Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Revising mtDNA haplotypes of the ancient Hungarian conquerors with next generation sequencing

Abstract

As part of the effort to create a high resolution representative sequence database of the medieval Hungarian conquerors we have resequenced the entire mtDNA genome of 24 published ancient samples with Next Generation Sequencing, whose haplotypes had been previously determined with traditional PCR based methods. We show that PCR based methods are prone to erroneous haplotype or haplogroup determination due to ambiguous sequence reads, and many of the resequenced samples had been classified inaccurately. The SNaPshot method applied with published ancient DNA authenticity criteria is the most straightforward and cheapest PCR based approach for testing a large number of coding region SNP-s, which greatly facilitates correct haplogroup determination.

Citation: Neparáczki E, Kocsy K, Tóth GE, Maróti Z, Kalmár T, Bihari P, et al. (2017) Revising mtDNA haplotypes of the ancient Hungarian conquerors with next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE 12(4): e0174886. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174886

Editor: David Caramelli, University of Florence, ITALY

Received: December 13, 2016; Accepted: March 16, 2017; Published: April 19, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Neparáczki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: Sequences were submitted to NCBI GenBank under the accession numbers: KY083702-KY083725.

Funding: The generous support of Avicenna Foundation grant no. GF/JSZF/814/9/2015 to I.R. and encouragement of professor Miklos Maroth is highly appreciated. This research was also supported in part by OTKA NN 78696. SeqOmics Biotechnology Ltd. IN was supported by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Hereby we certify that this company did not provide any funding for our study, they simply performed NGS sequencing services, and had consulting roles. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: Dr. Bihari and Dr. Nagy had consulting positions at SeqOmics Biotechnology Ltd. at the time the study was conceived. SeqOmics Biotechnology Ltd. was not directly involved in the design and execution of the experiments or in the writing of the manuscript. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction

Comparing ancient DNA (aDNA) sequences extracted from well dated archaeological remains from different periods and locations provide crucial information about past human population history (reviewed in [1]). Phylogeographic inferences are drawn from phylogenetic and population genetic analyses of sequence variations, the quality of which can be biased by data quantity and quality. Nowadays Next Generation Sequencing technology (NGS) provides a growing number of high quality aDNA sequence data, but until recently the majority of aDNA studies have been restricted to short fragments from the hypervariable region-1 (HVR-I) of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genome, using PCR based methods. PCR based methods are very sensitive for contamination, as low amounts of exogenous DNA can easily dominate PCR products resulting in the recovery of irrelevant sequences [2–5]. As a result, in spite of the applied authenticity criteria [6], many of the published databases may contain unreliable sequences, which distort statistical analyses. This problem is especially relevant for many of the ancient populations, from which only PCR based HVR data are available.

Recently several aDNA studies were published aiming to shed light on the origin of ancient Hungarians, two of these [7,8] applied restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) to identify 11 or 14 haplogroup (Hg) specific coding region SNP-s in addition to HVR sequencing, while another study [9] tested 22 coding region SNP-s with multiplex PCR and GenoCoRe22 assay described in [10].

Using the NGS method combined with hybridization enrichment, we have sequenced the entire mtDNA genome of 9 samples from the Tömöry et al. 2007 [7] study, and 15 samples from the Neparáczki et al. 2016 [9] study, so we could compare the reliability of two different traditional approaches.

Materials and methods

Archaeological samples

Bone samples from the Hungarian conquest period used in the study of [7] are carefully maintained in the anthropological collection at the Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Szeged, Hungary, so we could unambiguously identify and resample these remains. Bone powder remains of samples from the study of [9], were saved in the Department of Genetics, University of Szeged, and were reused to build NGS sequencing libraries.

DNA extraction

Ancient DNA work was performed in the specialized ancient DNA (aDNA) facilities of the Department of Genetics, University of Szeged, Hungary with strict clean-room conditions. 100 mg bone powder from tooth roots, femurs or metatarsus was predigested in 1 ml 0,5 M EDTA 100 μg/ml Proteinase K for 30 minutes at 48°C, to increase the proportion of endogenous DNA [11], then DNA solubilisation was done overnight, in 1 ml extraction buffer containing 0.45 M EDTA, 250 μg/ml Proteinase K, 1% Triton X-100, and 50 mM DTT. DNA was bound to silica [12] adding 6 ml binding buffer (5,83 M GuHCl, 105 mM NaOAc, 46,8% isopropanol, 0,06% Tween-20 and 150 μl silica suspension to the 1 ml extract, and the pH was adjusted between 4–6 with HCl. After 3 hours binding at room temperature silica was pelleted, and washed twice with 80% ethanol, then DNA was eluted in 100 μl TE buffer.

NGS library construction

First 50 μl DNA extract was subjected to partial uracil-DNA-glycosylase (UDG) treatment followed by blunt end repair, as described in [13]. DNA was then purified on MinElute column (Qiagen), and double stranded library was made as described in [14], except that all purifications were done with MinElute columns, and after adapter fill-in libraries were preamplified in 2 x 50 μl reactions containing 800 nM each of IS7 and IS8 primers, 200 μM dNTP mix, 2 mM MgCl2, 0,02 U/μl GoTaq G2 Hot Start Polymerase (Promega) and 1X GoTaq buffer, followed by MinElute purification. PCR conditions were 96°C 6 min, 16 cycles of 94°C 30 sec, 58°C 30 sec, 72°C 30 sec, followed by a final extension of 64°C 10 min. Libraries were eluted from the column in 50 μl 55°C EB buffer (Qiagen), and concentration was measured with Qubit (Termo Fisher Scientific). Libraries below 5 ng/μl concentration were reamplified in the same reaction for additional 5–12 cycles, depending on concentration, in order to obtain 50 μl preamplified library with a concentration between 10–50 ng/μl.

50 ng preamplified libraries were double indexed according to [15] in a 50 μl PCR reaction containing 1 x KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (Kapa Biosystems) and 1000 nM each of P5 and P7 indexing primers. PCR conditions were 98°C 3 min, 6 cycles of 98°C 20 sec, 66°C 10 sec, 72°C 15 sec followed by a final extension of 72°C 30sec. Indexed libraries were MinElute purified and their concentration was measured with Qubit, and size distribution was checked on Agilent 2200 TapeStation Genomic DNA ScreenTape.

Control libraries without UDG treatment were also made for assessing the presence of aDNA specific damages in the extract, as well as DNA free negative control libraries, to detect possible contamination during handling or present in materials.

Mitochondrial DNA capture and sequencing

Biotinilated mtDNA baits were prepared from three overlapping long-range PCR products as described in [16], but using the following primer pairs, L14759-H06378, L10870-H14799, L06363-H10888, described in [10].

Capture was done according to [16] with the following modifications: Just four blocking oligos, given below were used in 3 μM (each) final concentration:

BO1.P5.part1F: AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC-Phosphate,

BO2.P5.part2F ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT-Phosphate,

BO4.P7.part1 R GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCT-Phosphate,

BO6.P7.part2 R CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT-Phosphate.

For one capture 300 ng biotinilated bait was used with 30 μl Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin C1 magnetic beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Double indexed libraries of 20 samples (300 ng each) were mixed and concentrated on MinElute columns, then captured together in a 64 μl hybridization reaction. When fewer samples were enriched, we used proportionally smaller amounts of baits. After washing, bead-bound enriched libraries were resuspended in 20 μl water and released from the beads in a 60 μl PCR reaction containing 1 X KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix and 2000 nM each of IS5- IS6 library primers. PCR conditions were: 98°C 1 min, 10 cycles of 98°C 20 sec, 60°C 30 sec, 72°C 30 sec, followed by a final extension of 72°C 30 sec. The captured and amplified library mix was purified on MinElute column and eluted in 15 μl EB.

Before sequencing, libraries were quantified with Qubit, and quality checked and Agilent 2200 TapeStation Genomic DNA ScreenTape. Sequencing was done at the SeqOmics Biotechnology Ltd., using MiSeq sequencer with MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (Illumina, MS-102-3003) generating 2x150bp paired-end sequences.

Data analysis

The adapters of paired-end reads were trimmed with the cutadapt software [17] in paired end mode. Read quality was assessed with FastQC [18]. Sequences shorter than 25 nucleotide were removed from this dataset. The resulting analysis-ready reads were mapped to the GRCh37.75 human genome reference sequence using the Burrows Wheeler Aligner (BWA) v0.7.9 software [19] with the BWA mem algorithm in paired mode and default parameters. Aligning to the GRCh37.75 human reference genome that also contains the mtDNA revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS, NC_012920.1) [20] helped to avoid the forced false alignment of homologous nuclear mitochondrial sequences (NumtS) to rCRS, though the proportion of NumtS, derived from low copy nuclear genome, is expexted to be orders of magnitudes lower than mtDNA in aDNA libraries. Samtools v1.1 [21] was used for sorting and indexing BAM files. PCR duplicates were removed with Picard Tools v 1.113 [22]. Ancient DNA damage patterns were assessed using MapDamage 2.0 [23], and read quality scores were modified with the rescale option to account for post-mortem damage. Freebayes v1.02 [24] was used to identify variants and generate variant call format (VCF) files with the parameters -q 10 (exclude nucleotids with <10 phred quality) and -P 0.5 (exclude very low probability variants). Each variant call was also inspected manually. From VCF files FASTA format was generated with the Genom Analysis Tool Kit (GATK v3.5) FastaAlternateReferenceMaker walker [25].

Results

NGS sequencing

We have sequenced 24 complete mtDNA genomes of the ancient Hungarians with multiple coverage (Table 1) without gaps and determined the haplotypes of the individuals (Table 2 and S1 Table). For two samples (Table 1) we have replicated the experiments from two independent extracts, one from bone another from tooth derived from the same individual, and in each case received identical sequence reads. UDG treated and non UDG treated libraries derived from the same extract also gave the same sequence reads. MapDamage profile of our partial UDG treated and control non treated library molecules displayed typical aDNA damage distribution (S1 Fig), as described in [13]. MapDamage computed proportions of sequence reads with aDNA specific C-to-T and G-to-A transitions at the ends of molecules which remained after partial UDG treatment are shown in Table 1. The average length of the obtained mtDNA fragments ranged from 56 to 85 bp (Table 1), an expected size range for aDNA [26]. These data indicated that the majority of sequences were derived from endogenous DNA molecules. Then we have estimated the percentage of possible contaminating molecules (Table 1) with a similar logic as in [27], by calculating the proportion of reads which did not correspond with the diagnostic positions of the consensus sequence given in S1 Table, which revealed very low contamination levels. Phylogenetic analyses (HaploGrep 2, [28]) of all consensus sequences resulted unambigous classifications without contradictory positions. Consensus sequences were submitted to NCBI GenBank under Accession No: KY083702-KY083725.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Details of NGS data for each sample.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174886.t001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Comparison of Haplogroups identified with different PCR based methods and NGS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174886.t002

In NGS sequence reads typical aDNA sequence alterations, present in individual molecules, are disclosed and excluded by averaging multiple reads. Moreover aDNA specific sequence alterations, primarily C-T and G-A transitions accumulating at the end of molecules, serve as markers to distinguish ancient molecules from contaminating modern DNA. Therefore NGS eliminates most sequencing uncertainties inherent in PCR based methods (reviewed in [29]), resulting in very reliable sequence reads. So we could use our NGS data to reevaluate and compare previous haplotyping strategies used in [7–9]. For this end, from our NGS data, we collected all SNP-s within the HVR stretches and coding region positions, which had been examined in [7] and [9], then contrasted these with the original dataset (Table 2).

Contrasting NGS and PCR based sequence data

We found that in [7] haplotypes of 5 out of 9 samples were determined correctly, while in one sample haplogroup was correct with inaccurate haplotype, and in 3 samples NGS detected entirely different haplogroups. In the 15 samples of [9] the same haplogroups were assigned from NGS data in all cases, however only 8 haplotypes proved to be correct. In both studies the majority of deviations originated from undetected SNP-s in sequencing reactions of PCR fragments, but [7] also identified 3 SNP-s erroneously (lined through nucleotide positions in Table 2). These results indicate that haplotypes from both studies were rather unreliable, but haplogroup classification with the approach of [9] is more trustworthy than with approach used in [7].

Discussion

As multicopy mtDNA is best preserved in archaeological remains than low copy nuclear DNA, most ancient sequences are derived from mitochondria [30]. Within mtDNA, the most polymorphic HVR control region contains outstanding phylogenetic information, therefore HVR sequencing has been the primary method of choice for mtDNA hapolotyping. However HVR polymorphisms have a limited reliability for haplogroup determination, therefore in addition several informative coding region SNP-s (CR-SNP) were selected to unambiguously define haplogroups [31]. At the beginning individual CR-SNP-s were determined with RFLP [32] or direct sequencing of PCR clones, but soon multiplex PCR combined with the SNaPshot technique [33] offered a more straightforward solution for identifying multiple SNP-s simultaneously. Latter method was soon adapted in the ancient DNA field [34] [10].

Determining individual CR-SNP-s separately is very time consuming and expensive, so it is tempting to test just those CR-SNP-s which are in line with HVR-I data. This is exactly what we read in [7]: “In cases when haplogroup categorization was not possible on the basis of HVSI motifs alone, analysis of the diagnostic polymorphic sites in the HVSII region and mtDNA coding region was also performed.” A major problem with this approach is the ambiguity of sequence reads derived from aDNA PCR clones, as amplification typically starts from a mixture of endogenous and contaminating human DNA molecules [3]. Erroneous HVR reading will lead to inappropriate CR-SNP selection, and in case of dubious CR-SNP results, false Hg classification. This is the most probable explanation of the 3 incorrectly defined haplogroups in [7] (Table 2). A major advantage of the GonoCore22 SNaPshot assay is that all Hg specific CR-SNP-s are examined irrespectively of HVR reads. The 22 CR-SNP alleles independently define a certain Hg, which must correspond with that based on HVR sequence. As both HVR and CR-SNP reads may give ambiguous results, this approach provides a double control for correct Hg designation, but is not immune against incorrect HVR haplotype reads. This is the explanation of correct Hg-s and erroneous haplotypes in [9] (Table 2).

The problem of ambiguous aDNA sequence reads is demonstrated on Fig 1. In [9] consequently the higher peaks were taken into account, which also matched with the GenoCoRe22 data. However in position 16399 the correct nucleotide is defined by the neglected lower peak (G instead of A, see Table 2), which resulted in incorrect haplotyping. In contrast in the neighboring double peak (16403 in Fig 1), the correct nucleotide is defined by the selected higher peak.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Chromatogram of two HVR-I sequence fragments of the Karos-III/16 sample from [9].

Arrows label double peaks, correct reads according to NGS data are listed above the arrows.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174886.g001

Coding region SNP testing with either RFLP, sequencing or SNaPshot method also suffers from the same problem as demonstrated on Fig 2. After multiplex PCR amplification of 22 mtDNA fragments two separate Single Base Extension (SBE) reactions are performed, and each reveals 11 Hg defining alleles. Both independent SBE reactions shown in Fig 2 contain several double peaks, and one of each must have derived from contamination. Some of these can be excluded from repeated SNaPshot reactions, for example the lower electropherogram excludes the ancestral preHV allele, since it has a single peak (T) in this position. If such exclusion is not possible, the higher peaks are preferably chosen, as the blue peak (G) for Hg B and the green (A) for Hg N on Fig 2. These decisions however must be handled with caution, therefore the presence of the B Hg defining 9 bp deletion also had been confirmed in [9], with singleplex PCR and agarose gelelectrophoresis. In other cases phylogenetic relations are taken into account [35], for example if the preHV allele is derived the HV allele must also be derived, this is why we have considered the lower peak (A) for HV in Fig 2 [9]. The summary of repeated SNaPshot reactions considered together with multiple HVR sequence reads warrants trustable Hg classification.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Electropherograms of two SNaPshot SBE-II reactions from two extracts of the same Karos-III/6 sample [9].

Characters at the top indicate Hg-s defined by the corresponding peaks. Black characters indicate peaks defining the ancestral allele, read characters indicate peaks defining the derived allele. Arrows point at double peaks. As each dye has a different influence on DNA mobility, positions of identical fragments with different dyes are not the same. Black arrows point at peaks taken into account, while blue arrows indicate neglected peaks, considered to have been derived from contamination. Orange peaks are size standards (GeneScan-120 LIZ, Applied Biosystems).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174886.g002

The studied conqueror samples were excavated between the 1930-90s, and had been handled by a large number of researchers, many with untraceable identity. It follows that these samples were inevitably contaminated during sample collection and storage. Tömöry et al. 2007 [7] collected samples from a large number of cemeteries, and published the ones with best DNA preservation. In spite of careful sampling their available method was error prone. Neparáczki et al. 2016 [9] aimed at characterizing an entire cemetery which limited the ability of sample selection, so in spite of the more reliable method their haplotype determination proved error prone. The lesson from this study is that PCR based haplotypes need to be handled cautiously, which has been well known in the aDNA field [2] [36–38]. It also follows that incorrect haplotypes particularly distort sequence based statistical analysis, like Fst statistics or shared haplotype analysis applied in [7,8]. The accumulation of authentical NGS ancient DNA sequence data in databases will greatly facilitate reliable population genetic studies.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Mitochondrial sequence haplotypes of the 24 ancient samples.

SNPs are provided against rCRS. Following the recommendations in [40], we excluded common indels (hotspots) at nucleotide positions: 309.1C(C), 315.1C, 523-524del (or 522-523del), 3106del, 16182C, 16183C, 16193.1C(C), 16519C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174886.s001

(XLSX)

S1 Fig. Damage patterns of libraries generated by MapDamage 2.0 [23].

a. non UDG treated library shownig C to T (and complementary G to A) misincorporations at the 5’ and 3’ termini of the last 25 nucleotides. b. Damage pattern of partial UDG treated library derived from the same extract. As expected the nontreated library contains much higher rate of transitions, most of which was removed by partial UDG treatment. Only data from one extract are shown, as all libraries displayed similar pattern.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174886.s002

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The generous support of Avicenna Foundation grant no. GF/JSZF/814/9/2015 to I.R. and encouragement of professor Miklos Maroth is highly appreciated. This research was also supported in part by OTKA NN 78696. IN was supported by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: TT EN.
  2. Data curation: EN.
  3. Formal analysis: EN ZM TK.
  4. Funding acquisition: IR EM GyP.
  5. Investigation: EN KK GET PB.
  6. Methodology: TT EN.
  7. Project administration: TT IN.
  8. Resources: GyP EM IN PB ZM TK.
  9. Software: ZM.
  10. Supervision: TT.
  11. Validation: TT.
  12. Visualization: EN TT.
  13. Writing – original draft: TT.
  14. Writing – review & editing: TT.

References

  1. 1. Pickrell JK, Reich D. Toward a new history and geography of human genes informed by ancient DNA. Trends in Genetics. 2014. pp. 377–389. pmid:25168683
  2. 2. Richards MB, Sykes BC, Hedges REM. Authenticating DNA Extracted From Ancient Skeletal Remains. J Archaeol Sci. 1995;22: 291–299.
  3. 3. Malmström H, Storå J, Dalén L, Holmlund G, Götherström A. Extensive human DNA contamination in extracts from ancient dog bones and teeth. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22: 2040–2047. pmid:15958782
  4. 4. Pilli E, Modi A, Serpico C, Achilli A, Lancioni H, Lippi B, et al. Monitoring DNA Contamination in Handled vs. Directly Excavated Ancient Human Skeletal Remains. PLoS One. 2013;8.
  5. 5. Heupink TH, Subramanian S, Wright JL, Endicott P, Westaway MC, Huynen L, et al. Ancient mtDNA sequences from the First Australians revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016; 201521066.
  6. 6. Knapp M, Clarke AC, Horsburgh KA, Matisoo-Smith EA. Setting the stage—building and working in an ancient DNA laboratory. Ann Anat. 2012;194: 3–6. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2011.03.008 pmid:21514120
  7. 7. Tömöry G, Csányi B, Bogácsi-Szabó E, Kalmár T, Czibula Á, Csősz A, et al. Comparison of maternal lineage and biogeographic analyses of ancient and modern Hungarian populations. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;134: 354–368. pmid:17632797
  8. 8. Csősz A, Szécsényi-Nagy A, Csákyová V, Langó P, Bódis V, Köhler K, et al. Maternal Genetic Ancestry and Legacy of 10th Century AD Hungarians. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 33446. pmid:27633963
  9. 9. Neparáczki E, Juhász Z, Pamjav H, Fehér T, Csányi B, Zink A, et al. Genetic structure of the early Hungarian conquerors inferred from mtDNA haplotypes and Y-chromosome haplogroups in a small cemetery. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2016: 1–14.
  10. 10. Haak W, Balanovsky O, Sanchez JJ, Koshel S, Zaporozhchenko V, Adler CJ, et al. Ancient DNA from European early Neolithic farmers reveals their near eastern affinities. PLoS Biol. 2010;8.
  11. 11. Damgaard PB, Margaryan A, Schroeder H, Orlando L, Willerslev E, Allentoft ME. Improving access to endogenous DNA in ancient bones and teeth. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 11184. pmid:26081994
  12. 12. Rohland N, Hofreiter M. Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth. Nat Protoc. 2007;2: 1756–1762. Available: http://www.nature.com/nprot/journal/v2/n7/full/nprot.2007.247.html%5Cn http://www.nature.com/nprot/journal/v2/n7/pdf/nprot.2007.247.pdf pmid:17641642
  13. 13. Rohland N, Harney E, Mallick S, Nordenfelt S, Reich D. Partial uracil-DNA-glycosylase treatment for screening of ancient DNA. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370: 20130624. pmid:25487342
  14. 14. Meyer M, Kircher M. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010;5.
  15. 15. Kircher M, Sawyer S, Meyer M. Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40.
  16. 16. Maricic T, Whitten M, Pääbo S. Multiplexed DNA Sequence Capture of Mitochondrial Genomes Using PCR Products. PLoS One. 2010;5: e14004. pmid:21103372
  17. 17. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal. 2011;17: 10–12.
  18. 18. Andrews S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data [Internet]. babraham bioinformatics. 2016.
    • 19. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 1754–60. pmid:19451168
    • 20. Andrews RM, Kubacka I, Chinnery PF, Lightowlers RN, Turnbull DM, Howell N. Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA. Nat Genet. 1999;23: 147. pmid:10508508
    • 21. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 2078–9. pmid:19505943
    • 22. Broad Institute. Picard tools. https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/. 2016; http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/
      • 23. Jónsson H, Ginolhac A, Schubert M, Johnson PLF, Orlando L. MapDamage2.0: Fast approximate Bayesian estimates of ancient DNA damage parameters. Bioinformatics. 2013. pp. 1682–1684. pmid:23613487
      • 24. Garrison E, Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv Prepr arXiv12073907. 2012; 9.
        • 25. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20: 1297–1303. pmid:20644199
        • 26. Sawyer S, Krause J, Guschanski K, Savolainen V, Pääbo S. Temporal patterns of nucleotide misincorporations and DNA fragmentation in ancient DNA. PLoS One. 2012;7.
        • 27. Fu Q, Mittnik A, Johnson PLF, Bos K, Lari M, Bollongino R, et al. A revised timescale for human evolution based on ancient mitochondrial genomes. Curr Biol. 2013;23: 553–559. pmid:23523248
        • 28. Weissensteiner H, Pacher D, Kloss-Brandstätter A, Forer L, Specht G, Bandelt H-J, et al. HaploGrep 2: mitochondrial haplogroup classification in the era of high-throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44: W58–63. pmid:27084951
        • 29. Rizzi E, Lari M, Gigli E, De Bellis G, Caramelli D. Ancient DNA studies: new perspectives on old samples. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44: 21. pmid:22697611
        • 30. Hofreiter M, Serre D, Poinar HN, Kuch M, Pääbo S. Ancient DNA. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2: 353–9. pmid:11331901
        • 31. Behar DM, Rosset S, Blue-Smith J, Balanovsky O, Tzur S, Comas D, et al. The genographic project public participation mitochondrial DNA database. PLoS Genet. 2007;3: 1083–1095.
        • 32. Brown WM. Polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA of humans as revealed by restriction endonuclease analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980;77: 3605–3609. pmid:6251473
        • 33. Salas A, Quintáns B, Álvarez-iglesias V. SNaPshot Typing of Mitochondrial DNA Coding Region Variants. Forensic DNA Typing Protocols. 2005. pp. 197–208.
        • 34. Bouakaze C, Keyser C, Amory S, Crubézy E, Ludes B. First successful assay of Y-SNP typing by SNaPshot minisequencing on ancient DNA. Int J Legal Med. 2007;121: 493–499. pmid:17534642
        • 35. Cooper A, Poinar HN. Ancient DNA: do it right or not at all. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2000. p. 1139.
        • 36. Handt O, Höss M, Krings M, Pääbo S. Ancient DNA: Methodological challenges. Experientia. 1994. pp. 524–529. pmid:8020612
        • 37. Gilbert MTP, Rudbeck L, Willerslev E, Hansen AJ, Smith C, Penkman KEH, et al. Biochemical and physical correlates of DNA contamination in archaeological human bones and teeth excavated at Matera, Italy. J Archaeol Sci. 2005;32: 785–793.
        • 38. Sampietro ML, Gilbert MTP, Lao O, Caramelli D, Lari M, Bertranpetit J, et al. Tracking down human contamination in ancient human teeth. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23: 1801–1807. pmid:16809622
        • 39. van Oven M. PhyloTree Build 17: Growing the human mitochondrial DNA tree. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2015;5: 9–11.
        • 40. van Oven M. Revision of the mtDNA tree and corresponding haplogroup nomenclature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107: E38-NaN-e41.