Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genomic Analysis of Companion Rabbit Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract

In addition to being an important human pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus is able to cause a variety of infections in numerous other host species. While the S. aureus strains causing infection in several of these hosts have been well characterised, this is not the case for companion rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), where little data are available on S. aureus strains from this host. To address this deficiency we have performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing and genome sequencing on a collection of S. aureus isolates from companion rabbits. The findings show a diverse S. aureus population is able to cause infection in this host, and while antimicrobial resistance was uncommon, the isolates possess a range of known and putative virulence factors consistent with a diverse clinical presentation in companion rabbits including severe abscesses. We additionally show that companion rabbit isolates carry polymorphisms within dltB as described as underlying host-adaption of S. aureus to farmed rabbits. The availability of S. aureus genome sequences from companion rabbits provides an important aid to understanding the pathogenesis of disease in this host and in the clinical management and surveillance of these infections.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a major human and veterinary pathogen, responsible for a wide range of diseases. Among economically important livestock animals these diseases include mastitis in dairy cows and small ruminants, lameness in commercial broiler chickens and virulent epidemics of skin abscesses, mastitis and septicaemia in farmed rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). S. aureus colonisation and infection of animals is not only important from the perspective of animal wellbeing and economic impact but may also lead to zoonotic infection of humans [1, 2]. Although also recognised as a versatile and virulent pathogen among companion rabbits, in particular as a cause of severe abscesses [3], few data are available on the S. aureus strains causing disease in this host. This is despite the popularity of rabbits as a companion animal; for instance the population of companion rabbits in the UK is estimated at ~ 1 million [4]. Furthermore S. aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is a well-documented pathogen among other companion animals such as cats, dogs and horses, [57]. Interest in the S. aureus population among companion rabbits is further heightened by the discovery of emergent mecC MRSA in a farmed rabbit [8], and sporadic reports of MRSA in companion rabbits [9], including livestock-associated clonal complex 398 MRSA [10] and Panton-Valentine Leucocidin-positive isolates [11]. Furthermore, rabbits are a frequently used experimental model for S. aureus infections and a better understanding of the natural bacterial-host interactions in this setting may facilitate improved model systems.

In order to address this paucity of data on the S. aureus population among companion rabbits we have genome sequenced a collection of companion and research unit S. aureus from this host species in the United Kingdom. This novel genome-level study provides insight into host-pathogen interactions, antimicrobial resistance and the phylogenetics of S. aureus among rabbits. These data will inform clinical management in rabbits and the future surveillance of this widespread and important pathogen.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial isolates and antimicrobial susceptibility

A request for S. aureus isolates from companion rabbits was made to personal contacts and veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the UK. Isolates where collected by veterinary microbiology laboratories in the course of their routine diagnostic work, with the study approved by the Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge Ethics and Welfare Committee (reference: CR76 Collection of S. aureus isolates from domestic and wild animals for genome sequencing). The resultant ten isolates that were collected and their associated details are shown in Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Staph AST-P620 card on the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux, Basingstoke, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions with S. aureus NCTC6571 and NCTC12493 as control strains.

Genome sequencing and analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted using the MasterPure™ Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Cambio, Dry Drayton, UK) from overnight cultures grown from single colonies in 5 ml of tryptic soy broth overnight at 37°C. Illumina library preparation was carried out as described previously [12], and genome sequencing using Hi-Seq 2000 performed following the manufacturer’s standard protocols (Illumina, Little Chesterfield, UK). Nucleotide sequences been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive, accession numbers provided in Table 1. Genome assembly was performed de novo using Velvet [13] and antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors identified using BLAST and ResFinder [14]. Genome-derived multi-locus sequence types (MLST) were assigned as described previously [15]. The phylogenetic relationships among the isolates was assessed using core genome (cg)MLST using SeqSphere+ software (Ridom GmbH, Münster Germany) as described previously [16] and including twenty-eight reference genomes to place the rabbit isolates within the context of the wider S. aureus population. 1475 core genome loci found in all isolates were used. spa typing was performed using Sanger sequencing of PCR products using primers spa-1113f (5'- TAA AGA CGA TCC TTC GGT GAG C -3') and spa-1514r (5'- CAG CAG TAG TGC CGT TTG CTT -3') as per Ridom GmbH (Würzburg, Germany).

Results

Study strains, multi-locus sequence types and spa types

Ten rabbit S. aureus isolates collected between 1998 and 2013 in the UK were included in this study, Table 1. Eight were from companion rabbits including two isolates from the same rabbit, with a further two isolates from research unit rabbits. MLST showed the ten isolates belonged to nine different sequence types, the only duplication of ST being the two isolates from the same rabbit which both belonged to ST30. Three new ST were identified in this study; ST3092 and ST3120 being single locus variants (SLV) of ST425 in aroE and tpi respectively, whilst ST3126 is a SLV of ST291 in tpi. These STs belonged to eight clonal complexes, Table 1. Similarly to MLST, nine different spa types were found among the ten isolates, the only duplication again being the two isolates from the same rabbit. Two new spa types, t15409 and t15410 were found.

Whole genome phylogenetic analysis

In agreement with the diversity indicated by MLST, whole genome analysis using cgMLST across 1475 loci showed a diverse population among rabbit isolates, Fig 1. The average pairwise difference in allele profile between rabbit isolates was 1271 alleles, representing 86% of the core genome loci assessed. The two isolates from the same rabbit, FP01 and FP02 differed in 51 alleles and the largest pairwise difference in profile was 1402 (95% of the 475 core loci analysed). Inclusion in the analysis of twenty-eight reference S. aureus genomes showed the rabbit isolates to be distributed across the wider S. aureus population, Fig 1

thumbnail
Fig 1. Clonal relationships among rabbit S. aureus and their context within the wider S. aureus population.

A phylogenetic dendrogram (UPGMA) generated from the allelic profiles of 1475 cgMLST target genes, based on (16) and comprising the ten rabbit isolates from this study and twenty-eight reference S. aureus genomes from Genbank. Rabbit isolates are denoted by *, isolate name and Genbank accession provided for the reference genomes. The last figure in the text line indicates the multi-locus sequence type of each isolate, where available. The scale bar indicates the number of differing alleles comprising the calculated distance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151458.g001

Antimicrobial Resistance and resistance determinates

Resistance to benzylpenicillin occurred in seven of the isolates and correlated with the presence of blaZ, Table 1. Resistance to other antimicrobials was restricted to a single isolate, 543471, showing fusidic acid resistance, Table 1. This resistance correlated with a single amino acid substitution, H457Y in elongation factor G. Whilst no other phenotypic resistance was seen, all ten isolates were positive for the efflux pump genes tet(38) and norA.

Virulence factors and markers of host adaption

The sequenced rabbit isolates were assessed for the presence or absence of S. aureus virulence factors, Table 2. Several genes, including those encoding α-(hla), β-(hlb) and γ-haemolysins (hlgACB) were present in all the isolates with others present in a subset, Table 2. None of the ten isolates possessed the genes encoding for Panton-Valentine Leucocidin but isolates FP01 and FP02 were both positive for toxic shock syndrome toxin-1. Four of the strains were positive for the phage-encoded immune evasion genes, sak and scn which are taken as indicative of strains of human origin. Among clinical rabbit isolates from commercial rabbitries in mainland Europe, Viana et al. have demonstrated a critical role in host adaption for polymorphisms in dltB, encoding the d-alanine teichoic acid esterification protein [17]. We therefore compared the DltB sequence in our isolates to that from human isolated S. aureus. Every rabbit isolate in our collection had at least one amino acid polymorphism in DltB, Table 2. These comprised both novel and previously described polymorphisms including the experimentally validated T113K dltB mutation [17].

thumbnail
Table 2. Distribution of virulence factors and dltB mutations among rabbit S. aureus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151458.t002

Discussion

To gain insight into the molecular epidemiology and disease pathogenesis of rabbit staphylococcosis we have genome sequenced a collection of S. aureus isolates from companion rabbits. Strain typing by MLST and spa typing showed a diverse population of isolates with no duplication of ST or spa type between isolates from different animals and minimal overlap even at the level of MLST clonal complex. This finding of a diverse S. aureus population able to infect rabbits was further supported by the use of high-resolution whole genome analysis using cgMLST. Bacterial diversity extended to two isolates from the same individual rabbit which differed by 51 alleles and demonstrates that the within host diversity of S. aureus described previously in humans and dogs [1821] extends to the rabbit host also. This diversity among the isolates indicates that a variety of S. aureus lineages are able to cause disease in companion rabbits, with no strong suggestion that any lineages are predominant, albeit based on a relatively small sample. However, the finding that this relatively small collection led to the identification of three novel STs and two novel spa types strongly indicates that the S. aureus population among this host has been poorly sampled to date and includes strains rare in humans and other animals.

With the exception of penicillin resistance, present in the majority of isolates and which correlated with the possession of blaZ, antimicrobial resistance was scarce. No MRSA isolates were found and the only additional phenotypic resistance was a single isolate resistant to fusidic acid. This isolate possessed a single amino acid substitution in elongation factor G which has previously been found associated with fusidic acid resistance in naturally occurring clinical isolates and in experimentally selected resistance mutants [2225]. Furthermore, when introduced into a susceptible strain on a plasmid, this mutant fusA allele confers fusidic acid resistance [22]. All ten strains were positive for norA, a multidrug efflux pump which confers resistance to ciprofloxacin among a broad spectrum of agents [26] and tet(38), an efflux pump conferring tetracycline resistance [27]. In both cases however, phenotypic resistance is associated with mutations leading to over-expression which likely explains the absence of phenotypic resistance in these rabbit isolates [26, 27]. The presence of these genes in rabbit isolates, however, indicates the potential for such resistance to manifest in the future.

The importance of dltB polymorphisms in host adaption of S. aureus to rabbits has been demonstrated previously with a single amino acid substitution (T113K) sufficient to confer virulence in rabbits to a human ST121 isolate otherwise avirulent in that host [17]. Furthermore, while dltB is highly conserved in human isolates, thirty-nine rabbit isolates belonging to a range of STs and CCs all contained one or more non-synonymous SNPs in dltB thus suggesting convergent evolution among rabbit-adapted S. aureus [17]. All ten rabbit isolates in our collection carried at least one amino acid polymorphism in DltB with each strain encoding a different pattern of polymorphism(s) to each other. Two isolates belonging to ST121 and ST15 carried the experimentally validated T113K substitution. A second distinct dltB allele containing two SNPs and associated with the S. aureus ST96 rabbit clone was also shown experimentally to confer virulence in rabbits [17]. While one of those two SNPs, *405Q, was present in some of the isolates reported here, the second SNP, K402R, was not. We show therefore that host-adaption via dltB polymorphism occurs in companion rabbit isolates and provide further evidence for convergent evolution at this locus across diverse S. aureus lineages infecting rabbits. In addition to the DltB polymorphisms described previously we have identified six novel amino acid substitutions, Table 1. Using a predicted membrane topology model of the DltB protein, Viana et al. noted that the majority of mutations they described were predicted to be in the extracellular loops or proximal to the outer surface of the membrane [17]. Using that model, while none of the novel mutations described here appear to be located extracellularly, four are predicted to be proximal to the outer surface of the membrane (data not shown). Interestingly, the pattern of distinct polymorphisms between the isolates included the two related ST30 isolates, FP01 and FP02, cultured from the same animal. These two isolates shared one amino acid insertion but had a distinct second amino acid substitution. This suggests that the selective pressure exerted on dltB by the rabbit host may be acting to drive divergent evolution within clones within the same individual host. Although the independent acquisition of two related strains with divergent dltB alleles cannot be excluded.

To conclude, we have used antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole genome sequencing to characterise S. aureus isolates from companion rabbit. Isolates came from a diverse bacterial population, including three new STs and two new spa types. While antimicrobial resistance was uncommon, except for penicillin resistance, isolates possessed a number of virulence factors consistent with the ability to cause severe abscesses in companion rabbits. The availability of these genome sequences will underpin improved understanding of disease pathogenesis, clinical management and pathogen surveillance in this popular companion animal.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by internal funding from the School of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, a Medical Research Council (MRC) Partnership Grant (G1001787/1), and the Wellcome Trust, Grant number 098051. The help of the core sequencing and informatics team at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is gratefully acknowledged.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GKP MAH. Performed the experiments: GKP EMH EAF. Analyzed the data: MAH GKP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MAH JP EMG GF. Wrote the paper: GKP. Contributed to the drafting and approval of final manuscript: MAH EMH EAF EMG JP GF GKP.

References

  1. 1. Harrison EM, Paterson GK, Holden MTG, Larsen J, Stegger M, Larsen AR, et al. Whole genome sequencing identifies zoonotic transmission of MRSA isolates with the novel mecA homologue mecC. EMBO Molecular Medicine. 2013;5(4):509–15. pmid:WOS:000317070200005.
  2. 2. Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, Andersen PS, et al. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. MBio. 2012;3(1):00305–11. pmid:22354957.
  3. 3. Harcourt-Brown F. Textbook of Rabbit Medicine. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann 2001.
  4. 4. PFMA. Pet Food Manufacturers' Association Pet Population 2014 [cited 2015 02.07.2015]. Available from: http://www.pfma.org.uk/pet-population-2014/.
  5. 5. Harrison EM, Weinert LA, Holden MTG, Welch JJ, Wilson K, Morgan FJE, et al. A Shared Population of Epidemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus 15 Circulates in Humans and Companion Animals. Mbio. 2014;5(3). pmid:WOS:000338875900029.
  6. 6. Vincze S, Stamm I, Kopp PA, Hermes J, Adlhoch C, Semmler T, et al. Alarming Proportions of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Wound Samples from Companion Animals, Germany 2010–2012. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e85656. pmid:24465637
  7. 7. Weese JS. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Animals. ILAR Journal. 2010;51(3):233–44. pmid:21131724
  8. 8. Paterson GK, Larsen AR, Robb A, Edwards GE, Pennycott TW, Foster G, et al. The newly described mecA homologue, mecA(LGA251), is present in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a diverse range of host species. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2012;67(12):2809–13. pmid:WOS:000311312100006.
  9. 9. Rich M, Roberts L. MRSA in companion animals. Veterinary Record. 2006;159(16):535–6. pmid:17041070
  10. 10. Loncaric I, Künzel F. Sequence type 398 meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a pet rabbit. Veterinary Dermatology. 2013;24(3):370–e84. pmid:23551846
  11. 11. Rankin S, Roberts S, O'Shea K, Maloney D, Lorenzo M, Benson CE. Panton valentine leukocidin (PVL) toxin positive MRSA strains isolated from companion animals. Veterinary Microbiology. 2005;108(1–2):145–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.02.013. pmid:15917142
  12. 12. Quail MA, Kozarewa I, Smith F, Scally A, Stephens PJ, Durbin R, et al. A large genome center's improvements to the Illumina sequencing system. Nat Meth. 2008;5(12):1005–10. http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v5/n12/suppinfo/nmeth.1270_S1.html.
  13. 13. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Research. 2008;18(5):821–9. pmid:WOS:000255504600014.
  14. 14. Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2012;67(11):2640–4. pmid:22782487
  15. 15. Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, et al. Multilocus Sequence Typing of Total-Genome-Sequenced Bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2012;50(4):1355–61. pmid:22238442
  16. 16. Leopold SR, Goering RV, Witten A, Harmsen D, Mellmann A. Bacterial Whole-Genome Sequencing Revisited: Portable, Scalable, and Standardized Analysis for Typing and Detection of Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2014;52(7):2365–70. pmid:24759713
  17. 17. Viana D, Comos M, McAdam PR, Ward MJ, Selva L, Guinane CM, et al. A single natural nucleotide mutation alters bacterial pathogen host tropism. Nat Genet. 2015;47(4):361–6. http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v47/n4/abs/ng.3219.html#supplementary-information. pmid:25685890
  18. 18. Gullberg E, Cao S, Berg OG, Ilback C, Sandegren L, Hughes D, et al. Selection of resistant bacteria at very low antibiotic concentrations. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(7):e1002158. pmid:21811410.
  19. 19. Paterson GK, Harrison EM, Murray GGR, Welch JJ, Warland JH, Holden MTG, et al. Capturing the cloud of diversity reveals complexity and heterogeneity of MRSA carriage, infection and transmission. Nat Commun. 2015;6(6560).
  20. 20. Stanczak-Mrozek KI, Manne A, Knight GM, Gould K, Witney AA, Lindsay JA. Within-host diversity of MRSA antimicrobial resistances. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2015.
  21. 21. Harris SR, Cartwright EJ, Torok ME, Holden MT, Brown NM, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for analysis of an outbreak of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;9(12):70268–2. pmid:23158674.
  22. 22. Besier S, Ludwig A, Brade V, Wichelhaus TA. Molecular analysis of fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Molecular Microbiology. 2003;47(2):463–9. pmid:12519196
  23. 23. Nagaev I, Björkman J, Andersson DI, Hughes D. Biological cost and compensatory evolution in fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Molecular Microbiology. 2001;40(2):433–9. pmid:11309125
  24. 24. O’Neill AJ, Bostock JM, Morais Moita A, Chopra I. Antimicrobial activity and mechanisms of resistance to cephalosporin P1, an antibiotic related to fusidic acid. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2002;50(6):839–48. pmid:12461002
  25. 25. O'Neill AJ, Larsen AR, Henriksen AS, Chopra I. A Fusidic Acid-Resistant Epidemic Strain of Staphylococcus aureus Carries the fusB Determinant, whereas fusA Mutations Are Prevalent in Other Resistant Isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2004;48(9):3594–7. pmid:15328136
  26. 26. Kaatz GW, Seo SM. Inducible NorA-mediated multidrug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1995;39(12):2650–5. pmid:PMC163006.
  27. 27. Truong-Bolduc QC, Dunman PM, Strahilevitz J, Projan SJ, Hooper DC. MgrA Is a Multiple Regulator of Two New Efflux Pumps in Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Bacteriology. 2005;187(7):2395–405. pmid:PMC1065235.