Integrated control of wood destroying basidiomycetes combining Cu-based wood preservatives and Trichoderma spp.

Javier Ribera; Siegfried Fink; Maria del Carmen Bas; Francis W. M. R. Schwarze

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174335

Abstract

The production of new generation of wood preservatives (without addition of a co-biocide) in combination with an exchange of wood poles on identical sites with high fungal inoculum, has resulted in an increase of premature failures of wood utility poles in the last decades. Wood destroying basidiomycetes inhabiting sites where poles have been installed, have developed resistance against wood preservatives. The objective of the in vitro studies was to identify a Trichoderma spp. with a highly antagonistic potential against wood destroying basidiomycetes that is capable of colonizing Cu-rich environments. For this purpose, the activity of five Trichoderma spp. on Cu-rich medium was evaluated according to its growth and sporulation rates. The influence of the selected Trichoderma spp. on wood colonization and degradation by five wood destroying basidiomycetes was quantitatively analyzed by means of dry weight loss of wood specimens. Furthermore, the preventative effect of the selected Trichoderma spp. in combination with four Cu-based preservatives was also examined by mass loss and histological changes in the wood specimens. Trichoderma harzianum (T-720) was considered the biocontrol agent with higher antagonistic potential to colonize Cu-rich environments (up to 0.1% CuSO₄ amended medium). T. harzianum demonstrated significant preventative effect on wood specimens against four wood destroying basidiomycetes. The combined effect of T. harzianum and Cu-based wood preservatives demonstrated that after 9 months incubation with two wood destroying basidiomycetes, wood specimens treated with 3.8 kg m^-3 copper-chromium had weight losses between 55–65%, whereas containers previously treated with T. harzianum had significantly lower weight losses (0–25%). Histological studies on one of the wood destroying basidiomycetes revealed typical decomposition of wood cells by brown-rot fungi in Cu-impregnated samples, that were notably absent in wood specimens previously exposed to T. harzianum. It is concluded that carefully selected Trichoderma isolates can be used for integrated wood protection against a range of wood destroying basidiomycetes and may have potential for integrated wood protection in the field.

Citation: Ribera J, Fink S, Bas MdC, Schwarze FWMR (2017) Integrated control of wood destroying basidiomycetes combining Cu-based wood preservatives and Trichoderma spp. PLoS ONE 12(4): e0174335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335

Editor: Daniel Cullen, USDA Forest Service, UNITED STATES

Received: December 15, 2016; Accepted: March 7, 2017; Published: April 5, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Ribera et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The relevant data are available in Figshare at the following URL: https://figshare.com/articles/Determination_of_toxic_values_xlsx/4743061 and DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4743061.

Funding: The authors are pleased to acknowledge the financial support by the Swiss CTI (Project No. 17001.1 PFLS-LS).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

After many decades of use, wood remains the preferred choice for utility poles because of its availability, durability, strength-weight ratio and life cycle advantages. Copper (Cu) is the primary biocide component presently used to protect wood against soft-rot fungi in ground contact [1], but fails to protect against a range wood destroying basidiomycetes [2, 3]. Diverse mechanisms involved in the Cu-tolerance process of basidiomycetes have been described such as the ability to absorb Cu into cell wall components, extracellular chelation by metabolites and intracellular complexion with metallothioneins [4–9]. The absence of a co-biocide, in combination with an exchange of wood poles on identical sites with high fungal inoculum, has resulted in an increase in the number of premature failures of wood utility poles in the last decades [3, 10]. The economic damage due to premature failure of wood poles amounts to approx. 36 millions € per annum in Germany [3]. In a recent study by Ribera et al. [3], 73 utility poles of Norway spruce wood (Picea abies L.) impregnated with Cu-based wood preservatives from Switzerland and 38 from Germany and showing decay were selected and the associated wood destroying basidiomycetes isolated and analysed. The severity of decay differed according to the type of wood preservative formulation used and service life recorded. Brown-rot fungi and in particular Antrodia species were predominantly isolated from wood utility poles that were not treated with a co-biocide e.g. boron [3].

The search of environmentally friendly solutions to control undesirable microorganisms has resulted in great interest. Alternative management strategies are necessary to control fungi that have developed resistance to one or more pesticides. Integrated pest management is based on combining different control methods like cultural control, chemical control or biological control to reduce damage to crops and other commodities. The use of Trichoderma spp. as a biocontrol agent has been studied for decades [11–16]. A number of studies provide evidence that carefully selected Trichoderma spp. possess a high antagonistic activity against a range of wood destroying basidiomycetes [17–21]. The different mechanisms involved in the antagonistic process have been well described by several authors [17–21]. Although a combination of all mechanisms defines the antagonistic potential of each Trichoderma spp. it is believed that siderophores, volatile compounds and hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinases and glucanases play the most important role on the target hosts [19].

A commercial mixture of Trichoderma polysporum and T. harzianum was used in laboratory tests by Morrell and Sexton [22] to control decay of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) sapwood and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb.) heartwood by five basidiomycetes. Although the product demonstrated a high antagonistic potential to protect wood against Neolentinus lepideus and Rhodonia placenta, most of the tested fungi were not completely inhibited. The selected Trichoderma spp. had little effect on white-rot fungi, or even on N. lepideus, when wood was exposed to soil in the laboratory. In another study, Bruce et al. [23] reported that wood cores extracted from utility poles colonized by Trichoderma were able to reduce decay by N. lepideus and Antrodia carbonica in laboratory studies. These are two of the most common basidiomycetes that decay pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) and Douglas-fir (P. menziesii) wood poles [23]. These results and the earlier findings by Highley and Richard [24] clearly show that wood blocks pre-treated with Trichoderma (Binab) were resistant to decay by brown-rot fungi but offered little protection against white-rot fungi in the laboratory. In subsequent studies, Brown et al. [25] demonstrated a significant effect of Trichoderma to protect wood stakes against soft-rot and basidiomycete decay in the field. This study also confirmed that the application of Trichoderma would have a better chance for success as a ground line treatment for wood poles because of the continual moisture environment [25]. However, the use of Trichoderma in combination with new generations of wood preservatives has been insufficiently studied in long-term field trials.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of different Trichoderma spp. that can be used in combination with the new generation of Cu-based wood preservatives and to identify a competitive strain for integrated wood protection against a range wood destroying basidiomycetes.

Materials and methods

Growth rates and conidiogenesis of Trichoderma spp. on Cu-amended medium

The effect of Cu-amended medium was evaluated on the growth and sporulation of Trichoderma spp. (Table 1). Petri dishes containing 2% MEA (Malt extract agar, OXOID, Pratteln, Switzerland) and different concentrations of anhydrous CuSO₄ (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland) (0%, 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.075%, 0.1%, 0.5% and 1%) were inoculated in the centre with 100 μl of Trichoderma spp. conidia suspension adjusted to 10⁶ spores ml^-1. The growth rate (mm day^-1) was determined by colony diameter measurements after 10 days. To evaluate the influence of Cu-toxicity on conidiation rates of Trichoderma spp. the same concentrations of Cu-amended medium were evaluated. After 10 days, the produced conidia were collected, filtered with 5 μm pore filters and counted in a Neubauer improved chamber (Marienfeld, Germany). The yield of conidia was normalised to the surface of the fungal colony according to Gandía et al. [26]. For each experimental treatment (growth and conidiation rates), five Petri dishes for each Trichoderma spp. were performed.

Download:

Table 1. Fungal strains used in the present study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335.t001

Preventative effect of Trichoderma spp. against wood destroying basidiomycetes

Interaction tests with wood block specimens of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) sapwood (2 x 2 x 8 cm; radial, tangential, longitudinal) were performed as described by Ribera et al. [27] with following modifications. For evaluation of the preventative effect of Trichoderma spp. against wood destroying basidiomycetes, 45 autoclavable plastic containers (WEZ, Oberentfelden, Switzerland. dimensions; 40L x 60W x 15H cm) with 1000 g of vermiculite and 15 g of Scots pine sawdust were used as a substrate for the cultivation of wood destroying basidiomycetes (Table 1). Each fungus was tested on three autoclavable containers as a biological replicate. Before testing, the moisture content (MC) and water holding capacity (WHC) of vermiculite was determined according to ENV 807 [28]. The amount of water needed to bring the substrate to 75% of its WHC was calculated and added to the vermiculite. After 8 weeks incubation with the five wood destroying basidiomycetes at 22 (±1)°C and 70% relative humidity (RH), the boxes were inoculated with either T. harzianum (T-720) or T. atroviride (T-685) (100 ml of 10⁶ spores ml^-1). Three separate containers (biological replicates) for each wood decay basidiomycete were kept as controls. T. harzianum (T-720) was selected due to its high resistance on Cu-amended medium. T. atroviride (T-685) was selected as a bench mark fungus due its high antagonistic potential as described in previous studies [29, 30]. After 2 weeks incubation with Trichoderma, three wood specimens (3 repetitions) were sterilised with ethylene oxide and placed into each container. Three wood specimens were also placed into each control containers. Determination of the initial wood dry mass was calculated by oven drying (103°C) test specimens during 24h. After 12 weeks incubation, the specimens were removed, carefully cleaned with a brush, oven dried (103°C) and the mass loss recorded. In addition, the lethal effect of Trichoderma spp. was evaluated by re-isolating the wood destroying basidiomycetes from the substrate. Five subsamples of the infected substrate were selected randomly from the surface of each container and then placed into five different Petri dishes containing 20 ml of 2% MEA with 2 ml of thiabendazole dissolved in lactic acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) (T-MEA). Petri dishes were incubated at 22 (±1)°C and 70% RH for 10 days. T-MEA is a selective medium for wood destroying basidiomycetes [31]. If the wood destroying basidiomycete failed to grow on T-MEA, the lethal effect of Trichoderma spp. was considered to be 100%.

Test method for determining the protective effectiveness of wood preservatives against wood destroying basidiomycetes

Evaluation of the toxicity of Cu-based wood preservatives was performed according to the European Standard EN113 [32]. Wood specimens of Scots pine sapwood with standard dimensions (2.5R x 1.5T x 5L cm) were impregnated using a vacuum-pressure process. Four concentrations of wood preservatives distributed close to the expected toxic value were selected and the retention rates of the wood specimens were calculated (Table 2). Specimens impregnated with distilled water (0% preservative formulation) were used as controls. Wood specimens were kept in a drying vessel during four weeks and inverted twice per week. Culture vessels were inoculated with R. placenta, C. puteana, G. trabeum and F. pinicola from the Empa collection (Table 1). In each culture vessel one Cu-treated wood specimen and one non-impregnated control specimen was placed. For each different amount of retention rates of wood preservative and the respective fungi, four biological replicates were used. After 16 weeks mass loss was recorded (as described above) and toxic values were calculated. The toxic thresholds were calculated for each wood preservative formulation at which the wood was not adequately protected against the wood destroying fungi. The protection provided for the wood by the test preservative was considered to be adequate when the mean loss in mass of the specimens was less than 3.0% of their initial dry mass.

Download:

Table 2. Cu-based wood preservatives retained by the wood specimens (EN113).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335.t002

Combined effect of Cu-based wood preservatives and Trichoderma spp. on wood destroying basidiomycetes

Wood stakes of Scots pine sapwood (2R x 2T x 8L cm) were impregnated with vacuum-pressure according to EN252 [33] with two different concentrations selected from the results obtained in the “Test method for determining the protective effectiveness of wood preservatives against wood destroying basidiomycetes”. One concentration below the toxic value was used to evaluate the integrated control effect of Trichoderma spp. as a biocontrol agent. The second concentration above the toxic value was used as a positive control for each wood preservative. Wood specimens impregnated with distilled water (0% preservative formulation) were used as controls. After impregnation, stakes were dried for four weeks to allow fixation of the wood preservatives.

Autoclavable containers containing vermiculite/sawdust (as described above) were inoculated with a range wood destroying basidiomycetes. Antrodia serialis was selected as it is the most common fungus isolated from infected wood utility poles in Switzerland and Germany [3]. Serpula himantioides was selected due to its strong decomposition rates observed in 0.1% Cu-treated wood (higher than 5% mass loss after 8 weeks) [3]. R. placenta (EMPA 45) was used as a positive control because of its high Cu-tolerance as demonstrated by Civardi et al. [2] and Ribera et al. [3]. In total, nine containers per wood destroying basidiomycete were prepared (three biological repetitions per fungal treatment). After 8 weeks, three containers (biological replicates) per wood destroying basidiomycete were inoculated with spore suspensions of T. harzianum (T-720) or T. atroviride (T-685) as described above. Three separate containers (biological replicates) for each wood decay basidiomycete were kept as controls. Two weeks after the Trichoderma treatment, three sterilised wood specimens from each Cu-based wood preservative were randomly placed into each container. In total 27 samples per box were incubated.

After 9 months incubation, the wood specimens were removed and the mass loss was recorded as described above. In addition, the lethal effect of Trichoderma was also evaluated.

Light microscopy

For light microscopy, the incubated wood was cut into smaller blocks (1 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm), embedded in a methacrylate medium and subsequently polymerized at 50°C. The embedded specimens were sectioned at 3 μm using a rotary microtome (Leica^® 2040 Supercut) fitted with a diamond knife. The selected transverse sections were stained for 12 h in safranine and then counterstained for 3 min in methylene blue and 30 min in auramine [34]. Colour micrographs (Kodak EPY 64T) were taken with a Leitz Orthoplan microscope fitted with a Leitz-Vario-Orthomat camera system. Early stages of brown-rot (seen as loss of birefringence due to cellulolysis) were detected by viewing sections between crossed Nicols [35–38].

Statistical analysis

Several statistical tests were performed with different objectives applying Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to the growth, sporulation rates and wood mass losses variables. The normality assumption of the distribution data was checked via the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The p-values obtained rejected the normality at a 95% confidence level for growth measurements, sporulation rates and wood mass losses. Therefore, and following previous studies by Civardi et al. [2], a logarithmic transformation for growth and sporulation data and an arcsine transformation for wood weight losses were applied to obtain normality. All data was back-transformed to numerical values for presentation (expressed as mean ± SD). The ANOVA analysis was applied to assess the effect of Cu-amended medium on the growth and sporulation of each Trichoderma spp., considering measurements obtained from each Petri dish as biological replicates. For this purpose, Dunnett’s test was used to evaluate the differences in growth and sporulation between each treatment with CuSO₄ to the control group (0% CuSO₄) (significance levels of p<0.05). To compare the influence of Cu-amended medium on growth and sporulation between the Trichoderma spp., a Tukey’s HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) test was additionally performed for each concentration of CuSO₄ (p<0.05).

To evaluate the preventative effect of Trichoderma spp. (T-720 and T-685) against each wood destroying basidiomycetes another Tukey’s HSD test was also performed. The wood specimens from each container were considered as repetitions. Statistics were then performed on the average of the three repetitions that was considered the value for each biological replicate. All the statistical analysis were performed using the statistical software SPSS^® (Version 22, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results and discussion

Growth rates and conidiogenesis of Trichoderma spp. in Cu-amended medium

Due to the potential application of Trichoderma in soils with a high content of leached preservatives around the wood poles [39–42] it was important to identify a competitive strain that was able to colonise Cu-rich substrates. Some authors have described a high Cu-tolerance of Trichoderma spp. to a wide range of Cu concentrations [43–49]. In this study, the toxic effect of CuSO₄ amended medium on the growth of Trichoderma spp., compared by the Dunnett’s test, was statistically significant in concentrations above 0.1% CuSO₄ for all strains (Table 3). The Tukey’s test showed significant differences between the growths of Trichoderma spp. in some concentrations of CuSO₄. T. atroviride (T-722) demonstrated rapid colonization of the 0% Cu-amended medium compared to the other Trichoderma spp. However, T-722 was the most susceptible strain to CuSO₄, being the only strain that ceased to grow at 0.075% (Table 3). T. harzianum (T-720) and T. koningiopsis (T-723) were highly tolerant to CuSO₄-amended medium growing albeit more slowly in concentrations up to 0.75% of CuSO₄.

Download:

Table 3. Effect of Cu-amended medium on the diametric growth of Trichoderma spp. after 10 days incubation on Petri dishes.

Data represented as mean of five biological replicates (mm day^-1 ± SD).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335.t003

Results of the Dunnett’s test to measure the effect of CuSO₄ on the production of conidia showed that the effect was statistically significant (p<0.05) in concentrations above 0.075% CuSO_4, compared to the 0% CuSO₄ for all Trichoderma spp. (Table 4). The Tukey’s comparisons between Trichoderma spp. did not show significant differences for concentrations above 0.1% CuSO₄ since no Trichoderma spp. was able to colonise such a high concentrations of CuSO₄ in the substrate. T. harzianum (T-720) produced higher concentrations of conidia in absence of CuSO₄ (0% CuSO₄). Moreover, T-720 was able to sporulate, albeit in reduced yield, in toxic concentrations of CuSO₄ for the rest of the Trichoderma spp. (0% CuSO₄). The toxic effect of CuSO₄ on the production of conidia was more significant on the strains T-721 and T-722 compared to the other strains in 0.05% CuSO₄, producing no conidia.

Download:

Table 4. Effect of Cu-amended medium on the conidiogenesis process of Trichoderma spp. after 10 days incubation on Petri dishes.

Data represented as mean of five biological replicates (spore cm^-2 ± SD).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335.t004

Preventative effect of Trichoderma spp. against wood destroying basidiomycetes

The diversity of results reported by different authors [22–25] emphasizes the importance to specifically screen a Trichoderma isolate with a high antagonistic potential against the target fungus. The present study indicates that careful selection of a Trichoderma isolate with bioassays will improve the success rate of the antagonist in the field.

Treatment with Trichoderma spp. significantly reduced mass losses of some wood specimens compared to the controls (Fig 1). Trichoderma spp. had a significant impact (p<0.05) on the decay process of four wood destroying basidiomycetes (A. serialis, S. himantioides, G. sepiarium and R. placenta). Even if T. harzianum (T-720) showed a higher preventative effect on the reduction of mass loss against R. placenta, Tukey’s test did not show significant differences between the effects of both Trichoderma spp. treatments against wood destroying basidiomycetes (Fig 1). Additionally, negative re-isolation of wood destroying basidiomycetes after 12 weeks from the wood specimens on selective medium (T-MEA), demonstrated a 100% lethal effect of the wood destroying basidiomycetes by the applied Trichoderma spp. (Table 5).

Download:

Fig 1. Effect of Trichoderma species, T-685 and T-720, on preventing mass loss from basidiomycetes after 12 weeks incubation on wood.

Different letters indicate significant differences between the Trichoderma treatments and the controls. Shared numbers indicate the subgroups (wood destroying basidiomycete) of the analysis after the Tukey’s HDS test (p<0.05). Data represented as mean ± SD of three biological replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335.g001

Download:

Table 5. Lethal effect of Trichoderma strains against Cu-tolerant basidiomycetes.

Data represented as mean of five subsamples from three biological replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335.t005

Different authors have previously reported the successful eradication of wood destroying basidiomycetes with biocontrol agents on wood poles. For instance, Ricard [50] described the use of Scytalidium spp., Ascocoryne sarcoides and Trichoderma to suppress decay by N. lepideus and A. carbonica in the field. By contrast, Bruce and King [51, 52] showed that successfully eradication of L. lepideus only appeared possible during very early stage of wood decay in the field. The latter preventative and remedial studies demonstrated difficulties of Trichoderma to develop and dominate highly infected creosote wood poles in the field. The versatility of Trichoderma spp. to grow on a wide range of acid and basic substrates as well as its tolerance to high concentrations of CO₂ and N increases its potential as integrated control of wood destroying basidiomycetes as described by Score and Palfreyman [53].

Determination of the toxic values against wood destroying basidiomycetes

All selected concentrations were in the range of the expected toxic values for the fungi used in the EN113 test because all fungi reported mass loss of the specimens less than 3.0% of their initial dry mass for the highest amount of retention of wood preservative (Fig 2). The mass losses reported for the controls (higher than 20%) confirmed the minimum activity of the fungi required for the test. R. placenta (Empa 45) showed the highest Cu-tolerance for all Cu-based preservatives compared to the other fungi. The toxic effect of the Cu-based preservatives on R. placenta was used to select the toxic retention threshold for the integrated wood protection of T. harzianum against the wood destroying basidiomycetes. The non-toxic retentions were defined according to the minimum concentrations at which the wood was not adequately protected for R. placenta and at which other fungi could cause wood decay. The non-toxic value for the CC-treatment was chosen to be 50% of the minimum tested retention to guarantee the non-toxic values.

Download:

Fig 2. Results of wood mass loss according to EN113 (1996) after 16 weeks of fungal incubation.

(A) CCB formulation. (B)CC formulation. (C) Cr-free formulation 1. (D) Cr-free formulation 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335.g002

Combined effect of Cu-based wood preservatives and Trichoderma spp. on wood destroying basidiomycetes

The compatibility of T. harzianum (T-720) with a range of common wood preservatives demonstrated here and the good performance against wood destroying basidiomycetes was evident (Fig 3). A. serialis did not demonstrate a high resistance to the wood preservative formulations evaluated because it did not cause mass losses higher than 3% of the initial mass (Fig 3a). Nevertheless, the mass loss recorded for the control (absence of Cu-based and Trichoderma treatment) demonstrated a high activity of the fungus (nearly 70% of the initial mass). Wood samples treated without Cu-based preservatives showed a significant reduction of mass loss for both Trichoderma treatments. Besides, the treatment with T. atroviride (T-685) was significantly more effective to prevent wood decay. However, Tukey’s results did not show a positive effect of the Trichoderma spp. treatment for any Cu-impregnated specimens. S. himantioides caused mass losses higher than 5% in the control for all retentions rates of wood preservative formulations (Fig 3b). The application of both Trichoderma spp. to prevent decay against S. himantioides resulted in a reduction of mass loss for most of the Cu-impregnated wood. The preventative effect against wood decay basidiomycetes was only absent for high retentions of Cr-free preservative formulations (27.5 kg m³ Cr-free 1 and 41.89 kg m³ Cr-free 2). T. harzianum (T-720) demonstrated higher significant effect to prevent wood decay for all Cu-based treatments (Fig 3b). R. placenta caused high mass losses in the wood specimens used as controls (higher than 20%), CC preservative (3.85 kg m³ and 37.2 kg m³ CC) and low retentions of Cr-free preservatives (8.27 kg m³ Cr-free 1 and 15.10 kg m³ Cr-free 2) (Fig 3c). The preventative effect of Trichoderma treatment on those wood specimens was significant for all samples. Additionally, Tukey’s results only showed significant differences between both Trichoderma spp. for Cu-untreated wood specimens and 37.2 kg m³ CC (Fig 3c).

Download:

Fig 3. Effect of Trichoderma species, T-685 and T-720, on preventing mass loss from basidiomycetes after 9 months incubation on Cu-treated wood.

(A) A. serialis. (B) S. himantioides. (C) R. placenta. Different letters indicate significant differences between the Trichoderma treatments and the controls. Shared numbers indicate the subgroups (wood destroying basidiomycete) of the analysis after the Tukey’s HDS test (p<0.05). Data represented as mean ± SD of three replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335.g003

Interestingly, the general trend of a treatment with Trichoderma spp. was more evident on wood specimens impregnated with low concentrations of Cu-based wood preservatives that were incubated with S. himantioides (8.09 kg m³ CCB, 3.85 kg m³ CC, 8.27 kg m³ Cr-free 1 and 15.10 kg m³ Cr-free 2) and R. placenta (3.85 kg m³ CC, 8.27 kg m³ Cr-free 1 and 15.10 kg m³ Cr-free 2), respectively (Fig 3b and 3c). T. harzianum (T-720) showed a slightly higher antagonistic potential to protect Cu-impregnated and non-impregnated wood specimens against S. himatioides and R. placenta. Failure to re-isolate the wood destroying basidiomycetes from the wood specimens demonstrated 100% lethal effect by Trichoderma spp. (Table 6).

Download:

Table 6. Lethal effect of Trichoderma strains against Cu-tolerant basidiomycetes.

Data represented as mean of five subsamples from three biological replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335.t006

The microscopic investigations demonstrated typical features of brown-rot i.e. numerous clefts in the secondary walls of the tracheids by R. placenta even when the wood was treated with wood preservatives (Fig 4c, 4e and 4g). Cracks appeared in the secondary wall extending perpendicular within the S2 from the S3 to the S1. The colour of degraded secondary walls changed from blue to red, indicating the preferential decomposition of hemicellulose and cellulose (Fig 4c, 4e and 4g). Under polarized light, secondary walls of early wood tracheids showed a distinct loss of birefringence, as also observed by Schwarze et al. [38]. Higher lignified parts, such as the late wood tracheids and epithelial cells of the resin ducts were more resistant to decay, as also described by Schwarze [54]. In contrast, low retentions of wood preservatives in combination with T. harzianum (T-720) were associated with an absence of features typically associated with brown-rot (Fig 4d, 4f and 4h).

Download:

Fig 4. Combined effect of Trichoderma species, T-685 and T-720, on preventing mass loss from basidiomycetes after 9 months incubation on Cu-treated wood.

(A) Control—R. placenta. (B) Control—R. placenta + T. harzianum. (C) 37.2 kg m^-3 CC—R. placenta. (D) 37.2 kg m^-3 CC—R. placenta + T. harzianum. (E) 8.2 kg m^-3 Cr-free 1—R. placenta. (F) 8.2 kg m^-3 Cr-free 1—R. placenta + T. harzianum. (G) 15.1 kg m^-3 Cr-free 2—R. placenta. (H) 15.1 kg m^-3 Cr-free 2—R. placenta + T. harzianum. (Bar 200μm, 10x).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174335.g004

Although previous studies could not demonstrate the protection of Cu-treated wood against a range of wood destroying basidiomycetes [55, 56], the combined use of Trichoderma spp. as a biocontrol agent against two wood destroying basidiomycetes on creosote treated poles has been demonstrated in the past [50]. Thus, years after application of Trichoderma in the field, Bruce et al. [57–59] could demonstrate the viability of the Trichoderma treatment on the same site. The reduction of inoculum of wood destroying basidiomycetes demonstrated in the laboratory by T. harzianum (T-720), shows promising potential as a long term treatment for the field. This method of integrated wood protection could improve the efficacy of Cu-based new generation wood preservatives against wood destroying basidiomycetes on high risk sites in Switzerland and Germany.

Conclusions

In this study we demonstrated the possibility of using T. harzianum (T-720) as a biocontrol agent against a range of wood destroying basidiomycetes. The high Cu-threshold demonstrated by T. harzianum (T-720) suggests that this isolate might have a potential for integrated wood protection against Cu-tolerant wood decay basidiomycetes in infested soil around wood poles. The application of Trichoderma spp. for eradicating a range of wood destroying basidiomycetes under laboratory conditions and preventing wood decay was demonstrated. In the future, the application of carefully selected Trichoderma spp. in combination with more environmentally friendly wood preservative formulations (new generation of wood preservatives) and lower concentrations could be possible with more laboratory and long-term field testing. If future studies show that this method of integrated wood protection is successful in the field, it would be possible to enhance wood durability and prolong the service life of wood products. The development of such a sustainable method against wood decay would also help to regain traditional markets (i.e. wood sticks in orchards, hop -and vine yards) in which alternative materials such galvanized steel are currently in use. Long-term field studies with stakes and wood utility poles are currently in progress which will help to examine the performance of the selected T. harzianum (T-720) under natural conditions.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mycosolutions AG, Deutsche Telekom AG, Swisscom AG and BASF Wolman GmbH for assisting with the technical support.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: JR FS.
Data curation: JR MB FS.
Formal analysis: JR MB.
Funding acquisition: FS.
Investigation: JR FS SF.
Methodology: JR FS.
Project administration: FS JR.
Resources: FS SF JR.
Supervision: FS SF.
Validation: FS SF.
Writing – original draft: JR.
Writing – review & editing: FS SF.

References

1. Freeman M, McIntyre C. A comprehensive review of copper-based wood preservatives with a focus on new micronized or dispersed copper systems. Forest Prod J. 2008;58: 6–27.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Civardi C, Schubert M, Fey A, Wick P, Schwarze F. Micronized copper wood preservatives: efficacy of ion, nano and bulk copper against the brown rot fungus Rhodonia placenta. 2015; 10, 11. PLoS One 10:e0142578. pmid:26554706
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Ribera J, Schubert M, Fink S, Cartabia M, Schwarze F.W.M.R. Premature failure of utility poles in Switzerland and Germany related to wood decay basidiomycetes. Holzforschung. 2016;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Young GY. Copper tolerance of some wood rotting fungi. Report no. 2223 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI; 1961.
5. Sutter HP, Jones EBG, Walchli O. The mechanism of copper tolerance in Poria placenta (Fr.) Cke. and Poria vaillantii (Pers.). Fr Mater Org. 1983;18(4): 241–262.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Murphy RJ, Levy JF. Production of copper oxalate by some copper tolerant fungi. T Brit Mycol Soc. 1983;81: 165–168.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Cervantes C, Gutierrez-Corona F. Copper resistance mechanisms in bacteria and fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994;14: 121–138. pmid:8049096
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Civardi C, Schwarze F, Wick P. Micronized copper wood preservatives: An efficiency and potential health risk assessment for copper-based nanoparticles. Environ Pollut. 2015;200: 126–132. pmid:25705855
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Kartal SN, Terzi E, Yilmaz H, Goodell B. Bioremediation and decay of wood treated with ACQ, micronized ACQ, nano-CuO and CCA wood preservatives. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2015;99: 95–101.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Bollmus S, Rangno N, Militz H, Gellerich A. Analyses of premature failure of utility poles. IRG/WP12-40584. International Research Group on Wood Protection; 2012.
11. Benítez T, Rincón A, Limón MC, Codón AC. Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int Microbiol. 2008;7: 249–260.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Harman GE. Myths and dogmas of biocontrol. Changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Dis. 2000;84: 377–393.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Howell CR. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: The history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis. 2003;87: 4–10.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Kredics L, Antal Z, Manczinger L, Szekeres A, Kevei F, Nagy E. Influences of environmental prameters on Trichoderma strains with biocontrol potential. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2003;41(1): 37–42.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M. Trichoderma species-opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Reviews. 2004;2: 43–56. pmid:15035008
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Harman GE. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology. 2006;96: 190–194. pmid:18943924
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Verma M, Satinder KB, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY, Valéro JR. Antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma spp.: Panoply of biological control. Biochem Eng J. 2007;37: 1–20.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Kundu A, Chakraborty MR, Chatterjee NC. Biocontrol of wood decay by Trichoderma spp.–Retrospect and Prospect. Asian J Exp Sci. 2008;22(3): 373–384.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Schuster A, Schmoll M. Biology and biotechnology of Trichoderma. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87(3): 787–799. pmid:20461510
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Susi P, Aktuganov G, Himanen J, Korpela T. Biological control of wood decay against fungal infection. J Environ Mgmt. 2011;92(7): 1681–1689.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Herrera-Estrella A, Chet I. The biological control agent Trichoderma-from fundamentals to applications. In: Arora DK (ed) Fungal biotechnology in agricultural, food and environmental applications. Marcel Dekker, New York; 2004. pp. 147–156.
22. Morrell JJ, Sexton CM. Evaluation of a biological agent for controlling basidiomycete attack of Douglas-fir and southern pine. Wood Fibre Sci. 1990;22: 10–21.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Bruce A, King B, Highley TL. Decay resistance of wood removed from poles biologically treated with Trichoderma, Holzforschung. 1991;45: 307–311.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Highley TL, Ricard JL. Antagonism of Trichoderma spp. and Gliocladium virens against wood decay fungi. Mater Org. 1988;23: 157–169.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Brown HL, Bruce A, Staines HJ. Assessment of the biocontrol potential of a Trichoderma viride isolate. Part II: Protection against soft rot and basidiomycete decay. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 1999;44: 225–231.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Gandía M, Harries E, Marcos JF. The myosin motor domain-containing chitin synthase PdChsVII is required for development, cell wall integrity and virulence in the citrus postharvest pathogen Penicillium digitatum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;67: 58–70. pmid:24727399
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Ribera J, Tang AMC, Schubert M, Lam RYC, Chu LM, Leung MWK, et al. In-vitro evaluation of antagonistic Trichoderma strains for eradicating Phellinus noxius in colonised wood. J Trop For Sci. 2016;28(4): 457–468.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). ENV 807 Wood preservatives. Determination of the effectiveness against soft rotting micro-fungi and other soil inhabiting micro-organisms. Brussels, Belgium; 2001.
29. Schubert M, Fink S, Schwarze FWMR. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as a biocontrol agent against wood-decay fungi in urban trees. Biol Control. 2008;45: 111–123.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Schwarze FWMR, Jauss F, Spencer C, Hallam C, Schubert M. Evaluation of an antagonistic Trichoderma strain for reducing the rate of wood decomposition by the white rot fungus Phellinus noxius. Biol Control. 2012;61: 160–168.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Sieber TN. Pynrenochaeta ligni-putridi spp. nov., a new coelomycete associated with butt rot of Picea abies in Switzerland. Mycol Res. 1995;99: 274–276.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 113 Wood preservatives—test method for determining the protective effectiveness against wood destroying basidiomycetes: determination of toxic values. Brussels, Belgium; 1996.
33. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 252 Field test method for determining the relative protective effectiveness of a wood preservative in ground contact. Brussels, Belgium; 1989.
34. Schwarze FWMR, Fink S. Host and cell type affect the mode of degradation by Meripilus giganteus. New Phytologist. 1998;139: 721–731.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Lohwag GK. Polarisationsmikroskopische Untersuchungen pilzbefallener Hölzer. Mikrochemie. 1937;23: 198–202.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Schulze B, Theden G. Polarisationsmikroskopische Untersuchungen über den Werkstoff Holz durch holzzerstörende Pilze. Holz Roh Werkst. 1937;1: 548–555.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Wilcox WW. Comparative morphology of early stages of brown-rot wood decay. IAWA J. 1993;14: 127–138.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Schwarze FWMR, Fink S, Deflorio G. Resistance of parenchyma cells in wood to degradation by brown rot fungi. Mycol Prog. 2003;2(4): 267–274.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Hingston JA, Collins CD, Murphy RJ, Lester JN. Leaching of chromated copper arsenate wood preservatives: a review. Environ Pollut. 2001;111: 53–66. pmid:11202715
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Lebow S, Williams RS, Lebow P. Effect of simulated rainfall and weathering on release of preservative elements from CCA treated wood. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37(18): 4077–82. pmid:14524438
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Humar M, Zlindra D, Pohleven F. Effect of fixation time on leaching of copper-ethanolamine based wood preservatives. Holz Roh Werkst. 2007;65: 329–330.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Obanda DN, Shupe TF, Barnes HM. Reducing leaching of boron-based wood preservatives–A review of research. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(15): 7312–7322. pmid:18295480
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Kredics L, Antal Z, Manczinger L, Nagy E. Breeding of mycoparasitic Trichoderma strains for heavy metal resistance. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001;33: 112–116. pmid:11472517
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Kredics L, Dóczi I, Antal Z, Manczinger L. Effect of heavy metals on growth and extracellular enzyme activities of mycoparasitic Trichoderma strains. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001;66: 249–254. pmid:11116321
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. López E, Vazquez C. Tolerance and uptake of heavy metals by Trichoderma atroviride isolated from sludge. Chemosphere 2003;50: 137–143. pmid:12656239
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Anand P, Isar J, Saran S, Saxena RK. Bioaccumulation of copper by Trichoderma viride. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97: 1018–1025. pmid:16324839
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Ting ASY, Choong CC. Bioaccumulation and biosorption efficacy of Trichoderma isolates SP2F1 in removing copper (Cu II) from aqueous solutions. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;25: 1431–1437.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Tripathi P, Singh PC, Mishra A, Chauhan PS, Dwivedi S, Bais RT, et al. Trichoderma: a potential bioremediator for environmental clean up. Clean Tech Environ Policy. 2013;15: 541–550.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Racić G, Körmöczi P, Kredics L, Raičević V, Mutavdžić B, Vrvić MM, et al. Effect of the edaphic factors and metal content in soil on the diversity of Trichoderma spp. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Ricard J. Biological control of decay in standing creosote-treated poles. J Inst Wood Sci. 1976;7: 6–9.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Bruce A, King B. Biological control of decay in creosoted distribution poles. 1. Establishment of immunising commensal fungi in poles. Mater Org. 1986;27(1): 1–13.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Bruce A, King B. Biological control of decay in creosoted distribution poles. 2. Control of decay in poles by immunizing commensal fungi. Mater Org. 1986;21(3): 165–179.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Score AJ, Palfreyman AJ. Biological control of the dry rot fungus Serpula lacrymans by Trichoderma species: The effects of complex and synthetic media on interaction and hyphal extension rates. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 1994;33: 115–128.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Schwarze FWMR. Wood decay under the microscope. Fungal Biol Rev. 2007;21: 133–170.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Highley TL, Ricard JL. Antagonism of Trichoderma spp. and Gliocladium virens against wood decay fungi. Mater Org. 1988;23: 157–169.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Morrell JJ, Sexton CM. Evaluation of a biological agent for controlling basidiomycete attack of Douglas-fir and southern pine. Wood Fibre Sci. 1990;22: 10–21.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Bruce A, Fairnington A, King B. Biological control of decay in creosoted distribution poles. 3. Control of decay by immunising commensal fungi after extended incubation periods. Mater Org. 1990;25(1): 15–27.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Bruce A, Highley TL. Control of growth of wood decay basidiomycetes by Trichoderma spp. and other potentially antagonistic fungi. For Prod J. 1991;41(2): 63–67.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
59. Bruce A, King B, Highley TL. Decay resistance of wood removed from poles biologically treated with Trichoderma, Holzforschung. 1991;45: 307–311.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Freeman M, McIntyre C. A comprehensive review of copper-based wood preservatives with a focus on new micronized or dispersed copper systems. Forest Prod J. 2008;58: 6–27.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Civardi C, Schubert M, Fey A, Wick P, Schwarze F. Micronized copper wood preservatives: efficacy of ion, nano and bulk copper against the brown rot fungus Rhodonia placenta. 2015; 10, 11. PLoS One 10:e0142578. pmid:26554706
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] PubMed/NCBI

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Ribera J, Schubert M, Fink S, Cartabia M, Schwarze F.W.M.R. Premature failure of utility poles in Switzerland and Germany related to wood decay basidiomycetes. Holzforschung. 2016;
View Article
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Young GY. Copper tolerance of some wood rotting fungi. Report no. 2223 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI; 1961.

[ref5] 5. Sutter HP, Jones EBG, Walchli O. The mechanism of copper tolerance in Poria placenta (Fr.) Cke. and Poria vaillantii (Pers.). Fr Mater Org. 1983;18(4): 241–262.
View Article
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Murphy RJ, Levy JF. Production of copper oxalate by some copper tolerant fungi. T Brit Mycol Soc. 1983;81: 165–168.
View Article
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Cervantes C, Gutierrez-Corona F. Copper resistance mechanisms in bacteria and fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994;14: 121–138. pmid:8049096
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Civardi C, Schwarze F, Wick P. Micronized copper wood preservatives: An efficiency and potential health risk assessment for copper-based nanoparticles. Environ Pollut. 2015;200: 126–132. pmid:25705855
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kartal SN, Terzi E, Yilmaz H, Goodell B. Bioremediation and decay of wood treated with ACQ, micronized ACQ, nano-CuO and CCA wood preservatives. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2015;99: 95–101.
View Article
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Bollmus S, Rangno N, Militz H, Gellerich A. Analyses of premature failure of utility poles. IRG/WP12-40584. International Research Group on Wood Protection; 2012.

[ref11] 11. Benítez T, Rincón A, Limón MC, Codón AC. Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int Microbiol. 2008;7: 249–260.
View Article
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Harman GE. Myths and dogmas of biocontrol. Changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Dis. 2000;84: 377–393.
View Article
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Howell CR. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: The history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis. 2003;87: 4–10.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Kredics L, Antal Z, Manczinger L, Szekeres A, Kevei F, Nagy E. Influences of environmental prameters on Trichoderma strains with biocontrol potential. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2003;41(1): 37–42.
View Article
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M. Trichoderma species-opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Reviews. 2004;2: 43–56. pmid:15035008
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Harman GE. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology. 2006;96: 190–194. pmid:18943924
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Verma M, Satinder KB, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY, Valéro JR. Antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma spp.: Panoply of biological control. Biochem Eng J. 2007;37: 1–20.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Kundu A, Chakraborty MR, Chatterjee NC. Biocontrol of wood decay by Trichoderma spp.–Retrospect and Prospect. Asian J Exp Sci. 2008;22(3): 373–384.
View Article
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Schuster A, Schmoll M. Biology and biotechnology of Trichoderma. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87(3): 787–799. pmid:20461510
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Susi P, Aktuganov G, Himanen J, Korpela T. Biological control of wood decay against fungal infection. J Environ Mgmt. 2011;92(7): 1681–1689.
View Article
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Herrera-Estrella A, Chet I. The biological control agent Trichoderma-from fundamentals to applications. In: Arora DK (ed) Fungal biotechnology in agricultural, food and environmental applications. Marcel Dekker, New York; 2004. pp. 147–156.

[ref22] 22. Morrell JJ, Sexton CM. Evaluation of a biological agent for controlling basidiomycete attack of Douglas-fir and southern pine. Wood Fibre Sci. 1990;22: 10–21.
View Article
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Bruce A, King B, Highley TL. Decay resistance of wood removed from poles biologically treated with Trichoderma, Holzforschung. 1991;45: 307–311.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Highley TL, Ricard JL. Antagonism of Trichoderma spp. and Gliocladium virens against wood decay fungi. Mater Org. 1988;23: 157–169.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Brown HL, Bruce A, Staines HJ. Assessment of the biocontrol potential of a Trichoderma viride isolate. Part II: Protection against soft rot and basidiomycete decay. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 1999;44: 225–231.
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Gandía M, Harries E, Marcos JF. The myosin motor domain-containing chitin synthase PdChsVII is required for development, cell wall integrity and virulence in the citrus postharvest pathogen Penicillium digitatum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;67: 58–70. pmid:24727399
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Ribera J, Tang AMC, Schubert M, Lam RYC, Chu LM, Leung MWK, et al. In-vitro evaluation of antagonistic Trichoderma strains for eradicating Phellinus noxius in colonised wood. J Trop For Sci. 2016;28(4): 457–468.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). ENV 807 Wood preservatives. Determination of the effectiveness against soft rotting micro-fungi and other soil inhabiting micro-organisms. Brussels, Belgium; 2001.

[ref29] 29. Schubert M, Fink S, Schwarze FWMR. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as a biocontrol agent against wood-decay fungi in urban trees. Biol Control. 2008;45: 111–123.
View Article
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Schwarze FWMR, Jauss F, Spencer C, Hallam C, Schubert M. Evaluation of an antagonistic Trichoderma strain for reducing the rate of wood decomposition by the white rot fungus Phellinus noxius. Biol Control. 2012;61: 160–168.
View Article
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Sieber TN. Pynrenochaeta ligni-putridi spp. nov., a new coelomycete associated with butt rot of Picea abies in Switzerland. Mycol Res. 1995;99: 274–276.
View Article
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 113 Wood preservatives—test method for determining the protective effectiveness against wood destroying basidiomycetes: determination of toxic values. Brussels, Belgium; 1996.

[ref33] 33. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 252 Field test method for determining the relative protective effectiveness of a wood preservative in ground contact. Brussels, Belgium; 1989.

[ref34] 34. Schwarze FWMR, Fink S. Host and cell type affect the mode of degradation by Meripilus giganteus. New Phytologist. 1998;139: 721–731.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Lohwag GK. Polarisationsmikroskopische Untersuchungen pilzbefallener Hölzer. Mikrochemie. 1937;23: 198–202.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Schulze B, Theden G. Polarisationsmikroskopische Untersuchungen über den Werkstoff Holz durch holzzerstörende Pilze. Holz Roh Werkst. 1937;1: 548–555.
View Article
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Wilcox WW. Comparative morphology of early stages of brown-rot wood decay. IAWA J. 1993;14: 127–138.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Schwarze FWMR, Fink S, Deflorio G. Resistance of parenchyma cells in wood to degradation by brown rot fungi. Mycol Prog. 2003;2(4): 267–274.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Hingston JA, Collins CD, Murphy RJ, Lester JN. Leaching of chromated copper arsenate wood preservatives: a review. Environ Pollut. 2001;111: 53–66. pmid:11202715
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Lebow S, Williams RS, Lebow P. Effect of simulated rainfall and weathering on release of preservative elements from CCA treated wood. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37(18): 4077–82. pmid:14524438
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Humar M, Zlindra D, Pohleven F. Effect of fixation time on leaching of copper-ethanolamine based wood preservatives. Holz Roh Werkst. 2007;65: 329–330.
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Obanda DN, Shupe TF, Barnes HM. Reducing leaching of boron-based wood preservatives–A review of research. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(15): 7312–7322. pmid:18295480
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Kredics L, Antal Z, Manczinger L, Nagy E. Breeding of mycoparasitic Trichoderma strains for heavy metal resistance. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001;33: 112–116. pmid:11472517
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Kredics L, Dóczi I, Antal Z, Manczinger L. Effect of heavy metals on growth and extracellular enzyme activities of mycoparasitic Trichoderma strains. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001;66: 249–254. pmid:11116321
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. López E, Vazquez C. Tolerance and uptake of heavy metals by Trichoderma atroviride isolated from sludge. Chemosphere 2003;50: 137–143. pmid:12656239
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Anand P, Isar J, Saran S, Saxena RK. Bioaccumulation of copper by Trichoderma viride. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97: 1018–1025. pmid:16324839
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Ting ASY, Choong CC. Bioaccumulation and biosorption efficacy of Trichoderma isolates SP2F1 in removing copper (Cu II) from aqueous solutions. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;25: 1431–1437.
View Article
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Tripathi P, Singh PC, Mishra A, Chauhan PS, Dwivedi S, Bais RT, et al. Trichoderma: a potential bioremediator for environmental clean up. Clean Tech Environ Policy. 2013;15: 541–550.
View Article
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Racić G, Körmöczi P, Kredics L, Raičević V, Mutavdžić B, Vrvić MM, et al. Effect of the edaphic factors and metal content in soil on the diversity of Trichoderma spp. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;
View Article
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Ricard J. Biological control of decay in standing creosote-treated poles. J Inst Wood Sci. 1976;7: 6–9.
View Article
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Bruce A, King B. Biological control of decay in creosoted distribution poles. 1. Establishment of immunising commensal fungi in poles. Mater Org. 1986;27(1): 1–13.
View Article
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Bruce A, King B. Biological control of decay in creosoted distribution poles. 2. Control of decay in poles by immunizing commensal fungi. Mater Org. 1986;21(3): 165–179.
View Article
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Score AJ, Palfreyman AJ. Biological control of the dry rot fungus Serpula lacrymans by Trichoderma species: The effects of complex and synthetic media on interaction and hyphal extension rates. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 1994;33: 115–128.
View Article
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Schwarze FWMR. Wood decay under the microscope. Fungal Biol Rev. 2007;21: 133–170.
View Article
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Highley TL, Ricard JL. Antagonism of Trichoderma spp. and Gliocladium virens against wood decay fungi. Mater Org. 1988;23: 157–169.
View Article
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Morrell JJ, Sexton CM. Evaluation of a biological agent for controlling basidiomycete attack of Douglas-fir and southern pine. Wood Fibre Sci. 1990;22: 10–21.
View Article
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Bruce A, Fairnington A, King B. Biological control of decay in creosoted distribution poles. 3. Control of decay by immunising commensal fungi after extended incubation periods. Mater Org. 1990;25(1): 15–27.
View Article
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Bruce A, Highley TL. Control of growth of wood decay basidiomycetes by Trichoderma spp. and other potentially antagonistic fungi. For Prod J. 1991;41(2): 63–67.
View Article
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Bruce A, King B, Highley TL. Decay resistance of wood removed from poles biologically treated with Trichoderma, Holzforschung. 1991;45: 307–311.
View Article
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Growth rates and conidiogenesis of Trichoderma spp. on Cu-amended medium

Preventative effect of Trichoderma spp. against wood destroying basidiomycetes

Test method for determining the protective effectiveness of wood preservatives against wood destroying basidiomycetes

Combined effect of Cu-based wood preservatives and Trichoderma spp. on wood destroying basidiomycetes

Light microscopy

Statistical analysis

Results and discussion

Growth rates and conidiogenesis of Trichoderma spp. in Cu-amended medium

Preventative effect of Trichoderma spp. against wood destroying basidiomycetes

Determination of the toxic values against wood destroying basidiomycetes

Combined effect of Cu-based wood preservatives and Trichoderma spp. on wood destroying basidiomycetes

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References