Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Functional indicators of response mechanisms to nitrogen deposition, ozone, and their interaction in two Mediterranean tree species

  • Lina Fusaro ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    lina.fusaro@uniroma1.it

    Affiliation Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Environmental Biology, Rome, Italy

  • Adriano Palma,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Environmental Biology, Rome, Italy

  • Elisabetta Salvatori,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Environmental Biology, Rome, Italy

  • Adriana Basile,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation University of Naples “Federico II”, Biology Department, Naples, Italy

  • Viviana Maresca,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation University of Naples “Federico II”, Biology Department, Naples, Italy

  • Elham Asadi Karam,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Biology Department, Kerman, Iran

  • Fausto Manes

    Roles Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Environmental Biology, Rome, Italy

Abstract

The effects of nitrogen (N) deposition, tropospheric ozone (O3) and their interaction were investigated in two Mediterranean tree species, Fraxinus ornus L. (deciduous) and Quercus ilex L. (evergreen), having different leaf habits and resource use strategies. An experiment was conducted under controlled condition to analyse how nitrogen deposition affects the ecophysiological and biochemical traits, and to explore how the nitrogen-induced changes influence the response to O3. For both factors we selected realistic exposures (20 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and 80 ppb h for nitrogen and O3, respectively), in order to elucidate the mechanisms implemented by the plants. Nitrogen addition resulted in higher nitrogen concentration at the leaf level in F. ornus, whereas a slight increase was detected in Q. ilex. Nitrogen enhanced the maximum rate of assimilation and ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration in both species, whereas it influenced the light harvesting complex only in the deciduous F. ornus that was also affected by O3 (reduced assimilation rate and accelerated senescence-related processes). Conversely, Q. ilex developed an avoidance mechanism to cope with O3, confirming a substantial O3 tolerance of this species. Nitrogen seemed to ameliorate the harmful effects of O3 in F. ornus: the hypothesized mechanism of action involved the production of nitrogen oxide as the first antioxidant barrier, followed by enzymatic antioxidant response. In Q. ilex, the interaction was not detected on gas exchange and photosystem functionality; however, in this species, nitrogen might stimulate an alternative antioxidant response such as the emission of volatile organic compounds. Antioxidant enzyme activity was lower in plants treated with both O3 and nitrogen even though reactive oxygen species production did not differ between the treatments.

Introduction

Mediterranean forests are subjected to challenging environmental conditions in the current global change context, since many stressors, individually or in combination, affect plant functionality simultaneously or successively over time [1]. Of more recent concern are the combined effects of ozone (O3) and nitrogen (N) on vegetation [2]. Monitoring activities in European countries have indicated that studies on O3 exposure effects are essential in Mediterranean regions [3], where the concurrence of high temperature and radiation promote the photo-stationary cycle toward high O3 concentration during the late spring and summer seasons [4].

O3 impacts forests by increasing the oxidation load, thereby triggering the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that lead to alterations of functional processes at different levels [5,6]. The production of ROS activates the detoxifying barrier in the apoplast and enzymatic activity at the symplastic level that have high metabolic cost [7,8], and the capacity to increase antioxidant defences is recognized as a key factor in determining O3 tolerance [912].

Leaf gas exchange is also affected by O3 through a direct impact on stomatal guard cell functionality [13,14] or stomatal number [15], as well as owing to a decrease in the photochemical and carboxylation efficiency [1518]. Leaf structural traits such as leaf mass area (LMA), in addition to leaf nitrogen and carbon concentrations, have been found to reveal ozone sensitivity and tolerance in different species [19,20], where species with low LMA and high leaf nitrogen concentration show higher O3 sensitivity [11,21]. Further, O3 can adversely influence these functional traits, accelerating leaf senescence processes [2224].

Nitrogen deposition represents an additional threat for Mediterranean forests adapted to low nitrogen availability [25]. During the last decades many studies have evaluated the effects of nitrogen on plant biodiversity and carbon balance or assimilation capacity [2630], but many of them have been conducted on pastures [31], boreal and temperate forest species [26], or in Chaparral species [32,33]. The implications concerning Mediterranean forests are still scarce [34], and knowledge regarding the response of the large plethora of functional traits to increasing nitrogen deposition for forest species is lacking [15,35,36]. In Italy, the average nitrogen throughfall, in terms of NO3NH4, measured using the network of permanent monitoring stations, ranges between 4 and 29 kg N ha-1 yr-1 [37], and the critical loads indicated for Mediterranean forest ecosystems that fall within the range of 10 to 15 kg N ha-1 yr-1 have low reliability owing to the lack of experimental evidence [26].

Previous studies have shown that higher nitrogen availability can increase stomatal conductance [38,39], entailing a potential harmful increase in O3 uptake. However the effects of nitrogen on hydraulic architecture and stomatal conductance are still contradictory [40]. Higher leaf nitrogen contents can result in photosynthetic enhancements owing to the key role that nitrogen has in Calvin cycle and proteins [41], or by the increase of leaf area. Recent studies on the interaction between O3 and nitrogen deposition in deciduous species have highlighted that O3 reduced the nitrogen availability for photosynthesis in Fagus crenata [42]; further, the positive effect on root development owing to nitrogen, is lost at higher O3 levels in Quercus robur L. [43]. An antagonistic effect was detected on root starch concentrations, where higher nitrogen levels alleviated the negative impact of ozone [39]. Recent findings suggested that the interactions between O3 and nitrogen depend on the concentration of these two factors and can change throughout the growing season [2]. Therefore, experiments under controlled conditions are required to better elucidate the mechanisms underlying the influence of nitrogen on the key functional traits that are involved in pollutant uptake or antioxidant defence mechanisms [2].

Moreover, species can remarkably differ in nitrogen absorption depending on the successional stage and resource allocation strategy [44,45]. Deciduous species tend to allocate nitrogen to ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), or to light-harvesting components in order to enhance the photosynthetic capacity; in contrast, in evergreen species, nitrogen is preferentially allocated to the cell walls, leading to an increase in the persistence of leaves [46,47], as well as toughness and chemical defence [48].

In this framework, we performed an experiment under controlled conditions to investigate how Fraxinus ornus L. and Quercus ilex L. react to nitrogen addition, and how nitrogen availability can influence the response mechanisms to O3. For both factors, we selected realistic exposures (20 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and 80 ppb h for N and O3, respectively), since an acute exposure could hinder the elucidation of mechanisms implemented by the plants [2]. We focused on these two species that typically co-occur in Mediterranean forests [49], and have different functional traits and successional positions. F. ornus is typical of early successional stages, with a rapid growth strategy, whereas Q. ilex belongs to the mature stage of a succession with a slow growth strategy and a conservative patterns of nutrient use [50]. Moreover, previous studies have suggested that F. ornus is moderately sensitive to O3 [51], whereas Q. ilex was considered to be tolerant to this pollutant [11,15,52]; however, to the best of our knowledge, these two species have not yet been compared directly.

Owing to leaf habit and more flexible patterns of nitrogen uptake in F. ornus than in Q. ilex [53], we hypothesized that F. ornus uptakes a large amount of nitrogen and allocates higher fraction to photosynthetic tissues; in contrast, in Q. ilex, we expected that nitrogen would be allocated to non-photosynthetic compounds. Since both the hypothesized species-specific responses to nitrogen are related to O3 tolerance, nitrogen addition could lead to mitigation of O3 detrimental effects on functional traits. The present study provides new data on F. ornus and Q. ilex that would be useful to improve the risk assessment for Mediterranean forests subjected to nitrogen deposition and ozone. Furthermore, understanding the mechanisms underlying functional trait shifts under multistress environments could facilitate the forecasting of forests’ responses to global change and addressing biodiversity conservation in the future.

Materials and methods

Growth conditions

Two-year-old seedlings of F. ornus and Q. ilex, obtained from the nursery of Aurunci Regional Park (Central Italy), were transported to the experimental garden of the Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome on 18 May 2016. Plants were transferred to 7L pots along with their clods and the remaining pot volume was filled with a mixture of sand, turf, and perlite. The experiment was conducted in a ‘walk-in’ chamber facility, consisting of two closed chambers (2.5 m × 3.9 m × 3 m h): one was used as control and one for O3 fumigation [54]. Air temperature was maintained at 27.9 ± 1.8°C during the day and at 22.7 ± 0.9°C at night. The relative humidity was 61 ± 6.1%.

In each chamber, a photosynthetic active radiation of approximately 700 μmol m−2 s−1 was provided for 12 h per day by using 6 metal halide lamps (1000 W; Philips HPI-T). The microclimatic conditions were monitored at 5-min intervals and did not differ significantly between the chambers. In each chamber, plants were randomly relocated daily to reduce possible position effects. During the entire experimental period, all plants were watered in order to maintain soil close to field capacity and avoid water stress.

Experimental design

After the plants were acclimated for 30 days to the chamber environmental conditions, 20 plants per species were randomly divided into four experimental sets (C, N, O3, and O3N). Ten plants per species were assigned to the control chamber and thus randomly divided as follows: five plants to the control experimental set (C), and five plants to nitrogen addition experimental set (N). Ten plants per species were assigned to the fumigated chamber and thus randomly divided as follows: five plants to the O3 treatment (O3), and five plants to the interaction experimental set, treated with both N and O3 (O3N).

The fertilizer was divided into 7 aliquots and applied throughout the experimental period as an aqueous solution. For this, 100 mL of deionised water was weekly added to each pot with different doses of ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3): 0 mg for C plants and 0.031 mg for N treatment. The final nitrogen dose was equal to 20 kg N ha-1 yr-1 based on the soil surface area. The ozone fumigation was started after five nitrogen additions, when the cumulative dose was roughly equivalent to 14 kg N ha-1 yr-1, which falls in the upper limit of the threshold load currently indicated as critical for Mediterranean vegetation. The acclimation to nitrogen addition phase and fumigation period lasted 30 days and 10 days, respectively.

During the fumigation period, the C and N experimental sets were kept in the control chamber under filtered air (O3 = 0 to maximal 5.8 ppb). The O3 and O3N sets were placed in the fumigation chamber and exposed for 10 consecutive days to a mean hourly O3 concentration of 87.00 ± 0.5 ppb for 5 h per day simulating a concentration found in the Mediterranean rural area during the summer period [55,56]. The cumulative exposure was 2585.47 ppb h, expressed as AOT40, calculated by summing up all of the exceedances of the hourly O3 concentration above 40 ppb during the daylight hours [56]. O3 was generated in the fumigation chamber by flowing pure oxygen on a UV light source (Helios Italquartz, Milan, Italy), and then added to the chamber air inlet via a Teflon tube. The O3 concentration at plant height was continuously monitored using a photometric O3 detector (Model 205;, 2B Technologies, Boulder, CO, USA).

Leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll (Chl) a fluorescence were measured every three days, particularly on the first, fourth, seventh and tenth day of fumigation (DOF). Immediately after the end of fumigation, leaves for biochemical analysis (antioxidant activity) and structural measurements (nitrogen and carbon concentration, leaf mass area) were sampled; PN/Ci curves were performed within two days. Further details about the measurements are provided below.

Gas exchange measurements

Steady state measurements of gas exchange were performed using a portable infrared gas analyser (CIRAS-2; PP-System International, Amesbury, MA). The net photosynthesis (PN, μmolCO2 m-2 s-1), leaf transpiration (E, mmolH2O m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmolH2O m-2 s-1) and sub-stomatal CO2 concentration (Ci, ppm) were simultaneously measured. The instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE, μmol CO2 mmol H2O-1) was calculated as the ratio between net photosynthetic rates and transpiration rates, and the ratio of substomatal and ambient CO2 concentration, Ci/Ca, was determined. All measurements were performed using fully developed leaves.

Chl a fluorescence measurements and application of the JIP-test

The Chl a fluorescence was measured using a Handy PEA direct fluorometer (Hansatech Instruments, Norfolk, UK) on the same days, hours, and leaves as those used for steady state gas exchange measurements. After a dark adaptation period of 40 min, obtained using specific leaf clips, the measured leaves were exposed to a saturating red light pulse (peak 650 nm) of 3000 μmol photons m−2 s−1, for 1 s, thereby generating a fluorescence transient (FT). The FT, plotted on a logarithmic timescale, showed a polyphasic behaviour, the different steps of which corresponded to a specific stage in the electron chain between reaction centres of photosystem II (PSII) and end acceptors of photosystem I (PSI) [57,58]. The first part of the transient curve (O–J) is called ‘single turnover region’. It expresses the photochemical events, providing information regarding the reduction of plastoquinone. The J–I–P region of the FT is called ‘multiple turnover region’ and reflects the velocity of ferredoxin reduction beyond PSI. In particular, the I–P region reflects the velocity and quantity of ferredoxin and NADP reduction via electron donation of PSI. The JIP-test was applied to the FT, and the following parameters were calculated from each curve:

  • φPo: maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry expresses the probability that an absorbed photon will be trapped by the PSII reaction centre;
  • J-phase: expression of the efficiency with which a trapped exciton can move an electron into the electron transport chain from plastoquinone to the intersystem electron acceptors;
  • IP-phase: expression of the efficiency of electron transport around PSI to reduce the final acceptors of the electron transport chain, i.e. ferredoxin and NADP+
  • PItot: a multiparametric expression that synthesizes the potential for energy conservation from photons absorbed by PSII to the reduction of PSI end acceptors.

PN/Ci response curves

The response of net photosynthesis to the variation of substomatal CO2 concentration was measured on the same leaves used for steady state gas exchange. Two intercalibrated CIRAS2 were used for simultaneous measurements in F. ornus and Q. ilex. The PN/Ci curves were constructed following Long and Bernacchi, 2003 [59]. Cuvette environment was maintained at 60% relative humidity and 25°C; photosynthetic active radiation was mantained at the saturating value of 1000 μmol m-2s-1. The assimilation rate under CO2 saturation (PNmax) was measured and the maximum electron transport rate driving regeneration of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (Jmax, mol m-2 s-1) was calculated according to Loustau et al. 1999 [60]. The CO2 compensation point Γ (ppm) was derived and the in vivo apparent Rubisco activity (Vcmax, mol m-2s-1) was calculated as the angular coefficient of the linear part of the curve. Data at very low [CO2], which can be limited by Rubisco deactivation, were excluded from the analysis [61].

Leaf chemistry and derivation of the photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency

The total leaf nitrogen and carbon concentrations (NL, CL, % dry mass) were determined using the Dumas micro-combustion technique (Eurovector EA 3000; Milan, Italy) on the same dried leaf samples used for the calculation of sclerophylly degree (see paragraph Leaf structural and total biomass traits). Samples were ground in liquid nitrogen, and five subsamples were weighed using a precision balance (MJ-300; d = 0.001g) before the analysis. photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency (PNUE) was calculated as the ratio of instantaneous PNmax to nitrogen on an area basis.

Antioxidant enzymes

Antioxidant enzyme activities were determined using fresh leaf material, which was extracted as described previously [62]. All reagents for oxidative stress detection were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). ROS production was detected using the general oxidative stress cell-permeant 2′,7′dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate dye. This dye passively diffuses into the cells and interacts with endogenous esterases, which cleave the diacetate groups. The stock solution of the dye (25 μM in DMSO) was diluted to a final concentration of 5 μM. Fluorescence was monitored using a fluorescence spectrophotometer, with an excitation wavelength of 350 nm and an emission wavelength of 600 nm. The increase in fluorescence intensity yielded the ROS quantity.

The superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined using an SOD assay kit WST (Sigma–Aldrich) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The SOD activity (inhibition of activity) was calculated by measuring the decrease in the colour development at 440 nm. Catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6) activity was measured using a commercial CAT assay kit (Sigma–Aldrich) following manufacturer’s protocol. CAT activities were calculated and expressed as a decrease in absorbance at 240 nm due to H2O2 consumption. The total ascorbate peroxidase (APX, EC 1.11.1.11) activity of leaves was assayed by monitoring the decrease in absorbance at 290 nm due to ascorbate oxidation [63]. The concentration of ascorbic acid (ASC) was measured as described by [64]. Briefly, total ascorbate was determined after the reduction of oxidised ascorbic acid (DHA) to ASC with 1,4-dithiothreitol, and the concentration of DHA was estimated from the difference between the total ascorbate pool (ASA plus DHA) and ASC. Glutathione (GSH) content was determined at 412 nm by using 5,5ʹ-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid), according to the spectrophotometric method of [65].

Leaf structural traits

The degree of sclerophylly was estimated by assessing the leaf mass area (LMA, g cm-2). After petiole exclusion, the leaf area was measured using Image Lab software (http://en.freedownloadman-ager.org/Windows-PC/Image-Lab.html), and after the samples were dried at 80°C to constant weight, the leaf dry weight (g) was measured.

Statistical analysis

The effect of time on ecophysiological measurements (gas exchange and Chl a fluorescence) was analysed using repeated measurement ANOVA with nitrogen and O3 treatments as between-subjects factors. Two-way ANOVA, with nitrogen and O3 as fixed factors, with their interaction factor, was used to analyse the ecophysiological measurements during each sampling date (DOF1, DOF 4, DOF 7, and DOF 10), and to test the differences between treatments on the PN/Ci curve parameters and on the biochemical and structural measurements performed at the end of the experiment. Two-way ANOVA was followed by post hoc Student–Neuman–Keuls test at p < 0.05 when necessary. All analyses were performed using Statistica software, version 7.0 (StatSoft, Tulsa OK, USA).

Results

Steady-state gas exchange

Advancement of time (e.g plant developmental stage) affected all the gas exchanges parameters for both species, with the exception of WUE in F. ornus. In this species, a significant time × nitrogen interaction was noted (Table 1A) for all parameters. The time × O3 interaction was significant for WUE and Ci/Ca in Q. ilex, whereas the three-level interaction was significant for WUE and Ci/Ca in both species and for gs only in Q. ilex.

thumbnail
Table 1. Analysis of variance of the gas exchange parameters for F. ornus and Q. ilex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185836.t001

In particular, comparison of the gas exchange parameters of F. ornus for each sampling date (Fig 1) revealed that nitrogen affected all the assayed parameters at DOF 1, with a decrease in PN, gs, and Ci/Ca and an increase in WUE. However, at DOF4, only PN was affected and, at the following sampling dates, no difference from C values was found.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Trend of steady-state gas exchange parameters in F. ornus.

The trend is shown as the mean and standard deviation (n = 5) for each treatment. Measurements were performed at the first, fourth, seventh, and tenth day of fumigation (DOF). Symbols over the bars indicate the significant factors (p < 0.05) affecting the gas exchange parameters: N, nitrogen effect; O3, ozone effect; O3 × N, interaction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185836.g001

O3 began to affect PN and gs (-75% and -82% compared to those in the control, respectively) on DOF 4, lasting with the same order of magnitude through DOF 7 to 10. The interaction significantly affected PN and gs for low or high O3 exposure (DOF 1 and 10, AOT40 254.22 and 2585.47 ppb h, respectively); the direction of the interaction remained the same, where the decrease of PN and gs relative to the control was less pronounced in O3N plants than in O3 alone.

For Q. ilex nitrogen led to the increase in both PN and gs relative to those in C (from +5% to 15% depending on DOF); however, the variability in the data led to p > 0.05 at each DOF (Fig 2). The main factor affecting gas exchange was O3, entailing a decrement of PN (-60% at DOF 4, - 28% at DOF 7 and -23% at DOF10) because of stomatal limitation as indicated by Ci/Ca reduction. The interaction was present on DOF 1, for low O3 exposure (AOT40 254.22 ppb h) only for gs, where the reduction in O3N experimental set was higher than in the O3 set. At DOF 4 and DOF 10, the reduction of PN and gs in O3N was less pronounced than that in O3, even if the interaction effect was not significant (Table 1B).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Trend of steady-state gas exchange parameters in Q. ilex.

The trend is shown as the mean and standard deviation (n = 5) for each treatment. Measurements were performed at the first, fourth, seventh, and tenth day of fumigation (DOF). Symbols over the bars indicate the significant factors (p < 0.05) affecting the gas exchange parameters: N, nitrogen effect; O3, ozone effect; O3 × N, interaction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185836.g002

Chl a fluorescence measurements

The repeated measures ANOVA showed that the photosystems functionality was not affected by time in both species (Table 2A).

thumbnail
Table 2. Analysis of variance of JIP-test parameters for F. ornus and Q. ilex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185836.t002

In F. ornus, nitrogen enhanced the primary reactions characterizing the single turnover region of the fluorescence transient (Fig 3A and 3B). A slight, but significant increase of φPo occurred at DOF 4 and DOF 10, and the J-phase was affected from DOF 1 to DOF 7 (Table 2B). Nitrogen influenced the IP-phase (rate of reduction of end acceptors ferredoxin and NADP) on DOF 4 and 10 and the overall functionality of photosystems as showed by the trend of PItot. O3 affected the JIP-test parameters since DOF 1, decreasing both IP-phase and PItot relative to those in the control. The interaction between nitrogen and O3 was evident on PItot (DOF 4, 10), with nitrogen ameliorating the detrimental effect of O3 photosystem functionality (Fig 3D).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Trend of JIP-test parameters in F. ornus.

The histograms indicate the percentage variation of each parameter of all treatments in relation to those in control plants. Measurements were performed at the first, fourth, seventh, and tenth day of fumigation (DOF). Symbols over the bars indicate the significant factors (p < 0.05) affecting the gas exchange parameters: N, nitrogen effect; O3, ozone effect; O3 × N, interaction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185836.g003

In Q. ilex, the effect of nitrogen and interaction between factors on photosystems functionality was marginal (Fig 4; Table 2), affecting IP-phase and PItot on DOF1 only. The main driver of photosystem functionality was O3, which influenced the primary photochemistry (Fig 4B) only during the final phase of O3 exposure (DOF 7 and 10), whereas IP-phase and PItot (Fig 4C and 4D) were affected by O3 since DOF1.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Trend of JIP-test parameters in Q. ilex.

The histograms indicate the relative variation of each parameter of all treatments in relation to those in control plants. Measurements were performed at the first, fourth, seventh, and tenth day of fumigation (DOF). Symbols over the bars indicate the significant factors (p < 0.05) affecting the gas exchange parameters: N, nitrogen effect; O3, ozone effect; O3 × N, interaction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185836.g004

PN/Ci response curves, leaf chemistry, and structural traits

The parameters derived from PN/Ci curves, together with PNUE, chemical and structural leaf traits such as nitrogen and carbon concentration for the two species (NL; CL), their ratio, and LMA are shown in Table 3.

thumbnail
Table 3. Parameters derived from the PN/Ci response curves performed at the end of the experimental period and the chemical and structural leaf traits.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185836.t003

In F. ornus, PNmax increased significantly after nitrogen addition (final dose, 20 kg N ha-1 yr-1), decreasing in response to O3 (Table 3). The nitrogen concentration at the leaf level increased in the N experimental set, although slightly significantly (p = 0.058). The main driver of photosynthesis was O3, leading to a reduction of PNmax, Vcmax and Jmax relative to those in C plants. The NL decreased because of O3 fumigation, entailing a significant change in the CL/NL ratio. The interaction between factors significantly affected Jmax: O3 limited the positive effect of nitrogen. In F. ornus, nitrogen did not affect the LMA, whereas this parameter was reduced by O3 (Table 3).

Interestingly, in Q. ilex, the response curves parameters were affected by nitrogen, thereby enhancing PNmax as well as the apparent maximum electron transport rate contributing to RuBP regeneration (Jmax). Nitrogen addition resulted in an increase of NL (+14% and +8% in N and O3N experimental sets, respectively); however, because of high variability in the data, no significant nitrogen effect (p > 0.05) was detected. However, CL significantly increased in the evergreen species.

O3 caused the reduction in PNUE, because of slight, but not significant (p > 0.05), reduction of PNmax and NL, and an increase in CL concentration. No interaction was detected. LMA decreased in Q. ilex after nitrogen addition, because leaf area increased (data not shown), influencing in the same direction as the LMA of the O3N experimental set.

Antioxidant enzyme activities

In both species, nitrogen addition increased SOD, CAT, and GSH activities, the key enzymatic components of the first antioxidant defense mechanisms involved in O2- and H2O2 scavenging (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. The outputs of biochemical analysis.

They are shown for each treatment at the end of the experimental period for F. ornus (upper panel, from a to g) and Q. ilex (below panel, from h to p). Reactive oxygen species (ROS, %); superoxide dismutase, (SOD, inhibition rate %); catalase (CAT, U mg-1 of protein); ascorbate peroxidase (APX, U mg-1 of protein); total concentration of ascorbic acid (ASA, mg g-1); oxidised ascorbic acid (DHA, mg g-1); and glutathione (GSH, mg g-1). Data are means ± standard deviation (n = 5), and bars not accompanied by the same letter are significantly different at p < 0.05, by using post hoc Student–Neuman–Keuls test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185836.g005

In F. ornus, the ROS amount increased significantly under O3 exposure; however, compared to that in C, their concentration in the O3 experimental set was higher than that in the O3N experimental set. Accordingly, the activity of the first line of ROS scavengers such as SOD and CAT were higher in O3 than in the O3N experimental set, but the antioxidants involved in the conversion of H2O2 to O2 or H2O (i.e. APX, ASA, DHA, and GSH) were upregulated in the O3N plants. Conversely, in Q. ilex, even if ROS were produced to the same extent as in O3 and O3N plants, SOD and CAT were lower in O3N than in O3. All the antioxidants related to ascorbate-glutathione cycle were higher in O3N than in O3 plants.

Discussion

The impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition and O3 on Mediterranean forests have been of increasing concern, and experimental data are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of action, or identify specific functional traits affected by interacting stress factors. Thus, the present study aimed to measure the effects of realistic exposure of nitrogen and O3 on a broad range of traits of two Mediterranean species with different leaf habits, to characterize their response. The study was performed under controlled condition in a medium-term experiment, in order to determine the traits that are first affected by nitrogen and how the potential nitrogen effects can influence the response to O3. Moreover, to our knowledge, this is the first study to compare F. ornus and Q. ilex directly after O3 exposure, with important implication for assessing the risk for these co-occurring species.

Response patterns to nitrogen deposition

An overview of available literature highlights that the results for the effects of nitrogen deposition at the leaf and plant levels are contradictory [37,66]. The numerous processes involved in nitrogen assimilation and metabolism might lead to high variability in the assayed data. In our experiment, after an acclimation period to nitrogen, when the cumulative dose was roughly equivalent to 14 kg N ha yr-1, which was within the threshold load considered as critical for Mediterranean vegetation, nitrogen concentration at the leaf level did not increase in both species, and no adverse effect was detected on photosynthetic traits (data not shown). When nitrogen exposure exceeded this level, between 14 and 17 kg N ha yr-1 (DOF 1), assimilation rate measured under steady state conditions was adversely affected in F. ornus possibly because of the nitrogen-induced decrease in stomatal conductance, as documented in several species [67,68]. Indeed nitrogen can affect gs by changing the hydraulic conductivity [40], or by increasing nitric oxide (NO) emission as a side-reaction of the nitrate assimilation process [69]. In fact, NO is involved in the ABA-induced stomatal closure process [68,70]. Since the first mechanism was observed in long-lasting fertilisation experiments (from 2 to 5 years of nitrogen addition), we argued that, in our study, the nitrogen effect on gs could be mediated by NO signalling.

Interestingly, in both species, PNmax and Jmax increased because of nitrogen, whereas Vcmax did not change, namely, the electron transport driving RuBP regeneration was more affected than carboxylation. This result also explains why the assimilation rate measured under steady state condition, i.e. in the Rubisco-limited phase [59], did not show variations. Moreover, this evidence and the Chl a fluorescence measurement, indicate that, in Q. ilex, a higher fraction of nitrogen was allocated to components related to biochemical phase of assimilation process than to light-harvesting elements [71]. This hypothesis is not completely applicable to F. ornus. In fact, in Q. ilex, nitrogen significantly affects only the parameters related to the functionality of the end acceptors (i.e. IP-phase and PItot); in contrast in F. ornus primary photochemistry (φPo and J-phase) was also enhanced by nitrogen, confirming that the partitioning pattern can differ depending on leaf habit [47].

In agreement with ecophysiological measurements, at the end of the experimental period, the concentration of nitrogen on mass basis increased to a different extent between the species. In F. ornus, nitrogen addition resulted in 25% higher NL relative to that in the control (p = 0.058), whereas in Q. ilex the variation was less pronounced (+ 14%). Notably in both species PNUE did not change because of nitrogen addition. PNUE is controlled by physiological (assimilation rate, Rubisco activity, and nitrogen concentration on area basis) and structural traits (LMA, leaf thickness) [72], which can change in opposite ways and explain the lack of difference among treatments. In F. ornus, nitrogen treatment decreased both leaf area and dry mass, resulting in no LMA variation. However, in Q. ilex, the LMA decreased because of nitrogen, since the leaf area increased; thus, the evergreen species did not invest resources in the cell wall to increase leaf toughness, as reported in other studies [73,74].

These effects of nitrogen supply on leaf structural traits could influence the leaf nitrogen concentration when it is considered on area-basis [28,75]. In F. ornus, area-based leaf nitrogen was lower relative to the mass-based value (data not shown), whereas the two values remained similar in Q. ilex.

Response patterns to ozone

Ozone effect was assessed using a wide range of traits to allow defining thoroughly the differences in the response patterns between the species. Plant sensitivity to O3 cannot be identified based on the extent of leaf injury alone, because impairments to photosystem functionality and photochemistry occur before the appearance of visible injury [54,76]. In our experiment, although we adopted a realistic O3 exposure (80 ppb h, AOT40 2458), F. ornus seemed to be sensitive to this pollutant because it did not trigger an active physiological response to O3, such as avoidance mechanisms, activating instead an incoming injury. The gas exchange reduction occurred from the first day of fumigation (-55% and -33% for gs and PN, respectively), remaining around this order of magnitude for the entire fumigation period. Furthermore, in this species the PN reduction was not merely owing to stomatal limitation, since the PN/Ci response curves highlighted a decrease of PNmax and of both carboxylation efficiency (Vcmax) and maximum electron transport rate driving RuBP regeneration (Jmax). The reduction of nitrogen concentration can also be a good indicator of O3 injury, helping to define the scale of tolerance between species [23]. In F. ornus, O3 exposure accelerated the processes related to senescence as shown by the decrease of leaf nitrogen and dry matter i.e. decrease of LMA. Although the results from controlled conditions cannot be extended to natural ecosystems, the sensitivity found in this experiment should be considered for risk assessment of tree species in a Mediterranean climate. The response pattern of Q. ilex to O3 can be attributed to an avoidance mechanism, as shown by traits related to photochemistry, photosystems functionality or structural traits. The reduction of PN in O3-treated plants relative to controls was less pronounced in Q. ilex than in F. ornus, starting on DOF 4, and was related to stomatal limitation more than to biochemical impairments. Indeed, the parameters derived from PN/Ci curves did not indicate any detrimental effect on Rubisco activity because of O3, whereas the analysis of photosystem functionality highlighted a down-regulation mechanisms (i.e. reduction of end-acceptors activity). The differences in the response strategies implemented by the two species could be strictly associated with a different antioxidant potential [11]. Indeed, the inherent amount of CAT, responsible for the removal of H2O2 [77], was higher in Q. ilex. Moreover, the components involved in the ascorbate-glutathione cycle (APX, ASA, DHA, and GSH) showed high concentration or activity in Q. ilex relative to that in F. ornus, but these could be related to the higher stomatal conductance (that is, high O3 fluxes) in the former species. Furthermore, in both the species, the finding that, in O3-treated plants, the increase in DHA/ASA ratio was lower than the increases in APX activity, suggestings that recycling of DHA to ASA was not compromised by O3.

Response patterns to the interaction between nitrogen deposition and ozone

Information on the interactive effects of nitrogen deposition and ozone pollution on vegetation is still scarce [34]. Many of the studies on nitrogen and O3 have focused on the changes in community structure or species abundance in grasslands ecosystems [30,31,78]. However, few studies have determined the consequences of nitrogen and O3 interaction on tree species [24,38,43]. The results highlighted by previous studies suggested that the interactive effects could be dynamic, changing throughout the growing season, and the effects on key ecophysiological parameters such as PN and gs can remarkably change depending on the concentration of nitrogen and O3 exposure. In the present study, the interaction followed different patterns in the two species, confirming our hypothesis that leaf habit plays a crucial role in determining the way of interaction between the two factors. In particular, in F. ornus, the interaction was detectable on several traits indicating that nitrogen addition can ameliorate the detrimental effects owing to O3. Nitrogen had a positive effect on the processes related to photochemistry, resulting in enhanced carbon assimilation rate in the O3N experimental set relative to that in the O3 experimental set. The mechanisms involved in this type of response could be associated with the investment of available nitrogen to proteins that play a crucial role in enhancing the photosynthetic activity [79]. We argue that nitrogen was partially allocated to light-harvesting components, increasing the capacity to manage the energy flow through the photosystems even if stomatal closure occurs [57]. The positive effect of nitrogen on the functionality of plants treated with O3 could also be attributed to the upregulation of antioxidant response to O3 implemented by nitrogen addition [80]. In particular, in O3N plants, the APX activity and ASA and DHA were higher compared to that after treatment with O3 alone. Moreover, in F. ornus, the O3N experimental set led to lower ROS production relative to that in O3 plants, that is, lower exposure to oxidative stress, even if the O3 fluxes remained almost the same. On average, during the entire experimental period, gs was about 96.9 ± 21.2 and 92.5 ± 12.3 in O3 and O3N, respectively. This could be because of NO synthesis. Plants can emit NO under a series of stresses [81], in particular under ozone exposure [7], and several studies revealed that high nitrogen availability can promote NO production [82]. NO is involved in triggering antioxidant response and can react directly with free radicals such as H2O2 and O2, thereby decreasing their concentrations. We argue that, in the presence of high nitrogen availability, F. ornus can cope with incoming oxidative stress via the production of NO, which owing to the rapid synthesis and prompt availability, allows prompt scavenging of free radicals and concomitantly increases the photosynthesis rate [83]. As shown by Velikova et al. [78], higher NO is emitted in isoprene-inhibited leaves; therefore NO synthesis should be favoured in plants that do not emit VOCs, such as F. ornus. In Q. ilex, a strong monoterpene emitter species [84], the response to oxidative compounds could be attributed to VOCs [85] rather than to NO. Most importantly, in both species, nitrogen led to the increase in the constitutive amount of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and CAT, but did not affect their activity (GST did not change, data not shown).

Unlike in F. ornus, in Q. ilex, the interaction between nitrogen and O3 was weak and appeared only on DOF 1, when nitrogen seemed to aggravate the stomatal limitation owing to O3. The gs of O3N plants recovered at the following sampling times to the level in the O3 experimental set.

Photosystem functionality was not affected by the interaction, and Rubisco-related parameters did not show any nitrogen effect (positive or negative) when plants were exposed to O3. However, interestingly, enzymes such as SOD and CAT, which play a crucial role in determining a suitable level of ROS in different cell compartments [77], were lower in O3N plants than in O3 plants, although the ROS production did not differ between the treatments. This evidence suggests that, in Q. ilex, nitrogen addition could enhance secondary metabolism and promote the production of VOCs that can directly quench O3 without activating an enzymatic antioxidant response. Conversely, similar to that in F. ornus, nitrogen upregulated the activity of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in Q. ilex, indicating that nitrogen deposition can largely protect against oxidative stressors and to multi-stress condition experienced by Mediterranean vegetation.

Conclusion

In both species, photosynthetic traits such as photosystem functionality, maximum assimilation and maximum electron transport rate were enhanced by nitrogen at the end of the experiment, when 20 kg N ha-1 y-1 had been reached. Moreover, in both species, nitrogen enhanced the constitutive level of antioxidant activity, thus with a potential ameliorative effect on O3-related impacts. In F. ornus nitrogen was allocated to the light harvesting components as shown by chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements. The results suggest that F. ornus is an O3-sensitive species, as shown by biochemical limitation to photosynthesis and the acceleration of leaf senescence-related processes. In F. ornus, nitrogen ameliorated the detrimental effects that O3 had on the photosynthetic processes. The interaction between nitrogen and O3 had different mechanisms of action in the two species. In the deciduous species F. ornus, the lower ROS production in the interaction experimental set (O3N) might be related to the enhanced nitrogen oxide production, whereas, in Q. ilex, nitrogen might have upregulated the secondary metabolism, promoting high VOCs production. This hypothesis is based on the fact that, although no difference was noted in ROS production between O3 and O3N plants in this species, the activity of the first-level scavenging enzymes such SOD or CAT was lower in the interaction experimental set. These results indicate that nitrogen deposition could counteract the detrimental effect of O3, thus suggesting that nitrogen is an important factor for assessing the critical level of O3 for Mediterranean vegetation.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the following grants: MIUR, Rome, Project PRIN 2010–2011 “TreeCity” (Prot. no. 20109E8F95); Avvio alla Ricerca, Sapienza Research Project 2015 (Prot.No. C26N15CHHN); Sapienza Ateneo Research Project 2016 (Prot.No. RM116154C90A4EAD); Sapienza Ateneo Research Project 2016 (Prot.No. RM116154C9CFDE3B); and Accademia Nazionale delle Scienze detta dei XL (2012 Grants). We thank Dr. Antonietta Siciliano for providing support for antioxidant analysis and the anonymous Reviewer for valuable comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Niinemets Ü. Cohort-specific tuning of foliage physiology to interacting stresses in evergreens. Tree Physiol. 2014;34: 1301–1304. pmid:25428824
  2. 2. Mills G, Harmens H, Wagg S, Sharps K, Hayes F, Fowler D, et al. Ozone impacts on vegetation in a nitrogen enriched and changing climate. Environ Pollut. 2016;208, Part B: 898–908.
  3. 3. Manual on Methodologies and Criteria for Modelling and Mapping Critical Loads and Levels and Air Pollution Effects, Risks and Trends—European Environment Agency [Internet]. [cited 26 Apr 2017]. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/exposure-of-ecosystems-to-acidification-2/manual-on-methodologies-and-criteria
  4. 4. Santurtún A, González-Hidalgo JC, Sanchez-Lorenzo A, Zarrabeitia MT. Surface ozone concentration trends and its relationship with weather types in Spain (2001–2010). Atmos Environ. 2015;101: 10–22.
  5. 5. Bytnerowicz A, Omasa K, Paoletti E. Integrated effects of air pollution and climate change on forests: A northern hemisphere perspective. Environ Pollut. 2007;147: 438–445. pmid:17034915
  6. 6. de Vries W, Dobbertin MH, Solberg S, van Dobben HF, Schaub M. Impacts of acid deposition, ozone exposure and weather conditions on forest ecosystems in Europe: an overview. Plant Soil. 2014;380: 1–45.
  7. 7. Vainonen JP, Kangasjärvi J. Plant signalling in acute ozone exposure. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38: 240–252. pmid:24417414
  8. 8. Das P, Nutan KK, Singla-Pareek SL, Pareek A. Oxidative environment and redox homeostasis in plants: dissecting out significant contribution of major cellular organelles. Front Environ Sci. 2015;2.
  9. 9. Cotrozzi L, Remorini D, Pellegrini E, Landi M, Massai R, Nali C, et al. Variations in physiological and biochemical traits of oak seedlings grown under drought and ozone stress. Physiol Plant. 2016;157: 69–84. pmid:26541269
  10. 10. Guidi L, Degl’Innocenti E, Giordano C, Biricolti S, Tattini M. Ozone tolerance in Phaseolus vulgaris depends on more than one mechanism. Environ Pollut. 2010;158: 3164–3171. pmid:20656389
  11. 11. Nali C, Paoletti E, Marabottini R, Della Rocca G, Lorenzini G, Paolacci AR, et al. Ecophysiological and biochemical strategies of response to ozone in Mediterranean evergreen broadleaf species. Atmos Environ. 2004;38: 2247–2257.
  12. 12. Scalet M, Federico R, Guido MC, Manes F. Peroxidase activity and polyamine changes in response to ozone and simulated acid rain in Aleppo pine needles. Environ Exp Bot. 1995;35: 417–425.
  13. 13. Calatayud V, Cerveró J, Sanz MJ. Foliar, Physiologial and Growth Responses of Four Maple Species Exposed to Ozone. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007;185: 239–254.
  14. 14. Mills G, Hayes F, Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. Chronic exposure to increasing background ozone impairs stomatal functioning in grassland species. Glob Change Biol. 2009;15: 1522–1533.
  15. 15. Fusaro L, Gerosa G, Salvatori E, Marzuoli R, Monga R, Kuzminsky E, et al. Early and late adjustments of the photosynthetic traits and stomatal density in Quercus ilex L. grown in an ozone-enriched environment. Plant Biol. 2016;18: 13–21. pmid:26307426
  16. 16. Calatayud V, Cerveró J, Calvo E, García-Breijo F-J, Reig-Armiñana J, Sanz MJ. Responses of evergreen and deciduous Quercus species to enhanced ozone levels. Environ Pollut. 2011;159: 55–63. pmid:20974507
  17. 17. Manes F, Donato E, Vitale M. Physiological response of Pinus halepensis needles under ozone and water stress conditions. Physiol Plant. 2001;113: 249–257. pmid:12060303
  18. 18. Ribas À, Peñuelas J, Elvira S, Gimeno BS. Contrasting effects of ozone under different water supplies in two Mediterranean tree species. Atmos Environ. 2005;39: 685–693.
  19. 19. Bussotti F. Functional leaf traits, plant communities and acclimation processes in relation to oxidative stress in trees: a critical overview. Glob Change Biol. 2008;14: 2727–2739.
  20. 20. Li P, Calatayud V, Gao F, Uddling J, Feng Z. Differences in ozone sensitivity among woody species are related to leaf morphology and antioxidant levels. Tree Physiol. 2016;36: 1105–1116. pmid:27217527
  21. 21. Zhang W, Feng Z, Wang X, Niu J. Responses of native broadleaved woody species to elevated ozone in subtropical China. Environ Pollut. 2012;163: 149–157. pmid:22325443
  22. 22. Karnosky DF, Skelly JM, Percy KE, Chappelka AH. Perspectives regarding 50 years of research on effects of tropospheric ozone air pollution on US forests. Environ Pollut. 2007;147: 489–506. pmid:17084004
  23. 23. Ribas À, Peñuelas J, Elvira S, Gimeno BS. Ozone exposure induces the activation of leaf senescence-related processes and morphological and growth changes in seedlings of Mediterranean tree species. Environ Pollut. 2005;134: 291–300. pmid:15589656
  24. 24. Yamaguchi M, Watanabe M, Matsumura H, Kohno Y, Izuta T. Experimental Studies on the Effects of Ozone on Growth and Photosynthetic Activity of Japanese Forest Tree Species. Asian J Atmospheric Environ. 2011;5: 65–78.
  25. 25. Uscola M, Oliet JA, Villar-Salvador P, Díaz-Pinés E, Jacobs DF. Nitrogen form and concentration interact to affect the performance of two ecologically distinct Mediterranean forest trees. Eur J For Res. 2014;133: 235–246.
  26. 26. Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, Spranger T, Alkemade R, Ashmore M, et al. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol Appl. 2010;20: 30–59. pmid:20349829
  27. 27. Dirnböck T, Grandin U, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Beudert B, Canullo R, Forsius M, et al. Forest floor vegetation response to nitrogen deposition in Europe. Glob Change Biol. 2014;20: 429–440.
  28. 28. Fleischer K, Rebel KT, van der Molen MK, Erisman JW, Wassen MJ, van Loon EE, et al. The contribution of nitrogen deposition to the photosynthetic capacity of forests. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2013;27: 187–199.
  29. 29. García-Gómez H, Garrido JL, Vivanco MG, Lassaletta L, Rábago I, Àvila A, et al. Nitrogen deposition in Spain: Modeled patterns and threatened habitats within the Natura 2000 network. Sci Total Environ. 2014;485–486: 450–460. pmid:24742555
  30. 30. Volk M, Enderle J, Bassin S. Subalpine grassland carbon balance during 7 years of increased atmospheric N deposition. Biogeosciences. 2016;13: 3807–3817.
  31. 31. Calvete-Sogo H, González-Fernández I, Sanz J, Elvira S, Alonso R, García-Gómez H, et al. Heterogeneous responses to ozone and nitrogen alter the species composition of Mediterranean annual pastures. Oecologia. 2016;181: 1055–1067. pmid:27106851
  32. 32. Fenn ME, Allen EB, Weiss SB, Jovan S, Geiser LH, Tonnesen GS, et al. Nitrogen critical loads and management alternatives for N-impacted ecosystems in California. J Environ Manage. 2010;91: 2404–2423. pmid:20705383
  33. 33. Pardo LH, Fenn ME, Goodale CL, Geiser LH, Driscoll CT, Allen EB, et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition and empirical nitrogen critical loads for ecoregions of the United States. Ecol Appl. 2011;21: 3049–3082.
  34. 34. Ochoa-Hueso R, Munzi S, Alonso R, Arróniz-Crespo M, Avila A, Bermejo V, et al. Ecological impacts of atmospheric pollution and interactions with climate change in terrestrial ecosystems of the Mediterranean Basin: Current research and future directions. Environ Pollut. 2017;227: 194–206. pmid:28460237
  35. 35. Borghetti M, Gentilesca T, Leonardi S, van Noije T, Rita A, Mencuccini M. Long-term temporal relationships between environmental conditions and xylem functional traits: a meta-analysis across a range of woody species along climatic and nitrogen deposition gradients. Tree Physiol. 2017;37: 4–17. pmid:28173594
  36. 36. Camarero JJ, Carrer M, Way D. Bridging long-term wood functioning and nitrogen deposition to better understand changes in tree growth and forest productivity. Tree Physiol. 2017;37: 1–3. pmid:28175915
  37. 37. Ferretti M, Marchetto A, Arisci S, Bussotti F, Calderisi M, Carnicelli S, et al. On the tracks of Nitrogen deposition effects on temperate forests at their southern European range–an observational study from Italy. Glob Change Biol. 2014;20: 3423–3438. pmid:24729460
  38. 38. Azuchi F, Kinose Y, Matsumura T, Kanomata T, Uehara Y, Kobayashi A, et al. Modeling stomatal conductance and ozone uptake of Fagus crenata grown under different nitrogen loads. Environ Pollut. 2014;184: 481–487. pmid:24134917
  39. 39. Thomas VFD, Braun S, Flückiger W. Effects of simultaneous ozone exposure and nitrogen loads on carbohydrate concentrations, biomass, and growth of young spruce trees (Picea abies). Environ Pollut. 2005;137: 507–516. pmid:16005762
  40. 40. Pivovaroff AL, Santiago LS, Vourlitis GL, Grantz DA, Allen MF. Plant hydraulic responses to long-term dry season nitrogen deposition alter drought tolerance in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem. Oecologia. 2016;181: 721–731. pmid:27017604
  41. 41. Crous KY, O’Sullivan OS, Zaragoza-Castells J, Bloomfield KJ, Negrini ACA, Meir P, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus availabilities interact to modulate leaf trait scaling relationships across six plant functional types in a controlled-environment study. New Phytol. 2017;215: 992–1008. pmid:28505389
  42. 42. Yamaguchi M, Watanabe M, Iwasaki M, Tabe C, Matsumura H, Kohno Y, et al. Growth and photosynthetic responses of Fagus crenata seedlings to O3 under different nitrogen loads. Trees. 2007;21: 707–718.
  43. 43. Marzuoli R, Monga R, Finco A, Gerosa G. Biomass and physiological responses of Quercus robur (L.) young trees during 2 years of treatments with different levels of ozone and nitrogen wet deposition. Trees. 2016;30: 1995–2010.
  44. 44. Catovsky S, Bazzaz FA. Nitrogen Availability Influences Regeneration of Temperate Tree Species in the Understory Seedling Bank. Ecol Appl. 2002;12: 1056–1070.
  45. 45. Tulloss EM, Cadenasso ML. The Effect of Nitrogen Deposition on Plant Performance and Community Structure: Is It Life Stage Specific? PLOS ONE. 2016;11: e0156685. pmid:27253718
  46. 46. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature. 2004;428: 821–827. pmid:15103368
  47. 47. Takashima T, Hikosaka K, Hirose T. Photosynthesis or persistence: nitrogen allocation in leaves of evergreen and deciduous Quercus species. Plant Cell Environ. 2004;27: 1047–1054.
  48. 48. Feng Y-L, Lei Y-B, Wang R-F, Callaway RM, Valiente-Banuet A, Inderjit , et al. Evolutionary tradeoffs for nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis versus cell walls in an invasive plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106: 1853–1856. pmid:19171910
  49. 49. Tretiach M. Photosynthesis and transpiration of evergreen Mediterranean and deciduous trees in an ecotone during a growing season. Acta Oecologica. 1993;14: 341–360.
  50. 50. Valladares F, Martinez-Ferri E, Balaguer L, Perez-Corona E, Manrique E. Low leaf-level response to light and nutrients in Mediterranean evergreen oaks: a conservative resource-use strategy? New Phytol. 2000;148: 79–91.
  51. 51. Paoletti E, Contran N, Bernasconi P, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Vollenweider P. Erratum to “Structural and physiological responses to ozone in Manna ash (Fraxinus ornus L.) leaves of seedlings and mature trees under controlled and ambient conditions” [Science of the Total Environment 407 (2009) 1631–1643]. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408: 2013.
  52. 52. Manes F, Vitale M, Maria Fabi A, De Santis F, Zona D. Estimates of potential ozone stomatal uptake in mature trees of Quercus ilex in a Mediterranean climate. Environ Exp Bot. 2007;59: 235–241.
  53. 53. Bazzaz FA, Carlson RW. Photosynthetic acclimation to variability in the light environment of early and late successional plants. Oecologia. 1982;54: 313–316. pmid:28309954
  54. 54. Salvatori E, Fusaro L, Strasser RJ, Bussotti F, Manes F. Effects of acute O3 stress on PSII and PSI photochemistry of sensitive and resistant snap bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), probed by prompt chlorophyll “a” fluorescence and 820 nm modulated reflectance. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;97: 368–377. pmid:26535554
  55. 55. Fares S, Schnitzhofer R, Jiang X, Guenther A, Hansel A, Loreto F. Observations of Diurnal to Weekly Variations of Monoterpene-Dominated Fluxes of Volatile Organic Compounds from Mediterranean Forests: Implications for Regional Modeling. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47: 11073–11082. pmid:24004275
  56. 56. Manes F, De Santis F, Giannini MA, Vazzana C, Capogna F, Allegrini I. Integrated ambient ozone evaluation by passive samplers and clover biomonitoring mini-stations. Sci Total Environ. 2003;308: 133–141. pmid:12738207
  57. 57. Strasser RJ, Tsimilli-Michael M, Qiang S, Goltsev V. Simultaneous in vivo recording of prompt and delayed fluorescence and 820-nm reflection changes during drying and after rehydration of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA—Bioenerg. 2010;1797: 1313–1326. pmid:20226756
  58. 58. Salvatori E, Fusaro L, Gottardini E, Pollastrini M, Goltsev V, Strasser RJ, et al. Plant stress analysis: Application of prompt, delayed chlorophyll fluorescence and 820 nm modulated reflectance. Insights from independent experiments. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;85: 105–113. pmid:25463266
  59. 59. Long SP, Bernacchi CJ. Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. J Exp Bot. 2003;54: 2393–2401. pmid:14512377
  60. 60. Loustau D, Brahim MB, Gaudillère J-P, Dreyer E. Photosynthetic responses to phosphorus nutrition in two-year-old maritime pine seedlings. Tree Physiol. 1999;19: 707–715. pmid:12651309
  61. 61. Sharkey TD, Bernacchi CJ, Farquhar GD, Singsaas EL. Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30: 1035–1040. pmid:17661745
  62. 62. Guidi L, Degl’Innocenti E, Remorini D, Massai R, Tattini M. Interactions of water stress and solar irradiance on the physiology and biochemistry of Ligustrum vulgare. Tree Physiol. 2008;28: 873–883. pmid:18381268
  63. 63. Nakano Y, Asada K. Hydrogen Peroxide is Scavenged by Ascorbate-specific Peroxidase in Spinach Chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981;22: 867–880.
  64. 64. de Pinto MC, Francis D, Gara LD. The redox state of the ascorbate-dehydroascorbate pair as a specific sensor of cell division in tobacco BY-2 cells. Protoplasma. 1999;209: 90–97. pmid:18987797
  65. 65. Ellman GL. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959;82: 70–77. pmid:13650640
  66. 66. Dezi S, Medlyn BE, Tonon G, Magnani F. The effect of nitrogen deposition on forest carbon sequestration: a model-based analysis. Glob Change Biol. 2010;16: 1470–1486.
  67. 67. Amponsah IG, Lieffers VJ, Comeau PG, Brockley RP. Growth response and sapwood hydraulic properties of young lodgepole pine following repeated fertilization. Tree Physiol. 2004;24: 1099–1108. pmid:15294756
  68. 68. Scholz FG, Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Franco AC, Miralles-Wilhelm F; Removal of nutrient limitations by long-term fertilization decreases nocturnal water loss in savanna trees. [Internet]. 2007. https://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/29697
  69. 69. Wildt J, Kley D, Rockel A, Rockel P, Segschneider HJ. Emission of NO from several higher plant species. J Geophys Res Atmospheres. 1997;102: 5919–5927.
  70. 70. García-Mata C, Lamattina L. Nitric Oxide Induces Stomatal Closure and Enhances the Adaptive Plant Responses against Drought Stress. Plant Physiol. 2001;126: 1196–1204. pmid:11457969
  71. 71. Feng Y-L, Auge H, Ebeling SK. Invasive Buddleja davidii allocates more nitrogen to its photosynthetic machinery than five native woody species. Oecologia. 2007;153: 501–510. pmid:17534664
  72. 72. Hikosaka K, Hirose T. Nitrogen uptake and use by competing individuals in a Xanthium canadense stand. Oecologia. 2001;126: 174–181. pmid:28547615
  73. 73. Aranda I, Pardo F, Gil L, Pardos JA. Anatomical basis of the change in leaf mass per area and nitrogen investment with relative irradiance within the canopy of eight temperate tree species. Acta Oecologica. 2004;25: 187–195.
  74. 74. de la Riva EG, Olmo M, Poorter H, Ubera JL, Villar R. Leaf Mass per Area (LMA) and Its Relationship with Leaf Structure and Anatomy in 34 Mediterranean Woody Species along a Water Availability Gradient. PLOS ONE. 2016;11: e0148788. pmid:26867213
  75. 75. Edwards EJ, Chatelet DS, Sack L, Donoghue MJ. Leaf life span and the leaf economic spectrum in the context of whole plant architecture. J Ecol. 2014;102: 328–336.
  76. 76. Bussotti F, Pollastrini M, Cascio C, Desotgiu R, Gerosa G, Marzuoli R, et al. Conclusive remarks. Reliability and comparability of chlorophyll fluorescence data from several field teams. Environ Exp Bot. 2011;73: 116–119.
  77. 77. Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7: 405–410. pmid:12234732
  78. 78. Bassin S, Volk M, Fuhrer J. Species Composition of Subalpine Grassland is Sensitive to Nitrogen Deposition, but Not to Ozone, After Seven Years of Treatment. Ecosystems. 2013;16: 1105–1117.
  79. 79. Palmroth S, Bach LH, Nordin A, Palmqvist K. Nitrogen-addition effects on leaf traits and photosynthetic carbon gain of boreal forest understory shrubs. Oecologia. 2014;175: 457–470. pmid:24705693
  80. 80. Yao X, Liu Q. Changes in morphological, photosynthetic and physiological responses of Mono Maple seedlings to enhanced UV-B and to nitrogen addition. Plant Growth Regul. 2006;50: 165.
  81. 81. Velikova V, Fares S, Loreto F. Isoprene and nitric oxide reduce damages in leaves exposed to oxidative stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2008;31: 1882–1894. pmid:18811730
  82. 82. Neill SJ, Desikan R, Hancock JT. Nitric oxide signalling in plants. New Phytol. 2003;159: 11–35.
  83. 83. Beligni MV, Lamattina L. Nitric oxide counteracts cytotoxic processes mediated by reactive oxygen species in plant tissues. Planta. 1999;208: 337–344.
  84. 84. Fares S, Loreto F, Kleist E, Wildt J. Stomatal uptake and stomatal deposition of ozone in isoprene and monoterpene emitting plants. Plant Biol. 2008;10: 44–54. pmid:17538866
  85. 85. Loreto F, Pinelli P, Manes F, Kollist H. Impact of ozone on monoterpene emissions and evidence for an isoprene-like antioxidant action of monoterpenes emitted by Quercus ilex leaves. Tree Physiol. 2004;24: 361–367. pmid:14757575