http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0753-1966
Figures
Abstract
In the search for new antibacterial agents from natural sources, we revealed that a crude methanol extract of Sapium baccatum was highly active against Ralstonia solanacearum, a causal agent of a serious disease called bacterial wilt of tomato. The bioassay-guided fractionation of this extract resulted in the isolation of seven known active compounds, including gallic acid, methyl gallate, corilagin, tercatain, chebulagic acid, chebulinic acid, and quercetin 3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside. Their chemical structures were determined by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. An in vitro antibacterial bioassay using a broth microdilution method revealed that, except for quercetin 3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside (MIC = 250 μg/mL), the isolated compounds exhibited strong antibacterial activity against R. solanacearum (MIC = 26–52 μg/mL). Among the seven compounds, methyl gallate exhibited the strongest broad-spectrum activity against most of the plant pathogenic bacteria tested (MIC = 26–250 μg/mL). In the in vivo experiments, the crude extract of S. baccatum at 2000 and 1000 μg/mL reduced the development of tomato bacterial wilt by 83 and 63%, respectively, under greenhouse conditions after 14 days of infection. The results suggested that the extracts of S. baccatum or isolated tannins could be used as natural bactericides for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato.
Citation: Vu TT, Kim H, Tran VK, Vu HD, Hoang TX, Han JW, et al. (2017) Antibacterial activity of tannins isolated from Sapium baccatum extract and use for control of tomato bacterial wilt. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0181499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181499
Editor: Vijai Gupta, Tallinn University of Technology, ESTONIA
Received: January 10, 2017; Accepted: July 3, 2017; Published: July 25, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Vu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was supported by the Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (Project KK1606-M02) (http://www.krict.re.kr/) and the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries through the Advanced Production Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (315007-03). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Phytopathogenic bacteria cause serious economic losses by reducing the yield of marketable quality crops [1]. Ralstonia solanacearum, which causes vascular wilt disease, is one of the most destructive pathogens [2]. This soil-born pathogen is found worldwide and has a large range of hosts, comprising more than 200 plant species, including tomato, potato, pepper, peanut, tobacco, and banana [2–4]. The direct yield losses caused by R. solanacearum differ widely according to the host, cultivar, climate, soil type, cropping pattern, and strain; the losses were up to 90% for tomato, potato, and banana [2].
The control of bacterial wilt has been considered difficult owing to the complex nature of the pathogen: endophytic growth patterns, survival in soil, transport in water, and a wide host range and biological diversity [2, 5]. The investigation into various methods for the control of bacterial wilt disease has spanned several decades. Yuliar [2] reported that studies of these methods conducted between 1984 and 2014 predominantly described the biological methods (54%), followed by cultural practices (21%), chemical methods (8%), and physical methods (6%). Plant disease control has been largely dependent on the use of chemical pesticides. Unfortunately, the use of chemical pesticides has been strongly limited owing to their association with environmental pollution, poisonous effects, and antibiotic resistance [2, 6, 7]. As the demand for environmentally acceptable pesticides is increasing, the development of safe and effective antimicrobial agents is essential for the treatment of plant disease.
Plants contain chemically diverse compounds that can be used directly as pesticides with reduced harmful effects [8]. Globally, the use of botanicals as alternatives to synthetic pesticides has increased annually. In particular, the growing demand for botanical pesticides has been much higher in developed or industrialized countries because of the increase in organic food production [9]. Botanicals have many advantages over synthetic chemicals, such as less or no residues on food because of rapid degradation, little or no harmful effect in humans or on the environment, and cost effectiveness [9]. However, botanical pesticides have some limitations, such as slow and lower efficacy compared with chemical pesticides and less efficacy when applied to fields; thus, the development of novel formulations with enhanced efficacy and longer shelf life is required [10–12]. Nowadays, nanotechnology has been applied in formulating, thus plant parts such as fruit, leaf, bark, seed, and stem extracts have been used for synthesis of nanoparticles, as effective formulations for the phytopathogens control [12]. There are many botanical pesticides such as plant extracts and their compounds possess antibacterial activities against phytopathogenic bacteria including R. solanacearum [12]. Most current studies that have focused on botanicals for the control of R. solanacearum utilized in vitro assays or potted plants [13–16]. To the best of our knowledge, there are no commercialized botanical products currently available for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato. Therefore, the search and development of highly active botanical pesticides for the control of tomato bacterial wilt are quite necessary.
In the search for antibacterial agents from Vietnamese plants, we found that the methanol extract of aerial parts of Sapium baccatum was highly active against R. solanacearum. S. baccatum is widespread across South Asia and has been used as a traditional medicine in Malaysia [17, 18]. Although several compounds, including bukittingine, lupeol, betulin, β-taraxerol, taraxerone, aleuritolic acid, 3-acetoxy-aleuritolic acid, 1-hexacosanol, β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, docosyl trans-isoferulate, and docosanoic acid 2',3'-dihydroxypropyl ester have been extracted from S. baccatum [17–19], limited information is available about the antimicrobial activities of these components or whether S. baccatum has additional active compounds. The aims of this study were: 1) to isolate and identify antibacterial compounds from S. baccatum; 2) to examine the antibacterial spectra of the isolated compounds against plant pathogenic bacteria; and 3) to evaluate the disease control efficacies of the methanol extract of S. baccatum on bacterial wilt of tomato under greenhouse conditions.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
The following strains of plant pathogenic bacteria were used for antibacterial activity assays: Acidovorax avenae subsp. cattleyae SL4351, the causal agent of bacterial brown spot in Phalaenopsis (Phalaenopsis sp.); Agrobacterium tumefaciens SL2434, the causal agent of crown gall in apple (Malus domestica); Burkholderia glumae SL4269, the causal agent of bacterial panicle blight in rice (Oryza sativa); Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis SL4135, the causal agent of bacterial wilt and canker in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum); Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum SL290, the causal agent of bacterial soft rot in potato (Solanum tuberosum); Pectobacterium chrysanthemi SL3218, the causal agent of bacterial leaf rot in aloe (Aloe vera); Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae CJW7, the causal agent of bacterial canker in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa); Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans SL308, the causal agent of cucumber angular leaf spot (Cucumis sativus); R. solanacearum SL1944, the causal agent of bacterial wilt in tomato (S. lycopersicum); and Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni SL4370, the causal agent of bacterial spot of peach (Prunus persica). All of these bacteria were isolated from the infected tissues by Dr SD Lee of the National Academy of Agricultural Sciences [4], except for P. syringae pv. actinidiae CJW7, which was isolated by Prof. YJ Koh of Sunchon National University [20] and R. solanacearum, which was isolated by Prof. SW Lee of Dong-A University [4, 21]. All strains were grown on tryptic soy agar (TSA; Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) or tryptic soy broth (TSB). P. syringae pv. actinidiae and X. arboricola pv. pruni were grown at 25°C for 18–36 h and all other strains were cultured at 30°C for 18–36 h.
Plant material
The aerial parts of S. baccatum were collected by the Department of Phytochemistry, Vietnam Institute of Industrial Chemistry (Hanoi, Vietnam). Plant species were identified by Dr The Bach Tran from the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources (Hanoi, Vietnam) and voucher specimens were deposited in the laboratory.
Extraction and isolation of antibacterial compounds
The dry powdered material of S. baccatum (200 g) was extracted twice with 90% methanol (2 × 3 L) for 48 h at room temperature. The extracts were filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper and the filtrates were concentrated by using a rotary evaporator under vacuum to yield a crude extract (24.5 g). A portion of the methanol extract (15 g) was suspended in 500 mL distilled water and then successively partitioned twice with n-hexane, ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and n-butanol (BuOH). Of the four layers, the EtOAc and BuOH layers showed strong antibacterial activity against R. solanacearum as determined by the broth microdilution method [4]. Therefore, further isolation of active compounds was conducted from these two layers.
The EtOAc layer (1.55 g) was successively eluted on a silica gel column (2.5 × 60.0 cm, Kiesel gel 60, 100 g, 230–400 mesh, E. Merck) with mixtures of dichloromethane (DCM)/methanol (MeOH) (90:10, v/v, 200 mL; 85:15, v/v, 200 mL; 80:20, v/v, 500 mL; 70:30, v/v, 500 mL), yielding five fractions, E1–E5. The fractions were monitored with thin-layer chromatography (TLC, Silica gel 60 F254, 0.25 mm layer thickness; E. Merck) with the developing solvent DCM/MeOH (85:15, v/v). Fraction E2 (233 mg) was separated on a Sephadex LH20 column (2.5 × 60.0 cm, 60 g, 70–100 μm, Sigma-Aldrich) via successive elution with mixtures of DCM/MeOH (9:1, v/v, 100 mL; 8:2, v/v, 200 mL; 7:3, v/v, 300 mL), to obtain seven fractions designated E21–E27. Fraction E25 (21 mg) containing compound 2 was successfully separated on a Sephadex LH20 column (1.0 × 30.0 cm, 10 g, 70–100 μm) by using DCM/MeOH (7:3, v/v, 100 mL). Compound 2 was further purified on a silica gel column (1.0 × 30.0 cm, Kiesel gel 60, 10 g, 230–400 mesh) and eluted with DCM/MeOH (9:1, v/v, 50 mL), yielding a pure compound (5 mg).
Fraction E3 (900 mg) was separated on a Sephadex column (3.0 × 60.0 cm, 100 g, 70–100 μm; Sigma-Aldrich) and successively eluted with DCM/MeOH (8:2, v/v, 200 mL; 7:3, v/v, 500 mL; 5:5, v/v, 500 mL; 3:7, v/v, 700 mL), which yielded 10 fractions designated E31–E310. The fractions were monitored by using reversed-phase TLC (Silica gel 60 RP-18 F254, 0.25-mm layer thickness; E. Merck) with the developing solvent MeOH/water (W) (4:6, v/v). To obtain compound 7 (4.3 mg), fraction E35 (40 mg) was separated with a LiChroprep RP-18 column (1.0 × 30.0 cm, 10 g, 40–63 μm; E. Merck) and eluted with MeOH/W (2:8, v/v; 3:7, v/v; 4:6, v/v, 50 mL of each).
Fraction E38 (120 mg) was first purified with a LiChroprep RP-18 column (1.5 × 30.0 cm, 15 g, 40–63 μm) eluted with a mixture of MeOH/W (2:8, v/v, 50 mL; 3:7, v/v, 100 mL; 4:6, v/v, 50 mL), further purified with the Sephadex LH20 column (1.0 × 30.0 cm, 10 g, 70–100 μm) and eluted with 100% MeOH to afford compound 1 (43 mg). Fraction E310 (250 mg) was also separated with the LiChroprep RP-18 column (1.5 × 30.0 cm, 15 g, 40–63 μm) and eluted with MeOH/W (2:8, v/v, 30 mL; 3:7, v/v, 30 mL; 4:6, v/v, 100 mL), yielding compound 5 (41 mg), compound 4 (5 mg), and compound 6 (5 mg).
The BuOH layer (7 g) was loaded on a silica gel column (6.0 × 60.0 cm, Kiesel gel 60, 480 g, 230–400 mesh) and successively eluted with DCM/MeOH/W (70:25:5, v/v/v, 1.5 L; 65:30:5, v/v/v, 1.5 L; 50:45:7, v/v/v, 1 L; 30:60:10, v/v/v, 1 L), which yielded nine fractions, B1–B9. Because the active fractions B6–B8 exhibited patterns similar to those of the main components based on TLC analysis with the developing solvent DCM/MeOH/W (70:25:5, v/v/v), they were pooled and further purified. A portion (600 mg) of the combined fraction (2.3 g) was first separated on a Sephadex LH20 column (2.5 × 60.0 cm, 100 g, 70–100 μm) and successively eluted with DCM/MeOH (3:7, v/v; 2:8, v/v; 1:9, v/v; 100% MeOH; 200 mL of each) and then further purified with a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge (Sep-Pak Vac 35cc, 10 g, Waters) and eluted with MeOH/W (1:9, 2:8, 3:7, 4:6, 5:5, v/v, 100 mL of each) to yield compound 3 (50 mg).
Structure determination of antibacterial compounds
The chemical structures of the active components were determined by using mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and comparison with values reported in the literature. The electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS) of the isolated compounds were recorded on an MSD1100 single-quadruple mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionizer (Hewlett-Packard Co., Palo Alto, CA, USA). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured using methanol-d4, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6 or acetone-d6 (E. Merck) with a Bruker AMX-500 spectrometer (Bruker, Analytische Messtechnik Gmbh, Rheinstetten, Germany). Chemical shifts were calculated using tetramethylsilane as the internal standard.
In vitro antibacterial activity
The antibacterial activities of the isolated compounds (compounds 1–7) were measured with the broth microdilution method against various plant pathogenic bacteria, including R. solanacearum. Briefly, suspensions of plant pathogenic bacteria in TSB media (100 μL) with inocula of 106 CFU/mL were added to the wells of sterile 96-well plates. The stock solutions of the isolated compounds (25 mg/mL) were diluted 100-fold in the first wells and then subjected to two-fold serial dilutions in the growth media. The final concentrations of the isolated compounds were in the range 7.8–250 μg/mL. DMSO (1%), which corresponded to the highest concentration and did not affect the bacterial growth, was used as the negative control. Streptomycin sulfate was used as the positive control.
The inoculated plates were incubated at 30°C (except for P. syringae pv. actinidiae and X. arboricola pv. pruni, which were incubated at 25°C) for 18–36 h after shaking at 300 rpm for 10 min on a microplate shaker. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration that completely inhibited the growth of the bacteria. The assay was performed three times with three replicates for each extract at all concentrations tested.
Disease control efficacy of the methanol extract of S. baccatum against bacterial wilt of tomato
To evaluate the efficacy of the methanol extract of S. baccatum in controlling tomato bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum SL1944 (race 1, biovar 4) [4, 21], we used 3-week-old ‘Seokwang’ tomato plants at the four- to five-true-leaf stage. The plants were grown in vinyl pots with a volume of 90 mL in a greenhouse and were then transplanted into vinyl pots with a volume of 180 mL (one plant per pot). Two different amounts of starting material (100 and 200 mg) of the methanol plant extract were dissolved in 2 mL MeOH and then diluted in 98 mL distilled water containing 250 μg/mL Tween-20 to obtain test concentrations of 1000 and 2000 μg/mL. R. solanacearum was grown in TSA Petri dishes at 30°C for 48 h, harvested with distilled water, and adjusted to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.1 (approximately 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL). The two methanol extract solutions were applied to the soil of each pot (20 mL per pot). After 3 h of treatment, a cell suspension (20 mL) of R. solanacearum was inoculated into the soil of each pot. Streptomycin sulfate (200 μg/mL) was used as the positive control and distilled water solutions containing Tween-20 (250 μg/mL) and MeOH (2%) were used as negative controls. The plants were maintained in a controlled climate at 30 ± 2°C and a relative humidity of 70–80%. The pots were arranged as a randomized complete block with five replicates per treatment. The experiment was repeated three times [4, 22].
The disease severity was ranked daily for 14 days and recorded on a scale of 0–4 as described by He et al. (1983): 0, no symptoms; 1, one leaf wilted; 2, two or three leaves wilted; 3, four or more leaves wilted; and 4, plant dead [4, 23]. The control value was calculated by using following formula [22]:
Statistical analysis
The data were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the significance of the treatments was determined by Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) for multiple comparisons (p = 0.05). Statistical analyses were performed by using SAS software (version 12.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Differences were considered statistically significant for p values less than 0.05.
Results and discussion
Structure determination of antibacterial compounds
The bioassay-guided fractionation of S. baccatum crude extract (15 g) led to the isolation of seven compounds. The chemical structures of these compounds were determined based on 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and ESI-MS data and through comparison with the previously reported literature values. The compounds were identified as gallic acid (compound 1) [24–26], methyl gallate (compound 2) [24–26], corilagin (compound 3) [25–27], tercatain (compound 4) [28, 29], chebulagic acid (compound 5) [25, 26, 30, 31], chebulinic acid (compound 6) [26, 30, 31], and quercetin 3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside or guaijaverin (compound 7) [32–34] (Fig 1). The 1H, 13C NMR, and ESI-MS data of these compounds are shown in S1–S5 Tables.
Compound 1, gallic acid; compound 2, methyl gallate; compound 3, corilagin; compound 4, tercatain; compound 5, chebulagic acid; compound 6, chebulinic acid; compound 7, quercetin 3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside.
These compounds have previously been isolated from plant extracts, most of them belong to tannins group which possess various bioactivities including antibacterial activity [35]: gallic acid and methyl gallate from extracts of Sedum takesimense aerial parts [4]; Euphorbia helioscopia whole plants [24]; Dimocarpus longan seeds [25] and Terminalia spp. fruits, including T. bellerica, T. chebula, and T. horrida [26]; corilagin from extracts of the D. longan seeds [25] and Terminalia spp. fruits [26], Punica granatum leaves [27], and E. fischeriana roots [29]; tercatain from extracts of leaves of T. catappa [28] and E. fischeriana roots [29]; chebulagic and chebulinic acids from extracts of the D. longan seeds and the Terminalia spp. fruits [25, 26, 30, 31]; and quercetin 3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside from extracts of Woodfordia fruticosa [32] and Psidium guajava leaves [36], and Vaccinium macrocarpon powder [34]. To the best of our knowledge, we have reported the first isolation of these seven compounds from S. baccatum.
In vitro antibacterial activity
The antibacterial activity of the compounds isolated from S. baccatum is presented in Table 1. Among the seven compounds, methyl gallate (compound 2) exhibited the strongest broad-spectrum activity against most of the plant pathogenic bacteria tested, with MIC values between 26.0 and 250 μg/mL (except against A. avenae subsp. cattleyae). Of the glucoside gallates (compounds 3–6), corilagin (compound 3) and chebulagic acid (compound 5) showed a slightly stronger activity than that of tercatain (compound 4) and chebulinic acid (compound 6), respectively. Gallic acid was less active than other hydrolysable tannins (compounds 2–6) and quercetin 3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside (compound 7) was the least active compound (Table 1).
Of plant pathogenic bacteria tested, R. solanacearum was the most susceptible to all the isolated compounds, followed by X. arboricola pv. pruni, P. syringae pv. actinidiae, B. glume and A. avenae subsp. cattleyae. With the exception of compound 7 (MIC = 250 μg/mL), the isolated compounds showed impressive antibacterial activity against R. solanacearum, with very low MICs (26.0–52.1 μg/mL). Compounds 2–6 also exhibited strong antibacterial activities against X. arboricola pv. pruni (MIC = 52.1–88.3 μg/mL) (Table 1).
Methyl gallate (compound 2) was much more active than gallic acid (compound 1). The measurements of antibacterial activity in our study agreed with those of previous reports [4, 37, 38]. Compounds with similar structures, such as 3 and 4, and 5 and 6, had similar antibacterial activity and spectra (Table 1). Corilagin (compound 3) has been reported against Acinetobacter baumannii [39], methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [40, 41], and Escherichia coli [41]. Chebulagic acid (compound 5) and chebulinic acid (compound 6) showed moderate antibacterial activity against A. baumannii [39]. The antibacterial activity of quercetin-3-O-α-L- arabinopyranoside or guaijaverin (compound 7) against Streptococcus mutans has been reported [36]. To the best of our knowledge, information on the antibacterial activities of tercatain (compound 4) is unavailable. In addition, this is the first report of the antibacterial activities of the isolated compounds (with the exception of compounds 1 and 2) against plant pathogenic bacteria [4, 42].
Effect of the methanol extract on tomato bacterial wilt
In the in vivo experiment, wilt symptoms were observed 5 days after inoculation. The extracts efficiently suppressed the development of tomato bacterial wilt in a dose-dependent manner. At concentrations of 1000 and 2000 μg/mL, the methanol extract showed control efficacies of 100 and 100% after 7 days of inoculation, and 63 and 83% after 14 days of inoculation, respectively. The disease control efficacies of the extract at 1000 μg/mL were higher than those of 200 μg/mL streptomycin sulfate after 7 and 14 days of inoculation (Fig 2 and S6 Table). No phytotoxic symptoms appeared on the treated plants.
SB1000 and SB2000, 1000 and 2000 μg/mL methanol extract of S. baccatum, respectively; SS200, 200 μg/mL streptomycin sulfate. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation of three experiments with five replicates. Means with the same number days after inoculation followed by the same letter above the bars are not significantly different (p = 0.05) as determined by Tukey’s HSD test.
Recent studies revealed that several plant-derived products also exhibited potential antibacterial activity against R. solanacearum in in vivo tests. Allium fistulosum extract at concentrations of 50 and 100% significantly reduced the incidence of bacterial wilt of tomato: only 6 and 14% of the plants were affected, respectively, whereas the disease affected 61% of the plants in the untreated control [43]. The leaf extract of Eichhorina crassipes reduced the severity index of the bacterial wilt by more than 91% [44]. Several essential oils, such as cinnamon and clove oils [13], lemongrass and palmarosa oils and their components such as thymol [45, 46], were found to effectively reduce the R. solanacearum populations and incidence of bacterial wilt of tomato grown in infested soil. Methyl gallate at a concentration of 500 μg/mL showed a control efficacy of 65.2% in greenhouse conditions [42]. It is difficult to compare the results of our study with those of previous studies owing to a number of factors, such as different experimental design conditions, plants species, and bacterial species. In this study, the control efficacy of S. baccatum at a concentration of 2000 μg/mL was similar to that of the wettable powder formulation of the ethyl acetate layer of S. takesimense at a 200-fold dilution, as described in our previous study [4].
Conclusions
In this study, seven antibacterial compounds were isolated from the methanol extracts of S. baccatum. The compounds showed potent in vitro antibacterial activities against R. solanacearum, except for quercetin 3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside. In addition, most compounds exhibited strong antibacterial activities against X. arboricola pv. pruni and B. glumae. Methyl gallate and corilagin showed the strongest activities. These results suggested that the extracts from S. baccatum or their isolated compounds were promising antibacterial agents for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato.
Botanical pesticides are a promising alternative to reduce the harmful effects caused by use of synthetic pesticides. They have become more attractive after the increase in demand for organic food. Further research into production, formulation, and delivery may greatly assist and promote the development of botanical pesticides. Therefore, further studies are necessary to examine the toxicity of the S. baccatum extract, evaluate the disease control efficacy of the extract in various fields, and develop optimum formulations of the crude extracts for the control of tomato bacterial wilt.
Supporting information
S1 Table. NMR data of gallic acid and methyl gallate isolated from Sapium baccatum in methanol-d4.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181499.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. NMR data of corilagin and tercatain isolated from Sapium baccatum in DMSO-d6 and acetone-d6, respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181499.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. NMR data of chebulagic acid and chebulinic acid isolated from Sapium baccatum in acetone-d6.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181499.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. NMR data of quercetin 3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside isolated from Sapium baccatum in methanol-d4.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181499.s004
(DOCX)
S5 Table. ESI-MS data of seven active compounds isolated from Sapium baccatum.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181499.s005
(DOCX)
S6 Table. Effect of the methanol extract of Sapium baccatum on the control of tomato bacterial wilt under greenhouse conditions.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181499.s006
(DOCX)
References
- 1.
Obradovic A, Jones JB, Balogh B, Momol MT. Integrated management of tomato bacterial spot. In: Ciancio A, Mukerji KG, editors. Integrated management of diseases caused by fungi, phytoplasma and bacteria. Netherlands: Springer; 2008. p. 211.
- 2. Yuliar , Nion YA, Toyota K. Recent trends in control methods for bacterial wilt diseases caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbes Environ. 2015; 30: 1–11. pmid:25762345
- 3. Hayward AC. Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1991; 29: 65–87. pmid:18479193
- 4. Vu TT, Kim JC, Choi YH, Choi GJ, Jang KS, Choi TH, et al. Effect of gallotannins derived from Sedum takesimense on tomato bacterial wilt. Plant Dis. 2013; 97: 1593–1598.
- 5. Singh S, Gautam RK, Singh DR, Sharma TVRS, Sakthivel K, Roy SD. Genetic approaches for mitigating losses caused by bacterial wilt of tomato in tropical islands. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2015; 143: 205–221.
- 6. Vidaver AK. Uses of antimicrobials in plant agriculture. Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 34: S107–110. pmid:11988880
- 7. Montesinos E, Bardaji E. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides as agricultural pesticides for plant-disease control. Chem Biodivers. 2008; 5: 1225–1237. pmid:18649311
- 8.
Dubey NK, Shukla R, Kumar A, Singh P, Prakash B. Global scenario on the application of natural products in integrated pest management programmes. In: Dubey NK, editor. Natural products in plant pest management. Oxfordshire, UK: CAB International; 2011. pp. 2–14.
- 9. El-Wakeil NE. Botanical pesticides and their mode of action. Gesunde Pflanz. 2013; 65: 125–149.
- 10. Gurjar MS, Ali S, Akhtar M, Singh KS. Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management. Agric Sci. 2012; 3: 425–433.
- 11.
Bhagat S, Birah A, Kumar R, Yadav MS, Chattopadhyay C. Plant disease management: prospects of pesticides of plant origin. In: Singh D, editor. Advances in Plant Biopesticides. India: Springer; 2014. pp. 119–129.
- 12.
Marutescu L, Popa M, Saviuc C, Lazar V, Chifiriuc MC. 8 − Botanical pesticides with virucidal, bactericidal, and fungicidal activity. In: Grumezescu AM, editor. New pesticides and soil sensors. Oxford, UK: Academic Press; 2017. pp. 311–335.
- 13. Lee YH, Choi CW, Kim SH, Yun JG, Chang SW, Kim YS, et al. Chemical pesticides and plant essential oils for disease control of tomato bacterial wilt. Plant Pathol J. 2012; 28: 32–39.
- 14. Gaitonde SS, Ramesh R. Screening plant products for Ralstonia solanacearum inhibition and characterization of antibacterial compounds in Garcinia indica and Tamarindus indica. Proc Natl Acad Sci, India, Sect B Biol Sci. 2016.
- 15. Chen J, Yu Y, Li S, Ding W. Resveratrol and coumarin: Novel agricultural antibacterial agent against Ralstonia solanacearum in vitro and in vivo. Molecules. 2016; 21: 1501.
- 16. Li S, Yu Y, Chen J, Guo B, Yang L, Ding W. Evaluation of the antibacterial effects and mechanism of action of protocatechualdehyde against Ralstonia solanacearum. Molecules. 2016; 21: 754.
- 17. Ahmed Y, Sohrab MH, Al-Reza SM, Tareq FS, Hasan CM, Sattar MA. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic constituents from leaves of Sapium baccatum. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010; 48: 549–552. pmid:19932731
- 18. Muh L, Al Muqarrabun R, Ahmat N, Aris SRS, Norizan N. Phytochemical investigation of the stem bark of Sapium baccatum (Roxb.). Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2014; 8: 432–438.
- 19. Al Muqarrabun LMR, Ahmat N, Aris SRS. A review of the medicinal uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology of the genus Sapium. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014; 155: 9–20. pmid:24877849
- 20. Koh YJ, Kim GH, Jung JS, Lee YS, Hur JS. Outbreak of bacterial canker on Hort16A (Actinidia chinensis Planchon) caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in Korea. New Zealand J Crop Hort Sci. 2010; 38: 275–282.
- 21. Lee HJ, Jo EJ, Kim NH, Chae Y, Lee SW. Disease responses of tomato pure lines against Ralstonia solanacearum strains from Korea and susceptibility at high temperature. Res Plant Dis. 2011; 17: 326–333.
- 22. Le DQ, Shin TS, Park MS, Choi YH, Choi GJ, Jang KS, et al. Antimicrobial activities of novel mannosyl lipids isolated from the biocontrol fungus Simplicillium lamellicola BCP against phytopathogenic bacteria. J Agric Food Chem. 2014; 62: 3363–3370. pmid:24660753
- 23. He JY, Sequeira L, Kelman A. Characteristics of strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum from China. Plant Dis. 1983; 67: 1357–1361.
- 24. Feng WS, Gao L, Zheng XK, Wang YZ. Polyphenols of Euphorbia helioscopia. Chin J Nat Med. 2009; 7: 37–39.
- 25. Sudjaroen Y, Hull WE, Erben G, Wurtele G, Changbumrung S, Ulrich CM, et al. Isolation and characterization of ellagitannins as the major polyphenolic components of Longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour) seeds. Phytochemistry. 2012; 77: 226–237. pmid:22277734
- 26. Pfundstein B, El Desouky SK, Hull WE, Haubner R, Erben G, Owen RW. Polyphenolic compounds in the fruits of Egyptian medicinal plants (Terminalia bellerica, Terminalia chebula and Terminalia horrida): Characterization, quantitation and determination of antioxidant capacities. Phytochemistry. 2010; 71: 1132–1148. pmid:20451939
- 27. Nawwar MAM, Hussein SAM, Merfort I. NMR spectral analysis of polyphenols from Punica granatum. Phytochemistry. 1994; 36: 793–798.
- 28. Tanaka T, Nonaka GI, Nishioka I. Tannins and related compounds. XLII. Isolation and cheracterization of four new hydrolyzable tannins, terflavins A and B, tergallagin and tercatain from the leaves of Terminalia catappa L. Chem Pharm Bull. 1986; 34: 1039–1049.
- 29. Lee SH, Tanaka T, Nonaka GI, Nishioka I, Zhang B. Allose gallates from Euphorbia fischeriana. Phytochemistry. 1991; 30: 1251–1253.
- 30. Lee SH, Ryu SY, Choi SU, Lee CO, No Z, Kim SK, et al. Hydrolysable tannins and related compound having cytotoxic activity from the fruits of Terminalia chebula. Arch Pharm Res. 1995; 18: 118–120.
- 31. Zou D, Chen T, Li H, Chen C, Zhao J, Li Y. Separation of three phenolic high-molecular-weight compounds from the crude extract of Terminalia chebula Retz. by ultrasound-assisted extraction and high-speed counter-current chromatography. J Sep Sci. 2016; 39: 1278–1285. pmid:26864462
- 32. Kadota S, Takamori Y, Nyein KN, Kikuchi T, Tanaka K, Ekimoto H. Constituents of the leaves of Woodfordia fruticosa Kurz. I. Isolation, structure, and proton and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance signal assignments of woodfruticosin (woodfordin C), an inhibitor of deoxyribonucleic acid topoisomerase II. Chem Pharm Bull. 1990; 38: 2687–2697. pmid:1963810
- 33. Zapesochnaya GG. Study of the structure and sterochemistry of flavonoid O-arabinosides and xylosides with the aid of PMR spectroscopy. Chem Nat Compd. 1979; 15: 17–27.
- 34. Vvedenskaya IO, Rosen RT, Guido JE, Russell DJ, Millis KA, Vorsa N. Characterization of flavonols in cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) powder. J Agric Food Chem. 2004; 52: 188–195. pmid:14733493
- 35.
Sieniawska E, Baj T. Tannins . Plant metabolites: their chemistry. In: Badal S, Delgoda R. Pharmacognosy: fundamentals, applications and strategies. Oxford, UK: Academic Press; 2017. pp: 199–232.
- 36. Prabu GR, Gnanamani A, Sadulla S. Guaijaverin—a plant flavonoid as potential antiplaque agent against Streptococcus mutans. J Appl Microbiol. 2006; 101: 487–495. pmid:16882158
- 37. Ooshiro A, Kaji M, Katoh Y, Kawaide H, Natsume M. Antibacterial activity of alkyl gallates and related compounds against Ralstonia solanacearum. J Pestic Sci. 2011; 36: 240–242.
- 38. Kubo I, Fujita KI, Nihei KI, Nihei A. Antibacterial activity of alkyl gallates against Bacillus subtilis. J Agric Food Chem. 2004; 52: 1072–1076. pmid:14995100
- 39. Miyasaki Y, Rabenstein JD, Rhea J, Crouch ML, Mocek UM, Kittell PE, et al. Isolation and characterization of antimicrobial compounds in plant extracts against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e61594. pmid:23630600
- 40. Shimizu M, Shiota S, Mizushima T, Ito H, Hatano T, Yoshida T, et al. Marked potentiation of activity of β-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by corilagin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001; 45: 3198–3201. pmid:11600378
- 41. Li N, Luo M, Fu Y, Zu Y, Wang W, Zhang L, et al. Effect of corilagin on membrane permeability of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. Phytother Res. 2013; 27: 1517–1523. pmid:23192753
- 42. Yuan GQ, Li QQ, Qin J. Isolation of methyl gallate from Toxicodendron sylvestre and its effect on tomato bacterial wilt. Plant Dis. 2012; 96: 1143–1147.
- 43. Deberdt P, Perrin B, Coranson-Beaudu R, Duyck P-F, Wicker E. Effect of Allium fistulosum extract on Ralstonia solanacearum populations and tomato bacterial wilt. Plant Dis. 2012; 96: 687–692.
- 44. Alemu D, Lemessa F, Wakjira M, Berecha G. Antibacterial activity of some invasive alien species extracts against tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith). Plant Pathol J. 2013; 12: 61–70.
- 45. Pradhanang PM, Momol MT, Olson SM, Jones JB. Effects of plant essential oils on Ralstonia solanacearum population density and bacterial wilt incidence in tomato. Plant Dis. 2003; 87: 423–427.
- 46. Ji P, Momol MT, Olson SM, Pradhanang PM, Jones JB. Evaluation of thymol as biofumigant for control of bacterial wilt of tomato under field conditions. Plant Dis. 2005; 89: 497–500.