http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0268-9476
Figures
Abstract
Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) is a cytoplasmic protein tyrosine kinase with a fundamental role in B-lymphocyte development and activation. The nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of BTK is specifically modulated by the Ankyrin Repeat Domain 54 (ANKRD54) protein and the interaction is known to be exclusively SH3-dependent. To identify the spectrum of the ANKRD54 SH3-interactome, we applied phage-display screening of a library containing all the 296 human SH3 domains. The BTK-SH3 domain was the prime interactor. Quantitative western blotting analysis demonstrated the accuracy of the screening procedure. Revealing the spectrum and specificity of ANKRD54-interactome is a critical step toward functional analysis in cells and tissues.
Citation: Gustafsson MO, Mohammad DK, Ylösmäki E, Choi H, Shrestha S, Wang Q, et al. (2017) ANKRD54 preferentially selects Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) from a Human Src-Homology 3 (SH3) domain library. PLoS ONE 12(4): e0174909. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174909
Editor: Manuela Helmer-Citterich, Universita degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, ITALY
Received: July 1, 2016; Accepted: March 17, 2017; Published: April 3, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Gustafsson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: MOG holds a Ph.D. scholarship from Södertörn University-College, Sweden. DKM maintains a postdoctoral-fellowship from MoHE in the Kurdistan-Regional Government, Iraq. The project was supported by a grant from the Swedish Cancer Society.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Protein-protein interactions are prerequisite events for most cellular functions, since they organize signal transductions networks that control many aspects of cell biology [1,2]. While much on how cellular receptors trigger an intracellular response, through organizing signaling networks, is known, most of these domain-protein interaction events lack detailed spatial and temporal context [2,3].
Ankyrin repeat domains are one of the most abundant solenoid folds, each domain consisting of ≈33 amino acid stretches composed of a β-hairpin followed by two antiparallel α-helices and a variable loop [4]. Ankyrin repeat domains have been found in a plethora of proteins with a wide range of cellular functions involved in protein transport, cell-cell signaling, cytoskeleton integrity, cell-cycle regulation or development [5]. Despite sequence similarities in the ankyrin repeat domain, they are interacting with distinctive unrelated proteins by different mechanisms allowing them to function and locate in different intra- and/or extracellular locations [4,6], like GABPβ-GABPα-DNA complex in the nucleus [4], NF-κB/IκB system in the cytoplasm [7] and the intracellular domain of Notch receptor/cytosolic effector Deltex at the plasma membrane [8]. A unifying trait of the ankyrin repeat proteins is that they lack enzymatic activity and typically function as universal scaffolds or adaptor molecules.
Ankyrin Repeat Domain 54 (ANKRD54) consists of 4 ankyrin repeat domains, flanked by a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and a nuclear export signal (NES), and expressed in various tissues [9,10]. The secondary structure composition and measurements in the energetic signature of individual ankyrin repeats, reveals the GxTPLHLA motif as highly conserved within the internal and C-terminal repeats, whereas this motif is absent in the N-terminal repeats. The majority of the proteins contain 2 to 6 ankyrin repeats, while others can contain up to 29 [11].
Previously, we have reported ANKRD54 as a novel partner to BTK and shown that nuclear-resident BTK is specifically expelled by ANKRD54. Although, the precise role of BTK in the nucleus remains elusive, we have demonstrated that this mechanisms is mediated by the SH3 domain of BTK [9].
BTK is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase (nRTK) belonging to the TEC family of kinases together with other mammalian members, TEC, ITK, BMX/ETK and TXK/RLK. They play a pivotal role in regulating a wide range of cellular signaling pathways [12,13]. In humans, BTK is expressed in all hematopoietic cells except T-lymphocytes and plasma cells [14]. The BTK protein has a conserved multi-domain architecture comprised of Pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, Tec homology (TH) domain, Src homology 3 (SH3), Src homology 2 (SH2) and Kinase (SH1) domain in tandem. The BTK domains have the capacity to interact with cognate protein domains, polypeptide motifs, phosphoinositides and phosphorylated tyrosines, enabling BTK to carry out diverse multitasking biological processes. Two phosphorylated tyrosine residues, which are involved in these processes, have been identified in BTK, tyrosine-551 and tyrosine-223 within the kinase and SH3 domains, respectively [15–17].
Since the discovery of BTK mutations as the cause of X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) [18,19], the role of BTK in B-cell signaling has been extensively studied [1–3,12,20–22]. Although, a huge number of protein partners have been reported to interact with various domains of BTK, only some of them were validated both in vitro and in vivo, while others have not been explored further [13,23].
SH3 domains are small interaction modules of approx. 60 amino acids found in many signaling proteins, including nRTKs. Evolutionarily they are well conserved mediating protein-protein interactions important for a variety of signal transduction processes [24]. It was determined that the human genome contain 296 different SRC homology-3 (SH3) domains [25]. The three-dimensional conformations of a number of SH3 domains [26,27] are well described and classified [28–30], predicting different modes of binding. Numerous low- and high- affinity binding partners have been characterized and cataloged [25,31–34].
Currently, a multiplicity of techniques such as, synthetic peptide-array screening, large-scale yeast two-hybrid screening or affinity selection of phage-display runs, together with computational approaches enable to characterize and compare the specificity of the “SH3 domain interactome” (i.e., the interaction of the SH3 domain with proteins) [33,34].
In this study, we explored a screening strategy based on phage-display libraries of the complete human SH3 domainome with ANKRD54, with the aim to identify the specificity of ANKRD54 for different SH3 domains.
Materials and methods
Plasmids
The ANKRD54 wild-type gene was cloned and prepared with extensions in order to generate compatible ends with the plasmid. For PCR amplification, the following primers were used: 5´- ATA TTT TCT AGA ATG GCA GCC GCC GCC GGG GAC; antisense 3’- TAC GTC TCG TAC CTC TTC TCC CCA TGG TCA GC, then digested with BglII and KpnI. To obtain the ANKRD54-Δ3 deletion mutant lacking the entire ankyrin repeat domain 3 (L176—A205), a site-directed deletion was generated, using a multiple overlapping-PCR strategy. The pEBB-vector expresses a biotinylation target-domain (BTD) fusion, defined by a single lysine residue that serves as the biotin acceptor. The BTD exists as biotin acceptor domain of the 1.3S subunit of Propionibacterium shermanii originating from the PinPoint (pp) Xa-1 vector, as described in [35]. The ANKRD54 wild-type and ANKRD54-Δ3 sequences were sub-cloned into the C-terminal position of the pEBB backbone (pEBB-pp-ANKRD54), which was cleaved with BamHI and KpnI.
The single BTK (P265A, Y268A) or double BTK (P265A/Y268A) mutants were created by single substitution mutagenesis and all plasmids were verified by sequencing (Mutagenex, Inc.). The cDNAs encoding wild-type BTK and nucleus-targeted GFP-BTK fusion protein containing a synthetic NLS signal located at C-terminus were generated by sub-cloning into pSGT or pEGFP vectors, as described earlier [9].
Human SH3 domain phage display-based screening and protein production
SH3 phage libraries were prepared as described in [25] and the bio-panning procedure to select human SH3-domains binding to ANKRD54 was carried out according to [25] and [35]. Briefly, the biotinylated fusion protein of interest, ANKRD54 wild-type was analyzed with the ANKRD54-Δ3 mutant as a negative control and human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV Nef) as positive control, following transient transfection into HEK 293T cells. Cells were lysed and proteins were immobilized on M-280 streptavidin beads (Life Technologies), followed by the incubation with the infectious recombinant phages, already containing the SH3-phagemid vectors. After incubation and proper washing, the retained phages were eluted from the beads, followed by infection of Escherichia coli TG1 cells, and then plated at tenfold dilution. The identities of the SH3 domains of the selected phages were determined after sequencing of the clones.
The infectious recombinant phage supernatants were produced after overnight culture of E. coli cells carrying the phagemid(s) of interest, followed by super-infection with M13KO7 helper phage. After overnight growth of the double (ampicillin/kanamycin) resistant bacteria, the supernatants were cleared by filtration before usage.
Cell culture and transfections
Namalwa (human Burkitt B-cell lymphoma), Cos7 (African green monkey kidney), HEK293T (human embryonal kidney) cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultivated as previously described [9].
Transient transfections of Cos7 cells were performed using polyethylenimine (PEI) 25K (Polyscience, Inc) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and HEK293T cells were transfected with the standard calcium-phosphate precipitation method. The hematopoietic cells were transfected by electroporation using a Neon Electroporator (Life Technologies) and the 100μL tip kit with the following settings: 1350V (pulse-voltage); 20ms (pulse-width); 2 (pulse-number). Single cell suspensions were prepared from spleens obtained from normal and Btk knock-out (KO) mice. The use of mouse models in this study was approved by Stockholm South Animal Ethics Committee with registration number S56-14.
Biotin-streptavidin pull-down assay and immunoprecipitation
All the pull-down assays regarding the ANKRD54-wt-BTD and the Δ3 mutant were conducted using Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin-T1 (Life Technologies) together with DynaMag-2, Magnetic Particle-Concentrator, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells were lysed and proteins were separated on gradient 4–12% SDS Bis-Tris NuPage gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using the iBlot system (Life Technologies). The membranes were then blocked with LI-COR Blocking Buffer and probed with specific primary antibodies: anti-Liar/ANKRD54 (ProSci Inc.), anti-BTK (BD Transduction Lab.), anti-Lyn44 (Santa Cruz) and IRDye-680 Streptavidin, and secondary antibodies: goat-anti rabbit 680LT/800CW and goat-anti mouse 680LT/800CW from LI-COR Biosciences. Western blots signals were scanned by using the Odyssey-Imager (LI-COR Biosciences).
Immunofluorescence and microscopy
Immunofluorescence was performed as previously described [9]. Transfected cells were analyzed in a motorized Olympus IX-81 inverted-fluorescence microscope equipped with an XM10-monochrome-camera and narrow band-filter cubes for UV (DAPI), green (GFP) and red (Cy3) excitation. The cells were stained with a Cy3-conjugted goat anti-mouse IgG or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and nuclei were stained with DAPI (4’6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride).
Statistical analysis
Data are reported as (M±SEM) and statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version20 (SPSS Inc.). Comparisons between groups were assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in combination with Dunnett t-test post hoc analysis. P≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Validation of biotinylation target-domain on ANKRD54 wt and ANKRD54-Δ3 mutant
Validation of the newly generated vectors expressing biotinylation target-domain (BTD) on wild-type ANKRD54 (Fig 1A) and a mutant lacking the third ankyrin domain confirms that wild-type ANKRD54 protein specifically interacts with full length BTK. In order to biochemically verify these observations, we first transiently transfected the ANKRD54 wt or ANKRD54-Δ3 mutant into Cos7 cells, followed by immunoprecipitation with magnetic streptavidin-beads (SA) and immunoblotting. Anti-ANKRD54 antibody and IRDye-Streptavidin were used to visualize the proteins in two ways (Fig 1B). The pseudo-color-image (yellow indicates overlap of red and green) represents simultaneous detection of endogenous and exogenous ANKRD54 protein with biotinylation target-domain (ANKRD54-BTD) and demonstrates that the constructs are reliable.
(A) Schematic representation of the pEBB vector containing biotinylation target-domain (BTD) and (B) Simultaneous two-color target analysis of ANKRD54 wt and Δ3 mutant in Cos7 cells. The first three lanes (from left side of the blot) represent immunoprecipitation (IP) with streptavidin (SA) beads and the last three lanes show whole cell lysate (WCL). Anti-ANKRD54 (green) primary antibody recognizes the C-terminus of the protein and anti-IRDye 680-Streptavidin (red) recognizes the BTD domain.
Next, we set out to test whether functional expression of the ANKRD54-BTD wt and mutant constructs in B cells is feasible. Electroporation of Namalwa B-cells with the constructs resulted in the generation of stable proteins permitting successful immunoprecipitation, followed by pull-down of endogenous BTK using streptavidin-beads (Fig 2A). The ANKRD54-Δ3 mutant did not pull down endogenous BTK at all. Therefore, we used the ANKRD54-Δ3 mutant as negative control in all our experiments, including the phage-display screening.
(A) Transfection by electroporation of Namalwa cells and (B) transiently-transfected Cos7 cell lysate mixed with Namalwa (Nam) lysate, followed by co-immunoprecipitation (IP) of endogenous BTK. The missing expression of BTK from the whole cell lysate (WCL) of untransfected Cos7 cells (lane 1) shows that these cells do not express BTK.
Because the Cos7 cells do not express any BTK protein, as Namalwa B-cells do, we wanted to see if ANKRD54-BTD wt is able to specifically recognize and interact with endogenous BTK. Therefore, we extended our in vitro results and incubated the streptavidin-biotin complexes obtained after transient transfection of ANKRD54 wt and the Δ3 mutant in Cos7 cells with Namalwa B-cell lysate (Fig 2B). As expected, ANKRD54 wt was found to associate with BTK, while the ANKRD54-Δ3 mutant failed. Collectively these data clearly show that BTK and ANKRD54 interact in steady state, in vitro.
In vivo characterization of BTK and ANKRD54 interactions
Furthermore, to prove that BTK can also interact with ANKRD54 in living cells, in terms of subcellular localization, we conducted immunofluorescence analysis with GFP-BTK-NLS. As previously reported by our group [9] this form of BTK is 100% localized in the nucleus of resting cells (Fig 3, left panel). Indeed, in the presence of the wild-type ANKRD54 a complete nuclear exclusion and cytoplasmic retention of BTK protein is observed (Fig 3 second panel, from left to right). Conversely, co-expression of BTK with ANKRD54-Δ3 mutant or empty-vector had no effect on the nuclear/cytoplasmic distribution of BTK. Thus, deletion of ankyrin domain 3 is sufficient to abolish the interaction with BTK. Consequently, these observations are in line with our previous findings.
Subcellular localization of pEGFP-BTK-NLS alone (from left to right) and in the presence of wild-type ANKRD54, Δ3-mutant and mock. The white arrowheads in the second upper panel indicate nuclei devoid of BTK-NLS and the lower panels indicate merged images.
Phage-display screening for ANKRD54-binding SH3-domains
We next applied a phage-display screening using ANKRD54 as a bait against a complete human SH3-domain collection, according to the procedure described in [25]. Thus, we screened a library containing 296 different SH3-domains, derived from 217 human proteins. The excess of domains is due to the fact that several proteins contain more than one SH3-domain, namely up to 6. Sequences of all SH3-domains together with links to relevant bioinformatics information are available online [25].
After three screening rounds, 15 different SH3-domains were identified in total as ANKRD54 binders, but only two of them were previously described in the literature. These two SH3-domains belong to two kinases, namely BTK and LYN. Previously, Samuels [10] and colleagues have reported Liar (ANKRD54) as a novel partner to LYN influencing the erythropoietin-induced differentiation. As mentioned, we recently identified ANKRD54 as being the first protein specifically affecting the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of BTK [9].
Scoring of these three rounds of experiments were calculated from the number of colony-hits (Table 1) and demonstrates clearly that the BTK-SH3-domain is predominantly (16 out 35 colonies) selected from the library (P-value < 10−5).
Characterization of low-score ANKRD54 binders
In the next step, we wanted to biochemically examine the interaction between ANKRD54 and endogenously expressed proteins identified as low-score binders. First, Cos7 cells were transfected with biotinylated ANKRD54-wt or ANKRD54-Δ3 mutant followed by enrichment with streptavidin-beads. Subsequently, these beads were isolated and incubated with cell lysate obtained either from Namalwa B-cells or primary splenic mouse cells to determine the interaction with natively expressed proteins. Western blot detection of LYN, TEC, SRC, PLCγ1 or BLK revealed, apart that from BTK, only LYN could be validated to interact with ANKRD54 (Fig 4; negative results for other proteins, not shown).
Cos7 cells transiently-transfected with ANKRD54-wt or ANKRD54-Δ3 mutants followed by immunoprecipitation with streptavidin magnetic-beads. The IP complexes were incubated with whole cell lysates obtained from wt and Btk-KO primary spleen cells. The absence of BTK (second lane from left to right) did not enhance the enrichment to LYN. β-Actin used as quantity-index of protein, indicating equal-loading control of WCL.
To further explore this outcome, we decided to examine the ANKRD54/LYN interaction in the presence or absence of BTK. To achieve that we used cell lysates from Btk-KO and wt mouse splenic cells (Fig 4). The cell lysates were incubated with biotinylated ANKRD54-wt or the Δ3 mutant. In this set of experiments, the ANKRD54-Δ3 mutant was used as a negative control, instead of an empty vector-(mock). The absence of BTK did not enhance the enrichment of LYN, suggesting that access to ANKRD54 was not a limiting factor, and with the overall ANKRD54/LYN interaction being considerably weaker than that of BTK.
Mutation on the BTK-SH3 310 helix structure modulates ANKRD54 binding
From our previous work [9] and fine mapping analysis we knew that ANKRD54 binds to the BTK-SH3-domain in a polyproline-independent manner and only 22-amino-acids originating from the C-terminus of the SH3-domain were sufficient for this interaction.
In Fig 5, we present the amino-acid composition of the C-terminus of all the SH3-domains identified in the ANKRD54 binding screen, together with the synthetic BTK peptide used previously to pull-down endogenous ANKRD54 [9] and TXK. To study the effects of conserved residues on the BTK/ANKRD54 interaction, we generated single mutants for P265A, Y265A as well as the double mutant P265A/Y268A.
Secondary structural elements of BTK-SH3-domain and homology alignment of the last 20-amino-acids of the human SH3-domains, according to Kärkkäinen [25] database. The NCF1, BZRAP1 and SH3KBP1 proteins contain more than one SH3-domain and the sequence corresponds to the SH3-domain binding to ANKRD54. SNY-amino-acids create a right-handed 310 helix [27]. *The biotinylated synthetic BTK-peptide (22-aa) reported in [9] was used as bait for the interaction with endogenous ANKRD54. **The TXK/RLK-SH3 was not identified in this screening, although ANKRD54 influenced the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of full-length TXK [9].
ANKRD54-BTD-wt and BTK mutants were transiently transfected separately into Cos7 cells. After enrichment of ANKRD54 with streptavidin-beads, the immune-complexes were further incubated with each of the BTK mutant lysates. Immunoblotting analysis revealed that whenever the Y268 residue was mutated in BTK, the interaction with ANKRD54 was abolished (Fig 6). Substitution of the P265 residue had no effect on the interaction. The three-dimensional surface representation of amino-acids in the BTK-SH3-domain as determined by NMR shows that, the P265 residue is located in the inner cleft between the highly exposed W251 and Y268 residues [24].
Cos7 cells were separately transfected with ANKRD54-wt and the following BTK-SH3 mutants: P265A, Y268A and P265A/Y268A. The obtained lysates were mixed and processed for immunoprecipitation.
Discussion
Extensive studies have revealed that the binding specificity and cellular function of the plethora of SH3-domains are far more diverse than previously thought [27]. Except current canonical SH3-domain binding models, class I (R/K)xPxxP or class II PxxPx(R/K) motifs known to bind with relatively low-affinity ranging from 1μM to 1mM, there is Class III RxxK motifs proved to bind ligands with higher affinity [28]. Furthermore, the binding affinity to isolated singlets of SH3-domains compared with full-length, SH3-domain containing, intact proteins varies considerably [36]. The binding affinity of the full-length, intact, SH3-containing GADS protein to a complete proline-rich-region-peptide derived from SLP-76 was ≈ 10 fold-stronger than the interaction between only the C-terminal SH3 domain of GADS with the peptide derived from SLP-76 (≈ 250 nM) [27,29].
Previously, the classical mode of interaction to SH3 domains was thought to be via proline-rich-regions. Today, the thinking of the field is changing and an increased number of additional non-canonical binding modes between SH3-domains and peptides lacking PxxP motifs has been reported [27,36], including the interaction between endogenous ANKRD54 and a 22-amino-acids peptide derived from the C-terminal of the SH3-domain of BTK [9].
In this report, our objective was to examine the human SH3-domain interactome for ANKRD54, in order to identify additional SH3-domain-containing protein partners. Indeed, we provide strong evidence that ANKRD54 preferentially interacts with the BTK-SH3-domain. However, the structural basis for the ANKRD54 BTK-SH3-domain specificity and selectivity remains elusive. Additionally, to validate our phage-displayed SH3 domain interactome data to the targets, we performed a phage-ELISA binding assay. Although only relatively low level binding was observed when commercially available recombinant ANKRD54 adhered to plastic was used for this assay, the Btk-SH3 displaying phages did show the highest binding, and the signals obtained by six phages that were identified as ANKRD54 binders in library screening (BTK, LYN, SNX33, PLCγ1, BLK, and TEC; see Table 1) gave significantly (p = 0.02969 in a paired t-test) higher signals than two randomly chosen control SH3 phages (Hck and Eps8L1) across all phage dilutions tested (1:10, 1:20, 1:40, 1:80 and 1:160) (data not shown).
In our screenings, a number of new, much lower colony-score candidates for SH3-domain interactions was found: LYN, TEC, SRC, PLCγ1, BLK, SNX33, PTK6, NCF1, DLG3, SH3YL1, ARHGAP26, GAS7, BZRAP1 and SH3KBP1 (Table 1). We choose to give more attention to the proteins carrying the conserved PSNY-motif (BTK, LYN, TEC, SRC, PLCG1), in addition to BLK whose corresponding sequence is PSNF. In spite of the existence of a conserved 310helix motif, only BTK and LYN full-length proteins were confirmed to repeatedly interact with ANKRD54, in primary mouse spleen cells. Moreover, immunoprecipitation was also only positive for BTK and LYN using lysates of activated or resting isolated mouse B-cells or human Namalwa B-cells. This was furthermore confirmed in immunoprecipitates from exogenous interactions using proteins purified from co-transfected Cos7 cells.
We were also interested in exploring any possible competition between SH3-containg interactors, especially between LYN and BTK. We performed semi-quantitative IP in Btk-KO B-lymphocytes and did not find any increase in the LYN binding capacity in the absence of BTK. Except LYN, we could not confirm or validate any full-length ANKRD54 protein-interaction with low-score interactors: TEC, SRC, PLCγ1 or BLK. In this assay, we wanted to exclude the possibility that BTK outcompetes the LYN interaction, since the observed LYN band was weak. Indeed, the LYN interaction remained unaltered in the Btk-KO experiment, demonstrating that access to ANK54RD was not a limiting factor under our assay conditions; therefore, we conclude that the strong high-affinity interaction of ANKRD54 for BTK is remarkably selective.
However, for the other proteins identified in our triplicate screening procedure, we could not demonstrate any enhanced binding, suggesting that additional interactors with ANKRD54 are non-existing, at least from what we have tested (Data not shown). This was unexpected, since SH3-domain containing proteins often carry multiple domains as well as non-structured, adjacent regions flanking the SH3-domain permitting additional tethering. However, it is possible that other regions of a full-length protein mask the SH3-domain, thereby reducing binding to ANKRD54.
In an attempt to further explore the SH3-domain dependent interaction with the full-length ANKRD54, we generated a c-ABL mutant carrying the C-terminal portion of BTK’s SH3-domain by site-direct mutagenesis. Unpredictably, this mutant failed to interact with full-length ANKRD54. This observation suggests that the folding of other domain/motifs is required for intact interaction (Data not shown). This conclusion is supported by the report from Bartelt [28] and colleagues, where they proposed a revised model for the interaction of GRB2 with SH3-ligands, where a high affinity interaction occurs through other multiple contacts outside the proline-rich-region.
In addition to BTK and LYN, the binding of other possible ANKRD54 partners via their SH3-domains has been reported in the literature, such as TXK [9] or HS1, LASP1, VAV1, Hip55 and ESE2L [10], but they did not appear in our screening assay. We have previously shown that ANKRD54 influences the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of full-length TXK, but in spite of that TXK displays the conserved PSNY-motif, this kinase was not identified in the SH3-interactome screen. This could be due to involvement of other interactions beyond the SH3-domain needed for stable interaction [28].
Additionally, mutation of highly conserved Y268 residue in the BTK-SH3-domain abolished the interaction with ANKRD54, indicating an important role of this residue for stable and selective interaction. In contrast, the availability of conserved P265 for protein-protein interaction may be limited and P265 is also located in a cleft. Thus, the preferential BTK selection in our library-screening relies on additional motif/domain interaction exists on BTK, which are not well-conserved or present on other low-score hits. Although our observation implies this notation, but further fine-tuning on multiple motif/module outside SH3 needed to be identified in future. Still, we can only speculate about the biological relevance of ANKRD54, but many questions remain to be answered in order to understand the basis for the ANKRD54 specificity toward BTK-SH3-domain.
In summary, these results extend our earlier understandings by showing that the interaction between BTK and ANKRD54 is highly selective, since it was also identified in a screen using human SH3-domainome. A novel finding is that BTK not only binds to ANKRD54, but stands out as the preferred interactor, being highly dominant over all other human SH3-domains.
Acknowledgments
MOG holds a Ph.D. scholarship from Södertörn University-College, Sweden. DKM thanks the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Kurdistan-Regional Government-Erbil, Iraq for their support. BFN receives a research fund from CRDF Global (USA). The project was supported by a grant from the Swedish Cancer Society.
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: CIES.
- Formal analysis: DKM SS.
- Funding acquisition: CIES BFN.
- Investigation: MOG DKM EY HC QW.
- Methodology: CIES KS.
- Project administration: MOG.
- Resources: CIES KS.
- Supervision: MOG.
- Writing – original draft: MOG BFN CIES.
- Writing – review & editing: CIES BFN KS.
References
- 1. Bradshaw JM. The Src, Syk, and Tec family kinases: Distinct types of molecular switches. Cell Signal. Elsevier Inc.; 2010;22: 1175–1184. pmid:20206686
- 2. Takesono A, Finkelstein LD, Schwartzberg PL. Beyond calcium: new signaling pathways for Tec family kinases. J Cell Sci. 2002;115: 3039–3048. pmid:12118060
- 3. Kurosaki T, Hikida M. Tyrosine kinases and their substrates in B lymphocytes. Immunol Rev. 2009;228: 132–148. pmid:19290925
- 4. Sedgwick SG, Smerdon SJ. The ankyrin repeat: a diversity of interactions on a common structural framework. 1999;0004: 311–316.
- 5. Mosavi L, Cammett T. The ankyrin repeat as molecular architecture for protein recognition. Protein Sci. 2004;13: 1435–1448. pmid:15152081
- 6. Mosavi LK, Minor DL, Peng Z-Y. Consensus-derived structural determinants of the ankyrin repeat motif. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99: 16029–16034. pmid:12461176
- 7. Truhlar SME, Mathes E, Cervantes CF, Ghosh G, Komives EA. Pre-folding IκBα Alters Control of NF-κB Signaling. J Mol Biol. 2008;380: 67–82. pmid:18511071
- 8. Allgood AG, Barrick D. Mapping the Deltex-Binding Surface on the Notch Ankyrin Domain Using Analytical Ultracentrifugation. J Mol Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2011;414: 243–259. pmid:22001695
- 9. Gustafsson MO, Hussain A, Mohammad DK, Mohamed a. J, Nguyen V, Metalnikov P, et al. Regulation of Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (Btk) through a Novel SH3-Dependent Interaction with Ankyrin Repeat Domain 54 (ANKRD54). Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32: 2440–2453. pmid:22527282
- 10. Samuels AL, Klinken SP, Ingley E. Liar, a novel Lyn-binding nuclear/cytoplasmic shuttling protein that influences erythropoietin-induced differentiation. Blood. 2009;113: 3845–3856. pmid:19064729
- 11. Parra RG, Espada R, Verstraete N, Ferreiro DU. Structural and Energetic Characterization of the Ankyrin Repeat Protein Family. Orengo CA, editor. PLOS Comput Biol. 2015;11: e1004659. pmid:26691182
- 12. Smith CIE, Islam TC, Mattsson PT, Mohamed AJ, Nore BF, Vihinen M. The Tec family of cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases: mammalian Btk, Bmx, Itk, Tec, Txk and homologs in other species. BioEssays. 2001;23: 436–446. pmid:11340625
- 13. Mohamed AJ, Yu L, Bäckesjö C-M, Vargas L, Faryal R, Aints A, et al. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (Btk): function, regulation, and transformation with special emphasis on the PH domain. Immunol Rev. 2009;228: 58–73. pmid:19290921
- 14. Smith CI, Baskin B, Humire-Greiff P, Zhou JN, Olsson PG, Maniar HS, et al. Expression of Bruton’s agammaglobulinemia tyrosine kinase gene, BTK, is selectively down-regulated in T lymphocytes and plasma cells. J Immunol. 1994;152: 557–565. pmid:8283037
- 15. Nore BF, Mattsson PT, Antonsson P, Bäckesjö C-M, Westlund A, Lennartsson J, et al. Identification of phosphorylation sites within the SH3 domains of Tec family tyrosine kinases. Biochim Biophys Acta—Proteins Proteomics. 2003;1645: 123–132.
- 16. Park H, Wahl MI, Afar DE., Turck CW, Rawlings DJ, Tam C, et al. Regulation of Btk Function by a Major Autophosphorylation Site Within the SH3 Domain. Immunity. 1996;4: 515–525. pmid:8630736
- 17. Rawlings DJ, Lin S, Scharenberg a M, Park H, Wahl MI, Kato RM, et al. Activation of BTK by a Phosphorylation Mechanism Initiated by SRC Family Kinases. Science (80-). 1996;271: 822–825. pmid:8629002
- 18. Wilkie A. Medical genetics: advances in brief: The gene involved in X-linked agammaglobulinaemia is a member of the src family of protein-tyrosine kinases. J Med Genet. 1993;30: 444–444.
- 19. Tsukada S, Saffran DC, Rawlings DJ, Parolini O, Allen RC, Klisak I, et al. Deficient expression of a B cell cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase in human X-linked agammaglobulinemia. Cell. 1993;72: 279–290. pmid:8425221
- 20. Nore BF, Vargas L, Mohamed AJ, Brandén LJ, Bäckesjö C-M, Islam TC, et al. Redistribution of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase by activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Rho-family GTPases. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30: 145–154. pmid:10602036
- 21. Hendriks RW, Yuvaraj S, Kil LP. Targeting Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in B cell malignancies. Nat Rev Cancer. Nature Publishing Group; 2014;14: 219–232. pmid:24658273
- 22. Mohammad DK, Nore BF, Hussain A, Gustafsson MO, Mohamed AJ, Smith CIE. Dual phosphorylation of Btk by Akt/protein kinase b provides docking for 14-3-3ζ, regulates shuttling, and attenuates both tonic and induced signaling in B cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33: 3214–26. pmid:23754751
- 23. Lindvall JM, Blomberg KEM, Valiaho J, Vargas L, Heinonen JE, Berglof A, et al. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase: cell biology, sequence conservation, mutation spectrum, siRNA modifications, and expression profiling. Immunol Rev. 2005;203: 200–215. pmid:15661031
- 24. Hansson H, Mattsson PT, Allard P, Haapaniemi P, Vihinen M, Smith CIE, et al. Solution Structure of the SH3 Domain from Bruton ‘ s Tyrosine Kinase †,‡. 1998;2960: 2912–2924.
- 25. Kärkkäinen S, Hiipakka M, Wang J, Kleino I, Vähä‐Jaakkola M, Renkema GH, et al. Identification of preferred protein interactions by phage‐display of the human Src homology‐3 proteome. EMBO Rep. 2006;7: 186–191. Available: http://embor.embopress.org/content/7/2/186.abstract pmid:16374509
- 26. Yu H, Rosen M, Shin T, Seidel-Dugan C, Brugge J, Schreiber S. Solution structure of the SH3 domain of Src and identification of its ligand-binding site. Science (80-). 1992;258: 1665–1668. pmid:1280858
- 27. Saksela K, Permi P. SH3 domain ligand binding: What’s the consensus and where's the specificity? FEBS Lett. 2012;586: 2609–2614. pmid:22710157
- 28. Bartelt RR, Light J, Vacaflores A, Butcher A, Pandian M, Nash P, et al. Regions outside of conserved PxxPxR motifs drive the high affinity interaction of GRB2 with SH3 domain ligands. Biochim Biophys Acta—Mol Cell Res. 2015;1853: 2560–2569.
- 29. Schwarten M, Sólyom Z, Feuerstein S, Aladağ A, Hoffmann S, Willbold D, et al. Interaction of Nonstructural Protein 5A of the Hepatitis C Virus with Src Homology 3 Domains Using Noncanonical Binding Sites. Biochemistry. 2013;52: 6160–6168. pmid:23947833
- 30. Asbach B, Ludwig C, Saksela K, Wagner R. Comprehensive Analysis of Interactions between the Src-Associated Protein in Mitosis of 68 kDa and the Human Src-Homology 3 Proteome. Dübel S, editor. PLoS One. 2012;7: e38540. pmid:22745667
- 31. Reiss DJ, Schwikowski B. Predicting protein-peptide interactions via a network-based motif sampler. Bioinformatics. 2004;20: 274–282.
- 32. Musacchio a, Wilmanns M, Saraste M. Structure and Function of the SH3 Domain. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2002;61: 283–297. Available: papers://70e99c22-152e-47e4-8805-4dbdb6c09369/Paper/p6753
- 33. Ceol A, Chatr Aryamontri A, Licata L, Peluso D, Briganti L, Perfetto L, et al. MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38: D532–D539. pmid:19897547
- 34. Kay BK. SH3 domains come of age. FEBS Lett. 2012;586: 2606–2608. pmid:22683951
- 35. Kleino I, Järviluoma A, Hepojoki J, Huovila AP, Saksela K. Preferred SH3 Domain Partners of ADAM Metalloproteases Include Shared and ADAM-Specific SH3 Interactions. Buday L, editor. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0121301. pmid:25825872
- 36. Berry DM, Nash P, Liu SK-W, Pawson T, McGlade CJ. A High-Affinity Arg-X-X-Lys SH3 Binding Motif Confers Specificity for the Interaction between Gads and SLP-76 in T Cell Signaling. Curr Biol. 2002;12: 1336–1341. pmid:12176364