A growing animal model for neonatal repair of large diaphragmatic defects to evaluate patch function and outcome

Mary Patrice Eastwood; Luc Joyeux; Savitree Pranpanus; Johannes Van der Merwe; Eric Verbeken; Stephanie De Vleeschauwer; Ghislaine Gayan-Ramirez; Jan Deprest

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174332

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to develop a more representative model for neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair in a large animal model, by creating a large defect in a fast-growing pup, using functional pulmonary and diaphragmatic read outs.

Background

Grafts are increasingly used to repair congenital diaphragmatic hernia with the risk of local complications. Growing animal models have been used to test novel materials.

Methods

6-week-old rabbits underwent fiberoptic intubation, left subcostal laparotomy and hemi-diaphragmatic excision (either nearly complete (n = 13) or 3*3cm (n = 9)) and primary closure (Gore-Tex patch). Survival was further increased by moving to laryngeal mask airway ventilation (n = 15). Sham operated animals were used as controls (n = 6). Survivors (90 days) underwent chest X-Ray (scoliosis), measurements of maximum transdiaphragmatic pressure and breathing pattern (tidal volume, Pdi). Rates of herniation, lung histology and right hemi-diaphragmatic fiber cross-sectional area was measured.

Results

Rabbits surviving 90 days doubled their weight. Only one (8%) with a complete defect survived to 90 days. In the 3*3cm defect group all survived to 48 hours, however seven (78%) died later (16–49 days) from respiratory failure secondary to tracheal stricture formation. Use of a laryngeal mask airway doubled 90-day survival, one pup displaying herniation (17%). Cobb angel measurements, breathing pattern, and lung histology were comparable to sham. Under exertion, sham animals increased their maximum transdiaphragmatic pressure 134% compared to a 71% increase in patched animals (p<0.05). Patched animals had a compensatory increase in their right hemi-diaphragmatic fiber cross-sectional area (p<0.0001).

Conclusions

A primarily patched 3*3cm defect in growing rabbits, under laryngeal mask airway ventilation, enables adequate survival with normal lung function and reduced maximum transdiaphragmatic pressure compared to controls.

Citation: Eastwood MP, Joyeux L, Pranpanus S, Van der Merwe J, Verbeken E, De Vleeschauwer S, et al. (2017) A growing animal model for neonatal repair of large diaphragmatic defects to evaluate patch function and outcome. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0174332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174332

Editor: Carlos E. Ambrósio, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, BRAZIL

Received: January 5, 2017; Accepted: March 7, 2017; Published: March 30, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Eastwood et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: JDP is a Clinical Researcher of the Flanders Research Foundation (FWO Vlaanderen). LJ is a beneficiary of a NIH Wellcome Trust and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant (GIFT-Surg project; WT101957 and NS/A000027/1). MPE and JvdM are funded with support of the Erasmus + Programme of the European Union (Framework Agreement number: 2013-0040). This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) occurs in 2,6/10,000 live births [1]. Once the initial problems of ventilatory insufficiency and pulmonary hypertension due to pulmonary hypoplasia are managed, the defect requires surgical closure. This can be undertaken primarily for small defects or in the case of larger defects a patch repair may be required. Prenatal lung size predicts for post-natal outcome which is closely linked to defect size[2–4]. As promising in utero treatments to accelerate lung growth emerge, a new population of survivors will require a more challenging defect closure[5]. Reported postnatal patch rates in prenatally treated fetuses are around 70%, whereas it is 23% in the population covered by the CDH registry[4,6]. Diaphragmatic patch repairs exhibit significant re-herniation rates [7–9]. With children undergoing patch repair in comparison to those repaired primarily, reporting higher rates of scoliosis (10% vs. 0%), chest wall deformities (14% vs. 6%), small bowel obstruction (12% vs. 6%) and poorer long term pulmonary function testing[10,11]. The contribution of the nature of the patch to these problems is not well understood. None of the available materials mimic the complex muscular-tendinous structure of the diaphragm, which has important roles in both the respiratory system and gastrointestinal tract [12]. To improve long term outcomes, more biocompatible and functional diaphragmatic substitutes are needed, to overcome problems such as recurrence, small bowel obstruction, adhesions and gastro esophageal reflux disease [10]. Most of these problems occur in the first two years of life. This mirrors the time of greatest change in the thorax; by two years the rounded pattern of infancy is superseded by the more ovoid cross sectional shape of adults[13].

Growing animal models including rats, rabbits, lambs, pigs and dogs have been used to mimic the rapidly expanding rib cage in the human[14–18]. Large animal models, particularly the rabbit have the advantage that they are more similar to human in terms of thoracic size, pulmonary function and growth rates[19]. Previously, we tested patch biocompatibility in a growing rabbit model of diaphragmatic hernia[15]. Rabbits are relatively inexpensive, easy to both house and handle and very fast growing, reaching full size by approximatively six months of age [20]. Also, experimental rib fusion at young age induces scoliosis, a condition seen clinically in CDH [21].

As an important respiratory muscle, diaphragmatic replacement can be assessed by its impact on pulmonary function alongside its biomechanical function. In the experimental literature pulmonary outcomes are not frequently reported. As far as we are aware there are limited comprehensive studies analyzing pulmonary function and correlating it to lung histology, hence it remains unclear if pulmonary function is of any value at later time-points [22,23]. Functional evaluation of diaphragmatic replacements includes electromyography (rats) and movement on videoscopic X-ray (dogs, rabbits, pigs) [24–27]. Transdiaphragmatic pressure measurements are used as an index diaphragmatic force and contraction, hence its functional capacity as a respiratory muscle [28]. Transdiaphragmatic pressures have previously been used to assess diaphragmatic re-innervation in rabbits[29].

Herein, we used the young rabbit to develop a more representative animal model for neonatal CDH-repair. Such a model could then later be used for studying novel implants. Firstly, we compared survival rates for different defect size and ventilation modes. Once survival was adequate, we focused on the development of more comprehensive and representative outcome measures, in a controlled study comparing Gore-Tex repaired animals and sham controls.

Materials and methods

This experiment was approved by the institutional animal ethical committee (KU Leuven P112/2014). To obtain adequate survival there was several phases of this experiment described in detail below: i) tracheal intubation, laparotomy and subtotal left hemi diaphragmatic (HD) excision, ii) tracheal intubation, laparotomy and reduced left hemi diaphragmatic defect size (3*3cm), iii) laryngeal mask airway (LMA) intubation, laparotomy and reduced defect size (3*3cm). Finally, we compared sham operated to Gore-Tex implanted animals.

Surgery

In this part of the experiment we used in total 30 six-weeks old male rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus; New Zealand White, Laboratory Animal Center, KU Leuven) to undergo primary repair of a surgically induced left diaphragmatic hernia. They were group housed in a controlled environment. Prior to surgery, animals were weighed, pre-oxygenated, and anesthesia was induced with intra-muscular injection of ketamine 35mg/kg (^®Ketalar 100mg/ml, Eurovet, Bladel, Netherlands) and xylazine 5mg/kg (^®XYL-M 2%, VMD, Arendonk, Belgium) into the quadriceps. Simultaneously, they received a subcutaneous injection (SC) (neck) of enrofloxacin 10 mg/kg (^®Baytril 5%, Bayer, Diegem, Belgium), buprenorphine 0.05mg/kg (^®Vetergesic 0.3mg/ml, Ecuphar, Oostkamp, Belgium) and meloxicam 0.6mg/kg (^®Metacam 5mg/ml, Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany). Animals were then placed on a heating pad (Flexiguard 55, Petnap Ltd, Tadley Hants, UK) for the duration of surgery with continuous heart rate and saturation monitoring. A 26 Gauge venflon (^®BD Neoflon, Erembodegem, Belgium) was inserted into the lateral ear vein and secured (4–0 Vicryl ^®Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson Medical, USA). Maintenance anesthesia was commenced with an IV bolus of ketamine (1mg/kg) and propofol (2mg/kg) (^®PropoVet 10mg/ml, Abbott, Maidenhead, UK) followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine (100ug/kg/min) and propofol (0.8mg/kg/min)[30]. Further boluses were given in case of signs of awakening. In the initial animals (n = 27), tracheal intubation was endoscopically guided using a rigid neonatal bronchoscope (10339F) with a 1.3mm fiber endoscope (11540AA; both ^®Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany). In brief, a semi-rigid guide wire (TSF-35-145, 0.35”, 145cm; ^®Cook medical) was passed through the vocal cords under endoscopic vision. Over it, a 10Ch (2mm) endotracheal tube was advanced blindly[15]. Due to tracheal complications (as discussed later) subsequent animals (n = 15) were intubated using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (^®V-gel: R2, Millpledge, Wingene, Belgium). The LMA was attached to a mechanical ventilator (Babylog 8000, ^®Dräger) with standardized ventilator settings: TI 0.4, TE 0.6, Flow 8, Pin 14, PEEP 4–5, 40–50% O2 adjusted according to saturations.

The left upper abdomen and thorax were shaved (^®Aesculap ISIS, Beringen, Belgium) and the animal secured in the operative position (Fig 1A). Under aseptic conditions local anesthetic was infiltrated (1% lignocaine, AstraZeneca, Brussels, Belgium) at the incision site. Following a left subcostal transverse incision (Fig 1B), sharp and blunt discussion with diathermy (^®Force2, Valleylab, Dre, Louisville, USA) allowed access to the peritoneal cavity. The liver was gently retracted with a damp gauze permitting division of the left triangular ligament (Fig 1C) with visualization of the left hemi-diaphragm. A diaphragmatic defect was created via excision of the musculo-tendious left hemi-diaphragm. Initially, there was subtotal left hemi-diaphragmatic excision leaving a 1cm antero-postero-lateral and 2cm medial rim (n = 16; Fig 1D). Because of lower than expected survival rates we moved to induction of a smaller yet standardized 3x3cm posterior defect (Fig 1E; n = 11). To repair the defect a dome-shaped 1-mm single layer ^®Gore-Tex Dual Patch (depending on size: 5cmx3,5 or 3,5x3,5cm) was sutured in place using non-absorbable interrupted suture (Prolene 4–0, Ethicon) (Fig 1F). The laparotomy was closed in two layers (4–0 vicryl) followed by SC skin closure (4–0 Monocryl Ethicon) (Fig 1G). The ketamine/ propofol infusion was slowed and stopped during closure. Removal of the LMA was attempted only when the animal gained consciousness and began to reject the airway. Recovery was in a quiet and warm area with 4L O₂ via a nose cone. For three days a single daily SC injection of meloxicam and enrofloxacin was administered for pain control. Animals were monitored daily; if they developed respiratory distress O₂ saturations and clinical examination were undertaken at least twice daily. Low saturations <93% despite oxygen therapy and treatment with antibiotics, or visible discomfort despite adequate analgesia, signified by poor oral intake, reduced movement and weight loss over several days were considered humane endpoints. Subsequently we created 6 “sham” operated controls, who underwent a similar procedure via laparotomy, division of the posterior triangular ligament of the liver and their abdomen packed with damp swabs for 20 mins with no further surgical intervention.

Download:

Fig 1. Creation and repair of a left diaphragmatic defect in a 6-week old rabbit.

A. Operative position, B. Left subcostal transverse incision, C. Division of the posterior triangular ligament of the liver, D. Subtotal left diaphragmatic excision with Gore-Tex mesh repair, E. 3*3cm diaphragmatic defect, F. Repair with a 3,5*3,5cm Gore-Tex patch G. Sub-cuticular skin closure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174332.g001

Outcomes at 90 days

Outcome measures were assessed at 90 days. In case the animal died before 90days a post-mortem examination was undertaken to determine cause, alongside harvesting appropriate histology specimens.

Chest x-rays prior to harvest

24-48hrs prior to outcome measurements, animals were sedated (IM ketamine: 35mg/kg with xylazine: 5mg/kg as previously) to have posterior-anterior and left lateral chest x-rays (^®Embrace DM 1000 Mammography System; Agfa-Gevaert, Mortsel, Belgium: collimation size 24x29cm, thickness 280mm, voltage 28 kVp, engine load 65 and 80mAs). Chest x-rays were assessed by an observer blinded to the experimental surgery for re-herniation. To determine the degree of scoliosis the Cobb angle was measured between the 4^th and 10^th vertebrae in animals with no obvious curvature or at the extremes of the spinal curvature ^(®RadiAnt DICOM Viewer 3.2.2, Medixant, Poznan, Poland). Measurements were repeated three times and averaged.

Trans-diaphragmatic pressure measurement and breathing pattern

At 90 days animals were sedated (IM ketamine/ xylazine) and commenced on an IV infusion of ketamine/propofol (as above), with 4L O₂ given via a nose cone. They were placed supine, neck extended and shaved. A tracheostomy was performed in a stepwise fashion. 1% lignocaine was infiltrated 5mm below the thyroid cartilage on the neck. A 2cm horizontal incision neck incision was made and subplatysmal flaps were elevated with division of strap muscles. The thyroid was gently separated or avoided and pre-tracheal fascia opened. The tracheal cartilage was exposed from the cricoid cartilage to 5^th tracheal ring. A small vertical incision between the 2^nd to 4^th tracheal ring with a 3–0 endotracheal tube (35mm cut short). The tracheal tube was secured by passing two sutures (2–0 Vicryl) around the trachea. The nose cone was moved to cover the tracheal tube.

Measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) required placement of a pneumotachograph (PTG), intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal pressure catheters. The PTG enabled measurement of tidal volume (Vt) and airflow (ml/s). It was attached to a heater control unit (8411B, Hans Rudolph, Sawnee, KS USA) was attached to the end of the tracheal tube and a pressure transducer (Biopac MP150, Cerom, Paris, France). Two esophageal balloon catheters (5Ch, Cooper surgical, Trumbull, USA) were advanced from the mouth into the stomach (approx. 30cm) and attached to the pressure monitors giving a positive signal. One catheter was retracted until the signal became negative and then assumed to be in the distal esophagus which was synonymous to thoracic pressure. The catheters were labeled esophageal (Peos) or abdominal (Pab) and secured with tape. Once the animal was in an established breathing pattern a run of 5 consecutive breaths was recorded at rest. Then the ET tube (at tracheostomy site) was occluded and 5 attempted breaths recorded. Following these the animal was euthanized with an IV injection of T61 (MSD, Brussels, Belgium).

Histopathology

Animals were assessed for any signs of incision site breakdown (infection/ dehiscence) before a midline laparotomy was performed. The abdominal cavity was opened and inspected for fluid collections, infection or herniation of the diaphragm. A left thoracic window was also created with removal of the anterior section of the 4^th to 6^th ribs. The diaphragm was then explanted en bloc. Right hemi diaphragmatic specimens were taken from the lateral muscular edge in both sham and Gore-Tex operated animals. The lungs and trachea were removed en bloc and inflated at 20cm H2O with 4% neural buffered formaldehyde (bFA), the trachea was tied with a knot and immersed in bFA for 24 hours. Random sections were made from the left superior lobe (upper and lower lobe) and from the left inferior lobe (upper and lower). In the right lung a random section was taken from the superior and antero-inferior lobe.

Paraffin blocks were cut into 4μm sections of the lung and right hemi-diaphragmatic specimens and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for airway morphometry and cross sectional area respectively. Microscopic quantification was done by a single observer (MPE) blinded to the experimental group, with a Zeiss light microscope (Axioskop, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at a magnification of 200x. We assessed the left lower lobe as it is adjacent to the patch border. Each lower lobe was divided into 20 non-overlapping fields with three measurements taken: mean terminal bronchiolar density (MTBD), which is inversely proportional to the number of alveoli supplied by each bronchus, mean linear intercept (Lm) which is related to airspace size, mean wall transection length (Lmw) which is an index of the thickness of alveolar septa[31]. Right-hemi diaphragmatic specimens had the perimeters of at least 100 circular randomly selected fibers delineated and cross-sectional area (CSA) was automatically calculated (Zen 2.3, Carl Zeiss)[32]. This was then grouped by CSA (0–1000μm², 1000μm²-2000μm² etc), the percentage of fibers in each group was calculated for total fiber load and a histogram was created for Goretex or sham operated animals.

Statistics

All procedural information was documented as per the recordkeeping guidelines[33]. Data was analyzed using Prism for Windows version 5.0 (Graphpad software, San Diego, CA, USA). A power calculation based on our previous study (tensiometry results) suggested a repair group size of n = 6 would give 80% power (independent t-test)[15]. Data was checked for normality of distribution using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, then presented as a mean with SD or median and IQR. Comparison between groups was done by unpaired students t-test or Mann Whitney test. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Survival curves are presented as Kaplan-Meier graphs with group comparsions using a Mantel-Cox test. To compare the CSA of fiber sizes a two-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni multiple comparison test was used.

Results

Model creation

Complete left hemi-diaphragmatic resection.

Initially, 16 rabbits underwent creation of a large defect. Survival at 90 days was 6% (Fig 2). Three (19%) died peri-operatively. One having a gastro-intestinal upset died after induction yet prior to intubation (n = 1). Two others died due to ET tube dislodgement during the operation (n = 2). Therefore, thirteen (81%) survived the operation. In those the resected diaphragm measured either 4,5cm*3cm (10,6cm³: 1,3kg (1,13–1,48) n = 4), 5cm*3,5cm (13,7cm³: 1,4kg (1,33–1,48) n = 8), 5,5cm*4cm (17,3cm³: 1,4kg n = 1). Seven (54%) died <48 hours post-extubation with extreme respiratory distress. Two animals died prior to day 30 (D = 30). Of the six survivors, one died at D11 without obvious cause yet with serous fluid in chest. In a second, pathology confirmed pneumonia (D15). Neither animal had herniation. At D30 (720hrs) three animals were sacrificed due to increasing respiratory distress. One (33%) had a small (∼2cm) re-herniation; lung histology was normal. The second had normal lung pathology, the third diffuse alveolar damage. One animal survived to 90 days without respiratory problems. On post-mortem there was medial herniation of the liver. For this cohort, mean operative time (68±9mins) and weight before surgery (1.40 (1.25–1.45) kg) did not differ between immediate post-operative deaths (<48hours) and those surviving more than 1 week.

Download:

Fig 2. Survival curves.

Following a subtotal diaphragmatic excision, a 3*3cm defect with endotracheal intubation and a 3*3cm defect with laryngeal mask airway insertion; all defects were closed with a 3,5*3,5cm Gore-Tex patch* p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174332.g002

Reduced defect size with tracheal intubation.

Defect size was then systematically reduced to 3*3cm (7,1cm³) to overcome the immediate (<48hours) post-operative mortality (Fig 2). Eleven rabbits were anesthetized, two (18%) died before the operation either during intubation (n = 1) or secondary to iatrogenic pneumothorax (n = 1). No operated animals died within the first 48hrs. Overall, there was an improvement in survival (p <0.05). Of the remaining 9 rabbits, 7 died around D27 (16–49). The majority exhibited significant respiratory distress with significant desaturation (<80%). Post-mortem examination disclosed a small organized hemothorax in one animal. Lung pathology in all but one animal showed edema, respiratory infiltrates and hyaline membrane disease (Fig 3C). This was worse at later time points (Fig 3B and 3C) in keeping with the clinical pattern of respiratory failure. Tracheal pathology revealed strictures with mucosal loss, fibrosis and narrowing of the lumen (Fig 3D) which prompted us to move to working without tracheal intubation (see below). All animals had significant adhesions to the patch. In one animal there was herniation at D = 49. Eventually two out of the remaining nine (22%) survived to 90 days, one with a herniation. Initial weight (1.3±0.5 kg) and operation time (75±11 mins) similar between animals surviving 90 days and those not.

Download:

Fig 3. Lung, tracheal and diaphragmatic histology.

A. D2: normal lung pathology following a liver haemorrhage (control). B. D16: alveolar and interstitial odema (arrows) following ETT intubation. C. D14: evidence of hyaline membrane formation following ETT intubation. D. D33: Tracheal stricture formation resulting in respiratory distress and death following ETT intubation. E. D90: Intact tracheal muscosa following LMA intubation. F. Untouched 6-week old rabbit diaphragm showing muscle (M) and tendon (T) interface. G. D90: post Gore-Tex implantation right (contra-lateral) diaphragmatic muscle hypertrophy. H. D90: Gore-Tex (G)–tissue interface D: post-operative day, ETT: endotracheal tube, LMA: laryngeal mask airway.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174332.g003

Reduced defect size or sham operation with laryngeal mask airway (^®V-Gel).

To avoid the development of tracheal strictures we moved to securing the airway with an LMA (^®V-gel). Another nine rabbits underwent standardized induction of a reduced size defect (3*3cm) and primary repair with Gore-Tex to complete the envisaged number of survivors in that group. We then also added six sham operated animals. With this ventilation strategy overall survival was improved to 67% (Fig 2, p <0.05), no sham operated animals died. Notably, after 48 hours post-operatively there were no further episodes of respiratory distress suggestive of tracheal injury. There was normal tracheal architecture at D90 in these animals (Fig 3E). Four (44%) Gore-Tex rabbits survived to 90 days with three early post-operative deaths, all in the Gore-Tex group. Two had confirmed aspirations on post-mortem and no cause of death was found in the other. There were two late deaths at D73 (diarrhea) and D75 (pneumonia). No Gore-Tex repairs had recurrence.

Gore-Tex implanted compared to sham operated

We compared sham (n = 6) and Gore-Tex (n = 6) implanted animals at 90days. During the experiments, animals doubled in size (weight increase in Gore-Tex animals (220±54%) vs. sham (140±73%; p = 0.0571). In the Gore-Tex group, one had a re-herniation (17%) and one had bilateral pleural effusions, yet without wound infection, dehiscence and unremarkable lung pathology. Chest X-rays at 90 days revealed comparable Cobb angles (sham 3.8°±0.5 vs. Gore-Tex 3.2°±0.8; p = 1.0) (Fig 4A and 4B).

Download:

Fig 4. Pulmonary Outcomes.

Chest X-Ray (CXR) showing A. Cobb angle measurement (PA film) B. lateral view in sham operated animals and pulmonary function testing showing C. Flow rate, d. Tidal volume.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174332.g004

Trans-diaphragmatic pressure and breathing pattern measurements

Sham and Gore-Tex rabbits had similar Vt (7.1ml ± 0.8) vs. 8.1ml ± 3.8) and flow rates (66.4ml/s ±12.5 vs. 66.0ml/s ±8.4) (Fig 4C and 4D). Transdiaphragmatic pressure measurement were feasible in nearly all (Fig 5A and 5B). Tracheostomy occlusion resulted in an increase in Pdi (Fig 5C). At rest (i.e unoccluded), Pdi was similar in sham and Gore-Tex animals (6.6±2.5 mmHg vs. 7.4±1.2 mmHg; p = 0.9048). There was no correlation between tidal volume and Pdi (data not shown). On occlusion of the tracheostomy tube transdiaphragmatic pressure increased in sham operated animals, whereas it did not in Gore-Tex implanted animals (p<0.05, Fig 5B). Overall, following occlusion sham animals increased their transdiaphragmatic pressure 134% as compared to a 71% increase in Gore-Tex operated animals (Fig 5C).

Download:

Fig 5. Diaphragmatic Outcomes.

A. Transdiaphragmatic pressure measurement: airflow recording showing tracheostomy occlusion with halt of airflow (red arrow), increase in Pdi (black arrow). B. Pdi increases in Sham and Gore-Tex implanted animals following tracheostomy occlusion, C. Increase in Pdi as a % change at rest and following occlusion, D. Right hemi diaphragmatic muscle fiber cross sectional (μm²) area is increased in Gore-Tex implanted animals. Poes: oesophageal pressure, Pab: abdominal pressure, Pdi: transdiaphragmatic pressure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174332.g005

Histopathology

Lung histology was not different between groups, not for the Lmw (16.9±2.9 vs. 17.0±0.9), neither for the Lm (58.0±4.7 vs, 57.6±5.1) or MTBD (0.80±0.1 vs. 1.0±0.1) (sham vs. Gore-Tex). Pleural thickening was noted in Gore-Tex implanted animals, likely secondary to friction. Contra-lateral diaphragmatic muscular fiber size was increased in Gore-Tex implanted animals (Fig 5D; p<0.0001) (Fig 3G). Representative images include an untouched 6-week old rabbit diaphragm (muscle-tendon interface) and the Gore-Tex diaphragmatic interface (Fig 3F and 3H).

Discussion

Herein, we improved a large diaphragmatic hernia repair animal model by increasing diaphragmatic defect size to one that could not be directly closed with permissible survival, and by changing ventilation technique. We implanted the most commonly used patch for defect repair; Gore-Tex. This did not induce scoliosis although there was a 17% herniation rate with changes in transdiaphragmatic pressures and compensatory contralateral diaphragmatic hypertrophy.

To increase diaphragmatic defect size to the extent where primary closure was impossible required several modifications to our existing anesthetic protocol[15]. Initially, a large defect despite mechanical ventilation resulted in the majority of animals dying in the immediate post-operative period. As rabbits are diaphragmatic breathers, we speculated that they were unable to compensate for the near complete left hemi diaphragmatic replacement with a patch[34]. A reduction in defect size to around what is categorized as a type B defect (CDH study group staging) improved our immediate post-operative losses (<2hrs)[35]. However, we then ran into the problem of later losses due to tracheal stricture formation. Several models have been used to produce tracheal strictures in rabbits; one implanting an endotracheal tube wrapped in ^®Surgicel into the tracheal for one week[36]. Another study related tracheal stricture formation to the duration of intubation; with intermittent tracheal trauma throughout the intubation. However, it was only following six hours of trauma that they could routinely produce respiratory distress and stricture formation[37]. Our operative time of around 75mins produced significant and reproducible damage within 2–3 weeks. Despite intubating under direct vision using a guide wire to minimize trauma there are several possible contributors to the damage. In our previous study, with an identical intubation technique we had 19% mortality within two weeks of surgery, the cause of which was unclear. In this study we lost 54% at an intermediate time-point exhibiting significant respiratory distress secondary to tracheal stricture formation. Although we often re-used tracheal tubes rendering them stiffer and more likely to induce damage, these were uncuffed. This combined with the vulnerable immature rabbit airway may explain some of the lost in both of these experiments. The increased mortality may be due to the additional use of mechanical ventilation with positive pressure possibly further exacerbating the injury through mechanical injury. Furthermore, our larger defects may have meant that this tracheal insult was less well tolerated than in the previous experiment. Regardless, these problems were circumvented by the use of a LMA.

We also measured the transdiaphragmatic pressure to evaluate patch repair in the setting of CDH, which is to our knowledge has not been previously reported. Clinically, children with CDH have poorer exercise performance and respiratory function tests, demonstrating obstructive airways [38][39]. The most significant contributor must be the degree of pulmonary hypoplasia but the contribution of the diaphragmatic repair has not been so well considered. We demonstrated a change in diaphragmatic force with a Gore-Tex patch implant with no accompanying change in lung histology. Indeed, patch closure is a predictor for a worse outcome in pulmonary function testing[11,40]. Gore-Tex does not permit significant tissue remodeling whereas a structure which actively encourages tissues ingrowth and re-innervation of the bridging tissue may in time lead to a better functional result[15]. Regardless, in our model the de-innervated area of diaphragm replaced by the Gore-Tex patch will never function as well as native tissue. The phrenic nerve in children with a repaired diaphragmatic defect has been shown to have a prolonged latency and twitch diaphragmatic pressure on the affected side representing a further challenge to the ideal repair[41,42].

This model does not reproduce the primary pulmonary deficit present in CDH survivors. Of note is that rabbits alveolarize in the first few weeks after birth and by the time of patch implant lung development is already complete[43]. Any pulmonary dysfunction would therefore be considered secondary to the surgery or its complications. We found that measurements of breathing patterns confirmed by airway morphometry was relatively unaffected, both in treated and control animals. Although, herniation may lead to atelectasis and lung compression it is unlikely to modify alveolar structure. Previously, in adult rats direct closure of a muscular diaphragmatic defect reduced forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and elastic properties of the lungs significantly within 90 minutes compared to Gore-Tex closure[22]. It is to be expected that a tight primary repair leads to early ventilatory changes however these are likely compensated for in time. Regardless, we confirm here that the patch in itself does not impact respiratory function.

Re-herniation rates in humans vary between centers and it has been reported in the most expert hands they are actually relatively low[8,10]. We report a (re-)herniation rate of 20%, essentially only in one animal, this is likely reflective of the human situation. Although we did not identify any scoliosis, in previous animal models high rates of scoliosis are reported when the patch is secured directly to the ribs, which was not the case in this experiment [14]. It is likely that the aetiology of scoliosis is more complex than we can reproduce in this model. A reduced ipsilateral thoracic size resulting from the restrictive/ obstructive ventilatory defect, excessive tension from the diaphragmatic repair or a smaller lung volume necessitating a smaller thoracic size due to changes in the recoil pressure of the lung all may contribute[44,45].

Finally, we investigated whether there was a compensatory change in the right hemi-diaphragm in response to the left sided intervention. We speculated that the right hemi-diaphragm may hypertrophy in response to increased effort due to the lack of movement in the left and this was confirmed by measuring muscle fiber CSA. Rabbits are known to have around 20% type 1 fibers in their diaphragm and this differs according to region[46]. Under increased strain there is a documented muscle fiber switch from type 2b to type 2a and this could act as another compensatory mechanism[47]. An investigation of muscle fiber type could provide more insight into this disease model, yet we did not pursue this.

To further this study, one could also consider more extensive and non-invasive pulmonary function testing using whole body plethysomography[48]. Furthermore, fluoroscopic x-ray could provide interesting information on ipsilateral and contra-lateral diaphragmatic movement following diaphragmatic patch repair[26]. We also acknowledge that we have compared animals with different ventilation strategies and failed to report the passive biomechanical properties of our diaphragmatic repair. Finally, it would be interesting to explore the host cellular response to implants. This would be most valuable with additional examination of implants at earlier time-points.

Regardless, we present a more comprehensive model for neonatal diaphragmatic hernia repair with novel readouts for testing patch repairs. Future studies in this model could now explore novel solutions for diaphragmatic repair.

Supporting information

S1 Minimal Dataset. Excel file containing all raw data included in Fig 2, Fig 4C and 4D and Fig 5B, 5C and 5D.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174332.s001

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Godelieve Verbist for her assistance in sample processing and immunohistochemistry, Dr H Decaluwé, Dr M Roggen and Dr S Mayer for their technical suggestions. We also thank Mrs K Buelens for her radiographic support.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: MPE LJ GGR JvDM EV JD.
Formal analysis: MPE EV GGR JD.
Funding acquisition: JD.
Investigation: MPE LJ SP JvDM SdV JD.
Methodology: MPE LJ JvDM SdV GGR JD.
Project administration: MPE JD.
Resources: GGR JD.
Software: GGR.
Supervision: EV GGR JD.
Validation: MPE GGR JD.
Visualization: MPE GGR JD.
Writing – original draft: MPE.
Writing – review & editing: LJ JvDM SdV GGR JD.

References

1. McGivern MR, Best KE, Rankin J, Wellesley D, Greenlees R, Addor M-C, et al. Epidemiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: a register-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(2):F137–44. pmid:25411443
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Lally KP, Lally P a, Lasky RE, Tibboel D, Jaksic T, Wilson JM, et al. Defect size determines survival in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):e651–7. pmid:17766505
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Jani JC, Cannie M, Peralta CFA, Deprest JA, Nicolaides KH, Dymarkowski S. Lung volumes in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: comparison of 3D US and MR imaging assessments. Radiology. 2007;244(4):575–82.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Jani JC, Benachi A, Nicolaides KH, Allegaert K, Gratacós E, Mazkereth R, et al. Prenatal prediction of neonatal morbidity in survivors with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33: 64–9. pmid:18844275
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Al-Maary J, Eastwood MP, Russo FM, Deprest JA, Keijzer R. Fetal Tracheal Occlusion for Severe Pulmonary Hypoplasia in Isolated Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Survival. Ann Surg. 2016;264(6):929–33.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Cruz-Martínez R, Moreno-Alvarez O, Hernández-Andrade E, Castañón M, Martínez JM, Done E, et al. Changes in lung tissue perfusion in the prediction of survival in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29(1):101–7.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Lansdale N, Alam S, Losty PD, Jesudason EC. Neonatal endosurgical congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;252(1):20–6. pmid:20505506
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Tsai J, Sulkowski J, Adzick NS, Hedrick HL, Flake AW. Patch repair for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: is it really a problem? J Pediatr Surg. Elsevier Inc.; 2012;47(4):637–41. pmid:22498374
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Puligandla PS, Grabowski J, Austin M, Hedrick H, Renaud E, Arnold M, et al. Management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A systematic review from the APSA outcomes and evidence based practice committee. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(11):1958–70. pmid:26463502
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Jancelewicz T, Chiang M, Oliveira C, Chiu PP. Late surgical outcomes among congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) patients: why long-term follow-up with surgeons is recommended. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(5):935–41. pmid:23701763
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Panitch HB, Weiner DJ, Feng R, Perez MR, Healy F, McDonough JM, et al. Lung function over the first 3 years of life in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;50(9):896–907. pmid:25045135
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Pickering M, Jones JFX. The diaphragm: two physiological muscles in one. J Anat. 2002;201:305–12. pmid:12430954
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Openshaw P, Edwards S, Helms P. Changes in rib cage geometry during childhood. Thorax. 1984;39(8):624–7. pmid:6474391
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Lally KP, Cheu HW, Vazquez WD. Prosthetic diaphragm reconstruction in the growing animal. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28(1):45–7.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Mayer S, Decaluwe H, Ruol M, Manodoro S, Kramer M, Till H, et al. Diaphragm Repair with a Novel Cross-Linked Collagen Biomaterial in a Growing Rabbit Model. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132021. pmid:26147985
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Turner CG, Klein JD, Steigman S a, Armant M, Nicksa G a, Zurakowski D, et al. Preclinical regulatory validation of an engineered diaphragmatic tendon made with amniotic mesenchymal stem cells. J Pediatr Surg. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;46(1):57–61. pmid:21238640
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Sandoval J a, Lou D, Engum S a, Fisher LM, Bouchard CM, Davis MM, et al. The whole truth: comparative analysis of diaphragmatic hernia repair using 4-ply vs 8-ply small intestinal submucosa in a growing animal model. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(3):518–23. pmid:16516627
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Gonzalez R, Hill SJ, Mattar SG, Lin E, Ramshaw BJ, Smith CD, et al. Absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias in a growing animal model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(5):449–54. pmid:21542768
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Kamaruzaman NA, Kardia E, Kamaldin N ‘Atikah, Latahir AZ, Yahaya BH, Kamaruzaman NA, et al. The rabbit as a model for studying lung disease and stem cell therapy. Biomed Res Int. Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2013;2013:691830. pmid:23653896
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Masoud I, Shapiro F, Kent R, Moses A. A longitudinal study of the growth of the New Zealand white rabbit: cumulative and biweekly incremental growth rates for body length, body weight, femoral length, and tibial length. J Orthop Res. 1986;4(2):221–31. pmid:3712130
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Mehta HP, Snyder BD, Baldassarri SR, Hayward MJ, Giuffrida MJ, Entezari V, et al. Expansion thoracoplasty improves respiratory function in a rabbit model of postnatal pulmonary hypoplasia: a pilot study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(2):153–61.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Menezes SL, Chagas PS, Macedo-Neto A V, Santos VC, Rocco PR, Zin WA. Suture or prosthetic reconstruction of experimental diaphragmatic defects. Chest. 2000;117(5):1443–8. pmid:10807835
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Brouwer KM, Daamen WF, Hoogenkamp HR, Geutjes PJ, de Blaauw I, Janssen-Kessels W, et al. Collagen-Vicryl scaffolds for reconstruction of the diaphragm in a large animal model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(4): 756–63. pmid:24843887
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Gubareva EA, Sjöqvist S, Gilevich I V, Sotnichenko AS, Kuevda E V, Lim ML, et al. Orthotopic transplantation of a tissue engineered diaphragm in rats. Biomaterials. 2016;77:320–35. pmid:26618750
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Böhm G, Binnebösel M, Krähling E, Schumpelick V, Steinau G, Stanzel S, et al. Influence of the elasticity module of synthetic and natural polymeric tissue substitutes on the mobility of the diaphragm and healing process in a rabbit model. J Biomater Appl. 2011;25(8):771–93. pmid:20237180
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Touloukian RJ. A “new” diaphragm following prosthetic repair of experimental hemidiaphragmatic defects in the pup. Ann Surg. 1978;187(!):47–51. pmid:619799
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okamoto K, Toshimitsu Y, Okada K, Akimoto N, et al. Newly designed bioabsorbable substitute for the treatment of diaphragmatic defects. Surg Today. 2013;43(11):1298–304. pmid:23161480
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(4):518–624. pmid:12186831
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Derrey S, Verin E, Laquerrière A, de Barros AB, Lacoume Y, Fréger P, et al. Restoration of diaphragmatic function after diaphragm reinnervation by inferior laryngeal nerve; experimental study in rabbits. Respir Res. 2006;7:17. pmid:16438738
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Cruz FS, Carregaro AB, Raiser AG, Zimmerman M, Lukarsewski R, Steffen RP. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and S(+)-ketamine in rabbits. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2010;37(2):116–22. pmid:20230561
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Roubliova XI, Deprest JA, Biard JM, Ophalvens L, Gallot D, Jani JC, et al. Morphologic changes and methodological issues in the rabbit experimental model for diaphragmatic hernia. Histol Histopathol. 2010;25(9):1105–16. pmid:20607652
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Ceglia L, Niramitmahapanya S, Price LL, Harris SS, Fielding RA, Dawson-Hughes B. An evaluation of the reliability of muscle fiber cross-sectional area and fiber number measurements in rat skeletal muscle. Biol Proced Online. 2013;15(1):6. pmid:23497012
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. University of California B. RECORDKEEPING GUIDELINES FOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES ON LABORATORY ANIMALS [Internet]. 2015 [cited 1 Jan 2015] pp. 1–6. Available: http://www.acuc.berkeley.edu/guidelines/surgical_recordkeeping.pdf
34. Mognoni P, Saibene F, Sant’ambrogio G. Contribution of the diaphragm and the other inspiratory muscles to different levels of tidal volume and static inspiratory effort in the rabbit. J Physiol. Wiley-Blackwell; 1969;202(3): 517–34. pmid:5789936
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Harting MT, Lally KP. The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group registry update. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(6):370–375. pmid:25306471
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Lee HS, Kim SW, Oak C, Ahn Y-C, Kang HW, Chun BK, et al. Rabbit model of tracheal stenosis induced by prolonged endotracheal intubation using a segmented tube. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(12):2384–8. pmid:26586243
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Kumar SP, Ravikumar A, Thanka J. An animal model for laryngotracheal injuries: an experimental study. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(1):E23–7. pmid:25111795
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Rygl M, Rounova P, Sulc J, Slaby K, Stranak Z, Pycha K, et al. Abnormalities in pulmonary function in infants with high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacký, Olomouc, Czechoslov. 2015;159(3):497–502.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Bojanić K, Grizelj R, Dilber D, Šarić D, Vuković J, Pianosi PT, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise performance is reduced in congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51(12):1320–9. pmid:27228382
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Rygl M, Rounova P, Sulc J, Slaby K, Stranak Z, Pycha K, et al. Abnormalities in pulmonary function in infants with high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacký, Olomouc, Czechoslov. 2015;159(3):497–502.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Kassim Z, Jolley C, Moxham J, Greenough A, Rafferty GF. Diaphragm electromyogram in infants with abdominal wall defects and congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(1):143–9. pmid:20516054
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Kavvadia V, Davenport M, Nicolaides KH, Moxham J, et al. Diaphragmatic function in infants with surgically corrected anomalies. Pediatr Res. 2003;54(4):502–8. pmid:12815114
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Pringle KC. Human fetal lung development and related animal models. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1986;29(3):502–513. pmid:3757332
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Vanamo K, Peltonen J, Rintala R, Lindahl H, Jääskeläinen J, Louhimo I. Chest wall and spinal deformities in adults with congenital diaphragmatic defects. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(6):851–4. pmid:8783122
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Takayasu H, Masumoto K, Goishi K, Hayakawa M, Tazuke Y, Yokoi A, et al. Musculoskeletal abnormalities in congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors: Patterns and risk factors: report of a Japanese multicenter follow-up survey. Pediatr Int. 2016;58(9):877–80. pmid:26766165
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Kilarski W, Sjöström M. Systematic distribution of muscle fibre types in the rat and rabbit diaphragm: a morphometric and ultrastructural analysis. J Anat. 1990;168:13–30. pmid:2139020
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Vogel J, Figueiredo de Rezende F, Rohrbach S, Zhang M, Schröder K. Nox4 Is Dispensable for Exercise Induced Muscle Fibre Switch. PLoS One. 2015;10(6): e0130769. pmid:26083642
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Thrall KD, Woodstock AD, Soelberg JJ, Gargas ML, Kinzell JH, Corley RA. A real-time methodology to evaluate the nasal absorption of volatile compounds in anesthetized animals. Inhal Toxicol. 2009;21(6):531–6. pmid:19519153
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. McGivern MR, Best KE, Rankin J, Wellesley D, Greenlees R, Addor M-C, et al. Epidemiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: a register-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(2):F137–44. pmid:25411443
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Lally KP, Lally P a, Lasky RE, Tibboel D, Jaksic T, Wilson JM, et al. Defect size determines survival in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):e651–7. pmid:17766505
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Jani JC, Cannie M, Peralta CFA, Deprest JA, Nicolaides KH, Dymarkowski S. Lung volumes in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: comparison of 3D US and MR imaging assessments. Radiology. 2007;244(4):575–82.
View Article
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Jani JC, Benachi A, Nicolaides KH, Allegaert K, Gratacós E, Mazkereth R, et al. Prenatal prediction of neonatal morbidity in survivors with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33: 64–9. pmid:18844275
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] PubMed/NCBI

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Al-Maary J, Eastwood MP, Russo FM, Deprest JA, Keijzer R. Fetal Tracheal Occlusion for Severe Pulmonary Hypoplasia in Isolated Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Survival. Ann Surg. 2016;264(6):929–33.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Cruz-Martínez R, Moreno-Alvarez O, Hernández-Andrade E, Castañón M, Martínez JM, Done E, et al. Changes in lung tissue perfusion in the prediction of survival in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29(1):101–7.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Lansdale N, Alam S, Losty PD, Jesudason EC. Neonatal endosurgical congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;252(1):20–6. pmid:20505506
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Tsai J, Sulkowski J, Adzick NS, Hedrick HL, Flake AW. Patch repair for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: is it really a problem? J Pediatr Surg. Elsevier Inc.; 2012;47(4):637–41. pmid:22498374
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Puligandla PS, Grabowski J, Austin M, Hedrick H, Renaud E, Arnold M, et al. Management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A systematic review from the APSA outcomes and evidence based practice committee. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(11):1958–70. pmid:26463502
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Jancelewicz T, Chiang M, Oliveira C, Chiu PP. Late surgical outcomes among congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) patients: why long-term follow-up with surgeons is recommended. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(5):935–41. pmid:23701763
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Panitch HB, Weiner DJ, Feng R, Perez MR, Healy F, McDonough JM, et al. Lung function over the first 3 years of life in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;50(9):896–907. pmid:25045135
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Pickering M, Jones JFX. The diaphragm: two physiological muscles in one. J Anat. 2002;201:305–12. pmid:12430954
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Openshaw P, Edwards S, Helms P. Changes in rib cage geometry during childhood. Thorax. 1984;39(8):624–7. pmid:6474391
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Lally KP, Cheu HW, Vazquez WD. Prosthetic diaphragm reconstruction in the growing animal. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28(1):45–7.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Mayer S, Decaluwe H, Ruol M, Manodoro S, Kramer M, Till H, et al. Diaphragm Repair with a Novel Cross-Linked Collagen Biomaterial in a Growing Rabbit Model. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132021. pmid:26147985
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Turner CG, Klein JD, Steigman S a, Armant M, Nicksa G a, Zurakowski D, et al. Preclinical regulatory validation of an engineered diaphragmatic tendon made with amniotic mesenchymal stem cells. J Pediatr Surg. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;46(1):57–61. pmid:21238640
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Sandoval J a, Lou D, Engum S a, Fisher LM, Bouchard CM, Davis MM, et al. The whole truth: comparative analysis of diaphragmatic hernia repair using 4-ply vs 8-ply small intestinal submucosa in a growing animal model. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(3):518–23. pmid:16516627
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Gonzalez R, Hill SJ, Mattar SG, Lin E, Ramshaw BJ, Smith CD, et al. Absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias in a growing animal model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(5):449–54. pmid:21542768
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Kamaruzaman NA, Kardia E, Kamaldin N ‘Atikah, Latahir AZ, Yahaya BH, Kamaruzaman NA, et al. The rabbit as a model for studying lung disease and stem cell therapy. Biomed Res Int. Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2013;2013:691830. pmid:23653896
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Masoud I, Shapiro F, Kent R, Moses A. A longitudinal study of the growth of the New Zealand white rabbit: cumulative and biweekly incremental growth rates for body length, body weight, femoral length, and tibial length. J Orthop Res. 1986;4(2):221–31. pmid:3712130
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Mehta HP, Snyder BD, Baldassarri SR, Hayward MJ, Giuffrida MJ, Entezari V, et al. Expansion thoracoplasty improves respiratory function in a rabbit model of postnatal pulmonary hypoplasia: a pilot study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(2):153–61.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Menezes SL, Chagas PS, Macedo-Neto A V, Santos VC, Rocco PR, Zin WA. Suture or prosthetic reconstruction of experimental diaphragmatic defects. Chest. 2000;117(5):1443–8. pmid:10807835
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Brouwer KM, Daamen WF, Hoogenkamp HR, Geutjes PJ, de Blaauw I, Janssen-Kessels W, et al. Collagen-Vicryl scaffolds for reconstruction of the diaphragm in a large animal model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(4): 756–63. pmid:24843887
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Gubareva EA, Sjöqvist S, Gilevich I V, Sotnichenko AS, Kuevda E V, Lim ML, et al. Orthotopic transplantation of a tissue engineered diaphragm in rats. Biomaterials. 2016;77:320–35. pmid:26618750
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Böhm G, Binnebösel M, Krähling E, Schumpelick V, Steinau G, Stanzel S, et al. Influence of the elasticity module of synthetic and natural polymeric tissue substitutes on the mobility of the diaphragm and healing process in a rabbit model. J Biomater Appl. 2011;25(8):771–93. pmid:20237180
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Touloukian RJ. A “new” diaphragm following prosthetic repair of experimental hemidiaphragmatic defects in the pup. Ann Surg. 1978;187(!):47–51. pmid:619799
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okamoto K, Toshimitsu Y, Okada K, Akimoto N, et al. Newly designed bioabsorbable substitute for the treatment of diaphragmatic defects. Surg Today. 2013;43(11):1298–304. pmid:23161480
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(4):518–624. pmid:12186831
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Derrey S, Verin E, Laquerrière A, de Barros AB, Lacoume Y, Fréger P, et al. Restoration of diaphragmatic function after diaphragm reinnervation by inferior laryngeal nerve; experimental study in rabbits. Respir Res. 2006;7:17. pmid:16438738
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Cruz FS, Carregaro AB, Raiser AG, Zimmerman M, Lukarsewski R, Steffen RP. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and S(+)-ketamine in rabbits. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2010;37(2):116–22. pmid:20230561
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Roubliova XI, Deprest JA, Biard JM, Ophalvens L, Gallot D, Jani JC, et al. Morphologic changes and methodological issues in the rabbit experimental model for diaphragmatic hernia. Histol Histopathol. 2010;25(9):1105–16. pmid:20607652
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Ceglia L, Niramitmahapanya S, Price LL, Harris SS, Fielding RA, Dawson-Hughes B. An evaluation of the reliability of muscle fiber cross-sectional area and fiber number measurements in rat skeletal muscle. Biol Proced Online. 2013;15(1):6. pmid:23497012
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. University of California B. RECORDKEEPING GUIDELINES FOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES ON LABORATORY ANIMALS [Internet]. 2015 [cited 1 Jan 2015] pp. 1–6. Available: http://www.acuc.berkeley.edu/guidelines/surgical_recordkeeping.pdf

[ref34] 34. Mognoni P, Saibene F, Sant’ambrogio G. Contribution of the diaphragm and the other inspiratory muscles to different levels of tidal volume and static inspiratory effort in the rabbit. J Physiol. Wiley-Blackwell; 1969;202(3): 517–34. pmid:5789936
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Harting MT, Lally KP. The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group registry update. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(6):370–375. pmid:25306471
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Lee HS, Kim SW, Oak C, Ahn Y-C, Kang HW, Chun BK, et al. Rabbit model of tracheal stenosis induced by prolonged endotracheal intubation using a segmented tube. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(12):2384–8. pmid:26586243
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Kumar SP, Ravikumar A, Thanka J. An animal model for laryngotracheal injuries: an experimental study. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(1):E23–7. pmid:25111795
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Rygl M, Rounova P, Sulc J, Slaby K, Stranak Z, Pycha K, et al. Abnormalities in pulmonary function in infants with high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacký, Olomouc, Czechoslov. 2015;159(3):497–502.
View Article
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Bojanić K, Grizelj R, Dilber D, Šarić D, Vuković J, Pianosi PT, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise performance is reduced in congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51(12):1320–9. pmid:27228382
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Rygl M, Rounova P, Sulc J, Slaby K, Stranak Z, Pycha K, et al. Abnormalities in pulmonary function in infants with high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacký, Olomouc, Czechoslov. 2015;159(3):497–502.
View Article
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Kassim Z, Jolley C, Moxham J, Greenough A, Rafferty GF. Diaphragm electromyogram in infants with abdominal wall defects and congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(1):143–9. pmid:20516054
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Kavvadia V, Davenport M, Nicolaides KH, Moxham J, et al. Diaphragmatic function in infants with surgically corrected anomalies. Pediatr Res. 2003;54(4):502–8. pmid:12815114
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Pringle KC. Human fetal lung development and related animal models. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1986;29(3):502–513. pmid:3757332
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Vanamo K, Peltonen J, Rintala R, Lindahl H, Jääskeläinen J, Louhimo I. Chest wall and spinal deformities in adults with congenital diaphragmatic defects. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(6):851–4. pmid:8783122
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Takayasu H, Masumoto K, Goishi K, Hayakawa M, Tazuke Y, Yokoi A, et al. Musculoskeletal abnormalities in congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors: Patterns and risk factors: report of a Japanese multicenter follow-up survey. Pediatr Int. 2016;58(9):877–80. pmid:26766165
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Kilarski W, Sjöström M. Systematic distribution of muscle fibre types in the rat and rabbit diaphragm: a morphometric and ultrastructural analysis. J Anat. 1990;168:13–30. pmid:2139020
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Vogel J, Figueiredo de Rezende F, Rohrbach S, Zhang M, Schröder K. Nox4 Is Dispensable for Exercise Induced Muscle Fibre Switch. PLoS One. 2015;10(6): e0130769. pmid:26083642
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Thrall KD, Woodstock AD, Soelberg JJ, Gargas ML, Kinzell JH, Corley RA. A real-time methodology to evaluate the nasal absorption of volatile compounds in anesthetized animals. Inhal Toxicol. 2009;21(6):531–6. pmid:19519153
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Objectives

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Introduction

Materials and methods

Surgery

Outcomes at 90 days

Chest x-rays prior to harvest

Trans-diaphragmatic pressure measurement and breathing pattern

Histopathology

Statistics

Results

Model creation

Complete left hemi-diaphragmatic resection.

Reduced defect size with tracheal intubation.

Reduced defect size or sham operation with laryngeal mask airway (®V-Gel).

Gore-Tex implanted compared to sham operated

Trans-diaphragmatic pressure and breathing pattern measurements

Histopathology

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Minimal Dataset. Excel file containing all raw data included in Fig 2, Fig 4C and 4D and Fig 5B, 5C and 5D.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

Reduced defect size or sham operation with laryngeal mask airway (^®V-Gel).