Figures
In Fig 5, panel B is a duplicate of the first image of panel A. Please see the correct Fig 5 and its caption below.
Curves were fitted using the best logistic GLMM respectively, as shown in Table 5. The grey bar represents the 95% confidence interval around the estimated effect.
Reference
- 1. Arthur B, Hindell M, Bester M, Trathan P, Jonsen I, Staniland I, et al. (2015) Return Customers: Foraging Site Fidelity and the Effect of Environmental Variability in Wide-Ranging Antarctic Fur Seals. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0120888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120888 pmid:25807082
Citation: Arthur B, Hindell M, Bester M, Trathan P, Jonsen I, Staniland I, et al. (2017) Correction: Return Customers: Foraging Site Fidelity and the Effect of Environmental Variability in Wide-Ranging Antarctic Fur Seals. PLoS ONE 12(6): e0179322. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179322
Published: June 6, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Arthur et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.