Impact of the structural integrity of the three-way junction of adenovirus VAI RNA on PKR inhibition

Edis Dzananovic; Astha; Grzegorz Chojnowski; Soumya Deo; Evan P. Booy; Pauline Padilla-Meier; Kevin McEleney; Janusz M. Bujnicki; Trushar R. Patel; Sean A. McKenna

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186849

Abstract

Highly structured RNA derived from viral genomes is a key cellular indicator of viral infection. In response, cells produce the interferon inducible RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) that, when bound to viral dsRNA, phosphorylates eukaryotic initiation factor 2α and attenuates viral protein translation. Adenovirus can evade this line of defence through transcription of a non-coding RNA, VA_I, an inhibitor of PKR. VA_I consists of three base-paired regions that meet at a three-way junction; an apical stem responsible for the interaction with PKR, a central stem required for inhibition, and a terminal stem. Recent studies have highlighted the potential importance of the tertiary structure of the three-way junction to PKR inhibition by enabling interaction between regions of the central and terminal stems. To further investigate the role of the three-way junction, we characterized the binding affinity and inhibitory potential of central stem mutants designed to introduce subtle alterations. These results were then correlated with small-angle X-ray scattering solution studies and computational tertiary structural models. Our results demonstrate that while mutations to the central stem have no observable effect on binding affinity to PKR, mutations that appear to disrupt the structure of the three-way junction prevent inhibition of PKR. Therefore, we propose that instead of simply sequestering PKR, a specific structural conformation of the PKR-VA_I complex may be required for inhibition.

Citation: Dzananovic E, Astha, Chojnowski G, Deo S, Booy EP, Padilla-Meier P, et al. (2017) Impact of the structural integrity of the three-way junction of adenovirus VA_I RNA on PKR inhibition. PLoS ONE 12(10): e0186849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186849

Editor: Massimo Caputi, Florida Atlantic University, UNITED STATES

Received: July 5, 2017; Accepted: October 9, 2017; Published: October 20, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Dzananovic et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: The work was supported by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2015-06142). E.Dz. was supported by a Research Manitoba Graduate Fellowship. S.D. was supported by a University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowship. J.M.B. and A. were supported by the Polish National Science Center (grant 2012/04/A/NZ2/00455). J.M.B. and G.Ch. were supported by the Foundation for Polish Science (grant TEAM/2009-4/2). Publication charges were covered by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant to S.A.M. (RGPIN-2015-06142) and TRP (RGPIN-2017-04003).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: 3wj, three-way junction; AS, apical stem-loop; CS, central stem-loop; DLS, dynamic light scattering; D_max, maximum particle dimension; dsRBMs, double-stranded RNA binding motifs; eIF2α, eukaryotic initiation factor 2α; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assays; NSD, normalized spatial discrepancy; p(r) function, electron pair-distance distribution function; PKR, RNA-activated Protein Kinase; r_G, radius of gyration; r_H, hydrodynamic radius; SAXS, small angle X-ray scattering; SEC, size exclusion chromatography; TS, terminal stem-loop; VA_I, adenovirus virus-associated RNA; VA_IΔTS (wt), VA_I lacking the terminal stem; VA_IAS, apical stem-loop of VA_I

Introduction

RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) is a key interferon-stimulated enzyme involved in the innate immune response to viral infection. PKR is a Ser/Thr kinase that consists of tandem copies of a conserved double-stranded RNA binding motif (dsRBMs, residues 1–169) at the N-terminal domain, and a C-terminal kinase domain [1]. Upon viral infection and subsequent production of viral dsRNAs, PKR binds viral dsRNA, which enables self-association and a conformational change resulting in auto-phosphorylation on two threonine residues (Thr446 and Thr451) that overhang the enzyme’s active site [2]. Phosphorylated PKR in turn phosphorylates its target substrate eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) at Ser51, which slows the translation of viral proteins, thus helping the host cell’s response [3–5]. Phosphorylation on Thr446 and Thr451 leads to full activation of PKR and it promotes substrate recognition and phosphorylation [6, 7]. Typically, activation of PKR follows a bimolecular reaction mechanism [8, 9].

To evade the host innate immune system viral countermeasures are used, including transcription of small non-coding RNAs that inhibit PKR via direct binding to the dsRBMs of PKR to prevent autophosphorylation [9, 10]. Adenovirus uses the host RNA polymerase III to transcribe virus associated RNA-I (VA_I) that accumulates during the late stages of infection to inhibit PKR [11–14]. At the secondary structure level, VA_I consists of two stem-loops, apical (AS) and central (CS), and a terminal stem (TS) region that meet at a three-way junction (3wj) [15–18]. Functionally, the AS of VA_I is responsible for interaction with the dsRBMs of PKR, while the CS plays a pivotal role in the inhibition of PKR autophosphorylation [9, 10, 14, 19]. Most of the TS appears dispensable for PKR inhibition, as VA_I lacking 29 and 28 nucleotides from the 5' and 3' ends respectively (VA_IΔTS; Fig 1A) has no impact on affinity for or inhibition of PKR in vitro [10, 20]. Moreover, VA_IΔTS may represent a biologically relevant structure based on results demonstrated by the Dicer-processing of VA_I by the RNA interference machinery [20].

Download:

Fig 1.

(A) Secondary structure of adenovirus VA_IΔTS (wt). (B) Schematic (not experimentally determined) representation of mutations in the CS of wt RNA and the ΔCD mutant that lacks the CS. (C) Purification of wt RNA by size exclusion chromatography (HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 75 column). Concentration of elution fractions was monitored by in-line spectrophotometric detection at 260 (solid line) and 280 nm simultaneously. The inset to the elution profile represents the elution range for the peak volume of each mutant RNA. (D) Native gel electrophoresis of wt RNA and its mutants. 2 μg of each RNA was loaded on 8% native TBE gel. Gels were stained with toluidine blue for total RNA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186849.g001

There are currently no high-resolution structures of either full-length PKR or VA_I or VA_IΔTS; however, high-resolution structures of N-terminal PKR_1-169 [21] and C-terminal kinase domain [22] have been determined. The low-resolution structures of full-length PKR [23] and PKR_1-169 alone or in complex with viral dsRNAs [24, 25] have also been reported using small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Together, both, low- and high-resolution data have given insight into the mechanism of activation/inhibition of PKR. NMR studies of PKR_1-169 show that each dsRBM of PKR adopts a canonical fold required for dsRNA recognition, containing a 3-stranded antiparallel β-sheet flanked by two α-helices with the tandem dsRBMs joined by a 23 amino acid linker [21]. The C-terminal region of PKR encompasses a Ser/Thr kinase domain involved in PKR autophosphorylation and recognition and phosphorylation of target substrate. Structural studies on the kinase domain in complex with eIF2α detailed the overall Ser/Thr kinase fold including the Thr446 and Thr451 residues in activation loop overhanging the kinase active site that lead to PKR autophosphorylation and activation as well as the features required for target substrate interaction [22]. The dsRNA binding and kinase domains are joined by a flexible interdomain linker (80-residue). Previous studies have shown that significant flexibility in the two linkers (one between the dsRBMs, the other between the dsRBMs and kinase domains) exist, allowing for two distinct conformations of PKR; an extended “open” conformation where dsRBMs and kinase domains are not in contact, and a collapsed “closed” conformation [8, 23, 26–28].

The low-resolution structures of VA_I and VA_IΔTS reveal that the RNA adopts an extended shape in solution [25, 29]. Interestingly, tertiary structure computational models together with chemical probing suggest the potential presence of a pseudoknot in VA_IΔTS formed between the loop of central stem and a single-stranded region in the TS near the 3wj of the AS, CS, and TS [29]. The low-resolution structure of PKR_1-169 in complex with VA_IΔTS also shows an extended shape in solution where nearly the entire length of VA_IΔTS tracks along both dsRBMs of PKR [. Computational models of VA_IΔTS-PKR_1-169 complex derived using SAXS data for the complex, NMR structure of PKR_1-169 and computational model of VA_IΔTS supports that both dsRBMs interact with VA_IΔTS and that pseudoknot formation via a specific 3wj is possible [25].

In this study, we have investigated the role of the specific structure of the 3wj in the mechanism of inhibition of PKR by the VA_IΔTS RNA. In order to establish the importance of the structure of the 3wj to PKR inhibition, we in vitro transcribed and purified VA_IΔTS RNAs with modest changes in the central stem of VA_IΔTS designed to impact formation of the 3wj while retaining full binding affinity for PKR via the AS. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were performed to confirm that the mutations do not affect binding affinity with PKR. In vitro autophosphorylation assays were then performed to determine the impact of mutation of the central stem on PKR activity. Results suggest that while alterations to VA_IΔTS can be tolerated, specific mutations to the central stem prevent inhibition of PKR. Dynamic light scattering (DLS), SAXS, and computational modeling tools were utilized to determine the impact of mutations on global tertiary structure and their inhibitory potential. Based on results from biochemical, biophysical and computational methods, we conclude that the structural integrity of the 3wj, potentially enabling pseudoknot formation, and not solely steric hindrance, is essential for PKR inhibition.

Materials and methods

In vitro transcription and purification of RNA

Sequences corresponding to the transcribed RNAs are shown in Fig 1. We refer to VA_IΔTS as a wild-type (wt) RNA for the remainder of the manuscript. Plasmid design for wt and mutant RNA was performed as previously described [30, 31]. DNA encoding the desired RNA sequence was cloned into pUC119 vector via HindIII/EcoRI sites. Plasmids were transformed into E. coli MAX Efficiency® DH5α™ Competent Cells (Life Technologies, Invitrogen, USA), purification effected by standard maxi-prep (Thermo Scientific, USA). Purified plasmids were linearized by BsaI restriction digestion in preparation for transcription. In vitro transcription using T7 RNA polymerase was performed as described previously [14, 31]. RNAs were purified using size exclusion chromatography (SEC) equipped with a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 75 gel filtration column (2.6 x 60 cm, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA) in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.50), 100 mM NaCl, and 5 mM MgCl₂ (Buffer 1) as reported previously [14, 31]. Purified RNAs were subsequently concentrated using appropriate spin concentrators (Millipore, USA). The purity of the transcribed RNA was verified by both denaturing and native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (in 1X Tris/Borate/EDTA (TBE) buffer). Twinned bands observed by native gel electrophoresis result from running buffer lacking cation present in Buffer 1; single bands are observed under denaturing conditions. RNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically (NanoDrop2000c, Thermo Scientific), monitoring at 260 nm using the calculated extinction coefficients (ε_wt = 975000 cm^-1M^-1, ε_Δloop = 948500 cm^-1M^-1, ε_Δbulge = 963000 cm^-1M^-1, ε_ΔCD = 712000 cm^-1M^-1, ε_ΔGU = 975000 cm^-1M^-1, ε_Δ2bp = 937125 cm^-1M^-1, ε_Δ4bp = 902000 cm^-1M^-1).

Protein expression and purification

Recombinant human PKR_1-169 (N-terminal double-stranded RNA binding motifs with residues 1 to 169) as well as full-length PKR were expressed and purified as previously described [14]. Affinity purified proteins were subjected to SEC using a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 75 gel filtration column (2.6 x 60 cm, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA) for PKR_1-169, or HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 size exclusion column for full length PKR (all in 50 mM TRIS (pH 7.50), 100 mM NaCl, and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Buffer 2)). The elution fractions were monitored by means of absorbance at 280 nm and fractions containing purified protein were combined and concentrated using Millipore concentrator filters (Millipore, USA). Protein purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and concentration was determined using the known extinction coefficient as measured by UV-Vis spectrophotometry (NanoDrop2000c, Thermo Scientific, USA).

Purification of RNA-protein complex

The wt-PKR_1-169 and Δloop-PKR_1-169 complexes were prepared by incubating purified protein in the presence of a 1.1-fold excess of RNA in Buffer 1 for 15 minutes at room temperature. After incubation, the mixture was applied on a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 75 gel filtration column (2.6 x 60 cm, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA). The elution profile for both complexes showed two distinct peaks: a higher molecular weight peak corresponding to RNA-protein complex followed by a lower molecular weight peak corresponding to free RNA. Elution fractions for both complexes were assayed for the presence of RNA-protein complex via in-line spectrophotometer (at 260 and 280 nm simultaneously), and confirmed by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Fractions containing RNA-protein complex were pooled and concentrated using GE Healthcare Vivaspin 2 concentrators (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA). The purity of the complexes was assessed by the native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, whereas concentration was determined using the extinction coefficients of protein and RNA. The DLS profiles of wt-PKR_1-169 and Δloop-PKR_1-169 complexes showed no signs of aggregation across the concentration range at which the experiments were performed.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs)

EMSAs were performed by titrating RNA at 100 nM with increasing concentration (0–1000 nM) of PKR or PKR_1-169 in 50 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl (pH 7.0) and 5 mM MgCl₂. The RNA and protein were mixed and incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes followed by addition of native load dye (0.02% bromophenol blue, 0.01% xylene cyanol FF, 10% glycerol in 1X TBE). The samples were loaded onto native TBE-PAGE gels and electrophoresis was performed at 80V and 4°C. The electrophoresis system (mini-protean 3 cell, Biorad) and the buffer (0.5X TBE) were kept on ice during for the length of the experiment. To visualize RNA-containing species, gels were stained with SybrGold (Invitrogen Inc., USA) for 5 minutes and imaged by the FluorChem Q System (Protein Simple, USA). Densitometry of free RNA bands was quantified using Alpha Imager Software provided with FluorChem Q System, and used to determine the fraction of bound RNA. K_D was determined by fitting the fraction of bound RNA against the protein concentration using a quadratic form of the binding equation as the amount of RNA used was not limiting [32].

Dynamic light scattering (DLS)

DLS data for RNA was collected prior to SAXS data collection to confirm that all the samples were highly pure and suitable for data collection. Samples were dialyzed for 2 hours at 4°C against Buffer 1 [50 mM Tris (pH 7.50), 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl₂] prior to DLS analysis. After dialysis, samples were subjected to filtration through a 0.1μm filter (Millipore, USA) and equilibrated at 20°C. The hydrodynamic radius r_H and homogeneity (distribution of r_H) of each sample was examined using the Zetasizer Nano S system (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK) equipped with a 4 mW laser (λ = 633 nm) as previously described [24, 25, 31]. DLS experiments for each sample were performed at multiple concentrations: 2.20–3.70 mg/mL for wt, 1.00–1.40 mg/mL for Δloop, 0.40–0.80 mg/mL for Δbulge, 1.50–3.10 mg/mL for ΔCD, 0.70–1.30 mg/mL for ΔGU, 1.80–2.80 mg/mL for Δ2bp, 0.40–0.80 mg/mL for Δ4bp, 1.10–1.70 mg/mL for wt-PKR_1-169 complex, and 1.00–1.50 mg/mL for Δloop-PKR complex. DLS data were analyzed using the DTS software (Version 6.01, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK).

PKR activation/inhibition assay

The in vitro PKR activation assay was carried out as follows. RNA samples at various concentrations (0–1000 nM) were pipetted into microfuge tubes on ice. Next a reaction mixture of 5X activation buffer (250 mM Tris at pH 7.5, 125 mM NaCl, 25 mM MgCl₂, and 5 mM ATP), supplemented with PKR (100 nM) was added to tubes containing RNA to make a final buffer concentration of 1X. For the control reaction RNA samples were replaced by 0.0002 μg Poly I:C. The tubes were incubated at 30°C for 15 minutes and quenched by adding the 5X sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) load mixture to the reactions. 15 ng of protein was loaded on 10% SDS/polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto polyvinyl difluoride membrane to monitor PKR phosphorylation using anti-PKR phospho-Thr446 antibody (rabbit, ab47377, Abcam, with 1:2000 dilution) by means of western blot analysis as described previously [33]. In addition, anti-PKR antibody (mouse, ab32052, Abcam, with 1:5000 dilution) was also used for western blot analysis to monitor a loading control. Inhibition assays were carried out in a similar manner: 100 nM PKR was pre-incubated with the inhibitory RNAs ranging from 0–1500 nM for 10 minutes at room temperature. A mixture of 5X activation buffer and poly I:C was added to challenge the inhibitory RNAs and reactions were incubated at 30°C for 15 minutes and quenched by addition of 5X SDS load mixture. The western blot was developed as previously described and visualized using FluorChem Q System. Quantitation of PKR phosphorylation from at least triplicate experiments was performed using Alpha Imager Software. Band intensities were first corrected against the gel background and then against anti-PKR intensity (to ensure equal loading). Relative activity (on a scale of 0 to 1) was then determined relative to the poly I:C control.

Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)

SAXS data for wt RNA were collected at 1.00, 1.90 and 3.10 mg/mL, 1.00, 3.00, and 4 mg/mL for Δloop; 0.40, 0.60, 0.80 mg/mL for Δbulge; 1.00, 1.50, 2.20 mg/mL for ΔCD; 1.30, 1.80, 2.30 mg/mL for ΔGU; 1.30, 1.70 mg/mL for Δ2bp and 1.40, 1.90, 2.40 mg/mL for Δ4bp. For the complexes data were collected at following concentrations- 1.30, 1.50, and 1.70 mg/mL for wt-PKR_1-169 complex; and 1.25, 1.50 mg/mL for Δloop-PKR_1-169 complex (all in Buffer 1). The data collection was performed at room temperature on a Rigaku 3-pinhole camera (S-MAX3000) equipped with a Rigaku MicroMax+002 microfocus sealed tube (Cu Kα radiation at 1.54 Å) and a Confocal Max-Flux (CMF) optics system operating at 40 W (Rigaku, USA). Scattering data were recorded using a 200 mm multiwire 2D detector. The data for all samples and buffer was collected for three hours for each sample within the range of 0.008 ≤ s ≤ 0.26 Å^–1 and processed as previously described [34–36]. Briefly, the buffer scattering data was subtracted from the sample scattering data using the program PRIMUS [37] followed by merging of buffer subtracted data for all concentrations of each sample and the complex. The homogeneity of samples was assessed by Guinier analysis. The data were further processed using the GNOM program [38] to obtain radius of gyration (r_G) and maximal particle dimension (D_max). The ab initio modeling for protein and individual RNA molecules was performed using the program DAMMIF [39]. The quality of the models was verified by the goodness of fit parameter (χ value) after each model calculation. Ab initio models for each sample and the complex were then rotated and averaged using the program DAMAVER [40]. Homogeneity of RNA sample was confirmed after SAXS experiments by native gel electrophoresis.

Calculation of hydrodynamic parameters from ab initio models

The hydrodynamic properties were calculated for each model using the program HYDROPRO [41]. The atomic element radius of 2.9 Å was considered for HYDROPRO calculations according to the HYDROPRO manual. The density (1.004 g/mL) and viscosity (1.026 cPoise) of buffer was calculated using SEDNTERP [42] whereas the molecular weight and partial specific volumes for all RNAs were calculated using NucProt Calculator [43]. The partial specific volume of complexes were calculated using Equation 1 from [24].

Computational modeling

Secondary structures were predicted for wt and mutant RNA mutants using ContextFold [44], a program that scored one of the most accurate single-sequence RNA structure predictions according to the CompaRNA benchmark [45]. In all cases but one, the effects of deletions on secondary structure were local, while in the Δ4bp variant, the deletion of the helix core has led to a rearrangement of the 3wj structure. Tertiary structures were predicted using RNA Masonry, a new method based on software developed in the Bujnicki laboratory, including the SimRNA method for RNA folding [46] and the library of recurrent 3D motifs available in RNA Bricks database [47]. Briefly, RNA Masonry uses the energy function established for the SimRNA method [46], and composes atomistic models by assembling existing fragments using a replica exchange Monte-Carlo algorithm, in which local structure is sampled by taking fragments from the database. The program exploits hierarchical organization of RNA structures, which are composed of regularly shaped double-stranded helices, and irregularly shaped loop motifs. It is therefore much faster than SimRNA, and generates full-atom models that agree with the input secondary structure. Here, we additionally restrained the fragment assembly process with goodness-of-fit to the experimental SAXS curve calculated using CRYSOL [48]. With this approach the number of degrees of freedom in an RNA model is reduced roughly to the number of junctions, which is particularly important owing to the limited number of unique observations available from SAXS experiment as well as the risk of over-fitting [49]. For building models with suspected pseudoknots, we have additionally used SimRNA to generate initial models with tertiary contacts between elements of secondary structure, and only then subjected these models to the refinement with RNA Masonry to improve the agreement with the experimental SAXS curve, while keeping the pseudo-knotted domain rigid.

The 3D models generated by RNA Masonry were regularized with the QRNAS program (Stasiewicz and Bujnicki, unpublished) that extends the AMBER force field with energy terms explicitly modeling hydrogen bonds geometry, base pair planarity and backbone conformation. It has been shown that QRNAS vastly reduces number of severe clashes in RNA models [50]. The final models were superposed onto the corresponding ab initio reconstructions using SUPCOMB [51].

Results

Purification of wt RNA and derivatives to probe three-way junction structure

To investigate the importance of the 3wj formed from the AS, CS, and TS on PKR inhibition, we in vitro transcribed wt RNA and six mutants in the CS that were predicted to retain the intact apical stem (AS) (Fig 1B). VA_I lacking the terminal stem was used as the wt RNA in this study as it is the minimal RNA able to inhibit PKR in vitro and is similar to the hypothesized Dicer-processed version of VA_I by the RNA interference machinery [10, 20]. The selected mutants probed the CS heptaloop by mutation to UUCG (Δloop), CS bulge at its base by conversion to perfect duplex (Δbulge), mid-CS GU base-pair by conversion to a canonical GC base-pair (ΔGU), CS length by stem shortening by two (Δ2bp) or 4bp (Δ4bp), or complete CS truncation (ΔCD). In vitro transcribed RNAs were purified using non-denaturing SEC in a buffer containing Mg²⁺ (Buffer 1; 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl₂) to separate template plasmid and small molecule contaminants from the desired RNA. wt RNA eluted as a single, compact peak (Fig 1C). The peak elution volume for all of the mutants is very similar to that of wt RNA, with the notable exception of ΔCD that lacks the CS and is of smaller size (inset to Fig 1C). Purified RNA samples were verified using native gel electrophoresis, where all RNAs share mobility similar to wt RNA, with the exception of the smaller ΔCD (Fig 1D).

Next, the homogeneity of each sample was studied using DLS to ensure that the RNA preparations did not display self-association over the range of concentrations ultimately used to study low-resolution structures by SAXS (Fig 2). Additionally, the average hydrodynamic radius (r_H) for each sample at multiple concentrations was also determined (Table 1). Samples displayed no observable change in r_H consistent with the absence of self-association over the concentration range examined, suggesting that subsequent biochemical assay and SAXS studies were feasible. Reasonably comparable r_H values for wt RNA and mutants were observed, although Δ4bp, Δbulge, and Δloop demonstrated slightly larger values.

Download:

Fig 2. Dynamic light scattering of wt RNA and its mutants.

The concentration dependence of the hydrodynamic radius (r_H) was determined by DLS. The average (r_H) value over the concentration range is highlighted with a horizontal bar. Error bars represent the standard deviation from at least 3 measurements.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186849.g002

Download:

Table 1. Summary of hydrodynamic results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186849.t001

Mutations in the central stem-loop of wt RNA do not significantly impair binding affinity to PKR

Previous studies have shown that the CS does not make a high-affinity interaction with any region of PKR, and that the AS of VA_I is solely responsible for the interaction with the PKR [9, 10, 14, 19]. To confirm that introduced mutations of the CS did not impact binding affinity to PKR, EMSAs were performed at a single concentration of RNA (100 nM) and protein (500 nM) (Fig 3A). Under these conditions, both wt RNA and mutants result in detection of RNA-protein complex formation (using a fluorescent nucleic acid dye) that are of similar sizes near the top of the gel. To quantitatively compare affinities, RNAs were incubated with increasing concentrations of PKR and a gradual shift to a higher molecular weight species was observed by EMSA. As the shifted species stains far less intensely that the free RNA, quantitative comparison of affinity was achieved by determining the disappearance of free RNA to plot the fraction bound against the protein concentration (Fig 3B). Similar binding curves for wt and mutant RNAs were observed (much less than one order of magnitude in K_D), implying that the mutations in the CS are not drastically impacting the AS structure nor the ability of RNAs to bind PKR.

Download:

Fig 3. Central stem mutants display similar affinity to wt RNA.

(A) EMSAs performed at a single concentration of RNA (100 nM) and protein (500 nM), stained with SybrGold dye for visualization. (B) EMSA quantification of RNA (100 nM) binding to PKR (0–1000 nM). Error bars represent the standard deviation from at least 3 measurements. Curve fitting and calculation of K_D was performed as described in Materials and Methods. The inset represents the determined K_D values (μM) derived from the curve fit.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186849.g003

Specific mutations in the CS disrupt inhibition of PKR

Recombinant human PKR activation loop autophosphorylation was assessed by incubation with wt RNA and mutants in the presence of ATP/Mg²⁺ with detection of Thr446 phosphorylation using immunoblotting (Fig 4A). In the absence of RNA (negative control), basal levels of PKR phosphorylation were observed. In the presence of synthetic dsRNA (poly I:C, positive control), an increase in antibody intensity and a slight upward migration on the gel are observed, both characteristic of PKR autophosphorylation. Consistent with its established role as a PKR inhibitor, wt RNA does not lead to PKR activation above negative control levels. Neither ΔGU nor Δ2bp lead to PKR activation. As expected ΔCD, which lacks the CS, acts as an activator of PKR. Interestingly, Δloop, Δbulge and Δ4bp also lead to PKR activation, demonstrating that these RNAs have lost their inhibitory activity (Fig 4A). We then repeated these experiments over a wide-range of RNA concentrations and with multiple replicates to semi-quantitatively compare the relative activity of these RNAs (Fig 4B). As expected ΔCD behaves as a potent activator of PKR, while Δbulge, Δloop and Δ4bp led to similar intermediate activation, well above the negative control. wt RNA, ΔGU, and Δ2bp were within error of the negative control.

Download:

Fig 4. Biochemical assays to study the effect of mutations on PKR inhibition.

(A) Activation of PKR in presence of wt RNA and CS mutants. PKR (100 nM) and RNAs (500 nM) were incubated for 15 min at 30°C. The phosphorylation levels of PKR were monitored by Anti-PKR Thr446 specific antibodies. (B) Quantification of PKR autophosphorylation in presence of variable concentrations of RNAs. Error bars represent the standard deviation from at least 3 measurements. (C) Inhibition of PKR by wt RNA, ΔGU, and Δ2bp. PKR (100 nM) and variable concentrations of RNAs were preincubated for 10 min at room temperature, followed by addition of 10 μg/mL poly I:C. The reaction mixture was incubated for further 15 min at 30°C. PKR autophosphorylation assays were performed, as described in the Materials and Methods. (D) Quantification of PKR autophosphorylation (100 nM) by poly I:C in the presence of potential inhibitors. Error bars represent the standard deviation from 3 measurements.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186849.g004

To confirm that ΔGU and Δ2bp retained their ability to inhibit PKR (as opposed to not activating), increasing concentrations of these RNAs were incubated with PKR and then challenged with a potent dsRNA activator, poly I:C (Fig 4C and 4D). wt RNA, ΔGU, and Δ2bp are each potent inhibitors of PKR activation by poly I:C. Together the activation and inhibition assays strongly suggest that while all RNAs bind PKR with similar affinities, inhibition of PKR by wt RNA likely depends upon a specific structural conformation involving the CS.

Specific central stem mutations affect the solution conformation

To obtain structural insight on the impact of modest CS mutations on the conformation of the 3wj of wt RNA, we performed SAXS experiments. The scattering profiles of individual concentrations were merged to obtain a single scattering profile (Fig 5A). Primary analysis of the radius of gyration (r_G) was performed using Guinier analysis, which also demonstrated the suitability of the data for further analysis (Fig 5B, Table 1). The merged scattering data was then used to generate the p(r) distribution function (distribution of electron pair distances in the sample) (Fig 5C). The p(r) distribution function of these RNAs adopt a skewed bell shape at short radii with an extended tail that is typical of an elongated molecule. For some mutants, most notably Δbulge and Δloop, the extended tails observed in the p(r) distribution adopt different shapes suggesting structural differences from wt RNA. To quantify these differences, the maximum particle dimension (D_max) and r_G were determined from the p(r) distribution function. The r_G values determined for all RNAs obtained from GNOM analysis fell within a specific range (3.60–3.96 nm), with the largest values were observed for Δloop and Δbulge (Table 1). The D_max values determined by means of p(r) distribution were also relatively similar amongst the RNAs (11.2–12.5 nm), with Δbulge at the smaller end and wt/ΔCD at the larger (Table 1). Taken together, these results suggest that introduction of modest mutations, to the loop and bulge in particular, are impacting VA_I structure without its complete disruption.

Download:

Fig 5. Characterization of wt RNA and CS mutants by SAXS.

(A) SAXS scattering profiles, where each dataset represents the merged raw data from multiple sample concentrations. (B) A dotted line was fitted through the data at the low-q region of a plot of log I(q) vs. q² (Guinier analysis) with an upper limit for q.r_G of 1.3 to obtain r_G from the slope for wt and mutant RNAs. (C) Dependence of the pair distribution function om the particle radius for each of the samples outlined in (A).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186849.g005

To determine the average solution conformation of wt and mutants, the SAXS raw scattering data, r_G, and D_max were used as constraints for generating ab initio models. Twenty models for each RNA were determined using the program DAMMIF [39]. The calculated χ² value for individual models for each RNA was ~1 indicating good agreement between the experimental data and data calculated from ab initio models (Table 1). Ab initio models were then rotated, aligned, averaged and filtered using DAMAVER [40] that provided a normalized spatial discrepancy (NSD) of ~1 suggesting a strong agreement between the individual models. DLS experiments were carried out before (Fig 2) and after the SAXS experiments to ensure sample quality. An elongated solution conformation of wt RNA with a modest bend near the midpoint of the structure was observed, and is consistent with previously determined models [25] (Fig 6A, yellow). Noticeably, no obvious regions corresponding to the AS and CS are observed. ΔGU and Δ2bp present a similar overall shape as wt RNA, suggesting that these mutations have no discernable effect on VA_I conformation (Fig 6A, blue and green). ΔCD adopts a linear extended conformation consistent with an RNA that lacks the central stem and is almost completely A-RNA conformation along its length (Fig 6A, brown). Δ4bp adopts a conformation that is slightly less elongated and more globular at one end relative to wt RNA (Fig 6A, purple). Δloop and Δbulge show a large protuberance in the form of a distinct junction that is not observed in wt RNA (Fig 6A, crimson and orange). Hydrodynamic properties were calculated and compared with the experimentally determined properties, which resulted in a very good agreement between parameters from both approaches (Table 1), validating our ab initio models (in addition to the classical cross-checks of χ² and NSD values).

Download:

Fig 6. Solution conformation wt RNA and CS mutants.

(A) Averaged ab initio model of wt RNA and CS mutants obtained from DAMMIF and atomic RNA models predicted using RNA Masonry. The models were aligned using SUPCOMB from ATSAS package. (B) Rearrangement observed in Δ4bp based on computational determination of the secondary structure. All other mutants demonstrated similar secondary structures to those shown in Fig 1B. (C) Fit between SAXS raw data (coloured lines) and computational model-derived SAXS data (black dotted lines), with residuals from the fit shown in the individual panels below.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186849.g006

Computational structure determination suggests that the 3wj conformation is altered by specific mutations to the CS

To rationalize the determined solution conformation of the RNAs by SAXS, tertiary structure models were initially generated with the software RNA Masonry using only predicted secondary structure (without pseudoknots) and raw SAXS scattering data as restraints (Fig 6A) (see materials and methods for details). Predicted secondary structures correlated well with expectations (Fig 1B), with the exception of Δ4bp where the deletion causes local structural rearrangement, in which the position of the 3wj is shifted and an alternative helix is formed in place of the one destroyed by the deletion (Fig 6B). The final structure for each species was in good agreement with experimentally collected SAXS data (χ² value in range of 1 to 1.36) estimated by means of CRYSOL (Fig 6C) [48]. ΔCD, as expected, presents a roughly canonical A-form RNA double helix that superimposes on the SAXS envelope well. Δbulge, Δloop and Δ4bp computational structures correlate very well with the low-resolution SAXS models, adopting a 3wj structure where the AS and CS are roughly perpendicular. While there are slight variations in the base-pairing pattern amongst the computationally predicted structures, the 3wj is still generally positioned in similar region in each RNA.

However, preliminary computational models of wt RNA, Δ2bp and ΔGU demonstrated significant deviation from the ab initio SAXS envelopes, which was intriguing given that these are the only RNAs that demonstrated inhibition of PKR (Fig 4). To determine whether an improved superimposition between the low-resolution SAXS envelope and the computational model could be achieved by introduction of a pseudoknot as a possibility, we recalculated high-resolution structures, allowing pseudoknot formation. First, models for wt, Δ2bp and ΔGU were built using SimRNA [46] (Fig 7A) to enable the possibility of the complex pseudoknot fold of the 3wj. Next, the geometry of AS in each of the models was refined with RNA Masonry to improve agreement with the experimental SAXS curve (Fig 7B). The results obtained using this approach revealed an extended conformation of wt RNA (χ² value 3.77), where residues in the loop of the CS base-pair with a stretch near the 3'-end of the RNA allowing a pseudoknot conformation. Based on the computational models from Fig 7A, it is also evident that the ΔGU (χ² value 2.36) and Δ2bp (χ² value 1.59) display similar overall structures and are in good agreement with the low-resolution SAXS reconstructions. The imperfect fit to the SAXS curves is most likely a result of the vast reduction of the model’s degrees of freedom (conformations of the pseudoknotted domains were not altered to improve agreement with the experimental data). Any attempts to introduce the pseudoknot as an additional restraint for Δloop, Δbulge, Δ4bp resulted in obtaining even higher χ² values and structures that did not fit well to the low-resolution SAXS reconstructions for these models. Together, these results suggest that inhibition may require a specific orientation of the 3wj to enable pseudoknot formation.

Download:

Fig 7. Computational structures of wt RNA, ΔGU and Δ2bp.

(A) Atomic models were calculated using SimRNA3 and refined using RNA Masonry to improve fit to the experimental SAXS curves. Averaged ab initio reconstructions obtained from DAMMIF were superposed onto atomic models with SUPCOMB from ATSAS package. (B) Fit between SAXS raw data (coloured lines) and computational model-derived SAXS data (black dotted lines).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186849.g007

Solution conformations of the dsRBMs of PKR in complex with wt and Δloop RNA

Previously, we reported the low-resolution structure of the wt-PKR_1-169 complex in the absence of Mg²⁺ where PKR_1-169 (dsRBMs alone) and wt RNA interact in a side-by-side orientation that involves entire length of PKR_1-169 [24]. Recent reports suggest that the interaction between wt RNA and PKR is modulated by Mg²⁺ [29, 52]. We therefore extended our studies on wt-PKR_1-169 complex in the presence of 5 mM MgCl₂ (Buffer 1) to determine the effect of Mg²⁺ ions on overall structure and stability of the complex. The pair distribution function in the presence of Mg²⁺ is very similar to that previously determined in the absence of Mg²⁺ [25] (Fig 8A, 8B and 8C). The DAMAVER derived averaged model obtained from multiple ab initio models shows a one-to-one complex that is consistent with the previously observed solution conformation (Fig 8D). The calculated χ² values show good agreement between the experimental and model-derived hydrodynamic parameters, and NSD values suggest that individual models are in good agreement with each other (Table 1).

Download:

Fig 8. Characterization of complexes by SAXS.

(A) SAXS scattering profiles for wt-PKR_1-169, and Δloop-PKR_1-169 complexes. Each data point represents the merged raw data from multiple sample concentrations. (B) The pair distribution function analysis of wt-PKR_1-169, and Δloop-PKR_1-169 complexes. (C) A dotted line was fitted through the data at the low-q region of a plot of log I(q) vs. q² (Guinier analysis) with an upper limit for q.r_G of 1.3 to obtain r_G from the slope for both complexes. (D) A filtered model of wt-PKR_1-169 complex. (E) A filtered model of Δloop-PKR_1-169 complex obtained from ab initio calculations indicating overall shape of the complex in solution.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186849.g008

We next determined the solution conformation of the Δloop-PKR_1-169 complex (with Mg²⁺) as representative of an RNA mutant with a disrupted 3wj conformation (Fig 8A, 8B and 8C). While exhibiting similar D_max values, the pair distribution function of Δloop complex has distinct differences compared to that obtained for wt-PKR_1-169, reflected in an r_G and r_H for Δloop-PKR_1-169 being slightly larger than those of the wt-PKR_1-169 complex (Fig 8E, Table 1). These differences, however, are consistent with those observed for the free RNAs (Fig 6). The ab initio model of Δloop-PKR_1-169 complex generated by DAMAVER shows an extended structure in solution as suggested by the bell-shaped distribution function with a long tail (Fig 8B).

Discussion

The antiviral properties of PKR are well established [3]. Viruses have evolved various strategies to circumvent host immunity. In the case of PKR, viruses produce small non-coding dsRNAs, including VA_I, that interact with PKR and prevent its self-association, thereby inhibiting its antiviral effects. A recent review has highlighted the importance of VA_I as an essential pro-viral non-coding RNA [53]. The structural mechanism of inhibition of PKR by VA_I RNA is not fully understood, however previous in vitro studies have highlighted the importance of the CS of VA_I in the inhibition of PKR self-association [10–14, 19]. Recent studies have suggested that a pseudoknot forming between the CS and a single-stranded region (nucleotides 93–95, Fig 1) may play an important role in stabilizing the overall VA_I structure [29, 52]. Isothermal titration calorimetry, NMR and RNA footprinting studies previously suggested that the CS of VA_I does not make a direct high affinity interaction with any region of PKR [9, 10, 14, 19]. Therefore, while it is clear that the CS is required to sequester PKR in a 1:1 complex incapable of trans-autophosphorylation, it is unclear whether this is due to the CS imposing a steric block to PKR dimerization, or the CS being crucial to proper folding at the 3wj of the AS, CS, and TS so that inhibitory complex formation with PKR occurs. We therefore studied wt (VA_IΔTS) and CS mutants to improve our understanding of PKR inhibition. Binding affinity of these RNAs for PKR were not drastically different and consistent with previously published data [14, 54, 55]. Therefore, the structural and activity differences observed for RNA mutants cannot be accounted for by a simple increase or decrease in affinity.

Overall, the low-resolution structures of wt RNA and mutants in the presence of divalent cation support the formation of a pseudoknot requiring a specific structural 3wj orientation. This pseudoknot was originally proposed by Ma et. al. [56] and later confirmed by the Conn and Cole labs [29, 52]. Instead of observing the predicted perpendicular orientation of the CS and AS based on secondary structural information, wt RNA adopts an extended conformation in solution suggesting that the AS and CS form a more compact structure (Fig 6A). The Δloop and Δbulge mutants introduced a clear change in overall shape when compared to wt RNA (Fig 6A). We observe a clear conformational change in overall shape of Δloop, where a heptaloop is replaced with a UUCG tetraloop, suggesting that the loop sequence is important for the overall wt RNA fold despite its distal location from the 3wj. While converting the CS bulge to a perfectly double-stranded stem (Δbulge) was expected to introduce a more rigid conformation, a large protuberance in the 3wj region of this mutant was observed suggesting disruption of an important tertiary interaction. Interestingly, mutation of a GU base-pair to the more conformationally restricted GC bp in the CS had no such structural impact. Activation assays reinforce that mutations that disrupt the compact wt RNA fold behave as activators, and not inhibitors, of PKR (Fig 4). Complete truncation of the CS (ΔCD) shows substantially higher phosphorylation levels than wt RNA. Disruption of the compact pseudoknot structure with Δloop and Δbulge results in the loss of PKR inhibition despite increasing the potential for steric prevention of PKR autophosphorylation, arguing that a specific RNA conformation, as opposed to bulky steric features of VA_I, is responsible for inhibition of PKR. CS stem length has also been shown to be crucial for PKR inhibition [10]. We demonstrate that while deletion of 2 bp in the CS has no large impact on structure or inhibition of PKR, the more aggressive deletion of 4 bp impacts the 3wj tertiary structure and its inhibition activity to a significant degree. We propose that these mutants are able to activate PKR instead of inhibiting PKR due to the loss of structural integrity of the 3wj.

In addition to the SAXS derived structures and activation/inhibition assays, the tertiary structures of wt and mutant RNAs based on computational approaches show that loss of function is likely related to the presence of a pseudoknot. Within the structural restraints of SAXS ab initio envelope, computational models predicting the pseudoknot structure (Fig 7A) between the central stem-loop and adjacent bulge are present within the mutants that retain the ability to inhibit PKR.

It has been reported that Mg²⁺ ions are required for tertiary stability of VA_I, and that complex formation with PKR is enhanced in the presence of Mg²⁺ ions [29, 52]. Launer-Felty et al. [29] have previously proposed that both VA_I and VA_IΔTS (wt RNA in this study) may adopt a pseudoknot conformation in the presence of Mg²⁺, and our results support pseudoknot formation under similar conditions (albeit with a different overall predicted structure based on computational approaches). Based on our observations, the solution conformation of wt RNA in the presence of Mg²⁺ (Fig 6A, yellow) displays a more extended envelope with a correspondingly larger D_max relative to our previously determined SAXS solution structure of wt RNA in the absence of Mg²⁺ [25]. Comparison of the computational tertiary structures based on these SAXS results supports pseudoknot formation in the presence of Mg²⁺, whereas a perpendicular orientation of the CS and AS are observed in the absence of Mg²⁺.

Taken together, our results support the role that the formation of a specific structural conformation of the 3wj plays in inhibition of PKR. Overall the data presented here show that in addition to the previously proposed role of the central stem-loop of VA_I in PKR inhibition, the length of the central domain structure as well as its nucleotide composition are very important for the stability and the function of VA_I as an inhibitor of PKR. In summary, our results suggest the importance of studying such structural determinants in other non-coding RNA inhibitors of PKR. Studies are currently underway to test the importance of the 3wj in a cellular context.

References

1. Meurs E, Chong K, Galabru J, Thomas NS, Kerr IM, Williams BR, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase induced by interferon. Cell. 1990;62(2):379–90. pmid:1695551
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Thomis DC, Samuel CE. Mechanism of interferon action: evidence for intermolecular autophosphorylation and autoactivation of the interferon-induced, RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. Journal of virology. 1993;67(12):7695–700. pmid:7693978
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Gale M, Katze MG Jr.,. Molecular mechanisms of interferon resistance mediated by viral-directed inhibition of PKR, the interferon-induced protein kinase. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 1998;78(1):29–46.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Sudhakar A, Ramachandran A, Ghosh S, Hasnain SE, Kaufman RJ, Ramaiah KV. Phosphorylation of serine 51 in initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2 alpha) promotes complex formation between eIF2 alpha(P) and eIF2B and causes inhibition in the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of eIF2B. Biochemistry. 2000;39(42):12929–38. pmid:11041858
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Francois C, Duverlie G, Rebouillat D, Khorsi H, Castelain S, Blum HE, et al. Expression of hepatitis C virus proteins interferes with the antiviral action of interferon independently of PKR-mediated control of protein synthesis. Journal of virology. 2000;74(12):5587–96. pmid:10823866
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Lemaire PA, Lary J, Cole JL. Mechanism of PKR activation: dimerization and kinase activation in the absence of double-stranded RNA. Journal of molecular biology. 2005;345(1):81–90. pmid:15567412
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Dey M, Mann BR, Anshu A, Mannan MA. Activation of protein kinase PKR requires dimerization-induced cis-phosphorylation within the activation loop. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(9):5747–57. pmid:24338483
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. McKenna SA, Lindhout DA, Kim I, Liu CW, Gelev VM, Wagner G, et al. Molecular framework for the activation of RNA-dependent protein kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282(15):11474–86. pmid:17284445
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. McKenna SA, Lindhout DA, Shimoike T, Aitken CE, Puglisi JD. Viral dsRNA inhibitors prevent self-association and autophosphorylation of PKR. Journal of molecular biology. 2007;372(1):103–13. pmid:17619024
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Wahid AM, Coventry VK, Conn GL. Systematic deletion of the adenovirus-associated RNAI terminal stem reveals a surprisingly active RNA inhibitor of double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008;283(25):17485–93. pmid:18430723
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. O'Malley RP, Mariano TM, Siekierka J, Mathews MB. A mechanism for the control of protein synthesis by adenovirus VA RNAI. Cell. 1986;44(3):391–400. pmid:3943131
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Kitajewski J, Schneider RJ, Safer B, Munemitsu SM, Samuel CE, Thimmappaya B, et al. Adenovirus VAI RNA antagonizes the antiviral action of interferon by preventing activation of the interferon-induced eIF-2 alpha kinase. Cell. 1986;45(2):195–200. pmid:3698097
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Katze MG, DeCorato D, Safer B, Galabru J, Hovanessian AG. Adenovirus VAI RNA complexes with the 68 000 Mr protein kinase to regulate its autophosphorylation and activity. EMBO J. 1987;6(3):689–97. pmid:3582371
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. McKenna SA, Kim I, Liu CW, Puglisi JD. Uncoupling of RNA binding and PKR kinase activation by viral inhibitor RNAs. Journal of molecular biology. 2006;358(5):1270–85. pmid:16580685
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Mellits KH, Mathews MB. Effects of mutations in stem and loop regions on the structure and function of adenovirus VA RNAI. EMBO J. 1988;7(9):2849–59. pmid:3181142
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Bhat RA, Domer PH, Thimmappaya B. Structural requirements of adenovirus VAI RNA for its translation enhancement function. Mol Cell Biol. 1985;5(1):187–96. pmid:3982415
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Furtado MR, Subramanian S, Bhat RA, Fowlkes DM, Safer B, Thimmappaya B. Functional dissection of adenovirus VAI RNA. J Virol. 1989;63(8):3423–34. pmid:2746735
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Pe'ery T, Mellits KH, Mathews MB. Mutational analysis of the central domain of adenovirus virus-associated RNA mandates a revision of the proposed secondary structure. J Virol. 1993;67(6):3534–43. pmid:8098780
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Wahid AM, Coventry VK, Conn GL. The PKR-binding domain of adenovirus VA RNAI exists as a mixture of two functionally non-equivalent structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(17):5830–7. pmid:19635730
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Andersson MG, Haasnoot PC, Xu N, Berenjian S, Berkhout B, Akusjarvi G. Suppression of RNA interference by adenovirus virus-associated RNA. J Virol. 2005;79(15):9556–65. pmid:16014917
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Nanduri S, Carpick BW, Yang Y, Williams BR, Qin J. Structure of the double-stranded RNA-binding domain of the protein kinase PKR reveals the molecular basis of its dsRNA-mediated activation. The EMBO journal. 1998;17(18):5458–65. pmid:9736623
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Dar AC, Dever TE, Sicheri F. Higher-order substrate recognition of eIF2alpha by the RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. Cell. 2005;122(6):887–900. pmid:16179258
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. VanOudenhove J, Anderson E, Krueger S, Cole JL. Analysis of PKR structure by small-angle scattering. Journal of molecular biology. 2009;387(4):910–20. pmid:19232355
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Dzananovic E, Patel TR, Deo S, McEleney K, Stetefeld J, McKenna SA. Recognition of viral RNA stem-loops by the tandem double-stranded RNA binding domains of PKR. Rna. 2013;19(3):333–44. pmid:23329698
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Dzananovic E, Patel TR, Chojnowski G, Boniecki MJ, Deo S, McEleney K, et al. Solution conformation of adenovirus virus associated RNA-I and its interaction with PKR. Journal of structural biology. 2014;185(1):48–57. pmid:24291322
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Lemaire PA, Tessmer I, Craig R, Erie DA, Cole JL. Unactivated PKR exists in an open conformation capable of binding nucleotides. Biochemistry. 2006;45(30):9074–84. pmid:16866353
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Carpick BW, Graziano V, Schneider D, Maitra RK, Lee X, Williams BR. Characterization of the solution complex between the interferon-induced, double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase and HIV-I trans-activating region RNA. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1997;272(14):9510–6. pmid:9083092
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Gabel F, Wang D, Madern D, Sadler A, Dayie K, Daryoush MZ, et al. Dynamic flexibility of double-stranded RNA activated PKR in solution. Journal of molecular biology. 2006;359(3):610–23. pmid:16650856
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Launer-Felty K, Wong CJ, Cole JL. Structural analysis of adenovirus VAI RNA defines the mechanism of inhibition of PKR. Biophys J. 2015;108(3):748–57. pmid:25650941
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. McKenna SA, Lindhout DA, Shimoike T, Puglisi JD. Biophysical and biochemical investigations of dsRNA-activated kinase PKR. Methods Enzymol. 2007;430:373–96. pmid:17913645
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Meng H, Deo S, Xiong S, Dzananovic E, Donald LJ, van Dijk CW, et al. Regulation of the interferon-inducible 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetases by adenovirus VA(I) RNA. J Mol Biol. 2012;422(5):635–49. pmid:22709583
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Pagano JM, Clingman CC, Ryder SP. Quantitative approaches to monitor protein-nucleic acid interactions using fluorescent probes. Rna. 2011;17(1):14–20. pmid:21098142
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Booy EP, Meier M, Okun N, Novakowski SK, Xiong S, Stetefeld J, et al. The RNA helicase RHAU (DHX36) unwinds a G4-quadruplex in human telomerase RNA and promotes the formation of the P1 helix template boundary. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(9):4110–24. pmid:22238380
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Patel TR, Morris GA, Zwolanek D, Keene DR, Li J, Harding SE, et al. Nano-structure of the laminin gamma-1 short arm reveals an extended and curved multidomain assembly. Matrix Biol. 2010;29(7):565–72. pmid:20688161
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Patel TR, Meier M, Li J, Morris G, Rowe AJ, Stetefeld J. T-shaped arrangement of the recombinant agrin G3-IgG Fc protein. Protein Sci. 2011;20(6):931–40. pmid:21448912
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Patel TR, Reuten R, Xiong S, Meier M, Winzor DJ, Koch M, et al. Determination of a molecular shape for netrin-4 from hydrodynamic and small angle X-ray scattering measurements. Matrix Biol. 2012;31(2):135–40. pmid:22210009
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Konarev PV VV, Sokolova AV, Koch MHJ, Svergun DI. PRIMUS: a Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis. Journal of applied crystallography. 2003;36(5):1277–82.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. DI S. Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria. Journal of applied crystallography. 1992;25(4):495–503.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Franke D, Svergun DI. DAMMIF, a program for rapid ab-initio shape determination in small-angle scattering. J Appl Crystallogr. 2009;42(Pt 2):342–6. pmid:27630371
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Volkov VV SDUoaisdis-asJACP-dd. Uniqueness of ab initio shape determination in small-angle scattering. J Appl Crystallogr. 2003;36(3).
41. Garcia De La Torre J, Huertas ML, Carrasco B. Calculation of hydrodynamic properties of globular proteins from their atomic-level structure. Biophys J. 2000;78(2):719–30. pmid:10653785
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Laue TM SB, Ridgeway TM, Pelletier SL. Computer-aided interpretation of analytical sedimentation data for proteins. In: S. E. Harding AJR, and J. C. Horton, editor. Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science: Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 1992. p. 90–125. Computer-aided interpretation of analytical sedimentation data for proteins. Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science. 1992:90–125.
43. Voss NR, Gerstein M. Calculation of standard atomic volumes for RNA and comparison with proteins: RNA is packed more tightly. J Mol Biol. 2005;346(2):477–92. pmid:15670598
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Sato K, Hamada M, Asai K, Mituyama T. CENTROIDFOLD: a web server for RNA secondary structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W277–80. pmid:19435882
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Puton T, Kozlowski LP, Rother KM, Bujnicki JM. CompaRNA: a server for continuous benchmarking of automated methods for RNA secondary structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(7):4307–23. pmid:23435231
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Boniecki MJ, Lach G, Dawson WK, Tomala K, Lukasz P, Soltysinski T, et al. SimRNA: a coarse-grained method for RNA folding simulations and 3D structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(7):e63. pmid:26687716
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Chojnowski G, Walen T, Bujnicki JM. RNA Bricks—a database of RNA 3D motifs and their interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D123–31.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Svergun DI BC, Malfois M, Volkov V, Konarev P, Petoukhov M, Shkumatov A. CRYSOL—a Program to Evaluate X-ray Solution Scattering of Biological Macromolecules from Atomic Coordinates. J Appl Cryst. 1995;28:768–73.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Moore PB. Small-angle scattering. Information content and error analysis. Journal of applied crystallography. 1980;13(2):168–75.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Miao Z, Adamiak RW, Blanchet MF, Boniecki M, Bujnicki JM, Chen SJ, et al. RNA-Puzzles Round II: assessment of RNA structure prediction programs applied to three large RNA structures. RNA. 2015;21(6):1066–84. pmid:25883046
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Kozin MB SDAmoh-al-rsmJoac-dS. Automated matching of high- and low-resolution structural models. Journal of applied crystallography. 2001;34(1):33–41.
52. Wilson JL, Vachon VK, Sunita S, Schwartz SL, Conn GL. Dissection of the adenoviral VA RNAI central domain structure reveals minimum requirements for RNA-mediated inhibition of PKR. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(33):23233–45. pmid:24970889
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Vachon VK, Conn GL. Adenovirus VA RNA: An essential pro-viral non-coding RNA. Virus Res. 2016;212:39–52. pmid:26116898
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Launer-Felty K, Wong CJ, Wahid AM, Conn GL, Cole JL. Magnesium-dependent interaction of PKR with adenovirus VAI. J Mol Biol. 2010;402(4):638–44. pmid:20713064
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Husain B, Mukerji I, Cole JL. Analysis of high-affinity binding of protein kinase R to double-stranded RNA. Biochemistry. 2012;51(44):8764–70. pmid:23062027
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Ma Y, Mathews MB. Secondary and tertiary structure in the central domain of adenovirus type 2 VA RNA I. RNA. 1996;2(9):937–51. pmid:8809020
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Meurs E, Chong K, Galabru J, Thomas NS, Kerr IM, Williams BR, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase induced by interferon. Cell. 1990;62(2):379–90. pmid:1695551
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Thomis DC, Samuel CE. Mechanism of interferon action: evidence for intermolecular autophosphorylation and autoactivation of the interferon-induced, RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. Journal of virology. 1993;67(12):7695–700. pmid:7693978
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Gale M, Katze MG Jr.,. Molecular mechanisms of interferon resistance mediated by viral-directed inhibition of PKR, the interferon-induced protein kinase. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 1998;78(1):29–46.
View Article
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Sudhakar A, Ramachandran A, Ghosh S, Hasnain SE, Kaufman RJ, Ramaiah KV. Phosphorylation of serine 51 in initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2 alpha) promotes complex formation between eIF2 alpha(P) and eIF2B and causes inhibition in the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of eIF2B. Biochemistry. 2000;39(42):12929–38. pmid:11041858
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] PubMed/NCBI

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Francois C, Duverlie G, Rebouillat D, Khorsi H, Castelain S, Blum HE, et al. Expression of hepatitis C virus proteins interferes with the antiviral action of interferon independently of PKR-mediated control of protein synthesis. Journal of virology. 2000;74(12):5587–96. pmid:10823866
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Lemaire PA, Lary J, Cole JL. Mechanism of PKR activation: dimerization and kinase activation in the absence of double-stranded RNA. Journal of molecular biology. 2005;345(1):81–90. pmid:15567412
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Dey M, Mann BR, Anshu A, Mannan MA. Activation of protein kinase PKR requires dimerization-induced cis-phosphorylation within the activation loop. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(9):5747–57. pmid:24338483
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. McKenna SA, Lindhout DA, Kim I, Liu CW, Gelev VM, Wagner G, et al. Molecular framework for the activation of RNA-dependent protein kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282(15):11474–86. pmid:17284445
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. McKenna SA, Lindhout DA, Shimoike T, Aitken CE, Puglisi JD. Viral dsRNA inhibitors prevent self-association and autophosphorylation of PKR. Journal of molecular biology. 2007;372(1):103–13. pmid:17619024
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Wahid AM, Coventry VK, Conn GL. Systematic deletion of the adenovirus-associated RNAI terminal stem reveals a surprisingly active RNA inhibitor of double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008;283(25):17485–93. pmid:18430723
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. O'Malley RP, Mariano TM, Siekierka J, Mathews MB. A mechanism for the control of protein synthesis by adenovirus VA RNAI. Cell. 1986;44(3):391–400. pmid:3943131
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Kitajewski J, Schneider RJ, Safer B, Munemitsu SM, Samuel CE, Thimmappaya B, et al. Adenovirus VAI RNA antagonizes the antiviral action of interferon by preventing activation of the interferon-induced eIF-2 alpha kinase. Cell. 1986;45(2):195–200. pmid:3698097
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Katze MG, DeCorato D, Safer B, Galabru J, Hovanessian AG. Adenovirus VAI RNA complexes with the 68 000 Mr protein kinase to regulate its autophosphorylation and activity. EMBO J. 1987;6(3):689–97. pmid:3582371
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. McKenna SA, Kim I, Liu CW, Puglisi JD. Uncoupling of RNA binding and PKR kinase activation by viral inhibitor RNAs. Journal of molecular biology. 2006;358(5):1270–85. pmid:16580685
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Mellits KH, Mathews MB. Effects of mutations in stem and loop regions on the structure and function of adenovirus VA RNAI. EMBO J. 1988;7(9):2849–59. pmid:3181142
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Bhat RA, Domer PH, Thimmappaya B. Structural requirements of adenovirus VAI RNA for its translation enhancement function. Mol Cell Biol. 1985;5(1):187–96. pmid:3982415
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Furtado MR, Subramanian S, Bhat RA, Fowlkes DM, Safer B, Thimmappaya B. Functional dissection of adenovirus VAI RNA. J Virol. 1989;63(8):3423–34. pmid:2746735
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Pe'ery T, Mellits KH, Mathews MB. Mutational analysis of the central domain of adenovirus virus-associated RNA mandates a revision of the proposed secondary structure. J Virol. 1993;67(6):3534–43. pmid:8098780
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Wahid AM, Coventry VK, Conn GL. The PKR-binding domain of adenovirus VA RNAI exists as a mixture of two functionally non-equivalent structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(17):5830–7. pmid:19635730
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Andersson MG, Haasnoot PC, Xu N, Berenjian S, Berkhout B, Akusjarvi G. Suppression of RNA interference by adenovirus virus-associated RNA. J Virol. 2005;79(15):9556–65. pmid:16014917
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Nanduri S, Carpick BW, Yang Y, Williams BR, Qin J. Structure of the double-stranded RNA-binding domain of the protein kinase PKR reveals the molecular basis of its dsRNA-mediated activation. The EMBO journal. 1998;17(18):5458–65. pmid:9736623
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Dar AC, Dever TE, Sicheri F. Higher-order substrate recognition of eIF2alpha by the RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. Cell. 2005;122(6):887–900. pmid:16179258
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. VanOudenhove J, Anderson E, Krueger S, Cole JL. Analysis of PKR structure by small-angle scattering. Journal of molecular biology. 2009;387(4):910–20. pmid:19232355
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Dzananovic E, Patel TR, Deo S, McEleney K, Stetefeld J, McKenna SA. Recognition of viral RNA stem-loops by the tandem double-stranded RNA binding domains of PKR. Rna. 2013;19(3):333–44. pmid:23329698
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Dzananovic E, Patel TR, Chojnowski G, Boniecki MJ, Deo S, McEleney K, et al. Solution conformation of adenovirus virus associated RNA-I and its interaction with PKR. Journal of structural biology. 2014;185(1):48–57. pmid:24291322
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Lemaire PA, Tessmer I, Craig R, Erie DA, Cole JL. Unactivated PKR exists in an open conformation capable of binding nucleotides. Biochemistry. 2006;45(30):9074–84. pmid:16866353
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Carpick BW, Graziano V, Schneider D, Maitra RK, Lee X, Williams BR. Characterization of the solution complex between the interferon-induced, double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase and HIV-I trans-activating region RNA. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1997;272(14):9510–6. pmid:9083092
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Gabel F, Wang D, Madern D, Sadler A, Dayie K, Daryoush MZ, et al. Dynamic flexibility of double-stranded RNA activated PKR in solution. Journal of molecular biology. 2006;359(3):610–23. pmid:16650856
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Launer-Felty K, Wong CJ, Cole JL. Structural analysis of adenovirus VAI RNA defines the mechanism of inhibition of PKR. Biophys J. 2015;108(3):748–57. pmid:25650941
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. McKenna SA, Lindhout DA, Shimoike T, Puglisi JD. Biophysical and biochemical investigations of dsRNA-activated kinase PKR. Methods Enzymol. 2007;430:373–96. pmid:17913645
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Meng H, Deo S, Xiong S, Dzananovic E, Donald LJ, van Dijk CW, et al. Regulation of the interferon-inducible 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetases by adenovirus VA(I) RNA. J Mol Biol. 2012;422(5):635–49. pmid:22709583
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Pagano JM, Clingman CC, Ryder SP. Quantitative approaches to monitor protein-nucleic acid interactions using fluorescent probes. Rna. 2011;17(1):14–20. pmid:21098142
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Booy EP, Meier M, Okun N, Novakowski SK, Xiong S, Stetefeld J, et al. The RNA helicase RHAU (DHX36) unwinds a G4-quadruplex in human telomerase RNA and promotes the formation of the P1 helix template boundary. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(9):4110–24. pmid:22238380
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Patel TR, Morris GA, Zwolanek D, Keene DR, Li J, Harding SE, et al. Nano-structure of the laminin gamma-1 short arm reveals an extended and curved multidomain assembly. Matrix Biol. 2010;29(7):565–72. pmid:20688161
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Patel TR, Meier M, Li J, Morris G, Rowe AJ, Stetefeld J. T-shaped arrangement of the recombinant agrin G3-IgG Fc protein. Protein Sci. 2011;20(6):931–40. pmid:21448912
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Patel TR, Reuten R, Xiong S, Meier M, Winzor DJ, Koch M, et al. Determination of a molecular shape for netrin-4 from hydrodynamic and small angle X-ray scattering measurements. Matrix Biol. 2012;31(2):135–40. pmid:22210009
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Konarev PV VV, Sokolova AV, Koch MHJ, Svergun DI. PRIMUS: a Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis. Journal of applied crystallography. 2003;36(5):1277–82.
View Article
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. DI S. Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria. Journal of applied crystallography. 1992;25(4):495–503.
View Article
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Franke D, Svergun DI. DAMMIF, a program for rapid ab-initio shape determination in small-angle scattering. J Appl Crystallogr. 2009;42(Pt 2):342–6. pmid:27630371
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Volkov VV SDUoaisdis-asJACP-dd. Uniqueness of ab initio shape determination in small-angle scattering. J Appl Crystallogr. 2003;36(3).

[ref41] 41. Garcia De La Torre J, Huertas ML, Carrasco B. Calculation of hydrodynamic properties of globular proteins from their atomic-level structure. Biophys J. 2000;78(2):719–30. pmid:10653785
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Laue TM SB, Ridgeway TM, Pelletier SL. Computer-aided interpretation of analytical sedimentation data for proteins. In: S. E. Harding AJR, and J. C. Horton, editor. Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science: Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 1992. p. 90–125. Computer-aided interpretation of analytical sedimentation data for proteins. Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science. 1992:90–125.

[ref43] 43. Voss NR, Gerstein M. Calculation of standard atomic volumes for RNA and comparison with proteins: RNA is packed more tightly. J Mol Biol. 2005;346(2):477–92. pmid:15670598
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[161] View Article

[162] PubMed/NCBI

[163] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Sato K, Hamada M, Asai K, Mituyama T. CENTROIDFOLD: a web server for RNA secondary structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W277–80. pmid:19435882
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] PubMed/NCBI

[167] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Puton T, Kozlowski LP, Rother KM, Bujnicki JM. CompaRNA: a server for continuous benchmarking of automated methods for RNA secondary structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(7):4307–23. pmid:23435231
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] PubMed/NCBI

[171] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Boniecki MJ, Lach G, Dawson WK, Tomala K, Lukasz P, Soltysinski T, et al. SimRNA: a coarse-grained method for RNA folding simulations and 3D structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(7):e63. pmid:26687716
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[173] View Article

[174] PubMed/NCBI

[175] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Chojnowski G, Walen T, Bujnicki JM. RNA Bricks—a database of RNA 3D motifs and their interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D123–31.
View Article
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Svergun DI BC, Malfois M, Volkov V, Konarev P, Petoukhov M, Shkumatov A. CRYSOL—a Program to Evaluate X-ray Solution Scattering of Biological Macromolecules from Atomic Coordinates. J Appl Cryst. 1995;28:768–73.
View Article
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Moore PB. Small-angle scattering. Information content and error analysis. Journal of applied crystallography. 1980;13(2):168–75.
View Article
Google Scholar

[183] View Article

[184] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Miao Z, Adamiak RW, Blanchet MF, Boniecki M, Bujnicki JM, Chen SJ, et al. RNA-Puzzles Round II: assessment of RNA structure prediction programs applied to three large RNA structures. RNA. 2015;21(6):1066–84. pmid:25883046
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] PubMed/NCBI

[188] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Kozin MB SDAmoh-al-rsmJoac-dS. Automated matching of high- and low-resolution structural models. Journal of applied crystallography. 2001;34(1):33–41.

[ref52] 52. Wilson JL, Vachon VK, Sunita S, Schwartz SL, Conn GL. Dissection of the adenoviral VA RNAI central domain structure reveals minimum requirements for RNA-mediated inhibition of PKR. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(33):23233–45. pmid:24970889
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[191] View Article

[192] PubMed/NCBI

[193] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Vachon VK, Conn GL. Adenovirus VA RNA: An essential pro-viral non-coding RNA. Virus Res. 2016;212:39–52. pmid:26116898
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] PubMed/NCBI

[197] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Launer-Felty K, Wong CJ, Wahid AM, Conn GL, Cole JL. Magnesium-dependent interaction of PKR with adenovirus VAI. J Mol Biol. 2010;402(4):638–44. pmid:20713064
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[199] View Article

[200] PubMed/NCBI

[201] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Husain B, Mukerji I, Cole JL. Analysis of high-affinity binding of protein kinase R to double-stranded RNA. Biochemistry. 2012;51(44):8764–70. pmid:23062027
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[203] View Article

[204] PubMed/NCBI

[205] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Ma Y, Mathews MB. Secondary and tertiary structure in the central domain of adenovirus type 2 VA RNA I. RNA. 1996;2(9):937–51. pmid:8809020
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[207] View Article

[208] PubMed/NCBI

[209] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

In vitro transcription and purification of RNA

Protein expression and purification

Purification of RNA-protein complex

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs)

Dynamic light scattering (DLS)

PKR activation/inhibition assay

Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)

Calculation of hydrodynamic parameters from ab initio models

Computational modeling

Results

Purification of wt RNA and derivatives to probe three-way junction structure

Mutations in the central stem-loop of wt RNA do not significantly impair binding affinity to PKR

Specific mutations in the CS disrupt inhibition of PKR

Specific central stem mutations affect the solution conformation

Computational structure determination suggests that the 3wj conformation is altered by specific mutations to the CS

Solution conformations of the dsRBMs of PKR in complex with wt and Δloop RNA

Discussion

References