Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

An unmodified wobble uridine in tRNAs specific for Glutamine, Lysine, and Glutamic acid from Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium results in nonviability—Due to increased missense errors?

Abstract

In the wobble position of tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys, and Glu a universally conserved 5-methylene-2-thiouridine derivative (xm5s2U34, x denotes any of several chemical substituents and 34 denotes the wobble position) is present, which is 5-(carboxy)methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine ((c)mnm5s2U34) in Bacteria and 5-methylcarboxymethyl-2-thiouridine (mcm5s2U34) in Eukarya. Here we show that mutants of the bacterium Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium LT2 lacking either the s2- or the (c)mnm5-group of (c)mnm5s2U34 grow poorly especially at low temperature and do not grow at all at 15°C in both rich and glucose minimal media. A double mutant of S. enterica lacking both the s2- and the (c)mnm5-groups, and that thus has an unmodified uridine as wobble nucleoside, is nonviable at different temperatures. Overexpression of lacking either the s2- or the (c)mnm5-group and of lacking the s2-group exaggerated the reduced growth induced by the modification deficiency, whereas overexpression of lacking the mnm5-group did not. From these results we suggest that the primary function of cmnm5s2U34 in bacterial and mnm5s2U34 in is to prevent missense errors, but the mnm5-group of does not. However, other translational errors causing the growth defect cannot be excluded. These results are in contrast to what is found in yeast, since overexpression of the corresponding hypomodified yeast tRNAs instead counteracts the modification deficient induced phenotypes. Accordingly, it was suggested that the primary function of mcm5s2U34 in these yeast tRNAs is to improve cognate codon reading rather than prevents missense errors. Thus, although the xm5s2U34 derivatives are universally conserved, their major functional impact on bacterial and eukaryotic tRNAs may be different.

Introduction

Transfer RNA from all organisms contains modified nucleosides, which are derivatives of the four major nucleosides adenosine (A), guanosine (G), cytidine (C), and uridine (U). More than 100 different modified nucleosides have been characterized (http://mods.rna.albany.edu or http://modomics.genesilico.pl). Although their presence in tRNA is scattered over the entire molecule, there are two positions in the tRNA that are more frequently modified than others–about 50% of nucleosides in position 34 (the wobble position) and about 80% in position 37 (next to and 3’ of the anticodon) are modified [1, 2]. Not only are these two positions frequently modified but they also contain many chemically different modifications, which are important for an efficient and accurate decoding of the mRNA (Reviewed in [1]). These modifications alter the chemical properties of the base but also the adoption of syn or anti conformations as well as inducing different tautomeric forms [3]. Unmodified U is present rarely in this position of tRNAs from free living organisms [2]. Apparently, a modified U in the wobble position of tRNAs of most cellular organisms is required for efficient decoding with required fidelity.

Modified wobble U’s are classified in two groups based on their chemical structures. One group consists of 5-hydroxyuridine derivatives with a chemical group attached at position 5 of the uracil base via an ether linkage (xo5U34-derivatives) whereas the other group consists of 5-mehyluridine derivatives (xm5U34-derivatives) with a methylene carbon attached to the C5 atom of uracil (x denotes any of several different chemical substituents). The xo5U34- derivatives are found in tRNAs reading family codon boxes and the modification expands wobble capacity of uridine to read 3 to 4 codons in such a codon box. The xm5U34-derivatives are present in tRNAs reading mixed codon boxes and decode codons ending with A or G. They may also have a sulfur bound to position 2 of uracil (xm5s2U34-derivatives; reviewed in [1]). These wobble derivatives (xm5s2U34) are universally conserved in tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys, and Glu and, accordingly, are present in the three phylogenetic domains Bacteria, Eukarya and Archaea and also in organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts. The 5-(carboxy)methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine ((c)mnm5s2U34) derivative of these modifications are present as wobble nucleosides in bacterial tRNAs specific for glutamine (Gln), lysine (Lys), and glutamic acid (Glu) whereas the wobble nucleoside in the eukaryotic tRNA counterparts is 5-methylcarboxymethyl-2-thiouridine (mcm5s2U34) (Fig 1). Such derivatives were thought to restrict the wobble capacity of U and thereby improving the recognition of purine-ending codons and prevent misreading of the near-cognate codons ending in pyrimidines [4] (cf. Fig 2). The synthesis of the latter in yeast requires the activity of several genes, of which ELP3 is required for the early step(s) in the synthesis of the mcm5-side chain and TUC1 is required for last step in the thiolation at position 2 [5, 6]. The yeast double mutant elp3, tuc1, which thus contains an unmodified wobble uridine in tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys, and Glu, is nonviable but can be rescued by overexpression of the corresponding hypomodified tRNAs. The latter result suggests that the primary function of mcm5s2U34 is to improve the efficiency of decoding cognate codons rather than to prevent missense errors [5].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Structures of the nucleosides present in the wobble position of tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys, and Glu in Bacteria [mnm5s2U (Lys and Glu) and cmnm5s2U (Gln)] and in Eukarya (mcm5s2U).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175092.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Codon table and the anticodon loop of tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys, and Glu which contain cmnm5s2U (Gln) or mnm5s2U (Lys and Glu) as wobble nucleoside in bacterial tRNAs.

Above the third column (second codon base A) the anticodon stem and loop of the tRNAs containing the (c)mnm5s2U in position 34 is shown (denoted in red cmnm5s2). Position 36 of the anticodon is color coded with Green G36 being position 36 for , red U36 for , and blue C36 for . Similar color code is denoted for the modified nucleosides present in position 37 in the corresponding tRNAs. N denotes G, A or C, respectively, for first nucleoside in the relevant codons read by these tRNAs. Note that these tRNAs are rich in U, which is a poor stacker [24] making the anticodon very flexible especially if the modifications is absent and this is especially true of . In the codon table the letters outside the box, to the left, above, and to the right indicate the first, second, and third position of the codon. Circles connected by a line, or a single circle, represent one tRNA species. A filled circle indicates the capacity of that tRNA to base pair with the indicated codon, either by Watson-Crick or by wobble according to the revised wobble hypothesis [1]. Red and yellow circles indicate tRNAs that are sequenced at the RNA level while green circles represent tRNAs for which only a partial tRNA sequence is available. A red or green circle indicates efficient base pairing while a yellow circle indicates a restricted wobble. An open (white) circle is a base pairing that is not according to the revised wobble hypothesis. However, data in vivo from mutants where only this tRNA is left to decode all codons in the codon box, suggest that the tRNA in fact is able to read that codon [9, 25]. Data are compiled from Sprinzl data base (http://trnadb.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/ and Modomics data base (http://modomics.genesilico.pl/). Mutations in mnmE or mnmG genes result in no formation of the (c)mnm5- group not only of the (c)mnm5s2U present in tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys and Glu but also cmnm5Um in and mnm5U34 in tRNAs specific for Arg and Gly. Mutations in mnmA results in no thiolation of cmnm5s2U34. a) The modifications in position 34 of from S. enterica are cmnm5s2U (80%) and mnm5s2U (20%) [10] and similar in E. coli [11] b) The majority of this tRNAGly contains mnm5U34 but there is also a small amount of cmnm5U34 [1].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175092.g002

In bacteria the functional aspect of (c)mnm5s2U34 is more complex. Although it was thought that the function of these modifications was to prevent misreading, Hagervall et al [7] showed that this is not the case for , since lack of either the mnm5- or the s2-group reduces misreading of the near-cognate Asn-codons (AAU/C, see Fig 2). Moreover, Manickam et al [8] confirm these results for the lack of the mnm5- side chain and further show that such hypomodified also decreases other missense errors (Arg codons AGA/G; see Fig 2). However, lack of mnm5-side chain in increases missense errors of Gly (GGA) and Asp (GAU/C) codons [8]. Thus, the same modification (mnm5-side chain) in or in influences the frequency of missense errors differently–increasing () or decreasing (). Therefore, the functional impact of the modification is sensitive to the structural context it is part of, which has also been shown for the modified nucleosides queosine (Q34) [8] and the uridine-5-oxyacetic acid (cmo5U34) [9].

Transfer RNA specific of Gln, Lys, and Glu are the only tRNA species in bacteria that contain (c)mnm5s2U34 as wobble nucleoside. Whereas contains a mixture of cmnm5s2U (80%) and mnm5s2U (20%) [1012], and contain mnm5s2U34. The formation of (c)mnm5s2U34 requires the activity of several enzymes as summarized in Fig 3. A predicted minimal translation apparatus requires the mnmA, mnmE and mnmG genes but not the mnmC gene to synthesize cmnm5s2U34, which suggests an important role of this wobble modification for a proper translation [13]. The s2- and the (c)mnm5-group of (c)mnm5s2U34 are pivotal for reading frame maintenance and lack of either of them induces ability to suppress frameshift mutations [14]. We have characterized several frameshift suppressor mutants lacking this modified nucleoside and these mutants are our tools in studying the function of the (c)mnm5s2U34 wobble nucleoside [15]. Mutations in mnmA, tusB, or tusE block the sulfur relay pathway whereas mutations in mnmE or mnmG (gidA) block the synthesis of the (c)mnm5-side chain and accordingly such mutants lack (c)mnm5s2U34 (Fig 3, Table 1).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Synthesis of (c)mnm5s2U in bacteria.

Note that a mutations in mnmA, tusB or tusE block the formation of the s2-group and mutations in either mnmE or mnmG (gidA) block the synthesis of the side chain (c)mnm5-. In the bacterium Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium LT2, the sulfur may be exchanged by selenium, depending on the concentration of selenium in the growth medium. The intermediate in the selenation process is a geranylated derivative (c)mnm5ges2U34 (ge, denotes a geranyl group covalently bound to the s2-group) and it is present in the wild type bacteria at a level of only a few percent [26].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175092.g003

thumbnail
Table 1. Level of (c)mnm5s2U in tRNAs of various strains used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175092.t001

This paper focus on the functional aspect of the wobble nucleoside (c)mnm5s2U34 in bacteria. We show here that lack of either the s2- or the (c)mnm5-group induces poor growth and cold sensitivity, that a double mutant having an unmodified U34 as wobble nucleoside is not viable, and that overexpression of or lacking the s2-group reduces growth considerable suggesting that such hypomodified tRNAs increase missense error. Overexpression of lacking the cmnm5-group reduces growth although much less than s2-deficiency, whereas lack of the mnm5 group of overexpressed does not.

Materials and methods

Bacteria and growth conditions

The bacterial strains used were derivatives of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 or Escherichia coli K12 (S1 Table, Supporting materials). As rich medium Luria-Bertani (LB) was used [16]C:\GetARef\Refs\Refsmanus\FS_mutant_2011.ref #2; C:\GetARef\Refs\Refsmanus\Kristina-Gln05.ref #38;.The minimal solid medium was made from Vogel & Bonner basal salt medium [17] C:\GetARef\Refs\Refsmanus\FS_mutant_2011.ref #4; C:\GetARef\Refs\Refsmanus\Kristina-Gln05.ref #39; with 15g of agar per liter and supplemented with 0.2% glucose and required amino acids and/or vitamins [18]C:\GetARef\Refs\Refsmanus\FS_mutant_2011.ref #5; C:\GetARef\Refs\Refsmanus\Kristina-Gln05.ref #40;. When necessary antibiotics were added at following concentrations: carbenicillin 100 μg ml-1, kanamycin 50 μg ml-1 and chloramphenicol 25 μg ml-1.

Genetic procedures

Transduction with phage P22 HT105/1 (int-201) [19]C:\GetARef\Refs\Refsmanus\FS_mutant_2011.ref #20; was performed as previously described [18]C:\GetARef\Refs\Refsmanus\Kristina-Gln05.ref #40;. DNA sequencing was performed on plasmid DNA or PCR products following the manual of Applied Biosystems ABI PRISM Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit Big DyeTM v.1.1 or by LightRunTM sequencing at GATC Biotech, Cologna, Germany. The inactivation of mnmA and mnmE genes was done according to Datsenko & Wanner [20] and the resulting insertions were confirmed by PCR.

Analysis of modified nucleosides in tRNA

Bacterial strains were grown over night in medium LB, diluted 100 times in 100 ml of the same medium and grown at 37°C to a cell density of about 4x108 cells/ml. Cells were lysed and total RNA was prepared [21] and dissolved in 2 ml buffer R200 (10 mM Tris-H3PO4 (pH 6.3), 15% ethanol, 200 mM KCl) and applied to a Nucleobond® AX500 column (Macherey-Nagel Gmbh & Co., Düren, Germany), pre-equilibrated with the same buffer. The column was washed once with 6 ml R200 and once with 2 ml R650 (same composition as R200, except for 650 mM KCl instead of 200 mM KCl). Finally, tRNA was eluted with 7 ml R650, precipitated by 0.7 volumes cold isopropanol, washed twice with 70% ethanol and dissolved in water. Transfer RNA was digested to nucleosides by nuclease P1 followed by treatment with bacterial alkaline phosphatase at pH 8.3 [22]. C:\GetARef\Refs\Jocke\cmo5U.ref #91; The hydrolysate was analyzed as described earlier [23] using a Supelcosil C-18 column (Supelco) or Develosil C-30 (Phenomenex) with a Waters Alliance HPLC system.

Results

The mnmA or mnmE mutants have undetectable level of (c)mnm5s2U34 in tRNA

To test the viability of a mutant containing mutations in both mnmA and mnmE, selectable markers linked to the inactivation of these genes were required. We therefore inserted in the mnmA gene a chloramphenicol (cat) resistant element and in the mnmE gene a kanamycin (Km) resistant element (denoted mnmA16<>cat and mnmE17<>Km, respectively), which completely destroy the synthesis of the corresponding enzymes and block the synthesis of (c)mnm5s2U34. In an mnmA16<>cat, mnmE17<>Km double mutant tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys and Glu will therefore contain an unmodified wobble uridine (U34). These resistance elements should not induce any polar effect on the expression on downstream genes, since both genes are transcribed as single cistrons (http://regulondb.ccg.unam.mx/).

The biosynthesis of the cmnm5- and the s2-groups are suggested to be independent of each other [2729]. Accordingly, a deletion of the mnmE or the mnmG gene should result in tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys and Glu containing s2U34 instead of (c)mnm5s2U (Fig 3). If the thiolation is not dependent of the presence of the (c)mnm5 side chain, a similar level of moles of s2U should accumulate as the level of (c)mnm5s2U34 present in the wild type. Indeed, s2U is observed in the mnmE17<>Km mutant but at a level of 40% (at 314 nm) and 100% (at 254 nm) of the level of (c)mnm5s2U in the wild type (assuming the same extension coefficient constants for (c)mnm5s2U and s2U; Table 1, Fig 4). Note, that s2U is not well separated from s4U at 314 nm and G at 254 nm (Fig 4C and 4E) making the analysis not optimal. However, analysis of tRNA of an mnmE mutant of E. coli s2U is also about 50% of the level of mnm5s2U in the wild type at analysis conditions where s2U is well separated from s4U [30]. On the other hand determinations using radioactive labelling have found higher level of s2U in relation to the level of (c)mnm5s2U (80% by Hagervall et al [11]). Although the mnmE mutant used has s2U in its tRNA we cannot rule out that the level might not reach the expected level even though thiolation, as has been suggested, is not dependent on the presence of the cmnm5-side chain.

thumbnail
Fig 4. HPLC analysis of tRNA from mnmE17<>Km and mnmA16<>cat mutants grown in rich medium at 37°C.

(A) Strain GT7132 (mnmA+, mnmE+). (B) Strain GT8173 (mnmA16<>cat). (C) Strain GT8176 (mnmE17<>kan). (D) Strain GT7132 (mnmA+, mnmE+). (E) Strain GT8173(mnmA16<>cat). (F) Strain GT8176 (mnmE17<>kan). Panel A,B and C are monitored at 254 nm and panel D,E and F are monitored at 314 nm. AU, absorbance units.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175092.g004

A mutation in the mnmA, tusB or tusE genes should result in the presence of cmnm5U34 in the Gln- and mnm5U34 in Lys- and Glu-tRNAs (cf Fig 3). However, in the HPLC analysis used the mnm5U is not separated from the major nucleoside C. However, we have earlier analysed the distribution of modified nucleosides in an mnmA mutant and such a mutant contains mnm5U34 instead of mnm5s2U34 [7]. Moreover, mnmA, tusB or tusE deletion mutants contain mnm5U34 in tRNA instead of mnm5s2U34 [31]. Since the (c)mnm5s2U is not detected in tRNA of the mnmA, tusB and tusE mutants used (Table 1), it is likely that they instead have (c)mnm5U in their tRNAs specific to Gln-, Lys-, and Glu.

Lack of the s2- or (c)mnm5-group of (c)mnm5s2U as in the mnmA and mnmE mutants, respectively, results in a severe growth reduction especially at low temperature

As described in the introduction yeast has the chemically related wobble nucleoside mcm5s2U in the corresponding tRNA species in which (c)mnm5s2U34 is present in S. enterica and E. coli (Fig 1). The Elp3p catalyses the first step in the synthesis of the mcm5-group and the Tuc1p the last step in synthesis of the s2-group [5, 6]. A double mutant elp3, tuc1 is nonviable demonstrating that an unmodified U34 in the Gln, Lys and Glu-tRNA does not support viability in yeast [5]. However, lowering the temperature allows such a double mutant to grow, although poorly. Assuming that a bacterial mnmA,mnmE double mutant is also viable at lower temperature, we monitored the growth of the mnmA3 and mnmE13 single mutants at several temperatures and growth media. However, both single mutants grew very poorly at all conditions tested, especially at low temperature, and not at all at 15°C [on rich (mnmA and E mutants) and minimal medium (mnmA mutant)] (Table 2). The reduction of growth at 37°C is similar to the growth behaviour of mnmA, tusB and tusE mutants described by Suzuki and collaborators [31].

thumbnail
Table 2. The mnmA and mnmE mutants are cold sensitive on rich and minimal glucose media.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175092.t002

Overexpression of Gln or Lys specific tRNAs lacking the 2-thio- or the (c)mnm5- group of (c)mnm5s2U34 causes severe growth reduction

In a yeast elp3, tuc1 double mutant tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys, and Glu lack mcm5s2U34 in their wobble positions and have instead an unmodified U34. Such a double mutant is not viable, but overexpression of hypomodified versions of these tRNAs rescues the double mutant elp3, tuc1 [5]. A corresponding bacterial mnmA, mnmE double mutant, which should also have an unmodified wobble U34 in the corresponding tRNAs, would therefore be potentially nonviable. Since the xm5s2U34 derivatives are universally conserved their function might be similar so that overexpression of bacterial hypomodified tRNAs might, as in yeast, rescue a potential nonviable double mutant mnmA, mnmE. Overexpression of a hypomodified tRNA (e.g hypomodified ) in the recipient cell might therefore facilitate the construction of a viable mutant having both mnmA and mnmE mutations on the chromosome and a rescuing plasmid encoding e.g. hypomodified or . We therefore first monitored how overexpression of a hypomodified or influenced growth of the mnmA3 and mnmE13 mutants.

Overexpression of lacking the s2-group and possessing only the cmnm5-group of cmnm5s2U34.

Strains having a mutation in mnmA, tusB or tusE genes lack the s2-group of (c)mnm5s2U34 of and such a tRNA has only the cmnm5-group (See above). Plasmid pUST313 harbors the metT operon consisting of genes glnU and glnW encoding the (c)mnm5s2U34 containing and genes glnV and glnX encoding the C34 containing . This operon also contains the metT/U genes encoding and the leuW gene encoding (Fig 5). Note, no other full sized gene is present on this plasmid. We introduced this plasmid into mnmA3, tusB27 and tusE30 mutants as well as into the wild type strain. Overexpression of from plasmid pUST313 in the wild type influenced the growth only to a minor degree (Table 3). Slow growth as such was not sensitive to the overexpression of fully modified as tested by introducing the same plasmid into a mutant having a similar growth rate as an mnmA mutant (data not shown). However, plasmid pUST313 severely reduced the growth of the three independent mutants mnmA3, tusB27 and tusE30 all lacking the s2- group of (c)mnm5s2U34 in . Since the results were the same in the three independent s2-deficieint mutants, it was the lack of the s2-group of (c)mnm5s2U in that caused the reduced growth and no other aberrations in the cell. We obtained a few large colonies among the small colonies when introducing plasmid pUST313 into the mnmA3 mutant. Sequencing the metT operon of the plasmid present in such a large spontaneously occurring colony revealed that a recombination had occurred between the plasmid encoded metT and metU genes resulting in the loss of genes glnU and glnW, which code for (Fig 5). The resulting plasmid, pUST314, therefore lacks these genes and have only metT/U gene encoding and glnV and glnX genes encoding the C34 containing . This plasmid caused only a 50% growth reduction of the mnmA3 and the tusB27 mutants compared to the almost complete inhibition of growth caused by the expressing plasmid pUST313. Thus, a substantial part of the growth reduction is caused by overexpression of (Table 3). Plasmid pUST314 also reduced growth suggesting that overexpression of and of had some growth reducing effect in strains lacking the s2-group of (c)mnm5s2U34 but not at all in the wild type strain. In summary, overexpression of s2U-deficient in three independent mutants (mnmA3, tusB27 and tusE30) induced a severe growth reduction that was not observed if this tRNA was not overexpressed.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Gene organization of plasmids pUST313 and pUST314.

Plasmid pUST313 harbors the genes glnU and glnW (red) encoding the (c)mnm5s2U34 containing Gln-tRNA () and genes glnV and glnX (blue) encoding the C34 containing . Plasmid pUST314 is a spontaneous plasmid mutant in which a recombination has occurred between metT () and metU (also ) (green) resulting in a deletion of the glnU and glnW genes encoding and leuW (black). Note, only part of the asnB and STMO672 genes are present (shaded gray) suggesting that these defective genes do not express any full sized protein. Plasmid p815 (not shown in the figure but used in some experiments) contains the valU operon, which consists of genes valU, valX, valY and lysV. The latter is the structural gene for .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175092.g005

thumbnail
Table 3. Overexpression of hypomodified or severely reduced cellular growth.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175092.t003

On minimal medium we also observed a severe growth reduction by overexpression of in all mutants lacking the s2-group of (c)mnm5s2U34 but not in the wild type control. A similar growth reduction was also observed with plasmid pUST314, which does not encode but overexpressed and . Therefore, we cannot attribute this growth reduction to the overexpression of but to the s2-deficiency of (c)mnm5s2U34 in the cell, since a similar growth reduction was not observed in the wild type strain (Table 3). Apparently, overexpression of the tRNAs from these two plasmids (+/- expression of ) induces a severe growth reduction. Since this was observed on minimal medium, an unbalanced tRNA population due to the overexpression of the tRNAs encoded by these plasmids might induce in s2-deficient strains aberrations of translation of several genes involved in the synthesis of metabolites resulting in multiple auxotrophy.

Overexpression of lacking the cmnm5-group and possessing only the s2-group of (c)mnm5s2U34.

Plasmid pUST313 was introduced to the mnmE13 and mnmG1 mutants, which both lack the cmnm5-group of cmnm5s2U34 in their , and have instead s2U34 as wobble nucleoside. This caused also a growth reduction on rich medium although not to the same extent as when this plasmid was introduced into cells lacking the s2-group of (c)mnm5s2U34 (Table 3). Since a similar result was obtained in two different mutants (mnmE13 or mnmG1) inducing a similar mnm5- group deficiency, the growth reduction is likely due to the hypomodified and not to some other aberrations in these cells. There was no or very little growth reduction caused by plasmid pUST314, which lacks the genes encoding . Thus, the decreased growth observed is caused by overexpression of hypomodified . Note, that the observed growth reduction on minimal medium was larger than on rich medium and it was dependent on overexpression of . Thus, overexpression of lacking the cmnm5-group causes a substantial growth reduction on rich medium and even a more severe growth reduction on minimal medium. We suggest that lacking the cmnm5-group induces missense errors. Interestingly, lacking the mnm5-group also increases misreading of GGA (Gly), GAU (Asp) and GAC (Asp) codons [8].

Overexpression of having only the mnm5- or the s2-group of mnm5s2U34.

Plasmid p815 contains the valU operon, which consists of the genes valU, valX, valY and lysV, the latter of which is the structural gene for . Mutations mnmA3 or mnmE13 influence only the structure of the . Overexpression of these tRNAs, including , resulted in a severe growth reduction of strains lacking the s2-group of mnm5s2U34, suggesting that overexpressing thiol-deficient may induce translational errors, such as missense errors (Table 3). However, Hagervall et al [7] showed that s2-deficiency of mnm5s2U34 in results in less missense errors in reading the AAU/C (Asn) codons. If our results reflect increased missense errors, they may be due to other such errors than those monitored by Hagervall et al [7]. If so, the missense errors induced by s2-deficiency of mnm5s2U34 in may be codon specific, which has been observed earlier [8]. However, such a growth reduction was not observed when the overexpressed was mnm5-deficient, suggesting that this deficiency did not induce any increased translational errors such as missense error. This result is indeed consistent with earlier reports showing that mnm5-deficient results in less missense errors in decoding AGA/G (Arg) or AAU/C (Asn) codons [7, 8]. These results strengthen our suggestion that the growth reduction observed by overexpressing hypomodified tRNAs may be correlated to increased missense errors.

The combined results above show that overexpressed s2-deficent and imposed a considerable growth reduction suggesting that such hypomodified tRNAs increase missense error. Overexpression of lacking the cmnm5-group reduced growth although much less than s2-deficiency, whereas lack of the mnm5 group of overexpressed did not.

Presence of the wobble (c)mnm5s2U34 in tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys, and Glu is essential for viability of S. enterica.

To construct a double mutant mnmA, mnmE we wanted to combine strains harboring both the selectable mnmA16<>cat (CmR) and mnmE17<>Km (KmR) mutations and such a double mutant should have tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys, and Glu with an unmodified wobble uridine (U34). We grew the mnmA16<>cat mutant in rich medium at 37°C and mixed the cells with the transducing phage P22 grown on the mnmE17<>Km. We then spread the mixture on rich agar plates containing kanamycin to select for the mnmE17<>Km mutation and thereby creating the wanted double mutant mnmA16<>cat, mnmE17<>Km. The KmR transductants were selected at several temperatures to monitor if a double mutant might be viable at another temperature than 37°C. The donor strain GT8176 (STM3453-2550::Tn10dTc) also contains a selectable (tetracycline resistant, TcR) mutation known not to induce any growth defect and this mutation was used to monitor the efficiency of transduction. As recipient we also used strain GT8173 (pmnmA+/ mnmA16<>cat), which contains the same mnmA16<>cat mutation on the chromosome and the complementing plasmid pmnmA+ containing the wild type allele of the mnmA gene. Such strain should behave as the wild type unless the mutation mnmA16<>cat introduces some unknown phenotype, which is not related to the mutation in mnmA gene and therefore not complemented by the pmnmA+ plasmid.

Table 4 shows that no double mutant mnmA16<>cat, mnmE17<>Km was obtained at any temperature clearly demonstrating that such a double mutant is not viable. This result cannot be due to an inefficient transduction, since the transfer of the STM3453-2550::Tn10dTc marker was similar to the transfer frequency of the mnmE17<>Km mutation to the wild type (Compare the number of TcR colonies to the number of KmR colonies in the wild type). Moreover, the transduction frequency of mnmE17<>Km was similar when strain GT8177 (pmnmA+/ mnmA16<>cat) was used as recipient. Note also, that we waited several days in order to allow a very slow growing double mutant to appear but still no such mutant was recovered. Moreover, we did not obtain any external suppressor mutant with mutation counteracting the lack of modification of U34. We conclude that cells having an unmodified wobble uridine of tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys and Glu are not viable on rich medium at temperatures between room temperature (about 20°C) and 42°C.

thumbnail
Table 4. The double mutant mnmA, mnmE is nonviable on rich medium at 15 to 37°C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175092.t004

The inability to obtain any transductants at 15°C when selecting TcR transductants (STM3453-2550::Tn10dTc) shows that the recipient mnmA16<>cat mutant is not able to grow at such low temperature consistent with the results shown in Table 2.

Discussion

We [5] and others [32]) have shown that the major function of mcm5s2U34 in yeast tRNAs is to improve the efficiency of the cognate anticodon-codon interaction rather than preventing missense errors, since overexpression of hypomodified tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys or Glu counteracts the phenotypes induced by deficiency of either s2, mcm5- or both modifications. However, overexpression of bacterial did not counteract the slow growth caused by s2- or cmnm5- deficiency but rather exaggerated the reduced growth of these mutants (Table 3). This growth reduction is is caused by the s2- or cmnm5- deficiency and not to some other cellular aberrations, since the same result was obtained by three independent mutants (mnmA3, tusB27 and tusE30) defective in the thiolation and two independent mutants (mnmE13 and mnmG1) defective in the synthesis of the side chain (Table 3). Moreover, this severe growth reduction by overexpression of is due to the surplus of this particular tRNA, since a spontaneous faster growing mutant derivative was obtained that have a plasmid derivative lacking genes glnU/W, which both encode this tRNA (Fig 5). These results suggest that the major impact of hypomodified caused increased translational errors, such as missense errors, rather than reduced efficiency of reading the cognate codons as was suggested for yeast tRNA lacking mcm5s2U34 [5]. If the function of (c)mnm5s2U34 were to improve the efficiency of cognate codon reading, increased concentration of hypomodified tRNA should rather counteract the reduced growth of the mnmA3 and mnmE13 mutants than to exaggerate it. Thus, although the xm5s2U34 wobble modifications are universally conserved, their functional impacts may be different, at least in yeast and in S.enterica. A difference in translation accuracy between yeast and E. coli has been noted earlier, since missense errors are about 10-fold lower in yeast compared to E. coli. Yeast might have evolved mechanism(s) not present in bacteria to reduce missense errors [33].

An unmodified wobble uridine is rarely present in any cytosolic tRNAs [2]. In organelles, like mitochondria, unmodified uridines are present in tRNAs reading family boxes but not in tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys, and Glu, which always have an xm5s2U34 derivative. It was thought that the presence of this modification in the wobble position of Gln, Lys and Glu tRNAs would prevent missense errors [4]. The phenotypes of the mnmA3 and mnmE17 mutants show that these modifications are pivotal for cellular growth (Table 2) and, indeed, a double mutant mnmA16<>cat, mnmE17<>Km, which has an unmodified U34 as wobble nucleoside, did not grow at several different temperatures (Table 4). These results are consistent with an earlier report that showed that a similar double mutant of E. coli is not able to grow [34]. Clearly, the functional impact of (c)mnm5s2U34 is of the outmost importance and explain why such a modification is always present in these kind of tRNAs and predicted to be present in a minimal translation apparatus [13]. Based on the results presented in this paper we suggest that the major reason for inability to support growth with an unmodified uridine in the wobble position of tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys, and Glu is increased missense errors.

It has been suggested that the s2- and xm5- groups of xm5s2U derivatives present in the wobble position would prevent missense errors [4, 35]. This kind of modification is present in split codon boxes (Fig 2) and thus should prevent decoding the near-cognate pyrimidine ending codons in such boxes and thereby missense errors. Although the three tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys and Glu all have the xm5s2U34 wobble modification they still are part of distinct structural context. The has a very flexible anticodon loop due to the presence of several U (a poor stacker) including U36, whereas Gln has G36 and Glu has C36. Moreover, has the large hydrophobic cyclic N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosice (ct6A) in position 37 and both and have the much smaller methylated derivative m2A. The ct6A improves the stacking interaction with the base above (A38) and below (A36) of the anticodon loop but it also makes a cross strand stack to the first base (A) of the codon and thereby stabilizes the weak A-U36 base pairing in the first position [36, 37]. This strong functional impact on the stability of U-rich anticodon loops may explain why this modification is essential for viability [38]. The functional impact of m2A, which is present in and , is likely to be different and should have a lesser functional impact than ct6A37 and accordingly it is not essential for viability [39]. Thus, the structural context for these xm5s2U wobble modifications is different in these three tRNAs not only because differences in the primary sequence of the anticodon loop but also because of differences in the modification pattern and in particular the nature of the modifications at position 37 (ct6A in and m2A in and , see Fig 2). These features may influence weather the functional impact by (c)mnm5s2U34 is primarily to prevent missense errors or to improve the efficiency of cognate reading. The frequency of missense errors also depends on the efficiency of the competing near-cognate tRNAs [40]. Such a consideration may explain that missense errors for hypomodified are decreased [7, 8] (Table 3), whereas they are increased for (Table 3) and [8]. Note also, that when a specific missense error is monitored it is codon dependent but if growth reduction caused by overexpression of a specific hypomodified tRNA monitors missense errors it will be the total outcome of many possible such errors of several near- and/or non-cognate codons. Therefore, one would not expect identical results using two such different methods to monitor translational errors. Still, in the case of the functional impact of the mnm5-side chain on the two methods gave consistent results (Table 3 and [7, 8]).

We have suggested that the reduced growth linked to the overexpression of hypomodified or is mainly due to increased missense errors, although we cannot exclude other translational errors, such as errors in the reading frame maintenance, misfolding of nascent proteins, or ribosomal drop off. The latter probably does not explain the observed growth reduction, since overexpression of tRNA would counteract such errors. Deficiency of either s2- or (c)mnm5-group of (c)mnm5s2U34 induces frameshifts by the peptidyl-slippage mechanism (reviewed in [1]) and according to this model overexpression of the tRNA reading the next codon downstream of the frameshifting site decreases frameshifting. Still, Pande et al [41] noticed that overexpression of a few specific yeast tRNAs increases frameshifts probably by an out-of-frame binding, which pulls the ribosome into the shifted frame. The increase in frameshifting was modest and no major effect on growth was reported. Overexpression of hypomodified tRNA specific for Gln, Lys and Glu in yeast counteracts the phenotypes induced by modification deficiency and does not induce any growth defect [5, 32]. Moreover, as in bacteria overexpression of fully modified yeast tRNA does not cause any reduction in growth. Note also that one of the most efficient frameshift suppressors (sufA6) does not in any major way influence cellular growth (unpublished observation). Taken together, increased frameshifting as an explanation to the severe growth reduction observed upon overexpression of hypomodified tRNAs is not likely. On the other hand the growth reduction may cause an aberrant folding of several proteins. The nascent polypeptide is folded on the ribosome and a change of the polypeptide synthesis rate may influence the folding of proteins [42]. The speed with which the mRNA is decoded is correlated to the concentration of cognate tRNAs [43, 44]. Overexpression of an unmodified tRNA may change the rate of polypeptide synthesis and thereby be influencing the folding of the nascent peptides resulting in an accumulation of misfolded proteins. Such aberrant proteins may in turn induce a growth defect. Still, overexpression of fully modified tRNA did not influence the growth (Table 3), a condition which also should change the rate of polypeptide synthesis due to increased concentration of some tRNAs. Therefore, if the observed reduction of growth is caused by misfolding of proteins, it would be specific for modification deficiency. Overexpression of normal or hypomodified yeast tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys and Glu does not reduce cellular growth but rather counteracts the modification deficient induced phenotype(s). Thus in yeast overexpression of hypomodified tRNAs does not induce frameshifts or aberrant folding of proteins to such a degree that it influences growth, although both kinds of translational errors may well be operating also in this organism [5, 32]. From these considerations we favor missense errors causing the observed growth reduction, since theoretical considerations have suggested that the function of the xm5s2U34 is to prevent such errors. Moreover, such errors have been observed experimentally [8] although in some experiments reduced missense errors by hypomodified tRNA was noticed [7, 8]. These experiments monitored effects on specific codons why it is not excluded that misreading of other codons may be operating. Overexpression of lacking the mnm5-group did not reduce growth suggesting no increase missense errors consistent with results obtained earlier [7, 8], Thus, monitoring growth may well be relevant to estimate missense errors although not as specific as a direct measure of missense errors. Even if we cannot rule out other translational errors, we still found it likely that the growth reduction observed is caused mainly by increased missense errors. This suggestion is in line with the fact that the xm5s2U34 wobble modification have been shown theoretically and experimentally to influence the accuracy of translation besides its effect on the efficiency of cognate codon reading. Therefore, the primary function of the xm5s2U34 modifications may be different in yeast and in bacteria.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

A set of mobile plasmids containing most of the ORFs from E. coli with the expression controlled by Ptac/lacIq was a kind gift from National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411–8540, Japan. We further appreciate Drs Anders Byström and Marcus Johansson, Umeå for their critical reading of the manuscript. We also express our appreciation to Dr Phil Farabaugh, Baltimore, USA for his constructive suggestions for improvements of our manuscript.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: GRB.
  2. Data curation: KN GJ.
  3. Formal analysis: GRB KN GJ.
  4. Funding acquisition: GRB.
  5. Investigation: GRB KN GJ.
  6. Project administration: GRB.
  7. Resources: GRB.
  8. Supervision: GRB.
  9. Validation: GRB KN GJ.
  10. Visualization: GRB KN GJ.
  11. Writing – original draft: GRB.
  12. Writing – review & editing: GRB KN GJ.

References

  1. 1. Björk GR, Hagervall TG (2014) Transfer RNA Modification: Presence, Synthesis, and Function. EcoSal Plus, in press.
  2. 2. Machnicka MA, Olchowik A, Grosjean H, Bujnicki JM (2014) Distribution and frequencies of post-transcriptional modifications in tRNAs. RNA Biol 11:1619–29 LID—104161/. pmid:25611331
  3. 3. Grosjean H, Westhof E (2016) An integrated, structure- and energy-based view of the genetic code. LID—gkw608 [pii]. Nucleic Acids Res 44:8020–8040. pmid:27448410
  4. 4. Yokoyama S, Watanabe T, Murao K, Ishikura H, Yamaizumi Z, Nishimura S et al. Molecular mechanism of codon recognition by tRNA species with modified uridine in the first position of the anticodon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82:4905–4909. pmid:3860833
  5. 5. Björk GR, Huang B, Persson OP, Byström AS (2007) A conserved modified wobble nucleoside (mcm5s2U) in lysyl-tRNA is required for viability in yeast. RNA 13:1245–1255. pmid:17592039
  6. 6. Huang B, Johansson MJ, Bystrom AS (2005) An early step in wobble uridine tRNA modification requires the Elongator complex. RNA 11:424–436. pmid:15769872
  7. 7. Hagervall TG, Pomerantz SC, McCloskey JA (1998) Reduced misreading of asparagine codons by Escherichia coli tRNA(Lys) with hypomodified derivatives of 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine in the wobble position. J Mol Biol 284:33–42. pmid:9811540
  8. 8. Manickam N, Joshi K, Bhatt MJ, Farabaugh PJ (2016) Effects of tRNA modification on translational accuracy depend on intrinsic codon-anticodon strength. Nucleic Acids Res 44:1871–81 LID—101093/. pmid:26704976
  9. 9. Näsvall SJ, Chen P, Björk GR (2007) The wobble hypothesis revisited: Uridine-5-oxyacetic acid is critical for reading of G-ending codons. RNA 13:2151–2164. pmid:17942742
  10. 10. Chen P, Crain PF, Näsvall SJ, Pomerantz SC, Björk GR (2005) A "gain of function" mutation in a protein mediates production of novel modified nucleosides. EMBO J 24:1842–1851. pmid:15861125
  11. 11. Hagervall TG, Edmonds CG, McCloskey JA, Björk GR (1987) Transfer RNA(5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine)-methyltransferase from Escherichia coli K-12 has two enzymatic activities. J Biol Chem 262:8488–8495. pmid:3298234
  12. 12. Rodriguez-Hernandez A, Spears JL, Gaston KW, Limbach PA, Gamper H, Hou Y M et al. (2013) Structural and mechanistic basis for enhanced translational efficiency by 2-thiouridine at the tRNA anticodon wobble position. J Mol Biol 425:3888–3906. pmid:23727144
  13. 13. Grosjean H, Breton M, Sirand-Pugnet P, Tardy F, Thiaucourt F, Citti C et al. (2014) Predicting the minimal translation apparatus: lessons from the reductive evolution of mollicutes. PLoS Genet 10:e1004363 LID-101371/journalpg. pmid:24809820
  14. 14. Urbonavicius J, Qian Q, Durand JM, Hagervall TG, Björk GR (2001) Improvement of reading frame maintenance is a common function for several tRNA modifications. EMBO J 20:4863–4873. pmid:11532950
  15. 15. Jäger G, Nilsson K, Björk GR (2013) The phenotype of many independently isolated +1 frameshift suppressor mutants supports a pivotal role of the p-site in reading frame maintenance. PLoS One 8:e60246. pmid:23593181
  16. 16. Bertani G (1951) Studies on Lysogenesis. J Bacteriol 62:293–300. pmid:14888646
  17. 17. Vogel HJ, Bonner DM (1956) Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli: Partial purification and some properties. J Biol Chem 218:97–106. pmid:13278318
  18. 18. Davis W, Botstein D, Roth JR (1980) A manual for genetic engineering: Advanced Bacterial Genetics. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
  19. 19. Schmieger H (1972) Phage P22-mutants with increased or decreased transduction abilities. Molecular & General Genetics 119:75–88.
  20. 20. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6640–6645. pmid:10829079
  21. 21. Emilsson V, Kurland CG (1990) Growth rate dependence of transfer RNA abundance in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 9:4359–4366. pmid:2265611
  22. 22. Gehrke CW, Kuo KC, McCune RA, Gerhardt KO, Agris PF (1982) Quantitative enzymatic hydrolysis of tRNAs: reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography of tRNA nucleosides. Journal of Chromatography 230:297–308. pmid:7050138
  23. 23. Gehrke CW, Kuo KC (1990) Ribonucleoside analysis by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. In: Gehrke CW, Kuo KCT, editors. Chromatography and modification of nucleosides. Part A. Analytical methods for major and modified nucleosides. J Chromatography Library. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp A3–A71.
  24. 24. Turner DH, Bevilacqua PC (1993) Thermodynamic considerations for evolution by RNA. In: Gesterland RF, Atkins JF, editors. The RNA world. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp 447–464.
  25. 25. Näsvall SJ, Chen P, Björk GR (2004) The modified wobble nucleoside uridine-5-oxyacetic acid in tRNAProcmo5UGG promotes reading of all four proline codons in vivo. RNA 10:1662–1673. pmid:15383682
  26. 26. Jäger G, Chen P, Björk GR (2016) Transfer RNA Bound to MnmH Protein Is Enriched with Geranylated tRNA—A Possible Intermediate in Its Selenation? PLoS One 11:e0153488 LID-101371/journalpo. pmid:27073879
  27. 27. Armengod ME, Moukadiri I, Prado S, Ruiz-Partida R, Benítez-Páez A, Villarroya M et al. (2012) Enzymology of tRNA modification in the bacterial MnmEG pathway. Biochimie 94:1510–1520. pmid:22386868
  28. 28. Elseviers D, Petrullo LA, Gallagher PJ (1984) Novel E. coli mutants deficient in biosynthesis of 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine. Nucleic Acids Res 12:3521–3534. pmid:6427754
  29. 29. Sullivan MA, Cannon JF, Webb FH, Bock RM (1985) Antisuppressor mutation in Escherichia coli defective in biosynthesis of 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine. J Bacteriol 161:368–376. pmid:3881393
  30. 30. Yim L, Moukadiri I, Björk GR, Armengod ME (2006) Further insights into the tRNA modification process controlled by proteins MnmE and GidA of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 34:5892–5905. pmid:17062623
  31. 31. Ikeuchi Y, Shigi N, Kato J, Nishimura A, Suzuki T (2006) Mechanistic Insights into Sulfur Relay by Multiple Sulfur Mediators Involved in Thiouridine Biosynthesis at tRNA Wobble Positions. Mol Cell 21:97–108. pmid:16387657
  32. 32. Esberg A, Huang B, Johansson MJ, Bystrom AS (2006) Elevated Levels of Two tRNA Species Bypass the Requirement for Elongator Complex in Transcription and Exocytosis. Mol Cell 24:139–148. pmid:17018299
  33. 33. Kramer EB, Vallabhaneni H, Mayer LM, Farabaugh PJ (2010) A comprehensive analysis of translational missense errors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 16:1797–1808. pmid:20651030
  34. 34. Armengod ME, Meseguer S, Villarroya M, Prado S, Moukadiri I, Ruiz-Partida R et al. (2014) Modification of the wobble uridine in bacterial and mitochondrial tRNAs reading NNA/NNG triplets of 2-codon boxes. RNA Biol 11:1495–507 LID—104161. pmid:25607529
  35. 35. Yokoyama S, Nishimura S (1995) Modified nucleosides and codon recognition. In: Söll D, Rajbhandary UL, editors. tRNA: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Function. Washington, D. C.: ASM Press. pp 207–223.
  36. 36. Murphy FV, Ramakrishnan V, Malkiewicz A, Agris PF (2004) The role of modifications in codon discrimination by tRNA(Lys)(UUU). Nat Struct Mol Biol 11:1186–1192. pmid:15558052
  37. 37. Rozov A, Demeshkina N, Khusainov I, Westhof E, Yusupov M, Yusupova G (2016) Novel base-pairing interactions at the tRNA wobble position crucial for accurate reading of the genetic code. Nat Commun 7:10457 LID-101038/ncomms104. pmid:26791911
  38. 38. El Yacoubi B, Lyons B, Cruz Y, Reddy R, Nordin B, Agnelli F et al. (2009) The universal YrdC/Sua5 family is required for the formation of threonylcarbamoyladenosine in tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 37:2894–2909. pmid:19287007
  39. 39. Benitez-Paez A, Villarroya M, Armengod ME (2012) The Escherichia coli RlmN methyltransferase is a dual-specificity enzyme that modifies both rRNA and tRNA and controls translational accuracy. RNA 18:1783–1795. pmid:22891362
  40. 40. Kramer EB, Farabaugh PJ (2007) The frequency of translational misreading errors in E. coli is largely determined by tRNA competition. RNA 13:87–96. pmid:17095544
  41. 41. Pande S, Vimaladithan A, Zhao H, Farabaugh PJ (1995) Pulling the ribosome out of frame by +1 at a programmed frameshift site by cognate binding of aminoacyl-tRNA. Mol Cell Biol 15:298–304. pmid:7799937
  42. 42. Pechmann S, Willmund F, Frydman J (2013) The ribosome as a hub for protein quality control. Mol Cell 49:411–21 LID—101016/. pmid:23395271
  43. 43. Dong HJ, Nilsson L, Kurland CG (1996) Co-variation of tRNA abundance and codon usage in Escherichia coli at different growth rates. J Mol Biol 260:649–663. pmid:8709146
  44. 44. Varenne S, Buc J, Lloubes R, Lazdunski C (1984) Translation is a non-uniform process. Effect of tRNA availability on the rate of elongation of nascent polypeptide chains. J Mol Biol 180:549–576. pmid:6084718
  45. 45. Saka K, Tadenuma M, Nakade S, Tanaka N, Sugawara H, Nishikawa K et al. (2005) A complete set of Escherichia coli open reading frames in mobile plasmids facilitating genetic studies. DNA Res 12:63–68. pmid:16106753