http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4585-0477
Figures
Abstract
The molecular mechanisms controlling the differentiation of bone marrow stromal stem cells into osteoblasts remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated whether bone marrow stromal antigen 2 (BST2) influences differentiation toward the osteoblasts lineage. BST2 mRNA expression in human alveolar-derived bone marrow stromal cells (hAD-BMSCs) increased during differentiation into osteoblasts. hAD-BMSCs differentiation into osteoblasts and the mRNA expression of the bone-specific markers alkaline phosphatase, collagen type α 1, bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin, and osterix were reduced by BST2 knockdown using siRNA. Furthermore, BST2 knockdown in hAD-BMSCs resulted in decreased RUNX2 mRNA and protein expression. We hypothesized that BST2 is involved in differentiation of into osteoblasts via the BMP2 signaling pathway. Accordingly, we evaluated the mRNA expression levels of BMP2, BMP receptors (BMPR1 and 2), and the downstream signaling molecules SMAD1, SMAD4, and p-SMAD1/5/8 in BST2 knockdown cells. BMP2 expression following the induction of differentiation was significantly lower in BST2 knockdown cells than in cells treated with a non-targeting control siRNA. Similar results were found for the knockdown of the BMP2 receptor- BMPR1A. We also identified significantly lower expression of SMAD1, SMAD4, and p-SMAD1/5/8 in the BST2 knockdown cells than control cells. Our data provide the first evidence that BST2 is involved in the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells via the regulation of the BMP2 signaling pathway.
Citation: Yoo S-H, Kim JG, Kim B-S, Lee J, Pi S-H, Lim H-D, et al. (2016) BST2 Mediates Osteoblast Differentiation via the BMP2 Signaling Pathway in Human Alveolar-Derived Bone Marrow Stromal Cells. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0158481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158481
Editor: Jung-Eun Kim, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Received: March 10, 2016; Accepted: June 16, 2016; Published: June 30, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Yoo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea Grant, which was funded by the Korean Government (MSIP)(NO.2013M3A9B2076481) to HKY. Bone Cell Biotech provided support in the form of salary for BSK. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: Bone Cell Biotech provided support in the form of salary for BSK. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
Osteoblasts differentiate from bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), also known as mesenchymal stem cells, which have the capacity to become adipocytes or fibroblasts [1]. In recent years, human alveolar-derived BMSCs (hAD-BMSCs) have been successfully isolated and cultured [2]. These cells may be useful for periodontal bone regenerative medicine because marrow blood can be easily aspirated from alveolar bone during tooth extraction and dental implant surgery [3, 4].
The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) 2 signaling pathway is an essential regulator of osteogenesis. BMP2 binds to its receptors and activates SMADs, which directly regulate target gene expression [5]. BMP2 activates BMP receptors (BMPRs) 1 and 2 to initiate signal transduction. Activated BMPR1 phosphorylates receptor-specific SMAD 1, 5, and 8, each of which form complexes with SMAD 4 [6, 7]. The target genes of BMP2 in osteoblasts encode various transcription factors, such as DLX3, DLX5, ATF4, runt-related transcription factor-2 (RUNX2), and osterix (OSX) [8]. In particular, RUNX 2 is a key transcription factor for osteogenesis [9], and regulates the expression of several osteoblastic genes including collagen type 1α (COL1α), bone sialoprotein (BSP) and the skeletal-specific osteocalcin (OCN) gene. However, little is known about the specific signaling pathways that control gene expression during the differentiation of osteoblasts from BMSCs. In a previous study, we screened for genes that are differentially expressed between undifferentiated hAD-BMSCs and fully differentiated osteoblasts [10]. We identified several differentially expressed genes, including bone marrow stromal antigen 2 (BST2).
BST2 expression affects cancer cell behavior [11], retains budding viruses to the cell plasma membrane, and inhibits virus replication [12, 13]. BST2 expression was initially identified in human differentiated B cells, plasma cell lines, and myeloma cells [14, 15]. Recently, BST2 was designated CD317 and found to be widely expressed in all stages of B cell differentiation as well as in T cells, monocytes, CD34+ progenitorcells, and non-hematopoietic cells in humans [16]. Furthermore, BST-2 expression by BMSCs could promote the growth of murine pre-B cells [17]. However, the role of BST2 in the differentiation of osteoblasts from BMSCs is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functions and signal transduction pathways associated with BST2 during the differentiation of osteoblasts from hAD-BMSCs.
Materials and Methods
Culture of hAD-BMSCs and the induction of osteoblast differentiation
To obtain hAD-BMSCs, alveolar bone marrow aspirates (0.5–1.0 mL) were collected from osteotomy sites during implant surgery using an 18-gauge needle syringe. The patients were 50–60 years of age (n = 4). All MSC donors provided written informed consent. Patient recruitment and the study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Wonkwang University Dental Hospital (WKDIRB201403-02). hAD-BMSCs were isolated and expanded as described previously [2]. To induce osteoblast differentiation, cells (nearly 90% confluent) were treated with osteoblast-induction stimulants (OS) containing 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 50 μg/mL ascorbic acid, and 100 nM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The medium and OS were refreshed every 2 days after initial plating.
Knockdown of BST2 using siRNA
Two siRNAs specifically targeting BST2 and a negative control siRNA were designed and synthesized by Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea; catalogue numbers 1013484 and 1013488). Cells were transfected with siRNA using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. To confirm the efficiency of siRNA-mediated knockdown, BST2 mRNA and protein levels were evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunoblotting, respectively.
Semi quantitative PCR and qRT–PCR assays
Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and quantified with a Nano-drop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). First-strand cDNA was synthesized with the PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan). Semi-quantitative PCR was performed with HiPi™ 5× PCR Premix (Elpis Biotech, Daejeon, Korea) with GAPDH as the control gene. After amplification, PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel dyed with 0.5 μL/mL ethidium bromide, and gel images were obtained using an imaging system (RED™, Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA, USA) and saved in the JPG file format. Then, the signal intensity of the captured images was quantified using ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The relative densities were estimated as the ratios of the signal intensities of the bands corresponding to BST2, RUNX2, BMP2, BMPR1A, BMPR1B, and BMPR2 to that of the band corresponding to GAPDH. qRT-PCR was performed with HiPi™ Real-time PCR 2× Master Mix (Elpis Biotech) with GAPDH as an internal control. To determine the expression levels of COL1α, BSP, OCN, OSX, ALP, RUNX2, and BST2, the cDNA samples were analyzed by qRT-PCR using an ABI PRISM® 7300 unit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Primers for the genes are listed in Table 1. Qualitatively similar results were obtained using semi-quantitative PCR and qRT-PCR assays, confirming that our analyses were appropriate.
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay and staining
ALP activity was determined at 5 days after treatment with OS using p-nitrophenylphosphate as a substrate, as described previously [10]. ALP activity was normalized to the total protein content as measured using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). The data are presented as nmol/30 min/mg of protein. Experiments were repeated 4 times. To examine ALP activity by histochemistry, the cells were stained with 0.1 mg/mL naphthol AS-MX phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.6 mg/mL Fast Red Violet LB Salt (Sigma-Aldrich) after 5 days of culture and then photographed with a digital camera (D80: Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Calcium accumulation assay
Calcium accumulation was determined using alizarin red-sulfate (AR-S, Sigma-Aldrich). hAD-BMSCs were cultured in 24-well plates for 21 days with continuous OS treatment. Then, cells were fixed with ice-cold 70% (v/v) ethanol for 1 h at 4°C. The ethanol was then removed and 40mM AR-S staining solution was added to cells for 1 min at room temperature. The stained cells were photographed using a digital camera (D80, Nikon).
Immunoblotting
For the western blot analysis, each protein extract (30 μg of total protein) was resolved by SDS-PAGE using 10% polyacrylamide gels and subsequently transferred to Immun-Blot® PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The primary antibodies and their dilution factors were as follows BST2, 1:1000 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA); RUNX2, 1:1000 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); SMAD1, 1:1000 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); SMAD4, 1:500 (Abcam); SMAD5. 1:500 (Abcam); SMAD 8, 1:500 (Abcam); T-SMAD1/5/8, 1:500 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); p-SMAD1/5/8, 1:500 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and β-actin, 1:1000 (Sigma-Aldrich). Secondary antibodies were used at a 1:5000 dilution. The detection of protein bands was facilitated by an Enhanced Chemiluminescence Kit (Elpis Biotech) and membranes exposures to X-ray film (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK).
Immunohistochemistry of BST2
Human bone tissues were perfusion-fixed with 10% buffered formalin. Bone tissues sections (4 μm) were stained with hematoxylin–eosin. For immunohistochemical staining, sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated with phosphate-buffered saline and incubated for 30 min at 37°C with primary BST2, 1:200 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) followed by staining using a streptavidin biotin labeling kit (DAKO Corp., Glostrup, Denmark). Section were analyzed using a IX71 microscope (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) connected to a DP72 camera (OLYMPUS) which allowed the projection of the entire field of interest onto a computer monitor.
Results
BST2 expression was inhibited by siRNA
BST2 protein and mRNA were expressed at basal levels in OS-untreated cells and increased after OS treatment. BST2 was only minimally expressed in untreated cells, but its expression was significantly higher in OS-treated cells (Fig 1A). These results indicated that BST2 expression was significantly increased during the differentiation of hAD-BMSCs into osteoblasts. To determine the influence of BST2 knockdown on osteoblast differentiation, cells transfected with siRNA were cultured in the presence or absence of OS. BST2 expression was continuously inhibited in cells treated with OS and either siBST2 #1 or #2 compared with cells treated with OS and non-targeting siRNA (Fig 1B). qRT-PCR data showed that BST2 mRNA expression was reduced in siBST2 #1 and #2 treated cells by approximately 74% and 63%, respectively, compared with cells treated with the control siRNA (Fig 1B). We also were confirmed the expression of BST2 in human bone tissue that was surgically removed from patients (Fig 1C).
RT-PCR and immunoblotting analyses (A) as well as qRT-PCR (B) demonstrated that the expression of BST2 was lower in cells treated for 5 days with OS and siBST2 #1 or #2 than in cells treated with OS and non-targeting siRNA (siCont). (C) Expression of BST2 in the human bone marrow. Representative immunostaining of BST2 in the human bone marrow was observed under light microscope (magnification ×400). Brown staining (marked with a red arrow) indicates the expression of BST2 in bone marrow. Values are expressed as means ± SEM (standardized mean difference) **, P<0.01 compared withthe expression level in cells treated with the control siRNA (siCont) (n = 4).
BST2 knockdown inhibited ALP activity and calcium accumulation in osteoblasts
OS-treated control cells showed strong ALP staining, whereas cells treated with OS and either siBST2 #1 or siBST2 #2 showed weak ALP staining (Fig 2A). ALP activity was significantly higher in OS-treated controls cells than in OS-untreated controls cells; however, the knockdown of BST2 resulted in significant decreases in ALP activity in cells treated with OS + siBST2 #1 (0.16 ± 0.01μmol/30 min/mg of protein) and OS + siBST2 #2 (0.15 ± 0.01μmol/30 min/mg of protein) compared with the activity levels of cells treated with OS and the control siRNA (by approximately 3.6-fold and 4.5-fold, respectively) (Fig 2B). In addition, AR-S staining showed large decreases in calcium accumulation in cells treated with OS and siBST2 #1 or siBST2 #2 compared with cells treated with OS and the control siRNA (Fig 2C).
ALP staining (A) and ALP activity (n = 4) (B) were reduced after BST2 knockdown. At 21 days of cultivation, BST2 knockdown by siRNA resulted in a significant reduction in AR-S staining for calcium accumulation (C). Values are expressed as means ± SEM. **, P<0.01 compared with the control siRNA-treated group (siRNA Cont).
BST-2 knockdown inhibited the expression of osteoblast markers
We assessed the mRNA expression of osteoblast marker genes using qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig 3, the expression levels of ALP, COL1α1, BSP, OCN, and OSX were increased in cells treated with OS, and the inhibition of BST2 by treatment with siBST2 #1 or #2 led to decreases in the expression of these markers. Relative mRNA expression levels of ALP, normalized to those in cells treated with OS and the control siRNA, were 3.8 and 3.1 times lower, respectively, in cells treated with OS + siBST2 #1 and OS + siBST2 #2 than cells treated withOS and the control siRNA (P<0.01). Furthermore, the mRNA levels of COL1α1 were 2.2 and 1.7 times lower, those of BSP were 1.6 and 1.3 times lower, those of OCN were 1.9 and 1.6 times lower, and those OSX were 1.5 and 1.43 times lower respectively, in cells treated with OS + siBST2 #1 and OS + siBST2 #2 than cells treated with OS and the siRNA control (P< 0.05 for all comparisons).
hAD-BMSCs transfected with siRNA were cultured for 5 days in the presence or absence of OS, and qRT-PCR was performed to measure the expression of ALP, COL1α1, BSP, OCN, and OSX, with GAPDH as the internal control. Relative expression levels were normalized to the expression of the untreated negative control sample. Compared with the untreated control, increased expression levels of ALP, OSX, COL1α1, BSP, and OCN were apparent in cells treated with OS and the control siRNA; however, the expression of these markers was decreased after BST2 knockdown by siRNA. Values are expressed as means ± SEM. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01, when compared with cells treated with OS and the control siRNA.
BST2 knockdown inhibited the expression of RUNX2
To further investigate the mechanism of BST2-mediated osteoblast differentiation, the expression of RUNX2 was measured in BST2 knockdown cells. RUNX2 expression was higher in cells treated with OS alone, than in the untreated control; however, it was decreased in cells treated with OS and siBST2 #1 or #2, compared with that of cells treated with OS alone (Fig 4A). As shown in Fig 4B, the relative expression of RUNX2 mRNA (normalized to the expression level of cells treated with OS alone) was higher in cells treated with OS and the control siRNA than in untreated cells. However, relative RUNX2 mRNA expression was significantly lower in cells treated with OS + siBST2 #1 (4.25 ± 0.499) and OS+ siBST2 #2 (3.53 ± 0.469) by approximately 3.9 and 2.7 times, respectively, than in cells treated with OS alone (P<0.01; Fig 4B). An immunoblot analysis revealed that RUNX2 protein was also highly expressed in cells treated with OS alone; however, RUNX2 expression was reduced in cells treated with OS + siBST2 #1 and OS + siBST2 #2, similar to the mRNA expression results for the these samples (Fig 4C).
hAD-BMSCs transfected with siRNA were cultured for 5 days in the presence or absence of OS, and RT-PCR (A), qRT-PCR (B), and immunoblot analyses were performed. GAPDH was used as an internal standard, and the relative expression of RUNX2 was normalized to the expression levels in of cells treated with OS alone. qRT-PCR data showed that RUNX2 expression was reduced following BST2 knockdown with siBST2 #1 and #2. To determine protein expression, the cells were lysed and the proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (C). The band densities for RUNX2 were normalized to those for β-actin. RUNX2 mRNA and protein expression were significantly reduced following BST2 knockdown by siRNA. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 4, **P<0.01vs. OS-treated control).
BMP2 signaling promotes osteoblast differentiation via BST2
To clarify whether BST2 regulates osteoblast differentiation by modulating the BMP2 signaling pathway, we determined the expression levels of BMP2, BMPRs, and the downstream signaling molecules SMADs in BST2 knockdown cells. BMP2 mRNA and protein were highly expressed in cells treated with OS alone, whereas they were minimally expressed in cells treated with OS and siBST2 #1 or #2 (Fig 5A). As shown in Fig 5A, the relative expression of BMP2 (normalized to the expression level of cells treated with alone) was higher in cells treated with OS alone, than in untreated control cells. However, the relative levels of BMP2 mRNA expression were significantly lower in cells treated with OS + siBST2 #1 and OS + siBST2 #2 by approximately 1.6 and 1.4 times, respectively, than in cells treated with OS and the control siRNA (P<0.01; Fig 5A). The BMP2 receptors, BMPR1A showed similar results to those of BMP2. To further explore the mechanism by which the BMP2 signaling pathway is involved in the BST2-mediated differentiation of osteoblasts, we analyzed the protein expression levels of SMADs 1 and 4 and p-SMAD1/5/8 (Fig 5B). We found significant decreases in SMAD1 protein expression levels (approximately 2.0 and 1.7 times lower, respectively) in cells treated with OS + siBST2 #1 and OS + siBST2 #2 compared with cells treated with OS alone (P < 0.01) (Fig 5B). We also found significant decreases in SMAD4 protein expression levels (approximately 4.1 and 3.4 times lower, respectively) in cells treated with OS + siBST2 #1 and OS + siBST2 #2 compared with cells treated with OS alone (P < 0.01) (Fig 5B). Additionally, the levels of p-SMAD1/5/8 expression were significantly lower in cells treated with OS + siBST2 #1 and OS + siBST2 #2 (approximately 1.3 and 1.1 times lower, respectively) than in cells treated with OS alone (P < 0.01; Fig 5B).
hAD-BMSCs transfected with siRNA were cultured for 5 days in the presence or absence of OS, and an RT-PCR analysis was performed. GAPDH was used as an internal standard, and the relative expression levelsof BMP2, BMPR1A, BMPR1B, and BMPR2 were normalized to the expression levels of control cells treated with OS alone. The expression levels of BMP2 and BMPR1A were significantly reduced following BST2 knockdown by siRNA (A). The cells were lysed and the proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analyses. The band densities for SMADs 1, 4, and p-SMAD1/5/8 were normalized to those of β-actin and T-SMAD1/5/8. SMAD1, SMAD4 and p-SMAD1/5/8 expression levels were significantly reduced following BST2 knockdown by siRNA (B). Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 4, **P < 0.01 vs. OS-treated controls).
Discussion
The results of this study revealed that BST2 mediates the differentiation of hAD-BMSCs into osteoblasts by modulating osteoblast markers and the BMP2 signaling pathway. BST2 is an antiviral gene that is overexpressed in many cancers, including breast cancer. It is critical for the invasiveness of breast cancer cells and the occurrence of metastasis in vivo [4, 11]. Studies of BST2-deficient mice imply a complex role in the regulation of viral infection [18]; it also functions as an endogenous ligand for LILRA4, also known as ILT7, and inhibits cytokine production [19], although its precise biological roles remains contentious [20]. Although the regulation of BST2 in immune cells is becoming clear [21], a biological role for BST2 in the process of osteoblasts differentiation from human hAD-BMSCs has not been reported. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated BST2 expression and the effects of siRNA-mediated BST2 knockdown on differentiation makers in order to understand the mechanisms underlying osteoblast differentiation of hAD-BMSCs.
Bone formation is a typical differentiation procedure involving many osteoblast markers. Collagen and ALP are mainly involved in the early stage of this process, and OCN and BSP are mainly involved in middle and later stages. The transcription factors OSX and Runx2 are essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. We found that BST2 expression was increased during osteoblast differentiation and most osteoblast markers, including OSX, exhibited decreased expression when BST2 was knocked down by siRNA. We inferred that BST2 has an important role in osteoblast differentiation, though the precise mechanisms were unclear. Therefore, we also examined the relationship with the key transcription factor RUNX2 and the BMP2 signaling pathway during osteoblast differentiation.
RUNX2 interacts with various co-regulatory transcription factors, forming complexes that regulate the transcription of many bone-related factors in osteoblasts, including ALP, COL1α1, BSP, OCN, and OSX [10]. Furthermore, RUNX2 may be involved in oncogenesis and the DNA damage response [22, 23]. In addition, RUNX2 function in osteoblast differentiation is affected by various regulatory genes with broad functions [10, 24]. Our results indicated that BST2 expression decreases RUNX2 and mediates osteoblast differentiation, resulting in decreases in ALP, COL1α1, BSP, OCN, and OSX.
We also examined the regulatory mechanism that mediates the interaction between BST2 and the BMP2 signaling pathway. BMP2 signaling requires the oligomerization of two homodimers formed by type 1 and type 2 BMPR chains. BMP2 and BMP4 have 2 possible type 1 receptors, BMPR1A and BMPR1B, which can both oligomerize the type 2 receptor BMPR2 [25, 26]. The type 1 receptors activate BMPR-regulated SMADs (R-SMADs; SMAD1, 5, and 8) by phosphorylation. SMAD4 is known as a common partner SMAD (Co-SMAD); it passes through the nuclear membrane and forms a complex with R-SMADs [26,27]. The SMAD complex moves into the nucleus and acts as a transcription factor.
Previous studies have identified genes that act as negative regulators of the relationship between BMP-SMAD signaling during the differentiation of osteoblasts. Ishibashi et al. have reported that endoglin knockdown represses the BMP-2-induced osteoblast differentiation of periodontal ligament (PDL) cells [28]. Interestingly, there was no change in p-SMAD1/5/8 expression in endoglin-knockdown PDL cells induced by BMP2. However, they observed a change in SMAD2 expression. It is conceivable that endoglin controls the expression of BMP2-induced genes in PDL cells downstream of p-SMAD1/5/8. The authors concluded that PDL cells respond to BMP2 via an unusual signaling pathway that is dependent on endoglin, which is involved in osteoblast differentiation and calcification. In addition, Tan et al. reported that Smad4 knockout mice exhibit lower bone mass at up to 6 months of age. They reported negative effects of Smad4 knockout on osteoblast proliferation and function (based on mineral density, bone volume, bone formation rate, and osteoblast number) [29].
In our study, the relative mRNA expression level of BMP2 increased in cells treated with OS, but decreased in BST2 knockdown cells. p-SMAD 1/5/8 expression was controlled by BST2 according to our results. Interestingly, SMAD1 and 4 in osteoblasts were inhibited when BST2 was knocked down. However, SMAD5 and 8 were not correlated with BST2 expression. SMAD 1, 5, and 8 are structurally highly similar, including conserved ERK/MAPK agreement phosphorylation sites in the linker region. The linker regions of SMAD1 and SMAD5 are encoded by a single exon, but the SMAD8 linker is encoded by two exons [30, 31]. Ebisawa et al. reported that there was no change in SMAD8 expression, despite SMAD1 and 5 phosphorylation, during the induction of mouse undifferentiated mesenchymal cells (C2C12) via BMP6 [32]. Sebastian et al. reported that SMAD8 is only expressed in the initial visceral endoderm, while SMAD1 and 5 were strongly expressed in mouse embryos [33]. Our results suggest that the lack of changes in SMAD5 and 8 can be explained by differences in the stages of osteoblast differentiation. Considerable evidence suggests that SMAD1, SMAD5, and SMAD8 function individually according to cell type.
In summary, our data demonstrated that BST2 is highly expressed in osteoblasts and that BST2 knockdown suppresses the differentiation of hAD-BMSCs into osteoblasts. Furthermore, BST2 knockdown down-regulates the differentiation of osteoblasts via the BMP2 signaling pathway. This is the first demonstration that BST2 is involved in the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs via the regulation of the BMP2 signaling pathway.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea Grant, which was funded by the Korean Government (MSIP) (NO.2013M3A9B2076481). The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: HKY SHY ESC. Performed the experiments: HKY SHY JGK HIS. Analyzed the data: HKY SHY JGK BSK JL SHP HDL HIS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HKY SHY JGK HIS. Wrote the paper: HKY SHY.
References
- 1. Friedenstein AJ, Petrakova KV, Kurolesova AI, Frolova GP. Heterotopic of bone marrow analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues. Transplantation. 1968;6(2): 230–237. pmid:5654088
- 2. Matsubara T, Suardita K, Ishii M, Sugiyama M, Igarashi A, Oda R, et al. Alveolar bone marrow as a cell source for regenerative medicine: differences between alveolar and iliac bone marrow stromal cells. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(3): 399–409. pmid:15746984
- 3. Yamada Y, Nakamura S, Ueda M, Ito K. Osteotome technique with injectable tissue-engineered bone and simultaneous implant placement by cell therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(4): 468–474. pmid:22150696
- 4. Kagami H, Agata H, Inoue M, Asahina I, Tojo A, Yamashita N, et al. The use of bone marrow stromal cells (bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells) for alveolar bone tissue engineering: basic science to clinical translation. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2014;20(3): 229–232. pmid:24494719
- 5. Massagué J, Seoane J, Wotton D. Smad transcription factor. Genes Dev. 2005; 19:2783–2810. pmid:16322555
- 6. Mandal CC, Ganapathy S, Gorin Y, Mahadev K, Block K, Abboud HE, et al. Reactive oxygen species derived from Nox4 mediate BMP2 gene transcription and osteoblast differentiation. Biochem J. 2011;433(2): 393–402. pmid:21029048
- 7. Chen D, Harris MA, Rossini G, Dunstan CR, Dallas SL, Feng JQ, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) enhances BMP-3, BMP-4, and bone cell differentiation marker gene expression during the induction of mineralized bone matrix formation in cultures of fetal rat calvarial osteoblasts. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;60(3): 283–290. pmid:9069167
- 8. Nakashima K, de Crombrugghe B. Transcriptional mechanisms in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Trends Genet. 2003;19(8): 458–466. pmid:12902164
- 9. Matsubara T, Kida K, Yamaguchi A, Hata K, Ichida F, Meguro H, et al. BMP2 regulates Osterix through Msx2 and Runx2 during osteoblast differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2008;289(43): 29119–29125.
- 10. Kim BS, Kim HJ, Kim JS, You YO, Zadeh H, Shin HI, et al. IFITM1 increases osteogenesis through Runx2 in human alveolar-derived bone marrow stromal cells. Bone. 2012;51(3): 506–514. pmid:22634173
- 11. Jones PH, Mahauad-Fernandez WD, Madison MN, Okeoma CM. BST-2/tetherin is over expressed in mammary gland and tumor tissues in MMTV-induced mammary cancer. Virology. 2013;444(1–2): 124–139. pmid:23806386
- 12. Jones PH, Mehta HV, Maric M, Roller RJ, Okeoma CM. Bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (BST-2) restricts mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) replication in vivo. Retrovirology. 2012; 9: 10. pmid:22284121
- 13. Mahauad-Fernandez WD, Jones PH, Okeoma CM. Critical role for BST-2 in acute chikungunya virus infection. J Gen Virol. 2014;95(11): 2450–2461.
- 14. Goto T, Kennel SJ, Abe M, Takishita M, Kosaka M, Solomon A, et al. A novel membrane antigen selectively expressed on terminally differentiated human B cells. Blood. 1994;84(6): 1922–1930. pmid:8080996
- 15. Ohtomo T, Sugamata Y, Ozaki Y, Ono K, Yoshimura Y, Kawai S, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a surface antigen preferentially over expressed on multiple myeloma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;258(3): 583–591. pmid:10329429
- 16. Vidal-Laliena M, Romero X, March S, Requena V, Petriz J, Engel P. Characterization of antibodies submitted to the B cell section of the 8th Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens Workshop by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Cell Immunol. 2005;236(1–2): 6–16. pmid:16157322
- 17. Ishikawa J, Kaisho T, Tomizawa H, Lee BO, Kobune Y, Inazawa J, et al. Molecular cloning and chromosomal mapping of a bone marrow stromal cell surface gene, BST2, that may be involved in pre-B-cell growth. Genomics. 1995;26(3): 527–534. pmid:7607676
- 18. Swiecki M, Wang Y, Gilfillan S, Lenschow DJ, Colonna M. Cutting edge: paradoxical roles of BST2/tetherin in promoting type I IFN response and viral infection. J Immunol. 2012;188(6): 2488–2492. pmid:22327075
- 19. Duque G, Huang DC, Macoritto M, Rivas D, Yang XF, Ste-Marie LG, et al. Autocrine regulation of interferon gamma in mesenchymal stem cells plays a role in early osteoblastogenesis. Stem Cells. 2009;27(3): 550–558. pmid:19096039
- 20. Tavano B, Galao RP, Graham DR, Neil SJ, Aquino VN, Fuchs D,et al. Ig-like transcript 7, but not bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (also known as HM1.24, tetherin, or CD317), modulates plasmacytoid dendritic cell function in primary human blood leukocytes. J Immunol. 2013;190(6): 2622–2630. pmid:23401591
- 21. Mahauad-Fernandez WD, Borcherding NC, Zhang W, Okeoma CM. Bone marrow stromal antigen 2 (BST-2) DNA is demethylated in breast tumors and breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 2015;10(4): e0123931. pmid:25860442
- 22. Ito Y, Bae SC, Chuang LS. The RUNX family: developmental regulators in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(2): 81–95. pmid:25592647
- 23. Wysokinski D, Pawlowska E, Blasiak J. RUNX2: A master bone growth regulator that may beinvolved in the DNA damage response. DNA Cell Biol. 2015;34(5): 305–315. pmid:25555110
- 24. Ren D, Wei F, Hu L, Yang S, Wang C, Yuan X. Phosphorylation of Runx2, induced by cyclic mechanical tension via ERK1/2 pathway, contributes to osteodifferentiation of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230(10): 2426–2436. pmid:25740112
- 25. Chen D, Zhao M, Mundy GR. Bone morphogenetic proteins. Growth Factors. 2004;22(4): 233–241. pmid:15621726
- 26. Miyazono K, Maeda S, Imamura T. BMP receptor signaling: transcriptional targets, regulation of signals, and signaling crosstalk. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16(3): 251–263. pmid:15871923
- 27. Samad TA, Rebbapragada A, Bell E, Zhang Y, Sidis Y, Jeong SJ, et al. DRAGON, a bonemorphogenetic protein co-receptor. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(14): 14122–14129. pmid:15671031
- 28. Ishibashi O, Ikegame M, Takizawa F, Yoshizawa T, Moksed MA, Iizawa F, et al. Endoglin isinvolved in BMP-2-induced osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament cells through a pathway independent of Smad-1/5/8 phosphorylation. J Cell Physiol. 2010;222(2): 456–473.
- 29. Tan X, Weng T, Zhang J, Wang J, Li W, Wan H, et al., Smad4 is required for maintaining normal murine postnatal bone homeostasis. J Cell Sci. 2007;1(120): 2162–2170.
- 30. Aubin J, Davy A, Soriano P. In vivo convergence of BMP and MAPK signaling pathways: impact of differential Smad1 phosphorylation on development and homeostasis. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1482–1494. pmid:15198985
- 31. Massague J. Integration of Smad and MAPK pathways: a link and a linker revisited. Genes Dev. 2003;17: 2993–2997. pmid:14701870
- 32. Ebisawa T, Tada K, Kitajima I, Tojo K, Sampath TK, Kawabata M, et al. Characterization of bone morphogenetic protein-6 signaling pathways in osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Sci. 1999;112 (Pt 20): 3519–3527. pmid:10504300
- 33. Arnold SJ, Maretto S, Islam A, Bikoff EK, Robertson EJ. Dose-dependent Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8 signaling in the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol. 2006;1 (296): 104–118.