Comparative analysis of the expression level of recombinant ginsenoside-transforming β-glucosidase in GRAS hosts and mass production of the ginsenoside Rh2-Mix

Muhammad Zubair Siddiqi; Chang-Hao Cui; Seul-Ki Park; Nam Soo Han; Sun-Chang Kim; Wan-Taek Im

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176098

Abstract

The ginsenoside Rh₂, a pharmaceutically active component of ginseng, is known to have anticancer and antitumor effects. However, white ginseng and red ginseng have extremely low concentrations of Rh₂ or Rh₂-Mix [20(S)-Rh₂, 20(R)-Rh₂, Rk₂, and Rh₃]. To enhance the production of food-grade ginsenoside Rh₂, an edible enzymatic bioconversion technique was developed adopting GRAS host strains. A β-glucosidase (BglPm), which has ginsenoside conversion ability, was expressed in three GRAS host strains (Corynebacterium glutamicum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactococus lactis) by using a different vector system. Enzyme activity in these three GRAS hosts were 75.4%, 11.5%, and 9.3%, respectively, compared to that in the E. coli pGEX 4T-1 expression system. The highly expressed BglPm_C in C. glutamicum can effectively transform the ginsenoside Rg₃-Mix [20(S)-Rg₃, 20(R)-Rg₃, Rk₁, Rg₅] to Rh₂-Mix [20(S)-Rh₂, 20(R)-Rh₂, Rk₂, Rh₃] using a scaled-up biotransformation reaction, which was performed in a 10-L jar fermenter at pH 6.5/7.0 and 37°C for 24 h. To our knowledge, this is the first report in which 50 g of PPD-Mix (Rb₁, Rb₂, Rb₃, R_c, and Rd) as a starting substrate was converted to ginsenoside Rg₃-Mix by acid heat treatment and then 24.5-g Rh₂-Mix was obtained by enzymatic transformation of Rg₃-Mix through by BglPm_C. Utilization of this enzymatic method adopting a GRAS host could be usefully exploited in the preparation of ginsenoside Rh₂-Mix in cosmetics, functional food, and pharmaceutical industries, thereby replacing the E. coli expression system.

Citation: Siddiqi MZ, Cui C-H, Park S-K, Han NS, Kim S-C, Im W-T (2017) Comparative analysis of the expression level of recombinant ginsenoside-transforming β-glucosidase in GRAS hosts and mass production of the ginsenoside Rh₂-Mix. PLoS ONE 12(4): e0176098. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176098

Editor: Hua Zhou, Macau University of Science and Technology, MACAO

Received: December 20, 2016; Accepted: April 5, 2017; Published: April 19, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Siddiqi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.

Funding: This work was supported by the Intelligent Synthetic Biology Center of Global Frontier Project funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2014M3A6A8066437) and by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2015R1D1A1A01060255).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) is a famous herbal medicinal plant, which is broadly circulated in Asian and Western countries and used for millions of years for the cure of human diseases [1]. For the last decades, especially, red ginseng is used as a common tonic for its high pharmacological activities. The biological and pharmacological active components of P. ginseng are commonly known as ginsenosides (major ginsenosides), a class of triterpene glycosides [2–4].

The major ginsenosides, PPD-type [protopanaxadiol type (Rb₁, Rb₂, Rb₃, Rc and Rd)] and PPT-type [protopanaxatriol type (Re, and Rg₁)] are present more than 90% of all ginsenosides, in the ginseng constitute [2, 5]. But, due to its high molecular weight the absorption of these major ginsenosides are very difficult through by the human digestive tract system [6, 7]. Therefore, these major ginsenosides are converted into minor ginsenosides by using of various methods including physical (heat treatment), chemical (acid or base treatment) and biological (microorganisms or enzymes) transformation. The minor ginsenosides (including, F₁, F₂, Rg₂, Rg₃, Rh₁, Rh₂ and C-k) which are the de-glycosylated byproducts from major ginsenosides are present in smaller amounts in the ginseng extract or powder. These minor ginsenosides show high pharmacological effects for anticancer, anti-allergy, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, antidiabetic, and anti-osteoporosis effects [8–10] than major ginsenosides.

In particular, the minor ginsenoside Rh₂ can inhibit the growth of many kinds of cancer cells, including breast cancer, prostate cancer, hepatoma, gastric cancer, colon carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer; moreover, pre-clinical assessment of Rh₂ in the PC-3 human xenograft model for prostate cancer in vivo has also been shown to be effective [11–17]. In addition, Rh₂ also inhibits osteoclastogenesis [18], induces the differentiation and mineralization of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells through activation of PKD and p38 MAPK pathways [19], improves learning and memory [20], reduces cell proliferation, and increases sub-G1 cells [21]. Furthermore, ginsenoside Rh₂ improves the scopolamine-induced learning deficiency in mice [22],increases secretion of insulin and lowers plasma glucose in Wistar rats [23], has an antiobesity effect related to the activation of adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway in 3T3-L1 adipocytes [24], and dose-dependently decreases the acanthosis and papillomatosis index, T lymphocyte percentage, and vessel density in PN skin grafts in mice [25].

The total amount of minor ginsenosides is much less in ginseng extract/powder; researchers are therefore interested in scaling up the production of minor ginsenosides for commercial use in both herbal medicine and food supplementary products. In the early stages of this research, Bae et al. studied the conversion of ginsenosides in the human gastrointestinal tract by gut microorganisms [26]. Thereafter, a highly active recombinant glycoside hydrolase belonging to family I and family III was introduced for the conversion of major ginsenosides into minor ginsenosides for their pharmacological and cosmetic applications [27–32].

Initially, this ginsenoside-transforming glycoside hydrolase was mostly expressed in Escherichia coli and no researchers had yet studied the expression of the β-glycoside hydrolyzing gene in a GRAS (generally recognized as safe) host strain for the purpose of converting major ginsenosides into minor ginsenosides for mass production. Recently, Li et al. performed the conversion of major ginsenosides into minor ginsenosides using an expression system of Lactococcus lactis. The GRAS host organisms are non-pathogenic and recommended as food safe [33]. Compared to pathogenic strains, expression of the ginsenoside-transforming β-glucosidase in these GRAS strains is advantageous and of considerable interest for the commercial production of pharmacologically active minor ginsenosides and food supplements (i.e., industrial demand).

In the present study, the expression levels of recombinant ginsenoside-transforming β-glucosidase, from Paenibacillus mucilaginosus [27], were compared between GRAS hosts strains and E. coli. After remarkable successes with GRAS host expression (Corynebacterium glutamicum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Lactoccocus lactis), the 24.5 g scale-up production of Rh₂-Mix [20(S)-Rh₂, 20(R)-Rh₂, Rk₂, Rh₃] was performed from Rg₃-Mix [20(S)-Rg₃, 20(R)-Rg₃, Rk₁, Rg₅] using the highly expressed enzymes in C. glutamicum. To our knowledge, this is the first report of scale-up production of high-value Rh₂-Mix, using combined methods of acid treatment and food-grade recombinant enzymes expressed in GRAS host strain C. glutamicum. The results of this study would likely broaden the application of ginsenoside Rh₂ and Rh₂-Mix in the cosmetic, functional food, and pharmaceutical industries, thereby replacing the E. coli expression system.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

Ginsenosides standards, Rb₁, Rc, Rb₂, Rd, 20(S)-Rg₃, 20(R)-Rg₃, 20(S)-Rh₂, F₂ and C-K, were bought from Nanjing Zelang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. (China), while ginsenosides 20(R)-Rh₂, Rk₁, Rg₅, Rk₂ and Rh₃ were purchased from Chengdu Biopurify Phytochemicals Co., Ltd. (China). The PPD-Mix type ginsenosides mixture from the root of Panax quinquefolius [American root saponins, mainly contained Rb₁ (328 mg/g), Rc (173 mg/g), Rd (107 mg/g) and small amounts of Rb₂ (25 mg/g) and Rb₃ (25 mg/g)] acquired from Hongjiou Biotech Co. Ltd. (China) was used as the initial substrate in the current investigation. The genomic DNA from Paenibacillus mucilaginosus KCTC 3870^T, E. coli, and pGEX 4T-1 plasmid (GE Healthcare, USA) were used for the β-glucosidase gene, host, and expression vector sources, respectively. P. mucilaginosus KCTC 3870^T was grown in aerobic conditions at 37°C on nutrient agar (NA, BD, USA). The recombinant E. coli for protein expression was cultivated in a Luria-Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with ampicillin (100 mg/l). C. glutamicum and the pCES208 plasmid, S. cerevisiae and pYES 2.1 plasmid, L. lactis strain NZ9000 and PNZ8148 plasmid (MoBiTec GmbH, Germany) were used as host, and expression vector sources, respectively (Table 1).

Download:

Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176098.t001

2.2. Rg₃-Mix preparation as substrate

The ginsenosides Rg₃-Mix [20(S)-Rg₃ (118.6 mg/g), 20(R)-Rg₃ (108.8 mg/g), Rk₁ (144.9 mg/g), and Rg₅ (170.5 mg/g)] was prepared from PPD-Mix using heat treatment with organic acid. The PPD-Mix was dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 50 g/l and included citric acid (2%, w/v) and heat-treated (121°C for 15 min). After the reaction, resultant Rg₃-Mix was used as the substrate for the subsequent enzyme reaction.

2.3. Molecular cloning, expression, and purification of recombinant BglPm in GRAS

The genomic DNA from Paenibacillus mucilaginosus KCTC 3870^T was extracted using a genomic DNA extraction kit (Solgent, Korea). The gene encoding β-glucosidase (BglPm) [27], which has ginsenoside-transforming activity, was amplified from the genomic DNA as a template via a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Pfu DNA polymerase (Solgent, Korea). The sequence of the oligonucleotide primers used for the gene cloning was based on the DNA sequence of BglPm (β-glucosidase; GenBank accession number: AEI42200). Four sets of primers (Table 2) were designed and synthesized by Macrogen Co. Ltd. (Korea) to amplify the gene of BglPm for E. coli and three kinds of GRAS strains. The amplified DNA fragment obtained from the PCR was purified and inserted into the pGEX 4T-1 GST fusion vector, pYES2.1 His-tag combined vector, pCES208 Histag combined vector, and pNZ8148 vector, respectively, using an EzCloning Kit (Enzynomics Co. Ltd., Korea). The resulting recombinant pGEX-BglPm, pYES2.1-BglPm, pCES208-BglPm, and pNZ8148-BglPm were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3), C. glutamicum, S. cerevisiae, and L. lactis strain, respectively. The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study, their relevant characteristics, and their sources or references are given in Table 1.

Download:

Table 2. Primers used in this study (sequences 5′→3′).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176098.t002

2.4. Comparison of expressed enzyme activity in GRAS host

The E. coli strain BL21, and the three GRAS hosts strains were constructed with different vector systems —pGEX 4T-1, pCES208, pYES 2.1 and pNZ8148, respectively. To determine the levels of expression and the amount of soluble protein, the induction of expression of recombinant E. coli and three GRAS hosts studied was performed. The recombinant E. coli was cultivated in LBA (Luria-Bertani with ampicillin [100 mg/l final concentration]) and induced by 0.15 mM IPTG at 28°C. Similarly, C. glutamicum, S. Cerevisiae, and L. lactis were cultivated in LBK (Luria-Bertani with kanamycin [50 mg/l final concentration] induced by glucose [10 g/l final]), YPD (galactose inducible [18 g/l final concentration]), and GM–17 [glucose 10 g/l and induced by nisin, 10 μl/l final concentration)] at 30°C, respectively. After maximum growth of recombinant strains in the mentioned media, the cells were collected and sonicated for comparative analysis of their enzyme activity.

2.4.1. Effect of sonication on enzyme activity of both recombinant E. coli and GRAS hosts.

After the exponential growth of the strains in the particular media as stated above, cells were harvested by centrifugation and pellets were washed twice with a solution consisting of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer and 1% Triton X-100 (pH 7.0); cells were then resuspended to a concentration of 1 g/10 mL in cold lysis buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate buffer [pH 7.0]). The crude cell extracts were obtained by sonication of the cell pellets using Branson digital sonifier 450 (400 W, 70% power, USA). Total sonication time was 20 and 30 min for E. coli and GRAS hosts strains respectively. After each 2 and 5 min interval, cell lysates were collected in a 1.5 ml tube in order to check enzyme activity and the effect of sonication with time intervals.

2.4.2. Comparison of crude enzymes activities of GRAS host strains with recombinant E. coli.

The activity of crude recombinant β-glucosidase was determined using 5 mM pNPGlc (p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside) as substrate. Crude enzyme (20 μL) was incubated in 100 μL of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH7.0) containing 5 mM PNPGlc at 37°C, then the reaction was stopped by 0.5 M (final concentration) Na₂CO₃ and the release of p-nitrophenol was measured immediately using a microplate reader at 405 nm (Bio-Rad Model 680; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). One unit of activity was defined as the amount of protein required to generate 1 μmol of p-nitrophenol per minute. Specific activity was expressed as units per milligram of protein. Protein concentrations were determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL), with bovine serum albumin (Sigma Aldrich, USA) as the standard. All assays were performed in triplicate. In comparative analysis of the GRAS host strains, the strain, which showed high enzymatic activity COMPARED with recombinant E. coli was selected for further experiments.

2.4.3. Electrophoresis.

SDS-PAGE analysis was performed using a 10% acrylamide-bis-acrylamide gel (37.5:1 [Qbiogene]). The culture samples were prepared by mixing dye with the samples (3:1) of each cell suspension. The solutions were mixed well and heated for 5 min at 100°C. Similarly, in each lane of the gel 15 μL of dye-sample mixture was loaded and electrophoresis was performed in SDS-Tris-Glycine buffer at a constant voltage until the dye front reached the bottom of the gel. The protein bands were stained with Coomassie brilliant Blue Ez stain (AQua), and de-stained in distilled water. After de-staining, the results of the GRAS host strains were compared with those of the recombinant E. coli. Based on the comparative analysis of GRAS hosts with recombinant E. coli strain, the highly expressed β-glucosidase enzyme of C. glutamicum was selected for biotransformation of the ginsenoside Rg₃-Mix.

2.5. Biotransformation activity of Rg₃-Mix using BglPm_C from C. glutamicum

To check the effect of fusion His tag on the activity of BglPm_C, the initial transformation of Rb₁ and 20(S)-Rg₃ show that the His tag-fused enzyme does not affect the activity of BglPm_C for conversion of ginsenosides Rb₁ and 20(S)-Rg₃ into F₂ and 20(S)-Rh₂, respectively (data not shown). Therefore, the His tag fusion protein (BglPm_C) was used for the hydrolysis of the glucose moieties attached at the C-3 sites in the Rg₃-Mix [20(S)-Rg₃, 20(R)-Rg₃, Rk₁, Rg₅]. The enzyme (20 mg/ml) was reacted with Rg₃-Mix solution at a concentration of 5% (w/v, wet base) in 100 mM of sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 37°C. The samples were taken at regular intervals of time and analyzed via thin layer chromatography (TLC) or high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after pretreatment (see section 2.7).

2.6. Scaled-up biotransformation of Rg₃-Mix into Rh₂-Mix

2.6.1. Preparation of recombinant enzyme (BglPm_C) of C. glutamicum using high cell density culture.

For fed-batch cultivation and obtaining high cell density of the recombinant BglPm_C, the LB medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 mg/l final) was used to cultivate the C. glutamicum harboring pCES208 in a 10 L stirred-tank reactor (Biotron GX, Hanil Science Co., Korea) with a 6-L working volume at 400 rpm. Using 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer the pH value of the medium was adjusted to 7.0. The culture was incubated at 30°C for 24 h and the protein expression was induced through the addition of glucose with a final concentration of 10 g/l. After cell density reached an OD of 40–42 at 600 nm, the cells were harvested via centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 20 min. The pellets (50 g) were resuspended in 100 mM of sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0); then the cells were broken via sonication (Branson Digital Sonifier, Mexico), and the time was adjusted according to the method described in section 2.4.1. In order to get the crude soluble enzyme fraction for the conversion of ginsenosides, the unwanted cells debris was removed via centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. For the enzymatic biotransformation of ginsenoside Rg₃-Mix, the crude recombinant BglPm_C was diluted to the desired concentration with 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and was for the conversion of ginsenoside Rg₃-Mix.

2.6.2. Production of Rh₂-Mix from Rg₃-Mix using BglPm_C.

For the mass production of ginsenoside Rh₂-Mix, the reaction mixture was performed in a 10-L stirred-tank reactor (Biotron GX, Hanil Science Co.) with a 3-L of working volume. The reaction mixture was started with a composition of 50 mg/ml (final concentration) of substrate ginsenosides (Rg₃-Mix; total 150 g, wet base) and 20 mg/ml of crude recombinant BglPm_C in 0.1 M of sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5–7.0). The reaction was completed under its optimal conditions of pH 6.5 with 300 rpm for 24 h. After 24 h, the ginsenoside Rg₃-Mix was completely converted to the Rh₂-Mix. Samples were collected at regular intervals and were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in order to determine the time course of the biotransformation of ginsenoside Rg₃-Mix to Rh₂-Mix.

2.7. Analytic methods

2.7.1. TLC analysis.

The ginsenosides spots on the TLC plates [60F254 silica gel plates (Merck, Germany)] were identified and visualize through comparisons with ginsenosides standard using CHCl3-CH3OH-H2O (65:35:10, lower phase) as TLC solvent and 10% (v/v) H₂SO₄ as a spraying reagent for spots visualization followed by heating of 110°C for 5–10 min.

2.7.2. HPLC analysis.

The ginsenosides PPD-Mix, Rg₃-Mix, Rh₂-Mix (by BglPm_C) and ginsenoside standards with a final concentration of 1 mg/ml were dissolved in HPLC grade methanol and analysed by HPLC (Younglin Co. Ltd, Korea). The ginsenosides separation was performed on a Prodigy ODS (2) C₁₈ column (5 μm, 150 × 4.6 mm i.d.; Phenomenex, USA) with a guard column (Eclipse XDB C₁₈, 5 μm, 12.5 × 4.6 mm i.d.). The mobile phases were water (line B) and acetonitrile (line C). The gradient elution started with 68% of solvent B and 32% of solvent C; the flow rate was 1.0 ml/min and detection was performed by monitoring the absorbance at 203 nm with an injected volume of 25 μl for 28 min.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Cloning, expression and comparison of recombinant BglPm in different GRAS host strains

The β-glucosidase gene consists of 1,260 bp and encodes 419 amino acids, with 46 kDa M.wt, which have homology to the protein domain of the glycoside hydrolase family 1. The gene (β-glucosidase) was amplified via PCR and then inserted into the pGEX 4T-1, pYES2.1, pCES208 and pNZ8148 vectors respectively. The predictive molecular masses and expression level of the recombinant BglPm were also determined by SDS-PAGE, and the protein expression of the GRAS host strains were compared with the recombinant E. coli system (Fig 1A and 1B). The molecular masses of the native β-glucosidase were calculated via an amino acid sequence and fusion tag protein found to be 72 (46+26), 47 (46+1), 47 (46+1), and 46 kDa (Table 3), as expressed by E. coli, C. glutamicum, S. cerevisiae, and L. lactis, respectively. The GST-BglPm and His-tag-BglPm were purified using the GST and His-tag bind resin column (Elpis Biotech). After purification of cell lysates, non-induced, induced, and purified protein soluble fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and the prominent protein bands, with an apparent molecular weight near 72, 47, 47 and 46 kDa, were identified in three GRAS host strains and recombinant E. coli lysates. In the comparative study of SDS-PAGE assay of GRAS host strains with E. coli (Fig 1A, lane 3,4) it was clearly shown that the expected protein bands were more visible and well expressed in the soluble fraction in C. glutamicum (Fig 1A, lane 6,7) than in S. cerevisiae and L. lactis (Fig 1B, lane 11–12 and 13–14).

Download:

Table 3. Total activities of β-glucosidase in cell-free extracts of induced E. coli and GRAS host strains which were constructed with different vectors, and induced by different promoters used in this study.

The GRAS strain, which was well-expressed and showed high enzyme activity with recombinant E. coli, is indicated in bold.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176098.t003

Download:

Fig 1. (A and B). SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant E. coli and GRAS host strains.

A: Lane 1, molecular weight standard; lane 2, soluble crude extract of recombinant E. coli without induction; lane 3, BglPm of recombinant E. coli after induction; lane 4, purified soluble fraction of recombinant E. coli (BglPm); lane 5, non-inducible fraction of Corynebacterium glutamicum harboring pCES208; lane 6, inducible BglPm_C; lane 7, purified BglPm_C (C. glutamicum); lane 8, molecular weight standard. B: lane 9, molecular weight standard; lane 10, non-inducible fraction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae; lane, 11 inducible BglPm_S; lane 12, BglPm_S protein of S. cerevisiae after purification; lane, 13–14, non-inducible and inducible fraction of Lactococcus lactis; lane 15, molecular weight standard.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176098.g001

3.2. Effect of sonication on enzymes activities

Cell suspensions of recombinant E. coli and GRAS hosts were sonicated for different periods, ranging from 2 to 30 min, in 50-ml tubes. After the sonication, the cell lysates were separated into soluble and particulate fractions by centrifugation and each soluble fraction was assayed for its enzyme activity. During the investigation of enzymes activities of the GRAS host and recombinant E. coli, which were reacted with 5 mM pNPG, the maximum enzyme activity was obtained by recombinant E. coli after a 10 min period of sonication; further sonication caused loss of enzyme activity (Fig 2a). Comparable results were obtained from GRAS hosts, which showed optimum enzyme activity at 20, 25 and 15 min for C. glutamicum pCES208 (Fig 2b), S. cerevisiae pYES2.1 (Fig 2c), and L. lactis pNZ8148, respectively (Fig 2d). Collectively, these results suggest that the maximum enzyme activity of the GRAS host strains were compared with recombinant E. coli. On the basis of data presented here, we found that BglPm_C expressed by C. glutamicum had an enzyme activity of 75.4% COMPARED with recombinant BglPm expressed by E. coli (as compared to BglPm_S [11.5%] and BglPm_L [9.3%]), as shown in Table 3. We therefore selected highly expressed β-glucosidase (BglPm_C) by C. glutamicum for the mass production of edible Rh₂-Mix ginsenosides from Rg₃-Mix.

Download:

Fig 2. (a, b, c and d) shows the effect of sonication on the enzyme activity of; recombinant BglPm (E. coli), BglPm_C (C. glutamicum), BglPm_S (S. cerevisiae) and BglPm_L (Lactococcus lactis), respectively.

From the sonication analysis, these results clearly show that enzymes lose their activities after a specific time interval for all recombinant enzymes used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176098.g002

3.3. Biotransformation of Rg₃-Mix to Rh₂-Mix

To verify the bioconversion of Rg₃-Mix by BglPm_C expressed by C. glutamicum harboring pCES208, TLC and HPLC analyses were carried out at regular intervals. TLC analysis show that BglPm_C completely transformed ginsenosides Rg₃-Mix into Rh₂-Mix, as shown in Fig 3A and 3B. The Rf values of ginsenoside Rk₁ and Rg₅ was a little above the 20(S)-Rg₃ and 20(R)-Rg₃ position as shown in Fig 3A. Rh₂-Mix, which has one glucose moiety removed at the C20 position of Rg3-Mix, was placed in the upper position of control S (Rg₃-Mix), as shown in the middle position of Fig 3B.

Download:

Fig 3. TLC analyses of time course of ginsenosides by acid and enzyme (BglPm_C) treatment.

(A) Transformation of ginsenoside PPD-Mix. (B) Biotransformation of Rg₃-Mix to Rh₂-Mix after 24 h. Developing solvent: CHCl₃-CH₃OH-H₂O (65:35:10, lower phase). Lane S represents PPD-Mix (A) and Rg₃-Mix (B). PPD, protopanaxadiol.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176098.g003

3.4. Preparation of BglPm_C and scaled-up production of Rh₂-Mix as a gram unit

The C. glutamicum cells that harbor pCES208 were further incubated for 24 h at 30°C and induced by the addition of 10 g/l of glucose. After induction, when the culture reached an OD of 40–42 at 600 nm the cells were harvested via centrifugation. 100 g of wet cells were harvested and resusupended (50 g/500 ml [w/v]) in 0.1 M of phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) (w/v). The cells were broken via ultrasonication and the supernatant was used as crude enzymes for the biotransformation of the ginsenoside Rg₃-Mix. The crude recombinant BglPm_C (soluble form) was applied to the biotransformation reactor. The enzyme reaction was induced using the crude recombinant BglPm_C, which was adjusted to a final concentration of 20 mg/ml in a 3-L tank, to produce the Rh₂-Mix. The ginsenoside Rg₃-Mix [20(S)-Rg₃, 20(R)-Rg₃, Rk₁, and Rg₅] was completely converted to Rh₂-Mix [20(S)-Rh₂, 20(R)-Rh₂, Rk₂, and Rh₃]. After 24 h, the results were confirmed by HPLC analysis; all the ginsenosides (PPD-Mix, Rg₃-Mix, and Rh₂-Mix) were compared with the ginsenosides standards that were used in this study, as shown in Fig 4A. The PPD-Mix type ginsenoside (Fig 4B) was used as the initial substrate. For the enzymatic reaction, the PPD-Mix was transformed to the Rg₃-Mix by acid treatment as shown in Fig 4C. Lastly, after 24 h, the Rh₂-Mix [20(S)-Rh₂, 20(R)-Rh₂, Rk₂ and Rh₃] was produced as a final product from the bioconversion of Rg₃-Mix using the BglPm_C enzyme of C. glutamicum (Fig 4D). The HPLC analysis revealed that the BglPm_C completely hydrolyzed the Rg₃-Mix within 24 h.

Download:

Fig 4. HPLC analysis of the transformation of the ginsenosides (PPD-Mix and Rg₃-Mix) by acid and enzyme treatments.

(A) Ginsenosides standard. (B) PPD-Mix as a starting substrate. (C) Rg₃-Mix after 15 min at 121°C by acid treatment of PPD-Mix. (D) Rh₂-Mix after 24 h of the reaction of BglPm_C with Rg₃-Mix. PPD-Mix, protopanaxadiol-type ginsenoside mixture (Rb₁, Rb₂, Rb₃, Rc and Rd).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176098.g004

In order to remove the unwanted substances, the reaction mixture was centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 10 min. Most of the ginsenoside Rh₂-Mix precipitated to form a solid, with a small quantity remaining dissolved in the supernatant (data not shown). Three liters of a 95% ethanol solution was used, twice, to dissolve the precipitated ginsenosides Rh₂-Mix thoroughly. The ginsenosides Rh₂-Mix in the supernatant was evaporated in vacuo in order to create 24.5 g of powdered Rh₂-Mix [20(S)-Rh₂ (116.6 mg/g), 20(R)-Rh₂ (107.2 mg/g), Rk₂ (143.1 mg/g) and Rh₃ (165.0 mg/g)]. Finally, in terms of yield, 24.5 g of Rh₂-Mix was obtained via the conversion of 50 g of PPD-Mix as the initial substrate S1 Fig.

In oriental herbal medicine, red ginseng is a very popular health-promoting food but contains approximately less than 0.02% Rh₂ or Rh₂-Mix based on dry weight. Although Rh₂ has anti-cancer effect for breast cancer, prostate cancer, hepatoma, gastric cancer, colon carcinoma, and learning and memory effects, the lack of a selective mass-production technology has hindered its commercial uses. To get a scaled up production of Rh₂-Mix, a number of researchers sought to achieve biotransformation of major ginsenosides to minor ginsenosides using microorganisms [34] and recombinant enzymes in laboratory settings [35, 36, 41]. Ko et al [36] were only able to obtain a 10 mg scale of Rg₂(S) and Rh₁(S) from the bioconversion of PPT-type ginsenosides using crude β-galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae and crude lactase from Penicillium sp. Similarly, Juan et al. produced ginsenoside Rg₂(S) as a 100-gram unit using recombinant β-glucosidase from Pseudonocardia sp. Gsoil 1536 [30]. Despite the use of recombinant enzymes, no study has yet focused on the mass production of minor ginsenosides using edible enzymes from GRAS host strains.

In this study, we describe a brief comparison between GRAS host strains and recombinant E. coli and the effect of sonication on enzyme activity of GRAS hosts and E. coli. Furthermore, we found a BglPm_C, comparable to E. coli, from C. glutamicum, which is capable of the biotransformation of Rg₃-Mix and is therefore expected to facilitate the mass production of Rh₂-Mix. The BglPm_C shows a very specific ginsenoside hydrolysis activity via the following pathways: 20(S)-Rg₃→20(S)-Rh₂, 20(R)-Rg₃→20(R)-Rh₂ and ginsenoside Rk₁→RK₂ and Rg₅→Rh₃ as shown in Fig 5. This unique bioconversion ability, together with optimum reaction conditions (30°C and pH 6.5/7.0) [27], makes it possible to produce 24.5 gram-scale Rh₂-Mix. Here, we report for the first time that the BglPm_C expressed by one of GRAS hosts (C. glutamicum) can be used to make up to 50 mg/ml of PPD-Mix to 24.5 gram-scale Rh2-Mix within 24 h. This combined treatment of acid and the use of the recombinant enzyme BglPm_C expressed in C. glutamicum enable the usage of ginsenoside Rh₂ and Rh₂-Mix derived from Panax quinquefolius (American ginseng) or Panax ginseng Meyer (Korean ginseng) in the cosmetics, functional food, and pharmaceutical industries by replacing the E. coli expression system.

Download:

Fig 5. Schematic view of transformation pathways for Rh₂-Mix production and the relative structures of ginsenosides.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176098.g005

Conclusion

Upon choosing appropriate experimental organisms for β-glucosidase gene expression, we found alternative systems using food grade bacteria for the expression of β-glucosidase gene rather than recombinant E. coli. By means of BglPm_C, 24.5 g of ginsenoside Rh₂-Mix was achieved via biotransformation of 50 g of PPD-Mix initial substrate consisting of ginsenosides Rb₁, Rb₂, Rb₃, Rc, and Rd. The bioconversion reaction was started in a 10 L jar fermenter at pH 6.5 and 30°C for 24 h, with a substrate concentration of 50 mg (Rg₃-Mix, wet base). This combinational usage of edible organic acid treatment of PPD-Mix to Rg₃-Mix and enzymatic transformation of Rg₃-Mix to Rh₂-Mix offers an efficient method for the preparation of minor ginsenoside Rh₂-Mix on a large scale to meet industrial needs.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Entire process of Rh₂-Mix production from PPD-Mix (protopanaxadiol-type ginsenoside) as starting substrate using combined method of acid heat treatment and enzyme treatment (BglPm_C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176098.s001

(TIF)

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: WTI.
Data curation: MZS CHC SKP NSH SCK WTI.
Formal analysis: MZS WTI.
Funding acquisition: WTI.
Investigation: MZS CHC SKP NSH SCK WTI.
Methodology: MZS WTI.
Project administration: WTI.
Resources: MZS WTI SCK.
Supervision: WTI.
Validation: MZS WTI.
Visualization: MZS WTI.
Writing – original draft: MZS WTI.
Writing – review & editing: MZS WTI.

References

1. Sengupta S, Toh SA, Sellers LA, Skepper JN, Koolwijk P, Leung HW, et al. Modulating angiogenesis: The yin and the yang in ginseng. Circulation 2004; 110(10):1219–1225. pmid:15337705
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Attele AS, Wu JA, Yuan CS. Ginseng pharmacology: Multiple constituents and multiple actions. Biol Pharm Bull. 1999;58(11):1685–1693.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Yuan CS, Wu JA, Osinski J. Ginsenoside variability in American ginseng samples. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75(3):600–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00212-9 pmid:11864869
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Lee CH, Kim JH. A review on the medicinal potentials of ginseng and ginsenosides on cardiovascular diseases. J Ginseng Res. 2014;38(3):161–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2014.03.001 pmid:25378989
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Christensen LP. (2009). Ginsenosides chemistry, biosynthesis, analysis, and potential health effects. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2009;55:1–99. pmid:18772102
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Tawab MA, Bahr U, Karas M, Wurglics M, Schubert-Zsilavecz M. Degradation of ginsenosides in humans after oral administration. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003;31(8):1065–1071. pmid:12867496
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Xu QF, Fang XL, Chen DF. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of ginsenoside Rb1 and Rg1 from Panax notoginseng in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. (2003);84:187–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00317-3 pmid:12648814
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Jia L, Zhao Y. Current evaluation of the millennium phytomedicine-ginseng (I): etymology, pharmacognosy, phytochemistry, market and regulations. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(19):2475–84. pmid:19601793
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Choi JR, Hong SW, Kim Y, Jang SE, Kim NJ, Han MJ, et al. Metabolic activities of ginseng and its constituents, ginsenoside Rb1 and Rg1, by human intestinal microflora. J Ginseng Res. 2011;35(3):301–307. pmid:23717073
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Siddiqi MH, Siddiqi MZ, Ahn S, Kang S, Kim YJ, Veerappan K, et al. Stimulative effect of ginsenosides Rg5:Rk1 on murineosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Phytother Res. 2014; 28:1447–1455. pmid:24643957
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Oh M, Choi YH, Choi S, Chung H, Kim K, Kim SI, et al. Anti-proliferating effects of ginsenoside Rh2 on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 1999;14(5):869–75. pmid:10200336
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Wang CZ, Li XL, Wang QF, Mehendale SR, Fishbein AB, Han AH, et al. The mitochondrial pathway is involved in American ginseng-induced apoptosis of SW-480 colon cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2009; 21(3):577–584. pmid:19212614
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Tang XP, Tang GD, Fang CY, Liang ZH, Zhang LY. Effects of ginsenoside Rh2 on growth and migration of pancreatic cancer cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(10):1582–1592. pmid:23538603
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Li B, Zhao J, Wang CZ, Searle J, He TC, Yuan CS, et al. Ginsenoside Rh2 induces apoptosis and paraptosis like cell death in colorectal cancer cells through activation of p53. Cancer Lett. 2011;301(2):185–192. pmid:21194832
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Li S, Gao Y, Ma W, Guo W, Zhou G, Cheng T, et al. EDFR signaling-dependent inhibition of glioblastoma growth by ginsenoside Rh2. Tumour Biol. 2014; 35(6):5593–5598. pmid:24557544
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Liua S, Chena M, Li P, Wu Y, Chang C, Qiu Y, et al. Ginsenoside Rh2 Inhibits Cancer Stem-Like Cells in Skin Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36(2):499–508. pmid:25966742
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Musende AG, Eberding A, Wood C, Adomat H, Fazli L, Hurtado-Coll A, et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of Rh2 in PC-3 human xenograft model for prostate cancer in vivo: formulation, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and efficacy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;64(6):1085–1095. pmid:19301006
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. He L, Lee J, Jang JH, Lee SH, Nan MH, Nan BC. et al. Ginsenoside Rh2 inhibits osteoclastogenesis through down-regulation of NF-κB,NFATc1 and c-Fos. Bone. 2012;50(6):1207–13. pmid:22484180
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Kim DY, Jung MS., Park YG, Yuan HD, Quan HY, Chung SH. Ginsenoside Rh2(S) induces the differentiation and mineralization of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells through activation of PKD and p38 MAPK pathways. BMB Reports. 2011;44(10):659–64. pmid:22026999
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Hou J, Xue J, Lee M, Liu L, Zhang D, Sun M, et al. Ginsenoside Rh2 improves learning and memory in mice. J Med Food. 2013;16(8):772–776. pmid:23957360
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Popovich DG, Kitts DD. Ginsenosides 20(S)-protopanaxadiol and Rh2 reduce cell proliferation and increase sub-G1 cells in two cultured intestinal cell lines, Int-407 and Caco-2. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004;82(3):183–90 pmid:15052284
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Yang JH, Han SJ, Ryu JH, Jang IS, Kim DH. Ginsenoside Rh2 ameliorates scopolamine-induced learning deficit in mice. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009;32(10):1710–5. pmid:19801832
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Lee WK, Kao ST, Liu IM, Cheng JT. Increase of insulin secretion by ginsenoside Rh2 to lower plasma glucose in wistar rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;33(1–2):27–32. pmid:16445695
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Hwang JT, Kim SH, Lee MS., Kim SH, Yang HJ, Kim MJ, et al. Anti-obesity effects of ginsenoside Rh2 are associated with the activation of AMPK signaling pathway in 3T3-L1 adipocyte. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;364 (4):1002–1008. pmid:17971295
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Zhou J, Gao Y, Yi X, Ding Y. Ginsenoside Rh2 Suppresses Neovascularization in Xenograft Psoriasis Model. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36(3):980–7. pmid:26087848
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Bae EA, Han MJ, Kim EJ, Kim DH. Transformation of ginseng saponins to ginsenoside Rh2 by acids and human intestinal bacteria and biological activities of their transformants. Arch Pharm Res. 2004;27(1):61–7. pmid:14969341
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Cui CH, Kim JK, Kim SC, Im WT. Characterization of a ginsenoside-transforming beta-glucosidase from Paenibacillus mucilaginosus and its application for enhanced production of minor ginsenoside F(2). PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85727. pmid:24475050
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Cui CH, Kim SC, Im WT. Characterization of the ginsenoside-transforming recombinant beta-glucosidase from Actinosynnema mirum and bioconversion of major ginsenosides into minor ginsenosides. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2013a);97(2):649–59.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Cui CH, Liu QM, Kim JK, Sung BH, Kim SG, Kim SC, et al. Identification and characterization of a Mucilaginibacter sp. strain QM49 beta-glucosidase and its use in the production of the pharmaceutically active minor ginsenosides (S)-Rh1 and (S)-Rg2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013b;79(19):5788–5798.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Du Juan, Cui CH, Park SC, Kim JK, Yu HS, Jin FX, et al. Identification and Characterization of a Ginsenoside-Transforming β-Glucosidase from Pseudonocardia sp. Gsoil 1536 and Its Application for Enhanced Production of Minor Ginsenoside Rg2(S). PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e96914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096914 pmid:24911166
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Hong H, Cui CH, Kim JK, Jin FX, Kim SC, Im WT. Enzymatic Biotransformation of Ginsenoside Rb1 and Gypenoside XVII into Ginsenosides Rd and F2 by Recombinant beta-glucosidase from Flavobacterium johnsoniae. J Ginseng Res. 2012;36(4):418–424. pmid:23717145
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Kim JK, Cui CH, Yoon MH, Kim SC, Im WT. Bioconversion of major ginsenosides Rg1 to minor ginsenoside F1 using novel recombinant ginsenoside hydrolyzing glycosidase cloned from Sanguibacter keddieii and enzyme characterization. J Biotechnol. 2012;161(3):294–301. pmid:22766417
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Li L, Shin SY, Lee SJ, Moon JS, Im WT, Han NS. Production of Ginsenoside F2 by Using Lactococcus lactis with Enhanced Expression of β-Glucosidase Gene from Paenibacillus mucilaginosus. J Agric Food Chem. 2016; 64(12):2506–2512. pmid:26494255
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Bae EA, Shin JE, Kim DH. Metabolism of ginsenoside Re by human intestinal microflora and its estrogenic effect. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28(10):1903–1908. pmid:16204943
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Quan LH, Min JW, Jin Y, Wang C, Kim YJ, Yang DC. Enzymatic biotransformation of ginsenoside Rb1 to compound K by recombinant beta-glucosidase from Microbacterium esteraromaticum. J Agric Food Chem. (2012a); 60(14):3776–3781.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Ko SR, Choi KJ, Suzuki K, Suzuki Y. Enzymatic preparation of ginsenosides Rg2, Rh1, and F1. Chem Pharm Bull. 2003;51(4):404–408. pmid:12672992
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Nijkamp JF, van den Broek M, Datema E, de Kok S, Bosman L, Luttik MA, et al. De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of the genome of the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D, a model for modern industrial biotechnology. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:36. pmid:22448915
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. van Dijken JP, Bauer J, Brambilla L, Duboc P, François JM, Gancedo C, et al. An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000;26(9–10):706–714. pmid:10862876
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Park JU, Jo JH, Kim YJ, Chung SS, Lee JH, Lee HH. Construction of heat-inducible expression vector of C. glutamicum and C. ammoniagenes: fusion of lambda operator with promoters isolated from C. ammoniagenes. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18(4):639–47. pmid:18467855
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Deng X, Petitjean M, Teste MA, Kooli W, Samuel T, François JM, et al. Similarities and differences in the biochemical and enzymological properties of the four isomaltases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Open Bio. 2014;4:200–212. pmid:24649402
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Siddiqi MZ, Siddiqi MH, Kim YJ, Jin Y, Huq MA, Yang DC. Effect of Fermented Red Ginseng Extract Enriched in Ginsenoside Rg3 on the Differentiation and Mineralization of Preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 Cells. J Med Food. 2015;18(5):542–548. pmid:25764149
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Sengupta S, Toh SA, Sellers LA, Skepper JN, Koolwijk P, Leung HW, et al. Modulating angiogenesis: The yin and the yang in ginseng. Circulation 2004; 110(10):1219–1225. pmid:15337705
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Attele AS, Wu JA, Yuan CS. Ginseng pharmacology: Multiple constituents and multiple actions. Biol Pharm Bull. 1999;58(11):1685–1693.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Yuan CS, Wu JA, Osinski J. Ginsenoside variability in American ginseng samples. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75(3):600–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00212-9 pmid:11864869
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] PubMed/NCBI

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Lee CH, Kim JH. A review on the medicinal potentials of ginseng and ginsenosides on cardiovascular diseases. J Ginseng Res. 2014;38(3):161–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2014.03.001 pmid:25378989
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] PubMed/NCBI

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Christensen LP. (2009). Ginsenosides chemistry, biosynthesis, analysis, and potential health effects. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2009;55:1–99. pmid:18772102
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Tawab MA, Bahr U, Karas M, Wurglics M, Schubert-Zsilavecz M. Degradation of ginsenosides in humans after oral administration. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003;31(8):1065–1071. pmid:12867496
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Xu QF, Fang XL, Chen DF. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of ginsenoside Rb1 and Rg1 from Panax notoginseng in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. (2003);84:187–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00317-3 pmid:12648814
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Jia L, Zhao Y. Current evaluation of the millennium phytomedicine-ginseng (I): etymology, pharmacognosy, phytochemistry, market and regulations. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(19):2475–84. pmid:19601793
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Choi JR, Hong SW, Kim Y, Jang SE, Kim NJ, Han MJ, et al. Metabolic activities of ginseng and its constituents, ginsenoside Rb1 and Rg1, by human intestinal microflora. J Ginseng Res. 2011;35(3):301–307. pmid:23717073
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Siddiqi MH, Siddiqi MZ, Ahn S, Kang S, Kim YJ, Veerappan K, et al. Stimulative effect of ginsenosides Rg5:Rk1 on murineosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Phytother Res. 2014; 28:1447–1455. pmid:24643957
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Oh M, Choi YH, Choi S, Chung H, Kim K, Kim SI, et al. Anti-proliferating effects of ginsenoside Rh2 on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 1999;14(5):869–75. pmid:10200336
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Wang CZ, Li XL, Wang QF, Mehendale SR, Fishbein AB, Han AH, et al. The mitochondrial pathway is involved in American ginseng-induced apoptosis of SW-480 colon cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2009; 21(3):577–584. pmid:19212614
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Tang XP, Tang GD, Fang CY, Liang ZH, Zhang LY. Effects of ginsenoside Rh2 on growth and migration of pancreatic cancer cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(10):1582–1592. pmid:23538603
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Li B, Zhao J, Wang CZ, Searle J, He TC, Yuan CS, et al. Ginsenoside Rh2 induces apoptosis and paraptosis like cell death in colorectal cancer cells through activation of p53. Cancer Lett. 2011;301(2):185–192. pmid:21194832
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Li S, Gao Y, Ma W, Guo W, Zhou G, Cheng T, et al. EDFR signaling-dependent inhibition of glioblastoma growth by ginsenoside Rh2. Tumour Biol. 2014; 35(6):5593–5598. pmid:24557544
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Liua S, Chena M, Li P, Wu Y, Chang C, Qiu Y, et al. Ginsenoside Rh2 Inhibits Cancer Stem-Like Cells in Skin Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36(2):499–508. pmid:25966742
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Musende AG, Eberding A, Wood C, Adomat H, Fazli L, Hurtado-Coll A, et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of Rh2 in PC-3 human xenograft model for prostate cancer in vivo: formulation, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and efficacy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;64(6):1085–1095. pmid:19301006
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. He L, Lee J, Jang JH, Lee SH, Nan MH, Nan BC. et al. Ginsenoside Rh2 inhibits osteoclastogenesis through down-regulation of NF-κB,NFATc1 and c-Fos. Bone. 2012;50(6):1207–13. pmid:22484180
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Kim DY, Jung MS., Park YG, Yuan HD, Quan HY, Chung SH. Ginsenoside Rh2(S) induces the differentiation and mineralization of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells through activation of PKD and p38 MAPK pathways. BMB Reports. 2011;44(10):659–64. pmid:22026999
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Hou J, Xue J, Lee M, Liu L, Zhang D, Sun M, et al. Ginsenoside Rh2 improves learning and memory in mice. J Med Food. 2013;16(8):772–776. pmid:23957360
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Popovich DG, Kitts DD. Ginsenosides 20(S)-protopanaxadiol and Rh2 reduce cell proliferation and increase sub-G1 cells in two cultured intestinal cell lines, Int-407 and Caco-2. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004;82(3):183–90 pmid:15052284
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Yang JH, Han SJ, Ryu JH, Jang IS, Kim DH. Ginsenoside Rh2 ameliorates scopolamine-induced learning deficit in mice. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009;32(10):1710–5. pmid:19801832
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Lee WK, Kao ST, Liu IM, Cheng JT. Increase of insulin secretion by ginsenoside Rh2 to lower plasma glucose in wistar rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;33(1–2):27–32. pmid:16445695
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Hwang JT, Kim SH, Lee MS., Kim SH, Yang HJ, Kim MJ, et al. Anti-obesity effects of ginsenoside Rh2 are associated with the activation of AMPK signaling pathway in 3T3-L1 adipocyte. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;364 (4):1002–1008. pmid:17971295
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Zhou J, Gao Y, Yi X, Ding Y. Ginsenoside Rh2 Suppresses Neovascularization in Xenograft Psoriasis Model. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36(3):980–7. pmid:26087848
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Bae EA, Han MJ, Kim EJ, Kim DH. Transformation of ginseng saponins to ginsenoside Rh2 by acids and human intestinal bacteria and biological activities of their transformants. Arch Pharm Res. 2004;27(1):61–7. pmid:14969341
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Cui CH, Kim JK, Kim SC, Im WT. Characterization of a ginsenoside-transforming beta-glucosidase from Paenibacillus mucilaginosus and its application for enhanced production of minor ginsenoside F(2). PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85727. pmid:24475050
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Cui CH, Kim SC, Im WT. Characterization of the ginsenoside-transforming recombinant beta-glucosidase from Actinosynnema mirum and bioconversion of major ginsenosides into minor ginsenosides. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2013a);97(2):649–59.
View Article
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Cui CH, Liu QM, Kim JK, Sung BH, Kim SG, Kim SC, et al. Identification and characterization of a Mucilaginibacter sp. strain QM49 beta-glucosidase and its use in the production of the pharmaceutically active minor ginsenosides (S)-Rh1 and (S)-Rg2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013b;79(19):5788–5798.
View Article
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Du Juan, Cui CH, Park SC, Kim JK, Yu HS, Jin FX, et al. Identification and Characterization of a Ginsenoside-Transforming β-Glucosidase from Pseudonocardia sp. Gsoil 1536 and Its Application for Enhanced Production of Minor Ginsenoside Rg2(S). PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e96914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096914 pmid:24911166
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Hong H, Cui CH, Kim JK, Jin FX, Kim SC, Im WT. Enzymatic Biotransformation of Ginsenoside Rb1 and Gypenoside XVII into Ginsenosides Rd and F2 by Recombinant beta-glucosidase from Flavobacterium johnsoniae. J Ginseng Res. 2012;36(4):418–424. pmid:23717145
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Kim JK, Cui CH, Yoon MH, Kim SC, Im WT. Bioconversion of major ginsenosides Rg1 to minor ginsenoside F1 using novel recombinant ginsenoside hydrolyzing glycosidase cloned from Sanguibacter keddieii and enzyme characterization. J Biotechnol. 2012;161(3):294–301. pmid:22766417
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Li L, Shin SY, Lee SJ, Moon JS, Im WT, Han NS. Production of Ginsenoside F2 by Using Lactococcus lactis with Enhanced Expression of β-Glucosidase Gene from Paenibacillus mucilaginosus. J Agric Food Chem. 2016; 64(12):2506–2512. pmid:26494255
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Bae EA, Shin JE, Kim DH. Metabolism of ginsenoside Re by human intestinal microflora and its estrogenic effect. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28(10):1903–1908. pmid:16204943
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Quan LH, Min JW, Jin Y, Wang C, Kim YJ, Yang DC. Enzymatic biotransformation of ginsenoside Rb1 to compound K by recombinant beta-glucosidase from Microbacterium esteraromaticum. J Agric Food Chem. (2012a); 60(14):3776–3781.
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Ko SR, Choi KJ, Suzuki K, Suzuki Y. Enzymatic preparation of ginsenosides Rg2, Rh1, and F1. Chem Pharm Bull. 2003;51(4):404–408. pmid:12672992
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Nijkamp JF, van den Broek M, Datema E, de Kok S, Bosman L, Luttik MA, et al. De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of the genome of the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D, a model for modern industrial biotechnology. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:36. pmid:22448915
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. van Dijken JP, Bauer J, Brambilla L, Duboc P, François JM, Gancedo C, et al. An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000;26(9–10):706–714. pmid:10862876
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Park JU, Jo JH, Kim YJ, Chung SS, Lee JH, Lee HH. Construction of heat-inducible expression vector of C. glutamicum and C. ammoniagenes: fusion of lambda operator with promoters isolated from C. ammoniagenes. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18(4):639–47. pmid:18467855
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Deng X, Petitjean M, Teste MA, Kooli W, Samuel T, François JM, et al. Similarities and differences in the biochemical and enzymological properties of the four isomaltases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Open Bio. 2014;4:200–212. pmid:24649402
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Siddiqi MZ, Siddiqi MH, Kim YJ, Jin Y, Huq MA, Yang DC. Effect of Fermented Red Ginseng Extract Enriched in Ginsenoside Rg3 on the Differentiation and Mineralization of Preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 Cells. J Med Food. 2015;18(5):542–548. pmid:25764149
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

2.2. Rg3-Mix preparation as substrate

2.3. Molecular cloning, expression, and purification of recombinant BglPm in GRAS

2.4. Comparison of expressed enzyme activity in GRAS host

2.4.1. Effect of sonication on enzyme activity of both recombinant E. coli and GRAS hosts.

2.4.2. Comparison of crude enzymes activities of GRAS host strains with recombinant E. coli.

2.4.3. Electrophoresis.

2.5. Biotransformation activity of Rg3-Mix using BglPm_C from C. glutamicum

2.6. Scaled-up biotransformation of Rg3-Mix into Rh2-Mix

2.6.1. Preparation of recombinant enzyme (BglPm_C) of C. glutamicum using high cell density culture.

2.6.2. Production of Rh2-Mix from Rg3-Mix using BglPm_C.

2.7. Analytic methods

2.7.1. TLC analysis.

2.7.2. HPLC analysis.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Cloning, expression and comparison of recombinant BglPm in different GRAS host strains

3.2. Effect of sonication on enzymes activities

3.3. Biotransformation of Rg3-Mix to Rh2-Mix

3.4. Preparation of BglPm_C and scaled-up production of Rh2-Mix as a gram unit

Conclusion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Entire process of Rh2-Mix production from PPD-Mix (protopanaxadiol-type ginsenoside) as starting substrate using combined method of acid heat treatment and enzyme treatment (BglPm_C).

Author Contributions

References

2.2. Rg₃-Mix preparation as substrate

2.5. Biotransformation activity of Rg₃-Mix using BglPm_C from C. glutamicum

2.6. Scaled-up biotransformation of Rg₃-Mix into Rh₂-Mix

2.6.2. Production of Rh₂-Mix from Rg₃-Mix using BglPm_C.

3.3. Biotransformation of Rg₃-Mix to Rh₂-Mix

3.4. Preparation of BglPm_C and scaled-up production of Rh₂-Mix as a gram unit

S1 Fig. Entire process of Rh₂-Mix production from PPD-Mix (protopanaxadiol-type ginsenoside) as starting substrate using combined method of acid heat treatment and enzyme treatment (BglPm_C).