SLC26A Gene Family Participate in pH Regulation during Enamel Maturation

Kaifeng Yin; Yuejuan Lei; Xin Wen; Rodrigo S. Lacruz; Manoocher Soleimani; Ira Kurtz; Malcolm L. Snead; Shane N. White; Michael L. Paine

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144703

Abstract

The bicarbonate transport activities of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are essential to physiological processes in multiple organs. Although mutations of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 have not been linked to any human diseases, disruption of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 or Slc26a7 expression in animals causes severe dysregulation of acid-base balance and disorder of anion homeostasis. Amelogenesis, especially the enamel formation during maturation stage, requires complex pH regulation mechanisms based on ion transport. The disruption of stage-specific ion transporters frequently results in enamel pathosis in animals. Here we present evidence that Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are highly expressed in rodent incisor ameloblasts during maturation-stage tooth development. In maturation-stage ameloblasts, Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 show a similar cellular distribution as the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (Cftr) to the apical region of cytoplasmic membrane, and the distribution of Slc26a7 is also seen in the cytoplasmic/subapical region, presumably on the lysosomal membrane. We have also examined Slc26a1 and Slc26a7 null mice, and although no overt abnormal enamel phenotypes were observed in Slc26a1^-/- or Slc26a7^-/- animals, absence of Slc26a1 or Slc26a7 results in up-regulation of Cftr, Ca2, Slc4a4, Slc4a9 and Slc26a9, all of which are involved in pH homeostasis, indicating that this might be a compensatory mechanism used by ameloblasts cells in the absence of Slc26 genes. Together, our data show that Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are novel participants in the extracellular transport of bicarbonate during enamel maturation, and that their functional roles may be achieved by forming interaction units with Cftr.

Citation: Yin K, Lei Y, Wen X, Lacruz RS, Soleimani M, Kurtz I, et al. (2015) SLC26A Gene Family Participate in pH Regulation during Enamel Maturation. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0144703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703

Editor: Takuya Matsumoto, Department of Biomaterials, JAPAN

Received: August 12, 2015; Accepted: November 23, 2015; Published: December 15, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Yin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: Funding provided to MLP, DE019629, http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/, MLP designed the experiments and prepared the manuscript, MLS, DE013045, http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/, MLS prepared the manuscript and IK, DK077162, http://www.niddk.nih.gov/Pages/default.aspx, IK prepared the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Enamel development involves two major functional stages, secretory and maturation [1]. In the secretory stage, ameloblasts synthesize and secrete a number of structural Enamel Matrix Proteins (EMPs) [2–4]. The enamel matrix during the secretory stage is maintained at near-neutral pH conditions in a protein-rich environment. During the maturation stage, the extracellular pH varies considerably, ranging from neutral to acidic conditions, with a return to a more physiologic pH level at the end of maturation stage [4,5]. Changes in extracellular pH values require sophisticated regulatory mechanisms by ameloblasts, so as to maintain the acid-base balance in the microenvironment surrounding the apical pole to sustain crystal nucleation and growth [6]. In addition, extracellular EMPs at the maturation-stage are internalized by ameloblasts and degraded through endosome-lysosome pathways [7,8]. Regulation of intracellular pH is also required during endocytosis to create an acidic luminal environment for hydrolytic enzyme activation [9]. Although there is still uncertainty about the exact temporal and spatial working model of pH regulation during amelogenesis [2,3,6,10,11], the involvement of carbonic anhydrases (CAs), cystic fibrosis conductance transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), Chloride Channels (CLCNs), Solute Carrier family 4 (SLC4s) and Solute Carrier family 9 (SLC9s) in ameloblast-mediated pH homeostasis has been widely accepted [2,7,12–32].

The SLC26 gene family encodes multifunctional anion exchangers and anion channels with a broad range of substrates [33]. In mammals, this family consists of 11 genes, SLC26A1-SLC26A11. Based on our previous genome-wide miRNA and mRNA expression profiling of the enamel organ cells in rats [34], Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are the only members among the Slc26a gene family whose transcripts are significantly up-regulated during maturation-stage enamel formation when compared to secretory-stage [34]. Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7, which code for the proteins Sat1, Pat1 and Sut2 respectively, all exhibit chloride/bicarbonate exchanger activities [35–38]. Mutations in Slc26al, Slc26a6 or Slc26a7 lead to multiple disorders, such as urolithiasis, hepatotoxicity, distal renal tubular acidosis and impaired gastric secretion, induced by the disruption of ion homeostasis [39–42]. Enamel maturation involves pH regulation mediated by multiple ion transport/exchange activities across plasma and endosome membranes [2,3,7,8,12–32,43–47]. Thus there is a need to better understand the functional activities of the SLC26A gene family members in amelogenesis.

In the present study, we conducted quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot analyses, and showed that Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are all significantly up-regulated at maturation stage compared with secretory stage at both the mRNA and protein levels. Based on immuolocalization data, we show that in maturation-stage ameloblasts, the gene products of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 localize to the apical region of the cytoplasmic membrane, similar to the localization pattern of Cftr in maturation-stage ameloblasts. In addition, Slc26a7 is also seen within the cytoplasmic/subapical region of ameloblasts, presumably on the lysosomal membrane. From the protein complex pulled down using an antibody to Cftr, we detected Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 via immunoblotting, suggesting the direct interaction of each of these three Slc26 proteins with Cftr. Compared with wild-type (WT) animals, Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- animals did not show any clearly noticeable abnormalities in the mature enamel phenotype (density and structure). However, many gene transcripts examined by real-time PCR–such as Car2 (carbonic anhydrase 2), Cftr, Slc4a4/NBCe1, Slc4a9/Ae4, Slc26a9 and Alpl (alkaline phosphatase)–showed significant up-regulation in the enamel organ cells of Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- animals when compared to age- and sex-matched wild-type controls. Collectively, these data indicate that Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are actively involved in ion transport related to pH regulation processes during enamel maturation and their functional roles may be achieved, at-least in part, by forming protein supramolecular assemblies by their interactions with Cftr.

As mentioned above, for the ion channels discussed here the names assigned to the genes are different from the names assigned to their products. For example Slc4a4, Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 code for proteins AE2, Sat1, Pat1 and Sut2 respectively. To avoid confusion, in this paper we will refer to both the genes and their respective gene products (mRNA and protein) by their official gene ID rather than the product name.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All vertebrate animal studies complied with Institutional and Federal guidelines. For real-time PCR, western blot and co-immunoprecipitation analyses, we obtained RNA and protein samples from the enamel organs lining the surface of rat (Wistar Hannover, 4-week, 100–110g) incisors, because the reference line separating the secretory- and the maturation-stage enamel organs has been well documented in rats [3,43] (Fig 1). The subsequent immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence detection of target gene products were also conducted on sections of rat mandibles. Slc26a1^+/- mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (stock # 012892) [39]. Slc26a1^-/- mice were generated by breeding heterozygous (Slc26a1^+/-) parents. Slc26a7^+/- mice were a kind gift from Dr. Manoocher Soleimani [42], and bred in an identical manner to the Slc26a1 mutants. Although Slc26a7 null animals have been documented to show distal renal tubular acidosis and impaired gastric acid secretion, they were still reported to exhibited normal growth and survival compared to their WT littermates [42]. Both Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- mice are viable, fertile and normal in physical size compared with their WT and heterozygous littermates. Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- animals were genotyped by PCR using primers designed in earlier studies [39,42].

Download:

Fig 1. Reference lines for animal dissection.

A. In 4-week-old rats, the secretory- (S) and maturation-stage (M) enamel organs along the enamel surface of mandibular incisor are separated by the reference line between the first and the second molar [3,43]. B. Two reference lines were used to partition secretory-stage (S) from maturation-stage (M) enamel organ. The first reference line, vertical to the inferior border of mandibular cortical bone, divided the mesial-distal width of the first molar into halves. The second reference line, also vertical to the inferior to the bony border of the mandible, was located between the second and the third molar.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g001

Rat tissue dissection, RNA extraction & real-time PCR analysis

For semi-quantifying the expression of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 mRNA, secretory-stage and maturation-stage RNA samples were obtained from the enamel organs of rat incisors. Four 4-week old Wistar Hannover rats, each weighing 100–110g, were sacrificed for their mandibles. The rat mandibles were kept in liquid nitrogen overnight and then lyophilized for over 24 hours. After removing the cortical bone enclosing the incisors, the exposed multi-cellular layers along the enamel surface were collected into RNase-free Eppendorf tubes. Details regarding the dissection procedures were described previously [43,44]. The total RNA was extracted separately from secretory-stage and maturation-stage enamel organs using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The RNA sample from each of the four rats was also processed separately. cDNA used for real-time PCR analysis was synthesized using the miScript II RT Kit with miScript HiFlex Buffer (Qiagen). In order to check the accuracy of dissection, the expression of two stage-specific genes, Odam (highly expressed during maturation stage) and Enam (highly expressed during secretory stage), were each subjected to real-time PCR analysis [24,43] before proceeding to examining Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7, and other related gene transcript profiles. Real-time PCR reactions were performed on the CFX96 Touch^TM Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-rad Life Sciences, Hercules, CA) with iQ SYBR® Green supermix (Bio-rad Life Science) and rat-specific primers (S1 Table). The raw data acquired were in the form of Ct values, which were normalized to the Ct values of Actb (β-actin). The ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the fold changes in the expression of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 (maturation stage relative to secretory stage) [48,49]. Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to examine potential differences in the expression levels of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 transcripts between secretory- and maturation-stage (α = 0.05). Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

Mouse tissue dissection, cDNA analysis and real-time PCR

The mandibles were isolated from 4-week Slc26a1^+/+ and Slc26a1^-/-, and Slc26a7^+/+ and Slc26a7^-/- mice. The mandibles were then processed separately using the same procedures as those used for rat mandibles [43,44]. For RNA extraction from mouse mandibles, we used different reference lines from those used for the extraction from rat mandibles (Fig 1). On the lingual side of the mouse hemi-mandible, the first reference line, vertical to the inferior border of mandibular cortical bone, cut approximately half of the mesial-distal width of the first molar. The second reference line, also vertical to the inferior to the bony border of the mandible, was located between the second and the third molar (Fig 1). We collected the multi-cellular layers on the surface of incisor enamel mesially of the first reference line as maturation-stage-derived enamel organ and the tissues distally of the second reference line as secretory-stage-derived enamel organ (Fig 1). The dissected RNA samples from secretory and maturation stages were validated by detecting the stage-specific expression of Odam and Enam (relative to Actb) using real-time PCR. cDNA used for real-time PCR analysis was prepared using the miScript II RT Kit with miScript HiFlex Buffer (Qiagen). Real-time PCR reactions were performed on the CFX96 Touch^TM Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-rad Life Sciences) with iQ SYBR® Green supermix (Bio-rad Life Science) and mouse-specific primers (S1 Table). In order to verify that there were no intact transcripts of Slc26a1 or Slc26a7 in the maturation-stage enamel organs of mutant animals, PCR reactions were conducted using the maturation-stage cDNA template and self-designed primers. The sequences of the primers were: Slc26a1 Forward 5`-cctggatattgcaaagccttcag-3`, Slc26a1 Reverse 5`-gaatcctgggaagggtcaaagc-3`(product 524 bp); Slc26a7 Forward: 5`-cgggagcaaagaggaaaaag-3`, Slc26a7 Reverse: 5`-gtaagcaggaatgtggcactg-3`(product 520 bp). The PCR reactions were set as follows: for Slc26a1, 94°C initial denaturation (10 min), 35 cycles at 95°C (1 min), 59°C (1 min), 72°C (1 min), 72°C (8 min, final extension), followed by a return to 4°C; for Slc26a7, 94°C initial denaturation (10 min), 35 cycles at 95°C (1 min), 58°C (1 min), 72°C (1 min), 72°C (8 min, final extension), followed by a return to 4°C. No PCR products with expected sizes were generated in mutant animals. In addition, real-time PCR reactions were performed to detect the expression changes of the genes that are or might be involved in maturation-stage regulation (S1 and S2 Tables) [7,8,12–32,43–53], using mouse-specific primers (S1 Table) and cDNA samples from Slc26a1^+/+, Slc26a1^-/-, Slc26a7^+/+ and Slc26a7^-/- animals separately. The procedures of data analysis for real-time PCR were as described above for rat tissue analysis. The relative expression levels of each gene were evaluated between the Slc26a1^+/+ and Slc26a1^-/- animals and between the Slc26a7^+/+ and Slc26a7^-/- animals using two-tailed Student’s t tests in IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 (α = 0.05).

Immunoperoxidase immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Wistar Hannover rats (100–110g body weight, 4 weeks old) were sacrificed for their mandibles. The hemi-mandibles were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 4°C overnight. 10% EDTA (pH 7.4) was used to decalcify the samples for 10–12 weeks. 8μm sagittal sections were prepared from paraffin-embedded samples. After the tissue sections were dewaxed and rehydrated, endogenous peroxidase was blocked by 0.3% H₂O₂ in methanol. Sections were blocked by 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS (1X, pH 7.4) and incubated overnight with the primary antibodies against Slc26a1, Slc26a6 or Slc26a7 (antibody sources are listed in Table 1). Tissue sections were counter-stained using Mayer`s hematoxylin after an 3-Amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC)/ 3, 3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining kit was applied (Table 1). Negative controls were sagittal sections subjected to all staining procedures but with no antibodies added.

Download:

Table 1. Antibodies used for western blot, immunoperoxidase immunostaining, immunofluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.t001

Co-localization analysis by Immunofluorescence (IF)

With the purpose of clarifying the localization of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 within the milieu of maturation-stage ameloblasts, we conducted immunofluorescence (IF) to co-localize Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 with other gene products–Ae2, Lamp1, and Cftr–whose localization in ameloblasts have been previously reported [7,8,13–15,18,24,26,46,53]. The protocols of preparing tissue sections for IF were the same as those used for immunoperoxidase IHC. BSA-blocked tissue sections were incubated overnight with different combinations of primary antibodies: Slc26a1 x Ae2; Slc26a1 x Lamp1; Slc26a6 x Ae2; Slc26a6 x Lamp1; Slc26a7 x Ae2; Slc26a7 x Lamp1; and Slc26a7 x Cftr (Table 1). The co-localization analysis was not conducted for the combinations of Slc26a1 x Cftr, or Slc26a6 x Cftr, as the antibodies to Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Cftr were all goat-derived and therefore not suitable (Table 1), and no commercially available non-goat-derived Cftr antibodies suitable for rodent tissues could be identified. All tissue sections used for co-localization analyses were stained with DAPI (Vector Laboratories; Catalog # H-1200) before the cover slips were added.

Western blot analysis

Protein samples were obtained from three Wistar Hannover rats (100–110g body weight, 4 weeks old, n = 3). After the animals were euthanized and decapitated, the mandibles were dissected and isolated immediately. We used the reference line between the first and the second molar to discriminate secretory-stage from maturation-stage enamel organ [3,43] (Fig 1). The bony structures enclosing the incisor were removed and the enamel organs along the enamel surface were collected to analyze secretory stage and maturation stage separately. The samples were added to pre-cooled Eppendorf tubes containing RIPA Lysis and Extraction buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA; Catalog # 89901) mixed with Halt Protease Inhibitors Cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Catalog # 78429). The samples were homogenized with a pestle (on ice), kept on ice for 30min and centrifuged at 16,000rpm for 15min while being maintained at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and quantified using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Catalog # 23225). Protein extracts were also obtained from rat kidneys to serve as controls. The samples were mixed with LDS Sample Loading Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Catalog # 84788), heated for 10 min at 95°C, and loaded on mini-gels (15μg per well) (Thermo Fisher Scientific; NuPAGE® Novex® 10% Bis-Tris Protein Gels, Catalog # NP0315BOX). Electrophoresis was carried out at 120V for 2–2.5 h, and gels were electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membrane at a constant current of 0.1A for 2h. The blots were then blocked by 5% non-fat milk powder in Tris Buffered Saline (TBS) for 1 h at room temperature, and incubated overnight with primary antibodies to Slc26a1, Slc26a6, Slc26a7 and β-actin (internal control), separately (Table 1). After appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were applied for 2 h at room temperature, the blots were washed and developed with substrate kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific; SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate, Catalog # 34077; SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate, Catalog # 34095). The immunoblotting experiment was conducted using the protein samples from each animal separately. Quantification of the relative intensity of the bands was conducted using NIH ImageJ software version 1.48. Mann-Whitney U test was used to detect the potential difference in protein-level gene expression between secretory- and maturation stage enamel formation (IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0, α = 0.05).

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)

Maturation-stage enamel organ protein samples were obtained using the procedures described above, and were then lysed in 1xTBS with 1% Triton-100. After being pre-cleared by 20ul A/G agarose beads at 4°C for 1 h, the protein samples (50–100μg) were incubated with 1μg of primary antibody to Cftr (Table 1) at 4°C for 1 h, while being gently agitated. The samples were then mixed with 20μl A/G agarose beads and kept at 4°C overnight. The beads were washed extensively with Tris buffer (50mM Tris, 0.1% NP-40, pH 7.4), and the bound proteins were subject to Western blot analyses with the primary antibodies against Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 (separately), and the appropriate secondary antibody (Table 1). Protocols for Western blot analysis have been described previously. Positive and negative controls were set up simultaneously with the experimental groups. The positive control was the pre-cleared total protein without subsequent immunoprecipitation procedures, while the negative control was prepared by skipping the step of applying the primary antibody against Cftr.

Micro-CT analysis

Mandibles were isolated from 8-week-old Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- mice and their respective age-matched WT littermates. Four animals from each group were analyzed (n = 4 per group). The hemi-mandibles were air-dried for at least 7 days before micro-CT (μCT) analyses were conducted. The samples were scanned with a Siemens MicroCAT II at the Molecular Imaging Center of the University of Southern California. The acquisition settings were documented as previously described [30]. The reconstruction and the subsequent calculation of the relative density of fully mature enamel and dentin were performed with Amira 3D Visualization and Analysis Software 5.4.3 (FEI Visualization Science Group, Burlington, MA, USA). Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to evaluate the potential statistical differences in the relative density and the thickness of enamel between Slc26a1^-/- and their WT littermate controls, and Slc26a7^-/- and their WT littermate controls, using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 (α = 0.05).

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and hardness test

The hemi-mandibles used for SEM and microindentation analyses were extracted from 8-week-old Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- mice and their respective age-matched WT littermates (n = 6 per group). The samples were prepared and scanned as previously documented [23,30]. EDS was conducted on JEOL JSM-7001F to analyze the elemental composition of Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- enamel, with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. The differences in atomic percent (At%) of elements Ca, P, O, C, Cl, Na and Mg between mutant (Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/-) and wild-type enamel were detected using two-tailed Student’s t tests in IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 (n = 6 per group, α = 0.05).

Results

Up-regulation of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 during enamel maturation

Based on our previous genome-wide miRNA and mRNA transcriptome analyses using RNA samples extracted from the secretory- and maturation-stage enamel organs of 4-week-old rat mandibular incisors, we showed that among all the Slc26 gene family members, Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are the only three that are differentially expressed between the two developmental stages (Table 2). In this current study we conducted real-time PCR analysis using the same RNA samples used previously for genome-wide mRNA transcriptome analysis [34]. We verified that Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 were all significantly up-regulated at the mRNA level during maturation-stage tooth development (relative to secretory stage) (P<0.05; Fig 2), which is consistent with the results obtained from prior microarray analysis [34] (Table 2). The average fold changes for Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 were ~ 15.4, ~ 3.9 and ~ 8.1, respectively (Fig 2). In order to assess Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 protein expression levels, we performed Western blot analysis using protein samples obtained from secretory- and maturation-stage enamel organs of rat mandibular incisors, as well as from rat kidney (as a reference control tissue). At the protein level, Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 all exhibited higher expression during maturation stage when compared to secretory stage (Fig 3, P<0.05). The average fold changes in the protein expression levels of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 were ~1.6, ~6.1, ~4.2, respectively (Fig 3), which were not as great as those calculated at mRNA levels with the exception of Slc26a6 (Fig 2), but there was a consistent directional change (mRNA and protein) for all three genes. In addition, Slc26a1 and Slc26a6 showed higher protein abundance in maturation-stage enamel organ than in kidney, while the trend was the opposite for Slc26a7 (Fig 3).

Download:

Fig 2. Real-time PCR analysis of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 expression during amelogenesis.

The expression levels of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 were normalized to those of Beta-Actin and are presented in fold changes. The expression levels of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 were up-regulated by ~10.0, ~4.1 and ~15.3 fold, respectively, at maturation stage relative to secretory stage.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g002

Download:

Fig 3. Western blot analysis of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7.

A1-C1. Protein-level expression of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 was detected by western blot analysis using samples obtained from both secretory- and maturation-stage enamel organs (4-week-old rat incisors). Protein samples extracted from kidney (4-week-old rat) were used as reference controls. The molecular weights for Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are 75kDa, 90kDa and 72kDa, respectively. Beta-Actin served as the control for sample loading. A2-C2. The intensities of the bands (relative to Beta-Actin) were measured using ImageJ. The average fold changes of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 at the protein level were ~1.6, ~6.1, ~4.2, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g003

Download:

Table 2. Average fold changes of Slc26 gene family members during maturation stage relative to secretory stage based on genome-wide mRNA transcriptome analysis.

(N/A, expression not detected; α = 0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.t002

Localization of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 in the enamel organ

Using sagittal sections prepared from 4-week-old rat mandibles, immunoperoxidase immunostaining was performed to clarify the expression patterns of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 in both secretory- and maturation-stage enamel organs. At secretory stage, Slc26a1 was mainly localized to the basal membrane of ameloblasts (Fig 4A). The localization of Slc26a6 within the secretory-stage enamel organ seemed to be more diverse than Slc26a1; it is expressed at both the basal membrane and apical membrane of ameloblasts (Fig 4D). The expression of Slc26a7 was barely detected by IHC in secretory-stage enamel organs (Fig G). In maturation-stage enamel organ cells Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 were all expressed in both the ameloblasts and the papillary layer (Fig 4B, 4C, 4E, 4F, 4H and 4I), but the relative expression patterns varied. For Slc26a1, higher expression was observed in papillary layer than in ameloblasts (Fig 4B and 4C). In maturation-stage ameloblasts, Slc26a1 was localized to the apical and/or subapical domains of the cytoplasmic membrane (Fig 4B and 4C). The relative distribution of Slc26a6 in maturation-stage enamel organ cells differed from Slc26a1, with higher expression of Slc26a6 observed in the ameloblasts rather than in the papillary layer (Fig 4E and 4F). The localization of Slc26a6 in ameloblasts also varied between smooth-ended ameloblasts (SA) and ruffle-ended ameloblasts (RA), with a greater apical concentration of Slc26a6 seen in SA (Fig 4E compared to 4F). Slc26a7 is expressed both in the ameloblasts and papillary layer (Fig 4H and 4I) with a greater apical concentration seen in SA when compared to RA (Fig 4H compared to 4I).

Download:

Fig 4. Immunoperoxidase immunostaining of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 in secretory- and maturation-stage enamel organ.

Immunostaining procedures were applied to the sagittal sections prepared from paraffin-embedded 4-week-old rat mandibles. A. Slc26a1 in secretory-stage ameloblasts (S); B. Slc26a1 in smooth-ended ameloblasts at maturation stage (M-SA); C. Slc26a1 in ruffle-ended ameloblasts at maturation stage (M-RA); D. Slc26a6 in secretory-stage ameloblasts (S); E. Slc26a6 in smooth-ended ameloblasts at maturation stage (M-SA); F. Slc26a6 in ruffle-ended ameloblasts at maturation stage (M-RA); G. Slc26a7 in secretory-stage ameloblasts (S); H. Slc26a7 in smooth-ended ameloblasts at maturation stage (M-SA); I. Slc26a7 in ruffle-ended ameloblasts at maturation stage (M-RA); J-L. The sections that were incubated without antibodies served as negative controls for immunostaining. All images were collected under 20x magnification. Scale bar shown in Panel J (50μm). Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 all showed expression on the apical membrane and/or within subapical cytoplasmic region (double black arrows). Positive staining in other regions was indicated by double black asterisks. SI—Stratum intermedium; Am—Ameloblast; ES—Enamel space; CT—Connective tissue; PL—Papillary layer.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g004

With the purpose of acquiring deeper insight into the localization of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 in maturation-stage ameloblasts, we conducted dual immunofluorescence (IF) to establish the spatial localization of each of these three genes with respect to Slc4a2/Ae2, Lamp1 and Cftr. The expression patterns of Ae2, Lamp1 and Cftr during enamel maturation have been previously studied [2,8,13,14,18,26]. Based on the IF analysis, we showed that Slc26a1 and Slc26a6 exhibit similar distribution patterns during maturation stage, when they are both localized to the apical/subapical region of ameloblasts (Fig 5A–5D). Slc26a7 expression is localized to the apical/subapical membrane and the membrane of cytoplasmic vesicles of maturation-stage ameloblasts (Fig 5E, 5F and 5G). These data for Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are consistent with the observations seen in IHC (Fig 4). In ameloblasts the spatial localization of Ae2 is at the lateral membrane (Fig 5A, 5C and 5G), and Lamp1 is localized to the peri-nuclear region within the cytoplasm (Fig 5B, 5D and 5F). Cftr is localized to the apical membrane of maturation-stage ameloblasts (Fig 5G) [13]. Taken together, our data show that Cftr, Slc26a1 and Slc26a6 show significant colocalization patterns in maturation-stage ameloblasts.

Download:

Fig 5. Co-localization analysis of Slc26a1, Slc26a6, Slc26a7 with Ae2, Lamp1 and Cftr.

(A-B) Co-localization of Slc26a1 with Ae2 and Lamp1 in maturation-stage ameloblasts by confocal microscopy at 63x magnification. The signals of Slc26a1 were mainly seen on the apical membrane of maturation-stage ameloblasts (Panels A and B; Green). In contrast, Ae2 was localized to the basolateral membrane (Panel A; Red) and the basal pole (Panel C; Red), while Lamp1 showed a cytoplasmic and/or peri-nuclear distribution pattern in ameloblasts (Panel B; Red). The sections were stained with DAPI to highlight the nuclei (Panels A and B; Blue). (C-D) Co-localization of Slc26a6 with Ae2 and Lamp1 in maturation-stage ameloblasts. Slc26a6 exhibited a similar expression pattern to that of Slc26a1—on the apical membrane of maturation-stage ameloblasts (Panels C and D; Green). The fluorescence signals of Ae2 (Panel C; Red) and Lamp1 (Panel D; Red) were used as references. The sections were stained with DAPI to highlight the nuclei (Panels C and D; Blue). (E-G) Co-localization of Slc26a7 with Ae2, Lamp1 and Cftr in maturation-stage ameloblasts. The expression of Slc26a7 was found both on the apical membrane and within the cytoplasmic region (Panels E-G; Green). The fluorescence signals of Slc26a7 partially overlapped with those of Lamp1 (Panel F; Red) and Cftr (Panel G; Red), rather than Ae2 (Panel E; Red). The sections were stained with DAPI to highlight the nuclei (Panels E-G; Blue). The images were collected under confocal microscopy (63x magnification). Scale bar shown in Panel G (10μm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g005

Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 interact with Cftr

As we have shown, Slc26a1, Slc26a6, Slc26a7 and Cftr are all localized to the apical membrane of maturation-stage ameloblasts (Figs 4 and 5). To investigate the hypothesis that the similarity in the expression patterns of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 to that of Cftr on the apical membrane of ameloblasts during enamel maturation may involve a direct physical interaction, we conducted co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays using protein samples obtained from maturation-stage enamel organs. We confirmed that from the protein complex pulled down by anti-Cftr antibody, Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are all able to be detected by the corresponding antibodies separately (Fig 6), indicating that there exist protein-protein interactions between Cftr and each of the three SLC26 genes studied. Positive and negative controls were included in the co-IP assays (Fig 6).

Download:

Fig 6. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay of Cftr with Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7.

Co-IP was conducted using protein samples extracted from the maturation-stage enamel organs of 4-week-old rat incisors (50~100 μg initial input). The interaction complexes were pulled down by anti-Cftr antibody (Table 3). The subsequent western blot analyses were performed using primary antibodies to Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 (Table 3). The positive control was the pre-cleared total protein without the following immunoprecipitation procedures, and the negative control was prepared by skipping the step of applying the antibody against Cftr.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g006

Enamel phenotypes of Slc26a1 null and Slc26a7 null animals

All teeth prepared for micro-CT and SEM scanning were dissected from 8-week-old animals (Slc26a1-/-, Slc26a7-/- and their wild-type littermates). Generally, there were no remarkable differences between the mutant (Slc26a1-/- or Slc26a7-/-) and the wild-type teeth in terms of gross anatomy, microstructure or hardness of enamel (Figs 7 and 8, Table 3). We used Amira 3D Visualization and Analysis Software 5.4.3 to delineate enamel in scanned teeth and calculate its relative density. Moreover, we measured the thickness of enamel of incisors from 3D-reconstructed teeth at the point where the enclosing cortical bone of incisors terminates. These parameters obtained from Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- animals were compared separately with those from wild-types. However, no statistically significant differences were detected (P>0.05) (Fig 7). Nevertheless, the elemental composition of mutant enamel showed significant changes when compared with wild-type enamel. The Atomic percentages (At%) of Cl increased by ~34% in both Slc26a1^-/- (P = 0.012) and Slc26a7^-/- (P = 0.035) enamel (Fig 9A–9C and 9E). There was a decrease of ~24% in the At% of C in Slc26a1^-/- enamel (P = 0.028), and the difference in the At% of C between Slc26a7-/- and wild-type enamel was marginally significant (P = 0.078) (Fig 9E). In addition, the At% of Na in Slc26a7^-/- enamel also decreased significantly (P = 0.028) (Fig 9E).

Download:

Fig 7. Micro-CT analysis of Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- mandibles.

The mandibles from wild-type, Slc26a1 null and Slc26a7 null animals (at 8 weeks of age) were subject to micro-CT analysis (n = 3). The relative density and thickness of enamel on the labial incisor where the cortical bone enclosing just begins (A1-C2) were measured. There was no statistical difference between mutant and wild-type animals with respect to these two parameters (D-E). (Enamel Em, Dentin De)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g007

Download:

Fig 8. SEM images of mature enamel in Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- animals.

The surface of the enamel of incisor and molars in Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- animals were similar to those of wild-type animals (A1-B3, magnification 35x). When the internal structures of enamel (incisor) were observed in coronal section (C1-C3, magnification 5000x), the enamel from mutant animals showed a mild disruption in rod density and diameter (C2-C3) compared with wild-type enamel (C1). The arrangement of the enamel rod and inter-rod structures (incisor) did not seem to be impacted significantly by the deletion of Slc26a1 or Slc26a7 (C1-C3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g008

Download:

Fig 9. EDS analysis of mature enamel Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- animals.

(A-C) EDS spectrum of mature enamel in wild-type, Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- animals (n = 6 per group). (D) No statistically significant differences were detected in the At% of Ca, P and O between mutant and wild-type enamel. (E) The At% of Cl increased significantly by ~34% in both Slc26a1^-/- (P = 0.012) and Slc26a7^-/- (P = 0.035) enamel. There was a significant decrease in the At% of C in Slc26a1^-/- enamel (P = 0.028). A similar difference in the At% of C was detected between Slc26a7^-/- and wild-type enamel, but was only marginally significant (P = 0.078). The At% of Na in Slc26a7^-/- enamel also significantly decreased (P = 0.028).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g009

Download:

Table 3. Enamel and dentin Vickers microhardness of mutant animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.t003

The means and standard deviations (SD) of enamel and dentin microhardness are listed in units of GPa for mutant animals and their wild-type littermates. The sample size for each experimental group was 6, with 10 repetitions used to describe each tooth, and the individual tooth means were averaged. Differences in hardness between wild type and null animals were small, if present. It appears that biomechanical function, as measured by hardness, was unaffected by the knockout of a single transporter. Likewise, light microscopy revealed no macro- or micro-level differences in form, structure or organization between wild-type and null animals.

Compensatory gene expression in Slc26a1 null and Slc26a7 null animals

Since we observed no overt abnormalities in mature enamel from either Slc26a1^-/- or Slc26a7^-/- animals, we sought to investigate the changes in the expression profiles of genes that have a similar biological function to the anion exchangers Slc26a1 and Slc26a7 during maturation-stage enamel formation in mutant animals (complete list of interrogated genes provided in S2 Table). Total RNA samples used for real-time PCR analysis were extracted from the maturation-stage enamel organs of 4-week-old mutants (Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/-) and their age-matched WT littermates. Among the 41 genes examined, 22 genes showed differential expression (18 up-regulated and 4 down-regulated) in Slc26a1^-/- and/or Slc26a7^-/- animals compared with WT (P<0.05; S2 Table, Figs 10 and 11). Many of the up-regulated genes have been well characterized as being involved in either pH regulation (i.e., Cftr, Car2, Ae2 and NBCe1) or endocytosis (i.e., the lysosomal-associated membrane proteins Lamp1, Lamp2, Cd63 and Cd68, and others such as Clcn7, Rab21 and Ctss) during enamel maturation (Table 3, Fig 10) [7,8,12–32,43–53]. It is noteworthy that Cftr, Slc4a9/Ae4, Slc26a5 and Slc26a9 exhibited the largest scales of fold changes (>5) among the up-regulated genes in both mutant animal groups (S2 Table, Fig 10). These data provide strong evidence that enamel organ cells initiate a compensatory up-regulation of anion exchanger gene expression following the deletion of either Slc26a1 or Slc26a7. Finally, the expression of some of the SLC4 and Slc26 gene family members was not detected in the enamel organs of mutant mice strain, namely Slc4a5/NBCe2, Slc26a3, Slc26a8 and Slc26a10 (S2 Table).

Download:

Fig 10. Up-regulated genes in Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- animals compared with wild types.

Most genes that showed significant changes in expression were up-regulated (Panels A-S), indicating a compensatory effect induced by the deletion of Slc26a1 or Slc26a7. The expression values of differentially expressed genes were normalized to those of Beta-Actin. For all the two-tailed t tests used, the significance level was 0.05. * <0.05; ** <0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g010

Download:

Fig 11. Downregulated genes in Slc26a1^-/- and Slc26a7^-/- animals compared with wild types.

The expression values of differentially expressed genes were normalized to those of Beta-Actin. For all the two-tailed t tests used, the significance level was 0.05. * <0.05; ** <0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g011

Discussion

During maturation-stage of enamel development, ameloblasts function to remove organic protein debris from extracellular enamel matrix [7,54] and to deposit inorganic ions into the enamel area [3], so that the crystal structures in enamel achieve their final width and thickness, rendering the dental enamel fully mature and functional. In the extracellular matrix, the mineral deposition, crystal growth and protease activities are presumed to be highly pH-dependent [3,55], while in the lysosomal lumen, an acidic pH is necessary for the activation of hydrolytic enzymes and the degradation of internalized macromolecules [7,9,56]. Thus, these two interconnected key processes at maturation stage require the tight control of pH to maintain either luminal and extracellular acid-base balance, which is mediated by the diffusion of ions across various biological membranes [2,18]. Although the detailed mechanisms of maturation-stage pH regulation are yet to be elucidated, previous investigations have suggested the essential role of several genes, such as CFTR, AE2, NBCe1, CA2, CA6, NHE1 and CLCN7, in enamel maturation [2,7,12–15,18,20,21,23,25,26,29–32,43,45,46,57]. In this study, we provided experimental evidence to show that SLC26A1/SAT1, SLC26A6/PAT1 and SLC26A7/SUT2 are novel candidate genes that are involved in the pH regulation processes during maturation-stage tooth development.

The cellular localization patterns of genes that participate in the pH regulation processes during enamel maturation have been shown to be quite diverse, which may be direct reflections of their functional roles. For example, Cftr serves as a chloride channel mainly on the apical plasma membrane of the maturation-stage ameloblasts, and thus is considered a regulator of pH during rapid crystal growth [13] (Figs 6 and 12); NBCe1 and Ae2 localize to the basolateral membrane of ameloblasts at maturation stage, and the bicarbonate transport activity mediated by NBCe1 and Ae2 is thought to be critical to intracellular pH homeostasis [14,20,26] (Fig 12); Clcn7 is identified as being localized to the intracellular organelles, presumably at the late endosome/lysosomal membrane, suggesting that Clcn7 might help to accumulate protons within the lumen of these organelles and forms part of the endocytotic apparatus in maturation-stage ameloblasts [7] (Fig 12). According to our results from immunoperoxidase immunostaining and immunofluorescence, the distributions of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are similar—they all localize to the apical membrane of maturation-stage ameloblasts, and in the case of Slc26a7, to the subapical and cytoplasmic region (Figs 5 and 6). These data indicate that the anion exchanger activities of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 on the apical membrane of maturation-stage ameloblasts may respond to the intracellular and/or extracellular pH changes, and regulate pH values by secreting bicarbonate into enamel matrix to neutralize protons (Fig 12). In addition to the apical membrane, Slc26a7 is also seen in the cytoplasmic region within maturation-stage ameloblasts (Fig 6E–6G). It is highly possible that the intracellular localization of Slc26a7 is to the membranous structures in the early and/or late endo-lysosomal pathway (Fig 12). This is mainly evidenced by the observations that there are partial overlaps in the fluorescence signals of Lamp1 (late endo-lysosome-localized [8,58]) and Slc26a7 in co-localization assays, and that the overlaps reside in the subapical and middle regions instead of the peri-nuclear region of the cytosol (Fig 6F). In other functional cell types, the localization of Slc26a7 also demonstrates diversity as observed in maturation-stage ameloblasts. For example, in the kidney, Slc26a7 co-localizes with AE1 at the basolateral or subapical membrane, and with Tfrc at the endosomal membrane of A-intercalated cells in the renal outer medullary collecting duct (OMCD) [35,59]. The distinct distribution pattern of Slc26a7 in maturation-stage ameloblasts lends support to its potential role in regulating pH within the lysosomal lumen, which might be similar to that of Clcn7, in addition to the pH regulation presumed to be functioning in extracellular enamel matrix.

Download:

Fig 12. Schematic diagram depicting the distribution of major pH regulators in maturation-stage ameloblasts.

Cftr, Slc26a1, Slc26a4, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 are localized to the apical membrane and Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 physically interact with Cftr to form regulation complexes. Slc26a7 is also found on the endo-lysosomal membrane. Ae2, Nhe1 and NBCe1 are localized basolaterally. Clcn7 is expressed on the endo-lysosomal membrane. CA2 exhibits intracellular distribution whereas CA6 functions in extracellular enamel matrix. Lamp1 in this image was used as a marker of late lysosomes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.g012

The phenomenon that several ion transporters/channels with similar physiological functions and cellular localizations interact with one another to form united protein complexes has been reported in multiple areas of biomedical research. In most cases when Cftr interacts with Slc26s, Cftr seems to serve as a hub for these potential interaction complexes [60–66]. One example is that Slc26a3, Slc26a6 and Slc9a3r1 co-localize with Cftr in the midpiece of mouse sperm, and the protein complex formed by Cftr with Slc26a3, Slc26a6 and Slc9a3r1 functions primarily to mediate transmembrane transport of chloride, which is critical for sperm capacitation [61]. In cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs), the physical interaction between Cftr and Slc26a5, which is localized to the lateral membrane of OHCs, has potential electrophysiological significance [64]. Additionally, in human bronchial cell lines, functional CFTR contributes to the functions of SLC26A9 as an anion conductor [60]. Based on our data from Co-IP, we presented evidence that physical interactions exist between Cftr and Slc26 gene family members Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 in maturation-stage ameloblasts, and the functional complexes may be localized to the apical membrane where the expression of these genes is identified (Figs 5 and 6 and 12). At this stage, we did not seek to investigate the potential interactions between Cftr and other important pH regulators, such as Ae2, NBCe1 and Clcn7, mainly because of their distinct locations within the milieu of the ameloblast (Fig 12). However, it is unreasonable to rule out the possibility that physical interactions involving Cftr and other related genes do exist, as these pH regulators may exhibit mobility during ameloblast modulation cycles [21]. Therefore, it could be speculated that Cftr might interact with a broader range of pH regulators, and that the pH regulation process during enamel maturation might be achieved by the coordination of functional protein complexes that are far more sophisticated than expected.

Mutations in the pH regulators that have been identified to be functional during enamel maturation, such as Cftr, Ae2 and NBCe1, often result in severe AI-like enamel/tooth phenotypes [2,12–15,18,20,23,26,31,32]. In our study, deletion of Slc26a1 and Slc26a7 led to an increase of Cl and a decrease of C in the elemental composition of enamel matrix (Fig 9E), which is consistent with our hypothesis about the functional roles of Slc26a1 and Slc26a7 as anion exchangers of Cl^- (intracellular-oriented) and HCO₃^- (extracellular-oriented) (Fig 12). However, no significant abnormalities in mature enamel structures or hardness were observed in Slc26a1 or Slc26a7 mutant animals (Figs 7 and 8, Table 2), although impaired physiological functions were documented in other organs [39,42], suggesting that there might be functional redundancy of Slc26a1 and Slc26a7 during amelogenesis. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted real-time PCR reactions to detect potential changes in gene expression in mutant animals. While a small number of genes were selected for qPCR analysis, the selection was made based on previous studies showing that these genes or other members within the same gene family are involved in ion transport, pH regulation and endocytotic pathways during maturation-stage amelogenesis [2,7,12–18,20–24,26,27,29,31,32,45,47,55]. The results showed that deletion of Slc26a1 or Slc26a7 induced upregulation of multiple genes with similar functional roles in maturation-stage pH regulation and endocytotic pathway (Fig 10, S2 Table). The up-regulated genes can be roughly subdivided into three categories: 1) those that have been relatively well characterized, such as Car2, Cftr, Ae2, NBCe1, Slc26a6, Clcn7, Lamp1-Lamp4, Rab21 and Ctss [2,7,12–18,20–24,26,27,29,31,32,45,47,55]; 2) those that are not expressed/differentially expressed in normal enamel maturation, such as Slc26a2, Slc26a5, Slc26a9 and Ae4 [43]; 3) other related genes, such as Alpl and Enam. Based on the features of these up-regulated genes, it is reasonable to conclude that there were strong compensatory reactions in response to the deletion of Slc26a1 or Slc26a7 in mutant animals. Absence of enamel phenotypes is hardly a novel discovery when the genes involved in maturation-stage pH regulation and endocytotic pathway are deleted, and can often be explained by the compensatory effect from other genes [7,67,68]. A final point to be noted is that compared with wild-type animals, the expression of Slc26a7 was downregulated by ~5 fold in Slc26a1 null animals (Fig 11, S2 Table). Previous investigations on Car2 null animals demonstrated that Car2 deficiency decreases the expression of Slc26a4, Slc26a7 and Ae1 at the mRNA level in kidney collecting ducts [69]. The authors proposed that changes in the expression patterns of Slc26a4, Slc26a7 and Ae1 might be attributed to increased level of apoptosis, which could result from disturbance of pH homeostasis induced by Car2 deletion [69]. Similar explanations may or may not apply in case of decreased Slc26a7 transcripts in Slc26a1 null animals, and the interplay between Slc26a1 and Slc26a7 during enamel maturation warrants further investigation.

In summary, Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 participate in maintaining the acid-base balance during amelogenesis, although deletion of Slc26a1 or Slc26a7 fails to induce abnormalities in enamel phenotypes. Moreover, Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 contribute to the formation of more sophisticated functional complexes involving other stage-specific pH regulatory proteins, which may shed light on future investigations into the pathophysiological mechanisms of enamel development and health.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Rat and mouse specific primers for qPCR and cDNA analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.s001

(XLSX)

S2 Table. qPCR analysis of gene expression changes in Slc26a1 null and Slc26a7 null animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144703.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Douglas Hauser from the Cell and Tissue Imaging Core at University of Southern California for scanning electron microscopy, Tautis Skorka and Grant Dagliyan of University of Southern California Molecular Imaging Center for micro-CT scanning and data collection, and John Curulli and Ian McFarlane from the Center for Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis at University of Southern California for energy dispersive spectroscopy.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KY XW RSL MLS SNW MLP. Performed the experiments: KY YL. Analyzed the data: KY SNW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MLP MS MLS. Wrote the paper: KY RSL IK MLS SNW MLP.

References

1. Nanci A (2008) Ten Cate`s oral histology development, structure and function. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
2. Lacruz RS, Nanci A, Kurtz I, Wright JT, Paine ML (2010) Regulation of pH During Amelogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int 86: 91–103. pmid:20016979
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Smith CE (1998) Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9: 128–161. pmid:9603233
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Smith CE, Issid M, Margolis HC, Moreno EC (1996) Developmental changes in the pH of enamel fluid and its effects on matrix-resident proteinases. Adv Dent Res 10: 159–169. pmid:9206332
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Smith CE, Nanci A (1996) Protein dynamics of amelogenesis. Anat Rec 245: 186–207. pmid:8769663
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Simmer JP, Fincham AG (1995) Molecular mechanisms of dental enamel formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6: 84–108. pmid:7548623
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Lacruz RS, Brookes SJ, Wen X, Jimenez JM, Vikman S, Hu P, et al. (2013) Adaptor protein complex 2-mediated, clathrin-dependent endocytosis, and related gene activities, are a prominent feature during maturation stage amelogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 28: 672–687. pmid:23044750
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Shapiro JL, Wen X, Okamoto CT, Wang HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Goldberg M, et al. (2007) Cellular uptake of amelogenin, and its localization to CD63, and Lamp1-positive vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci 64: 244–256. pmid:17187173
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Lloyd JB (1996) Metabolite efflux and influx across the lysosome membrane. Subcell Biochem 27: 361–386. pmid:8993166
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Lyman GE, Waddell WJ (1977) pH gradients in the developing teeth of young mice from autoradiography of [14C]DMO. Am J Physiol 232: F364–367. pmid:15460
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Sasaki S, Takagi T, Suzuki M (1991) Cyclical changes in pH in bovine developing enamel as sequential bands. Arch Oral Biol 36: 227–231. pmid:1877895
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Arquitt CK, Boyd C, Wright JT (2002) Cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene (CFTR) is associated with abnormal enamel formation. J Dent Res 81: 492–496. pmid:12161463
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Bronckers A, Kalogeraki L, Jorna HJ, Wilke M, Bervoets TJ, Lyaruu DM, et al. (2010) The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is expressed in maturation stage ameloblasts, odontoblasts and bone cells. Bone 46: 1188–1196. pmid:20004757
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Bronckers AL, Lyaruu DM, Jansen ID, Medina JF, Kellokumpu S, Hoeben KA, et al. (2009) Localization and function of the anion exchanger Ae2 in developing teeth and orofacial bone in rodents. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 312B: 375–387. pmid:19206174
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Chang EH, Lacruz RS, Bromage TG, Bringas P Jr., Welsh MJ, Zabner J, et al. (2011) Enamel pathology resulting from loss of function in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in a porcine animal model. Cells Tissues Organs 194: 249–254. pmid:21525720
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Dogterom AA, Bervoets TJ, Lyaruu DM, Woltgens JH (1983) Carbonate incorporation and carbonic anhydrase activity in developing hamster molars in vitro. J Biol Buccale 11: 15–21. pmid:6406475
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Dogterom AA, Bronckers AL (1983) Carbonic anhydrase in developing hamster molars. J Dent Res 62: 789–791. pmid:6408149
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Duan X (2014) Ion channels, channelopathies, and tooth formation. J Dent Res 93: 117–125. pmid:24076519
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Duan X, Mao Y, Wen X, Yang T, Xue Y (2011) Excess fluoride interferes with chloride-channel-dependent endocytosis in ameloblasts. J Dent Res 90: 175–180. pmid:21148016
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Jalali R, Guo J, Zandieh-Doulabi B, Bervoets TJ, Paine ML, Boron WF, et al. (2014) NBCe1 (SLC4A4) a potential pH regulator in enamel organ cells during enamel development in the mouse. Cell Tissue Res.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Josephsen K, Takano Y, Frische S, Praetorius J, Nielsen S, Aoba T, et al. (2010) Ion transporters in secretory and cyclically modulating ameloblasts: a new hypothesis for cellular control of preeruptive enamel maturation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 299: C1299–1307. pmid:20844245
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Lacruz RS, Hilvo M, Kurtz I, Paine ML (2010) A survey of carbonic anhydrase mRNA expression in enamel cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 393: 883–887. pmid:20175995
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Lacruz RS, Nanci A, White SN, Wen X, Wang H, Zalzal SF, et al. (2010) The sodium bicarbonate cotransporter (NBCe1) is essential for normal development of mouse dentition. J Biol Chem 285: 24432–24438. pmid:20529845
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Lacruz RS, Smith CE, Moffatt P, Chang EH, Bromage TG, Bringas P Jr., et al. (2012) Requirements for ion and solute transport, and pH regulation during enamel maturation. J Cell Physiol 227: 1776–1785. pmid:21732355
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Lin HM, Nakamura H, Noda T, Ozawa H (1994) Localization of H(+)-ATPase and carbonic anhydrase II in ameloblasts at maturation. Calcif Tissue Int 55: 38–45. pmid:7922788
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Lyaruu DM, Bronckers AL, Mulder L, Mardones P, Medina JF, Kellokumpu S, et al. (2008) The anion exchanger Ae2 is required for enamel maturation in mouse teeth. Matrix Biol 27: 119–127. pmid:18042363
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Paine ML, Snead ML, Wang HJ, Abuladze N, Pushkin A, Liu W, et al. (2008) Role of NBCe1 and AE2 in secretory ameloblasts. J Dent Res 87: 391–395. pmid:18362326
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Reibring CG, El Shahawy M, Hallberg K, Kannius-Janson M, Nilsson J, Parkkila S, et al. (2014) Expression patterns and subcellular localization of carbonic anhydrases are developmentally regulated during tooth formation. PLoS One 9: e96007. pmid:24789143
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Wang X, Suzawa T, Ohtsuka H, Zhao B, Miyamoto Y, Miyauchi T, et al. (2010) Carbonic anhydrase II regulates differentiation of ameloblasts via intracellular pH-dependent JNK signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol 225: 709–719. pmid:20533306
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Wen X, Kurtz I, Paine ML (2014) Prevention of the disrupted enamel phenotype in Slc4a4-null mice using explant organ culture maintained in a living host kidney capsule. PLoS One 9: e97318. pmid:24828138
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Wright JT, Hall KI, Grubb BR (1996) Enamel mineral composition of normal and cystic fibrosis transgenic mice. Adv Dent Res 10: 270–274; discussion 275. pmid:9206347
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Wright JT, Kiefer CL, Hall KI, Grubb BR (1996) Abnormal enamel development in a cystic fibrosis transgenic mouse model. J Dent Res 75: 966–973. pmid:8708137
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Alper SL, Sharma AK (2013) The SLC26 gene family of anion transporters and channels. Mol Aspects Med 34: 494–515. pmid:23506885
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Yin K, Hacia JG, Zhong Z, Paine ML (2014) Genome-wide analysis of miRNA and mRNA transcriptomes during amelogenesis. BMC Genomics 15: 998. pmid:25406666
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Petrovic S, Barone S, Xu J, Conforti L, Ma L, Kujala M, et al. (2004) SLC26A7: a basolateral Cl-/HCO3- exchanger specific to intercalated cells of the outer medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286: F161–169. pmid:12965893
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Petrovic S, Ju X, Barone S, Seidler U, Alper SL, Lohi H, et al. (2003) Identification of a basolateral Cl-/HCO3- exchanger specific to gastric parietal cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 284: G1093–1103. pmid:12736153
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Petrovic S, Ma L, Wang Z, Soleimani M (2003) Identification of an apical Cl-/HCO-3 exchanger in rat kidney proximal tubule. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 285: C608–617. pmid:12736136
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Xie Q, Welch R, Mercado A, Romero MF, Mount DB (2002) Molecular characterization of the murine Slc26a6 anion exchanger: functional comparison with Slc26a1. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 283: F826–838. pmid:12217875
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Dawson PA, Russell CS, Lee S, McLeay SC, van Dongen JM, Cowley DM, et al. (2010) Urolithiasis and hepatotoxicity are linked to the anion transporter Sat1 in mice. J Clin Invest 120: 706–712. pmid:20160351
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Freel RW, Hatch M, Green M, Soleimani M (2006) Ileal oxalate absorption and urinary oxalate excretion are enhanced in Slc26a6 null mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290: G719–728. pmid:16373425
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Jiang Z, Asplin JR, Evan AP, Rajendran VM, Velazquez H, Nottoli TP, et al. (2006) Calcium oxalate urolithiasis in mice lacking anion transporter Slc26a6. Nat Genet 38: 474–478. pmid:16532010
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Xu J, Song P, Nakamura S, Miller M, Barone S, Alper SL, et al. (2009) Deletion of the chloride transporter slc26a7 causes distal renal tubular acidosis and impairs gastric acid secretion. J Biol Chem 284: 29470–29479. pmid:19723628
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Lacruz RS, Smith CE, Bringas P Jr., Chen YB, Smith SM, Snead ML, et al. (2012) Identification of novel candidate genes involved in mineralization of dental enamel by genome-wide transcript profiling. J Cell Physiol 227: 2264–2275. pmid:21809343
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Lacruz RS, Smith CE, Chen YB, Hubbard MJ, Hacia JG, Paine ML (2011) Gene-expression analysis of early- and late-maturation-stage rat enamel organ. Eur J Oral Sci 119 Suppl 1: 149–157. pmid:22243241
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Snead CM, Smith SM, Sadeghein N, Lacruz RS, Hu P, Kurtz I, et al. (2011) Identification of a pH-responsive DNA region upstream of the transcription start site of human NBCe1-B. Eur J Oral Sci 119 Suppl 1: 136–141. pmid:22243239
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Sui W, Boyd C, Wright JT (2003) Altered pH regulation during enamel development in the cystic fibrosis mouse incisor. J Dent Res 82: 388–392. pmid:12709507
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Toyosawa S, Ogawa Y, Inagaki T, Ijuhin N (1996) Immunohistochemical localization of carbonic anhydrase isozyme II in rat incisor epithelial cells at various stages of amelogenesis. Cell Tissue Res 285: 217–225. pmid:8766158
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408. pmid:11846609
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3: 1101–1108. pmid:18546601
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Hu JC, Simmer JP (2007) Developmental biology and genetics of dental malformations. Orthod Craniofac Res 10: 45–52. pmid:17552940
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. McKee MD, Yadav MC, Foster BL, Somerman MJ, Farquharson C, Millan JL (2013) Compounded PHOSPHO1/ALPL deficiencies reduce dentin mineralization. J Dent Res 92: 721–727. pmid:23694930
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Yadav MC, de Oliveira RC, Foster BL, Fong H, Cory E, Narisawa S, et al. (2012) Enzyme replacement prevents enamel defects in hypophosphatasia mice. J Bone Miner Res 27: 1722–1734. pmid:22461224
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Zou Y, Wang H, Shapiro JL, Okamoto CT, Brookes SJ, Lyngstadaas SP, et al. (2007) Determination of protein regions responsible for interactions of amelogenin with CD63 and LAMP1. Biochem J 408: 347–354. pmid:17708745
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Simmer JP, Hu JC (2002) Expression, structure, and function of enamel proteinases. Connect Tissue Res 43: 441–449. pmid:12489196
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Takagi T, Ogasawara T, Tagami J, Akao M, Kuboki Y, Nagai N, et al. (1998) pH and carbonate levels in developing enamel. Connect Tissue Res 38: 181–187; discussion 201–185. pmid:11063026
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. De Duve C, Wattiaux R (1966) Functions of lysosomes. Annu Rev Physiol 28: 435–492. pmid:5322983
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Smith CE, Nanci A, Moffatt P (2006) Evidence by signal peptide trap technology for the expression of carbonic anhydrase 6 in rat incisor enamel organs. Eur J Oral Sci 114 Suppl 1: 147–153; discussion 164–145, 380–141. pmid:16674677
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Huotari J, Helenius A (2011) Endosome maturation. EMBO J 30: 3481–3500. pmid:21878991
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. Xu J, Worrell RT, Li HC, Barone SL, Petrovic S, Amlal H, et al. (2006) Chloride/bicarbonate exchanger SLC26A7 is localized in endosomes in medullary collecting duct cells and is targeted to the basolateral membrane in hypertonicity and potassium depletion. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 956–967. pmid:16524946
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Bertrand CA, Zhang R, Pilewski JM, Frizzell RA (2009) SLC26A9 is a constitutively active, CFTR-regulated anion conductance in human bronchial epithelia. J Gen Physiol 133: 421–438. pmid:19289574
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
61. Chavez JC, Hernandez-Gonzalez EO, Wertheimer E, Visconti PE, Darszon A, Trevino CL (2012) Participation of the Cl-/HCO(3)- exchangers SLC26A3 and SLC26A6, the Cl- channel CFTR, and the regulatory factor SLC9A3R1 in mouse sperm capacitation. Biol Reprod 86: 1–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
62. Hayashi H, Suruga K, Yamashita Y (2009) Regulation of intestinal Cl-/HCO3- exchanger SLC26A3 by intracellular pH. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 296: C1279–1290. pmid:19321737
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
63. Hihnala S, Kujala M, Toppari J, Kere J, Holmberg C, Hoglund P (2006) Expression of SLC26A3, CFTR and NHE3 in the human male reproductive tract: role in male subfertility caused by congenital chloride diarrhoea. Mol Hum Reprod 12: 107–111. pmid:16421216
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
64. Homma K, Miller KK, Anderson CT, Sengupta S, Du GG, Aguinaga S, et al. (2010) Interaction between CFTR and prestin (SLC26A5). Biochim Biophys Acta 1798: 1029–1040. pmid:20138822
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
65. Singh AK, Sjoblom M, Zheng W, Krabbenhoft A, Riederer B, Rausch B, et al. (2008) CFTR and its key role in in vivo resting and luminal acid-induced duodenal HCO3- secretion. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 193: 357–365.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
66. Wang Y, Soyombo AA, Shcheynikov N, Zeng W, Dorwart M, Marino CR, et al. (2006) Slc26a6 regulates CFTR activity in vivo to determine pancreatic duct HCO3- secretion: relevance to cystic fibrosis. EMBO J 25: 5049–5057. pmid:17053783
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
67. Andrejewski N, Punnonen EL, Guhde G, Tanaka Y, Lullmann-Rauch R, Hartmann D, et al. (1999) Normal lysosomal morphology and function in LAMP-1-deficient mice. J Biol Chem 274: 12692–12701. pmid:10212251
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
68. Bronckers AL, Guo J, Zandieh-Doulabi B, Bervoets TJ, Lyaruu DM, Li X, et al. (2011) Developmental expression of solute carrier family 26A member 4 (SLC26A4/pendrin) during amelogenesis in developing rodent teeth. Eur J Oral Sci 119 Suppl 1: 185–192. pmid:22243245
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
69. Sun X, Soleimani M, Petrovic S (2008) Decreased expression of Slc26a4 (Pendrin) and Slc26a7 in the kidneys of carbonic anhydrase II-deficient mice. Cell Physiol Biochem 21: 95–108. pmid:18209476
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Nanci A (2008) Ten Cate`s oral histology development, structure and function. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.

[ref2] 2. Lacruz RS, Nanci A, Kurtz I, Wright JT, Paine ML (2010) Regulation of pH During Amelogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int 86: 91–103. pmid:20016979
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] PubMed/NCBI

[5] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Smith CE (1998) Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9: 128–161. pmid:9603233
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Smith CE, Issid M, Margolis HC, Moreno EC (1996) Developmental changes in the pH of enamel fluid and its effects on matrix-resident proteinases. Adv Dent Res 10: 159–169. pmid:9206332
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Smith CE, Nanci A (1996) Protein dynamics of amelogenesis. Anat Rec 245: 186–207. pmid:8769663
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Simmer JP, Fincham AG (1995) Molecular mechanisms of dental enamel formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6: 84–108. pmid:7548623
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Lacruz RS, Brookes SJ, Wen X, Jimenez JM, Vikman S, Hu P, et al. (2013) Adaptor protein complex 2-mediated, clathrin-dependent endocytosis, and related gene activities, are a prominent feature during maturation stage amelogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 28: 672–687. pmid:23044750
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Shapiro JL, Wen X, Okamoto CT, Wang HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Goldberg M, et al. (2007) Cellular uptake of amelogenin, and its localization to CD63, and Lamp1-positive vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci 64: 244–256. pmid:17187173
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Lloyd JB (1996) Metabolite efflux and influx across the lysosome membrane. Subcell Biochem 27: 361–386. pmid:8993166
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Lyman GE, Waddell WJ (1977) pH gradients in the developing teeth of young mice from autoradiography of [14C]DMO. Am J Physiol 232: F364–367. pmid:15460
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Sasaki S, Takagi T, Suzuki M (1991) Cyclical changes in pH in bovine developing enamel as sequential bands. Arch Oral Biol 36: 227–231. pmid:1877895
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Arquitt CK, Boyd C, Wright JT (2002) Cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene (CFTR) is associated with abnormal enamel formation. J Dent Res 81: 492–496. pmid:12161463
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Bronckers A, Kalogeraki L, Jorna HJ, Wilke M, Bervoets TJ, Lyaruu DM, et al. (2010) The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is expressed in maturation stage ameloblasts, odontoblasts and bone cells. Bone 46: 1188–1196. pmid:20004757
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Bronckers AL, Lyaruu DM, Jansen ID, Medina JF, Kellokumpu S, Hoeben KA, et al. (2009) Localization and function of the anion exchanger Ae2 in developing teeth and orofacial bone in rodents. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 312B: 375–387. pmid:19206174
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Chang EH, Lacruz RS, Bromage TG, Bringas P Jr., Welsh MJ, Zabner J, et al. (2011) Enamel pathology resulting from loss of function in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in a porcine animal model. Cells Tissues Organs 194: 249–254. pmid:21525720
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Dogterom AA, Bervoets TJ, Lyaruu DM, Woltgens JH (1983) Carbonate incorporation and carbonic anhydrase activity in developing hamster molars in vitro. J Biol Buccale 11: 15–21. pmid:6406475
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Dogterom AA, Bronckers AL (1983) Carbonic anhydrase in developing hamster molars. J Dent Res 62: 789–791. pmid:6408149
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Duan X (2014) Ion channels, channelopathies, and tooth formation. J Dent Res 93: 117–125. pmid:24076519
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Duan X, Mao Y, Wen X, Yang T, Xue Y (2011) Excess fluoride interferes with chloride-channel-dependent endocytosis in ameloblasts. J Dent Res 90: 175–180. pmid:21148016
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Jalali R, Guo J, Zandieh-Doulabi B, Bervoets TJ, Paine ML, Boron WF, et al. (2014) NBCe1 (SLC4A4) a potential pH regulator in enamel organ cells during enamel development in the mouse. Cell Tissue Res.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Josephsen K, Takano Y, Frische S, Praetorius J, Nielsen S, Aoba T, et al. (2010) Ion transporters in secretory and cyclically modulating ameloblasts: a new hypothesis for cellular control of preeruptive enamel maturation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 299: C1299–1307. pmid:20844245
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Lacruz RS, Hilvo M, Kurtz I, Paine ML (2010) A survey of carbonic anhydrase mRNA expression in enamel cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 393: 883–887. pmid:20175995
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Lacruz RS, Nanci A, White SN, Wen X, Wang H, Zalzal SF, et al. (2010) The sodium bicarbonate cotransporter (NBCe1) is essential for normal development of mouse dentition. J Biol Chem 285: 24432–24438. pmid:20529845
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Lacruz RS, Smith CE, Moffatt P, Chang EH, Bromage TG, Bringas P Jr., et al. (2012) Requirements for ion and solute transport, and pH regulation during enamel maturation. J Cell Physiol 227: 1776–1785. pmid:21732355
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Lin HM, Nakamura H, Noda T, Ozawa H (1994) Localization of H(+)-ATPase and carbonic anhydrase II in ameloblasts at maturation. Calcif Tissue Int 55: 38–45. pmid:7922788
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Lyaruu DM, Bronckers AL, Mulder L, Mardones P, Medina JF, Kellokumpu S, et al. (2008) The anion exchanger Ae2 is required for enamel maturation in mouse teeth. Matrix Biol 27: 119–127. pmid:18042363
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Paine ML, Snead ML, Wang HJ, Abuladze N, Pushkin A, Liu W, et al. (2008) Role of NBCe1 and AE2 in secretory ameloblasts. J Dent Res 87: 391–395. pmid:18362326
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Reibring CG, El Shahawy M, Hallberg K, Kannius-Janson M, Nilsson J, Parkkila S, et al. (2014) Expression patterns and subcellular localization of carbonic anhydrases are developmentally regulated during tooth formation. PLoS One 9: e96007. pmid:24789143
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Wang X, Suzawa T, Ohtsuka H, Zhao B, Miyamoto Y, Miyauchi T, et al. (2010) Carbonic anhydrase II regulates differentiation of ameloblasts via intracellular pH-dependent JNK signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol 225: 709–719. pmid:20533306
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Wen X, Kurtz I, Paine ML (2014) Prevention of the disrupted enamel phenotype in Slc4a4-null mice using explant organ culture maintained in a living host kidney capsule. PLoS One 9: e97318. pmid:24828138
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Wright JT, Hall KI, Grubb BR (1996) Enamel mineral composition of normal and cystic fibrosis transgenic mice. Adv Dent Res 10: 270–274; discussion 275. pmid:9206347
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Wright JT, Kiefer CL, Hall KI, Grubb BR (1996) Abnormal enamel development in a cystic fibrosis transgenic mouse model. J Dent Res 75: 966–973. pmid:8708137
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Alper SL, Sharma AK (2013) The SLC26 gene family of anion transporters and channels. Mol Aspects Med 34: 494–515. pmid:23506885
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Yin K, Hacia JG, Zhong Z, Paine ML (2014) Genome-wide analysis of miRNA and mRNA transcriptomes during amelogenesis. BMC Genomics 15: 998. pmid:25406666
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Petrovic S, Barone S, Xu J, Conforti L, Ma L, Kujala M, et al. (2004) SLC26A7: a basolateral Cl-/HCO3- exchanger specific to intercalated cells of the outer medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286: F161–169. pmid:12965893
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Petrovic S, Ju X, Barone S, Seidler U, Alper SL, Lohi H, et al. (2003) Identification of a basolateral Cl-/HCO3- exchanger specific to gastric parietal cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 284: G1093–1103. pmid:12736153
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Petrovic S, Ma L, Wang Z, Soleimani M (2003) Identification of an apical Cl-/HCO-3 exchanger in rat kidney proximal tubule. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 285: C608–617. pmid:12736136
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Xie Q, Welch R, Mercado A, Romero MF, Mount DB (2002) Molecular characterization of the murine Slc26a6 anion exchanger: functional comparison with Slc26a1. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 283: F826–838. pmid:12217875
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Dawson PA, Russell CS, Lee S, McLeay SC, van Dongen JM, Cowley DM, et al. (2010) Urolithiasis and hepatotoxicity are linked to the anion transporter Sat1 in mice. J Clin Invest 120: 706–712. pmid:20160351
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Freel RW, Hatch M, Green M, Soleimani M (2006) Ileal oxalate absorption and urinary oxalate excretion are enhanced in Slc26a6 null mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290: G719–728. pmid:16373425
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Jiang Z, Asplin JR, Evan AP, Rajendran VM, Velazquez H, Nottoli TP, et al. (2006) Calcium oxalate urolithiasis in mice lacking anion transporter Slc26a6. Nat Genet 38: 474–478. pmid:16532010
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Xu J, Song P, Nakamura S, Miller M, Barone S, Alper SL, et al. (2009) Deletion of the chloride transporter slc26a7 causes distal renal tubular acidosis and impairs gastric acid secretion. J Biol Chem 284: 29470–29479. pmid:19723628
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Lacruz RS, Smith CE, Bringas P Jr., Chen YB, Smith SM, Snead ML, et al. (2012) Identification of novel candidate genes involved in mineralization of dental enamel by genome-wide transcript profiling. J Cell Physiol 227: 2264–2275. pmid:21809343
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Lacruz RS, Smith CE, Chen YB, Hubbard MJ, Hacia JG, Paine ML (2011) Gene-expression analysis of early- and late-maturation-stage rat enamel organ. Eur J Oral Sci 119 Suppl 1: 149–157. pmid:22243241
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Snead CM, Smith SM, Sadeghein N, Lacruz RS, Hu P, Kurtz I, et al. (2011) Identification of a pH-responsive DNA region upstream of the transcription start site of human NBCe1-B. Eur J Oral Sci 119 Suppl 1: 136–141. pmid:22243239
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Sui W, Boyd C, Wright JT (2003) Altered pH regulation during enamel development in the cystic fibrosis mouse incisor. J Dent Res 82: 388–392. pmid:12709507
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Toyosawa S, Ogawa Y, Inagaki T, Ijuhin N (1996) Immunohistochemical localization of carbonic anhydrase isozyme II in rat incisor epithelial cells at various stages of amelogenesis. Cell Tissue Res 285: 217–225. pmid:8766158
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408. pmid:11846609
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] PubMed/NCBI

[188] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3: 1101–1108. pmid:18546601
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] PubMed/NCBI

[192] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Hu JC, Simmer JP (2007) Developmental biology and genetics of dental malformations. Orthod Craniofac Res 10: 45–52. pmid:17552940
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[194] View Article

[195] PubMed/NCBI

[196] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. McKee MD, Yadav MC, Foster BL, Somerman MJ, Farquharson C, Millan JL (2013) Compounded PHOSPHO1/ALPL deficiencies reduce dentin mineralization. J Dent Res 92: 721–727. pmid:23694930
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[198] View Article

[199] PubMed/NCBI

[200] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Yadav MC, de Oliveira RC, Foster BL, Fong H, Cory E, Narisawa S, et al. (2012) Enzyme replacement prevents enamel defects in hypophosphatasia mice. J Bone Miner Res 27: 1722–1734. pmid:22461224
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[202] View Article

[203] PubMed/NCBI

[204] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Zou Y, Wang H, Shapiro JL, Okamoto CT, Brookes SJ, Lyngstadaas SP, et al. (2007) Determination of protein regions responsible for interactions of amelogenin with CD63 and LAMP1. Biochem J 408: 347–354. pmid:17708745
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[206] View Article

[207] PubMed/NCBI

[208] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Simmer JP, Hu JC (2002) Expression, structure, and function of enamel proteinases. Connect Tissue Res 43: 441–449. pmid:12489196
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[210] View Article

[211] PubMed/NCBI

[212] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Takagi T, Ogasawara T, Tagami J, Akao M, Kuboki Y, Nagai N, et al. (1998) pH and carbonate levels in developing enamel. Connect Tissue Res 38: 181–187; discussion 201–185. pmid:11063026
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[214] View Article

[215] PubMed/NCBI

[216] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. De Duve C, Wattiaux R (1966) Functions of lysosomes. Annu Rev Physiol 28: 435–492. pmid:5322983
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[218] View Article

[219] PubMed/NCBI

[220] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Smith CE, Nanci A, Moffatt P (2006) Evidence by signal peptide trap technology for the expression of carbonic anhydrase 6 in rat incisor enamel organs. Eur J Oral Sci 114 Suppl 1: 147–153; discussion 164–145, 380–141. pmid:16674677
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[222] View Article

[223] PubMed/NCBI

[224] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Huotari J, Helenius A (2011) Endosome maturation. EMBO J 30: 3481–3500. pmid:21878991
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[226] View Article

[227] PubMed/NCBI

[228] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Xu J, Worrell RT, Li HC, Barone SL, Petrovic S, Amlal H, et al. (2006) Chloride/bicarbonate exchanger SLC26A7 is localized in endosomes in medullary collecting duct cells and is targeted to the basolateral membrane in hypertonicity and potassium depletion. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 956–967. pmid:16524946
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[230] View Article

[231] PubMed/NCBI

[232] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Bertrand CA, Zhang R, Pilewski JM, Frizzell RA (2009) SLC26A9 is a constitutively active, CFTR-regulated anion conductance in human bronchial epithelia. J Gen Physiol 133: 421–438. pmid:19289574
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[234] View Article

[235] PubMed/NCBI

[236] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Chavez JC, Hernandez-Gonzalez EO, Wertheimer E, Visconti PE, Darszon A, Trevino CL (2012) Participation of the Cl-/HCO(3)- exchangers SLC26A3 and SLC26A6, the Cl- channel CFTR, and the regulatory factor SLC9A3R1 in mouse sperm capacitation. Biol Reprod 86: 1–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[238] View Article

[239] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Hayashi H, Suruga K, Yamashita Y (2009) Regulation of intestinal Cl-/HCO3- exchanger SLC26A3 by intracellular pH. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 296: C1279–1290. pmid:19321737
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[241] View Article

[242] PubMed/NCBI

[243] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Hihnala S, Kujala M, Toppari J, Kere J, Holmberg C, Hoglund P (2006) Expression of SLC26A3, CFTR and NHE3 in the human male reproductive tract: role in male subfertility caused by congenital chloride diarrhoea. Mol Hum Reprod 12: 107–111. pmid:16421216
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[245] View Article

[246] PubMed/NCBI

[247] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Homma K, Miller KK, Anderson CT, Sengupta S, Du GG, Aguinaga S, et al. (2010) Interaction between CFTR and prestin (SLC26A5). Biochim Biophys Acta 1798: 1029–1040. pmid:20138822
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[249] View Article

[250] PubMed/NCBI

[251] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Singh AK, Sjoblom M, Zheng W, Krabbenhoft A, Riederer B, Rausch B, et al. (2008) CFTR and its key role in in vivo resting and luminal acid-induced duodenal HCO3- secretion. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 193: 357–365.
View Article
Google Scholar

[253] View Article

[254] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Wang Y, Soyombo AA, Shcheynikov N, Zeng W, Dorwart M, Marino CR, et al. (2006) Slc26a6 regulates CFTR activity in vivo to determine pancreatic duct HCO3- secretion: relevance to cystic fibrosis. EMBO J 25: 5049–5057. pmid:17053783
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[256] View Article

[257] PubMed/NCBI

[258] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Andrejewski N, Punnonen EL, Guhde G, Tanaka Y, Lullmann-Rauch R, Hartmann D, et al. (1999) Normal lysosomal morphology and function in LAMP-1-deficient mice. J Biol Chem 274: 12692–12701. pmid:10212251
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[260] View Article

[261] PubMed/NCBI

[262] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. Bronckers AL, Guo J, Zandieh-Doulabi B, Bervoets TJ, Lyaruu DM, Li X, et al. (2011) Developmental expression of solute carrier family 26A member 4 (SLC26A4/pendrin) during amelogenesis in developing rodent teeth. Eur J Oral Sci 119 Suppl 1: 185–192. pmid:22243245
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[264] View Article

[265] PubMed/NCBI

[266] Google Scholar

[ref69] 69. Sun X, Soleimani M, Petrovic S (2008) Decreased expression of Slc26a4 (Pendrin) and Slc26a7 in the kidneys of carbonic anhydrase II-deficient mice. Cell Physiol Biochem 21: 95–108. pmid:18209476
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[268] View Article

[269] PubMed/NCBI

[270] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Animals

Rat tissue dissection, RNA extraction & real-time PCR analysis

Mouse tissue dissection, cDNA analysis and real-time PCR

Immunoperoxidase immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Co-localization analysis by Immunofluorescence (IF)

Western blot analysis

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)

Micro-CT analysis

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and hardness test

Results

Up-regulation of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 during enamel maturation

Localization of Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 in the enamel organ

Slc26a1, Slc26a6 and Slc26a7 interact with Cftr

Enamel phenotypes of Slc26a1 null and Slc26a7 null animals

Compensatory gene expression in Slc26a1 null and Slc26a7 null animals

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Rat and mouse specific primers for qPCR and cDNA analyses.

S2 Table. qPCR analysis of gene expression changes in Slc26a1 null and Slc26a7 null animals.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References