Figures
Abstract
Background
Self-rated health (SRH) has strong predictive value for mortality in different contexts and cultures, but there is inconsistent evidence on ethnoracial disparities in SRH in Latin America, possibly due to the complexity surrounding ethnoracial self-classification.
Materials/Methods
We used 370,539 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) to examine the association between individual genomic proportions of African, European and Native American ancestry, and ethnoracial self-classification, with baseline and 10-year SRH trajectories in 1,311 community dwelling older Brazilians. We also examined whether genomic ancestry and ethnoracial self-classification affect the predictive value of SRH for subsequent mortality.
Results
European ancestry predominated among participants, followed by African and Native American (median = 84.0%, 9.6% and 5.3%, respectively); the prevalence of Non-White (Mixed and Black) was 39.8%. Persons at higher levels of African and Native American genomic ancestry, and those self-identified as Non-White, were more likely to report poor health than other groups, even after controlling for socioeconomic conditions and an array of self-reported and objective physical health measures. Increased risks for mortality associated with worse SRH trajectories were strong and remarkably similar (hazard ratio ~3) across all genomic ancestry and ethno-racial groups.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrated for the first time that higher levels of African and Native American genomic ancestry—and the inverse for European ancestry—were strongly correlated with worse SRH in a Latin American admixed population. Both genomic ancestry and ethnoracial self-classification did not modify the strong association between baseline SRH or SRH trajectory, and subsequent mortality.
Citation: Lima-Costa MF, Macinko J, Mambrini JVdM, Cesar CC, Peixoto SV, Magalhães WCS, et al. (2015) Genomic Ancestry, Self-Rated Health and Its Association with Mortality in an Admixed Population: 10 Year Follow-Up of the Bambui-Epigen (Brazil) Cohort Study of Ageing. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0144456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144456
Editor: Tom R. Gaunt, University of Bristol, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: June 19, 2015; Accepted: November 18, 2015; Published: December 17, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Lima-Costa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: Genome-wide data are deposited in the EBI-ENA Archive (EGA, http://www.ebi.ac.uk.ega/) under EPIGEN-Committee Controlled Access mode (accession number EGAS00001001245). However, The study data contain personally identifiable information, not limited to lab results (including genomic ancestry), and other physical and mental health tests. They also include extensive individual data on income and family structure. For these reasons and according to the permissions given with the existing human subjects review board, it is not possible to make public the data used for this study. Requests may be made out to Maria Fernanda Lima-Costa, (lima-costa@cpqrr.fiocruz.b).
Funding: This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DECIT, Ministry of Health) and National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FNDCT, Ministry of Science and Technology), Funding of Studies and Projects (FINEP, Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil), Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Ministry of Education, Brazil). MFLC, SVP, JOAF, FAP, CCC and ETS are fellow researchers of the National Council for Research and Technological Development (CNPq).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Self-rated health (SRH) is one of the most widely used epidemiologic variables because of its simplicity, its validity in different contexts and cultures, and its strong predictive power for future mortality. [1–4] While there is considerable evidence of ethnoracial disparities in SRH in the USA [5–7], studies conducted in Latin American countries have reported inconsistent results. [8–10] One possible explanation for these inconsistencies is the complexity surrounding ethnoracial classification in Latin American populations. [11]
Brazil, the world’s fifth most populous nation [12], offers a unique opportunity to explore the extent of agreement among objective measures of ethnoracial background (genome-wide ancestry) and ethnoracial identity on SRH disparities. The Brazilian population originated from African, European and Native American ancestral roots. [11, 13] The slave trade to Brazil was the largest in the Americas; 3.6 million African slaves were brought to Brazil, seven times more than to the United States. [11] The absence of legal segregation and other factors resulted in the construction of a complex, fluid system of ethnoracial classification. [11, 13] A recent population-based multicenter study concluded that ethnoracial self-classification in Brazil is affected by both genomic ancestry and non-biological factors [13]
To our knowledge, no previous study has examined the association between genome-wide ancestry and SRH in an admixed Western population. We used 370,539 SNPs to examine the association between individual genomic proportions of African, European and Native American ancestry, as well as that of ethnoracial self-classification, with SRH in a population-based cohort of older adults in Brazil. Additionally, we examined whether genomic ancestry and ethnoracial self-classification affect the predictive value of SRH for subsequent mortality.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
The Bambui cohort study of aging was fully approved by the Comissão de Ética em Pesquisa (Institutional Review Board) at Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants at baseline and at all follow-up interviews. Genotyping was approved by Brazil’s national research ethics committee, as part of the Epigen-Brazil protocol (CONEP, resolution 15895).
Study design and population
The Bambui cohort study of aging is ongoing in Bambuí, a city of approximately 15,000 inhabitants in the state of Minas Gerais in Southeast Brazil. [14] The population eligible for the cohort consisted of all residents aged 60 years and over on 1 January 1997 (1,606 out of 1,742 of whom participated). Cohort members undergo annual follow-up visits, which consist of an interview and verification of death certificates (98.8% of which have been verified). All deaths from any cause occurring from study enrollment to December 31, 2007, were included in this analysis. At baseline, 1,442 participants had their DNA stored and authorized its use for future investigation. Genotyping were performed in 2012, as part of the Epigen-Brazil Initiative. [13]
Self-rated health
Information on SRH was obtained during the household interview at baseline and at each subsequent wave. SRH was measured by asking the question, ‘‘In general, would you say your health is …,” and five response categories ranged from ‘‘excellent,” to “very poor”. Language plays a role in an individual´s choice on the SRH scale [15, 16] and we have shown that for the Bambui cohort population, whose language is Portuguese, the middle option (“fair”) seems to describe normal health and is viewed as similar to the “good” option. [4, 17] Thus, we categorized SRH as a binary variable, comprising poor/very poor (exposure category) versus fair/good/excellent.
Genotyping and external parental populations
Participants were genotyped by the Illumina facility, using the Omni 2.5M array (Illumina, San Diego, California). We performed the unsupervised tri-hybrid (k = 3) admixture analyses based on 370,539 SNPs shared between samples from the Epigen-Brazil study population, the HapMap Project, and the Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP). [18, 19] As external panels, we used the following HapMap samples: 266 Africans, 262 Europeans (American and Italian), 77 admixed Mexican Americans, 83 African Americans, and 93 Native Americans from the HGDP. Further details can be seen elsewhere. [13]
Ethnoracial self-classification
The Brazilian census uses ethnoracial self-classification with five groups: White, Brown/Mixed (“pardo” in official Portuguese), Black, “Yellow” (Asian) and Indigenous (Native American). [12] At baseline, cohort participants categorized themselves into the above mentioned ethnoracial groups, according to standard photographs of Brazilians; no individuals categorized themselves as Native American or Asian. Those self-classified as Black or Brown/Mixed were considered as Non-White in the current analysis.
Other baseline measures
SRH is affected by several main factors [2] and variables selected for this study followed this framework, including: 1) socio demographic characteristics (age, sex, schooling and household income); 2) lifestyle (current smoking and leisure-time physical activity); 3) mental symptoms (common mental disorders); 4) physical functioning (disability in activities of daily living); and 5) objective measures of health (described below).
Based on its distribution, we categorized schooling into incomplete primary school (<4 years) and complete primary and higher (4 years and more). We categorized monthly household income per capita into equal or superior to the median value (median = 1.5 Brazilian minimum wage or USD 180.00 at baseline) and lower. Current smokers were persons who had smoked at least 100 cigarettes during their lifetime and who were still smokers. Leisure-time physical activity was defined as activity of any intensity for 20–30 minutes at least 3 times a week during the previous 3 months. Assessment of common mental disorders was based on participants’ answers to the 12-item version of the General Health Questionnaire. A score of 4/5 was used to define exposure status, as recommended for the study population. [20] Participants were considered to have a disability in activities of daily living if they reported much difficulty or inability in at least one of the following: feeding oneself, dressing oneself, bathing or showering, using the toilet, getting in and out of the bed to a chair, and/or walking across a room. [17]
Objective measures of health were those previously found to be associated with increased risk of mortality among cohort participants. [21–25] Systolic blood pressure was defined as the mean of 2 out of 3 measures according to standard protocols. Body mass index was defined as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Blood fasting glucose, total cholesterol, and lipoprotein cholesterol were determined by using standard enzymatic methods (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) was measured using a micro particle-based immunoassay (AxSYM MEIA; Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Park, Illinois). White blood cell count and hemoglobin level were assessed using an electronic counter (Coulter Counter T 890; Coulter Electronics, Hialeah, Florida). Infection with Trypanosoma cruzi was assessed by means of 1 hemagglutination assay (Biolab Mérieux SA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and 2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Abbott Laboratories, Inc., and Wiener Laboratories, Rosario, Argentina) performed concurrently. Blood samples were collected after a 12-hour fast. Further details are described elsewhere. [14]
Statistical analysis
To estimate the genetic ancestry of the study population, we applied the methodology implemented in the software Admixture [26] and used an unsupervised mode to identify clusters corresponding to the 3 ancestral populations (African, European and Native American) from the genetic structure of our dataset. We estimated kinship coefficients for each possible pair of individuals, using the Related Estimation in Admixed Populations (REAP) software. [27] We considered a related pair if their coefficient was ≥ 0.1 (first- and second-degree relatives). Based on this cut-off, we identified 885 participants as related. Since excluding them would lead to loss of power and possible selection bias, we kept related individuals in the sample and used robust variance estimators to correct results of all multivariate analysis for family structure.
Principal component analysis [28] was used to create a physical health score that included the following measures: systolic blood pressure, body mass index, ratio of total cholesterol to high density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin value, white blood cell count, log-transformed blood glucose value, log-transformed plasma BNP value (all continuous variables), and T. cruzi infection (yes or no). Scores may range from - ∞ to + ∞. Higher scores indicated worse health.
We used negative binomial regression (for dichotomous variables) and ordinary least squares regression (for continuous variables) to examine the age and sex (plus family structure) adjusted association between genomic ancestry and ethnoracial self-classification with schooling, household income, health behaviors, physical functioning (all dichotomous variables) and the physical health score (a continuous variable) defined above.
We used mixed-effects logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals to model baseline and 10-year SRH trajectory, using poor SRH as the reference category. [29] To take into account dropouts that could be related to the outcome, we applied the pattern mixture model. [30] This entailed creating a factor variable representing the time of the last valid observation and including it in statistical models as both a main effect and an interaction term with the time variable. We examined the significance of the effect of multiplicative interactions between ancestry in tertiles and self-classification on SRH trajectories, by means of cross-product terms with time. Models were adjusted for the sociodemographic and health factors identified above.
We estimated adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between baseline SRH and time dependent SRH, and subsequent mortality, using Cox proportional hazards models [31] after confirming that the assumption of proportionality among the hazards was met; time scale was number of years since the baseline We examined separately the influence of each genome-wide ancestry and ethnoracial self-classification on this association. All hazard ratios were adjusted for age, sex, schooling, household income, health behaviors, physical functioning and physical health score, as previously described. Additionally, we examined the significance of the effect of multiplicative interactions between each genomic ancestry tertile and baseline and SRH trajectories on subsequent mortality by means of cross-product terms in fully adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. We used a clustered robust variance estimate in these analyses to take into account clustering of individuals within families. Finally, we conducted supplementary analyses, based on R squared estimates, to quantify how much of the variation in the outcome (survival time) is explained by baseline SRH and SRH trajectory, respectively [32].
The multivariable models (described above) were build separately for each tertile of genomic ancestry and for ethnoracial self-classification. Separate analyses were performed because African, Native American and European ancestry proportions are complementary measures, whose sum is equal to 1. Further, ethnoracial self-classification showed a strong correlation with each of the genomic ancestries in exploratory analysis. Thus, we opted for not controlling self-classification for ancestry and vice-versa.
Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 13.1 statistical software. All p-values were 2-tailed (alpha = 0.05).
Results
Descriptive
Of the 1,606 baseline cohort participants, complete data on all study variables were available for 1,311 persons, who were included in the current analysis. As can be seen in Table 1, the mean age of participants at baseline was 68.1 years and 61.4% were women. European ancestry predominated, followed by African and Native American (median = 84.0%, 9.6% and 5.3%, respectively), and prevalence of self-identified Non-White (Mixed or Black) was 39.8%. Most participants had some degree of admixture of African, European and Native American ancestry, as shown in Fig 1.
The red, blue and green colors represent the European, African and Native American ancestry proportions, respectively.
Overall, 18.5% of participants rated their health as poor or very poor. As shown in Table 2, there was a significant increase (p<0.001 in the chi-squared test for trend) in the prevalence of poor SRH ranging from 13.3% among people at the lowest levels of African ancestry to 19.5% among those at intermediate levels to 19.5% among those at the highest tertile of African ancestry (28.9%); a similar trend (p<0.001) was found for tertiles of Native American ancestry (12.8%, 18.8%, 24.0%; p<0.001). In contrast, persons at the highest tertile of European ancestry were significantly (p<0.001) less likely to report poor health (13.0%) relative to those at the intermediate (19.5%) and lowest tertiles (23.1%). Self-classified Non-White persons were significantly (p<0.05) more likely to report poor health (21.8%) compared to those who self-classified as White (16.4%).
Age-sex adjusted analysis of the association between genomic ancestry and ethnoracial classification with socioeconomic and health indicators
As shown in Table 2, European ancestry was significantly associated with all sociodemographic and health measures considered in the current analysis (except physical functioning), with better conditions among those at the highest tertile. Both African and Native American ancestry were significantly associated with lower schooling, lower income and worse physical health. Highest level of Native American ancestry (but not of African ancestry) was associated with less physical exercise and higher prevalence of common mental disorders. Those self-classified as Non-White, relative to Whites, were more likely to have lower schooling level, to be current smokers, to report common mental symptoms and to have worse physical health.
Multivariable analysis of the association genomic ancestry and ethnoracial classification with self-rated health
Over the 10-year follow-up, 9,721 measures of SRH were made (median = 7.4 per participant). Table 3 presents results from multivariate mixed regression models explaining baseline and changes in SRH over time. The results show that the association between poor SRH at the baseline and each genomic ancestry group remains largely significant after adjustments for schooling, education, lifestyle, mental health, physical functioning and physical health score, besides age and sex. Those in the highest tertile of African ancestry were about twice as likely to report poor health (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.98; 95% CI 1.34, 2.93) compared with those in the lowest tertile of African ancestry. For Native American ancestry, both intermediate and highest ancestry levels were significant and suggested a graded relationship (OR = 1.71; 95% CI 1.13, 2.60 and OR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.54, 3.38, respectively). European ancestry showed the inverse relationship with negative and statistically significant associations with poor SRH among those at the intermediate and highest tertile levels (OR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.47, 0.99 and OR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.35, 0.74). The corresponding analysis for ethnoracial self-classification revealed a significant association between Non-White classification and the likelihood of poor SRH at baseline (OR = 1.47; 95% CI 1.08, 1.99).
With regards to SRH trajectories, Table 4 shows a significant but modest improvement in SRH trajectories among those at the highest tertile of African ancestry relative to those in the lowest tertile (OR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.86, 0.99), and a modest worsening in SRH among those at the highest European ancestry level (OR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.00, 1.15). No significant association was found for Native American ancestry or ethno-racial self-classification.
Multivariable analysis of the association between self-rated health and mortality
During a mean follow-up period of 8.9 years, 522 participants died and 84 were lost, leading to 11,725 person-years of observation. Overall, the mortality rate was 65.6 per 1,000 person-years among persons who reported poor SRH at baseline compared to 43.3 per 1,000 among those who reported better health. As shown in Table 4, in Cox proportional hazard models that were adjusted for all sociodemographic and health characteristics, participants who reported poor health at baseline were at significantly increased risk for subsequent mortality relative to those who reported good/fair health in the following groups: individuals who were at the intermediate African ancestry (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.55; 95% CI 1.09, 2.20) and the highest tertiles of African ancestry (HR = 1.06; 95% CI 1.06, 2.10); individuals who were at intermediate (HR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.12, 2.18) and highest tertiles of Native American ancestry (HR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.08, 2.17); among those who were at the lowest tertile of European ancestry (HR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.17, 2.25), and for self-classified as White (HR = 1.47; 95% CI 1.10, 1.97). With regards to the prognostic value of SRH trajectories for subsequent mortality, significant and highly similar hazard ratios were found for all groups with values ranging from 2.99 (95% CI 2.05, 4.35) to 3.65 (95% CI 2.57, 5.17). Notably, there was no significant interaction (p>0.05) between genomic ancestry or ethnoracial classification on the predictive value of both baseline and SRH trajectories for subsequent mortality.
Overall, the variation in mortality (survival time) explained by repeated measures of SRH was about 40% higher (R2 = 0.41; 95% CI 0.35, 0.49) compared with a single measure of SRH at the baseline (R2 = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.24, 0.36). The corresponding values ranged from 0.38 (95% CI 0.28, 0.53) to 0.45 (95%CI 0.36, 0.59) across genome-wide ancestry and ethno-racial self identified groups for SRH trajectory, and from 0.25 (95% CI 0.17, 0.40) to 0.34 (95% CI 0.26, 0.49) for a single baseline measure of SRH.
Discussion
Major results of this study demonstrate that: first, persons at higher levels of African and Native American genomic ancestry, as well as those self-identified as Non-White, were more likely to report poor health at baseline than other groups, even after controlling for socioeconomic conditions, health behaviors, mental health, physical functioning and a wide array of objective measures of physical health; second, given that baseline SRH was the strongest predictor of health assessment trajectories, those with higher African and Native American genomic ancestry, and those self-identified as “Non-White” tended to report worse health over time relative to their respective reference groups; third, neither genomic ancestry nor ethnoracial self-identification modified the strong predictive power of SRH trajectories for 10-year mortality risk.
The Bambui population is ethnically mixed, linked to a history of decimation of Native American groups (or its incorporation by miscegenation), the importation of slaves from Africa, and colonization by Europeans and their descendants. [33] Our results show that the current genetic make up of the Bambui cohort members reflects this background. Interestingly, the individual proportion of genomic African ancestry among cohort participants (9.6%), and the proportion of European ancestry (84.0%) were similar to that estimated for the Brazilian general population (9.0% and 82.0%, respectively). [34] The contribution of Native American ancestry to the cohort population was smaller (5.3%) than that estimated for Brazil (9%) since our sample does not include the Amazon region, where the largest concentration of people with Native American ancestry resides. [34]
Previous research has shown that adult Brazilians who self-report as Black and/or Mixed are more likely to report worse health outcomes. [8, 10, 35] Our results are in line with these reports and add to them by showing that; 1) ethnoracial disparities in health may occur even in small, tightly-knit populations with relatively small differences in education and income levels; and 2) ethnoracial disparities were apparent not only in schooling and income, health behaviors and mental health-factors that can be observed by individuals themselves and by other people around them, but also in laboratory and other objective health measures.
A major explanation for socioeconomic disparities associated with African ancestry in Brazil is the cumulative effect of the lack of social policies designed to support the newly freed slaves and their descendants since the abolition of slavery in 1888 up to the last decades of the 20th century. [11,36] As a consequence, persons of African origin are more likely to have lower income and education [8, 11]. They also experience race-based discrimination in other realms of life. [37, 38] The most comprehensive studies in Latin American investigating the association between SRH and ethnoracial classification concluded that socio economic differences fully mediate this association. [8, 9] Our results show a different picture. In the current analysis, based on older adults with low socioeconomic and educational levels, poor SRH remained associated with higher levels of African and Native American ancestries and non-White self-identification, independent of education, household income and several health indicators.
As a consequence of sustained marginalization, indigenous populations through Latin America tend to live in more isolated communities and experience higher rates of mortality and morbidity than the general population. [37, 38] Individuals with indigenous parentage may sometimes prefer to self-identify as White or Mixed (“pardo”in Portuguese or mestizo in Spanish), especially if they live in urban areas. [9, 38] Therefore, self-reports tend to underestimate Native American ancestry. This is true for the Brazilian population as a whole (only 1% of the total population declared being indigenous in the most recent census [12]), as well as for the Bambui cohort population, in which no participant identified himself as being Indigenous. Previous studies showed poorer SRH in persons self-identified as indigenous and/or having indigenous parentage. [9, 38] Our results showed a graded increase in the likelihood of poor SRH among people with increasing levels of Native American ancestry, independent of other relevant factors.
Self-rated health appears to be a universal predictor of mortality. This association has been reported in very different populations and countries [1–3], including Brazil. [4,17] Why SRH has prognostic value for mortality is not well understood [2]. The most intuitive explanation is that SRH reflects an individual’s awareness of symptoms, diagnoses, or diminished functioning, all of which are associated with mortality risk. [2] Others argue that SRH represents a broader dimension of health than do these domains, and its ability to predict mortality is because SRH reflects the general state of the human organism [2]. There are within group differences in the ability of SRH to predict mortality. SRH seems to be a stronger predictor for Whites than for other groups, at least in the United States. [39] SRH appears to be a weaker predictor of mortality in older compared to younger age groups, possibly because of new and/or life-threatening health events with advancing age [2, 40, 41]. To our knowledge, no previous study has investigated the influence of genomic ancestry, as well as that of ethnoracial self-classification, on the ability of SRH to predict mortality in Latin America. To approach the subject we used to two measures of SRH, i.e. a single measure of SRH at baseline and SRH trajectory a measure that captures changes over time. Our results indicate that SRH trajectory is a stronger predictor of mortality for all genomic ancestry and ethnoracial categories than the traditional SRH single baseline measure. Increased risks for mortality associated with worse SRH trajectory were strong and remarkably similar (hazard ratio ~3) across all genomic ancestry and ethnoracial groups.
This study has strengths and limitations. Strengths of the study include the community-based sample, standardized and systematic measurement of parameters at baseline, annual measures of SRH, continuous surveillance of mortality according to standardized criteria, and minimal loss of participants to follow-up. Another major strength is the use of genome-wide measures of ancestry. Genomic ancestry does not change over time, while self-classification is prone to misclassification, particularly in admixed populations, and can even fluctuate over time, due to changing social norms. [11] Previous Latin American studies were cross sectional in nature and considered few health conditions as potential confounders (all of them self-reported) for the association between ethnoracial classification and SRH. [8–10] Our study incorporated a much more robust set of measures of determinants of SRH, allowing us to make more meaningful estimates of ancestry/ethnoracial classification and its association with SRH and mortality over time. However, even given the range of health and health-related variables included in this study, there may be additional unmeasured factors that confound our results. Thus, we cannot discard the possibility of the existence of other variables affecting our results, including unknown genetic factors that might predispose an individual towards poor SRH.
In conclusion, our analyses provide new insights based on solid data on the association between genomic ancestry/ethnoracial and SRH, as well as on its prognostic value for mortality. Our results demonstrate for the first time that higher levels of African and Native American genomic ancestry–and the inverse for European ancestry–were strongly correlated with worse SRH in a Latin American admixed population. Further, genomic ancestry/ethnoracial classification did not modify the strong predictive power of SRH for mortality. Further research is needed to identify the set of mechanisms by which ethnoracial ancestry and the social constructions of ethnoracial ethnic identities may interact to cause the observed disparities in SRH.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DECIT, Ministry of Health) and National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FNDCT, Ministry of Science and Technology), Funding of Studies and Projects (FINEP, Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil), Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Ministry of Education, Brazil). MFLC, SVP, JOAF, FAP, CCC and ETS are fellow researchers of the National Council for Research and Technological Development (CNPq).
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MFFLC JM JVMM ETS. Performed the experiments: MFLC JM JVdMM CCC SVP WCSM BLH MB ECC JOAF FAP TPL MRR AP ETS. Analyzed the data: MFFLC JM JVMM MLCL. Wrote the paper: MFLC JM JVdMM CCC SVP WCSM BLH MB ECC JOAF FAP TPL MRR AP ETS.
References
- 1. Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of health and social behavior 1997;38(1):21–37. pmid:9097506
- 2. Jylha M. What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Social science & medicine 2009;69(3):307–16.
- 3. DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, Jiang He, Muntner P. Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis. Journal of general internal medicine 2006;21(3):267–75. pmid:16336622
- 4. Lima-Costa MF, Steptoe A, Cesar CC, De Oliveira C, Proietti FA, Marmot M. The influence of socioeconomic status on the predictive power of self-rated health for 6-year mortality in English and Brazilian older adults: the ELSA and Bambui cohort studies. Annals of epidemiology 2012;22(9):644–8. pmid:22819435
- 5. Lopez R. Income inequality and self-rated health in US metropolitan areas: a multi-level analysis. Social science & medicine 2004;59(12):2409–19.
- 6. Meyer OL, Castro-Schilo L, Aguilar-Gaxiola S. Determinants of mental health and self-rated health: a model of socioeconomic status, neighborhood safety, and physical activity. American journal of public health 2014;104(9):1734–41. pmid:25033151
- 7. Kwate NO, Goodman MS. An empirical analysis of White privilege, social position and health. Social science & medicine 2014;116:150–60.
- 8. Travassos C, Laguardia J, Marques PM, Mota JC, Szwarcwald CL. Comparison between two race/skin color classifications in relation to health-related outcomes in Brazil. International journal for equity in health 2011;10:35. pmid:21867522
- 9. Perreira KM, Telles EE. The color of health: skin color, ethnoracial classification, and discrimination in the health of Latin Americans. Social science & medicine 2014;116:241–50.
- 10. Oliveira BL, Thomaz EB, Silva RA. The association between skin color/race and health indicators in elderly Brazilians: a study based on the Brazilian National Household Sample Survey (2008). Cadernos de saude publica 2014;30(7):1438–52. pmid:25166941
- 11.
Telles EE. Race in Another America: The Significance of Skin Color in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2004.
- 12.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica—IBGE. Atlas do Censo Demografico de 2010. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica—IBGE, 2013.
- 13. Lima-Costa MF, Rodrigues LC, Barreto ML, Gouveia M, Horta BL, Mambrini J, et al. Genomic-wide ancestry and ethnoracial self-classification based on 5,871 community-dwelling Brazilians (The Epigen Initiative). SREP 5: 9812 |
- 14. Lima-Costa MF, Firmo JO, Uchoa E. Cohort profile: the Bambui (Brazil) Cohort Study of Ageing. International journal of epidemiology 2011;40(4):862–7. pmid:20805109
- 15. Viruell-Fuentes EA, Morenoff JD, Williams DR, House JS. Language of interview, self-rated health, and the other Latino health puzzle. American journal of public health 2011;101(7):1306–13. pmid:21164101
- 16. Jurges H. True health vs response styles: exploring cross-country differences in self-reported health. Health economics 2007;16(2):163–78. pmid:16941555
- 17. Lima-Costa MF, Cesar CC, Chor D, Proietti FA. Self-rated health compared with objectively measured health status as a tool for mortality risk screening in older adults: 10-year follow-up of the Bambui Cohort Study of Aging. American journal of epidemiology 2012;175(3):228–35. pmid:22193172
- 18. International HapMap C, Altshuler DM, Gibbs RA, et al. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature 2010;467(7311):52–8. pmid:20811451
- 19. Li JZ, Absher DM, Tang H, Southwick AM, Casto AM, Ramachandran S, et al. Worldwide human relationships inferred from genome-wide patterns of variation. Science 2008;319(5866):1100–4. pmid:18292342
- 20. Costa E, Barreto SM, Uchoa E, Firmo JO, Lima-Costa MF, Prince M. Is the GDS-30 better than the GHQ-12 for screening depression in elderly people in the community? The Bambui Health Aging Study (BHAS). International psychogeriatrics / IPA 2006;18(3):493–503. pmid:16478572
- 21. Beleigoli AM, Boersma E, Diniz Mde F, Lima-Costa MF, Ribeiro AL. Overweight and class I obesity are associated with lower 10-year risk of mortality in Brazilian older adults: the Bambui Cohort Study of Ageing. PloS one 2012;7(12):e52111. pmid:23251690
- 22. Beleigoli AM, Boersma E, Diniz Mde F, Vidigal PG, Lima-Cost MF, Ribeiro AL. C-reactive protein and B-type natriuretic peptide yield either a non-significant or a modest incremental value to traditional risk factors in predicting long-term overall mortality in older adults. PloS one 2013;8(9):e75809. pmid:24244755
- 23. Lima-Costa MF, Matos DL, Ribeiro AL. Chagas disease predicts 10-year stroke mortality in community-dwelling elderly: the Bambui cohort study of aging. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation 2010;41(11):2477–82. pmid:20864663
- 24. Lima-Costa MF, Cesar CC, Peixoto SV, Ribeiro AL. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide as a predictor of mortality in community-dwelling older adults with Chagas disease: 10-year follow-up of the Bambui Cohort Study of Aging.American journal of epidemiology 2010;172(2):190–6. pmid:20581155
- 25. Silva CL, Lima-Costa MF, Firmo JO, Peixoto SV. Anemia e nível de hemoglobina como fatores prognósticos da mortalidade entre idosos residentes na comunidade: evidências da Coorte de Idosos de Bambuí, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Cadernos de saude publica 2013;29(11):2241–50.
- 26. Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome research 2009;19(9):1655–64. pmid:19648217
- 27. Thornton T, Tang H, Hoffmann TJ Ochs-Balcom HM, Caan BJ, Risch N. Estimating kinship in admixed populations. American journal of human genetics 2012;91(1):122–38. pmid:22748210
- 28. Ismail K. Unraveling factor analysis. Evidence-based mental health 2008;11(4):99–102. pmid:18952952
- 29.
Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH (2011) Applied Longitudinal Analysis (2nd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
- 30.
Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang K-Y, Zeger S. Analysis of Longitudinal Data (2nd edition). New York: Oxford University Press Inc,; 2002.
- 31. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B 1972;34:187–220.
- 32. Royston P. Explained variation for survival models. The Stata Journal 2006; 6(1):83–96.
- 33.
Prefeitura Municipal de Bambui. Historia da cidade. Bambui, MG, Brazil: Webpage Prefeitura Municipal de Bambui. Available: http://www.bambui.mg.gov.br/portal/htdocs/modules/mastop_publish/?tac=Hist%C3%B3ria_da_cidade. Accessed 12 January 2015.
- 34. Ruiz-Linhares A, Kaustubh A, Acuña-Alonso V, Quinto-Sanchez M, Jaramillo C, Arias W, et al. Admixture in Latin America: geographic structure, phenotypic diversity and self-perception of ancestry based on 7,342 individuals. PLoS Genet 10: e1004572 (2014). pmid:25254375
- 35. Chor D, Faerstein E, Kaplan GA, Lynch JW, Lopes CS. Association of weight change with ethnicity and life course socioeconomic position among Brazilian civil servants. International journal of epidemiology 2004;33(1):100–6. pmid:15075153
- 36.
Fernandes F. O Negro no Mundo dos Brancos. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Difusão Europeia no Livro; 1972.
- 37. Telles EE, Flores RD. Not Just Color: Whiteness, Nation, and Status in Latin America. Hispanic American Historical Review 2013;93(3):411–49.
- 38. Montenegro RA, Stephens C. Indigenous health in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Lancet 2006;367(9525):1859–69.
- 39. Lee SJ, Moody-Ayres SY, Landefeld CS, Walter LC, Lindquist K, Segal MR, et al. The relationship between self-rated health and mortality in older black and white Americans. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2007;55(10):1624–9. pmid:17697102
- 40. Benyamini Y, Blumstein T, Lusky A, Modan B. Gender differences in the self-rated-health mortality association: is it poor self-rated health that predicts mortality or excellent self-rated health that predicts survival? Gerontologist 2003;43(3):396–405. pmid:12810904
- 41. Franks P, Gold MR, Fiscella K. Sociodemographic, self-rated health, and mortality in the US. Social Science and Medicine 2003;56(12): 2505–14. pmid:12742613