Azpiroz MB, Molina MA, Mourelle AC, Alaniz FS, Maldonado AM, et al. (2012) Preliminary studies on the prevention of the ovalbumin-induced allergic response by Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 in mice. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 157(1):11–20. pmid:21894024
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Schaefer M, Reiling N, Fessler C, Stephani J, Taniuchi I, Hatam F, et al. (2008) Decreased pathology and prolonged survival of human DC-SIGN transgenic mice during mycobacterial infection. J Immunol 180(10):6836–6845. pmid:18453604
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Adachi O, Kawai T, Takeda K, Matsumoto M, Tsutsui H, Sakagami M, et al. (1998) Targeted disruption of the MyD88 gene results in loss of IL-1- and IL-18-mediated function. Immunity 9(1):143–150. pmid:9697844
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Lee SJ, Evers S, Roeder D, Parlow AF, Risteli J, Lee YC, et al. (2002) Mannose receptor-mediated regulation of serum glycoprotein homeostasis. Science 295(5561):1898–1901. pmid:11884756
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Barnden MJ, Allison J, Heath WR, Carbone FR. (1998) Defective TCR expression in transgenic mice constructed using cDNA-based alpha- and beta-chain genes under the control of heterologous regulatory elements. Immunol Cell Biol 76(1):34–40. pmid:9553774
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Araki Y, Nakatani T, Nakayama K, Ito E. (1972) Occurence of N-nonsubstituted glucosamine residues in peptidoglycan of lysozyme-resistant cell walls from Bacillus cereus. J Biol Chem 247(19):6312–6322. pmid:4631319
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Morath S, Geyer A, Hartung T. (2001) Structure-function relationship of cytokine induction by lipoteichoic acid from Staphylococcus aureus. J Exp Med 193(3):393–397. pmid:11157059
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Ilarregui JM, Croci DO, Bianco GA, Toscano MA, Salatino M, Vermeulen ME, et al. (2009) Tolerogenic signals delivered by dendritic cells to T cells through a galectin-1-driven immunoregulatory circuit involving interleukin 27 and interleukin 10. Nat Immunol 10(9):981–991. pmid:19668220
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Kruisbeek AM. (2001) Isolation of mouse mononuclear cells. Curr Protoc Immunol 39:3.1.3–3.1.4.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Toscano MA, Bianco GA, Ilarregui JM, Croci DO, Correale J, Hernandez JD, et al. (2007) Differential glycosylation of T_H1, T_H2 and T_H-17 effector cells selectively regulates susceptibility to cell death. Nat Immunol 8(8):825–834. pmid:17589510
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. MacDonald AS, Straw AD, Bauman B, Pearce EJ. (2001) CD8^- dendritic cell activation status plays an integral role in influencing Th2 response development. J Immunol 167(4):1982–1988. pmid:11489979
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. MacDonald AS, Pearce EJ. (2002) Cutting edge: polarized Th cell response induction by transferred antigen-pulsed dendritic cells is dependent on IL-4 or IL-12 production by recipient cells. J Immunol 168(7):3127–3130. pmid:11907061
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Cervi L, MacDonald AS, Kane C, Dzierszinski F, Pearce EJ. (2004) Cutting edge: dendritic cells copulsed with microbial and helminth antigens undergo modified maturation, segregate the antigens to distinct intracellular compartments, and concurrently induce microbe-specific Th1 and helminth-specific Th2 responses. J Immunol 172(4):2016–2020. pmid:14764665
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Akira S, Takeda K. (2004) Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 4(7):499–511. pmid:15229469
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Geijtenbeek TBH, Gringhuis SI. (2009) Signalling through C-type lectin receptors: shaping immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 9(7):465–479. pmid:19521399
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Finkelman FD, Lees A, Birnbaum R, Gause WC, Morris SC. (1996) Dendritic cells can present antigen in vivo in a tolerogenic or immunogenic fashion. J Immunol 157(4):1406–1414. pmid:8759720
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Hawiger D, Inaba K, Dorsett Y, Guo M, Mahnke K, Rivera M, et al. (2001) Dendritic cells induce peripherial T cell unresponsiveness under steady state conditions in vivo. J Exp Med 194(6):769–779. pmid:11560993
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Bonifaz LC, Bonnyay DP, Charalambous A, Darguste DI, Fujii S, Soares H, et al. (2004) In vivo targeting of antigens to maturing dendritic cells via the DEC-205 receptor improves T cell vaccination. J Exp Med 199(6):815–824. pmid:15024047
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Keler T, Ramakrishna V, Fanger MW. (2004) Mannose receptor-targeted vaccines. Expert Opin Biol Ther 4(12):1953–1962. pmid:15571457
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Dudziak D, Kamphorst AO, Heidkamp GF, Buchholz VR, Trumpfheller C, Yamazaki S, et al. (2007) Differential antigen processing by dendritic cell subsets in vivo. Science 315(5808):107–111. pmid:17204652
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Boirivant M, Amendola A, Butera A. (2008) Intestinal microflora and immunoregulation. Mucosal Immunol 1(1):S47–S49.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Baba N, Samson S, Bourdet-Sicard R, Rubio M, Sarfati M. (2009) Selected commensal-related bacteria and Toll-like receptor 3 agonist combinatorial codes synergistically induce interleukin-12 production by dendritic cells to trigger a T helper type 1 polarizing programme. Immunology 128(1 Suppl):e523–e531. pmid:19740313
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Weiss G, Christensen HR, Zeuthen LH, Vogensen FK, Jakobsen M, Frøkiær H. (2011) Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria induce differential interferon-β profiles in dendritic cells. Cytokine 56(2):520–530. pmid:21889358
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Klaenhammer TR, Kleerebezem M, Kopp MV, Rescigno M. (2012) The impact of probiotics and prebiotics on the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 12(10):728–734. pmid:23007572
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Kapsenberg ML. (2003) Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nat Rev Immunol 3(12):984–993. pmid:14647480
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Tangye SG, Ma CS, Brink R, Deenick EK. (2013) The good, the bad and the ugly—TFH cells in human health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 13(6):412–426. pmid:23681096
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Shida K, Nanno M, Nagata S. (2011) Flexible cytokine production by macrophages and T cells in response to probiotic bacteria: a possible mechanism by which probiotics exert multifunctional immune regulatory activities. Gut Microbes 2(2):109–114. pmid:21637028
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Weill FS, Cela EM, Paz ML, Ferrari A, Leoni J, González Maglio DH. (2012) Lipoteichoic acid from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as an oral photoprotective agent against UV-induced carcinogenesis. Br J Nutr 6:1–10.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Popovic ZV, Wang S, Papatriantafyllou M, Kaya Z, Porubsky S, Meisner M, et al. (2011) The proteoglycan biglycan enhances antigen-specific T cell activation potentially via MyD88 and TRIF pathways and triggers autoimmune perimyocarditis. J Immunol 187(12):6217–6226. pmid:22095710
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Kirjavainen PV, El-Nezami HS, Salminen SJ, Ahokas JT, Wright PF. (1999) Effects of orally administered viable Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. shermanii JS on mouse lymphocyte proliferation. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 6(6):799–802. pmid:10548566
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Kirjavainen PV, El-Nezami HS, Salminen SJ, Ahokas JT, Wright PF. (1999) The effect of orally administered viable probiotic and dairy lactobacilli on mouse lymphocyte proliferation. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 26(2):131–135. pmid:10536299
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Macpherson AJ, Uhr T. (2004) Induction of protective IgA by intestinal dendritic cells carrying commensal bacteria. Science 303(5664):1662–1665. pmid:15016999
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Macpherson AJ, Geuking MB, McCoy KD. (2012) Homeland security: IgA immunity at the frontiers of the body. Trends Immunol 33(4):160–167. pmid:22410243
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Atarashi K, Nishimura J, Shima T, Umesaki Y, Yamamoto M, Onoue M, et al. (2008) ATP drives lamina propria TH17 cell differentiation. Nature 455(7214):808–812. pmid:18716618
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Plitnick LM, Jordan RA, Banas JA, Jelley-Gibbs DM, Walsh MC, Preissler MT, et al. (2001) Lipoteichoic acid inhibits interleukin-2 (IL-2) function by binding to IL-2. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 8(5):972–979. pmid:11527813
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Tacke RS, Lee HC, Goh C, Courtney J, Polyak SJ, Rosen HR, et al. (2012) Myeloid suppressor cells induced by hepatitis C virus suppress T-cell responses through the production of reactive oxygen species. Hepatology 55(2):343–353. pmid:21953144
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Poe SL, Arora M, Oriss TB, Yarlagadda M, Isse K, Khare A, et al. (2013) STAT1-regulated lung MDSC-like cells produce IL-10 and efferocytose apoptotic neutrophils with relevance in resolution of bacterial pneumonia. Mucosal Immunol 6(1):189–199. pmid:22785228
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Pan W, Zhou HJ, Shen YJ, Wang Y, Xu YX, Hu Y, et al. (2013) Surveillance on the status of immune cells after Echinnococcus granulosus protoscoleces infection in Balb/c mice. PLoS ONE 8(3):e59746. pmid:23555767
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Ganesh V, Baru AM, Hesse C, Friedrich C, Glage S, Gohmert M, et al. (2014) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection-induced CD11b⁺ Gr1⁺ cells ameliorate allergic airway inflammation. Infect Immun 82(3):1052–1063. pmid:24343652
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Smelt MJ, de Haan BJ, Bron PA, van Swam I, Meijerink M, Wells JM, et al. (2012) L. plantarum, L. salivarus, and L. lactis attenuate Th2 responses and increase Treg frequencies in healthy mice in strain dependent manner. PLoS ONE 7(10):e47244. pmid:23056616
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Hua MC, Lin TY, Lai MW, Kong MS, Chang HJ, Chen CC. (2010) Probiotic Bio-Three induces Th1 and anti-inflammatory effects in PBMC and dendritic cells. World J Gastroenterol 16(28):3529–3540. pmid:20653061
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Kosaka A, Yan H, Ohashi S, Gotoh Y, Sato A, Tsutsui H, et al. (2012) Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris FC triggers IFN-γ production from NK and T cells via IL-12 and IL-18. Int Immunopharmacol 14(4):729–733. pmid:23102661
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. (2010) Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 8(3):171–184. pmid:20157338
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States—World Health Organization. (2001) Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. 5 p.

[ref3] 3. Chirdo FG, Millington OR, Beacock-Sharp H, Mowat AM. (2005) Immunomodulatory dendritic cells in intestinal lamina propria. Eur J Immunol 35(6):1831–1840. pmid:16010704
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Neutra MR, Kozlowski PA. (2006) Mucosal vaccines: the promise and the challenge. Nat Rev Immunol 6(2):148–158. pmid:16491139
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Iwasaki A. (2007) Mucosal dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol 25:381–418. pmid:17378762
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Coombes JL, Powrie F. (2008) Dendritic cells in intestinal immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol 8(6):435–446. pmid:18500229
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Mayer CT, Berod L, Sparwasser T. (2012) Layers of dendritic cell-mediated T cell tolerance, their regulation and the prevention. Front Immunol 3(183):1–16.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. van Vliet SJ, den Dunnen J, Gringhuis SI, Geijtenbeek TBH, van Kooyk Y. (2007) Innate signaling and regulation of dendritic cell immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 19:435–440. pmid:17629469
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. van Vliet SJ, García-Vallejo JJ, van Kooyk Y. (2008) Dendritic cells and C-type lectin receptors: coupling innate to adaptive immune responses. Immunol Cell Biol 86:580–587. pmid:18679407
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Heeg K, Sparwasser T, Lipford GB, Häcker H, Zimmermann S, Wagner H. (1998) Bacterial DNA as an evolutionary conserved ligand signaling danger of infection to immune cells. EMBO J 17(7):464–469. pmid:9764548
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Mann ER, Landy JD, Bernardo D, Peake ST, Hart AL, Al-Hassi HO, et al. (2013) Intestinal dendritic cells: their role in intestinal inflammation, manipulation by the gut microbiota and differences between mice and men. Immunol Lett 150(1–2):30–40. pmid:23376547
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Castro MS, Sparo MD, Molina MA, Andino PJ, Manghi MA. (2007) Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 induces systemic immunomodulatory effects and protects from Salmonella infection. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 2(4):215–224.
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Castro MS, Molina MA, Sparo MD, Manghi MA. (2008) Effects of Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 on the specific immune response after DTPw vaccionation. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 3(1):25–30.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Castro MS, Molina MA, Di Sciullo P, Azpiroz MB, Leocata Nieto F, Sterín-Speziale NB, et al. (2010) Beneficial activity of Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 in the anti-lymphoma protective response. J Appl Microbiol 109(4):1234–1243. pmid:20477887
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] PubMed/NCBI

[50] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Castro MS, Azpiroz MB, Molina MA, Mourelle AC, Alaniz FS, Maldonado AM, et al. (2012) Preliminary studies on the prevention of the ovalbumin-induced allergic response by Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 in mice. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 157(1):11–20. pmid:21894024
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] PubMed/NCBI

[54] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Schaefer M, Reiling N, Fessler C, Stephani J, Taniuchi I, Hatam F, et al. (2008) Decreased pathology and prolonged survival of human DC-SIGN transgenic mice during mycobacterial infection. J Immunol 180(10):6836–6845. pmid:18453604
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] PubMed/NCBI

[58] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Adachi O, Kawai T, Takeda K, Matsumoto M, Tsutsui H, Sakagami M, et al. (1998) Targeted disruption of the MyD88 gene results in loss of IL-1- and IL-18-mediated function. Immunity 9(1):143–150. pmid:9697844
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Lee SJ, Evers S, Roeder D, Parlow AF, Risteli J, Lee YC, et al. (2002) Mannose receptor-mediated regulation of serum glycoprotein homeostasis. Science 295(5561):1898–1901. pmid:11884756
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] PubMed/NCBI

[66] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Barnden MJ, Allison J, Heath WR, Carbone FR. (1998) Defective TCR expression in transgenic mice constructed using cDNA-based alpha- and beta-chain genes under the control of heterologous regulatory elements. Immunol Cell Biol 76(1):34–40. pmid:9553774
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] PubMed/NCBI

[70] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Araki Y, Nakatani T, Nakayama K, Ito E. (1972) Occurence of N-nonsubstituted glucosamine residues in peptidoglycan of lysozyme-resistant cell walls from Bacillus cereus. J Biol Chem 247(19):6312–6322. pmid:4631319
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] PubMed/NCBI

[74] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Morath S, Geyer A, Hartung T. (2001) Structure-function relationship of cytokine induction by lipoteichoic acid from Staphylococcus aureus. J Exp Med 193(3):393–397. pmid:11157059
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Ilarregui JM, Croci DO, Bianco GA, Toscano MA, Salatino M, Vermeulen ME, et al. (2009) Tolerogenic signals delivered by dendritic cells to T cells through a galectin-1-driven immunoregulatory circuit involving interleukin 27 and interleukin 10. Nat Immunol 10(9):981–991. pmid:19668220
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] PubMed/NCBI

[82] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Kruisbeek AM. (2001) Isolation of mouse mononuclear cells. Curr Protoc Immunol 39:3.1.3–3.1.4.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Toscano MA, Bianco GA, Ilarregui JM, Croci DO, Correale J, Hernandez JD, et al. (2007) Differential glycosylation of T_H1, T_H2 and T_H-17 effector cells selectively regulates susceptibility to cell death. Nat Immunol 8(8):825–834. pmid:17589510
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. MacDonald AS, Straw AD, Bauman B, Pearce EJ. (2001) CD8^- dendritic cell activation status plays an integral role in influencing Th2 response development. J Immunol 167(4):1982–1988. pmid:11489979
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. MacDonald AS, Pearce EJ. (2002) Cutting edge: polarized Th cell response induction by transferred antigen-pulsed dendritic cells is dependent on IL-4 or IL-12 production by recipient cells. J Immunol 168(7):3127–3130. pmid:11907061
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Cervi L, MacDonald AS, Kane C, Dzierszinski F, Pearce EJ. (2004) Cutting edge: dendritic cells copulsed with microbial and helminth antigens undergo modified maturation, segregate the antigens to distinct intracellular compartments, and concurrently induce microbe-specific Th1 and helminth-specific Th2 responses. J Immunol 172(4):2016–2020. pmid:14764665
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Akira S, Takeda K. (2004) Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 4(7):499–511. pmid:15229469
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Geijtenbeek TBH, Gringhuis SI. (2009) Signalling through C-type lectin receptors: shaping immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 9(7):465–479. pmid:19521399
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Finkelman FD, Lees A, Birnbaum R, Gause WC, Morris SC. (1996) Dendritic cells can present antigen in vivo in a tolerogenic or immunogenic fashion. J Immunol 157(4):1406–1414. pmid:8759720
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Hawiger D, Inaba K, Dorsett Y, Guo M, Mahnke K, Rivera M, et al. (2001) Dendritic cells induce peripherial T cell unresponsiveness under steady state conditions in vivo. J Exp Med 194(6):769–779. pmid:11560993
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Bonifaz LC, Bonnyay DP, Charalambous A, Darguste DI, Fujii S, Soares H, et al. (2004) In vivo targeting of antigens to maturing dendritic cells via the DEC-205 receptor improves T cell vaccination. J Exp Med 199(6):815–824. pmid:15024047
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Keler T, Ramakrishna V, Fanger MW. (2004) Mannose receptor-targeted vaccines. Expert Opin Biol Ther 4(12):1953–1962. pmid:15571457
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Dudziak D, Kamphorst AO, Heidkamp GF, Buchholz VR, Trumpfheller C, Yamazaki S, et al. (2007) Differential antigen processing by dendritic cell subsets in vivo. Science 315(5808):107–111. pmid:17204652
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Boirivant M, Amendola A, Butera A. (2008) Intestinal microflora and immunoregulation. Mucosal Immunol 1(1):S47–S49.
View Article
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Baba N, Samson S, Bourdet-Sicard R, Rubio M, Sarfati M. (2009) Selected commensal-related bacteria and Toll-like receptor 3 agonist combinatorial codes synergistically induce interleukin-12 production by dendritic cells to trigger a T helper type 1 polarizing programme. Immunology 128(1 Suppl):e523–e531. pmid:19740313
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Weiss G, Christensen HR, Zeuthen LH, Vogensen FK, Jakobsen M, Frøkiær H. (2011) Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria induce differential interferon-β profiles in dendritic cells. Cytokine 56(2):520–530. pmid:21889358
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Klaenhammer TR, Kleerebezem M, Kopp MV, Rescigno M. (2012) The impact of probiotics and prebiotics on the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 12(10):728–734. pmid:23007572
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Kapsenberg ML. (2003) Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nat Rev Immunol 3(12):984–993. pmid:14647480
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Tangye SG, Ma CS, Brink R, Deenick EK. (2013) The good, the bad and the ugly—TFH cells in human health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 13(6):412–426. pmid:23681096
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Shida K, Nanno M, Nagata S. (2011) Flexible cytokine production by macrophages and T cells in response to probiotic bacteria: a possible mechanism by which probiotics exert multifunctional immune regulatory activities. Gut Microbes 2(2):109–114. pmid:21637028
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Weill FS, Cela EM, Paz ML, Ferrari A, Leoni J, González Maglio DH. (2012) Lipoteichoic acid from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as an oral photoprotective agent against UV-induced carcinogenesis. Br J Nutr 6:1–10.
View Article
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Popovic ZV, Wang S, Papatriantafyllou M, Kaya Z, Porubsky S, Meisner M, et al. (2011) The proteoglycan biglycan enhances antigen-specific T cell activation potentially via MyD88 and TRIF pathways and triggers autoimmune perimyocarditis. J Immunol 187(12):6217–6226. pmid:22095710
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[161] View Article

[162] PubMed/NCBI

[163] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Kirjavainen PV, El-Nezami HS, Salminen SJ, Ahokas JT, Wright PF. (1999) Effects of orally administered viable Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. shermanii JS on mouse lymphocyte proliferation. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 6(6):799–802. pmid:10548566
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] PubMed/NCBI

[167] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Kirjavainen PV, El-Nezami HS, Salminen SJ, Ahokas JT, Wright PF. (1999) The effect of orally administered viable probiotic and dairy lactobacilli on mouse lymphocyte proliferation. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 26(2):131–135. pmid:10536299
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] PubMed/NCBI

[171] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Macpherson AJ, Uhr T. (2004) Induction of protective IgA by intestinal dendritic cells carrying commensal bacteria. Science 303(5664):1662–1665. pmid:15016999
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[173] View Article

[174] PubMed/NCBI

[175] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Macpherson AJ, Geuking MB, McCoy KD. (2012) Homeland security: IgA immunity at the frontiers of the body. Trends Immunol 33(4):160–167. pmid:22410243
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] PubMed/NCBI

[179] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Atarashi K, Nishimura J, Shima T, Umesaki Y, Yamamoto M, Onoue M, et al. (2008) ATP drives lamina propria TH17 cell differentiation. Nature 455(7214):808–812. pmid:18716618
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[181] View Article

[182] PubMed/NCBI

[183] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Plitnick LM, Jordan RA, Banas JA, Jelley-Gibbs DM, Walsh MC, Preissler MT, et al. (2001) Lipoteichoic acid inhibits interleukin-2 (IL-2) function by binding to IL-2. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 8(5):972–979. pmid:11527813
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] PubMed/NCBI

[187] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Tacke RS, Lee HC, Goh C, Courtney J, Polyak SJ, Rosen HR, et al. (2012) Myeloid suppressor cells induced by hepatitis C virus suppress T-cell responses through the production of reactive oxygen species. Hepatology 55(2):343–353. pmid:21953144
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] PubMed/NCBI

[191] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Poe SL, Arora M, Oriss TB, Yarlagadda M, Isse K, Khare A, et al. (2013) STAT1-regulated lung MDSC-like cells produce IL-10 and efferocytose apoptotic neutrophils with relevance in resolution of bacterial pneumonia. Mucosal Immunol 6(1):189–199. pmid:22785228
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] PubMed/NCBI

[195] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Pan W, Zhou HJ, Shen YJ, Wang Y, Xu YX, Hu Y, et al. (2013) Surveillance on the status of immune cells after Echinnococcus granulosus protoscoleces infection in Balb/c mice. PLoS ONE 8(3):e59746. pmid:23555767
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[197] View Article

[198] PubMed/NCBI

[199] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Ganesh V, Baru AM, Hesse C, Friedrich C, Glage S, Gohmert M, et al. (2014) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection-induced CD11b⁺ Gr1⁺ cells ameliorate allergic airway inflammation. Infect Immun 82(3):1052–1063. pmid:24343652
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[201] View Article

[202] PubMed/NCBI

[203] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Smelt MJ, de Haan BJ, Bron PA, van Swam I, Meijerink M, Wells JM, et al. (2012) L. plantarum, L. salivarus, and L. lactis attenuate Th2 responses and increase Treg frequencies in healthy mice in strain dependent manner. PLoS ONE 7(10):e47244. pmid:23056616
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[205] View Article

[206] PubMed/NCBI

[207] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Hua MC, Lin TY, Lai MW, Kong MS, Chang HJ, Chen CC. (2010) Probiotic Bio-Three induces Th1 and anti-inflammatory effects in PBMC and dendritic cells. World J Gastroenterol 16(28):3529–3540. pmid:20653061
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[209] View Article

[210] PubMed/NCBI

[211] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Kosaka A, Yan H, Ohashi S, Gotoh Y, Sato A, Tsutsui H, et al. (2012) Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris FC triggers IFN-γ production from NK and T cells via IL-12 and IL-18. Int Immunopharmacol 14(4):729–733. pmid:23102661
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[213] View Article

[214] PubMed/NCBI

[215] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Ethical statement

Animals

Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 suspensions and sub-cellular fractions

Generation and in vitro stimulation of mouse Bone Marrow-derived Dendritic Cells (BM-DCs)

DC-T cell co-culture under stimulation with E. faecalis CECT7121

Spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes cell cultures

Identification of immune cellular populations by flow cytometry

Determination of cytokine levels by ELISA

In vivo stimulation with probiotic-pulsed DCs

Intragastric treatment of mice with Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121

Statistical analysis

Results

E. faecalis CECT7121 activates BM-DCs in vitro and stimulates the production of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines

BM-DC activation by E. faecalis CECT7121 is dependent on the presence of MyD88

In vitro probiotic-activated BM-DCs drive the polarization of T cells towards a Th1 profile

E. faecalis CECT7121-primed BM-DCs also induce the production of IFNγ in vivo after adoptive cell transference

Intragastric immunization with live Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 does not modify the total cellularity at local or systemic levels

Treatment with the probiotic strain primes T cell proliferation and production of IFNγ

The probiotic strain E. faecalis CECT7121 does not modify the recruitment of regulatory cell populations

Discussion

Author Contributions

References