Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Anticoagulation Management Practices and Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Clinical Research Study

  • Charlène Insam ,

    charlene.insam@insel.ch

    Affiliation Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

  • Marie Méan ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Marie Méan, Andreas Limacher, Drahomir Aujesky

    Affiliation Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

  • Andreas Limacher ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Marie Méan, Andreas Limacher, Drahomir Aujesky

    Affiliation Clinical Trial Unit Bern, Department of Clinical Research and Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

  • Anne Angelillo-Scherrer,

    Affiliation University Clinic of Hematology and Hematologic Central Laboratory, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

  • Markus Aschwanden,

    Affiliation Department of Angiology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

  • Martin Banyai,

    Affiliation Division of Angiology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

  • Juerg- Hans Beer,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland

  • Henri Bounameaux,

    Affiliation Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Michael Egloff,

    Affiliation Division of Diabetology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Beat Frauchiger,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland

  • Marc Husmann,

    Affiliation Department of Angiology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

  • Nils Kucher,

    Affiliation Division of Angiology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

  • Bernhard Lämmle,

    Affiliations University Clinic of Hematology and Hematologic Central Laboratory, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland, Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany

  • Christian Matter,

    Affiliation Cardiovascular Research, Institute of Physiology, Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

  • Joseph Osterwalder,

    Affiliation Emergency Department, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

  • Marc Righini,

    Affiliation Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Daniel Staub,

    Affiliation Department of Angiology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

  • Nicolas Rodondi,

    Affiliation Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

  •  [ ... ],
  • Drahomir Aujesky

    Contributed equally to this work with: Marie Méan, Andreas Limacher, Drahomir Aujesky

    Affiliation Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Abstract

Whether anticoagulation management practices are associated with improved outcomes in elderly patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is uncertain. Thus, we aimed to examine whether practices recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines are associated with outcomes in elderly patients with VTE. We studied 991 patients aged ≥65 years with acute VTE in a Swiss prospective multicenter cohort study and assessed the adherence to four management practices: parenteral anticoagulation ≥5 days, INR ≥2.0 for ≥24 hours before stopping parenteral anticoagulation, early start with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) ≤24 hours of VTE diagnosis, and the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux. The outcomes were all-cause mortality, VTE recurrence, and major bleeding at 6 months, and the length of hospital stay (LOS). We used Cox regression and lognormal survival models, adjusting for patient characteristics. Overall, 9% of patients died, 3% had VTE recurrence, and 7% major bleeding. Early start with VKA was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 0.37, 95% CI 0.20–0.71). Early start with VKA (adjusted time ratio [TR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.69–0.86) and use of LMWH/fondaparinux (adjusted TR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97) were associated with a shorter LOS. An INR ≥2.0 for ≥24 hours before stopping parenteral anticoagulants was associated with a longer LOS (adjusted TR 1.2, 95% CI 1.08–1.33). In elderly patients with VTE, the adherence to recommended anticoagulation management practices showed mixed results. In conclusion, only early start with VKA and use of parenteral LMWH/fondaparinux were associated with better outcomes.

Introduction

The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) regularly issues methodologically rigorous, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on antithrombotic therapy for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) [1]. In these guidelines, several anticoagulation management practices, which have the potential to improve medical outcomes and to reduce the length of hospital stay (LOS), are recommended [1]. These practices include the administration of parenteral anticoagulation for ≥5 days and the achievement of an international normalized ratio (INR) ≥2.0 for ≥24 hours before stopping parenteral anticoagulation, an early start with oral vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and the initial treatment with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) rather than with intravenous unfractionated heparin. These practices were shown to reduce the incidence of medical complications, such as death, recurrent VTE, major bleeding, thrombocytopenia and infusion phlebitis, and to decrease the LOS [25].

However, although elderly patients have a higher incidence of VTE and VTE-related complications than younger patients, elderly patients are underrepresented in prospective studies of VTE treatment [68]. Moreover, to our knowledge, whether anticoagulation management practices recommended by the ACCP guidelines are associated with improved outcomes in elderly patients with acute VTE has never been specifically assessed. In a large, prospective multicenter cohort study, we therefore examined the association between recommended anticoagulation management practices and short-term medical outcomes and LOS in elderly patients with acute VTE.

Methods

Cohort sample

This observational study was conducted between September 2009 and March 2012 as part of the Swiss Cohort of Elderly Patients with Venous Thromboembolism (SWITCO65+), a prospective multicenter cohort study that assessed long-term medical outcomes and quality of life in elderly patients with acute VTE. Consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with an acute, objectively confirmed VTE were identified in the inpatient and outpatient services of all five university and four high-volume non-university hospitals in Switzerland. The management of VTE, including type and duration of anticoagulation, was left entirely to the discretion of the managing physicians. Anticoagulation monitoring was done by primary care physicians, as it is common practice in Switzerland. A detailed description of the study methods was previously published [9]. The Institutional Review Board at each participating study site approved the study and patients gave written consent to participation. The approving ethic committees were the “Commission cantonale d’éthique de la recherche sur l’être humain Vaud” (site of Lausanne), “Commission cantonale d'éthique de la recherche Genève” (site of Geneva), “Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern” (site of Bern), “Kantonale Ethikkommission Zürich” (site of Zurich), “Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz” (sites of Basel, Lucerne and Baden), “Ethikkommission des Kantons Thurgau” (site of Frauenfeld) and “Ethikkommission des Kantons St. Gallen” (site of St. Gallen).

Baseline data collection

For all enrolled patients, trained study nurses prospectively collected baseline demographic information (age and sex), weight, height, comorbid conditions (active cancer, recent immobilization, chronic lung disease, heart failure, neurologic disease, history of major bleeding and VTE, and date and type of VTE), vital signs, laboratory findings (hemoglobin, serum creatinine), concomitant antiplatelet therapy, and VTE-related treatments using standardized data collection forms. VTE-related treatment information included the start and stop times/dates and the generic names of parenteral anticoagulants and VKA, insertion of a vena cava filter, systemic and catheter-based thrombolysis, and surgical thromboembolectomy.

Anticoagulation management practices

Because our patient sample was enrolled between 2009 and early 2012, we prospectively collected anticoagulation management practices recommended by the 2008 version of the ACCP guidelines [1], including (1) administration of parenteral anticoagulants for ≥5 days; (2) achievement of an INR ≥2.0 for ≥24 hours before stopping parenteral anticoagulation; (3) start with VKA on the first treatment day (within 24 hours of VTE diagnosis); and (4) initial treatment with subcutaneous LMWH rather than with intravenous unfractionated heparin. All four practices received a strong recommendation (Grade 1) by the 2008 ACCP guidelines. We defined start with VKA on the first treatment day as the start with VKA treatment within 24 hours of VTE diagnosis. Because fondaparinux is administered once daily by subcutaneous injection, the small minority of patients who received fondaparinux as the initial treatment were grouped together with patients who received LMWH.

Study outcomes

The study outcomes were all-cause mortality, recurrent VTE (symptomatic or fatal), and major bleeding within six months of VTE diagnosis, as done in previous studies of VTE-related quality of care [10, 11]. We defined recurrent symptomatic VTE as acute chest pain, new or worsening dyspnea or cough, acute hemoptysis, or syncope coupled with an objective diagnosis of pulmonary embolism based on spiral computed tomography, pulmonary angiography, or autopsy [12], or a new unilateral leg pain or swelling coupled with an objective diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis based on ultrasonography or contrast venography [13]. Fatal recurrent VTE was defined as death possibly or definitely related to a recurrent PE. We defined major bleeding as fatal bleeding, bleeding in a critical site or organ (intracranial, intra-spinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular, pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome), bleeding with reduction of hemoglobin ≥20 g/L or leading to the transfusion of ≥2 units of packed red blood cells [14]. Among patients who developed the index VTE in the outpatient setting and who were admitted to the hospital, we also recorded the LOS.

Follow-up included a surveillance face-to-face evaluation at three months and a telephone interview at six months of study participation, as well as periodic reviews of the hospital charts [9]. During each contact, study nurses interviewed patients or proxies to obtain information about mortality, VTE recurrence, and bleeding. If a clinical event had occurred, supplemental information was obtained by reviewing medical charts and interviewing the patient’s primary care physician and/or family members. A committee of three blinded clinical experts adjudicated these events. Final classifications were made on the basis of the full consensus of this committee [9].

Statistical analyses

We presented patient baseline characteristics and the adherence to recommended anticoagulation practices as numbers and percentages or medians and interquartile ranges, as appropriate. We examined the association between anticoagulation practices and the time to death, a first VTE recurrence and a first major bleeding within six months of the index VTE using Cox proportional hazard models. For each model, we adjusted for selected variables that have previously been found to be associated with the specific outcome, i.e., short-term all-cause mortality [1517], major bleeding [15, 1820], and VTE recurrence [15, 2124]. Because anticoagulation practices usually differ in patients who receive invasive treatments, i.e. thrombolysis, a vena cava filter, or surgical thromboembolectomy, such patients were excluded from all analyses. When analyzing practices pertaining to the overlap of parenteral anticoagulants and VKA (parenteral anticoagulation for ≥5 days, INR ≥2.0 for ≥24 hours, and start with VKA on the first treatment day), we also excluded patients who received monotherapy with parenteral anticoagulants (e.g., patients with cancer) or VKA, no anticoagulation at all, and those in whom the index VTE occurred under therapeutic anticoagulation. Similarly, when analyzing the use of LMWH/fondaparinux as the initial treatment, we excluded patients with severe renal failure (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min./m2) because unfractionated heparin may be the treatment of choice in such patients [1].

In the subset of outpatients with VTE who were admitted to the hospital, we assessed the association between anticoagulation practices and the LOS using a lognormal survival model, adjusting for a broad set of patient baseline characteristics. The model yields time ratios (TR), with a TR above 1 indicating a prolonged LOS and a TR below 1 a shortened LOS.

Given the low proportion of missing values except for arterial oxygen saturation (23%), we assumed missing values to be normal. When we used multiple imputation for the missing values of arterial oxygen saturation, the adjusted hazard rates and the time ratio remained almost identical. All analyses were done using Stata 13 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas).

Results

Study sample

Of the 1003 patients enrolled in the cohort [9], we excluded 12 patients who did not allow the use of their data or withdrew from the study within one day, leaving a final sample of 991 analyzed patients. One patient was lost to follow up, 26 patient withdrew consent within 6 months but were included in the analysis. The median age was 75 years, 47% of patients were women, 63% had VTE in the outpatient setting and were admitted to the hospital, 69% had symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without deep vein thrombosis, 18% active cancer, and 6% severe renal failure (Table 1). Overall, 4% (41/991) of patients received invasive treatments (30 systemic or catheter based-thrombolysis, 11 vena cava filter insertions, and/or 3 surgical thromboembolectomy). The median duration of anticoagulation was 8 months (interquartile range 4 to 24 months).

Adherence to recommended anticoagulation management practices

Among patients who received parenteral anticoagulation with concomitant VKA, the adherence to our pre-defined anticoagulation practices was very variable (Table 2): 86% (667/774) received parenteral anticoagulation ≥5 days, 36% (276/774) achieved an INR ≥2.0 for ≥24 hours before parenteral anticoagulation was stopped, and in 54% (414/774) VKA therapy was started within 24 hours of VTE diagnosis. Overall, 66% (589/898) of patients received LMWH or fondaparinux as the initial parenteral anticoagulant.

thumbnail
Table 2. Adherence to anticoagulation management practices.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148348.t002

Association between anticoagulation management practices and outcomes

Within six months of VTE diagnosis, 9% (85/991) of patients died, 3% (28/991) had recurrent VTE, and 7% (70/991) had major bleeding. Overall, 2% of patients had fatal PE (20/991) and fatal bleeding (19/991), respectively. The median LOS was 8 days (interquartile range, 5–11 days). After adjustment, no anticoagulation practice was associated with mortality or VTE recurrence at six months (Table 3). However, start with VKA on the first treatment day was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20–0.71) (Table 3). In patients with early vs. late start of VKA, 47% of major bleeds occurred during the first treatment month, and 38% of bleeds occurred under parenteral anticoagulation. The risk of major bleeding did not differ by type of parenteral anticoagulant used (LMWH/fondaparinux vs.unfractionated heparin) or the site of treatment (home vs. hospital) in these patients. The percentage of time in the therapeutic INR range did not differ between patients with early vs. late start of VKA treatment (58 vs%. 56%; P = 0.28).

thumbnail
Table 3. Associations between anticoagulation practices and clinical outcomes at 6 months.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148348.t003

Whereas start with VKA on the first treatment day (adjusted TR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69–0.86) and initial treatment with LMWH or fondaparinux (adjusted TR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97) were associated with a decreased LOS, the achievement of an INR ≥2.0 for ≥24 hours before stopping parenteral anticoagulation was associated with an increased LOS (adjusted TR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08–1.33) (Table 4). Patients who received parenteral anticoagulants ≥5 days were also more likely to have a prolonged LOS but the association failed to achieve statistical significance (adjusted TR 1.14, 95% CI 0.99–1.32).

thumbnail
Table 4. Association between anticoagulation practices and length of hospital stay*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148348.t004

When analyzing practices pertaining to the overlap of parenteral anticoagulants and VKA (parenteral anticoagulation for ≥5 days, INR ≥2.0 for ≥24 hours, and start with VKA on the first treatment day), we excluded patients who received monotherapy with parenteral anticoagulants (e.g., patients with cancer) or VKA, no anticoagulation at all, and those in whom the index VTE occurred under therapeutic anticoagulation. Overall, only 90 (51%) of 178 patients with cancer received VKA treatment. When these patients were excluded from analysis, our results did not change markedly.

Discussion

In our prospective multicenter cohort study of elderly patients with acute VTE, the adherence to the four recommended anticoagulation management practices was highly variable (36–86%). Overall, two out of four practices were associated with a lower rate of major bleeding and/or a shorter LOS.

As expected, starting VKA on the first treatment day was associated with a reduction of the median LOS by two days. These findings are consistent with a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials in which hospital stay was approximately four days shorter in patients with an early start of VKA [25]. In our study, early start with VKA was also associated with a significant decrease in major bleeding. In a prior meta-analysis, early initiation with VKA was associated with a lower risk of minor but not major bleeding [25]. The beneficial effect of starting VKA early on incidence of minor bleeding has been explained by concomitant earlier withdrawal of heparin, which shortens the exposure to this antithrombotic agent [25]. In a retrospective study of U.S. veterans, the administration of warfarin within one day of starting heparin was associated with a significantly lower overall 90-day complication rate (death, VTE recurrence, or major bleeding) [26]. However, the lower bleeding rate in patients with an early VKA start could also be the effect of an indication bias, i.e. physicians may deliberately delay VKA treatment in patients perceived to have a higher bleeding risk. A prior study demonstrated that patients with an early start with VKA also had a lower risk of thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced infusion phlebitis [4]. Overall, these results confirm that an early start of VKA has the potential to safely reduce costly hospital days in elderly patients with VTE. The fact that only half of patients received early VKA treatment in our study suggests that this cost-saving anticoagulation practice is still underused in elderly patients with acute VTE.

The 2008 ACCP guidelines recommend parenteral anticoagulant treatment ≥5 days and the achievement an INR ≥2.0 for ≥24 hours before stopping parenteral anticoagulation because randomized trials of VTE treatment often used heparin therapy for a minimum duration of five days [1, 2729]. Moreover, there is evidence from animal studies that VKA require several days before developing a therapeutic antithrombotic effect [30, 31]. While the adherence to these anticoagulation practices was not associated with improved clinical outcomes, both practices were associated with a 1 to 2-day increase in LOS. This does not come as a surprise because physicians may be reluctant to discharge elderly patients before the 5-day course of parenteral anticoagulation is completed and patients are successfully switched to VKA treatment within the therapeutic range. Further studies should examine whether a shorter course of parenteral anticoagulants (e.g., three days) is as effective as a 5-day course. Care organizations that facilitate the switch from parenteral anticoagulants to VKA in the outpatient setting may have the potential to substantially decrease the LOS.

Compared to intravenous unfractionated heparin, initial parenteral anticoagulation with subcutaneous LMWH/fondaparinux was associated with shorter LOS because the latter treatment can be given on an outpatient basis [10, 12]. In our study, the use of LMWH/fondaparinux reduced the median LOS by one day. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials demonstrated that LMWH was associated with significantly fewer deaths (odds ratio, 0.76) and lower rates of recurrent VTE (odds ratio, 0.68) and major bleeding (odds ratio, 0.57) [2]. While our study did not find any association between use of LMWH/fondaparinux and clinical outcomes, it may not have enough power to detect such an association. In our study, only about two-thirds of elderly patients without severe renal failure received LMWH/fondaparinux. Given its proven benefit to reduce the LOS and its potential to improve patient outcomes, the use of parenteral anticoagulation with LMWH or fondaparinux should be encouraged in elderly patients with acute VTE.

Our study has potential limitations. First, because new oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors) were not authorized for the treatment of acute VTE in Switzerland at the time of patient enrollment, we could not evaluate the potential impact of these drugs on patient outcomes. Second, we could not study the association between anticoagulation practices and other clinically relevant outcomes, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or infusion phlebitis. Third, because we had only a limited number of VTE recurrences (n = 28) during follow-up, our study may have been underpowered to detect weaker associations between anticoagulation practices and VTE recurrence. Fourth, despite extensive adjustment, the observed outcome differences may be attributable to confounding related to unmeasured severity of illness. Thus, regarding the association of early start with VKA and lower major bleeding risk, there might be a patients selection process, where physicians tend to start oral anticoagulation early in healthier patients who have a lower bleeding risk. Finally, because we focused on initial anticoagulation practices, we cannot exclude the possibility that other anticoagulation-related factors (e.g., anticoagulation quality) and treatments during follow-up have influenced medical outcomes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the adherence to recommended anticoagulation management practices showed mixed results in elderly patients with VTE. Only early start with VKA and use of parenteral LMWH/fondaparinux rather than unfractionated heparin were associated with better outcomes. Given the suboptimal adherence rate of these practices and their potential clinical and economic benefit, their implementation could be useful.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all collaborators of the SWITCO65+ cohort.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CI MM AL DA. Performed the experiments: MR JB BF JO NK AA NR CM MB ME MA MH HB BL DS. Analyzed the data: CI MM AL DA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AL. Wrote the paper: CI MM AL DA. Obtaining funding from Swiss National Science Foundation: MR JB BF JO NK AA NR DA.

References

  1. 1. Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G, Goldhaber S, Raskob GE, Comerota AJ. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133(6 Suppl):454S–545S. pmid:18574272
  2. 2. Erkens PM, Prins MH. Fixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins versus adjusted dose unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2010(9):CD001100. pmid:20824828
  3. 3. Segal JB, Streiff MB, Hofmann LV, Thornton K, Bass EB. Management of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review for a practice guideline. Annals of internal medicine. 2007;146(3):211–22. pmid:17261856
  4. 4. Mohiuddin SM, Hilleman DE, Destache CJ, Stoysich AM, Gannon JM, Sketch MH Sr. Efficacy and safety of early versus late initiation of warfarin during heparin therapy in acute thromboembolism. American heart journal. 1992;123(3):729–32. pmid:1539524
  5. 5. Westblom TU, Marienfeld RD. Prolonged hospitalization because of inappropriate delay of warfarin therapy in deep venous thrombosis. Southern medical journal. 1985;78(10):1164–7. pmid:4049032
  6. 6. Naess IA, Christiansen SC, Romundstad P, Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Hammerstrom J. Incidence and mortality of venous thrombosis: a population-based study. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis: JTH. 2007;5(4):692–9. pmid:17367492
  7. 7. Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D, Emery C, Pacifico L, Reed G, et al. Venous thromboembolism in the elderly. A community-based perspective. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2008;100(5):780–8. pmid:18989521
  8. 8. Mean M, Aujesky D. [Venous thromboembolism in the elderly]. Revue medicale suisse. 2009;5(223):2142–4, 6. pmid:19968026
  9. 9. Mean M, Righini M, Jaeger K, Beer HJ, Frauchiger B, Osterwalder J, et al. The Swiss cohort of elderly patients with venous thromboembolism (SWITCO65+): rationale and methodology. Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis. 2013;36(4):475–83. pmid:23359097
  10. 10. Koopman MM, Prandoni P, Piovella F, Ockelford PA, Brandjes DP, van der Meer J, et al. Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. The Tasman Study Group. The New England journal of medicine. 1996;334(11):682–7. pmid:8594426
  11. 11. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Buller HR, Carta M, Cogo A, Vigo M, et al. Comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin with intravenous standard heparin in proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1992;339(8791):441–5. pmid:1346817
  12. 12. Buller HR, Davidson BL, Decousus H, Gallus A, Gent M, Piovella F, et al. Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;349(18):1695–702. pmid:14585937
  13. 13. ColumbusInvestigators. Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. The New England journal of medicine. 1997;337(10):657–62. pmid:9280815
  14. 14. Schulman S, Kearon C. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis: JTH. 2005;3(4):692–4. pmid:15842354
  15. 15. Gussoni G, Frasson S, La Regina M, Di Micco P, Monreal M. Three-month mortality rate and clinical predictors in patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer. Findings from the RIETE registry. Thrombosis research. 2013;131(1):24–30. pmid:23141849
  16. 16. Jimenez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, Gomez V, Lobo JL, Uresandi F, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Archives of internal medicine. 2010;170(15):1383–9. pmid:20696966
  17. 17. Spirk D, Husmann M, Hayoz D, Baldi T, Frauchiger B, Engelberger R, et al. Predictors of in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with acute venous thrombo-embolism: the SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER). European heart journal. 2012;33(7):921–6. pmid:22036872
  18. 18. Ruiz-Gimenez N, Suarez C, Gonzalez R, Nieto JA, Todoli JA, Samperiz AL, et al. Predictive variables for major bleeding events in patients presenting with documented acute venous thromboembolism. Findings from the RIETE Registry. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2008;100(1):26–31. pmid:18612534
  19. 19. Flaker GC, Gruber M, Connolly SJ, Goldman S, Chaparro S, Vahanian A, et al. Risks and benefits of combining aspirin with anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: an exploratory analysis of stroke prevention using an oral thrombin inhibitor in atrial fibrillation (SPORTIF) trials. American heart journal. 2006;152(5):967–73. pmid:17070169
  20. 20. Lane DA, Kamphuisen PW, Minini P, Buller HR, Lip GY. Bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: the AMADEUS study. Chest. 2011;140(1):146–55. pmid:21415134
  21. 21. Iorio A, Kearon C, Filippucci E, Marcucci M, Macura A, Pengo V, et al. Risk of recurrence after a first episode of symptomatic venous thromboembolism provoked by a transient risk factor: a systematic review. Archives of internal medicine. 2010;170(19):1710–6. pmid:20975016
  22. 22. Heit JA, Mohr DN, Silverstein MD, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Predictors of recurrence after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based cohort study. Archives of internal medicine. 2000;160(6):761–8. pmid:10737275
  23. 23. Samama MM. An epidemiologic study of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in medical outpatients: the Sirius study. Archives of internal medicine. 2000;160(22):3415–20. pmid:11112234
  24. 24. Kato S, Shimada YJ, Friedmann P, Kashan G, Husk G, Bergmann SR. Identification of residual risk factors for the development of venous thromboembolism in medical inpatients receiving subcutaneous heparin therapy for prophylaxis. Coronary artery disease. 2012;23(4):294–7. pmid:22421548
  25. 25. Qayyum F, Holbrook A, Lam J, Kovacs MJ, Schulman S. Should vitamin K antagonist therapy be started simultaneously with parenteral anticoagulation: a meta-analysis? Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis: an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis. 2012;23(8):705–13.
  26. 26. Aujesky D, Long JA, Fine MJ, Ibrahim SA. African American race was associated with an increased risk of complications following venous thromboembolism. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2007;60(4):410–6. pmid:17346616
  27. 27. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Rosenbloom D, Panju AA, Brill-Edwards P, Ginsberg JS, et al. Heparin for 5 days as compared with 10 days in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis. The New England journal of medicine. 1990;322(18):1260–4. pmid:2183055
  28. 28. Becattini C, Agnelli G, Emmerich J, Bura A, Weitz JI. Initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2006;96(3):242–50. pmid:16953263
  29. 29. de Moerloose P, Samama CM, Motte S. Management of venous thromboembolism. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2006;53(6 Suppl):S80–8. pmid:16766793
  30. 30. Wessler S, Gitel SN. Warfarin. From bedside to bench. The New England journal of medicine. 1984;311(10):645–52. pmid:6472343
  31. 31. Zivelin A, Rao LV, Rapaport SI. Mechanism of the anticoagulant effect of warfarin as evaluated in rabbits by selective depression of individual procoagulant vitamin K-dependent clotting factors. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1993;92(5):2131–40. pmid:8227329