http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3773-4035
Figures
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify microRNAs associated with a serum antibody response to Mycoplasma bovis in beef cattle. Serum from sixteen beef calves was collected at three points: in summer after calves were born, in fall at weaning, and in the following spring. All sera collected in the summer were ELISA-negative for anti-M. bovis. By the fall, eight animals were seropositive for IgG (positive group), while eight remained negative (negative group). By spring, all animals in both groups were seropositive. MicroRNAs were extracted from sera and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq next-generation sequencer. A total of 1,374,697 sequences mapped to microRNAs in the bovine genome. Of these, 82% of the sequences corresponded to 27 microRNAs, each represented by a minimum of 10,000 sequences. There was a statistically significant interaction between ELISA response and season for bta-miR-24-3p (P = 0.0268). All sera collected at the initial summer had a similar number of copies of this microRNA (P = 0.773). In the fall, the positive group had an increased number of copies when compared to the negative group (P = 0.021), and this grew more significant by the following spring (P = 0.0001). There were 21 microRNAs associated (P< 0.05) with season. These microRNAs could be evaluated further as candidates to potentially improve productivity in cattle. The microRNAs bta-let-7b, bta-miR- 24-3p, bta-miR- 92a, and bta-miR-423-5p, were significatly associated with ELISA status (P< 0.05). These microRNAs have been recognized as playing a role in the host defense against bacteria in humans, mice, and dairy cattle. Further studies are needed to establish if these microRNAs could be used as diagnostic marker or indicator of exposure, or whether intervention strategies could be developed as an alternative to antibiotics for controlling disease due to M. bovis.
Citation: Casas E, Cai G, Kuehn LA, Register KB, McDaneld TG, Neill JD (2016) Association of MicroRNAs with Antibody Response to Mycoplasma bovis in Beef Cattle. PLoS ONE 11(8): e0161651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161651
Editor: George Calin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UNITED STATES
Received: May 9, 2016; Accepted: August 9, 2016; Published: August 18, 2016
This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Data Availability: Sequences have been submitted to NCBI Short Read Archive4, under BioProject accession PRJNA319677.
Funding: This research was conducted at a USDA research facility and all funding was provided through internal USDA research dollars. This project is an intramural project of the USDA/ARS National Animal Disease Center. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Bovine respiratory disease complex is the most expensive condition in cattle, costing up to $1 billion annually in the United States [1]. With infectious diseases being a major economical factor influencing productivity in the cattle industry, it is suggested that perhaps it is time to look for ways to reduce losses by focusing on the animal’s response to related pathogens, instead of continuing to focus on the pathogens themselves [2].
Mycoplasma bovis has been identified as an important pathogen causing respiratory disease of cattle [3, 4]. In cattle, the most common pathogen retrieved from lungs is is M. bovis, however, additional Mycoplasmas are retrieved, including M. bovis, M. arginini, M. bovirhinis, and M. bovigenitalium [5].
Cattle infected by M. bovis are usually chronically affected, unresponsive to treatment, and unable to attain commercial weights.
MicroRNAs have been proposed as a source of biomarkers and as indicators of exposure to pathogens [6, 7]. MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that alter the transcriptome by inhibiting translation of messenger RNA, or by degrading them [8, 9]. MicroRNAs were first described in C. elegans in the 1990’s [10], and their origin and function in regulation of biological functions has been established [8, 11, 12]. These molecules have been proposed as novel non-invasive biomarkers for hepatitis C virus and hepatocellular carcinomas [13]. Additionally, there have been studies to identify microRNAs and establish their profile in bacterial infections of cattle [14, 15]. However, there has not been a study to establish microRNA profiles in cattle exposed to M. bovis; therefore, our objective was to identify microRNAs associated with a serum antibody response to M. bovis in beef cattle.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Sera from sixteen beef steers born during the spring, 2013, were obtained from the US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska. Animals were bled on three occasions: during the summer of 2013, while in the pasture with the dam, at weaning in the fall of the same year, and during the spring of 2014. Bleeding of animals was done according to the management protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institution. Blood was obtained by jugular venipuncture using a syringe. The sample was centrifuged at 1,300 X g for 25 minutes at 4°C and serum was aspirated and frozen at -20°C. Samples were shipped to the National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa.
Health records for each animal were obtained. Two animals from the negative group developed bovine respiratory disease prior to weaning and did not develop it afterwards. The condition was diagnosed in eleven animals, from the positive and negative groups, after weaning. No assessment was made of the etiology of the condition.
ELISA
Cattle sera were tested for antibodies reactive with M. bovis using a direct ELISA, as previously reported [16], with the following modifications: 0.5 ug of antigen was used per well. Anti-bovine IgG-peroxidase conjugate (KPL, Inc.), was diluted 1:3000 in wash buffer to detect cattle IgG and color development was halted after 45 min. The M. bovis isolate M23 was used as the source of antigen [17]. Pooled sera from 32 cattle naturally or experimentally infected with M. bovis (positive pool) or 25 healthy cattle (negative pool) were used as positive and negative controls. The presence or absence of serum antibody to M. bovis was confirmed in each animal using a commercially available ELISA (Biovet, Inc.) prior to selection for inclusion in the appropriate pool. Sera included in the positive pool were 3+ or 4+ positive, on a scale of 1+ to 4+, as directed by the ELISA manufacturer. The pool itself tested as 4+ with the Biovet ELISA and had a level of IgG higher than that of the positive control serum provided with the kit. A positive result in our in-house ELISA was defined as an average absorbance at 405 nm greater than the average plus 3 standard deviations of the negative control, calculated independently for each plate analyzed.
MicroRNA isolation
MicroRNAs were isolated from the serum samples using the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD) using 200ul of serum sample. MicroRNAs were extracted according to the manufacturer’s direction and the samples were eluted in 14ul of RNase free water. After extraction 1 ul of each sample was run using the Small RNA chip on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) to quantify the microRNAs extracted from the samples. MicroRNA concentration was determined by using a 10–40 nucleotide gate.
Library Preparation
MicroRNA preparation extracted from each sample was used to prepare sequencing libraries. The libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Set for Illumina Set 1 and 2 (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA). The libraries were individually index with the Illumina 1–24 indexed primers. Six microliters of each animal’s small RNA fraction was used in library preparation according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After the library preparation the libraries were cleaned up and concentrated using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD) from 100ul to 27.5ul. The quality and quantity of the libraries were determined by running 1 ul of each library on a DNA 1000 chip on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Five nanograms of each indexed library was then pooled and size selected within a 135–170 nucleotide range. The total volume of the pool was 246.5 ul. The pool was concentrated using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD) to 35ul of RNase free water. The pool was then size selected using the Pippin Prep on a 3% Agarose gel without added ethidium bromide (SAGE Sciences, Beverly, MA) with a size selection of 142–170 nucleotides according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After the gel was run the pools were concentrated using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD) by eluting in 32 ul of RNase free water. One microliter of the size selected library pool was run using a High sensitivity DNA chip on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The concentration was determined by using a 135–170 nucleotide gate. The final concentration of the size selected pool library was 1.5nM and the pool was stored at -20°C.
Sequencing the Library Pool
The pooled and size selected library was sequenced using the Hi-Seq Sequencing Kit v2 50 Cycles (Illumina, San Diego, CA) in the Sequencing Core Facility at the National Animal Disease Center (NADC).
Data Analysis
The quality of Illumina sequences was inspected using FastQCv0.11.22 program in the fastx toolkit3. The Illumina adapter was removed using fastx_clipper. Sequences of bovine microRNAs and their precursors were downloaded from miRBase (v21). Reads were mapped to known bovine microRNAs, and read counts for each microRNA were compiled and normalized using miRDeep2 [18]. Sequences have been submitted to NCBI Short Read Archive4, under BioProject accession PRJNA319677.
Statistical Analysis
Analysis was done using the Mixed procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The model included the effects ELISA status (positive or negative), season (summer, fall, or spring), and the interaction between ELISA status and season.
Probability values shown are nominal and uncorrected for multiple testing. Sixteen animals were used to ascertain the association of microRNAs with ELISA status in the present study. Additional experimental units would be needed if significance was adjusted for multiple comparisons. Although next generation sequencing allows profiling microRNAs in each experimental unit, the cost associated with embarking on a large scale study is still a limiting factor. The present study was designed to ascertain nominal significant differences with the minimal number of samples. For this reason it was deemed relevant to present un-corrected significances in this study. Significances should be taken in consideration when interpreting results.
Results
There were 1,374,697 sequences mapped to microRNAs in the bovine genome. Of these, 1,129,750 sequences corresponded to 27 highly abundant microRNAs with more than 10,000 copies each for all 16 animals. MicroRNAs with fewer than 10,000 copies were excluded from the study. Table 1 shows the number of copies for each microRNA used in the study.
There were four microRNAs associated (P< 0.05) with ELISA status (Table 2). For bta-let-7b and bta-miR-24-3p, the positive group had a greater number of copies when compared to the negative group; whereas for bta-miR-92a and bta-miR-423-5p, the negative group had the greatest number of counts when compared to the positive group.
A total of 21 microRNAs were associated with season (Table 3). Six microRNAs (bta-miR-1246, bta-miR-10b, bta-miR-423-3p, bta-miR-99a-5p, bta-miR-181a, and bta-miR-423-5p), had the fewest copy numbers (P< 0.01) in the spring, 2014, when compared with copy numbers produced during summer and fall, 2013. There were six microRNAs (bta-miR-27b, bta-miR-191, bta-miR-30d, bta-miR-451, bta-miR-25, and bta-miR-140), that had the greatest number of copies (P< 0.05) in the spring, 2014, when compared with summer and fall, 2013. Three microRNAs (bta-miR-148a, bta-miR-26a, and bta-miR-21-5p), had the greatest copy numbers (P< 0.02) during the summer, 2013, when compared to the fall, 2013 and spring, 2014. Bta-miR-22-3p and bta-miR-24-3p had the fewest number of copies in summer, 2013, an intermediate number of sequences in fall, 2013, and the greatest number in spring, 2014 (P< 0.0001). Bta-miR-320a and bta-miR-192 had the greatest number of copies during fall, 2013, while spring, 2014, had the fewest (P< 0.02). Bta-miR-486 had the fewest counts during fall, 2013, and the highest in spring, 2014 (P = 0.0347), while bta-miR-122 had the lowest in summer, 2013, and the highest in spring, 2014 (P = 0.0143).
Fig 1 shows the interaction (P = 0.0268) of ELISA status (positive and negative groups) and season for bta-miR-24-3p. During summer, 2013, both groups have similar (P> 0.05) copies of this microRNA. During fall, 2013, the positive group has an increased production of the microRNA, which is different from the negative group (P = 0.0211). In the spring of 2014, both groups increase the number of counts for this microRNA, but the differences between both groups in this season are significant (P = 0.0001).
Solid and dashed lines correspond to positive and negative groups, respectively.
Of sixteen animals in which ELISA status was determined, thirteen developed respiratory disease (two prior, and eleven post-weaning). No association between ELISA status and respiratory disease should exist. It is probable that M. bovis was involved in the development of respiratory disease in these animals, but the etiology was undetermined.
Discussion
In this study, bta-miR-24-3p abundance increased in the seropositive group. This microRNA has been previously been reported to be associated with Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1) in other species. HO-1 is an enzyme that degrades heme groups in different components that give the cell anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and antiviral properties [19]. One of the components that HO-1 produces is carbon monoxide, which is known to be an important mediator of the host defense response mechanism [20]. For this reason, HO-1 is known as a cytoprotective enzyme that gives the cell cytoprotective properties against bacteria, viruses, and fungi [19]. Bta-miR-24-3p regulate the production of HO-1 at the post-transcriptional level [21].
Bta-miR-24-3p upregulation has been reported in challenge studies. In bovine mammary epithelial cells challenged with E. coli, an over-expression of bta-miR-24-3p was identified [22]. It has also been observed that bta-miR-24-3p was over-expressed in serum samples from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [13]. Additionally, this micro RNA is over-expressed in swine challenged with Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), and has been identified as a regulator of HO-1 [23]. It has been proposed that upregulation of bta-miR-24-3p inhibits the transcription of HO-1, therefore, hampering the cell’s ability to defends itself against pathogens [23]. Therefore, it is probable that M. bovis has a similar effect in cattle. In the present study, an upregulation of bta-miR-24-3p was detected after animals became ELISA-positive. It can be postulated that bta-miR-24-3p is over-expressed when exposed to a pathogen; however, further studies are needed to establish if HO-1 is the target of bta-miR-24-3p in M. bovis exposure in cattle.
The microRNA bta-let-7b was upregulated in the current study for the positive, compared to the negative group. A similar increase in abundance has been identified in other species with different diseases. Thornburg et al. [24], using monocyte-derived dendritic cells challenged with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), determined that human let-7b was over-expressed in challenged versus non-challenged cells. Additionally, Edmonds and Eischen [25], indicate that let-7b was upregulated in recurrent tumors but not non-recurrent tumors, in human lungs with adenocarcinomas. Let-7b was also over-expressed in mice synaptoneurosomes during prion disease [26]. It has been reported that members of the let-7 family target, and directly inhibit, interleukin-6 (IL-6). During tumorgenesis, NF-κB mediates the inflammatory response, reducing transcription of let-7 family members. IL-6 increases when let-7 family members are depleted [27]. The upregulation of bta-let-7b in the positive group may be a mechanism of the pathogen to inhibit IL-6 production and the ability of the animal to defend itself.
Bta-miR-92a was down-regulated in the positive, compared to the negative group for the study herein. Berschneider et al. [28], using human tissue from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients, determined that this condition is mediated by the WNT1-inducible signaling pathway protein-1 (WISP1), which is a target of miR-92a. MiR-92a was down-regulated in IPF samples, while WISP1 was upregulated, and Berschneider et al. [28] provide evidence for WISP1 regulation by miR-92a in pulmonary fibrosis. Toll-like receptors (TLR) are essential for the initiation of the innate immune response, recognizing pathogens and the response of the host against them [29]. Lai et al. [30], demonstrated that stimulation of TLR production in macrophages down-regulates miR-92a. It is probable that exposure to M. bovis has a similar effect in cattle. Bta-miR-92a is a candidate to be used as a diagnostic tool in animals exposed to the pathogen.
Conflicting data have been reported on the expression of bta-423-5p in different conditions. In the present study, there was a down-regulation of the microRNA in the positive, compared to the negative group. Punga et al [31], in a study using lung samples affected with myasthenia gravis (a chronic autoimmune disorder caused by an antibody-mediated attack against neuromuscular junctions) in humans, indicate that hsa-miR-423-5p is over-expressed. Punga et al. [31], indicate that possible immunosuppression increases this microRNA. Jin et al. [22], using bovine mammary gland epithelial cells challenged with E. coli, found an upregulation of bta-miR-423-5p. Lawless et al. [32], also found this microRNA over-expressed in bovine monocytes in mammary gland affected with mastitis due to Streptococcus uberis. It is possible that bta-miR-423-5p may be upregulated in dairy cattle affected with mastitis, whereas circulating bta-miR-423-5p may be down-regulated in beef cattle when exposed to a pathogen that produces respiratory disease.
The ELISA used here to identify cattle as positive or negative for M. bovis is based on the reactivity of serum IgG with an extract enriched in membrane proteins of the bacterium. ELISAs of similar design are commonly used for detection of M. bovis-infected animals in both research and diagnostic settings. However, it is not known whether cross-reactive antibodies that may be elicited by infection with related commensal species, such as M. bovirhinis, could falsely contribute to estimates of M. bovis-specific antibody in individual animals, including those in this study. Nonetheless, seroconversion on a group level is predictive of M. bovis infection, especially when antibody titers are high [33], as we found here for sera from animals in the positive group. At the fall, 2013 sampling, when positive and negative groups were defined, the level of serum antibody in all 8 positive animals exceeded the level in the pool of sera used as a positive control, in most cases by at least two-fold. Therefore, we expect any cross-reactive antibodies detected by the ELISA to have had a negligible effect on the accurate identification of cattle infected with M. bovis.
The present study comprises of microRNAs that are differentially expressed throughout the growth stage of beef cattle, surveyed by season. Two studies in the Chinese Qinchuan breed evaluated microRNAs in cattle [34, 35]. A genome-wide profile was done, in which fetal and adult muscle tissues were compared to establish the genome-wide DNA methylation, microRNA and messenger RNA transcriptional activity of muscle in cattle, with the objective to understand how DNA methylation and microRNAs regulate the expression of target genes [35] had the objective to identify expression of microRNAs in bovine muscle at two prenatal, and three postnatal stages.
In the present study, bta-miR-22-3p was upregulated as the animals grew older. This microRNA was also upregulated in adult, when compared to fetal muscle tissue in the previously mentioned studies, regardless of the tissue in which it is measured [34, 35]. Bta-miR-22-3p may be a critical micro RNA associated with development of cattle.
Several microRNAs had similar expression when comparing results from the present study with those of There were nine microRNAs (bta-miR-10b, bta-miR-423-3p, bta-miR-99a-5p, bta-miR-181a, bta-miR-423-5p, bta-miR-148a, bta-miR-26a, bta-miR-192, and bta-miR-486), that were upregulated in earlier stages of life in both studies. These microRNAs may be important earlier in life, and their relevance diminishes as the animal grows older, given that similar expression patterns were identified regardless of the tissue (serum or muscle).
There were eight microRNAs (bta-miR-27b, bta-miR-191, bta-miR-30d, bta-miR-451, bta-miR-25, bta-miR-140, bta-miR-24-3p, and bta-miR-122), that were upregulated in older animals in the present study, and upregulated in fetal muscle tissue of the study. These differences in expression may be tissue-specific, and may be produced by cells and not released to circulating serum. Further studies would be needed to establish whether these differences are due to aging.
There were three microRNAs (bta-miR-1246, bta-miR-21-5p, and bta-miR-320a) that were identified in the present study, but unreported by. These microRNAs may be produced by tissues other than muscle and released to circulating serum, therefore not identified when studying muscle samples [35].
Coordinated cellular activity of different tissues in an organism is based on the ability to communicate among different cell types. MicroRNAs are molecules by which cells can communicate with each other and their impact in biological processes is becoming apparent [36, 37]. Serum is a readily available sample, and is used to monitor the health status of living organisms [13]. The use of bovine serum will allow the development of research programs focused on establishing microRNA health patterns in cattle, and to ascertain their exposure to pathogens.
There were 21 microRNAs associated with season (growth of cattle), suggesting that these microRNAs could be targets to improve productivity in the species. We also identified bta-let-7b, bta-miR- 24-3p, bta-miR- 92a, and 423-5p, to be associated (P< 0.05) with serum antibody response to M. bovis These microRNAs have been recognized as involved in the host defense mechanisms against pathogens in human, mice, and dairy cattle. Further studies are needed to establish if these microRNAs could be used as a diagnostic indicator of exposure, or whether intervention strategies could be developed to be used as an alternative to antibiotics for controlling disease due to M. bovis.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Randy Atchison and William Boatwright from the NADC and Sandra Nejezchleb from the USMARC, for outstanding technical assistance. Mention of trade name, proprietary product, or specified equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty
by the USDA and does not imply approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable. USDA is an Equal Opportunity Employer.
Author Contributions
- Conceived and designed the experiments: EC GC KBR JDN.
- Performed the experiments: EC GC KBR JDN LAK TGM.
- Analyzed the data: GC EC.
- Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EC GC KBR JDN LAK TGM.
- Wrote the paper: EC GC KBR JDN LAK TGM.
References
- 1. Griffin D. Economic impact associated with respiratory disease in beef cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1997;13(3):367–77. pmid:9368983.
- 2. Miles DG. Overview of the North American beef cattle industry and the incidence of bovine respiratory disease (BRD). Anim Health Res Rev. 2009;10(2):101–3. pmid:20003641.
- 3. Caswell JL, Bateman KG, Cai HY, Castillo-Alcala F. Mycoplasma bovis in respiratory disease of feedlot cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2010;26(2):365–79. pmid:20619190.
- 4. Maunsell FP, Woolums AR, Francoz D, Rosenbusch RF, Step DL, Wilson DJ, et al. Mycoplasma bovis infections in cattle. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25(4):772–83. pmid:21745245.
- 5. Shahriar FM, Clark EG, Janzen E, West K, Wobeser G. Coinfection with bovine viral diarrhea virus and Mycoplasma bovis in feedlot cattle with chronic pneumonia. Can Vet J. 2002;43(11):863–8. pmid:12497963; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC339759.
- 6. Angelini TG, Emanueli C. MicroRNAs as clinical biomarkers? Front Genet. 2015;6:240. pmid:26236333; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4500989.
- 7. Wang J, Chen J, Sen S. MicroRNA as Biomarkers and Diagnostics. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231(1):25–30. pmid:26031493.
- 8. Wang X, Gu Z, Jiang H. MicroRNAs in farm animals. Animal: an international journal of animal bioscience. 2013;7(10):1567–75. pmid:23822880.
- 9. Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431(7006):350–5. pmid:15372042.
- 10. Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75(5):843–54. pmid:8252621.
- 11. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136(2):215–33. pmid:19167326; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3794896.
- 12. McDaneld TG. MicroRNA: mechanism of gene regulation and application to livestock. Journal of animal science. 2009;87(14 Suppl):E21–8. pmid:18791136.
- 13. Oksuz Z, Serin MS, Kaplan E, Dogen A, Tezcan S, Aslan G, et al. Serum microRNAs; miR-30c-5p, miR-223-3p, miR-302c-3p and miR-17-5p could be used as novel non-invasive biomarkers for HCV-positive cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Molecular biology reports. 2015;42(3):713–20. pmid:25391771.
- 14. Lawless N, Vegh P, O'Farrelly C, Lynn DJ. The Role of microRNAs in Bovine Infection and Immunity. Front Immunol. 2014;5:611. pmid:25505900; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4245999.
- 15. Britton LE, Cassidy JP, O'Donovan J, Gordon SV, Markey B. Potential application of emerging diagnostic techniques to the diagnosis of bovine Johne's disease (paratuberculosis). Veterinary journal. 2016;209:32–9. pmid:26831164.
- 16. Register KB, Sacco RE, Olsen SC. Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of Mycoplasma bovis-specific antibody in bison sera. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20(9):1405–9. pmid:23843427; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3889597.
- 17. Vanden Bush TJ, Rosenbusch RF. Characterization of the immune response to Mycoplasma bovis lung infection. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology. 2003;94(1–2):23–33. pmid:12842609.
- 18. Friedlander MR, Mackowiak SD, Li N, Chen W, Rajewsky N. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(1):37–52. pmid:21911355; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3245920.
- 19. Chung SW, Hall SR, Perrella MA. Role of haem oxygenase-1 in microbial host defence. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11(2):199–207. pmid:19016784; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3080039.
- 20. Chung SW, Liu X, Macias AA, Baron RM, Perrella MA. Heme oxygenase-1-derived carbon monoxide enhances the host defense response to microbial sepsis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(1):239–47. pmid:18060048; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2104480.
- 21. Kozakowska M, Szade K, Dulak J, Jozkowicz A. Role of heme oxygenase-1 in postnatal differentiation of stem cells: a possible cross-talk with microRNAs. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;20(11):1827–50. pmid:24053682; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3961774.
- 22. Jin W, Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Liang G, Beaudoin F, Zhao X, Guan le L. Transcriptome microRNA profiling of bovine mammary epithelial cells challenged with Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus bacteria reveals pathogen directed microRNA expression profiles. BMC genomics. 2014;15:181. pmid:24606609; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4029070.
- 23. Xiao S, Wang X, Ni H, Li N, Zhang A, Liu H, et al. MicroRNA miR-24-3p promotes porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus replication through suppression of heme oxygenase-1 expression. J Virol. 2015;89(8):4494–503. pmid:25653454; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4442403.
- 24. Thornburg NJ, Hayward SL, Crowe JE Jr. Respiratory syncytial virus regulates human microRNAs by using mechanisms involving beta interferon and NF-kappaB. mBio. 2012;3(6). pmid:23249809; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3529541.
- 25. Edmonds MD, Eischen CM. Differences in miRNA expression in early stage lung adenocarcinomas that did and did not relapse. PloS one. 2014;9(7):e101802. pmid:25028925; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4100742.
- 26. Boese AS, Saba R, Campbell K, Majer A, Medina S, Burton L, et al. MicroRNA abundance is altered in synaptoneurosomes during prion disease. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2016;71:13–24. pmid:26658803.
- 27. Iliopoulos D, Hirsch HA, Struhl K. An epigenetic switch involving NF-kappaB, Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 links inflammation to cell transformation. Cell. 2009;139(4):693–706. pmid:19878981; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2783826.
- 28. Berschneider B, Ellwanger DC, Baarsma HA, Thiel C, Shimbori C, White ES, et al. miR-92a regulates TGF-beta1-induced WISP1 expression in pulmonary fibrosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;53:432–41. pmid:24953558.
- 29. Kawai T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. Immunity. 2011;34(5):637–50. pmid:21616434.
- 30. Lai L, Song Y, Liu Y, Chen Q, Han Q, Chen W, et al. MicroRNA-92a negatively regulates Toll-like receptor (TLR)-triggered inflammatory response in macrophages by targeting MKK4 kinase. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(11):7956–67. pmid:23355465; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3597832.
- 31. Punga T, Bartoccioni E, Lewandowska M, Damato V, Evoli A, Punga AR. Disease specific enrichment of circulating let-7 family microRNA in MuSK+ myasthenia gravis. J Neuroimmunol. 2016;292:21–6. pmid:26943954.
- 32. Lawless N, Reinhardt TA, Bryan K, Baker M, Pesch B, Zimmerman D, et al. MicroRNA Regulation of Bovine Monocyte Inflammatory and Metabolic Networks in an In Vivo Infection Model. G3. 2014. pmid:24470219.
- 33. Martin SW, Bateman KG, Shewen PE, Rosendal S, Bohac JG, Thorburn M. A group level analysis of the associations between antibodies to seven putative pathogens and respiratory disease and weight gain in Ontario feedlot calves. Can J Vet Res. 1990;54(3):337–42. pmid:2165846; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1255666.
- 34. Sun J, Sonstegard TS, Li C, Huang Y, Li Z, Lan X, et al. Altered microRNA expression in bovine skeletal muscle with age. Animal genetics. 2015;46(3):227–38. pmid:25703017.
- 35. Huang YZ, Sun JJ, Zhang LZ, Li CJ, Womack JE, Li ZJ, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles and their relationships with mRNA and the microRNA transcriptome in bovine muscle tissue (Bos taurine). Scientific reports. 2014;4:6546. pmid:25306978; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4194443.
- 36. Chen X, Liang H, Zhang J, Zen K, Zhang CY. Secreted microRNAs: a new form of intercellular communication. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22(3):125–32. pmid:22260888.
- 37. Cortez MA, Bueso-Ramos C, Ferdin J, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK, Calin GA. MicroRNAs in body fluids—the mix of hormones and biomarkers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(8):467–77. pmid:21647195; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3423224.