N-Glycosylation of the Na+-Taurocholate Cotransporting Polypeptide (NTCP) Determines Its Trafficking and Stability and Is Required for Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Monique D. Appelman; Anindita Chakraborty; Ulrike Protzer; Jane A. McKeating; Stan F. J. van de Graaf

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170419

Abstract

The sodium/bile acid cotransporter NTCP was recently identified as a receptor for hepatitis B virus (HBV). NTCP is glycosylated and the role of glycans in protein trafficking or viral receptor activity is not known. NTCP contains two N-linked glycosylation sites and asparagine amino acid residues N5 and N11 were mutated to a glutamine to generate NTCP with a single glycan (NTCP-N5Q or NTCP- N11Q) or no glycans (NTCP- N5,11Q). HepG2 cells expressing NTCP with a single glycan supported HBV infection at a comparable level to NTCP-WT. The physiological function of NTCP, the uptake of bile acids, was also not affected in cells expressing these single glycosylation variants, consistent with their trafficking to the plasma membrane. However, glycosylation-deficient NTCP (NTCP-N5,11Q) failed to support HBV infection, showed minimal cellular expression and was degraded in the lysosome. This affected the physiological bile acid transporter function of NTCP-N5,11Q in a similar fashion. In conclusion, N-glycosylation is required for efficient NTCP localization at the plasma membrane and subsequent HBV infection and these characteristics are preserved in NTCP carrying a single carbohydrate moiety.

Citation: Appelman MD, Chakraborty A, Protzer U, McKeating JA, van de Graaf SFJ (2017) N-Glycosylation of the Na+-Taurocholate Cotransporting Polypeptide (NTCP) Determines Its Trafficking and Stability and Is Required for Hepatitis B Virus Infection. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0170419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419

Editor: Koichi Watashi, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, JAPAN

Received: August 25, 2016; Accepted: January 4, 2017; Published: January 26, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Appelman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: SFJvdG is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VIDI 91713319) and the European Research Council (Starting grant 337479). Research in the McKeating laboratory is funded by the MRC, EU FP7 PathCO and H2020 grant Hep-CAR. Research in the Protzer laboratory was funded by the H2020 grant Hep-CAR and by the German research Foundation (DFG; TRR179). AC and collaborative work between McKeating and Protzer laboratories is funded by the Institute for Advanced Study with the support of the Technische Universitat Munchen via the German Excellence Initiative and EU 7th Framework Programme under grant agreement number 291763.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The sodium-dependent taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) is an integral membrane glycoprotein that participates in the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids [1]. NTCP is expressed exclusively at the basolateral membrane of hepatocytes in the liver [2] and mediates the uptake of glycine/taurine-conjugated bile acids from the portal vein [3–5].

NTCP was recently identified as the bona fide receptor for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) [6]. HBV and HDV share the same envelope consisting of a membrane lipid bilayer into which the small (S), medium (M) and large (L) HBV envelope glycoproteins are integrated. All three envelop proteins share the S domain, but M and L N-terminally have an additional preS2 or preS1 and preS2 domain, respectively. L is responsible for the specific receptor binding via amino acids 157–165 in its pre-S1 domain, which interact with the third extracellular domain of NTCP [6]. Silencing NTCP expression in HepaRG cells inhibits HBV and HDV infection and exogenous expression in hepatocyte-derived cell lines HepG2 and Huh-7 confers permissivity to both viruses [6, 7].

HBV or HDV particle entry into hepatocytes occurs via a multistep process and NTCP binding is preceded by a low affinity attachment of the virus to cells via the carbohydrate side chain of heparin sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) [8]. Glypican 5 was identified as one of the HSPGs involved in this process [9]. We recently reported that lentiviral pseudotypes expressing HBV glycoproteins infect human hepatoma cells in an NTCP-dependent manner [10] supporting the model that NTCP envelop-protein interaction is sufficient to induce particle uptake and membrane fusion. Moreover, HBV infection of HepG2-NTCP cells is inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by taurine and glycine conjugates of bile acids, the main substrates for NTCP [11–14], suggesting that bile acids and the HBV pre-S1 domain compete for NTCP binding. Indeed, a synthetic N-acylated pre-S1 lipopeptide that binds NTCP, Myrcludex B, inhibits HBV infection in vitro and in vivo [7, 11, 15–17]. Specific domains of human NTCP are essential for viral infection and exchange of the first extracellular loop of the human homolog (specifically amino acids 84–87) into the murine counterpart confers susceptibility to HBV/HDV infection [6]. However, detailed understanding on the structural requirements of viral docking to NTCP and the role of carbohydrate moieties in this process is lacking.

Human NTCP is a multi-pass transmembrane protein that comprises an extracellular N-terminus and cytoplasmic C-terminal domain [5]. The extracellular N-terminal domain encodes two N-glycosylation sites at residues N5 and N11 (Fig 1A) [5, 18] and we hypothesize that these glycosyl moieties regulate NTCP trafficking and localization at the plasma membrane. Carbohydrate moieties of glycoproteins play several roles, such as controlling protein folding, stabilizing protein conformation, intracellular and membrane trafficking and interaction with other proteins [19]. We therefore investigated the role of N-glycosylation on NTCP receptor activity for HBV and bile acid transporter function.

Download:

Fig 1. NTCP structure and mRNA expression.

(A) Structure of human NTCP (hNTCP). An HA tag was present at the cell surface exposed N-terminus. N-linked glycosylation sites are indicated. (B) NTCP mRNA expression in HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-WT, NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q or NTCP-N5,11Q analysed by qRT-PCR using primers listed in S2 Table. NTCP expression values were calculated relative to housekeeping gene H36B4. Data represent mean +/- SD (N = 4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.g001

Results

N-glycosyl moieties of NTCP are required for HBV infection

Site-directed mutagenesis of a tagged NTCP open reading frame introduced single or double substitution of the exofacial Asn residues (N5 and N11) with glutamine, resulted in four constructs; NTCP-wild type (WT), NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q and NTCP-N5,11Q. Expression of WT and NTCP mutants in HepG2 hepatoma cells showed comparable levels of mRNA as determined by qPCR (Fig 1A).

We first examined the effect of N-glycosylation on HBV infection of NTCP expressing HepG2 cell lines. HBV establishes a covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in the nucleus of infected cells that serves as the transcription template for all viral proteins including secreted hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). Infection was assessed by quantifying cccDNA by qPCR and measuring HBeAg expression. HBV infection of HepG2 cells expressing WT or single glycan mutants, NTCP-N5Q and NTCP-N11Q, resulted in comparable levels of cccDNA and HBeAg expression (Fig 2). However, disruption of both glycosylation sites (NTCP-N5,11Q) prevented viral infection, both at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100 (Fig 2), and 400 (data not shown). Since cells expressing NTCP with a single glycan located either at N5 or N11 support similar levels of infection as the WT transporter molecule, we conclude that a single glycan is required for HBV infection. Moreover, the location of this glycan is not critical since both N5 and N11 mutants support similar levels of viral infection.

Download:

Fig 2. HBV infection of wild type and glycosylation deficient NTCP variants.

HepG2 cells stably expressing NTCP-WT, NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q or NTCP-N5,11Q were infected with HBV. (A) 3 days post infection, HBeAg production was measured by ELISA. (B) Establishment of HBV infection was determined by quantification of intracellular cccDNA 3 days post-infection. Values are given as mean +/- sd of two independent experiments each performed in triplicate. The dotted line represents the values obtained after infecting parental HepG2 cells that lack NTCP expression. *Significantly different from NTCP-WT values (p < 0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.g002

Bile acid uptake affected by NTCP glycosylation pattern

Since HepG2 cells expressing the glycosylation deficient NTCP (NTCP-N5,11Q) variant failed to support HBV infection, we investigated the capacity of these cells to uptake bile acids. The single mutants, NTCP-N5Q and NTCP-N11Q, exhibited TCA transport activity comparable to NTCP-WT. However, NTCP-N5,11Q showed a minimal uptake (Fig 3), suggesting that NTCP lacking both N-glycosyl moieties is unable to transport bile acids. The reduced uptake capacity of NTCP-N5,11Q was also observed in Huh-7 cells (S1A Fig). Furthermore, the limited transport of bile acids by NTCP-N5,11Q was not due to the HA-tag since untagged NTCP-N5,11Q showed a similar phenotype (S1C–S1E Fig).

Download:

Fig 3. Effect of NTCP glycosylation on bile acid transport activity.

Taurocholate (TCA) uptake assay in parental HepG2 cells and those stably expressing NTCP-WT, NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q or NTCP-N5,11Q. Cells were incubated for 2 minutes with uptake buffer containing 20 mM taurocholate, spiked with [³H]-taurocholate. NTCP specific uptake capacity is defined as pmol TCA uptake/well, where the bars represent the mean +/- sd of three experiments each performed in quadruplicate. *Significantly different from parental cells and # indicates significantly different from NTCP-WT values (p < 0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.g003

NTCP N-glycosylation profile

Since HBV infection and bile acid uptake was defective in HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-N5,11Q, we investigated the effect of this mutation on protein expression. NTCP-WT was detected as multiple bands with a molecular mass of 35-60kDa. HepG2 cells expressing NTCP carrying a single glycan moiety (N5Q or N11Q), displayed a band of 45kDa and NTCP-N5,11Q migrated around 35kDa (Fig 4A). To test whether the bands at 35-60kDa correspond to differences in N-glycosylation, samples were treated with PNGaseF, that cleaves N-glycan chains from glycoproteins. This procedure resulted in a near complete shift of NTCP signal towards +/- 35kDa (Fig 4B), demonstrating that the differences in molecular weight were due to the addition of N linked glycans on the protein. Since comparable protein amounts were loaded we conclude that the glycosylation-depleted NTCP variant shows a modest level of protein expression (Fig 4C). Furthermore, similar glycosylation patterns were observed in HepaRG and Huh7 cells (S1B Fig).

Download:

Fig 4. Effect of N-linked glycosylation on NTCP protein expression.

(A and B) HA-tagged NTCP was immunoprecipitated (IP) from lysates of HepG2 cells stably expressing NTCP-WT, NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q or NTCP-N5,11Q. IP samples were subjected to immunoblotting for NTCP (using anti-HA-hrp). (B) IP samples were digested with PNGase F for 1h at 37°C (500 units) prior to immunoblotting for NTCP. (C) NTCP was quantified by image J and expressed relative to NTCP-WT. Molecular mass is given in kDa on the left-hand side. Results are mean +/- sd. *Indicates significant different from NTCP-WT (p <0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.g004

Glycosylation is essential for NTCP localization at the plasma membrane

Since HBV infection and bile acid uptake requires NTCP localization at the plasma membrane, we anticipated that N-glycosylation would influence NTCP expression at the plasma membrane. Cell surface biotinylation demonstrates that NTCP-WT, NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q but not NTCP-N5,11Q were detected in the plasma membrane fraction (Fig 5A). Notably, the minority pool of unglycosylated WT protein, migrating at ~35 kDa (Fig 4A) is also not expressed at the cell surface (Fig 5A). Transferrin receptor was used as loading control and similar expression levels were detected in all samples. These results were similar when NTCP cell surface abundance was measured with FITC-labeled Myrcludex B. Myrcludex B, a ligand based on the pre-S1 domain of HBV-L protein [7, 11, 15], binds NTCP at position 157–165, so at a certain distance from the glycosyl moieties. NTCP with a single glycan moiety showed a modest reduction in plasma membrane expression compared to NTCP-WT (Fig 5B). However, NTCP-N5,11Q showed a significant reduction in plasma membrane expression compared to NTCP-WT (Fig 5B). Altogether, this suggests that glycosylation-depleted NTCP, in contrast with NTCP-N5Q and NTCP-N11Q, is not efficiently expressed or targeted to the plasma membrane.

Download:

Fig 5. Effect of N-linked glycosylation on NTCP plasma membrane expression.

Plasma membrane expression was assessed by surface-biotinylation of parental HepG2 cells or those expressing NTCP-WT, NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q, NTCP-N5,11Q. (A) Representative immunoblot for NTCP membrane expression and for the Transferrin receptor (TfR), as a loading control. Molecular mass is given in kDa on the left-hand side. (B) NTCP expression at the plasma membrane was semi-quantified by Myrcludex-B-FITC intensity. Fluorescence of the parental cells was subtracted before normalization and the net fluorescence units expressed relative to NTCP-WT. *Indicates significant different from NTCP-WT (p<0,05) (C) Confocal microscopic images of HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-WT or mutant proteins stained with anti-HA (green) and counterstained with Hoechst (blue). Scale bar represents 10μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.g005

Since NTCP-N5,11Q showed only minimal plasma membrane expression, we tested whether this protein was retained in the cytoplasm. As shown in Fig 5C, HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-N5,11Q displayed a weak intracellular signal. The NTCP mutants with one glycan (NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q), in contrast, showed the same NTCP distribution as NTCP-WT.

Glycosylation-depleted NTCP is rapidly degraded in lysosomes

The low expression levels of NTCP N5,11Q may reflect an enhanced degradation of this variant. To investigate whether NTCP-N5,11Q was targeted to the proteasome or alternatively degraded in the lysosome, parental HepG2 cells and those stably expressing NTCP-WT or NTCP-N5,11Q. were treated with MG132, Bafilomycin or the combination of these two drugs. The proteasome inhibitor MG132 had no effect on NTCP-N5,11Q expression at the plasma membrane (Fig 6A) or bile acid uptake (Fig 6B and 6C). However, treatment with Bafilomycin to prevent degradation of internalized and lysosomally targeted proteins [20], induced an intracellular accumulation of NTCP (Fig 6A). The increased intracellular signal of NTCP-N5,11Q following Bafilomycin treatment either alone or in combination with MG132 was not accompanied by restoration of bile acid uptake activity (Fig 6C). Activity of NTCP-WT was not affected by Bafilomycin or MG132 (Fig 6C). In conclusion, NTCP-N5,11Q is rapidly endocytosed to be degraded in lysosomes.

Download:

Fig 6. Treatment with Bafilomycin but not with MG132 induces expression of NTCP-N5,11Q.

(A,B) Parental HepG2 or cells expressing NTCP-WT or NTCP-N5,11Q were treated with 0.1% DMSO, Bafilomycin (10nM/24h), MG132 (20μM/6h) or a combination of Bafilomycin (10nM/24h) and MG132 (20μM/ for the last 6h). (A) Immunofluorescence microscopy of NTCP-WT and NTCP-N5,11Q. in which NTCP was visualized using anti-HA antibody (green) and Hoechst (blue) was used to visualize the nucleus. (B) Results of TCA uptake in parental HepG2 cells (grey) and HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-N5,11Q (black). (C) Results of TCA uptake in HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-WT (grey) or NTCP-N5,11Q (black). (B,C)The uptake capacity of the NTCP was determined as pmol TCA uptake/well. Bars represent the mean +/- sd of three independent experiments, each performed in quadruplicate. *Indicates significant different from DMSO treated (p <0.05). # indicates significant different between the cell-lines in the same treatment (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.g006

Discussion

In the present study, we show that N-linked glycans on NTCP are required for protein expression, localization, bile acid uptake and NTCP-mediated HBV infection. NTCP binds the preS1 domain of the HBV encoded L protein with high-affinity, and its selective expression at the basolateral hepatocellular plasma membrane can explain both liver tropism and species specificity of HBV and HDV.

This study aimed to assess whether the glycosyl-moieties of NTCP itself contribute to virus infection. Strategies to modulate total cellular glycosylation, such as using tunicamycin would not be suitable to tackle specifically the contribution of NTCP-bound glycans to HBV infection. In NTCP, both N5 and N11 are used as glycan-attachments residues and mutating both amino acids abolished NTCP glycosylation. These amino acids are conserved across multiple species, including human, mouse, rat, macaca, pongo, and cow and in the related transporter Slc10a2/ASBT (S3 Table). The data presented here demonstrate that at least one glycan residue is sufficient for NTCP, plasma membrane localization, bile acid uptake and viral receptor activity. NTCP-N5,11Q is degraded via the lysosome. This could imply that the glycosylation-deficient NTCP might be first targeted to the plasma membrane, to be rapidly internalized and degraded. This model is supported by data showing a low level of bile acid uptake in HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-N5,11Q compared to parental cells. However, treatment with Bafolimycin to inhibit lysosomal degradation did not enhance plasma membrane abundance of the glycosylation-deficient NTCP, nor bile acid uptake. For several other integral membrane proteins, N-glycosylation is associated with decreased protein stability and absence of glycosyl moieties can promote degradative pathways [21–23]. Interestingly, multiple transporters that lack their normal glycosylation, degradation occurs via the proteosomal route, in line with ER-assisted degradation and impaired trafficking to the plasma membrane [23, 24]. For NTCP the degradation occurs via a lysosomal fashion, suggesting a post-ER sensing of altered NTCP conformation and degradation after entering the endosomal pathway. The small but significant bile acid uptake seen for NTCP-N5,11Q is in line with (partial) plasma membrane targeting. The significant uptake of taurocholate that can be detected even while plasma membrane abundance is minimal also implicates that the NTCP N5,11Q protein is functional. This is similar to some other glycoproteins with a transporter function, for example ASCT2, where only membrane trafficking and not the transport function is affected when glycosylation sites are mutated [22]. In contrast, for other transporters, for example PEPT1 N-linked glycosylation does not affect plasma membrane abundance in Xenopus laevis oocytes, but transport kinetics are lower in the unglycosylated mutant [25].

We did not observe any evidence of HBV infection of HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-N5,11Q. This could suggest that i) viral entry requires a certain NTCP density at the cell surface, ii) NTCP needs to remain at the plasma membrane sufficiently long to allow efficient virus docking, or iii) the lysosomal degradation of NTCP is not compatible with its role in the viral life cycle. Since NTCP-N5,11Q was not detected at the plasma membrane by cell surface biotinylation, we conclude that glycosylation plays an important role in NTCP trafficking. This phenotype makes it impossible to reliably assess the contribution of the NTCP glycan moieties on viral binding per se to the receptor. However, we can conclude that one glycan residue is sufficient for bile acid uptake as well as efficient HBV entry. Furthermore, we established that glycosylation of NTCP, at least one glycan residue, is required for NTCP localization at the plasma membrane and subsequent bile acid uptake.

Methods

Chemicals and reagents

Hygromycin (merckmillipore), anti-HA HRP (sigma), ^3HTaurocholate (Perkin Elmer), Taurocholate (Sigma), MG132 (Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-al) (sigma), Bafilomycin A1 (sigma), DMSO (VWR), Myrcludex B-FITC (Pepscan), Transferrin receptor (Invitrogen), anti-mouse-HRP(DAKO).

NTCP glycosylation mutants

Aspargine to glutamine mutations in NTCP constructs [26] were generated using the QuikChange^® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies). NTCP open reading frames were cloned into the vector pLenti-PGK-Hygro-DEST (Addgene) using the Gateway LR clonase II enzyme mix (Invitrogen) after initial cloning into pENTR-D-TOPO according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies). All constructs were sequenced to verify they contained the correct mutation. Primers used to generate the constructs can be found in S1 Table.

Cell culture

Human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2, from ATCC, VA, USA) and human embryonic kidney (HEK293T, from ATCC) cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and, 1% Glutamine. Cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified incubator at a 5% CO₂ atmosphere.

Stable cell-line

HEK293T cells were seeded in 10cm² plates, 24h before transfection with 3^rd generation virus plasmids, PMD2G, PMDL and PRSV vectors and one of the NTCP constructs. Medium of the HEK293T cells was harvested and added to HepG2 cells for 6 hours followed by refreshing of the medium. After 48h, the infected HepG2 cells were selected using Hygromycin (50 μg/ml).

Determination of HBV infection

HepG2 cells were seeded onto collagen-coated plates (6x10⁵ cells/well) and after 3 days of differentiation using 2.5% DMSO infected with HBV (MOI = 100) overnight. Infection was proven by establishment of nuclear cccDNA and HBeAg secretion. HBeAg was detected in the culture medium using a commercial immunoassay (Siemens Molecular Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany). Total DNA was extracted from infected cells 3 days post infection (PI) using a NucleoSpin tissue kit (Macherey Nagel, Düren, Germany) and subsequently treated with T5 exonuclease (10U/μl) for 10 min before cccDNA detection. HBV cccDNA was detected by real time PCR (qPCR) with selective PCR primers as previously described [27, 28]. qPCR was performed on the LightCycler 480 real time PCR 96-well system II (Roche, 5015278001) and analysed using the second derivative maximum approach that takes normalisation to a reference gene (PrP) and primer efficiency into account.

Immunofluorescence NTCP

HepG2 cells were seeded onto coverslip and cultured using standard culturing conditions until 60–70% confluence. 72h after seeding, cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde/PBS for 20 min and permeabilized for 2 min with 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS at room temperature. After rinsing with PBS, nonspecific binding of antibodies was blocked by 2%(w/v) bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. Cells were incubated with mouse anti-HA (H9658, Sigma) for 2 hours followed by Alexa Fluor^™ 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen) for 45 minutes. Cover slips were washed three times with PBS and Hoechst staining was performed afterwards. Cells were mounted with mowiol. Images were obtained using a confocal laser scanning microscope (TCA SP8 X LEICA) equipped with HC Plan Apochromat 63X NA 1,4 oil CS2.

Taurocholate uptake assay

HepG2 cells were seeded into 24-well plates and cultured using standard culturing conditions until they reached 80% confluence. Cells were rinsed twice with warm uptake buffer [5 mM KCl, 1.1 mM KH₂PO₄, 1 mM MgCl₂, 1.8 mM CaCl₂, 10 mM D-glucose, 10 mM Hepes and 136 mM NaCl]. After which, cells were incubated at 37°C with uptake buffer containing 20μM taurocholate supplemented with 0,25μC [³H]taurocholate for 2 min. Subsequently, cells were washed four times with ice-cold PBS and lysed in 0.05% SDS. Accumulation of radiolabelled substrates was determined by scintillation counting.

Immunoblotting

Proteins were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Unspecific binding was blocked with 5% milk in 0.1% TBS-TWEEN (TBST) for 1h at room temperature. Antibodies for either NTCP (visualized with HA-HRP) or transferrin receptor (TfR) were added to 5% milk-TBST and incubated with the membrane for 16h at 4°C while rocking. After three washes with TBST, membranes were incubated with a HRP (horseradish peroxidase)-conjugated mouse antibodies (Sigma) to visualize the TfR as described previously [26]. Following three washes in TBST, ECL was performed, and proteins were detected by chemiluminescence.

Immunoprecipitation

Cells were grown in a 100mm culture plates to 80% confluence. After washing with PBS, cells were lysed in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris PH 7,4, 5 mM EDTA, 10% (w/v) sucrose, 1% Nonidet P40) supplemented with protein inhibitors. Subsequently, BCA assay according to manufactory protocol was performed and equal protein amounts were incubated with monoclonal anti-HA antibody (Sigma 9568) immobilized on Protein A—agarose beads (Sigma) for 16h at 4°C. Samples were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-HA antibodies (Sigma) and HRP-conjugated mouse antibodies (Sigma) as described above.

PNGaseF treatment

NTCP was immunoprecipitated from stably transduced HepG2 cells using monoclonal anti-HA antibody immobilized on Protein A-agarose beads as described above. After addition of sample buffer (2% (w/v) SDS, 10% v/v glycerol 40mM Tris pH6.8, Bromophenol blue (Sigma Alrich) containing 0.1M DTT (Promega), supernatant was taken and samples were treated with PNGase F (peptide N-glycosidase F) according to the manufacturer's instructions (New England Biolabs).

Cell surface biotinylation assay

Cells were grown in a 100mm culture plates to 80% confluence. After washing with PBS-CM (PBS containing 1mM MgCl₂, 0.5mM CaCl₂, pH 8.0), 0,5mg/ml NHS-ss-Biotin/PBS-CM was added for 30min at 4°C. After quenching with PBS-CM containing 0.1% BSA, cells were washed three times with PBS-CM and lysed in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris PH 7,4, 5 mM EDTA, 10% (w/v) sucrose, 1% Nonidet P40) supplemented with protein inhibitors. Lysate was centrifuged and supernatant was added to pre-washed neutravidin beads. Pull down was performed for 2 hours followed by washing with lysis buffer. The proteins were eluted in sample buffer and subjected to immunoblotting as described above.

Lysosomal versus proteosomal degradation

Cells were plated for either TCA assay or immunofluorescence as described above. 48 or 66 hours after seeding, treatment with either DMSO, 10nM Bafilomycin (24h) or 20μM MG132 (6h) or a combination of the last two was performed. After treatment, cells were analyzed following the above described protocols.

NTCP plasma membrane expression

Cells were seeded into 96 wells plate (Corning; 734–1609) three days before staining. Cells were stained with 0.02μM Myrcludex-B—FITC for 30min at 37°C. Myrcludex B-Fitc intensity was measured using a NOVOstar microplate reader (BMG Labtech GmbH, Offenburg) at λex / λem = 483–14 nm/ 530–30 nm. The option orbital averaging was set at a diameter of 3mm. Background fluorescence was subtracted and results were plotted as percentage of NTCP WT.

mRNA expression of NTCP

Cells were seeded in a 6 wells format, three days before RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Bleiswijk, The Netherlands). Complementary DNA was synthesized from DNAse-treated total RNA with Oligo-dT_12-18 and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was carried out in a Roche Lightcycler 480 II instrument using SYBR green (Roche) and the hNTCP primers listed in S2 Table. Expression level in each sample was normalized to reference gene H36B4.

Statistical analysis

Values are expressed as mean ± sd. Significant analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variances following the Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. Graphpad Prism software was used for analysis.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. NTCP expression is similar in different cell-lines and not its function is not influenced by the HA-tag.

(A) Taurocholate (TCA) uptake assay in parental Huh-7 cells and those stably expressing NTCP-WT, NTCP-N11Q or NTCP-N5,11Q. Cells were incubated for 2 minutes with uptake buffer containing 20 mM taurocholate, spiked with [³H]-taurocholate. NTCP specific uptake capacity is defined as pmol TCA uptake/well, where the bars represent the mean +/- sd (n = 4). (B). HepG2 cells, HepaRG cells and Huh-7 cells stably expressing NTCP-WT were lysed and equal amount of total protein were subjected to immunoblotting for NTCP either directly or after digestion with PNGase F for 1h at 37°C (500 units). (C) Taurocholate (TCA) uptake assay in parental HepG2 cells and those stably expressing NTCP-WT or NTCP-N5,11Q with or without a HA-tag. Cells were incubated for 2 minutes with uptake buffer containing 20 mM taurocholate, spiked with [³H]-taurocholate. NTCP specific uptake capacity is defined as pmol TCA uptake/well, where the bars represent the mean +/- sd (n = 4). (D,E) NTCP mRNA expression (D) and HA-NTCP mRNA expression (E) in HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-WT or NTCP-N5,11Q with or without a HA-tag analysed by qRT-PCR using primers listed in S2 Table. NTCP expression values were calculated relative to housekeeping gene H36B4. Data represent mean +/- SD (N = 4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.s001

(EPS)

S1 Supplementary Methods. HUH-7 cell culture conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.s002

(DOC)

S1 Table. Primer sequences used for site-directed mutagenesis to generate single or double substitution of the two Asn residues (N5 and N11) with glutamine in HA-NTCP by site-directed mutagenesis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.s003

(DOC)

S2 Table. Oligonucleotide primers used for qRT-PCR to analyze NTCP expression and the reference gene H36B4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.s004

(DOC)

S3 Table. Overview of the conserved glycosylation sites in SLC10A1 across multiple species, including human, mouse, rat, macaca, pongo, and cow and in the related transporter Slc10A2/ASBT.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170419.s005

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Jane van Heteren and Marion Robin for help with the cloning and optimization of compound dosing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: UP JM SFJvdG.
Formal analysis: MDA AC SFJvdG.
Funding acquisition: UP JM SFJvdG.
Investigation: MDA AC.
Methodology: MDA AC UP JM SFJvdG.
Supervision: UP JM SFJvdG.
Validation: MDA AC.
Writing – original draft: MDA SFJvdG.
Writing – review & editing: MDA AC UP JM SFJvdG.

References

1. Craddock AL, Love MW, Daniel RW, Kirby LC, Walters HC, Wong MH, et al. Expression and transport properties of the human ileal and renal sodium-dependent bile acid transporter. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(1 Pt 1):G157–69. pmid:9458785
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Sun AQ, Swaby I, Xu S, Suchy FJ. Cell-specific basolateral membrane sorting of the human liver Na⁺-dependent bile acid cotransporter. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280(6):G1305–13. pmid:11352825
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Vaz FM, Paulusma CC, Huidekoper H, de Ru M, Lim C, Koster J, et al. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (SLC10A1) deficiency: conjugated hypercholanemia without a clear clinical phenotype. Hepatology. 2015;61(1):260–7. pmid:24867799
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Slijepcevic D, Kaufman C, Wichers CG, Gilglioni EH, Lempp FA, Duijst S, et al. Impaired uptake of conjugated bile acids and hepatitis b virus pres1-binding in na -taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide knockout mice. Hepatology. 2015.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Hagenbuch B, Meier PJ. Molecular cloning, chromosomal localization, and functional characterization of a human liver Na+/bile acid cotransporter. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(3):1326–31. pmid:8132774
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Yan H, Zhong G, Xu G, He W, Jing Z, Gao Z, et al. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus. Elife. 2012;1:e00049. pmid:23150796
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Urban S, Bartenschlager R, Kubitz R, Zoulim F. Strategies to inhibit entry of HBV and HDV into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(1):48–64. pmid:24768844
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Schulze A, Gripon P, Urban S. Hepatitis B virus infection initiates with a large surface protein-dependent binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Hepatology. 2007;46(6):1759–68. pmid:18046710
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Verrier ER, Colpitts CC, Bach C, Heydmann L, Weiss A, Renaud M, et al. A targeted functional RNA interference screen uncovers glypican 5 as an entry factor for hepatitis B and D viruses. Hepatology. 2016;63(1):35–48. pmid:26224662
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Meredith LW, Hu K, Cheng X, Howard CR, Baumert TF, Balfe P, et al. Lentiviral hepatitis B pseudotype entry requires sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide and additional hepatocyte-specific factors. J Gen Virol. 2016;97(1):121–7. pmid:26474824
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Ni Y, Lempp FA, Mehrle S, Nkongolo S, Kaufman C, Falth M, et al. Hepatitis B and D viruses exploit sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide for species-specific entry into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(4):1070–83. pmid:24361467
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Veloso Alves Pereira I, Buchmann B, Sandmann L, Sprinzl K, Schlaphoff V, Dohner K, et al. Primary biliary acids inhibit hepatitis D virus (HDV) entry into human hepatoma cells expressing the sodium-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP). PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117152. pmid:25646622
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Yan H, Peng B, Liu Y, Xu G, He W, Ren B, et al. Viral entry of hepatitis B and D viruses and bile salts transportation share common molecular determinants on sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide. J Virol. 2014;88(6):3273–84. pmid:24390325
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Konig A, Doring B, Mohr C, Geipel A, Geyer J, Glebe D. Kinetics of the bile acid transporter and hepatitis B virus receptor Na+/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) in hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 2014;61(4):867–75. pmid:24845614
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Petersen J, Dandri M, Mier W, Lutgehetmann M, Volz T, von Weizsacker F, et al. Prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in vivo by entry inhibitors derived from the large envelope protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(3):335–41. pmid:18297057
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Blank A, Markert C, Hohmann N, Carls A, Mikus G, Lehr T, et al. First-in-human application of the novel hepatitis B and hepatitis D virus entry inhibitor myrcludex B. J Hepatol. 2016;65(3):483–9. pmid:27132172
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Volz T, Allweiss L, Ben MM, Warlich M, Lohse AW, Pollok JM, et al. The entry inhibitor Myrcludex-B efficiently blocks intrahepatic virus spreading in humanized mice previously infected with hepatitis B virus. J Hepatol. 2013;58(5):861–7. pmid:23246506
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Hallen S, Mareninova O, Branden M, Sachs G. Organization of the membrane domain of the human liver sodium/bile acid cotransporter. Biochemistry. 2002;41(23):7253–66. pmid:12044156
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Lis H, Sharon N. Protein glycosylation. Structural and functional aspects. Eur J Biochem. 1993;218(1):1–27. pmid:8243456
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Yoshimori T, Yamamoto A, Moriyama Y, Futai M, Tashiro Y. Bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of vacuolar-type H⁺-ATPase, inhibits acidification and protein degradation in lysosomes of cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(26):17707–12. pmid:1832676
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Christiansen MN, Chik J, Lee L, Anugraham M, Abrahams JL, Packer NH. Cell surface protein glycosylation in cancer. Proteomics. 2014;14(4–5):525–46. pmid:24339177
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Console L, Scalise M, Tarmakova Z, Coe IR, Indiveri C. N-linked glycosylation of human SLC1A5 (ASCT2) transporter is critical for trafficking to membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1853(7):1636–45. pmid:25862406
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Beers MF, Zhao M, Tomer Y, Russo SJ, Zhang P, Gonzales LW, et al. Disruption of N-linked glycosylation promotes proteasomal degradation of the human ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCA3. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2013;305(12):L970–80. pmid:24142515
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Zhao N, Zhang AS, Worthen C, Knutson MD, Enns CA. An iron-regulated and glycosylation-dependent proteasomal degradation pathway for the plasma membrane metal transporter ZIP14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(25):9175–80. pmid:24927598
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Stelzl T, Baranov T, Geillinger KE, Kottra G, Daniel H. Effect of N-glycosylation on the transport activity of the peptide transporter PEPT1. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016;310(2):G128–41. pmid:26585416
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Bijsmans IT, Bouwmeester RA, Geyer J, Faber KN, van de Graaf SF. Homo- and hetero-dimeric architecture of the human liver Na⁺-dependent taurocholate co-transporting protein. Biochem J. 2012;441(3):1007–15. pmid:22029531
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Jost S, Turelli P, Mangeat B, Protzer U, Trono D. Induction of antiviral cytidine deaminases does not explain the inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by interferons. J Virol. 2007;81(19):10588–96. pmid:17652382
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Protzer U, Seyfried S, Quasdorff M, Sass G, Svorcova M, Webb D, et al. Antiviral activity and hepatoprotection by heme oxygenase-1 in hepatitis B virus infection. Gastroenterology. 2007;133(4):1156–65. pmid:17919491
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Craddock AL, Love MW, Daniel RW, Kirby LC, Walters HC, Wong MH, et al. Expression and transport properties of the human ileal and renal sodium-dependent bile acid transporter. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(1 Pt 1):G157–69. pmid:9458785
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Sun AQ, Swaby I, Xu S, Suchy FJ. Cell-specific basolateral membrane sorting of the human liver Na⁺-dependent bile acid cotransporter. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280(6):G1305–13. pmid:11352825
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Vaz FM, Paulusma CC, Huidekoper H, de Ru M, Lim C, Koster J, et al. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (SLC10A1) deficiency: conjugated hypercholanemia without a clear clinical phenotype. Hepatology. 2015;61(1):260–7. pmid:24867799
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Slijepcevic D, Kaufman C, Wichers CG, Gilglioni EH, Lempp FA, Duijst S, et al. Impaired uptake of conjugated bile acids and hepatitis b virus pres1-binding in na -taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide knockout mice. Hepatology. 2015.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Hagenbuch B, Meier PJ. Molecular cloning, chromosomal localization, and functional characterization of a human liver Na+/bile acid cotransporter. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(3):1326–31. pmid:8132774
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Yan H, Zhong G, Xu G, He W, Jing Z, Gao Z, et al. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus. Elife. 2012;1:e00049. pmid:23150796
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Urban S, Bartenschlager R, Kubitz R, Zoulim F. Strategies to inhibit entry of HBV and HDV into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(1):48–64. pmid:24768844
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Schulze A, Gripon P, Urban S. Hepatitis B virus infection initiates with a large surface protein-dependent binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Hepatology. 2007;46(6):1759–68. pmid:18046710
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Verrier ER, Colpitts CC, Bach C, Heydmann L, Weiss A, Renaud M, et al. A targeted functional RNA interference screen uncovers glypican 5 as an entry factor for hepatitis B and D viruses. Hepatology. 2016;63(1):35–48. pmid:26224662
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Meredith LW, Hu K, Cheng X, Howard CR, Baumert TF, Balfe P, et al. Lentiviral hepatitis B pseudotype entry requires sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide and additional hepatocyte-specific factors. J Gen Virol. 2016;97(1):121–7. pmid:26474824
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Ni Y, Lempp FA, Mehrle S, Nkongolo S, Kaufman C, Falth M, et al. Hepatitis B and D viruses exploit sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide for species-specific entry into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(4):1070–83. pmid:24361467
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Veloso Alves Pereira I, Buchmann B, Sandmann L, Sprinzl K, Schlaphoff V, Dohner K, et al. Primary biliary acids inhibit hepatitis D virus (HDV) entry into human hepatoma cells expressing the sodium-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP). PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117152. pmid:25646622
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Yan H, Peng B, Liu Y, Xu G, He W, Ren B, et al. Viral entry of hepatitis B and D viruses and bile salts transportation share common molecular determinants on sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide. J Virol. 2014;88(6):3273–84. pmid:24390325
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Konig A, Doring B, Mohr C, Geipel A, Geyer J, Glebe D. Kinetics of the bile acid transporter and hepatitis B virus receptor Na+/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) in hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 2014;61(4):867–75. pmid:24845614
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Petersen J, Dandri M, Mier W, Lutgehetmann M, Volz T, von Weizsacker F, et al. Prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in vivo by entry inhibitors derived from the large envelope protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(3):335–41. pmid:18297057
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Blank A, Markert C, Hohmann N, Carls A, Mikus G, Lehr T, et al. First-in-human application of the novel hepatitis B and hepatitis D virus entry inhibitor myrcludex B. J Hepatol. 2016;65(3):483–9. pmid:27132172
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Volz T, Allweiss L, Ben MM, Warlich M, Lohse AW, Pollok JM, et al. The entry inhibitor Myrcludex-B efficiently blocks intrahepatic virus spreading in humanized mice previously infected with hepatitis B virus. J Hepatol. 2013;58(5):861–7. pmid:23246506
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Hallen S, Mareninova O, Branden M, Sachs G. Organization of the membrane domain of the human liver sodium/bile acid cotransporter. Biochemistry. 2002;41(23):7253–66. pmid:12044156
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Lis H, Sharon N. Protein glycosylation. Structural and functional aspects. Eur J Biochem. 1993;218(1):1–27. pmid:8243456
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Yoshimori T, Yamamoto A, Moriyama Y, Futai M, Tashiro Y. Bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of vacuolar-type H⁺-ATPase, inhibits acidification and protein degradation in lysosomes of cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(26):17707–12. pmid:1832676
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Christiansen MN, Chik J, Lee L, Anugraham M, Abrahams JL, Packer NH. Cell surface protein glycosylation in cancer. Proteomics. 2014;14(4–5):525–46. pmid:24339177
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Console L, Scalise M, Tarmakova Z, Coe IR, Indiveri C. N-linked glycosylation of human SLC1A5 (ASCT2) transporter is critical for trafficking to membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1853(7):1636–45. pmid:25862406
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Beers MF, Zhao M, Tomer Y, Russo SJ, Zhang P, Gonzales LW, et al. Disruption of N-linked glycosylation promotes proteasomal degradation of the human ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCA3. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2013;305(12):L970–80. pmid:24142515
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Zhao N, Zhang AS, Worthen C, Knutson MD, Enns CA. An iron-regulated and glycosylation-dependent proteasomal degradation pathway for the plasma membrane metal transporter ZIP14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(25):9175–80. pmid:24927598
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Stelzl T, Baranov T, Geillinger KE, Kottra G, Daniel H. Effect of N-glycosylation on the transport activity of the peptide transporter PEPT1. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016;310(2):G128–41. pmid:26585416
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Bijsmans IT, Bouwmeester RA, Geyer J, Faber KN, van de Graaf SF. Homo- and hetero-dimeric architecture of the human liver Na⁺-dependent taurocholate co-transporting protein. Biochem J. 2012;441(3):1007–15. pmid:22029531
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Jost S, Turelli P, Mangeat B, Protzer U, Trono D. Induction of antiviral cytidine deaminases does not explain the inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by interferons. J Virol. 2007;81(19):10588–96. pmid:17652382
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Protzer U, Seyfried S, Quasdorff M, Sass G, Svorcova M, Webb D, et al. Antiviral activity and hepatoprotection by heme oxygenase-1 in hepatitis B virus infection. Gastroenterology. 2007;133(4):1156–65. pmid:17919491
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Results

N-glycosyl moieties of NTCP are required for HBV infection

Bile acid uptake affected by NTCP glycosylation pattern

NTCP N-glycosylation profile

Glycosylation is essential for NTCP localization at the plasma membrane

Glycosylation-depleted NTCP is rapidly degraded in lysosomes

Discussion

Methods

Chemicals and reagents

NTCP glycosylation mutants

Cell culture

Stable cell-line

Determination of HBV infection

Immunofluorescence NTCP

Taurocholate uptake assay

Immunoblotting

Immunoprecipitation

PNGaseF treatment

Cell surface biotinylation assay

Lysosomal versus proteosomal degradation

NTCP plasma membrane expression

mRNA expression of NTCP

Statistical analysis

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. NTCP expression is similar in different cell-lines and not its function is not influenced by the HA-tag.

S1 Supplementary Methods. HUH-7 cell culture conditions.

S1 Table. Primer sequences used for site-directed mutagenesis to generate single or double substitution of the two Asn residues (N5 and N11) with glutamine in HA-NTCP by site-directed mutagenesis.

S2 Table. Oligonucleotide primers used for qRT-PCR to analyze NTCP expression and the reference gene H36B4.

S3 Table. Overview of the conserved glycosylation sites in SLC10A1 across multiple species, including human, mouse, rat, macaca, pongo, and cow and in the related transporter Slc10A2/ASBT.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References