VCA nanobodies target N-WASp to reduce invadopodium formation and functioning

Tim Hebbrecht; Isabel Van Audenhove; Olivier Zwaenepoel; Adriaan Verhelle; Jan Gettemans

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185076

Abstract

Invasive cancer cells develop small actin-based protrusions called invadopodia, which perform a primordial role in metastasis and extracellular matrix remodelling. Neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASp) is a scaffold protein which can directly bind to actin monomers and Arp2/3 and is a crucial player in the formation of an invadopodium precursor. Expression modulation has pointed to an important role for N-WASp in invadopodium formation but the role of its C-terminal VCA domain in this process remains unknown. In this study, we generated alpaca nanobodies against the N-WASp VCA domain and investigated if these nanobodies affect invadopodium formation. By using this approach, we were able to study functions of a selected functional/structural N-WASp protein domain in living cells, without requiring overexpression, dominant negative mutants or siRNAs which target the gene, and hence the entire protein. When expressed as intrabodies, the VCA nanobodies significantly reduced invadopodium formation in both MDA-MB-231 breast cancer and HNSCC61 head and neck squamous cancer cells. Furthermore, expression of distinct VCA Nbs (VCA Nb7 and VCA Nb14) in PC-3 prostate cancer cells resulted in reduced overall matrix degradation without affecting MMP9 secretion/activation or MT1-MMP localisation at invadopodial membranes. From these results, we conclude that we have generated nanobodies targeting N-WASp which reduce invadopodium formation and functioning, most likely via regulation of N-WASp—Arp2/3 complex interaction, indicating that this region of N-WASp plays an important role in these processes.

Citation: Hebbrecht T, Van Audenhove I, Zwaenepoel O, Verhelle A, Gettemans J (2017) VCA nanobodies target N-WASp to reduce invadopodium formation and functioning. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0185076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076

Editor: Yulia Komarova, University of Illinois at Chicago, UNITED STATES

Received: February 7, 2017; Accepted: September 6, 2017; Published: September 22, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Hebbrecht et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was funded by Research Foundation Flanders, Ghent University (BOF13/GOA/010), Emmanuel van der Schueren, Flemish League against Cancer (VLK), and Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Metastasis is the primary cause of cancer associated deaths. In this process cancer cells leave a primary tumour to disseminate through the entire body [1]. In doing so, these cancer cells are able to create secondary tumours throughout the body, a lethal process for the cancer patient in almost all cases [1]. In order to leave the primary tumour, cancer cells create small actin-based protrusions to facilitate their spreading [2]. Invadopodia are such malignant specialized structures known to enable cancer cells to invade through natural barriers [2, 3]. Invadopodium formation is found in highly invasive cancer cell lines [4] and has been evinced in vivo [3]. A mature invadopodium displays considerable proteolytic activity. More specifically, invadopodium-related degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) has been linked to extravasation and metastasis in vivo [3]. Inside an invadopodium, approximately 129 different proteins can be found [5]. They contribute to the aggressive nature of invadopodia in cancer. Before an invadopodium can be formed, assembly of a precursor is required. This precursor will kick-start actin polymerisation towards the plasma membrane and invadopodia will arise [6–9].

Activation of the Arp2/3 –N-WASp pathway, found to be important in invadopodium formation, has been observed in a broad spectrum of cancers [10]. Arp2/3 (actin related protein) is a protein complex existing of seven subunits, of which Arp2 and Arp3 are the only two proteins of the complex that are actin-related [11]. Once Arp2/3 is activated, those two subproteins will mimic two actin monomers to boost the actin polymerisation [11, 12].

The neural variant of WASp (N-WASp) is a ubiquitously expressed member of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) family [8, 13, 14]. This family is known as nucleation-promoting factors of the Arp2/3 complex [15] and fills the gap between reorganisation of the actin cytoskeleton and signalling molecules [16, 17]. Because N-WASp is a scaffold protein, it has several domains through which it interacts with interaction partners [8, 13, 14]. Using its C-terminal VCA domain, N-WASp can directly interact with actin monomers and the Arp2/3 complex. The VCA domain consists of a verprolin-homology (V) domain (a.k.a. WASp homology 2 (WH2) domain), a cofilin-like or central (C) domain and an acidic (A) domain [18]. While the V domain is a binding site for actin monomers, the Arp2/3 complex binds the latter two parts (C and A domains) [14, 18–21]. It has been shown in vitro that N-WASps VCA domain is needed during the formation of the invadopodium precursor [6, 17, 22, 23]. Moreover, by bringing actin monomers and Arp2/3 closer together, N-WASp stimulates and enhances the actin polymerisation [24].

We generated alpaca nanobodies against the VCA domain of N-WASp (VCA Nb) to investigate the role of this region in formation of cancer cell invadopodia. Nanobodies are single-domain antibody fragments or, more specifically, the variable part of the heavy chain of Camelid heavy chain antibodies [25]. A nanobody is the smallest, natural, antigen binding fragment that completely retains its original binding affinity and specificity. Contrary to RNAi, intracellularly expressed nanobodies or so-called intrabodies can interfere with protein functions without silencing the whole protein. Moreover, intracellular nanobodies render the need for overexpression, siRNA or dominant negative mutants superfluous, which makes it able to study functions of endogenous proteins. By using VCA Nbs, we study the influence of N-WASps VCA domain in invadopodium formation and extracellular matrix degradation. Using breast, prostate and head and neck cancer cell lines that inducibly express these VCA nanobodies, we show that this N-WASp region indeed contributes to invadopodium formation and extracellular matrix remodelling, suggesting that it is involved in invadopodium based spreading of cancer cells.

Materials and methods

Antibodies and reagents

Rabbit polyclonal anti-N-WASp (H100) was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Mouse monoclonal anti-actin clone C4 (0869100) was obtained from MP Biomedicals (Santa Ana, CA, USA). Rabbit monoclonal anti-ARPC2 antibody (ab133315) and anti-MMP14 (ab51074) were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Rabbit monoclonal anti-MMP9 was obtained from Epitomics (Burlingame, CA, USA). Alexa Fluor-labeled secondary goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG antibodies were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA). Mouse monoclonal anti-V5 antibody, Alexa Fluor labeled phalloidin and Mitotracker Orange were purchased from Invitrogen (Merelbeke, Belgium). The synthetic VCA—hN-WASp peptide biotin-Ahx-⁴²⁰KKVEQNSRPVSCSGRDALLDQIRQGIQLKSVADGQESTPPTPAPTSGIVGALMEVMQKRSKAIHSSDEDEDEDDEEDFEDDDEWED⁵⁰⁵-NH₂, used for raising nanobodies (see further), was chemically synthesized by Caslo (Denmark).

Generation of VCA Nbs

Nbs were obtained in collaboration with the Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB) Nanobody Service Facility (NSF). All animal work was performed by the VIB NSF and has PHS approved animal welfare assurance from OLAW (F16-00131(A5593-01)). Briefly, two alpacas were immunized by a subcutaneous injection of human VCA-N-WASp peptide on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35. On day 39, anticoagulated blood was collected for lymphocyte preparation. A nanobody library was constructed by extracting total RNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes and screened for the presence of antigen-specific nanobodies. The obtained Nbs were subcloned into the phagemid vector pMECS. In order to isolate N-WASp nanobodies, several rounds of phage panning were performed. These experiments suggested that the phage population was enriched for antigen-specific phages from round 3 panning onwards. In total, 380 colonies from 3rd and 4th rounds were randomly selected and analyzed by ELISA for the presence of antigen-specific nanobodies in their periplasmic extracts. The positives ones were sequenced. Based on those sequence data, the positive colonies represented 5 different groups of nanobodies in each of the two alpacas.

cDNA cloning

Nbs were cloned into mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) V5 pcDNA3.1 His₆ and pEGFP-N1 vectors (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA), as described before [26–28]. The nanobodies were subcloned by means of a Cold Fusion Cloning Kit (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA, USA). The first subcloning was performed into V5 pcDNA3.1 His₆ vector by using the following primers: forward 5’-TCGATTCTACGCGTACCGGTGCCCAGGTGCAGCTGCAGGAG-3’ and reverse 5’-GGTGATGATGACCGGCTAGCTGGAGACGGTGACCTG-3’. Cloning of the Nbs in the pEGFP-N1 vector was done using the following primers: forward 5’-CGAGCTCAAGCTTCGGCCACCATGCAGGTGCAGCTGCAGGAG-3’ and reverse 5’-GGCGACCGGTGGATCCTTGCTGGAGACGGTGACCTG-3’.

To obtain inducible Nb expressing cells, a third cloning of the EGFP-tagged VCA Nbs into the pLVX-TP vector (Clontech) was done using following primers: Forward 5’-TGGAGAAGGATCCGCGGCCGCGCCACCATGGCCCAGGTGCAGCTGCAGGAGTCTGGG-3’ and reverse 5’-CTACCCGGTAGAATTCTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCC-3’.

Recombinant nanobody and N-WASp production

BL21 cells were transformed with VCA Nbs in pMECS vector or N-WASp in pTrcHis TOPO. They were grown in TB (with 100 μg/ml ampicillin) at 37°C. After induction with 1 mM IPTG, incubation was performed at 28°C (overnight for nanobody production or 4 h for N-WASp production).

Nanobodies were extracted from the periplasm, where they are located due to an N-terminal PelB signal, by means of an osmotic burst of the outer membrane using TES buffer (0.2 M Tris, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 M sucrose, pH 8.0). Next an IMAC and/or gel filtration was performed for a higher purification, as described before [29].

To extract recombinant N-WASp, pelleted cells were dissolved in lysis buffer (1% Triton, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF and 1 mM protease inhibitor, pH 7.5) supplemented with 200 μg/ml lysozyme and incubated during 30 min at room temperature. After sonication and pelleting, IMAC purification was performed.

Cell culture, transfection and transduction

MDA-MB-231 (ATCC HTB-26), PC-3 (ATCC CRL-1435) and HEK293T (ATCC CRL-11268) cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified 10% CO₂ incubator, HNSCC61 cells were grown at 5% CO₂. All cells (except PC-3) were grown in DMEM. We obtained the HNSCC61 cells from Prof. Dr. Weaver [30] (Vanderbilt University) in August 2011, who obtained the cells from Prof. Dr. Yarbrough [31–33]. PC-3 cells were grown in RPMI. All media (from Gibco Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA) were supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum, 10 μg/mL streptomycin and 10 IU/mL penicillin. As an exception, HNSCC61 required 20% fetal bovine serum and an extra addition of 0.4 μg/mL hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

JetPrime (Polyplus Transfection Inc., New York, NY, USA) was used to perform transient expression according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For virus production HEK293T cells were transfected using the calcium phosphate method as described before [28]. Inducible stable cell lines were obtained by transduction of the VCA Nbs in the pLVXTP vector, making use of the Lenti-X Tet-On advanced system (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Expression was induced by addition of 500 ng/mL doxycycline.

Pull down assays, immunoprecipitations and binding assay

Cells were lysed with ice-cold lysis buffer (1% Triton, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF and 1 mM protease inhibitor, pH 7.5) [27]. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

In the pull down assays to analyse binding between N-WASp and the 10 VCA Nbs, recombinant HA-tagged nanobodies were immobilized onto HA-agarose beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) (1.5 h at 4°C). Next, 650 μg crude cell lysate was added and followed by incubation (1.5 h at 4°C).

In the pull down to analyse binding between N-WASp and VCA Nbs using EGFP-tagged VCA Nb expressing cancer cells, we performed overnight incubation of cell lysate with anti-GFP antibody (at 4°C), followed by an incubation with Protein G Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) (1,5 h at 4°C).

In the binding assay, recombinant HA-tagged VCA Nbs, in a concentration range, were incubated with the synthetic biotin-tagged VCA domain (1.5 h at 4°C). Next, 550 μg crude MDA-MB-231 cell lysate was added, as source for Arp2/3 and actin, and an incubation was followed (1.5 h at 4°C). Last, an immobilization on STREPTactin beads (IBA, Göttingen, Germany) was performed (1h at 4°C).

After washing steps, elution of the beads was obtained by boiling for 5 minutes in Laemmli SDS sample buffer (65 mM Tris-HCl, 20% glycerol, 5% SDS, 0.2% bromophenol blue, 5% β-mercaptoethanol in Milli-Q, pH 6.8). This was followed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. The H100 N-WASp antibody from Santa Cruz Biotechnology was used to detect N-WASp on blot.

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)

ITC was performed as described before [27–29]. Binding of VCA Nbs to VCA peptide was measured by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) using a MicroCal VP-ITC MicroCalorimeter and MICROCAL ORIGIN software (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Malvern, UK). The recombinant VCA Nbs were dialyzed against 20 mM Tris buffer and 150 mM NaCl at pH 7,5. Briefly, 8,6 μM biotinylated VCA peptide was titrated once with 108 μM VCA Nb7 and once with 88 μM VCA Nb14. 46,91 μM VCA Nb2 and 5,6 μM VCA Nb13 was titrated with 46,91 μM and 56 μM biotinylated VCA peptide, respectively. The obtained values are expressed with the standard deviation.

Immunofluorescence and microscopy

Cells were seeded on a 100 μg/ml gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or 50 μg/ml rat tail type I collagen (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) coated coverslip. Cells were fixed using 3% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized using 0.1% Triton for 5 min and neutralized in 0.75% glycin for 20 min. Next, a blocking step was performed using 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich), followed by an incubation with primary antibodies (1 h at 37°C) and Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (30 min at room temperature). DAPI (0.4 μg/ml; Sigma) and Alexa Fluor labeled phalloidin (Invitrogen) were used to stain nuclei and actin filaments, respectively. Cells were mounted using VectaShield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). For imaging, a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M Apotome epifluorescence microscope equipped with a cooled CCD Axiocam camera (Zeiss x63 1.4-NA Oil Plan-Apochromat objective; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and Axiovision 4.5 software (Zeiss) was used at room temperature.

Matrix degradation

In matrix degradation assays, coverslips were coated with Cy3-labeled gelatin according to the manufacturer’s protocol (QCM Gelatin Invadopodia Kit, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). 24h after induction with doxycycline, cells were seeded and allowed to degrade the matrix for another 24h. Degradation is found on the places where black holes were present in the matrix underneath the cells. Two parameters were used to analyze the degradation. The parameter ‘degraded area per cell area’ was obtained by dividing the total degraded area by the total cell area per picture. The second parameter ‘degradation area per cell’ is determined by the total degradation area divided by the amount of cells per picture.

Gelatin zymography

24 h after induction with 500 ng/ml doxycycline, cells were seeded in a 1 mg/ml collagen matrix which was allowed to polymerize for 1 h at 37°C. After approximately 20 h incubation in serum-free medium, equal amounts of conditioned medium proteins were analyzed on 10% SDS-PAGE without (for secretion levels) or with 0.1% gelatin (for activity). In the SDS-PAGE containing 0.1% gelatin, proteins were enabled to renature by removing SDS with 2% Triton X-100 washing buffer. To analyse the activity, digestion was allowed during an overnight incubation in MMP buffer (50 mM Tris and 10 mM CaCl₂, pH 7.5). Band intensities were analyzed with ImageJ.

MT1-MMP localization

Nanobody expression was induced 24 h before cells were seeded on a 100 μg/ml gelatin matrix. They were fixed, stained and imaged as described above. MT1-MMP containing invadopodia were count when MT1-MMP dots were overlapping F-actin dots. To analyse MT1-MMP, the amount MT1-MMP containing invadopodia was divided by the total amount of invadopodia for each cell.

Image and statistical analysis

Image analysis (protein intensities, intensity profiles, quantifications) was performed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunns post tests with p = 0.05. Bar plots were made using mean and SEM.

Results

N-WASp recognising of VCA nanobodies

Initially, 16 different nanobodies were identified through phage display following immunization with chemically synthesized N-WASp VCA domain (human N-WASp K420-D505), lymphocyte collection and library construction. Based on their amino acid sequence, 10 different groups could be discerned. One nanobody was chosen from each group for biochemical characterisation. To detect antigen-nanobody binding in vitro, recombinant HA-tagged nanobodies were used in a pull down assay. MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lysate was used as a source of endogenous N-WASp. Seven nanobodies out of 10 bound with the endogenous N-WASp (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. VCA nanobody—N-WASp binding.

Pull down assay of endogenous N-WASp from MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lysate with HA-tagged VCA Nb (1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) by means of anti-HA agarose beads. Two negative controls were included, anti-HA agarose beads were incubated with no nanobody (C1) or with a cortactin NTA nanobody against the N-terminal acidic (NTA) region of cortactin (C2). N-WASp was blotted and detected by anti-N-WASp antibody. To see the pull down of the 4 selected VCA Nbs using HNSCC61 cancer cells, which express EGFP-tagged VCA Nbs, see S1 Fig.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.g001

Mitochondrial outer membrane anchoring and intracellular displacement of N-WASp

To investigate whether the nanobodies would still bind their target in the reducing environment of the cytosol, we performed a MOM (mitochondrial outer membrane) delocalisation assay. In this experiment, the nanobodies were equipped with a MOM- and V5-tag at their N-terminus. The MOM-tag originates from yeast TOM70 [34] and redirects the tagged nanobodies to the mitochondrial outer membrane, which can confirm the intracellular binding capacity of VCA Nb to endogenous N-WASp. If N-WASp binds to the VCA Nbs, N-WASp will be found at the mitochondrial outer membrane which does not correspond with its natural subcellular localization. The effectiveness of the MOM-tag is first analysed by performing immunofluorescent assays visualising the mitochondria with Mitotracker Orange (S2 Fig). This confirmed that the MOM-tagged nanobody patterns are similar to the mitochondrial patterns. Further, we will only look at the nanobody patterns as it stands for the mitochondrial patterns. Secondly, the N-WASp co-localisation is performed by visualising the VCA Nbs and N-WASp at the same time. In MOM-tagged EGFP Nb expressing control cells, no mitochondria-like pattern for N-WASp could be found (Fig 2, upper panel). The same was observed in MOM-VCA Nb1, 5 and 15 expressing cells. These are the same 3 nanobodies which did not bind N-WASp in pull down experiments. All other MOM-VCA nanobodies resulted in a mitochondrial-like N-WASp distribution pattern. This was most obvious in MOM-VCA Nb2, 7, 13 and 14 expressing cells (Fig 2, lower panels). The intensity plots were determined as well to quantify the co-localisation (Fig 2, at the right). In conclusion, the nanobodies which were able to bind N-WASp in vitro (Fig 1) are also able to efficiently capture endogenous N-WASp in the dense intracellular environment, demonstrating their in vivo interaction with the target.

Download:

Fig 2. VCA Nb2, 7, 13 and 14 capture endogenous N-WASp at mitochondria.

Representative epifluorescence images of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells transiently expressing VCA Nbs equipped with a MOM-tag. MOM-tagged EGFP nanobody was used as a negative control (upper panel). Nuclei were visualized with DAPI (blue), nanobodies with anti-V5 antibody (green) and N-WASp with anti-N-WASp antibody (red). Right: the intensity profiles for N-WASp (red) and MOM-tagged nanobodies (green) are very similar, indicative of co-localisation, except for the EGFP nanobody (negative control). (Scale bar = 10 μm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.g002

The mitochondrial patterns of the MOM-tagged VCA Nb13 and VCA Nb14 show a dissimilar pattern compared to the control and the other VCA Nb conditions (VCA Nb2 and VCA Nb7) (Fig 2 and S2 Fig). These patterns were only found with the MOM-tag which is used here to demonstrate binding. In all subsequent experiments this tag was not included and under these conditions the mitochondrial pattern looks the same for all nanobodies (S3 Fig).

Affinity and stoichiometry of 4 selected VCA Nbs

Based on the pull down and MOM delocalisation criteria, we determined the binding affinity and stoichiometric properties of 4 nanobodies; VCA Nb2, 7, 13 and 14. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) was performed at physiological pH by using recombinant VCA Nbs (S4 Fig). As these nanobodies were generated against a domain of N-WASp, we used chemically synthesized pure VCA peptide. The K_d values were determined at 0.699 ± 0.154 μM for VCA Nb2, 0.820 ± 0.201 μM for VCA Nb7, 0.685 ± 0.133 μM for VCA Nb13 and 1.597 ± 0.249 μM for VCA Nb14 (Table 1 and S4 Fig). These results showed that VCA Nb2, 7, 13 and 14 have a submicromolar affinity for the VCA peptide. This submicromolar affinity proved to be sufficient as the VCA nanobodies were able to relocate N-WASp to the outer membrane of mitochondria (Fig 2).

Download:

Table 1. Thermodynamic parameters (and respectively standard deviations) of HA-tagged VCA nanobodies interacting with synthetic VCA peptide, determined by ITC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.t001

The VCA Nbs interfere in the binding between N-WASp and its direct interaction partner Arp2/3, but not actin

N-WASps VCA domain can directly interact with actin monomers via its V region and with Arp2/3 via its CA regions. To analyse if the VCA Nbs are able to interfere with the binding between N-WASp and either actin or Arp2/3, a pull down assay was performed by adding a concentration range of VCA Nb2, 7, 13 or 14 together with biotinylated VCA peptide and STREPTactin beads. As an Arp2/3 and actin source, we used MDA-MB-231 cell lysate (Fig 3). Via Western blotting, the amount of bound Arp2/3 and actin was quantified. A quadruplicate of this experiment was analysed with a Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunns post tests. Four different concentrations of each VCA Nb were added, based on the stoichiometry of VCA Nb to the VCA domain. The results show a dose dependent decrease of Arp2/3 binding with increasing concentrations of VCA Nb. While only VCA Nb2 and VCA Nb13 were able to show significant differences, the decreasing trend was found in all four VCA Nbs. This reduction in binding was not observed for actin, meaning that VCA Nbs do not disturb the interaction between N-WASp and actin and VCA Nbs do not interfere at the V region of the VCA domain.

Download:

Fig 3. VCA Nb effect on actin or Arp2/3 binding to N-WASp using a nanobody concentration range.

Pull down was performed by using biotin-tagged VCA peptide, MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lysate, recombinant VCA Nbs and STREPTactin beads. The two controls (no nanobody (No Nb) or EGFP Nb) show maximal Arp2/3 binding. A concentration range was used (VCA Nb: VCA domain stoichiometry of 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x). For each repeat, actin as well as Arp2/3 were analysed on western blot and quantification was done using ImageJ (bars represent mean and SEM, n = 3). Kruskal-Wallis and Duns post test was performed. On top the influence of each VCA Nb on actin—N-WASp binding (A-D) is shown and at the bottom the effect of each VCA Nb on Arp2/3 –N-WASp binding (E-H) is shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.g003

VCA nanobodies reduce cancer cell invadopodium formation

Before a fully mature invadopodium can be formed, an invadopodium precursor has to be created. N-WASp plays an important role in the latter [8–10]. The VCA domain of N-WASp brings Arp2/3 and actin monomers in close proximity to enhance actin polymerisation. This polymerisation creates actin-based protrusions, which in cancer cells may develop into invadopodia. To visualise N-WASp in invadopodia, a staining was performed of invadopodia markers (actin and cortactin) (Fig 4). Our findings clearly revealed N-WASp concentrated at invadopodium sites, which confirms previous research [10, 24].

Download:

Fig 4. N-WASp colocalizes with invadopodia markers.

Representative epifluorescence images of HNSCC61 head and neck squamous cancer cells. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI (blue) and N-WASp (green) with anti-N-WASp antibody. Invadopodia were visualized by using an invadopodium marker; (A) actin (red) with Alexa Fluor labelled phalloidin and (B) cortactin (red) with anti-cortactin antibody. (Scale bar = 10 μm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.g004

To analyse if the VCA Nbs could influence invadopodium formation in different cancer cells, lentiviral, stable doxycycline-inducible MDA-MB-231 breast and HNSCC61 head and neck squamous cancer cell lines were made in which EGFP-tagged VCA Nbs are expressed as intrabodies. As a control, an EGFP-only expressing stable cell line was made. After nanobody induction overnight, the cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde and stained with phalloidin. When VCA Nb2, 7, 13 and 14 were expressed a significant reduction in invadopodia numbers was observed in both MDA-MB-231 and HNSCC61 cancer cells (Fig 5).

Download:

Fig 5. Expression of VCA Nbs in cancer cells reduces invadopodia number.

Representative epifluorescence images of HNSCC61 head and neck squamous cancer cells which express EGFP-tagged VCA Nbs (green) (A). Nuclei were visualized with DAPI (blue) and actin (red) with phalloidin. Bar plots of MDA-MB-231 breast (B) and HNSCC61 head and neck squamous (C) cancer cells, which inducible express EGFP- tagged VCA Nbs, were used to count invadopodia per cell. Quantification was done using ImageJ and Kruskal-Wallis and Dunns post tests were performed. As negative control EGFP-only expressing stable cells were used. (* p < 5%, ** p < 1%, *** p < 0.01%).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.g005

The VCA Nbs reduce overall matrix degradation

A conspicuous and important link to metastasis is the proteolytic activity of a mature invadopodium [3]. Once this structure is formed, matrix remodelling follows, underlining the importance of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). MMPs are zinc-containing endopeptidases [2, 8, 35, 36]. The gelatinases MMP2 and MMP9 and the membrane bound collagenase MT1-MMP (also known as MMP14) are the most abundant MMPs. The latter is important since it acts as a master switch to activate other MMPs [2, 12, 35, 36]. To analyse the effect of N-WASp nanobodies on matrix degradation, stable doxycycline-inducible PC-3 prostate cancer cell lines were constructed in which the EGFP-tagged VCA Nbs are expressed as an intrabody after adding doxycycline. As a control, an EGFP-only expressing stable cell line was made. In earlier studies we have used a similar approach [27, 28, 37–40]. The cells were seeded on a Cy3-gelatin matrix and overnight induced with doxycycline (Fig 6A). Analysis was done with ImageJ [28, 41] and a Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunns post tests were performed. First, the degradation index was determined. This parameter can be interpreted as the normalised difference between the mean grey value of the background (here the red fluorescent labelled gelatin matrix) and of the cell area. For two out of four VCA Nbs (VCA Nb7 and Nb14), significant less degradation was found (Fig 6B). The second parameter ‘degradation area per cell’ revealed significantly less degradation per cell for the same two VCA Nbs (Fig 6C). Thirdly, the ratio of ‘degradation area to total cell area’ was determined. This parameter gives only for VCA Nb14 a significant reduction in degradation per cell area (Fig 6D). In conclusion, only expression of VCA Nb7 and 14 in PC-3 cells resulted in reduced matrix degradation.

Download:

Fig 6. Effects of VCA intrabodies on matrix degradation.

(A) Representative epifluorescence images of PC-3 prostate cancer cells, which inducibly express EGFP-tagged VCA Nbs, were seeded on Cy3-gelatin matrix (scale bar = 10 μm). As negative control EGFP-only expressing stable cells were used. Quantification was done using ImageJ and Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunns post tests were performed. Degrading capacity of PC-3 cells was analyzed by 3 parameters. For the first parameter ‘degradation index’ (B) and the second parameter ‘degradation area per cell’ (C), a comparison between ‘not induced’ and ‘doxycycline induced’ was made for each stable cell line. The third parameter ‘degradation area per total cell area’ (D) was compared to the EGFP-only cell line. (ns = not significant, * p < 5%, ** p < 1%, *** p < 0.01%).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.g006

Matrix remodelling is caused by proteolytic activity of invadopodia [3, 8]. The MMPs need to be transported through the invadopodia before they can perform their function extracellularly. N-WASp is suggested to form actin comet tails at vesicles, which brings the MMPs to the membrane [42]. These actin tails will give the vesicles a propelling force to help their movement. To study this, the secretion and activity in the medium of the most abundant MMP was analysed by zymography experiments with PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Initially, the purpose was to study either MMP2 and MMP9, but no MMP2 activity was observed after 20 h of incubation, not even in the control experiment. We could observe a small decrease of MMP9 secretion/activity between the induced and the non-induced VCA Nb-EGFP expressing cell lines but these proved to be not statistically significant (S5 Fig). Furthermore, another proposed function of N-WASp involves proper localisation of MT1-MMP [8]. The potential effect of the VCA Nbs on MT1-MMP positioning was analysed in HNSCC61 cells by counting MT1-MMP containing invadopodia when MT1-MMP positive dots overlapped with F-actin dots. However, no difference in MT1-MMP localisation was observed (S6 Fig). In conclusion, VCA Nb7 and VCA Nb14 reduce the degrading properties of PC-3 cells, but without significant effects on MMP9 secretion/activity or on MT1-MMP localisation.

Discussion

In this study, nanobodies were generated against the VCA domain of N-WASp, an actin and Arp2/3 interaction partner. Out of all binders, four VCA nanobodies (VCA Nb2, 7, 13 and 14) were selected and expressed in 3 different cancer cell lines. Pull down experiments and immunofluorescence revealed their ability to bind endogenous N-WASp. Their submicromolar affinity for the VCA peptide was determined with ITC. Previous studies found actin binding affinities to the VCA domain of WASP family proteins ranging from 50 to 250 nM, also using ITC [43, 44]. The affinity between VCA and Arp2/3 complex is more difficult to determine and expected to be lower [45–49]. Depending on the techniques used, previous research suggested a binding of one Arp2/3 complex to two N-WASp molecules [45–47]. These previously determined affinities cover a broad range, but almost all conclude that the affinity differences between those two binding sites differs by one or two order of magnitude [45–47]. As we observed a delocalization of N-WASp using the MOM-tagged VCA nanobodies (Fig 2), a decreased binding of Arp2/3 to VCA in the presence of the VCA Nbs (Fig 3), a significant disturbance of invadopodium formation (Fig 5) and a decrease in the overall matrix degradation (Fig 6), we conclude that VCA nanobodies indeed perturb several functions of endogenous N-WASp in these cancer cells.

N-WASp participates in the formation of an invadopodium precursor which activates the actin polymerisation process. It was previously demonstrated that N-WASp is a key player in invadopodium genesis [50]. The cancer cell receives a signal (i.e. EGF) which activates a cascade leading to invadopodium formation. In this cascade, the RhoGTPase CDC42 is activated and will change the conformation of N-WASp from the inactive to the active state [14, 51]. Only in the active state will the VCA domain of N-WASp bind Arp2/3 and actin and stimulate actin polymerisation at the pre-invadopodium site. Next, Arp3 binds to cortactin and after the activated N-WASp comes in, the Arp2/3 complex will interact with N-WASp, leading to a higher activation of Arp2/3 and initiation of actin polymerisation [11]. N-WASp interacts with Arp2/3 through the central or cofilin-like (C) and acidic (A) regions of the VCA domain. Of the seven subunits of the Arp2/3 complex, only Arp2 and Arp3 bind to the VCA domain of N-WASp [11, 12]. This double interaction differs in properties and functions [22, 52]. The first interaction occurs at the acidic (A) region of the VCA domain and is important for the affinity between N-WASp and the Arp2/3 complex, but is not essential for Arp2/3 activation. The second interaction involves the central (C) region, which binds Arp2/3 with lower affinity, but it is indispensable for Arp2/3 activation. Our observations show that the VCA nanobodies are able to interfere with this process. The Arp2/3 and actin binding experiments reveal that the VCA Nbs have no effect on actin binding, but the VCA Nbs all show a reduction in Arp2/3 interaction with VCA. Moreover, we observed a significant reduction in the number of invadopodia, both in MDA-MB-231 and HNSCC61 cells, when VCA Nbs were expressed as intrabody (Fig 5), highlighting the importance of the VCA domain of N-WASp in invadopodium formation [6, 17, 22, 23]. Because VCA Nb2 and VCA Nb13 show a significant reduction in Arp2/3 interaction, we suggest that these nanobodies interrupt the interactions via binding to the acidic (A) region of the VCA domain. In contrast, VCA Nb7 and VCA Nb14 elicit only a slight reduction in Arp2/3 interaction, but display a significant effect in the degradation properties of PC-3 cells. We suggest that VCA Nb7 and VCA Nb14 bind the central (C) region of the VCA domain, where they do not disturb the Arp2/3 interaction that much, but more specifically affect Arp2/3 activation. Because VCA Nb2 and VCA Nb13 do not show an effect on overall degradation, we hypothesize that the interference with the acidic (A) part of the VCA domain is enough to significantly reduce the number of invadopodia but not sufficient to show effects in the following degradation step.

After invadopodium maturation, matrix remodelling will follow. Our results revealed that VCA Nb7 and 14 were able to significantly reduce the overall degradation (Fig 6). Presumably, these nanobodies lead to invadopodia that are defective in protrusion through interfering with N-WASp—Arp2/3 interaction. When there are less protrusive invadopodia, the overall degrading properties of cells will decrease because actin polymerisation is what drives invadopodium growth through the matrix, followed by matrix degradation.

The properties of N-WASp in this pathway may also be related to the transportation of vesicles [15, 42, 53]. To elicit matrix degradation, the MMPs must traverse the invadopodium to the extracellular space, where they can exert their function [53]. N-WASp is expected to activate actin polymerisation via Arp2/3 to form actin comet tails at vesicles [42, 53]. This will give a propelling force to enhance the movement of these vesicles through an invadopodium [15, 53]. To study this further, we analysed MMP9 secretion and activity in VCA nanobody expressing cancer cells. However, in PC-3 cells no effects were found (S5 Fig). This is contrary to what we observed for cortactin [40]. Indeed, cortactin nanobodies targeting its C-terminal SH3 or the N-terminal NTA domains significantly reduced MMP9 secretion and activity. FasNb5 however, which blocks the actin bundling activity of the actin bundling protein fascin that is also present in invadopodia, did not [28, 40]. Alternatively, the degrading properties of N-WASp can be attributed to MT1-MMP as suggested previously [8]. Yu et al. concluded that N-WASp plays a role in matrix degradation by optimising the organisation and positioning of MT1-MMP, the master switch of other MMPs. At the cytoplasmic tail of MT1-MMP, N-WASp creates an actin network to specifically stabilize MT1-MMP to increase the effectiveness of degradation [8]. Moreover, no difference in MT1-MMP localisation was observed in HNSCC61 cells (S6 Fig). Currently, we suggest that the reduction in overall matrix degradation is due to the reduction in Arp2/3 complex binding to N-WASp leading to defective invadopodia. When the VCA Nbs reduce the number of invadopodia per cell, the overall degradation properties will also be lower per cell. Less invadopodia implies less available MT1-MMP (enriched in invadopodia) for degradation. We therefore propose that the effect of N-WASp in matrix remodelling is caused by its regulation of invadopodium formation.

Recently, Fulcher et al. succeeded in eradicating endogenous proteins via the proteasome degradation pathway using nanobodies and monobodies [54]. If this approach proves to be efficient for a broad variety of targets (providing that a nano/monobody can be generated or is available), it would be an important new tool to study protein function, one that parallels the advent of RNAi in mammalian cells nearly two decades ago [55]. In this respect, Shaefer et al. very recently demonstrated that CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing can trigger hundreds of unintended mutations and deletions in the genome [56]. It is therefore incumbent to continue developing new methodologies aimed at studying protein function in cells and organisms and we expect that proteasome-induced protein knock out represents a valuable and important new technological approach towards this end.

In conclusion, nanobodies against the VCA domain of N-WASp affect invadopodium formation and overall matrix degradation, most likely via regulation of N-WASp—Arp2/3 complex interaction, indicating that this region of N-WASp critically contributes to these processes.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. VCA nanobody—N-WASp binding in EGFP-tagged VCA Nb expressing HNSCC61.

The EGFP-tagged VCA Nbs were pulled down using a GFP Ab and Protein G Sepharose beads. N-WASp is detected by N-WASp antibody and the VCA-Nbs by GFP Ab.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Mitochondrial pattern in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells which transiently express a VCA Nb equipped with a MOM-tag.

Representative epifluorescence images showing the mitochondrial patterns indicating that the MOM-tag directs the nanobody to the mitochondrial outer membrane (compare with the Mitotracker channel). MOM-tagged EGFP nanobody was used as a negative control (upper panel). Nuclei were visualized with DAPI (blue), nanobodies with anti-V5 antibody (green) and the mitochondria with Mitotracker Orange (red). (Scale bar = 10 μm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Mitochondrial pattern in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in which EGFP-tagged VCA Nbs inducably are expressed.

Representative epifluorescence images showing the mitochondrial patterns. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI (blue) and the mitochondria with Mitotracker Orange (red). (Scale bar = 10 μm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Affinity study of VCA Nbs.

ITC profiles of recombinant HA-tagged VCA Nbs with synthetic VCA peptide of human N-WASp. VCA peptide was titrated once with VCA Nb7 and once with VCA Nb14. VCA Nb2 and VCA Nb13 were titrated with VCA peptide. The upper panel shows the raw data of heat release in function of time, while the lower panel shows the fitted binding curve of total heat release per injection as a function of the molar ratio.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Effects of VCA Nbs on MMP9 secretion and activity levels.

(A) Quantification of MMP9 levels in medium was determined using ImageJ after SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. As control the uninduced cell line was used. (B) Activity was obtained after digestion in 0.1% gelatin gel. Quantification was performed using ImageJ and a Kruskal-Wallis and Dunns post tests were performed. The bars represent mean and SEM (n = 3). (ns = not significant).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Effects of VCA Nbs on MT1-MMP positioning.

MT1-MMP containing invadopodia were counted when MT1-MMP dots were overlapping with F-actin dots in HNSCC61 cells, in which VCA Nbs expression could be induced. The number of MT1-MMP containing invadopodia was divided by the total amount of invadopodia for each cell and Kruskal-Wallis and Dunns post tests were used. The bar plot represents mean and SEM (n = 3). (ns = not significant).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185076.s006

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Research Foundation Flanders (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO) Vlaanderen) and Ghent University (BOF13/GOA/010). T.H. is supported by Ghent University (BOF PhD fellowship) and an Emmanuel van der Schueren grant of the Flemish League against Cancer (VLK). A.V. is supported by the Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT). I.V.A. is supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO) Vlaanderen).

The authors thank Dr. Gholamreza Hassanzadeh-Ghassabeh (Nanobody Service Facility, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Brussels, Belgium) for the generation and isolation of VCA-specific nanobodies. We thank Dr. A. Weaver (Department of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) for the gift of HNSCC61 cells, Prof. Dr. Marc Bracke (Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Belgium) for the gift of MDA-MB-231 cells and Prof. Dr. Sven Eyckerman (VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, Ghent University, Belgium) for the gift of HEK293T cells.

References

1. Kim MY, Oskarsson T, Acharyya S, Nguyen DX, Zhang XHF, Norton L, et al. Tumor Self-Seeding by Circulating Cancer Cells. Cell. 2009;139(7):1315–26. pmid:20064377
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Stylli SS, Kaye AH, Lock P. Invadopodia: At the cutting edge of tumour invasion. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2008;15(7):725–37. pmid:18468901
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Leong HS, Robertson AE, Stoletov K, Leith SJ, Chin CA, Chien AE, et al. Invadopodia Are Required for Cancer Cell Extravasation and Are a Therapeutic Target for Metastasis. Cell Reports. 2014;8(5):1558–70. pmid:25176655
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Yamaguchi H, Wyckoff J, Condeelis J. Cell migration in tumors. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2005;17(5):559–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.002.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Siar CH, Rahman ZABA, Tsujigiwa H, Mohamed Om Alblazi K, Nagatsuka H, Ng KH. Invadopodia proteins, cortactin, N-WASP and WIP differentially promote local invasiveness in ameloblastoma. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. 2016.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Rohatgi R, Ma L, Miki H, Lopez M, Kirchhausen T, Takenawa T, et al. The interaction between N-WASP and the Arp2/3 complex links Cdc42-dependent signals to actin assembly. Cell. 1999;97(2):221–31. pmid:10219243
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Oser M, Yamaguchi H, Mader CC, Bravo-Cordero J, Arias M, Chen X, et al. Cortactin regulates cofilin and N-WASp activities to control the stages of invadopodium assembly and maturation. The Journal of cell biology. 2009;186(4):571–87. pmid:19704022
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Yu X, Zech T, McDonald L, Gonzalez EG, Li A, Macpherson I, et al. N-WASP coordinates the delivery and F-actin–mediated capture of MT1-MMP at invasive pseudopods. The Journal of cell biology. 2012;199(3):527–44. pmid:23091069
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. DesMarais V, Yamaguchi H, Oser M, Soon L, Mouneimne G, Sarmiento C, et al. N-WASP and Cortactin Are Involved In Invadopodium-Dependent Chemotaxis to EGF In Breast Tumor Cells. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton. 2009;66(6):303–16. pmid:19373774
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Yamaguchi H, Lorenz M, Kempiak S, Sarmiento C, Coniglio S, Symons M, et al. Molecular mechanisms of invadopodium formation: the role of the N-WASP-Arp2/3 complex pathway and cofilin. Journal of Cell Biology. 2005;168(3):441–52. pmid:15684033
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Carlier M-F. Actin-based motility: Springer; 2010.
12. Pollitt AY, Insall RH. WASP and SCAR/WAVE proteins: the drivers of actin assembly. Journal of Cell Science. 2009;122(15):2575–8. pmid:19625501
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Pichot CS, Arvanitis C, Hartig SM, Jensen SA, Bechill J, Marzouk S, et al. Cdc42-interacting protein 4 promotes breast cancer cell invasion and formation of invadopodia through activation of N-WASp. Cancer research. 2010;70(21):8347–56. pmid:20940394
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Miki H, Takenawa T. Regulation of actin dynamics by WASP family proteins. Journal of biochemistry. 2003;134(3):309–13. pmid:14561714
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Oda A, Eto K. WASPs and WAVEs: From molecular function to physiology in hematopoietic cells. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2013;24(4):308–13. pmid:23499790
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Snapper SB, Rosen FS. The Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP): roles in signaling and cytoskeletal organization. Annual review of immunology. 1999;17(1):905–29.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Gligorijevic B, Wyckoff J, Yamaguchi H, Wang YR, Roussos ET, Condeelis J. N-WASP-mediated invadopodium formation is involved in intravasation and lung metastasis of mammary tumors. Journal of Cell Science. 2012;125(3):724–34. pmid:22389406
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Yamazaki D, Kurisu S, Takenawa T. Regulation of cancer cell motility through actin reorganization. Cancer science. 2005;96(7):379–86. pmid:16053508
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Bompard G, Caron E. Regulation of WASP/WAVE proteins making a long story short. The Journal of cell biology. 2004;166(7):957–62. pmid:15452139
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Oda A, Eto K, editors. WASPs and WAVEs: From molecular function to physiology in hematopoietic cells. Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2013: Elsevier.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Suetsugu S, Miki H, Takenawa T. Spatial and temporal regulation of actin polymerization for cytoskeleton formation through Arp2/3 complex and WASP/WAVE proteins. Cell motility and the cytoskeleton. 2002;51(3):113–22. pmid:11921168
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Suetsugu S, Miki H, Takenawa T. Identification of another actin-related protein (Arp) 2/3 complex binding site in neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP) that complements actin polymerization induced by the Arp2/3 complex activating (VCA) domain of N-WASP. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(35):33175–80. pmid:11432863
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Miki H, Sasaki T, Takai Y, Takenawa T. Induction of filopodium formation by a WASP-related actin-depolymerizing protein N-WASP. Nature. 1998;391(6662):93–6. pmid:9422512
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Kurisu S, Takenawa T. WASP and WAVE family proteins: friends or foes in cancer invasion? Cancer science. 2010;101(10):2093–104. pmid:20707804
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Hamers-Casterman C, Atarhouch T, Muyldermans S, Robinson G, Hammers C, Songa EB, et al. Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature. 1993;363(6428):446–8. pmid:8502296
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Delanote V, Vanloo B, Catillon M, Friederich E, Vandekerckhove J, Gettemans J. An alpaca single-domain antibody blocks filopodia formation by obstructing L-plastin-mediated F-actin bundling. Faseb Journal. 2010;24(1):105–18. pmid:19726756
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Van den Abbeele A, De Clercq S, De Ganck A, De Corte V, Van Loo B, Soror SH, et al. A llama-derived gelsolin single-domain antibody blocks gelsolin-G-actin interaction. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2010;67(9):1519–35. pmid:20140750
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Van Audenhove I, Boucherie C, Pieters L, Zwaenepoel O, Vanloo B, Martens E, et al. Stratifying fascin and cortactin function in invadopodium formation using inhibitory nanobodies and targeted subcellular delocalization. Faseb Journal. 2014;28(4):1805–18. pmid:24414419
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Beghein E, Van Audenhove I, Zwaenepoel O, Verhelle A, De Ganck A, Gettemans J. A new survivin tracer tracks, delocalizes and captures endogenous survivin at different subcellular locations and in distinct organelles. Scientific Reports. 2016;6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Clark ES, Whigham AS, Yarbrough WG, Weaver AM. Cortactin is an essential regulator of matrix metalloproteinase secretion and extracellular matrix degradation in invadopodia. Cancer Research. 2007;67(9):4227–35. pmid:17483334
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Clark ES, Brown B, Whigham AS, Kochaishvili A, Yarbrough WG, Weaver AM. Aggressiveness of HNSCC tumors depends on expression levels of cortactin, a gene in the 11q13 amplicon. Oncogene. 2009;28(3):431–44. pmid:18931703
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Weichselbaum RR, Dahlberg W, Beckett M, Karrison T, Miller D, Clark J, et al. Radiation-resistant and repair-proficient human tumor cells may be associated with radiotherapy failure in head-and neck-cancer patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1986;83(8):2684–8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Somers K, Cartwright S, Schechter G. Amplification of the int-2 gene in human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oncogene. 1990;5(6):915–20. pmid:2193294
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. McBride HM, Millar DG, Li J-M, Shore GC. A signal-anchor sequence selective for the mitochondrial outer membrane. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1992;119(6):1451–7. pmid:1334957
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Linder S, Wiesner C, Himmel M. Degrading Devices: Invadosomes in Proteolytic Cell Invasion. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vol 27. 2011;27:185–211. pmid:21801014
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Mattila PK, Lappalainen P. Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2008;9(6):446–54. pmid:18464790
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. De Clercq S, Boucherie C, Vandekerckhove J, Gettemans J, Guillabert A. L-Plastin Nanobodies Perturb Matrix Degradation, Podosome Formation, Stability and Lifetime in THP-1 Macrophages. Plos One. 2013;8(11). pmid:24236012
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Van Audenhove I, Debeuf N, Boucherie C, Gettemans J. Fascin actin bundling controls podosome turnover and disassembly while cortactin is involved in podosome assembly by its SH3 domain in THP-1 macrophages and dendritic cells. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Molecular Cell Research. 2015;1853(5):940–52. pmid:25601713
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Van Audenhove I, Denert M, Boucherie C, Pieters L, Cornelissen M, Gettemans J. Fascin Rigidity and L-plastin Flexibility Cooperate in Cancer Cell Invadopodia and Filopodia. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2016;291(17):9148–60. pmid:26945069
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Bertier L, Boucherie C, Zwaenepoel O, Vanloo B, Van Troys M, Van Audenhove I, et al. Inhibitory cortactin nanobodies delineate the role of NTA-and SH3-domain–specific functions during invadopodium formation and cancer cell invasion. The FASEB Journal. 2017:fj. 201600810RR.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Van Audenhove I, Gettemans J. Use of Nanobodies to Localize Endogenous Cytoskeletal Proteins and to Determine Their Contribution to Cancer Cell Invasion by Using an ECM Degradation Assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1365:225–41. pmid:26498788
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Li A, Dawson JC, Forero-Vargas M, Spence HJ, Yu X, König I, et al. The actin-bundling protein fascin stabilizes actin in invadopodia and potentiates protrusive invasion. Current biology. 2010;20(4):339–45. pmid:20137952
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Chereau D, Kerff F, Graceffa P, Grabarek Z, Langsetmo K, Dominguez R. Actin-bound structures of Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP)-homology domain 2 and the implications for filament assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(46):16644–9. pmid:16275905
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Chereau D, Dominguez R. Understanding the role of the G-actin-binding domain of Ena/VASP in actin assembly. Journal of structural biology. 2006;155(2):195–201. pmid:16684607
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Boczkowska M, Rebowski G, Kast DJ, Dominguez R. Structural analysis of the transitional state of Arp2/3 complex activation by two actin-bound WCAs. Nature communications. 2014;5.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Ti S-C, Jurgenson CT, Nolen BJ, Pollard TD. Structural and biochemical characterization of two binding sites for nucleation-promoting factor WASp-VCA on Arp2/3 complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(33):E463–E71.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Hetrick B, Han MS, Helgeson LA, Nolen BJ. Small molecules CK-666 and CK-869 inhibit actin-related protein 2/3 complex by blocking an activating conformational change. Chemistry & biology. 2013;20(5):701–12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Marchand J-B, Kaiser DA, Pollard TD, Higgs HN. Interaction of WASP/Scar proteins with actin and vertebrate Arp2/3 complex. Nature cell biology. 2001;3(1):76–82. pmid:11146629
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Uruno T, Liu J, Zhang P, Fan Y-X, Egile C, Li R, et al. Activation of Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin polymerization by cortactin. Nature cell biology. 2001;3(3):259–66. pmid:11231575
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Murphy DA, Courtneidge SA. The 'ins' and 'outs' of podosomes and invadopodia: characteristics, formation and function. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2011;12(7):413–26. pmid:21697900
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Kim AS, Kakalis LT, Abdul-Manan M, Liu GA, Rosen MK. Autoinhibition and activation mechanisms of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein. Nature. 2000;404(6774):151–8. pmid:10724160
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Hüfner K, Higgs HN, Pollard TD, Jacobi C, Aepfelbacher M, Linder S. The verprolin-like central (vc) region of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein induces Arp2/3 complex-dependent actin nucleation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(38):35761–7. pmid:11459849
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Burianek LE, Soderling SH. Under lock and key: Spatiotemporal regulation of WASP family proteins coordinates separate dynamic cellular processes. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2013;24(4):258–66. pmid:23291261
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Fulcher LJ, Hutchinson LD, Macartney TJ, Turnbull C, Sapkota GP. Targeting endogenous proteins for degradation through the affinity-directed protein missile system. Open Biology. 2017;7(5):170066. pmid:28490657
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. nature. 2001;411(6836):494. pmid:11373684
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Schaefer KA, Wu W-H, Colgan DF, Tsang SH, Bassuk AG, Mahajan VB. Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo. Nat Meth. 2017;14(6):547–8. http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v14/n6/abs/nmeth.4293.html#supplementary-information
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Kim MY, Oskarsson T, Acharyya S, Nguyen DX, Zhang XHF, Norton L, et al. Tumor Self-Seeding by Circulating Cancer Cells. Cell. 2009;139(7):1315–26. pmid:20064377
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Stylli SS, Kaye AH, Lock P. Invadopodia: At the cutting edge of tumour invasion. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2008;15(7):725–37. pmid:18468901
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Leong HS, Robertson AE, Stoletov K, Leith SJ, Chin CA, Chien AE, et al. Invadopodia Are Required for Cancer Cell Extravasation and Are a Therapeutic Target for Metastasis. Cell Reports. 2014;8(5):1558–70. pmid:25176655
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Yamaguchi H, Wyckoff J, Condeelis J. Cell migration in tumors. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2005;17(5):559–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.002.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Siar CH, Rahman ZABA, Tsujigiwa H, Mohamed Om Alblazi K, Nagatsuka H, Ng KH. Invadopodia proteins, cortactin, N-WASP and WIP differentially promote local invasiveness in ameloblastoma. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. 2016.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Rohatgi R, Ma L, Miki H, Lopez M, Kirchhausen T, Takenawa T, et al. The interaction between N-WASP and the Arp2/3 complex links Cdc42-dependent signals to actin assembly. Cell. 1999;97(2):221–31. pmid:10219243
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] PubMed/NCBI

[22] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Oser M, Yamaguchi H, Mader CC, Bravo-Cordero J, Arias M, Chen X, et al. Cortactin regulates cofilin and N-WASp activities to control the stages of invadopodium assembly and maturation. The Journal of cell biology. 2009;186(4):571–87. pmid:19704022
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] PubMed/NCBI

[26] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Yu X, Zech T, McDonald L, Gonzalez EG, Li A, Macpherson I, et al. N-WASP coordinates the delivery and F-actin–mediated capture of MT1-MMP at invasive pseudopods. The Journal of cell biology. 2012;199(3):527–44. pmid:23091069
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[28] View Article

[29] PubMed/NCBI

[30] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. DesMarais V, Yamaguchi H, Oser M, Soon L, Mouneimne G, Sarmiento C, et al. N-WASP and Cortactin Are Involved In Invadopodium-Dependent Chemotaxis to EGF In Breast Tumor Cells. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton. 2009;66(6):303–16. pmid:19373774
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] PubMed/NCBI

[34] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Yamaguchi H, Lorenz M, Kempiak S, Sarmiento C, Coniglio S, Symons M, et al. Molecular mechanisms of invadopodium formation: the role of the N-WASP-Arp2/3 complex pathway and cofilin. Journal of Cell Biology. 2005;168(3):441–52. pmid:15684033
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] PubMed/NCBI

[38] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Carlier M-F. Actin-based motility: Springer; 2010.

[ref12] 12. Pollitt AY, Insall RH. WASP and SCAR/WAVE proteins: the drivers of actin assembly. Journal of Cell Science. 2009;122(15):2575–8. pmid:19625501
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Pichot CS, Arvanitis C, Hartig SM, Jensen SA, Bechill J, Marzouk S, et al. Cdc42-interacting protein 4 promotes breast cancer cell invasion and formation of invadopodia through activation of N-WASp. Cancer research. 2010;70(21):8347–56. pmid:20940394
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Miki H, Takenawa T. Regulation of actin dynamics by WASP family proteins. Journal of biochemistry. 2003;134(3):309–13. pmid:14561714
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Oda A, Eto K. WASPs and WAVEs: From molecular function to physiology in hematopoietic cells. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2013;24(4):308–13. pmid:23499790
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Snapper SB, Rosen FS. The Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP): roles in signaling and cytoskeletal organization. Annual review of immunology. 1999;17(1):905–29.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Gligorijevic B, Wyckoff J, Yamaguchi H, Wang YR, Roussos ET, Condeelis J. N-WASP-mediated invadopodium formation is involved in intravasation and lung metastasis of mammary tumors. Journal of Cell Science. 2012;125(3):724–34. pmid:22389406
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Yamazaki D, Kurisu S, Takenawa T. Regulation of cancer cell motility through actin reorganization. Cancer science. 2005;96(7):379–86. pmid:16053508
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] PubMed/NCBI

[66] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Bompard G, Caron E. Regulation of WASP/WAVE proteins making a long story short. The Journal of cell biology. 2004;166(7):957–62. pmid:15452139
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] PubMed/NCBI

[70] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Oda A, Eto K, editors. WASPs and WAVEs: From molecular function to physiology in hematopoietic cells. Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2013: Elsevier.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Suetsugu S, Miki H, Takenawa T. Spatial and temporal regulation of actin polymerization for cytoskeleton formation through Arp2/3 complex and WASP/WAVE proteins. Cell motility and the cytoskeleton. 2002;51(3):113–22. pmid:11921168
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Suetsugu S, Miki H, Takenawa T. Identification of another actin-related protein (Arp) 2/3 complex binding site in neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP) that complements actin polymerization induced by the Arp2/3 complex activating (VCA) domain of N-WASP. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(35):33175–80. pmid:11432863
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] PubMed/NCBI

[81] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Miki H, Sasaki T, Takai Y, Takenawa T. Induction of filopodium formation by a WASP-related actin-depolymerizing protein N-WASP. Nature. 1998;391(6662):93–6. pmid:9422512
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] PubMed/NCBI

[85] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Kurisu S, Takenawa T. WASP and WAVE family proteins: friends or foes in cancer invasion? Cancer science. 2010;101(10):2093–104. pmid:20707804
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Hamers-Casterman C, Atarhouch T, Muyldermans S, Robinson G, Hammers C, Songa EB, et al. Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature. 1993;363(6428):446–8. pmid:8502296
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Delanote V, Vanloo B, Catillon M, Friederich E, Vandekerckhove J, Gettemans J. An alpaca single-domain antibody blocks filopodia formation by obstructing L-plastin-mediated F-actin bundling. Faseb Journal. 2010;24(1):105–18. pmid:19726756
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Van den Abbeele A, De Clercq S, De Ganck A, De Corte V, Van Loo B, Soror SH, et al. A llama-derived gelsolin single-domain antibody blocks gelsolin-G-actin interaction. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2010;67(9):1519–35. pmid:20140750
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Van Audenhove I, Boucherie C, Pieters L, Zwaenepoel O, Vanloo B, Martens E, et al. Stratifying fascin and cortactin function in invadopodium formation using inhibitory nanobodies and targeted subcellular delocalization. Faseb Journal. 2014;28(4):1805–18. pmid:24414419
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Beghein E, Van Audenhove I, Zwaenepoel O, Verhelle A, De Ganck A, Gettemans J. A new survivin tracer tracks, delocalizes and captures endogenous survivin at different subcellular locations and in distinct organelles. Scientific Reports. 2016;6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Clark ES, Whigham AS, Yarbrough WG, Weaver AM. Cortactin is an essential regulator of matrix metalloproteinase secretion and extracellular matrix degradation in invadopodia. Cancer Research. 2007;67(9):4227–35. pmid:17483334
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Clark ES, Brown B, Whigham AS, Kochaishvili A, Yarbrough WG, Weaver AM. Aggressiveness of HNSCC tumors depends on expression levels of cortactin, a gene in the 11q13 amplicon. Oncogene. 2009;28(3):431–44. pmid:18931703
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Weichselbaum RR, Dahlberg W, Beckett M, Karrison T, Miller D, Clark J, et al. Radiation-resistant and repair-proficient human tumor cells may be associated with radiotherapy failure in head-and neck-cancer patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1986;83(8):2684–8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Somers K, Cartwright S, Schechter G. Amplification of the int-2 gene in human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oncogene. 1990;5(6):915–20. pmid:2193294
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. McBride HM, Millar DG, Li J-M, Shore GC. A signal-anchor sequence selective for the mitochondrial outer membrane. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1992;119(6):1451–7. pmid:1334957
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Linder S, Wiesner C, Himmel M. Degrading Devices: Invadosomes in Proteolytic Cell Invasion. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vol 27. 2011;27:185–211. pmid:21801014
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Mattila PK, Lappalainen P. Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2008;9(6):446–54. pmid:18464790
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. De Clercq S, Boucherie C, Vandekerckhove J, Gettemans J, Guillabert A. L-Plastin Nanobodies Perturb Matrix Degradation, Podosome Formation, Stability and Lifetime in THP-1 Macrophages. Plos One. 2013;8(11). pmid:24236012
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Van Audenhove I, Debeuf N, Boucherie C, Gettemans J. Fascin actin bundling controls podosome turnover and disassembly while cortactin is involved in podosome assembly by its SH3 domain in THP-1 macrophages and dendritic cells. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Molecular Cell Research. 2015;1853(5):940–52. pmid:25601713
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Van Audenhove I, Denert M, Boucherie C, Pieters L, Cornelissen M, Gettemans J. Fascin Rigidity and L-plastin Flexibility Cooperate in Cancer Cell Invadopodia and Filopodia. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2016;291(17):9148–60. pmid:26945069
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Bertier L, Boucherie C, Zwaenepoel O, Vanloo B, Van Troys M, Van Audenhove I, et al. Inhibitory cortactin nanobodies delineate the role of NTA-and SH3-domain–specific functions during invadopodium formation and cancer cell invasion. The FASEB Journal. 2017:fj. 201600810RR.
View Article
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Van Audenhove I, Gettemans J. Use of Nanobodies to Localize Endogenous Cytoskeletal Proteins and to Determine Their Contribution to Cancer Cell Invasion by Using an ECM Degradation Assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1365:225–41. pmid:26498788
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Li A, Dawson JC, Forero-Vargas M, Spence HJ, Yu X, König I, et al. The actin-bundling protein fascin stabilizes actin in invadopodia and potentiates protrusive invasion. Current biology. 2010;20(4):339–45. pmid:20137952
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Chereau D, Kerff F, Graceffa P, Grabarek Z, Langsetmo K, Dominguez R. Actin-bound structures of Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP)-homology domain 2 and the implications for filament assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(46):16644–9. pmid:16275905
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Chereau D, Dominguez R. Understanding the role of the G-actin-binding domain of Ena/VASP in actin assembly. Journal of structural biology. 2006;155(2):195–201. pmid:16684607
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Boczkowska M, Rebowski G, Kast DJ, Dominguez R. Structural analysis of the transitional state of Arp2/3 complex activation by two actin-bound WCAs. Nature communications. 2014;5.
View Article
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Ti S-C, Jurgenson CT, Nolen BJ, Pollard TD. Structural and biochemical characterization of two binding sites for nucleation-promoting factor WASp-VCA on Arp2/3 complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(33):E463–E71.
View Article
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Hetrick B, Han MS, Helgeson LA, Nolen BJ. Small molecules CK-666 and CK-869 inhibit actin-related protein 2/3 complex by blocking an activating conformational change. Chemistry & biology. 2013;20(5):701–12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Marchand J-B, Kaiser DA, Pollard TD, Higgs HN. Interaction of WASP/Scar proteins with actin and vertebrate Arp2/3 complex. Nature cell biology. 2001;3(1):76–82. pmid:11146629
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] PubMed/NCBI

[179] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Uruno T, Liu J, Zhang P, Fan Y-X, Egile C, Li R, et al. Activation of Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin polymerization by cortactin. Nature cell biology. 2001;3(3):259–66. pmid:11231575
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[181] View Article

[182] PubMed/NCBI

[183] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Murphy DA, Courtneidge SA. The 'ins' and 'outs' of podosomes and invadopodia: characteristics, formation and function. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2011;12(7):413–26. pmid:21697900
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] PubMed/NCBI

[187] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Kim AS, Kakalis LT, Abdul-Manan M, Liu GA, Rosen MK. Autoinhibition and activation mechanisms of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein. Nature. 2000;404(6774):151–8. pmid:10724160
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] PubMed/NCBI

[191] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Hüfner K, Higgs HN, Pollard TD, Jacobi C, Aepfelbacher M, Linder S. The verprolin-like central (vc) region of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein induces Arp2/3 complex-dependent actin nucleation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(38):35761–7. pmid:11459849
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] PubMed/NCBI

[195] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Burianek LE, Soderling SH. Under lock and key: Spatiotemporal regulation of WASP family proteins coordinates separate dynamic cellular processes. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2013;24(4):258–66. pmid:23291261
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[197] View Article

[198] PubMed/NCBI

[199] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Fulcher LJ, Hutchinson LD, Macartney TJ, Turnbull C, Sapkota GP. Targeting endogenous proteins for degradation through the affinity-directed protein missile system. Open Biology. 2017;7(5):170066. pmid:28490657
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[201] View Article

[202] PubMed/NCBI

[203] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. nature. 2001;411(6836):494. pmid:11373684
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[205] View Article

[206] PubMed/NCBI

[207] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Schaefer KA, Wu W-H, Colgan DF, Tsang SH, Bassuk AG, Mahajan VB. Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo. Nat Meth. 2017;14(6):547–8. http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v14/n6/abs/nmeth.4293.html#supplementary-information
View Article
Google Scholar

[209] View Article

[210] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Antibodies and reagents

Generation of VCA Nbs

cDNA cloning

Recombinant nanobody and N-WASp production

Cell culture, transfection and transduction

Pull down assays, immunoprecipitations and binding assay

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)

Immunofluorescence and microscopy

Matrix degradation

Gelatin zymography

MT1-MMP localization

Image and statistical analysis

Results

N-WASp recognising of VCA nanobodies

Mitochondrial outer membrane anchoring and intracellular displacement of N-WASp

Affinity and stoichiometry of 4 selected VCA Nbs

The VCA Nbs interfere in the binding between N-WASp and its direct interaction partner Arp2/3, but not actin

VCA nanobodies reduce cancer cell invadopodium formation

The VCA Nbs reduce overall matrix degradation

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. VCA nanobody—N-WASp binding in EGFP-tagged VCA Nb expressing HNSCC61.

S2 Fig. Mitochondrial pattern in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells which transiently express a VCA Nb equipped with a MOM-tag.

S3 Fig. Mitochondrial pattern in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in which EGFP-tagged VCA Nbs inducably are expressed.

S4 Fig. Affinity study of VCA Nbs.

S5 Fig. Effects of VCA Nbs on MMP9 secretion and activity levels.

S6 Fig. Effects of VCA Nbs on MT1-MMP positioning.

Acknowledgments

References