Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Interaction of iron status with single nucleotide polymorphisms on incidence of type 2 diabetes

  • Jihye Kim,

    Affiliations Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea, Institute for Health and Society, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea

  • Mi Kyung Kim ,

    kmkkim@hanyang.ac.kr

    Affiliations Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea, Institute for Health and Society, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea

  • Sukyoung Jung,

    Affiliations Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea, Institute for Health and Society, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea

  • Ji Eun Lim,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea

  • Myung-Hee Shin,

    Affiliation Social and Preventive Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

  • Yeon-Jung Kim,

    Affiliation Division of Structural and Functional Genomics, Center for Genome Science, Korea National Institute of Health, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea

  • Bermseok Oh

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea

Abstract

The objective of this study is to find single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with a risk of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Korean adults and to investigate the longitudinal association between these SNPs and T2D and the interaction effects of iron intake and average hemoglobin level. Data from the KoGES_Ansan and Ansung Study were used. Gene-iron interaction analysis was conducted using a two-step approach. To select candidate SNPs associated with T2D, a total of 7,935 adults at baseline were included in genome-wide association analysis (step one). After excluding T2D prevalent cases, prospective analyses were conducted with 7,024 adults aged 40–69 (step two). The association of selected SNPs and iron status with T2D and their interaction were determined using a Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 3 SNPs [rs9465871 (CDKAL1), rs10761745 (JMJD1C), and rs163177 (KCNQ1)] were selected as candidate SNPs related to T2D. Among them, rs10761745 (JMJD1C) and rs163177 (KCNQ1) were prospectively associated with T2D. High iron intake was also prospectively associated with the risk of T2D after adjusting for covariates. Average hemoglobin level was positively associated with T2D after adjusting for covariates in women. We also found significant interaction effects between rs10761745 (JMJD1C) and average hemoglobin levels on the risk of T2D among women with normal inflammation and without anemia at baseline. In conclusion, KCNQ1 and JMJD1C may prospectively contribute to the risk of T2D incidence among adults over the age of 40 and JMJD1C, but CDKAL1 may not, and iron status may interactively contribute to T2D incidence in women.

Introduction

Diabetes is a huge and growing problem. The worldwide prevalence of diabetes in those aged 20–79 years was estimated to be 8.3% in 2011[1], including approximately 12.4% of Koreans aged ≥ 30 years [2]. It has been estimated that the number of diabetic patients worldwide will reach 439 million adults by 2030, primarily due to population growth, lifestyle, and demographic changes [3].

Iron is a vital nutrient for humans and is a cofactor for various metabolic functions. However, excessive iron levels helps produce and amplify free radicals, which can lead to tissue damage [4]. In particular, because of inefficient hydrogen peroxide-inactivating enzymes, pancreatic beta cells are susceptible to oxidative stress [5]. With the exception of direct tissue damage, elevated oxidative stress may directly lead to increased blood glucose levels [6]. Additionally, increased heme iron intake is significantly associated with a greater risk of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) [7]. There is a positive relationship between an increased risk of T2D and serum ferritin, an indicator of total body iron stores [7, 8]. Additionally, higher hemoglobin level is also associated with a high risk of T2D in women [9].

Hepcidin, a peptide hormone synthesized by hepatocytes, is a key modulator of dietary iron absorption and iron release from macrophages [6], and increasing body iron stores induce hepcidin synthesis. Production of hepcidin is also induced by infection and inflammation, which result in decreased iron absorption and iron release from macrophages [10]. Conversely, anemia leads to a decrease in hepcidin production, thereby eliminating the inhibitory effect on intestinal iron absorption and release from macrophages [10]. Thus, inflammatory status and anemia need to be considered in epidemiologic studies regarding iron status.

Environmental, genetic factors, and their interactions contribute to the development of T2D [11]. Heritability for T2D was estimated to be about 26% [12]. Interactions between genetic and environmental factors are likely to be important in the remaining variance [13], but such studies analyzing SNPs and dietary iron intake are sparse. Previously, one study suggested a potential interaction between hemochromatosis (HFE), a major regulator of iron homeostasis, and heme iron intake [14]. However, another study did not find any new interactions between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the heme iron metabolic pathway and heme iron intake [15]. Currently, it is unclear whether iron levels interact with SNPs on the risk of T2D.

To the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies investigating the interaction effects between iron intake and gene polymorphisms in the Asian population. Elucidating gene-iron interactions could enhance our understanding of the development of T2D and lead to effective personalized prevention of this disease. Therefore, the objectives of this study were as follows: 1) to find new SNPs associated with the risk of T2D in Koreans; 2) to investigate the prospective association between the SNPs and the risk of T2D; 3) to study the interaction effect between dietary iron intake and the SNPs, prospectively.

Materials and methods

Study dataset

The study dataset was an ongoing community-based cohort included in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES_Ansan and Ansung Study). Study participants consisted of 10,038 men and women recruited from the city of Ansan (5,020 participants), located 25 miles southwest of the capital city, Seoul, and the city of Ansung (5,018 participants), located 47 miles south of Seoul. Ansan is an industrialized community and Ansung is a rural area. The baseline study was conducted between June 18, 2001 and January 29, 2003 and follow-up examinations were conducted biennially with a scheduled site visit. The details of the study design and procedures are described in a previous report [16].

DNA samples were obtained from 10,004 participants in 2 cohorts. Through the sample and SNP quality controls, a total of 8,842 individuals were included in the data analysis [17]. We additionally excluded participants who did not answer to history taking in medicine (n 146), reported coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, or cancer (n 354), did not complete the food frequency questionnaire (n 248), or reported an implausible energy intake (<500 kcal/d or >4,000 kcal/d), (n 159).

The gene-iron interaction was conducted by a two-step approach. Three data sets were used (Fig 1). The first step was a screening step using data set 1 and set 2 and the second was a gene-iron interaction step using data set 3. To select candidate SNPs for the gene-iron interaction analysis, association analyses between genes and T2D were conducted in the first step. This step was composed of two data sets for a genome-wide association (GWA) analysis: one data set (set 1) consisted of 7,935 participants (911 prevalent cases and 7,024 non-cases (3811 men and 4124 women), and the second dataset (set 2) consisted of 1895 cases (911 prevalent cases and 984 incident cases) and 6,040 non-cases. We then prospectively examined whether the SNPs identified in step 1 were associated with T2D and interacted with iron to influence the risk of T2D, after excluding the prevalent cases (n 911) of set 1 (set 3, n 7,024) in the second step. All procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kyung Hee University in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

General characteristics, anthropometrics, and biochemical variables

Participants completed comprehensive health examinations and interviewer-administered questionnaires, which contained questions on demographic information, medical history, family history, and lifestyles. Interviewers were trained how to administer the questionnaire with a standardized manual and all procedures were conducted with a standardized protocol. Participants were weighed in kilograms to the nearest 0.1 kg and height was measured within 0.1 cm without shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m2). Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the narrowest part between the lowest rib and the iliac crest to the nearest 0.1 cm. Blood pressure was measured in the supine position with mercury sphygmomanometers. red to a central laboratory (Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul, Korea) for measuring serum concentrations of glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and for measuring the whole blood concentration of hemoglobin. Fasting glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, and HDL-cholesterol were measured using an autoanalyzer and hsCRP was measured by immunoradiometric assay (ADVIA1650; Siemens, NY, USA). Hemoglobin was measured by an autoanalyzer (ADVIA120; Siemens, NY, USA).

Although hepcidin peptide hormone and serum ferritin may be more valid biomarkers of iron status [18], there was unfortunately no data on these markers in the Ansung-Ansan cohort. Since it has been reported that serum hemoglobin level was associated with ferritin, hepcidin, and the risk of T2D [9, 19], we used hemoglobin levels as a surrogate biomarker of iron status [20, 21]. The central 95 percentile intervals for hemoglobin were 13.3–16.7 g/dL in men and 11.6–14.2 g/dL in women [22]. We calculated the average hemoglobin level between baseline and before diagnosis of T2D to reflect long-term iron status. We classified participants into 3 groups: <13.3g/dL, 13.3–16.7 g/dL, and >16.7 g/dL in men; <11.6g/dL, 11.6–14.2 g/dL, and >14.2 g/dL in women. Normal average hemoglobin levels were 13.3g/dl for men and 11.6 g/dl for women in this population.

Dietary measurement

A semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) with 103 food items was used to estimate nutrient intake. The validity and reproducibility of the FFQ have been previously assessed in detail [23]. Estimation of nutrient intake was done using the seventh edition Food Composition Table of Korea [24]. Nutrient intake was adjusted for total energy intake using the residual method in men and women, separately [25]. Participants were grouped in tertiles by dietary iron intake.

Genotyping

DNA samples were genotyped on the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 5.0 using 500 ng of genomic DNA. The Bayesian Robust Linear Modeling using Mahalanobis Distance (BRLMM) Genotyping Algorithm was employed for genotype calling of 500,568 SNPs [26]. Markers with low minor allele frequency (MAF), high missing gene call rate (>5%), significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P < 1 x 10−6) were excluded, resulting in a total of 352,228 SNPs. Further details regarding the genotype calling and quality control processes are described in a previous study [17].

Case definition and follow up

The prevalent T2D cases and/or incident T2D cases were used as T2D cases in the analyses for candidate SNPs screening (only prevalent cases were included in set 1; prevalent and incident cases in set 2) and only incident cases were used for interaction analysis (only incident cases in set 3). If a participant reported treatment of T2D by hypoglycemic medications (oral anti-diabetic drugs and/or insulin) and/or satisfied the World Health Organization criteria for T2D (FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/l (126 mg/dl) and/or plasma glucose 2-h after ingestion of 75g oral glucose load ≥ 11.1mmol/l (200mg/dl) at baseline [27], the participant was defined as a prevalent T2D case. For the diagnosis of incident T2D case, the identical criteria of diagnosis of prevalent T2D cases were applied for self-reported T2D and fasting and oral glucose loading blood glucose levels at each follow-up visit. Participants were followed biennially for 10 years (2001–2010) with repeated measurements using validated questionnaires and health examinations to acquire updated information on lifestyle factors and disease status at each visit. Using this information for 10 years, we ascertained incident cases of T2D (n 984).

Statistical methods

The sex difference in the prevalence of diabetes have been reported from previous studies [28, 29]. Men may have generally higher fasting plasma glucose level than women because men’s hepatic sensitivity to insulin tend to be lower [30]. In addition, since men and women have different life style, all analyses were conducted for men and women, separately.

Association analysis between SNPs and T2D was conducted using Plink (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink2/) and SAS software (version 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The gene-iron interaction was conducted by a two-step approach. The first step was a screening step and the second a gene-iron interaction step. In the first step, the association analysis of 352,228 genotyped SNPs and T2D was performed under an additive logistic regression model after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and residential area using data set 1 and set 2. We screened out SNPs that had either a weak relationship to type 2 diabetes (P≥5x10-6). A total of 8 SNPs in set 1 and 2 SNPs in set 2 passed the criteria (P<5x10-6). For 8 SNPs on CDKAL1 in set 1, we additionally examined the linkage disequilibrium (LD) analyses. Eight SNPs were located on identical genes and loci and showed strong LDs of r2 = 0.90 (rs7747752), 0.86 (rs2328549), 0.90 (rs7767391), 0.63 (rs9460546), 0.63 (rs7754840), 0.63 (rs6456368), and 0.64 (rs10946398), with rs9465871 having the lowest P value. Therefore, only rs9465871 was included in the following analysis. Finally, 3 SNPs were selected (Table 1) for gene-iron interaction analysis: one SNP was selected from set 1 [(rs9465871 on CDKAL1 (CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 1-like 1)] and two SNPs [rs10761745 on JMJD1C (jumonji domain containing 1C) and rs163177 on KCNQ1 (potassium voltage-gated channel KQT-like subfamily, member 1)] were adopted from set 2. While the association between CDKAL1 and T2D has been well known in GWAS study using prevalent cases [31, 32] and also KCNQ1 was identified as a T2D susceptibility gene in Asian and European populations [33, 34], there was no evidence on the association between JMJD1C and T2D.

thumbnail
Table 1. Description of SNPs related to type 2 diabetes*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175681.t001

In data set 3, for each participant, person-time were calculated from baseline survey to the date of T2D diagnosis, loss to follow-up, or the end of final survey in 2010, whichever came first. A Cox proportional hazard model was applied to model time to incident T2D events and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained. The prospective association between these 3 SNPs finally selected in the screening step and T2D incidence and the interaction between SNPs and iron status on T2D were confirmed and examined using a Cox proportional hazard model (Table 1).

In the second step, all analyses were separately performed for men and women in set 3. Descriptive statistics on the baseline characteristics for men and women are shown in S1 Table. Potential confounders were evaluated using an age-adjusted general linear model and only variables exhibiting significant linear trends across tertiles of iron intake or hemoglobin levels groups were included in multivariable analyses as confounders.

The validity of the proportional hazards assumption was assessed using two different approaches. First, the assumption was graphically assessed by log-log plots. Second, the proportional hazards assumption was examined using a time-dependent covariate by including an interaction term between the main exposure (iron intake) and log of follow-up time. The time-dependent covariate was not statistically significant (P = 0.5744 in men; P = 0.1412 in women) and the proportionality was reasonable. The interaction was assessed by comparing nested models with and without interaction terms using the likelihood ratio test. Based on Bonferroni correction, statistical significance was set at 0.0083 for multiple testing (6 tests; 3 SNPs for men and women). Additionally, a false discovery rate (FDR) correction was used with a threshold of < 0.1 for statistical significance [35, 36].

Results

Table 1 shows the candidate SNPs from the screening step. Among the three SNPs from sets 1 and 2, CDKAL1 was not associated with incident risk of T2D, but the JMJD1C polymorphism in the rs10761745 region (C>G) (HR = 0.82 and P = 5.30x10-5) and the KCNQ1 polymorphism in the rs163177 region (T>C) were significantly associated with an increased risk of T2D (HR = 1.17 and P = 6.25x10-4).

The general characteristics of the participants by dietary iron intake tertiles and average hemoglobin level groups are shown in Table 2. Men in the highest tertile of iron intakes tended to be slightly younger, unlikely to be former drinker and current smoker, and to have lower carbohydrate intake comparing with those in the lowest tertile, while they tended to have higher BMI and WC, to have higher intakes of protein, fat, zinc, vitamin C, tea, and meat, to be residents in Ansan, and to be more likely current drinker, regular exerciser, and dietary supplement user. In women, those with a higher iron intake tended to be younger, had a lower carbohydrate intake, were more likely to be residents of Ansan, had a higher education level, were dietary supplementary users, and had a higher intake of protein, fat, zinc, vitamin C, tea, and meat. In comparison with average hemoglobin level groups, we noted that men in the highest average hemoglobin group tended to be younger. Compared to the lowest average hemoglobin group, men in the highest group had a high school or above education and were more likely to be current smokers. Women in the highest average hemoglobin group tended to be older, lived in an urban area, and were more likely to be a current drinker. Compared to women in the lowest average hemoglobin group, the highest group had a lower proportion of former smokers and consumed more energy, carbohydrates, protein, and tea. BMI and WC increased across the average hemoglobin level groups in men and women. Variables showing significant trends across tertiles of iron intake or hemoglobin level groups in Table 2 were adjusted as potential confounders in Tables 3 and 4.

thumbnail
Table 2. Age-adjusted baseline characteristics of the study subjects based on iron intake group and hemoglobin level*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175681.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. HRs (95% CI) of type 2 diabetes according to iron intake& hemoglobin level and interaction between the studied gene polymorphism with iron intakes and hemoglobin level in relation to type 2 diabetes risk*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175681.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. HRs (95% CI) of type 2 diabetes according to iron intake and hemoglobin level and interaction between the studied gene polymorphisms with iron intake and hemoglobin level in relation to type 2 diabetes risk among participants with normal inflammation (hsCRP level of ≥1.0 mg/dL) and without anemia at baseline*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175681.t004

Table 3 shows the multivariable-adjusted HRs for T2D by tertiles of iron intake and average hemoglobin level groups. Dietary iron intake was significantly positively associated with T2D after adjusting for age, residential area, WC, education, drinking status, smoking status, regular exercise, dietary supplement use, and carbohydrate, zinc, vitamin C, tea, and meat intake in men; a similar trend was found in women after adjusting for age, residential area, education, regular exercise, dietary supplement use, and carbohydrate, zinc, vitamin C, tea, and meat intake (3rd vs. 1st tertile: HR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.04–1.78, P = 0.0272 for trend in men; HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.18–2.14, and P = 0.0023 for trend in women). Average hemoglobin level was significantly positively associated with T2D after adjusting for age, residential area, smoking status, WC, and energy and tea intake in women (highest group vs. lowest group: HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.06–2.94, and P for trend<0.0001). A linear trend of the risk of T2D was identified in men (P for trend<0.0001). We then evaluated whether genetic polymorphisms of CDKAL1 (rs9465871), JMJD1C (rs10761745), and KCNQ1 (rs163177) and iron interacted in the development of T2D, where the minor alleles of CDKAL1 and JMJD1C were used as references to calculate HR (Table 3). We did not find significant interaction effects on the risk of T2D between the 3SNPs with iron intake and average hemoglobin levels at Bonferroni and FDR significance levels. However, using a significance threshold of P<0.05, we found that rs163177 (KCNQ1) interacted with iron intake in men (P for interaction = 0.0193, FDR = 0.1158) and rs10761745 (JMJD1C) interacted with average hemoglobin levels in women (P for interaction = 0.0417, FDR = 0.2502).

Table 4 shows the prospective interaction effects between gene and iron status after excluding subjects with hsCRP≥1.0 mg/dL or average hemoglobin level <13.3/11.6 g/dL (men/women) in order to reduce confounding effects related to inflammation and anemia. In women, rs10761745 (JMJD1C) had significant average hemoglobin level-dependent effects on the risk of T2D (P for interaction = 0.0077, FDR = 0.0462). Using a significance threshold of P<0.05, iron intake significantly interacted with rs10761745 (JMJD1C) in women (P for interaction = 0.0493, FDR = 0.1479) and rs163177 (KCNQ1) in men.

Discussion

In the present study, we identified that loci JMJD1C at 10q21.2 and KCNQ1 at 11p15.5 were prospectively significantly associated with the risk of T2D. Iron intake was significantly associated with the risk of T2D in men and women and average hemoglobin level also showed a significant linear trend with T2D in men and women. JMJD1C interacted with average hemoglobin levels in women on the risk of T2D after excluding subjects with hsCRP≥ 1.0 mg/dL or an average Hgb level <13.3/11.6 g/dL (men/women). Interestingly, in our study, we found no significant association between CDKAL1 and T2D risk.

The association between higher total iron intake and an increased risk of T2D among women in the present study disagrees with a meta-analysis that established that non-heme iron and total iron intake were not associated with a higher risk of T2D [7]. We did not find any association between iron intake from animal sources and T2D in additional analysis (data not shown). However, this meta-analysis included 11 prospective studies consisting of 10 Western countries (including USA, Finland, and UK) and 1 Asian country (China). It was likely that dietary differences contributed to this discrepancy. In Korea, the major source of iron is rice and vegetables [37], mostly containing non-heme iron. Total iron intake was positively correlated with serum ferritin [38] and green leafy vegetables were also a determinant of hemoglobin level [39]. A Chinese study showed that subjects who acquired most of their iron from non-heme iron sources in rural areas had adequate ferritin levels[40]. Although heme iron has a higher bioavailability, non-heme iron and heme iron are not distinguishable after absorption [6]. Furthermore, the adaptive HFE variants in Asians likely contributed to elevated iron absorption [41]. Therefore, total iron intake can influence the risk of T2D even when non-heme iron was the major source of intake.

In the present study, a SNP in the 10q21 region (rs10761745) was significantly associated with a lower risk of T2D. Among participants with no pathologic inflammation (hsCRP levels ≥1.0 mg/dL) and without anemia at baseline, the interaction effect between the SNP in the 10q21 region and average hemoglobin level was identified in women. Four genes (JMJD1C, EGR2, NRBF2, and REEP3) are located in the 10q21 region. Although the function of JMJD1C is unclear until now, of four genes, JMJD1C may be the most plausible candidate gene as a type 2 diabetes susceptibility gene, because previous studies have reported that JMJD1C may be associated with serum sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels and serum androgen levels [42, 43] that may influence pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes [44]. To date, no study has reported on the interaction effects of genetic variations of CDKAL1, JMJD1C, or KCNQ1 with iron intake on the risk of T2D. A potential interaction between HFE genetic variation and heme iron intake has been previously suggested [14], but no SNPs have been found in the heme iron metabolic pathway showing significant interactions with heme iron intake [15]. SNPs at locus JMJD1C have been reported to have a negative correlation with lipoprotein level [45] and a positive correlation with plasma alkaline phosphate [46]. A SNP (rs7910927) at locus JMJD1C was associated with increased serum SHBG levels in men and women [42]. In LD analysis, rs10761745 identified in the present study and rs7910927 [42] at JMJD1C were in high LD (D′ = 1.00). Thus, rs10761745 may be involved in regulating levels of SHBG. Higher SHBG means lower bioavailable testosterone (free and albumin-bound testosterones) [47], which may result in reduced hepcidin suppression [48]. Androgens may indirectly contribute to erythropoiesis through the suppression of hepcidin, which is a key peptide hormone regulating iron homeostasis [48, 49]. This may result in increased iron export into blood from enterocytes, thereby changing body iron stores. Hence, reduced hepcidin suppression may cause decreased dietary iron absorption and iron release from macrophages. Therefore, decreased dietary iron absorption and iron release from macrophages may help reduce the risk of T2D [6].

Genetic variation of KCNQ1 (rs163177) was associated with development of T2D in this study. Indeed, the major allele (C) of rs2237892 in KCNQ1, which was in high linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs163177 (D′ = 1.00), was significantly associated an increased risk of T2D [50]. In a meta-analysis, the summary per-allele odds ratio of the C variant of rs2237892 for T2D was 1.32 (95% CI: 1.26–1.38) [50]. This could be explained by the fact that KCNQ1 encodes the pore-forming subunit of a voltage-gated K+ channel (KvLQT1) and is also expressed in pancreatic islets; thus, variants of KCNQ1 may be in connection with insulin section [50]. On the contrary, KCNQ1 mutation may reduce gastric acid secretion, which could cause decreased absorption of ferric iron [51] and thereby reduce the risk of T2D [6, 51]. Although KCNQ1 may be related to iron metabolism, it is likely that its beneficial influence on T2D is weaker than its harmful effects.

In this study, we identified that there was cross-sectional association between variants near CDKAL1 and T2D, but the variants were not associated with incidence of T2D. A GWAS study in a Chinese Han Population has reported that the four CDKAL1 SNPs (rs7754840, rs10946398, rs7756992, and rs9465871) were cross-sectionally associated with T2D (range of odds ratio: 1.38–1.49; P < 1.9 x 10−5) [52].

The lack of an association between CDKAL1 and the incidence of T2D is not in line with previous cross-sectional observations [52, 53], but does agree with a prospective study in the U.S. [54]. The definite function of this gene is not well known. However, Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have reported that variants of CDKAL1 was significantly associated with reduced insulin secretion [31, 55]. Therefore, the function of CDKAL1 may be related to β-cell function. We could not assert why CDKAL1 was not detected as a SNP affecting T2D incidence in this longitudinal analysis. However, because the present study population was composed of subjects aged 40–69 years in the baseline survey and only non-diabetic subjects were included in the prospective analyses, the influence of genes on the incidence of T2D may be diminished compared to a population including diabetics diagnosed at a younger age. The strengths of the environmental (dietary) and genetic effects may change over the course of a lifetime; genetic effects may decrease with age as environmental effects exert more influence [56]. This finding suggests that SNPs previously found in case-control analyses need to be confirmed in a longitudinal study design and that our results need to be pursued in future large-scale cohort studies.

Our study has some limitations. First, serum ferritin is the most widely used biomarker of body iron status, but it was not examined in the present study. Serum ferritin may be a better indicator of body iron status than iron intake and hemoglobin, but hemoglobin levels are related to serum ferritin and hepcidin [19]. Because 1-year FFQ depends upon the long-term memory of participants, dietary intake accuracy may be lower. In addition, we could not integrate FFQs of the first and third surveys because different questionnaires were used; therefore, we could not calculate average iron intake. Another limitation was that we did not have information on the form of iron (heme/non-heme iron), which is important in determining the bioavailability of iron. Regardless of these limitations, the strength of the present study was a population-based prospective cohort study with genome data and repeated measures of hemoglobin. In addition, the present study provided the first longitudinal evidence on the interaction effect between a SNP of JMJD1C with iron intake and hemoglobin level.

In conclusion, SNPs of JMJD1C at 10q21.2 and KCNQ1 at 11p15.5 were prospectively associated with the risk of T2D. Additionally, CDKAL1 may not be associated with T2D onset over the age of 40. Results from our study confirm that iron intake and hemoglobin levels are associated with a higher risk of T2D. In addition, we found that for women, a SNP of JMJD1C was interacted with average hemoglobin level on the risk of T2D among participants with normal inflammation and without anemia. However, further study on the function of JMJD1C is necessary to confirm these associations for prevention and/or treatment of T2D.

Supporting information

S1 Table. General characteristics of the study participants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175681.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a fund (HD14B0005) by Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI16C2048). This study was provided with biospecimens and data from the Korean Genome Analysis Projects (4845–301), the Korean Genome and Epidemiology (4845–302), and Korea Biobank Project (4851–307, KBP-2014-000), which were supported by the Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Republic of Korea. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: MKK.
  2. Formal analysis: JK SJ MKK.
  3. Funding acquisition: BO.
  4. Investigation: JK SJ MKK.
  5. Methodology: MKK.
  6. Project administration: BO.
  7. Supervision: MKK BO.
  8. Validation: BO MHS YJK JEL.
  9. Visualization: JK.
  10. Writing – original draft: JK MKK.
  11. Writing – review & editing: JK MKK.

References

  1. 1. Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, Shaw J. IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2011;94(3):311–21. Epub 2011/11/15. pmid:22079683
  2. 2. Association KD. Diabetes fact sheet in Korea 2013. Seoul: Korean Diabetes Association, 2013.
  3. 3. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2010;87(1):4–14. Epub 2009/11/10. pmid:19896746
  4. 4. Fernandez-Real JM, Lopez-Bermejo A, Ricart W. Cross-talk between iron metabolism and diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51(8):2348–54. Epub 2002/07/30. pmid:12145144
  5. 5. Tiedge M, Lortz S, Drinkgern J, Lenzen S. Relation between antioxidant enzyme gene expression and antioxidative defense status of insulin-producing cells. Diabetes. 1997;46(11):1733–42. Epub 1997/11/14. pmid:9356019
  6. 6. Rajpathak SN, Crandall JP, Wylie-Rosett J, Kabat GC, Rohan TE, Hu FB. The role of iron in type 2 diabetes in humans. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1790(7):671–81. Epub 2008/05/27. pmid:18501198
  7. 7. Bao W, Rong Y, Rong S, Liu L. Dietary iron intake, body iron stores, and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2012;10:119. Epub 2012/10/11. pmid:23046549
  8. 8. Orban E, Schwab S, Thorand B, Huth C. Association of iron indices and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014;30(5):372–94. Epub 2013/12/12. pmid:24327370
  9. 9. Shi Z, Hu X, Yuan B, Pan X, Meyer HE, Holmboe-Ottesen G. Association between serum ferritin, hemoglobin, iron intake, and diabetes in adults in Jiangsu, China. Diabetes care. 2006;29(8):1878–83. Epub 2006/07/29. pmid:16873796
  10. 10. Ganz T. Hepcidin, a key regulator of iron metabolism and mediator of anemia of inflammation. Blood. 2003;102(3):783–8. Epub 2003/03/29. pmid:12663437
  11. 11. Kato N. Insights into the genetic basis of type 2 diabetes. Journal of diabetes investigation. 2013;4(3):233–44. Epub 2014/05/21. pmid:24843659
  12. 12. Poulsen P, Kyvik KO, Vaag A, Beck-Nielsen H. Heritability of type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and abnormal glucose tolerance—a population-based twin study. Diabetologia. 1999;42(2):139–45. Epub 1999/03/04. pmid:10064092
  13. 13. Manolio TA. Cohort studies and the genetics of complex disease. Nat Genet. 2009;41(1):5–6. Epub 2008/12/30. pmid:19112455
  14. 14. Qi L, Meigs J, Manson JE, Ma J, Hunter D, Rifai N, et al. HFE genetic variability, body iron stores, and the risk of type 2 diabetes in U.S. women. Diabetes. 2005;54(12):3567–72. Epub 2005/11/25. pmid:16306377
  15. 15. Pasquale LR, Loomis SJ, Aschard H, Kang JH, Cornelis MC, Qi L, et al. Exploring genome-wide—dietary heme iron intake interactions and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Front Genet. 2013;4:7. Epub 2013/02/07. pmid:23386860
  16. 16. Baik I, Kim J, Abbott RD, Joo S, Jung K, Lee S, et al. Association of snoring with chronic bronchitis. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):167–73. Epub 2008/01/30. pmid:18227363
  17. 17. Cho YS, Go MJ, Kim YJ, Heo JY, Oh JH, Ban HJ, et al. A large-scale genome-wide association study of Asian populations uncovers genetic factors influencing eight quantitative traits. Nat Genet. 2009;41(5):527–34. Epub 2009/04/28. pmid:19396169
  18. 18. Kroot JJ, Tjalsma H, Fleming RE, Swinkels DW. Hepcidin in human iron disorders: diagnostic implications. Clinical chemistry. 2011;57(12):1650–69. Epub 2011/10/13. pmid:21989113
  19. 19. Guo X, Zhou D, An P, Wu Q, Wang H, Wu A, et al. Associations between serum hepcidin, ferritin and Hb concentrations and type 2 diabetes risks in a Han Chinese population. The British journal of nutrition. 2013;110(12):2180–5. Epub 2013/06/08. pmid:23742704
  20. 20. Milman N, Kirchhoff M, Jorgensen T. Iron status markers, serum ferritin and hemoglobin in 1359 Danish women in relation to menstruation, hormonal contraception, parity, and postmenopausal hormone treatment. Annals of hematology. 1992;65(2):96–102. Epub 1992/08/01. pmid:1511065
  21. 21. Milman N, Clausen J, Byg KE. Iron status in 268 Danish women aged 18–30 years: influence of menstruation, contraceptive method, and iron supplementation. Annals of hematology. 1998;77(1–2):13–9. Epub 1998/10/06. pmid:9760147
  22. 22. EA S. How to define and determine reference intervals in the clinical laboratory: approved guideline-second edition (CLSI document C28-A). 2nd ed ed. Wayne, PA: NCCLS; 2000.
  23. 23. Ahn Y, Kwon E, Shim JE, Park MK, Joo Y, Kimm K, et al. Validation and reproducibility of food frequency questionnaire for Korean genome epidemiologic study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61(12):1435–41. Epub 2007/02/15. pmid:17299477
  24. 24. The Korean Nutrition Society. Food Composition Table. In: Recommended dietary allowances for Koreans. 7th edition ed. Seoul: The Korean Nutrition Society; 2000.
  25. 25. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
  26. 26. Rabbee N, Speed TP. A genotype calling algorithm for affymetrix SNP arrays. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2006;22(1):7–12. Epub 2005/11/04.
  27. 27. WHO. definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycemia: Report of a WHO/IDF Consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2006.
  28. 28. Bu S, Ruan D, Yang Z, Xing X, Zhao W, Wang N, et al. Sex-Specific Prevalence of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Middle-Aged Population of China: A Subgroup Analysis of the 2007–2008 China National Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Study. PloS one. 2015;10(9):e0139039. Epub 2015/09/26. pmid:26406982
  29. 29. Hilawe EH, Yatsuya H, Kawaguchi L, Aoyama A. Differences by sex in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2013;91(9):671–82d. Epub 2013/10/09. pmid:24101783
  30. 30. Faerch K, Borch-Johnsen K, Vaag A, Jorgensen T, Witte DR. Sex differences in glucose levels: a consequence of physiology or methodological convenience? The Inter99 study. Diabetologia. 2010;53(5):858–65. Epub 2010/02/26. pmid:20182862
  31. 31. Steinthorsdottir V, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir I, Benediktsson R, Jonsdottir T, Walters GB, et al. A variant in CDKAL1 influences insulin response and risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2007;39(6):770–5. Epub 2007/04/27. pmid:17460697
  32. 32. Wen J, Ronn T, Olsson A, Yang Z, Lu B, Du Y, et al. Investigation of type 2 diabetes risk alleles support CDKN2A/B, CDKAL1, and TCF7L2 as susceptibility genes in a Han Chinese cohort. PloS one. 2010;5(2):e9153. Epub 2010/02/18. pmid:20161779
  33. 33. Yasuda K, Miyake K, Horikawa Y, Hara K, Osawa H, Furuta H, et al. Variants in KCNQ1 are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Genet. 2008;40(9):1092–7. Epub 2008/08/20. pmid:18711367
  34. 34. Unoki H, Takahashi A, Kawaguchi T, Hara K, Horikoshi M, Andersen G, et al. SNPs in KCNQ1 are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in East Asian and European populations. Nat Genet. 2008;40(9):1098–102. Epub 2008/08/20. pmid:18711366
  35. 35. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological). 1995:289–300.
  36. 36. van den Oord EJ, Sullivan PF. False discoveries and models for gene discovery. Trends in genetics: TIG. 2003;19(10):537–42. Epub 2003/10/11. pmid:14550627
  37. 37. Ministry of Health and Welfare KCfDCaP. Korea Health Statistics 2013: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VI). 2013.
  38. 38. Galan P, Yoon HC, Preziosi P, Viteri F, Valeix P, Fieux B, et al. Determining factors in the iron status of adult women in the SU.VI.MAX study. SUpplementation en VItamines et Mineraux AntioXydants. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998;52(6):383–8. Epub 1998/07/31. pmid:9683388
  39. 39. Sirdah M. Determinants of hemoglobin level in adolescence students at Gaza Strip, Palestine. International Journal of Health Research. 2008;1(4):225–34.
  40. 40. Root MM, Hu J, Stephenson LS, Parker RS, Campbell TC. Iron status of middle-aged women in five counties of rural China. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999;53(3):199–206. Epub 1999/04/14. pmid:10201801
  41. 41. Ye K, Cao C, Lin X, O'Brien KO, Gu Z. Natural selection on HFE in Asian populations contributes to enhanced non-heme iron absorption. BMC genetics. 2015;16:61. Epub 2015/06/10. pmid:26054392
  42. 42. Coviello AD, Haring R, Wellons M, Vaidya D, Lehtimaki T, Keildson S, et al. A genome-wide association meta-analysis of circulating sex hormone-binding globulin reveals multiple Loci implicated in sex steroid hormone regulation. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(7):e1002805. Epub 2012/07/26. pmid:22829776
  43. 43. Jin G, Sun J, Kim ST, Feng J, Wang Z, Tao S, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a new locus JMJD1C at 10q21 that may influence serum androgen levels in men. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(23):5222–8. Epub 2012/09/01. pmid:22936694
  44. 44. Ding EL, Song Y, Malik VS, Liu S. Sex differences of endogenous sex hormones and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(11):1288–99. Epub 2006/03/16. pmid:16537739
  45. 45. Chasman DI, Pare G, Mora S, Hopewell JC, Peloso G, Clarke R, et al. Forty-three loci associated with plasma lipoprotein size, concentration, and cholesterol content in genome-wide analysis. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(11):e1000730. Epub 2009/11/26. pmid:19936222
  46. 46. Yuan X, Waterworth D, Perry JR, Lim N, Song K, Chambers JC, et al. Population-based genome-wide association studies reveal six loci influencing plasma levels of liver enzymes. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83(4):520–8. Epub 2008/10/23. pmid:18940312
  47. 47. Dandona P, Rosenberg MT. A practical guide to male hypogonadism in the primary care setting. International journal of clinical practice. 2010;64(6):682–96. Epub 2010/06/04. pmid:20518947
  48. 48. Bachman E, Feng R, Travison T, Li M, Olbina G, Ostland V, et al. Testosterone suppresses hepcidin in men: a potential mechanism for testosterone-induced erythrocytosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(10):4743–7. Epub 2010/07/28. pmid:20660052
  49. 49. Bachman E, Travison TG, Basaria S, Davda MN, Guo W, Li M, et al. Testosterone induces erythrocytosis via increased erythropoietin and suppressed hepcidin: evidence for a new erythropoietin/hemoglobin set point. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(6):725–35. Epub 2013/10/26. pmid:24158761
  50. 50. Sun Q, Song K, Shen X, Cai Y. The association between KCNQ1 gene polymorphism and type 2 diabetes risk: a meta-analysis. PloS one. 2012;7(11):e48578. Epub 2012/11/08. pmid:23133642
  51. 51. Pan Q, Ma J, Zhou Q, Li J, Tang Y, Liu Y, et al. KCNQ1 loss-of-function mutation impairs gastric acid secretion in mice. Molecular biology reports. 2010;37(3):1329–33. Epub 2009/03/24. pmid:19306073
  52. 52. Wu Y, Li H, Loos RJ, Yu Z, Ye X, Chen L, et al. Common variants in CDKAL1, CDKN2A/B, IGF2BP2, SLC30A8, and HHEX/IDE genes are associated with type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in a Chinese Han population. Diabetes. 2008;57(10):2834–42. Epub 2008/07/18. pmid:18633108
  53. 53. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007;447(7145):661–78. Epub 2007/06/08. pmid:17554300
  54. 54. Moore AF, Jablonski KA, McAteer JB, Saxena R, Pollin TI, Franks PW, et al. Extension of type 2 diabetes genome-wide association scan results in the diabetes prevention program. Diabetes. 2008;57(9):2503–10. Epub 2008/06/12. pmid:18544707
  55. 55. Pascoe L, Tura A, Patel SK, Ibrahim IM, Ferrannini E, Zeggini E, et al. Common variants of the novel type 2 diabetes genes CDKAL1 and HHEX/IDE are associated with decreased pancreatic beta-cell function. Diabetes. 2007;56(12):3101–4. Epub 2007/09/07. pmid:17804762
  56. 56. Qi L, Liang J. Interactions between genetic factors that predict diabetes and dietary factors that ultimately impact on risk of diabetes. Current opinion in lipidology. 2010;21(1):31–7. Epub 2009/11/17. pmid:19915463